The URL can be used to link to this page

S-1403 - 07/08/2014 - ZONING - Ordinances Supporting Documents ITEM 9.B. t. OF 0,44. QG ,�' l►*yc" 69 o C. OW.AEA,exts0 0 9 — - COUNT1'� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of July 8, 2014 SUBJECT: Oak Brook Park District — 1450 Forest Gate Road - Variation — To Amend Section 3, Paragraph H of Ordinance S-1361 FROM: Robert L.Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance S4403 as prepared by the Village Attorney to amend Ordinance S-1361 regarding lights on Park District Fields. Background/History: At the May 27, 2014 meeting, and again after discussion at the June 10, 2014 meeting, the Village Board deferred taking final action on the recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals on a petition from the Oak Brook Park District seeking to amend certain provisions of Ordinance 2013-ZO- V-EX-S-1361 with respect to the use of the synthetic turf soccer field to the July 8, 2014 Board meeting. The reason for deferral was to accommodate the Oak Brook Park District's request to conduct additional tests/analysis of its existing field lights. The Park District has presented some additional information to the Village with respect to candela measurements for the turf soccer field. ORDINANCE 2014-ZO-V-EX-S-1403 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO VARIATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF THE LIGHTS AT 1450 FOREST GATE ROAD IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK (Oak Brook Park District- 1300- 1500 Forest Gate Road, Oak Brook Illinois 60523 PINS: 06-26-303-001; 06-26-303-002; 06-26-303-003; 06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031) WHEREAS, the Oak Brook Park District ("District") owns the property located at 1300 to 1500 Forest Gate Road and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"); and WHEREAS, Fields 1, 2, 3, 4 (collectively, "Ball Fields"), and a synthetic turf soccer field ("Soccer Field") are located on the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Property is located in the Village's CR Conservation/Recreation District; and WHEREAS, the maximum height for structures in the CR Conservation/Recreation District, pursuant to Section 13-5-4 of the"Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook," as amended ("Zoning Regulations"), is 30 feet, although structures in this District may have a maximum height of 40 feet upon issuance by the Village of a special use permit; and WHEREAS, upon application of the District, on August 9, 1994, and pursuant to Ordinance 94- ZO-V-E1-S-779 ("S-779"), the President and Board of Trustees granted a variation to the District from the Zoning Regulations to allow the District to construct 64.5-foot high light poles on Fields 2 and 3, which variation was subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, upon further application of the District, on September 28, 2004, and pursuant to Ordinance 2004-70-V-S-1084 ("S-1084"), the President and Board of Trustees granted an additional variation to the District to permit the construction of 70-foot high light poles on Field 1, subject to certain conditions, which included restrictions on the days and hours the lights on the Ball Fields could be used; and WHEREAS, upon further application of the District, on October 12, 2010, and pursuant to Ordinance 2010-ZO-V-EX1-5-1296 ("S-1296"), the President and Board of Trustees amended S-1084 to, among other things, adjust the conditions in S-1084 that restricted the days and hours the lights on the Ball Fields could be used, and to allow adult athletic teams to use the lights on Field 1; and WHEREAS, upon further application of the District, on September 25, 2012, and pursuant to Ordinance 2012-ZO-V-EX1-S-1350 ("S-1350"), the President and Board of Trustees granted the District an additional variation to construct four seventy-foot high light poles on the previously unlighted Soccer Field ("Soccer Field Light Variation"); and WHEREAS, the Soccer Field Light Variation was subject to certain conditions, including limited restrictions on the hours during which the Soccer Field .lights could be used, and limited restrictions providing that the Soccer Field Lights could be used only from April 1 to November 15 ("Soccer Field Days Restriction"); and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2013, and pursuant to Ordinance 2013-ZO-V-EX-S-1361 ("S-1361") ("Park District Variation Ordinance"), the President and Board repealed S-779, S-1084, S-1296, and S- 1350 and restated the variations granted, and the conditions imposed, by those Ordinances in one Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003; 06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 2 of 11 consolidated ordinance containing the conditions and requirements related to the District's use of the Ball Fields and the Soccer Field under the Village Zoning Regulations; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2013, the District filed a new petition ("Petition's) requesting an amendment to the Park District Variation Ordinance to eliminate the Soccer Field Days Restriction, with the effect that under the Petition Soccer Field lights would be allowed to be utilized 365 days a year ("Proposed Amendment"); and WHEREAS, On October 1, 2013, the Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") conducted a public hearing, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, on the Petition for the Proposed Amendment; and WHEREAS, after the close of the public hearing, the ZBA found that the District satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of the Proposed Amendment set forth in Section 13-14-6D of the Zoning Regulations and, in a letter to the President and Board of Trustees dated October 16, 2013, recommended approval of the Proposed Amendment subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the Village Board publicly considered and publicly continued the consideration of the Proposed Amendment at its November 12, November 26, and December 10, 2013 meetings, and at its January 14, February 11, April 8, May 27, and June 10, 2014 meetings; and WHEREAS, at its June 10, 2014 meeting, the Village Board continued the consideration of the Proposed Amendment to its July 8, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, in response to the Proposed Amendment, the Village Board, Village Staff, and Village Attorney have worked determinedly to foster intergovernmental cooperation with the District in order to development changes to the Park District Variation Ordinance that reasonably and clearly provide the District with adjustments to the lighting restrictions related to the Ball Fields and the Soccer Field, while mitigating to the extent possible the impacts of the use of the lights on the Ball Fields and Soccer Field on the surrounding residents'ability to enjoy the use of their residential properties; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that the amendments to the Park District Variation Ordinance as set forth in this Ordinance are reasonable and fair and carefully address the Village's legitimate interests in (i) providing zoning relief to the District that complies with the standards set forth in Section 13-14-6 of the Zoning Regulations, (ii) minimizing the injurious effects of the lights for the Ball Fields and the Soccer Field upon surrounding residential properties, and (iii) otherwise protecting the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Regulations; and WHEREAS, the conditions set forth in this Ordinance related to the brightness and intensity of the Ball Field and Soccer Field lights are intended to allow the District to generally use the Ball Field and Soccer Field lights at the brightness and intensity levels at which they are currently being used; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendation of the ZBA and deem the amendments to the Park District Variation Ordinance, as set forth in this Ordinance, to be in the best interests of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are restated and incorporated herein as the findings of the President and Board of Trustees. Section 2. Amendment to Variation Ordinance. Pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 13-14-6D of the Zoning Regulations, and subject to and contingent on the conditions set forth in Additions are hold and double-underlined; Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-901;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 3 of 11 Section 3 of this Ordinance, Section 3 of S-1361 is hereby amended in its entirety so that Section 3 of S- 1361 shall hereafter be and read as follows: "Section 3. Conditions. Notwithstanding any use or development right that may be applicable or available pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Regulations or any other rights the District may have, the approvals granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance are expressly subject to and contingent upon each of the following conditions: A. International Lights on Field 1. The original light configuration on Field 1 will be altered to include International Lights which can be focused onto Field 1 and placed on the light standards that face directly towards the Forest Gate subdivision located immediately south of the Property ("Forest Gate") (approximately 15 of 41 total lights); and B. Glare from Fields 1, 4, and the Synthetic Turf Soccer Field. The District shall eliminate any glare from-the source of light for Fields 1, 4, and the synthetic turf soccer field and assure the source of light is not directly visible from any adjacent G$.Foot Candle Limitation from Fields 1, 1, and the Synthetic Turf Soccer Field. illumination Standards for Fields 1, 2,3,4, and the Soccer Field. i. The illumination from the lights on Fields 1, 2; 3, 4, and the Soccer Field, collectively, may not exceed 1/2 foot candle at the property line of Forest Gate. ii. All individual Ii•ht fi tures that illuminate Fields 1, 2, 3, 4, including, without limitation, any light fixtures that are installed to illuminate any additional baseball fields installed on the Property, shall not exceed 30 foot lamberts (fl) of intensity, subject to temporary fluctuation for any newly installed light bulbs that may occur while the li• t bulbs decay to their normal luminance level, as measured from an unobstructed view of each light fixture from the northerly- most curb line of the ring road in Forest Gate. iii. All individual Iiaht fxtures that illuminate the Soccer Field, including, without limitation, any I'•ht fixtures that are installed to illuminate any additional soccer fields that may be installed on the Pro•erty, shall not exceed 40 foot lamberts (fl) of intensi , subject to tem•ora fluctuation for any newly installed light bulbs that may occur while the light bulbs decay to their normal luminance level,as measured from an unobstructed view from the northerly-most lot lines of lots 67, 68, and 69 in Forest Gate. D-C Landscaping. The District will transport mature landscaping from within the District to the Forest Gate Road side of Field 1 that will grow to block the view and aura of the lights from Forest Gate residences; and &D Retrofitting Lights on Field 2 and 3. -- ! - _ • . _• Additions are hold and double-underlined;deletions are struck through Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District-1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 4 of 11 adjacent cingic family dwelling; and The District will retrofit the existing lights on Fields 2 and 3 with Qualite Sports Lighting Fixtures, International Series, or an alternative type of lighting fixture reasonably acceptable to the Village. S.E. Walking and Parking Signs. The District will install walking paths and parking signs to direct patrons to proper parking locations near the Family Recreation Center and the Racquet Club; and G-Ejnstallation of Light Switches. The District will ensure the retrofitting of automatic off light switches on Fields 2 and 3 and install automatic off light switches on Fields 1 and 4 and on the Soccer Field. 147 Dates of Operation of Lights. The District shall only use the lights on Fields 1, 2, •, -•- • - ----- - . -• • . at and November 155'-of athletic teams (high school age and younger) between November 181 November 15th of each year• and J. The District_will only use the Lights on Fields 1, 2, 3, and 4 between April 1 and November 15, provided, however, that between November 1 to November 15 the District will only use the_fights on Field 1 for youth athletic teams (high school age and younger). The lights on Fields 1, 2, 3, and 4 will not be used for any reason between November 16 and March 31. ii. Subject to Paragraph (iii) of this Subsection, the Districtj,vill only use the lights on the Soccer Field between March 1 and December 15. The lights on the Soccer Field will not be used for any reason between December 16 and the last day of February ("Soccer Field Date Restriction"), iii. The Soccer Field Date Restriction will not apply if: (1) the Class of Play for soccer illumination levels is reduced from II to either Ill or 1V, as defined in the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America's Lighting Handbook, Tenth Edition published in 2011; or (ii) all of the individual lights on the Soccer Field produce no more than 30 foot lamberts (fl) of intensity, subject to temporary fluctuation for any newly installed light bulbs that may occur while the light bulbs decay to their normal luminance level, at all times of year as measured from an unobstructed view of any Soccer Field light fixture from the northerly-most lot lines of lots 67, 68, and 69 in Forest Gate, 1-kL Times of Operation of Lights. The District shall ensure that all lights on Fields 2, off by 9:00 p.m.; and Subject to the restrictions on dates in Subsection G of this Ordinance, the lights on Fields 1, 2, 3, 4, and the Soccer Field will: (1) have secure activations chat are only accessible by the coaches of the teams using the Fields; and (2)automatically shut off no later than: i. 10:30 p.m.for the lights on Fields 2, 3,and 4, Additions are bold and double-underlined;deletions are struck through Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 5 of 11 ii. 9:00 p.m. for the lights on Field 1, iii. If the Soccer Field Date Restriction applies,then 10:30 p.m. for the lights on the Soccer Field. If the Soccer Field Date Restriction does not apply,then 9:30 p.m. from December 15 to the last day of February, and 10:30 p.m. from March 1 to December 14, .1,1- Testing of Lights. --•_._ - _ -- •_ _ _ _ ' - • , . •- Home--Owner's Association. Based on the results of the Tests, the District may be required to take additional steps regarding the lights, including, without - - - -- - -•• • - - e - e e in order• to ensure compliance with the conditions contained in Section 3 of this Ordinance, the District will retain a third-party lighting professional, reasonably approved in advance by the Village, to conduct a light measurement test between December 16 and March 1 of each year to insure that the lights on Fields 1, 2, 3, 4, the Soccer Field, and any future fields that may be installed on the Property, comply with Section 3 of this Ordinance ("Test"). The conditions in Subsection 3.G of this Ordinance will not apply during the Tests. The Tests will be conducted in the presence of a Village employee designated by the Village and an individual designated by the Forest Gate Homeowners Association. If a Test determines that a y of the lights on Fields 1, 2, 3, 4, the Soccer Field, or any fields that may be installed on the Property do not comply with Section 3 of this Ordinance, the Park District will bring the lights into conformance with the requirements of Section 3 within 30 days of the applicable Test; and Review of On-Street Parking. On-Street parking shall continue to be allowed on Forest Gate Road ("Parking") until July 31, 2013 while the Village studies whether the Parking creates any safety issues. If, on or after July 31,2013, the Village determines, in its sole discretion, that the Parking is not safe, the Village reserves the right to relocate or remove the Parking and the District shall cooperate with the Village to develop a plan to remove the Parking and make alternate parking arrangements for persons using Fields 1, 2, 3, 4, and the synthetic turf soccer field; and 1=K Compliance with Applicable Law. In addition to the other specific requirements of this Ordinance, the Property, and all of the operations and activities conducted on and in the Property, must comply at all times with all applicable federal, state, and Village statutes, ordinances, resolutions, rules, codes, and regulations; and L,Agreement and Consent. Within 60 days after the date of final passage of this Ordinance, the District will execute and file with the Village Clerk, for recording in the Office of the DuPage County Recorder of Deeds, an unconditional agreement and consent, as attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit C, to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in this Ordinance, ("Unconditional Agreement and Consent")." Additions are bold and double-underlined; : -.- . Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 6 of 11 Section 3. Failure to Comply with Conditions. Upon failure or refusal of the District to comply with any or all of the conditions, restrictions, or provisions of S-1361, as amended by this Ordinance, the Variation Amendment granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance will, at the sole discretion of the Village President and the Village Board of Trustees, by ordinance duly adopted, be revoked and become null and void. Section 4. Binding Effect; Mon-Transferability. The privileges, obligations, and provisions of each and every section and provision of this Ordinance are for and inure to the benefit of and run with and bind the Property, unless otherwise explicitly set forth in this Ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be effective only upon passage by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook in the manner required by law and publication in pamphlet form in the manner required by law. APPROVED THIS 10th day of June, 2014. Gopal G. Lalmalani Village President PASSED THIS 10th day of June, 2014. Ayes: Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Charlotte K. Pruss Village Clerk Additions ate bold and double-underlined; .• .. •. - - . .. . - Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003; 06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 7 of 11 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Property: That part of Lot 1 in Oak Brook Investment Company Assessment Plat No. 3, of parts of Section 26, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to Plat thereof recorded July 23, 1964 as Document No. R64-26333 described as follows: LOT#1 Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees- 40'- 30" West along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 178.85 feet; thence North 0 Degrees- 05'- 40"West, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence North 89 Degrees -40' - 30"West, and parallel with the South line of Lot 1, a distance of 100.00 feet to the place of beginning; thence North 0 degrees - 05' - 40" West, a distance of 1122.50 feet; thence South 89 degrees - 53'- 48" West, a distance of 26.78 feet; thence North 70 degrees - 48' West, a distance of 324.80 feet; thence North 63 degrees - 49'- West, a distance of 256.19 feet; thence North 81 degrees-09'West, a distance of 231.71 feet; thence South 89 degrees-42'West, a distance of 842.44 feet; thence South 75 degrees -20' West, a distance of 532.46 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly boundary line of land conveyed to the State of Illinois for use of the Department of Public Works and Buildings per deed recorded January 9, 1969 as Document No. R69-1030; thence Southerly along the East line of land conveyed to the State of Illinois per Document No. R69-1030 the following three (3) courses or curves and distances: (1)thence Southerly along an arc of a circle, having a radius of 4658.35 feet (4654.65 feet Deed), being convex to the West, the chord thereof having a bearing of South 2 degrees - 46' - 57" East, and a length of 397.63 feet, an arc-distance of 397.75 feet; (2) thence South 9 degrees- 21' - 58" East, a distance of 195 feet; (3) thence Southerly along an arc of a circle, having a radius of 4648.35 feet(4644.65 feet Deed), being convex to the West, the chord thereof having a bearing of South 12 degrees - 09' - 31" East, and a length of 734.61 feet an arc distance of 735.37 feet to the intersection with the South line of Lot 1, aforesaid; thence South 89 degrees -40'-30" East along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 1144.17 feet more or less to a point, which is 1080.84 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence Northerly along an arc of a circle, having a radius of 1487 feet, being convex to the East, the chord thereof having a bearing of North 8 degrees-00'-34"West and a length of 80.85 feet, an arc-distance of 80.86 feet; thence South 89 degrees - 40' - 30" East, and parallel with the South line of Lot 1, aforesaid, a distance of 813.12 feet to the place of beginning, (except that part thereof described as follows: LOT#3 Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees - 40'- 30" West along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 178.85 feet; thence North 0 degrees -05' - 40"West, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees -40' -30"West, and parallel with the South line of Lot 1, a distance of 846.17 feet to the place of beginning; thence continuing North 89 degrees - 40'30" West and parallel with the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 620 feet; thence North 4 degrees - 21' West, a distance of 845.91 feet; thence South 89 degrees - 40`- 30 ' East and parallel with the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 620 feet; thence South 4 degrees - 21' East, a distance of 845.91 feet to the place of beginning;)and (except that part thereof described as follows: LOT#4 Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees - 40' - 30" West along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 178.85 feet; thence North 0 degrees -05' -40"West, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees -40' - 30"West, and parallel with the South line of Lot 1, a distance of 913.12 feet to the place of beginning; thence continuing North 89 degrees -40' - 30"West and parallel with the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 553.05 feet; thence North 4 degrees - 21'West, a distance of 467.36 feet; thence North 89 degrees —40 degrees- 30" West and parallel with the South fine of said Lot 1, a distance of 672.89 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly boundary line of land conveyed to Additions are bold an&double-underlined;deletions are struck through Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-F._X1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 8 of 11 the State of Illinois for use of the Department of Public Works and Buildings per deed recorded January 9, 1969 as Document No. R69-1030; thence Southerly along said Easterly line of land conveyed to the State of Illinois per Document No. R69-1030, being an arc of a circle, having a radius of 4648.35 feet (4644.65 feet Deed), being a convex to the West, having a chord bearing of South 13 degrees- 13' -43" East and a length of 561.44 feet, an arc-distance of 1144.17 feet more or less to a point, which is 1080.84 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence Northerly along an arc of a circle, having a radius of 1487 feet, being convex to the East, the chord thereof having a bearing of North 8 degrees - 00' - 34" West and a length of 80.85 feet, an arc-distance of 80.86 feet to the place of beginning;) containing 44.0000 Acres more or less, in DuPage County, Illinois. LOT#2 That part of Lot I in Oak Brook Investment Company Assessment Plat No. 3 of parts of Section 26, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the 3rd Principal Meridian, according to Plat thereof recorded July 23, 1964 as Document No. R64-26333 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees - 40 ' - 30" West along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 178.85 feet; thence North 0 degrees - 05' -40"West, a distance of 80.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees - 40' - 30" West and parallel with the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees- 05'-40"West, a distance of 1122.50 feet to the place of beginning; thence South 89 degrees- 53' -48"West, a distance of 26.78 feet; thence North 70 degrees- 48' West, a distance of 324.80 feet; thence North 63 degrees-49'West, a distance of 256.19 feet; thence North 81 degrees- 09'West, a distance of 231.71 feet; thence South 89 degrees-42'West, a distance of 842.44 feet; thence South 75 degrees - 20'West, a distance of 532.46 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly boundary line of land conveyed to the State of Illinois for use of the Department of Public Works and Buildings per deed recorded January 9, 1969 as Document No. R69-1030; thence Northerly along said Easterly line of land conveyed to the State of Illinois per Document No R69-1030, being an arc of a circle, having a radius of 4658.35 feet (4654.65 feet Deed), being convex to the West, the chord thereof having a bearing of North 0 degrees -20' - 38" East, a chord and arc-distance of 110.60 feet to a point in the center of Ginger Creek; thence Easterly along the center thread of Ginger Creek the following seventeen (17) courses and distances: (1) North 63 degrees - 50' East, a distance of 61.97 feet; (2) thence North 73 degrees - 38' East, a distance of 226 feet; (3) thence North 78 degrees-02' East, a distance of 220 feet; (4) thence South 88 degrees - 54' East, a distance of 562 feet; (5) thence North 70 degrees -27' East, a distance of 36 feet; (6) thence North 88 degrees - 29' feet East, a distance of 284 feet; (7) thence South 81 degrees - 57' East, a distance of 218 feet; (8) thence North 88 degrees - 30' East, a distance of 40 feet; (9) thence South 39 degrees - 14' East, a distance of 72 feet ; (10) thence North 75 Degrees - 39 feet East, a distance of 74 feet; (11)thence South 27 degrees- 19' East, a distance of 60 feet; (12) thence South 79 degrees -02' East, a distance of 111 feet; (13)thence South 69 degrees -08' East, a distance of 55 feet; (14) thence South 83 degrees - 09' East, a distance of 73 feet; (15) thence South 77 degrees- 19' East, a distance of 70 feet; (16) thence South 35 degrees - 08' East, a distance of 80 feet; (17) thence South 55 degrees- 08' East, a distance of 41.32 feet more or less to a point located 98.19 feet North 0 degrees - 05' 40"West of the place of beginning; thence South 0 degrees- 05'-40" East, a distance of 98.18 feet to the place of beginning; containing 6.0000 Acres more or less, in DuPage County, Illinois. • Also described as: Lot 2 in Autumn Oaks Unit One, being a subdivision of part of Section 26, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to Plat thereof recorded February 1, 1973 as document No. R73-5825 in Du Page County, Illinois. Permanent Parcel#06-26-303-001; 06-26-303-002; 06-26-303-003; 06-26-303-004 Additions are bold and double-underlined; :• - • . ._ .• - Ordinance 2014ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002; 06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 9 of 11 Exhibit B Site Plan Additions are bold and double-underlined;deletions are struck through Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-5-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002; 06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT C UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT TO: The Village of Oak Brook, Illinois ("Village"): WHEREAS, the Oak Brook Park District ("Park District") has filed a petition ("Petition") requesting: (i) a variation from Section 13-3-8A to allow for the construction of four, seventy-foot high light poles on the synthetic turf soccer field ("Light Pole Variation") on the property located at 1300 to 1500 Forest Gate Road and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"); and (ii) an amendment to Ordinance 2004-ZO-V-S-1084 ("S-1084'), as amended by Ordinance 2010-ZO-V-EX1-S-1296 ("S-1296"), to extend the time the lights on the athletic fields may be used ("Variation Amendment"); and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2012, the Board of Trustees adopted Ordinance 2012-ZO-V-EX1- S-1350 ("S-1350"), granting the Park District: (i) the Light Pole Variation; and (ii) the Variation Amendment to extend the times the Park District can use the lights on Fields 2, 3, and 4, and established a time restriction on the use of the lights on the synthetic turf soccer field; however, the Board of Trustees tabled the Park District's request for a Variation Amendment to amend the times the lights can,be used on Field 1; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2013-ZO-V-EX1-S-1361, adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook on February 12, 2013 ("Ordinance"), granted approval of the Variation Amendment, subject to certain modifications, conditions, restrictions, and provisions; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2013-ZO-V-EX1-S-1361, was subsequently amended on June 10, 2014 pursuant to Ordinance No. 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S- ; and WHEREAS, Subsection 31 of the Ordinance provides, among other things, that the Ordinance will be of no force or effect unless and until the Park District files this Unconditional Agreement and Consent with the Village Clerk, within 60 days following the passage of the Ordinance, and consents to accept and abide by each of the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in said Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, the Park District does hereby agree and covenant as follows: 1. The Park District hereby unconditionally agrees to accept, consent to, and abide by all of the terms, conditions, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance, as amended. 2. The Park District acknowledges that public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the adoption of the Ordinance, has considered the possibility of the revocation provided for in the Ordinance, and agrees not to challenge any such revocation on the grounds of any procedural infirmity or a denial of any procedural right. 3. The Park District acknowledges and agrees that the Village is not and will not be, in any way, liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village's issuance of any permits for the use of the Property, the construction and installation of the seventy-foot high light poles on the synthetic turf soccer field, or the use of lights on the Property, and that the Village's issuance of any such permits does not, and will not, in any way, be deemed to insure the Park District against damage or injury of any kind and at any time. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Additions are hold and double-underlined;deletions are struck through Ordinance 2014-ZO-V-EX1-S-1403 Oak Brook Park District—1450 Forest Gate Road Use of Field Lights PINS:06-26-303-001;06-26-303-002;06-26-303-003;06-26-303-004 06-35-400-031 Page 11 of 11 Dated: , 2014. ATTEST: Oak Brook Park District By: By: Its: Additions are bold and double-underlined;deletions are struck through Village of Oak Brook-Synthetic Turf Field and Bail Field#1 Lighting Analysis Page 1 of 5 January 15, 2014 GENERAL: This will serve as a report of my findings for the lighting analysis of the'Synthetic Turf(soccer) Field and the Ball field#1. Scope of Services: a. Review the Village lighting ordinances. b. Review the Village and Park District records about the installed lighting fixtures, including manufacturer's illumination reports. c. Take Illumination measurements with the lighting fixtures at full operation for the Synthetic Turf Field and Ball field#1. d. Provide engineering analysis and evaluation of the findings. General Lighting Definitions: a. Rated Lamp Life is the total operating time at which, under normal operating conditions, 50%of any large group of initially installed lamps is expected to have failed. b. Lumen Maintenance is the depreciation of lumens over lamp life and is available from the lamp manufacturer for the specific lamp type. C. Color Temperature, Uniformity and Stability are usually specified for the specific lamp type by the manufacturer. Metal Halide lamp types exhibit inherent color variations from lamp-to-lamp(uniformity)and they may change in color as they age(stability). d. Source of Light varies for each specific lamp type. 1. Incandescent lamp is the filament for clear and outer bulb for frosted types. 2. Fluorescent lamp is the phosphor coated glass. 3. HID lamp is the arc tube for clear and outer bulb for coated types. e. Glare is light that hinders or bothers the human eye due to the eye's difficulty in adjusting to different levels of light. Apparent glare can vary between people. Direct glare from a light source is typically an important issue in the design and operation of athletic field lighting installations, both in terms for the players and nearby population. VILLAGE LIGHTING ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE 2012-ZO-V-EX-S-1350 dated September 25, 2012. Since this ordinance addresses seasonal use and hours of operation, I will not provide engineering comment. 2, . . ORDINANCE 2013-ZO-V-EX-S-1361 dated February 12,2013. Section 2, E.Synthetic Soccer Field Recommend changing this to: Synthetic Turf Field Section 3.Conditions A. International Lights on Field 1. The original light configuration on Field 1 will be altered to include International Lights which can be focused onto the field and placed on the light standards that face directly towards Forest Gate(approximately 15 of 41 total lights); and Recommend changing this to: A. Qualite Sports Lighting Fixtures, International Series and Pro Series on Field 1. The original light configuration of the Pro Series fixtures on Field 1 will be altered to include these International Series Fixtures which can be focused onto the field and placed on the light standards that face directly towards Forest Gate( 14 of 44 total fixtures); and Village of Oak Brook- Synthetic Turf Field and Ball Field#1 Lighting Analysis Page 2 of 5 January 15, 2014 B. Glare from Fields 1, 4, and the Synthetic Turf Soccer Field. The District shall eliminate any glare from the source of light for Fields 1, 4, and the synthetic turf soccer field and assure the source of light is not directly visible from any adjacent single-family dwelling; and Recommend changing this to: B. Glare from Fields 1, 4, and the Synthetic Turf Soccer Field. The District shall assure that the design and appropriate illumination level for these fields shall comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society(IESNA) recommended practice for Outdoor Sports and selected Class of Play for the appropriate sport played on the field. This will assure that there is acceptable illumination at the field level and minimize obtrusive light and glare to adjacent areas. E. Retrofitting Lights on Field 2 and 3. The District will retrofit existing lights on Fields 2 and 3 with International Lights and/or shield the existing lights on Fields 2 and 3 facing Forest Gate in such a manner as to eliminate any glare from the source of light and assure that the source of light is not directly visible from any adjacent single family dwelling; and Recommend changing this to: E. Retrofitting Lights on Field 2 and 3. The District will retrofit existing lights on Fields 2 and 3 with Qua lite Sports Lighting Fixtures, International Series and/or shield the existing lights on Fields 2 and 3 facing Forest Gate to comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society(IESNA) recommended practice for Outdoor Sports and selected Class of Play for the appropriate sport played on the field. of Oak Brook- Synthetic Turf Field and Ball Field#1 Lighting Analysis Page 3 of 5 January 15, 2014 ILLUMINATION MEASUREMENTS It was decided that there would be The first date was Wednesday, September 25, 2013 and second date was Monday, December 2, 2013, when all the leaves had fallen from the deciduous trees. Measurements were recorded in Foot Lamberts L's)with a Sekonic L-508 spot meter. September 25, 2013 1. Measurements recorded from vacant Lot 68 looking at the Synthetic Turf field were a maximum of 11 FL's. Illumination levels of 0,007 Horizontal footcandles and 0.007 Vertical footcandles were measured with a Minolta T10 Illumination meter. 2. Measurements recorded from vacant Lot 69 look at th Synthetic Turf field vwaoeamaximum of 20 FL's. Illumination levels of 0.008 Horizontal footcandles and 0.022 Vertical footcandles were measured. 3. Ball Field#1 was illuminated for a very brief time due to curfew restrictions and could not get proper readings. December 2,2013 1. Measurements recorded from vacant Lot 68 line with front door of house to West) looking at the Synthetic Turf field were a maximum of 43 FL's. 2. Measurements recorded from 2nd floor of house under construction on Lot 69 looking at the Synthetic Turf field were a maximum of 40 FL's. 3. Ball Field#1 poles are identified pole T on first base side closest to home plate, pole V on first base side closer to right outfield, pole Y in right outfield pole W in left outfield, pole U on third base side closer to left outfield and pole S on third base side closer to home plate a. From resident input for West of pond location, it was determined to take readings at "worst"condition poles Y, U, and S. Pole T was identified as best case. Measurements recorded for Ball Field#1 wer 6.2 FL's on pole T. 24FL'ecmpokaY, 7OFL}son.pcdeS, and26FLis on pole U. b. From resident input for East of pond by house location it was determined to take readings at"worst' condition pole W. Measurements recorded for Ball Field#1 were 39 FL's on pole W. c, From resident input for Center of pond location, it was determined to take readings ot "worst"condition poles U and S. Measurements recorded for Ball Field#1 were 30 FL's on pole U and 70 FL's on pole 5, 4. Other miscellaneous measurements taken were: a. Street light on association road from lot 67 was measured to be 80 FL's b. Guard house coach light from south side on association road was measured to be 180 FL's. Village of Oak Brook-Synthetic Turf Field and Ball Field#1 Lighting Analysis Page 4 of 5 January 15, 2014 Engineering Analysis and Evaluation: Ball Field#1 It appears that the lighting on ball field#1 was acceptable in 2005 to the Forest Gate residents per the Fulton Contracting letter dated January,23, 2006, the minutes of the March 28, 2013 meeting where the Forest Gate residents, the Park District and the Village were represented, Item#1 on Tom Truedson memo dated August 6, 2004, and the June 25, 2013 email from A.T. Cygan to David Niemeyer. See attached documents for the above referenced material. This acceptable condition was reached with a combination of 14 of the Qua lite International series fixtures strategically placed in combination with the 30 Qualite Pro Series fixtures. See attachment 1 for pole and fixture combination. This design does comply with the Village Ordinance at the Forest Gate property edge. This was confirmed in the Packer Engineering Survey conducted in April 2006 which measured illumination levels from 0..03 to 0.136 footcandles. See attachment 2. Both fixture types use metal halide lamps and these lamps do lose their intensity and have possible color shift with age. The International series uses a double ended, cable connected M1500T8/DE lamp. Life expectancy of this lamp is 6000 hours with a typical 30% loss of its initial lumens at 6000 hours. The PRO series uses a single ended MS1650 BT56 with POM base. Life expectancy of this lamp is 3000 hours with a typical 30% loss of its initial lumens at 3000 hours. For lamp info, see attachment 3. From discussions with Qua lite, it should be noted that all four ball fields have the Pro Series with the MS1650 BT56 lamp and only ball field#1 has a combination with the International Series M1500T8/DE. The design criteria for Ball Field#1 was determined to be Type Ill Class of Play from the Oak Brook Park District fax dated July 22, 2005 that included the Lighting Solutions of Illinois report (attachment 4). This report indicated that the design illumination level was 50 footcandles for the infield and 30 footcandles for the outfield. This is in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society (IESNA) recommended practice for Outdoor Sports-Baseball and Type III Class of Play. This class of play is for training facilities, High Schools, Amateur Leagues, and Sport club levels. There is a Forest Gate resident claim that the lighting has changed and now is unacceptable, possibly due to relarnping. According to the records provided by the Park District, the only relamping were 12 lamps replaced by Fitzgerald Lighting in September 2012 (attachment 5). The invoice for this relamping states that these lamps were 1500 watt MH BT56 mogul lamp. Upon further investigation, Fitzgerald has acknowledged that they installed the MS1650 BT56 with POM base lamp and that there invoice nomenclature was in error. No one can provide the location of these 12 replacement lamps. Fitzgerald Lighting did visit the site on Friday, 12/6/2013 and verified that the fixtures on ball field#1 were properly tamped. Since it appears that there has been no change to the lamp types and wattage installed in the fixtures on ball field#1, it is my professional opinion that the lighting is as before when it was considered to be acceptable. Village of Oak Brook-Synthetic Turf Field and Ball Field#1 Lighting Analysis Page 5 of 5 January 15,2014 Synthetic Turf Field The lighting for this field was designed and provided by Musco in 2012. The original design was to be in,compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society(IESNA) recommended practice for Outdoor Sports-Soccer and Type I I Class of Play per Oak Brook Park District, Laure Kosey's 12/10/2013 email (attachment 6). These;,requirements state that there has to be 50 horizontal footcandles maintained with,a light to dark ratio not exceeding 2.5;1 on the field. See attachment 7. This design does comply with the Village Ordinance at the Forest Gate property edge. Musco has provided information showing the horizontal illumination is at zero around the field. See attachment 7. It was noted that after the initial installation, there were complaints about the field lighting from the Forest Gate residents. Per David Miller of Musco, there was a site inspection done at the end of 2012 and some fixtures were readjusted from the initial design to reduce the lighting appearance as viewed from the Forest Gate community. Musco was present at the December 2nd meeting and revised the current design with longer visors on some fixtures. It appears that Musco has provided maximum possible shielding of each of the fixtures in question,while maintaining the proper illumination requirements for the Type II Class of Play as documented in their January 3,2014 letter(attachment 8)to the Park District. This class of play is for High Schools,Amateur Leagues, Sport clubs, Semi-Professional.and College levels. It should be noted that at our December 2nd meeting, there were comments for the Forest Gate residents that these latest Musco revisions were an improvement. At one point during the visor replacement,when there was no visor on one of the fixtures, you could definitely see the full unshielded intensity from the Northeast pole marked S1. It is my professional opinion,that this Musco lighting installation for this design criteria of Type II is acceptable and has been adjusted to minimize the effect on the Forest Gate subdivision and complies with the Village Ordinance 51361. Summary For the specified Class of Play, both the Ball Field#1 and the Synthetic Turf field are properly illuminated. In review of Ball Field#1 history, there appears to be no change to the fixture position or lamp type installed. This application was accepted in 2005. In review of the Synthetic Turf Field, the Oak Brook Park District has indicated that Type II Class of Play is, has been, and will be conducted on this field, necessitating this level of lighting for player safety. MUSCO has adjusted fixture aiming and provided appropriate visors to mitigate the effects of glare and still maintain proper playability for Type 11 Class of Play. For both existing field lighting systems, it is my professional opinion that everything that could be done to mitigate apparent glare, has been done. One option that has not been evaluated is to completely redesign the synthetic turf field lighting system. The Park District could request computer generated options from Musco that may include higher poles, additional poles, or other suggestions that would mitigate the complaint from the Forest Gate residents. Then, if an alternate option is found, the Park District could review the total cost to implement and have the cost approved in the proper methods. Rick Kellen, P.E. LC Line Associates I I 44 TOTAL, I XT JRE 01. Asa BLY tquf4Dta mr�:sr i'ffix. EPA Ma x KM ■ 1 1 6FPRV-16 a01,i' , 70.t1 , 69 1 0 59 30 .3a a I TV FIXTURES t t: i t"`PS-45V E I4 T RE ' d trrp4 4.44,-i4. i,fiw 0 0 10.. E4, 1 77.18 TOTAL .1 v 8/PRv-1 00H ?C. 0 3.0. � 33.,64 U 6rw y-,rx v-t rerc, r 70.:0. 30','24 . 1 4.3a a ox-14/y- 'sa^t-t4s014.ii nt t 70. (1 r"yam. 69 ; 10 `59 31 L`. itirE r i..ON4L '541Z irS .. (1:q::,2 2) it ) . + �T w'14) :4V - 11L47 Z IFs � v i` PROFESS 1I31€tL : ERI ' ° E i f •1 t tx 11L�ti 6 1. 1E5 x x �t,,, t, �" t" r r'",";j 3 4X4V "- 1:L41 e..1C 4a i i ,1"`� r3 3fl` 091 T3,- ..'� ,r",�"`... r k 2) �ik4T1V1 11d Ics..3..ICS �� „ sa � i i4 il r P e , .• 4-1 a5U,' 'Ly (--40,.1 70) i ;' „, n U- 6-4660 V'-/500 1-400 vA'i SEOUR t T Mini ct erg r m 4,„„„,,:10 Y ( /6 50; "L7 e ] 1.1' i y .1 ,, ., l: '4.1',4 5p 507E ^S4 c 4 1 4°t a .; kc )i �,,), r x n n4f &1, 3 ,r r .,_., i v. A"' aa;S i tiC.�i6t§'t..i-.1`✓& ' 4hx a..Fll. '�»,.^✓` 414x_:..': .MI a:et;Y,""'... a•.d.,K•«1 40.1,1114 P.kr ..:d,i`t>a 'C1�LI9+?.N,- l'. sash 1'ry5%n4 C;w'W.i7t 4 :; 9Fj +} q =lUT./4:Ps.tC. E Srg,};'<4tt'PMV4T On 4;..to<WF..m.p YA^2 Cg2.1,4., IMhS6f.•w"ss`k?I lea,,Yr4 Mt``w`4"]T s, Yf'8� ■ r,344,4.if vot", ::1•xtroit.x...,Ato.i ritY t'Ai; rx lA,4 sl.4q.H0,r1Lr1,Mi,4 x�x Ft axe 1 l x '[ fD]JY �v" �tamrr9L r4 I.i�}x11Vf en ArmrAt.*t + .tge S a l'Allt ,,'S11tkkur„c, Ord e,r,>,er*4a t4.� 01 LEE ONI,' at./a IS 1,,t1"TO 9 x'±•ry mtaro 0.,, wr<tiK ..,':a a.:wt.t.•w,',r,..r .�+'erP 1M. arr 1%.41'1, },..: a t, '*�+ xN „C C-w't*.. t,:4N�iat?d.CXIH i;. .x ;pre oo 4,0 ttarw V t sn.rer, ,To .4 ft:I/Atm v i ravel ati,i,t Ir'21',*:'r•,r7" w C�11.7.4-1 N J GUC'ia5r, x�0'.t'+ 1"'Y,,"�'kn3'+4.14,4101.:qlk .fiml irlY: 11 • ■ rKy��a l :t� 0 ,- p AL\ ft ri r E GINEEfINGinc. April 14,2006 Via FedEx Mr. Don Hastings Village of Oak Brook Dept. of Community Development 1200 Oak Brook Rd. Oak Brook, IL 60523 Re: Oak Brook Lighting Survey Packer Engineering Project No,500252 Dear Mr, Hastings: Enclosed please find the original©f the report in the above-captioned matter, Please do not hesitate to call if you have questions or if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, e‘,. t' 1 k ,Q, -_, ' --)/As -•- Rhonda May Administrative Assistant to Electrical Engineering Doper nt Enclosures P.O.Box 353(60566-0353) 6700 Alexander Bell Drive 1050 Highland Drive 1950 N.Washington St.(60563-1366), Suite 100 Suite B Napervi0e,IL Columbia,MD 21046 Ann Arbor, Ml 4814£i-2262 630,505.5722 Fax:630.505.1986 443.545.2000 Fax;443.545,2001 734,706.5000 Fax:734.786.5001 www.pacicereng.com www.pachereng.com www.paekereng.00m 1 I OAK BROOK LIGHTING SURVEY 500252 Submitted By: çR 74.Z PACKER : NGINEE no E ING R aama=1 r Submitted to: Mr. Don Hastings Village of Oak Brook Dept of Community Development 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 April 14 2006 Packer Engineering,Inc. Packer Engineering,Inc. P.O.Box 353(60566-0353) 1050 Highland Drive 1950 N.Washington St.(60563-1366) Suite B Naperville,IL Ann Arbor,MI 48108-2262 630.505.5722 Fax 630.505.1986 734,786,5000 Fax 734/86.5001 www.packereng.corn r e ENGINEEFRING AK BROOK LIGHTING SURVEY L Introduction On Sept 27,2005,Mr.Don Hastings, Chief Building Inspector for the Village of Oak - Brook,Illinois,requested Packer Engineering,Inc.,to perform lighting surveys at two baseball fields adjacent to the Forest Gate subdivision in Oak Brook.At issue were village ordinance provisions that governed the glare which occurred at the periphery of each field when the fields' lights were on and in use.Packer Engineering was requested to provide a technical judgment as to whether glare emanating from the parks area was compatible with relevant permit restrictions,and to suggest mitigations if glare proved to be a problem. IL Background It was reported to Packer Engineering that the lighting systems on ball fields 1 arid 4, located in the recreational areas off of lone Boulevard near 3 l't Street,between which the Forest Gate residences were situated,were producing a glare level which was disturbing to various residents,Because of this disturbance,glare levels indicated in governing village documents were called into question. On two prior occasions surveys had been done by lighting professional in attempts to determine whether or not the glare at the same fields met village limits,In both cases results indicated that measurable lighting levels were acceptable, and one indicated glare or"spill"values were less than values originally submitted to the village prior to lighting system installation.Packer Engineering was requested to examine the same parameters. This report will serve as a presentation of our findings. III. Inspection The first new survey was conducted by technicians from Packer Engineering on March 20,2006,with a follow-up survey conducted on March 29,2006.Light levels on the subject fields were recorded to compare against values that were indicated as normal ranges in recognized industry standards, Additional measurements were taken at several selected paints inside the subject neighborhood (Forest Gate) and at a number of points near the road edges surrounding the fields.In all cases measurements taken on and around the subject ball fields indicated illumination values at or below suggested levels for Class III and Class IV outdoor playing fields. According to the recommended practices provided by the Illumination Engineering Society of North America(IESNA),playing fields are divided into classes roughly • according to the number of spectators provided for and the lighting requirements for their safety and security. The subject ball fields covered by this exercise fall between Classes. III and IV according to criteria presented in the TESNA guideline RP-6-0l. The recommended light levels for these classes are 30 to 50 foot-candles(FC)of illumination measured as an average.The average intensity on field I measured 28.85 FC for the total field and 32.44 FC for the playing area* The playing area included outfield and infield P.O.Box 363(60566-0353) 6700 Alexander Dell Drive 1050 Highland Drive 1950 N.Washington St.(60663-1366) Suite 100 Suite B Naperville,IL Columbia,MD 21046 Ann Arbors MI 48100.2262 • 630.605.6722 Fax:630.505.1986 443.5452000 Fax:443.545.2001 734.786.5000 Fax:734,786.5001 www.pa ekereng.cora www.paeltereng.corn www.packereng.sein i Oak Brook Lighting Survey April 145,020025062 Page 2 . eof"of only,without sidelines and areas beyond the backstops.The average intensity on field 4 measured 27.68 FC for the total area and 31.375 FC for the playing area, Illumination measurements taken on each of the fields were obtained with a Minolta T-I illuminance meter on a field grid of approximately 25 squares of 40 feet by 40 feet each. Additional readings were taken at the field peripheries and included in the totals. Readings taken near the residences and mad edges were not averaged because the raw values were more illustrative of levels that are not meaningful in industry standards, The levels near the residences and road edges ranged from a low of 0.031 FC to a high of 0.136 Fe.A number of these measurements were compromised by radiance components from nearby street lamps, so the actual values of illumination from the ball fields were lower. Glare has been defined as a"condition of vision"and has been considered to have two components, a"discomfort"component and a"disability"component.Newer standards quantify these components to some degree;but in the case of peripheral illumination measurements on ball fields I and 4,the levels do not even rise to the"noticeable"ranges on given scales. IV. Conclusion In conclusion,this lighting assessment indicated that the existing foot-candle levels on ball fields 1 and 4 were in compliance with provisions in Section 2 of village ordinance 2004-ZO-V-S4 084.No illumination measurement exceeded one-half foot-candle near the residences, and no single light cluster mast has all of its lamps shining directly into the residence area when turned on.Glare was too low to be measured inside the residence areas and therefore meets the ordinance provision. For general improvements the following efforts could be undertaken: .),> Redirect or shade lamp 7 on the center-right field mast on field 1;and , lamps 4,7, and 8 on the right field mast on field 4 to shield the residences from the lamps' harsher illumination. (The lamps were numbered left-to- right-top and left-to-right-bottom on the eight-lamp clusters on the outfield masts.) .)i-,- Replace strategically identified flood lamps that produce uncomfortable glare with spot lights or lamps whose radiance character is "softer?' Inquire of sports lighting manufacturers such as Qualite as to providing larger scale baffles that can shield light clusters in toio from undesirable spill. :.,t ) Oak Brook Lighting Survey 500252 '� .: April �14,2006 k page 3 fir:` > Experiment with lowering the clusters on the light masts selectively and determine if such placements can affect"glare horizons"in a positive manner. Inquire of other neighboring municipalities with similar facilities whether or not glare problems exist and if effective glare reduction measures have been introduced. i Perform regular"glare assessment"throughout the playing season and continuously readjust lamps or conditions that produce discomfort, 1 Monitor the industry literature,e.g.,lighting equipment bulletins and industry standards,to remain at a'`cutting edge"in glare reduction. Documents reviewed in preparing this report included the following. "Reconmiended Practice for Sports and Recreational Area Lighting,"TFSNA RP-6-0l (www.techstreet.com). "Glare Evaluation Systems for Use within Outdoor Sports and Area Lighting," CIE 112-1994,International Commission on Illumination Technical Report, . The IESNA Lighting Handbook,Reference and Application,Illumination En- gineering Society of North America, 120 Wall St,, 17#'`floor,New York,N,Y., Part IV, Chapter 20, 9th Edition,2000, Packer Engineering,Inc.based the above findings on the information obtained and observations made before the preparation of this report. Packer Engineering reserves the right to amend or modify this report should additional information become available. PACKER ENGINEERING,INC. Report prep r{ed by: Report Rer iers'ed by: ill)16i8 } 111:0 4. e,--"."-e. 4 A ci„.„ .....__.--- 1 Robert D.Quin ,Johannes C. Laun,P.E. Senior Staffiei6nsultant Director Electrical Engineering Department Electrical Engineering Department if ® / O I Tr‘i V _: GENE, L trnr cter stic ELE � I yk lamp Type Standard MU Single Ended lamp Vdotts 1115D VENTURE' ANSI Code M112/E Lamp Oper,Volloge(Nom.) 270 VV T U R E Bulb Shape BT56 ® i Bose Type Mogul POW(€P39) SUSTAIHABILITY Bulb finish (hear Recycling Program Smarlpae-800.451-2606 Rated life 3000 hours Operating Position Horizontal±60° Dimming 11/A NOTES tamp performance ratings published in this data sheet ore hosed on PHOTOMETRIC operation mil l magnetic ballasts.Performance of position-rated lamps outside of their tolerances will result in poor potentiate.Permitted Initial Lumens 177000 rotation about axis±15°.To calculate nighttime Scout*lumens,multiply tiply -- the lumen'rating by the SIP ratio. Lumens Per Walt 107 Sealopic Lumens(SIP 1,4) 248000 Lamp Lumen Depredation(LLD) .82(42%)(4)1200 hours Correlated Color Temperature 3200K Chromaticity Coordinates(CIE--x,y) .420 .395 Color Rendering Index((RI) 70 ibHYSICAL Bulb Diameter 7.8"(180mm) Max,Overall Length(MOL) 15.3"(391mm) light Center length(€{L1 9.5'(241mm} -- -. Effective Arc length $5.0 min Max.Base Temperature{°C} 250 Max.Bulb Temperature 1°C) 430 Socket Pulse Rating(14Yf - Nt R 60° Luminaire Type Enclosed Rated Horizontal Spectra' Distribution Lumen Maintenance trS4 i t#XT in _ 32001( a Alamo iJ 80 1111111111im sir 60 b. lid tit..iiiiiiii 53as®■mita` i e ■ola o allam. - a._,_ ,' ,,. _.. Ula._ 'T.fy(184mm) 2a � �� L 15.3(41 mm) . .. C !' � RR Bos= Mogul OMit( 1a� ,. Bose� Mogul POMB(€P391 ', � : � �� - 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 a .� 700 750 800 25 50 75 100 Wavelength(nm) °l6 L$e (8 0) 451-2606 .-. or (440) 248.3510 Fax:(800)451-2605 THIS LAMP CONFORMS TO FEOFRALSTANDARD 21 CfR 104030 10295 Philipp Pcrrhtway Warning:ibis'loop tan couse skin bun end eye tnfemmotion(root show/eve Streetstsorn,Ohio 44241 USA oltravialei whet ontieiderenvelopeofthetemptsbrokenurpondered.Donotuse 1. R E-mail:venture@acllt.com where peatde wilt remain has tyre thus a lee minutes unhs%adequate shielding or �` VentureLighting.corri olher MIA'Pre""5 me mei Loops But toll eoteettogray extinguish pohap(Kau This Product 15Recyrlabklfnough a t K envelope is'broken or pondered ere tansnteuintlyt ahte. o 0 2010 Venture Lighting International Venture Lighting is a registered trademarks of Venture Lighting tntarnotional. Revision: 1 1/7/201 1 # 1468-1`1 i GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS GE Lamp Type High Intensity Discharge- Quartz Metal Halide Ughtinc Bulb 5T56 Base Position-Oriented Mogul ...., Bulb Finish Clear 25532- IVIVR1650/HOR Rated Life 3000.0 his Bulb Material Hard glass GE Quartz Metal Halide BT56-Sports Lighting Lamp Enclosure Type(LET) Enclosed fixtures only Base Temperature(MAX) 230.0 °C --.....! , t.'1` 1 ,.., 'fl I .., , ,, . . „..: _ , . Bulb Temperature(MAX) 450.0 C LEED-EB MR Credit ° I 486 picograms Hg per mean [4-Llumen hour Primary Application Sports Lighting I n ., ,: — - .t ' -.._- - - -- -r,i — PHOTOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS , 11 Initial Lumens 177000.0 1--- i f - Mean Lumens 145000.0 __...... et, Nominal initial Lumens per Watt 107 Color Temperature 3200,0 K Color Rendering Index(CFI]) 65.0 •„i' 11 - Effective Arc Length 3.7 in ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS Wattage 1650.0 Burn Position Horizontal-±162 Warm Up Time to 90%(MIN) 2.0 min i :Ns 1 I Warm Up Time to 90%(MAX) 5.0 min 1 , Hot Restart Time to 90%(MIN) 10.0 min Hot Restart Time to 90%(MAX) 15.0 min DIMENSIONS ------ Maximum Overall Length 15.3700 in(390.4 nun) (MOL) CAUTIONS&WARNINGS Bulb Diameter(DIA) 7.000 in(177.8 mm) R-WARNING:This lamp can cause serious skin burn and eye kWarnmation born shortwave ultraviolet radiation - Light Center Length(LCL) 9.500 in(241.3 mm) if outer envelope of the lamp is broken or punctured,and the arc tube continues to operate.Do not use where people will remain for more than a few minutes unless adequate.thieiding or other safety precautions are Used. PRODUCT INFORMATION Certain typeset lamps that wit automatically extinguish when the outer envelope is broken or punctured am commercially available.Visit the FDA wattage for mote information;hind/wwwida.govicdthirarineatedproducts/ Product Code 25532 taburns.html Description MVR1650/HOR Caution ANSI Code M112 •Lamp may shatter end cause Injury If broken Standard Package Case -Dispose of tamp ma closed container. Standard Package GTIN 10043168255322 Standard Package Quantity e .Do not use excessive force when Installing tamp. Sales Unit Unit -Do not use lamp If outer glass Is scratched or broken. No Of Items Per Sales Unit 1 Warning No Of Items Per Standard a •Unexpected tamp rupture may cause injury,rite,or property damage Package -Do not exceed rated voltage. UPC 043168255325 .Do not turn on lamp until fully installed. Do not use beyond rated Re, -Do not use lamp if Wet glass is scratched or broken. Do not use where directly exposed to water or outdoors Without an enclosed lecture, -It used on a dimming system,see instructions, •operate,lamp only In specified position. -Turn lamp oft at least once for IS minutes per week. -Use in enclosed fixture rated tor this product, -Use only properly rated helmet. •A damaged lamp emits UV radiation which may cause eye/skin injury -Turn power off If glass hotels broken.Remove and dispose of tamp. •Risk of Burn -Allow lamp to cool before banana. -Do not turn on lamp until tally installed. •Risk of Electric Shook -Do not use where directly exposed to waterer outdoors without an enclosed fixture. -Turn power oft before Inspection,Installation or removal. •Risk of Fire -Keep combustible materials away front lam)). -use Mindere rated for this product, GRAPHS&CHARTS Graphs_Spectral Power Distribution For additional information,visit vrtivw,gelighting.bom Page 1 Nov 27,2013 2:17:00 PM Page 2 For additional information,visit www.gelighting.com Sample Specifications Ordering and Specification Information Lamp(s)shall be Item Ordering ANSI Average Rated Initial Mean (a)METAtARC BRIT& Number Abbreviation Watts Bulb Base Ballast Life(hours) Lumens Lumens CCT CM . . LINE cbuble-ended metal 26589 M1500T7/DE 1500 77 fiX7S IBISC M P 3000 - -150,000 127,500 .. 4200K 65 halide lamp(s)and shall 66632 M1500T8/DE 1500 TB Ceramic#8-10 Spade it4133/F 6000 150,000 127,500 4200K 65 have an 85%mean •66627 - M2000T8/DE 2000 TB BUS FilISC kJ' 3000 - 200,000 170 000 "4000K 65 lumen maintenance. 66631 M2000T9/OE 2000 TO Ceramic#8-10 Spade Ml 34/F 3000 180,000 153,000 4200K 65 Lamp(s)shall have 1 Consult your OSRAM SYLVANIA fighting representative for tamp/ballast compathility a correlated color temperature of 4200K and a CR1 of 85. Technical Information Typical Lumen Maintenance Typical Mortality Curve lea ree 40 0 00 e0 - 70 EN1IMMa 1111l11 11m e1111 z111i1.11n 1 uso a 1..0.1..1.F ..-......- . 40 .40 lsm I ., 21) 0 10 I - 0 10 20 00 40 00 00 10 00 00 100 0 10 20 30 40 00 00 70 80 SO 100 'I Percent of Rated Lite Percent of Rated Lamp Life 0 Dimensions E '3 (A) (B) (C) k Ordering VIOL LCI. Diameter Abbreviation (mm) (nun) (mm) .., )., A M150017/DE 256 127 170,5 M1500T8/DE 254 127 110 M2000T7/DE 254 127 180 0 M2000T8/OE 254 127 108 Ordering Guide - - . - , 1 DE Wattage: Tubular Nominal diameter in I Double-ended IvIETALAFIC -,1000,1500 or 2000 watts ' eighths of an iriCh 1 OSRAM SYLVANIA National Customer Service and Sales Center 18725 N.Union Street Operate In Enclosed Fixtures Only Westfield,IN 46074 industrial Commercial To reduce the risk of personal injury and property damage resulting from an arc-tube rupture,this lamp must be oper- ated in a suitably enclosed fixture and the Proper Care and Maintenance"instructions must be followed.A suitably Phone:1-800-255-5042 Fax: 1-800-255-5043 enclosed fixture uses lens/diffuser material able to contain hot lamp fragments(up to 1832"F,1000°G).Enclosed fix- National Accounts tures which comply with UL 1598/GSA G22,2 No.250 should withstand an arc-lube rupture.If you do not know whether your fixture can safely withstand an arc-tube rupture,contact your fixture manufacturer. Phone;1-800-582-4871 Fax: 1-800-562-4674 Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure ciEmispemaity Markets i-- 0 This lamp can cause serious skin burn and eye inflammation from shortwave ultraviolet radiation.It MUST be operated ■ Pitoriat-800-782-7101 in an enclosed fixture which litters out the shortwave ultraviolet radiation.Use ONLY in equipment provided with a lens Fax: 1-800-762-7192 cover of high temperature aluminosilicate glass or equivalent which filters out harmful shortwave ultraviolet radiation. z Display/Optic .-t A lens that meets the requirements of UL 1598/CSA G22.2 No.250,section 9.4,titled,"ultraviolet(UV)attenuation Phone:1-888-677-2627 barriers for metal halide lamps without integral UV blocking outer glass envelopes"should fulfill this requirement. Fax. 1-800-782-7192 CO In Canada A power interlock device is strongly recommended to automatically turn off the lamp if the-fixture assembly is opened cc OSRAM SYLVANIA LTD. Or If the fixture lens is broken.If the fixture lens breaks and the lamp remains on,turn oft power immediately and repair co 0 Headquarters before re-onergizing. 2001 Draw Road 0 0 Mississauga.ON L5S 184 Due to the ultraviolet hazard,this lamp is to be used ONLY In equipment specifically designed for use with this lamp (,) 0 Industrial Commercial and recommended for Its use by the equipment manufacturer. Phone:1-800.283-2862 Fax; 1-800-667-6772 Special Markets Phone:1-800-285-2852 Fax: 1-800-667-6772 Visit cur website:www.sylvania,com SYLVANIA and METALAFIC are registered trademarks or OSRAm SYLVANIA Inc. •07/22/200.5 O8;3; iA% 030 $its $ 79 OAT, BROOK PARK i71 7', V12001. ..:•::• r Park District Bl�o 1450 Forest Gate Road J < ' 1,, 0*Brook IL 60 3. 151 I) -11, a Administration Phone: (630)645$ o . ,'' �Cir LLA, Family Recitation Cone; ( 0)999-4233 • www.obparks,org FAX TO; 61 ■ ■ 131-101,1B: DAT RB: t ...._ i ,,,,,,..,,..-. .:„,i-tr=r) ! I JUL 222005 $ Join the Oak Brock Park District for summer furl at these July 2005 events) 2"Annual Aunnuer`Run for Van Outdoor Concert Soriet Red,White+ :Blue SIVIOIC/IX Oak Brook stun Banjo Buddies Dixieland Band Super Splash Speei Sunday,July 24 Thursday,July Stuidtty,July 3 1;OO a.m.start 7:34 pArtiCentral Park{ a:V.ebe Disooua,tr.,d tdruinion all day R 001i1e ut www.eleperks.org PABBI Family Aquatic Cor r Otttc e{rr Cw eert Series Outdoor Cosset Series Outdoor Contio aeties tvorponl Lagos& Nov riy*others Chicago Skylines Bigla4od . Thursday,July 14 Thursday,, my 21 Thursday,1`uiy20 7:30 pu, aural Pack Gawk 7; 0 pmJ rat al Park O : o 7:30 p.n./coma 1 Park bo fi - -o. t '07/22/2445 48.33 PAX 830 800 837`0 oss Paton PARR DIST, ti0o2 • 87/21/2805 31;42 6304629077' PAGE 02169 LIGH G SOLUTIONS oFE,tmois WC. REPRESENTATIVES IV OP+ ECI AEON ORA-33B.11011TINO PRODUCTS 703STSSTREET ATONt ILLINOIS PROs(630)935-5334 PAX:( 30)462-9077 Mike Slettea 00.1 Brook Park District 1450 Fit Otte Road k i3.xook, of 60523-2151 ubjeo Oakbrook P3cs Liziotrig Mr,Stotter, Maze se€s the fallowing lots-as our firms Witten outLinnalitop ante avontng light testing that was p e r f e c t on t h e Central Per O r t'k cottraa of the last few vteolcs ow firm has pazformed light meter readings on the new lighting firt6rn8 for both the 300t boys baseball field and the smeller 2Utt'field That wena reeentlyinaralled by Ga ey's PIZ.Au Thefts were perknmed In aoe •,ta,Ott with vas tee procedurea uritl with board sue,members,and some Forest homeowners Beth fields were designed to the same speCificidican alighting level,being 50 ot4eandie<s in the meld:. meg and 30 candle s across th Wield area,Both of the baseball fi 1 ,throughout our initial testing and air urn it itia1 burn in period Meats al)of the written spoolfiirutious lighting requirements both M.And OfrOf the fle]ds, it hes hen brought to our attrition throughout both converdion at both the parks locations and through telephone conversations that the offsits re lht s for the fields ere of signi importance,Caw firm was party to all of the previous meetings thughout tree design phase,approval please,installation phase,end testing phase,and turdershind that the off-site spill and readings apps to be the most important nuf Air numerous evenings of light motor refitlings,our coraeltesf on is that every reading taken has been below and in cOmplate compliance with the villages written+ rdinanDes. TAO nrdirstuea$s writtun describes 2 separate categories for compliance.that of nirtaiunan.5 fool eandicsonatiacent property lines and elimination ofg The filst firs portion of the maim* inEtailtlit foe-dittos,desori bes what it normally tamed as spill light Spill light is dafrneble by at actual rearing ta,611 with a ligldmeter bold in a horizontal position 34"above gt'ade,As stated ahoy, bal.-toxin=readings tat=on the poperty lies adjacent are • a.navitinurra reading of.2 or roam than itsirtha mar,itauto*tllcwabla,Tho Vast ingjority the reading near the forest gatepropeny ale reading coosiderabiy liar with must around.02 or 2%of therm/ram allowable, • 07/22;2004 08;33 PAZ 830 800 8379 OAK BROOK PARK DIST. Z003 B7/21/2005 1142 630452W:377 PAGE Wes On the evening of 748-05,wt rook readings with it city inspector prowl at whish time the geld actually passed the offsitaletruirement in the parking lot ed_180eat to the flela which is still 75-100' closer to the field tlum the actual required pope:1y line. The second portion of the written ordinance is somewhat more vaga,and cloacae;the elimination of glare front the light source on attiseentproliertias.Glare light an be defined as u verticel meter reading, which is with the light meter aimed at the brightest object in the observer's field aviator..Although ghat can be darted as a lumen value itt vertical footoarallek glare can be subjective from the observes porspective.Row bright li lights appearunce will vary widely dvrauling on the viewers perspectiv& We have walked the entire property liau adjuoeut to the Forest Gate community and hove tick=vertical meter readings at the line.Every reading to along the line was well below what is even being- seen at the horizontal level.The htgbust reading being we witnessed along the line vats .02 foot-candles. Please bear in naiad that'Venial meter readings at a full moon oan be as high as,05 foot-candles.In • 4 12tE from rl * most spots,sky,-glow and ambient light,meaustg est ,to si and al,,ghhog balmactaut.ed more light on the property line than the hall field. It is in ow Fofessiottal °pinion that the light being read on the ropttyIine e AttirdlY tee than what was originally 5Uhrnitred and approved by the perks hoard and city cminciL We ere always pleasantly me-prised when an:predicted light levels 00nOeroing Off-Site zumbers are lower than predicted.The aystem itself works flawlessly producing all of the light on the field and olirebuthag aD of the&Atte (=cents. Once again,thank yen for all of your beip and please do not hesitate to contact MO ifyou have any fitrthet atieStialas or CCOLOWS. 'Very Sincerely, 11.1011 Orsak • Fitzgerald Lighting Phone:630-513-7147 Invoice Fax: 630-513-6872tttibrT 2 y 134 1585 Beverly Court,Suite 104 Aurora, IL 60562 Date: 3/9/2012 Source:SO No.3.0716 dill- Ship-To Oak Brook Park District Attn: Norm Russell 1450 Forest Gate Rd Oak Brook Park District Oak Brook, IL 60523 1450 Forest Gate Rd Oak Brook, IL 60523 Phone: (630)645-9531 Acct.No. AIR Cust.No. Customer Pd Reference Sales Reo Ship Via Terms 2692 2692 Sara Rybarczyk Net 30 Per Norm Russell,he wants us to and inspect&service 4 ball fields(all located together at the address on file). He has 15-18 bulbs out.. We arrived onsite and contacted Norm who met us outside. He unlocked Sky logic panel and we turned on lighter Norm asked that we look into fixing a security fixture that had fallen off one of the ballfield poles. We walked the perimeter and found 12 outages. However,we did not find where the fixture came from and Norm will have his guys look at it since they are Installed at aprx 15: We relarnped the outages. There were a couple of broken lamps and very dirty lens on fixtures that took time to clean. The lights are now properly working. We left a message for Norm about the fixture, Qty. Part Number Rescrtptton BOK Ea Price Total 12 1500MH 1500.watt 1411 13156 mogul lamp EA $89.92 $1,079.04 12.00 Lamp Recycling EA $2.35 $28.20 1.00 Service Gall-Prevailing Wage to 100 ft. EA $31.2.25 $312.25 6.25 Labor-Prevailing Wage 49 to 100 ft. HR $169.00 $1,056.25 Item Total.: $2,475.74 HST; $0.00 Total Amount Due: $2,475.74 • Qttr (C denotes repair Item) invoice-MA Printed: 3f13/2012 1:31.:18P01 Page 1 Workspace Webmail Print littpsfiemail03,secureservermetiview_print_multIpbp7uldArray=17.., Fririt l Close Window subject: RE:Synthetic Turf Field Illumination Design Criteria From: Laura Kosey‹lkoseymobparke.org> Date; Tue,bec 10,2013313 pm Ton, "rkeliorgiineassociates.com"<rkellen@lineassociates,conP,David Miller <david.triiiier@musco.com> Cc: Robert Kaillen-erkallien@sak-brook.org> Rick, The Park District invested in the Type II lighting to provide the best Illumination for the community activities. We have soccer dubs,lacrosse clubs,high school regional playoff games,a wOrnen's professional soccer team(Chicago Fled Stars)training,some high school bait-ling and quite a few amateur league games_ We have had a few college practices,but no college games have been played on the field. Does this help at all? Let me know if you need anything else,Lac:re From rkellen@lineasSOCiateS.corn[mallW:ekellen@lineassociates.corn] Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2013 10:11 AM To David Miller; Laure IKosey Cc: Robert'<When Subject: Synthetic Turf Field Illumination Design Criteria David and Laure, The Forest Gate residents are questioning the selection of Class of Play for the Synthetic turf field. They sent in some literature that they found on the Internet (my assumption because it does not show where it came from) that shows recommended illumination levels and uniformity ratios for the Class of Play types I, II, III, and IV. This agrees with the Illumination Engineering Society (IESNA) Recommended Practice for Sports and Recreational Area Lighting, RP-6-01 and the 10th edition of the IESNA Lighting Handbook, They also attached a manufacturer's Information sheet that focuses on spectator capacity for these various types. I have attached the current recommended IESNA Illumination levels for 'Soccer" OUTDOOR SPORTS from the IESNA Lighting Handbook. If you look at the 1st page, Table 35.2, it does show Spectator Capacity as a bottom line item> What's more important is that it defines the level of play from Professional down to Social Events. In reviewing the Musco Illurrilnation Summary dated 4/18/2012, the the average horizontal footcandles on the playing surface is @ 50.0 fr(500 lux). According to pages 35.28 and 35.29 of the attached "IESNA recommendation for level of OUTDOOR play' file, this illumination level indicates that it is for Type II. This is for levels from College down to High Schools per Table 35.2 of the IESNA Lighting Handbook. I would like to find out the basis for selecting this Class of Play for the Synthetic Turf Field. Thank you, of 2 117/2014 1:53 PM Workspace Webrnait Print littps:iferrtail03,sectireservermetiview_printtriulti.php?uidArray=17.,. Rick Kellen, R.E. LC 847-382-9543 Copyright CO 2003,2014.AD rights reserved. of 1/712014 1;53 PM 6J9usfpouvt ate'1tl?I*ithWri7 o>14#?Il° ;,VStkM�Wo6Auf sW6ar.al .1.4.t.A7Cw.ls.,%C.6.ra elk•N gip,kMa+pasR9r tlp.p is?ft'.. n1 4 731 .14441$ _ _ QA:b,r38dr'A�f'14.. ..< l.Gyq a+waGY� f. .. l.' 1.1**P Y�N.a$Wi1 VOW*Maui nr d°s'o$. 'O.atSletaas:!*a;. •. 1 r �'. of.,..w.- t LXS+ G. 1, ..II.R*.apiu*1001.N+�`sZuoWY+K.W:Wka**A l JI 1 I r t.....,....»---.1 a0gs e t.arywr.av!�wmNluanwlst**Pon'J'. ,. c:r. ki ♦Y lav**i.AlrliC.a.'v aNa a**Rail . ''' '''.'"^'r_ tt . ilowl*Q.L F.— i r..a...._.. ..f iy rave+a•0nparrar :ne owooaw.�aawnrrrr !* ` + r s 9 ...� kAM),tC:Bwm:.suermapo tfeablluaw 9A :stt!aalxmF'IRP4'nlp r..}.{'..,,,,` tilt y�,... }y� 9 f l ;MPPl,{Arlon Mlk.My' 1 62,i" j'4 LY 'NI ii }�l 9 4 9t ^9 yl. ' ' ., 1 .-.. ;.t ill� . . [sit--s', [ std tt Or4 *WOW :.a '.da*ate 1, .1• t'`` 0I 85'' sr c : r or mgr a ;,,;:: ' s Irmamr�sarsiiraeoanreat .at r row. In y. 6 f r ' —1�,U vt§oM 3 mti .M ny. V Ya M ('! s i..Ci9SxRCC w1EFeAAK7m+ Jo:oast wan '. .X 1111.1IN iS N91.1..t}REtb"Shill ,_—__\..,, ......,,,�, tl tiomd d3mtt esviva . JIMMININISIMEINUMM 1 . rrrurt J . "�" •tea '"' », x.1110.SO* Robert kellien Front: A T, Cygan jatoygaraman=.111] Sant! Tuesday,June 26,2013 941 AM To: David Niemeyer Cc: Gopal LaImtan Gopal Lahna lam;dadlerD0q3fpaotcorn;Don Adler,John Bear;John Niar, Michael Manzo, k4 Manzo;Mark May moyaklajaoLcorri:G.Wolin;A Ylittif.A Yusut Robert Kai lien; Peter Friedman HKLAw Subject: Lighting Constuitant Information Dave. We knov. that)ou are going forward'with the process of hiring a consultant to help had a rented) for the soccer field elate problem and reasaosinent(if baseball field I lights= We would appreciate.you including the following points when giving the eownritant the parameters for histher investigation: 0 The glare problem was recognized,and an ordinance wits written,Because f that the consultant should advise WHAT can be done to eliminate the glare,not IF there is larc Musco, the lighting contractor.acknowledged they could put custom shieldsivisors on the soccer lights for rut additional cost. Should the-consultant talk to'Masco?, • Presumably the consultant%vitt have a copy of Ordinance 1361. Museo was no%er given ordinance conditions in on R1:Q. What would the consultant have done different!) in order to comply with the Ordinance? • Although glare is quite subjective,the consultant in 2005 was able to measure it 4 This is important; The consultant needs to lake into consideration the act that,although the glare from the 2-,occer lights is less intrusive this time of the year because of the deciduous trees, the soccer lights produce tremendous glare in the fall and spring(about 1/3 of the athletic season)when the trees are not loafed out. Several of the Trustees and others viewed the lights in the fall/winter and early spring months, and based on those vievongs,sympathy to Forest Gate resulted in the Ordinance, ▪ Baseball Held I lights need to he reusseKsed due to changes acmitned made to bulbs and settings during 6 Forest Gate would appreciate being able to speak to the consultant. Thank you. Andrea Cygan for Forest Gate ()Li:151200d Od:38 FAX 530 BOO.8370 OAK BROOK PARK DIST. ra1001 1450 Paell elite Rd,OAk laktddk,EL 60523 - - - Pliant)630.000-42P Pdte 00,590-53I0 -- Oak Br4:scok I/ark District - 4 ..f. ll: Ple5,11EU LEatel Rat CC - — 0 Undent 13 Far FlevieW Li Procue Cerement 0 Placa°Reply ID Please Recycle 0 ecattettobst /4 "1-:''' 74 i‘it.... 1/--641.06 620k64) Ai 14-6.6-, /I • - 077-1-:11/> - Etvp4-3------ r-- .......,.. JAN 2 1)- '2006 lital--i.-----2,_• it , i - ...... ............-._ ..„________ I j ala0t+6 90.36 1/AZ 030 990 0379 Ojet DROK PAltit DIST, 7I002 .� t1 ar4 06 04:clef, FuLTLMI CUNTRRCTttit S3Ct883 1747 i.2 otroiv F , CONTRACTING • .r.. _ tL 160 N.GAR1 N AVE.ROEELLE.IL60172 (63O)1303 139 January 23)2006 145 Etteick Mike Sletten 00.k' Brook Park District 1100 Forest t..Gate Road Otik Brook, , 50521 aver MMfike. it!wag a pleasure meeting with you at Central Park in Oak Brook last week to review the final insulation of the new lighting project yctc Eeoantly completed. 6 p it apparent that the utilization of tlw Qealite alums on this field with the combination of . standard and international series,Itn done en excellent jab of Lighting the if iced, The lighting levels and perimeter spill obviously tneet the standards end levels that were specifier)in your piwis. The spilt contral at the per peter is extremely minimal and is far below the village's re uirements Tie fields themselves,eller being retimed have a minimal amount of visual point source Aare, although there is one fixture on the North aide of the fi id that you and I discussed,obviously hes tot be re-aimed down. I'm sure this was cz°i°verMg:la in the process of the aiming with the coitzr ctor and your engineer. Outer than the one fixture.,I would say that the field has as m taama!amount of point Strtirc a any fields that are done at this time. Your uoi n lty ratio was ouite good on the field and the general appearance of the pre feet was excellent. can be of any further assistance to you or help you in any way,please don't hesitate to give ma sail, .i I L ON CONTRACTING CO. r Thank,l.Kshoe Vice President FiMero , . ■ 1 7 . . .........e.,.. p. ) e„, .0■..k,low t, ,),0 March a ,2013 J1,1410)111..'” ' .eAr. ,,,... Pin' ose of Wieetingi Village of At 7;30 pro„,the Village coordinated a meeting with the Park District and Forest i Oak Brook Gate,to teat the soccer field and ball field I lights(prior to Aprill„2013)as required t. 12e00,ak ontek Ruud by Village Ordinance 8-1361, i oak Iltonk, L.1■052.1-2265 I Wohglic : The goal of the test was to determine if the soccer field and ball field 1 lights met all of the requiftainoinS of 5-1361 with respect to level of ilhunination,shielding the Administration 630368,5000 source of light and minimize the level orglare as specifically measured from the l'AX 6/11361'*5°4 single-flimily residences located in the adjacent Forest Gate Subdivision, community . tlitwolopineilt Attendees: 630.5683M . I AX 6:4036Rc-17.4 Ernie Kam—Forest Girth Resident 'I Ina Cygati—Forest Gate Resident If:nr,plutriall ihn Carson-Resident ugziim i wilt 630,3685110 Mary Toasty—Park District Staff MX 610.16R51211 ' Dave norm-nes—Park District Staff rim niltortmett Kathy Carson-- Park Disttict Board Member 630.36/1,5200 1•,Ax 630,36a$250 Tom Truedsert—Park District Board Member Bill Hudson—Building Inspection Supervisor,Village of Oak Brook etiago main talent Bob Kallien—Community Development Director,Village of Oak Brook 630,36RX7011 FAX 610340$739 'Soccer Field Lights Public Vibrits . 0 Light levels wore inadequate for the Village's calibrated light meter to itomrouent altutm27a determine illumination levels on Lots 68 and 69(both vacant)in Forest,Gate. MX 63 0.3613.V.95 At each locetiun,the level of light trespass"was insufficient in register any reading on light meter. Ordinance 8-1361 contains a prevision that limits (Am nrouts Public Library light levels to be a maximum of one-hall(1/2)tool candle. From the perspective of Staff,the level of light spillage has been noticeably 600 riiikarna ROMI Oak Bartok 11,6052 -2700 reduced since the lights were initially°installed in the fall of 2012. llowever, tatLiintman the southernmost(3 lights)in northeast light standard that illuminate the FAX 611)•:166.7104 M.1111 hall of the field still appear direct some light towards lots 68 and 69 in oqin in alga;orniseiwo. Forest Gate. At this location,the Forest Gate residents stated that the level of glare at this location still appeared to be excessive, Final&Timms Clad 700 NI Broitk Roitil On lot 68,the planting of several larger evergreen's(in excess of 10 feet in ()au 13cook,IL Mb:3-4140 height)in the vacant gaps between existing evergreens thong the north side of 430•3611• 420 VAX 630,3611,6439 the lot could Thriller reduce light spillage which appears to coming from the north easternmost sower field light statniarcl. Coll-Club 2604 York Rend Oat 13ruoli,11,6052341602 630301400 VAX 630.3 611419 , ,.. Bali Field 1 Lights • The group assessed the lights from the ball field from a number of locations along the northern edge of Forest Gate(inside the subdivision fence). • On lot 68,it appeared that the source of light could be observed from the right-field light standard, 9 The illumination levels at this location did not exceed the une-balr(1f2)foot candle provision of Ordinance 8-1361. From the street located nearest to lot 1,the lights from the two outfield light standards were most visible. G It was observed that the two outfield light standards contained lights that were two distiactly different colors, The leftfield light bulbs were all a higher color temperature(blue/white)and general matched the majority of the tights on ball field I and soccer field, Conversely,the majority of the right field light bulbs waiv a lower color temperature(appearing to have an orange/copper/pink tint to them). This difference in shade of the bulbs appeared to increase the contrast,between the lights and made them mom visible to eye. Ft should be noted that there was no consensus as to which bulbs were more objectionable, • Pat-k District Staff did acknowledge that the ball field fights have been replaced several times since originally installed in 2005. The maintenance records should be checked to ensure that lights that have been replaced are of the same intensity as the original lights. Staff anticipates that the wattage has not increased,although the efficacy(lumens per watt)and color temperature may have, • At this location nearest lot I,there were comments raised by the Forest Gate residents that both"glare"and"source of light"was being observed and remains an issue for both of the outfield light standards. The difficulty with IbiS issue is that the"source of lighr is not specifically defined in Ordinance S-1361. As an example,the'source of light"could be defined as;the light filament,actual light bulb or the reflection from light ballast, e it was also observed by the Pore,st(late residents and Village Staff that it appeared that the nature of light coining from the two outfield lights appears to have changed since 2005, The Forest Gate residents also raised questions regarding:if the replacement tight bulbs were a higher wattage than the previous lights;did the process of changing the light bulbs change the direction cifwhere the light was pointed;or did the wind have an effect on the direction of the actual light and/or light shield? The residents of Forest Gate did also state that the same effort that was used in 2005 to mitigate the impact of the field 1 lights should be-undertaken again, For reference,in 2005 the Village contracted with Packer Engineering 1 of Naperville to mama the lighting conditions at the Park District's four ball fields. Al least one other lighting expert was also involved. Through those • efforts and the recommendations that were made and ultimately implemented by the Park District,consensus was reached back hi 2005 that the lights ware operating in a manner that was acceptable to Forest Gate,Park District and Forest Gate. This effort to roach UtirlSellatt8 back in 2005 should be attempted At this location,Village Staff noted that there were a number of trees that exist(both on Perk District and Forest Onto property)that do not have leaves on them, When those trees get their loaves in the next Couple of months,it is the opinion of Staff that the view of the outfield lights at this location would he partially screened, ccommended Next Stem 1, With respect to the terms"glare"and"source of light?'that arc contained in Ordinance S-1361, it is the UPIIMISITS of all interested parties(Lc.,Forest Gale,Park District and Village) that these terms need to be clearly defined so that Choir meaning can be clearly understood. 2. Based on,the observations made at the field lost,Stalris recommending conditional approval so the soccer field lights can be operated beginning on April 1, 2013 subject to the following conditions: a) All use and operational conditions contained in Ordinance 5-1361 be followed with specific attention given to the required automatic shut-off of the lights by 10:30 pin and use of the lights be limited to April 1 to November 15'1'of each year. b) In the awd.60 days(by June 1,2013),the Park District shall secure the services of a lighting consultant in order to assess if either redirection or shielding the lights that are on the northeast light standard would further mitigate and reduce the level of fight and glare away from Forest Gate. If changes are recommended by the consultant and once that work is completed, an additional field test should be done and involve representatives of the Village,Park District and Forest Gat . c) That Forest Gate and the Park District work together to secure one or more additional evergreens to be planted along the north side of lot 611 in order to further reduce the view of the soccer field lights that area of Forest Gate. The additional overgreen(s)should be planted sometime in 2013. d) When the bulbs are„replaced on the soccer field,the love)of light iroduced and the direction of the light must he maintained as approved. 3. Based on the observations madc at the field test,it is Stairs professional opinion that even though the lighting conditions on ball field I appear to have changed from what was approved in 2005.Stalls recommending conditional prwa1 of the field l lights subieet to meeting the following conditions: a) All use and operational conditions contained in Ordinance S-1361 he followed with specific attention given to the required automatic:shut-off of the lights by 900 pm and Liao of the lights be limited to April I to November 151b of each year. b) In the next 60 clays(by June 1,2013),the Park District shall secure the services of a lighting coiiStati1111 in order to assess if either redirection or shielding the lights that are on the two outfield light standards would farther mitigate and reduce the level of light and glare away from Forest Gate, If changes are recommended by the consultant and once that work is completed, an additional field test should be done and involve representatives of the Village,Park District and Forest Onto. e) When the bulbs are replaced en ball field I,the level of light produced and the direction of the light niust be maintained as approved, However,if the Park District objects to the recommended conditions for use of the lights on the soccer field andim ball field t Staff would defer judgment to the Village Board Trustees to determine appropriate next steps, Sincerely DISPARIIVIENT OF CONIMIINITY DEVELOPMENT Reber , Kat ' MCP William Hudson,MCP Director Building Inspection Supervisor cc: Dave.Niemeyer,Village Manager Peter Priedmttn,Village Attorney Oak Brook Park District ,$age4d. ff' y d Th: Board of Commissioners From Tom Truedsan Deter August 6,2004 Ro: Ball Field Lights The ball field lights have been discussed and presented to the board. Commissioner O'Brien met with Win Squires from Forest Gate last month to gain clarity in the issue and subsequently sent a recommendation to the board for wheideration. As the committee chair for the baseball and lights,and to augment Commissioner O'Brien's earlier memo,below are the issues that should help the board to clarify the discussion and develop a recommendation that we can take to the village for approval in having lights installed on field#1 as well as issues for fields 2&5, The following are the issues: 1_ We have (tentative) agreement with the Forest Gate residence to alter the original light configuration to include the more targeted International Lights. This includes utilizing International Lights on those specific lights that face directly towards Forest Gate. This Is estimated to be approximately 15 of the 41 total lights that will be on field 1. 2. €ransplant mature landscaping from within the park district to the Forest Gate road side of field 1 that will grew to block the view°fine lights_ Also,pursue tree offer that was made by Dan Callaghan to Tom Truedson for 30 or so mature pine trees for the south side of the park district. 3. Understand the villages view and their recommendation regarding parking on Forest Gate road. Parking, on certain days, is extremely limited near the bail fields. Consider limiting parking to only the north side of Forest Gate mad or completely eliminate from Forest Gate road entirely. I will have the village's opinion regarding parking at the board meeting. Either decision would require re-striping Forest Gate road from its present striping. 4. Install the walking paths end parking signs to direct patrons to proper parking locations near the recreation center,soc=cer fields and racquet club. . Price retrofitting International Lights or simply augment with shields the existing lights on fields 2 4. 3. We should have pricing for the shields at Monday's meeting. Also consider asking Callaghan bullders to Myer the Cost of these options since these lights were already in place when they began the Forest Gate development. 6. Ensure the retrofitting of the auto off light switch on fields 2&3 as well as included in the field 1 design. 0 Pagel 7. Ensure that Little League and corporate soft bait league (they are playing now) clearly understands the ramifications of leaving tights on after 10 pm. We have been notified by the village that effective (June 2004) that if lights are left on we (the PD) are in violation of ordinance,and they will consider the ordinance void 8. Encourage the village to consider alterations to Forest Gate Road that would include the center median planted with trees, G. Determine a policy regarding Who can and cannot use the fields. Forest Gates concern is that once lights are an fled tt 1 that we will expand and promote usage of the field. 10. Discuss lighting limitations of field # 1. Currently fields 2 8, 8 can be lit until 10 pm up until 1 0131. Forest Gate would like us to limit lighting to no later than 7131. These are the issues. Please be ready to discuss and format a policy and recommendation to take to tie village board for village board approval recording board request for installing lights on held#1, e Page 2 Applications Lighting for Sports and Recreation Table 35.2[Class of Play and Facilities Gassaaflay �., A = F 1 t Mw -ice X - - X l - z71 x aver5000 under 5 n some nsrn 35,1,2.1 Multi-directional Multi-directional ground level sports where the play ss and:spectators view playing objects from n utzipic positions,normally Inking dosvaward,horizontall y,and occasionally upward_ Iliac sports require well-distributed horizontal illuminance,although versic:al illuminance should be considered_Typical Muhl-directional ground level spot ts include boxing,ending, field hocks:} ice hockey,skating,swimming(excluding high board diving),and wrestling. 3.1.2.2 I./al-directional Uni-directional ground level sports where the playing object is aimed at a fixed target neat ground level(usually the target is in a vertical position)).Vertical illuminance is critical at the target.It is normally provided by aiming luminaires(shielded from the players and spectators field of view)toward the target_Typical xni-directional ground level sports include arched=,howling,skiing,and target shooting. 35.1.3 Television Broadcasting In larger facilities,sports events are broadcast or recorded for television.Higher illunai mane,.allow the use or high speed shutters and small apertures that increase image sharp- ness and depth of field.Miorc light also favors stop action,slow motion,and special effects created with telephoto/zoom lenses. Even simple panned shots of the playing field anti spectator stands will show improved quality with higher luminances.: high definition television(HDTV)replaces standard color television,it is recommended that lighting sys- tems address the lamp's sttoboteopie effect associated with low f requency ballasts on 1-I1U systems,This tan he minimized by ensuring the illumination is provided by multiples of three luminaires,with overlapping besmswhich are balanced across three electrical phases. It should be noted that the recommended values in Table 35.3 do nor necessarily provide sufficient illuminance for broadcast equipment. Many TV broadcast companies and sports leagues have recommended lighting specifications available and should he con- sulted to determine the appropriate illumination leech.Several aspects of the equipment used for television broadcasting van help define the type of project and lighting system required since they have an effect on illuminance requirements. 35.13.1 Position and Distance of the Camera Relative to the Playing Field Telephoto lenses usually have a smaller optical aperture,and thus,require higher illuminance, 35.1.3..2 Apparent Speed and Size of the Object in Play `l.hc speed of the object in play appears faster for movement across rather than along the direction of view.Smaller objects,such as baseballs or tenths halls,require higher illumi- nance than latter ohsiceu such as basketball or footballs, ICS 1 0th Edition trio:Ugi;tinr4 FiOnelbOeh,1 35.3 „ . . . ., nri )co _3t ..‘ A,,:-i' tic -1,, 1 Lighting for Sports and Recreation . Table 35,3 i Sports and Recreation III,timinance Rcorn.Mendati"I5 continued .,from Prev:!°t15,.P,,,,,P7!.._..,,,,,,.._,,,,,....,,,,,„„„,,,,,,,,,,_:,,, :...•,-,.,-;,-_,-,-.-:-.,, :.'-1,:..,..,'J,:::;,:-...---,;.--;:,:A.:;;--7',. „..,„n;:.,4„d'i":'iiiiik6!iiiii4iiiiWiiii'i.4:::**ioiiiiiit907 7-'1 ,;?.;::-.- , ,* ;i. .-,,,...4,-::::::::: : :::: :i; :::„...;:‘ : 1:150,:400 ... ..,t...,:,:ic).,.154::.„00:.=?,..:rye .tiiyis04,,,,,,-,:.,... .;_:,1›, *-,._e6 ,,i,--T+A*-7V--Z;Xr .=.,:,•= ::::7,:;:.::•i- :::.:, -,y::;:;:.::,,.:y::y.,-,,,--f4-..---:4;:!,-:.::::: ,-----,;-,.,.-,;---,..,-.--i=- --.z.- .:-...,,:,:::..:-;,-,:;.Fi,r,..;.:qi.o,cai.,;t ,o,ig.E'vg.tg,, ...,s ' . .1,@1.*3-7:-.ii-}'-5-,;:2.-.---,1:-',-,.:;E:=.:.:---=-,:11:, :;-:,.:.,,1 --...:'-':::::.;:-::,,,,-.=:::,,i'liciti.zppol.{5iii.AAT #!4-,-.,--::::-,:r..;,,,:,,-,,:,,,-;;:,,i..57r....-;;::;,.......-.,-.,„;.:-,:,:,-.:,,,.;.-,4i,,,,J.::-.:,;:,„•:-.:.:.-.- , ....:-..7.-_: ft ,Y151.1,L.1.49giTtlizliiiri,:.,::,::,,,ii,:,-. .:4-::!.:,:r:,-,orgis .*:!e6411 .,;!. ....,,,, ,4* -11.7- P - 77--?"'',- ...-T,'",=.%: ::::'2'.::':::=,::?;V'',':1-.°:. ::-:J-4-S.:;;''',”25-6$::•;,,,,;,,40.5,.‘':,''' _,,,,,:li, ao,,fr..:#Nt- fV .6;T:::;-'-'•: :'....,..,..!, zs-_,•;: :::•,6::,:,„.,:, ,,,;=;:::-.:45:,'..,;,-,:.25-63.-.;...:-:''!,.?..??.:'. _...;,.........,;<.<" ' .. —77. ifitatpty77,,::::vvz••-•,:.,,,...:=:-,.=--.. .. . . M.,. 4.k.,::',,,, Z1 aumea.4....4.4. .....*,77". _ CNII.KM C,4',V)EY 'tr,W7-.7. ,..,,,,,, .,....,, 1-4te3,97 Wg*F114*.i 3.0'74:4,7''4.gtik*F.0 TI 'r ""lt"r\S,": •-•,4024:4440eMil'X''''''V,t e''''''.--;* ' • Ripe gurrace.Categorize,. a r gjtieir17:.--`11' roLIV .--14A..1147°3._ab°vc cc'ellP . ' .. I CC43 diti916 th'i ‘lfc°fIlPeilli°11- - --•'- ..,,,,I.wm-r-*-7tz-m.7, 200 2t0 750 750 75D A‘,0 , it-- ;'.M.**, tf4434.1"zUf:A--;„4--- _., a.. SW 500 500 Avg .._ 1 ofj. 100 lc1,1) ., . :30 Avg -,vu ,.-.•'' ,......,_—_,,,,,,,--,1 b . --i r -'1.-----71-74. -,' ,,T.-wt., .1E 03,01.)0„e competition surface,czrfertj9r4e,d accord mg to class of corape1ItIDIL 1°:-...":--'%Iv' ,,,,,,...._.....),p2n,..,..41:. q'..vie1r....1 l■ ' * .00 1 100 300 Avg 3 _ 00 30 0 ' -. •,... __.00.. _„.... . 1:-IPV-7fzk'x'at'filitzs-f-.1f.fiSa...',,s.,:lka--1=M- ' -). tb 3'-abov competition gelat.e.Ca tegorized ar_cotdIng ta das5(4 c("P?ttii-cm• aa.ivo,,R6f-,,-, .. _ ., -4-ri--,;. .-__ -,..„-.---.,4.:: .., ...4... ..=, i,--lit''ill:' '' '''.4_, ,,21?_,,..17:7'%,,,,,,,TZ' --- 10D 100 Nu Avg 300 300 300,_., ... .- . _... . ; — 500 5 500 < 00 < ..;. '--' ---- 4 . WM, — '44''"..1■4724444.4.4 '' ..4.0 ' 'fiti4,44 ,:14t . . 2 7ca 200 .4 -••,=,-,:---,-.5*P4:1"4•*--fe,Arail=,,,*:---- 100 700 190 00 -4 i41.„1 , ,74„e.w4::olgig, ...... '..„7,F -1'.1:4',l':':ti Ji: i tige i.M. ir^,"244,g;•'.. - "—°--4. --- 0 t340-, ....,.. 300 300 300. A,1-i: E;-,. ..&.e,,"-f a.,:"*".4,‘,.'-."'"....,.. -;;;*-:: $,;74,•ezt '---- . 1 l ,: ±1.44Z'-.:" -..,. 6,'-:'E •- 3'above$17fvce of particpar on M 50 100 200 At,,c, 1 Cs 30 60 . Ava t . prized a,cord Ina to tie of coropatition, ..: 3'above competition eur ace. ,alag". - - 0•4:' .1..- ... '. -' '.r-r•'•-:i;'' ...71 —--- — ,,. --- 300 00 AV.,„ 00 1500 1500 Av 400 .. 400 430 Ave.,L 3 < **'.3 r, • '"', e'litiRdisg:, -- - 151000 1 000 I000 Avg 3D3 -,,,,,,,-- -. .,'.7,1...•,,rwe-,M...,7;:g1.1.. ..„..0 30.0 300 •'.-1. :L4, 1000 100 1000,_ Avg za 200 .2.42 _ ..,....._ '''..6.#'z•,-1,---.'-'xe'..-,.--::,.--, ....7....,4.31,-.z .".;...--- -"- no 750 750 Ali., t ,.., 4 _____ - -— -----. v --150- 17'50 150 A,/0 .--, 500 500 500 A 9 rpi 4=1,--. Atxt-..0.4r- -,m..15.,,-,io, _. . —-, 160 103 !Olt ---9-----‘:<-t,--,------:.-.0 '-,- -- "•=sr- . 41: ' 7,3p0 no 300 Avg. 7 ... . " 3 pvci < li.„-,444- ‹;;AF:'- xat ,.. 1% Avg t„;..-- - A-P).-L--- ...-----,--.--y..0-4 .,f,..-_,--' J - - 1,CI° C'/°' 0.1'`. 100-----.!90 ' 1..?-. ti iO At g 200 A . -5°- —5....—....".......,.4.—-,...• a'03 -, 200 .,,.....,„„,... .....se.S.As*4,.,-.44. 0.4r... ,..4-.....' I..',4.4. ''''''*".''''''''''''''7'.."' .'‘. ..!: . ,..., .„...: _ . , ....,...... .. , . _ . TV We 35.3 1 5p0115-and R-tire-atinti illuminance liecoltmendations'continued next Pa9e IES 10th Ltiiiion 1)1 - V- 1-1' $3 14rIticti.i&c.14, 0.0n , . , i - - . - i A pr-)t"lc ons [ Lightiri for Sports clad Recreation Ta-hae.35,3 1 sports and Recreation illuminance Recornrnrdatkms continuedf77,::::7,;1)7::, ,e,„„.„,,,,,,,:,,,,„,,,,i.„...„;,,,,,,.„...„.,,,,,,,,s.„,,,,,,,,,.:.,„.,,,..,::..„:":.,,,;, '• •• -----,•--,-,-----•••••-,----•:---,:-..,•-',„ ',!--,..---:-,•• •-•---i .-., iislriinceTatt044114 .-...-z-,.,.::-:',.::::-!-----:-,u,-„:.--,... ..,-.-.-:;,,-, 018Aktt-.......4,. ,,,,,,,.- ..., 0 . ..„,vettiat(54).,"rarogt*,:,;•:..i.:;-',:,,•..,--- --,-. *,,*, ..--• ----7-,:: .-,,4,figliv#744t.. . TO ,.....-,4. -,,,...y-•."--",c-- ,1T -.L..--..,.-„,;:,,,,,,,,,,c;,...:,.1-F.-,,,,-,-.•:;•••.;7, • w„,44:f.4,.4.-, -.,..,,. ,4,r.,,•,••::r..7=7.......:.,•-:',.:.:i:::!,,..',.::,,f,7----:- :,-:,.. - , ''fi„-'-'5'ft5it:A-V_,„ , .2,:, ,,,z.,(.7•:,:,,,c_•,,••••::-..,,..„,T,-....,-,...,:.;:,..:.,--,..,,,-.--,;-„, ,7„-:,.•:_•,..1...-.:--7,. .:-,..,-..;:7-:_,',,,,.....,?,,......-_:.Lv:,,,,,, ,,T,J.,..;:2..iirhtiw.ficiokotooerktatiAlv,.,..,,k,_ ,,w . . .)-:: :-.,.:2..•:,:_l%Mow Ago:0 Obs.g.0011;1MT .,,...,4;.::: e.iii- 1 .-.ji. ..:"c'1 -„,:iii,i-.::.-!..-•:::,:-..; -_,:•,;-..:__..„'',..,_-,i.,:::.;,_•:-.7,,•:-,„:--,:is,..---“,--1..foiltt te-iiit big -rp..,,,..,,,,,:-,-,,:;.,;,;..:,,:.,•;:-.:,,,L.:-,,:, ,,,,, tl:;* % tfa,-.IA'tt'-.:,.:::-.;z:-:.,•,::-:,:..,-.,"--:'..-.'.!,-.---,=2:_i.::--.:-.::::-.-,'.."----':7-,,.,.:--:-.-- - -- .--..-f...j., ).25_65'..•.-.:ipp:'.,..-_-_- _'---_,--';':_'- .i sVb--ff-g---5f7ZirWat=0,6:94 .•..:;:ii:.! :'.. ..-::--..-''''.'-' - --..:-:'_.:- ...ii-,..:.25.:6s::,-:-.-.: 051,',''':..--;':'?-:::-';':',---':..:--- '$4?-::--i.'- ''":', •----- ''-1---- ---•-• •:;•'*-7,3-`1'.18;4•:',•7:Ar''', 4;k 0-0 f§k;',::;;:f:T:•! ,',•:'-''f.=:::.S:1-L-._,..-..::,i .- - --..;: -,-.-- ',. _ .. ---.•-•••-•. . • -- G,„4,,. ( t1*.-...'t,!'',-,:A7--i----.4'' "...-'----' c_ Gauge Category -.,---- -.- -,..iirp,iaiat -n- ,,,,,,Am ,---.‘--. 7.trfsf,-4-444-±3"..T.TTXtar #,,,..,L -., .„. .,,, r--,,,ger:*"ff,,f,::ti,:44.1.1-'1 ,! \t1*.1:1„,-M7trlr,i*I'll:741.4'4:.,.4,-,...4 ,,,I.W.,.,n6.1.':°7-'Et..,4,3,4bove comp,titi,,,,,rf.„-re_E•, te..1,0-. riz.d accordio!?t,o 9 lass,„e;a51:orriAp:tit or, ..__,,....„ 2i..,...,4it,„...--- ...i.,,-..,...,:. --------.. no 7J0 .,..k. g (10 Avo , 200 700 2-, P''''': tVi'',, ,'''-Z1'f-Vt,'..#.4,:6'e.j.,-r',4a 150 -150 At'g 150 __. ...i...., - ,w0,..--7,-*wv„.--w. -,,,,,.:,„g ...,......„..4 500 500 Avg _.. li3vigq•-:*-1.M.Vet.,•.,,WW.V:w_ - ______ ?-.i--,%„ ..t-.-..t,e,.----*---V4--,..ii:::-..t:,:iii,,r i •,--v ftiz.:54,.z-o--:iezi--i..441._; -'-''--•'-1..','.i,--:..,•-;:'..•-;'---4.--*.-*-7:-. ..,m- •-- _., 300 3(>L 300 Avg 1:00 150: _13070-0 Ag0 •-,,,, 200 200 Avo - ______ ----- 4,- at,.. 7tIi;;!''**::32114f445tailifit-ii7=4:"1- , . , etir:''''•••f'1:4-rfr:(4•404.:‘,441:',44,art' Saa SpottsfOutdoorlflaieb311 kr..,iii.:‘,`--U.•,•,01--•.S1 .4,,• ••-•,-!;c•--.:, _ ----- -------iiiii--,,x,---ii a-•-..,-,,,,_-•A,--,,a...,- triftr.•'..•,„:,,,,,,,,,,„,„,,,,,...„..„..,„„:„.„ ,, _, 0,,s,0„,,,,...,„„.,,,,„db. ,.... . „. . P ° - _ t,.. ..c4 ,-.•,_•,:A't•;•'n'2'.:''''*'; -; ' ,„:40,..„„wrvitirmtaio roivibzailit-,..4.i g •i:_ii,...tAtuttifitiLl.,---;Categoti..te ci a ccording to cias of competitin s o _ ,-.•-----te-%.i-Ai. ---, .-ti-11ctia.t.-fiM ' - - 11 kt 4 b -i•,,, .•,,,lf,:44:1..4. 7,„ . ••• . '''''— • .4, -..•,. .,,,,,,r,A•777-7,3 ,,-..e„,,,,.•• elrAti74 ‘--17:--1, --'.-',•?-10:-,: -.11tZ;-.44.17-e. _._ „___________. 16.1 ..,.-, r, 161 161 Avci ...,4,„,....1,..-•iir 0,..-..,,_ .i..., -...---..a.2._--..i.:*-s ectirtr ottvater surface ,- —-- • --:---•-•ri-- Ili 7---A-4;•404W---- ,'`--,. - ' lag 300 300 Aug ---' -.•......,.-• ',.--•-•.--- -a-4e--,-,---- --e-li-,--,.c zroter.4irfaco• . - . • --- 4, ,,, ftVg-ea.4,•-:1 t- ' .. — 200 200 200 Avg • `•-•--:*-•::.'-..:z•-•..--'4.•-•..- ft E 0 deck surface -i...:71.,,•' -7,,...-fi *, o t fflwg..14w.,,,,1/2•^41... t, , .,, , 500 500 500 Avg ,,,,,,,---..1.-..•,•- -$‘-,--,.-4. ---- ffir-W-,W,= E,...,0 mter stirface 11424.. .... _stv:• •,-, ,- lOS 10L Avg_ .. dirt?'Ovoater surface -------_ ''..1°-• 1:1441 -, ° -r. -..-ea-c. • ---------. 300 340 300 Avg - • •._ V--•-•••;- - -,--e-----7e,c'-'''--e--r-4-'-4.-,?pt.%Er,0 water ti rfaa_ Avg ._ .. A i'l--;Pil-- !.-44.:-11111` :_,',......tei _ . .---• ------ ., 1-surface .1w. 100 100 A rieC' 500 500 500 Avg. r,i%-'''f,'„'.7.'---.;;.'-r----i-!:•''''''''''-3-010t„. :1 '''''--eW'4 ..-•'*-•.Yt-!,t.cu '5rc ----- r-;,-'!-:-„„a--,•:**.4.:i4A-AAMMIMM--4:24.1 , ,_____ , .,---- ill k-•-'-',Xf•: 04-•*4-rettatzt44:t.M.Vti__I-t-iitrAi--,v,' __ . --- „._ .,•*?,,1 . t race 54 54 54 Avg -,,,,rT — — 4-..i•i-= --,-,.--x,„Ii*,-4_:- ....:.--, (dim *via er su . •'•4 •,1 .-ziz.,_,..te.2--1-?..,4,-,-..1 - - --- __— • [i-..-- --,.- . .,,--,,-,-..--:,,wir...-47r*E ft mittal surface 100 100 100 .4^‘'0 . ____ _ j'"1-1"'„.i.:!. ..; Too 100 1 rx, No '„:':---Tv'''--.. ---."'"'-'1Wg,.''''''' 'ft••,----Er cfe deck surface gin 200 200 Avg 1.r°57:, 4Ii--,"--,,,r, ,r,,--WrL., Ebtk4V2i,TStiffaCt2 F 0.3 of-kivi:copopatition surface.Categorized;according 10 class-of cOnIPMtio0- ;-1,71V4T. ,:1•4 -h.7s-- .' ' A' .. .4;_t„‘_... .,"al..7 .i...-•...a.a.,...-... - -- 300 300 300 Avg 1000 1000 1000 t 9 ,„,-,.......i...e ..-517,4-7,-trkire-07.W, .4.1.:,..?,-4-1:"... CO A..0 - .., 2013 20.3 Avg 204. - 750 750 7- 'i-• —a i ........... 150 150 1-o Mg 500 500 500 Avg •',-CIT0*•4"*.''.W-7-tw"-a-7-4":4.; 300 300 -a •Ott Ac 1-00 100 100 Avg .,,. .,-;",„,..-,-,w,,se,,,717._4,•-,%‘v„-mitt4,7*.A-',3•9---'4',`,1 --•-- ... t ,42i,-••--,....----w ';: T.31-,W-:7--., ,,. .',2grm , ,ttjtToT'-i.:,. ...,;, ,-,,,F4'*,,g.10,1.,,..,„1,,,,,,,bove.corripetition surid-ce.Categorized according to class DT competition, ' --------- l':-..;:-•.. .';':.i..••.•,::,•,.:::' •.;:.;,,,..:.---_a_,,, ,H.,. ":-:',..: ,,,-''''''''-i 14,. tniv - . 500 AN9 1.50 159 1.351: ,t: ----•-•"''',;•'i:i frif-.4_,,,,itt-e•-.4,.,•*_,iii44iiir- . •l.. ' ',----,;; 1....-f.::;;;-:•?,,,"-.;,:.„, .,,,,___,,-.ii--,-1.-,-:-...”-,-_ -_.q.:21.„-:----,--zaw.70"---.w'"2.---...:' 500 0P .., ,-----,---f,,--,---- 0.,:. -.,-, -..,....s.„.......,......f.., ..tati 366 300 Avg it4 100 - Avg 100 100 100 ,Ailai Nia.,-.-w,--,-;-9--.. -.. . ...,.-,•-i-5,7Wel.-'1AM,,,s' • -- '-------- -- - ------ 300 300 300 Avg •,-,.,v- , ,.. .,,A, ft .4-*A, °-----„...„--_JA...,#,----” —.1-e_ifia....---,, ,,,,,,!.?,--,,,..„r... .. - 50 50 ,AV9 Ek."4:-',1,7",;" . 4.01467::1 . ,...,..„,,,,..,,?119,,,,..,,,,,,,,...,.,;42.??.......aethilatt.21....*'11........ 50 ''''''''''''''''"5 455.St 5-4 55 55.'..44'' ''' 4±-,:-.< .i.. .,..Z„.",,,,,'- --::;1■8 Or—' MAW=SO 2...max MU A iffi ma tam se.,v., r';1..:17, :73 i sports and Recreation fifuntinut rtre ftecommendationF continued next Page ,,,------.\ Lilir , . IES 1001 el ean ctiici 1-1prid boo., EOl -..._ Appltcotions 1 Lighting for Sports and Recreation f Notes for Table 353 -ltllfsrrtaat. 7 r. The table column hea rings are di scussr d lit detail in 35.3 ill miriance Criteria: ,aver.4-rea Di Coverage a Ty teal Al"rrf r vtreraget, 5e111153 Illuminance for dscussiion on Procedures for estebIisitlni libralhailCe 7k Prop € RoDn or targets ion a project,See Table 35.4151 Oimerisional Conversions. -O TaskA1 a Destgrtated. a. Applir.mans.tasks,or viewing specifics e=ncountered an Any cjisertprcadett may cYrnaa i;4ar4NNln Area be different from These and may warrant dtiterent ctitcr'ra_See 353.1 Apfaiica- Boris andTasl :The designer is responsible for making final determinations of applications,tasks,and illuminance criteria.Outdoor tasks are so noted- b, Values cited are to be maintained sv-er time err the area of coverage, 013 tt c. Values cited are consensus and deemed appropriate for respettire fur,cr n.l ci21' 2.5:i __ - .n� act ivity.ina€ wsit uations,code requirementsare within 1ti 0%of1ESrecorr 0,25 3:1 mendatioras.Thisisapparenti yanartifact ofinetrication,footceridieccars er- a3 .1 1= skins of any valdes cited in Table 35.3 should be made-at l tc Cr f Air,Record- ._.. ___________._ _______ ______.. _......- .__ fess,codes,ordinances,or mandates may superse=de any of the lE•S criteria for any of the applications and tasks and the designer must design accordingly, el. `targets are intended to apply to the respect»re plane or planes of the task_ a, Minimum Illuminance shall be set according to the following table: Recommended Percentage of Average Uniformity Ratio that DefriesMimirtmurtt 1.5:1 B0% 1,2:1 74%? 2:1 06'h1 2.5:1 57% __a_ 3:1 50% i1�1 2 4:i 4:1 40% 03 41 <___. f illuminance uniformity targets offer best results when planned In corgvnctlon tt 2] "I 51 t . with luminance ratios and surface retleceances.Any parenthetical uniformity __ - . _ values reference respective parenthefkat applications ot tasks,such esa ear- _.-.._.� .. ,. _ kw situation associated with nighttime outdoor lighting. 0.25 3:i 4:i g.Applications and tasks cited with sunburst icon are candidates for strategies employing enycombination of tlayligltting and electric fighting to, O.25 3:1 re — achieve target values during daylight hours.Oa li g htln may require ire uncs-. -° ventIonafap oact , __-.....°._..- _._- h.Tasks with Spatula rcomponents,litre computers with CS A,450 Type(k scree .3 r:l - o rprin€t€d tasks with glossy ink or glossy paper,aeprone toveilingreflections. 0.3 41 _...- The likelihood of an application's or;task's Rrzdispos'stiti'arr to veiling reflections 0.3 +i si . _ isIidical edby the refinCied-lightIcon:blackant white sirgnal5 high hfigfi- hood;gray and white.1rEe3 signalsmoderateiike lihopd,palegrayandwhite signals some likelihood,and all-white signals little-to-no likelihood: ,_1_ 1.5:1 it The desl tsetmustcttabiishareasofc overagetowhichtargetsapply.groan till 11.1 ._. ____,. ___ highlight tIdentifies task proper orCask,area as the typical area of cci Of etelerage.for 0.17 2:1 respective cited targets,Anther ,;highlight identifies room or designated area 0.21 1 5. as the typical area of coverage for respective cited targets. 025 3:1 .,_ to - 3:1 0.3 4:1 IT----, 0.3" 4:1 - r _ ire 10t[rltion Tilt Li 311 n i i l€=dbob t 35.29 , Corporate: 100 is!Ave West - PO Box 808 - Oskaloosa,IA 52577 • 6411673-0411 - 800/825-6020 • Fax:641/673-4852 Manufacturing:2107 Stewart Road , PO Box 260 ., Muscatine,IA 52761 - 563/263-2281 , 800/756-1205 • Fax:800/374-6402 Web:WWWATIUSCO.COM ,, Email:ligitoo@musoo.co in 0000 MUS al January 3, 2014 r ritin Oak Brook Soccer Subject: Fixtures adjustments from 12/2/13 On the evening of December 2,2013 myself and another Musco representative changed visors on some of the fixtures on the Oak Brook Soccer field.AU of the fixtures had visors when originally installed. Musco has 3 different versions of our visor for use in multiple applications depending on the sport and/or the neighboring environment. It was determined that we should change out some of the visors with our more extreme spill control visor. This was done on a number of the fixtures that are oriented toward the neighboring homes. No visors were removed at this time and all fixtures still maintain an external visor. The fixtures were also adjusted down to help control the glare even more.All of the adjustments, the new visors and the downward aiming, did not adversely affect the on-field performance of the lighting.The on- field performance was designed for Class II,per IESNA RP-6-01. Any additional aiming or visor changes at this point has the potential to negatively affect the playability of the field, Ryan Marsh, LC Lighting Specialist Musco Lighting lighting. . .We Make It Happen. TO: OAK BROOK VILLAGE TRUSTEES President Gopal Lalmalani, Don Adler,John Baar,John Manzo, Mark May,Jerry Wolin,Asif Yusuf AND VILLAGE STAFF Dave Niemeyer,Village Manager, Bob Ka!lien, Director of Development,Charlotte Pruss,Village Clerk FROM:The Forest Gate Homeowners Association SUBJECT: CONTENTS OF PACKET FROM FOREST GATE SUBDIVISION DATE: March 31,2014 A great deal of time has passed since the Park District first requested the variance in Ordinance 1361 for extension of time of year usage on the synthetic turf(aka soccer)field lights. Forest Gate has in the past and still objects to the extension of time of year until the lights are brought into conformance with requirements in the ordinance regarding glare and source of light. The Village has hired a consultant and also seeks compromise to resolve the conflict, Unfortunately,the consultant's report was incomplete and inconclusive,and although a minor attempt by the Park District to shield the lights was helpful,the problem still exists. We would like you to remember that: • The entire problem of light intrusion from the synthetic turf(aka soccer)field lights was a result of independent actions by the Park District and their contractor. An ordinance was in place to prevent problems with adjacent neighborhoods. Either the Park District did not check into the ordinance or they and their contractor chose to ignore it. • Forest Gate's compromise is agreeing to residual glare once the lights are further adjusted. • Forest Gate is willing to compromise and has done so in the past by not objecting to installation of 70'synthetic turf(aka soccer)lights,those lights being on until 10:30 from April 1 to November 15,extension of time on baseball fields 2, 3,and 4 until 10:30 for Little League, eliminating"youth only" reference on baseball field 1 in 2010. • Baseball field 1 is included in this discussion because adjustments to it were made part of Ordinance 1361. THIS PACKET CONTAINS: • Restatement of Forest Gate's Position—Tab 1 • Synthetic Turf Recap—Tab 2 ▪ Forest Gate Recommendations • Musco Technical Information • J. Delvin Armstrong Writings and Credentials—Tab 3 • Baseball Field 1—Tab 4 • Qualite Line Diagram—Pole Configuration * Fitzgerald Lighting Invoice#20631 • Forest Gate Comments on Consultant's Report—Tab 5 RESTATEMENT OF FOREST GATE'S POSITION REGARDING THE PARK DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO EXTEND SYNTHETIC FIELD LIGHTING TO YEAR ROUND USAGE Forest Gate cannot support the Park bistrict's request to extend the synthetic field lighting to year round usage for the following reasons: • The glare and source of light requirements of Ordinance 1361,Section 3,Paragraph B have not been met. The paragraph states,"The District shall eliminate any glare from the source of light for Fields 1,4,and the synthetic turf soccer field and assure the source of light is not directly visible from any adjacent single family dwelling." • The additional mitigation steps required by Ordinance 1361 Section 3,Paragraph J for the synthetic turf field and baseball field 1 have not been taken. • The continued violation of Ordinance 1361,Section 3,Paragraph H(Dates of Operation)is most troubling. Synthetic field lights were utilized in late November,early December and now again in March. This disrespect of the Village ordinance should be of utmost concern. * November 15 to April 1 is a span of time during which the lights are the most intrusive to Forest Gate as confirmed by the consultant's report The consultant's report,which was intended to resolve the entire matter,is,unfortunately, incomplete and inconclusive. It should be noted that Forest Gate did not oppose the development and lighting of the synthetic turf field because of assurances from the Park District that because of the distance from Forest Gate and the topography of the land,the lights would not be seen. As we know now,those assurances were either a misrepresentation or an assumption. SYNTHETIC FIELD-SEE TAB 2 DETAILING RECAP Whatever term applies-whether glare,source of light,illumination-the synthetic field lights are too bright The genesis of the problem is that the field lights were designed for the wrong Class of Play.There are additional measures that can be taken;however,the consultant did not recommend any.The consultant's report merely confirms that the field is lighted for Class of Play IL We have done considerable research and have engaged an expert in the field.J.Delvia Armstrong,now retired,was chairman of the RP(Recommended Practice)Taskforce and had responsibility for re-writing and updating(IESNA RP-6-01,Reaffirmed 2009)-the bible of the Sports Lighting Industry. SEE TAB 3.Based on his experience,writings,and over 37 years of involvement with sports lighting,he has confirmed that the field is over lit,and the lighting may be improperly designed,The Park District may be a victim of"up-selling" by Musco,or it may have lacked the understanding of RP-6-01 Class of Play categories. "Brighter is better"is not an uncommon way of thinking by the uninformed. Class of Play is determined by spectator capacity NOT skill level. This fact is collaborated in the Packer Engineering,Inc.report to the Village dated April 14,2006 which was included in the consultant's report. Class of Play IV,according to Mr.Armstrong,is well suited for all skill levels. Class of Play H lighting is for facilities which can accommodate up to 5,000 spectators. Class of Play II is 2-1/2 times brighter than Class of Play W. It should be noted that baseball field 1 is lighted between Class W and Class III illumination. As we know,the velocity of a baseball whether thrown,pitched,or batted is much greater than that of a soccer or lacrosse ball. Furthermore,the height that a batted baseball can reach is significantly higher. Past actions taken by the Park District have improved the glare and source of light problem,but they have fallen short of meeting the requirements of the ordinance. As stated previously,there are other actions that can be taken,and they are listed in subsequent sections of this report.SEE TAB. Simply put the lights need to be dimmed down. The solution to the problem may be as simple as reducing the intensity of the lighting to a level compatible with the correct Class of Play. BASEBALL FIELD 1--SEE TAB 4 DETAILING RECAP The problem here is that the consultant's report indicates there has been no change in lighting on this field since 2005 when mitigation efforts by the Park District and the Village were successful in addressing glare and source of light issues. At that time,compromise was reached,and the residents of Forest Gate were satisfied. Unfortunately,something changed in 2012. New complaints surfaced,and observations by a number of individuals within and outside of Forest Gate noticed the change. On site visits by Village Trustees and the Staff resulted in general agreement that something,indeed,had changed,and the Park District acknowledged that the lamps were changed several times over the years(documented in Village minutes of the March 28, 2013 meeting). It was because of these observations and the associated complaints that further mitigation of glare and source of light issues were made part of Ordinance 1361,Section 3,Paragraphs B and J. The consultant's report documented a significant range of foot lamberts-a measurement related to glare(6.2 to 70.0). SEE TABS,PAGE 2. Of the six poles on this field,pole Sat 70.0 and pole W at 39.0 were especially intrusive. Foot lamberts between 20 and 30 would be acceptable to Forest Gate The consultant also provided a convoluted maintenance report which indicated that 12 lamps were replaced some time in 2012, however,the contractor(Fitzgerald Lighting)and Park District could not identify on which of the baseball fields or poles the replacement lamps were installed. Yet,based on this limited information,the consultant concluded"nothing changed"from the 2005 time period-an unbelievable conclusion. The genesis of the problem lies in the maintenance records which were either not made available by the Park District or were not kept by the Park District. Additionally,there was considerable confusion about replacement lamps which has not been adequately resolved. The solution to the problem,again,is simple: retain Qualite(the manufacturer of the lighting system),have them recheck the lamps and settings,and work with the Staff and Forest Gate representatives to achieve the glare and source of light levels which were agreed to in 2005. Particular attention needs to be given to Poles S and W. More detailed recommendations are provided in subsequent sections of this report SEE TAB 4. CONCLUSION This matter has gone on for an unacceptable period of time. Unless prompt action is taken,we suggest that Ordinance 1361,Section 4(Failure to Comply with Conditions)which revokes and declares null and void the variations granted in Section 2 of the ordinance be enforced. 3/31/14 SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD- RECAP 1. Glare and source of light mitigation actions have improved the situation 2. Additional mitigation steps need to be taken 3. Foot lamberts of 43 is excessive 4. Entire field is over-illuminated 5. D.Armstrong,Forest Gate consulting engineer,confirms Class of Play and design problems • IESNA member since 1967 ✓ Sports and Recreational Area Lighting Committee since the 80's > Committee Member > Vice Chairman—responsible for rewriting RP-6 > Chairman • Recommended Practice Task Force—Chairman 6, Designed for wrong Class of Play ✓ Class of Play II at 50 foot candles vs. Class of Play IV at 20 foot candles I Note: Baseball field I is designed at or below illumination levels between Class Ill and IV(Packer Engineering report dated April 14,2006) ✓ Results of mistake > Field is 2-1/2 times brighter than needed > Higher installation costs > Player visibility issues > Greater neighborhood impact 7. Inadequate lighting design (4 poles vs,8 poles) ✓ Longer aiming angles ✓ Excessive glare for players and neighborhood 8. Additional mitigation actions for compliance with Ordinance 1361 and for reducing field illuminance to Class IV levels ✓ Change lamps(bulbs)from 1500 watts to 1000 watts(approximately$13,000 plus labor) ✓ Remove appropriate number of lamps and re-aim fixtures ✓ Replace current lamps(bulbs)with ones of softer radiance ✓ Install larger concentric cone type visors • Re-design field from 4 pole system to 8 pole system ✓ Measure and document foot lamberts for glare for inclusion in Ordinance 1361 ✓ Perform additional grid analysis as required 3/21/14 SYNTHETIC FIELD ITI TION RECOMMENDATION Price Estimates from Musco Parts Department The cost to purchase either a 1500 or a 1000 watt metal halide bulb would be $68,00 each. The cost to purchase al 000 watt metal halide 480 volt ballast would be $145.00. The existing sockets will accept 1000 watt bulbs, and the 1000 watt ballast will mount as a direct replacement for the 1500 watt ballast currently used. Each bulb requires its own ballast; each cluster of 15 luminaries has the ballasts and controls mounted in three enclosures on each pole. Using 1000 watt bulbs would create a greater than 33% immediate saving on the ever rising cost of electricity,. The total cost for 60 bulbs and ballasts purchased from Musco would be$12,780.00 plus labor. The company doing ball field lighting maintenance should be capable of doing the conversion. Note: See "Control System Summary" on next page for lamp specifications. 3/31/14 p Control F.-:---.:;:r.-'3.T_. -} - � Oak Brook�er 1 13t059-1n O sznagraxccss ' .uc soccer, age 3 oil ' ffCHHW1G SCHEDULE Field Typo Zones' Zone- ptio CONTROL POWER CONSUMPTION Soccer` 1 No th Soccer- 120V Single Phase Soccer 1,2 Main Soccer Soccer 2 Solt Soccer VA loading -INRUSH: 100-65_0 of Muses Supplied SEALED: 189.0 Equiprteri • BALLAST SPECIFICATIONS VOLTAGE:-410v THREE PHASE - ` --- _9O taiir numP-over"Fac€Dr . • BALLAST OPERA I.NG VOLTAGE 208 0 240. ( 277 347 380 T _. t . 1 - ilr_ 1509 e Mew Halide Lamp 8.6 T:::- .'":7-,76 - 6.5: 5.1 0,0 - 31. . - - rit AITIPeraje Pe crn+ 1 - -1 0°Watt.Ilieai'Haliide LarriP' 6.5 = 5.8;-::: :6.a '-.4.9 4.0 3.0 29==" - f , frog sne anperageperlixlure,;maximum -= . ' - .. C C SUS 4 . .y ''Y ZONE •PAL S air. ,+.f.tl' S :oi= FULL ip corm R COW 4�'rTO ' L—ere t i fPTiQN BRAS LOAD :1 sizE Aan ss ii) - - • 9 - • AMPS • Si - North 37 1 _ S4 _- North _ 15 37 -"89' C2 - L 1 S2 South 15 - 37° -50- G3 2 s3 south . 1s . 37 'Ss t c4 2 • „• 1840 -N.e - X?,cXtfNtXXY6),Ci.e,VCW?5-WWAW- e giAgXXAMNX2(4, -"tX.OVCX:Y4Q.0 -,Y6-9351 2224- 137th Place S_E„; Bellevue.WA 980054032 Phone: 425.679.6550 Web: www,softlite.com March 3,2014 A.T. Cygan 12 Forest Gate Circle Oak Brook, IL 60523-2129 Subj: Sportslighting Illumination Level Recommendations File: 1843.01 Dear Tom: As you are aware,I have previously rendered my opinion to a number of individuals on the basis of the lighting level recommendations listed in RP-6. The Class of Play classifications from the RP are: Class I-Competition play before a large group (5000 or more spectators).Lighting criteria fir major Stadiums and arenas require special design considerations such as vertical and horizontal Illuminance values not covered by this practice,which may be defined by individual sports governing bodies and/or broadcasting organizations_ Class II-Competition play with facilities for up to 5000 spectators. Class III-Competition play with some spectator facilities. Class IV-Competition or recreational play only(limited or no provision for spectators These classifications refer mainly to the number of spectators with"competition play”included in each. The logic in this has never been clearly enunciated. It is my personal and professional opinion that the number of spectators is the predominant criteria and I have expressed this position on several occasions. This has not been much of an issue over the years but has gained increasing significance with some manufacturer's recommending much higher lighting levels for recreational play than those values listed in RP-6. It should be clearly understood that Class IV Illumination levels are completely adequate for the play of the game by any skill level. There are several important design considerations in the design of a sports lighting facility in addition to the illumination design level. The most important consideration is the location of the luminaires both vertically and horizontally. Some vendors utilize fewer poles with larger wattages just to meet some vendor described lighting level but that results in a very inadequate lighting system for both the players, spectators and neighbors. This is most unfortunate as it results in higher construction,operating and maintenance costs for a poor lighting system that irritates the surrounding community with excessive glare. Specialist in: illumination - Electrical Power&Controls -2- March 3,2014 The facility you have referred me to is a good example of over-lighting plus an inadequate lighting design. The use of four poles only to illuminate a soccer/football field results in longer aiming angles that direct glare into the eyes of the players as well as produce excessive offsite glare and spill light. This problem is exacerbated by an excessively high lighting level. A four pole design does work when the poles are placed further back from the field,usually in the corner areas and with mounting heights in the 100 foot elevation range. I have made written opinions on this subject of which you do have copies. You are welcome to include those along with your use of this opinion. I have also attached a copy of my resume. Sincerely J Kelvin Armstrong,P.E. Principal c:wa SectioMausine.ss FilesUOBFILEX830ForermicReFoiderk830-C Tam CygaMilr01 Lt g Levels.docx EXCERPTS FROM J DELVIN ARMSTRONG •IESNA member since May 1967 *Sports and Recreational Area Lighting Committee since early 80's Committee Member Vice Chairman (responsible for updating RP-6) Chairman Recommended Practice Task Force Chairman Flagstaff Dark Skies Coalition Letter 6-20-06 "The classification system was intended to specify the amount of illumination necessary to play a particular sport. This was defined as Class IV illumination. Many people mistakenly believe that more skilled players cannot play at Class IV illumination levels. So let me emphatically state at this point that Class IV illumination levels are satisfactory for the play of the game by players of all skill levels. The higher illumination levels specified in Class III,Class II, and Class I are primarily related to the number of spectators and their distance from their field of play. The recommendation for the type of play (recreational,etc.)then is primarily based on the expected number of spectators and their location with respect to the field. A chart was prepared to provide general guidelines on this design element. Class IV illumination levels are completely adequate for the play of the game for which they are specified. Higher lighting levels result in increased installation costs, increased maintenance costs, increased operating costs,and substantially more off site impacts. In most cases,they do not contribute to increased visibility for the players,and in some instances, may actually detract from the players'ability to see. This is because higher wattage luminaries are oftentimes utilized with narrow beams,and the glare to the players can be quite intense. I have been involved in the design of over 750 lighted athletic facilities in the Pacific Northwest. With the exception of the Kingdome,the Key Arena,and a minor league baseball field,all have been designed to Class IV levels. There has never been a complaint in over 35 years about insufficient illumination levels. In summary, I would give my strongest recommendation for a design based on Class IV illumination. You will have happier players, happier owners, and happier neighbors." Email dated 12-19-13 "The lowest recommended level for a particular sport is sufficient for play by ANYONE. While higher lighting levels are recommended for reasons of age or the skill of the players,the real reason is for the spectators based on the distance of the furthest one from the field of play. But in actuality,the real reason is broadcast TV that requires the highest levels for the studio level broadcast. That has now become standard for most sports." Email dated 12-20-13 "Two hundred lux is very well suited for soccer,however, I normally designed to 250 lux because when you achieved proper coverage and CV values,you were at the 250 design level. As you may know, my preferred design utilizes full cut off,forward throw luminaries installed on 8 lighting standards. Two poles are on each side. This provides superior visibility for the players and greatly reduces off site impact as the luminaries can be aimed up close to the pole. " RESUME J.Delwin Armstrong,P.E. 2224—137th Place S.E. Bellevue,Washington 98005-4032 Phone: 425.679.6550 Email: del @sc.ft:11. Cell: 206.601.7312 Web Page: www.soft1ite.com/soft Education: Bachelor of Science-Electrical Engineering-University of Utah, 1963 Registration: Professional Electrical Engineer in: State of Washington#10935-30 August 1968 State of Idaho#2220-3 February 1971 State of Alaska#EE 2177- 1 April 1971 State of Oregon#07487PE- 14 July 1972 Professional Experience: January 1969 to Present Principal Engineer-Armstrong Engineers,Inc. (Formerly.JD-21 Engineers) Engineer of record on numerous sportsfield illumination projects. Clients include the City of Seattle,King County, City of Bellevue,Lake Washington School District,Bellevue School District Shoreline School District,Issaquah School District,Seattle Supersonics and numerous others. Responsible for streetlight*design of several major streets including: Mercer Island Central Business District (CBD)-Over 30 Square Blocks Kent-West Valley Highway @ Three Major Intersections Bellevue- 148th Street,Bellevue Way and the Bellevue CBD Bellingham-Chestnut Street,Ellis Street,Roeder Avenue King County-S.W. 320th Street,200th Street North,and numerous other streets and roadways. Developed the lighting criteria for the Metro Park&Ride lots and provided the lighting design on most of those now built. Developed the lighting criteria for the Trident facility for the U.S.Navy. Responsible for the complete engineering services for the Mount Baker LID's for Seattle City Light including both streetlighting and the primary and secondary electrical distribution system and telephone system for the area. Designed illumination for the Cable-Stayed Bridge in Huntington,West Virginia,Tacoma, Washington and Pasco,Washington. Provided electrical engineering for several sewerage lift stations including the telemetry. Other projects include sewerage treatment stations,water pumping and storage, salmon fish hatcheries and a major flood control project at French Creek. Provided engineering for the Centerline and Touchdown zone lighting at McChord A.F.B. including all the electrical switchgear and controls. Resume J.Delvin Armstrong,P.E. Page 2 Participated in the IES Roadway Lighting Delegation to China in 1987 and delivered lectures in several Chinese cities including Beijing. Participated in the 1ES Roadway Lighting Delegation to Europe in 1990 and visited in Eindhoven,the Netherlands,Dornbirn,Austria,Koblenz,Germany,Hanover Fair,and other sites of significance to outdoor illumination. Provides forensic services for lighting related disputes. This has been a minor but important activity over the years as there are few people with extensive expertise in illumination related issues. Deliver Seminars on Roadway Illumination Design in conjunction with the University of Wisconsin. These seminars are presented in Madison,Wisconsin as well as sites around the Country. It has included Philadelphia,Las Vegas,Los Angeles,Anchorage and others. June 1963 to January 1969 Lighting Sales Engineer-Westinghouse Electric Corporation Provided design coordination with Design Professionals in Washington and Alaska concerning the proper application of lighting equipment manufactured by Westinghouse. Professional Societies: Member-Illumination Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Member-Roadway Lighting Committee of the TFSNA Member&Past Chairman-Sportsfield Lighting Committee of the IESNA Member-National Society of Professional Engineers ISPE) Member-Washington Society of Professional Engineers (WSPE) Publications: Article-"The Kent Concept" Lighting Design&Application, April 1974 Article-"Relighting Seattle's Kingdome" Lighting Design.&Application,February, 1982 Paper-"A New Measure of Uniformity For Lighting Installations" Presented At: IESNA Annual Conference,Orlando,Florida, August, 1989 Published In: Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society,Volume 19 Number 2 Summer 1990,Pages 84-89 Article-"Shining Bright"-American School&University,July, 1993 Article-'Woking Sense of Mixed Lamps"-Lighting Design&Application,May,2008 D:\Business Files\OBFlLElRESUME\RES,IDAApex BASEBALL FIELD 1—RECAP • Present lighting is unacceptable and has changed since the 2005 mitigation actions were negotiated and accepted by the Village, Park District, and Forest Gate • No documented glare measurements were made in 2005 and,therefore,there is no means of comparison 1 Forest Gate visually identified intrusive glare and source of light issues in 2005 until mitigation efforts proved successful • No complaints from Forest Gate from 2005 to 2012 2012 complaints surfaced when glare and source of light issues returned > Village Trustees and others noticed the excessive glare at on site visit in fall of 2012 > Issue of increased glare since 2005 was confirmed by Village staff at on site visit in March of 2013 • Resident complaints increased > Park District acknowledged apparent change • Ordinance 1361 specifically includes reference to mitigation needs for Baseball Field 1 lighting because of the acknowledged change in glare and source of light. • Possible reasons for change leading to recurrence of glare and source of light issues 1 Improper maintenance • Improper re-lam ping (see note on page 2) 1 Weather related aiming changes • Damage by baseballs or other objects • Consultant's report documents considerable glare through spot meter measurements ranging from 6.2 foot lamberts to 70.0 foot lamberts. See TAB 5, page 2. Foot lamberts between 20 and 30 would be acceptable to Forest Gate. • Possible actions to be taken Conduct a comprehensive study of the maintenance of the lighting system. If formal records are not available, utilize Accounts Payable data to identify and review invoices and documents on maintenance performed 1 Retain Qualite technician to: > Check for appropriate lamping(see Qualite chart that follows) > Confirm original visors are still intact • Re-aim fixtures to acceptable levels of glare and source of light attained in 2005 > Measure and document foot lamberts for glare and for inclusion in Ordinance 1361 > Perform a current grid analysis > Pay particular attention to poles S and W. See TAB 5, page 2 Recap of Baseball Field 1 Page 2 0 Regarding re-tamping, note the following discrepancies in the consultant's report: 1. According to the report,the only re-lamping that occurred was in September of 2012 (which coincides with the resurfacing of Forest Gate complaints); however, at the March 28, 2013 on site meeting,the Park District indicated that re tamping had occurred several times since the original installation in 2005. 2. The contractor, Fitzgerald Lighting, invoiced the Park District on March 9, 2012 for 12 bulbs which did not meet specification.When questioned by the consultant,they indicated that the nomenclature on the invoice was in error, and the correct bulbs were actually installed. How can we be sure of this? 3. No one can provide the location of the 12 replacement lamps.There were no records kept or they were not made available. Note that the 12 replacement lamps were scattered over all four baseball fields. 4. Note the invoice date vs.the date of re-larnpirig.The invoice is dated March 9, 2012 while the re-lamping,according to the report, was done in September 2012. How could it happen that any company would bill for services and parts six months before the work was done? 5. The lighting system on baseball field 1 has 44 lamps (30 Professional Series #MS1650BT56 and 14 International Series#M1500T8DE). Is it possible that since 2005,only one re-lamping occurred,and no International Series lamps were replaced anywhere(as specified on the invoice)? For additional detail, refer to Lamp Specifications on the following pages. March 31, 2014 Fkizgeralci Liohtinsi .,, ..._ Phone: 630-513-7147 Fax: 630-513-5872 Number: 2-063 , . 1-..: ,.... 1585 Beverly anirt.Suite 104 1 Aurora, IL 50502 Date: 3/9/2012 . source:SO Mo. 10716 Bili-To Shia-To Oak Brook Park District Attn: Norm Russell 1450 Forest C-ate IRA Oak Brook Park District Oak Brook, IL 60523 1450 Forest Gate Rd Oak Brook, IL 60523 Phone: (630)645-9531 Acct. No. AIR Cust.No. Customer PO Reference Sal. -Ren Ship Via Terms 2692 2692 Sara Rybarczyk Net 30 i Per NOM Russell, he wants us to and insivcr&se/vice-4 ball fields(all located together at the address on file,). He has 15-13 bulbs out. We arrived onsite and contacted Norm who met us outside. Re unlock ed Sky logic panel and we armed on lion'ts. Norm asked That we look into fixing a security fixture that had fallen off one of the ballfield poles, We walked the peitTieter and tbi....7.---! "2=2'',7i.7e.5. However, we did not find where the fixture carte from and Norm gel have his gu.ys look at it since they are installed at apex 15`. We relaniped The o ,,rages. There were a couple ---broken lamps and very dirty lens on fixtures that took NTIE w dean. The lights are now properly working. We a message for ft/arm about the fixture. 7------'7.--t-&:::1 12 1SOOMH 1500-4.=-.:4H 9T56 n lamp EA s89.92 sl.,079.04 17.03 Lamp R.:Kw:Inc EA 52.35 S28.20 - 1,00 Service Cali-Prevailing Wage to 100 ft. EA 5312.25 $312.25 5.25 Labor- Prevailing Wage 49 to 100 ft. HR. .*.169,00 51,056_25 Item Total: 52,475.74 HST: $0.00 Total Amount Due: $2,475.74 _C; I-, 6 I .,..,„›. 4-=. ---,s __ r P\ , ) , .---1 -.. I . 41C-- c , ..- v\i, f----1 - , ,cc( c..-- .--"' fe- den3t :- nair ltami- , '') il (..' il 1, Iril / i %,,-;,. 4' ,,,,,,,,,--.',. 4, ,,,,, t , ,,,, ,,,,,vi ...,1- ,,, , i , v ,.„.,. ...,,, ,... ,,,..,...,,,,. ;..... ,, 1.1 ,o, 1■ , .,.:, , .1.,, I. : : i , . e gr 0 C , ..,. ) if 4"4 4€0-)'' • I 4 "1," 1 '' ---' k . ..,...,,,€ - €€ 4 1 ' € 1 •-) ': ', ' "$ • k , 1 i ,. 1 ', .'1 , , , , , '-- ; ., Al Aft/ 1-,., t- 1 r,-. I ' I ,,' ,' ', ;, ,,,,ii . 1 , '', '.„*:?';" 7 i I , ., , ,,, ', ; ' • ' : ',' 1 It• : , '' '' ' ..,, _ ,_,...,........., ) z oc"."... sip tz) r',.i...... S,(. • 1'-' 1 1 ' 0 '' ' ) 1 ) - ) .., ) €0' 1 --„ , . . , . . ,. , , .,„ ,, ,, .... , . „,...,.. .,..,...,„..,. . ... . . .,.._ _,......,....,.........„„ .,. . ,,,, , , , r........," i.,,,,..., o Lt„?..-*'. cooy, i' i o v BASEBALL FIELD 1 LAMP SPECIFICATIONS Total of 44 needed: • 14 International Series M1500T8DE—1500 Watt Metalarc Briteline double ended (also available in 2000 watt) • 30 Professional Series IVIS165OBT56—1650 Watt Probe Start Lamps Note: Spec sheets follow 3/31/14 Product Information Bulletin TA C® Double-Ended High Output Metal Halide L. ps Smaller light source allows for higher-fixture efficiency m Closer positioning of the reflector to the lamp allows more light out of the fixture and aimed to the desired area • Compact,high-intensity,double-ended metal halide V lamps u 1 Single point of contact for lamp and ballast questions, technical and warranty issues •ideal lamp for sports lighting applications •Available in 1500 and 2000 watts SYLVANIA METALARC BRITELINE 1500 and 2000 watt lamps are compact,high-intensity,double-ended metal w Ridb Shape Rase halide sources. 1500 T7 RX7S RiRSC The compact shape allows for higher fixture efficiency TB Ceramic,#8-10 spade compared to other lamps with a large outer jacks:. she increased fixture efficiency can reduce the amount 2600 Ta Rx7S ARSE of"wasted"light thereby reducing the total fixture count T9 Ceramic,#8-10 spade _ i arvviatti9 the same or nigher levels of itturrtina von. METALARC BRITELINE lamps are ideal for use in indoor and outdoor sports arenas and stadiums as well as for area flood lighting; Ordering Avg.Rated Initial Mean Item Number Abbreviation Watts life (hrs.) Lumens Lumens' Results' 64431 M1500/8U-NOR 1500 3000 153,000 127,400 66632 11500T8M0E 1500 6000 150,000 127,500 Twice the lamp lite 66631 M2000T9/DE 2000 3000 180,000 153,000 20%higher maintained light output M1500181.i-HOR:mean lumens rated at 1200 hours,M1500T8/OE mean lumens rated at 2400 hours 2 Compared to M1500/BU-HOR tams in the hor"zontai burning position Applications Application rioter Sports arenas/stadiums,outdoor sports fields,area flood 1.Lamps must be used in a suitably enclosed fixture_ lighting and architectural lighting 2.Operating position:Horizontal only±4°tip up. Fixtures 3.All metal halide and high pressure sodium lamps may be Consult your local fixture agent for available fixtures. operated in any position. METALARC BRITEL1t4E fixture design guide including amp specifications and recommendations on fixture design is available from OSRAM SYLVANIA. Sample Specifications Lamp(s)shall be item Onderin" g ANSI Average Rated initial Mean (a)mErALARC BRIM- Number Abbreviation Watts Bulb Rase Ballast Life(hours) Lumens beams CRY CHI 1NE double-ended metal 66619 Ml 50if17/DE 1500 17 RX7S RRSC MP 3000 150,000 127,500 4200K 65 .ratide lamp(s)and shall r,--65532 M1500T8/DE 1500 18 Ceramic#6-10 Spade MI 33/F 6000 150,000 127,500 4200K 65 have an 85%mean 66627 N12000T8/0E 2000 78 RX7S RRSC MP 3000 200,000 170,000 400OK 65 66631 M200019/DE 2000 19 Ceramic 48-10 Spade M134/F 3000 180,000 153,000 4200K 65 lumen maintenance. Lamp(s)shall have 'Consult yOur OSRAM SYLVANIA iighting representative for trap/ballast cornpatibilery a correlated color temperature of 4200K and a CIRI of 65. Typical Lumen Maintenance Typical Mortality Curve 110 _ 100 . 80 a at .... LI 2 1 lc: ---- IL ' 0 ., , 0 ,z... . o to 20 m 40 50 00 70 80 SO 100 0 10 0 2:1 40 51 00 10 00 so 100 ... Percent of Rated Life Percent of Rated Lamp Life i' _ so, m..' T 31 (R) (a) (C3 .., ri Ordering MOL LO. Diameter Abbreviafran (arm) (,,,, (mm) A M150017/DE 256 127 170.5 M150018/05 254 127 110 M2000T7/DE 254 127 180 8 M200018/DE 254 127 108 c M 211DD T a I DE , M r-- Wattage: Tubular Nominal diameter in Double-ended MEMLARC 1000,1500 or 2000 watts eighths of an inch OSRAM SYLVANIA National Customer Service and Sales Center 18725 N.Union Street Operate In Enclosed Fixtures Only Westfield,IN 46074 Industrial Conirriercial To reduce the risk of personal injury and property damage resulting from an arc-tube rupture,this lamp must be oper- Pro 1-800-255-5042 ated in a suitably enclosed fixture and the"Proper Care and Maintenance"instructions must be followed.A suitably ne: Fax: 1-800-255-5043 enclosed fixture uses lenstdiffuser material able to contain hot lamp fragments(up to 1832°F, 100000).Enclosed fix-. National Accounts tures which comply with UL 1598/CSA 022.2 No.250 should withstand an arc-tube rupture.If you do not know Phone:1-800-562-4671 whether your fixture can safely withstand an arc-tube rupture,contact your fixture manufacturer. Fax 1-800-5524674 Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure OEM/Spec:ratty Markets 1-- 0 This lamp can cause serious skin burn and eye inflammation from shortwave ultraviolet radiation.It MUST be operated --- Phone:1-800-762-7191 . 1-ax: 1-WO-762-7192 in an enclosed fixture which biters out the shortwave ultraviolet radiation,Use ONLY in equipment provided with a Ions cover of high temperature akominosilicate ghags or equivalent which filters out harmful shortwave ultraviolet radiation. z bistolay/DPtin < A lens that meets the requirements of UL 1598/CSA 022.2 No.250,section 9.4,titled,"ultraviolet(UV),attenuation ?J` Phone:1-883-677-2M7 barriers for metal halide lamps without integral UV blocking outer glass envelopes'should fulfill this requirement, Fax- 1-800-782-71W A power interlock device is strongly recommended to automatically turn oft the temp if fixture assembly is opened In Canada cc OSRAM SYLVANIA LTD. or lithe fixture lens is broken.it the fixture lens breaks and the lamp remains on,turn off power immediately and repair u) o Headquarters before re-energizing. J--- 2001 Drew Road o Mississauga,ON L5S IS4 Due to the ultraviolet hazard,this lamp is to be used ONLY in equipment specifically designed for use with this lamp 45, industrial Commercial and recommended for its use by the equipment manufacturer. 'tone:1-800-263-2852 s.: 1-800-657-6772 Special Market* Phone:1-800-265-2852 Fax 1-800-667-6772 tamp Type Standard Mil Single add Lew Watts 1650 ANSI Code_ _._Mi112/E lump Oper.-Voltage Oka.) 270 VENTURE $tilh� 0T56 i■► Base Type __ _ Mogul POMB f EP39) Bulb Finish Clear Recycling Program Swipe 800-451-2606 Rifted life 3000 hours; Operaii ing Position Horizontal'AO' Dimming N/A NOTES temp performance Wings published in this data sheet ore based on ,€ . Performance of posifion-rated lamas outside of their talerames a result in poor performance.Permitted Initial lumens 177000 mute about axis J.--1S.To •x,, mutiiply the lumen rates by the S/P Tatra. Lumens Per Watt 107 Scott*battens(S/P 1.4) 2 tamp Lumen Depredation DID) .02(82n)@ 1200 hours Correlated Color Temperature 3200K Chromaticity Coordinates(C1€-x,y) A20 .395 C CRI}Rendering index f , 70 PHYSICAL Bulb Diameter 7.0°(180mm) Max Overall Length(MOU 131(391mm) tight Center length(L ) 9.5°{241 mmi Effective Effecirve Arc Length 85.0 ti m { Max.Base Temperature(CC) 250 ? Max.Bulb Temperature(°C) 430 Socket Pulse Rang( irttt itmiie Type ._.._ Enclosed Rated Horizontal 45�� w °. 7-- �.r -. -,T.-...... .t q t z Mewl" k x o4, MO 111 _ 3 Ts __ r l - -- Dia.= 7.0 1$0mm) .m ( i 1 I ,5 i �rLL)L= 1�' fit mm1 a .,. LpG�L�Base X455 (2p41mm) pZ 10 t Base= Mogul E t"t i (1P39) 4:, - ',', 01__ 0 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 so 7s 10 le t eJert t'h(nun) %Life or (440) 248-3510 Cox_(800)451-2605 THIS LAMP CONFORMS TO t13)ERAtSTANDARD 21.CFR 1040.30 10295 Philipp Parkway c�� ' tmmg7 iII1C St;ttt�dd g11d Ly2 i terQet i'lSRi 6 ., p. S t r e e t s h a r c r,Ohio 4424) U S A union t oo rgol oll oulgroodme el the twap sbmmen er voodi rmL De �-; R E-mail:venture@acllt.ccsm ' peril t fer than a lea attunes unless o: "' iri COMMENTS ON CONSULTANT'S REPORT Original comments dated January 18,2014. Three additions,noted by*asterisk,added March 6 and 22,2014 We are disappointed with the report from the consultant. Aside from the obvious(the consultant's professional opinion and summary),with the exception of two site visits,we are disappointed with the interaction and lack of communication with the consultant. Some ongoing conversation could have resulted in a better report. Be that as it may, we find the report lacking in complete analysis and somewhat antidotal in nature. It relies on history-36 of the 41 pages have been photocopied from Village or Park District records.To a great extent, it tells us what was done versus what could be done. Here are our other comments: Scope of Services,page 1 of 5 was to include recommended actions to further mitigate glare. Refer to the ATCygan email to Dave Niemeyer dated 6/25/13 (attached to the consultant's report).The consultant excluded this from his Scope of Services. Source of Light and Glare issues were not adequately addressed in the report. Glare can be measured with a Spot Meter, measurements can be recorded and analyzed, and actions to lower the readings can be recommended. Village Lighting Ordinances, pages 1 and 2 of 5.The consultant did not spend much time on this.Aside from correcting the obvious and doing some wordsmithing,the recommendation eliminates glare and source of light as an important part of the ordinance.Substituting "Complying with, IESNSA recommended practice," etc. is too liberal.The recommendation does not protect the community. Any revision to the ordinance should include references to glare (quantified in terms of foot lamberts), source of light,visors,shielding, height of poles, class of play, etc.There is a lot of work that needs to be done, but the language has not been clarified. illumination Measurements, pages 3-5-Synthetic Turf Field.An obvious conclusion when comparing measurements from September 25, 2013 to those taken on December 2,2013 was not made. On Lot 68, FLs quadrupled (from 11 FLs to 43 FLs). On Lot 69, FLs doubled (from 20 FLs to 40 FLs). * It seems reasonable that any report should have made comment on the differences-mostly caused by the leaves being off the trees. Keep in mind that on December 2, the lights were further mitigated by the installation of additional visors which were installed earlier that day and yet the FL's increased. Furthermore, Spot Meter measurements were taken from several locations on both lots yet only the maximum readings were shown. All measurements need to be detailed and documented. Comments on Consultant's Report Page 2 Illumination Measurements, pages 3-5-Ball field 1 Spot Meter Foot Lambert measurements are reported but difficult to read.The following table will clarify the numbers: POLE FIELD LOCATION FOOT LAMBERTS 1st base near home plate 6.2 ✓ 1st base near right field Y Right field 24.0 W Left field 39.0 U Third base near left field 26.0/30.0 two locations S Third base near home plate 70.0/70.0 two locations Notes: No measurement was reported for Pole V. It either was omitted or not measured. Lamberts of 6.2 were described as best case while 70 lamberts represented worst case. It seems reasonable that the report would have included some commentary on these measurements. Engineering Analysis and Evaluation, pages 4-5-Ball field 1. • Class of Play is noted as Class Ill, but foot candle grid analysis conducted by Packer Engineering, Inc indicates that it is lighted between Class of Play IV and III which is acceptable. o Reports/letters from Lighting Solutions of Illinois (dated July 21, 2005), Fulton Contracting Co. (January 23, 2006), and Packer Engineering, Inc. (April 14, 2006) are attached to the consultant's report and referenced, but aside from presenting an interesting view of history, the narrative on glare is not helpful. These reports did not utilize a Spot Meter for their off field measurements,and the numbers were reported in foot candles which are not appropriate for the measurement of glare.The consultant's measurements were made with a Spot Meter and reported in foot lamberts which are appropriate for the measurement of glare. Unfortunately, no comparisons can be made with the previous reports without more data. • During the December 2, 2013 onsite meeting,the 6.2 FL's measurement was determined as the best case scenario and one which should serve as a baseline standard going forward. Comments on Consultant's Report Page 3 • The issue as mentioned previously is-what happened between 2005-2006 and March 28, 2013? We believe the answer lies with the maintenance and re-lamping of the fixtures. * Regarding re-tamping, note the following discrepancies in the consultant's report: 1. According to the report,the only re-lamping that occurred was in September of 2012,however, at the March 28, 2013 on site meeting,the Park District indicated that re-lamping had occurred several times since the original installation in 2005. 2. The contractor, Fitzgerald Lighting, invoiced the Park District on March 9, 2012 for 12 bulbs which did not meet specification. When questioned by the consultant,they indicated that the nomenclature on the invoice was in error, and the correct bulbs were actually installed. How can we be sure of this? 3. No one can provide the location of the 12 replacement lamps.There were no records kept or they were not made available. If we believe the Fitzgerald invoice,the replacement lamps are scattered on baseball fields 1, 2, 3, and 4. 4. Note the invoice date vs.the date of re-lamping.The invoice is dated March 9, 2012 while the re-lamping, according to the report,was done in September 2012. How could it happen that any company would bill for services and parts six months before the work was done?** 5. On baseball field 1,the lighting system has 44 lamps (30 Professional Series #MS1650BT56 and 14 International Series#M1500T8DE). is it possible that since 2005,only one re-lamping occurred and not one International Series lamp was replaced? *** • Throughout this section,the consultant uses the word, "appears" and assumes that there are no issues with the re-tamping of the fixtures. Based on all of the confusion within this section,we don't know how a professional opinion can be given as to the acceptability of the lights. The correct professional opinion should be that,without further analysis and research, no opinion can be given. We still don't know what happened between 2005-2006 and March 28, 2013. At a minimum,the consultant should be recommending actions to close the gap between the 6.2 FL's and the 70 FL's measurements. Instead the report assumes that nothing has changed. Engineering Analysis and Evaluation, page 5 of 5-Synthetic Turf Field. • Contrary to the report,the design does not comply with the source of light and glare requirements of the Village ordinance. Comments on Consultant's Report Page 4 • Class of Play is the issue in this section. The Park District acknowledges that it specified Class II, and Musco acknowledges that it supplied lighting for Class II. Forest Gate contends,supported by expert opinion, that the synthetic turf field lighting is designed for a Class of Play beyond its intended usage.The consultant's report demonstrates a lack of understanding of the Class of Play categorization. Class of Play is determined by spectator capacity NOT skill levels. Class of Play IV, according to experts, is well suited for all skill levels.The synthetic turf field lights were designed for Class of Play II which can accommodate up to 5,000 spectators. In this section,the consultant does not challenge the Class of Play specified and supplied but goes on to indicate that the lighting of the field meets the foot candle requirements of Class II. "A correlation exists between the size of a facility and level of play. For example, a higher skill level attracts a greater number of spectators.As the number of spectators increases, their distance from the playing surface increases, and their need for increased illuminance to see players and tasks requires the values to increase."(The Lighting Handbook and RP-6-01). • Another issue is that the consultant did not perform his own grid analysis but relied on a Musco analysis dated April 2012.The lights were not installed until late summer of 2012.An independent grid analysis should have been conducted. • Lastly,we believe detail needs to be provided on the number and size of the visors installed,which poles were affected, and which lights were shielded.The field has four poles, 15 lights per pole for a total of 60 lights. Summary-page 5 of 5.We disagree with the summary and conclusion to this report. • In terms of Ball field 1, no conclusion can be reached.The consultant was unable to determine what changed from 2005-2006.There was general agreement on March 28, 2013 that the lights were brighter, more intrusive, and produced more glare than previously. More research and analysis is required. • In terms of the synthetic turf field, Class II is the wrong Class of Play category. Musco has not done everything possible to mitigate the glare issue.Additional actions should be considered: Comments on Consultants Report Page 5 1. Lower the intensity of the lights by reducing wattage. 2. Replace strategically identified lamps with those with softer radiance. 3. Remove an appropriate number of lamps. 4. Install larger and concentric/cone-type visors. 5. Experiment with lowering the light masts on each pole. Lastly, please refer to the Packer Engineering report, page 3,dated April 14, 2006 which details actions for consideration to further reduce glare(attached to the consultant's report). Tom Cygan cc Forest Gate Board of Directors