Minutes - 01/06/2015 - Zoning Board of AppealsMINUTES OF THE JANUARY 6, 2015 REGULAR
MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF
THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPROVED AS
WRITTEN ON MARCH 3, 2015
1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Acting
Chairman Alfred Savino in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler
Government Center at 6:59 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL
Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: Acting Chairman Alfred Savino, Members Jeffrey Bulin, Natalie
Cappetta and Wayne Ziemer
ABSENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Members Baker Nimry and Steven
Young
IN ATTENDANCE: Dr. Mark Moy, Trustee, Robert Kallien, Jr., Director of
Community Development and Gail Polanek, Planning
Technician
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES
REGULAR MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 2 2014 MEETING
Motion by Member Cappetta, seconded by Member Ziemer to approve the
minutes of the September 2, 2014 Regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting as
written. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business to discuss.
5. NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS
A. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION BY TJ DESIGN COSTCO- I90I22-
STREET.-
STRATEGIES LTD. — 1901 22ND STREET — VARIATION — FRONT VARIATION -
YARD SETBACK — AMEND ORDINANCE S -900 FRONT YARD
SETBACK
Acting Chairman Alfred Savino announced the public hearing and stated the
requested relief. He noted that the property had previously been granted a
variation in 1998 (Ordinance S -900) to permit a reduction of the 40 -foot front
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 1 of 6 January 6, 2015
yard setback to 38 feet when Costco Wholesale purchased the property from
Eastman Kodak. They were seeking a further reduction from 38 feet to 32 feet
to construct a new entrance vestibule, which is required with the conversion of
some indoor parking for office space. The encroachment sought is not for the
entire length of the north side of the building (entire length is 443 feet).
All witnesses providing testimony were sworn in.
Jeri Krieg, TJ Design Strategies, represented the applicant, Costco Wholesale as
their development manager in the Midwest. They have taken approximately
half of their underground parking converting it to additional office space,
conference rooms for vendors that come in and a presentation kitchen. The
conversion will better control the amount of traffic that comes into the office
operations. Currently, visitors can go upstairs without anyone really controlling
where they go. Vendors would typically go to the Seattle office, but they are
trying to control more regional vendors that have products for the Costco office.
The vestibule is coming out approximately 6 feet and will not change the
existing driveway. The vestibule itself is just less than 17 feet, but there is a
channel that extends above the vestibule making the encroachment
approximately 36.4 feet.
When the architects discussed the modification with the building department
they were advised that a variance would be required to install it.
Ms. Krieg reviewed the standards for a variation as follows:
1. a. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the
regulations governing the district in which it is located.
RESPONSE: Costco's Midwest Regional Office has outgrown their current
location. They prefer to remain at this warehouse thus proposing expansion
into the existing parking garage area. The Oak Brook building department
requested entrance vestibule along 22nd street office access.
1. b. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances.
RESPONSE: This property has already received a setback variation from the
original code of 40 feet to 38 feet. The vestibule addition along 22nd Street will
require this setback to be amended to 32 feet.
1. c. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 2 of 6 January 6, 2015
Im
RESPONSE: The variation, if granted will not alter the essential character of
the locality, in fact will actually enhance the entrance location for the Midwest
Office, thus providing for easier office entrance identification to visitors.
2. a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical
conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular
hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if
the strict letter of the regulation were to be carried out.
RESPONSE: Due to current setback restrictions, as well as updated
requirements, this medication would not be possible as requested by the
building department for the office expansion request.
2. b.The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not
be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning
classification.
RESPONSE: They believe that this property is one of a few along 22nd Street
that cannot meet the general setback. Since this building was previously owned
by Kodak and setback requirements have changed substantially since the
original construction.
2. c. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the
neighborhood in which the property is located.
RESPONSE: The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the
neighborhood in which the property is located.
2. d.The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and
air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or
otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
RESPONSE: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or
otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
2. e. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire
to make more money out of the property.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 3 of 6 January 6, 2015
RESPONSE: This variation is a request for Costco's Midwest Operations
office and is not a result of a desire to make more money, but instead to provide
adequate office space for the increase in company personnel needs.
2. £ That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any
person presently having an interest in the property.
RESPONSE: The hardship is based on Village setback requirements and the
original user's construction placement of the building on the parcel. No
revenue is generated directly from the Midwest Regional office for Costco.
Member Ziemer noted that the vestibule extends approximately 6'2" and then
the overhang extends another 1'4" making it extend approximately 7'6" beyond
the building.
Director of Community Development Kallien responded that whatever the
Zoning Board recommends will go to the Village Board.
Member Bulin questioned whether the 628 parking spaces noted on the plans
included those that were underground. He also asked how many interior spaces
would be lost.
Ms. Krieg responded that it was her understanding the underground parking
spaces were not included in the counts. She was not sure of the number of
interior spaces that were being removed, but thought it might be around half.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that in terms of retail use for
the overall building, they meet the required parking requirements. He noted
that only a portion of the building is actually used for retail. He noted that the
interior spaces were not open for the retail use of the building and were never
counted.
Member Ziemer questioned where visitors /vendors park and how they access
the vestibule.
Ms. Krieg responded that they will park underground or in the parking lot and
walk along 22nd Street.
Member Bulin questioned whether there was a sidewalk along the building or if
they would walls along the drive.
Director of Community Development Kallien responded that the sidewalk is
located along 22nd Street.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 4 of 6 January 6, 2015
Ms. Krieg responded that there are a few parking spaces along the outside of
the building to the west of the building. She noted that vendors cannot come to
the building without an appointment.
Member Bulin questioned whether there should be a sidewalk.
Director of Community Development Kallien responded that it would become a
challenge because of the existing IDOT easement. The existing sidewalk and
road pavement are technically in Oakbrook Terrace and the Village would need
to seek some sort of link.
Dr. Moy commented that the request appeared to be straightforward.
There were no comments or questions from the audience.
Acting Chairman Savino noted that the Standards for a variation were well
addressed verbally and in writing on page D of the case file.
Motion by Member Bulin, seconded by Member Ziemer that the applicant had
satisfied the requirements for a variation and to recommend approval of the
variation to allow the vestibule addition to be located on the north side of the
Costco building in the front yard, subject to the following conditions:
1. Front t Yard — Reduce the existing 38 foot front yard setback to 32 feet
as measured to the eave, for an approximate length of 36'4 ". It was
noted that the applicant's request did not include a 1'4" overhead
channel located above the vestibule and was not shown clearly on the
plans. The Zoning Board found this to be reasonable and also
recommends approval of this encroachment should it be allowable;
2. The proposed development shall be constructed in substantial
conformance to the approved plans;
3. All other provisions of Ordinance 98- ZO -V -S -900 will remain in effect;
and
4. Add the condition "Notwithstanding the attached exhibits, the applicant
shall meet all Village Ordinance requirements at the time of building
permit application except as specifically varied or waived."
ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 — Members Bulin, Cappetta, Ziemer and Acting Chairman Savino
Absent: 3 — Chairman Davis, Members Nimry and Young. Motion carried.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 6 January 6, 2015
6. OTHER BUSINESS
Director of Community Development Kallien reviewed possible upcoming
cases.
There was no other business to discuss.
7. ADJOURNMENT:
Motion by Member Ziemer, seconded by Member Cappetta to adjourn the
meeting at 7:26 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert L. Kallien, Jr.
Director of Community Development
Secretary
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 6
January 6, 2015
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT