The URL can be used to link to this page

S-345 - 10/28/1975 - VARIATION - Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. G-60, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the owner of the hereinafter-described property has applied for a variation to Section V, F. of Ordinance No. G-60, the Zoning Ordinance-of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage County, Illinois, and WHEREAS, the necessary public hearing pursuant to proper notice has been held on the application for variation by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, and WHEREAS, the said Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended that a variation be granted, and } WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook have reviewed the findings and recommendation of the said Zoning Board of Appeals, and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook find that a variation should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage County, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: The provisions of the preamble hereinbefore set forth are restated herein as though herein fully set forth. SECTION 2: The provisions of Section V, F. are hereby varied to permit park- ing on the property herein described abutting Thirty-First Street in accordance with and as depicted on that certain Site Plan prepared by C. Edward Ware, A.I.A. , Architect, Rockford, Illinois, under Job No. 7427, Sheet No. SU-5 dated October 11, 1975, and revised October 16, 1975, a copy of which Site Plan is annexed hereto, identified as Exhibit A, and by this reference incorporated herein. SECTION 3: The real estate to which this variance is granted is legally described as follows, to-wit: The North 660 Feet of the East 880 Feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in DuPage County, Illinois. The subject real estate is commonly known as Christ Church of Oak Brook, Thirty-First Street and York Road, Oak Brook, Illinois. SECTION 4: All ordinances, rules, and regulations of the Village of Oak Brook which are in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict and only as they apply to the property hereinbefore described. SECTION 5: If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such determination shall not affect the validity of any remaining portion of this Ordinance. } SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by statute. PASSED and APPROVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook this tt day of 1975. APPROVED: sident -' ATTEST: Village Clerk AYES: ' NAYS: p ABSENT: c APPROVED AS TO FORM: i llage Attorney _ 2 _ Page 2 Minutes of March 9, 1976 IV. FINANCIAL (continued) -7 (as D. Investments None V. OLD BUSINESS A. Bid Recommendation-Traffic Signal Maintenance and Street Light Repair Contract Four bids were opened February 17, 1976. Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To award the contract to the low bidder, Contracting & Material Company at an annual amount of $14,160.00. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. B. Acceptance Water Revenue Analysis Report Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To accept the Water Revenue Analysis Report as prepared by Warren & Van Pragg, Inc. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. C. Capital Water Improvements Report Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To proceed with the prepatory work for issuance of revenue bonds for Capital Water Improvements in the amount of $3,000,000 with a fifteen (15) year amortization provision. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: Trustee Brown So ordered. D. Water Main Extension-Meyers Road & 35th Street Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To authorize advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1976 for 12" Water Main Extension. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 1976/77 Budget Report Trustee Cerne reported on the status of the budget based upon anticipated revenues. B. Street Name Change-St. Paschal 's Drive Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To approve naming the street presently known as Frontage Road between Oak Brook Road and 35th Street, as St. Paschal ' s Drive. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. C. Christ Church of Oak Brook-Request to Waive Fee Application for zoning variation was submitted and fee paid on October 3, 1975, then withdrawn prior to public hearing. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Rush. . . That the fee for reapplication for a zoning variation for Christ Church of Oak Brook Be waived. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, and Rush So ordered. Nayes: None Absent: None Abstain: President Howell So ordered. 379/75 -2- (continued) G Q 4 L F NOUN y R VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 June 10, 1976 Mr. Bernard L. Cozette 42 Bradford Lane OakBrook, Illinois 60521 Dear Mr. Cozette, The village board at their meeting of June 8, 1976 denied both requests for variations on the south side of the property and the east side of the property. The existing asphalt and appurtenances must be removed, concrete curbing constructed and landscaping provided along the south side as per the zoning ordinance. If we can be of any further service, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully yours, c Ken ,eth G. Carmig ani _> Village Manager KGC/ls Pag� , Min of June 8, 1976 V. OLD BUSINESS (continued) C. Bid Recommendation - Public Works Utility Tractor/Mower Two bids were opened May 28, 1976. Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Brown. . . To accept the low bid of West Side Tractor Sales for a Utility Tractor/ Mower for $4,953.34. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves and President Howell So Ordered. D. Saddle Brook Covenants The Final Plats Phase I and II were approved subject to Board approval of the covenants. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To approve the Saddle Brook covenants redraft dated June 6th as presented. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and Rush. Nayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves and President Howell So Ordered. E. Portec, 300 Windsor Drive, Variation - Loading Dock On June 1 , 1976 the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of a variation to locate the loading dock on the west side of the building. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. To approve the variation as recommended by the Zoning Board of Appeals and directed the attorney to prepare the required ordinance. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves and President Howell So Ordered. F. Mary Ann Doehrin , 3725 Madison Street, Side Yard Variation On June 1 , 1976 the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of a variation to allow the new roof overhang to project into the side yard. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To approve the variation as recommended by the Zoning Board of Appeals and directed the attorney to prepare the required ordinance. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves and President Howell So Ordered. G. Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation - Parking On June 1 , 1976 the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denial of the variation request for parking less than forty feet from the south property line and recommended approval of the variation request to allow parking in the side yard abutting York Road Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To deny the variation request for both the south and east yards prohibiting parking within forty feet of the south property line and prohibiting the driveway or parking area within one hundred feet of the east property line along York Road, except for the entrance drive; and further that the asphalt be removed in these areas and the landscape and curb requirements of the zoning ordinance be adhered to. Poll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and Rush Nayes : None Absent: Trustee Glaves and President Howell So Ordered. ZOtiIUG BOARD OF APPE4LS'" DATE OF HEARING- 6/1/6 APPLICANT: Christ Church of Oak Brook ADDRESS: 3100 So. York Road PRIOR HEARING: YES NO Lrf Date: 4/6/6 RELIEF SOUGHT: AMIE'_-MMENT APPEAL SPECIAL USE L� VARIATION ZXJ DECISION: REC0MA...NDED APPROVAL rf X/ _ East Variation RECOrk 'N'DED DENIAL X South'Variation CONTINUED WITHDRA.TA T?�i OTHER MEMBERS PRESENT ABSENT YES VOTE) NO ABSTAI`F Edward Fraser Virqil Fuller John Lavery X X' Arthur MuschlerMet;nn X X t X x W-K. Skinner X X John W. Baschen Chrm. X Recommendation of .Plan Commission: N/A Date- NA Referred to Plan Commission: NA Date: NA Y FULL TRANSCRIPT 'OF PROCEEDIISTGS by DuPAGE COUNTY REPORTING SEP.VICE M. T 10 N - To recommend to the Village Board denial of the variation request for the south property line and recommend approval . of the variation request for the east side of the property subject to the following findings of fact. w � PAGE l`f�FL7:'�1'IO�; -- FINDINGS and �tECO�I;tEtinAr['XO�;S (Complete Sections A, B, C and D) In support of its reco:ymencation of this Variation, the Zoning Board of i peals sets forth the followi.n- facts as required by the Zoninb Ordinance Section XXII G 4, said findings of fact being based on the evidence fires: to the Board: A. ? x �xxxx •x � xxx � . � x�xx • _ .{J• IMMAM9 xAxCi.41.xx1g3 x)0)MG�+f.•1 11.=0_ A1{x3t)FX C. The subject variation gill not alter the essen'i2;1: character. .o_ the locality D. The following supplemental :facts have also been- consiOered by Board pursuant to Zoninr; Ordinance Section X111, 1-4b as set forth- on th verse hereof: A hardsbip has been' demQnstratedby the petitioner _in providing access to handicapped parishioners. - I .'�_LUtea. Gb4.4vI.• vaCl.. vr.VVAAA. l.V )IA[ � \ X VIAL: LV_' 1L 1/.I.116 J.c Lil..�, J.CLVV.I.Ci. V LlIG e-Ij cat7-t,, . have been ester} shed by the evidence ( at : � (1) The par t Zcular physical S rr nd.ings, sii�, or tcipo;;ra :�icwl c�,- ditions of the specific property involved would brl.iig a pa. l_ rticuar hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a r,_ere inconveni ence if the strict letter of the xepiil atioa ti;,ere to be carried out . (2) The condition upon which the petition for variation _i s based wotild not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. (3) The granting of the variation will not be detri.Iental. to the public welfare • or injurious to other property or imiprovements in the neigh borliood in which -the propsrty' is Located - (4). The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light. and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety. or substantially diminish or impair property values within, the neighborhood. (5)- That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a - desire to make more- money out. of the proper ty'. (b) That the alleged difficulty 'or 'hardship, has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property.** a K_. *ge 2 of 7 pages o Zoning Boarrff f Appeals Minutes - June 1, 1976 3. CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK - VARIATIONS Mr. Bernie Cozette representing the Christ Church of Oak Brook and Reverend Arthur DeKruyter reviewed the revised site plan which was sub- mitted to the Village Board of Trustees on May 6 , 1976 . In summary, the new proposal provides for a 40 ft. setback before parking stalls begin on the south yard line in 100 ft . setback before parking stalls begin on the east property line . In both instances roadway paving would be within the required yards . Mr. Cozette stated .that .there was some question in his mind as to what material could be used as ground cover within the required front yard and side yard. He stated that his most recent proposal provides the following advantages to the site : (1) better traffic flow (2) maintaining a 100 yard setback free from parking stalls (3) maintain a 40 yard setback (south yard free from parking stalls. ) He mentioned that along the south yard, a five foot hedge screen would be provided within the 18 ft. of green space. Chairman Baschen asked for questions from the board. Mr. Lavery asked Mr. Cozette to locate the house to the south of Christ Church. Mr. Cozette proceeded to do so. Mr. Baroni then asked if construction has occurred within the required 40 ft . setback recently. Rev. DeKruyter said that it had not. Mr. Baroni asked for an explanation of the parking flow and Mr. Cozette proceeded to review the traffic flow patterns illustrated on the site plan. Mr. Baroni asked if the 18 ft. area would be planted. Mr. Cozette said it would be restored with grass and planted with five foot hedge plantings. Mr. Baroni asked if ground cover is in fact, inconclusive in the ordinance. He stated that in his judgement it was not and, in fact, drives which are required to service parking facilities should in fact be counted as part of the parking and not exempted from yard setback requirements . Mr. Baro.n,iasked if the drainage problem to the south has been corrected and if the retention ponds were installed to correct the problem. Mr. Cozette responded that while the retention ponds will help alleviate flooding problems downstream, outside detention was provided primarily to compensate for the increase run-off as a result of the paving areas of the Christ Church properties . Mr. Fuller then asked if there is an inlet to the detention ponds along 31st Street. Mr. Cozette said this was , in fact, the case. Page 3 of __L_pages Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes - June 1 , 1976 Chairman Baschen then called for those in the audience which would speak for the petitioner and no one responded. Chairman Baschen then called on the audience for those who wished to speak against the petition and Mr . John Novacek rose and made the follow- ing points : 1. That open space does not include paving which is necessary to service parking and should in fact be included as required parking area in zoning computations . 2 . In his judgement, Christ Church has proven no hardship since their last application. 3. Christ Church by the design of the parking facility, in fact, creates their own hardships . 4. The issue of handicapped parking is not well taken. 5 . Islands provided within the paved area could provide additional parking. 6. Mr. Novacek pointed out that there was an apparent disparity between the east 1 dimension as ow o o exhibit f f and of en n shown n one t o 611..85 t. I� shown on another as 660 . He asked the Village to take notice of same . 7. Since SU-5 was approved last fall for a building permit he could see no reason why it should not be complied with. Miss Etta Chapek, 3121 S. York Road, stated that progress had been made across from her lot and the improvement was in fact less of an eyesore. She stated, however, that she was sympathetic to the needs of Mr. Novacek and felt that waivement of the 40 yard required setback was an abuse of his rights. Mr. Novacek then stated that in his judgement, the detention areas could be put to the west of the site rather than in the center. Mr. Baroni then asked if the parking was in conformance with the zoning ordinance. Mr. Littleton stated that parking would be in conformance , provided wheel stops were installed along the south driveway. Mr. Ehle then noted that the ordinance does not mention . piggyback parking. Mr. Muschler then moved - seconded by Mr. Lavery. . . To recommend to the Village Board denial of the variation request for the south property line and recommend approval of the variation request for the east property line subject to the following findings of fact: 1. the subject variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Page 4 of 7 � a es Zoning Boar—tcofgAppeals Minutes - June 1 , 1976 2 . that a hardship has been demonstrated by the petitioner in providing access to handicapped parishioners . pp P Roll call vote : Ayes - Members Fuller, Muschler, Lavery, Baroni. Nayes - Chairman Baschen Absent - Members Fraser and Skinner. MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, William R. Balling Assistant to the Village Manager Secretary Pro tem APPROVED : John W. Baschen, Chairman VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK © — ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL DATE OF HEARING 6/1/6 APPLICANT: Christ Church of Oak Brook ADDRESS: 3100 So. York Road PRIOR HEARING: YES NO Date• 4/6/6 RELIEF SOUGHT: AMENDMENT f APPEAL z z_ SPECIAL USE VARIATION DECISION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL X _ East Variation RECOMMENDED DENIAL X CONTINUED -: South Variation WITHDRATAW OTHER U MEMBERS PRESENT ABSENT YES _(VOTE NO ABSTAIN Edward Fraser X. Virgil Fuller John Lave X X- Arthur Muschler Mnt;nn X X W.K. Skinner X X ,Tohn W. Baschen,Chrm. x Recommendation of .Plan Commission: N/A Date: NA Referred to Plan Commission: NA Date: NA FULL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BY DuPAGE COUNTY REPORTING SERVICE tTOOra To recommend to the Village Board denial of the variation request for the south property line and recommend approval . of the variation request for the east side of the property subject to the following findings of fact. a� Ch a i rman .' . P VARIATIOI, -- FIiNDINGS and R.ECO_AVJEit\7DATIOI;S (Coimplete Sections A, B, C and D) In support of its recommendation of this Variation, the Zoning Board of peals sets forth the following facts as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Section XIII 'G-4, said findings of fact being based on the evidence pies, to the Board: A. ? �X �X, a� x •X � x�XXa��? YX�xX 33. . C. ; The subject variation will not alter the essentizl; character. .> the localityl�k� � A: The following, supplemental facts have also been• consielered by Board pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section XIII, 3--4b as set forth- on the verse hereof: A hard5bip has been demonstrate!d by -thg. petitioner in providing access to handicapped Parishioners. sideration the extent to which the fol_lowin, facts, favorable to tha ap cn_It, . have been -esta shed by the evidence t!� - (1) The particular physical surroundings, - shape, or t000graphi.ca.l con- ditions of the specific property involved i,lould bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconven-1 ence . if the strict letter of the re -clation were to be 'carried out . (2) The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not: be applicable generally to the other property within the satie . zoning classification. - . . (3) The granting of the variation will not be detrintental- to the public welfare - or injurious to other property or improvements in the neigh- borhood in which -the property' is located. (4). The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light. and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety_ or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. (5) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon_ a . F desire to make more- money out. of the property. (n) That the alleged difficulty or 'hardsh .p has not been creaked by any person presently having an interest in the property.* 5/27/76 BUREAU OF INSPECTIONS Applicant: Christ Church of O.B. 501 Oak Brook Road Comment: Site Development Plan, Scheme B, Sheet SV-3 revised 5/5/76, Edward ware Architects, submitted to Board on 5/11/76. Reviewed by Commissioner Ehle, Engineer Littleton, and Marianne Lakosil on 5/28/76. 22' Aisle ma"rked "One way" is in conflict with the ordinance. As an aisle it should be 27` and the curbing on the south to be located 40' from R - District. Retention areas have not decreased the number of parking spaces, since there were none provided in these areas as per sheet SD-1. (See item *5 in letter of 5/6/76 to Mr. Brown. ) Respectfully submitted, Arthur H. Ehle Building Commissioner ML Addendum - 6/2/76: Section XI,E,4, (page 56) , requires each parking space to open directly upon an aisle or driveway, in confor- mance with Appendix I (page 91) , and appropriate means of access to street in conformance with Appendix II (page 92) . Section XI,E,7 (page 56) prohibits a parking area con- taining (4) or more spaces to be located not less than (401 ) from the adjoining residence district boundry. SAVE ENVELOPE TYPING n^^ FORM #374-3 SAVE CLERICAL TIME FOLD FORM ON TOP LINE OF MESSAGE fUIJJ SUBSTITUTE SPEED MESSAGES FOR BO%AND USE 2-VUE OR X 10 WINDOW DICTATED LETTERS. MAY BE TYPED ENVELOPE. OR HANDWRITTEN. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Sc� T�lec. 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 [] IMMEDIATE REPLY REQUESTED (312) 654.2220 Z NO REPLY NECESSARY TO USE WINDOW ENVELOPE FOR RETURNING MESSAGE TO SENDER FOLD HERE _ • SURJECT �•► • DATE �ceaagc J 81._..rrT.._- .__/•sue _, ,;ash SIGNED i DATE SIGNED PLEASE RETURN THIS COPY TO SENDER i nutes of May 11 , 1 y7o V. OLD EUS1i;ESS Ot'inued) . hi B. Chicago Bridge & Iron-Variation (continued) On May 4, 1976, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended a' variation be granted to allow for a twenty-seven (27' ) .feet addition to the south side of the non-conforming structure known as the Armour building, which would project into the 150' front yard requirement along Jorie Boulevard. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Rush. . . Because the circumstances are unique and will not alter the character of the locality, that the variation as recommended by the Zoning Board of a Appeals be approved and the attorney prepare the required ordinance. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. Heliport: Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended that no assumptions were to be made about the use of the heliport and no action was taken by the Board of Trustees. C. Lions International —Variation The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval at the meeting of May 4, 1976. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . That the variation as recommended by the Zoning Board of Appeals be approved and that the attorney be directed to amend Ordinance S-316 to refer to the Site Plan dated March 31 , 1976, Joseph Legat, Architect. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Glaves, and Rush Nayes: Trustees Congreve, Philip, and President Howell . So ordered. � Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation - Becaus'e of new material submitted, this was referred back to Zoning Board of Appeals. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Public Works Equipment Purchase - Wheel Alignment Equipment Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To approve the expenditure of $1 ,616.25 for the basic instrumentation to provide wheel alignment within the Public Works garage. Poll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Push, and President Howell Nayes: None So Ordered. Truck No action Tractor/Mower Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To authorize the advertising of bids for a Utility Tractor/lower with bids to be opened in the Board Room at 10:00 A.M. on May 28, 1976. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Hayes: None So Ordered. lam' � S 4, ✓a-.. � '"Y ± �� Xf�4�*} '�f,may -:]� * • •� v (r E iv�R� "* 1SS( I�4T S INC. ARC j} �n r tr �"P i `f S 4i5-� BOUL V_AkD. RQCeKF�O3D t iNQl� B x ;; as zi 1211 r s � a . r Oak , �Z #f •r it 10-1k - .� 3i T `+►•ir r �' .° #•:>: iiR!! ! � " tb Y1 'd tar is kkftwlltw� • ►I * ti " #� 011 of ?rator Y � �; � ; . ►� bit �al�nNd 4�il�'�t:Lxi�►t�" tf� #t �Oip,, It�4 � k v , • 1 awr, t r�cst it# at sugh s "'Wstit Oak SAW*" Aa h �'�+ ��►6sn1 `of " � ;� i� trill bo. �I►t#+�+9i °till ``"� " �lno• " Mfr . r1� Prirsna � ,,tipzrdio �- at t3 Y loo Aw s &ft" k ri *se ►it . dsy h � - ►«��=�Mt4� 1Nt �r ` `fi ,A<'•1 +1,,.. ► a@ t�'"��p1�i"r 11�r0 sd�to 4 � ► �� , Ti tv as 00*01,► ,y }} t F �.,� S,d YY t .,1..:• �RI .t 4 ,� ^�:.. 0. :Y- l l�. � � $ ; � � roY * ,if-"� is ern. .. � &R j 4 ,�� '+� ';e� •,�,. ,�u�,��. is `. �!. {' t ^:.. •. � .. ,, ,�; ,::. � R� _';„� S ASZaQCIA�f�3 RO$E!V'1"F{ fE�AKANT.AIA BURTON 004§0®TH, *A z 'ti�dNALD'LIPPINCOTT,�AIA MTEt€F�f�1�� ,. UOp E ELLIOTT,.AIA. DAVIDG SL'Ilk'TtERY; A'1-A •".t ><.v{ t:' -�;.. ':; ' `,yP A'� ,. 42 Bradford Lane Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 May 6, 1976 Mr. - Fred Brown Oak Brook Village Board of Trustees Oak Brook and Spring. Roads Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Re: Christ Church request for Dear Mr. Brown: parking area variation Unfortunately our presentation to the Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday night, May 4, 1976 took on a rather legalistic tone, which seemed to reduce the possibility of flexibility and compromise. As you may have gathered from the various plans presented by Mr. Ed Ware, our architect, we were really searching for an approach which might relieve some of our hardship and inconvenience, but yet preserve the spirit of the various ordinances which the Board considered important. i I would like to ask you to reconsider one of the suggestions that was made; however, was subsequently lost in legalistic discussion: Relevant points are as follows: I . All that would be in the 40 ft. area by the south line would be a 22 ft. wide one-way drive. Thus the 18 feet immediately adjacent to the south lot line would be green. We would assure that no parking would take place on this drive. 2. All that would be in the 100 ft. set back from York Road would be drives with no parking. 3. There is still some question as to what kind of ground cover is allowed in this set back area: grass vs. gravel vs. stone vs. blacktop, etc. 4. It does indeed work a hardship and inconvenience to our members. a. We incur an expense of several thousand dollars to rip up a drive that has existed since about 1970. b. We lose a number of parking spaces that are in a prime location to serve our handicapped and staff because of their ready access to the church. Mr. Fred Brown May 6, 1976 Page 2 C. By having the drive along the south lot line we 'reduce the confusion and possible auto accidents in exiting from, this area. 5. We have lost about 100 parking spaces close to the church on the west ! side of the building because of special flood control retension basins which we were required to build. I 6. Based on this compromise approach, it seems that the appearance of the i area has not been appreciably altered to render it unattractive or in poor keeping with our village. Attached you will find a drawing prepared by Ed Ware, outlining the 'modifica- Lions described and indicating what we are seeking. This, of course, is quite ` different from the variation which the Zoning Board rejected at their meeting. I`m not sure what the procedure is, Mr. Brown, for this reconsideration; however, perhaps you feel it has merit. We need your help and will appreciate your con- sideration. I will look forward to being at the Village Board meeting on Tuesday, May 11 , to answer any questions or take whatever steps the Board of Trustees might suggest to pursue this further. l Sincerely, { Bernard L. Cozet e Christ Church Building Committee and Oak Brook resident. BLC:db ' It I { i I r i IL A O G 4 1, F COUN VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROA D OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 20, 1975 I.C. Harbour Construction Co. 615 W. 22nd St. Oak Brook, 111. 60521 + Re: Christ Church Addition Dear Sir, Please be cautioned that this is a partial building permit. You assume the risk and obligation of fully complying with all of the ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Village of Oak Brook relating to the construction encompassed by the issuance of this permit. Sincerely yours, Arthur H. Ehle Building Commissioner (f cc: Rev. DeKruyter � Ken Carmignani Edward Ware, Archt. , A.Bianucci - Atty. Ci• 11 - • i SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) ❑ Show address. Deliver-ONLY where delivered ❑ to addresses RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below ' REGISTERED N0. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSE Must always be filled in)., y CERTIFIED NO 880524" ` IGNATURE 0 DDRESSEE'S AGEN F ANY INSURED NO 2 ' AHOW WHERE DELIVERED (only if requested and include ZIP Code) tm. , # ,yz z .. w.ti:.a�.Fk•�,.;„n. "r".c :.r^C..:.:.:L�.X err::._ �,�. OAK ' yP4 b9G • G o 3�� S _ A F fOwS VILLAGE OF OAK BIROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 December 1, 1975 I.C. Harbour Construction Co. 615 Hunter Drive Oak Brook, Ill.. 60521 Gentlemen, You recently obtained a permit for a structure that is to utilize a special structural steel as noted in Section 74 of the Village of Oak Brook Building Code. Such steel requires verification of its use and proper placing by the designing Architect or Structural. Engineer under the controlled materials procedure as specified in Section 69.5 For your convenience a .suggested form letter to provide the reuuir- ed verification is attached. It is believed that knowledge of this procedure will result in sav- ing of both time and expense. Your cooperation will be appreciated. . Very truly yours, Arthur H. Ehle Building Commissioner 4 x c 1 P'ti�. �'j{� 7, fo ON a t r t:'3 Y �a N X. t, n . s � DEPARTM4A I r DEPARTWt !° "1 AC S „ i Page 4 Mi nutesApril 13, 1976 VI. OLD BUSINESS (continued) C. Corporate Realty Development Inc. - Request to Reconsider - Special Use (continued) Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To refer this back to Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals for reconsideration. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Forest Glen Subdivision Unit 1 , Final Plat The Plan Commission recommended approval at the meeting of March 29, 1976, subject to the following: That .6idewa Jzz be waived. That 6tAeet t i ght i.ng be waived, except that adequate ittumi.nat i on w.i U be pno vided at d nteu ect i,onz. Ptan Commiadion wilt upptave a 30 Joot zetbaek on Lot 69 along Abbeywood CouAt. A .eanctseaping easement (30 beet wade) w.iU be provided a.2ong the nonthwat poAtion o6 Unit #1 which backz on the tottway ptoperrty. That the bike and pedeztAian path be exeeuded in back o4 the wooAide Estates Lots 10, 11, 12, and 13 to attow Jot mote privacy. Trustee Brown moved— seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To approve Forest Glen Subdivision Unit 1 Final Plat as recommended by the Plan Commission. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. B. Authorization for 1975176 Audit Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To authorize Village Manager to engage Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company at a cost not to exceed $6. 9 00.00 to conduct the 1975/76 Audit. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. C. Resignation - Carle Wunderlich President Howell read letter dated March 10, 1976 from Carle Wunderlich resigning from the Plan Commission as of April 1 , 1976. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To accept the resignation of Carle Wunderlich and directed a resolution be prepared. Voice vote - all in favor So ordered. D. Clean-Up Day The new contract of the three scavenger firms doing business in the village requires them to collect items as regular pickups and there no longer exists necessity to continue the annual pickup service. Notice of this to be published. E. hrist Church of Oak Brook -Water Service Variance Request The Public Works Ordinance No. S-277 requires dual service taps for domestic line and fire protection line. Request of the church is to allow the construction of a single water service. At this time there is no water in th- main in York Road. T. i ,try? Cant'-lev,: Ii?c;; seco -1 To table this matter to next board meeting. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, and Rush. Nayes: None Abstain: President Howell So ordered. 4/13/76 -4- (continued) rage 2 of 4 pages ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES - April 6, 1976 CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK - VARIATION Mr. Nicholas Kitsos represented the Christ Church of Oak Brook and stated that he requested a variation to permit the south yard asphalt pavement to remain in the required forty foot side yard, and that the sixty foot setback line (existing) be permitted to remain in the York Road required front yard. Mr. Kitsos stated that his reasons for hardship were: (1) the Church's expense in removing the asphalt in re-installing an acceptable asphalt covering where permitted. (2) that 5.5 years ago the ordinance did not require a 100 ft. setback along York Road. . New construction lost 2j acres to a retention-detention pond that was needed for parking and for that the church does not get the variation more parking spaces will be lost. He further noted that curbing will be installed on the south asphalt line of the Christ Church parking area to guide water, and he noted that the home immediately south of the Christ Church is buffered by a hedgerow. Mr. Kitsos further noted that with one exception, a 100 ft. required yard setback is not required by Ordinance G-60. His last comment stated that parking was critical only to Sunday mornings before 1:00 P.M. He then noted Mr. Bernie Cozette, the building committee, and a trustee of the church, was also present. Mr. Baschen asked Mr. Kitsos if parking would be permitted on the south perimeter of the parking lot. Mr. Kitsos stated that he does not want parking along the south perimeter line and that although the exhibit attached submitted with his application did illustrate parking spaces along the property line, he would obliterate the south parking. Mr. Kitsos stated that he hereby amended his drawing by deleting all markings along the south property line that related to parking. Mr. Baroni then asked if the entire drawing is void. Mr. Kitsos stated that the asphalting is accurately shown. Mr. Baroni then asked why is a variation requested inasmuch as the plan submitted for a building permit provided ample parking within required yards. Mr. Fraser then asked if the staff approved the plan that was submitted for a building permit. Building Commissioner Ehle stated that he did in fact, and the number of spaces provided without encroaching on required yards would be greater than those proposed by Mr. Kitsos leaving the asphalt pavement in. Mr. Fraser then advised Mr. Kitsos that all new construction must meet the require- ments of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Bernie Cozette, trustee for the Church stated that the south parking was a non- conforming use which was voluntarily deleted from the site plan when an application for building permit was received. Page 3 of 4 pages ZONING BOARD-UF APPEALS MINUTES - April 6, 1976 CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK - VARIATION (Continued) Mr. Fraser then asked if changes will be made to the entrance way. Mr. Kitsos said that widening of the entrances on York Road will occur. Mr. Baschen then stated that the drawing submitted with the application is not acceptable for review by the Zoning Board of Appeals because it does not accurately illustrate what changes are requested. Chairman Baschen then asked for questions from the audience. Mr. Novacek stated that several years ago former Manager Urhausen stated that a 40 ft. setback was required and that a gravel asphalt driveway was only provided on a temporary basis. He further noted that he counted cars on the Butler Annex lot and found on two different Sundays. 42 cars and 48 cars were parked. Attorney Bianucci pointed out that the special use permit refers to a specific site plan which depicts the maintenance of the 40 ft. 100 yard setback lines. Miss Edith Chapek said that she was opposed to these parking lots because the headlights from the church detract from the property value and her lifestyle. Mrs. Barbara Reynolds representing the Fullersburg Woods Association stated that the Fullersburg Woods Association would rather go on record prior to the Zoning Board of Appeals taking action although she would hold in abeyance any comment on the proposal if the matter will be continued. Mr. Kitsos said that he formally requests a continuance to the May, 1976 meeting. Mr. Fraser noted that the petitioner must come up 'with a better'case. , Mr Lavery stated that the petitioner should consider Section XII of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Kitsos then requested a copy of the site plan which was attached to the building permit. Member Skinner moved - seconded by Member Muschler To continue the matter of the Christ Church Variation at the May 4, 1976 Village Zoning Board of Appeals meeting at the request of the petitioner. Voice vote all in favor. Motion carried. Respectfull ubmitted, Willf'ain-R. Bal i g Assistant to the Villa Manager APPROVED: Secretary Pro tem John W. Baschen, Chairman VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 4tl ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DATE OF HEARING: April 6, 1976 APPLICANT: CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK ADDRESS: 3100 South York Road, Oak Brook PRIOR HEARING: YES Z= NO =X/- Date: April 6, 1976 RELIEF SOUGHT: AMENDMENT APPEAL SPECIAL USE �_ VARIATION Lx� DECISION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL / RECOMMENDED DENIAL `1. CONTINUED X WITHDRAWN �I OTHER MEMBERS PRESENT ABSENT YES VOTE) NO ABSTAIN Edward Fraser X X Virgil Fuller X John Lavery. X X Arthur Muschler 2nd X X Gene Baroni X X W.K. Skinner Motion X X John W. Baschen Chan. X X Recommendation of Plan Commission: None Date: 1L'A Referred to Plan Commission: NA Date: NA * -FULL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BY Du PAGE COUNTY REPORTING SERVICE MOTION: Continue to the Zoning-Board- of Appeals meeting of May 4`1976 rA^ r MEMO FRO`4: Bureau of Inspections PETITIONER: Christ Church of Oak Brook LOCI1TION: 501 Oak Brook Road ZONING: R-2 REQUEST: Variation to allow existing parking along the south property line and along York Road to remain. COMMENT: 8/12/71 - Permit #2080 - Permit issued for Phase II. Drawings were approved as noted: "Parking restricted to 40' from Residential zoning per Oak Brook ordinance". (South and West Lot Lines. ) "Screen parking along this Lot Line. " (South Lot Line) 9/3/75 -- Permit #3765 - Permit issued subject to compli- ance with all the ordinances, codes, and regulations of the Village of Oak Brook relating to the construction en- compassed by the issuance of the permit. Site plan submitted for permit shows parking along York Road and the south property line in conformance. (See attached sketch) 10/28/75 - Ordinance S-245 Variation to Section V,F, granted to permit parking along Oa?c Brook Road less than 110 ' from the center line of the road. PARKING: Not permitted in Yards Adjoining Streets (Section V.G,H, 13) (page 8) Set back along York Road shall be not less than 100 ' (Section V,F. ) (page 6) p Not permitted less than 40' from an adjoining residence district boundry. (Section X,E, 7, ) (page 56) Respectfully submitted, Arthur H. Ehle Building commissioner ML Noce: Similar request applie d or on 9/2/75 and t+li�'`xd1clCJn on 10/7/75, pry O� to �Ub:is T1e�lring Scheduleet fo-r that date. a March 30, 1976 Dear Resident, The Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board and Plan Commission, if necessary, will be considering a: Zoning Amendment Special Use XX Variation at their meetings scheduled on the reverse side of this notice. Please refer to the schedule for time, place and dates of meetings. The application has been filed by: Christ Church of Oak Brook flame of applicant ' 501 Oak Brook Road Address Name of property Location: York Road and Oak Broolc Road — Soutl-1viest corner A map of the area has been reproduced to assist you in determing your relation- ship to the property in question. The specific action being requested is as follows: To per the existing asphalt driveway along the South property line to remaintat 5' instead of 40' and alo Yorl� Read at 60 instead of 100' _ If you desire more detailed information, we would suggest that you contact L e Inspection Bureau located in Fire Station 1 , at 1212 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois to review the file on this application. Re pectfully yours , Vil i r,; -..c-"—.-----tee lage ,arlage, KGC/l s M.L. (over) All meetings are held the Samuel E. Dears Board R000 the Oak Brook Village Corimons on Oak Brook Road (31st Street) and Spring Road, Oak Brook, Illinois. PLAN COK-1I SS I Oil MEET ING 7:30 P.t-1., MONDAY ��---------- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY April 6, 1976 BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY April 13, 1976 BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING 7:30 P.M. TUESDAY April 27, 1976 (ORDINANCE APPROVAL) MAP OF AREA I , •w•T° _ INTERgATIONAL SPURTS - --- — --- � CORE _ �_- �_•I , t , 0 • _ - - o >, - nn —� - K-BRO IT sz vl •= n• _ /mil ,• s° t• h .l .�.- j ---- 1 , ,• \y�i -G•1 .,�' ley[ 1 , \ C..vT_..[111i�.. 11 111, I T� lo DE , t' •� rINILING LIST Community Homeowners Associations Applicant: Christ Church of January 1976 Oak Brook Fullersburq Woods 501 Oak Brook Road Gene Baroni 12 Luthin Road March 30, 1976 Broo! Forest Yorkshire V,7oods Briarwood Lakes boyle� Barbara Nasharr (Mrs. ) Ronald TotNell 15 Camelot Drive 43 Yorkshire Woods 52 Regent Drive Woodside Estates York Woods Robinhood Ranch Frank McCormick John Lindquist Thomas Doyle 28 Hickory Drive 61 Sheffield Lane .7 Robin Hood Ranch Ginger Creek Oak Brook Estates Merry Lane Subd. James Regas Richard Kropacek Al Hosler 46 Baybrook Lane 2803 Oak Brook Road 820 Merry Lane Timber Trails Estates Oak Brook Civic Assn. Oak Brook Dev. Co. Tom Millon Ralph Maxson 52 Regent Drive 812 Merry Lane 6 Woodridge Drive . (Ronald Towell) Oak Brook Assn. of Zoninq_& Planning Lincoln St. Commerce & Industry Fred Brown 3001 " " James Spiker 710 Acorn Hill Lane 3003 of " 1ll. Bell . Tele, Co. 3004 If " 1000 Commerce Drive Coolidge Road 3007 of 3005 11 11 3008 If Grant Street 3006 16 3012 Is " 3001 Grant 3015 " 3014 if " 3009 Grant * 3020 3016 3025 York Road Oak Brook Road 3005 n n 107 to u 3109 110 11 3117 " 115 it 3121 116 If 3202 If 11 121 " 3207 209 3212 219 " 3213 222 " 3302 302 3305 305 3309 If 11 308 3315 of If 313 3317 It 11 314 3403 11 If 321 If it 3408 It If 324 11 11 3412 It of 405 to 3415 of of 406 u n 409 of n 411 413 + 414 n n R VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING RECEIPT Name of Applicant Received by: Q �., o-i� (Village Clerk) (date) (amount APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED: Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Publication Date -- DOINGS NEWSPAPER Thurso- Y Plan Co. i-inission Meeting 7:30 P.M. Monday [/ Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday ( � 7 (/ Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Lf Board o= Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday (approval of ordinance) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK AIWIC ION FOR PUBLIC HEARIO �. Name of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-1882 Address Thirty-first and York Road City Oak Brook State Ill. Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Nicholas T. Kitsos Telephone No. 726-2564 Address 11 South LaSalle Street (1001) City Chicago State Illinois Zip 60603 General Location (or) Address of Property: Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first (Oak Brook Road) , Oak Brook, Illinois. Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) Z , Zoning Amendment Z`� Special use L : Variation Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See attached Supplement B. ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTI`iG BUILDINOS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY BiJILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF .SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF THE MONTH FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH. :-EVIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook X: 1200 Oak .Brook Road Oa"-- D1vV:� , 1.111.1101..7 VV.J 1.1 ,,p (signature of Applicant) . I SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT A TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request a variation be granted to: 1. Section XIE-7 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the exist- ing asphalt driveway along the South property line and the parking spaces adjoining to the North of said driveway to remain; and to, 2. Section V paragraph F of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the existing parking and driveways to remain at the existing set-back line of 60 feet in lieu of the now required set-back line of 100 feet; All as shown in the existing site plan dated 6/18/75, sheet No. SDI-Supp. SU-1 by C. Edward Ware, architect heretofore filed with the office of the Manager of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois. The parking for the church is very critical. In an effort to meet the demands, the church has acquired the use of an additional six acres of property. A variance will allow the church to park an addi- tional 52 cars in close proximity to the church. This parking need occurs primarily on Sunday mornings. Presently, the adjoining neighbor has a very dense and high hedgelike growth along the entire south line. The church will install a curb along this driveway to prevent surfact water from running onto the neighbor's property. The church is also providing a water retention reservoir of approximately 2-1/2 acres. In our opinion, the location of this driveway and parking spaces, as existing, does not cause a traffic hazard or create noise, nor is it aesthetically undesirable. This 46 foot wide strip will be used in the same manner as used during the last approximate 5-1/2 years. It meets the requirements of the ordinance for open space. The ordinance is silent on the matter of access driveways. It does not define drive- ways as parking. We believe this is a unique application of the zoning ordinance and that a variance will not cause injury to the adjacent property owner. The ordinance requires a 100 foot set-back from the property line along York Road. With one other exception, this is the most rest- rictive requirement, and the only such requirement, in the village. The church plans to provide more than the required plantings and trees between the streets and the interior drives. Unless the variance is granted, the church will be required to remove part of a paved area which has existed on the property since the initial church was built in 1968. The major portion of the driveway areas were on drawings prior to the enactment of Ordinance G 136 on June 22, 1971. The proposed variance will allow parking for an additional 16 parking spaces on the site owned by the church. This could amount to as many as 30 cars since the church double parks within the site on Sunday to meet the demand. I The use of this parking area is critical on Sunday mornings. At other times, these areas are, or will be, seldom used. The church will be meeting or exceeding the requirements for landscaping and green areas. In our opinion, the requested variance does not present any adverse effect on the surrounding environment, nor will it cause con- gestion in the area. Since the ordinance is silent on the matter of on-site circula- tion and driveways, it is possible that the present driveways are within the requirements of the ordinance but, because immediate consideration is needed, a variance is being requested. The cost of removing the existing pavement is of course, prohibitive and would be a real hardship. -2- THE INFORMATION BELOW THIS SHEET IS RELATED TO THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION.MADE ON BEHALF OF THE CHRIST CHURCH BY ITS ARCHITECT AND THE BUTLER COMPANY w,�"k ."Y $•.Y �C5 w�?4 d €gib�� da�� "�kdi' r.}iKr ?�•' �' --�—_-°—• � «� � ,+^gyp: , ,rr�4 S�yd te t. ,:, k�` _ .„.'. "'."--x----• _ ...31 _ A► # A6 w OR x}k ��° '��II�+IF�� ir4•� - -`q �� wed p Cy � I SiMrW r y 3 dF,� Le Q VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS March 4, 1976 654-2220 MEMO TO: President & Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation Gentlemen, Attached is a request from the Christ Church of Oak Brook indicating that they have previously paid for a public hearing and ask that the fee be waived. They submitted a petition on October 7, 1975 which was published in the newspaper, and staff did, in fact, review the summations and paid for publication. Christ Church of Oak Brook has requested through their attorney that the fee be waived, however, we did incur cost on the previous petition. This requires board action. Respectfully yours, Ken eth G. Carmig 5a; n i Village Manager KGC/ls att. SUITE 1001 11 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET �lGn 6'06°aY JEROME M.KAPLAN RICHARD D.GLICKMAN AREA CODE 312 RANDOLPH 6-2564 March 2 , 1976 Village of Oak Brook New Village Hall Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois MESSENGER DELIVERED RE: File #2621 Gentlemen: On behalf of Christ Church of Oak Brook, I herewith enclose and file with you a re-petition for zoning variations previously filed with your office and withdrawn by the Church by mutual consent. The fee for this variation has previously been paid by the Church, which fee has not been withdrawn or refunded to the Church. Kindly process the application so that the Church is . given the necessary administrative hearings and ultimate hearing before the Village Board. Sincerely, . N CHV4T. ITSOS NTK:pl Page 2 ' . Mges of March 9, 1976 Z.V. FINANCIAL (continued) D. Investments None V. OLD BUSINESS A. Bid Recommendation-Traffic Signal Maintenance and Street Light Repair Contract Four bids were opened February 17, 1976. Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To award the contract to the low bidder, Contracting & Material Company at an annual amount of $14,160.00. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush,. and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. B. Acceptance Water Revenue Analysis Report Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To accept the Water Revenue Analysis Report as prepared by Warren & Van Pragg, Inc. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. C. Capital Water Improvements Report Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To proceed with the prepatory work for issuance of revenue bonds for Capital Water Improvements in the amount of $3,000,000 with a fifteen (15) year amortization provision. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. D. Water Main Extension-Meyers Road & 35th Street Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To authorize advertising for bids to be received on March 30, 1976 for 12" Water Main Extension. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 1976/77 Budget Report Trustee Cerne reported on the status of the budget based upon anticipated revenues. B. Street Name Change-St. Paschal 's Drive Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To approve naming the street presently known as Frontage Road between Oak Brook Road and 35th Street, as St. Paschal ' s Drive. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. . C. rist Church of Oak Brook-Request to Waive Fee -- Application for zoning variation was submitted and fee paid on October 3, 1975, then withdrawn prior to public hearing. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Rush. . . The the fee for reapplication for a zoning variation for Christ Church of Oak Brook be waived. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Abstain: President Howell So ordered. 3/9/76 -2- (continued) • • �/ G C VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK. 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, 1LL1NO15 March 4, 1976 654-2220 MEMO TO: President & Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation Gentlemen, Attached is a request from the Christ Church of Oak Brook indicating that they have previously paid for a public hearing and ask that the fee be waived. They submitted a petition on October 7, 1975 which was published in the newspaper, and staff did, in fact, review the summations and paid for publication. Christ Church of Oak Brook has requested through their attorney that the fee be waived, however, we did incur cost on the previous petition. This requires board action. Respectfully yours, IN YA Kenieth G. Carmignani\� Village Manager KGC/ls att. - �^^ SUITE 1001 II SOUTH LA SALLE STREET JEROME M.KAPLAN RICHARD D.GLICKMAN AREA CODE 312 RANDOLPH 6-2564 March 2 , 1976 Village of Oak Brook New Village Hall Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois MESSENGER DELIVERED RE: File #2621 Gentlemen: On behalf of Christ Church of Oak Brook, I herewith enclose and file with you a re-petition for zoning variations previously filed with your office and withdrawn by the Church by mutual consent. The fee for this variation has previously been paid by the Church, which fee has not been withdrawn or refunded to the Church. Kindly process the application so that the Church is given the necessary administrative hearings and ultimate hearing before the Village Board. Sincerely, N CH LLA T. KITSOS NTK:pl VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK•�� 9LICATION FOR PUBLIC HEAR* Name of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-1882 Address Thirty-first and York Road City Oak Brook State Ill. Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Nicholas T. Kitsos Telephone No. 726-2564 Address 11 South LaSalle Street (1001) City Chicago State Illinois Zip 60603 General Location (or) Address of Property: Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first Oak Brook Road Oak Brook Illinois. Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) Zoning Amendment Z--7 Special Use L__^___J Variation Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See attached Su lemen ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE DP.AWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF. THE MONTH F02 H. PUB IC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE .FOLLOWING MONTH. MA Village Clerk village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road (Signature of Applicant) SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT A TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request a variation be granted to: 1. Section XIE-7 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the exist- ing asphalt driveway along the South property line and the parking spaces adjoining to the North of said driveway to remain; and to, 2. Section V paragraph F of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the existing parking and driveways to remain at the existing set-back line of 60 feet in lieu of the now required set-back line of 100 feet; All as shown in the existing site plan dated 6/18/75, sheet No. SDI-Supp. SU-1 by C. Edward Ware, architect heretofore filed with the office of the Manager of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois. The parking for the church is very critical. In an effort to meet the demands, the church has acquired the use of an additional six acres of property. A variance will allow the church to park an addi- tional 52 cars in close proximity to the church. This parking need occurs primarily on Sunday mornings. Presently, the adjoining neighbor has a very dense and high hedgelike growth along the entire south line. The church will install a curb along this driveway to prevent surfact water from running onto the neighbor's property. The church is also providing a water retention reservoir of approximately 2-1/2 acres. In our opinion, the location of this driveway and parking spaces, as existing, does not cause a traffic hazard or create noise, nor is it aesthetically undesirable. This 40 foot wide strip will be used in the same manner as used during the last approximate 5-1/2 years. It meets the requirements of the ordinance for open space. The ordinance is silent on the matter of access driveways. It does not define drive- ways as parking. We believe this is a unique application of the zoning ordinance and that a variance will not cause injury to the adjacent property owner. The ordinance requires a 100 foot set-back from the property line along York Road. With one other exception, this is the most rest- rictive requirement, and the only such requirement, in the village. The church plans to provide more than the required plantings and trees between the streets and the interior drives. Unless the variance is granted, the church will be required to remove part of a paved area which has existed on the property since the initial church was built in 1968. The major portion of the driveway areas were on drawings prior to the enactment of Ordinance G 136 on June 22, 1971. The proposed variance will allow parking for an additional 16 parking spaces on the site owned by the church. This could amount to as many as 30 cars since the church double parks within the site on Sunday to meet the demand. The use of this parking area is critical on Sunday mornings, At other times, these areas are, or will be, seldom used. The church will be meeting or exceeding the requirements for landscaping and green areas. In our opinion, the requested variance does not present any adverse effect on the surrounding environment, nor will it cause con- gestion in the area. Since the ordinance is silent on the matter of on-site circula- tion and driveways, it is possible that the present driveways are within the requirements of the ordinance but, because immediate consideration is needed, a variance is being requested. The cost of removing the existing pavement is of course, prohibitive and would be a real hardship. -2- VILLAGE OF OAX BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING RECEIPT Marne of Applicant Received by: C—\ (Village Clerk) (date) (amount) APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED: 1 Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday �—In-.-,i Publication Date -- DOINGS NEWSPAPER Thursday, A Plan Commission Meeting 7:30 P.M.. Monday Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7:30 P.14. Tuesday Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.14. Tuesday Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Tc-� �� q I s- (approval of ordinance) . \ 1 VILLAGE OF O 1K B1'\.0OK '4 ► PPLICATION FOR PUBLIC H. ti`ti Name of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-188 Address Thirty-First and York Road City Oak Brook State I11. Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Na_-me Telephone No. Address City State Zip if owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Mr. C. Edviard Ware Telephone No. V5-963--8407 Address 415 Y Boulevard City Rockford State Imo_ Zip 61 107 General Location (or) Address of Property: .. Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first (Oak Brook -Road) , Oak Brook, Illinois., Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) �f Zoning Amendment L� Special Use X Va-ia-ion Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See attached Supplement A. ALL APPLICATIONS im.JST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND Sr0'ri1PiG THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTI^N �=:V-D QTY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF `1'_E • --, H FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MOTH. MAIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oa',,-, Brook r, 1. 207 0a"r-, Brunk Road i) h; It 5j-cn.ature off: AL-1Nli ca_ t ) SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT A TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request a variation be granted to Section XI E-7 of the zoning ordinance to permit the existing asphalt driveway along the south property line to remain. See enclosed plot plan. The parking requirements set forth by the zoning ordinance can be met within the setback lines. However, parking for the church is very critical. In an effort to meet the demands, the church has acquired the use of an additional eight acres of property. A variance will allow the church to park an additional 52. cars in close proximity to the church. This parking need occurs primar- ily on Sunday mornings. Presently, the adjoining neighbor has a very dense and high hedgelike growth along the entire south line. His residence is not visible from the church property. The church will install a curb along this driveway to prevent surface water from running onto the neighbor's property. In our opinion, the location of this driveway does not cause a traffic hazard or create noise, nor is it aesthetically undesir- able. This 40-foot wide strip will be used only as access space. It meets the requirements of the ordinance for open space. The ordinance is silent on the matter of access driveways. It does not define driveways as parking. We believe this is a unique application of the zoning ordinance . and that a variance will not cause injury to the adjacent pro- perty owner. Page 2 r1i utes of October 28, 1975 III ORDINANCES, RESOLUOIS, VARIATIONS, PLATS, ETC. (c -nued) D. ORDINANCE S-345 - CHRIST CHURCH/BUTLER CO'. VARIATION Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . That Ordinance S-345 as presented be approved and waive reading of same. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Abstain: President Howell So ordered.' E. ORDINANCE S-346 - BUTLER, CO. - SPECIAL USE/VARIATION Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . That Ordinance S-346 as presented be approved, subject to modification to Sub-Section 2 of Paragraph 1 adding, "provided, however, that the Special Use shall terminate on January 1 , 1981 , unless the Christ Church of Oak Brook shall prior thereto, acquire title to subject property". Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, and Rush Nayes: Trustee Philip Abstain: President Howell So ordered. F. Traffic Ordinance President Howell requested that action be deferred until Trustee Rush had an opportunity to review the proposed ordinance. IV. FINANCIAL A. Investments Trustee Cerne .moved seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on January 14, 1976 at the rate of 6.310%. This Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $100,000.00 is drawn on the Corporate Account. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on January 14, 1976 at the rate of 6.310%. This certificate of deposit is in the amount of $165,000.00, and is drav,n on the following accounts: Water Surplus Account $ 65,000 Dep. , Imp. & Ext. Account $100,000 Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on December- 10, 1975 at the rate of 6.125%. This certificate of deposit in the amount of $211 ,000 is drawn on the following accounts: Bond & Interest Account $ 44,100 Bond Reserve Account $ 11 ,900 Water Surplus Account $ 50,000 Dep. , Imp. & Ext. Account $105,000 Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush; and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. 10/28/75 -2- (continued) - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE UNDER AND A VARIATION TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. G-60, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the Butler Company, the owner of the hereinafter- described property, has applied for a special use under Section VII D 2 and Section VII C 2 b and g and for variations of Sections V F and XI E 7 of Ordinance No. G-60, the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage County, Illinois, to permit utilization of said property for vehicular parking, together with the adjoining property to the East owned by Christ Church of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, all necessary public hearings, pursuant to proper legal notice, have been held; and WHEREAS, both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook have recommended that such special use and variations be granted, subject to certain stated conditions; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook likewise find that such special use and variations should be granted, subject to certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage County, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: The provisions of the preamble hereinbefore set forth are re- stated herein as though herein fully set forth. SECTION 2: A special use is hereby granted to the Butler Company under the provisions of Section VII D 2 and VII C 2 b and g and Section XIII J of Ordinan No. G-60, the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, to permit the property hereinafter described to be utilized for vehicular parking by the adjoining property owner to the East, Christ Church of Oak Brook, all in accordance with that certain Site Plan prepared by C. Edward Ware, .A. I. A. , Architect, Rockford, Illinois, under Job No. 7427, Sheet No. SU-5 dated October 11, 1975, and revised October 16, 1975, a copy of which Site Plan is annexed hereto, identified as Exhibit A, and by this reference incorporated herein, and subject to the following conditions: (1) The special use herein granted shall terminate upon cessation of utilization of the subject property by the Christ Church of Oak Brook for vehicular parking in conjunction with the use of the adjoining property to the East owned by said Christ Church of Oak Brook, upon which occurrence the said Christ Church of Oak Brook shall, with reasonable promptness, restore the subject property to its original condition as unimproved property; provided, however, that said special use shall terminate on January 1, 1981, unless prior thereto the Christ Church of Oak Brook shall acquire title to the subject property. r (2) The special use herein granted shall permit the subject property to be utilized for vehicular parking on a limited basis when needed for various sporting events held at the International Sports Core, provided that advance notice of such use shall be given to the Village of Oak Brook and its Police Department and provided further that such use shall be subject to such parking and traffic control regulation as may be imposed by the Village of Oak Brook and its Police Department. SECTION 3: The provisions of Section.XI E 7 of Ordinance No. G-60, the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, are hereby varied to reduce from 40 feet to 5 feet the required parking space setback from the west and south boundaries of the subject property lines and the provisions of Section V F of said Ordinance No. G-60 are hereby varied to reduce the setback as applied to the subject property from 110 feet from the north line of Section 36 (approximately the Center Line of Oak Brook Road) to 60 feet for parking area access and service drives, to 85 feet for parking area concrete or landscaping "islands", and to 95 feet for parking spaces, all to permit the subject property to be used for vehicular parking by the Christ Church of Oak Brook as permitted and subject to the conditions stated in Section 2 of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: The subject property encompassed by the provisions of this Ordinance is legally described as follows, to-wit: That part of Lot 2 in Old Oak Brook Assessment Plat No. 2, of Parts of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35 and the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat thereof recorded November 10, 1964, as Document No. R64-42440 described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Salt Creek Highlands, being a resubdivision of Lot "C" of Plat of Survey of Farm F. E. Graue, situated in the West 1/2 of said Section 36, as per plat thereof recorded October 1, 1955, as Document No. 775 368; thence southerly and westerly along the east and south lines of said Lot 2 the following three (3) courses and distances: (1) S. 00-20'-54" E. , 115.42 feet, (recorded N. 01-27'-11" W. , 115. 50 feet); thence (2) S. 780-18'-00" W. 314. 57 feet (record'ed N. 780-11'-57" E. , 314. 50 feet); (3) N. 280-30'-30" W. , 282. 39 feet (recorded S. 280-37'-14" E. , 282. 20 feet) to an iron pipe and the place of beginning; thence N. 00-20'-54" W. and parallel with the. West line of said Salt Creek Highlands, a distance of 592. 82 feet, more or less, to the North line of NW. 1/4 of Section 36, aforesaid; thence S. , 890-53'-43" E. along the North line of said NW. 1/4 of Section 36, a distance of 441. 70 feet to the West line of said Salt Creek Highlands; thence S. 00-20'-54" E. along said West line, a distance of 660. 95 feet, more or less to the place of beginning, containing 6. 356 acres, more or less; subject to dedication for 31st Street as shown on Plat recorded per Document No. R64-42440; all in DuPage County, Illinois. SECTION 5: All ordinances, rules, and regulations of the Village of Oak Brook which are in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict and only as they apply to the property hereinbefore described. i 2 - I SECTION 6: If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such determination shall not affect the validity of any remaining portion of this Ordinance. SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by statute. PASSED and APPROVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook this g d� — day of ��r� 1975. APPROVED: President ATTEST: L Village Clerk AYES: S NAYS: ABSENT: p Lw / APPROVED AS TO FORM: o Village Attorney - 3 - Fage L Min es of October 28, 1975 III ORDINANCES, RESOLUT O, VARIATIONS, PLATS, ETC. (co ued) D. ORDINANCE S-345 - CHRIST CHURCH/BUTLER CO. VARIATION Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne.. . That Ordinance S-345 as presented be approved and waive reading of same. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, and Rush Nayes: None Abstain: President Howell So ordered. E. ORDINANCE S-346 - BUTLER. CO. - SPECIAL USE/VARIATION Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . That Ordinance S-346 as presented be approved, subject to modification to Sub-Section 2 of Paragraph 1 adding, "provided, however, that the Special Use shall terminate on January 1 , 1981 , unless the Christ Church of Oak Brook shall prior thereto, acquire title to subject property". Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, and Rush Nayes: Trustee Philip Abstain: President Howell So ordered. F. Traffic Ordinance President Howell requested that action be deferred until Trustee Rush had an opportunity to review the proposed ordinance. IV. FINANCIAL A. Investments Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify. this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on January 14, 1976 at the rate of 6.310%. This Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $100,000.00 is drawn on the Corporate Account. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President ft-,,ell Nayes: None So ordered. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on January 14, 1976 at the rate of 6.310%. This certificate of deposit *is in the amount of $165,000.00, and is drawn on the following accounts: Water Surplus Account $ 65,000 Dep. , Imp. & Ext. Account $100,000 Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To approve and ratify this investment One federally secured certificate of deposit to mature in the First Security Bank of Oak Brook on December 10, 1975 at the rate of 6.125%. This certificate of deposit in the amount of $211 ,000 is drawn on the following accounts: Bond &Interest Account $ 44,100 Bond Reserve Account $ 11 ,900 Water Surplus Account $ 50,000 Dep. , Imp. & Ext. Account S105,000 Poll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Broom, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip, Rush, and President Howell Nayes: gone So ordered. 10/28/75 -2- (continued) 9e 3 nutes of MW� ng ''� October 14,MW V. OLD BUSINESS (continued) B. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass. of Chicago - Reconsideration —Sign Attorney Jack Bowers presented a request for reconsideration and reviewed the issues involved. Two new signs are proposed of 198 sq.ft: rather than one of 240 sq.f t. on the North Building, and there are none proposed for the third building on the lot. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . Based upon the unique circumstances of the building and upon the location and character of the surrounding area, that the signs as presented on October 9, 1975 by the petitioner be approved. Poll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown and Philip Nayes: Trustees Cerne, Congreve, Glaves and President Howell MOTION NOT CARRIED. . C. Bid Recommendation- Libra_ry Terrace Site Development Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . That F. J. Richter Construction Company, Inc—be awarded the contract for the Library Terrace Site Work in the amount of $25,532.00. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell Nayes: Trustee Cerne So ordered. D. Bid Recommendation - Rock Salt Five bids were opened on October 10, 1975. Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To award the contract to the low bidder, Cargill Salt, in the amount of $12.89 per ton delivered. Roll call vote Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. E. Report on Well # 1 Repairs Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To authorize the additional expenditure of $12,016.13 for the repair of Well #1 . Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell Nayes: None So ordered. F. hrist Church - Variation & Special Use Plan Commission recommended approval to permit parking on the property of Butler Company. Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the Special Use and Variations. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . 1) To instruct the Village Attorney to draft the required ordinance granting the zoning variations,as requested by Butler Company and Christ Church,with the exception of the 100' setback from York Road; and 2) To instruct the Village Attorney to draft the required ordinance granting a Special Use,as requested by the Butler Company, to permit development of the premises by Christ Church to provide for the necessary parking of Christ Church based upon the following conditions: (a) Parking area is to include landscaping, berming, planting, and proper flood control as shc:,:r. on the plot plat filed with the Village, SD-1 , dated June 18, 1975. 10/14/75 -3- (continued) #Pr. e 4 • tes of Meeting ober 14, 1975 V. - OLD BUSINESS (continued) F. Christ Church - Variation & Special Use (continued) (b) The Special Use will terminate at such time as the church rights to use the property for parking terminates, at which time the church will be required to restore the property to its original vacant state. (c) Church may permit parking facility to be used when needed for sports events being held at the International Sports Core only with advance notice to the Village and Police, and with parking and traffic control arrangements satisfactory to the Village. Due to another commitment, President Howell excused himself at 8:45 P.M. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . To appoint Trustee Brown as President Pro Tem for the remainder of the meeting. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustee Cerne, Congreve, Glaves and Philip Nayes: None So ordered. Mr. Frank Novacek, adjoining property owner, voiced his objections. Attorney Dave Gooder, stated revised site plans would be submitted prior to the' adoption of the ordinance delineating the parking. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, and Brown Nayes: Trustee Philip Absent: President Howell So ordered. G. Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation - Appeal , Special Use & Variation Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval to amend the ordinance to allow for Heliports in ORA-2 Districts. Zoning Board of Appeals further recommended approval of this request for a heliport on the roof of the McDonald's Building. Trustee Cerne moved To authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the required ordinance to add Heliports to ORA-2 Zoning District and to grant the Special Use as presented. For lack of a second. . . NOT CARRIED. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. . . That the request of the petitioner be denied for the following reasons: 1) Safety and noise problems. 2) Not in keeping with character of surrounding area. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Cerne, Congreve, Glaves and Brown Nayes: None Absent: President Howell So ordered. Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . That the Zoning Board of Appeals hold a Public Hearing for the Special Use provision, relative to Heliports, be removed from ORA-1 and B3 Zoning Districts. Roll call vote: Ayes: Trustees Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and Brown Nayes: None Absent: President Howell So ordered. H. Report on Census Trustee Philip commented on the Special Census of Population reflecting a 27% increase from 4,118 persons in 1970 to 5,240 persons. Increase Revenue allocation will be $11 ,422.00 for the Corporate Fund and $13,116.00 for the MFT Fund annually. 10/11./75 -4- (continued) � s ile No. 74-1805 C OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS October 14 , 1975 654-2220 C. Edward Ware Associates , Architects 415 Y Boulevard Rockford , I1 . 61107 Dear Mr. Ware: In accordance with your request , I have reviewed drawing G-1 and offer the following comments . I . I concur with your determination of 2. 7 acre-feet of storm water detention as being justified for this project. 2. The outlet culvert at the south end of the property is to be 27" diameter. 3. The locations of the proposed driveways connecting to York and Oak Brook Roads are approved. 4. The parking lot and driveways must conform to Village of Oak Brook ordinances as they relate to both thickness of base and surface and the requirement of providing curb. 5. Landscape screening is required along the south property line adjacent to the Novacek lot. From past experience I have found that parking lot grades less than 1 % and 'swale grades less than 0. 75% - 1 . 00% have not worked satis- factorily. Grades as flat as these require exceptional construct- ion control and maintenance to function without problems. Please call if there are any questions . Also, would you send me two more copies of drawing G-1 . Thank you. . Sincerely, Charles A. Littleton , P. E. Village Engineer CAL/ee cc: Arthur Ehle • Page Minutes of Zoning Board of Appeals October 7, 1975 6. Christ Church of Oak Brook and the Butler Company - Variation and Special Use Mr. David Gooder, Mr. Ware, and Rev. DeKruyter spoke on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Gooder stated that the requests of the Butler Co. before the Zoning Board of Appeals, were side yard variations to the south and west of the Butler property and the set-back variations from Oak Brook Road (31st Street) . Additionally, there would be a Special Use Request for the use of the parking lot as a parking facility. The Christ Church application requests relief on the York Road set back and has dropped their side yard line set back request from the application. After a brief presentation Mr. Rush asked for Questions from the Board. Mr. Lavery asked for clarification on the retention earthen dam, which was provided by Mr. Ware. Chairman Rush then asked for persons in the audience in favor of the development. Rev. DeKruyter, 20 Windsor Drive, Oak Brook, stated that the Butler Company requests to use the parking lot facilities on an emergency basis negotiated by the Church and was a good faith effort to assist the Butler Company in exchange for the free use of their property. Chairman Rush then asked for those speaking against the development. Mr. Leon Leaf of Lincoln Road, Oak Brook, spoke against the development, he felt that additional paving would aggravate flooding in his neighborhood. Miss Edith Chapek, 3121 York Road, spoke against the petition because she wanted no more traffic exiting onto York Road across from her home. Mr. Novacek objected to the 40 foot side yard set back waiver request on the south yard line (which had been dropped by the petitioner) . He additionally spoke against increased paving as aggravating flooding problems on his property, and objected to Butler Company using the church parking lot on various occasions. Mr. Jerry Hjerpe of Lincoln Road, Oak Brook, that the parking spaces were not required, that the parking lot was being provided in an area designated as a flood hazard area, and that an air polution problem would result, and because of these reasons was against the development. Chairman Rush then asked Mr. Gooder for a rebuttal. Mr. Gooder responded to the storm water management program, the traffic control and the driveway egress/ingress points. Building Commissioner Ehle then asked if the required parking for the church property would be met. Mr. Ware stated that it would be met if the driveways were used for parallel parking. Mr. Littleton noted that the outlet to the storm tention reservoir must be 27 inches. Mr. Lavery then moved that both petitions be DENIED because they have not satisfied the requirements of the ordinance. That motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Fuller than moved the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval to the Village Board the variations and special use requested in the Butler Company application, including Riders A and B and the Christ Church of Oak Brook application except that portion which has been withdrawn October 7, 1975 regarding the Christ Church south yard. Page 8 Minutes of Zoning Board of Appeals October 7, 1975 6. Christ Church of Oak Brook and the Butler Company - Variation and Special Use Continued This special use should be granted subject to the following conditions and restrictions: 1. The conditions of record including landscaping, berming, and flood control. 2. The Special Use is contingent upon the Christ Church executing its option to purchase the Butler parking facility. Failure by the Church to purchase the Butler property will result in the termination of the Special Use with the Christ Church being responsible for restoration of the parking facility to its original vacant state. 3. The parking facility will be used by the Butler Co. only on an emergency basis. 4. The drainage problems occurring on the Novacek property as a*result of the construction of the parking facility will be somewhat alleviated. In support of its recommendation of this Variation, the Zoning Board of Appeals sets forth the following facts as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section XIII G-4, said findings of fact being based on the evidence presented to the Board: 1. The subject property cannot yield a reasonable return under the conditions of its present zoning. 2. The subject variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Edward Fraser, Mr. Fuller, Mr. Allan Roysdon, Chairman Rush. Nayes: John Lavery Abstained: W. K. Skinner MOTION CARRIED. William R. Balling 1, Y VILLAGE OF OAK BROOD '� '� " 0! 11 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ` DATE OF HEARING: October 7 1975 APPLICANT: CHRIST CHURCH of OAK BROOK and THE BUTLER CaTANY ADDRESS: PRIOR HEARING:: YES �� NO ZX Date: October 7 1975 RELIEF SOUGHT: AME\wiENT APPEAL Z4 SPECIAL USE VARIATION DECISION: RECOM4ENDED APPROVAL 1 x RECO,NL.MENDED DENIAL CONTINUED _.l_../ WITHDRAWN OTHER MEMBERS ' PRESENT ABSENT YES VOTE NO ABSTAIN Edward Fraser X X Virgil Fuller Motion X X John Lavery X X Arthur Muschler X Allan Ro sdon .2nd X X W.K. Skinner X X Joseph Rush Chairman X X Recommendation of Plan Commission: Ap,,r ,-n�TA Date: 9/15/75 Referred to Plan Co:nryission: N/A Date: N/A * FULL TRAINSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BY DuPAGE .COUNTY REPORTING SERVICE RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Fuller moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval to the Village Board the variations and special use requested in the Butler Company application, including Riders A and B and the Christ Church of Oak Brook application except that portion which has been withdrawn October 7, 1975 regarding the Christ Church south yard. The Special Use is subject to the following conditions: (attached) The variations are granted based on the attached findings of fact. PAGE 2 SPECIAL USE — FlINDIN16and RECO ME\'RATIONS (Coriplete Section A, or Sections B and C — Section D is optional) . In support- of its recommendation of this Special Use, the Zoning Board of Appeals sets forth the following facts as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section XIII J_5, said findings of fact being based on the evidence pre- sented to the Board: A. 1 � cbawL B. u J]Qoilk :1e C etjccs D. This special. use should be granted subject to the following condi- tions and restrictions: 1. The conditions of record including landsca ping' bermin , and flood control. 2. The Special Use is continjzent upon the Christ Church executing its option. to purchase the Butler parking facility. Failure by the urc to purchase_ the Butler property will result in the termination of the Special Use with the Christ Church being response le for restoration of t e par ing aci—Tify to its original vacant state. 3. The parking, facility will be used by the Butler Co. only on an emergency basis 4. The drainage problems occurring on the Novacek property as a result of the construction of the parking facility will be somewhat alleviated. • PAGE 2D VARIATION - FINDINGS and RECO-IMENIIDATIONS (Complete Sections A, B, C and D) In support of its recommendation of this Variation, the Zoning Board of. Ap- peals sets forth the following facts as required by the Zoning Ordinance, Section XIII G-4, said findings of fact being based on the evidence presented to the Board: A. The subject property cannot yield a reasonable return under -the conditions of its present zoning. hmcmwisi= C. Ther subject variation will not alter the. essentia:]; character. of �. the locality. D. VARIATIONS *ngOrdinance Section XI9, 1-4b , The Zoning Board of Appeals, in making the determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, shall also take into con- sideration the extent to which the following facts, favorable to the appli- cant, . have been established by the evidence that : (1) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical con- ditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience -if the strict letter of the regulation were to be *carried out . - (2) The condition . upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning . classification. (3) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental. to the public welfare or. injurious to other property or improvements in-.the neigh- borhood in which -the property is located. -(4) The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and. air to. adjacent property, or substantially - increase the danger, - of :-fire, -or ;otherwise: endanger the public safety or- substantially diminish or" impair property values within the-.neighborhood: (5)- That the purpose._oz - the variation is not based exclusively upon: a. desire',to make more money out. of the property. (5) That the alleged difficul-ty or 'hardship has not been crewed by any person presently_ having an interest in the property. - . _ .s s C y. VILLAGE OF OAK B ROO K 1200 OAK BROOK ROA / D OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS October 7, 1975 654-2220 MEMO TO: A.H. Ehle, Building Commissioner SUBJECT: Christ Church/Butler Company - Variations & Parkin Addendum to Memo dated 8/18/75. g COMMENT Based on the submittal of C.Edward Ware, drawing SD-1, Revised 8/23/75, The required parking is provided on site. The criteria used in determining the required spaces is not indicated, just the total - 233 spaces. However, though the spaces are shown, the design of the parking lot and driveways are not in compliance with APpendi.,z I and II (pages 91 & 92) of the Zoning Ordin- ance To determine the amount of required necessary to receive the folling nformat information: be Church Number of Seats Auditorium Number of Seats (1/5 seats) Employee Maximum of duty (1/5 seats) Faculty Number of Faculty (1/1 member) If it were to comply, the required parking spaces could not be supplied. After the Board action of 8/12/75, approving the con- struction of the building addition on the property the church has title to, only, a conditional issued, subject to compliance with all ofet�tordinances, codes, and regulations of the Village of Oak Brook re- lating to the construction encompassed by the issuance of the permit. Respectfully submitted, Marianne Lakosil " ou VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS October 7, 1975 654-2220 MEMO TO: File-Christ Church of Oak Brook RE: Driveways on York and Oak Brook Roads The driveways for Christ Church have been reviewed by the Police and Engineering Departments relative on accident and operational stand- point. Both drives (existing drive on Oak Brook Road and relocated drive on York Road) are properly located. The Oak Brook Road drive lines up with Coolidge Drive on the north creating a four way intersection. It also is located on a four lane section of pavement permitting turning movements without blocking traffic. Both drives are located far enough from the intersection to provide adequate stacking with- out backing traffic thru the intersection. Both drives are at locations where headlights of departing traffic will not shine directly into homes . The York Road drive is opposite aside lot line. The accident experience is such that the Police Department does not consider either drive to be a hazard. Also traffic control during peak periods has not been a problem. Charles A. Littleton, P. E. October 7, 1975 Mrs. Marianne Lakosil Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Rd. Oak Brook, IL 60521 Dear Mrs. Lakosil : The church has decided to withdraw its request for a variance along the south line of Christ Church's existing property _ bordering the property of Mr. John Novacek. Attached is a copy of the application for public hearing which .was- submi'tted._in support of .:this 'request. - 0 Aft Co d'rall y yours, Allan W. Streeter :. _ 1g Enclosure: Application for Public Hearing cc: Mr. C. Edward Ware, Architect Thirty-first and York Road Oak Brook,Illinois 60521 312/654-1408 Allan W.Streeter Director of Business Affairs R> VILLAGE, OF OAK BROOK -� APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HE G ��' IName of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-1882 Address Thirty-First and York Road City Oak Brook State Ill. Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip General' Location (or) Address of Property: Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first (Oak Brook Road) , Oak Brook, Illinois Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) Zoning Amendment -ion Fee:. $150.00 F : $154.00 Fee $150.00 See attached Supplement A. MA ov ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS,, LOCATION. OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT .PRO?ERTY. -IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF THIE MO�,'TH FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH. MAIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook _Road (signature of Applicant) SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT A TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request a variation be granted to Section XI E-7 of the zoning ordinance to permit the existing asphalt driveway along the south property line to remain. See enclosed plot plan. The parking requirements set forth by the zoning ordinance can be met within the setback lines. . However, parking for the church is very critical. In an effort to meet the demands , the church has acquired the use of an additional eight acres of property. A variance will allow the church to park an additional 52 cars in close proximity to the church. This parking need occurs primar- ily on Sunday mornings. Presently, the adjoining neighbor has a very dense and high hedgelike growth along the entire south line. His residence is not visible from the church property. The church will install a curb along this driveway to prevent surface water from running onto the neighbor's property. In our opinion, the location of this driveway does not cause a traffic hazard or create noise, nor is it aesthetically undesir- able. This 40-foot wide strip will be used only as access space. It meets the requirements of the ordinance for open space. The ordinance is silent on the matter of access driveways. It does not define driveways as parking. We believe this is a unique application of the zoning ordinance and that a"variance will not cause .injury to . the adjacent pro- perty owner. 4 . V OLD BUSINESS E. REPORT OF ACTIVITIES - (Continued) Zoning & Planning - Trustee Brown - Acknowledged receipt of a letter from Mr. Jack Bowers, Attorney for First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of Chicago, requesting the Board to pass a motion to reconsider their application re 240 sq. ft. sign, which was denied at board meeting of Sept. 9, 1975. Trustee Glaves moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. That the board of trustees reconsider the application at their next board meeting of October •14th, 1975. Voice Vote - All in favor. So ordered. VI NEW BUSINESS A. First Federal SAvings & Loan Assn of Chicago, Request, Temporary Sign Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. That the village board approve the request of First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of Chicago for a temporary sign to be erected on their premises for a period of 331 days, commencing Sept. 24, 1975. Roll Call Vote: Ayes - Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell Nayes - None So ordered. B. hrist Church - Temporary Permit, Parking Area Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. That the board grant this request to allow stoning of the parking area during the period of construction. Roll Call Vote: Ayes - Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves and Philip. Nayes - None . Abstain - President Howell C. Authority to Bid - Rock Salt Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Glaves. .. To advertise the bidding for 1200 tons of Deicer Salt with bids to be re- ceived on October 10, 1975 at 10:00 A.M. Voice Vote - All in favor. So Ordered. D. Oak Brook Development Company Subdivision Unit 5 —Acceptance Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. That the village board accept the Swift Drive Cul deSac in Oak Brook Development Company Subdivision Unit 5. Roll Call Vote: . Ayes Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell. . Nayes - None So ordered. E. Oak Park Federal Savings Special Use & Variation - Temporary Modular Facility President Howell referred this to the Plan Commission meeting of October 20, 1975 and Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of November 4, 1975. F. Resignation of Trustee John W. Baschen President Howell accepted, with regret, Trustee Baschen's resignation from the Oak Brook Board of Trustees effective September 30, 1975. VII ADJOURNMENT Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . That the .meeting be adjourned. Time 9:40 P.M. voice Vote - All in favor. So ordered.. Res ectfully submitted, La erne J. Sl{r1le A VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS September 19, 1975 654-2220 MEMO TO: President & Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Christ Church Gentlemen, We have been requested to permit temporary stoxiing of the parking area located on the lot presently owned by the Butler Company. Temporary stoning would provide for parking while the church is under con- struction and during the period of time to hear the question of special use. This matter must be approved by the village board. Respectfully yours, D Ken th G. Carmigna Village Manager KGC/ls A 7C F u u VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 September 16, 1975 PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Re: Christ Church Variation -arid Special Use At "the regular meeting of the Plan Commission held on September 15, 19-75, the Commission recommended that the application to permit parking on the property of Butler Company (subject to a lease with an option to purchase in favor of Christ Church) located immediately west of the premises of Christ Church as an accessory use to the special use being made of the primary premises be granted. During the discussion preceding the vote, there was concern expressed as to the size of the parking facility and the. need for adequate architectural landscaping such as a berm and plantings extending between 31st Street and the parking facility, a screen of natural trees at the south boundary- shielding the lot from the bridle path in the forest preserve, interior landscaping islands and compliance with Section XI E 9 (i) (page 59) of the Zoning Ordinance relating to a pedestrain walkway at intervals not to exceed 200 feet. While these matters may not have been properly the subject of decision making by the Plan Commission, they are matters that the Plan Commission recommends to the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board in the procedural steps that will follow. Respectfully submitted, Ri, hard A. Barton Chairman - Plan Commission lvg cc: Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals • PAGE -1- VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK PLAN COMMISSION File: Date of Meeting Sept. 15, 1975 Applicant:— BUTLER COMPANY Christ Church) -- Address City, State: Tel. -.No. Prior Hearing: C] Yes No Relief Sought: Preliminary Plat Final Plat Rezoning Special Use ' Other Decision: X Recommended Approval -- Recommended Denial Continued. Withdrawn Other `lotion: Member -Noy the Village Board approval or the special use request by the Butler Company for a arkin adjoining principal special use (Christ Church) . Motion seconded by Member Scott MEMBERS. ABSENT PRESENT YES NO ABSTAIN Chairman Barton x x John Bowman x Robert List ec x x B. Jack Noyes x x Barbara Re nolds x x Harold Scott x Carle Wunderlich L x Recommendation of Staff: Date: Referred to Date: Respectfully yours, Chairman, Plan Commission Date: PLAN COMMISSION MEETING September 15, 1975 Members Present: Richard A. Barton, Chairman B. J. Noyes Carle Wunderlich Harold E. Scott Barbara Reynolds Robert E. Listecki Absent: John J. Bowman Also Present: Marianne Lakosil, Commissioners Aide Charles E. Littleton, Village Engineer William R. Balling, Assistant to Village Manager The meeting of the Oak Brook Plan Commission was held pursuant to a call on Monday evening, September 15, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. in the T. A. Mohlman Board Room. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 18, 1975 - Regular Meeting September 8, 1975 - Special Meeting Member Noyes moved that the minutes be approved, with the correction of Member Noyes ' name in the minutes of September 8, 1975; seconded by Member Wunderlich and unanimously carried. SUMMARY OF ACTION TAKEN: Clayton - Variation & Zoning Amendment. (Moved to recommend approval to the Village Board with certain conditions) Mayslake - Preliminary Plat Mayslake - Rezoning (zoning amendment) . . . . . . . . . (Moved to recommend to Village Board that zoning. for parcels A. B, and C be denied and also moved that the request for R-4 Special Use onthe entire parcel be denied) Christ Church - Variation & Special Use . . . . . . (Moved to recommend to the Village Board that the Special Use request be granted) SUMMARY OF ACTION (Continued) Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. (McDonald Office Bldg. ) - Appeal, Special Use & Variation . . . . . (Moved to recommend to the Village Board that the Zoning Ordinance be amended and that a special use be granted under the amended Ordinance. ) Oak Brook Comprehensive Plan . . . . . . . (Special meeting to be held on October 13, 1975) ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Plan Commission, Member Listecki moved that the meeting be adjourned; seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried, at the hour of . 1:20 P.M. Respectfull submitted, Mary ou Emory, Secretary Ys Y Oak Brook Plan Commission APPROVED: Richard A. Barton, Chairman i Page 8 of 13 Pages September 15, 1975 CHRIST CHURCH - Variation & Special Use Mr. David Gooder, the attorney representing the Butler Company was present. Mr. Gooder pointed out that the property in question is on the southwest corner of 31st Street and York Road. Mr. Gooder stated that what they are asking for is a variation inthe R-2 zone to have a special use that will permit parking on this property as an accessory use to the Church property on the adjoining parcel. Mr. Gooder stated that the Butler Company has leased this property to the Christ Church for 5 yearsorent free, with an optiontto purchase after 5 years. Mr. Gooder stated that he has sought the advice of Mr. Bianucci as to how to proceed. He stated thataretention area plan has been submitted to the Village and that this area is more than adequately being taken care. Mr. Gooder stated that they are asking for variations on lot lines on the southern and western sides. It was pointed out that the Forest Preserve engineers designed the Church parking lot. Member Reynolds stated that excavation is going on at this location the permission for which was given by the Chief Ehle. It was stated that the berm should be replaced. It was pointed out that a resident in the area is concerned about the parking setback. Mr. Gooder stated that this problem was to the process of being worked out with Mr. Novacek. Member Listejzki stated the Village Ordinance provides for pedestrian walkway in parking lots and their plan does not show them. Mr. Gooder stated that the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance will be met. Member Reynolds stated that this corner is a prime visual corner of Oak Brook and was concerned about it being a big parking lot. Mr. Gooder stated that they plan to put in plantings. Chairman Barton asked for those people in the audience who wish to speak in favor to do so. No one did. Page 9 of __1_3_Pages September 15, 1975 Chairman Barton asked'fthere was anyone who wished to speak in opposition to the development. Mr. Hjerpe stated that he lives on Lincoln Road, directly north of the proposed parking lot. He wanted to know how far from the center line of 31st Street the parking lot was . Mr. Gooder stated he did not feel that the Zoning Ordinance applies to this use. Mr. Hjerpe was also concerned with water run-off. Mr. Gooder stated that the proposed retention area should alleviate this problem. Mr. Hjerpe stated that one of his neighbors., who was unable to attend the meeting this evening, was concerned with lights shining into his home.. It was pointed out that the Village' s lighting requirements would be met. Concerned with ingress and egress, he wondered if there was an entrance proposed for the west. Mr. Gooder stated that they are just as shown. Mr. Okmark also lives on Lincoln Road. He stated that he has talked to most of his neighbors about this matter and they are all opposed to the leveling of trees and putting in. asphalt. He was also concerned about traffic. Mr. Gene Baroni stated that heisconcerned with setbacks and lighting. He stated that he and some of the neighbors that he has talked to are concerned with the setbacks. Mr. Baroni stated that he is talking a s •President of the Fullersburg Woods Association. He stated that the Church has activities going on almost every evening, which does cause a noise factor. Mr. Listecki stated that he would like to see it buffered from view from traffic on York Road and 31st Street, and against the residential property it should meetthe Zoning Ordinance. Chairman Barton stated that if this request is granted that it should be made contingent upon their staying within the requirements of the Ordinance. Member Noyes moved that the Plan Commission recommend to the Village Board approval of the special use request by the Butler Company for a parking lot to be used as an accessory use to an adjoining principal special use (Christ Church) . Motion seconded by Member Scott. Voice Vote : Ayes : Listecki Nayes Reynolds Noyes Scott Wunderlich Barton Mr. Gooder stated that the questions that were raised this evening by the Commission members with regard to the lining up of the entrance with Grant Street and other safety aspects will be further reviewed. Mr. Okmark pointed out that this corner can at times be difficult as far as traffic from the Church is concerned. i FOREST PRE RVE DISTRICT OFFICERS of DuPage County Frank H. Bellinger President Ray W. MacDonald 881 west St. Charles Road Secretary r Lombard, Illinois 60148 James K Clark Phone: 312-629-6700 Treasurer ` ► T� Howard C.Johnson,Director Carleton Nadelhoffer Attorney September 15, 1975 Mr. David Gooder Butler Company 1000 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Dear Mr. Gooder: I have been following with interest the planning for the proposed extension of the Christ Church parking lot. The project lies directly east of the property recently donated by Mr. Butler to the Forest Foundation of Du Page County. It also is adjacent to property recently purchased from Mr. Butler by the Forest Preserve District and a portion of the original Fullersburg Preserve. The construc- tion will obviously have a. visual , as well as water drainage affect, on District property. I would like to express my appreciation to Mr. Butler, yourself, and Reverend DeKruyter for your cooperative efforts in designing a functional and visually acceptable parking area. As you are aware, the plan being used is basically the one suggested by Mr. Edward Shalkey, Landscape Architect for the District. With this in mind I see no potential conflict in allowing the parking lot to come within five (5') feet of the easterly property line of the District and the Forest Foundation property. If I, or members of my staff, can be of any further assistance in this regard I would be happy to work with you. I appreciate your bringing this matter to my attention several months ago so that effective plans could be developed to serve both the needs of the District and those of Christ Church. Sincerely, HCJ:ma H. C. Jo n Director SERVING DUPAGE COUNTY THROUGH: EDUCATION - CONSERVATION - RECREATION �• age 5 linutes of S ' eptemoer 9, 1975 V OLD BUSINESS (Continued) ff. Drake Oak Brook Hotel - Extension of Ord . S-199 (See V, G) I . L. H. Metcoff (Greencase) Special Use The Plan COMM fission and Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended denial of the request for a greenhouse in a residential area. Trustee Brown roved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. . . To deny the request for a Special Use. Roll Call Vote : Ayes : Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves , Philip and President Howell. Mayes : hone So ordered. J. First Federal Savings of Chicago - Variation - Sign Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed and recommended to approve the 240 sq. ft. sign at 2011 Spring Road. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To approve 240 sq. ft. sign for First Federal Savings of Chicago. Roll Call Vote : Ayes : Trustee Brown Nayes : Trustees Baschen, Cerne, Congreve, Glaves, Philip and President Howell MOTION NOT CARRIED. VI NEW BUSINESS A. Authority to Bid - Hopper Box Salt Spreader Trustee Congreve moved - seconded by Trustee Philip. . . To advertise the bidding of a Hopper Box Salt Spreader for Unit 503, with bids to be opened at 10 : 00 a.m. on September 26, 1975 . Voice vote - all in favor. So ordered. B. utler Co./Christ Church - S ecial Use & Zoning Variations President Hov,,ell referred this to the Plan Commission meeting of September 15,' 1975 and to the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of October 7 , 1975 . C. Franchise Realty (`•icDonald' s Corn. ) - A peal/Variation President Hoi'7ell referred this to the Plan Commission meeting of September 15 , 19-5 and to the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of October 7, 1975 . D. (Not on the agenda) - IVestmont Public Hearing - Healy Property_ Jack Douglass Chevrolet. Discussion t•,as held relative to proposals for development of the Healy property at 35th and Cass Avenue , and for Jack Douglass Chevrolet at Rt. 83 between 35th Street and Ogden Avenue . Trustee Cerne moved - seconded by Trustee Baschen. . . That the Village Manager be directed to write a letter to the Village of Itiestnont requesting they defer any action on proposals for the undeveloped property adjacent to the Village of Oak Brook. The letter cnnu' c also stare t�h;1t anv pla.nG t�ri.th acc ��,s tc� };t ar% ir-ons_stenL Proposjls 'or 'said road to uc a liit%u access highway. Roll Call Vote : Ayes : Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne , Congreve , Glaves , Philip a7id PreSiC!^71t I-I0:: '.i.1 ��?32 Yore; ??oari Wk Broo.., Ill. 60;21 To: idr. Joseph h. Rush Sept. 8, 1975 Chi zrm-n of Zoning Board of Appeals O.^.:t 3rook Village IIP11 Oak Brook. ill. 60;21 Subject: Christ Church of ook. Brook p rk-inC Lot. ,ear <rr. Push: I r;3r�t to go on record as objecting to ar_y variations that conflict �sith the ar�cine lot ordin?nce pertinent to the present parking lot and the new aaditior--A lot because I may not be able to attend 211 the heariaes- T_.e -present pari:inF lot :pox is within 5 feet instead of 40 feet from our property line. In the -oast I have been led to believe by the village and a member of the Church 3uildinp of the lo* woiDld conform to the rarkin-:, lot ordinance committtia that the final version and this idil be the fin.' -, a lion of sae a. The reasons for objecting are: 1. Exhaust gases which. are a health hazard. z. Cirt and soot which someti",es have to be wired several times a week from the window sills adjacent to the parking lot. 3. Debris, cans, bottles, etc. which I have to pick up almost eve?yr aa4;. 4. Noise which many tires is very disturbing. Ground seepa;e for rain water is badly needed. r. They should have a,dequa_.te roux fo^ °crean. ra quid: Blanca of the proposed lot 'DIP-' and readily saw that a re-arrange.-rent could be achieved without undue hardshir nor loss of parking space for the church. Ecwev er, any reduction of set back from- our property line domes create a hardship on us ti,s already mentioned. AaDI_I�svhL 1`'- 'I'NG ?COL In the past we have had problems vdth floodir.-� , soil erosion and debris -tt the r,,-:7r of our property. The village engineer, '.r. Charles Littleton is aware of the oble s. .Uso, bear in mind that the area north of 31st :street dreins across our land. a;i&at now the drain &iannel is co:roletely p1ueL6ed Pith Gravel, silt and debris anC, the water ruh-off is eroding, new channels. There is such 2, large volume of mater r•,n--off that it cre;Aes a 75 to 100 foot -pride flood because the whole concept of drainer:; is beer_ c%--?n-.--ed. I will close by that the church >. a :great potential: of becoming a lard mark because Of its unique C1esi 17 , ch rerras:-: 3 individUalisM so lets not g )04 1 ±t•. Si nc' 'rciy yours, Cc?y `o: ri. Geo. ?.oxFell r:-'-Adent of Oak Brook Villa e r. Arthur ri. %'1c1 e John 41. . ova.cek =:11 1G'in- coy.ri ssi oner I ` • .:• wo�.lw like t`J �C�IieF7 ?�i^.y Y� F .^3 to 11E9i£t.e the flooding, problems. J`,« r n :'�P } VAtA OF OAK IROOK ill.. 3202 Yor: ROF:.(!, sue_t• > 175 _ . k,enet'h G. Ciarni flan Sub j°c'%. 01arist Ci urcla 0= 0ak Bro x=_ FEt i_i:ice Lo` Pro!==. ,� ;;ife aid I attended the Au ;-ast 13, 1'975 Plan Co's:sission zeetin to Of the Go:':is3iOn aviar'e of our proble: with flood.i-. ', sot, erosion on OI 0+-1r property. Howev r, action on L!7 e 1 Q Si2 :Ja i i AT E"r @i b-1-: we r. th - was ne t axle .o aend. At an infornal maetin= on Au ;ust 29, 1975 I had a. chance to L,lance at the uropo al to the e7distin to plus fhe additional lot. I object to the final vers_ _)n of the ex.stin f- lot bec?use it does not conf orz to the parkin-F lot ordinance namely that it is not 40 feet awey from our property line. In the past we were assured that the fir-al version would conform to the ordi--nce. TO sale matters worse, the present lot; has the in?'ress and ermess drivewa ad. =cent to our property and the final version shows parkintr stalls adjacent to our property. Our proble-_ is zainly pollution from noise, exhaust �-Iwses and dirt. My „ife as to wine the soot from our north Trindo s several times a week. The parkinF. lot now is 5 fee} fron our property line and we feel if it is W feet gi4?zT it Pill alleviate the problem- Also, we are concerned that the ad`.i tional -oa&.in^; lot will co :pound the _rOClems with flooding, soil erosion and debris at the rear of our property. The .Jilla�e enYineer, .=Sr. C. Littleton is acquainted with the problems. now the drain channel is completely plu=;7ed with xrravel, silt and debris fro.- the •arkin- late axd the water run-off is eroding new channels. There is such a_ la--e vQlu e of run-o-F` that it created a. 75 to 100 foot -aide flood across our property. In addition to this, :he drainacre fro:r, the area north of 31st is cOitpounkes because of various projects approved by the village. Because vie c-aaTL.ot attend all the hearin=s, please advise all concerned of our probies:s and objections so a realistic solution can be -thieved. I do not think a variation should be =ranted wren it create a hardship o n t�:e adjacent property. Tharirina you in advance, Sincerely yours, i) 6� John r. 2�ovacek P.S. I Mould life to review any plans to alleviate the flordin- roroble_:-s. 1 • A r c VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS September 4, 1975 654-2220 MEMO TO: Plan Commission Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Please note that this file contains three (3) separate applications for a public hearing. Since the requests are related, we have com- bined them into one (1) file to eliminate the duplication of material. Please notify the administrative office if this proves to be unsatisfactory. Included: Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation - Section XI,E,7,- (Supplement A) Parking Location South Property Line Christ Church of Oak Brook - Variation - Section V,F, - (Supplement B) Parking Location York Road. & Oak Brook Road Butler Company - Special Use - (Rider B) Section VII,D,2 & Section VII,C,2,g - Parking on Adjoining Property - Variation - Section XIE,7 - Parking Location South $ West Property Line - Variation - Section V,F, Parking Location North Line -�T--� Marianne Lakosil Village Clerk 1 BUTLER COMPANY OAK BROOK ROAD OOK, ILLINOIS E S T A B L I 5 H E D 1 8 4 4 PHONE. 312. 654-2211 CABLE: BUTLER September 2, 1975 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Re: Application for Public Hearing Christ Church Parking Facility Gentlemen: We wish to withdraw from any further.consideration our request for a special use filed August 8,. 1975. This has been replaced by a new request for special use and vari- ation filed with you on August 29, 1975. Enclosed herewith is our check for $150. 00 in payment of the minimum fee due for the last filing. cer ly, c DAVID M. GOODER Treasurer DMG/as Enc. 1 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING RECEIPT Name of Applicant Received by: g � s�� a 7 5 05 Q. ,-- (Village Clerk) (date) (amount) APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED: Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday �5 Publication Date - DOINGS NEWSPAPER Thursday Plan Co;mrission Meeting 7:30 P.M. Monday f, 15't-�,S Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Lq:k. `71 19 1s Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday (approval of ordinance) Vi"il\ La\Vv AP CATION FOR PUBLIC HEARIN Name of Owner Butler Companv Telephone No. 654-2211 Address 1000 Oak Brook Road City Oak Brook State Ill. Zip 60521 3eneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Nye David M. Gooder Telephone No. 654-2211 Address 1000 Oak Brook Road City Oak Brook State T11. Zip 60521 General Location (or) Address of Property: South Side of Oak Brook-Road 600 - 1000 feet west of York Road Legal Description of Property See Rider A attach d - - - State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance 0-60. ) Zoninq Amendment Special Use Variation Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See Rider B attached ALT APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE D?.AWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY B'ITILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF THE MONTH FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH. :.s IL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road VQA 13 r�.JVA t11ZUllt.'7.J V JL1 I (Signature of Applicant) . - 1 *RIDER A PARCEL "C" (Gross Area 6. 356 Acres) That part of Lot 2 in Old Oak Brook Assessment Plat No. 2, of Parts of the NE 1 /4 of Section 35 and the NW 1/4 of Section 36, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat thereof recorded November 10, 1964 as Document No. R64-42440 described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Salt Creek Highlands, being a resubdivision of Lot "C" of Plat of Survey of farm F. E. Graue, situated in the West 1 /2 of said Section 36, as per plat thereof recorded October 1, 1955 as Document No. 775 368; thence southerly and westerly along the east and south lines of said Lot 2 the following three (3) courses and distances; (1) S. 00-20--5411 E. , 115. 42 feet, (recorded N. 00-27'-11" W. , 115. 50 feet); thence (2) S. 78'-181-00" W. 314. 57 feet (recorded N. 78'-111-57" E. , 314. 50 feet); (3) N. 280-301 -30-- W. , 282. 39 feet (recorded S. 280-37'-14" E. , 282. 20 feet) to an iron pipe and the place of beginning; thence N. 00-20' -54" W. and parallel with the West line of said Salt Creek Highlands, a distance of 592. 82 feet, more or less, to the North line of NW. 1/4 of Section 36, afore- said; thence S. , 890-531 -4311 E. along the North line of said NW. 1/4 of Section 36, a distance of 441. 70 feet to the West line of said Salt Creek Highlands; thence S. 00-20'-54" E. along said West line, a distance of 660. 95 feet, more or less to the place of beginning, containing 6. 356 acres, more or less; subject to dedication for 31st Street as shown on Plat recorded per Document No. R64-42440; all in DuPage County, Illinois. 0 r RIDER B ACTION REQUESTED: 1. SPECIAL USE under Section VII, D. 2, and Section WI, c, 2, g, of the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the property which is in an R-2 District to be utilized as a parking lot by the Christ Church of Oak Brook which owns the adjoining property to the east on which it has built a number of church buildings. Attendance at regular Sunday and special services is so great as to require additional parking in excess of the minimum required by Village ordinances. Therefore Butler Company has given the Church a 5-year rent free lease to use the property for parking purposes and also an option to purchase the property at the end of the lease term. The land to the west and south of the subject property is owned by, or held for, the benefi- cial use of the DuPage County Forest Preserve District. 2. A VARIATION of Section XI, E, 7 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce from 40 feet to 5 feet the required parking space set back from the west and south boundaries of the subject property. 3. AN INTERPRETATION of Section V, F, of the Zoning Ordinance that the required setback along Oak Brook Road does not apply to accessory uses, such as parking areas. OR, in the alternative, A VARIATION of Section V, F, to reduce the setback as applied to the subject property from 110 feet from the north line of Section 36 (approxi- mately the center of Oak Brook Road) as follows: (i) 60 feet for parking area access and service drives; (ii) 85 feet for parking area concrete or landscaped "islands" and Rider B c ont'd (iii) 95 feet for parking spaces. 4. A waiver or reduction of the filing fee since Butler Company paid $150. 00 for a prior variation request for the same property which has been withdrawn. I- f - • Rec.JU'oul3, 7925 F� . us DpC.-jY0.2O3037 `. ^ �- . M,—171s;rcm �•'-`�' !� Ce�$rlinemf3ls+'sI`asCbnsJr,•r�cr�+d�`C�rs,ei-1 e - es• '� � tr � aslal dove'iaCldct�rkBmokAss/m`P/afJita�.. . �__ -c`�,-, ��' JQorfhlirte C�l.7PLUrh��'�Se+c.36-3.9-1! �4� "�� ' s• - ' :, ¢.4�ff befwr�r� • r a7:;. f Z. y. dk NGrtyssor a►fci O'!fS=.Irxe.. ---------------------- -i q h ry�.��rIL/rr ww. _•J�YIJ� T'�1 C�� .�Y O .rtJJi.JJ.�•'sl....�ww!lr.� s;i+L'j.•...+.st�L. Ul C- s •• •S8!_°08�1S:E �� 1� i tl!'CS�r7alSolf .tbvndlpy� eemsor- ..:_. , °f�9srol !�/ �'Ci�J'/Sl9ff.RGOf \ + ,g�o9l �+ 7n�•1 r�Y-s r r, • J M l".f t ti�ic...R•s 'rf-►G^� 7-r isry+ r�L►•'�^J�T"!G'�"y'�i'►ge �..jt a - Cv� .1 v A- .. t...► r r.. ca....a.. 1o�3T�Cy'2."fit" ��oSS�3REE3 =3Sf 225 RCR�S, 7tZET.F3.�22rR, 32.377' rPS F'l3'RC�L "-E7» - G!?GS5 -�•�.�R.N2�.rffz ad.R?r�•�l"�»t5e�weert Sic.In.�¢ 31SfSf. =O-O6O.tiCr� " � __ -n- -Al- •.gyp C r ' o � UN VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 20. 1975 I.C. Harbour Construction Co. 615 W. 22nd St. • Oak Brook, Ill. 60521 Re: Christ Church Addition Dear Sir, Please be cautioned that this is a partial building permit. You assume the risk and obligation of fully complying with all of the ordinances, codes, and. regulations. of the Village of Oak Brook relating to the construction encompassed by the issuance of this permit. Sincerely yours, Arthur H. Ehle Building Commissioner cc: Rev. DeKruyter Ken Carmignani ,,,�✓ Edward Ware, Archt. A.Bianucci - Atty. - (1 o (• B G O F Coum VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 18, 1975 DS40 TO: Arthur H. Ehle, Building Commissioner SUBJECT: Special Use - PETITIONER: Butler Company (Christ Church of Oak Brook) LOCATION: South Side of Oak Brook Road, west of the Christ Church property. ZONING: R-2 REQUEST: To allow for parking on a lot in a R district to serve the Christ Church located on the adjacent lot. COviINIENT: 6/25/68 - Variation (S-162) granted for Sanctuary and Steeple height limitation 11/12/68 - Permit #1414 - Building Permit issued. 8/10/71 - Special Use Ord. (S-237) amending Ord. S-162, to allow for construction of the church in a R District. 8/12/71 - Permit # 2080 - Permit issued for Phase II Dwgs. were approved as noted: "Parking restricted to 40' from Residential Zoning per Oak Brook Ordinance". (South & West lot lines) . "Screen parking along this lot line". (South lot line). 10/9/73 - Board approved paving of approximately 70' of additional space West of their property for temporary parking, not to exceed 2 years or the next phase of construction, whichever comes first. 12/10/73 - Permit #2974 - Issued conditioned to com- pliance with parking regulations within 2 years or next phase of construction, whichever comes first. Continued • i ( Butler Company (Christ Church. of Oak Brook) - 2 - 10/8/74 - Board approved expanding the temporary parking on adjoining property under the conditon "That the Church be required within 1 year (October, 1975) or at the next phase of construction, what- ever comes first, to develop and pave and landscape the parking areas in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance". 11/20/74 - Permit #3438 - Extension of parking lot with recommendation of Village Engineer of storm water storage with controlled release in the area of the ditch between the two parking lots. Accessory Uses and Structures: Parking: Not permitted in yards adjoining streets (Sec.V,G,h,13) Exceptions are for B-1, B-3, and 0 Districts. n} e 1 �e .0 WV14v, �..N Required Yards: Oak Brook Road - 100' from Center line (Section Line) of Road - (Section V,F.) York Road - 100' (Section V,F) Interior Side Yard - 156' (Section VII, D,8,b (2) ) Interior Rear Yard - 60' (Section VII,D,8,c) Required Spaces: Church - 1 space per 5 seats - 240 Auditorium -1 space per 5 seats - 42 School - 1 space per Faculty member - 20 School - 1 space per each full time employee. 12 Site plan indicates 715 spaces, however. Dwg S. D. - 1 showing the parking lot configuration is not in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Respectfully submitted Marianne Lakosil �� f PAGE -l- VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK PLAN COMMISSION File: Date of Meeting August 18, 1975 Applicant:_ CgRIST:.`CHURCH - UTLER COMPANY T Address : City, State: Tel. No. Prior Hearing: CX] Yes No Relief Sought: Preliminary Plat Final Plat Rezoning x Special Use Other Decision: Recommended Approval Recommended Denial c Continued- Withdrawn Other Motion: x9anMember Bowman moved that the Plan Commission continue the matter of additional parking for Christ Church of Oak Brook until the next meeting of the Plan Commission. Seconded by member Scott and unanimously carried. MEMBERS: ABSENT PRESENT YES NO ABSTAIN F7- Chairman Barton x x John Bo :Fan Robert Listecki B. Jack Noyes Bar'oara Re nolds x Harold Scott Carle V9;underlich Recon !endation of Staff: Date: Referred to Date: Respectfully yours, Chairman, Plan Commission Date: 3 of 13 Pages Ael , 18, 1975 BUTLER CO. (Christ .Church) Special Use Mr. David Gooder, attorney for Butler Co. was the only one present and since the representatives of the Church did not appear it was suggested that this matter be continued until the next Plan Commission meeting. Mr. Gooder stated that the 6 acres to west of the Church property, Mr. Butler has agreed to lease to the Church for parking purposes for a period of 5 years. Butler has the legal title to the land and for this reason they are the applicant. Chief Ehle stated that he met with representatives from the Church today and informed them that the parking layout does not comply with the Ordinance. Chief Ehle stated that they were going to go back and discuss the plan. Chairman Barton asked if there was anyone present who wishes to comment on this development. Mr. J-ohn Novacek stated that his property is south of the Church. He stated that they have a flooding problem_ on the rear of his property due to the construction of the Church -parking lot. Chairman Barton asked that Mr. Gooder take Mr. Novacekts problem back to the Church. Mr. Littleton, the Village Engineer, has looked at Mr. Novacek's property. Mr. Novacek stated that he is not against this project, but does expect his flooding problem to be taken care of. He suggested that this could be accomplished by widening she channel. Chairman Barton asked Mr. Gooder to ask the Church to get in touch with Mr. Littleton. Member Bowman moved that the Plan Commission continue the Matter of additional parking for Christ Church of Oak Brook until the next meeting of the Plan Commission. Motion seconded by Member Scott and unanimously carried. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING RECEIPT Name of Applicant � � l��LO Received -�`� l`osc $ Re b y (Village Clerk) (date) (amount) APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED: Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday ��• } \q`15 Publication Date -- DOINGS NEWSPAPER Thursday �, kg, \ Plan Commission Meeting 7:30 P.M. Monday l/ Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7: 30 P.M. Tuesday Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday 4, cif S Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday (Q'C (approval of ordinance) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARIP Name of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-1882 . Address Thirty-First and York Road City Oak Brook State Ill- Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip z Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Mr. Edward Ware Telephone No. 815-963-8407 Address 415 Y Boulevard City Rockford State IL Zip General Location (or) Address of Property:,.., Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first (Oak Brook Road) , Oak Brook, Illinois. Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) Zoning- Amendment Z�;7 Special Use X Variation Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See attached Supplement A. ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING OF A RECENT SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF TriE MONTH FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH. MAIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Prom Roar? i / 1 J l/C1A U1VVp J.tl.A.A1V_S.a VVJGi 11 A (signature of Applicant) Allan +ri . Stl rpeter For SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT A TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request a variation be granted to Section XI E-7 of the zoning ordinance to permit the existing asphalt driveway along the south property line to remain. See enclosed plot plan. The parking requirements set forth by the zoning ordinance can be met within the setback lines. However, parking for the church is very critical. In an effort to meet the demands , the church has acquired the use of an additional eight acres of property. A variance will allow the church to park an additional 52 cars in close proximity to the church. This parking need occurs primar- ily on Sunday mornings. Presently, the adjoining neighbor has a very dense and high hedgelike growth along the entire south line. His residence is not visible from the church property. The church will install a curb along this driveway to prevent surface water from running onto the neighbor' s property. In our opinion, the location of this driveway does not cause a traffic hazard or create noise, nor is it aesthetically undesir- able. This 40-foot wide strip will be used only as access space. It meets the requirements of the ordinance for open space. The ordinance is silent on the matter of access driveways. It does not define driveways as parking. We believe this is a unique application of the zoning ordinance and that a variance will not cause injury to the adjacent pro- perty owner. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING RECEIPT Name of Applicant Received by: � 4 _ IV) S IS��:.-s�-- (Village Clerk) (date) (amount) APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED: Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Publication Date -- DOINGS NEWSPAPER Thursday. Plan Commission Meeting 7:30 P.M.. Monday Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday�e�. r7a 1 1 5 t Board of Trustees Meetin g 7:30 P.M. Tuesday • i Board of Trustees Meeting 7:30 P.M. Tuesday c'cli • g S (approval of ordinance) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ASLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEAR* Name of Owner Christ Church of Oak Brook Telephone No. (312) 654-1882 Address Thirty-first and York Road City Oak Brook State I11. Zip 60521 Beneficiary (ies) of Trust: Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip Name Telephone No. Address City State Zip If owner is being represented by someone other than himself, please fill in the information below: Owners Representative: Name Mr. C. Edward blare Telephone No. 815-963-80 Address 415 Y Boulevard City ,Ro kfny-d State IL zip 6 General Location (or) Address of Property:,..,. Southwest corner of York Road and Thirty-first Oak Brook Road) , Oak Brook Illinois. Legal Description of Property See attached survey. State specific action requested and give reasons for same: (Refer to pertinent section of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance G-60. ) L�7 Zoning. Amendment !� Special Use rx Variation Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 Fee: $150.00 See attached Supplement B. ALL APPLICATIONS .;MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, (15) COPIES OF A SCALE . DRAWING OF A RECE'N-T SURVEY PREPARED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND SHOWING THE PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS NECESSARY THAT THIS INFORMATION BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRST OF THE MONTH FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF THE FOLLOWING MONTH. MAIL TO: Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road _ (signature of Applicant) I Allan W. Streeter for Cnr-'s = " f1,i.arr1, r••; 0 a '; u!•c0� SUPPLEMENTARY ATTACHMENT B TO APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING We respectfully request that a variance be granted to setback requirements of Section V, paragraph F, of the Zoning Ordinance to allow existing parking and driveways to remain and to permit the construction of certain new driveway and parking modifications as shown on the accompanying plot plan. The ordinance requires a 100-foot setback from the property line along York Road and. a 110-foot setback from the center line of Oak Brook Road (Thirty- first Street) . With one other exception, these are the most restrictive requirements, and the only such requirements, in the village. The church plans to provide more than the required plantings and trees between the streets and the interior drives. Unless the variance is granted, the church will be required to remove part of a paved area which has existed on the property since the initial church was built in 1968. The major portion of the driveway areas were on drawings prior to the enactment of Ordinance G 136 on June 22, 1971 . The proposed variance will allow parking, for an additional 16 parking spaces on the site owned by the church. This could amount to as many as 30 cars since the church double parks with- in the site on Sunday to meet the demand. The use of these parking areas is critical on Sunday mornings. At other times , these areas are, or will be, seldom used. The church will be meeting or exceeding the requirements for landscaping and green areas. In our opinion, the requested variance does not present any adverse effect on the surrounding environment, nor will it cause congestion in the area. Since the ordinance is silent on the matter of on-site circula- tion and driveways, it is possible that the present driveways are within the requirements of the ordinance but, because immediate consideration is needed, a variance is being requested. . c.7 . . �l�f 6 _Il�•yam!—T�'•L1-r+Gr.+'L..�"7 I �, ' ✓�—�,w�.r. }!i " �?v.r��.� ((++ (-"�--'_— ✓vim-+J._l+i..y.J.:.a-.��.. I * as Rec.Noul3, 19i 5 noc..rro.203037 t� ;r 77 -T ClCnh?rAvemfYpT'_s)`as aslalii'ova'lirC/o'cAakBrtaokAss°rntPJaf?lag ze Cb • p l� srrissar�crfa l�sc-c<lrre••s.3��sxs o � ' . o . v b A7 y'?E7art4 ob3`Res h ►�� ., ,. h t !l/cmrSvlf �c�Ilny►p;� . .F"ar�nslizzrtpipe• �e5* . � -,- � o�'c�r-lsJ9 f.� f K 1 Its Al G�t r, t-.y+ t'�L` y. •*-f't C•7 '+r�,r x,+'7'7•► T b �..,...e.... _,_� •. \ --. ..L�.'t�•�.,T,.:�''G.�i-..a.► }�fc"L°'.1�..�t'�� .....•.._,�.�.�.�a..•.. �. .,.�..1'.r-. a�.,� a..O'' "''�,.� F .��yRzyy, �.rs�C�L a,M7.1 •-..1/_. V�T.1 J� �i/_ —N`- �i ZT.r— •.�'•- _ i•�H.e"'7e 'H 1, I.5G.1 �. ::f•Gi' �'?T_,2aF?C7J$�J�.1::.r• - T�rr.u�� -O- r�TJTi4.�.1�.".T.r�ar+j�t 7.4 f�� h- RRS a o.xh4 m!�rcel» ,,fie/ule �z Sac.In. 31SfSf=O.0Go.vcr& f 00 r ST S T P E E T Y 658.9 - _ _---_ 662.5 . X10.3' c c • op to OK 5SAIM • 1 a0 XG l r � ' .. r� 1 617.p ��, ! i9.0 �" Page 3 inures of August 12, 1975 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Water Rate Adjustment The present Water Rates were evaluated, and after discussion, Trustee Cerne roved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. . . To direct the Village Attorney to prepare an ordinance to amend the Mater Rates, leaving the rates open. Voice vote - all in favor So ordered. B. Clayton - preliminary Plat and Zoning Amendment- set date for Joint Public Hearin Trustee Broom roved - seconded by Trustee Congreve. ... That the Village of Oak Brook conduct a Joint Public Hearing of the Board of Trustees, Plan Commission, and Zoning Board of Appeals, on September 10, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. in the Samuel. E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons, and that Notice of Public Hearing be published on August 21 , 1975 Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, Philip, and President Howell Nayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves So ordered. P Christ Church of Oak Brook - 4laiving of Permit Fee Prior to the public hearing for additional parking on adjoining property, the church requested approval to begin the Phase III addition. Trustee Brown roved - seconded by Trustee Baschen. . . That a pet--,it to begin construction of the building addition on the property the church has title to only, and that the permit fees be waived. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Trustees Baschen, Brown, Cerne, Congreve, and Philip Mayes: None Absent: Trustee Glaves Abstain: President Howell So ordered. D. L. H. Metcoff - Special Use - Greenhouse- tleyers Road-south of 31st Street President Fc•Kel 1 referred this to next. meeti ng .of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals. E. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Chicago-Variation Sign President Howell referred this to the next meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. F. John DuFon - Variation - Horse Barn-220 Breakenridge Farm President Hlo ell referred this to the next meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. G. Oak Brook Bible Church - Special Use Withdrawn by petitioner H. Butler Comn�-ny (Christ Church) Special Use- Parking- President Fcael l referred this to the next meeting of the Plan Commission and Zoning board of Appeals. VII. ADJOURNMENT Time 7:15 P.�•.. Trustee Brown moved - seconded by Trustee Cerne. .. That th—Is --atiricii be au,-13urineu. Voice vote - a1. in favor So ordered. Respectfully submitted, I. C. HARBOUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 615 WEST 22nd St. OAKBROOK, ILL. 60523 Phone. 654-2780 TO: Village of Oak Brook Date: August 6, 1975 Oak Brook Job: 146 - Addition to Christ Church of Illinois Oak Brook, Illinois We are sending Topographist Survey on above - per your request. s XXX Herewith For Approval Under Separate Cover Approved For Your Files Field Use Remarks: �' �f � i rl�'.7 ,t L C. Harbour Construction Co. VILLAGE .,K iL,_ M. H. Taylor BLDG.. QE 7' By y it