The URL can be used to link to this page

S-566 - 08/27/1985 - ZONING - Ordinances 0 ORDINANCE NO. S- 566 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1-B IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE VI(A) OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE G.H.Q. PROPERTY WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, the Corporate Authorities approved a Development Plan and amendments to said Plan by passage of Ordinance S-409 and S-564 respectively for development of the subject property described in Section. 3 below; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the request of the owner of the Subject Property, McDonald's Corporation., the Village approved an Improvement Plan, for the subject property known, as "McDonald's Corporation Office Campus Phase 1-A" by passing Ordinance 5-477 on July 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the owner of the subject property, McDonald's Corporation., has petitioned the Village for approval of an Improvement Plan for said subject property, said Improvement Plan known. as "McDonald's Corporation Office Campus Phase 1-B11; and WHEREAS, the Plan. Commission, of the Village has recommended its approval of said Improvement Plan. Phase 1-B as consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision. Regulations of said Village, and, as further consistent with the Development Plan as amended and approved for the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the provisions of the Improvement Plan for Phase 1-B and concur with the recommendation of the Plan Commission for approval of Improvement Plan Phase 1-B subject to the provisions of this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereirabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: That the Improvement Plan. entitled "McDonald's Corporation. Office Campus - Phase 1-B Improvement Plan" prepared by FCL Associates, Inc., et al. , as last revised on July 8, 1985 (Sheets 1 through FPG-4) and August 13, 1985 (Sheets G-1, RP-1 and D-1) , Exhibit "A" hereto, be and is hereby approved as consistent with the provisions of Section. X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook and Article VI(A) of the Subdivision Regulations of said Village. The provisions of said Improvement Plan as noted herein and as further detailed in the drawings listed in the attached Exhibit "B" are hereby incorporated by reference herein, as though fully set forth herein.. In the evert of any conflict between any of said provisions of the Improvement Plan or the drawings listed in Exhibit 'B" hereto and this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance herein set forth shall control and supercede any such inconsistent provisions. Section 3: That the approval of the Improvement Plan set forth in Section. 2 of this Ordinance is specifically limited to the property described as: Lot l in Butler G.H.Q. Subdivision, being a subdivision of part of Section, 26, Township 39 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded August 6, 1980 as Document R80-44966 in DuPage County, Illinois. Permanent Parcel Nos. 06-26-401-008; -009 and -010. Ordinance No. S- 566 Approving an Improvement Plan for Phase 1-B for Property Commonly Known, as G.H.Q. Property (McDonald's) Page two Section 4: That the provisions of this Ordinance and Village approval hereof are without prejudice to the Village's rights to require additional public improvements as defined in Section. 2(J) of Article VI(A) of the Subdivision. Regulations of the Village in correction with the approval of any subsequent phase or sub-phase Improvement Plan, other development or resubdivision of the property described in Section 3. Section. 5: That the "Improvement Plan Agreement (for) McDonald's Corporation. Office Campus Phase 1-B11, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C", be and the same is hereby approved and is hereby made a part of this Ordinance. By such approval the Village President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Improvement Plan. Agreement. Section 6: That the approval of the McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus Phase 1-B Improvement Plan as giver. in Section. 2 hereof be and is hereby expressly subject to the following conditions: A. That landscaping be installed on Village Commons property as part of the Phase 1-B Improvements pursuant to the Landscape Planting Plan., Sheet 4 of Exhibit "A". B. That the provisions thereon for the construction of a building known as the Maintenance Building is expressly made a discretionary part of the Improvement Plan and the approval thereof as herein giver.. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to require MdDorald's to undertake the construction of such building and it may elect not to undertake such construction without prejudice to its compliance with said Plan or its right to request the inclusion of these improvements in any application for approval of a subsequent phase or sub-phase Improvement Plan provided that if the Maintenance Building is constructed as part of Phase 1-B, it shall be constructed in conformity with Exhibit "A". C. That all requirements as contained in Section X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance governing development of ORA-3 property be complied with, including, but not limited to the requirements of Section X(D)(2) pertaining to the permissible percentage of office space which may be occupied by nor.-employees. D. That development under the said Improvement Plan as approved herein shall be subject to the issuance of building permits: (i) building permit allowing the construction of building foundations; and (ii) a subsequent building permit encompassing completion of construction of said buildings provided that application for such second permit shall be made within. 180 days of the issuance of the building permit as specified in sub-section (i) hereof. E. That all on-site and off-site lard improvements and public improvements be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications therefor entitled "McDonald's Corporation Office Campus Phase 1-B Improvement Plan" prepared by FCL Associates, Inc. , all drawings as detailed in Exhibit "B". Said plans and specifications are hereby approved. Section 7: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval pursuant to law. Ordinance No. S- 566 Approving an Improvement Plan for Phase 1-B for Property Commonly Known. as G.H.Q. Property (McDonald's) Page three Section 8: The the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify the approval of the Improvement Plan. for Phase 1-B by the Village Board upon the filing with the Village by McDonald's of an appropriate completion bond and other documentation as required pursuant to Article VI(A), Section. 2 of the Village's Subdivision. Regulations. PASSED THIS 27th day of August , 1985. Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush and Winters Nays: None Absent: None APPROVED THIS 27th day of August , 1985. Village Pres:F ernt ATTEST: Villa e Clerk Approved as to Form: matwT,,-1 Village Attorney Published Date Paper Not Published XX EXHIBIT B McDONALD"S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS Phase 1B Improvement Plan DRAWING INDEX Drawing No. Drawing Description 1 Title Sheet 2 Site Plan. 3 Site Plan./Development Plan 4 Landscape Planting Plan 5 Location Plan 6 Surrounding Lard Use Plan IP-1 Phase lA Improvement Plan. IP-7 Development Plan, ABG-1 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-2 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-3 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-4 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan LU-1 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan. LU-2 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-3 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-4 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan, FPG-4 Flood Plain. Grading Plan G-1 Materials, Grading and Drainage ) RP-1 Roadway Plan. and Profile ) Last revised 8/13/85 D-1 Site Details ) EXHIBIT B VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -3- April 14, 1?37 V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Dam & Sluice Gate - Old Oak Brook Subdivision: The engineering analysis for the Old Oak Brook dam was reviewed. It was a concensus of opinion that the Dam and Sluice Gate be repaired -.-ith the $50,000.00 apprcpriated within the FY 87/88 budget. B.J McDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B - Extension of Time: Ordinance No. 5-585 granted a Special Use Permit for filling wi`-._n the Flood Plain with an expiration date for removal of ss,,a not late_ than May 1, 1987. Trustee Philip moved, seconder by Trustee Bushy... To grant an extension of time for the removal of a temporary stoc'spile to July 1, 1987 and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary document. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. C. Owner's Subdivision (3622 Spring Road) - Extension of Time: Resolution No. R-352 required all public improvenenrs to be comp=eted by May 15, 1987. TruStce Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To grant an extension of time to August 15, 1987 and direct the :page Attorney to prepare the necessary document. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. D. Microphones - Samuel E. Dean Board Roam - Bid Recommendation: Authorized at the Regular Meeting of January 13, 1987 and five bids were received were received on April 6, 1987.. Trustee Rush moved, seconded by Trustee Imrie... To award the bid to to lowest responsible bidder, CEM Communic-_ions, Inc., to furnish and install a public address system per specific. tions in the total amount of $7,145.00. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trusters Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Hinters and President Cerne. Nays: Trustee Philip Absent: None So ordered. E. 22nd & Spring Road (7CS) Rehabilitation - Bid Recommendation: Authorized at the Regular Meeting of March 10, 1987 and five bids were received on April 1, 1987. Trustee Rush moved, seconded by Trustee Maher... To award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Allied �.smhalt Paving Company, in to total amount of $916,317.00. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Hinters and President Cerne. Nays: Trustee Bushy Absent: None So ordered. VILLA= OF OAK BROOK Minutes -3- April 14, 1:.7 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING August 27, 1985 MEETING CALL: The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order at 7:50 P.M. in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons by President Cerne. I. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Wence F. Cerne Trustees Karen M. Bushy Walter C. Imrie Ronald P. Maher Arthur W. Philip Joseph H. Rush H. Richard Winters ABSENT: None II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters... That the Minutes of the Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting of August 12, 1985 be approved as presented and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered., Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters... That the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985 be approved as corrected and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. III. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, VARIATIONS, PLATS, ETC.: A. McDonald's Corporation (Jorie Boulevard): , As directed at the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. 1. ORDINANCE NO. S-564 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A-DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS "G.H.Q. PROPERTY." Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-564 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None I Absent: None So ordered. 2. ORDINANCE NO. S-565 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WORK AND CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN PURSUANT TO OF THE CODE OF ORDfRXRCES OF THE VIEEXGE OF OAK BROOK McDonald"s Corporation - Phase 1-B5. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -1- August 27, 1985 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minu• -2- • August 27 1 85 . g 9 To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-565 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VO • A LL A L TE. yes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. 3. ORDINANCE NO. S-566 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1-B IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE VI A) OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE G.H.Q. PROPERTY. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-566 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. B. Vantage Properties (Northwest Corner, 16th Street/Route 83/Monterey Avenue): As directed at the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. 1. AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PARCELS OF THE ORA-2 ZONING DISTRICT (16th Street and Monterey Avenue). Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve the proposed ordinance. Discussion followed. Trustee Imrie moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To table this matter to the next Regular Meeting of September 10, 1985. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: Trustees Bushy and Philip. Absent: None So ordered. 2. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT OF ABROGATION AND THE FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS VANTAGE PROPERTIES RESUBDIVISION. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Rush.. . To table this matter to the next Regular Meeting of September 10, 1985. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. C. ORDINANCE NO. G-363 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IX OF APPENDIX D Personnel Rules and Regulations) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Rush. .. To pass and approve Ordinance No. G-363 as presented and waive reading of same. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- August ,?7, 1985 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING August 27, 1985 MEETING CALL: The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order at 7:50 P.M. in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons by President Cerne. I. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Wence F. Cerne Trustees Karen M. Bushy Walter C. Imrie Ronald P. Maher Arthur W. Philip Joseph H. Rush H. Richard Winters ABSENT: None II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters... That the Minutes of the Committee—of—the—Whole Meeting of August 12, 1985 be approved as presented and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered., Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters... That the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985 be approved as corrected and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. III. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, VARIATIONS, PLATS, ETC.: A. McDonald's Corporation (Jorie Boulevard): . As directed at the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. 1. ORDINANCE NO. S-564 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A-DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS "G.H.Q. PROPERTY." Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve Ordinance No. 5-564 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. 2. ORDINANCE NO. S-565 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WORK AND CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN PURSUANT TO SECTIM 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF T E VIEEIGE OF OA BROOK McDonald s Corporation — Phase 1—B5. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes —1— August 27, 1985 r i VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minut1P -2- *August 27, 1985 To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-565 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. 3. ORDINANCE NO. S-566 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1-B IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE VI(A) OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE G.H.Q. PROPERTY. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-566 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. B. Vantage Properties (Northwest Corner, 16th Street/Route 83/Monterey Avenue): As directed at the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. 1. AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PARCELS OF THE ORA-2 ZONING DISTRICT (16th Street and Monterey Avenue). Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass and approve the proposed ordinance. Discussion followed. Trustee Imrie moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To table this matter to the next Regular Meeting of September 10, 1985. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: Trustees Bushy and Philip. Absent: None So ordered. 2. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT OF ABROGATION AND THE FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS VANTAGE PROPERTIES RESUBDIVISION. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To table this matter to the next Regular Meeting of September 10, 1985. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. C. ORDINANCE NO. G-363 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IX OF APPENDIX D Personnel Rules and Regulations) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Rush. .. To pass and approve Ordinance No. G-363 as presented and waive reading of same. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- August .27, 1985 , e VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING August 27, 1985 MEETING CALL: The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order at 7:50 P.M. in the Samuel E. Dear. Board Room of the Village Commons by President Cerre. I. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: President Werce F. Cerre Trustees Karen. M. Bushy Walter C. Imrie Ronald P. Maher Arthur W. Philip Joseph H. Rush H. Richard Winters ABSENT: None II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters.. . That the Minutes of the Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting of August 12, 1985 be approved as presented and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Winters... That the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985 be approved as corrected and waive reading of same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. III. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, VARIATIONS, PLATS, ETC.: A. McDonald's Corporation (Jorie Boulevard): . As directed at the Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. ORDINANCE NO. 5-564 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A-DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(D) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS "G.H.Q. PROPERTY." Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy.. . To pass and approve Ordinance No. S-564 as presented and waive reading of same. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerre. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. 2. ORDINANCE NO. S-565 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN WORK AND CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN PURSUANT TO SMIN 16- OF THE CODE OF ORDI ANCES OF THE VIEEAGE OF OAK BROOK McDonald's Corporation - Phase 1-B5. Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -1- August 27, 1985 _�klk i VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -4- August 13, 1985 • structure, and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. VI. NEW BUSINESS: A. Police Department - Purchase Request - Squad Cars: Authorized at the Regular Meeting of May 28, 1985 for purchase from Schaumburg Dodge. Cars delivered did not meet specifications and were returned. Trustee Bushy moved, seconded by Trustee Imrie. .. To authorize the purchase from Thomas Dodge, the next lowest qualified bidder, for two (2) 1985 Dodge Diplomat four-door sedans in the amount of $20,166.00 with trade-in of two (2) 1983 Dodge Diplomat sedans. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Philip, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. B. Oak Brook Historical Society -- Storage Request: Trustee Imrie moved, seconded by Trustee Philip. .. To authorize the use of space available in the Fire Station, as designated by Chief Clark, for the storage of material to be saved for a future historic museum. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. DMcDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B (Jorie Boulevard): On July 15, 1985, per memo from Chairman Marcy, the Plan Commission, recommended approval and on August 6, 1985, the Zoning Board of Appeals similarly recommended approval, per memo from Chairman Savino dated August 9, 1985, of Phase 1-B of the development which calls for the construction of a 260,000 square foot office building containing underground parking for 600+ cars, Lodge Building 03 with a swimming pool, and a maintenance building directly northwest of the Training Center. They further recommended approval of amendment to the Development Plan regarding the location of maintenance building within bubble "F", clarification of structure height between Phase 1-A and Phase 1-B, and approval of the Flood Plain Special Use for the Phase 1-B reconstruction of service drive. 1. Improvement Plan Phase 1-B: Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Rush. .. To concur with the recommendations of the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the Improvement Plan Phase 1-B as presented and to include an agreement relative to the plantings on adjacent Village property, and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary documents to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. 2. Development Plan Amendment: Trustee Philip moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To concur with the recommendations of the Plan, Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the amendment to the Development Plan and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary documents to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -4- August 13, 1985 • I Ike, VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 9, 1985 Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: McDonald's ORA-3 - Development Plan Amendment McDonald's Phase 1-B - Flood Plain Special Use Dear President and Board of Trustees: The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its regular meeting of August 6, 1985, considered the application of McDonald's Corporation for a Flood Plain Special Use and amendment to the Development Plan which are required in conjunction with McDonald's proposed development of Phase 1-B. At the August 6th meeting, the six (6) members of the Zoning Board of Appeals who were present unanimously adopted the following motions: 1) To recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the McDonald's Development Plan be modified by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South of its present location, and further, that the last sentence of the Development Plan, namely "no building in Phase 1 shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, whichever is less,!' be deleted, based on the assumption that the proposed office building not exceed 53 feet in height; and 2) To recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the requested Flood Plain Special Use Permit be granted as the various factors set forth in Section 10-34 of the Village Code had been favorably answered. Sincerely, Alfred P. Savino, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RAM/APS/jr LORD, BISSELL & BROOK IIS SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 August 9, 1985 President and Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 6052-1 Re: McDonald' s Request for Special Use (Flood Plain) McDonald' s Office Campus Dear President Cerne and Trustees : Because of the need to raise , widen and regrade the shoulders of the existing service drive in the area south, southeast and east of the major office building to be constructed in Phase 1B, McDonald' s has requested permission to fill a por- tion of the flood fringe west of the Salt Creek floodway. As you will recall, the Special Use (Flood Plain) for McDonald' s approved on October 21, 1980, by Ordinance No. S-457 provided for modification of the flood plain more than adequate to meet the needs of the office campus for developmental and compensating storage of flood waters and control of the outflow thereof at full development. This work has been completed and, as planned, it provides 5 .91 acre feet of flood water storage in excess of that required. The filling necessary in connection with improvement of the service drive will reduce this excess by 1.4 acre feet thus leaving 4 . 51 acre feet in excess of that required at full -- development. Therefore, McDonald' s respectfully urges that its request for Special Use (Flood Plain) permit be granted. Respectfully submitted, CAM David M. Gooder DMG:pg LORD, BISSELL & BROOK .115 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD (� TELEX:25-3070 L05 ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M. GOODER Oak Brook, IL 6052 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 August 9 , 1985 President and Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: Phase 1B Improvement Plan McDonald' s Office Campus Dear President Cerne and Trustees : McDonald' s Phase 1B Improvement contemplates the completion of Phase 1 by construction of the following: 1. A major office building, 3 stories in height, with not to exceed about 260 ,000 gross square feet. It will be similar in design, construction and exterior materials to the Lodge and Training Center and will be located in Development Area/Bubble A where the Butler office buildings and the other buildings formerly used for the Saddle Club, horse arena and stables are now located. All of these will be removed or demolished. and its adjacent landscaped 2. Beneath the office building � p terraces, there will be a 3 level parking garage with parking stalls for a least 780 cars. I P g 3. The following additional buildings will be constructed in Phase 1B within Bubble D: (a) An additional wing on the Lodge (west of south bed- room wing) containing about 75 rooms. This is re- quired because of the increasing number of students attending classes at the Training Center. (b) A wing on the Lodge (west of its center) containing a swimming pool and other health facilities. 4 . The following additional buildings may be built during Phase 1B: (a) A maintenance building northwest of the Training Center to be located in Bubble F. LORD, BISSELL & BROOK sident and Trustees ,August 9, 1985 Page - Two (b) An extensiori• of the Training Center to the north within -Bubble C. 5. The service drive south, southeast and east of the proposed office building will be rebuilt and widened to 24 feet in order to handle the trucks coming to the .loading docks at the east end of the east wing of the building. This will necessitate regrading. and minor modifications of the flood plain. (See McDonald' s Application for Special Use (Flood Plain) ) . 6. Trees will be planted to meet the need for screening the new office building from Oak Brook Road and from the Vil- lage Commons. The existing oak forest will fully screen the office building from Jorie Boulevard. No additional plantings are necessary for the new wings on the Lodge since they will be screened by the oak forest on the south and west along Jorie Boulevard. Screening will be added as required west and northwest of the maintenance building and the northerly expansion of the Training Center. No new structures are currently planned to be located between or east of the Lodge and Training Center. 7. There will be no new roads , sewer or water mains . There will only be entrance drives and service lines for utilities all of which will be submitted for approval in the building permit process. In addition to approval of the proposed Improvement Plan for Phase 1B, McDonald's requests that it be permitted by issuance of a foundation permit to enable excavation and. construction of the subgrade parking structure to begin prior to filing its final plans, specifi- cations and working drawings for the above-grade office building. This will make it possible to begin excavating in the late Fall of 1985 and continue through the winter. Such permission was granted also for Phase lA. At the Board meeting scheduled for Tuesday, McDonald' s will have company officers present and also representatives of its archi- tects, engineers and landscapers all of whom will. be pleased to answer. questions and to make a brief presentation of the planned construction. The Phase 1B Improvement Plan as presented meets the require- ments of ORA3 provisions of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. X(D) ) and the requirements of the ORA3 improvement plan sections of the Subdivision Regulations. With two minor exceptions (see McDonald's Application for Development Plan Amendments) it meets all the requirements of the Development Plan approved May 31, 1978 , by Ordinance No. S-409 . It is therefore respectfully urged that, after reviewing and approving McDonald' s request for a Special Use (Flood Plain) permit and amend- ments to the Development Plan, the Board of Trustees approve the pro- posed Improvement Plan for Phase 1B. Respectfully submitted, DMG:pg David M. Gooder ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE At the Chairman's request, Village Attorney Martens administered the oath to all witnesses who intended to testify on these matters. Village Attorney Martens noted that because the Zoning Board of Appeals had adopted its Rules of Procedure for the pending Flood Plain Special Use application, the concurring votes of four members of the Board would be necessary to return a favorable recommendation to the Village President and Board of Trustees. David M. Gooder, attorney for the applicant, stated that he wished to first present testimony and evidence on the Flood Plain Special Use. Mr. Gooder noted that the Village approved the rezoning of the McDonald's property to ORA-3 and the Development Plan for this property in 1978. The Development Plan breaks up the property into areas which are "developable" and "non,-developable". All development must take place in the designated "bubbles". In 1980, McDonald's Corporation received a Flood Plain. Special Use for regrading and construction of the lakes on its property. In 1981 McDonald's received approval from the Village for the Improvement Plan. for Phase 1-A which included the Training Center and Lodge. McDonald's in now ready to construct Phase 1-B and has received a favorable recommendation, from the Plan. Commission for this phase. According to the Village Code, the Plan Commission recommendation goes directly the the Village Board for its consideration. Although the Zoning Board's approval is not required for the Phase 1-B Improvement Plan., McDonald's is asking for a favorable recommendation, from the Zoning Board on McDonald's request to modify the Development Plan by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South and deleting a sentence which pertains to a 48-foot height limitation. on Phase 1 construction.. McDonald's is also requesting a favorable recommendation from the Zoning Board to allow construction within. the Salt Creek Flood Plain.. Joseph Antunovich, architect for the McDonald's Phase 1-B Development and an associate principal with FCL Associates, stated that Phase 1-B would involve construction of 1) a three-story office building containing approximately 260,000 square feet and three levels of below-grade parking which would accomodate 780 cars, 2) the construction of 75 rooms and swimming pool on the West side of the existing Lodge building and 3) the construction of a maintenance building most probably located on the West side of the existing Training Center. Mr. Antunovich noted that construction of these improvements would be compatible with existing buildings and adequate screening would be provided. Mr. Antunovich noted that the improvement promised for Phase 1-A, namely construction of the 110,000 square foot Training Center, the 154 room Lodge and all site improvements had been completed and substantially accepted by the Village. According to Mr. Antunovich, the original McDonald's Development Plan provided 5.91 acre feet of excess compensatory storage on the site. To service the loading berths on the East end of the proposed office building, the service drive had to be widened to 24 feet and raised 2-3 feet above the flood plain.. Any construction will be out of the floodway. McDonald's is asking that the 5.91 acre feet of ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- August 6, 1985 _ r • • ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) excess compensatory storage be reduced by 1.4 acre feet to accomodate the re-worked service drive. Mr. Gooder interjected that Roger Lockwood, a civil engineer with the Illinois Department of Transportation, has submitted a letter dated August 2, 1985 which stated that the McDonald's plans for this site and the service drive in particular are outside of the floodway and that, consequently, the State authorized the proposed construction under Statewide Permit No. 1. At Mr. Gooder's request, this letter was received into evidence as applicant's Exhibit A. In. response to Member Bartecki's question regarding the drainage on the West side of the service road, Mr. Antunovich stated that a 12-inch culvert would drain this area to the East. According to Mr. Antunovich, the East side of the service road is lower so that the water would drain in a West to East direction.. In response to Member Weber's inquiry, Mr. Gooder noted that the proposed service road is in an area rear the former location of Barr. X64. In response to Member Bartecki's question., Mr. Antunovich stated that some water would remain. 1-2 days on the West side of the service road in the event that a flood occurred. However, Mr. Antunovich did not believe that this water would present any hazard, as the slopes in this area are very gradual. Mr. Gooder then introduced a 3-page memorandum which addressed the eleven factors set forth in Section. 10-34 of the Village Code. In addition,, Mr. Gooder offered into evidence applicant's Exhibit B, a letter from John. B. Hollywood, a professional engineer with Sasaki Associates, Inc. , which states in part that Mr. Hollywood concurs with the information contained in the memorandum. Turning to the applicant's request to amend the Development Plan, Mr. Gooder noted that the maintenance building which would most likely be included in bubble "F", will be recessed into the ground and accessable by ramps. The building should intrude approximately 4-5 feet above ground. McDonald's has not firmly decided that it will build the maintenance building. In response to Member Weber's inquiry, Mr. Gooder stated that construction of the maintenance building in its proposed location. 50 feet South of the original site suggested in bubble "F" will not adversely impact Ginger Creek. Regarding the height restrictions for construction, on the McDonald property, Mr. Gooder noted that there were two sets of height restrictions. The Development Plan. - contains one set of restrictions, namely, that buildings may not exceed 60 feet or five stories or 719 feet above sea level, which is the level of tree tops on the site. Mr. Gooder noted that all of the McDonald's buildings, including the proposed construction. for Phase 1-B, comply with these height restrictions. The second set of height restrictions pertain, to only Phase 1 buildings. These restrictions limit a building to 48 feet or four stories, whichever is less. The South end of the proposed three-story office building meets this 48-foot height ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- August 6, 1985 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) limitation.. The North wing of the building, does not meet this limitation due to the rolling terrain.. Moreover, McDonald' s has combined part of Phase 2 with Phase 1 by constructing the North wing of the office building at this time. Phase 2 does not have the 48-foot height limitation.. Due to the way in which the height of buildings is determined, namely averaging the height of five principal corners, the proposed office building is approximately 53 feet in height. Consequently, the applicant is asking that the 48-foot height limitation, on Phase 1 be deleted. In response to Chairman. Saviro's question., Mr. Gooder noted that the roof lire for the entire office building would be at a generally consistent level. Member O'Brien asked why the applicant didn't simply choose to call the construction of the office building phase 2 and thereby obviate the need to meet the 48-foot height requirement. Mr. Gooder stated that it was the applicant's judgment that although the proposed development contained a part of what was generally considered phase 2, this current phase should be labelled phase 1 to meet the 500 underground parking spaces which were required under Phase 1. Upon further questioning by Member O'Brien., Mr. Gooder stated that he expected that there would be at least two more phases by McDonald's. In response to questions by Member Martinello, Mr. Antunovich stated that the average height of the trees around the building do exceed the height of the building but that the density of trees was far less to the North of the building than it is to the South and East of the building. In response to a question. by Chairman. Saviro, Village Engineer Dale Durfey stated that he agreed with the testimony of the applicant and agreed that the swale on the West side of the service drive would not present a hazard to persons or property. The Chairman noted that there were no members of the audience expressing support for or opposition to these applications. A motion was made by Member O'Brien., seconded by Member Weber to recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the Development Plan, be modified by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South of its present location anal, further, that the last sentence in the Development Plan, namely "no building in Phase 1 shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, whichever is less," be deleted, based on the assumption that the proposed office building will not exceed 53 feet in height. - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- August 6, 1985 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -5- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (6) Members Bartecki, Crouch, Martirello, O'Brien., Weber, Chairman, Savino Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Member Lojewski MOTION CARRIED... A motion was made by Member Bartecki, seconded by Member O'Brien. to recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the requested Flood Plain. Special Use Permit be granted as the various factors set forth in Section 10-34 of the Village Code had been favorably answered. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (6) Members Bartecki, Crouch, Martirello, O'Brien, Weber, Chairman. Saviro Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Member Lojewski MOTION CARRIED. .. V ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Member O'Brien., seconded by Member Bartecki to adjourn this regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals at 8:33 P.M. VOICE VOTE: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED. .. Respectfully submitted, Richard A. Martens Acting Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Approved ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -5- August 6, 1985 Illinois Department of Transportation Division of-Water Resources . 1000 Plaza Drive/Schaumburg, Illinois/60196 August 2 , 1985 Mr . Joseph M. Antunovich FCL Associates 225 N. Michigan Ave . Chicago , IL 60601 Dear Mr. Antunovich: McDonald ' s Corporation Roadway Improvement Salt Creek, DuPage County I have received your plan submitted at our August 1, 1985 , meeting entitled: MCDONALD ' S CORPORATION OFFICE COMPLEX, PHASE 1B OFFICE BUILDING, FLOOD PLAIN GRADING PLAN, SHEET FPG-4, DATED JUNE 14, 1985 . The plan shows that an existing roadway in the Salt Creek flood plain will be raised . I concur with your delineation of our regulatory floodway and the plan does not show any work to be performed within these floodway limits . Therefore , the work can be considered authorized under Statewide Permit #1 (copy enclosed) . No additional submittal to our office is necessary for this work as described. Very truly yours , Roger Lockwood, P.E. Civil Engineer Northern Technical Analysis and Regulation Unit cc: Village of Oak Brook Corps of Engineers RL: da Sasaki nssooes, 111C. i Planning/Architecture/Landscape Architecture/Urban Design Civil Engineering/Environniental Services July 23, 1985 Mr. Joseph Antunovich FCL Associates, Inc. Boulevard Towers-North Suite 800 225 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60601 Re: McDonald's Phase IB - SA X65116 Floodplain Special Use Permit Dear Mr. Antunovich: In response to you request, I have reviewed the "Memorandum in Support of Request for Special Use Floodplain", dated July 15, 1985, which addresses the eleven factors to be considered by the Village in evaluating a Request for a Floodplain Special Use Permit. I concur with all of the information presented in that memorandum. In addition it is important to emphasize that this proposed work is the second step in the comprehensive flood plain management plan established in the master plan for the site, and whose primary components were constucted as part of the Phase IA site development. If you should require any further input on this matter, please contract me. Very truly yours, ohn D. Hollywood, P. E. smm/0767T Enclosure pCL A6� 11.U"0 F_S9 CHICAGO' 64 Pleasant Street,Watertown,Massachusetts 02172 617/9263300 Telex 92/2471 4649 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305/6611346 1925 San Jacinto Street, Dallasjexas 75201 214/9229380 r LORD, BISSELL & BROOK IIS SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90 01 0 (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER 3000 Ronald Lane TELEX:18-1135 Oak Brook, IL 6052.1 654-0561 August 9 , 1985 President and Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: Amendment of Development Plan McDonald' s Office Campus Dear President Cerne and Trustees: In preparing the plans for the proposed Phase 1B improve- ments, McDonald' s architects found that there were two aspects of the planned construction which did not comply in all respects with the Development Plan, approved on May 31, 1978 , by Ordinance S-409 . However, after reviewing the background and reasons for these two requirements and the fact that the proposed construction more than met all the other requirements of the Development Plan it seemed appropriate to request what we believe are two minor amendments of the Development Plan as follows : 1. Amend the Development Plat to move Bubble F approximately 50 feet south while substantially maintaining its overall size and shape. This is necessary in .order to permit the maintenance building to utilize the existing off-street, below grade loading area and also to permit the building to be built substantially below grade so that its roof will not be more than seven or eight feet above grade. Moving Bubble F will not permit removal of any trees in existence before the development of the office campus began. 2. Amend the narrative portion of the Development Plan to eliminate the second sentence of Paragraph 2 . In considering this request it should first be noted that Paragraph 8 contains an all phase height restriction as follows : "No office building shall have a structure height in excess of five stories or 60 feet in height or 719 feet above mean sea level, whichever is less. " *esident and Trustees ,'LORD, BISSELL BROOK August 9 , 1985 Page. Two The proposed office building will meet all three require- ments: it will contain three stories , be .no more than 53 feet in height, and its roof will be no more than 716 feet above mean sea level. The reason it will exceed 48 feet is because a wing ex- tending to the low ground to the east has been added to the building shown on. the original Phase 1 plans in 1977 and 1978 . If the east wing had not been added the proposed office building would be 48 feet in height above average existing grade. However, because the existing grade to the east is significantly lower, the addition of the east wing reduces the average grade by 5 feet thus increasing the building height to 53 feet although the roof remains at 716 feet above mean sea level. Since this would be less than the 60 feet permitted in all phases other than Phase 1 , consideration was given to entitling the present application as "Improvement Plan Phase 1B/2". However, this would have created other complications . Therefore, McDonald' s respectfully urges that its request for two amendments of the Development Plan be approved as unanimously recommended by the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals. R pec ully u mit ed, r Day .d M. Gooder • DMG:Pg OF OgKe • �w P 9po� O 'n G O O `2 9C� `yam COUNty' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 9, 1985 Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: McDonald's ORA-3 - Development Plan Amendment McDonald's Phase 1-B - Flood Plain Special Use Dear President and Board of Trustees: The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its regular meeting of August 6, 1985, considered the application of McDonald's Corporation for a Flood Plain Special Use and amendment to the Development Plan which are required in conjunction with McDonald's proposed development of Phase 1-B. At the August 6th meeting, the six (6) members of the Zoning Board of Appeals who were present unanimously adopted the following motions: 1) To recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the McDonald's Development Plan be modified by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South of its present location, and further, that the last sentence of the Development Plan, namely "no building in Phase 1 shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, whichever is less," be deleted, based on the assumption that the proposed office building not exceed 53 feet in height; and 2) To recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the requested Flood Plain Special Use Permit be granted as the various factors set forth in Section 10-34 of the Village Code had been favorably answered. Sincerely, Alfred P. Savino, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals RAM/APS/jr f ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE At the Chairman's request, Village Attorney Martens administered the oath to all witnesses who intended to testify on these matters. Village Attorney Martens noted that because the Zoning Board of Appeals had adopted its Rules of Procedure for the pending Flood Plain. Special Use application., the concurring votes of four members of the Board would be necessary to return a favorable recommendation to the Village President and Board of Trustees. David M. Gooder, attorney for the applicant, stated that he wished to first present testimony and evidence on the Flood Plain. Special Use. Mr. Gooder noted that the Village approved the rezoning of the McDonald's property to ORA-3 and the Development Plan for this property in 1978. The Development Plan breaks up the property into areas which are "developable" and "non.-developable". All development must take place in the designated "bubbles". In. 1980, McDonald's Corporation received a Flood Plain. Special Use for regrading and construction of the lakes on its property. In 1981 McDonald's received approval from the Village for the Improvement Plan. for Phase 1-A which included the Training Center and Lodge. McDonald's in now ready to construct Phase 1-B and has received a favorable recommendation from the Plan. Commission for this phase. According to the Village Code, the Plan. Commission recommendation goes directly the the Village Board for its consideration.. Although the Zoning Board's approval is not required for the Phase 1-B Improvement Plan,, McDonald's is asking for a favorable recommendation from the Zoning Board on McDonald's request to modify the Development Plan by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South and deleting a sentence which pertains to a 48-foot height limitation. on Phase 1 construction.. McDonald's is also requesting a favorable recommendation from the Zoning Board to allow construction within. the Salt Creek Flood Plain.. Joseph Antunovich, architect for the McDonald's Phase 1-B Development and an associate principal with FCL Associates, stated that Phase 1-B would involve construction of 1) a three-story office building containing approximately 260,000 square feet and three levels of below-grade parking which would accomodate 780 cars, 2) the construction. of 75 rooms and swimming pool on the West side of the existing Lodge building and 3) the construction of a maintenance building most probably located on the West side of the existing Training Center. Mr. Antunovich noted that construction of these improvements would be compatible with existing buildings and adequate screening would be provided. Mr. Antunovich noted that the improvement promised for Phase 1-A, namely construction of the 110,000 square foot Training Center, the 154 room Lodge and all site improvements had been completed and substantially accepted by the Village. According to Mr. Antunovich, the original McDonald's Development Plan. provided 5.91 acre feet of excess compensatory storage on the site. To service the loading berths on the East end of the proposed office building, the service drive had to be widened to 24 feet and raised 2-3 feet above the flood plain.. Any construction will be out of the floodway. McDonald's is asking that the 5.91 acre feet of ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- August 6, 1985 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) excess compensatory storage be reduced by 1.4 acre feet to accomodate the re-worked service drive. Mr. Gooder interjected that Roger Lockwood, a civil engineer with the Illinois Department of Transportation., has submitted a letter dated August 2, 1985 which stated that the McDonald's plans for this site and the service drive in particular are outside of the floodway and that, consequently, the State authorized the proposed construction under Statewide Permit No. 1. At Mr. Gooder's request, this letter was received into evidence as applicant's Exhibit A. In response to Member Bartecki's question, regarding the drainage on the West side of the service road, Mr. Artunovich stated that a 12-inch culvert would drain, this area to the East. According to Mr. Anturovich, the East side of the service road is lower so that the water would drain in a West to East direction. In response to Member Weber's inquiry, Mr. Gooder noted that the proposed service road is in an area rear the former location. of Barr. #4. In response to Member Bartecki's question, Mr. Antunovich stated that some water would remain, 1-2 days on the West side of the service road in the event that a flood occurred. However, Mr. Antur.ovich did not believe that this water would present any hazard, as the slopes in this area are very gradual. Mr. Gooder then introduced a 3-page memorandum which addressed the eleven factors set forth in Section. 10-34 of the Village Code. In addition., Mr. Gooder offered into evidence applicant's Exhibit B, a letter from John B. Hollywood, a professional engineer with Sasaki Associates, Inc. , which states in part that Mr. Hollywood concurs with the information contained in the memorandum. Turning to the applicant's request to amend the Development Plan., Mr. Gooder noted that the maintenance building which would most likely be included in bubble "F", will be recessed into the ground and accessable by ramps. The building should intrude approximately 4-5 feet above ground. McDonald's has not firmly decided that it will build the maintenance building. In response to Member Weber's inquiry, Mr. Gooder stated that construction of the maintenance building in its proposed location. 50 feet South of the original site suggested in bubble "F" will not adversely impact Ginger Creek. Regarding the height restrictions for construction on the McDonald property, Mr. Gooder noted that there were two sets of height restrictions. The Development Plan, contains one set of restrictions, namely, that buildings may not exceed 60 feet or five stories or 719 feet above sea level, which is the level of tree tops on the site. Mr. Gooder noted that all of the McDonald's buildings, including the proposed construction. for Phase 1-B, comply with these height restrictions. The second set of height restrictions pertain, to only Phase 1 buildings. These restrictions limit a building to 48 feet or four stories, whichever is less. The South end of the proposed three-story office building meets this 48-foot height ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- August 6, 1985 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- August 6, 1985 IV McDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) limitation.. The North wing of the building, does not meet this limitation, due to the rolling terrain.. Moreover, McDonald's has combined part of Phase 2 with Phase 1 by constructing the North wing of the office building at this time. Phase 2 does not have the 48-foot height limitation.. Due to the way in which the height of buildings is determined, namely averaging the height of five principal corners, the proposed office building is approximately 53 feet in height. Consequently, the applicant is asking that the 48-foot height limitation. on Phase 1 be deleted. In. response to Chairman. Saviro's question., Mr. Gooder noted that the roof line for the entire office building would be at a generally consistent level. Member O'Brien. asked why the applicant didn't simply choose to call the construction of the office building phase 2 and thereby obviate the reed to meet the 48-foot height requirement. Mr. Gooder stated that it was the applicant's judgment that although the proposed development contained a part of what was generally considered phase 2, this current phase should be labelled phase 1 to meet the 500 underground parking spaces which were required under Phase 1. Upon further .questiorirg by Member O'Brien, Mr. Gooder stated that he expected that there would be at least two more phases by McDonald's. In response to questions by Member Martirello, Mr. Anturovich stated that the average height of the trees around the building do exceed the height of the building but that the density of trees was far less to the North of the building than it is to the South and East of the building. In response to a question by Chairman Savino, Village Engineer Dale Durfey stated that he agreed with the testimony of the applicant and agreed that the swale on the West side of the service drive would not present a hazard to persons or property. The Chairman noted that there were no members of the audience expressing support for or opposition to these applications. A motion was made by Member O'Brien., seconded by Member Weber to recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the Development Plan be modified by moving bubble "F" 50 feet to the South of its present location and, further, that the last sentence in the Development Plan, namely "no building in Phase 1 shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, whichever is less," be deleted, based on the assumption that the proposed office building will not exceed 53 feet in height. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- August 6, 1985 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -5- August 6, 1985 IV MCDONALD'S ORA-3 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT McDONALD'S 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE (Continued) ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (6) Members Bartecki, Crouch, Martinello, O'Brien., Weber, Chairman. Saviro Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Member Lojewski MOTION CARRIED. .. A motion was made by Member Bartecki, seconded by Member O'Brien. to recommend to the President and Board of Trustees that the requested Flood Plain Special Use Permit be granted as the various factors set forth in Section. 10-34 of the Village Code had been favorably answered. _ ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (6) Members Bartecki, Crouch, Martirello, O'Brien, Weber, Chairman. Savino Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Member Lojewski MOTION CARRIED. .. V ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by Member O'Brien, seconded by Member Bartecki to adjourn this regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals at 8:33 P.M. VOICE VOTE: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED. .. Respectfully submitted, Richard A. Martens Acting Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Approved ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -5- August 6, 1985 • GOOF 0,4k � BOO G N 4 �O �COUNT�' VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 August 1, 1985 MEMO TO: John H. Brechin, Village Manager FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's - Phase 1-B - 1) Improvement Plan 2) Development Plan Amendment 3) Flood Plain Special Use McDonald's Corporation has made three specific applications relative to the continued development of the McDonald's Office Campus as follows: 1) Phase 1-B Improvement Plan - This second phase of the development calls for the construction of an office building of 260,000 square feet containing underground parking for 600+ cars, lodge building #3 with a swimming pool, and a maintenance building directly northwest of the existing training center. i The Plan Commission, . at its July 15, 1985 meeting, recommended approval of this phase of the development. 2) Improvement Plan Amendment - Ordinance No. S-409, approved by the Village on May 31, 1978, approved a Development Plan and Plat for the total development of the McDonald's Office Campus, copies of which documents are contained in the Development Plan Amendment file. Referring to page 1 of Exhibit B to Ordinance S-409, Item #2 states in part "No building in Phase 1 shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, which- ever is less." The proposed Phase 1-B office building will be approximately 53 feet in height as measured from Natural Ground Level and, thereby, fails to meet this requirement. In this regard, Item #8 on page 3 of that Exhibit B states that "No office building shall have a structure height in excess of five stories or 60 feet in height." In reviewing the Phase 1-B proposal, it became clear that it really contained elements of both the first and second proposed phases of the office campus development. However, instead of referring to the proposed • RE: McDonald's - Phase 1-B "Angus"t 1, 1985 Page 2 development as "Phase 1-B, 2" which would have indicated elements of two phases being proposed, the applicant has chosen to modify the original Development Plan concerning the 48-foot structure height maximum for buildings within Phase 1. The second part of this application concerns development bubble F which is proposed to contain a one-story maintenance building. The proposed location of the mainten- ance building extends South of the originally proposed bubble F and, therefore, application has been made to relocate the boundary of bubble F to the South. The Plan Commission, at its July 15th meeting, recommended approval of both of the above amendments. Since the Zoning Board of Appeals, as of this date, intends to consider .these amendments at its August 6th meeting, I would refer you to minutes of that meeting concerning their specific recommendations. 3) Flood Plain Special Use - As part of the Phase 1-A improvement, McDonald's con- structed a service drive along the eastern edge of the property adjacent to Salt Creek. Phase 1-B, as presently proposed, calls for the service drive to be reconstructed to provide access to proposed loading docks. This reconstruction of the roadway includes certain flood plain filling operations to raise the service drive above the Salt Creek flood plain. The revised flood plain grading is shown on Sheet FPG-4 dated as last revised July 8, 1985 contained in the Flood Plain Special Use folder. As noted on the Plan, the floodway or moving portion of a flood will not be impacted by the road- way improvement, since only the flood fringe will be affected. As indicated by documents submitted by the applicant, excess storm water storage provided as a part of Phase 1-A will more than compensate for the additional filling for the service drive reconstruction. The Plan Commission, at its July 15th meeting, recommended approval of the requested Flood Plain Special Use Permit. I refer you to the Zoning Board's August 6th minutes concerning their recommendations with respect to this application. In the event the Village Board should choose to grant the requested relief, it would be appropriate for them to direct the Village Attorney to $raft the necessary ordinances incorporating approval of the Improvement Plan, modification to the Development Plan and Plat (Ordinance 5-409) and approval .of the Flood Plain Special Use Permit. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/j r PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -3- July 15, 1985 V MCDONALD'S IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT David M. Gooder, attorney for the applicant, noted that the McDonald's Corporation is preparing plans for its next phase of development of the McDorald1t Office Campus to be known. as Phase 1-B. The primary construction proposed for this phase will be the first major office building on the site ranging in size from 200,000-260,000 square feet of floor area. He noted that in conjunction with the Village's approval of this Improvement Plan, they have made application to modify the Development Plan. and Plat, approved by the Village in 1978, as well as a Flood Plain Special Use Permit which will permit modification of the service drive adjacent to Salt Creek. Chairman Marcy noted the approximate time schedule attached to Ordinance S-409, which approved the McDonald's Development Plan. Mr. Gooder noted that the schedule contained in Ordinance S-409 was only approximate based on a preliminary time table for development. Joe Antunovich, architect for the development, noted that this Phase 1-B Office Building would take approximately 30 months for construction with the additional time being for construction of three below-grade levels of parking. He further noted that as a part of Phase 1-A, McDonald's chose to construct all lard improvements, utilities, roadways, and storm water detention facilities based on full development of the property. He further noted that the proposed office building will be approximately three stories and only project 42 feet above the highest point within. bubble A. It was noted that one of the Development Plan amendments requested relates to the severe slope within. bubble A and a modified office building layout from that originally proposed in 1978. He also made the following comments with respect to Phase 1-B: 1. A proposed walkway will connect the existing lodge building and proposed office building, running over Ronald Lane, with a 14-foot clear height under the walkway. 2. An addition to the lodge facility comprising 75 rooms and enclosed pool are proposed for Phase 1-B. 3. The proposed maintenance building as part of this phase will be a ore-story grounds maintenance building within. bubble F. In response to Chairman Marcy, Mr. Antunovich stated that phases 2, 3 and 4, comprised entirely of office building construction., will be additional wings added on to the current proposed building. In response to Member Haglund, Mr. Antunovich stated that the design of the underground parking decks is very difficult due to the high water table and that the entire underground construction will be made watertight. He also noted that this underground parking will extend approximately 35 feet below ground. PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -3- July 15, 1985 PLAN COMMISSION Mirtues -4- July 15, 1985 V MCDONALD'S IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Continued) David Gooder and Joe Arturovich noted that the various items contained in Dale Durfey's memo of July 11, 1985 will be taker, care of, although they are making certain requests as follows: The first request is to be able to delay submittal of a detailed grading plan around the office building until application is made for a building permit. In addition., they are requesting permission to plant some minor landscaping on Village Commons property to serve as additional screening of the development. Member Doyle stated his concern with respect to the close spacing of such large diameter trees. Mr. Arturovich stated that Mc Donald's and Brickman Landscape Company have had success with such plantings in the past. Mr. Gooder noted that the requested flood plain, special use permit will permit construction of an enlarged service drive to the East of the office building which will service the loading berths behind the building. The proposal is to widen this driveway to 24 feet in width, taking it, for the most part, above the 100-year flood plain.. He further noted that there will be no modification to the floodway of Salt Creek and only minor modifications to the flood fringe. Member Stachniak arrived at this point of the meeting. Mr. Gooder noted that in conjunction with Phase 1-A, 5.9 acre feet of additional storm detention was created. This proposed roadway modification will fill 1.4 acre feet of that surplus detention.. Mr. Gooder stated the applicant's willingness to comply with the review items contained in Dale Durfey's memo of July 11, 1985 concerning the flood plain special use. Mr. Gooder further submitted a memorandum in support of the requested flood plain special use addressing the eleven factors contained in Section 10-34 of the Village Code concerning flood plain. modifications.' Mr. Gooder noted that there were two specific modifications requested to the development plan and plat which was approved pursuant to Ordinance S-409 passed by the Village in 1978. The first modification concerns construction, of the proposed ore-story maintenance building and that it was determined that it would be best to relocate bubble F - approximately 75 feet to the South. It was noted that the proposed building will only project approximately 6 feet above current ground level, since the majority of the building will be dug into the hill. PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -4- July 15, 1985 PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -5- July 15, 1985 V McDONALD'S IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE 1-B - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE - DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Continued) Mr. Arturovich stated that the exterior of the building will be constructed of Lannon stone, as viewed from Jorie Boulevard. Mr. Gooder stated that the second requested modification is to strike the sentence in paragraph 2 of the Development Plan, which presently prohibits any building within. Phase 1 to exceed four stories or 48 feet in height whichever is less. Mr. Gooder noted that the other height requirement contained in the Development Plan is under item #8 which states that no office building shall exceed five stories or 60 feet in height or elevation. 719.0 feet. He noted that the average height figured against the natural ground level for the office building is approximately 53 feet. If, however, the westerly portion of the proposed building were considered by itself, that portion of the building would meet the 48-foot height limitation. Chairman Marcy commented that the Development Plan was primarily concerned with keeping all buildings below tree height, and that the proposed 1-B development appears to meet that concern.. A motion was made by Member Sardstedt, seconded by Member Stachriak to approve the two requested development plan, amendments based on the assumption that the proposed office building will not exceed 53 feet in height and that the modified bubble F will remain the same size but only be moved in a southerly direction based on testimony that this modification will have no impact on any original trees located on the site. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (5) Members Doyle, Haglund, Sardstedt, Stachniak, Chairman. Marcy Nays: (0) Absent: (2) Members Antoniou, Beard. MOTION CARRIED... A motion was made by Member Doyle, seconded by Member Haglund to approve the requested Flood Plain. Special Use Permit subject to a confirmation by the Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources concerning the actual boundary of the Salt Creek floodway. �I PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -5- July 15, 1985 PLAN COMMISSION Minutes —6— July 15, 1985 V MCDONALD'S IMPROVEMENT PLAN — PHASE 1—B — FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE — DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Continued) ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (5) Members Doyle, Haglund, Sandstedt, Stachriak, Chairman Marcy Nays: (0) Absent: (2) Members Artoniou, Beard MOTION CARRIED. .. A motion was made by Member Haglund, seconded by Member Doyle to recommend approval of the Phase 1—B Improvement Plan., based on a modification to the Development Plan and Plat as recommended by the Plan. Commission., subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the Village of certain proposed plantings on Village Commons property. 2. Waiver of the requirement to submit a detailed grading plan until such time as the building permit application has been submitted. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (5) Members Doyle, Haglund, Sardstedt, Stachniak, Chairman. Marcy Nays: (0) Absent: (2) Members Antoriou, Beard MOTION CARRIED. .. PLAN COMMISSION Minutes —6— July 15, 1985 vPGSOfOgKe90 • O� O n G o �a COUNT VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 554-2220 July 30, 1985 Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: McDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B Dear President and Board of Trustees: The Plan Commission, at its regular meeting of July 15, 1985, considered the application of McDonald's Corporation for approval of their Phase 1-B Improvement Plan. This phase of the development will include the construction of an office building containing approximately 260,000 square feet of floor area, underground parking for 600+ cars, lodge building number 3 with a swimming pool, and a main- tenance building directly North of the existing training center. The Plan Commission recommends to the President and Board of Trustees approval of the Phase 1-B Improvement Plan based on a modification to the Development Plan and Plat as recommended by the Plan Commission subject to the following conditions: 1) Approval by the Village of certain proposed plantings on Village Commons property. 2) Waiver of the requirement to submit a detailed grading plan until such time as the Building Permit application has been submitted. This recommendation was made on a motion by Member Haglund, seconded by Member Doyle and approved on a Roll Call Vote of five (5) ayes: Members Doyle, Haglund, CD Sandstedt, Stachniak, Chairman Marcy; zero (0) nays; two (2) absent: Members Antoniou, Beard. Sincerely, Henry 0. Marcy, Chairman Plan Commission BFK/HOM/jr VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Mies —5— July 9, 1985 1. Variations: To concur with the recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the Variations for reduction, of Loading Berths from 3 to 2; location to the side of the building instead of the rear; Front Yard for underground parking to 23 feet from front lot line; and Driveway separation from 228 feet to 196 feet; based upon, the Grading Plan dated June 28, 1985 and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the required ordinance. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. 2. Flood Plain Special Use: David H. Gooder explained that the requested Flood Plain, Special Use relates to the minor regrading of existing flood fringe areas and that no negative impact will be created as the result of this regrading. Trustee Imrie moved, seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To approve the Flood Plain Special Use subject to the installation, of appropriate sump pumps and emergency generating systems to prevent an accumulation of water in the underground parking area and that the Village Attorney be directed to prepare the required ordinance. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. 3. Assessment Plat: Proposed 701 Harger Road Assessment Plat consolidates two (2) existing lots into one (1) lot. Trustee Imrie moved, seconded by Trustee Rush. . . To approve the 701 Harger Road Assessment Plat subject to all items contained in Village Engineer Dale Durfey's July 5, 1985 memo be corrected on the Plat and that the Village Attorney be directed to prepare the required resolution.. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. H. Vantage Properties — (16th Street & Monterey Avenue): 1. Rezone from R-4 to ORA-2: 2. Parking & Loading Variations: 3. Resubdivision — Final Plat: To concur with the request of the petitioner and continue this matter to the next Regular Meeting of August 13, 1985. I. Referrals: With no objections, President Cerne made the following referrals: 1. McDonald's Phase 1—B — Referred to Plan. Commission. Meeting of July 15, 1985. 2. McDonald's Phase 1—B — Flood Plain, Special Use — Referred to Plan, Commission Meeting of July 15, 1985 and Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of August 6, 1985. 3. McDonald's ORA-3 — Development Plan, Amendment — Referred to Plan Commission Meeting of July 15, 1985 and Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of August 6, 1985. J. Open Forum: No one appeared. VIII ADJOURNMENT: Trustee Bushy moved, seconded by Trustee Rush.. . To adjourn, this meeting. TIME: 9:43 P.M. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes —5— July 9, 1985 -r-r\ OFOF Ogke ;vP 9OOf p n G 0 4 ,� COUN-O' VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 July 12, 1985 MEMO TO: Plan Commission FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B McDonald's Corporation, as a continuing part of their development of the office campus, has made application for approval of Phase 1-B of that overall development. This current phase proposes the construction of an office building of approximately 260,000 square feet containing underground parking for 600+ cars, lodge building 463 with swimming pool, and a maintenance building directly northwest of the existing training center. In reviewing this current application, Staff referred to Article VI-A of the Subdivision Regulations and Section X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance, copies of which I have attached to this memo. Also in the file is a copy of Ordinance No. 5-409 approved by the Village May 31, 1978 which governs the overall development of the office campus. I would also refer you to Dale's memo of July 11, 1985 concerning this subject. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/jr Attachment /' Art. VI, § 5 OAK BROOK CODE rules and regulations of the Village, as applicable to the location of the site, or acceptable provision made therefor. (Ord. No. G-226, § 2, 2-14-78) Editor's note—Ord. No. G-226, § 2, adopted Feb. 14, 1978, amended iApp. B. by adding provisions designated as § 5.Section 3 of said ordinance provided that "the dedications and contributions required by this ! Ordinance shall also be required as a condition to the annexation of any f` land to the Village and provisions therefor shall be incorporated in any pre-annexation agreement governing such land." Section 6. Recording of final plats;time limit. Upon approval of a final plat of subdivision by resolution of the corporate authorities,as provided in Section 1(C)hereof,the subdi- vider shall within six (6) months thereof submit to the Village the plat and all other documentation required pursuant to said resolu- tion and these Subdivision Regulations.Failure to comply with this provision shall render such approved final plat as null and void. Said six (6) month time limit as set forth above shall apply to all final plats previously approved by the Corporate Authorities com- mencing as of the effective date of this ordinance. (Ord. No. G-324, § 2,6-8-82) ARTICLE VI-A. ORA3 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT f PLAN PROCEDURES AND i REQUIREMENTS* Before.commencing development of any tract or parcel of. land in an ORA3 district, the owner shall submit_-an- improvement plan to be acted upon by the village authorities in accordance with the requirements set forth in this article. Section 1. ORA3 district improvement plan pro- , cedures. (A) Subsequent to the approval of an ORA3 district development plan for a tract or parcel of land in accordance *Editor's note—Ord. No. G-238, § 4, adopted Sept. 26, 1978, amended the Code by adding Art. VI-A, §§ 1, 2,to Appendix B. Cross reference—Zoning regulations for ORA3 district,App.A, § X(D). Supp.No.17 1070.4 tt W"na-to i s ^ �S� 2. ,_, '�'+ �• r�a= � R r tiS sCR ,Cr✓`, '?yYrej``� ' "' •` ��'`rN !va�i t,. �g{�° "1•�If; ..:. ani - ' L r i .•.'• ->+,,,�:r,1y ?,".ri � +} x�n � "v' -a�1'�' f t�-, � �(,' �. �w�i(�°`!' ti �'` � � �_%y; t � � y�."� 5�' 'N4 r '.� � .hT ��.. �d y �t �6-•�" �,yta''r�'. �h i r � l. . .7y� ,'h. ..[ r ,. ti ',�� -1s,- 'k"1' K'` P' ,d,:y. ,� *a>r .,..✓:." .a'°.: .-;1.a. u."�..;�C ...x.i..».Y .. ..i.ert±.,�ierk4l.5.1�i..::..� a�:>=• M. APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art.VI-A,§1 e to the with section X(D) of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance, and therefor. prior to applying for building or other permits, the owner shall file with the village clerk, together with the required amended filing fee an application for approval of an improvement . I ordinance pan cr all or a portion of the proposed development. The 3 by this development may be divided into several improvement ;ion of any ted in any phases and shall be so divided if the time for fu implementation thereof is expected to exceed four (4) years. No work shall be included in an improvement plan unless it can, under normal circumstances, be completed within four (4) years and completion within such period is planned. .on of the Applications shall be accompanied by an original inked he subdi- tracing on linen or mylar, seventeen (17)- prints of the illage the id resolu- with this void. )ply to all ities com- lo. G-324, Y i' k EMENT parcel of ibmit"an e village t forth in an pro- 3 district :cordance 8, amended �. A, g X(D). Supp.No.17 1070.4.1 APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art. VI-A, § 1 proposed improvement plan, and four (4) copies of all required supporting data, drawings and documents. The proposed improvement Pan Thelvllage board shall hrefer the approved development plan. improvement the application for approval of the proposed plan to-the plan commission for its recommendations and report. ($) The village clerk shall refer sixteen (16) copies of the proposed improvement plan to the plan commission, and one copy to the village engineer at least ten (10) days in advance of the next meeting of the plan commission. (C) The plan commission shall notify the owner as to the time and place of the plan commission meeting at which he will be afforded an opportunity of being heard.The engineer shall furnish the plan comm ssi n a report on his review of the proposed improvement plan. (D) The plan commission shall recommend approval or disapproval of the improvement plan within ninety (90) days from the date of filing the application or the filing by the applicant of the last item of required supporting data, whichever date is later, unless such time is extended by mutual consent. (E) When the proposed improvement plan has been acted the upon by the plan commission, it shall be referred to village board. If the plan commission recommends approval of the plan, it shall so indicate on the plan; and if it of the plan, it shall furnish the recommends disapproval ettin written statement setting the applicant a , and PP village board with forth the reason for disapproval and specifying, fails h particularity, the aspects in which the proposed roved development conform to these standards and the app said plan. The village board shall approve or disapprove plan within thirty (30) days after its first regular meeting following the action of the plan commission. (F) Recommendation for approval of the proposed im- provement plan by the plan commission, and approval by Supp.No.6 1070.5 Art. VI-A, § 1 OAK BROOK CODE the village board, may be conditioned upon compliance with such stipulations as they may deem necessary and proper. j (G) Upon approval of the improvement plan in final form i by the village board, and the receipt of any remaining required documents, the village clerk shall certify such approval on the plan and have one mylar or equal transparency made and deliver the plan or transparency to the owner at his option. The cost of the transparency shall be paid by the owner. (H) On certification, one copy of the approved improve- ment plan, together with one set of supporting data, shall be retained in the village clerk's files; two (2) complete sets retained by the village engineer; and one complete set returned to the owner. (Ord. No. G-238, § 4, 9-26-78) Section 2. ORM district improvement plan require- ments. (A) General: The improvement plan shall be drawn with black waterproof drawing ink on transparent linen tracing cloth, or [its] equal, in [such] a manner that clear and legible transparent or contact prints can be made. (B) Identification and description:The improvement plan shall include: (1) Location by section, township and range and by other legal description necessary to clearly locate and describe the entire tract described in the approved development plan which includes the area to be improved. Y> (2) A scale drawing prepared and certified by a register- ed surveyor showing the topography, the boundary lines and the area of the tract as a whole and of the - „ part thereof to be improved drawn to a scale not smaller than one hundred (100) feet to one inch. (3) Names and addresses of the owner of the tract and of the surveyor who prepared the plat. (4) North point (true north). Supp. No.6 1070.6 ZV 74. 7f `ay� tiT°. � -,,�� 3•�� 4 � �� H�_ , '�'��Etb. c . oan ".1 N 7.✓ei.yck'�y r,. }_. < NN 'v1 §'� s�E+�� }�.{ t ..y .. �. .:t } .r u r- s`Bt,�,: }..y+ - �;{!?"b�,''�'.Z'M�4-:1 wa;�,j.:}r�''r, �'�t��j�j��''�°;S`� .�"k!. �:��"�;1'.' ,,�jr s hr 3 L,,,� �•}��.y'"'''Yr'f� ,7$�..�:' " �: iu":31Gk �'�;.s� `�yy4'�JTa.�`�yR�,��:�aF�., s},.k�tt '' •'ti -�p.6 ,� nr(f.,"(.� ,�'�' �f �' fy ti5�'��; �""y��?��, �+mss�"� � ti��.Wi s�. �Y �'��r ,•t�+,�y'�J. 7�� A'1° ,,+{ - ��L y+y�� 'P'. "� l � hx, y�p7�L��i� 'K '�. l',�Y �"��,w�. r , • yy` �4� � [( w+�`y �a� �✓ '� Ti{� � III 1'W nw �� x•r� 1 • 'F�•54.�Ya' s -�iS.�•.� 9' APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art. VI-A, § 2 diance with (5) Date of survey and preparation. .d proper. (C)-Existing conditions: i final form remaining l (1) The improvement plan shall include: ertify such (a) Boundary lines of the entire tract of land included or equal in the approved development plan. 3parency to (b) Total acreage of the tract. Lrency shall (c) Existing zoning classifications of adjacent tracts. d improve- (d) Boundary lines of each part of the tract showing ita, shall be those areas reserved for open space and those replete sets reserved for buildings and parking under the mplete set approved development plan. 3-78) (e) Location, widths and names of all existing or previously approved streets or other rights-of-way a require- showin g type of improvement (if any), utility rights-of-way, parks and other public open drawn with spaces, permanent buildings and structures, ease- nen tracing „ments and section and corporate lines within the and legible .tract and to a distance of at least two hundred (200) feet beyond the tract. ,ement plan (f) Location map, drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one thousand (1,000) feet, showing boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided or red by other subdivided land within an area bounded by the locate and nearest arterial streets or other natural bounda- e approved ries, identifying the type of use and ownership of area to be such surrounding land and showing the align- ments of all existing streets and boundaries. a register- boundary � (g) Location and size of existing sewers, water mains, and n the culverts and other underground facilities within the tract and to a distance of at least two hundred not smaller (200)._feet beyond the tract, also indicating such data as grades, invert elevations and locations of tract and of catch basins, manholes and hydrants. (h) Topographic data including existing contours at vertical intervals of not more than two (2) feet, Supp.No.6 1070.7 Art. VI-A, § 2 OAK BROOK CODE except in unusual topographical conditions such vertical intervals may be required to be altered as determined by the village engineer. Topographic i I data shall refer to the United States Geological ! Survey .Datum and shall show the location of watercourses, marshes and other significant features. Soil boring data and seepage tests may be required at locations and depths as determined by the village engineer. Locations of, or reference to, locations of existing monuments or survey markers used in preparation of survey and grade elevations of each monument and marker. (2) The improvement plan shall be accompanied by: (a) A copy of the approved development plan and each prior -approved improvement plan for the tract,-all certified by the village clerk. 12 A i - (b) As-built drawings for all land improvements on the tract completed pursuant to prior approved improvement plans. (c) When the proposed improvement plan contains less than the entire tract included in the development plan, the improvement plan shall also be accompanied by preliminary drawings indicating any...proposed .extension,.of -land im- provements in areas of the development plan not Myet included in an approved improvement plan. (d) When an improvement plan or plans have previously been approved for the tract or any part thereof, the application shall show: (i) All improvements approved in earlier im- provement plans. (ii) The extent to which those improvements have been completed. Supp. No. 6 1070.8 T. �.�xSi t jj"�'.,,x`� � Vii:; • � ,y '�^ : - ''' v :.,.. _ ... 4,dt. t�„✓..Y r +..,� i- �i . PW }y uY: S ��ta``..f�p}, !". 't' � "�•SS 4',�''ii'1.G l'� �. .�� fate � l.. a,pt�? R:+e» ' :i., , .•`;`' ;r V' '* �'".�,�4•.-^.�,'` , ^� ', ,'x* ma=z 0143!� „b�Xi�'+1 M1•` �Yi•'� 'F''^'YK,� 4.'wii;� kv!'a` .i .s�. � !! APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art. VI-A, § 2 ns such (iii) A summary of floor area ratio, open space, tered as structure heights and off-street parking for )graphic each such phase. sological (D) proposed improvement design features:The proposed ition of improvement plan shall: ificant M (1)(1) Be in substantial accord with the approved develop- : ermined ment plan. (2) Indicate the layout of private streets showing pro- existing posed pavement widths and street names (not paration duplicating the name of any street heretofore used in mument the village or its environs unless it is an extension of, or in line with, an already named street, in which event that name shall be used). by: - (3) Indicate the location and width of bicycle and bridle plan and paths, pedestrian ways and easements. for the (4) Indicate the exact location, heights and square footage of floor area of proposed buildings and parking areas. vents on approved (5) Indicate building setback lines, where applicable, indicating dimensions. contains (6) Indicate the proposed location of sewers, water mains, in the storm drains and detention facilities, and proposed Ian shall methods of sewage disposal and water supply. drawings (7) No land which is subject to periodic flooding, which land im- lies in floodplain areas as designated on the most plan not recent applicable flood maps of the national topo- it plan. graphic map series published by the geological survey ms have " of the U.S. Department of Interior, or which contains any part inadequate drainage facilities, will be approved for occupancy in an improvement plan; unless the owner agrees to make all necessary improvements and irlier im- agrees to all required covenants which will, in the opinion of the village engineer, plan commission and .ents have village board, make such land safe for occupancy and provide necessary safeguards for adjacent property which would be affected by the filling, grading, Supp.No.6 1070.9 Art. VI-A, § 2 OAK BROOK CODE drainage or other changes being permitted or required for this improvement. �. (8) All streets (private or public) and easements within or adjacent to the property included in the plan shall have all angular and linear dimensions given and all i radii, internal angles, bearings, points of curvature, tangents and lengths of all curves reflected so that no dimensions or data are missing which may be required for the future relocation of any of the corners or bounda;ies of streets and easements. All dimen- sions shall be given to the nearest hundredth of a foot. (9) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use within the tract. (10) The proposed location of any entrance structures and landscaping intended to identify the development and provide an entranceway or entranceways to the development. (11) The general design and development standards of Article VII of this ordinance shall govern all ORA3 development, except for the following parts: Subsec- tions A(2), and E, F and H of section 3, all of which are waived. (E) Information required for development involving a floodplain: Accompanying the first improvement plan for each development which involves any portion of a I floodplain as described by the official maps of this village, there shall be furnished the following information and data: (1) Contour map: A topographic map with one-foot interval contours of the entire parcel and such adjoining land, the topography of which may affect the layout or drainage of the development. On such a map there shall be shown the following: (a) The location of streams and other watercourses, their normal channels, the,extent of their flood- Supp. No. 6 1070.10 -ti' sp 1F1."4tF w• .•Y, `'na' :.. •��IT'Sr . �„ T� 'L P °L^�T°?"i M �yw.a, -.=. .. 4Y v,i' '7' �R(Yt• 1.';lyz `w rT '�� 'jiN 't:"id y!' '4" .}.i'� M1'.i': —1RA 0 Y,�'�"R�+�1''S' , yS�YC.. '�rte. °" �,o . t{�ha`!'sP''"��t N� �•� �'t.4._R+^ APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art. VI-A, § 2 quired plains at the established high water elevations, and the limits of the floodway, all properly ;hin or - identified. F i shall (b) The normal shoreline of all watercourses, their ind all floodplains and lines of inflow and outflow, if iature, any. hat no ay be (c) The location of farm and/or field drains and their :orners inlets and outlets. limen- (d) Culverts, storm and sanitary sewers and sewer h of a inlets and outfalls. (e) Septic systems and outlets, if any. r areas tin the (f) Seeps, springs, and flowing and other wells. (g) Location of existing structures that will remain. ,es and (2) Channel profiles: Profile drawings of each stream, nt and channel, pond and basin showing elevations of the to the following: (a) The streambed. Ards of Os o (b) Channel banks, if any. ;ubsec- (c) Waterway openings of existing culverts and which bridges within and near the tract. (d) Size and elevation of sewer and drain outlets into wing a the stream, channel or basin. Ian for of a (e) The flood profile. village, (3) Maps and profiles: As per paragraph (E) of section 3 d data: of Article V of this ordinance. ne-foot (F) Supporting documents:The improvement plan shall be i such accompanied by the following supporting documents when affect submitted: such a , (1) Final plans, specifications and cost estimates prepared by a registered professional engineer for all planned .ourses, land improvements including a detailed grading plan. flood- The village engineer and other public officials having Supp.No.6 1070.11 Art. VI-A, § 2 OAK BROOK CODE jurisdiction shall approve such plans and specifica- tions, and such approval shall be certified on the improvement plan. (2) Complete plans and specifications of any development gateway prepared by a registered professional ar- chitect, and based upon the conditions of approval of the development plan. The applicant will have obtained approval from all governmental agencies having jurisdiction over, or rights in, the property on which such gateway is proposed to be located, other than the Village of Oak Brook, prior to submission of said improvement plan to the plan commission. Plans and specifications shall be approved by the village engineer, building commissioner and other public officials having jurisdiction, and such approval certified on the improvement plan. (3) A draft of all necessary or advisable covenants and easements acceptable in form and substance to the ' village board. (4) A statement of agreement signed by the owner listing the following: j (a) The land improvements the owner proposes to construct at his expense, the time of their completion and the method of payment for such construction. (b) The amount, method and time of payment of any i agreed reimbursement by the owner to the village for such improvements necessitated b the de- velopment i I velopment to be constructed b the village. t Y v g e. (c) (i) The method of selection of contractors to be engaged by the owner, [and it shall] provide for their approval by the village engineer, require that the improvements be completed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the village engineer within four (4) years following the approval of the Supp. No. 6 1070.12 - e • � "'' �• � r � r fix,.x• J .';�'',}f' '� fi, 4s pa. t Sri vet. • y �. r sM, � ,'�' }�pf'*r - � r �* r.. Jv��. +.l- c✓.�* :..S,�i� LY ,,�f2'? � .av _ '1r.4'Y'r ' .ice � �p•`c�+. 1"' .,,�� ti<� { !"�"",ft,`�Mh°'d'r+c'Y•{ . APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art.VI-A, § 2 >pecifica- improvement plan by the village board, and l on the require them to submit evidence of insurance covering their employees. alopment (ii) That all inspection fees are paid. ional ar- (iii) That one set of specifications and the original proval of tracings or mylar copies of the improvement All have drawings, corrected to show all actual as-built agencies improvements, shall be filed with the village )perty on engineer prior to acceptance of the iYnprove- ed, other ments by the village board. nission of on. Plans (d) Standard documents to be filed shall include two ie village (2) signed copies of an agreement between the s Br public owner and the registered professional engineer approval representing the owner providing for the design layout and inspection of the construction of all improvements to be constructed by the owner, and cants and a statement and bond in the amount of fifteen (15) ce to the per cent of the cost of the public improvements to be constructed by the owner, providing for the '= ner listing owner to be responsible for repairs and corrections which may be required due to failures or because of, or on account of, faulty construction for one oposes to year beyond final acceptance of such improve- of their ments by the village board. t for such •- .=-- � (5) A detailed landscaping plan as required under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance to be approved by ent of any the village board. the village ,y the de- (G) Completion bond: A completion bond shall be posted age. by the owner with the village clerk prior to the village clerk's certification of the approval of the improvement :tors to be plan. Such completion bond shall be in a penal sum ill provide sufficient to cover the cost of the public improvements to be engineer, constructed by the owner and executed by a surety mpleted in acceptable to the village board, or in lieu of bond, a deposit ;cifications of cash or other security or undertaking acceptable to the vithin four village board. If a completion bond or other guarantee is al of the posted, there should be a good and sufficient surety thereon, Supp•No.6 1070.13 - - r Art. VI-A, § 2 OAK BROOK CODE approved as to form by the village attorney and conditioned upon the installation of said public improvements, and payment of inspection fees, within four (4) years following the approval of the improvement plan. If cash or other security is deposited, it may be used to defray the cost of making such improvements as provided in an agreement between the village and the owner accepting said deposit as complying herewith. Such agreement shall provide that no payments shall be made from the cash or other security deposited without the joint consent of the village engineer and the owner. Any unused balance will be returned to the depositor after acceptance of the public improvements by the ' village. There shall be no reduction of that portion of the bond or other guarantee or deposit applying to a particular. improvement unless, and until, that improvement is complete and accepted or approved by the village board; except that upon the completion of major portions of the work, as determined by the village engineer, the village board may redur-. the amount of that portion of the bond cr other guarantee or deposit covering such public improve- ments completed, but such reduction shall not be more than I an amount equal to ninety 0 Y ( ) per cent of the estimated cost. The completion bond shall be acknowledged before a ' notary public by the principal and surety, and shall include the following provisions: (1) A penal sum in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this paragraph (G). (2) Irrevocably bind the principal, surety, their heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, jointly and severally. (3) Completion date of public improvements to be constructed by the owner. (4) Description of public improvements to be constructed by the owner. (5) Provide for construction of the improvements in a good and workmanlike manner in conformance with the ordinances and standards of the Village of Oak Supp, No.6 1070.14 e by�' •'� y-L .i• ms's v:^y�,�'Vp, *�t� <.v :sr -crw3Fa.'+a+�?.�t1F+'a i,,' •+,f��r w-R"1 _mot.. *w - •'� ,� ._. i 'o:..iN .t ' r '+� A+`>' t '' "�,3'',C `�!M�, ;a 4+ y�'4'hts 'C..:� '•�t Y> rt '`�� ... r�� xr � a� � � 2 '� .. tir. r- jn a A i APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art. VI-A, § 2 Brook and in accordance with the approved plans and i conditioned j:. : specifications. ements, and ars following (6) Payment of all inspection fees. ash or other "ti'(7) Such other provisions as may be required by the y the cost of Ih,4° project. n agreement id deposit as s: (H) Village clerk certificate: The village clerk shall not Vide that no certify the approval of the village board on the Improve- ;her security ment Plan until the required bond or deposit has been filed, age engineer and written evidence from any governmental agencies, if urned to the other than the village, filed showing their willingness, ments by the ability and agreement to accept and maintain all applicable )rtion of the dedicated areas or improvements. a particular (I) Village engineer's services and fees: . ment is board; (1) The village engineer shall review the land improve- illage 'tions of the ment plans and specifications, confer with the the village owner's engineers and make periodic inspections the bond or during constructic: of all required land improvements lic improve- to assure compliance with the requirements of this ►e more than ` ' ordinance. The fee for this work will be paid by the ie estimated owner in accordance with the resume of fees ;ed before aia+ciY established by separate ordinance of the village. The shall include wiz.-,o fee shall be due and payable following approval of the �- improvement plan and prior to certification of the ,'A i-: plan by the village clerk. e foregoing (2) Upon completion of the land improvements, the owner's registered professional engineer responsible their heirs, for the improvement plans shall file the as-built jointly and tracings of the improvement drawings with the village engineer and shall file a certificate with the village ants to be clerk stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and ;.__. meets the requirements of applicable village ordi- constructed nances. Upon satisfactory completion of the work and Ai��p''. receipt of these, the village engineer shall submit a menu in a statement to the village board recommending accept- mance with �$,•`;,. ance of said improvements by the village. Upon lage of Oak :.'. receipt of this statement and acceptance of the supp.No. 13 1070.15 7 C Art. VI-A, § 2 OAK BROOK CODE improvements by the village board, the improvements shall be considered complete and the improvement bonds or deposits released, as applicable. (J) Definition: For purposes of paragraphs (F)(4)(d) and P (G) of this section 2, the term "public improvement" shall mean land improvements that are to be owned and maintained by the village or other governmental body, after completion of construction, and in addition, other land improvements that are privately owned which, if not completed, may adversely affect other properties, such as but not limited to on site storm water detention ponds, and bicycle pathways. (Ord. No. G-238, § 4, 9-26-78; Ord. No. [ ' G-289, § 5, 3-24-81) ARTICLE VII. GENERAL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 1. General. The subdivision plan should conform Jo design standards that will encourage good development patterns and adhere to the goals and standards which are generally exhibited in the Official Plan. The streets, drainage, rights-of-way, school sites, public parks, playgrounds and other public facilities are shown on the officially adopted comprehensive plan and/or official map and should be considered in the subdivision plat. Every subdivision approved shall be in harmony with all applicable sections of the zoning ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook including any amendments. I Section 2. Design standards. i (A) Block layout: - (1) In determining the shape and size of blocks, existing topographic features, basic street system and traffic plan, areas designated for public and other nonres- idential land use, and the minimum lot areas and dimensions required by the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance for the applicable zoning area shall be considered Supp. No. 13 1070.16 I �jdr'l�+ r�. x�SVer ,° "1 • roc � {y. � .y l t •^ e r h t AV •� r �• • - i/ r�• t Sec % OAK BROOK CODE ting a street shall be not less than 50 feet in depth, (3) not less each interior side yard shall be increased by ;$' k than one foot for each one foot of structure height over 32 feet, and (4) side yards abutting 22nd Street an ! York Road shall have a depth of not less than 100 feet. ,,.. (c) Rear: Not less than 20 feet in depth—except that por- �f tion of a rear yard abutting a residence district shall be not less than 100 feet in depth. ° 6 Awnings, Marquees and Signs: As in ORAL Office' Research-Assembly District. Street Parking: As in Section ,, ,i { (7) Off-Street Loading and Off-Street ` XI of this ordinance. a, (Ord.No.G-213,§ 3,3-22-77) we z`• 1 1 (D) ORA3 Office-Research-Assembly District is designed to permit and en- (1) Purpose: The ORA3 District g �1 .� courage orderly and attractive site planning in accordance 4 ( with an overall des:, which provides for the preservation ofw.; natural site qualities,a high proportion of open space,and an arrangement of land uses and physical features into a har monious design compatible with the surrounding area. It is 1 i }, ; " intended that an area may be classified as an ORA3 Distnc only when the following conditions are met: a Not less than 50`,0 of the property shall be permanentlyr ( ) devoted to open space which shall consist of plant areas(including planted surfaces of parking decks), for {w lagoons, ests, watercourses storm water swales and all tention areas, pedestrian,bicycle, and bridle paths walkways, with the maximum practicable retention q i forests and other natural vegetation. , ;4 (b) All buildings and parking, and other structures to t extent practical, will be substantially screened fro' •,� .� -. i public view from public streets and streets private owned and maintained in residential developments accordance with a landscaping plan to be submitted 0 s I approval by the village. 3opP.No. Supp.No. 15 936 a t � e APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. X � .. '"`�'�t r`y..�,• a'tx,5.., W s. in depth, (3) d by not less (c) All roads and bridges will be retained in re height over ;rl private ownership and constructed to meet `�- village standards and maintained by the ' ri Id Street and pan 100 feet. owner without cost to the village. :ept that por- >�;.Y �.,. (d) All access to and from the property can be I constructed and maintained so that substan- " ' � . strict shall be tially all traffic generated will use commercial " r " . .� thoroughfares. 1RA1 Office- 4 (2) Permitted uses (but only to the extent that each �j• } r� � " ; such use is in accordance with an approved 11 q L s As in Section development plan): (a) Oce.business and professional; provided, ffi however, that following completion of any 6^ phase and for five (5) years thereafter not M r lct t 7 more than 33% of the office space shall be -� rmit and en- occupied by persons other than employees (or f: i n accordance business invitees, excluding employees of i� 1 reservation of , tenants), of the owner, its successors or a pace,and an E subsidiary or affil;ated corporation thereof. s into a har- ' (b) Accessory uses and structures including: ng area. It is ,.. I, RA3 District (i) Research and development facilities. , f (ii) Nonpublic meeting and conference facili- permanently ties for the use of employees of the owner, r' t"of-planted its subsidiaries, affiliates, franchisees, ; decks),for- other business invitees, and not-for-prof- it community organizations. gales and re- le paths and v (iii) Lodging facilities (together with restaurant ; retention of and accessory cocktail lounge) for the transient use of employees of the owner, Mures to the its subsidiaries, affiliates, franchisees, and •eened from other business invitees. its privately / (iv) Limited retail and service facilities for the lopments in convenience of employees of the owner, its ibmitted for - subsidiaries, affiliates, franchisees, and other business invitees. i Supp.No.5 937 y - s Sec.X OAK BROOK CODE v) Living quarters (not in separate residen- ( of tial buildings) solely for occupancy watchmen, janitors, maintenance, and } similar employees (and their families) employed in connection with the mainte ' nance and security of the property and ; improvements thereon. x ( (vi) Storage, service, and maintenance build rk ings and areas. r �.M {� ' ^ (vii) Central heating and air conditioning �, i plants. r T public utility and . transportation uses, (viii)• i � such as: (a) Bus turnarounds and passenger shel ters; n (b) Outdoor telephone booths; t, (c) Sewerage and storm water lift sta tions; w I ��:• (d) Wells and reservoirs; a (e) Electric distribution stations solely for serving the development. (ix) Private recreational use, such as tennis putting greens, swimming courts, p g g pools ase-. Otis Y - bowling alleys, racquetball courts, , x, cha ball diamonds, stables, bridle paths, and- health facilities, all for the uses of th ;, l owner, its subsidiaries, affiliates, fran- � chisees, and other business invitees. t+ A. . a (x) Temporary buildings for construction pui' poses and construction equipment storage areas fora eriod not to exceed thirty (30) " ;1� y days following completion of constructi gal' i provided, however, that none of such accessory de pses and structures shall be used by or pro products, services, or recreation to the general R�• rt-•� s public. S°pp r Supp.No.5 938 X. t � r tq Sec. X � APPENDIX A—ZONING �f u Y a (3) Special uses:, 9 a , ;e residen. (a) Not-for-profit, noncommercial performing and t s fine arts center. gp � upancy of �S . mce, and (b) Schools of music, fine arts, dance, theatre, and �j :.� r>> , 4, families) other arts. j,.: `+*r�j ae mainte- � , .- (c) Heliport (not for freight): Shall meet all of the �+ n p a and +perty and ,�. t < ;ti *. 1' standards as contained in Section X (B) (2) ( ) may be located on a roof of a building of four stories , nce build- or less.(Ord.No.G-305,§ 4,9-8-81) c::i �.. (d) Reserved. : , ��°`,• ,nditioning a (4) Lot area Not less than 70 acres which may d= more than single ownership but must b ,\ tion uses, _ single control. x� t � (5)<Floor area ratio: .: l anger shel- permitted and accessory z (a) Not to exceed 0.36 for p uses. r lift sta- (b) Not to exceed 0.01 for special uses. (6) Open Space: shall be k (a) Not more than 15% of the property a solely for covered by buildings. I � E the property s (b) Not less,.than-50%•:of- P erty shall be i as tennis open space as`defined in subparagraph (1)(a) .ing pools, of this•paragraph(D). arts, base- 4 ' ' (7) Structure height: Not to exceed:35 feet or three baths, and stories, whichever is less; provided, however, that i�{y �' t -- ies of the ;up to 25% of the total permitted- ermitted office space may rtes, fran- be-,above that height but shall -not. exceed the I ;ees. of five (5) stories or 60 fiction pur- signs �I 2 ant stora a (8) Yards: No stru=aura h(D) (9)no is Section g vided for in pa g P 'n e d within 100 feet 'n to i thirty maintained 1 30 or ( cte d Y X shall be ere ; rt exc e P t that ro Y! .1 said P _ structi n .. s o r of P n da ou . f b Y fro m an f Y u la r 9 ve hic .. ied b drives,, e 0 cc u Y a may b P re en- or id a Y accessor s en Y house - or provide parking, sidewalks, landscaping, gate ae general 1 Supp.No. 15 938.1 7 :' ► Fw r � *A $ > I"' '�yC' �y ` Y W i•w°3?-A •:a` Ys if°- ia.L. ''41:'J ��T 1 J 1 Sec. X OAK BROOK CODE f y. r trance treatment and similar facilities, except that tra 4 paved parking areas shall not be located on required yards adjacent to public streets or within ;; 40 feet of all other boundary lines. r• a ;i s (9) Signs: Business signs advertising the name, business, and principal products or services of the principal occupants of the development are 1 d I permitted in accordance with the following j:. -a YM , t �` regulations: (a) They shall be nonflashing and have no moving parts. direct (b) All sources of light, whether by y. exposure, surface reflection or transmission, . having an intrinsic brightness greater than 30 •� �. foot lamberts shall be shielded so that the \ ' source of light cannot be seen at any point within a residence district. j � s (c) Any luminous source of light, whether direct n or transmission, ,.. sue► 3 „ .�•f,. _ exposure, surface reflection, �, whose total area is larger than one square Y t foot and which can be seen from any point within a residence district shall not exceed aR brightness value of 150 foot lamberts. � (d) No source of light shall be permitted to cause illumination in excess of one-half foot candle in a residence district. k k + ` R, 1 n� SUPP. No. Supp.No. 15 938.2 � r '-'+y',"�," �' xx"pL!'"'Z��n'h'�'L:•'"• ,e a.'!H'�K t•�'e�'��4 « w'�".L' :st7^ .�- s �,��, , tiQ^�,s�.yua�--�-i';+•I" �a ' 'v�' hnpCe,�t-.��A,.a -ss;+tti -Z` � - ��'�.�.,�,�� " �. �,'-'��j.� 1,.'•v�iaa erg.� +y��°�� '�.: i1��',TY - �..�", �,,r�y ��3�,Y"'k'S.; •r. rj , + �.: ,/ �`r y � •.� .� Y,tt,yy��•• �T.,�� .�' v.3"� .� Yt x•i is w °:a,RR Wt l r7,. T.{;� •''� tit rx.. APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. X except that (e) A sign in direct line of vision of motorists uK , located on ; approaching any traffic signal shall not have z ;ts or within 96 c: a red, green, or amber illumination that may tend to appear as a traffic signal. ^ the name :vices of the There may be a total of not more than two �� 1: freestanding signs having an area not to pment are �r �► sue¢ following k�� exceed, in the aggregate, 240 square feet. The � `t . signs must be located: I have no (i) Along the boundary streets; _ -ib (ii) At the principal entrance and in the ^' required yard; and � E by direct (iii) Not less than 10 feet from any street ansmission, right-of-way line. 'I ter than 30 o that the Provided, however, that one additional ground , may be laced at a service entrance !: any point d"� sign Y P ; location, and provided that said sign shall not ;. exceed a total of 10 square feet. ther direct ` ansmission (g) There may be unlimited directional signs not )ne square is, larger than 6 square feet and there shall be any point not more than one identification sign per I :, )t exceed a building not larger than square feet. t t ts. c: t, (10) Off-street parking and off-street loading: As i ' �d to cause �-a� ' , required by Section XI of this ordinance, except ii. ! ' 'oot candle s:; that if the approved development plan shall ,, p f reserve enough land area to satisfy the full requirements of Section XI, then only 60% of the required parking for any phase of the develop- �. ment need be developed until and unless the Village determines that the existing parking is inadequate. At such time, the owner shall 4 I; construct additional parking spaces as required y Section XI up to 100%.An amount equal to 25% of = the parking provided for the-development shall be' located., in an:.office- building and/or- in under- ; , ground parking facilities decked over with ar- chitectural landscaping. Supp.No. 11 938.3 " r ' a 19, }+ �, f' ,,��,g 'L. `I�j�kgY7`a>4' k �A�' iy4��. l '•f _ t 1/.:r K. '!". wst'76.,�ir Ci+.sSI•�.5Y 1a,� a. � . f ! Sec. X OAK BROOK CODE (11) Procedure: (a) The applicant shall concurrently file with they village clerk: (i) An application for rezoning of the proper-2, ty to an ORA3 Office-Research-Assembly,," district classification; and (ii) An application for approval of a proposed development plan. X44• { (b) Such applications shall be processed in the manner provided in Section XIII (I) of this - ordinance. r it (c) The proposed development plan shall include the following: , ,! (i) A statement as to the following: i staeme Y . (a) The period of time expected to be it required to implemenA, the develop ment plan, and each development phase necessary or desirable for full implementation thereof. i (b) The total acreage allocated for each N ,� principal and accessory use, including Ii 4*e.,. '. :' but not limited to open space, office. and other buildings and structures,` i*• �; . ty parking and other accessory usesrT (c) The conditions and limitations rela 1 ' ing to the development of the prop- i erty. (ii) A plat setting forth graphically on'xA scaled drawing drawn to a scale riot smaller than 100 feet to one inch, whiff shall include the following information.: a ' 4f (a) The boundaries of the site and loCa' tion of adjacent public streets. Supp. No. 11 a supp•No. 938.4 1 I i APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec.X fi yLr w R (b) The general location of proposed sag 3 il; ile with the vehicular access points and internal t � Z" c` private drives. . the proper. (c) The proposed boundaries of areas h-Assembly within the site of: (1) Open space " as where no building or parg are kin y 0� :. a proposed lots will be permitted; (2) Building areas where buildings and other structures and parking lots will be ssed in the 0,r permitted. ' (I) of this u � (d) The location of water channels, storm water detention areas, lakes, and "F � M ? -iall include ponds; provided that prior to final approval of ~{ vbC s improvement plans as provided for in subpar- t cted to be agraph (e) hereof, all of such areas shall be precisely . �� E ' .e develop � P }' defined ' _ avelopment = ' (d) The applicant shall also provide the follow- t ale for full 3 ing: (i) A statement of the planning objectives to ; d for each be achieved by the development. including (ii) A plat of survey of the site. )ace, office ;: structures, 41 h j ..� r (iii) A topographical analysis of the site with .... . two uses. �`• contour intervals of not more than p� Lions relat feet. L�; the pro - s 1 hoto ra h of the site at a scale P P - (iv) An aeria p g P , �•;3: . • of not less than 200 feet to the inch. -ally on a on existing tin g water mains, Informat ion ,) V! storm s cale not san itar Y se veers, storm sewers, � nch, which ', ! water retention and runoff, stream chan- -mation: '`` nels, floodplains and floodways, lakes, +{� : and loca- and ponds. 1 r ats. (vi) A study by traffic engineers providing :. information on the impact of the develop- ment on public streets and intersections. 111 u .No.5 S pp 938.5 R 1 Yom. ;y .:.�. . .,.:•+. _ *.::,`. '•i.,.yk..@i+::i! N-11'w� �`^+`�dr .'t 4,"A�WV� Y �' 'k r - '�? Sec. X OAK BROOK CODE , (vii) A plat or map showing the land uses, (2) physical features, and zoning of all 7aM_tj{ H . adjacent lands within 400 yards of the site. yy � w (e) Following final approval of the development } M� ¢ s plan for the site,'no building permit shall be issued and no improveents shall m be com ': menced until an improvement plan shall have ? ' # -� ! been approved in the manner provided in the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Regu lations Ordinance, as amended. (f) The owner of property zoned ORA3 may file i. from time to time applications for approval of proposed amendments to an approved de r f: velo ment plan, which applications shall be processed in the manner provided in subpar f ` s p a ra hs b through e of this P aragraph (D) (11). (Ord. No. G-233, § 4, 5-31-78) ff (` (T;) 03 Office District. (4) 3 3`'A 'V" Permitted Uses: (t " 1 V. I 1 (a) Offices. (b) Accessory uses and structures including: j t x Restaurants and accessory cocktail lone ' i fi ate; ges—in a structure over five stories in height y r �ur which is used principally for a permitted us ( , ,� ,; t ; and when located on floors below those used; "u ` for the principal use or on the top floor or roof;. of such structure. (2) Retail sales and personal service uses—hays (c) ing no exterior advertising and accessible only, from the lobby and interior of a building: !R 7 P (which is over 12 stories in height) and used' .� for a permitted principal use and when'�110. single establishment occupies more than 2,�� square feet o£floor area !` ' ' (c) Electric distribution centers and substations . 3°DVo. 15 >~ : .T Supp.No.5 938.6 7j{ •, '}Y�YRt'-, f0. •.r 1 .T x.. • G�OF Oqk e F��wP 9OO� COUNT'S` VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS July 11, 1985 654-2220 MEMO TO: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. SUBJECT: McDonal.d's Improvement Plan - Phase IB I have reviewed the revised plans, revised dated 7/08/85, received on July 9, 1985, along with accompanying documentation, and offer the following comments: 1. The drawing index on Sheet 1 should correctly state drawing no."FPG-4". 2. Consideration should be given to requiring the Phase IB plans to include a grading plan for the area around the proposed improvements. Alternatively, the detailed grading plan could be delayed until building permit application. 3. Sheet 4 should state "Existing Gatehouse" for the gatehouse on Ronald Lane just nort;- of 31st Street. 4. Sheet 4 also contains additional plantings which will be on Village property northeasterly of the Village Hall. This item is informational in that the Village should be aware that they are contemplating planting screening material on our property. 5. On Sheet LU-1, many asterisks appear within the drainage system design data table. A note should appear as to define what the asterisk means. 6. Complete "As-builts" of Improvement Plan Phase IA have not been totally accomplished as of this date. The applicant has been advised some weeks ago of the remaining deficiencies. 7. If the reconstruction of the service drive is part of this Improvement Plan, detailed plans and specifications remain to be submitted. In this same light, should a grading plan be required for these improvements within the Improvement Plan documents, detailed plans and specifications would probably be appropriate. Respectfully s bmitted, V L" Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 115 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 July 11, 1985 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Att'n: Mr. Bruce Kapff Re: Phase lA and 1B : Parking Requirements McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus Dear Bruce: Attached hereto is a memorandum entitled "McDonald' s Corporation Improvement Plan Phase lA and 1B - Summary of Parking Requirements" dated July 10 , 1985 . This is the memorandum referred to in the FCL Memorandum dated July 8, 1985 , entitled "McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus: Phase 1B Improvement Plan Area Calculations" . The attached memorandum is the one referred to on page 3 of the "Parking Summary" as the "separate Memorandum" . Eighteen (18) copies attached. Si cere y yours r David M. Goode DMG:pg Encl 7/11/85 • NJ E M 0 .R A N D [J M • McDONALD' S CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN PHASE lA and 1B SUMMARY OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS This memorandum summarizes the required parking outlined in the "Declaration of Covenants" to- the Phase lA Improvement Plan, dated July 14 , 1981 . We have recalculated the parking required to be constructed in Phase 1A, and confirmed the 231 spaces originally computed by using actual "As-Built" areas and building population counts . We have also calculated the required reserved area for parking at the end of Phase 1A. This indicates that a total of 515 spaces might have to be provided in the future . The calculation averaged the three methods of computation as called for in the Declaration of Covenants. Using As-Built information, 159 spaces need to be reserved for future parking as of the conclusion of construction in Phase lA since 356 parking spaces were constructed in that Phase. We have also calculated parking requirements for the Phase 1B Improvement Plan using the same criteria. The additional parking required to be constructed in Phase 1B is 617 spaces (500 below grade) . In fact, a minimum of 780 parking spaces, all below grade, are planned to be constructed in Phase 1B . We have also calculated the size of the required reserved parking area for the end of Phase 1B. This indicates that up to a total of 1, 545 parking spaces might have to be provided in the future. Since the total amount of parking spaces to be constructed by the end of Phase 1B construction is 1, 136 the total required reserve parking at that time will be 409 spaces. It is intended that space for the possible additional parking be reserved on the north side of the easterly lake; if, and ,as necessary, a second level of parking, could be constructed over the existing parking in that area. . The above requirements were calculated as set forth below using the following information supplied by McDonald' s : Totals at End Totals as End of Phase 1A of Phase 1B Office floor area 50, 000 g. s . f. 310 ,000 g.s . f. Floor area of non-office Training _. Center Buildings 59 , 305 g. s.f. 59 , 305 g.s. f. Number of seats in Training Center Auditorium 299 299 Number of non-office Training Center employees 6 6 Number of lodging rooms 154 229 Number of Lodge employees 75 89 Maximum number of students at one time 175 210 ' qARKING REQUIREMENT CALCUL7t`i'IONS A. Parking Required to be Constructed in Phase lA One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 50 ,000 sq. ft.. 182 spaces One (1) parking space for each lodging room 154 rooms 154 spaces One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 75 employees 38 spaces Total Spaces 374 spaces Total required spaces (374 x 0 . 6) = 224 spaces However, 231 spaces are greater than 224 spaces , therefore, 231 spaces are required for Phase 1A. B. Parking Required to be Constructed in Phase 1B _ One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 260 ,000 aces s . ft. 945 spaces P One (1) parking space for each additional lodging room 75 rooms 75 spaces One (1) parking space for each two I additional Lodge employees 12 employees 6 spaces One (1) parking space for each two Maintenance Building employees 4 employees 2 ,spaces Total Parking 1, 028 spaces ' Total required spaces (11028 x . 6) = 617 spaces Page 2 of 4 C. Reserved Area for Parking in Phase lA 1. (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 50 ,000 sq. ft. 182 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each 250 square feet of floor area of non- office Training Center building(s) 59 ,305 sq. ft. 238 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 154 rooms 154 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 75 employees 38 spaces Total Parking 612 spaces 2 . (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 50 ,000 sq. ft. 182 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each 2 . 5 seats in Training Center Auditorium 299 seats 120 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each two non-office Training Center employees 6 employees 3 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 154 rooms 154 spaces (e) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 75 employees 38 spaces Total Parking 497 spaces 3. (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 50 ,000 sq. ft. 182 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each two non-office Training Center Employees 6 employees 3 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each three students 175 students 59 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 154 rooms 154 spaces (e) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 75 employees 38 spaces Total Parking 436 spaces Average of calculations .l, 2, & 3 (100% parking requirements) = 515 spaces Page 3 of 4 D. Required Reserved Area for Parking at End of Phase 1B Construction 1. (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 310 ,000 sq. ft. 1127 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each 250 square feet of floor area of non- office Training Center building(s) 59 ,305 sq. ft. 238 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 229 rooms 229 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 87 employees 44 spaces Total Parking 1638 spaces 2 . (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 310 ,000 sq. ft. 1127 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each 2 . 5 seats in Training Center Auditorium 299 seats 120 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each two non-office Training Center employees 6 employees 3 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 229 rooms 229 spaces (e) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 87 employees 44 spaces Total Parking 1523 spaces 3. (a) One (1) parking space for each 275 square feet of office floor area 310 , 000 sq. ft. . 1127 spaces (b) One (1) parking space for each two non-office Training Center employees 6 employees 3 spaces (c) One (1) parking space for each three students 210 students 70 spaces (d) One (1) parking space for each lodging room 229 rooms 229 spaces (e) One (1) parking space for each two Lodge employees 87 employees 44 spaces Total Parking 1473 spaces Average of calculations 1, 2 , & 3 (100% parking requirements) 1545 spaces Page 4 of 4 LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 115 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 July 9, 1985 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re : Phase 1B Improvement Plan McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus Gentlemen: This will confirm that on Monday, July 8, 1985 , I delivered eighteen (18) copies each of the following materials to you on behalf of my client, McDonald' s Corporation: 1 . Sets of revised drawings consisting of 17 sheets as listed on Exhibit B (Revised 7/8/85) . 2. Exhibit B Drawing Index (Revised 7/8/85) . This is a revised exhibit for the draft Improvment Plan Agree- ment submitted earlier, 3. Exhibit C, Perimeter Landscape Screening - Cost Estimate (Revised 7/8/85) . This also is a revised exhibit for the draft Improvement Plan Agreement submitted earlier. 4 . FCL Associates Memorandum entitled "McDonald' s Cor- poration Office Campus : Phase 1B Improvement Plan Area Calculations" originally dated May 15 , 1985 . (Now revised as of July 8, 1985) 5 . FCL Associates Memorandum to me dated July 8, 1985 , in which are summarized changes of . July 8, 1985, to the Phase 1B Improvement Plan documents originally filed with the Village on May 15 , 1985. Res ctf lly yours , David M. Gooder DMG:pg cc Ken Pardue Joe Antunovich t � LORD, BISSELL & BROOK r ✓✓✓ 115 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 RC�rI'VE June 28, 1985 JUL 0 i 1985 Mr. Bruce Kapff VILLAGE Or OAK BROOK, IL. Assistant to Village Manager A 1)M I N I STRATI 13 N Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re : Improvement Plan Phase 1B McDonald' s Office Campus Dear Bruce: r Members of the Village staf f have a is ed questions as to proper interpretation and application of Section X(D) ( 7) of the Zoning Ordinance which reads as follows : " ( 7) Structure height: Not to exceed 35 feet or three stories, whichever is less; provided, however, that up to 25% of the total permitted office space may be above that height but shall not exceed the lesser of five (5) stories or 60 feet . " The key issue seems to be the 25% limitation . On its face it seems to carry out the original intention, i.e . that it applies only to that portion of office space which is located more than 35 feet above grade . Thus it does not apply to office space- below that height even if such lower space is located in a building which exceeds 35 feet in height. In other words, if a 150 ,000 square foot building has 5 stories of 30, 000 square feet each and 2 stories exceed 35 feet in height, only 60 ,000 square feet would be included in applying the 25% limitation. It is clear from the record that this was the intention of the Board of Trustees when the ordinance was adopted in 1978. From the time of the original hearings in 1977 McDonald' s pointed out that it was planning to construct 925 ,000 gross square feet of office space and that 750 , 000 square feet would be built in Bubble A to house McDonald' s headquarters in a group of buildings. The original plan called for 200 , 000 square feet in 2 buildings 3 stories high, 200 , 000 square feet in 2 buildings 4 stories high LORD, BISSELL & BROOK • Mr. Bruce Kapfl June 28, 1985 Page Two and 350 ,000 square feet in buildings 6 (later 5) stories high. Thus at least 550 ,000 square feet would be in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height. All of the remaining 200 ,000 square feet of office space would have been in buildings of 3 stories or less. Thus at least 550 ,000 square feet out of a planned 750 ,000 square feet of office space or 73% would have been in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height. No question was ever raised as to the validity of the plan. Thus it seems clear that the 25% limitation was not in- tended to apply to all space in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height but only to that portion of office space which itself was more than 35 feet above grade. If I can add anything more, please let me know. Sin rel yours , David M. Gooder DMG:pg En cl cc Seymour G?.eenman Ken Pardue Joe Antunovich Enclosed are copies of the following: 1. Four sheets from the plastic bound book entitled "McDonald' s Office Campus" (Section VI. Planning Analysis) which McDonald' s filed with the Village in 1977. 2. A one-page table entitled "Proposed Development" prepared by McDonald;s in 1978. I I I Illustrative Site Plan The McDonald's office campus will staff approximately 2,075 people and contain approximately 1,150,000 square feet when it is com- pleted in 2005 A.D. It is intended to be constructed in four phases described further in this report. It is to be the head- quarters of the McDonald's Corporation and will include restaurants, lounges, a computer center, research, training and lodging for McDonald's use. The complex is designed as groups of elements clustered around and over landscaped terraces. Preserving the balance of the eco-system and natural beauty of the site is an essential goal of the project. The preceding exhibits accurately describe all of the site constraints that must be recognized in order to achieve this goal. The baloon diagram, as noted, is the schematic delineation of the site investigation, and the illus- trative site plan, exhibit 12, is an example of how the physical spaces can be arranged within the baloon diagram to preserve the natural beauty of the site. It shows how the different types of structures, heights, sizes and volumes, cannot only provide space solutions to McDonald's functioning relationships, but also how each of the different building types can be oriented to take maximum advantage of the surrounding countryside. It is the intention of the design to bring the outdoors visually into each interior space so that all employees will have a unique environmental atmosphere in which to work. The following is a summary of the different corporate facilities. A. Main Office Approximately 750,000 square feet contained in three to six story buildings, each story of which is based on a floor area of approximately 30,000 square feet. This floor area size has been determined by McDonald's to be the maximum size of a department. It is also a good architectural solution allowing maximum efficiency as it relates to common areas, elevators, stairs etc. , and a geometric size that will permit exterior lighting to permeate throughout the entire floor. The heights of the buildings have been established on the basis of how many floors must be related vertically in order to accomplish an efficient interrelationship between departments. The six story a ry re located on the lower contours (elevation 656) and the three story buildings are located on a higher topo (elevation 670) . The roof tops of each building are, therefore, approximately the same height. The six story buildings have been located on the lower contours of the site so that they will not project above the natural tree screening that exists on the site. VI - 28 A garage housing approximately 1,000 cars connects all of the buildings in the A area. The top of the garage is designed to be a landscaped terrace. There are approximately ten entrances into the parking garage from a peripheral service drive that connects vehicular traffic of all buildings in area A to the Jorie Boulevard main entrance. B. Food Testing and Research Approximately 25,000 square feet, two story building. Con- ducting of research and development with special equipment and experimentation of different menu items. C. Training Center Approximately 80,000 square feet, two story building. An audio-visual training facility. Employees are transported to Chicago from the different parts of the country for an intensive training program, usually lasting approximately ten days. These employees will stay on campus in provided housing. D. Lodge Approximately 210,000 square feet, two story building. A private motel exclusively for McDonald's employees. E. Future Offices 150,000 square feet, three story building. F. Service Storage Approximately 10,000 square feet, one story building. This will house the equipment and maintenance personnel that are required to maintain the campus. G. Midwest Regional Office 25,000 square feet, two story building. Each region of the country contains a satellite office facility. Architectural Concept: The architectural concept will have low, horizontal lines, in square building modules, each of which are separated from the other, by landscaped areas natural to the site and provided as part of the landscape concept. Materials and Construction: Garage Structure - Reinforced concrete Office Structures in Area A - Structural Steel, fire proofed Exterior walls, brick VI - 29 k. {4 r �f C lk Ah MW ♦ f'� �� tit r _; �;r a �'} �✓ �°,'" 't��- �l,' fit, t: J �` �'I��+� `^:� .rte� �"`r°' �'• F"�� i� 41L � ow Jm,2LV w �. •.' tad TITLE LEGEND A MAIN x r • r • OFFICES Illustrative 25l000: . •TESTING,RESEARCH •. Corporation' • • • ' .• F SERVICE STORAGE lo.000l �' • !�J C. Phase Development Schedule The total project will be built in four phases over a period of years ranging from 1979 through 2005. The following exhibits ■ illustrate each cumulative phase showing how building structures, roads and parking areas will be configured as the construction occurs through each phase. Phase I is the most significant phase during which time the ' majority of the road system will be constructed and most of the campus facilities. These will consist of the following: -� A. Main Offices, 200,000 square feet B. Research and Development Lab, 25,000 square feet C. Training and Meeting Center, 80,000 square feet D. Lodge Facilities, 70,000 square feet E. Service and Storage Facilities, 10,000 square feet F. Midwest Region Offices, 25,000 square feet for a total first phase development of 410,000 square feet. -� In addition to buildings, the parking deck of 500 cars will be built in conjunction with the general headquarters complex, and 400 surface parking stalls will be distributed throughout the site. Phase II will be built somewhere in the time frame between 1985 •� and 1990 and will consist of the following structures: J A. Main Offices, 200,000 square feet D. Lodge and Restaurant Facilities, 40,000 square feet for a total phase construction program of 240,000 square feet, and a running total of 650,000 square feet for the project to-date. In addition to the structures in this phase, an additional 500 car parking deck will be constructed and 300 more surface parking stalls will be added to the complex. Phase III will take place in the time period ranging from 1990 to 1995 and will consist of the following structures: An additional 350,000 square feet of space located in the general headquarters complex area. In addition to structures, 300 surface parking stalls will be added to the complex. Phase IV is the last phase of construction, taking place in the time frame somewhere between 2000 and 2005 and will consist of an additional 150,000 square feet of office complex. These buildings will be located in the vicinity of the Research and Development Laboratories and the Midwest Region Offices. In addition to building construction, the final 300 parking stalls will be added to the surface parking throughout the complex, bringing the total project up to 1,150,000 square feet of facilities and 2,300 parking stalls. VI - 31 PROPOSED DEVF.LO MIE LNT \ ^ Completion Dote PHASE I PHASE II • 1919-1980 PHASE III Z PHASE IY TOTAL 1985-1990 1990-1995 2000-2005 02000-2005 DFFICESt Sq. Font Employees Sq, Feat Employees Sq. Feet U t o eea I [' Y sq. Fast £nployer.a Sg, Feet Fri nloreci I I I I General Headquarters 200,000 425 200,000 ' I 425 , 350,000 I 745 - � 750,000 1,555 Ch 62 Chicago District 119. 25 000 ' _ - � -- - - - 25,000 I 62 EXPANSION _ I 15D,000 319 150,000 I 319 Tutal Office 225,000 487 200,000 425 350,000 I 745 150,000 I 319 925,000 1,90 I I R b D Lab 25,000 25 _ _ — — 25,000 25 liceting Center 30,000 I 10 30,000 10 Training Center 50,000 40 50,000 I 10 Lodge and Restaurant 70,000 I 12 40,000 6 _ 80 Rooms 40 Rooms - 110,000 13 Maintenance Facility 10.000 6 _ I 10,000 6 i � GUND TOTAL 410,000 580 240,000 I 431 350,000 745 150,000 319 1,150,000 2,075 Cumulative - - 650,000 1,011 1,000,000 -1,-756 1,150,000 2,075 Parking Deck 500 I I I I 500 1,000 Surfuc° 400 300 - 300 300 1,700 Total Parking 2,300 Retention 6 . 81% 6 . 81•% 6 . 87% 6 . 81% Access Roads 6 . 19% 6 . 19% 6 . 19% 6 . 19% Surface Parking 3 . 83% 6 . 61% 8 . 90% 15 . 34% Decked Parking 3 . 18% 3 . 18% 4 . 77% 4 . 77% 4 . 77% Structural Coverage 5 . 86% 7 . 55% 9 . 40% 10 . 83% Gpen Land 79 . 13% 68 . 04% 63 . 93% 56 . 06% Open Space 84 . 12% 79 . 62% 75 . 51% 67 . 64% I Goof Cgke a a G j o �2 COUNTY VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 June 19, 1985 Mr. David M. Gooder Attorney at Law Lord, Bissell & Brook 3000 Ronald Lane Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: cDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B Dear Dave: The Plan Commission, at its regular meeting of June 17, 1985, granted your requested continuance on the above application and tabled consideration of this subject until their meeting of July 15, 1985 in order to give McDonald's adequate time to submit additional information required by Staff as well as to process their Flood Plain application which is required as a result of certain modifications to the existing service drive. Any and all revised information in this regard must be in this office no later than noon, Monday, July 8, 1985. Sincerely, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/j r cc: Seymour Greenman, Vice-President, McDonald's Corporation Joe Antunovich, FCL Associates PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -10- June 17, 1985 VIII MCDONALD'S IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE 1-B The Chairman noted that the applicant, as represented by their attorney, David M. Gooder, has requested a continuance of this matter in order to submit additional information required by Village Staff, including an application for certain flood plain modifications. A motion was made by Member Doyle, seconded by Member Beard to table this subject to the July 15, 1985 Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission. VOICE VOTE: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED. . . PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -10- June 17, 1985 GOOF OgKe '9O `1 O� n ! m c o' 4 � eCOUNt�' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS G54-2220 June 13, 1985 MEMO TO: Plan Commission FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B McDonald's has filed with the Village for approval of its Phase 1-B Improvement Plan which calls for various office building construction on their property. In reviewing information submitted, it was determined that additional information would be necessary prior to a consideration of this subject by the Plan Commission. Such information will be forwarded and ready for the Plan Commission at its July 15th meeting. In addition, McDonald's has chosen to make certain modifications to the flood plain in conjunction with this development and, therefore, will be presently filing an application for modification to the flood plain also to be heard at the July 15th Plan Commission meeting. It would, therefore, be appropriate for the Plan Commission to table consideration of this subject until such time as the above information has been forwarded. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/jr 0 • LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 June 13, 1985 Mr. Henry Marcy Chairman, Plan Commission Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: McDonald' s Office Campus Improvement Plan Phase 1B. Dear Henry: In view of the fact that my client, McDonald's Corporation, must seek a special use permit under the flood plain ordinance for certain changes in the flood plain, it requests that the hearing on its Improvement Plan for Phase 1B be continued to the scheduled meeting of the Plan Com- mission to be held on July 15, 1985. Si cerely yours , Davi M. Gooder i DMG:pg cc Seymour Greenman Joseph Antunovich JUN 1 1985 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. ADMINISTRATION o `qc wx, F COUNt�' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 June 3, 1985 Dear Resident, The Oak Brook Plan Commissiou and,/or Zoning Board of Appeals, and the Village Board will be considering a: X Improvemeat Plan Variation Preliminary Plat Special Use Final Plat Zoning Amendment at -the meetings as scheduled on the reverse side of this notice. The application has been filed by McDonald's Corporation Name of applicant One McDonald's Plaza Address Relationship of applicant to property Owner Name of Subdivision (if applicable) The property in question is situated at: 74 1/2 acres fronting on Jorie Boulevard, North of the Village Commons, West of Salt Creek We have attached a map of the area to assist you in determining your relation- ship to the property in question. The request which has been made is as follows: Approval of Phase l-B Improvement Plan to construct 260,000 square foot Office Building, Lodge Building #3, Swimming Pool and Maintenance Building. If you desire more detailed information, we would suggest that you contact Mr. Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to the Village Manager, at the Village Hall to review the file on this application. We will be looking forward to your attendance at the public meetings. Respectfully yours, 4ohn H. Brechin Village Manager JHB/ms All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, on Oak Brook Road (31st Street) and Spring Road, Oak Brook, Illinois Plan Commission Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7:30 P.M. Monday June 17, 1985 Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .7:30 P.M. Tuesday N/A Board of Trustees Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7:30 P.M. Tuesday June 25, 1985 MAP OF AREA i \ / ` _ r .. W wo.e a E 1 i i 11 Ilk O o0Jr -. - Q<'A BROOK RO�O ( 1 T 11 12 HINSDALE SANITARY DISTRICT P.O. Box 179 RECEIVED Hinsdale, Illinois 60521" ` ' " 312-323-3299 MAY 3 11985 FCL A8SOCIATES CHH"A00. IWNOIS May 29; 1985 Joseph M. Antunovich, AIA FCL Associates 225 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL. 60601 MCDONALD'S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS - PHASE 1B This will confirm that the sanitary sewer facilities installed during Phase 1 construction of the McDonald's Corporation Office Campus are sufficient to properly serve the proposed Phase 1B Expansion. We will issue w r permits for connection upon proper application for each of the 'four units of the Phase 1B expansion. C. CARL T. BLOMGREN, - IVE DIRECTOR am NF�E�-C 294 L t: VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. stEVe p1� 55 ACMIN1 STRATI CN PUNT & OFFICE ON 49 ACRES 6975 Commonwealth Ave. Burr Ridee IL _-- LORD, BISSELL & BROOK [IS SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:2S-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213) 487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook., IL 60521 TELEX:I8-1135 654-0561 June 28, 1985 lStj D Mr. Bruce Kapff JUL Q 1 1985 Assistant to Village Manager Village of oak Brook VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. 1200 Oak Brook Road ADMINISTRATIpN Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re : Improvement Plan Phase 1B McDonald' s Office Campus Dear Bruce: Members of the Village staff have raised questions as to proper interpretation and application of Section X(D) ( 7) of the Zoning Ordinance which reads as follows : " (7) Structure height: Not to exceed 35 feet or three stories, whichever is less; provided, however, that up to 250 of the total permitted office space may be above that height but shall not exceed the lesser of five (5) stories or 60 feet . " The key issue seems to be the 25% limitation . On its face it seems to carry out the original intention, i.e. that it applies only to that portion of office space which is located more than 35 feet above grade . Thus it does not apply to office space below that height even if such lower space is located in a building which exceeds 35 feet in height. In other words, if a 150 ,000 square foot building has 5 stories of 30, 000 square feet each and 2 stories exceed 35 feet in height, only 60 ,000 square feet would be included in applying the 250 limitation. It is clear from the record that this was the intention of the Board of Trustees when the ordinance was adopted in 1978. From the time of the original hearings in 1977 McDonald' s pointed out that it was planning to construct 925 ,000 gross square feet of office space and that 750 , 000 square feet would be built in Bubble A to house McDonald' s headquarters in a group of buildings. The original plan called for 200 , 000 square feet in 2 buildings 3 stories high, 200 , 000 square feet in 2 buildings 4 stories high LORD, BISSELL & BROOK Mr. Bruce Kapff June 28, 1985 Page Two and 350 , 000 square feet in buildings 6 (later 5) stories high. Thus at least 550 ,000 square feet would be in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height. All of the remaining 200 ,000 square feet of office space would have been in buildings of 3 stories or less. Thus at least 550 , 000 square feet out of a planned 750 ,000 square feet of office space or 73% would have been in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height. No question was ever raised as to the validity of the plan. Thus it seems clear that the 25% limitation was not in- tended to apply to all space in buildings exceeding 35 feet in height but only to that portion of office space which itself was more than 35 feet above grade. If I can add anything more, please let me know. Sin rel yours , David M. Gooder DMG:pg En cl cc Seymour Greenman Ken Pardue Joe Antunovich Enclosed are copies of the following: 1. Four sheets from the plastic bound book entitled "McDonald' s Office Campus" (Section VI. Planning Analysis) which McDonald' s filed with the Village in 1977. 2. A one-page table entitled "Proposed Development" prepared by McDonald; s in 1978. Illustrative Site Plan The McDonald's office campus will staff approximately 2,075 people and contain approximately 1,150,000 square feet when it is com- pleted in 2005 A.D. It is intended to be constructed in four phases described further in this report. It is to be the head- quarters of the McDonald's Corporation and will include restaurants, lounges, a computer center, research, training and lodging for McDonald's use. The complex is designed as groups of elements clustered around and over landscaped terraces. Preserving the balance of the eco-system and natural beauty of the site is an essential goal of the project. The preceding exhibits accurately describe all of the site constraints that must be recognized in order to achieve this goal. The baloon diagram, as noted, is the schematic delineation of the site investigation, and the illus- trative site plan, exhibit 12, is an example of how the physical spaces can be arranged within the baloon diagram to preserve the natural beauty of the site. It shows how the different types of structures, heights, sizes and volumes, cannot only provide space solutions to McDonald's functioning relationships, but also how each of the different building types can be oriented to take maximum advantage of the surrounding countryside. It is the intention of the design to bring the outdoors visually into each interior space so that all employees will have a unique environmental atmosphere in which to work. The following is a summary of the different corporate facilities. A. Main Office Approximately 750,000 square feet contained in three -to six story buildings, each story of which is based on a floor area of approximately 30,000 square feet. This floor area size has been determined by McDonald's to be the maximum size of a department. It is also a good architectural solution allowing maximum efficiency as it relates to common areas, elevators, stairs etc. , and a geometric size that will permit exterior lighting to permeate throughout the entire floor. The heights of the buildings have been established on the basis of how many floors must be related vertically in order to accomplish an efficient interrelationship between departments. The six story buildings are located on the lower contours (elevation 656) and the three story buildings are located on a higher topo (elevation 670) . The roof tops of each building are, therefore, approximately the same height. The six story buildings have been located on the lower contours of the site so that they will not project above the natural tree screening that exists on the site. VI - 28 A garage housing approximately 1,000 cars connects all of the buildings in the A area. The top of the garage is designed to be a landscaped terrace. There are approximately ten entrances into the parking garage from a peripheral service drive that connects vehicular traffic of all buildings in area A to the Jorie Boulevard main entrance. B. Food Testing and Research Approximately 25,000 square feet, two story building. Con- ducting of research and development with special equipment and experimentation of different menu items. C. Training Center Approximately 80,000 square feet, two story building. An audio-visual training facility. Employees are transported to Chicago from the different parts of the country for an intensive training program, usually lasting approximately ten days. These employees will stay on campus in provided housing. D. Lodge Approximately 210,000 square feet, two story building. A private motel exclusively for McDonald's employees. E. Future Offices 150,000 square feet, three story building. F. Service Storage Approximately 10,000 square feet, one story building. This will house the equipment and maintenance personnel that are required to maintain the campus. G. Midwest Regional Office 25,000 square feet, two story building. Each region of the country contains a satellite office facility. Architectural Concept: The architectural concept will have low, horizontal lines, in square building modules, each of which are separated from the other, by landscaped areas natural to the site and provided as part of the landscape concept. Materials and Construction: Garage Structure - Reinforced concrete Office Structures in Area A - Structural Steel, fire proofed Exterior walls, brick VI - 29 1 _ q ft •. +4 % !A xis 7`77 3r•=�'. x _ - I .i !. Future - Cultural Center& ' ' •, ' r a , �YY+ '•'fie 1 •y '�! 1 y x �.�_ ..........:. F ... lA ' Oak Brook Road .......... ' ....� .. •315 _`°ci'X' R� TITLE LEGEND � MCDonald s B FOODOTESTING,RESEAR Illustrative 25.000! CH Corporation Site Plan o MCLODGECEo.oo, e0,00 E FUTURE OFFICES-150.000>• SHEET F E STORAGE o0, 12 VZ — 30 MfDWE !,, G MIDWE570FFICES z5,0o0: 0 C. Phase Development Schedule The total project will be built in four phases over a period of years ranging from 1979 through 2005. The following exhibits ■ illustrate each cumulative phase showing how building structures, roads and parking areas will be configured as the construction occurs through each phase. Phase I is the most significant phase during which time the ' majority of the road system will be constructed and most of ,., the campus facilities. These will consist of the following: - � A. Main Offices, 200,000 square feet B. Research and Development Lab, 25,000 square feet , J C. Training and Meeting Center, 80,000 square feet J D. Lodge Facilities, 70,000 square feet „ E. Service and Storage Facilities, 10,000 square feet ^ � F. Midwest Region Offices, 25,000 square feet for a total first phase development of 410,000 square feet. In addition to buildings, the parking deck of 500 cars will be built in conjunction with the general headquarters complex, and 400 surface _J parking stalls will be distributed throughout the site. Phase II will be built somewhere in the time frame between 1985 and 1990 and will consist of the following structures: A. Main Offices, 200,000 square feet -� D. Lodge and Restaurant Facilities, 40,000 square feet for a total phase construction program of 240,000 square feet, and a running total of 650,000 square feet for the project to-date. In addition to the structures in this phase, an additional 500 car parking deck will be constructed and 300 more surface parking stalls will be added to the complex. Phase III will take place in the time period ranging from 1990 to 1995 and will consist of the following structures: An additional 350,000 square feet of space located in the general headquarters complex area. In addition to structures, 300 surface parking stalls will be added to the complex. Phase IV is the last phase of construction, taking place in the time y . frame somewhere between 2000 and 2005 and will consist of an additional 150,000 square feet of office complex. These buildings will be located in the vicinity of the Research and Development Laboratories and the Midwest Region Offices. In addition to building construction, the final 300 parking stalls will be added to the surface parking throughout the complex, bringing the total project up to 1,150,000 square feet of facilities and 2,300 parking stalls. 1 VI - 31 PROPOSED DIE LOPHENT - Completion Date PIIASE I PIIASE II PHASE III PHASE IV TOTAL 1979-1980 1985-1990 1990-1995 2000-2005 2000-2005 Sq. Font Employeea Sq. Feat Employees Sq. Feat P.mployeas Sq. Fact Employees Sq. Ftet F.nnloreca OFFICESi I I I ( I General Headquarters 200,000 425 200,000 I 425 . 350,000 745 - - 750,000 1,555 Chicago District 11q. 25,000 ' 62 - _ - _ 25,000 I 62 EXPANSION - I _ _ I - - I 150,000 I 319 150,000 319 Tutal Office 225,000 487 200,000 425 350,000 745 150,000 319 925,000 I 1,97 R 6 0 Lab 25,000 25 - - _ _ _ 25,000 25 Hceting Center 30,000 I 10 - I - _ I _ _ ( _ 30,000 l 10 Training Center 50,000 40 - - _ _ .. _ 50,000 I 43 Lodge and Restaurant 70,000 I 12 40,000 I 6 - - _ I _ 110,000 13 80 Rooraa 40 Room$ I Hairrcnunce Facility 10,000 I 6 - - _ 10,000 I 5 GZASD TOTAL. 410,000 580 240,000 I 431 350,000 I 745 150,000 ( 319 13150,000 2,075 Cumulative - - 650,000 1,011 1,000,000 1,.156 1,150,000 1,075 Parking neck I I I I soo soo l,D00 Sur fuce 400 300 300 300 1=30O Total Parking 2,300 Retention 6 . 81% 6 . 81% 6 . 87% 6 . 81% Access Roads 6 . 19% 6 . 19% 6 . 19% 6 . 19% Surface Parking 3 . 83% 6 . 64% 8 . 90% 15 . 34% Decked Parking 3 . 18% 3 . 18% 4 . 77% 4 . 77% 4 . 77% Structural Coverage 5 . 86% 7 . 55% 9 . 40% 10 . 83% Coen Land 79 . 13% 68 . 04% 63 . 93% 56 . 06% Open SLDace 84 . 12% 79 . 62% 75 . 51% 67 . 64% ': I, LIORD, BISSELL &IIJBROOK I'� I January 15, 1985 ! FEB 1S' 1985 TO: File VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL, DMINISTRATION FROM:' DMG A ; SUBJtCT: McDonald's Phase 1-B - Material Required to be Filed ' to Initiate Improvement Plan Approval Procedures i The requirements are set forth in Article VI-A of the Village Subdivision Regulations. i In reviewing the requirements I have kept in mind the following facts: 1. The McDonald' s Office Campus Development Plan is on file with the Village. 2. The McDonald' s Phase 1-A Improvement Plan is on file l� with the Village. 3. Within the next 30 days the "as-built" drawings, plans � . and prints will be on file with the Village. 4 . In my opinion the construction work which McDonald' s intends to carry out in Phase 1-B does not involve any land improvements or public improvements as defined in the subdivision regulations other than, possibly, the required landscape screening adjacent to Oak Brook Road and the Village Commons. All of the construction will be of the kind normally associated with the construction of OffiCe b ildiug_ including utility service lines, entrance driveways and ramps, entrance walk-ways and , patios and terraces. No extensions of the utility mains or public bicycle and pedestrian pathways or Ronald Lane or Kroc Drive are contempl;�ted. The one possible exception is the construction o,,A a walk-way connecting the office building with the Lodge. The specific requirements are set forth in Section 2 of Article- VI-A and will be discussed in order: i (A) This sets forth the requirements ' for ,the drawing of the' plans. These requirements will be complied with. (B) (1)•(5) These include requirements for, identifying the area covered by the Development Plan and an up-to-date topo survey. The latter will be provided as part of the "as- built", filings required under the Phase 1-A Improvement Plan. i.le (McDonald' s) i anuary 15 , 1985 Page Two (C) (1) (a) - (i) These set forth the information 'to be 'included in the Improvement Plan. All of the information is either presently on file with the Village or will be on file when the "as-built" drawings have been provided with one exception. The last sentence of subparagraph (h) reads as follows: "Soil boring data and seepage tests may be required at locations and depths as determined by the village engineer. " McDonald's intends to carry out these tests - in March 1985 and will be prepared to file the results, thereof by the end of that month. (2) Requires that the Improvement Plan be accompanied by the materials specified in the various subparagraphs as follows: (a) McDonald's will file a copy of the approved / Development Plan Phase l-A. i (b) "As-built" drawings wi]j have been previously filed with the Village.O (c) This paragraph raises questions as to how much detail is required to be filed P rior to the Siting for a building permit. This requires ' discussion with the Village, in light of the fact that no extension of street$ or utility mains are planned. it would seem that plans for landscape screening might constitute full compliance with this. (d) All improvements have been completed and Sheet IP-2 will reflect the approved improvements in earli.er improvement plans. Reference can also be made to all of the detailed drawings currently eA on file at the Village in connection with the Je� construction under Improvement Plan Phase 1-A. III fje In additio, McDon4ld's intends to file a summary of the 'flo r area constructed during Phase 1-A, �IbC` Xa' �� the open space area remaining after such con- S struction, the s' ructure heights of buildings constructed in Phase 1-A, and the location and 1,9°� number of parking spaces in, the off-street parking, constructed in Phase 1-A. D. This paragraph sets forth the requirements for design features for the Improvement Plan. Each subparagraph ��°� will be discussed separately as follows : File (McDonald' s) January 15, 1985 Page Three (1) This will be complied with. (2) The "as-built" drawings and Sheet IP-1 reflect the layout of private streets. No additional !' streets will be constructed , uring Phase 1-B. ( 3) The "as-built" drawings reflect the location of all public bicycle paths and easements. None will (� be constructed during Phase 1-Bo (4) This paragraph reads as follows : , "Indicate the exact location, heights and square footage of floor area of proposed buildings and parking areas. " ' It is intended that the only building to be con- structed under Phase; l-B will be an office building in Bubble A to include 200,000-250 ,000 square feet and necessary parking which will include not less ? 'than 500 parking spaces below the building or(below 'the landscaped area around the building It would expedite the appFova�, process if the Village would agree that the building footprint on the plan might be changed during the course of final engineering and design provided tr at the building remain totally within Bubble A and the parking area, both subgrade and on the surface, , be located within Bubble A and provide not less than the required parking spaces. Again it would expedite and facilitate final design and engineering if parking areas might be moved somewhat or reshaped prior to application for a building permit. (5) Not applicable. i (6) It is not planned to change or extend sewer or water mains but only to connect the building to existing sewer and water mains. All run off of storm water will be directed into storm drains which will terminate in the easterly lagoon as set forth in plans presented in connection with Improve- ment Plan Phase 1-A. (7) All required material filed and necessary construction completed in, Phase 1-A. (8) There will no new streets or easements. (9) N additional s o area are to be dedicated or reserved for public use. file (McDonald' s) anuary 15, 1985 Page Four (10) Not applicable (11) All applicable general design and development standards of Article VII will be complied with. I I i i (E) This deals with the flood plain and was taken care of ✓/ as required in Improvement Plan Phase 1-A. No con- struction in the flood .plain and no modification of 5 the flood, plain is contemplated in Phase 1-B. (F) This requires a number of supporting documents to be �. ,filed apparently when the Improvement Plan is submitted. included are such things �s final plans and specifi- cations and cost eAtimates for all planned land improvements . ' If any of such documents are indeed re- quired to be filed, McDohald' s would like to file those after approval by the Village Board of' the Improvement Plan in order. to avoid the. heavy cost of preparing such material prior to approval. In any event, the items covered by subparagraphs (2) and (3) do not seem necessary in connection with Phase 1-B. 'A question arises under subparagraph (5) as to the area to be covered by "A detailed landscaping plan as required under the provisions of zoning ordinance" . It would seem that should only relate to the required landscape r� screening adjacent to Oak , Brook Road and the Village i Commons and should not include landscaping within Bubble A adjacent to and related to the proposed office building. (G) It would seem no completion bond is required since no "public improvements" are to be constructed. I , LORD, BISSELL & BROOK IIS SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 I (312) 443-0700 'LOS ANGELES OFFICE I f - CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 900101 3000 Ronald Lane (213'497-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:19-1135 i 654-0561 • 1 February 18, 1985 I Mr. Bruce Kapff Assistant of the Village Manager Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: Phase 1B Improvement Plan McDonald' s Office Campus Dear Bruce: McDonald' s Corporation has began developing plans for an office building of approximately 250 ,000 square feet to be con- structed in the area designated as "Bubb'2e A" on the plat approved as part of McDonald' s Development Plan b j, Ordinance No. S-409 . In setting up a schedule of the procedure to be followed in obtaining approval of the Phase 1B Improvement P1an, I reviewed . the provisions of Article VI-A of the Subdivision Regulations. Enclosed are six (6) copies of my file memorandum dated January 15, 1985, which sets forth my comments on the necessary materials to be filed. I ' You will note that there are several areas where I believe that the Village review is more properly part bf the building permit , process than the improvement plan process. We need to reach an understanding as to these areas so that McDonald's can proceed to prepare the required materials for filing. Please let me ,.know when, I may meet with appropriate Village staff member's to resolve all questions. 'Since y ours, David M. Gooder DMG:pg Encl cc John Cooke Seymour Greenman Ken Pardue Joe Antunovich I �pp pqK • L 9AFCOUNt'�'`�2 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 September 7, 1984 MEMO TO: James E. Clark - Fire Chief/Building Commissioner FROM: John H. Brechin - Village Manager SUBJECT: Mc Donald's I Please give me a written report on your meeting with Dave Gooder regarding the Mc Donald's situation as soon as possible. John H. Brechin Vill ge Manager JHB/cak CA4 OF OAk 6 off 9 G al 4 `2C C�COUN-14, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 September 7, 1984 MEMO TO: John Brechin, Village Attorney FROM: James E. Clark, Building Commissioner SUBJECT: Scheduled Catering Events for McDonald's Lodge On Wednesday, September 5, 1984 Mr. David Gooder, who represents the McDonald's Corporartion met with our attorney, Richard Martins, Marianne Lakosil, and myself regarding the use of McDonald's Lodge for different events which have already been scheduled. It was brought to Mr. Gooder's attention that the events scheduled were not authorized or permitted by the Development Plan Ordinance S-409 and the Improvement Plan Ordinance S-477 and the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Gooder scheduled a meeting with us to clarify that in fact the events scheduled were authorized. This meeting is for Tuesday, September 11, 1984 at 2:0O P.M. in the upper conference room. Respectfully submitted, James E. Clark, Building Commissioner JEC/sc I! • POD OF Oqk eA • �wv oO¢ o w G O '0 �•Z 9Q `Vr �COUNt�' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 September 4, 1984 MEMO TO: James E. Clark, Building Commissioner FROM: Marianne Lakosil, Assistant to Building Commissioner SUBJECT: 3000 Ronald Lane (formerly Spring Road) McDonald's Construction Office It has come to my attention that the construction office has been vacated by Gerhardt F. Meyne Company and FCL & Associates, Inc. , their having com- pleted the construction of the Training Center and The Lodge. It is my understanding that it. is intended to be occupied again when McDonald's authorizes the construction of a proposed office building within two (2) years. For about one (1) month, the building has been vacant and two (2) weeks ago Dave Gooder, Attorney, Lord, Bissell & Brook, rented approximately 600 sq, ft. of space on the first floor. Mr. Gooder felt that the ordinance .permits the rental of office space, and entered into an agreement with McDonald's on that basis. The ordinance he refers to is Sec. X,D,(2) "Permitted uses (but only to the extent that each such use is in accordance-with an approved development plan) : (a) Office, business .and professional; provided, however, that following completion of any phase and for five (5) years thereafter, not more than,33% of the office space shall be occupied by persons other than employees of the owner." Note: 1) Exhibit B of Ord. S-409, Development Plan, Sec. 9 - Existing uses uses and structures may be continued so long as the totalTc�coverage by all structures, new and existing, does not exceed 15 percent at any t ime. 2) Exhibit 3 of Ord. S-477, Improvement Plan Agreement, Section 4, makes reference to "Gerhardt F. Meyne Company as the contractor for the Work'. Section 10 makes reference to "Fujikawa, Conterato, Lohan and Associates Inc. with Sasaki Associates, Inc. who are the consulting engineers for McDonald's Corporation Office Campus - Phase lA'. 3) The existing use was a residence and by virtue of the Building Permits, was .allowed to be used as a temporary construction office by the contractor and architect. ' James E. Clark September 4, 1984 Page 2 4) If this were to be considered as. a .permitted use, then the next step would be to enforce the regulations of the Fire Prevention Code, G-248. Lt. Nielsen, Fire Prevention Director, has made a determination that as rentable office space, the building would have to be sprinklered. Section X,(D) (2)(b) , the ordinance further refers to "Accessory uses and structures, (x) Temporary buildings for construction purposes". By this provision, the duplex residence used as a temporary construction office was not required to be sprinklered, nor was it to be used as rentable office space. Respectfully, Marianne Lakosil Assistant to Building Commissioner ML/js cc: John H. Brechin, Village Manager OF Oq�@q00 0 �COUNty' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS March 1, 1985 654-2220 MEMO TO: File FROM Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to the Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan - Required Submittals The following is a list of documents and other necessary information required to be submitted in conjunction with McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan. These items were generated at a Planning and Zoning Staff Meeting held February 26, 1985. Subdivision Requirements - Section by Section Analysis Article VI-A of the Subdivision Regulations governs the development of properties zoned ORA-3 (McDonald's Office Campus) . The following listing goes through each section of the Subdivision Regulations concerning this subject: Section I ORA-3 District Improvement Plan Procedures (A) A Mylar and 17 prints of the proposed Improvement Plan for Phase I-B and 4 copies of all supporting data and. documents are required to be submitted in conjunction with the Improvement Plan Application. This Section also states that the Application shall be filed "with the re- quired filing fee". It was determined that although McDonald's was not required to file a fee in conjunction with Phase I-A, this Section of the Regulations requires some type of fee to be filed as is the case with subdivisions and other forms of zoning relief. Staff is to deter- mine the method of computing this required filing fee. (B) through (H) Various procedural steps to follow. No clarification re- quired. Section 2 - ORA-3 District Improvement Plan Requirements (A) General information (B) This subsection requires basic locational information concerning the entire development plan which encompasses the entire ORA-3 zoned property. (C) Subsection (1) (A) through (I) states specific requirements noting existing conditions on the entire tract of land included in the approved develop- ment plan. All of the required information could be shown on a four page set of plans similar to the IP-1 through IP-4 sheets contained in the Phase I-A Improvement Plan. These four sheets break the entire tract into four quadrants and is a convenient means of viewing the existing as well MEMO: McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan - Required Submittals March 1, 1985 Page 2 as proposed design features. Since this is part of the Improvement Plan and As required under Section 1(A) of this Article VI-A, 17copies of this in- formation are required to be submitted. (2) '=:•.This subsection states various documents ::which are required to -accomp- any the application. (A) 17 copies of the approved Development Plan and each prior approved Improve- ment Plan for the tract are required since this information will be circu- lated to Staff, Plan Commission and Board Members in their review of Phase I _I-B. , (B) Only,4.copies -of _the as-built-drawings-need to be filed.' (C) This subsection requires submittal of preliminary drawings indicating proposed extension of land improvements anywhere on the property. In our discussions, it was determined that land improvements include such things as required landscape screening as well as the pedestrian way planned to connect Phase I-A with Phase I-B as well as any other pro- posed improvements which fall under the definition of land improvements, and as such, 17 copies of such land improvements must be submitted. This information could be combined on the previously discussed 4 sheet set of plans noting existing conditions on the entire property. (D) „Thj-stsubsection is comprised of subsection (i) through (iii) . Sub- sections (i) -and (ii) are apparently !, vere d lnthe discussion `under (C), existing condition, 'sub-paragraph (1) (e) and. (1)„ ;(g) . ;;17 _copies information under (iii) are required. I. (D) Proposed Improvement Design features (1) The applicant intends to comply with the improved development plan as noted in Dave Gooder's January 15, 1985 letter. (2) As indicated in ,Dave's -letter, no'additional streets will be constructed in Phase I-B. (3) No additional public bicycle paths will be constructed as a part of Phase I-B. (4) This subsection requires the applicant to "indicate the exact location, heights and square footage of floor area of proposed buildings and parking areas". The applicant notes that Phase I-B will include an office building from 200,000 to 250,000 square feet in floor area containing not less than 500 parking spaces below ground and is re- questing the Village to agree that the building foot print on the proposed plan might be changed during the course of final engineering. but states that both the building and all parking areas below and above surface, will be located within Bubble A and that they will provide not less than the required number of parking spaces. Staff determined that this would be acceptable based on the above conditions, noting that a final review of compliance with the standards would be made again at the building permit stage. (5) No building set-back lines are necessary. MEMO: McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan - Required Submittals March 1, 1985 Page 3 (6) The applicant notes that no new sewers, water mains, storm drains or detention facilities are proposed and therefore will not be shown on the plans. (7) This subsection deals with flood plain modifications which, as indicated by .the applicant, are not proposed in Phase I-B. (8) No new streets or easements are proposed and therefore will not show on the Phase I-B plans. L:l X (9) Since no new additional areas will be didicated for public use, this section is not applicable. ;' ;' (10) No new entrance structures or landscaping adjacent to entrance ways are planned and therefore this subsection is inapplicable. (11) The applicant states that. all applicable general design and --development standards of Article XI will be complied with as required by this sub- section. (E) All flood plain modifications were taken care ,of in Phase I-A and therefore, this section does not apply. (F) Four copies of final plans, specifications and cost estimates as further detailed within this section (F) are required to be submitted covering such land improvements as screening, pedestrian ways, and other improvements which fall under the definition of land improvements. The Staff determined that these must be filed in conjunction with the I-B application '`and not, as the applicant requests, following the Village Board's approval of the Phase I-B Improvement Plan. It was further noted that the required landscaping, as noted in paragraph 4 of the Development Plan attached to Ordinance 5-409, 'would include' "additional plantings consisting of evergreen or other trees not less than 20 feet in height, shall be planted . . . North along Salt Creek and adjacent to the North and East lines of the Village Commons, as necess- ary to provide, to -the reasonable satisfaction of the Village, substantial year-round screening of all buildings, parking and other structures to the extent practical commencing with building construction". (G) Following the Village's approval of the Phase I-B Improvement Plan, it will be necessary for submittal of a completion bond since, as noted above, there are certain public or land improvements required as a part of this Phase I-B (see subsection :(J) for a definition of public and land improvements as de- fined in this Article) . Zoning Ordinance Requirements As we discussed, it would be appropriate for the applicant to submit a written state- ment that all of the particular requirements, as contained in Section X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance, governing development of ORA-3 properties will be complied with as well as a specific statement concerning the provisions within that Section under (2) Permitted 'Uses as to the percent of office space permitted to be occupied by persons other than employees of the owner. Development Plan Ordinance 5-409, approved by the Village on May 31, 1978, contains specific conditions under which development of the subject property was to be governed. It would therefore be appropriate for the Phase I-B application to address each of the sections of the • MEMO: McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan - Required Submittals March 1, 1985 Page 4 Ordinance acid exhibits as -to -this p'hase's comP`l'ia ce'w'ith_ -the requi�rementa contained therein. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to the Village Manager BFK/mf 9d i a Q ( 01F 00(3 a (0 wr { Dit'll, (-aP A 4ylll� o 40 tk) I,/n x � � Lt 'Id/f rl%k�4 I r1l U 3 09 • - _1 N 0 ! 1 m \.".ro Ai. Sb�b p` 4-® Y.--v 1M Ar CO) i G�OF OqK B G � O COUNt-4 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 June 13, 1985 MEMO TO: Plan Commission FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's Improvement Plan - Phase 1-B McDonald's has filed with the Village for approval of its Phase 1-B Improvement Plan which calls for various office building construction on their property. In reviewing information submittea, it was determined that additional information would be necessary prior to a consideration of this subject by the Plan Commission. Such information will be forwarded and ready for the Plan Commission at its July 15th meeting. In addition, McDonald's has chosen to make certain modifications to the flood plain in conjunction with this development and, therefore, will be presently filing an application for modification to the flood plain also to be heard at the July 15th Plan Commission meeting. It would, therefore, be appropriate for the Plan Commission to table consideration of this subject until such time as the above information has been forwarded. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/jr LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 115 SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE - CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:f8-1135 654-0561 June 13, 1985 Mr. Henry Marcy Chairman, Plan Commission Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: McDonald' s Office Campus Improvement Plan Phase 1B Dear Henry: In view of the fact that my client, McDonald' s Corporation., must seek a special use permit under the flood plain ordinance for certain changes in the flood plain, it requests that the hearing on its Improvement Plan for Phase 1B be continued to the scheduled meeting of the Plan Com- mission to be held on July 15, 1985. S ' cerely yours, Davi M. Gooder DMG:pg cc Seymour Greenman Joseph Antunovich ��Z � JUN 1 /_ '1985 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. ADMINISTRATION 4. EL. 659.80 EL. 656.00 � N � •-- � .t.`� � �i/ y � .-ci i'�J .._._fig.- -t "E�' •s`-•�- � k - I i - -�. — I L-' STY f .h EL. 655.50 TY SE NEL. 672.20 j� EL. 671.50~ r F � 2-Sly +i - •� I f ri l/Y' i+ * I' ` �`� _ _'��- 1 �i % 1 Ntf BARN � ,: - (• ROOF EL. 716.00 EL./ 668.50 , �/ ;',; < < }p 1T__." �1L ±' + ' '`'-7 /��*+ FEL. 672.20 +,11 r 2-STx ri l \ ! r I BARN : s - 672.00 EL. 670.50 i 10 AU>ITRIAN ►iNE _�'•'�` ,�.{(� v 4 AT 0'- . 0 AT 0'-10'+ "T 14'-11' 7 AT 11'-1AW HAWTHORN +� 4 AT 0'-10, 0 At 10 j 12't! • McDonald's Corporation !' Phase Ib - Proposed Office Building . - , m : •LAND -9 3 I I with Existing Grading ' VALQ 30 May 1985 Sk-4a +. FCL ASSOCIATES* Architecture 225 North Michigan Avenue Planning Chicago,Illinois 60601 Interior Design Telephone 312.938.4455 Memorandum Date: 15 May 1985 To: David Gooder From: Joe Antunovich Subject: McDonald's Corporation Office Campus: Phase IB Improvement Plan Area Calculations Listed below please find Area Calculations and Summaries of the development proposed by the McDonald's Corporation under the Phase IB Improvement Plan: Building Areas: A. Phase IB Improvement Plan I Office Building 260,000 SF Cooling Tower Area 1,650 SF Maintenance Building 5,500 SF Lodge Building 3 28,000 SF Lodge Swimming Pool (IeY\ C-k C, 5,700 SF Total Proposed Building Area Phase IB 300,850 SF B. Phase IA Improvement Plan (Existing Buildings) Training Center (including 50,000 SF us d and 109,305 SF to be used for offices Lodge Building 1 51,765 SF Lodge Building 2 39,609 SF Gate House Kroc Drive 140 SF Gate House Oak Brook Road 120 SF Construction Field Office 4,945 SF Total Existing Building Areas Phase IA 205,884 SF Total Building Area Phase IA and IB (A + B) 506,734 SF F.A.R. = 0.156 Site Coverage: Phase IA and Phase IB A. Buildings Office Building 114,150 SF Cooling Tower Area 1,650 SF Training Center 55,680 SF Lodge Building 1 32,625 SF Building 2 13,980 SF Building 3 9,800 SF Swimming Pool 5,700 SF Gate Houses Kroc Drive 140 SF Oak Brook Road 120 SF Maintenance Building 5,500 SF Construction Field Office 2,200 SF Total Building Coverage Phase IA and IB 241,545 SF 7.45% of Total Land Area B. Roads & Parking Roads 148,550 SF Exterior Parking and Driveways 216,700 SF Total Roads and Parking Phase IA and IB 365,250 SF Total Site Coverage Phase IA and IB (A + B) 606,795 SF 18.7% of Total Land Area Open Space Lake Fred 217,680 SF Lake Ed 179,440 SF Salt Creek 52,750 SF Marsh 14,130 SF Landscaped, Paved Areas 45,500 SF Bicycle Paths 52,700 SF Pedestrian Paths 11,740 SF Forests, Water Courses, and Other Landscaped Areas 2,063,614 SF Total Open Space, Phase IA 2,637,554 SF 81.3% of Total Land Area Total Site Area 3,244,349 SF Building Heights Summary Phase IB: Roof Elevation Office Building 716.0' Lodge Building 3 701.62' Lodge Swimming Pool 683.0' Maintenance Building 672.5' Phase IA: Training Center 696.0' Lodge Building 1 701.62' Lodge Building 2 701.62' Gate House - Kroc Drive 679.30' Gate House - Oak Brook 676.44' Parking Summary Phase IA - Required 231 spaces Phase IA - Existing 356 spaces Phase IB - Proposed (all to be below grade) 620 spaces r LORD, BISSELL & BROOK 115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO CGO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)487-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:18-1135 654-0561 May 31, 1985 Village of Oak Brook JUN 0 3 1985 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. ADMINISTRATION Re : Improvement Plan - Phase 1B McDonald' s Office Campus Gentlemen: Filed herewith are eighteen (18) copies of each of the following documents: 1. Perimeter Landscape Screening - Cost Estimate To be attached as Exhibit C to Improvement Plan Agree- ment for Phase 1B. 2. 8h"x 11" copy of that portion of topographic survey showing existing grades at all corners of the proposed office building to be constructed in Area/Bubble A in Phase 1B (Dated 5/30/85) . 3. Memorandum dated May 15, 1985, from Joe Antunovich of FCL to me which sets forth the following area calcu- lations : (a) Building gross floor areas for floor area ratio. calculations for buildings constructed during Phase lA and those to be constructed during Phase 1B. (b) Site coverage at end of Phase 1B of buildings , roads and parking areas , and "open space" as defined in Section X(D) (1) (a) of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance (Code, p. 9 36) . (c) Parking spaces existing and to be provided in Phase 1B. It should be noted that all parking to be constructed during Phase 1B will be below grade and either located under the proposed office building or decked over with architectural land- scaping pursuant to Section X(B) (10) of the Zoning Ordinance (Code, p. 938.3) and Sec. 6 of the Devel- opment Plan approved May 31, 1978, (Ord. S-409) . I Si re y yours, (AI ,j DMG:pg David M. Gooder Encl • EXHIBIT C • McDONALD'S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS PHASE 1B IMPROVEMENT PLAN Perimeter Landscape Screening Cost Estimate Listed below is a summary of plant material and an estimated cost of the proposed landscape screening depicted on Sheet No. 4 , dated 5/15/85 of the proposed Phase IB Improvement Plan documents: 5 River Birch 5 Clump Alder 4 Willows 3" 5 Redbud 20 Austrian Pine 6 Marshall Seedless Ash 7 Crusgalli Hawthorn 8 Red Maple 5 Transplanted Spruce 7 Transplanted Hawthorn Total Estimated Cost $39,654.00 JMA:cc EXHIBIT C EL. 656.00 / " '- I •. EL. 659.80 — z r ' /��/ r • . %F ,". r6 -. "1-STY - "T ..STY r— w•c 9pnN l J ! : / i . --•l;i i (� .�` .FR r.1 BRICK[ •-,,FF EL. 655.50 lb EL. 672,20 EL. 671.50 t• �F •a— EL. 67 -50 �� _ + t �' ROOF EL. 716.001 / L� _ , 1 r EL. 668.50 �.< d- iT' / 'rl ' +• / f } EL. 672.20 Yl BORN • 1 C t , '''�`' �\` '� •1 --� t� �� I' -`' ( EL. 672.00 . 1X+ `1 � \ �� (-—:"�, r �� EL. 670.50 ., 10 AUSTRIAN PINE 1 AT 6'-itf 3 AT •' rAT 1p'-1!' It 1 '.\, '• 4•- / 7 C11UEdALU NAWTM01101 '4 AT 0'-10'. 3 AT W-12' i • i McDonald's Corporation Phase Ib Proposed Office Building1 (' i with Existing Grading `'� v40LA.ILA N� 30 May 1985 i+ r < 6 Sk-4a FCL ASSOCIATE Architecture 225 North Michigan Avenue Planning Chicago,Illinois 60601 Interior Design Telephone 312.938.4455 Memorandum Date: 15 May 1985 To: David Gooder From: Joe Antunovich Subject: McDonald's Corporation Office Campus: Phase IB Improvement Plan Area Calculations Listed below please find Area Calculations and Summaries of the development proposed by the McDonald's Corporation under the Phase IB Improvement Plan: Building Areas: A. Phase IB Improvement Plan Office Building 260,000 SF Cooling Tower Area. 1,650 SF Maintenance Building 5,500 SF Lodge Building 3 28,000 SF Lodge Swimming Pool 5,700 SF Total Proposed Building Area Phase IB 300,850 SF B. Phase IA Improvement Plan (Existing Buildings) Training Center (including 50,000 SF us d and 109,305 SF to be used for offices Lodge Building 1 51,765 SF Lodge Building 2 39,609 SF Gate House Kroc Drive -140 SF Gate House Oak Brook Road 120 SF Construction Field Office 4,945 SF Total Existing Building Areas Phase IA 205,884 SF Total Building Area Phase IA and IB (A + B) 506,734 SF F.A.R. = 0.156 Site Coverage: Phase IA and Phase IB A. Buildings Office Building 114,150 SF Cooling Tower Area 1,650 SF Training Center 55,680 SF Lodge Building 1 32,625 SF Building 2 13,980 SF Building 3 9,800 SF Swimming Pool 5,700 SF Gate Houses - Rroc Drive 140 SF Oak Brook Road 120 SF Maintenance Building 5,500 SF Construction Field Office 2,200 SF Total Building Coverage Phase IA and IB 241,545 SF 7.45% of Total Land Area B. Roads & Parking Roads 148,550 SF Exterior Parking and Driveways 216,700 SF Total Roads and Parking Phase IA and IB 365,250 SF Total Site Coverage Phase IA and IB (A + B) 606,795 SF 18.7% of Total Land Area Open Space Lake Fred 217,680 SF Lake Ed 179,440 SF Salt Creek 52,750 SF Marsh 14,130 SF Landscaped, Paved Areas 45,500 SF Bicycle Paths 52,700 SF Pedestrian Paths 11,740 SF Forests, Water Courses, and Other Landscaped Areas 2,063,614 SF Total Open Space, Phase IA 2,637,554 SF 81.3% of Total Land Area Total Site Area 3,244,349 SF Building Heights Summary Phase IB: Roof Elevation Office Building 716.0' Lodge Building 3 701.62' Lodge Swimming Pool 683.0' Maintenance Building 672.5' Phase IA: Training Center 696.0' Lodge Building 1 701.62' Lodge Building 2 701.62' Gate House - Kroc Drive 679.30' Gate House - Oak Brook 676.44' Parking Summary Phase IA - Required 231 spaces Phase IA - Existing 356 spaces Phase IB - Proposed (all to be below grade) 620 spaces HINSDALE SANITARY D TRICT P.O. sox 179 RECEIVED Hinsdale, Illinois 60521 312-323-3299 MAY 3 11985 FCC ASSOCIATES CNIC"06 ILLJN019 May 29, 1985 Joseph M. Antunovich, AIA FCL Associates 225 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL. 60601 MCDONALD'S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS - PHASE 1B This will confirm that the sanitary sewer facilities installed during Phase 1 construction of the McDonald's Corporation Office Campus are sufficient to properly serve the proposed Phase 1B Expansion. We will issue our permits for connection upon proper application for each of the four units of the Phase 1B expansion. C. CARL T. BLOMGREN, - CUTIVE DIRECTOR am Pill D 294 JUN 0 3 1985 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, IL. p Y ADMINISTRATION a m Toll Plaza 1 s-Tv iso" 55 PUNT 3 OFFICE ON 49 ACRES 6975 Commonwealth Ave. Burr Ridge, IL RESOLUTION NO . R- 331 A RESOLUTION OBJECTING TO AND DISAPPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS ON BEHALF OF MCDONALD' S CORPORATION BY THE ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS , the Village of Oak Brook on June 22 , 1982 , received notice from the Illinois Industrial Development Authority of its intent to issue and sell its Industrial Development Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed one million dollars and 00/100 ($1 ,000 ,000 . 00) , with the proceeds of same to be utilized for the benefit of McDonald ' s Corporation; WHEREAS , the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the preliminary bond resolution and memorandum of agree- ment between the Illinois Industrial Development Authority and McDonald's Corporation; NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND .COOK COUNTIES , ILLINOIS, as follows : Section l : That pursuant to paragraph 850 . 06 of Chapter 48 of the Illinois Revised Statutes , the Village of Oak Brook does hereby object to and disapprove of the project relating to the issuance of one million dollars and 00/100 ($1 ,000 ,000 .00) in industrial development revenue bonds by or on behalf of the Illinois Industrial Development Authority. Section 2 : That a certified copy of this resolution be submitted to the Illinois Industrial Development Authority. Passed and approved this 13th day of Jul 1982 by the President and Board o Trustees of t e Village of Oak Brook , Du Page and Cook Counties , Illinois according to a roll call vote as follows : Ayes : Trustees Cerne , Congreve , Imrie , Listecki , Philip , Rush and Watson . Nays . Absent: Village President ATTEST : Vill ge Clerk `J CJ 900 E.DeYoung-Suite 5 — P.O.Box 397 MARION,ILLINOIS 62959 1618!997-6318 ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY June 18, 1982 Ms. Marianne Lakosil City Clerk 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Dear Ms. Lakosil: On June 16, 1982, the directors of the Illinois Industrial Development Authooity approved a Memorandum of'Agreement to issue industrial-revenue bonds on behalf of McDonald's Corporation. McDonald's will use the proceeds of the bond issue for a part of the construction of a training center, lodge, and corporate offices in Oak.Brook. According to information available to us, this project falls within the planning and subdivision control of Oak Brook. A copy of the Memorandum of Agreement is enclosed. Following is a portion of Section 6 of the "Industrial Development Authority Act" which describes one of the conditions that must be met before industrial revenue bonds may be issued: "The Authority shall not issue any bonds relating to the financing of a project located within the planning and subdivision control jurisdiction of any municipality unless: 1) notice, including a description of the proposed project and the financing therefore, is submitted to the corporate authorities of such municipality; and 2) such corporate authorities do not adopt a resolution disapproving the project within 45 days after receipt of the notice."--- Please be advised that the corporate authorities of Oak Brook. have 45 days after receipt of this letter to adopt such a resolution. If we are not notified of the adoption of such a resolution within the specified time limits, it will be assumed that the corporate Ms. Marianne Lakosil Page 2 June 18, 1982 authorities have no objections to this project. You are requested to send such notification, and a certified copy of any pertinent resolution by registered or certified mail to: ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT-AUTHORITY P. 0. BOX 397 MARION, ILLINOIS _62959 If you have any questions concerning this, please contact our office. Sincerely, ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CLelby�rBrindon General Manager LRB:mc Enclosure cc: James Russell, Sidley and Austin Paul Olsen, McDonald's Corporation Richard Goss, Chapman and Cutler y The members of the Illinois Industrial Development Authority (the "Authority") , met in duly called and convened open public session pursuant to notice, at the First National Bank Building, 205 South 5th Street, in the City of Springfield, Illinois, at 9:30 o'clock A.M. on June 16, 1982. The meeting was called to order and declared open to the public; upon roll there were present G. Allen And as 2 Chairman presiding, and the following named members present:_Peter Gidwitz,_Wait er Lohman, Clyde Oberlin, Peter Fox, Al Bernardi Sheldon Gray. Tom Harrington Absent:_ Frank Considine Cram Duchossois Richard Shanahan Michael Malone. Thomas EEverman * * * * (other business) Lee Roy Brandon introduced in writing a proposed Resolution in regard to the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement by and between McDonald's Corporation and the Authority, a copy of which Resolution is attached hereto and made a part hereof. It was recognized that all parties concerned were familiar with the intended accomplishments and text of the proposed Resolution. Clyde Oberlin moved that the proposed Resolution be adopted; seconded by Sheldon Graff_ and after due consideration thereof by the Authority, the Chairman put the question, and upon the roll being called the following voted: Aye: Allen Andreas, Peter Gidwitz, Walter Lohman, Clyde Oberlin, Peter Fox, Al Bernardi, Sheldon Gray, Tom Harrington Nay: None Whereupon the Chairman declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted. * On motion and vote the meeting adjourned. Chairman Attest: J / e cretary y PRELIMINARY BOND RESOLUTION WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Authority by McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corpora- tion, an application for the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds by the Authority and a proposed Memorandum of Agreement (the "Agreement") between this Authority and McDonald's Corporation with respect to an industrial project in DuPage County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, a determination has been made by this Authority that the acquisition, construction and equipping of such industrial project by McDonald's Corporation will increase employment in DuPage County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, each of the members of this Authority has read the form of the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, Be it Resolved by the Illinois Industrial Development Authority that the application of McDonald's Corporation is approved, that the Agreement presented to this meeting is accepted; and that the Chairman, General Manager and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of this Authority are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Authority, and to do any and all things necessary or desirable in order to carry out the intention of the parties as expressed therein; Be it further resolved that upon final deter- mination of the details of the financing, this Authority will take all further steps necessary to issue its indus- trial development revenue bonds on behalf of McDonald's Corporation in an amount not exceeding $ 1 .000 ,000 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is between the Illinois Industrial Development Authority, party of the first part (hereinafter referred to as the "Authority") , and McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation, party of the second part (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") . 1. Preliminary Statement. Among the matters of mutual inducement which have resulted in the execu- tion of this Agreement are the following: (a) The Authority is an Illinois body, cor- porate and politic organized under and pursuant to Ill. Rev. Stats. (1979) , Chapter 48, Sections 850.01 to 850.17, inclusive, and known as The Illinois Industrial Development Authority Act (the "Act") , authorized an empowered to issue industrial development revenue bonds (the "bonds") for the purpose of defraying the cost of acquiring and improving land, buildings and equipment suitable for use as commercial, industrial or manu- facturing facilities in areas of critical labor surplus, and to lease the same to the occupant for such rentals or to loan the proceeds of such bonds to the developer, upon such terms and conditions as the Authority may deem advisable, but at all times sufficient for the full amortization of such bonds, both principal and interest and the payment of all expenses and fees of the Authority. (b) DuPage County, Illinois, has been determined to be an area of critical labor surplus by the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs. In order to provide for industrial and commercial develop- ment and increased employment opportunities for the inhabitants of the area and to add to the welfare and prosperity of the area and of such inhabitants, the Authority proposes to issue industrial development revenue bonds, the proceeds of which will be used by the Company to finance the cost of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping of an industrial building, such facilities being herein referred to as the "Project and to be located within the planning and subdivision control jurisdiction of OakBrook, Illinois. The Authority will loan the proceeds of its bonds to the Company. The principal user of the Project will be the Company (hereinafter sometimes the "Principal User") . (c) Representatives of the Authority have indicated the willingness of the Authority to proceed with and effect such financing as an inducement to the Company to undertake the Project in DuPage County, Illinois, and the Authority has advised the Company that, subject to due compliance with all requirements of law and the obtaining of all necessary consents and approvals and to the happening of all acts, conditions and things required to exist, happen and be performed precedent to and in connection with such financing in due time, form and manner as required by law, the Authority by virtue of its powers as may now or hereafter be conferred by the Act, will issue and sell its industrial development revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000.00 and loan the proceeds thereof to the Company to be used to pay the costs of the Project. Based on such indications, the Company is willing: (a) to forego other financing proposals to locate the Project elsewhere; (b) to enter into such agreements as may be necessary for acquiring, constructing and equipping the Project; and (c) upon the availability of the proceeds of such bonds, to enter into a loan agree- ment or other financing agreement with the Authority pro- viding for the loaning by the Authority of the bond proceeds to the Company, on mutually agreeable terms. (d) The Authority considers that the financing of the Project by the Authority for use by the Company as Principal User will promote industrial development, provide increased employment opportunities for the inhabi- . tants of DuPage County, Illinois, and prevent their involuntary unemployment and possible migration elsewhere, increase comr..erce and add to the welfare and prosperity of the area and that of its inhabitants. 2. Undertakings on the Part of the Authority. Subject .to the con itions above stated, the Authority agrees as follows; (a) That it will authorize, the issuance and sale of an issue of its industrial development revenue bonds, pursuant to the terms of the Act as then in -2- force, in an aggregate principal amount equal to the then estimated cost of the Project, not to exceed $1,000,000 (b) That it will cooperate with the Company to endeavor to find a purchaser or purchasers for the bonds, and if purchase arrangements satisfactory to thx, Authority, its Bond Counsel and its Financial Consultants and to the Company and its financing agent can be made, it will adopt, or cause to be adopted, such proceedings and authorize the execution of such documents as may be necessary or advisable for the authorization, issuance and sale of the bonds and the loan of bond proceeds to the Company, all as shall be authorized by law and mutually satisfactory to the Authority and the Company. (c) That the aggregate basic loan repayments (i.e. , the amounts to be used to pay the principal, interest and premium, if any, on the bonds) payable under the loan or financing agreement whereby the bond proceeds shall be loaned to the Company shall be such sums as shall .be sufficient to pay the principal of and interest and redemption premium, if any, on the bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. (d) That it will take or cause to be taken such other acts and adopt such further proceedings as may be required to, implement the aforesaid undertakings or as it may deem appropriate in pursuance thereof. 3. Undertakings on the Part of the Company. Subject to the conditions above stated, the Company agrees as follows: (a) That it will use all reasonable efforts to find one or more purchasers for the bonds in an aggre- gate principal amount not to exceed the amount as above stated; provided, however, that the terms of such bonds and of the sale and delivery thereof shall be mutually satisfactory to the Authority and the Company. (b) That it will enter into a contract or con- tracts for the acquisition, construction and equipping of all items constituting the Project. (c) That contemporaneously with the sale of the bonds it will enter into a loan agreement with the Authority under the terms of which the Company will obli- gate itself to pay to the Authority sums sufficient in the aggregate to pay the principal of and interest and -3- redemption premium, if any, on the bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable, plus an amount consistent with the Authority' s scheduled fees, such agreement to contain other provisions required by law and such other provisions as shall be mutually acceptable to the Authority and the Company. (d) That it is recognized that additional instruments and agreements to provide additional security for the purchasers of the bonds may be necessary or desir- able in order to successfully market the bonds. (e) That it will take such further action and adopt such further proceedings as may .be required to implement its . aforesiad undertakings or as it may deem appropriate in pursuance thereof. 4. General Provisions. (a) All commitments of the Authority under paragraph 2 hereof and of the Company under paragraph 3 hereof are subject to the condition that on or before June 30, 1983 (or such other date as shall be mutually satisfactory to the Authority and the Company) , the Authority and the Company shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms for the bonds and of the sale and delivery thereof, and mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph 3 and the proceedings referred to in Para- graphs 2 and 3 hereof. (b) The Company agrees to pay all fees and expenses in connection with the issuance of the bonds by the Authority and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, including but not limited to title charges, stamp taxes, fees and expenses of counsel to the Authority, and Bond Counsel to the Company, recording fees, fees and expenses of Financial Consultants to the Authority, architects and engineering fees. (c) if the events set forth im (a) of this paragraph do not take place within the time set forth or any extension thereof, the Company acknowledges that cer- tain fees and expenses will have accrued by reason of the execution of this Agreement, and agrees that it will -4- Y reimburse the Authority for all reasonable and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses which the Authority may incur at its request arising from the execution of this Agreement and the performance by the Authority of its obligations hereunder, and will pay promptly upon request all legal and other fees and expenses, including. the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel and Financial Consultants to the Authority, incurred within such time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized as of the 16th day of June 1982• ILLINOIS INDU5TRI:AL DEVELQPMNT AUTN.QRIITY (SEAL) B FITTEST: C S cretary McDONALW 5 CQRPQRATIQN By (Seal of Company) ATTEST: -5- LORD, BISSELL & BROOK IIS SOUTH LASALLE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 (312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES OFFICE CABLE:LOWIRCO COO 3250 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TELEX:25-3070 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90010 3000 Ronald Lane (213)467-7064 DAVID M.GOODER Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELEX:IS-1135 654-0561 May 15, 1985 President and Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: McDonald' s Office Campus Application for Approval of an ORA3 Improvement Plan for Phase 1B Dear President Cerne and Trustees : On behalf of my client, McDonald' s Corporation, I am delivering herewith its application dated May 15 , 1985, for ap- proval under the Oak Brook Subdivision Regulations of an ORA3 improvement plan for Lot 1 in the Butler GHQ Subdivision, entitled "McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus ; Phase 1B Improvement Plan" , which is attached to the application as Exhibit A and consists of 16 sheets which are indexed on attached Exhibit B. Also filed herewith are the following: 1. Five (5) additional copies of Exhibit A. 2. Check in the amount of $50. 00 to cover filing fee. 3. Six (6) certified copies of Ordinance S-409 approving an ORA3 development plan for the property. 4. Six copies of a draft of an Improvement Plan Agreement for Phase 1B. At the appropriate time we will file an additional twelve (12) copies for distribution to the Village Boards. However, my client would like to receive the comments of the staff so that all appropriate changes may be made prior to filing the additional copies. It is requested that the matter be referred to the Plan Commission for processing based on the materials submitted. It is our opinion that the proposed improvement plan for Phase 1B is consistent with the approved development plan for this property and complies with all of the required laws and ordinances. We therefore urge that the Phase 1B Improv ent Plan be approved. s ectfull ted DMG:pg En cl David M. Goo e EXHIBIT B MCDONALD' S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS PHASE 1B IMPROVEMENT PLAN DRAWING INDEX Drawing No. Drawing Description 1 Title Sheet 2 Site Plan 3 Site Plan/Development Plan 4 Landscape Planting Plan 5 Location Plan 6 Surrounding Land Use Plan IP-1 Phase lA Improvement Plan IP-.7 Development Plan ABG-1 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-2 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-3 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-4 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan LU-1 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-2 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-3 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-4 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan EXHIBIT B V.i..11.ag e of Oak 11rook V T.A(;I: OL� OAK BKOOK ].200 Oak Brook 12oad SUCI .u1C1 SL11j::L.i. LuL#!L1 Pik Brook, illinuis l,U'. 21 TMPROVEMI:NT PLAN n1111f,T(_'A'1!-[ON Refer to Oak Brook Code - Appendix B - Subdivision Regulations McDonald' s Corporation Campus 'iIMPROVEMENT PLAN TITLE: Phase 1B Improvement Plan DATE FILED: May 15 , 1985 GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 74-1/2 acres fronting Jorie Boulevard north of Village Commons , consisting of Lot 1 of Butler GHQ Subdivision NAME OF APPLICANT• McDonald' s Corporation PHONE NO. 887-3520 ADDRESS: One McDonald' s Plaza CITY Oak Brook STATE IL 60521 Zip Code RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: Owner OWNER OF RECORD: McDonald' s Corporation PHONE ,NO. 887-3520 ADDRESS: One McDonald' s Plaza CITY Oak Brook STATE IL 60521 Zip Code BENEFICIARY (IES) OF TRUST: NAME: not applicable PHONE NO. ADDRESS: CITY STATE Zip Code (Sign ure f Applicant) A. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof is a 16-sheet set of drawings entitled "Phase 1B Improvement Plan" for which approval is requested. IDENTIFY STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY: These are set forth on Sheet 2 entitled "Site Plan" in Exhibit A. 22 . 642, acres) _ Flood Plains: 986 , 286 (or Sq.Ft. are under Flood Plain Ordinance and are graphically depicted on attached plans. WHAT IS THE LAND USE AND ZONING FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY? ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE Westerly 200 feet, more or less R-4 Golf Course NORTH Remainder R-1 Golf Course Easterly 981 feet R-1 Vacant SOUTH Remainder R-3 Village Common EAST All R-1 Village Sports Core WEST Southerly, 412 feet R-3 One single fam- ily residence WEST Next 1300 feet to north C/R tR��ecreatioon facili- es Remainder R-4 Par Dist Brook Page 1 Of 2 Iti1 L\1• AIT- 111E C1 b\'\AC1TR I STI CS 01: '11H' DE'VI:1.01'mI::`;T? SIZING BY L'QND USE QVIAGL'ORY _ RESIDENTIAL COM" ERCIAL OPLN SPACE OTT-1ER TOTAL, NO. OF ACRES -0- 37.24 max. 37. 24 min. -0- 74 .48 NO. OF Sq.Ft. -0- 1,622,000 max 1,622 ,000 -0- 3,244 ,000 min. NO. OF LOTS -0- ---------1- ------- -0- 1 NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: Following are the names and addresses of surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 2S0 feet in all directions, and the number of feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in comput- ing the 250 foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles'of the County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County. NAME ADDRESS See attached rider ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE AND (15) COPIES OF TILE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FILING FEE: X $50.00 (Plus Plan Review & Inspection Fees, if required) RECEIVED: ! 5� NAME: ZY DAT7J:,S/" 'S a�rouNT ' f Check o. RECEIVED BY: DATE: Ter ! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------' APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECKED All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village CoTmons, i 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 j Board of Trustees (Referral) . . . .. .. . . . . . .7:30 P.M., Tuesday Plan Commission Meeting. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. .7:30 P.M. , Monday Board of Tnistees Meetirnl:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7:30 P.M. , Tuesday �1ZUlz 'I'0 5(:IllillULliU N11i11'1Nh, /�l'1'LI(:AN'1' 15 '1'(S CUNT�ICT VILLf\GE I NGINFER AND RE IJEST ST'A'TUS OF 11I.AT ld'ViElvp ALLOWING FOR SUFFICIENT TIME TO RESUW TIT lfffli ANY NECESSARY ADDITIONS OR fuT-CTIONS. Page 2 of 2 J `- • RIDER TO IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPLICAMN MCDONALD' S CORPORATION Parcel Number Address Owner 06-26-202-002 none Chicago Title & Trust (golf course) Trust #64294 111 West Washington Chicago, IL g � 06-26-102-006 vacant McDonald's Corp. One McDonald' s Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-201-018 none Chicago Title & Trust (golf course) Trust #64294 111 West Washington Chicago, IL 06-25-300-017 Sports Core Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak BrookRoad Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-301-013 Butler Company 1000 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,. IL 60521 06-26-301-114 Estate of Paul Butler 1000 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-301-015 Estate of Paul Butler 1000 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-303-001 Oak Brook Park Dist. . 1300 Forest Gate Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-303-002 Oak Brook Park Dist. 1300 Forest Gate Oak Brook, IL 6052-1 06-26-400-012 (Village Commons) Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-400-014 (Buffer strip) McDonald' s Corp. One McDonald' s Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60521 06-26-401-004 Office Campus McDonald' s Corp. One McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, IL 60521 'J PATRICIA GIESLER + 1995 5400 WALNUT, UNIT 303 DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 85 7Q�4 May 15, 1s_ PAY TO THE Village of Oak Brook $ 50 .00 ORDER OF Fifty and no/100 - - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS ®Hinsdale Federal Savings AND LOAN ASSOCIATION GRANT SOUARE•HINSDALE.ILLINOIS•60521 QQ FOR filing fee Phase 1B -4271972145I: 031 302220 211' 1995 ANK ` ANSIT i CHECKS = CASH RECEIPT NO. NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION RECEIVED BY: A VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK INVALID ` WITHOUT SIGNATURE 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD 49817 OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS E� U PHONE: (312) 654-2220 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS 7" FEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS RM CR-OTC r- STATE OF ILLINOIS � SS COUNTIES OF COOK & DU PAGE a r, Mari�nne-�.Lakosil , do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the annexed document is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No . S-409 I DO FUR= CERTIFY that the original document, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper .. of the same. I DO FUR= CERTIFr that I am the keeper of the reoords, Journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances, and documents of the said Village of Oak Brcok, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois.. IN WITNESS F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this ' ' 1st day of November , 1979.' INC n Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPaga &Cook Counties,,. Illinois. r • C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAT IN ACCORD WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X (D) OF ORDINANCE NO. G-60, AS AMENDED, THE SAME BEING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS, OF 1966, RELATIVE TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "G. H. Q. PROPERTY." WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the' Village of Oak Brook adopted Ordinance No. S - 408 pursuant to which the property legally described in Exhibit-"A'-'_.hereto-.and_-by__this._r-eference incorporated herein was rezoned and reclassified into the ORA3 District classification; and WHEREAS, as required under the provisions of Ordinance No. G-60, as amended; the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, relative to property l classified in the ORA3 District classification and in particular the provisions of Section X (D) thereof, the owner-of the subject property, the Butler Company, and its representative, McDonald's Corporation, have submitted for the approval of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village a Development Plan in substantially the form of that annexed hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference incorporated herein, and a Development Plat in substantially the form of that annexed hereto as Exhibit "B-1" and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village, pursuant to statutory notice, held all required public hearings concerning the propositions and has submitted its report and recommendation thereon to the Corporate Authorities;. and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village held public meetings concerning the propositions and has also submitted its report and recommendations thereon to the Corporate Authorities; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village have reviewed the provisions of the Development Plan and the graphics depicted in the Development Plat and have also considered the reports and recommendations of the Zoning Board . ( of Appeals and the Plan Commission; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities deem the passage of this Ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the public health, safety, and general welf-are of the Village of Oak Brook, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of . Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, Du Page and Cook Counties, Illinois, that: SECTION 1: The provisions of the preamble hereinbefore set forth are hereby restated herein as though herein fully set forth. SECTION 2: The Development Plan and the Development Plat annexed hereto as Exhibits "B" and 1113-1111 respectively, pertaining to the development-of the property described in Exhibit "A" hereto under the provisions of Section X (D) of Ordinance No. G-60, as amended, are hereby found to be in conformance with the requirements set forth therefor under the provisions of Section X (D) of said Ordinance No. G-60, as amended, and are therefore hereby approved. SECTION 3: ' All ordinances,' rules, and regulations of the.Village of Oak Brook which are•in-conflict:with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed solely to the' extent of the conflict, and only as they apply to the property hereinbefore described. - SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication as by Statute in such cases made and provided. This..Ordinance shall be published in pamphlet form. PASSED.this, day of -N--" 1978. T AYES: 5 NAYS: 2 ABSENT: y APPROVED this , day of �ti ,_ , 1978. • - �'Presiden �-' . r t ) ATTEST: Village\Clerk Filed in the Office of the Village Clerk and published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of.Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook this day of . t 1978. . Village Clerk APPROVED as to form illa;e ttorney s -2- LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 Those parts of lots 1, 2 and '3, taken as a tract, in Oak Brook Investment Company Assessment Plat. No. 3, of parts of section 26, township 39 north, range 11, east of the 3rd principal meridian according to plat thereof recorded July 23,1964 per document No. R64-26333 lying east of Jorie Blvd.., per dedications recorded August 30, 1971 per document No. R71-43495 and 24ay 30, 1973 per document . No. R73-30748- and lying south of those parts thereof described as follows: Beginning at the'northeast' corner of'said lot 3; thence :N.` 27°-50'-l0" W. along the east line .of said lot 2, a distance of 430.63' feet (record 430.71 feet) . to an angle--point-'in-the east line of said lot 2; .thence 'N. 0°-02'-0" E., _along__ ---- -- the%•.east•.line-.•of •lot••-2,-a- distance- of 803..24: feet, more.or. less.-7--to-.-a..poh.t.Qa.,__ ...��,___._ the south-line of Jorie Blvd..-as dedicated in corporate_plaza subdivision unit e one,--•as -per.plat-- thereof -recorded' October- 14,. 1970 as -document_No.-R70-37311, and. . vacated per.:plat.of vacation.:re corded .April- 28,"1972 per dociument--.No.'-.R72-21725, said point being--76.69 feet arc-measure -along said southerly: northeasterly'. . of the southwest corner of said Jorie Blvd.; thence southwesterly along the- . southerly line' of said vacated Jorie Blvd•.; being also an arc of a circle, convex to the northwest, having a radius of 474 feet the chord thereof, 'having a bearing of S. 40°-46'-46" W. and a length of 76.60 feet, an arc-distance of 76.69 feet to the most *southerly corner of vacated Jorie Blvd., aforesaid; thence N. 0°-02'-0" E. along the .west. line and the west line extended north of said vacated Jorie Blvd. , a distance of 188.23 feet to the southerly line of Jorie Blvd. as dedicated in Corporate Plaza Subdivision Unit Two, as per plat thereof, recorded August 10, 1972 as document No. R72-46895; thence south and west along the southerly and easterly lines of Jorie Blvd. , as dedicated per document ,No. R72-46895 the following two (2) curves, courses and distances:. (1) southwester- ly along an arc of a circle., being convex to the northwest, having a radius of 330.82 feet, the chord thereof, having a bearing of S. 39°-41'-19" W. and a length of 423:47 feet, an arc-distance of 459.54 feet to a point of 'tangency; (2) thence S. 0°-06'-20" E., a distance. of 868.86 feet; thence.S. 56°-34'-26" E. , a distance of 424.59 feet; thence S. 70°-23'-58" E. , a distance of 256.19 feet; thence S. 67°-57'-55" E. , a distance of 40.38 feet, more or less, to a point in the easterly line of said lot 3, which point is 243.64 feet S. 27°-50'-10" E. of the northeast corner of said lot 3; thence N. 27°-50'-10" W. , a distance of 243.64 feet to the ( place of beginning, ' in DuPage County, Illinois. Also: Lot 2 in Butler Company Spring Road Subdivision Unit One, being a sub- division of part of' lot 6 in .Oak Brook Investment Company Assessment Plat No. 3, . of part of section 26, aforesaid, according to plat thereof recorded September 1Z, 1971 per document No. R71-47555, in DuPage County, Illinois. Also: Lot 4 in Oak Brook Investment Company Assessment Plat No. 3, being a subdivision of Section 26, aforesaid- according to plat thereof recorded July 23, 1964 per document No. R64-26333, in DuPage County, Illinois. Also: The lands formerly owned by T. A. Mohlman, being that part of the SE 1/4 of section 26, aforesaid described as follows: commencing at the .SW corner . of said SE 1/4* of Section 26; thence N. O=06'-12" W. measured (N. 0°14' W. deed) along the west'line of said SE 1/4 of Section 26, a distance of 1,195.2 feet measured (1,195.7 feet deed) to an iron pipe for a place of beginning; thence continuing N. 0°-06'-20" W. measured (N. 0°-14' W. deed) along the west line of SE 1/4 of - Section 26, a distance, of 364.4 feet; thence S. 88°-13'--45" E. , a distance of. 660.0 feet measured (651.1 feet deed). to the centerline of vacated Spring Road; thence S.0°-04'-55" E. along said centerline, a distance of 338.9 feet; thence N, 850-1.5 --12'.' W.•. measured, (N.. 85°-23' W. deed) , a distance of.-309151 eer measured., EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. C tJ Page 1 of 2 Pages j (300..0 feet deed) ; thence S. 84°-W-48" W. measured. (S. 84°-52' W. deed) ,. . p distance of 352.3 feet to the place of beginning in DuPage County, Illinois. Also: That part of lot 6 in plat of lands of F.O. and J.F. Butler, To,.rn of York, DuPage County, Illinois., of parts of sections 25 and 26, township 39 .TY0 thy range 11, east of the 3rd principal meridian as per plat thereof recorded Kbruary 13, 1912 as document No. 107037 lying west of the center thread of S.aTt'. Creek and south of the following described boundary line: coamencin_ g at the-'center of said section 25; thence S. 89°-44}'-33" W. along the south line of the northwest 114 of said section 25, a distance of 937.89 feet; .thence S. 0°=15'-27" E. at .right angles to the last described line, a distance of 51.80 feet; thence S. 89°-44'-33" W. , parallel with the north line. of the 'southwest 114 of said section 25, a distance of 790.62 feet to 'the place of beginning of said boundary line; thence continuing S. .890-44'-33" W. along said parallel line a distance of898.31 feet, more or less, to a point on ;the.west line of the southwest .2/4-_of -said section- 25, -said-pbint:,being 51.'80 feet S. 0°-05--'-55" E. .' of -.the vest quarter corner of said., section 25;: thence .S. :89°-28'-02" V. parallel- with `the north line:of -the.southeast. Y/4: of said. section".26, .a -dis- tance' of 570.75 feet -to ,the centerthread -of -Salt Creek; .thence- southerly along the centerthread of Salt Creek the-following eight (8) courses •and distances: (1) S. 7°-27'-27" E. ..a distance of 59.91 feet;. (2) thence S. 22°-59'-47" W. ; a distance of 402.00 feet; (3) `thence S. 9°-18'-58" W.., a distance of 100.98 feet; (4) thence S.. 1°-41'-03" E. ' a distance of 92.01 feet; (5) thence S." 5°-43'-56" E. , a distance of 102.84 feet; {6) thence S. 12°-54'-23" W. , a distance of 200.81 feet; (7) thence S. 18°-31'-18" W. , a distance of 101.79 feet; (8) thence S. 30°-37 -59" W. , a distance of 164.77 feet; thence N. 31°-30'-21" W: , a distance of 283.68 feet; thence N. 36°703'-11}',W. , a distance of 23.38 feet; thence N. 48°-25'-50" W. , a distance of 17..80 feet; thence N: 60°-15'-11" W., a distance of 18.21 feet; thence-N. 76°-19'-55" W. , a distance of 22.69 feet; thence N.• 55°-22'-48"- W. , a distance of 99.73 feet; *thence 'N.. 37°-43'-26" W. , a distance of 97.09 feet; thence .N. 53°-55'-52" W. , a distance of 658.29 feet; thence N. 67°--57'-55" W. , a distance of 452.22 feet, more or less, to a.-point on the east line of lot 3 in Oak Brook.Investment Company Assessment Plat No. 3, as per plat thereof,. recorded July 23, .1964 as document No. R64-26333; said point being 243.64 feet S. 27°-50'-10" E. of the.northeast corner of said' lot 3 (except the south 367 feet thereof) , all in DuPage County, Illinois. Parcel 2 Lot 2 in Oak Brook Village Green subdivision being a subdivision of the southwest 1/4 of section 26 and lots 1 and 5 in Oak Brook Investment Coapany Assess- ment Plat No. 3 of part of said section 26, township 39 north, 'range 11 east of. .the third principal meridian in DuPage County, Illinois. EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO.. - 47 Page 2 of 2 Pages DEVELOPMENT PLAN C THE BUTLER COMPANY/MCDONALD'S CORPORATION FOR THE GHQ PROPERTY, OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 1. The final Development Plat for the Development Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. On it are delineated,the areas within which buildings, other structures, and parking areas may be constructed. In the remaining area, only the following shall be permitted: -- - - - a. Necessary service and access drives. b. Entrance gateway installation on Jorie Boulevard. Cy c. Necessary lagoons and storm water swales and retention areas with landscaped banks. d. Additional plantings. e. Bridle, pedestrian, and bicycle paths in locations subject to the reasonable approval of the Village. f. tJnderground utilities. . 2. No building exceeding three stories or 35 feet in height,. whichever is less,. shall be constructed West of Spring Road extended or North of Ginger Creek. No building in Phase I shall exceed four stories or 48 feet in height, which- ever is less. 3. Access to Oak Brook Road (31st Street) shall be limited to one roadway location. Such roadway shall not have access to Oak Brook Road (31st Street) , from 7:00.A. M, to 9:30 A. M, nor from 3:30 P. M. to 6:30 P.M. weekdays. During other hours, access shall be restricted by appropriately controlled means to passenger vehicles occupied by members of the owner's board of directors, its executive management personnel, and their guests. Such roadway shall not exceed two lanes or 24 feet in width. Identification and direction signs at the intersection of such roadway and Oak Brook Road (. (31st Street) shall be limited to one standard roadway name sign. EXHIBIT B TO ORDINANCE NO. Q 4.. Additional plantings, consisting of evergreen or other trees, not less than 20 feet in height, shall be planted along Jorie Boulevard and along Oak Brook Road and North along Salt Creek, and adjacent to the North and ' East lines of the Village Commons, as necessary to provide, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Village, substantial year-round screening of all buildings and parking and other structures to the extent practical, commencing with building construction. 5.. Within six years following final approval of this Development Plan by the Village, the'following steps shall have been initiated by -McDonald!s Corporation and prosecuted diligently: a. An Improvement Plan for the first phase of the development shall have been presented to the Village by McDonald's Corporation no later than one year after final approval of the Development Plan. b. The initial Improvement Plan shall include provision for storm water, swales and retention areas, lagoons, and bridle, pedestrian, and bicycle paths, as contemplated for the complete development, .all of which shall be completed in Phase I. c. All structures and other installations to be included in Phase I shall be constructed. d. . Covenants shall be granted (and recorded) as to all bridle, pedestrian, and bicycle paths which shall permit public usage daily from one-half hour after sunrise until one-half hour before sunset with the provision that such paths (and related easements) maybe relocated by McDonald's Corporation (its successors or assigns) at its expense, at any time _ with the consent of the Village, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, provided, however; that in the event of the commencement of litigation at- tacking the zoning, of the property or its development as proposed, then and in that event, the running of the time periods hereinbefore provided shall be suspended for periods of Lime equal to those during ,.,hich such litigation remains pending. Upon final termination of such litigation, �- said time period shall again commence and continue for its remaining term. 6. .There shall be provision for parking for 1, 000 cars in an office building- and/or underground parking facilities decked over with architectural landscaping. Phase I shall include such parking for 500 cars. For each additional 50, 000 square feet of office buildings, up to 250, 000 square feet constructed in subsequent phases, additional parking facilities of similar _ . design shall be constructed to accommodate a minimum of 100 cars for each additional 50, 000 square feet of office buildings. 7. No more than the maximum square footage of office buildings set forth below shall be occupied prior to the date indicated: 225, 000 square feet - January 1, 1984. 8. No office building shall have a structure height in excess of five stories or 60 feet in height or 719 feet above mean sea level, whichever is less. 9. Existing uses and structures may be continued so long as the total land coverage by all structures, new and existing, does not exceed 15 percent at any time and the total square footage for all-such structures does not exceed 1, 150, 000 square feet (925, 000 square feet for all office buildings) plus an additional 30, 000 square feet for special.uses. 10.' The period of time expected to be required to fully implement the Develop- ment, Plan is approximately 30 years, during which development is presently expected to proceed in four phases, as follows: Phase I, expected to be ready for occupancy prior to December,. 1980: Office Buildings . 2251,000 square feet Research and Development Laboratory 25, 000 Lodge and Restaurant 110, 000 Mceting, Center 30, 000 �► �� Training/Conference Center 50, 000 Maintenance Facility _ 10' .000 Total Phase I 450, 000 square feet be read for occupancy prior to December, 1990: Phase I!,. expected to , P Y P YP Office Buildings 350, 000 square feet Total.Phase Il 350, 000 square feet TOTAL PHASES I-AND II 800, 000 square feet Phase III,- expected to be ready for occupancy prior to December, 1995: Office Buildings 200, 000 square feet TOTAL PHASES I, II, AND III 1, 000, 000 square feet Phase IV, expected to be ready for occupancy prior to December, .2005: . Office Buildings 150, 000 square feet TOTAL PHASES I, II, . III, AND IV 1, 150, 000 square feet 11. The total acreage is expected *to be utilized as follows when development is completed: Area to be covered by buildings '9. 0 acres Area to be used for exterior surface parking 12. 5 " Access and Service Drives S:A Area to be in open space: Two Retention Lakes 5: 5 acres Landscaped Parking Decks 4. 0 Forests, water courses, and other planted and land- scaped areas 37. 2 " 46. 7 " 73. 2'acres Lot 2, Village Green Subdivision I. a " TOTAL SITE 75: 0 acres 12•. All terms used in this Development Plan shall have the same meaning as the terms are defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Oak Brook. - 4 _ ) � �, '�I '_4� y ✓ f't... i' .,. '..i r t :•/r 1 .,: !. •r•I,.r)r• ,� .n,, - u `,/.re - "—J _ •��1 M" __ ..L,L..•u1 Zyli":•,IL..L.�.� •iW��J�elFri�•.4yl�k�— ,�ar�l��1'i _.Ja..�" ~�a .l: '1 l ►..J. _.S-_a_/ f '� V.i `�� ( �� .J.. - 1 t y ' 1t,••�yy:r.:.�l.ii.+,c" •.J..` •i�.iiiiair-•.:i,tlf" •aY�.�+'�.w:a�-•J Vt �fi0 ii'L.li�' f d P � t ,�: - - .. l� y � •} I r 1 1 f I/, �� r-�� •'4 r'r e•�r� r �i�.�.1(-'��, 1t � � •� 1 / •t .t z t .�.. "^ O � � r .� 0 • r{� ', •' `�f i•,f;.�17'#r,`i E z� Ul tr t' 1 J 1�� , /l t I '1-I � .� �� , • GJ b � T , �• / I � .I� .V � 1•W�•1 _ I '�!• ' �It 1 . 1 �wrY�• I! V � 0 1 P �A •Pla•� �� _�,/� / � �}�'�� /�� iU Y} 1'� - i• ,", /t•I• ` !�C�i��I ,` a �`. ' �'D t r 1 ' v ;n� /'_ '� ,= a ; 'r " 3..,. ,/�L ; -; - � t�.. 1y�%is j5't" •'.)tt . _� �' - �., l� .:: .- ! ;• ;;' '1 '�; , .,�: r�`•• It ; 1�, a o�r'��•' I � _ _ I 1. .h • '. �I•'�.1`.,, 1 �,\• }t1 , 1,,'' f Y1. � �,� 1'� o' a' ''I t ', ' L i► .. ��.; t � � �i 1.11'�ti t Ii I � r ,i 4 \ ,,� 1 , 'I I ON ►/t E' 1 I •, ) " \ ` •\ '? O bj ri era I L/) LL I J•- � '� I w 04 uj _ �� .� 'r ,;•, • . �-�.,,- '11i`� �'1 � .( . II � D ' °" � � _j ,'�� to �g� ".,t _ M1�•.�•s'R1'l+f•f•r7. • w....�3 en+4 �!' LjJ 4 I 5/15/85 IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT McDONALD'S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS - PHASE 1B THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of 1985 , by and between the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, an Illinois municipal corporation, having its office at 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521, (hereinafter called "Vil- lage") ; and McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation having its principal office at McDonald' s Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 (hereinafter called "McDonald' s") . W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, in compliance with the Village' s Subdivision Regu- lations and pursuant to the Development Plan and Plat approved by the Village ' s Ordinance No. S-409 McDonald' s wishes to commence the second phase of the improvement of the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto (hereinafter called the "Property") and has submitted to the Village an Improvement Plan entitled "McDonald' s Corporation Office Campus - Phase 1B Improvement Plan" consisting of the materials listed on the schedule designated as Exhibit B attached hereto (hereinafter called the "Phase 1B Improve- ment Plan") ; and WHEREAS, the Village is willing to approve said Phase 1B Improvement Plan provided that this Agreement is executed to insure the completion of certain land improvements, which is a condition precedent to the issuance of occupancy permits for any buildings to be constructed on the Property during Phase 1B; NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows : 1. McDonald' s acknowledges that Village ' s execution of this Agreement and its approval of the Phase 1B Improvement Plan are without prejudice to Village' s rights to require addi- tional public improvements, as defined in Section 2 (1) of Article VI-A of the Village' s Subdivision Regulations, as amended from time to time, in connection with approval of any subsequent phase or subphase improvement plan, other development or resub- division of the Property. 2 . McDonald's shall furnish, or cause to be furnished, at its own cost and expense as required by Village, all the necessary materials , labor and equipment to complete the Perimeter Land- scape Screening indicated on Sheet 4 of the Phase 1B Improvement Plan and more fully detailed in Exhibit C attached in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all pertinent ordinances and regulations of the Village and in accordance with Sheet 4 of the Phase 1B Improvement Plan and the Specifications set forth thereon (hereinafter referred to as the "Work") . 3. - Included in Exhibit C is a complete cost estimate for the Work. Payments to contractors for the Work are to be made as the work progresses on the joint order of the Village and McDonald' s. Upon the execution of this Agreement and prior to the commencement of construction, McDonald' s shall deposit a bond in form and substance acceptable to the Village , as further described in Paragraph 14 herein (hereinafter referred. to as "Bond") . The Bond shall originally be in the amount of 4 . McDonald' s has selected Theodore Brickman Company as the landscaping contractor for the Work. Such landscaping con- tractor has been approved by the Village Engineer. -2- 5. All Work shall be subject to inspection by and the approval of the Village Engineer, and his approval thereof shall be a condition precedent to the payout of funds to contractors or subcontractors. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6. McDonald' s shall pay the Village Plan Review and In- spection Fees of $ as required by the Village and based on the estimated costs set forth on Exhibit C. Payment of said fees shall be a condition precedent to the commencement of any of the Work hereunder and to the issuance of any building per- mit for any construction on the Property. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a copy of a fully exe- cuted contract dated 1985 , made between McDonald' s and Theodore Brickman Company. 8. Prior to the time McDonald' s or any of its contractors begin any of the work indicated on Sheet 2 of the Phase 1B Improve- ment Plan, McDonald'.s and/or its contractors shall furnish the Village evidence of insurance covering their respective employees in amounts as required by the Village ' s ordiances. In ,addition, by its execution of this Agreement, McDonald' s hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Village, its agents, servants and employees , and each of them, against all loss, damage or expense, including attorney' s fees, which they may sustain or become liable for on account of injury or death of persons, or on account of damage to or destruction of property resulting from the performance of work under this Agreement - by McDonald' s or its contractors or any employee or subcontractor of any of them, or by the Village, its agents, servants or -3- employees (except in the case of their own negligence) , or due to the condition of the premises or other property of McDonald' s or th e Village, upon, about, or in connection with any work indicated on the Phase 1B Improvement Plan. 9. McDonald' s shall cause the Work to be substantially completed within four years from the approval of the Phase 1B Improvement Plan by the Village. If work is not substantially completed within the time prescribed herein, the Village shall have the right to proceed under the Bond described in Paragraph hereof, in accordance with its terms , for the purpose of payment to contractors or subcontractors who have completed work in ac- cordance with this Agreement and with their respective construction contracts and any new contractors employed to complete or correct any unfinished or defective work in accordance with this Agree- ment and also for any other purpose permitted under the Bond. Upon completion of the Work as evidenced by the certificate or certificates of the Village President and Board of Trustees, the Village shall be deemed to have approved the Work. Thereupon the Bond shall serve as security, in accordance with its terms, for the obligations of McDonald' s as set forth in Paragraph 10 hereof. McDonald' s shall cause its civil engineers, Bollinger, Lach & Biancalana, to correct drawings to show work as actually constructed and said engineers shall turn over to the Village reproducible Mylar tracings thereof for the Village ' s property prior to approval of .the improvements by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. 10. McDonald' s for a period of one year beyond final approval of the Work by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village, shall be responsible for repairs and corrections to such improve- -4- • ments which may be required due to failures or because of or on account of faulty construction. The obligation of McDonald' s hereunder shall be secured by the Bond as further described in Paragraph 11 hereof. 11. The obligations of McDonald' s hereunder as to the deposit of security for the completion of the Work (Paragraph 2 herein) and the one year maintenance of the Work after approval by the Village (Paragraph 10 herein) shall be satisfied by de- livery to the Village of a Bond issued by a surety company reasonably satisfactory to Village, under which the Village shall be an obligee, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E (the "Bond") . In addition to the terms, covenants and conditions of the Bond, the Village hereby agrees to proceed under the Bond solely for the purpose of causing .completion or repairs and corrections (as referred to in Paragraph 10 herein) and payment for the Work, including but not limited to payment for labor and materials supplied by contractors or subcontractors, to, or for the benefit of McDonald' s or the Village, as the case may be, under the pro- visions of this Agreement and the said improvements. 12. The term McDonald' s as used herein is intended to refer to McDonald' s and to any other title holder or holders from time to time of the property described in Exhibit A or portions there- of. All provisions of this Agreement including the benefits and burdens are hereby declared to run with the land and are binding upon and inure to the benefit of ,the heirs , successors, assigns , tenants and personal representatives of McDonald' s and the Village herein. -5- 13. This Agreement and the obligations contained herein are in addition to, and not in limitation of, all other agree- ments between the parties hereto, including, without limitation, applicable agreements, easements, covenants and restrictions of record and the obligations contained therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE Village has caused this Agreement to be executed by its President and attested by its Clerk and McDonald' s has executed this Agreement, all as of the date first above written. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, an Illinois Municipal Corporation ATTEST: By: President Village Clerk McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation By: ATTEST: -6- SS _ . . COUNTY OF DUPA ) I , the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County- and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that the above named President and Secretary of the MCDONALD' S CORPORATION, Grantor, personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such President and Secretary respectively, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that they signed and delivered the said instrument as their own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said Company for the uses and purposes therein set forth; and the said Secretary then and there acknowledged that said Secretary, as custodian of the corporate seal of said Company, caused the corporate seal of said Company to be affixed to said instrument as said Secretary' s own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said Company, for the uses and purposes herein set forth. GIVEN under my hand and Notarial Seal, this day of _. 198 . Commission Expires: Notary Public STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS COUNTY OF DUPAGE ) I , the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that the above named and of the Village of Oak Brook, Grantee, personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such and respectively, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that they signed and accepted the said instrument as their own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said Municipality, for the uses and purposes therein set forth; and the said then and there acknowledged that said , as custodian of the seal of said Municipality, caused the corporate seal of said Municipality to be affixed to said instrument as said own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said Municipality, for the uses and purposes herein set forth. GIVEN under my hand and Notarial Seal, this day of 198 Notary Public. -7- • EXHIBIT A • LOT 1 IN BUTLER GHQ SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTION 26 , TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,- -RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 6 , 1980 , AS DOCUMENT NO. R80-44966, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B McDONALD' S CORPORATION OFFICE CAMPUS PHASE 1B IMPROVEMENT PLAN DRAWING INDEX Drawing No. Drawing Description 1 Title Sheet 2 Site Plan 3 Site I Plan/Development Plan 4 Landscape Planting Plan 5 Location Plan 6 Surrounding Band Use Plan IP-1 Phase lA Improvement Plan IP-:7 Development Plan ABG-1 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-2 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-3 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan ABG-4 As-Built Drawing Grading Plan LU-1 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-2 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-3 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan LU-4 As-Built Drawing Layout and Utilities Plan EXHIBIT B BOND NO: • 1A111ROV1 ;d1:NT BOND CORPORATION - CORPORATL SURETY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that: McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware Corporation as Principal, and American Home Assurance Company , as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Village of Oak Brook , as Obligee, in the amount of Dollars ($ ) , for payment whereof said Principal and Surety bind . themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION .is such that if said Principal shall construct the public improvements in accordance with the Improvement Plan entitled McDonald's Corporation Office Campus - - Phase 1B Improvement Plan dated , 196 and listed in Exhibit A , in a good and workmanlike manner, in accordance with the applicable. regulations, specifications, standards, ordinances and laws of said Village of Oak Brook and of the State of Illinois then this obligation shall expire as provided herein. Said public improvements shall be completed, and all inspection fees paid within 4 years of the date of the approval of the Improvement. Plan or as otherwise provided in the Improvement Plan Agreement McDonald's Corporation Office Campus - - Phase 1B dated 198 .. Upon verification from Obligee that all public improvements have been completed and accepted by the Obligee, or that all requirements of the Improvement Plan have been complied with, this bond shall be reduced to 15% of the face amount and shall continue in full force as provided further herein. NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal shall complete said public improvements, and shall have made all corrections and shall have paid all claims for the cost of correcting all insufficiencies in design, workmanship and/or materials discovered within one year of the date of completion, then this obligation shall be null and void; else to continue in full force and effect. This bond shall become effective , 198 .. Signed and sealed this day of , 198 McDONALD'S CORPORATION AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY EXHIBIT E • •` OF OgKe G � O 4 `? �COUN0, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654-2220 April 29, 1985 David M. Gooder Attorney at Law Lord, Bissell & Brook 3000 Ronald Lane Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: Phase I-B Improvement Plan McDonald's Office Campus Dear Dave: In response to your letter of February 18, 1985, the Village Staff has reviewed the various provisions concerning future development of the McDonald's Office Campus. Following our Staff review, I prepared a memo dated March 1, 1985, a copy of which is attached for your review indicating our consensus with respect to the various regulations. Should you have any questions concerning any of these requirements, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to the Village Manager BFK/mf Attachment: it OF. . . •• p�OFO4K9 ♦vim 9001 G � O 90�COUN r4 v� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS L March 1,, 1985 ,� k 654-2220 MEMO TO: File FROM Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to the Village Manager SUBJECT: McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan - Required Submittals The following is a list of documents and other necessary information required to be submitted in conjunction with McDonald's Phase I-B Improvement Plan. These w._ . items were generated at a Planning and Zoning Staff Meeting held February 26, 1985. Subdivision Requirements - Section by Section Analysis Article VI-A of the Subdivision Regulations governs the development of properties zoned ORA-3 (McDonald's Office Campus) . The following listing goes through each section of the Subdivision Regulations concerning this subject: Section 1 - ORA-3 District Improvement Plan Procedures (A) A Mylar and 17 prints of the proposed Improvement Plan kor Phase I-B and 4 copies of all supporting data and. documents are required to be submitted in conjunction with the Improvement Plan Application. This Section also states that the Application shall be filed "with the re- quired filing fee". It was determined that although McDonald's was not required to file a fee in conjunction with Phase I-A, this Section of the Regulations requires some type of fee to be filed as is the case with subdivisions and other forms of zoning relief. Staff is to deter- mine the method of computing this required filing fee. (B) through (H) Various procedural steps to follow. No clarification re- quired. Section 2 - ORA-3 District Improvement Plan Requirements (A) General information (B) This subsection requires basic locational information concerning the entire development plan which encompasses the entire ORA-3 zoned property. (C) Subsection (1) (A) through (I) states specific requirements noting existing conditions on the entire tract of land included in the approved develop- ment plan. All of the required information could be shown on a four page set of plans similar to the IP-1 through IP-4 sheets contained in the Phase I-A Improvement Plan. . These four sheets break the entire tract into four quadrants and is a convenient means of viewing the existing as well MEMO: McDonald's Phase I Improvement Plan - Required Submittals March 1, 1985 Page 2 as proposed design features. Since this is part of the Improvement Plan and As required under Section 1(A) of this Article VI-A, 17--copies of this in- formation are required to be submitted. (2) - -This subsection :states various documents which are required to -accomp- any the application (A) " 17 copies of the approved Development Plan and each prior approved Improve- :`:went Plan for the tract are required since this information will be circu- lated to Staff,--Plan Commission and Board Members in their review of .Phase 3 I-B (B) n Only 4 copies of the as-built drawUigs need to be filed _ _ (C) This subsection requires submittal of_ preliminary-drawings"'indicating ( proposed extension of land improvements``anywhere on the property. Iii our discussions, it was determined that land improvements include such things`as 'required landscape. screening as well as the pedestrian way planned to connect Phase I-A with Phase I-B as ;well as any other pro- posed improvements which fall under the definition of land improvements, and as such, 17 copies of such land improvements must be submitted. This information could be combined on the previously discussed 4 sheet set of plans noting existin.g-conditions on the entire property. his rsubsection is comprised of -subsection uh, iii) :Sub- 'seins . and (ii) are :ap a- r cto (C) _existing.condition, sub-paragraph ,(1)(e) and_ (1) :(g) 17 copies 'of'•the_information„under (iii) are- required. (D) Proposed Improvement Design features (1) The applicant intends to comply with the :appr:ovesi development plan:; as noted in Dave Gooder's January 15, 1985 letter. (2) As indicated in-Dave's -.letter,--no.•.additional :streets- will be constructed in Phase I-B. (3) No additional public bicycle paths will be constructed as a part of Phase I-B. (4) This subsection requires the applicant to "indicate the exact location, heights and square footage of floor area of proposed buildings and parking areas". The applicant notes that Phase I-B will include an office building from 200,000 to 250,000 square feet in floor area containing not less than 500 parking spaces below ground and is re- questing the Village to agree that the building foot print on the proposed plan might be changed during the course of final engineering but states that both the building and all parking areas below and above surface, will *be located within Bubble A and that they will provide not less than the required number of parking spaces. Staff determined that this would be acceptable based on the above conditions, noting that a final review of compliance with the standards would be made again at the building permit stage. (5) No building set-back lines are necessary. r-- 'MEMO: McDonald's Phase I-Aprovement Plan - Required Subdktals •' March 1, 1985 Page 3 (6) The applicant notes that no new sewers, water mains, storm drains or detention facilities are proposed and therefore will not be shown on the plans. (7) This subsection deals with flood plain modifications which, as indicated by`:the applicant, are not proposed in Phase I-B. (8) No new streets or easements are proposed and therefore will not show on :the Phase I-B plans. ...:. (9) -Since no new additional areas will be ded=.cated:for public use this . ..:-:section is`not applicable 1. - (10) `No new entrance structures or landscaping adjacent to entrance ways are planned and therefore this subsection is inapplicable. (11) ,;The applicant states that^al'1 applicable .general-''design =arid !development 'standards of Article Xl will be complied with as required by this sub- . _section: `(E) '' All flood plain modifications were,'taken-care of in Phase`I A and therefore, - section does does not apply: (F) Four copies of final plans, - specifications and cost estimates as further_cz_ _detailed within.;this section (F) are required to be submitted covering such land improvements as screening.-pedestrian ways `and,:otber,rimprovementsY which fall under the definition of land improvements. The Staff determined that these must be filed in conjunction with the I-B applicationYand not,:.=:as.-the applicant requests, following_the Village Board's approval bf the Phase I-B Improvement Plan. It was further noted that the required landscaping,-as noted in paragraph 4 of the Development Plan:attached to Ordinance S-409, would include ' "additional plantings consisting of evergreen or other trees not less than'20 feet in height, shall be planted . . . North along Salt Creek and adjacent to the North and East lines of the Village Commons, as necess- ary to provide, to .-the reasonable satisfaction of -the-Village, substantial year-round screening of all buildings; parking and other structures to the extent practical commencing with building construction". (G) Following the Village's approval of the Phase I-B Improvement Plan, it will be necessary for submittal of a completion bond since, as noted above, there are certain public or land improvements required as a part of this Phase I-B (see subsection-'(J) for ,a:definition of public and land improvements as de- fined in this Article) . Zoning Ordinance Requirements As we discussed, it would be appropriate for the applicant to submit a written state- ment that all of the particular requirements, as contained in Section X(D) of the Zoning Ordinance, governing development of ORA-3 properties will be complied with as well as a specific statement concerning the provisions within that Section under (2) Permitted Uses as to the percent of office space permitted to be occupied by persons other than employees of the owner. Development Plan Ordinance S-409, approved by the Village on May 31, 1978, contains specific conditions under which development of the subject property was to be governed. It would therefore be appropriate for the Phase I-B application to address each of the sections of the MEMO: McDonald's Phase I*Improvement Plan - Required Su*ittals March 1, 1985 Page 4 Ordinance aAd exhibits as to"this_,Phases 'compli4nce with_'-the'-eq 'iarement� contained therein. _y Respectfully submitted, >: Bruce F.-.Y%apff c.Assistant to 'the Village Manager %_ BFK/mf _ I VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -5- April 24, 1990 ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Maher, Payovich, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. VI. QUARTERLY REPORTS: A. Ambulance F. Library B. Engineering Department G. Planning Zoning C. Fire Department H. Police Department D. Inspection Bureau I. Public Works E. Legal Department J. Sports Core All department reports were discussed and accepted. +.r VIZ. NEW BUSINESS: A. Recommendation - Hoch - Side Yard Variation (3515 Spring Road): Application has been made for a variation from the provisions of Section VII(D)(8)(b) of the Village Code to permit construction of a 20' addition which would maintain the existing one-foot roof line encroachment into the 18' side yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its Regular Meeting of April 3, 1990, unanimously recommended approval of this requested Side Yard Variation based on the findings of fact as stated in letter dated April 12, 1990 from Chairman Savino. ' Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Maher... To direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary documentation relative to granting a Side Yard Variation as requested for the subject property. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. B. Recommendation - Town & CountrX Homes (1603 16th Street): I 1© Screening Wall Variation 2. Text Amendment RE: Signs ; 3. Ground Signs in B-1, B-3 and B-4 Zoning Districts 1. Application has been made for a variation from Section XI(E)(9)(c) -Y of the Village Code to permit the use of a 5' x 75' curved brick wall 4 as a screening element adjacent to the parking area. The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its Regular Meeting of April 3, 1990, denied approval of the current brick wall but recommended approval of the brick wall on the condition that its height be reduced from 5' to 4' based on the findings of fact as stated in letter dated April 12, 1990 from Chairman Savino. 2. Application has been made for a text amendment which would allow ground signs on properties less than three (3) acres in area and restricted solely to office uses. The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its Regular Meeting of April 3, 1990, denied the requested text amendment based on the findings of fact stated in letter dated April 12, 1990 from Chairman Savino. 3. The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its Regular Meeting of April 3, 1990, upon its denial of the requested text amendment established a consensus that the Village Board direct staff to investigate appropriate zoning standards which would allow construction of ground signs on parcels containing less than three (3) acres in area for developments within the B-1, B-3 and B-4 Zoning Districts. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -5- April 24, 1990 1 TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES ILETTER 0)[F UIUMMO T UL 125 West 55th Street Suite 100 CLARENDON HILLS, ILLINOIS 60514 DATE /y JOB NO. Qo 7 (312)325.8800 ATT NTION RE: �v � vTO t l [l GaDt�C 51 ;j 141 azze--e 1910 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: • Shop drawings * Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications • Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: • For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval • For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1 61610 6 IS J¢Sl�. elay-va 5-6� SI�Su. 4 h s I VX b 1dc- wlu o� nDV4+e49-f- cvrn4*- 'Oh-111 � cry 4/sue arm sl �f r Q. -rarL�..�' "_ \ COPY tQ o n;� ►, l 19 o v�Q SIGNED: P80W 242 ® ft m,VM 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. r -14 t w` � A , y ►� 1 ti --ORR, T -Y.•_ ^tip .�� FK� __��w fill �, \ ;JS+Icy wsaysei�'':-ww••�'�'T -'•s _ MIy•I_ � z-' ` I Am of Lj gy nw,%rc+ceCfzt +as ;K ` AL w/ +� �� r � : . � � � 1.; �:+ Jt.�y�2�lyt..r�;'_ _ �,..�'�+t!• �'"��1�1 LX�'� 3'��-#� �tea+ T _ � 1 •- •�! wo 4 �q - _ :i ..— T' _ 'S* e •iY 1T T._.r.P7j a; +r�r �. ,�Y �I ��." ! / J -- � .... _ •.1 .. -?'X11 r .� � 1�-. v Ir � 1 ��+'� '� s..• 'e;r .a";-�A't'{A fit_...._W}±, :,;#fi.�. i., .i4`. ,�.'yi.;'�e: Q, � alp. qtr •I, \•� ..ti - * Al tiR\ 1 ♦ (/ NN rr] � � `iY 't' .'..`;Y' .y .y«ff. ♦ k SAP' �} i a y } ,i 0,A4 I-A wit"/ 40_ y r • 4, • I + v' y , r11L, 44, 46 r t t