The URL can be used to link to this page

S-645 - 07/12/1988 - VARIATION - Ordinances Zo��rr—tg9Q VAft1AT;*M-%A1T Coa+�ERFKNir 2. PiN#0 ti-2.1—,3504-d" ORDINANCE; NO. S- (0 5 ft$'a—, 9 0-11 q 2-tom.-419 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 3-116 GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION X(B)(5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REQUIRED FRONT YARDS ,611 Enterprise Drive) WHEREAS, the subject property previously was granted a variation reducing the required front yard to 60 feet pursuant to Ordinance S-11°; and WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting a variation from the provisions of Section X(B)(5) tc permit construction of an addition further reducing the setback from 60 feet to 40 feet; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such application has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeal- of the Village of Oak Brook on June 7, 1986 pursuant to i due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, a recommendation has been made by said Zoning Board of Appeals that the variation requested be granted: and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the recommendation made by the Zoning Board of Appeals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES,'ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That tha provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: That a variation is hereby granted from the provisions of Section X(B .5 so as to permit construction of a 20' x 50' addition to be constructed at the northwesterly corner of the building ,.n the front yard with a 40-foot setback to be limited to the area of the proposed addition and nog; for the entire width of the front yard. The location and size of the proposed addition shall conform to materials submitted to the Village as a part of the hearing process. Section 3: That this Ordinance is limited and restricted to property commonly known as 611 Enterprise Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois, which property is :egal.ly described as: Lot 11 in Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast quarter of Section 23 and in the southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the plat recorded June 1, 1965, as Document No. R65-16254 in DuPage County, Illinois. arm r,n P real No 6-? -° 6- VILL'GE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -3- July 12, 1988 To pass Ordinance No. 3-643 as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. G. ORDINANCE NO. S-644 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS VII C 3 AND VII C 4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO LOT AREA AND WIDTH Lots 14 & 15 - Homeyer Woods Subdivision - 11 & 15 Hunt Club Lane)- Discussed ane :Discussed and direction given at the Regular Meeting of June 28, 1968. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To pass Ordinance No. S-644 as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. H. RESOLUTION NO. R-454 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT HOMEYER WOODS SUBDIVISION 11 & 15 Hunt Club Lane): Discussed and direction given at the Regular Meeting of June 28, 1988. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To pass Resolution No. R-454 as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. I. ORDINANCE NO. S-645 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE S-118 GRANTING A - VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R B 5 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REQUIRED FRONT YARDS 611 Enterprise Drive): Discussed and direction given at the Regular Meeting of June 28, 1988. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Maher... To pass Ordinance No. S-645 as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. J. RESOLUTION NO. R-455 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR THE SALT CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN: Proposed resolution establishes a technical coordinating committee consisting of key municipal staff members from lower Salt Creek drainage basin committees and the DuPage County Stormwater Management staff who are to hold regular meetings to coordinate stornwater management planning efforts. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -3- July 12, 1988 SOF OAA S 9C ,`yam �COUNZ'�' VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 June 1, 1988 312 990-3000 MEMO TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise Drive) Cooperfund, Inc. , as owners of the property at 611 Enterprise Drive, are proposing construction of a 20-foot addition in front of the existing building. 611 Enterprise (Lot 11) is one of 18 properties fronting on Enterprise Drive. This area was annexed to the Village of Oak Brook between 1958 and 1961 and according to the 1959 Zoning Ordinance, this area was zoned M Manufacturing requiring a 100-foot front yard. These properties were originally subdivided in 1965 and are referred to as the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision approved by the Village in 1965. The Subdivision Plat only required a 40-foot setback from Enterprise Drive and not the 100-foot setback required by the Zoning Ordinance. There are no Village records indicating a granting of variations to all of the properties in conjunction with the approval of this Subdivision Plat. Therefore since that time, development of these properties has been required to meet the 100-foot zoning setback unless a separate variation was granted. Immediately following subdivision approval in 1965, the 1966 Zoning Ordinance classified this area as ORA-1, also with a 100-foot front yard requirement. The attached map of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision has noted on each of the lots the particular front yard setback in those cases where variations were granted from the 100-foot setback. Six of these properties received a variation permitting a 40-foot setback. Three received a 50- foot setback. One received a 55-foot setback. Lot 11 (the. subject property) received a 60-foot setback and one property received a 70-foot setback. The current application came about as a result of Cooperfund's desire to construct a 20-foot addition which would reduce the setback from 60-foot to 40-foot. The initial building permit application filed by Cooperfund stated that a variation had previously been granted for the property permitting a 40-foot setback which, in fact, was not the case. Upon discovering the discrepancy involved, the Building Department stopped any further work on the addition. Presently, only two footing extensions have been dug and no concrete has been poured. Respectfully submitted, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manag BFK/jr r� //1�3�ya}� �yr�3� ��i�aZ �00/ !•moo � ee.N a 3[ami S� a airn�d� s�'o�1�b'l�� •` i V7*5-L Oh U W rot i s.L07 77V -_C�d y0 C2 N♦ Ice"► p ' " Gj • C' jyt O 0 w 1 y t y � ' 14 s V AS lla ^405 A� 0 I i ° s • r=s o i O[v!a r ff 64 y v •-1, 9 M � 1 � osa a ° o ° 1 w L/ �o =a as rot g w v L 8 c v O O K 04 � q W 1 ��` O fi"6i -5v Q.y "'110 / , �\ - I o/ �o�sl�a � ,oz Q�sodQ�d Qiybr ��r1�NZl1L �/li/1 S�X� . Alt THM lnui-Et •�r'rTlr+.'a 1ATlailf TO THE RULES AND REGUL%TSORS OY -:fa•A+. '• THE _0A1I:Bli00K ZONING ORD xNANCE WEEP.EAS the owner of the ' � property more particularly J hereinafter described has petitioned the corporate authorities of the Village of Oakbrook for a variation to the rules and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oakbrook ter; 'i q r`:•t with respect to yard requirements; and r WK EREAS, a public hearing pursuant to said request has been held by the Zoning board of Appeals •Qf the Village of Oak- brook after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission of said village; and k'EEREAS, the Zoning Board of :_ppeals of the Village of Oakbrook has recommended that a variation be granted; and T'{ s WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oakbrook concur with said recommendation and are of i the opinion that a variation should be granted; NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT ORD6II,.r.D by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oakbrook: Section 1. That the applicable rules and regulations of =� the Oakbrook Zoning Ordinance contained in Section 10-B-5 pertain- ing to yard requirements are hereby varied reducing the front yard requirements from 100 feet to 90 feet, and the xear yard requirements rr from 40 feet to 20 feet on the following described property, to-wit: J iot 11 in Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast quarter of Section 23 and in the southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 39 :•j North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian �t according to the plat thereof recorded June 1, 1965, as Document iso. R65-16254 in Du-Page County, Illinois, commonly known as Lot 11 in Central Industrial Plaza, Enterprise Drive and Cermak Road, Oakbrook, Illinois. Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and c effect from and after its passage and approval as by statute in such i' Y• fir- ! 7�`' 'r'c'nq,/"f�ytp> n .a - .� •`-'sr++..�i'�aTN'+v 'i - , � Z ► ♦; i 'Ll'�—"".r' �� y:� � � .�,t *C:.rry {�:• .+'1 :1 J2': 44 ' '� w !.A a ,� ! .rr 'i`4 �. �jSTT = F'r+i5�is �y �• ii i0�+u�r I•Y r r.�, .s. Y� � t �.+t'r ti.y; W. r(,.^ 3.�'7'.tte'} f; ter• a r •h •s r^�, bM/ yf••C: ` 9 Xj 'S;•'✓i,,; r� Y"r !r+ •f .. 4•.y {,t:.v'l -'` ' "'*—,:-•�j .s'sr ,� c• , : s ro"t.w' <. r v v,'7' rn„q n iy ��A.•t'•'-7't " •yr ,.. f;r. ` i wLl�'1iµ r� .' ,�� f•�` .1'r_"iJ r .404` �/' b � �'r '\`� � 2�'y!'t� e .D � x fj e i �+ .,.Tri" �tXv � -t�cy,r��.� '.'t> *.v;. ti.�;8.. c f' '.x;.' � a r� �{ C i- ><t'`r tC- aa..J t•y t, '0>t vs`r> 'tits �. tifd� e1J.rj, ! •�r!.1A .r.-.. .W.! - -w 1s`/:y''4 ..li•e J' hi��ft7��.4i*f!_ Yi4t t .1 ♦ •, >! r.>r• r;i•' .•k+ - .r• .0 ...•+,. a: '?.. Ohre u`•- ~ .7't � } :•+. a �� '�+� _. x c ,l � �.. 1 c� .�r jS-" /7St 3 x�jy'K`: �i t♦r .s t a ° $ � - '+ •'. ,. ,�4 �,.:,.. y...! r t r �7. �a=-+�'t't. �y r ...*3 r5+." ic� �,,,r ^.}R it •Y A♦ t .S.V.'.^ ., s cases made and provided. v . Passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees V� of the Village of Oakbrook this /� rday of December, 1966. Approved- President .i Attest: `,� �•>•i//G�.,4��J �.—/.�/_ter' Clerk �L VZ Z t.*Lt y. >y F, �1' M yy k� `f I - 2 - k 1 :�Y Y I 7 .J i ' I�� .:T:�.D":�C.. r� �t. r ♦ r1'•tY:./''fxr ,%05 y s. ;°.$t'.�.` s .r.}.. .0 ��. ``!: ..s ,{-!�^ a(�.��y?r,"r��,y},'> r0 ,}S1S.'w^�.w�irlrrq s r .�,� pry xis tir.y<.a .'�'�a y_•�'•�`' .saa�'� r:;.r'J T� t.l ra 7 .a'� R�t � .�► j'.Y�iC �.a Y �� Y♦[ N � i o :d�'}'7f•�.� M 3/.r� �r ��- Ir t. a ga.. s r' '..,rF .3+," 4•..,,I ( # , .'4iaic, < j.-'v rf x, �:�: ///jjj/ !-Saa• F }r 7 r"!V.'.� // 1/1/rJt"i "^'-'�.+wr y .h J/yy�'' .f'�,F •c �� yY( rt+1-'1!,+;.�'Sx ��:..y;.+_ Kr�+t..!'�. e ♦� 1 �,t-{�?y ,.�.,,;�".�:.�. 1 e S y,l,�'¢"' � � 'r'��i�' �. rb' .,,� .�'� "mow'""R� ,, lar, "115:x" J � i'l"�. *b �• �3 +c-,.F 'k+,f�. rr � ,.� c�a. ��`�•.,� � '� `�� IM � � � Rj��,��f�'3�n x wi��t r,�, us �:�{£fit r,,.`Y^n4�!'41 �� ' 'J � ,�* '"_7 w r1��R� 4 1 �M S'� ��+ll^� '1 'j��j,,j'��xr F tr•{ati r+i 'aay f�{f��tynt��.•R�.-4*� .�'�T�� a .},. �+.F,�,Y.��A! a.e T es + SOF OAK vP� �e40 FCOUNTv' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 May 25, 1988 312 990-3000 Da+gr Resident: The Oak Brook Plan Commission and/or Zoning Board of Appeals, and the Village Board will be considering a: X Variation Preliminary Plat Special Use Final Plat Zoning Amendment at the meetings as scheduled on the reverse side of this notice. The application has been filed by W. T. Barthel Name of applicant 790 North Central, Wood Dale Address Relationship of applicant to property Agent N/A Name of Subdivision if applicable The property in question is situated at: 611 Enterprise Dirve I have attached a map of the area to assist you in determining your relation- ship to the property in question. The request which has been made is as follows: A Variation from the provisions of Section X(B)(5) to permit construction of an addition encroaching approximately 60 feet into the Required 100-foot Front Yard. If you desire more detailed information, please contact me at the Village Hall to review the file on this application. I will be looking forward to your attendance at the public meetings. Sincerely, Bruce F. KaDff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/jr RE: Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation Additional Surrounding Residents: 06-24-306-004 R. R. Street & Co. , 625 Enterprise Drive, O.B. -005 C B Industries Fund, c/o Real Estate Tax .Services, P. O. Box 832310, Richardson, Texas 75083 -006 American National Bank, #59504, 33 North La Salle Street, Chicago, IL 60690 -007 Heritage Standard Bank, #10474, 2400 West 95th Street, Evergreen Park, IL 60642 305-005 Jay McGreevy, 620 Enterprise, O.B. -007 Commonwealth Edison, 72 West Adams, Chicago, IL 60603 -008 Carol Grimes, Trustee, 607 North Park, LaGrange Park, IL 60525 -009 First National Bank, #L-346, 45 Briarwood Drive, O.B. 06-24-307-003 Butler Estate, 1420 Kensington, O.B. -008 Boulevard Bank, #8447, 410 North Michigan, Chicago, IL 60611 -022 Official Airline Guides, 2000 Clearwater, O.B. A G E N D A . VILLAGE OF OAK BR. TUESDAY, -May 24, 1988 7:30 P.M. (Immediately following 7:15 P.M. Executive Session) I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting of May 9. 1988 Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of May 10, 1988 III. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: %1T A. An Ordinance Granting a Variation from the Provisions of Section VII(D)(8)(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Ordinance G-60, as Amended, Relative to Required Side Yards (3323 Heritage Oaks Court, Oak Brook, TL) IV. FINANCIAL: No business. V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Recommendation - Fogarty - Rear Yard Variation (3814 Washington) VI. NEX BUSINESS: A. Plat of Easement Vacation - Lot 58 - Hunter Trails B. Recommendation - Wehmeyer - Rear Yard Variation (16 Robin Rood Ranch) C. Miscellaneous Drainage Update: 1. Elmhurst Berm 2. Flood Erosion 3. Salt Creek Easements - Reaches 2 d 3 4. Creek Cleaning D. Request for Purchase - End Loader Parts (Unit 513) - Public Works E. Request for Purchase - Uniforms - Public Works F. Request for Purchase Order - DuPage Metropolitan Enforcement Group (DUMEG) - Annual Fee - Police Department G. Illinois Auxiliary Police - Temporary Appointment Y. _mergency Operating Plan - Temporary Shelter Agreements I. Referrals: 1. Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise) - Refer to Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of June 7, 1988 2. Obucina - Variation RE: Control Over Bulk (3005, 3015 Coolidge) Refer to Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of June 7, 1988 J. Onen ?o nun 7I:. ADJOURNMENT: i "•' s. ,.t s`= ;.-LEG NOTICE DU PAG VIL OAK BROOK N 71C C�KCOUNTIES ILLINOIS NOTICE IS E OF PUBLIC HEAR+NG HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing DuPaZp yBoard of Appeals of the Vrllage of Oak g�je tom'at y�30 1?Mk i�the lOak lBr�ppi k Vlllape iold°, oak PUBLISHER'S CERTIFICATE Brook Read,Illlnola for the ur Plication of Qooperfund Inc fo a Va lat oo as prove a under Section XIII(G)pf ilia 2ontnp p of Oak Brook 't.-lliis,Ordinance rd, rtio A VarlatIon tha loldIna of the Village dinancs Is requested g Stec n of the&Z.;,n` iron X(BXS) to A Variation from the prowmons ppsQ'. IS TO CERTIFY That the notice, a true copy of which IS attached to this Eryng a prox+matey a njeef jnto tAe Raqulredljp°pl�� ertificate, was published in THE DOINGS once each week for Front YaW The Oropert P se Drlvs,Oak Br Y generally described as 61l I Von Is as follows: ook,Illinois,and the 1 One Lot 11 in egal deacri weeks sucessivel that the date Central Indust 1 - -- sotitslonInthe -�` t P -••••''''''' i ................................... • Plaza Subdlvision being the sOUfhweat 91 the ��qon 21r own-fhip 39 North of the first publication was the .............. 18th y Range 17 East !the Third"Corded tJ clpal Meridian ace I p to fhe�pplat therfol, da Of ;;No. Ia6'518251 kt 0.!t. ��uns t,19".an ording '""u_ •• _ge C u e I Illinois. p°Current tion+to fp hegoposed Vijati amain support ennpnent I May 88 Pport of or the o goal A.D., 19 ......, and that the date of the last publication was M afforded an Y Provisions therep/wpl statements orally wMtlno o°sO and may .:raoassed to another date If g both.The hearing mtatheir news Public announced nnOtice o!time and be date o f tt Dubllcatbn not bats than art place that the ............................. day of............................. A.D., 19...... recessed hearing. or rs giver by I days prior to the Marianne Lakoen AND IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED That THE DOINGS is a secular newspaper of t Published Zj at the dire Ion Of the Cor Village clerk general circulation, published weekly in the Villages of Hinsdale, Clarendon Hills, Ou lis a argin The Couefpee piOf olse e0 oh 0aklBrook Oak Brook,Burr Ridge,Willowbrook and City of Darien and circulated generally in PubBehed In The Doings May 18,1888. `. the Villages of Hinsdale, Clarendon Hills,Oak Brook,Burr Ridge,Willowbrook and " City of Darien and adjacent unincorporated and incorporated areas,and in DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, and in other areas; that said THE DOINGS is a "newspaper" as defined by the Illinois Statutes made and provided for such situa- tions,to wit;by Section 5 of"An Act to revise the law in relation to notices,"1874,Feb. 13,R.S.1874,p.723,§5,as amended 1959,July 17,Laws 1959,p.1494,§1; and is also a "newspaper"as defined by Section 1 of"An Act concerning the publication of legal notices,"1909,June 8,Laws 1909,p.288,§1,as amended 1927,June 29,Laws 1927,P. 603,§1,and as further amended 1945,April 12,Laws 1945,p.1089,§1,and as further amended in 1957,July 9,Laws 1957,p.2270,§1,and as further amended 1959,July 17, Laws 1959,p.1496,§1;and that said THE DOINGS has been continuously published at regular intervals of at least once each week with a minimum of 50 issues per year for over one year prior to the first publication of the attached notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, one of the co-publishers of said THE DOINGS has affixed his hand and seal this ...........19th......... day of ..May......................... A.D. 1900 88... Publishers Charge ..36. .. Publisher NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, will be held on June 7, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. i%.the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Illinois, for the purpose of considering the application of Cooperfund, Inc. for a Variation as provided under Section RIII(G) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, Ordinance G-60, as amended. A Variation to the following Section of the Zoning Ordinance is requested: A Variation from the provisions of Section x(B)(5) to permit construction of an addition encroaching approximately 60 feet into the Required 100-foot Front Yard. The property may be generally described as 611 Enterprise Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois, and the legal description is as follows: Lot 11 in Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast quarter of Section 23 and in the southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the plat thereof recorded June 1, 1965, as Document No. R65-16254 in DuPage County, Illinois. Permanent Parcel #06-24-306-006. All persons desiring to be heard in support of or in opposition to the proposed Variation or any provision thereof, will be afforded an opportunity to do so and may submit their statements orally or in writing or both. The hearing may be recessed to another date if notice of time and place thereof is publicly announced at the hearing or is given by newspaper publication not less than five (5) days prior to the date of the recessed hearing. Marianne Lakosil, Village Clerk Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I , G�OF 04" ,v P 7 9001 '9 p �� m CouN'l VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521-2255 hr 312 990-3000 May 16, 1988 Mr. Thomas Barthel George Sollitt Construction Company 790 North Central Avenue Wood Dale, Illinois 60191 RE: W6'11 Enterprise Drive Dear Mr. Barthel: This letter is to inform you that your requested front yard variation will be heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals at its June 7th meeting which begins at 7:30 P.M. in the S. E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Commons. Should you have any questions in this regard, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager BFK/jr O 4. OF 0A1, 011 VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 June 23, 1988 3 1 2 990- 3000 MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen Berley, Village Manager Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to the Village Manager SUBJECT: Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise Drive) Cooperfund, Inc. , as owners of the property at 611 Enterprise Drive, are proposing construction of a twenty (20') foot addition in front of the existing building. 611 Enterprise Drive (Lot 11) is one (1) of eighteen (18) properties fronting on Enterprise Drive. This area was annexed to the Village of Oak Brook between 1958 and 1961 and the zoning requirement since that time has been consistently for a 100 foot front yard. This area was originally subdivided in 1965 as the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision. The confusing item in this application is the fact that the subdivision plat only required a 40 foot setback from Enterprise Drive and not the 100 foot setback required by the Zoning Ordinance. No Village records indicate the granting of variations to all of the properties in conjunction with the approval of this plat. Since that time,'development of each of the properties has been required to meet the 100 foot setback unless a separate variation was granted. Based on our review of the Village's zoning files and information submitted by the applicant at the zoning hearing, of the eighteen (18) properties within the subdivision, fifteen (15) have received some type of setback variation. Eight (8) properties have received variations for a 40 foot setback, three (3) for a 50 foot, one (1) for a 55 foot, one (1) for 60 feet (the subject property) , one (1) for a 70 foot and one (1) for 78 feet. The variations and dates granted are indicated on the revised Page 11 of the folder. The Zoning Board of Appeals at its June 7, 1988 hearing unanimously recommended approval of the requested variation which would reduce the front yard from 60 feet to 40 feet. In the event the Village Board concurs with this recommendation, the necessary ordinance approving same should be prepared by the Village Attorney. Respectfully submitted, AtE�gjc,, hl,� Stephen Be ley Village Manager Bruce F. Kapff BK/etg Assistant to the Village anager07 Barofsky & Associates Corporate Real Estate Services June 21, 1988 JUN 2 31988 Mr. Bruce F. Kapff Assistant to Village Manager VILLAGE OF OAK BHOO-K, IL. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ADMINISTRATION 1200 Oak Brook Rd. Oak Brook, IL 60521 Dear Mr. Kapff, In reference to the consideration of a variance at 611 Enterprise Drive, presented to the village by Mr. W. T. Barthel of Wood Dale, I have the following thoughts. I am the managing general partner of a newly formed group which has recently purchased 616 Enterprise Drive. We object to Mr. Barthel' s proposed variation without specific reference to his architectural plans and/or schemes for the following reasons: -Recent flooding and flood control in the area is negatively served by creating additions and specifically additions which move 60% into a required front yard setback. -Enterprise Drive has long been established as a very special, small corporation user environment that is not well served by interrupting the tree lines and building lines currently in place. -The requested variation would have an extremely detrimental impact on the attractive wooded scenario which surrounds many of the properties on Enterprise Drive and there is no positive impact to the neighboring areas and/or the environment through the issuance of this variance. We, as always , respect the judgement of the Village of Oak Brook and will wholeheartedly support any decision you make. These however are thoughts on the current issue. t regar Frederick J. Barofs�ky� President BAROFSKY AND ASSOCIATES Managing General Partner FJB/tsv 616 Enterprise Associates 701 Harger Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 (312) 954-2121 o27 OF OqIr e9OO'F t�J f$1 O tq G p q 9C6 COUNt4' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 June 13, 1988 312990.3000 Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 RE: Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise) Dear President and Board of Trustees: The Zoning Board of Appeals, at its Regular Meeting of June 7, 1988, considered the application of Mr. W. T. Barthel, owner's contractor, for a 20-foot addition to the front of an existing structure which will add approximately 1,000 square feet of office space. After careful consideration, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested front yard variation reducing the front yard from 60 feet to 40 feet based on the following findings of fact: 1) The property owner would be denied a reasonable return if the strict requirements of the Zoning Ordinance were followed. 2) The property is unique due to its somewhat irregular shape. 3) The requested variation would not generally be applicable to other properties within the zoning classification. 4) Approval of the requested variation would not alter the character of the area. 5) The current hardship is not created by any current owner of the property. This recommendation was made on a motion by Member Weber, seconded by Member Martinello, and approved on a Roll Call Vote of six (6) ayes: Members Crouch, Martinello, Sarwar, Shumate, Weber, Chairman Savino; zero (0) nays; one -(l) absent: Member Herman. Sin erel , Alfre P. Savino, airman Zoning Board of Appeals BFK/APS/jr 0. 6 June 7, 1988 The Chairman and Members of the Village of Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255 Statement of Cooperfund, Inc . ( "Cooperfund" ) in support of Request for front yard Variation at 611 Enterprise Drive, Oakbrook Description of Work Cooperfund, Inc . purchased the subject one story, twelve thousand square foot building at 611 Enterprise Drive in Oakbrook, Illinois in 1970 to house its corporate offices . Cooperfund, Inc . is the parent corporation of the Weight Watchers Company. The Company has found it necessary to expand its offices at the location and thus proposes the construction of a 1000 square foot addition ( less than 8% of current building area) of the same architectural character to the front of the existing building. Compliance with standards The proposed addition meets local zoning standards for grant- ing the requested front yard variation in the following ways : 1 . The building as constructed does not allow Cooperfund to obtain a reasonable return on the building. Cooperfund would like to add executive personnel to its company. The company will be much more efficient if its offices are expanded and located at the building where the company' s operations take place ( 611 Enterprise Drive) . 2 . The necessity for the variation is the product of unique circumstances . The building is located on lot 11 - an irregularly shaped parcel - of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision in such a manner that to locate the additional office space elsewhere in the building will interfere with required parking and loading. 3 . The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since 1965 , the Village of Oakbrook has granted numerous variations in the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, eight of which are identi- cal to the front yard variation sought by Cooperfund ( that is a 40 foot front yard) . Furthermore, the minimal addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing building. The many large trees on the subject property will continue to buffer the building addition from neighboring properties and the public right-of-way. No new traffic will be generated by this addition. Other Considerations in Determining Hardship 1 . The manner in which the subject building is sited on this irregularly shaped lot makes it impossible to locate the addition elsewhere without reducing, or interfering with, parking and loading required by the Village Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The condition upon which the application is based is not applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. The physical limitations on adding to the building ( see 1 above) and the need to add the necessary office space are not present generally in the district. 3 . This front yard variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to neighboring properties . In fact, many neighboring property owners have sought and received the same, and in some cases greater, front yard variations . As stated above, the many large trees provide an excellent natural buffer from the street and neighboring properties . 4 . The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or other- wise affect neighboring property values . The proposed addition will not move the building closer to any abut- ting property. The building addition in the front yard projects the building line 20 feet, which is a minimal amount; moreover, no height is being added to the build- ing. Finally, the addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing structure. 5 . The proposed variation does not stem from a desire to make more money. The addition will cost the Cooperfund Corporation a substantial amount of money and will simply allow the company to add needed office space. 2 - �y 6 . Cooperfund has not caused the hardship which neces- sitates this variation. The building size was adequate when purchased in 1970 . However, due to increased demand for the services of the company, additional office space is required. Respectfully submitted, Jean Frandsen Vice President Cooperfund, Inc . 3 - �3 June 7, 1988 The Chairman and Members of the 0- Village of Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255 Statement of Cooperfund, Inc . ( "Cooperfund" ) in support of Request for front yard Variation at 611 Enterprise Drive, Oakbrook Description of Work Cooperfund, Inc . purchased the subject one story, twelve thousand square foot building at 611 Enterprise Drive in Oakbrook, Illinois in 1970 to house its corporate offices. Cooperfund, Inc . is the parent corporation of the Weight Watchers Company. The Company has found it necessary to expand its offices at the location and thus proposes the construction of a 1000 square foot addition (less than 8% of current building area) of the same architectural character to the front of the existing building. Compliance with standards The proposed addition meets local zoning standards for grant- ing the requested front yard variation in the following ways: 1 . The building as constructed does not allow Cooperfund to obtain a reasonable return on the building. Cooperfund would like to add executive personnel to its company. The company will be much more efficient if its offices are expanded and located at the building where the company' s operations take place ( 611 Enterprise Drive) . 2 . The necessity for the variation is the product of unique circumstances . The building is located on lot 11 - an irregularly shaped parcel - of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision in such a manner that to locate the additional office space elsewhere in the building will interfere with required parking and loading. 3 . The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since 1965, the Village of Oakbrook has granted numerous variations in the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, eight of which are identi- cal to the front yard variation sought by Cooperfund (that is a 40 foot front yard) . Furthermore, the minimal addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing building. The many large trees on the subject property will continue to buffer the building addition from neighboring properties and the public right-of-way. No new traffic will be generated by this addition. Other Considerations in Determining Hardship 1 . The manner in which the subject building is sited on this irregularly shaped lot makes it impossible to locate the addition elsewhere without reducing, or interfering with, parking and loading required by the Village Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The condition upon which the application is based is not applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. The physical limitations on adding to the building ( see 1 above) and the need to add the necessary office space are not present generally in the district. 3 . This front yard variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to neighboring properties . In fact, many neighboring property owners have sought and received the same, and in some cases greater, front yard variations . As stated above, the many large trees provide an excellent natural buffer from the street and neighboring properties . 4 . The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or other- wise affect neighboring property values . The proposed addition will not move the building closer to any abut- ting property. The building addition in the front yard projects the building line 20 feet, which is a minimal amount; moreover, no height is being added to the build- ing. Finally, the addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing structure. 5 . The proposed variation does not stem from a desire to make more money. The addition will cost the Cooperfund Corporation a substantial amount of money and will simply allow the company to add needed office space. - 2 - � 1 6 . Cooperfund has not caused the hardship which neces- sitates this variation. The building size was adequate when purchased in 1970 . However, due to increased demand for the services of the company, additional office space is required. Respectfully submitted, Jeah Frandsen Vice President Cooperfund, Inc . 3 - 1 June 7 , 1988 The Chairman and Members of the Village of Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255 Statement of Cooperfund, Inc . ( "Cooperfund" ) in support of Request for front yard Variation at 611 Enterprise Drive, Oakbrook Description of Work Cooperfund, Inc . purchased the subject one story, twelve thousand square foot building at 611 Enterprise Drive in Oakbrook, Illinois in 1970 to house its corporate offices . Cooperfund, Inc . is the parent corporation of the Weight Watchers Company. The Company has found it necessary to expand its offices at the location and thus proposes the construction of a 1000 square foot addition ( less than 8% of current building area) of the same architectural character to the front of the existing building. Compliance with standards The proposed addition meets local zoning standards for grant- ing the requested front yard variation in the following ways: 1 . The building as constructed does not allow Cooperfund to obtain a reasonable return on the building. Cooperfund would like to add executive personnel to its company. The company will be much more efficient if its offices are expanded and located at the building where the company' s operations take place ( 611 Enterprise Drive) . 2 . The necessity for the variation is the product of unique circumstances . The building is located on lot 11 - an irregularly shaped parcel - of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision in such a manner that to locate the additional office space elsewhere in the building will interfere with required parking and loading. /9 3 . The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since 1965, the Village of Oakbrook has granted numerous variations in the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, eight of which are identi- cal to the front yard variation sought by Cooperfund ( that is a 40 foot front yard) . Furthermore, the minimal addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing building. The many large trees on the subject property will continue to buffer the building addition from neighboring properties and the public right-of-way. No new traffic will be generated by this addition. Other Considerations in Determining Hardship 1 . The manner in which the subject building is sited on this irregularly shaped lot makes it impossible to locate the addition elsewhere without reducing, or interfering with, parking and loading required by the Village Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The condition upon which the application is based is not applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. The physical limitations on adding to the building ( see 1 above) and the need to add the necessary office space are not present generally in the district. 3 . This front yard variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to neighboring properties . In fact, many neighboring property owners have sought and received the same, and in some cases greater, front yard variations. As stated above, the many large trees provide an excellent natural buffer from the street and neighboring properties . 4 . The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or other- wise affect neighboring property values . The proposed addition will not move the building closer to any abut- ting property. The building addition in the front yard projects the building line 20 feet, which is a minimal amount; moreover, no height is being added to the build- ing. Finally, the addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing structure. 5 . The proposed variation does not stem from a desire to make more money. The addition will cost the Cooperfund Corporation a substantial amount of money and will simply allow the company to add needed office space. - 2 - i 6 . Cooperfund has not caused the hardship which neces- sitates this variation. The building size was adequate when purchased in 1970 . However, due to increased demand for the services of the company, additional office space is required. Respectfully submitted, Jean Frandsen Vice President Cooperfund, Inc . 3 - l7 June 7 , 1988 The Chairman and Members of the Village of Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255 Statement of Cooperfund, Inc . ( "Cooperfund" ) in support of Request for front yard Variation at 611 Enterprise Drive, Oakbrook Description of Work Cooperfund, Inc . purchased the subject one story, twelve thousand square foot building at 611 Enterprise Drive in Oakbrook, Illinois in 1970 to house its corporate offices . Cooperfund, Inc . is the parent corporation of the Weight Watchers Company. The Company has found it necessary to expand its offices at the location and thus proposes the construction of a 1000 square foot addition ( less than 8% of current building area) of the same architectural character to the front of the existing building. Compliance with standards The proposed addition meets local zoning standards for grant- ing the requested front yard variation in the following ways: 1 . The building as constructed does not allow Cooperfund to obtain a reasonable return on the building. Cooperfund would like to add executive personnel to its company. The company will be much more efficient if its offices are expanded and located at the building where the company' s operations take place ( 611 Enterprise Drive) . 2 . The necessity for the variation is the product of unique circumstances . The building is located on lot 11 - an irregularly shaped parcel - of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision in such a manner that to locate the additional office space elsewhere in the building will interfere with required parking and loading. 4 3 . The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since 1965 , the Village of Oakbrook has granted numerous variations in the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, eight of which are identi- cal to the front yard variation sought by Cooperfund ( that is a 40 foot front yard) . Furthermore, the minimal addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing building. The many large trees on the subject property will continue to buffer the building addition from neighboring properties and the public right-of-way. No new traffic will be generated by this addition. Other Considerations in Determining Hardship 1 . The manner in which the subject building is sited on this irregularly shaped lot makes it impossible to locate the addition elsewhere without reducing, or interfering with, parking and loading required by the Village Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The condition upon which the application is based is not applicable to other property within the same zoning classification. The physical limitations on adding to the building ( see 1 above) and the need to add the necessary office space are not present generally in the district. 3 . This front yard variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to neighboring properties . In fact, many neighboring property owners have sought and received the same, and in some cases greater, front yard variations. As stated above, the many large trees provide an excellent natural buffer from the street and neighboring properties . 4 . The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or other- wise affect neighboring property values . The proposed addition will not move the building closer to any abut- ting property. The building addition in the front yard projects the building line 20 feet, which is a minimal amount; moreover, no height is being added to the build- ing. Finally, the addition will be architecturally consistent with the existing structure. 5 . The proposed variation does not stem from a desire to make more money. The addition will cost the Cooperfund Corporation a substantial amount of money and will simply allow the company to add needed office space. - 2 - 15- 6 . Cooperfund has not caused the hardship which neces- sitates this variation. The building size was adequate when purchased in 1970 . However, due to increased demand for the services of the company, additional office space is required. Respectfully submitted, Jean Frandsen Vice President Cooperfund, Inc . - 3 - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -6- June 7, 1988 COOPERFUND - FRONT YARD VARIATION (611 Enterprise) The Secretary noted that the required Legal Notice was published in the Oak Brook DOINGS on May 18, 1988 and surrounding property owners were notified of this hearing on May 25, 1988. Gary Chico, attorney, and Mr. Barthel, contractor, were present representing this application and made the following comments: 1) The proposed construction is for a 20-foot addition to the front of the existing structure which will add approximately 1,000 square feet of office space. 2) The only place to locate the addition is to the front due to the small depth of the lot and existing parking areas elsewhere. 3) The current property owner is not the original property owner. 4) The proposed addition will not generate any traffic difficulties. 5) Three exhibits were presented noting the location of the proposed 20' x 50' addition, pictures of the subject site, and a marked-up copy of the Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision Plat indicating that 14 properties have in the past received setback variations with the majority being for a 40-foot setback from the right-of-way. A motion was made by Member Weber, seconded by Member Martinello, to recommend approval of the requested front yard variation reducing the front yard from 60 feet to 40 feet based on the following findings of fact: 1) The property owner would be denied a reasonable return if the strict requirements of the Zoning Ordinance were followed. 2) The property is unique due to its somewhat irregular shape. 3) The requested variation would not generally be applicable to other properties within the zoning classification. 4) Approval of the requested variation would not alter the character of the area. 5) The current hardship is not created by any current owner of the property. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: (6) Members Crouch, Martinello, Sarwar, Shumate, Weber, Chairman Savino Nays: (0) Absent: (1) Member Herman MOTION CARRIED. . . ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -6- June 7, 1988 13 ORDINANCE NO. S- 0 15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 5-118 GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION R(B)(5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REQUIRED FRONT YARDS (611 Enterprise Drive) n► WHEREAS, the subject property previously was granted a variation reducing the required front yard to 60 feet pursuant to Ordinance S-118; and WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting a variation from the provisions of Section %(B)(5) to permit construction of an addition further reducing the setback from 60 feet to 40 feet; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such application has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook on June 7, 1988 pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, a recommendation has been made by said Zoning Board of Appeals that the variation requested be granted; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the recommendation made by the Zoning Board of Appeals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: That a variation is hereby granted from the provisions of Section R(B 5 so as to permit construction of a 20' x 50' addition to be constructed at the northwesterly corner of the building in the front yard with a 40-foot setback to be limited to the area of the proposed addition and not for the entire width of the front yard. The location and size of the proposed addition shall conform to materials submitted to the Village as a part of the hearing process. Section 3: That this Ordinance is limited and restricted to property commonly known as 611 Enterprise Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois, which property is legally described as: Lot 11 in Central Industrial Plaza Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast quarter of Section 23 and in the southwest quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the plat recorded June 1, 1965, as Document No. R65-16254 in DuPage County, Illinois. Permanent Parcel No. 06-24-306-006. • Ordinance No. S- 045 An Ordinance Granting a Variation Relative to Required Front Yards Page two Section 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval pursuant to law. PASSED THIS 12th day of 'July 1988. \ Ayes: 'trustees Bartccki, Bushy, Imric, Maher, Rush and Winters Nays: None Absent: None APPROVED THIS 12th day of July .l 7 Villfte PresicTent ATTEST: Village Clerk r Approved to Form: Vil age Attorney Published Date Paper Not Published X X • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- May 24, 1988 V. /�OLLD BUSINESS: U Fogarty - Rear Yard Variation (3814 Washington): Tabled at the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1988. Revised plans dated May 16, 1988 have been submitted showing that the two (2) proposed additions will not further encroach into the Rear Yard than the existing measurement to the roof overhang of 16 feet. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To approve the requested Rear Yard Variation consistent with revised plans dated May 16, 1988, and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary document to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. VI. NEW BUSINESS: A. Plat of Easement Vacation - Lot 58 - Hunter Trails West (709 Deer Trail Lane): Twenty (20) foot drainage easement across Lot 58 does not serve any purpose as determined by the Village Engineer. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To approve the drainage Plat of Easement Vacation as presented and authorize its recordation. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. -- Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. B. Wehmeyer - Rear Yard Variation (16 Robin Hood Ranch): On May 3, 1988, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested rear yard variation to permit construction of a 15 foot by 24 foot addition to the northwest corner of an existing house encroaching not more than 11 feet into the 60-foor required Rear Yard. In approximately 1971 or 1972, a twenty (20) foot wide strip of land on the south edge of the property was added without benefit of a plat of subdivision being filed. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Imrie... To concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant a variation, conditioned on a plat being filed and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the appropriate document to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor with Trustee Bushy voting nay. So ordered. C. Miscellaneous Drainage Update: At the Plan Commission meeting of May 16, 1988, several questions were raised by members of the audience concerning the following subjects: 1. Elmhurst Flood Mitigation Plan: Staff directed to send letter of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and DuPage County expressing concerns. The Village of Oak Brook is prepared to support a regional approach. Hydrological engineering consultants to be interviewed, including Harza. As new developments occur, this will be an agenda item. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- May 24, 1988 VILLAGE OAK BROOK Minutes -2- May 24, 1988 V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Fogarty - Rear Yard Variation (3814 Washington): Tabled at the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1988. Revised plans dated May 16, 1988 have been submitted showing that the two (2) proposed additions will not further encroach into the Rear Yard than the existing measurement to the roof overhang of 16 feet. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Rush... To approve the requested Rear Yard Variation consistent with revised plans dated May 16, 1988, and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary document to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. VI. AD. BUSINESS: f A.) Plat of Easement Vacation - Lot 58 - Hunter Trails West (709 Deer Trail �/ Lane): Twenty (20) foot drainage easement across Lot 58 does not serve any purpose as determined by the Village Engineer. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Bushy... To approve the drainage Plat of Easement Vacation as presented and authorize its recordation. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Trustees Bartecki, Bushy, Imrie, Maher, Rush, Winters and President Cerne. Nays: None Absent: None So ordered. B. Wehmeyer - Rear Yard Variation (16 Robin Hood Ranch): On May 3, 1988, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested rear yard variation to permit construction of a 15 foot by 24 foot addition to the northwest corner of an existing house encroaching not more than 11 feet into the 60-foor required Rear Yard. In approximately 1971 or 1972, a twenty (20) foot wide strip of land on the south edge of the property was added without benefit of a plat of subdivision being filed. Trustee Winters moved, seconded by Trustee Imrie... To concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant a variation, conditioned on a plat being filed and direct the Village Attorney to prepare the appropriate document to effectuate same. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor with Trustee Bushy voting nay. So ordered. C. Miscellaneous Drainage Update: At the Plan Commission meeting of May 16, 1988, several questions were raised by members of the audience concerning the following subjects: 1. Elmhurst Flood Mitigation Plan: Staff directed to send letter of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and DuPage County expressing concerns. The Village of Oak Brook is prepared to support a regional approach. Hydrological engineering consultants to be interviewed, including Harza. As new developments occur, this will be an agenda item. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- May 24, 1988 __ I Q 31 cr�i !�� Q�/l4��b/ S/✓O 11�l� � �Cr 1 1 ,oh 6Vlf 235.11Xszs t43 ti 7Y Of 74 As Ste u �sia� �, c^Z •z '4 • �� Gj opo'r ,•,f 1 o w f a L M IT oualrx • s , o y °tt o u » f 1 V . 00 O °ts :.: VA-lot 4 Ct r V 0 NJ •�OA a QD M /VY szazea zney coula supply manpower proviaing the village woula co-sign a commission of appointment. Trustee Rush moved, seconded by Trustee Maher. . . To ratify Commission of Appointment for the Illinois Auxiliary Police. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. H. Temporary Shelter Agreements - Emergency Operating Plan: The American Red Cross often handles temporary shelters in times of disasters, and they have informed us that their ability to respond to Village needs may be severely limited. Trustee Rush moved, seconded by Trustee To approve a basic Temporary Shelter Agreement with the American Red Cross and authorize staff to pursue agreements for future approval. VOICE VOTE: All present, in favor. So ordered. I. Referrals: With no objections, President Cerne made the following referrals: 1. Cooperfund - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise) -- Referred to Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 7, 1988. 2. Obucina - Variation RE: Control Over Bulk (3005, 3015 Coolidge) -- Referred to Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 7, 1988. J. Open Forum: There will be a meeting regarding drainage issues with the Forest Preserve District. The date and time will be furnished to the Village. Village Hall landscaping: "Staff to review program. Garden Club might consider volunteering. Bridge on Baybrook crossing Ginger Creek: Staff directed to review. VII. ADJOURNEMNT: Trustee Maher moved, seconded by Trustee Bartecki. . . To adjourn this meeting. TIME: 10:10 P.M. ATTEST: Marihnne Lakosil, CMC Village Clerk 7:LLAGG OF OAK BP.00K Minu`.as -1- ;?ay 24, 10'a " L SPECIAL USE $400 (Section 2-225, 8/11/81; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, PLAT OF SURVEY, AND (18) COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING, SHOWING ALL PERTINENT APPLICABLE INFORMATION, i.e. , PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS,' LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE -- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Dato Filed: Board of Trustees Referral Notice Published: !�7-/:6 Newspaper: Date Adjacent Property Owners Notified: l�-25- S� Staff Referral: Public Hearing Dates: Plan Commission N�� Zoning Board of Appeals 6-Z-S�T Board of Trustees 'Z S -8 g Board of Trustees 7-/Z -$`a (Approval of Ordinance) FEE PAID: $ Receipt No. : O Received By: Village Cler ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT TO CCNIPLETE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: PERMANENT PARCEL NUMBER 0624306006 Central LOT NO. ll SUBDIVISION Industrial Plaza ADDRESS 611 Enterprise ZONING OR/A-1 ZONIAG ORDINANCE SECTION .. . SEC 10 B-5 ACTION REQUESTED 40' Front Yard set back in lieu of present 61' PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER f--J CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT OWNER(S) OF RECORD American National Bank Trust 59504 PHONE NUMBER 661-5610 ADDRESS 33 North La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois ZIP 60602 BENEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST: Cooperfund Inc. PHONE NUMBER 571-5292 ADDRESS 611 Enterprise, Oak Brook, Illinois ZIP 60521 NAME OF APPLICANT W. T. Barthel PHONE NUMBER 860-7333 ADDRESS 790 North Central Avenue, Wood Dale, Illinois ZIP 60191 I (aw) certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my (war►) knowledge and belief. ( M�f d g (S Rn ture) ADolicant nar_p TciVA heroluatter described hae ,potLtioned tbo eorpmato au¢iwa1v.1*s of the grillage of Lrakbrook for a varistioc, to the ruLos ojnd rsauLsti.ot�* or the zoning ordirarao of tLe Ultag* of k�ak4xoox with rasped to yard requirements; and Wk':MA.59 a public hearing pursuant: ta.s&44 requose has boon hold by ttho 4"Moaln& Loard of Appeals of tbo Villas* of i3nk- brook after receiving the recommendation of the PianaLng Gomatasjon of said villsge; and W1tZciU;'O, the Zoning Soard of r�pposlx of this Vil,lago of Oakbrook has rnaommandod that a variation bo grouted* am WlM , trio President and box►rd of Treat oss of the+ Village of uakbrvok comur with said recommendation *ad erre of the epi aLon that a variation should be grouted; a*W, h9AXWOU, :1f IT ORDAINED by the $resident and board of irust:oes of t h* V&Lla&o of Oakbrooks Lect&gn 1. 1h4t tits applicable Sulu and r*sulatians of the Oa"room Zonin& Ordinance contsined Ln S*etloa 10-6-5 pertoln- ing to yard rsquirarments are hereby varied reducing the front yard requisemoutts from 100 fast to 60 feat, snd thenar yard requirements from 40 fact to 10 fact on the followings described property, to-wit: A.ot 11 in ConttroX Industrial plana Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast; quarrtew of Section 23 and in the southwest quarter of Section 14, Township 3�i North, lAngo 11, test of aria Third frinelpal Meridian according to the plat thereof recorded Juno L, 19659 As :rocum*nt ; o. 465-161.54 La LuPege county, Illinois, commonly known as lea it In e.sntraai Industrial Ir laza, Enterprise ►"give end Cormok Roads Oa1brook, Illinois. J991120-2,& ihOZ this ordin4aaa shall be in full force end effect f om avd a►ftor its passaj$* axed apperoval as by statute in such of the Village of Oaktsook thio day of Dec*WA r f 1966, Approwd SZ Is A. J-fg�jman President J tt"ti Cl*rk vPG OF 04Ar 9 O m G - O 9C�COUNt0'`yy VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 312990-3000 May 13, 1988 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Staff FROM: Bruce F. Kapff, Assistant to Village Manager SUBJECT: COOPERFUND - Front Yard Variation (611 Enterprise) Please let me know your comments by Friday, May 20, 1988 . A.. a GEORGE SOLLITT CONSTRUCTION CO. 2833 I 790 N. CENTRAL AVE. 802833 WOOD DALE, ILL. 60191 MAY 6 19 88 70-2355 19 PAY TO THE $ *>ti inn_nn** ORDER OF VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1ki_ GE4 SOII!TT i�" ,Inul ,.nn (••,�., �,Iun ,w�l �•• !-,�� CONSTRUCT'N CO. Z") �q�1 ianl� • 'I'II "I uI� iuu I• • DOLLARS %EafRIrYn BANKofc9W cDak 972 WOOD DALE ROAD•WOOD DALE,ILLINOIS 60191 r� � I 11'00283311'® 1:0719235561: 11' 10 Lee, 1621,190 ,. I O I I I Q4, 92 BANK RECEIPT TRANSIT S CHECKS $ CASH NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION RECEIVED BY: NO. A INVALID VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 64843 SIGNATURE• 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD r OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS ll PHONE: (312) 654-2220 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS ♦ CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL PLANA SUBDIVII. UTH11S!T "APTEP OF SECIION 24, TOWNSHIP !@ NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, -I, INC A3!rSSMENT PLAT NO. 3 RECORDED JULY B, 1964 AS DOCUMENT N0. R64-24070, DESCRIBED AS ".1110A^ raerNerMt is hereby reserved for and granted b tD SECTION 23; ':;ENCE N 0023135' r A DISTANCE OF 75.0 FEET TOA POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF ��a STATE OF ILLINOIS) RTH LINE OF 22ND STREETA DISTANCE OF 525.39 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF &PtA&*Awa / "'"Y'�aT COUNTY OF 00% )ss UTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-MAY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, AS PRESENTLY MONUKMft; I•- A. T PRUDENTIAL ORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF kf wcc«fon and msigm, in W Platted "eawwwlf" VICE ►RE3A. Of TME ►RDOENTIAI IN 3. THE FOLLOWING TEN (101 COURSES AND DISTANCES: (1) N 56016'13" E A D!STANCE OF 21.25 FEET; arnoe,sheds,alleys,other►abRe e+ey.and Ploe«fM.a OF SAI CORPORATION, AND PERSONALLY OF 38.50 FEET; (4) N S103111108" E A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET; (5) N 38025152" M A DISTANCE OF 38.5 plot, soid a«enKnt b M for the inslallotion, TEAT AS MUCH VICE PRESIDENT ANO Asa ISTANCE OF 605.18 FEET; 6 N 52°11'38• E A DISTANCE on thn SET FORTE. ( ) OF 635.72 FEET; (9) N 57021'20• E A DISTANCE . mainNnonee, relocation. fenaleol and reesevd of q« SIYEN UNDER MY PANS AND NOTARIAL SEl NORTHERLY POINT OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTNEASTERV ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 mom and aorHrl«wnc«. UR (4) COURSES AND DISTANCES: (I) S 37°21139" E A DI'TANCE OF 173.17 FEET; (2) S 40029;56" M S 38046'43" F A DISTANCE OF 99.14 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY POINT OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH- ER COMPANY t4-1. INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. B THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 10, E OF 700.06 FEET; (3) S 00231!5" E A DISTANCE OF 376.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF �, A• DISTANCE OF 642.01 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. titi Ecsoment Provisions statement Ry. �, s• e \ ♦ N7statementit herebyreserved for orad graAr• b IN eK � ys'// a �t�� \. and f\Je �J T E;!tYtr7fi11ircac�s Ge�LdOrd � / - 6y40 / / VTIA.ITY ESSi,MtesT ��\=i.e .0 10" 4 and their respectivewcc•lsws on.,r/11;2.s w:ntin 1M area 9 A - � � Q 45 . as d-a"_ by daned 1:"s an the aloe and -whod "Ease- 4; lwenf,"ra,•Hall,fay,ca,ttruct,renew.Operate and ma:main - ba ••• 1 4-1 ♦Z , �• canrisa. :antes, pales a,d rues, o.erhead and .ndfr• - J'er •'••// - Cr s/grn..wd.•.�h all wecesary bwces,qurs,a.-Cos and Other r� -quip,ne-fc, rbe swrpose of 1erv:r.g :fie wbdrainn awd 'i• .�/� �. a.wgr r e•r.r,y wit; lels.st•an• and electric set,icf;also i1 V r1• ` . /C L` here •: :n .. :,•'yq ro•.•e rhe %aert 1 s-.Q;,!tc ? �- e1, be / p�rpotrt. O rgr . ••sr�r.r pony all I•,rt w:rh aerial tervica.rias to N� � I♦V :are• .. iof%.i-::'q.n •n em,r JPe the lots at all r tory �/ 45, �. Q a mo:r_ .:sy.:rH,•: .,w-.,. co-::fe.end maintain vb Nu �O.f ZOa •^.♦ .: ."r eve: ,.:.t (er!.y, a:bl,., Ifs, ,• R7' /_ 7 s, s:rraat t and ptr wr equiprneelnd / .. 9r . .•n„d.•n 1 ,r.,ty grawted•.cA do-and remove or 1,—.,,d Imep tnmm-.d awy bees.srr,bsw saplings that ♦ '� 116.11. / J -r lfireat-r to:rgrfere-ah-:.r of NtI' � . '• N c .Jlil.ty eµ.+pmenl %I* P .n p eronerf buildinys or or said publi r:eet :holt sa-d ease•nenr, but same rroy be used f � prd-p%,slry 7 b:,Ion dseaping and other purposes Ih^ do sot Ohs" or later imerfere -1h she efpresa:d.s, the, ` •♦` / ^fie.'\ �^ A / / 'ight- here;. granted. ? y''r 11 ?S N ala, V,lr O. .O ♦�\ � `r. - ,.� _1 / ♦1' v ft �� ♦\ \ N A_ COX d� .' Irl♦� y4'� �� ` \ T'� (.1 -` v 47 10, ,p AV lip- r 4 14 / ' •• A. 40 i. ham' ®��. �•`O !\\Wc` /�'d V Q •tNa `' h°te I w ♦\\ M .'STATE OF ILLI 'SAN CalO1liSIp1.CUTIFICATE Ar♦ \ 1 d j W MOfi) \1 I + 15 , CMIT OF.011'" n A►P*pTEO 'T11 ti a S DtiT 6P txy i e. ism y New 16 J I b I T 1 LLA0 OF OA[ IIROOR r 10 j iT99�..Y � y►�..>,.��,. i CNA INO.RF PLAN COM111S31011 tECOebEt i CERTIFICATE 10^'1 I 1 NATE OF'ILILIMS CO m 1 Tl./ai I t lar � C9YN1T K U•IAOE;>1! UT%?.IT`f a.•.fn- . R6� REgt�ER s OFfIlE his. ►41s1r rA9•FIIED:FWt•> 11Tdf ' f" "Iwn• + s&rwz w ,\ _ F io IM01=��+tifORFEAI)F•IM-TETE E S DAT-OF 3A9z ( 1IapEC�'M t ls� 1?a.d s�eINIeT D ...... \` ;PLATS.p.► L o - CAOCtE-gX..AND•IMI:B�COROD.111:OOtH( M a M 1 / \ MCERIFICA STREET :STU ►u►ess os GOswMNtrieleAo E.O:ILCN01i :>t1RTETORTE COhM'iT•Of:Nl,R7bt�A! •- _ Titlti:q:T0-C6TtiFT;TiAT Ir UOLiN'te.liiRT�atdillQ:LAS-.1 t a1r1�Ne:tAiE- ElaM0. M1>iIBNeT7tE;FRNfBIY:A= :��AOW'F: IOd1;1�Tri:�i.►UT.''I�tiCa.4?l�AaCOfIETT.REI�tjit0l/:Af.u1M�11R!'11r..•Yi3l�OlT>Rii1M::-$L . 01iL :AN:OiQM+ItifEET: B�B11f.�i1 :nl1�F._-a.;f►mEO:CwTtA.TUT•'ALL KNUT100i:XIIAMD:IT,r11E TiLLM.M110 R 11!4 TA:Fu7s fi 14T101�.aTE.�#;1 SUIT*, IO:TEk IM OF''ltls< KAT. **11 �.� •NTS .tAf:N11RBr AN'>EAt aT 00111EBii:�I1ME,�iLitlNt;:TRIf_: O�iR VGJl9E ._ _ ILLI 1S•-Wllf�'•��7EfOti• ERS 814 OGDEN "E•- =DOWNERS GROVE. ILL. { 9 4 ' Ordinance No. J- 0(i45 An Ordinance Granting a Variation Relative to Required Front Yard* Page two w Section 4: That thin Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval pursuant to law. PASSED THIS 12th day of Tilly , 1988. Trustees Bartecki , Busby, 1mric,,Maher, Rush and Winters Ayes: None Nays: Absent: None APPROVED THIS 12th day of July , :Vil a Presi ent ATTEST: Village Clerk Approved to Form: Vil age Attorney �I fI i Published at+ ap*x� iX rot Published