The URL can be used to link to this page

S-726 - 02/11/1992 - SPECIAL USE - Ordinances ORDINANCE S- 726 AN. ORDINANCE GRANTING A FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS (615 West 22nd Street) WHEREAS, the owner of certain property described herein has petitioned the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, for a Flood Plain Special Use Permit under Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, relating to flood plain and wetland regulations; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such petition has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village on November 5, 1991, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Oak Brook has submitted its recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have recommended approval of the petition since the proposed use is consistent with the best use of the flood plain; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the proposed use satisfies the requirements of and is consistent with each of the factors set forth in Section 10-34(c) of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook deem the passage of this ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, a Flood Plain Special Use Permit is hereby granted to allow regrading of the Salt Creek flood plain, said property being legally described as: Ordinance S- 726 Granting a Flood Plain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street Page 2 That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, DuPage County, Illinois, being more fully described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence South 890 36' 25" West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, said line also being the center line of 22nd Street, a distance of 1185.0 feet; thence North 010, 231 35" West a distance of 85.37 feet to a point on the North right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) said point also being on the Westerly line of a dedicated road, recorded March 21, 1962 as Document No. R62-7996; thence continuing North O°, 23' 35" West, along the Westerly line of said dedicated road, a distance of 50.02 feet; thence North 880 57' 39" West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to, the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) a distance of 387.52 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing North 88° 57' 39" West along the previously described line a distance of 197.40 feet; thence South 89° 36' 25" West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street a distance of 46.26 feet; thence North 010 23' 35" West a distance of 214.26 feet; thence North 520 43' 55" East a distance of 304.52 feet; thence South 00 43' 35" East a distance of 401.92 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage County, IL. Permanent Parcel No. 06-24-307-010. Section 3: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance is expressly subject to the following conditions: A. That maintenance responsibility lies upon the property owner, its successors and assigns ("property owner") ; B. That in the event the property owner defaults in its maintenance responsibility, the Village of Oak Brook will perform the necessary maintenance; C. That the property owner grant the Village the right to enter upon the property and perform the necessary maintenance; and D. That the cost of all maintenance work performed by the Village shall be paid by the property owner. E. That the property owner prepare and execute an agreement incorporating the conditions set forth herein prior to any work being done at the property. The Village shall record the agreement at the property owner's expense. Section 4: That this special use permit is granted subject to the further condition that all applicable permits be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies, and that improvements constructed on the subject property be constructed in accordance with the Building Code and in accordance with the requirements for flood resistent construction as set forth in Section 2102.0 of the BOCA National Building Code. I Ordinance S-726 Granting a Flood. Plain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street Page 3 Section 5: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance be further expressly subject to the condition that all land modifications on the subject property be completed on or before February 11, 1996 in substantial conformity with the Site Floodproofing & Restoration Plan prepared by Lindley & Sons, Inc. as last revised January 22, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. If the property owner fails to meet the conditions of this section, this special use permit shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. Section 6: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after passage and approval pursuant to law. PASSED THIS 11th day of February , 1992. Ayes: Trustees Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters Nays: None Absent: Trustee Krafthefer Abstain: Trustee Bartecki APPROVED THIS 11th day of February . 1992• Village President ATTEST: illage Clerk Approved as to Form: Village Attorney Published Date Paper Not Published XX aed.ord i G� �OF Oqk e A cFCOUN'�• I VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 ` 708 990-3000 March 16, 1992 1. Mr. Thomas Schelewitz Associated Equipment Distributors 615 West 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL 60521 Dear Tom: Enclosed is a copy of the recorded document - Ordinance S-726 - pertaining to your Flood Plain Special Use. k Sincerely, i-6;4_4 Thomas R. Haw Director of Code Enforcement G t cc: Tom Hawk Address File r. it i i a f t y 1 AE02.LET t Er } R92 -- 0251f0de 92 FEB 13 Phi 1= 15 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) RECORDER " )9J.PAGE COUNTY COUNTIES OF COOK $ DU PAGE) I , Linda K. Gonnella , do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the annexed document is a - true and correct copy of ORDINANCE S-726 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF i THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS (615 West 22nd Street) I ' I I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same . I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the re- cords , Journals , entries , resolutions , ordinances , and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 12th day of February 19 92 Vi1!aee__C'1erk !-`0A,r,he ViiYage o Oak Brook , Dr "y$ Coo Counties , Illinois_. At `.f Coll, 15 /05 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS. COUNTIES OF COOK $ DU PAGE) ;i !3 I , Linda K. Gonnella , do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Village Clerk of the Village of :3 Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . i I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the annexed document is a - true and correct copy of ORDINANCE S-726 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS (615 West 22nd Street) c. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document , of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same . I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the re- cords , Journals , entries , resolutions , ordinances , and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a, affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 12th day of February , 19 92 Viliagle Clerk of the Village o Oak Brook, DuPage & Cook Counties , Illinois . i I :i ORDINANCE S- 726 -6 AN. ORDINANCE GRANTING A FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS r` (615 West 22nd Street) "i WHEREAS, the owner of certain property described herein has petitioned the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, for a Flood Plain Special Use Permit under Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, relating to flood plain and wetland regulations; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such petition has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village on November 5, 1991, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Oak Brook has submitted its recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have recommended approval of the petition since the proposed use is consistent with j the best use of the flood plain; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the proposed use satisfies the requirements of and is consistent with each of the factors set forth in Section 10-34(c) of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook deem the passage of this ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, a Flood Plain Special Use Permit is hereby granted to allow regrading of the Salt Creek flood plain, said property being legally described as: �d� • • Ordinance S- Granting a F1 Plain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street Page 2 That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, DuPage County, Illinois, being more fully described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence South 890 36' 25" West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, said line also being the center line of 22nd Street, a distance of 1185.0 feet; thence North 00, 23' 35" West a distance of 85.37 feet to a point on the North right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) said point also being on the Westerly line of a dedicated road, recorded March 21, 1962 as Document No. R62-7996; thence continuing North 0°, 23' 35" West, along the Westerly line of said dedicated road, a distance of 50.02 feet; thence North 880 57' 39" West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to, the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) a distance of 387.52 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing North 88° 57' 39" West along the previously described line a distance of 197.40 feet; thence South 89° 36' 25" West along a line which is 510.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street a distance of 46.26 feet; thence North 00 23' 35" West a distance of 214.26 feet; thence North 520 43' 55" East a distance of 304.52 feet; thence South 00 43' 35" East a distance of 401.92 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage County, IL. Permanent Parcel No. 06-24-307-010. Section 3: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance is expressly subject to the following conditions: A. That maintenance responsibility lies upon the property owner, its successors and assigns ("property owner") ; B. That in the event the property owner defaults in its maintenance responsibility, the Village of Oak Brook will perform the necessary maintenance; C. That the property owner grant the Village the right to enter upon the property and perform the necessary maintenance; and D. That the cost of all maintenance work performed by the Village shall be paid by the property owner. E. That the property owner prepare and execute an agreement incorporating the conditions set forth herein prior to any work being done at the property. The Village shall record the agreement at the property owner's expense. Section 4: That this special use permit is granted subject to the further condition that all applicable permits be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies, and that improvements constructed on the subject property be constructed in accordance with the Building Code and in accordance with the requirements for flood resistent construction as set forth in Section 2102.0 of the BOCA National Building Code. 9q ordinance S46 Granting a Flood Plain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street ggN Page 3 ' i Section 5: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this ordinance be further expressly subject to the condition that all land modifications on the subject property be completed on or before February 11, 1996 in substantial conformity with the Site Floodproofing & Restoration Plan prepared by Lindley & Sons, Inc. as last revised January 22, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. If the property owner fails to meet the conditions of this section, this special use permit shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. Section 6: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after passage and approval pursuant to law. jPASSED THIS 11th day of February , 1992. J Ayes: Trustees Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters Nays: None Absent: Trustee Krafthefer Abstain: Trustee Bartecki APPROVED THIS 11th day of February , 1992. j Village President '! ATTEST: 7L-4 �"rVillage Clerk Approved as to Form: i I Village Attorney Published Date Paper Not Published XX aed.ord PREPARED BY: RETURN TO: Richard A. Martens, Village Attorney Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement Village of Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 9� G�OF OqK 6 • vP i'+r•; 90� 7 b ECOUN�y VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 January 15 , 1992 708 990-3000 1 Mr . William T. Boyd, Civil Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources 201 West Center Court Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 1 i e RE: Flood Plain Special Use - AED I Dear Bill : In a telephone conversation we had on December 3 , 1991 , 1 asked you specifically what Item No. 4 in your November 1 , 1991 letter meant . You replied that you did not have it formally defined, but it would include such things as making sure the berm remains structurally sound, make sure f that the floodway would not be overgrown with vegetation , removal of garbage and debris , etc . Since it appears that this item is of some concern to the Village of Oak Brook since we are being asked to do something, I would appreciate your formal response and explanation to what 'i that point means . As you know, as of this date, I do not feel that it is appropriate for the Village of Oak Brook to agree to do anything on private property which it approves subject to an application from a private property owner . Your requirement No . 708 . 80(a) (4 ) of your department ' s rules for floodway construction states that the unit of local government must assume responsibility to operate and maintain any modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway. It appears to me that requiring a local government to do this , based upon a private property application, is inappropriate. I Would you be so kind as to formally respond to my question of how you interpret the definition of this rule and exactly what the Village of Oak ' Brook is expected to do. 97 i • Mr . William Boyd January 15 , 1992 Page 2 f i I Our Village Board is scheduled to hear this petition at its meeting of { January 28 , 1992 . Your quick response to my request would be very much appreciated. i Sinc ly, Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg cc : Toni Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement Bill Lindley, Lindley & Sons , Inc. BOYD1-15 .j� I } 7f 4 , I i LIN&Y SONS, INC. 9200 South Kingery Road Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-6848 (708) 325-8190 Fax: (708) 325-8643 Illinois Department of Transportation U. S. Corps of Engineers Division of Water Resources Chicago District 201 West Center Court 111 North Canal Street Schaumburg, IL 60196-1096 Chicago, IL 60604-1797 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Illinois Department of Conservation 2200 Churchill Road 524 South Second Street, Room 310 Springfield, IL 62794-9276 Springfield, IL 62701-1787 January 8, 1992 Re: Associated Equipment Distributors Oak Brook, Illinois i Gentlemen: Attached, you will find a revised submittal document dated January 7, 1992, for the proposed construction in the floodway of Salt Creek to partially protect property now occupied by '! Associated Equipment Distributors (AED). Since substantial alterations were required to jl accommodate the needs of the Village of Oakbrook's advisory commissions, a completely revised y submittal is being provided. This will allow you to destroy the previous application that was dated August 20, 1991, since all data contained therein is no longer applicable. These substantive changes now provide a reduced degree of protection that limits the encroachment of floodwater from Salt Creek to an elevation of 655.3, which is lower than the ppro ected 10-year floodstage. A temporary berm section provided by sandbags will be utilized to ;I build up the level of the Hunter Drive pavement on an as needed basis. As of this date, a recommendation for approval, subject to the agreement of the Village of Oakbrook Engineer and the Illinois Department of Transportation/Division of Water Resources (IDOT/DWR), has been provided by the Village of Oakbrook Zoning Board and Plan Commission, with review by the Village Board pending this month. Your continued attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 1 LINDLEY & SONS, INC. i enclosure cc: Associated Equipment Distributors -Tom Schelewitz Village of Oak Brook i - Dale Durfey -Tom Hawk. RWL/sg R. W. Lindley, P.E. CIVIL ENGINEERING • DRAINAGE/STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SITE PLANNING/DESIGN• LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 0 LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW•FORENSIC ENGINEERING 95 GEpF OAAr MY FCOUN�� j VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 i January 8 , 1992 708 990-3000 Mr . Tony Charleton DuPage County Department of Environmental Concerns 421 N. County Farm Road Wheaton, Illinois 60189 RE: Flood Plain Special Use - AED Dear Tony: Thank you and Rob Covey for taking the time to meet with myself and the applicant for the above stated project Tuesday, January 7 , 1992 . It is my understanding that we concluded that some of the items within your December 2 , 1991 letter have been done, some items won ' t apply until after February 15 , 1992 , and some items remain to be accomplished. Bill Lindley stated that he would send you directly a copy of the newly revised plans and booklet for your further review. The Village of Oak Brook and the applicant would very much appreciate your quick review of this material when you receive it and your quick response. This item is being placed before our Village Board for their consideration on January 28th. I would need your comments by no later than noon January 21 , 1992 in order to review them and include them within the Board packet . I Thank you for your help in reviewing this matter and I look forward to our j continuing good working relationship. Sincer,oqy, Da a L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , V " llage Engineer DLD/etg j cc: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement1 Bill Lindley, Lindley & Sons , Inc . 9� EOF CAAr i �COUNt'�• VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 January 8 , 1992 708 990-3000 1 Dr . Eric Loucks , P.E. Donohue & Associates , Inc. 1501 Woodfield Road Suite 200 East Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 RE: Flood Plain Special Use McDonald' s Autumn Oaks Subdivision Lot 1 Dear Eric: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter dated January 7 , 1992 from David Landeweer to myself along with one ( 1 ) copy of the letter ' s attachments . Since there appears to be a conflict between your compensatory storage volumes and their ' s , would you please review this information and let me know your findings . Perhaps a meeting would be in order with the Bollinger Lach people if discrepancies still exist . Please let me know whether you feel a meeting is in order after you review this information. Since ly, j 1 Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg Attach. cc: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement David Landeweer , Bollinger Lach & Associates 99 Insured, or, if a corporation, its successors by dissolution, merger or con- solidation, against loss or damage not exceeding the amount stated in Schedule A, together with costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay as provided in the Conditions and Stipulations hereof, which the Insured shall sustain by reason of: Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title to the estate or i interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, existing at the date hereof, not shown or referred to in Schedule B or excluded from coverage in Schedule B or in the Conditions and Stipulations; all subject, however, to the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed, which Conditions and Stipulations together with Schedules A and B, are hereby made a part of this policy; all as of the date of this policy. In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. President. i ATTEST: Secretary. �; pRPORgTf -0 1 U .0 33AL +IT ..........s... Countersigne Authorized Signatory ' IMPORTANT This policy necessarily relates solely to the title as of the date of the policy. In order that a purchaser of the real estate described herein may be insured against defects, liens or encum- brances, this policy should be reissued in the name of such purchaser. a�, 1. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this schedule covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE TITLE 2. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in the Insured. 3. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24 Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, DuPage County Illinois, being more fully described as follows : Commencing at the Southeast Corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds, West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of 8aid ' Section 24, said line also being the center line of 22nd Street a distance of 1185.0 feet; thence North 0 degrees 23, minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 85.37 feet to a point on the North right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak road) said point also being on the Westerly line of a dedicated road, recorded March 21, 1962 as document Number R62-7996; thence continuing North 0 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds West, along the Westerly line of said dedicated road, a distance of 50. 02 feet; thence North 88 dgrees 57_minutes 39 seconds West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to, . the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) a distance of 387.52 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing North 88 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds West along the previously described line a distance of 197.40 feet; thEnce South 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds West along a line which is 90.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of 22nd street a distance of 46. 26 feet; thence North 0 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 214. 26 feet; thence North 52 degrees 43 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 304.52 feet; . thence South 0 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 401. 92 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage SCHEDULE B County Illinois This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: (NOTE: There are no items numbered 1, 2 and 3 under the Special Exceptions of Schedule B.) Special Exceptions: 4. This policy should not be construed as insuring access to the premises in question by means of the easement recorded as document R62-32394 lying South and adjoining premises,in question. 5. Grant dated September 5, 1962 and recorded September 13, 1962 as document R62-32393 from M-1 Incorporated a corporation of Illinois to Associated Equipment Distributors a not-for-profit corporation of Illinois of a perpetual but non-exclusive right and easement, appurtenant to have surface waters flow or pass from premises in question onto, over, and across premises West and adjoining premises in question to the waters of Salt Creek. (FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS, SEE RECORD) 6. Easement for underground public utilities twenty feet in Width, the center line of which easement is the Westerly and North Westerly lines of the premises in question as contained in Warranty Deed from M-1 Inc. to associated Equipment Distributors recorded September 13, 1962 as document R62-32392. (Affects the Westerly 10 feet and the North Westerly 10 feet) 9� i I - 4 i` F F� f F i' General Exceptions: I' Matters Not 1. The following matters which are not of record as of the date of this policy are not insured against: (a) rights or claims of of Record. parties in possession not shown of record; (b) encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises; (c) easements and claims of easement not shown of record; (d) mechanics' or materialmen's liens or other statutory liens for labor or material not shown of record; (e) taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. Marital 2. Rights of dower, homestead or other marital rights of the spouse, if any, of any individual insured. Rights. Conditions and Stipulations. See reverse side hereof. ATA Owners— Form A. _ _ �It(IIL`J or Y 7 u„uc• , .., a.. .a �,.c rue• .,r y..0 abutting owners for access to one of sue streets or hig�iways, un- Ity of any mortgage or dee of trust shown or referred to )n less otherwise excepted or excluded her (e) defects. (lens. en- Schedule B hereof or any mortgage or deed of or hereafter exe- cumbrances, adverse claims against the title as Insured or other cuted by the Insured which Is a charge or lien on the land described matters (1) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured' or referred to.in Schedule A. or (2) known to the Insured either at the date of this policy or at the date such Insured acquired an estate or interest insured by this Coinsurance 8. (a) In the event that a partial loss occurs after an policy and not shown by the public records, unless disclosure there- and alteration or Improvement subsequent to the date of of in writing by the Insured shall have been made to the Company Apportionment this policy, and only in that event, the Insured be- prior to the date of this policy; or (3) resulting in no loss to the comes a coinsurer to the extent hereinafter set forth. Insured; or (4) attaching or created subsequent to the date hereof; If the cost of the alteration or Improvement exceeds twenty per (fl loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the In- centum of the amount of this policy, such proportion only of any sured were a purchaser for value without knowledge. partial loss established shall a borne by the Company as one E=d twenty per centum of the amount of this policy bears to Defense and 3. la) The Company. at its own cost and without un- the sum of the amount of this policy and the amount expended for Prosecution of due delay.shall provide for the defense of the Insured the alteration or improvement. The foregoing provisions shall not Actions-Notice in all litigation consisting of actions or proceedings apply to costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the Company In of Claim to be commenced against the Insured, which litigation 1srosecuting or providing for the defense of actions or proceedings In Given by the founded upon n defect., lien or encumbrance insured behalf of the Insured pursuant to the terms of this policy or to costs Insured against by ibis policy. and may pursue such Iltiganon imposed on the Insured in such actions or proceedings,and shall not to final determination in the court of last resort. (b) apply to losses which do not exceed, in the aggregate, an amount In case any such action or proceeding shall be begun, or defense in- equal to one per centum of the face amount of this policy.Provided, terposed,or in case knowledge shall come to the Insured of any claim however, that the foregoing coinsurance provisions shall not apply of title or interest which is adverse to the title as insured, or which to any loss if, at the time of the occurrence of such loss, the then might cause loss or damage for which the Company shall or may be value of the premises, as so improved, does not exceed the amount liable by virtue of this policy, lite Insured shall notify the Company of this policy. thereof in writing. If such notice shall not be given to the Company (b) If the land described or referred to in Schedule A Is divisible within ten days of the receipt of process or pleadings or if the In- Into separate and noncontiguous parcels, or If contiguous and such sured shall not, in writing, promptly notify the Company of any parcels are not used as one single site, andd-a loss Is established defect, lien or encumbrance insured against which shall come to affecting one or more of said parcels but not all, the loss shall be the knowledge of the Insured, then all liability of the Company In computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the face amount of regard to the subject matter of such action, proceeding or matter this policy was divided pro rate as to the value on the date of this shall cease and terminate; provided, however, that failure to notify policy of each separate independent parcel to the whole, exclusive shall In no case prejudice the claim of any Insured unless the Com- of any Improvements made subsequent to the date of this policyy pany shall be actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to the extent of such prejudice. (c) The Company shall have the right each such parcel by the Company and the Insured at the time of at Its own cost to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding the Issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement herein or do any other act which In its opinion may be necessary or de- or by an endorsement attached hereto. sirable to establish the title as insured; and the Company may take any approprlate action under the terms of this policy whether or Subro ation u on 9. Whenever the Com not It shall be liable thereunder and shall not thereby concede 9 P Company shall have settled a liability or waive any provision of this policy. (d) In all cases where Payment or claim under this policy, all right of subrogation this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or pro- Settlement shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of vide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the Insured shall the Insured, and It shall be subrogated to and be secure to It the right to so prosecute or provide defense In such entitled to all rights and remedies which the Insured would have action or proceeding, and all a tpeals therein, and permit It to use, had against any person or property In respect to such claim had this at Its option, the name of the 4nsured for such purpose. Whenever policy not been issued. II the payymeat does not cover the loss of requested by the Company the Insured shall give the Company all the Insured, the Company shall be subrogated to such rights and assistance in any such action or proceeding, in effecting settlement, remedies in the proportion which said payment bears to the amount securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or defending of said loss. If loss should result from any act of the Insured, such such action or proceeding, and the Company shall reimburse the act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall Insured for any expense so incurred. be required to pay only that part of any losses Insured against hereunder which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Com- Notice of toss- 4. In addition to the notices required under para- pany by reason of the impairment of the right of subrogation. The Limitation graph 3(b), a statement In writing of any loss or IInured if requested by the Company,shall transfer to the Company of Action damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable all hts and remedies against any person or property necessary in under this policy shall be furnished to the Company orderrigto perfect such right of subrogation, and shall permit the within sixty days after such loss or damage shall have been deter- Company to use the name of the Insured In any transaction or litl- mined and no right of action shall accrue to the Insured under this gation involving such rights or remedies. Fgpolicy until thirty days after such statement shall have been furn- ed, and no recovery shall be had by the Insured under this policy Policy Entire 10.Any action or actions or rights of action that the In- unless action shall be commenced thereon within five years after Contract sured may have or may.bring against the Company arcs- expiration of said thirty day period. Failure to furnish such state- Ing out of the status of the title Insured herein must be ment of loss or damage, or to commence such action within the time based on the provisions of this policy. No provision or condition of hereinbefore specified, shall be a conclusive bar against maintenance this policy can be waived or changed except by writing endorsed by the Insured of any action under this policy. hereon or attached hereto signed by the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary or other validating officer of Option to Pay, 5. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle the Company. Settle or or compromise for or in the name of the Insured any Compromise claim Insured against or to pay the full amount of Notices, 11. All notices required to be given the Comppany and Claims this policy and such payment or tender of payment, Where Sent any statement In writing required to be f=hed the together with all costs, attorneys' fees and expenses Company shall be addressed to It at Its main office. Form 863 12-61 O y V ti O Fr O UoJ O Cn a w U U i • I � ; C aOar'g:y Yks�ue4 Ntr VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 - 2255 ;"ti 99 - 10 February 19 , 1992 Mr. Tom Schelewitz ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS 615 West 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL 60521 Dear Mr. Schelewitz : The ordinance granting the Flood Plain Special Use for your property was approved by the Board of Trustees on February 11, 1992 . The Ordinance number is 5-726. The ordinance was filed with the Recorder of Deeds on January 13, 1992 . The Document number is R92-025400. You will be billed the $15. 00 filing fee and we will send you a copy of the recorded document when we receive it back from the Recorder of Deeds. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Thomas R. wk Director of Code Enforcement cc: all files AEDI AET GE OF 04Ir e FCOUNS�• VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 - 2255 99 . 3000 February 18 , 1992 MEMO TO: Stephen Berley Dick Martens Robert Nielsen Mike Miranda Linda Gonnella Bruce Kapff Dale Durfey FROM: Thomas Hawk�o SUBJECT: Recording of Documents The following documents were filed with the Rocorder of Deeds of February 13 , 1992 : 1) Oak Brook Park District - Flood Plain Special Use - 1425 Kensington - Ordinance #S-725 - Document #R92-025401. V--"*'�2) Associated Equipment Distributors - Flood Plain Special Use - 615 22nd Street - Ordinance #5-726 - Document 4R92-025400. 3) McDonald ' s / Oak Brook Park District - Flood Plain Special Use - 1315 Kensington Road - Ordinance #S-727 - Document #R92- 025402 . RCDGI.MEM 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. RECOMMENDATION - RYS -- REAR YARD FENCE HEIGHT VARIATION (2421 35th 2421 35th ST. Street) : REAR YARD FENCE HEIGHT Applicant requested to table the application for a fence variation to the VARIATION February 25, 1992 Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees. Trustee Skinner moved to table the requested fence variation application to the Regular Meeting of February 25, 1992. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. B. RECOMMENDATION - OAK BROOK PARK DISTRICT COMMUNITY CENTMR (1425 Kensincton1425 KENSI\G" Road Site) - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE: O.B.PK.DIST. FPSU The Oak Brook Park District requests a Flood Plain Special Use; withdrawal of the proposed Text Amendment and Special Use regarding the proposed Community Center. Trustee Skinner moved to direct the Village Attorney to draft an ordinance relative to the requested Flood Plain Special Use subject to the removal of the Community Center from the Site Plan and final engineering approval by Village Engineer Durfey. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6-Trustees Bartecki, Krafthefer, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters. Nays: 0-None. Absent: 0-None. Motion carried. C. RECOMMENDATION - ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS (AED) FIa0OD PLAIN 615 22nd ST. SPECIAL USE (615 22nd Street): FPSU Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals have recommended approval of this requested Flood Plain Special Use subject to the following conditions: 1) final engineering approval; 2) permits from all other required regulatory agencies such as IDOT-DWR and the Corps of Engineers; and 3) resolution of the maintenance requirement issue raised by IDOT-DWR. Trustee Skinner moved to direct the Village Attorney to draft an ordinance relative to the requested Flood Plain Special Use subject to the following maintenance requirements: 1) maintenance will be the responsibility of the property owner; 2) in the event the property owner defaults in its maintenance responsibility, the Village of Oak Brock will perform the necessary maintenance; 3) language granting the Village the right to enter upon the property and perform the necessary maintenance; and 4) the cost of all maintenance work performed by the Village shall be paid by the property owner. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. Trustee Bartecki stated that because he was a member of AED, he would abstain from voting. Roll Call Vote: VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -4- January 28, 1992 eSV • STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS. COUNTIES OF COOK & DU PAGE) I , Linda K. Gonnella do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook , DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the annexed document is a • true and correct copy of ORDINANCE S-726 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS (615 West 22nd Street) I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document , of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same . I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the re- cords , Journals , entries , resolutions , ordinances , and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties , Illinois . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 12th day of February , 19 92 Iiia e Clerk of the Village o Oak Brook, DuPage F, Cook Counties , Illinois . Yj ORDINANCE S- 726 AN. ORDINANCE GRANTING A FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10-34 OF THE CODS OF ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAR BROOK, n.T•INOIS (615 West 22nd Street) WHEREAS, the owner of certain property described herein has petitioned the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, for a Flood Plain Special Use Permit under Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, relating to flood plain and wetland regulations; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such petition has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village on November 5, 1991, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Oak Brook has submitted Its recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have recommended approval of the petition since the proposed use is consistent with the best use of the flood plain; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, the proposed use satisfies the requirements of and is consistent with each of the factors set forth in Section 10-34(c) of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook deem the passage of this ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 10-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, a Flood Plain Special Use Permit is hereby granted to allow regrading of the Salt Creek flood plain, said property being legally described as: Ordinance S- 7 Granting a Floo ain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street Page 2 That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, DuPage County, Illinois, being more fully described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence South 890 36' 25" West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, said line also being the center line of 22nd Street, a distance of 1185.0 feet; thence North 00, 23' 35" West a distance of 85.37 feet to a point on the North right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) said point also being on the westerly line of a dedicated road, recorded March 21, 1962 as Document No. R62-7996; thence continuing North 0° , 23' 35" West, along the Westerly line of said dedicated road, a distance of 50.02 feet; thence North 880 57' 39" West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to, the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street (Cermak Road) a distance of 387.52 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing North 88° 57' 39" West along the previously described line a distance of 197.40 feet; thence South 89° 36' 25" West along a line which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street a distance of 46.26 feet; thence North 0° 23' 35" West a distance of 214.26 feet; thence North 52° 43' 55" East a distance of 304.52 feet; thence South 0° 43' 35" East a distance of 401.92 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage County, IL. Permanent Parcel No. 06-24-307-010. Section 3: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance is expressly subject to the following conditions: A. That maintenance responsibility lies upon the property owner, its successors and assigns ("property owner"); B. That in the event the property owner defaults in its maintenance responsibility, the Village of Oak Brook will perform the necessary maintenance; C. That the property owner grant the Village the right to enter upon the property and perform the necessary maintenance; and D. That the cost of all maintenance work performed by the Village shall be paid by the property owner. E. That the property owner prepare and execute an agreement Incorporating the conditions set forth herein prior to any work being done at the property. The Village shall record the agreement at the property owner's expense. Section 4: That this special use permit is granted subject to the further condition that all applicable permits be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies, and that improvements constructed on the subject property be constructed in accordance with the Building Code and in accordance with the requirements for flood resistent construction as set forth in Section 2102.0 of the BOCA National Building Code. P3 Ordinance S-_72�61A ., Granting a Floodplain Special Use 615 West 22nd Street Page 3 Section 5: That the special use permit herein granted in Section 2 of this ordinance be further expressly subject to the condition that all land modifications on the subject property be completed on or before February 11, 1996 in substantial conformity with the Site Floodproofing & Restoration Plan prepared by Lindley & Sons, Inc. as last revised January 22, 1992, incorporated herein by reference. If the property owner fails to meet the conditions of this section, this special use permit shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. Section 6: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after passage and approval pursuant to law. PASSED THIS 11th day of February , 1992. Ayes: Trustees Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters Nays: None Absent: Trustee Krafthefer Abstain: Trustee Bartecki APPROVED THIS 11th day of February , 1992. Village President ATTEST: - �7 _/ �_44 7�% �� c/l4L Cti '/" ) —Village Clerk Approved as to Form: a, Village Attorney Published Date Paper Not Published XX aed.ord PREPARED BY: RETURN TO: Richard A. Martens, Village Attorney Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement Village of Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 GE OF Oqk 8 P Ap 40 G o o `2 f COON-t VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 February 11 , 1992 708 990.3000 Mr . William T. Boyd . Civil Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources 201 West Center Court Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 RE: Flood Plain Special Use - ,QED Dear Bill : Since my letter to you of January 15 , 1992 , we have discussed by telephone on a couple of occasions , my request for your written definition of a rule on exactly what the Village of Oak Brook is expected to do. Unfortunately, I have not received your written response. Your written response is very important not only for this project , but for future projects . Since your rule is a written rule , the Village would very much appreciate your written explanation and definition. Please let me know in writing your conclusions as soon as possible. Since ,y-, Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. /Village Engineer DLD/etg cc: Tom Hawk. Director of Code Enforcement Bill Lindley, Lindley & Sons , Inc . t DuPage County f i i' DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 421 N.COUNTY FARM ROADW `. WHEATON,INOIS 60187 f$ t1`I, 708-682-7130 Qp n� ; FEB ( 0 1992 February 7, 1992 Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Village Engineer Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521-2255 RE: AED Berm Proposal 615 Hunter Drive Dear Dale: This letter is in response to our phone conversation of February 4 , 1992 . Based on my letter of January 22 , 1992 there were still several items left to be discussed. Item #1 of that letter, which pertained to water surface elevations and creek velocities, has been completed. The revised cross-sections were input into the Dupage County Lower Salt Creek FEQ model and runs were made for both Existing and Proposed conditions. Comparisons were made for the 5-year, 10-year, and 25-year design events, and also for the 1987 historical event. The results of these model runs showed no increases in water surface elevations or creek velocities upstream, downstream, or through the project site. Item #2 was not addressed on the revised submittal by Lindley and Sons, Inc. No erosion control or restoration plans concerning ' the riparian environment were submitted. Natural vegetation should be replaced in the riparian environment if it is destroyed, and replacement vegetation should be capable of withstanding frequent and extended inundation. Item #4 was only partially completed. According to the Ordinance, backup power should be self-sufficient, not requiring ,' human intervention. Insufficient details were given on the revised plans to determine if this is true. �U Item #5 was partially addressed on the revised plans. Although compensatory storage was provided at a ratio greater than 1. 5: 1, the Ordinance will require the compensatory storage to be provided at the same incremental elevation as the displaced storage. On page E78 of the Draft Guidance Document (see attached) , four items are listed which can achieve equivalency of displaced storage and compensatory storage. Also, hydrology records should be checked to determine if the normal water• „p elevation noted on the plans is accurate. If conditions had been `C' dry prior to the survey date, 'then the normal water elevation may(A be higher. If you have any further questions or comments, I may be reached at 682-7130 between 8: 00 and 4 :.30. Sincerely, Robert A. Covey Civil Engineer cc: Anthony J. Charlton, P. E. , Environmental Concerns Jonathon P. Steffen, P.E. , Environmental Concerns 79 GUIDANCE (left column) COMMENTARY (right column) plain. Grading in special management areas shall be done in such a manner that the existing flood plain storage is maintained at all times" Sec. 15-133.8. IDOT/DWR further requires that compensatory storage be: • Hydraulically equivalent to that displaced • Open and freely draining, and • Opposite and adjacent to the development site displacing storage The Ordinance requires compensatory storage any time fill, structures, or other materials will occupy or enclose space normally occupied by flood waters during the base flood condition (the only exception is for floodproofing of existing structures). The required compensatory storage volume is calculated by measuring the planned volume of fill,structure,or other material below the base flood elevation, plus any enclosed space that excludes access of future floodwaters,and multiplying by 1.5. The compensatory storage shall be provided at about the same elevation and flood volume frequency as the flood storage volume displaced so it will be filled and emptied with flood waters during similar flood conditions. Equivalency of flood frequency elevation and flood storage displacement can be achieved by ensuring that: 1. Flood waters have access to the compensatory volume when they reach the elevation frequency that would have flooded the lower portions of the displaced flood storage volume,and 2. The entire compensatory flood storage volume would be filled if flood waters reached the base flood elevation, and 3. All points on the stage-frequency-volume curve (see Example E-5) for the compensatory flood storage volume have greater volume for each stage-frequency than that on the stage-frequency-volume curve for the displaced flood storage, and 4. The compensatory flood storage volume would dewater in approximately the same time period as the flood recession. Compensatory flood storage meeting the Ordinance criteria must be operational before the fill,structure,or other materials displace the historic flood storage volume to avoid the risk of increased flood damage in the interim. The development plan for the flood plain, therefore, shall show sequential scheduling with construction of the compensatory storage volume complete E-78 December 30, 1991 DuPage County DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ✓ 421 N.COUNTY FARM ROAD WHEATON,ILLINOIS 60187 1 708-682-7130 A. January 22 , 1992 toy RoK!AZ N Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Village Engineer Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road �•�� ! Oak Brook, IL 60521-2255 r•�vL RE: AED Berm Proposal 615 Hunter Drive Dear Dale: This letter is in response to a permit application submitted by Lindley and Sons, Inc. for construction in the floodway of Salt Creek. The proposed project consists of a berm to be constructed along the east bank of the creek and is intended to protect parking and landscaping on the site of Associated Equipment Distributors. The proposed site plan was checked with its conformance to the new Dupage County Stormwater and Flood Plain Ordinance. The following list is in response to the January 7 meeting on this project and the subsequent resubmittal by Lindley and Sons, Inc. This list addresses each point made in my December 2 letter and the subsequent project meeting on January 7 . 1. Does not meet Article 9 , Section 15-112 , #1, Page 36 (DCSFPO) : DuPage County has input the revised cross-sections into the Lower Salt Creek FEQ model and completed runs for both the Existing and Proposed conditions. Model runs were made for the 2-year, 10-year, and 25-year design events for each of the conditions. The 1987 storm event will be run overnight tonight. These results will be available tomorrow. 2 . Does not meet Article 9 , Section 15-115, #2d, Page 41: The developer still has not addressed the riparian environment issue. 3 . Does meet Article 10, Section 15-132 , #1, Page 45: The developer has identified the existing and proposed floodway boundary on the revised plans. 4 . Does meet Article 10 , Section 15-133 , #7 , Page 47 : The developer has noted on the revised plans that backup power is available for the pumps during times of electrical failure. 77 5 . Does meet Article 10, Section 15-133 , #8, Page 47 : The developer does provide compensatory storage at a ratio of 1. 5: 1. However, the compensatory storage is not provided at the same incremental elevation as the displaced storage. Another item of concern on the proposed plan is that the proposed 649 elevation should be darkened. If the existing 649 elevation is not changing, a concern exists that the comensatory storage may be filled with normal flows for extended periods of time, and therefore not available for flood flows during heavy rains. 6. Does not meet Article 10, Section 15-134 , #1, Page 50: Any developer proposing development in or near mapped wetland areas shall identify the boundaries, extent, and quality of all wetland areas on the subject property, or note that there is none located nearby. 7 . The following items were lacking detail or not included in the report and could not be reviewed per Article 11, Section 15- 149 , Page 58 : #lb - Site Runoff Calculations #lc - Site Runoff Storage Calculations #ld - Schedule of Implementation #le - Information of Off-Site Conditions #lf - Sediment/Erosion Control Plan #lg - Riparian Environment Submittal These are items which should be addressed after February 15. 8 . All proposed slopes of the proposed cross-sections are acceptable. 9 . Top and bottom elevations of the Keystone retaining wall are included in the revised plans. It is still recommended that careful attention be paid to the trees and their root systems in the vicinity of the retaining wall because too much fill placed above the roots would be very harmful . 10 . Alternative landscaping is provided on the revised plans. We appreciate this opportunity to review this permit application. If you have any further comments or questions, I may be reached at 682-7130 between 8 : 00 and 4 : 30. Sincerely, Robert A. Covey Civil Engineer cc: Anthony J. Charlton, P.E. , Environmental Concerns 111. ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DIST ORSA< ED) _ FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE —DP" 'F I Engineer Dale Durfey reported that he had met with Bill Lindley, the engineer for the petitioners, and mem- bers of the county staff; and they had reviewed AED propos9l. Bill Lindley distributed a revised plan based on previous discussions. Engineer Durfey reported, at this point, the plans are in accordance with the Village and County's require- ments, though Engineer Durfey still has to do a final detail examination for any minor problems. The AED discussion was put on hold because of the fact that Bill Lindley was not present at this time. The AED discussion will continue when Bill Lindley is present. IV. RYS VARIATION REQUEST Mr. Rys restated his request for the board and a general discussion ensued. Mr. Rys explained his petition was for a 5 foot fence to extend from the rear of his home to the rear lot line along both sides of his rear yard. The fence would be a an open weaved cyclone fence and would abut with the existing fence which is approximately a 5 foot high fence which is on the adjacent property which is located in Westmont. Mr. Rys's request is to vary the maximum height permitted by the Village of 42 inches and to allow Mr. Rys to construct a 60 inch high fence. Member Martis moved, seconded by Member Martinello, to recommend denial of the request of the 5 foot fence along the sides of the rear yard. This motion was based on the fact that the circumstances are not unique and similar situations do occur in a number of other properties within the Village. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Paul Martis Roy Martinello Elaine Herman Claybourne A. Crouch Nays: Raymond White Motion passed - a recomendation for denial will be reported to the Board of Trustees. V. MC DONALD'S L OAK BROOK PARK DISTRICT _ FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE Attorney Dave Gooder, Engineer Mike Lach, and Ken Pardue were sworn in by Chairman Kenny. Mr. Gooder described the request. His description included the following items: 1) The location and size of the property and the adjacent property uses 2) The request is to modify the floodplain, making the floodplain boundary more or less paralell to South property line, which also runs paralell to Ginger Creek thereby improving the usefulness of the balance of the site and in accordance to the previously approved site development plan. 4) The floodway is not included. 5) Compensatory storage will be provided at a ratio of 1 to 1. 6) There will be no change to the velocities of water movement either within the floodplain or within the floodway. 7) The flood elevation will not be increased. 8) There will be no detrimental effects to any other property owners either upstream or downstream of this request. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- January 7, 1992 ZSA01-92.DOC ' A motion was made by Member He*Zoning seconded by Member Crouch, to table this e and continue this public hearing until the February 4, Board of Appeals meeting. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - Motion passed. III. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORESABED) _ FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE _ CONTINUED At this time Engineer Lindley had arrived at the meeting, so we returned to the AED Flood Plain Special Use. General discussion ensued regarding the plan that had been delivered to the Village today. Again it was restated by both Engineer Lindley and Engineer Durfey that the plans were in compliance with both the County and the Village requirements and any details left should be minor and should be resolvable. Engineer Lindley reviewed the factors pertaining to Flood Plain Special Uses as found on page 635 in the Village Code. His responses were as follows: 1) No danger or increase of danger to life and property due to increase flood heights or velocities caused by this project. 2) No increase of danger of materials being swept onto other lands, either cross stream, upstream, or down stream to the injury of others. 3) No detrimental effects on water supply systems or sanitary systems. 4) This proposal will protect the AED property from damage of storms within the 5 to 10 year range. It will not have the effect of increasing the Likelyhood of damage to other property owners. 5) Not relevant 6) Not relevant 7) The proposal is compatible with the development in the area both present and in the future. 8) The proposal is in accordance with the Village's Flood Plain Management Program and is not in conflict with the comprehensive plan of the Village. 9) Access to the property is via Hunter Drive and 22nd Street and is not impacted. 10) The expected heights, velocities, durations, rate of rise, and sediment transport will not increase. 11) There are no other pertinent factors pertaining to this issue. There were no comments, either pro or con to this project from the public. Member Martinello moved, seconded by Member Crouch, to recommend approval of this Flood Plain Special Use subject to the following conditions: 1) That final engineering approval be obtained. 2) That IDOT permits and any other necessary regulatory agencies permits be obtained. This motion is based on the following findings: 1) That there is a clear hardship to this property in the fact that this property has repeatedly suffered flooding over the past 10 to 12 years. 2) The proposal is in accordance with the purposes of the Village Codes. 3) That this project does not have any detrimental effects that will damage any other property either upstream or downstream. ROLL CALL VOTE: Aye Roy Martinello Claybourne A. Crouch Elaine Herman Paul Martis Raymond White Motion passed. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- January 7, 1992 ZBA01-92.D0C - V LINDLEY SONS, INC. 9200 South Kingery Road 9 Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-6848 (708) 325-8190 Fax: (708) 325-8643 January 20 1992 Toni Schelewitz ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS 615 West 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL 60521 Re: AED Floodplain Special Use Dear Mr. Schelewitz: The Village of Oak Brook scheduled a meeting on Friday, January 17, 1992, for the purpose of reviewing the issue of maintenance of the Salt Creek floodway to meet a condition of a permit from the Illinois Department of Transportation/Division of Water Resources (IDOT/DWR). Dale Durfey, Village Engineer, questions the IDOT/DWR authority to require local municipal a&encies to accept the responsibility for the maintenance of private property when encumbered with a floodway designation. This concept is directly contrary to other requirements that prohibit the use of public funds to maintain privately owned property. (See attached copy of letter to IDOT/DWR.) Review of the Illinois state statutes finds that no specific authority was legislated to IDOT/DWR for this purpose. However, the Rules and Regulations that were adopted by the legislative committee contain a general reference to this issue. These Rules and Regulations were reviewed and approved by a legislative committee of the Illinois General Assembly and, as such, are binding until modified. The Village of Oak Brook requested that I present to those attending the meeting alternative procedures used by other governmental units in addressing this issue. I reported that some local governmental units have either adopted a new ordinance or modified an existing ordinance which provides for the use of local police powers to eliminate a nuisance and dangerous or unacceptable conditions through public action. Under these circumstances, lien rights against the property are employed to recover any expenses. This procedure would be similar to the elimination of noxious weeds on private property or the towing of illegally parked or abandoned vehicles. I explained that in the specific instance under consideration, it is the wish of AED to continue to maintain its own property in a manner that is acceptable to AED, the Village of Oak Brook, and IDOT/DWR. Dale Durfey reported that the present agreement between the Village of Oak Brook and IDOT/DWR, which was prepared in connection with the recent cleaning and dredging program for Salt Creek, speaks only to the area of normal flow and does not address the floodway, which extends well beyond the limits of normal flow. CIVIL ENGINEERING • DRAINAGE/STORM WATER MANAGEMENT• SITE PLANNING/DESIGN • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW * FORENSIC E_t1GINEERING r� AED Floodproofingg January 20, 1992/Page 2 Mr. Durfey also scheduled a meeting for Monday, January 20, 1992, at 10:00 A.M. to review specific wording in the plans for this pro'ect. The matter of compensating storage potential has been resolved in an adequate manner an�the minor points of wording on the plans will be cleared up prior to the scheduled meeting of the Village Board of Trustees on January 28, 1992. Mr. Durfey also indicated that it would not be necessary to attend the Committee of the Whole meeting on the 27th of January since this item is not on the agenda. Should you have any questions on this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, LINDLEY & SONS, INC. cc: Village of Oak Brook R. W. Lindley, P.E. - Stephen Berley - Dale Durfey - Thomas Hawk RWL/sg 7a2.. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK PLAN COMMISSION December 16, 1991 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:37 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Members: Al Savino Tom Doyle Bernard Dudek Donald Haglund George Mueller Anthony Tappin MEMBERS ABSENT: Member: Donald Sandstedt ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner Engineer Dale Durfey Director of Code Enforcement Thomas Hawk A quorum was declared. 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Member Mueller moved, seconded by Member Tappin to waive the reading of the minutes of the November 18, 1991 meeting and to approve them as written VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed Note: Chairman Savino revised the agenda to hear the A.E.D. item next. Dave Gooder representing McDonald's had no objection. ..�.ss.�IV. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORS _ FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE _ Continued Mr. Bill Lindley indicated that he had met that afternoon with Village Engineer, Dale Durfey, and that a further modification to the plan would be drawn up. This revised plan would place a berm/wall along the east side of the A.E.D. property. This will allow the attaining of the 1 to 1 compensatory storage ratio and also thereby excludes the property to the east from any involvement in this plan. He also indicated that the maintenance issue will still need to be clarified and also the easement rights to the creek lot will have to be obtained. Mr. Lindley indicated that the remaining issues by the County review could be resolved. Engineer Durfey indicated that the new plan should accomplish what is needed to bring the proposal into good compliance with the Village ordinances. i A general discussion ensued. PC12-91.DOC Page 1 of GOOF OA/(9 p q O N G O 4 `c„ COUNtr, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 708 990-3000 I' January 21, 1992 MEMO: President and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen Berley Thomas R. Hawk SUBJECT: Associated Equipment Distributors (AED) Flood Plain Special Use - January 28, 1992 Agenda Over the last few months, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have been reviewing AED' s request for Flood Plain Special 11,;e to per',idt flood proofing of their property. The plans have ::ndergone several major revisions in order to satisfy the re- qui.Yements of the Village, County, and IDOT-DWR. The plan as it now stands, protects the property from storms of the 5 to 10 year frequency level . This is desirable to the property owner since this property is subject Lo surface flooding on a yearly basis. Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of appeals have recommended approval cf this request subject to the following conditions: 1) final engineering approval 2) permits from all other required regulatory agencies such as IDOT-DWR and the Corps of Engineers 3) resolution of the maintenance requirement _issue raised by IDOT-DWR The engineering is close to receiving final approval and this- may be accomplished prior to your meeting. The only outside permit is apt)arent] y from IDOT-DWR. Any ordi- nance approving this request should include this as a stipula- tion. P88T.AED PAGE 1 OF 1. /( 0 0 The staff recommendation regarding the maintenance requirements is to include in the approval ordinance the following require- ments: 1) maintenance will be the responsibility of the property owner 2) in the event the property owner defaults in its mainte- nance responsibility, the Village of Oak Brook will pre- form the necessary maintenance. 3) language granting the Village the right to enter upon the property and perform the necessary maintenance 4) the cost of all maintenance work performed by the Village shall be paid by the property owner. Hopefully, these stipulations will satisfy IDOT-DWR' s require- ments. If it is your wish to approve this request, it would be appropri- ate to authorize the attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Be ley ('� Thomas R. awk Village Manager \ Director of Code Enforcement PBBT-AED.MEM PAGE 2 OF 2 69 LINDL?Y P SONS INC. 9200 South Kingery Road Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-6848 i (708) 325-8190 Fax: (708) 325-8643 January 12, 1992 Stephen Berley, Manager VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255 Re: AED Floodplain Special Use Dcar Mr. Berley: Consideration of a Floodplain Special Use Permit for Associated Equipment Distributors (AED) will be an agenda item for the Village Board meeting of January 28, 1992. As you are aware, this project has been presented to both the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission for their review and comment. A review of the somewhat modified plans is also anticipated from Mr. Durfey prior to the Board meeting, a requirement of both advisory units of the Village Board. A matter raised by the Illinois Department of Transportation/Division of Water Resources (IDOT/DWR) is cause for some concern. This correspondence requests a letter from the Village of Oak Brook stating that it agrees to operate and maintain the revised floodway per Section 708.80(a)(4) of the Department's Rules for Floodway Construction. This rule states: 4) The unit of local government exercising zoning control over an area within its corporate limits proposes or concurs in the proposal that the floodway storage or conveyance be relocated to facilitate development, and a unit of local government will either: a) assume responsibility to operate and maintain any modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway; or b) have the ri*lit and will agree, upon default of the party primarily responsible for such operation and maintenance, to undertake such operation and maintenance. The recent dredging and shaping of the primary channel of Salt Creek by IDOT/DWR from Roosevelt Road to 22nd Street also required a maintenance agreement from the Village of Oak Brook. The change in the 100-year floodway location produced by the proposed flood-proofing for the AEDproperty is only minor, as can be determined from the document supplied to the Village of Oak Brook. The proposed berm and landscaping features are located on the private property of AED and are within the existing and proposed floodway. The entire AED property lies within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Federal Insurance Study (FIS ) designated floodway published for the Village of Oak Brook. While the dredging and channel shaping recently completed by IDOT/DWR has relocated this floodway, it has not been re- established except for the work on this project. CIVIL ENGINEERING • DRAINAGE/STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SITE PLANNING/DESIGN • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 0 LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 9 FORENSIC ENGINEERING � AED Floodlain Special Use Page 2yianuary 12, 1992 It is not the intent of AED to rely upon the Village of Oak Brook to operate and maintain the floodway as it crosses its property. However, in order to obtain the necessary permit review from IDOT/DWR, some type of agreement will be required. Prior to the Village Board meeting on January 28, 1992, it is requested that this matter be reviewed, perhaps at the Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for January 13, 1992. As an alternative, it may be within the police powers of the Village of Oak Brook to somehow convince IDOT/DWR that AED's private property lying within the Salt Creek floodway will be properly operated and maintained. Thank you for your assistance with this issue. The AED staff appreciates the effort being provided by the Village of Oak Brook in order to obtain the necessary permits to protect its workspace from damage due to the frequent increases in the level of Salt Creek which have occurred over the past few years. Sincerely, LINDLEY & SONS, INC. PAIX R. W. Lindley, P.E. cc: Associated Equipment Distributors -Tom Schelewitz Village of Oak Brook - Dale Durfey -Thomas Hawk IDOT/DWR - William T. Boyd DuPage County DEC -Tony Charlton RWL/am lv 7 • Member Herman, seconded by Memberouch, moved to table this request until to ebruary S, 1992 Zoning Board Meeting. VOICE VOTE: Alt were in favor - motion passed. This item tabled until the Feb. 4, 1992 meeting. V. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISIRIBUTORSA( ED) _ Flood Plain Special Use _ Public Hearn _ Continued i i The petitioner was represented by Bill Lindley. Mr. Lindley indicated that he and Engineer Dale Durfey had met and had discussed the over all engineering plan revisions which are being made at this time. It is planned to maintain storm water storage potential west of the birm and other engineering details the birm Is slightly being relocated and reduced in height, etc. Mr. Durfey also had requested that easement permis- sion be obtained from the property owner of the area immediately adjacent and including the creek bed which apparently is the Butler Corporation, and this will be sought. 1 Mr. Lirdtey did belive that he would have this redesign completed in time to get it to Engineer Dale Durfey early enough for him to mnke a report for the Plan Commission's Meeting on December 16, 1991 in the hopes that the Plan Commission could make their recommendation to the Board of Trustees and the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals then can possibly,take this issue to a vote at their January 7, 1992 meeting. At the petitioners request Member Herman moved, seconded by Member Crouch, to table further consideration of this request until the January 7, 1992, meeting. VOICE VOTE: All were in favor - motion passed. This item tabled until the Jan. 7, 1992 meeting. VI. CONTROL OF BULK On the basis that this is a significant item, and where the board is not unanimous that it best be discussed before a more complete board. Member Herman moved, seconded by Member White, to table the Control of Bulk issue until the January 7, 1992 meeting. VOICE VOTE: Alt in favor - Motion passed. This item tabled until the Jan. 7, 1992 meeting. VII. ADJOURNMENT Member White moved, seconded by Member Herman, to adjourn. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -4- December 3, 1991 ZBA12-91.DOC Page 4 of 5 There was no testimony from the public. Member Herman moved seconded � by member Martinello, to recommend denial of their request based on the find- ings that: a) the property can yield a reasonable rate of return without the encroachment. b) that no unique circumstance or hardship had been demonstrated. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Elaine Herman Roy Martinello Raymond White Nays: William Kenny Member Kenny stated that he felt that the irregular shaped lot and lack of buildable depth constituted a hardship. IV. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORS (AED) - 615 22nd Street Hunter Drive _ Flood Plain Speial Use _ Public Hearing The petitioner was represented by Mr. Thomas Schelewitz and Mr. David Gordon of A.E.D. and Mr. Bill Lindley of Lindley 8 Sons. All were sworn in by Chairman Kenny. Several sets of photos were presented to members showing flood conditions in 1979 and 1987. Mr. Lindley gave a presentation describing the petitioner's request which include the following: 1. A physical description of the levee system they are proposing. 2. Landscaping. 3. There will be no change upstream or downstream effecting any other property owners. 4. The proposal will not prevent a 100 year storm event from flooding the building but will have positive effects for A.E.D. during lesser storms. 5. This property, due to upstream development and the channel dredging, has seen an increase in the frequency, height, and duration of flooding. 6. The petitioner is seeking not only the approval of their request but also the support of the Village in the review process with IDOT-DWR and all the others with review authority. Mr. Lindley answered the question of the Commission members. Mr. Schelewitz made his remarks which were aimed at the effects of the frequent flooding including the following: 1. Actual dollar costs were for the most part covered by flood insurance. 2. The major inconvenience in operating their business during and after flooding. 3. The potential health hazard for his employees due to the silt, debris, and sewage deposited on the property. He also pointed out that A.E.D. was a 27 year resident at this location and that they would very much like to stay. A general discussion ensued. • The review by IDOT / DWR and the County have not been received; an Lindley and Durfey have not as yet re- solved the questions raised by Durfey. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- November 5, 1991 mts.zba Member White moved, seconded by Member Nartinello to continue this public hearO until December 3, 1991 meeting. Q I ' VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motioned passed. V. CONTROL OF BULK Since the Zoning Board wishes to discuss this issue with as close to a full board as possible, Member i Herman moved, seconded by Member white to table this to the December 3, 1991 meeting. I i i VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. I V1. GENERAL DISCUSSION Several members asked Mr. Hawk if it would be possible to get new copies of the Zoning Ordinance and to place them in three ring binders for easy updating. Mr. Hawk indicated he would do so. V11. ADJOUNMENT Member White moved, seconded by Member Martinello, to adjourn. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, I Thomas Hawk, Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Approved ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- November S, 1991 410 a 9 Oaa • • SFT VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK PLAN COMMISSION December 16, 1991 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:37 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Members: Al Savino Tom Doyle Bernard Dudek Donald Haglund George Mueller Anthony Tappin MEMBERS ABSENT: Member: Donald Sandstedt ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner Engineer Dale Durfey Director of Code Enforcement Thomas Hawk A quorum was declared. 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Member Mueller moved, seconded by Member Tappin to waive the reading of the minutes of the November 18, 1991 meeting and to approve them as written VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed Note: Chairman Savino revised the agenda to hear the A.E.D. item next. Dave Gooder representing McDonald's had no objection. IV. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORS - FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE - Continued Mr. Bill Lindley indicated that he had met that afternoon with Village Engineer, Dale Durfey, and that a further modification to the plan would be drawn up. This revised plan would place a berm/wall along the east side of the A.E.D. property. This will allow the attaining of the 1 to 1 compensatory storage ratio and also thereby excludes the property to the east from any involvement in this plan. He also indicated that the maintenance issue will still need to be clarified and also the easement rights to the creek lot will have to be abtained. lir. Lindley indicated that the remaining issues by the County review could be resolved. Engineer Durfey indicated that the new plan should accomplish what is needed to bring the proposal into good compliance with the Village ordinances. A general discussion ensued. PC12-91.DOC Page 1 of 3 • • "Z),4e*r-r Member Doyle moved, seconded by Member Mueller, to recommend approval of the Associated Equipment Distribu- tors Flood Special Use as further modified subject to the following conditions: 1) final engineering approval by the Village Engineer Dale Durfey 2) proper required permits from all other regulatory agencies Member Dudek stated that he could not support this motion without the final plan in hand. ROLL CALL: In Favor: Tom Doyle George Mueller i Donlad Haglund Anthony Tappin Al Savino Opposed: Bernie Dudek Motion Passed. V. MC DONALD'S [ OB PARK DISTRICT The petitioner was represented by Attorney Dave Gooder and the design engineer Mide Lach. They described their proposal with the following items being covered: 1) the proposal is for a flood plain modification 2) compensatory storage is provided at a 1 to 1 ratio 3) the flooding is not involved 4) the proposal, both alterantes 1 and 2, are compatible with the oak Brook Park District proposal for the property to the west 5) the Oak Brook Park District has give their permission for the proposed work along their property line. Attorney Gooder reviewed the factors specified in the Village ordinance ( see Section 10-34c) and indicated that the proposed was in agreement with all of them and further that their proposal meets the intent of the Village ordinances as well as the specific requirements. There was no comment, either pro or con, from those in attendance. Member Haglund moved, seconded by Member Tappin, to recommend approval of the McDonald's / OB Park District Flood Plain Special Use request. ROLL CALL: All in favor - motion passed. V1. BIKE PATH PLANNING ji Member Tappin up-dated the Commission on the activities of the Bike Path Sub-Committee. The next meeting of the Sub-Committee is scheduled for January 20, 1992 at 6:00 P.M. in the lower level conference room. PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -2- December 16, 1991 PC12-91.DOC Page 2 of 3 6�- VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK PLAN COMMISSION November 18, 1991 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:31 P.M. 11. ROLL CAL MEMBERS PRESENT: Members Al Savino Tom Doyle Bernard Dudek Donald Haglund George Mueller ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner Engineer Dale Durfey Director of Code Enforcement Tom Hawk A quorum was declared. Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Member Mueller moved, seconded by Member Haglund to approve the minutes as written. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed IV. ASSOCIATED EOUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORS, FLOOD PLAIN SPECIAL USE Mr. Bill Lindley, the engineer representing the petitioner, went over the letter from IDOT / DNR pertaining to AED's application. In summary, he indicated that all items could be resolved by him with the exception of item 04 which re- quires a letter from the Village (see letter). Nobody was certain what this commitment by the Village entailed. A lengthly general discussion ensued. Member Doyle moved, seconded by Member Mueller, to table until the next meeting in order to allow time to II resolve the following issues: + 1) What exactly does item #4 of IDOT / DWR'S letter mean? What does the Village attorney think? 2) Resolve Engineer Durfey's exceptions. 3) Exactly how much volume of fill material will be brought in? 4) Should we support the concept of flood proofing developed properties. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. PLAN COMMISSION Minutes November 18, 1991 pc.mnt V. BIKE PATH PLANNING The Bike Path Sub-committee's next meeting is scheduled for December 3 at 6:00 P.M. in the Lower Level Con- ference Room. V1. MISCELLANEOUS Chairman Savino distributed copies of the Plan Commission Rules of Practice and asked everybody to look them over. He also asked the members of the Plan Commission to give some thought to what issues, ordinances, etc. that the Commission may want to consider. V11. ADJOURNMENT Member Haglund moved, seconded by Member Mueller, to adjourn. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Thomas R. Hawk, Secretary Approved C date PLAN COMMISSION Minutes -2- November 18, 1991 pc.mnt 60 GOOF OA/(9 P *001, O !� G O 4 �l� V 9CF�ouN�+•�� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 December 16 , 1991 708 990-3000 MEMO TO: Tom Hawk . Director of Code Enforcement FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P. E. SUBJECT: Flood Plain Special Use - AE:D Revised flans were received on Friday, December 13 , 1991 . White a complete review of the plans has not been undertaken, the Engineering Department has calculated the compensatory storage requirements of this revised plan. Since the property east of AEU, 600 Hunter Drive, will also be protected, sufficient compensatory storage oil the stream side of the levee is not provided . Bill Lindley and Tom Schelewitz met with me this afternoon and reviewed this subject in detail . Hill stated that they would revise the plans to basically encircle the AED property so that the 600 Hunter Drive lot is not flood protected . Revised plans need to be submitted and reviewed to insure that tile. ASID site has compensatory storage. The letter from the DuPage County Department of Environmental Concerns of December 2 . 1991 contains many issues which are unresolved. A meeting was originally scheduled for this afternoon with County personnel ; however , the County called last Friday and cancelled the meeting. It is now rescheduled for January- 7 . 1992 . Res pec fully submitted, P& Dale L. Durfey. Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg \tom1211; v • or DuNge County DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ALDO E. BOTTI COUNTY BOARD CHAIRMAN (708) 682-7130 !' l iii4t�.':j...��'_,�j•..-.... ;' -_ December 2, 1991 s �: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. . Village Engineer Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521-2255 RE: AED Berm Proposal 615 Hunter Drive Dear Dale: This letter is in response to a permit application submitted by Lindley and Sons, Inc. for construction in the floodway- of Salt Creek. The proposed project consists of a berm to be constructed along the east bank of the creek and is intended to protect parking and landscaping on the site of Associated Equipment Distributors. The proposed site plan was checked with its conformance to the new Dupage County Stormwater and Flood Plain Ordinance. The following list and attachments are our findings to date with this permit review. 1. Does not meet Article 9, Section 15-112, 11, Page 36(DCSFPO) : The developer has increased velocities at the project site and has not provided a regional benefit from the proposed berm. Enclosed is a summary table which shows velocities and elevations upstream, downstream, and through the project site. 2 . Does not meet Article 9, Section 15-115, #2d, Page 41: The developer needs to identify and delineate the boundary of the riparian environment which includes vegetative areas within I 50 ' of Salt Creek. s3 . Does not meet Article 10, Section 15-132, 11, Page 45: The developer needs to identify the 100-year flood plain and floodway on the existing and proposed site plans. 4 . Does not meet Article 10, Section 15-133, 17, Page 47: The developer has not shown any source of backup power to be available for the pumps during times of electrical failure. 5. Does not meet Article 10, Section 15-133 , #8, Page 47: The developer does not provide compensatory storage at a ratio of 1. 5: 1. In fact, compensatory storage is provided at a ratio DUPAGF. CENTER • 421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD • WHEATON, 11, 60187 of less than 1: 1. Also, the compensatory storage that was provided, was not provided at the same incremental frequency elevation as the displaced storage. 6. Does not meet Article 10, Section 15-134, 11, Page 50: Any developer proposing development in or near mapped wetland areas shall identify the boundaries, extent, and quality of all wetland areas on the subject property. 7. The following items were lacking detail or not included in the report and could not be reviewed. per Article 11, Section 15- 149, Page 58: #lb - Site Runoff Calculations #ic - Site Runoff Storage Calculations #id - Schedule of Implementation #1e - Information of Off-Site Conditions #lf - Sediment/Erosion Control Plan 11g - Riparian Environment Submittal 8 . Enclosed with this letter is a list of inside slopes of the berm, which vary from 12% to 30%. Because of the steep slopes, it should be noted in the Sediment/Erosion Control Plan, #lf above, the placement and maintenance of soil stabilization controls to prevent undercutting the slope. 9. It is recommended that the top and bottom elevations of the Keystone retaining wall system be included in •the site plan. It is unclear from the landscaping plan how the contours mesh with the wall. It would be recommended that careful attention be paid to the trees and their root systems in the vicinity of the retaining wall because too much fill placed above the roots would be very harmful. 10. As an alternative, the developer may wish to consider different landscape vegetations which would be more suitable to the existing flow conditions and may also reduce maintenance costs. We appreciate this opportunity to review this permit application. We would be happy to meet with you and/or the developer to review these points if you feel it is necessary. iSincerely, Robert A. Covey Civil Engineer cc: Bill Lindley Lindley and Sons, Inc. Anthony Charlton, Dept. of Environmental Concerns tl DuPage County Subject V od.1 t' VECotlty Project -SAIT C4EEk Environmental UmmiqA File No. Concerns Computed Checked Date Q12 -Poge_ of-Pages Engineering wIT# 9 llfo BER�1. W1� 8r'�M qO VELoeir/ vgtocl v 45-CEVAT/oV CCEVA7/ON �E 1905, STA II,900 1, 3s- 1, 3 653, 3 Sl X53,,3 7 AbE 1809, srA 11, 03 /, y� l• 91 653, E 653. 31 I STA 11,779 �,o?s9 �,27 V 6154 11.1196 1, 13 1.30• 163, 19 6-63,17 Cwmy RDS sm 11,139 1,46 6-13,l7 6S31/10 p0DE 1710 , s;-11 11,57 Ikbr 1goS Sn9, 11,900 1,y5 1. 49 6635 Pq Obe lwl sm. ll, 13 1,s 1 j,5o 6,53, 77 4S3, 90 �. yy �,40? 4S-3/70 45-3,73 1121 1,38 6.63,67 453,66 66<84K 1e b,S-M Il,OF 1, yo 1,53 4S3, 44 �S31 6 y Wbv 17/0) 5-TN 11,577 1,3 I j,31 453,4S- X 53,Ly O?q /K NODE loos S7n /1,900 , /d �, (0 656,VO X56, 69 We /go? STA 11,613 /, 8�l 1, 90 I 4177 I.S6,1-7 3,79 } 3,�� I 46161 6AG 8 CEI�MAr; KD� S7� II,6sF �,�� ; I, 73 656,53 �s6,s7 NebE 1710 S-M 11, 7 ►,7g )"A 6s�, i bs6,ss 1 N : DuPage County Subject A67b Project S LT CI�EIC Environmental 0,4k 94,00 , File No. ConcernsCom Computed Checked Date Page oi�Poges Engineering P S-MRA6E VOLUMES 6Y ELEI/�T/oma XSEC 678+7y -ro X80*-?3 (A P TO COMP�iVSXMR A IS PLACED C#4AX6' /,4) FLOAT/ .0 S AGE S70RAGE FT3 90, GE Ff! 6 q6 134 0 I3 q 6q 3 63 Soo �48 Wyss 9 / S �yQ �s3 3yy.2 309a 6so I J 36 Y 65x6 y 813 6s1 l6 I 1 y 97s� 6S� 11?- 1y9 13686 M 6S3 0 16 330 163-30) 6sy 0 19s/9 19s14) ass o ;42 9q6 6s6 0 ?q Is aq ITS ls'7 0 -�6 q10 WO NET VOLUME DEC,eEASE (82 w.?) x S E C 6 80 +�23 To � 81 +6)0 UP To 61MPE,0TIgAC blSf 6E eHAN6F X U 7/o(I TU,QRCE �T3 ST0446C F7j_ SWA6F (rT-3 6y6 3gs 0 38s i1 6q7 ?3 71 d ?371 6 y8 Sq -7 4 /586 367-3 6y9 7868 36.27 y3gl CE-0 /a 3 7.? 008 Sq 6 y 6s1 1,5 ?7s 10 76 S611 6sa l ao3 14 quo i�7 83 653 0 17670 CI 76 70 Ess 0 ' �$3 y8 aeoy 6S 0 �17SS 317 5 ' NET VOCUME Dce�6-Asr = (103,31 )) 4J i Project SA Ur C'�E�K DuPoge County Su:::: f Environmentol _ .�L File No.Concerns Co —Checked Date Poge of�Poges Engineering ell,06r r/J -! W-W 66- WONT . 9v 6YI/If IO XSc 6gl -t- PO To (,(P To 60MPEA)SA-ro 01096- M) ?l i EIEUATlot1 S-09ACE Cr-r3 9WACE Fra S-rMlIce- (rT) SWq o S�fy 6q7 033 0 1933 �q8 y.2 q3 p 66 7q 6�0 �� 0 �6�ss1 I2�yFs 15,66 9aQ bs� !4 912 x.507 1 y yoS k3 1 9 X70 6-516 3 9Q 173 99 66 o So ill 6 so 0 148.51 ly SsJ� 6s� 0 1660a 16 60,4) NET VLILUME 11JU OV X SE-C 6934-3) -z �8y f81 U P To CoMn�,vsR�,e/ 15,oCAc�� Cy.�,u�E �N (,EUATloA1 ST.2AGF �r3 STo��GE �,�T) STofAGF Fra � 4� 3og 308 . 0 a 1,53 0 0?%3 iI 6yq 3893 0 X993 6sl 8 6 7a O 5670 56 3 -7 6.57 � /1?98 - Q?O 9 798 5,3 13 y;?S 6030 73 9.5 65y I x( 183 3660 /053 6S-S- 0 73,28" (738 �S6 0 l0 0�0 looao 657 0 11363 11363 t1ET VoLOA1E IAWCASC _ 18,676 DuPoge County Subject AO Project SAL-' CREEK Environmental 0A &COOK File No. Concerns Engineering Computed KACChecked Date II.M.Poge 3 of...-Pages k S UMMAKy �ABLE Fop STORAGE UDLUA(ES By EIEUgrl U 1' TO bfSAACE-b MUce 1A) �C�U T�v s o 6E S R GE S��A�E �T3 I (0 16 13`7 /T3 O rr3137 rT3 i 647I583� _50q b 686 7 F 6ya 9 �.so�q '7o � 1800 6so 3 S q33 13 Why 25-3 9 6s1 5a 6 Dy 3 )6q7 I 6s� -115512 33103 38yy4 ly 14g 653 3�3�8 4654 �( i q 16 3 5 4 913 g0730 6Y,5- o 6 997 g g7a 65-61 0 �q 1;20 657 o TOT-ALs a59, qty 41%,707 s. yl q , 907 Pr 3 ( N� 6_,,OJAVIOV S-R,646E 15 ONty 6� Z 1 �EPc A eEM�,u r of Dls Pc,�eF� s�apa 6E `-J • • I DuPage CountySubject E Project SALT CKEEk Environmental SL File No Concerns Computed —Checked Date 07 Page—of—Pages Engineering C-REEkSlbC SLOKS OP MfM i `78 7q 6Sa-6 Y6 = a• I.? = l Z ` C S 0 0,-?0 6 Z SSI + 80 �s7_ 6 q6,s 0, 31 = 31 % t W183 + 3 ( _657-6y7 - 0,16 = 167 103-111 ES PES%411 Y 4T CeosS--S 6C-r-1oeU 691+90 IS B�rUK ST�BIUZRT/oN .�(JE6D�b I + 678. XSEC AED-678 100- U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) + 680. XSEC AED-680 260' U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) e 681. XSEC AEO-681 420' U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) to co rn to to- I O) :2 U) .�to Ld W LL- Z to Z O QQ W J •W Lo co r to M v —240 —160 —80 0 80 160 240 320 400 480 OFFSET IN FEET C �V ^`x -4. 683. XSEC AED-683- 580' U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) 684. XSEC AED-684 740' U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) 686. XSEC AED-686 900' U/S OF CERMAK ROAD (22nd STREET) �r co c rW W . J V) cD CD W U- Z N if1 Z cc O W Lai cc t It 14, to O cc �1 —160 —80 0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 OFFSET IN FEET i • ros ( p N 9CF �ouNt.4' VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 November 19, 1991 708 990. 3000 MEMO TO: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , Village Engineer SUBJECT: Flood Plain Special Use - AED; Interpretation of IDOT Regulation I am in receipt of your memorandum dated November 14, 1991, requesting that I review Section 708.80(a) (4) in light of William Boyd's letter to Tom Schelewitz which asks, in part, for "a letter from the Village of Oak Brook stating that they agree to operate and maintain the revised floodway per Section 708.80(a) (4) of the department's rules for floodway construction." Although I am not familiar with AED's request for a flood plain special use, I would note that Section 708.80(a) of IDOT's rules allows for an amendment to the 100-year frequency flood profile and regulatory flood plain in the event of one of the four occurrences listed in Section 708.80(a) . Assuming that occurrences 1 through 3 of this subsection are not applicable in AED's case, a question arises as to what Oak Brook's responsibilities would be under occurrence 4. I would note that occurrence 4 does require a unit of local government to undertake some degree of responsibility to operate and maintain any modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway, but this unit of local government need not be the Village, in spite of the fact that the Village operates zoning control over the subject property. Assuming that there is no other unit of local government which is willing to step up and undertake any degree of responsibility, we, of course, are left with the Village itself. As you correctly point out in your memorandum of November 14, occurrence 4 has two alternatives. Alternative A would require the Village to assume primary responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway; Alternative B would have the Village assume responsibility in the event that the party primarily responsible for the operation and maintenance (presumably the owner) fails to perform that duty. Returning to Mr. Boyd's letter, I would suggest that if: (1) Occurrences 1 through 3 in Section 708.80(a) are inapplicable; and dT Flood Plain Special Use - AED - 2 - November 18, 1991 (2) there is no other unit of local government which is willing to assume any responsibility for the operation and maintenance of any improvements or modifications made to relocate the floodway in AED's property; (3) then the Village determine whether it wishes to have primary or secondary responsibility for the maintenance and operation of the modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway. If the Village opts to have a secondary responsibility, I would suggest that we respond to Mr. Boyd by stating that upon default of the party primarily responsible for such operation and maintenance (presumably this is AED) , the Village agrees that it will undertake such operation and maintenance pursuant to Section 708.80(a) (4) of the department's rules for floodway construction. If you have comments or questions about this memorandum, do not hesitate to contact me. Res ctfully submitted, L Richard A. Martens Village Attorney RAM:sps fpsu.ram cc: Stephen Berley, Village Manager Thomas Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement`_... 0 0 There was no testimony from the public. Member Herman moved, seconded by member Martinello, to recommend denial of their request based on the find- ings that: a) the property can yield a reasonable rate of return without the encroachment. b) that no unique circumstance or hardship had been demonstrated. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Elaine Herman Roy Martinello Raymond White Nays: William Kenny Member Kenny stated that he felt that the irregular shaped lot and lack of buildable depth constituted a hardship. IV. ASSOCIATED EDUIPTMENT DISTRIBUTORSA( ED) _ 615 22nd Street Hunter Drive _ Flood Plain Speial Use Public Hearing The petitioner was represented by Mr. Thomas Schelewitz and Mr. David Gordon of A.E.D. and Mr. Bill Lindley of Lindley & Sons. All were sworn in by Chairman Kenny. Several sets of photos were presented to members showing flood conditions in 1979 and 1987. Mr. Lindley gave a presentation describing the petitioner's request which include the following: 1. A physical description of the levee system they are proposing. 2. Landscaping. 3. There will be no change upstream or downstream effecting any other property owners. 4. The proposal will not prevent a 100 year storm event from flooding the building but will have positive effects for A.E.D. during lesser storms. 5. This property, due to upstream development and the channel dredging, has seen an increase in the frequency, height, and duration of flooding. b. The petitioner is seeking not only the approval of their request but also the support of the Village in the review process with IDOT-DWR and all the others with review authority. Mr. Lindley answered the question of the Commission members. Mr. Schelewitz made his remarks which were aimed at the effects of the frequent flooding including the following: 1. Actual dollar costs were for the most part covered by flood insurance. 2. The major inconvenience in operating their business during and after flooding. 3. The potential health hazard for his employees due to the silt, debris, and sewage deposited on the property. He also pointed out that A.E.D. was a 27 year resident at this location and that they would very much like to stay. A general discussion ensued. The review by IDOT / DWR and the County have not been received; an Lindley and Durfey have not as yet re- solved the questions raised by Durfey. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- November 14, 1991 mts.zba Member White moved, seconded by Member Martinello to continue this public hearing until December 3, 1991 meeting. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motioned passed. V. CONTROL OF BULK Since the Zoning Board wishes to discuss this issue with as close to a full board as possible, Member Herman moved, seconded by Member White to table this to the December 3, 1991 meeting. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. V1. GENERAL DISCUSSION Several members asked Mr. Hawk if it would be possible to get new copies of the Zoning Ordinance and to place them in three ring binders for easy updating. Mr. Hawk indicated he would do so. V11. ADJOUNMENT J Member White moved, seconded by Member Martinello, to adjourn. VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Thomas Hawk, Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Approved ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- November 14, 1991 mts.zba 7W I § 10.32 OAK BROOK CODE (c) Special Uses: Uses not listed above which are permitted or special uses under the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance for the subject property may be allowed upon issuance of a special use permit as set forth below. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77) Sec. 10-33. Occupation and use of wetlands. (a) [Generally] In wetlands only those uses will be permitted which will not affect adversely the quantity or quality of the public water supply, drainage, storm water runoff or detention, or the health and safety of the village and its environs. (b) Permitted Uses: The uses listed in section 10-31(b) and any other uses permitted by the applicable provisions of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance which, in the opinion of the building commissioner, will not adversely affect the public water supply or the public health and sanitation. (c) Special Uses: Uses not listed above which are permitted or special uses under the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance for the subject property may be allowed upon issuance of a special use permit as set forth below. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77) Sec. 10-34. Special use permits. (a) Required: Any use listed in this article as requiring a spe- cial use permit may be allowed only upon application to and issuance of a special use permit by the village. (1) Authority: Special uses shall be authorized or denied by the village board in accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amendments of a zoning or- dinance, and the regulations and conditions set forth in this division for special uses. No application for a special use shall be acted upon by the village board until after: (i) A written report is prepared and forwarded to the zoning board of appeals and the village board by the plan commission in the manner prescribed in the zon- ing ordinance for amendments to said ordinance; and Supp. No. 30 632 0 • I PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 I�I I (ii) A public hearing has been held by the zoning board of appeals, after due notice by publication as provided by f the applicable statutes of the State of Illinois for amend- ments to a zoning ordinance and upon a report of the plan commission to the board of trustees, if such a report is made. The concurring vote of four (4) members of the plan com- mission and/or the zoning board of appeals shall be neces- sary to recommend in favor of any application which is brought before the respective hearing body pursuant to this article. (2) Initiation: An application for a special use may be made by any person, firm or corporation or by any office, department, board, bureau or commission requesting or intended to request a zoning certificate for property within a floodplain, as defined in this article. Supp. No. 30 632.1 0 • PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 I (3) Processing: An application for a special use, in such form and accompanied by such information as shall be established from time to time by the Village of Oak Brook, shall be filed with the village clerk and thereafter processed in the manner prescribed thereto- fore for applications for amendments. j (4) Decisions: The village board, upon report of the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission, and without further hearing, may authorize or deny an application for a special use in accordance with the j statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amend- ments, or may refer it back to the zoning board.-of appeals and the plan commission for further consider- I ation. No special use shall be authorized by the village board unless the special use: (i) Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected; and (ii) Would not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located. (5) Conditions: The plan commission and zoning board of appeals may recommend, and the village board may provide, such conditions and restrictions upon the construction, location and operation of a special use, as may be deemed necessary to promote the general objectives of this article and to minimize the danger of flood damage resulting therefrom. (b) Procedure To Be Followed by the Plan Commission in Making Recommendations Concerning Special Use Permits: Upon receiving an application for a special use permit, the plan commission shall, prior to making a recommendation thereon: (1) Require the applicants to furnish three (3) copies of such of the following information, prepared by a professional engineer or land surveyor, registered as such in the State of Illinois, as is deemed necessary by Supp. No. 3 633 y3 § I U .i l OAK BROOK CODE the plan commission for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use: (i) flans drawn to a readable scale showing location, nature, dimensions and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, floodproofing measures, and the rela- tionship of the above to the location of the channel, floodway and the flood protection eleva- tion. (ii) 'Typical valley cross-section(s) drawn to a scale of one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet and a vertical scale of one (1) inch to ten (10) feet showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and high water elevation. Cross-section intervals shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet. (iii) Plans (surface view) showing elevations or con- tours of the ground; pertinent structure, fill or storage elevations; size, location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing struc- tures on the site; location and elevations of streets, water supply, sanitary facilities; soil types; and other pertinent information. Contours shall be shown at one-foot intervals. (iv) Photographs showing existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream. (v) A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or the flow line of the stream. (vi) Specifications for filling, grading, dredging, chan- nel improvements, storage of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities. (2) Transmit one copy of the information described in subsection (b)(1) to the village engineer for technical assistance, where necessary, in evaluating the pro- posed project in relation to flood heights and Supp. No. 3 634 i PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 velocities; the seriousness of flood damage to the use; the adequacy of the plans for protection; and other technical matters. (3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the village engineer, determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. (c) Factors Upon Which the Recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission Shall Be Based: In making recommendations upon applications for special use permits, the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this article, including but not limited to the following: (1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; (2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or cross-stream, upstream or downstream to the injury of others; (3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions; (4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners; (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. (6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (7) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; (8) The relationship of the proposed use to the compre- hensive plan and floodplain management program for the area; Supp. No. 3 635 1l) ,31 OAK BROOK CODE (J) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (10) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters expected at the site; and (11) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this article. (d) Conditions Attached to Special Use Permits: Upon consideration of the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission recommendations, the factors listed above, and the purpose of this article, the president and board of trustees may by ordinance grant, deny or attach such conditions to the granting of special use permits as they deem necessary to further the purposes of this article. Among such conditions, without limitation because of specific enumeration, may be included: (1) Modification of waste disposal and water-supply facilities; (2) Limitations on periods of use and operation; (3) Imposition on operational controls, deposit of surety bonds and deed restrictions; (4) Requirements for construction of channel modifica- tions, dikes, levees and other protective measures; and (5) Floodproofing measures designed to be consistent with the flood protection elevation for the particular area, flood velocities, durations, rate of rise, hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces, and other factors associated with the 100-year flood. In this event, the president and board of trustees shall require that the applicant submit a plan or document certified by a registered structural engineer that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area and shall be provided in accordance with the standards for coinpletely floodproofed structures contained within the United States Army Corps of Engineers publica- Supp. No. 3 636 �%Chi • I PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-35 tion, "Flood-Proofing Regulations," June, 1972, GPO: 1973 0-505-026 edition, or any subsequent edition thereof. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77; Ord. No. G-364, § 2, 9-10-85) Sec. 10-36. Variations. (a) [President and Board of Trustees May Grant:] Variations to the provisions of this article may be granted by the president and board of trustees upon recommendation by the zoning board of appeals. (b) Authority: The board of trustees shall decide all applica- tions for variations of the provisions of this division after a public hearing held before the zoning board of appeals on such notice as shall be required by the Illinois Statutes for zoning variations. The zoning board of appeals shall hold public hearing upon all applications for variations and shall report its recommendations to the board of trustees as to whether a requested variation would be in harmony with its general purpose and intent, and shall recommend a variation only where it shall have made a finding of fact specifying the reason or reasons for recommending the variation. Such findings shall be based upon the standards prescribed in subsection (e) below. No variation shall be granted by the board of trustees without such findings of fact. The con- curring vote of four (4) members of the zoning board of appeals shall be necessary to recommend in favor of the. requested varia- tion. In the case of a variation where the zoning board of appeals fails to recommend the variation, it can only be adopted by an ordinance with the favorable vote of two-thirds of the trustees. (c) Initiation: An application for a variation shall be in triplicate and may be made by any governmental office, department, board, bureau or commission, or by any person, firm or corporation having a freehold interest, a possessory interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual interest which may become a freehold interest, or any exclusive possessory interest applicable to the land or land and improvements described in the application for a variation. (d) Processing: An application for a variation shall be filed with the village clerk who shall forward one copy of Supp. No. 30 637 4 l0 f�i OAK BROOK CODE such application to the zoning board of appeals for processing in accordance with applicable statutes of the State of Illinois and one copy to the board of trustees. (e) Standards: The, recommendation of the zoning board I of appeals and the decision of the president and board of trustees on an application for a variation to the provisions of this article shall be based on the following standards, the burden of showing to be borne by the applicant: i (1) A showing of good and sufficient cause; (2) A determination that failure to grant the variation would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and (3) A determination that the variation will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nui- sances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, conflict with other existing ordinances, or conflict with the intent of this article. (t) [C'ottditiorts and Restrictions:) The zoning board of appeals may recommend and the board of trustees may re(p.dre such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a variation as may be necessary to comply with the standards set forth in this section to reduce or minimize the injurious effect of such variation upon other property in the neighborhood, and to implement the general purpose and intent of this article. (g) lInsurarice rates:] The village shall inform applicants for variations that should a variation be granted to build a structure with its lowest floor below the base flood elevnHon, it could result in flood insurance premiums as high as twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of insurance coverage.. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77; Ord. No. Cx-277, § 7, 1-27-81; Ord. No. G-364, § 3, 9-10-85) Sece- 10-36---10-45. Iteeerved. Supp. No. 30 638 � pGE OF Oqk 9q t O � COUN��' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 October 3 . 1991 708 990.3000 Mr . Tony Charleton DuPage County Department of Environmental Concerns 421 N. County Farm Road %heaton. Illinois 60189 RE: Flood Plain Special Use - AEU Dear Tony: Several days azo . you called me and we discussed the proposal for a floodproofing berm for the AED property at 615 Hunter Drive in Oak Brook . At that time . I had not received the application and had not started my review. I did receive the application yesterday and have subsequently started my review. The proposal calls for the construction of a floodproofinP berm within the Salt Creek floodway. Since you i-:er•e sent a copy of the complete IDOT application by Bill I.indley . you are familiar with their proposal . In keepin• with the concept within the recently adopted Countywide Stormwater Ordinance . thy: Village of Oak Brook would like the County to review this application since it involves work within the floodway . I assume your analysis will also be analyzing- this proposal utilizin^ the FEQ Salt Creek Model which you currently have in your offices . During our discussions . ,you ,stated that it should be fairly simple for you to add any cross- sections needed from this proposal into ,your model and analyze the results . Upon the conclusion of your review. would you please forward a report to the Villaze detailing• what you analyzed . how you analyzed them. and your conclusions and recommendations . Since the recently adopted Countywide Ordinance is very- new and we are still stru-.--zlinq with its implementation. I assume that you will bill the Villaze of Oak Brook for your review services . If some other arrangement is to be mane . please let me know as soon as you are aware of it . October 3 . 1981 Page 2 I Look forward to working with you and other County staff on this application. Sincerely. Dale L. Durfey. Jr . . P . E. . Villaeze Engineer DLD/etr cc : Stephen Berle.y. Villacze Manager Tom Hawk . Director of Code Enforcement Bill Lindley. Lindley - Sons . Inc . P COUN�,,, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 October 3 . 1991 708 990.3000 Mr . Bill Boyd Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources 201 W . Center Court Chicano . Illinois 60196 RE: Flood Plain Special lase-aED Dear Bill : This will confirm our telephone conversation of this afternoon regarding the above stated subject . You stated that your staff is reviewing the application and the steady- state model supplied by Bill Lindley. You stated that you would check with ,your supervisor as to whether or not the submittal of a dynamic model was required. You said that .you found some initial problems with some of the Lindley data in the computer program and would be gettine- back to Bill with these and any other comments you find. You also mentioned the maintenance requirement in part 708 . 80 (A) ( 4 ) within your floodway rules and re��ulations . This states that the Village of Oak Brook would have to agree to maintain the floodway if the applicant does not . This might already be an Oak Brook requirement due to the Village/ IDOT agreement regarding the recently completed IDOT Dredging Project . You and 1 should both review this particular subject so that an ae-reed upon conclusion as to this maintenance responsibility is clearly understood by all parties . You said that it would probably take more than a month from now before the project would be permitted. assuming it meets your rules and regulations . I have asked the County to review this proposal for the Village of Oak Brook since it deals with the floodway of Salt Creek and modelling capabilities which the Village does not have . I hope that you . the County . and the Village can all work together in the review of this application. Sin zrely v Dale L . Durfey. Jr . . P. E. . Village Engineer DLD/etg cc : Stephen Berley. Village ManagerV Tom Hawk. Director of Code. Enforcement Bill Lindley. Lindley & Sons . Inc. YORKSHIRE WOODS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 57 YORKSHIRE WOODS, OAK BROOK, ILLTNOTS 60521 708/530-5802 MARY THOMPSON - President Mary Ann Arazan - Former President JANE DUDEK - Vice President Bernard Dudek MARY SMRHA - Secretary Thomas RichArdson RICHARD SCHRIK - T[Qnsuror November 11 , 1991 Karen M. Bushy, President Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Dear Mrs. Bushy: Re: Associated Equipment Distributors, Flood Plain Special Use We appreciate the concerns of Associated Equipment Distributors, just as we do all property owners whose homes or businesses experience flooding problems, particularly those homeowners in Yorkshire Woods and Timber Trails. Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement, has described the A.E.D. proposal as "A very progressive approach to dealing with a flooding problem. " He also said, "Some of the details of the proposal bump into some of the building codes," (such as compensatory storage, ) "but the principle of the plan is in line with the code: to protect a property owner from flooding without hurting anybody else. " We do not disagree. In order to assure that the flood-proofing plan proposed by A.E.D. does not negatively impact other property along Salt Creek, we urge the Village to withhold its consideration of the plan until it has been reviewed by experts at the various approval agencies. Any other action would set a precedent and could hurt others along the creek. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you, the Board, and the staff for your efforts to bring about effective flood protection to Oak Brook residents . We continue to strongly support your efforts. Yours truly, Mary Th pson Copies to: Board of Trustees r Plan Commission Im `�� r= _'yl 5' O Zoning Board Village Manager NOV 1 5 191 Timber Trails Homeowners Association VILLAGE OF OAK EIROOK dUF EAU OF INSPECTIOtt 1 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 November 14 , 1991 708 990- 3000 MEMO TO: Toro Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. SUBJECT: Flood Plain Special Use - AED Since the Plan Commission of October 21 , 1991 , the following issues and actions have taken place: 1 . On November 8 , 1991 , I contacted Tony Charleton of DuPage County and inquired of their statics concerning their review of this issue. Tony replied that they were in the process of running the FEQ Computer Model and would need a couple more weeks before they would have their conclusions . Therefore, Tony said that as of the Plan Commission meeting of November 18 , 1991 , the County would still be reviewing the application. 2 . We received a copy of a letter dated November 1 , 1991 from William T. Boyd of IDOT to Tom Schelewitz of AEU listing five ( 5 ) specific points . Points 1 , 2 , 3 , and 5 relate to technical submissions and/or revisions which the State needs from the applicant . Point 4 , however , states that "A letter from the Village of Oak Brook stating that they agree to operate and maintain the revised floodway per section 708. 80(a) ( 4) of the department ' s rules for floodway construction" . IDOT is apparently requiring that the Village agree to operate and maintain the floodway which in this case is entirely within private property. I am attaching a copy of Section 708. 80( a) for your reference. Subparagraph A) would have the Village of Oak Brook primarily responsible for operation and maintenance of the floodway on this private property. Subparagraph B) would have the property owner as the primarily responsible party but have the Village as a secondary responsible party should the primary party default . It seems somewhat inappropriate for the Village of Oak Brook to agree to maintain any private property relative to the proposed development of a private individual . I am also forwarding this questions to Village Attorney Martens for his legal review concerning the appropriateness of IDOT ' s request . 33 Mr . Tom Hawk November 14 , 1991 Page 2 3 . Mr . Boyd ' s letter also states that the proposed construction results in a loss of the 10 to 100-year floodway storage which is not permissible. This comment is in keeping with comment 5 of my October 17 . 1991 memo which states that the proposed compensatory storage does not meet the Village ' s requirements of having a 1 to 1 ratio. 4 . The applicant needs to apply for and receive a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA prior to commencing any construction activity. This , of course, assumes that IDOT and the Village approve this application. 5. The applicant must address the eleven factors within the Floodplain Ordinance. Since it appears that we are some time away from the final comments from both IDOT and the County, it again appears appropriate to table this item to the December 16th Plan Commission meeting. Respe tf;ly ubmitted, Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg Attach. ILLINOIS REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION — NOTICE OF ADOPTED RULES 7 ` y 12) For public flood control projects, the permitting _l requirements of this section will be considered met if the applicant can demonstrate to the Department through hydraulic and hydrologic calculations that the proposed project will not singularly or cumulatively result in increased flood heights outside the project right-of-way or easements for all flood events up to and including the 100-year frequency event. 13) If the appropriate use would result in a change in the regulatory floodway location or the 100-year frequency flood elevation, the applicant shall submit to the Department and to FEMA all the information, calculations and documents necessary to be issued a conditional regulatory floodway map revision and receive from the Department a conditional J approval of the regulatory floodway change before a permit is issued. However, the final regulatory floodway map will not be changed by the Department until as-built plans are J submitted and accepted by FEMA and the Department. In the case of non-government projects, the municipality in incorporated areas and the county in unincorporated areas - must concur with the proposed conditional regulatory floodway map revision before Department approval can be given. 14) All engineering analyses shall be performed by or under the supervision of a registered professional engineer, except in _I the case of a federal project. J 15) All dams, as defined by 92 Ill . Adm. Code 702, shall meet the permitting requirements of Part 702 (Construction and Maintenance of Dams) . Section 708.80 Changes to the Regulatory Floodway J a) The 100-year frequency flood profile and regulatory floodway shall not be changed by the Department unless one of the following has occurred: J1 ) The original regulatory floodway delineation is shown by the applicant's engineer to be in error based upon a review of '—- physical data or the mathematical model ; i 2) There are changed conditions such as changes in land use or �� modifications to the ground elevations which require ILLINOIS REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF ADOPTED RULES modification of the original regulatory floodway computations; i — 3) A public flood control project has been constructed and is operable; or _ 4) The unit of local government exercising zoning control over an area within its corporate limits proposes or concurs in 7 the proposal that the floodway storage or conveyance be relocated to facilitate development and a unit of local government will either: A) Assume responsibility to operate and maintain any modifications or improvements made to relocate the floodway; or —I B) Have the right and will agree, upon default of the party primarily responsible for such operation and maintenance, to undertake such operation and maintenance. b) Any person contesting the correctness of the delineation shall be given an opportunity to submit his or her own technical evidence of error or changed conditions . The Department will review the technical evidence to determine the correctness of the delineation. c) Effective regulatory floodway conveyance or storage can be relocated by moving the regulatory floodway delineation onto the =I existing flood fringe property if the following criteria are met: 1 ) It must be shown through engineering calculations that the new regulatory floodway storage or conveyance gained effectively compensates for lost regulatory floodway storage or conveyance; 2) If the affected property is other than the applicant's or is subdivided or proposed to be subdivided, covenants shall be obtained and recorded on the affected properties to assure that they are maintained with the existing and future Jowner's agreement as regulatory floodway storage or conveyance areas; 3) The regulatory floodway map is revised to include the new area as regulatory floodway; and 4) A notice of such regulatory floodway map change is recorded II' with the affected parcel in the county recorder's office. '. ILLINOIS REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' NOTICE OF ADOPTED RULES d) After receipt of conditional approval of the regulatory floodway change and issuance of a permit, construction as necessary to change the regulatory floodway designation may proceed but no buildings or structures or other construction that is not an appropriate use may be placed in that area until the regulatory floodway map is changed. The regulatory floodway map will be revised upon acceptance by the Department and FEMA of the "as-built" plans. e) The Department may require deed restrictions, performance bonds or sureties, as-built certification or maintenance guarantees to --� assure projects are built according to permitted plans. f) All field surveys as required by this Part shall be conducted under the supervision of a registered professional engineer or !� registered land surveyor, and shall be so sealed. All required engineering analyses shall be conducted under the supervision of a' registered professional engineer or in the case of a federal project, by the federal agency and shall be so sealed or stated. (Source: Amended at 13 Ill . Reg. , effective June 1989.) N Section 708.90 Delegation to Municipalities and Counties a) NO UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING HOME RULE UNITS, MAY ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER APPARENT AUTHORIZATION FOR ANY PROHIBITED NEW CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE REGULATORY FLOODWAY (Section 18g of the Act) . b) The Department will delegate to municipalities within incorporated areas and to counties within unincorporated areas the Department's authority to issue permits in accordance with this Part for non-governmental activities, upon determination by the Division that the following conditions have been met: 1 ) The municipality or county is participating in the regular I, phase of the National Flood Insurance Program; 2) The municipality or county has enacted an ordinance that adopts requirements at least as restrictive as this Part; and 3) The municipality or county has enacted an ordinance which requires that all proposed regulatory floodway projects are reviewed under the supervision of a• registered professional engineer under the employ or contract of the municipality or county and, in the case of appropriate uses, so stated in writing by that registered professional engineer to meet the specific requirements of Section 708.70. Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Water Resources 201 West Center Court/Schaumburg,Illinois/60196-1096 November 1, 1991 Subject: DOWR Application No.: 910331 Applicant: Associated Equipmenmt Distributors Project: Proposed Berm Watercourse: Salt Creek Community: Oak Brook Mr. Tom Schelewitz Associated Equipment Distributors 615 Hunter Drive Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Dear Mr. Schelewitz: Thank you for the application for permit for the above referenced project located in Oak Brook. According to the application you propose to place a berm around the property to protect the parking lot and the yard of Associated Equipment Distributors (AED). Due to the fact that the site of the proposed construction is located within the floodway of Salt Creek an Illinois Department of Transportation/Division of Water Resources permit is required. The information submitted with the application is not sufficient for us to continue the review. In order for us to continue the review of your application you need to submit the following information: 1) Revised base line hydraulic model with modified cross-section data which reflects the entire floodplain. Cross-sections 67874, 68023, 68180 and 6831 only reflected a portion of the floodplain geometry. As a result the program inserted vertical walls at the point when the profile exceeded the survey data and much of the floodplain storage and conveyance was not represented in the analysis. 2) Modified grading plan which shows the following a) floodway delineation from the IDOT/DOWR state regulatory maps b) modified existing floodway delineation c) proposed floodway delineation 3) Revised cross-section plots which show the limits of the modified existing floodway and the proposed floodway. 4) A letter from the Village of Oak Brook stating that they agree to operate and maintain the revised floodway per section 708.80(a)(4) of the Department's Rules for Floodway Construction (copy enclosed). 0 Mr. Tom Schelewitz November 1, 1991 Page Two 5) Revised storage caculations which includes that portion of the berm which runs parallel to 22nd Street. Be advised that your current submittal shows that the proposed construction results in a loss of the 10 to 100-year floodway storage which is not permissible. i The review of your application can continue after we receive the requested information. If you have any questions I can be reached at (708)705-4341. Sincerely, William T. Boyd Civil Engineer Northern Technical Analysis and Regulation Unit WTB:gw 2477w cc: Oak Brook DuPage County D.E.C., (Tony Charlton, Rob Covy) Lindley & Sons Federal Emergency Management Agency �7 rn Illinois Department of Conservation life and land together LINCOLN TOWER PLAZA • 524 SOUTH SECOND STREET • SPRINGFIELD 62701-1787 CHICAGO OFFICE • ROOM 4-300 • 100 WEST RANDOLPH 60601 BRENT MANNING, DIRECTOR ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSULTATION AGENCY ACTION REPORT Date Submitted: PROJCODE: October 29. 1991 Date Due For Office Use Only Agency Name: VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Contact Person: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Phone: (708) 990-3010 Agency Address: 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 DESCRIBE PRECISE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION County(i es) : DuPage City/Town: Oak Brook Township/Range/Section: Township 39 North, Range 11 East, Southwest Quarter Section 24 U.S.G.S. Quad Map Name(s) : Hinsdale Brief Description of the Proposed Action: Associated Equipment Distributorsutors corporate office has requested a Flood Plain Special Use to regrade and build a levee around their building and parking lot adjacent to Salt Creek. 615 Hunter Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois, 60521 Please enclose a map delineating the location of the proposed action. FOR NATURAL HERITAGE USE ONLY .> Y QUADCODE(S) : 71� Are there threatened/endangered species or n 'atural areas Located within the vicinity of the project? t Yes �`o ( � The consultation process is terminated? ! Ye 1 No ] If 'No', complete the enclosed Detailed Ageffcy Action Report to continue the consultation process. Evaluation Approved by: Deanna Glosser, Ph.D. Date Endangered & Threatened Species Program Manager ;1,10 y PROJECT LOCATION herr d. ,\O $ — 3 � ;T.nb•r '•� Lys 4 '�+P" 1' � � � � � I'll p � �`�" ' J —a. 1 Haab• �"t �' wooerleee K;t'U ; F "7_. Fro*.--- Or TOLL .._ Gd} PLAZA ...l � r� Conrm�o• — `' Ad%l - j�o r.r 2S.1 3• CERMAK - SPC' l o Executive W�rO�°on� E STC H EST E EAST t OAK i ;DoH Course �I .L, I 1 BROOK,`. ' r �• ButlorNotbne1, f ' Y'O Doll Club �+ , v r t...: 1 a\•1 ; nt.rn.tbr,.l Spar is y Ytv \ p Coro is • S E ut TRKWOOOS 0. _i P,.; ----�; .. a Brurwood Or. rlay pe='s-"HQ1�!w '.`L� Cr Z ' C •q` le., 4 r� i s 'ai v p p t s /'. O BEMIS WOODS NORTH y 1- ` #A� c ! �•urntwrt, w rlw.�� 0 FOREST PRESERVE 11a►� M �w 1' 33rd St. M hr• Cr N lokt ic* Tr•il FULLERf�URO'F. r_ ZM•Ilnd Cnfk FOREiT' 34%h5t �" 0 C-6-71, HUNTER TR ILS PRESERVECI'�' cc �•' et ►acc•al ecn �r�Tr�il_Ln.�W EST i 4Q.F ! .�-�- - Sl N.. 75th Budd Stj � 1 �iA. Iri 'Y� . •r. ILuthin_9 o I •. N u O l5Y I Meyldeke �I eta' ; - ,� •sl w C: u ,ee� vec BEMIS WOODS SOUTH ien Retiremt I OAK BROOK F.,.L �r A :` i0-.. FOREST PRESERVE`S Village q emmwCom.' h Cemetery R:--+ 1 S "1 'cl YORK TOWNSHIP >E'• Glandal Ave.; ,gyp • -:" - ,N 1 t DOWNERS_GR TWP. Bireh ' A. �� `^ a Rw�er! 1 t IB�i-—ood_d.- 0ircLrw°od A1•f Yt' c I �Y r! ! %.3•'' s J`I: e'•. BirQrwoedB_�'a '.,4 0 NI �.N i' i• Oilr $L • '1�6dM Pons Hill Ln.i Rd Tem. 1 i '1. 1 I.. r..__..�;' �...•:.- £ k � • 1 o i3 r .� °1VESTM NT - Gnter r17 .j l Q I L� !�' —1 F_ul�Fulled u ,.�. :, i�<•< MaoN��++� r ;�✓ 1• �- BonnirBrae Rd. � .r'_-!- :_-•,-��_ -yr Oak+t2od rl� —"have r�t_��V�. -AT E•�_-i 7011 r� t 11) -1a11aw -��.. Nt l�r. r r ,. Meume , W I� •x, �1 �' r ��=-I ��t!, c o Hrt i � OAKWOOB �' "c OEN c, Cenur St_ I'St� F 1 C'' p pG •` Minned� M_inned t� cc Cnntnut 3r o Ind nceiilsJ'2 ` .t•1 F) lanurrp'St. ■'.i.... I 1�n': �+. ;AIMt 1;; i y Morna� w AWee Sl ] i Rd,' _ `•, Aau rM y tern A a!ir _ 1 >r C'�u l::'n Y ¢I. J• ii�(� �� 1� lrl� _� N !:I�ICi rn•-•' ..i Hampton\ '� av�neRd.-_ •St.�W Ilow:Re_M_3.....- LOCATION MAP �Z J G�OF OAA A P 90 � O a O FCOUNtr' VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 October 29, 1991 708 990-3000 Illinois Department of Conservation Division of Natural Heritage 524 South Second Street Springfield, Illinois 62701-1787 RE: Flood Plain Special Use - AED Gentlemen: Enclosed please find your "Endangered Species Consultation Agency Action Report" form which I have filled out . Associated Equipment Distributors corporate offices in Oak Brook are proposing to regrade their property and construct a levee to protect them from flooding from Salt Creek. They presently have an application for Flood Plain Special Use before the Village of Oak Brook which we are considering. I recently became aware of your requirement that these types of applications need to be reviewed by you. Please review this item and let me know your determination as soon as possible. Since a y, Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg / cc: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement V Official File Bill Lindley, Lindley & Sons , Inc. Illinois Department of Conservation life and hind together LINCOLN TOWER PLAZA • 524 SOUTH SECOND STREET • SPRINGFIELD 62701-1167 CHICAGO OFFICE • ROOM 4-300 • 100 WEST RANDOLPH 60601 BRENT MANNING,DIRECTOR ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSULTATION AGENCY ACTION REPORT Date Submitted: October 29. 1991 PROJCODE: Date Due: For Office Use Only Agency Name: VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Contact Person: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Phone: (708) 990-3010 Agency Address: 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 DESCRIBE PRECISE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION County(i es) : DuPage City/Town: Oak Brook Township/Range/Section: Township 39 North, Range 11 East, Southwest Quarter Section 24 U.S.G.S. Quad Map Name(s) : ,Hinsdale Brief Description of the Proposed Action: Associated Equipment Distributors corporate office has requested a Flood Plain Special Use to regrade and build a levee around their building and parking lot adjacent to Salt Creek. 615 Hunter Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois, 60521 Please enclose a map delineating the location of the proposed action. FOR NATURAL HERITAGE USE ONLY QUADCODE(S) : Are there threatened/endangered species or natural areas located within the vicinity of the project? [ Yes No ] The consultation process is terminated? l Yes j No 7 If 'No', complete the enclosed Detailed Agency Action Report to continue the consultation process. Evaluation Approved by: Deanna Glosser, Ph.D. Date 3 Endangered & Threatened Species Program Manager PROJECT LOCATION a. lip 4 . raa p• �, q 2 3 --�� a D' wt�°'1. 1 r^woos. �� ck '\4 _ Woodridge Or �qe I=— TOLL -Gdf :•' bra 1 PLAZA Ad�l so Part' or r-I Z .S. CERMAK - g ExxoutIv* G eon WESTCHESTE EAST WESTOAK e .Golf Course BROOK II b' ' f• r -Butler Nat nal Y'G ` Golf Club K on r 12 Ln t 10 t f% ' p' nUrnattonal y Ir LL S , Ilk Spar ts Cor• I ' '' ;70+� d q - -fi ---��1 club t , Brv.Yood Dr. �O( Pd� <�i Q_ "Ise Y Zop 0 p ~ BEMIS WOODS NORTH p�rti " % 1 Ir.FYllrrraYle': �t+�rLtw.�-_Y O FOREST PRESERVE 91ayst1 0. �` �, hrY 33rd St. Lake 'r- ' ..v t,daIs Rd. ` foe Trail PUlLER1tbUR0'F,• O > Crafk FOREiT1 yahSt }' Oft \ / Ipolard lNUNTER TR ILS RESERNEg�� ' 4 r¢ r%rr- fit raar.a.l sea p••r�jTlail�n_�WEST C' .. 3Slh St < ]Stn l!-- - St:....-. J�-•- ,S ''� �T A 1 IT th d r Budd Stj , . 'f ILuthin_ o Mayslak• ' w t ' d r a I I 0 Yr est t BEMIS WOODS SOUTH Retirement 1 OAK BROOK ' H"o" -1 I - W Ac°�Ln'u- .^ /r (;I FOREST PRESERVE`S Village I g'SronswooC'• cam. ;G I1 v1 H 1W o0 3I ve.e _� 1 Cemetery . u/ c I 'YORK TOWNSHIP --1 _ ' Gleridal AYe.;,!.. nl I a t DOWNERS GRAVE TWP. STi _ �S!lsgr!aod Birc++ A. 4" 'n `o : Birchwood d. BYd Al t ; il,"! O �y� r Oaks St. • £ `t mill0+" �' ►rne Hill Ln.� i Rd Tarra�• { 1: I.,- Y• Y,. ESTMONT - Vn,erot+^l .�� (Ir1 ,. t! V 1 • �'_— Full" Fullo 1.Y.�N -i. �. Y >..•�r M St. �� 1 i�✓�� ti •. Bonnierflrae Rd. •�: -.- = r ' " <� MaP•^�,.rr+=^ Oakh tit �� -�•�a.a(I ...�+ k.3 d Re. �'=iri l too NIn i, 1 Cerra St. r Maum-e-lIll; W N• a I' a Lardla-, . 0►RW°00 I ��' oEN t, --- = YSt'/ >s 1 °` ]l s� wr 8 P..a • dpi OG f]+eeUut_ �C Indro•nH•nc•��"�" aLanunq'St. /'i.... ILanel N:.tn•�. ;yyalnutF, ':ss ;� !r N A r•e St. Rd_y a Maris I `• _ _1'' 'Y_ tr+. < i k .^s_•,_ Aa« Hast• iJ � �.. y� �� Ln.d = N1 �� L.��•= avrrr Rd. St. �..--. LOCATION MAP LLGAL IIJII�L V� FLy OAK BROOK DU PARK'NOTICE �OF �RI IC COUHFARINP INO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that aof Of before the Zoning Board d Appeals at the VXlags Oakak Brook ok.DuPage and Cook Counties.IpYroM.will be Mid on November 5,1991 at 730 p.m.in the Oak Brook Village Hal,1200 Oak Brock Road, IBlncs, for IM purpose of considering the application of Associated Equipment Distributors for various relief as follows: /V/ L 11 approval of a I"Plain Spedai Use Permit as provided under section 10-34 of the VIKage Code to allow construction of a levee and cher land ions, and various drainage. structures within the Sell CreeCtoo k Flood Plain and Floodway and 21 any other relief as may be necessary to accomplish the �.The properly may be and the described a3 ion 22nd ILISHER S CERTIFICATE Street, Oak Break,IOMtob, and the legal description Is as f follows. I That pan of the Southwest Ouarter of Section 24 Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,DuPage County Illinois,being more tufty described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner ol the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24;thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 notice, a true copy of which is attached to this certificate, seconds,West sitting the South line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 24,said line also being the center line of 22nd Street a distance of 1185.0 feet; ce each week for . Qr e , weeks successively; that the 1' thence North 0 degrees 23,minutes 35 seconds West a distance d 85.37 be to a poke on the North right of way 9th Ine of 22nd Street(Cermak road)said point also being . . . . . . . . . . . da of . OctoberA. D. D 9 on the Westerly One of a dedicated road, recorded Y A. D. 19 9�. . . , and March 21,1962 as document Number R62.7996;thence continuing North 0 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds vas the . . . . . . . . . . . day of• • , , • , , , , , , A. D. 19 West,along the Westerly line of said dedicated road,a distance o1 50.02 feet;thence North 86 degrees 57 minutes lyofaseconds West along a line which is with loot nd :D That THE DOINGS is a secular newspaper of general Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to.the Northerly right of way line of 22nd Street(Cermak road)a distance of 387.52 feet lora a Villages of Hinsdale, Clarendon Hills, Oak Brook, Burr place of beginning;thence continuing North 88 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds West along the previously irien and Oakbrook Terrace and circulated generally in the described line a distance of me Soule Oak Brook,Burr Ridge,Willowbrook and Cities of Darien 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds thence Wesl along a line , which is 50.0 lad Northerly of as measured parallel with and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of unincorporated and incorporated areas and in DuPage and 22nd street a distance of 46.26 feet;thence North 0 f degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of areas; that said THE DOINGS is a``newspaper"as defined 214.26 feet;thence North 52 degrees 43 minutes 55 de ones Est a distaninutes ce of 304.52 feet;thence ole South o vided for such situations,to wit;by Section 5 of"An Act to 409.92 feet to IM place of beginning,in DuPage County 1874,Feb. 13,R.S. 1874, P. 723 § 5 as amended 1959 Ju- Illinois a4 „ f f , Permanent Parcel e0624307-010, also a newspaper as defined by Section 1 of"An Act con- All persons desiring to be heard in support o1 or in opposition „ to the proposed reliel or any provision thereof,will be afforded s, 1909,June 8,Laws 1909 p. 288 § 1 as amended 1927, an opportunity to do so and may submit their statements orally f , , or in writing or both.The hearing may be recessed to anolher as further amended 1945 April 12 Laws 1945, p. 1089, 1u1 �' date if notice of time and place thereof is publicly announced at f f the hearing or is given by newspaper publication not less than y Laws 1957, . 2270 live(5)days prior to the date of the recessed hearing. f !' L , j�t/ 1, and as further amended The petition application is on file with the Village Clerk and 1 1; and that said THE DOINGS has with the Director d Code Enforcement. Persons wishing to been continuously examine the petition documents may arrange to do so with the Ist once each week with a minimum of 50 issues per year Director of Code Enforcement,Thomas Hawk, 1212 Oak Brook Road.990-3045 Iblication of the attached notice. Linda Gonnella Village Clerk WITNESS WHEREOF one of the co-publishers of said Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board d Appeals d the Village of Oak Break.DuPage f p and Counties,Illinois. THE DOINGS has affixed his hand and seal this Published in The Doings October 9,1991. yof . . .QQtQhQr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A.D. 19 91. . . . Publishers Charge . . . 71.44 • • , • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Publisher �Z1 OF Oqk 9 "P ACO �v f i G c� 9cF �♦y COUNtV V1 LLAG E OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 October 17 , 1991 708 990-3000 MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. SUBJECT: Flood Plain Special Use - AED I have preliminarily reviewed the Flood Plain Special Use Application which I received on October 2 , 1991 and offer the following comments : 1 . The AED property is located within the Salt Creek flood plain and is also within the Salt Creek floodway. Appendix 7 of the Lindley report depicts the property on the FEMA FIRM map and also on the FEMA FLOODWAY map. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study depicts a varying 100-year high water level through this area as between 657 . 9 - 657 .3 . The IDOT Regulatory Flood maps also depict a varying 100-year high water level as between 657 . 8 - 657 . 1 . Please keep in mind that these maps are the original flood plain and floodway maps from 1981 and do not reflect the recent dredging accomplished by the State. The County is hopeful to re-map Salt Creek within the next few years , but until they do, these maps are the currently used regulatory maps by the various regulatory agencies . 2. Because the area is within the Salt Creek floodway, the applicant has made application to IDOT. I have spoken with Bill Boyd who is reviewing the application in Schaumburg regarding their progress . Bill informed me that IDOT is requesting additional information from Bill Lindley, the applicant ' s engineer , and that they are still unsure of whether or not they will require the applicant to provide a dynamic computer model as opposed to the submitted steady state computer model . Bill stated that they are approximately one to two months away from IDOT issuing a permit if the application is found to be acceptable. 3 . I have also formally requested from DuPage County their review, analyzation and recommendations concerning this proposal . This is in keeping with the concept within the recently adopted Countywide Stormwater Ordinance since it involves work within the floodway. The County currently has the FEQ dynamic model within their files which they can run with this application to see if there are any adverse impacts . As of this date, I have not received a reply from DuPage County on my request and the.ir analyzation. Mr. Tom Hawk October 17 , 1991 Page 2 4 . The proposal calls for the construction of a levee with a top elevation of 657 .0 to protect the parking lot , building, and Hunter Drive from the frequent flood events. You can see that the area still will flood in the 100-year flood; the applicant ' s desire is to not totally remove this area from the flood plain, but only keep his building and parking lot usable in the more frequent and less high flood events. Many of the existing trees on the site will be removed and a proposed landscaping plan includes some replacements. The area behind the levee will be drained by a pump with a pumping rate of 200 gallons per minute. This rate equates to 0.45 cfs . Since the area behind the levee is approximately 2 acres , this equates to 0.23 cfs per acre. 5. The Engineering Department has calculated the existing flood plain volume on the site up to elevation 657 as 13 .3 acre feet . The proposed compensatory storage volume up to elevation 657 calculates to 7 .7 acre feet . Consequently, the proposal does not meet the Village ' s requirement of having a 1 : 1 compensatory storage ratio. The newly adopted DuPage County Flood Plain Ordinance requires a 1 . 5: 1 compensatory storage ratio. This issue should be part of the discussion which we receive back from DuPage County. 6. Many questions and details remain to be addressed to the applicant and his engineer . Examples include drawing the property lines onto the Engineering drawings, defining what work is proposed to be done off of the site, and are the proposed depressional areas behind the levee and the 200 gallon per minute pump sufficient to handle a 100-year rain event regarding detention purposes . 7 . DuPage County is currently proceeding with a Salt Creek Watershed Plan which includes projects known as Alternative 7 ( the Elmhurst Quarry and the Wood. Dale-Itasca Reservoirs are part of this plan) . Preliminary information received from the County states that , if Alternative 7 is constructed, the 100-year high water level of Salt Creek at 22nd Street will drop by approximately 1 .3 feet . If those projects do get constructed and the 100-year flood level drops by that amount , the levee will remove the greater portion of the . property from the 100-year flood plain. The question then becomes whether the applicant needs to construct this much of an improvement to protect himself from the more frequent and less high storm events . N Mr . Tom Hawk October 17 , 1991 Page 3 8. The concept of floodproofing as espoused by the various regulatory agencies is one of floodproofing buildings rather than entire lots. For instance, IDOT allows the floodproofing of a building up to approximately ten ( 10 ' ) feet beyond the outside wall and does not require compensatory storage ( it seems unfair to require compensatory storage of a singular building when our goal is to reduce flood damages to people' s homes and businesses. Additionally, an individual structure has a miniscule volume compared to the flood plain) . This application, however, is going beyond the normal idea of floodproofing and is not only floodproofing the building but the parking lot and much of the rest of the lot as well . If sufficient compensatory storage can be found and the respective computer models show no adverse affects, then this application should be approved. However , it appears that compensatory storage may be a problem as well as other issues which are currently being reviewed. In light of the many outstanding issues, it seems appropriate that the Plan Commission hear the presentation by the applicant and his engineer , enter into initial questions and discussions , and then table this application to the November Plan Commission meeting. Respeqflflly submitted, Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer DLD/etg 1� LEGAL NOTICE k Nm:Louis R.Main LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK LEGAL NOTICE OuPage County Atlbrnsy Na 77700 STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF DU PAGE OU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES,ILLINOIS STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF OU PAGE Address:115 E.First SL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NOTICE OF PURI IC DARING IN THE CFKAAT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH ALWCIAL CIRCUIT �Him EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Published in Phone:709 32:46600 ESTATE OF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pubic heat"bNors the Doig October 2,9 and 16,1991 Louse V.Pagano,Deceased Case No.91P 0957 Notice is given of the death of Louise V. Pagano whose Zorwng Board of Appeals d the Villags of Oak Brook DuPage ESTATE OF i address was 21 Spinning Wheel Road,Hinsdale.Illinois. and Cods Counties Illinois,oil be held on Nowrrber 5,1991 al Evelyn A TeBodkhorst Cass N0.91P 0815 LEGAL NOTICE Loners Of Office were issued on October 4, 1991 to NOW V. 7O0 pm in the Oak Brock Village Hal,1200 Oak Brook Road, Notioe is given of the death Of Evelyn A.TeBockhonkt whose STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF DU PAGE Ferrara, 7301 West Harrsm,Forest Park, Illinois 60130,as Illinois, for the purpose of considering the apps anon of address was 15 W.675 82nd Street,Hinsdale,IL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR whose ahorney is David D.Laurie. I-sod arad Equips se a Distributors for various relief as gallows: Leaere d Office were issued on September 13,1991 to Allen EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Letizia 6 Leuzia, Ltd., One Lincoln Centre, Suite 1170, 1)approval of a Flood Plain Sped al Use Permit as provided C. TeBodchorst, 2109 Camellia Court, Naperville, IL as ESTATE OF Oakbrook Terrace,IFinos 60161, under section 10.34 of the Village Cods to slow construction of INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR whose attorney is David J.Lynann, MICHAEL E.SORVILLO.deceased Case No.89P785 NOTICE TO HEIRS AND LEGATEES a Twee and other land modifications. and various drainage 431 S.Dearborn,81604 Chicago,IL 60805. Notice is given of the death of Michael E. Sorvino whose The estate win be adrtwkistered without Court Supervision, structures within the Sall Creek Flood Plain and Floodway and NOTICE TO HEIRS AND LEGATEES address was 1010 351h Street,Oak Brook,Illinois 60521. unless under section 28.4 of the Probate Act(Il,Rut.Stat.1981, 21 any other raw as they be necessary to atoomllsh the Notice Is hereby q"n to Alen C. TeBaikhorst, Gail A Loders of Oryx were issued an August 21,1989 to N above.The property may be generally described as 615 22nd To8odkhorst,Orville F.TeBodkhorat and Unknown Hairs who Nancy L Chap. 110 V2 para 281)any interested person terminates Strew, Oak Brook, Illinois, and the legal description is as are heirs or legatees in the above proceeding. INDEPENDENT 3EXECUTOR�whose attorneyls.Thomas E a pepenn o adrtninistroth C any tittle C mailing or delivering tdlowL to probate a will and whose nitre or address s not stated n Swa petition to temknare o the Gait Court Cork. The petition to admit the will to probate, that an order was Illinois 60603. 8 Austin,One First National Plaza.Chicago, Clans agora the estate may rc tiled a the Office d Ci bar, Court Clerk JOEL KAGANr Circuit Court sena,201 Reber That part d the Southwest Quarter d Section 24 entere0 by the Court on September 13, 1991 admitting the will NOTICE TO HEIRS AND LEGATEES Street,Wheaon, Illinois,M with the to probate. The estate will be administered without Court Supervision, Representative April ,1 both, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third before 6 months from the date d first publication(April 9,1992), Principal Meridian,DuPage County IFinds,being more Within 42 days after the effective date of the original order of unless under section 284 of the Probate Act(111.Rev.Stat.1981, any claim not fled v i hin that period s barred.Cias d apa claim fully described as follows: Commencing at the admission.you may file a petition with the Court to require proof Chap. 11012,para. 284) any interested person terminates filed with the Circuit Court Clerk must be mailed or delivered Ip Southeast Comer of the Southwest Quarter of said Of the will by Testimony of the waresses to the will in open Court independent administration at any time by mailing or delivering the representative and to the attorney,it any,within 10 days alter Section 24;thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 Or Other evidence,as provided in section 6-21 of the Probate Act a petition to terminate to the Circuit Cion Clerk it has been filed with the Circuit Clerk seconds,West along the South line of the Southwest 1975(Ill.Rev.Slat.1981,Ch.110.1/2,para.6-21). Claims against the estate may be filed in the Office of Circuit Quarter of said Section 24,said line also ben the You also have the right under section 8.1 d the Probate Act Court Clerk Joel Ka ann, DuPage County Courthouse, 201 Name:David D.Leffzs center line d 22nd Sir"a distance of 1185.being 1975(111.Rev.Star.1981,Ch.110-U2,para 8-1)to contest the geber Street,Wheaton, Illinois a with the Representative or �a9°inn Attorney No.1,1490 thence North 0 degrees 23.minutes 35 seconds West a validity of the will by filing a petition with the Court within 6 both,within 6 months from the date d first publication of this Attorney for Petitioner: P Address:One Lirirrdn Centre,Suite 1170 distance d 85.37 too to a on the North ht d way rtortths atter admission d the will to prorate. notice and any claim not filed within that period is barred. flirt rill Y CityOakbrook Terrace,Illinoisgj 60181 line d 22nd Street Cemrak road)said pont also bei The estate will be administered without Court Supervision, Copies of a claim filed with the Circuli Court Clerk must be ( ed (708)916 2080 on the Westerly lints d a dedicated road, retarded unless under section 284 of the Probate Act(III.Rev.Stat.1981, /nailed or delivered to the representative and to the attorney,it published in The Doings October 9,16 173m119:91 . Mardi 21,1982 as document Number R62-7996;thence Chap. 11012,para 284) any interested person terminates any,within 10 days after it has been tied. continuing North 0 degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds independent administration at any time by mailing or delivering Name:Thomas E.Swaney/Sidney&Austin West,a"the Westerly lime of said dedicated road,a a petition to terminate to the Circuit Coun Clerk. DuPage County Attorney No.79800 distance of 50.02 feet;thence North 88 degrees 57 Charas against the estate may be filed in the Office of JOEL Address:One First National Plaza rrinutes 39 seconds West along a line which is 50.0 feet KAGANN, Circuit Coun Clerk, 201 Reber Street. Wheaton, Cly:Chicago,Illinois 60603 LEGAL NOTICE Northerly of as measured parallel with and Illinois, or with the Representative or both before March 26, Phone:(312)853-7476 CERTIFICATE NO.29762 was filed in the office of the County perpendicular to,the Northerly right of way line of 22nd 1992• any claim not filed within that period s barred.Copies d Published in The Doings Septemtber 25,October 2 and 9,1991 Clerk of DuPage County on September 20,1991 wherein tl.;; Street(Cermak road) a distance d 387.52 feet for a a claim filed with the Circuit Court Clerk must be mailed or business firm at ACCURATE AUTO BODY,Located at 1692 W. place of beginning;thence continuing North 88 degrees delivered to the representative and o the attorney,if any,within Quincy Avenue 8128,Naperville,was registered;that the true or 57 minutes 39 seconds West along the previously t0 days after it has been filed with the Circuit Clerk. LEGAL NOTICE real name or names d the person or persons owning the described line a distance of 197.40 feet;thence South CERTIFICATE NO.29758 was filed in the office of the County business,with their respective post office address(es)isiare as 89 degrees 36 minutes 25 seconds West along a line Name:David J.Lynam Clerk of DuPage County on September 19, 1991 wherein the follows' which is 50.0 feet Northerly of as measured parallel with DuPage County Attorney No.21207 business firm of Quality Cortparator Services(C.C.S.).Located NAME(S)OF PERSON(S) ADDRESS(ES) and perpendicular to the Northerly right of way line of Attorney for Petitioner:Allen C.TeBockhorst at P.O.Boz 5104,Oakbrook,IL,60522 was registered;that the William T.Carroll Jr. 21 Spinning Wheel Rd.,84K,Hinsdale 22nd street a distance of 46.26 feet;thence North 0 Address:431 S.Dearborn,Ste.1604 true or real name or names of the person or persons owning the IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and degrees 23 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of City:Chicago business,with their respective post office address(es)is/are as- Official Seal,at my office in Wheaton,Illinois,this 20th day of Phone:312427-8741 follows: September A.D.,1991. second feet;thence North 52 degrees thence minuses 55 Published in The Doings Sepuermoer 25.October 2 and 9,1991 NAMES OF PERSONS ADDRESS ES g seconds East a distance of 304.52 feet;thence South 0 9 ( ) ( ) ADDRESS(ES) Gary A.Kin degrees 43 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of Daniel R.McMillan 5723 S.Grant,Hinsdale,IL 60521 Gary A.King,DuPage County Clerk 401.92 feet to the place of beginning,in DuPage County IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and Published in rhe Doings September 25.October 2 and 9.1991 Illinois Official Seal,at my office in Wheaton,Illinois,this 194h day of Permanent Parcel 806-24-307-010, LEGAL NOTICE September A.D.,1991 All persons desiring 10 be heard in support of or in opposition Gary A.King STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF DU PAGE to the proposed reiiet or any provision thereof,will be afforded Gary A.King,DuPage County Clerk LEGAL NOTICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Published in The Doin s Se to an opportunity to th so and may submit their statements orally g September 25, October 2 and 9,1991 CERTIFICATE NO.29757 was filed in the office d the County or in writing or both.The nearing may be recessed t0 another EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ESTATE OF Clerk of DuPage County on September 19, 1991 wherein the date if notice of tins and place thereol is publicly announced at JAMES W.JOHNSON Case No.91P928 LEGAL NOTICE business firm of Real Estate 60521. Located at 730 N. Elm the hearing or is given by newspaper publication not less than Notice is given of the death of James W.Johnson whose CERTIFICATE NO.29771 was filed in the office of the County Street,Hinsdale,Illinois 60521 was registered;that the true or ;no (5)days prior to the date of the recessed hearing. address was 623 South Gram Street,Hinsdale,IL 60521. Clerk of DuPage County on September 23. 1991 wherein the real name or names of the person or persons owning the The petition application is on lila with the Village Clerk and Loners d Ottioe were issued on September 25,1991 to Peter business firm of NEWS. ETC..Located at 288 Jackson St. business,with their respective post office address(es)istare as ezth The amine tDheepeUtion documents may r of Code arrange to do sont. Persons wl with the to M.Johnson and Nancy Johnson Power.C/O Louis R.main.115 Bartlett e person orrperso s owning istered;that tthe b s ness,withe true or real h heirrrespective Anames of IME(S)OF PERSON(S) ADDRESSES) E. First Street, Hinsdale, IL 60521 as EXECUTOR whose Director of Code Enforcement,Thomas Hawk,1212 Oak Brook attorney s Louis R.Main, post office address(es)islare as follows: Peter Lucas 730 N.Elm Hinsdale,IL 60521 Road.990.3045 NOTICE TO HEIRS AND LEGATEES NAME(S)OF PERSON(S) ADDRESS(ES) IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and Claims agaric the estate may be filed in the Office d JOEL A. Elisabeth Ann Steinbre mer 288 Jackson St.,Bartlett Official Seal,at my office in Wheaton,Illinois,this 19th day of IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and September A.D.,1991. Linda GonneNla KAGANN Circus Court Clonic. 201 Reber Street, Wheaton, Village Clerk Illinois.or with the Representative or both before Apnt 2,19W SeOffptember Seal at rtry office in Wheaton,Illinois.this 23rd day of Gary A.K'ug Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the any claim not filed within that period s barred.Copies d a claim September A.D.,1991. Gary A.King,DuPage County Clerk Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook OuPage fnad with the Circuit Court Clark must be mailed or delivered to Gary A.King Published in The Doings September 25,October 2 and 9,1991 and Cook Counties,Illinois. r,>a representative and to the attorney,i any,within 10 days after PblishGary A.King,DuPage County Clerk Ptblsn hed The Ooings October 9,1991. i has been tiled with the Circuit Client. ued in The Doi Oct ent. 2,9 and 16,1991 The Doings•Wednesday,October 9,1991•Page 51 A S S O C I A T E D E Q U I P M E N T D I S T R I B U T O R S October 7, 1991 President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Ladies and Gentlemen: For the past 27 years, Associated Equipment Distributors, an international trade association representing the construction equipment industry, has maintained its headquarters location at 615 W. 22nd Street in Oak Brook. We've enjoyed and benefitted from the fact that we are located in an area recognized as home to many major businesses and organizations. We want to stay in our "home" and continue to be a part of the Oak Brook community. Indeed, we have virtually no choice but to stay. We own the building and surrounding property and relocation would mean extreme economic hardship for our organization and its employees. That's why we're respectfully asking for the village's assistance to help us combat a serious flooding problem that continues to grow worse each subsequent year. The Salt Creek floodwaters which surround our building on a regular basis are more than just a nuisance. They endanger the health and safety of our employees. They disrupt traffic on the streets near our building. And the flooding costs our organization thousands of dollars in lost workhours annually. Over the years, AED has appreciated the village's generous cooperation when our building has flooded. You've provided sandbags and clean-up assistance on numerous occasions. Unfortunately, the situation has now reached a point where we need to ask for your permission to take more effective steps that will protect our home. Specialists in flood control and engineering have studied our situation. They've come to the conclusion that while the depth of flooding on our property is not increasing, the frequency and duration of floods is continuing to grow. A fact of life at 615 West 22nd Street is that we will "flood". Only the question of how often remains. This is the key reason why we are requesting a floodway revision. Please allow me to describe why this request is absolutely vital to the welfare of the 25 people who work at AED. We are faced with the danger and inconvenience of accessing a building surrounded by water several times a year--or with the prospect of lost wages and lost productivity if the building The Association Of Leaders In Equipment Distribution 615 WEST 22ND STREET OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 (708) 574-0650 FAX (708) 574-0132 F0 /4 L must be closed. Once the flood waters do recede, they leave behind debris, garbage, tree branches and raw sewage that must be cleaned-up before the grounds are again safe for our use. This situation was taken to an extreme in the 1987 flood when all of our employees were required to receive tetnus innoculations before being able to re-enter our building. With the recently completed channel improvements on Salt Creek north of 22nd Street finished last year and the resulting decrease in water velocity, the amount of residue which remained after the last two "floodings" has increased as less residue was carried downstream by the receding water. In conclusion, we have done all we can to address this problem. We have a solution that is practical and which will not have a negative affect on any of our Oak Brook neighbors. We simply need your understanding and a favorable ruling on our petition. With your consent, we can then remain in our facility and provide a safe working environment for our employees within the limits of village authority. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Sinc rely, Thomas J. Ich4elewitz Director of Business Affairs cc: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Village Engineer Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement Stephen Berley, Village Manager Bill Lindley, Lindley & Sons, Inc. >5 GOOF OgK0 P _"'f 400 G jO 4 �� COUNT" VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 October 2, 1991 708 990. 3000 i Dear Resident: The Oak Brook Plan Commission and/or Zoning Board of Appeals, and the Village Board will be considering a: Flood Plain Special Use at the meetings as scheduled on the reverse side of this notice. The application has been filed by: Associated Equipment Distribu- tors Relationship of Applicant to Property: Owner Name of Subdivision (if applicable) : The property in question is situated at: 615 22nd Street Also shown on the reverse side is a map of the area to assist you in determining your relationship to the property in question. The request which has been made is as follows: To permit land modifications, including a levee and channel modifications, and various drainage structure within the Salt Creek Floodway and Floodplain, to provide flood water protection . of the corporate offices of Associated Equipment Distributors. If you desire more detailed information, please contact me at the Building Dept. to review the file on this application. I look forward to your attendance at the public meetings. Sincerely yours, Thomas R. Hawk Director of Code Enforcement G�OF 04k 9 P '� 40 �} O N G O o �2 9C �� 4PCOUNO' V1 LLAC E OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 September 26, 1991 708 990- 3000 MEMO TO: Stephen Berley, Village Manager Dale Durfey, Village Engineer Richard Martens, Village Attorney FROM: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcemen SUBJECT: Flood Plain Special Use - Associated Equipment Distributors 615 22nd Street Please provide me with your comments regarding the attached Flood Plain Special Use petition no later than October 16, 1991, if at all possible. TRH/11 att. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Sept. 24, 1991 UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY BOARD APPROVED AS WRITTEN L—'" OR APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS BY VILLAGE BOARD ONla'44f« K 19 Ff 1. MEETING CALL: CALL TO ORDE The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order by President Bushy in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons at 7:42 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance was given. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL The Clerk called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: President Bushy, Trustees Bartecki, Krafthefer, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters. ABSENT: None. 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND OPEN FORUM: OPEN FORUM Ed Wisnewski, 3614 Madison Street, addressed the Board with his concerns regarding the Village drainage renovation at his property. He requested an alternative plan to the renovation in- which he would pay for any cost above what has been designated for the present project. The property owner next to 3614 Madison Street, Cleo Current, stated she will pay for any costs over said project that would affect their property. After further discussion, Mr. Wisnewski stated he will pay fees for engineering redesign 'of said project and any cost over the 1991 project cost. The Board requested Mr. Wisnewski meet with Village Engineer Durfey and Trustee Payovich to discuss said project. Trustee Winters moved to authorize the Village Engineer to withdraw said 1991 DRAIN- project from the 1991 Drainage Project and that it be reinstated on the 1992 AGE PROJECT Drainage Project. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. Voice Vote: Motion carried. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES Trustee Krafthefer moved to approve the Minutes of the Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting of September 9, 1991 as presented. Seconded by Trustee Bartecki. Voice Vote: Motion carried with Trustee Skinner abstaining. Trustee Krafthefer moved to approve the Minutes of the .Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of September 10, 1991 as presented. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. Voice Vote: Motion carried with Trustee Skinner abstaining. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: Trustee Skinner moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Seconded by Trustee Payovich. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6-Trustees Bartecki, Krafthefer, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters. Nays: 0-None. Motion carried. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -1- September 24, 1991 • A. ' ORDINANCES REGARDING APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, ANNEXATION OF ORD. ISTHA CERTAIN TERRITORY, AND ZONING NEWLY ANNEXED TERRITORY (Illinois State Toll Highway Authority) - Request to table to November 26, 1991 Board Meeting: Approved Omnibus Vote. B. Temporary Grant of Easement - Illinois Bell Telephone - Well #5 Site: EASEMENT - Approved Omnibus Vote. ILL. BELL - WELL #5 SITE C. Bid Authorization - Fire Station #1 Overhead Doors: Approved Omnibus FIRE STN. RC1 Vote. OVERHEAD DOO D. Bid Authorization - Office Cleaning - Village Facilities: Approved VILLAGE - Omnibus Vote. OFFICE CLEAN ING E. Bid Authorization - Carpeting - Sports Core Administration Building: SPORTS CORE Approved Omnibus Vote. CARPETING F. Recommendation to Release Funds - Oak Brook Hotel, Convention and OHCVC - FUND Visitors Committee: Approved Omnibus Vote. G. Payouts: PAYOUTS: 1. James J. Benes & Associates, Inc. - Payout #3 - 1991 Paving_ Project -1991 PAVING Engineering Services: Approved Omnibus Vote. PROJECT 2. Forest Preserve District of DuPage County- Payout #1 & Final - FULLERSBURG Fullersburg Crossings Property: Approved Omnibus Vote. CROSSINGS H Referral - Flood Plain Special Use (615 22nd Street - Associated REFERRAL: Equipment Distributors) -- Referred to Plan Commission of October 21, FPSU - 615- 1991 and Zoning Board of Appeals of November 5, 1991: Approved Omnibus 22nd STREET Vote. 6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: None. 7. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: A. RESOLUTION NO. R-540 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT KNOWN AS FJS RES. R-540 AND BGS RESUBDIVISION IN SITZBERGER'S SUBDIVISION (318 Canterberry Lane) :_FJS & BGS FINAL PLAT Trustee Skinner moved to pass Resolution No. R-540 as presented and waive the full reading thereof. Seconded by Trustee Winters. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6-Trustees Bartecki, Krafthefer, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner and Winters. Nays: 0-None. Motion carried. 8. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: None. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Discussion Regarding Oak Brook/Oakbrook Terrace Water Service Agreement: OAKBROOK TERRACE WATE President Bushy stated Village Engineer Durfey and she met with Oakbrook SERVICE Terrace Mayor Sarello, their City Attorney and Director of Tourism. to AGREEMENT VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes -2- September 24, 1991 7� PGE OF oAk 0900 � f • a C m G O 4 �2 9C000UNV'4 VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 708 990- 3000 September 16, 1991 MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen Berley and Tom Hawk SUBJECT: Board Referral - Flood Plain Special Use 615 22nd Street We have received a petition for a Flood Plain Special Use for protection from flood waters of Associated Equipment Distributors corporate offices. Please refer this to the Plan Commission for public hearing on October 21, 1991 and the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing on November 5, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Bexley Village Manager 47x) Tom Hawk Director of Code Enforcement 10-32 OAK BROOK CODE (c) Special Uses: Uses not listed above which are permitted or special uses under the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance for the subject property may be allowed upon issuance of a special use permit as set forth below. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77) Sec. 10-33. Occupation and use of wetlands. (a) (Generally:] In wetlands only those uses will be permitted which will not affect adversely the quantity or quality of the public water supply, drainage, storm water runoff or detention, or the health and safety of the village and its environs. (b) Permitted Uses: The uses listed in section 10-31(b) and any other uses permitted by the applicable provisions of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance which, in the opinion of the building commissioner, will not adversely affect the public water supply or the public health and sanitation. (c) Special Uses: Uses not listed above which are permitted or special uses under the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance for the subject property may be allowed upon issuance of a special use permit as set forth below. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77) Sec. 10-34. Special use permits. (a) Required: Any use listed in this article as requiring a spe- cial use permit may be allowed only upon application to and issuance of a special use permit by the village. (1) Authority: Special uses shall be authorized or denied by the village board in accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amendments of a zoning or- dinance, and the regulations and conditions set forth in this division for special uses. No application for a special use shall be acted upon by the village board until after: (i) A written report is prepared and forwarded to the zoning board of appeals and the village board by the plan commission in the manner prescribed in the zon- ing ordinance for amendments to said ordinance; and Supp. No. 30 632 g PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 (ii) A public hearing has been held by the zoning board of appeals, after due notice by publication as provided by the applicable statutes of the State of Illinois for amend- ments to a zoning ordinance and upon a report of the plan commission to the board of trustees, if such a report is made. The concurring vote of four (4) members of the plan com- mission and/or the zoning board of appeals shall be neces- sary to recommend in favor of any application which is brought before the respective hearing body pursuant to this article. (2) Initiation: An application for a special use may be made by any person, firm or corporation or by any office, department, board, bureau or commission requesting or intended to request a zoning certificate for property within a floodplain, as defined in this article. Supp. No. 30 632.1 PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 (3) Processing: An application for a special use, in such form and accompanied by such information as shall be established from time to time by the Village of Oak Brook, shall be filed with the village clerk and thereafter processed in the manner prescribed thereto- fore for applications for amendments. (4) Decisions: The village board, upon report of the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission, and without further hearing, may authorize or deny an application for a special use in accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amend- ments, or may refer it back to the zoning board..-of appeals and the plan commission for further consider- ation. No special use shall be authorized by the village board unless the special use: (i) Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected; and (ii) Would not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located. (5) Conditions: The plan commission and zoning board of appeals may recommend, and the village board may provide, such conditions and restrictions upon the construction, location and operation of a special use, as may be deemed necessary to promote the general objectives of this article and to minimize the danger of flood damage resulting therefrom. (b) Procedure To Be Followed by the Plan Commission in Making Recommendations Concerning Special Use Permits: Upon receiving an application for a special use permit, the plan commission shall, prior to making a recommendation thereon: (1) Require the applicants to furnish three (3) copies of such of the following information, prepared by a professional engineer or land surveyor, registered as such in the State of Illinois, as is deemed necessary by Supp. No. 3 633 7 • 4 10-34 OAK BROOK CODE the plan commission for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use: (i) Plans drawn to a readable scale showing location, nature, dimensions and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, floodproofing measures, and the rela- tionship of the above to the location of the channel, floodway and the flood protection eleva- tion. (ii) Typical valley cross-section(s) drawn to a scale of one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet and a vertical scale of one (1) inch to ten (10) feet showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross-sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and high water elevation. Cross-section intervals shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet. (iii) Plans (surface view) showing elevations or con- tours of the ground; pertinent structure, fill or storage elevations; size, location and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing struc- tures on the site; location and elevations of streets, water supply, sanitary facilities; soil types; and other pertinent information. Contours shall be shown at one-foot intervals. (iv) Photographs showing existing land uses and vegetation upstream and downstream. (v) A profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or the flow line of the stream. (vi) Specifications for filling, grading, dredging, chan- nel improvements, storage of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities. (2) Transmit one copy of the information- described in subsection (b)(1) to the village engineer for technical assistance, where necessary, in evaluating the pro- posed project in relation to flood heights and Supp. No. 3 634 PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-34 velocities; the seriousness of flood damage to the use; the adequacy of the plans for protection; and other technical matters. (3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the village engineer, determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. (c) Factors Upon Which the Recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission Shall Be Based: In making recommendations upon applications for special use permits, the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this article, including but not limited to the following: (1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; (2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or cross-stream, upstream or downstream to the injury of others; (3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and- the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions; (4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owners; (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. (6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (7) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; (8) The relationship of the proposed use to the compre- hensive plan and floodplain management program for the area; Supp. No. 3 635 10-34 OAK BROOK CODE (9) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (10) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters expected at the site; and (11) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this article. (d) Conditions Attached to Special Use Permits: Upon consideration of the zoning board of appeals and the plan commission recommendations, the factors listed above, and the purpose of this article, the president and board of trustees may by ordinance grant, deny or attach such conditions to the granting of special use permits as they deem necessary to further the purposes of this article. Among such conditions, without limitation because of specific enumeration, may be included: (1) Modification of waste disposal and water-supply facilities; (2) Limitations on periods of use and operation; (3) Imposition on operational controls, deposit of surety bonds and deed restrictions; (4) Requirements for construction of channel modifica- tions, dikes, levees and other protective measures; and (5) Floodproofing measures designed to be consistent with the flood protection elevation for the particular area, flood velocities, durations, rate of rise, hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces, and other factors associated with the 100-year flood. In this event, the president and board of trustees shall require that the applicant submit a plan or document certified by a registered structural engineer that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area and shall be provided in accordance with the standards for completely floodproofed structures contained within the United States Army Corps of Engineers publica- Supp. No. 3 636 0 PLANNING AND ZONING § 10-35 tion, "Flood-Proofing Regulations," June, 1972, GPO: 1973 0-505-026 edition, or any subsequent edition thereof. (Ord. No. G-217, § 2, 9-27-77; Ord. No. G-364, § 2, 9-10-85) Sec. 10-35. Variations. (a) [President and Board of Trustees May Grant:] Variations to the provisions of this article may be granted by the president and board of trustees upon recommendation by the zoning board of appeals. (b) Authority: The board of trustees shall decide all applica- tions for variations of the provisions of this division after a public hearing held before the zoning board of appeals on such notice as shall be required by the Illinois Statutes for zoning variations. The zoning board of appeals shall hold public hearing upon all applications for variations and shall report its recommendations to the board of trustees as to whether a requested variation would be in harmony with its general purpose and intent, and shall recommend a variation only where it shall have made a finding of fact specifying the reason or reasons for recommending the variation. Such findings shall be based upon the standards prescribed in subsection (e) below. No variation shall be granted by the board of trustees without such findings of fact. The con- curring vote of four (4) members of the zoning board of appeals shall be necessary to recommend in favor of the requested varia- tion. In the case of a variation where the zoning board of appeals fails to recommend the variation, it can only be adopted by an ordinance with the favorable vote of two-thirds of the trustees. (c) Initiation: An application for a variation shall be in triplicate and may be made by any governmental office, department, board, bureau or commission, or by any person, firm or corporation having a freehold interest, a possessory interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual interest which may become a freehold interest, or any exclusive possessory interest applicable to the land or land and improvements described in the application for a variation. (d) Processing: An application for a variation shall be filed with the village clerk who shall forward one copy of Supp. No. 30 637 ,3. O�Of 04Ir 0 p 4 `„ 00'F �COUN�r VILLAGE O F OAK B ROO K 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 708 990-3000 September 16, 1991 MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen Berley and Tom Hawk SUBJECT: Board Referral - Flood Plain Special Use 615 22nd Street We have received a petition for a Flood Plain Special Use for protection from flood waters of Associated Equipment Distributors corporate offices. Please refer this to the Plan Commission for public hearing on October 21, 1991 and the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing on November 5, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Berley Village Manager Tom Hawk Director of Code Enforcement a. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING Amendment TO BE FILED WITlt VILLAGE CLERK $650 Special Use $400 ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, PLAT OF SURVEY, AND 18 COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING, SHOWING ALL PERTINENT APPLICABLE INFORMATION; i.e. , PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE -- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Filed: Board of Trustees Referral: Sept. 24, 1991 Notice Published: October 4. 1991 Newspaper: Oak Brook Doings. Date Adjacent Property Owners Notified: Oct. 9, 1991 Staff Referral: Public Hearing Dates: Plan Commission: Oct. 21, 1991Zoning Board: November 5, 1991 Board of Trustees: Nov. 26, '91 Board of Trustees: `` ( pproval of Ordinance) FEE PAID: $ 625.X Receipt No. 36L56 Received By: az Village Clerk APPLICANT TO COMPLETE LOCATION 1st building east of Salt Creek, OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1st building north of 22nd StPERMANENT PARCEL NO. 06-24-307-010 LOT NO. 1-010 SUBDIVISION: 'H' ADDRESS: 615 West 22nd Street Oak roo , iL 6052T— ZONING: ORA 1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION: ACTION REQUESTED: Flood water protection of corporate offices for Associated Equipment Distributors, 615 West 22nd Street (Hunter Drive) Oak Brook, IL 60521 PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER Fx-x-I CONTRACT PURCHASER EJ AGENT a OWNER(S) OF RECORD Associated Equipment Distributors PHONE NO. 708-574-0650 ADDRESS 615 West 22nd Street, Oak Brook ZIP 60521 BENEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST PHONE NO. ADDRESS ZIP . j NAME OF APPLICANT J.T. Mack PHONE NO. 708-574-0650 ' ADDRESS 615 West 22nd Street, Oak Brook, IL ZIP 60521 I (we) certify that all. of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my (our) knowledge and ef. 9/13/91 Appl icanl_ Date (Signature) Applicant Date L~xecutive Vice President ;r•.:^it ._— .. __.— rw-:—:- e.,.--.i a i...--,.i av:.,.. —;,.;ars..: ..-..::zr _ _'.r-• a E -_:._ ; _.-_ i _.-.- .x :_ - c. _ - i. r. x __ ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT OAK BROOK 34509 DISTRIBUTORS BANK 615 W. 22ND STREET OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60522 OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 SEPTEMBER 13 18 91 70-2331f719 PAY DOLLARS $ 675.00 r � TO VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS THE SECRETARY'S ACCOUNT ORDER EXECUTIVE V.P. OF TX�R9l7L ( • u•034509u■ ,)j:07L9233101: L09984400 IL ' 3 I ?sem 3&so CHECK $ CHECKS 5 CASH INV X DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT X `DESCRIPTION NUMBER t INVALID E Ak VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK WITHOUT SIGNATURE BUREAU OF INSPECTION B 03680 • g 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD i 4 `cF c `2 OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS u PHONE: (708) 990-3000 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT 7�QKk FOR YOUR RECORDS 1/" SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS