G-566 - 02/13/1996 - ZONING - Ordinances ORDINANCE 96-ZO-TA-G-.566
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ORDINANCE G-60, AS AMENDED,
RELATIVE TO HISTORIC FACILITIES IN THE C/R DISTRICT
i
WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting an amendment to
Section VI-A of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook to add
historic facilities; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on such application was conducted by the
Zoning Board of Appeals on December 5, 1995, pursuant to due and appropriate
legal notice; and
WHEREAS, both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals made
recommendations that the requested text amendments be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed said
recommendations and concur with the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows:
Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are
hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein.
Section 2: That Section VI-A(2) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village
of Oak Brook be and is hereby amended by adding the following new subsection
(2) (g) and relettering the present subsections (2) (g) and (h) as subsections
(2) (h) and (2) (i) , respectively:
"(g} Historic facilities available to the public and used
primarily for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes
and activities in furtherance of the maintenance and support
of the historic facilities as set forth in the applicable
special use ordinance."
Section 3: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law.
Section 4: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
publish this ordinance in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
PASSED THIS 13th day of February, 1996.
Ayes: Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Payovich, Savino and Shumate
Nays: None
Absent: Trustee Bartecki
Abstain: None
Ordinance 96-ZO-TA-G- 566
Amending the Zoning Ordinance
Relative to Historic
Facilities, Page 2
APPROVED THIS 13th day of February, 1996.
p Vi lage President
ATTEST "
9 �
laletkk
C
Approved as to Form:
Village Attorney
Published 2-14-96 Pamphlet form
Date Paper
Not Published
mayslake.ord
ACTIVE AGENDA (Items For Final Action):
CA. ORDINANCE 96-ZO-TA-G-566 AN ORDINANCE AMENDIN ORD. 96-ZO-TA
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK G-566
BROOK ORDINANCE G-60 AS AMENDED RELATIVE TO MAYSLAKE LAND
HISTORIC FACILITIES IN THE C/R DISTRICT (MAYSLAKE CONSERVANCY -
LANDMARK CONSERVANCY- PEABODY MANSION - 1717 TEXT AiNtENDMEN
OAK BROOK ROAD):
The revised text amendment for the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
has been structured to allow particular uses to be specified in the
special use ordinance, and the special use ordinance now contains
language that enumerates specific uses based on the petitioner's
submittal and further discussions between the attorneys.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to pass
Ordinance 96-ZO-TA-G-566, "An Ordinance Amending the Zoning
Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Ordinance G-60, as
Amended, Relative to Historic Facilities in the C/R District", as
presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 - Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Payovich, Savino and
Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 - Trustee Bartecki. Motion carried.
B. ORDINANCE 96-ZO-SU-S-841 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A ORD. 96-ZO-SU
SPECIAL USE FOR A HISTORIC FACILITY (MAYSLAKE S-841
LANDMARK CONSERVANCY - PEABODY MANSION - 1717 MAYSLAKE LAND'
OAK BROOK ROAD: CONSERVANCY -
SPECIAL USE
The special use ordinance also contains provisions restricting noise
levels, requiring notice to the Village of each event and providing for
revocation of the special use permit in the event of incidents of
disorderly conduct at the site. These provisions are all designed to
allow the Village to exert control over activities at the site, even
though they fit within the list of specific uses permitted.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Payovich, to pass
Ordinance 96-ZO-SU-S-841, "An Ordinance Granting a Special Use
for a Historic Facility (1717 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, IL
60521)", as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL
CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 - Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Payovich, Savino and
Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 3 of 6 February 13, 1996
/ ,
• •
Trustee Shumate again voiced his concern of such a broad definition
of events for the Conservancy over a long period of time.
Trustee Kenny explained that the Village Board does not want to
unreasonably restrict the Conservancy, but a bingo or Las Vegas night
may be objectionable by Trinity Lakes residents and not objectionable
by the Forest Preserve District of DuPage County. Could the Village
Board find some type of parameter of the events without unreasonably
restricting the Conservancy?
Trustee Shumate requested a list of special uses as long as an event
does not cause a nuisance to the area neighbors, since this is a
residential rather than a commercial sector of the Village. David
Fichter, President of the Conservancy, commented that the
Conservancy was rather specific on what event they would schedule.
Trustee Bartecki suggested the petitioner provide a list of events to be
included in the Ordinance, and then the petitioner would have to come
before the Village again if any changes were required.
President Bushy acknowledged a concern for the differences between
the Forest Preserve District of DuPage County and their
understanding of what is acceptable in Oak Brook. An example
would be the fishing and public access to their lake. The residents of
Trinity Lakes were inconvenienced, and Village staff worked
diligently to require the Forest Preserve District to correct the public
nuisance. These residents deserve the Village's careful review of this
Text Amendment and its land use.
Mr. Gooder suggested the language of text remain but place
restrictions in the grant of the Special Use.
Upon further discussion, Village Attorney Martens suggested
deferring the matter until the next regularly scheduled Village Board
meeting for further review by staff and the applicant.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Bartecki, to table
Ordinance 96-ZO-TA-G-_, "An Ordinance Amending the Zoning
Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Ordinance G-60, As
Amended, Relative to Historic Facilities in the C/R District", to the
next Regular Village Board meeting of February 13, 1996. VOICE
VOTE: Motion carried.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 5 of 12 January 23, 1996
•
C. ORDINANCE 96-ZO-SU-S- AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A MAYSLAKE
SPECIAL USE FOR A HISTORIC FACILITY (1717 OAK BROOK LANDMARK
ROAD. OAK BROOK. IL 60521): CONSERVAN
SPECIAL U
Village Attorney Martens has drafted an ordinance granting a Special
Use for the Mayslake property at 1717 Oak Brook Road as a historic
facility. The following language which appears in the draft ordinance
addresses the Conservancy's proposed uses and the Village's desire
for clarity:
"(g) Historic facilities available to the public and used primarily for
educational, cultural and/or historic purposes."
Due to the previous discussion of the Text Amendment and request
for further review by staff and the applicant,the following motion was
presented:
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to table
Ordinance 96-ZO-SU-S-_, "An Ordinance Granting a Special Use
for a Historic Facility (1717 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, IL
60521)", to the next Regular Village Board meeting of February 13,
1996. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
D. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE- STATE JOINT PURCHASE - ENGINEERI.
REPLACEMENT OF ENGINEERING DEPARTM NT V HI T F: DEPT. VEH
STATE JOI
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2-182 of our Village Code and PURCHASE
the Illinois Compiled Statutes,the Village is permitted to join with
other governmental units in order to benefit from cooperative
purchasing arrangements. The State of Illinois has recently accepted
bids for the purchase of cargo vans, of the type required by our
Engineering Department. The cost breakdown for the vehicle is as
follows:
ITEM
Replaces Engineering Unit #400, 82,000 miles
1987 Chevy Astro Van
BasePrice.......................................................$13,992
Service manual......................................................$90
Partsmanual..........................................................$45
Add cloth seats....................................................$273
Delivery.................................................................$60
Total Cost..........$14,460
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 6 of 12 January 23, 1996
B. ORDINANCE 96-ZO-TA-G- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MAYSLAKE
THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK LANDMARK
BROOK. ORDINANCE G-60. AS AMENDED. RELATIVE TO CONSERVAN(
HISTORIC FACILITIES IN THE C/R DISTR_ICT: TEXT
AMENDMENT
Village Attorney Martens has drafted an ordinance amending the
Zoning Ordinance by adding"Historic Facilities" as a Special Use in
the C/R District. The original request by the Conservancy asked that
the following special use be added:
"(g) Historic facilities for uses necessary or appropriate to their
maintenance and public benefit and enjoyment."
Trustee Shumate noted that a revised Text Amendment Ordinance
was presented for approval this evening. Section 2(g) revised now
reads, "Historic facilities available to the public and used primarily for
educational, cultural and/or historic purposes and activities in
furtherance of the maintenance and support of the historic
facilities". This clarifies the right of the Conservancy to hold benefits
and other fund-raising functions in support of the Conservancy's
historic preservation efforts. He requested a change in this language
to read: "Historic facilities available to the public and used primarily
for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes and educational or
cultural activities in furtherance of the maintenance and support of
the historic facilities". This would allow fund-raising for cultural and
educational activities.
Counsel for the applicant, David Gooder, explained the need for the
Conservancy to have a wide variety of activities for fund-raising. He
named such activities as catered luncheons, daily tours, concerts,
exhibits, lectures, performing arts, receptions and social gatherings.
The previous owner of this property had held these type of activities.
These activities are needed to continue to maintain the use of the
property as has been over previous years. The President of the
Conservancy proposed these activities to the Plan Commission and
the Zoning Board of Appeals. Trustee Shumate requested this list of
activities be included in the Text Amendment Ordinance rather than a
blanket of activities in furtherance of the maintenance and support of
the historic facilities. He voiced a concern for the type of activities
that could occur without being on this list. Mr. Gooder indicated it
requires significant revenue for extensive renovation of the facilities
to meet ADA requirements. The Conservancy must receive Forest
Preserve District of DuPage County approval for their events and
would find it difficult to also seek approval from the Plan
Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 4 of 12 January 23, 1996
vPaEOF 04ke9C •
O m
G �
4 .r
r�
9C�COUN-O'\y
OAK BROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT
1 2 1 2 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK , ILLINOIS 6052 1 - 225 5
ROBERT NIELSEN,Chief
Business Phone: 708-990-3040
Fax: 708-990-Z39'
January 10, 1996
TO: Steve Veitch, Village Manager
FROM: Chief Robert Nielsen
SUBJECT: Entrance to 1717 Oak Brook Rd.
At the Board of Trustees'meeting of Jan. 9th,a question was raised concerning the emergency
usage of the Gateway, to 1717 Oak Brook Rd. (Peabody Mansion) by Fire Department
emergency vehicles. I offer the following comments:
The Gateway is approx. 14 ft. wide. Our vehicles, on average are 8 ft. wide. Even our
widest vehicle is far less that the width of the gate area.
On many occasions, we have been to the building in question, entering through this
gate. Entrance to this complex has never posed any problem for our vehicles, either
in an emergency situation, or otherwise.
If there are any further questions on this matter, please advise.
J> .
0
Village President: President Bushy- The Village has received their
accreditation for Emergency Services from the Emergency Services Disaster
Agency of DuPage County. A certified Emergency Services Plan has been
designed and is updated by the Village. The Village has been coordinating a
fourteen-month emergency disaster program with DuPage County. This will
culminate in a large Village disaster drill on July 14, 1996. Mark Fleishman,
Assistant ESDA Coordinator, has also received accreditation.
Sports Core: December 18, 1995 was the last day of play on the Village Golf
Course. Christmas sales were excellent from gift certificates being issued in
the Golf Pro Shop.
1996 Bath& Tennis Club brochures are drafted and will be circulated for
proofing with a mid-February mailing. Calendars will be available in March
for swim and tennis events.
Bath& Tennis Club preparation has begun for the window replacement project
with bids being sought in February. The contractor performed excellent
workmanship in replacing the skylight in the Clubhouse.
Staff is currently seeking proposals for the 1996 Fireworks Display with
anticipated review by the Village Board in February.
Bath & Tennis Club Manager Sartore, Trustee McInerney and President Bushy
have been working to develop the Ethnic Fest. The Park District and School
Board are coordinating this effort also with interested residents.
President Bushy further commended the men and women of the Oak Brook
Fire Department for their efforts in eliminating the fire and assisting the Brook
Forest couple of the garage fire.
9. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS (Final Action Not Anticipated):
A. RECOMMENDATION -MAYSLAKE LANDMARK MAYSLAKE
CONSERVANCY- (1717 OAK BROOK ROAD) - TEXT LANDMARK
AMENDMENT AND SPECIAL USE : CONSERVANCY -
TEXT AMENDMENT
& SPECIAL USE
This petition, if approved,will establish the needed zoning conditions (1717 OAK RROO1:
to allow the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy to make use of the ROAD)
Peabody Mansion, the Portiuncula Chapel, and adjacent grounds. It
establishes a new Special Use for historic facilities in a C/R District
and approval of that Special Use for the property.
The buildings will still require considerable renovation and
modification to bring them into compliance with the current building
code regulations.
Both the Plan Commission,b a vote of 5 to 0, and the Zoning Board
Y g
of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 1, have recommended approval of these
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 6 of 9 January 9, 1911
requests. Both bodies have recommended inclusion of a list of
conditional elements that were submitted and agreed to by the
petitioner. These conditions are based on the conditional restrictions
that were developed for the Atelier/Friary Special Use that was
approved early last year. The conditions are as follows:
1. The daily use period for the special use property shall not begin
earlier than 7 a.m. nor last later than 11 p.m. Sunday through
Thursday, and on Fridays and Saturdays shall not begin earlier than
7 a.m. nor last later than midnight.
2. The Conservancy shall provide the Village on or before the 15th of
each month with a list of events scheduled for the following
month.
3. No restaurant or other facility that provides regular food service
shall be operated on the special use property.
�I
4. A minimum of 100 parking spaces shall be provided on the special
use property or on adjacent property for use in connection with
activities conducted on the special use property.
5. Noise coming from the special use property shall be subject to the
performance standards set forth below:
At no point on or beyond the westerly boundary line of the special
use property shall the sound pressure level of any performance or
operation coming from the special use property (other than
background noises produced by sources not under control of the
Conservancy and/or its approved sublicensees, such as operation of
motor vehicles or other transportation facilities) exceed the decibel
limits in the table below:
Octave Bank Maximum Permitted Sound
Level in Decibels
Frequency in Cycles
Per Second
20 to 75 72
75 to 150 67
150 to 300 59
300 to 600 52
600 to 1,200 46
1,200 to 2,400 40
2,400 to 4,800 34
Above 4,800 32
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK.Minutes 7 of 9 January 9, 1996
Sound levels shall be measured with a sound level meter and
associated octave band filter manufactured according to standards
prescribed by the American Standards Association. Measurements
shall be made using the flat network of the sound level meter.
Impulsive type noises shall be subject to the limitations set forth
below, provided that such notices shall be capable of being
accurately measured and for the purpose of this special use permit,
shall be those notices which cause rapid fluctuation of the needle
of the sound level meter with a variation of no more than plus or
minus two decibels. Noises incapable of being so measured, such
as those of an irregular and intermittent nature, shall be controlled
t become a nuisance to adjacent uses.
as not o
so J
6. All utilities constructed on the special use property shall be placed
underground.
7. The Special Use permit shall automatically terminate if certificates
of occupancy for buildings located on the special use property have
not been issued within two (2) years from the date of adoption of
this ordinance.
8. In the event that there are more than two incidents involving the
offense of disorderly conduct occurring at the special use property
in any twelve-month period,this special use permit shall be subject
to revocation upon notice and hearing. The offense of disorderly
conduct is presently set forth in Section 9-19 of the Oak Brook
Code of Ordinances, as may be amended from time to time.
9. In the event that one or more of the above conditions are not met,
the Village Manager shall promptly initiate enforcement action,
including, but not limited to revocation proceedings, as may be
warranted under the circumstances.
There has been no public opposition to these proposals, however, one
of the immediate neighbors expressed concerns that the use of these
buildings be properly regulated to avoid negative impacts on the
adjacent residential properties.
Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to
approve the Text Amendment and Special Use and authorize the
Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinances for action at the
Board meeting of January 23, 1996 subject to the conditional
elements as developed by the Plan Commission,Zoning Board of
Appeals and petitioner. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
.J
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 8 of 9 January 9, 1996
•
Trustee McInerney inquired into the accessibility of public safety
vehicular traffic at the 31 st Street entrance. David Fichter, President
of Mayslake Landmark Conservancy, stated the distance between the
two pillars of the entrance is fourteen (14') feet, and the vehicles are
eight (8') feet wide and would be able to enter. Village Manager
Veitch will have staff review this further and report to the Village
Board at their next meeting.
10. OTHER BUSINESS PERTAINING TO VILLAGE OPERATIONS: None.
11. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Savino, to adjourn the
meeting at 8:20 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
- k
Linda . Gonnella, CMC
Vill ge Clerk
bot1996
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 9 of 9 January 9, 1996
y
0
MAYSLAKE LANDMARK
CONSERVANCY
INDEX
PAGE CONTENTS
19 Informational Memo from Tom Hawk to Board of Trustees
18 Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals
Chairman to Board of Trustees
17-17a Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated 1215195
16 Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairman to
Board of Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals
15-15a Plan Commission Meeting Minutes dated 11120195
14 Presentation given to Plan Commission from David Fichter
13-13a Presentation given to Plan Commission from Audrey Muschler
12-12a Mayslake Landmark Conservancy Special Use Permit
Conditions dated 11120195
11-11b License Agreement Excerpt between Forest Preserve District
and Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
11c-17d Letter from Forest Preserve District re: Special Use and Parking
10-100 Informational Memo to Plan Commission and Zoning Board of
Appeals from Hawk dated 11115195
9 Resident Letter dated 1118195
8 Certificate of Publication dated 11/8/95
7-7c Board of Trustee Meeting Minutes dated 10124195
6 Letter to Gooder from Hawk re: Hearing dates (10125196)
5-5a Waiver of Fees Memo to Board of Trustees from Hawk
(10/19/95)
4 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Hawk (10/19/95)
3-3a Plan Commission Standards for Special Use Permits and Text
Amendments (Plan Commission Rules of Procedure pages 5-6)
2 Amendments-Zoning Ordinance Section X111 (1)pages 970-971
1-1 b Special Uses -Zoning Ordinance Section Xlll (J)pages 971-973
A-A2 Application/Petition, Surrounding Property Owner, and Exhibit
B (Text Amendment and Special Use Language)
B-B 1 Letter of Transmittal from David Gooder dated 10116195
C-C 1 Letter from Gooder with revised Legal Description dated
10/31/95
D Site Plan
E Floor Plan
F Survey Excerpt
G Map of Adjacent Zoning
H Survey
OF OqK
,`vpG 9gOO'F
O to
G O
0 2
q0 4A,
COUNT'S
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
PHONE: -108 1190- iOOO
FA X: 70'8 990-0876
MEMO
January 4, 1996
TO: President Bush and Board of Trustees
FROM. Tom Haw
SUBJECT.• Mayslake Landmark Conservancy- Peabody Mansion and Portiuncula Chapel
1717 Oak Brook Road- Text Amendment and Special Use
This petition, if approved, will establish the needed zoning conditions to allow the Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy to make use of the Peabody Mansion, the Portiuncula Chapel, and adjacent grounds. It
establishes a new Special Use for historic facilities in a CR District and approval of that Special Use for the
property.
The buildings will still require considerable renovation and modification to bring them into compliance with the
current building code regulations.
Both the Plan Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0, and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 1, have
recommended approval of these requests. Both bodies have recommended inclusion of a list of conditional
elements that were submitted and agreed to by the petitioner. These conditions are based on the conditional
restrictions that were developed for the Atelier/Friary Special Use that was approved early last year.
There has been no public opposition to these proposals,however, one of the immediate neighbors expressed
concerns that the use of these buildings be properly regulated to avoid negative impacts on the adjacent
residential properties.
If it is your wish to proceed toward approval of these proposals, it may be done by voice motion to authorize
Attorney Martens to draft the necessary ordinances for action at your meeting of January 23, 1996. Your
approval should include the conditional elements as suggested by the Plan Commission and Zoning Board
of Appeals recommendations.
TRH/gp
cc: Petition files
l9.
Fo
GAO 4k9
vrp 9pp
O Nl
G O
4 �
COON-0
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
PHC_,NE: 7 CO
December 18, 1995 FA X: 0 ?`' O'�_0
President Bushy and Board of Trustees
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
RE. Mayslake Landmark Conservancy(Peabody Mansion)- 1717 Oak Brook Road
Text Amendment and Special Use
Dear Madam President and Board of Trustees:
On December 5, 1995, the Zoning Board of Appeals, held the required public hearing for the Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy proposal to accomplish the following:
1. Approval of a text amendment to establish a new Special Use in Conservation/Recreation Districts for historic
facilities, and
2 Approval of this new Special Use for the Peabody Mansion, Portiuncula Chapel, and adjacent grounds.
Several persons spoke in support of the proposals and there was no opposition testimony. However, the record
indicates some concern for adequate regulations to prevent any detrimental effects.
The Zoning Board of Appeals was in receipt of the Plan Commission recommendation of November 20, 1995.
By a vote of 4 to 1, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the following motions:
1. To recommend approval of the proposed text amendment as requested.
2. To recommend approval of the granting of this new Special Use for"historic facilities" for the subject
property. This motion included as conditional elements the conditions suggested by the petitioner
(see Index Pages 12 and 12a of this file). It should be noted that these conditions were based on
the previously approved Special Use for Atelier Intemational at the Friary building.
Respectfully submitted,
t L�
Champ D vis
Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Me
Davis requested and Hawk relayed the history of how the amortization began in 1966.
Joe Rush, resident entered an objection to the York Tavern request. Rush lives adjacent to the
Village Gate Tavern. A copy of the letter he read was submitted for the record.
Bill Gothard, stated his objection to the request saying that the use does not belong in the
residential area.
Werner responded to Rush saying that he did not agree with him. They run a nice establishment
and have never had any complaints. The business started over 157 years ago as a general store
and many neighbors have given their support of the request.
The Board members discussed whether the surrounding neighbors of all the business involved
were aware of the proceedings. Martens said that the notification requirements of the Ordinance
have been met. A legal notice of the proposed text amendment is published in the newspaper.
The agenda is published in the newspaper. The matter is heard through two separate hearing
bodies (Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals) and recommendations from each are given
to the Board of Trustees and they make the final decision.
Davis said that he would like to find out the legal issues involved. He requested that Martens
provide legal input to be given to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the Village's financial
responsibility should certain actions be taken. Aldini requested information regarding the possibility
of separating the properties for individual actions. Davis noted the conditions of the Plan
Commission recommendations.
Member Ascher moved, seconded by Member Shah, to table this matter to the next regular Zoning
Board of Appeals meeting on January 2, 1996.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried.
(9i MAYSLAKE LANDMARK CONSERVANCY- 1717 OAK BROOK ROAD (PEABODY MANS_I�
TEXT AMENDMENT AND SPECIAL USE
David Gooder, Attorney for the Petitioner, reviewed the location of the Forest Preserve District
property, the existing structures and the area involved in this petition. He gave a brief history of
the chapel, the quality of the structure and the historic elements.
Audrey Muschler, a Director of the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy showed a short film. She
reviewed the historic nature of the mansion noting that it was built between 1919 and 1921.
There are no tax dollars available to restore the buildings. The entire 90-acre site is on the National
Register. They have the complete guidelines for the anticipated restoration.
David Fichter the president of the organization spoke briefly giving the history of Peabody. It
served as a residence for only two years before it was sold to the Franciscans who fully utilized
the facility. The overall capacity of the mansion is 200 persons. The mansion restoration design
is by John Vinci. The building will be furnished in period furniture. The use will include exhibits,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes December 5, 1995
2
�%`�
INE6, 0 0
catered affairs, daily tours, cultural and educational programs, concerts, meetings, weddings,
receptions, and baptisms. They intend to recreate the historic gardens. Activities will take place
between 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. during the week and until midnight on weekends.
There will be no increase in operation capacity. Two hundred (200) occupants will be the
maximum allowed. There will be no need for additional parking.
Fichter said that the operation will be slow at the beginning, having small tours. It will take time
to build up momentum. He said repairs will be dependent upon donations, and money made from
activities. The urgent things will be done first, such as the leaky roofs which are done in slate and
copper and very expensive. In order for the facility to be operational, the repairs will run about
one-half million dollars. The entire restoration will cost about 2.8 million.
The members questioned the time allowed for restoration process and the license agreement. They
discussed the historical nature of the building and bringing the building up to current codes,
including ADA and Fire Prevention Codes. Gooder said that some requirements may destroy the
authenticity of the building.
Howard Trier, resident and President of the Oak Brook Historical Society said that this is a unique
opportunity for Oak Brook.
Father Barr, resident of Briarwood Lakes said that Oak Brook should be proud, these are very
distinguished buildings.
Bill Gothard, Institute in Basic Life Principles said this would be a wonderful opportunity for Oak
Brook.
No one spoke in opposition to the petition request.
Member Aldini moved, seconded by Member Vescovi, to recommend for approval the Text
Amendment as requested.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 - Aldini, Shah, Vescovi, and Davis.
Nays: 1 - Ascher.
Absent: 2 - Dosedlo, Hasen. Motion carried.
Member Vescovi moved, seconded by Member Shah, to recommend for approval the Special Use
permit subject to the nine conditions set forth in index pages 12-12a of this file.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 - Aldini, Shah, Vescovi, and Davis.
Nays: 1 - Ascher.
Absent: 2 - Dosedlo, Hasen. Motion carried.
I
I
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes December 5, 1995
/ 3
OF OAI�9 pOt
9
o �
c g
o �2
COUN-O'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
PHONE: -0,� 3C 0
November 30, 1995 FA V �
President Bushy and Board of Trustees
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
RE: Mayslake Landmark Conservancy Petition-Peabody Mansion and Portiuncula Chapel- 1717 Oak
Brook Road- Text Amendment and Special Use
Dear Madam President and Board of Trustees:
The Plan Commission at their meeting of November 20, 1995 reviewed the petition by the Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy for a text amendment establishing a Special Use for historic facilities in a Conservation/Recreation District
and for approval of this Special Use for the Peabody Mansion and the Portiuncula Chapel.
The principal concerns of Plan Commission members were with respect to parking being adequately provided and the
possibility of traffic bottlenecks where the entrance driveway narrows to a single lane. Attorney Gooder pointed out
that the uses proposed are very similar in nature to the uses made in the past by the Franciscans and that the above
problems had not been apparent.
There was no public opposition to the request. However, one of the nearby neighbors in Trinity Lakes asked that
proper controls be placed on the Special Use to prevent any adverse impacts for the neighboring areas.
The Plan Commission by a vote of 5 to 0 passed a motion recommending approval of the following:
1. A revision of the Zoning Ordinance text to establish a new "historic facility" Special Use in
Conservation/Recreation Districts as requested.
2. Granting of the above Special Use for the subject property subject to the list of conditions drafted
by the petitioner(See Index Page Nos. 12-12a of this file). It should be noted that these conditions
are based on the previously approved Special Use for the use of the Friary by Atelier International.
Respectfully submitted,
Stelios Aktipis
Chairman
Plan Commission
cc: Petition files 160
IV. MAYSLAKE LANDMARK CONSERVANCY- 1717 OAK BROOK ROAD (PEABODY MANSION)
TEXT AMENDMENT AND SPECIAL USE
David Gooder, Attorney for the Petitioner, said that the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy was
formed for the very purpose of saving the Peabody Mansion and associated structures including
the Portiuncula Chapel. He reviewed the location of the Forest Preserve District property, the
existing structures and the area involved in this petition. He gave a brief history of the chapel, the
quality of the structure and the historic elements.
Gooder passed out and reviewed three pages of the license agreement between the Mayslake
Landmark Conservancy and the Forest Preserve District. There will be 100 parking spaces for this
use. He also reviewed the surrounding zoning. Outside of this area, the Forest Preserve District
has said that the rest of the area is to remain undeveloped.
He also suggested that the special use permit may be conditioned to meet some concerns and
he passed out copies of these suggested special use conditions dated 11/20/95. He noted that
these suggested conditions were based on the presently approved special use for Atelier
International's use of the Friary which is also located on the Forest Preserve District of DuPage
County Mayslake site.
Audrey Muschler, a Director of the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy showed a short film. She
reviewed the historic nature of the mansion. They will receive a $40,000 tourism matching grant
from the State of Illinois. The mansion is of great value to all of the citizens in the community.
David Fichter the president of the organization spoke briefly giving the history of Peabody. The
structure was built in 1922 and sold to the Franciscans by his family after his death in 1924. The
Franciscans conducted retreats in the building and it served as a meeting place for many in the
community. The overall capacity of the mansion is 200 persons. The mansion restoration design
is by John Vinci. The building will be furnished in period furniture. The use will include exhibits,
catered affairs, tours, cultural and educational programs, concerts, meetings, receptions, and
baptisms. They intend to have a gift and sale shop that is similar to the Pro Shop at the Bath and
Tennis and will recreate the historic gardens. There will be a resident caretaker and ground's
.keeper on the premises.
Noise - there will be little. No outdoor performances before 9 a.m. or after 10 p.m. They would
agree to the same terms as Atelier. Parking - 100 spaces for a capacity of 200 persons, and they
will not allow parking along any access ways. The Franciscans never had traffic problems and this
use will not exceed the previous use. No new buildings will be built and they may remove the
convent and garage within the next five years. There will be no increase in operation capacity -
200 will be the maximum. There will be no need for additional parking.
Fichter said that the operation will be slow at the beginning, having small tours. It will take time
to build up momentum. He said repairs will be dependent upon donations, and money made from
activities. The urgent things will be done first, such as the leaky roofs which were made of slate
and copper and very expensive to repair.
Mueller questioned the open area, and if the activities will conflict. Fichter said the people may
want to walk the trails, but he does not anticipate any conflicts.
PLAN COMMISSION Minutes November 20, 1995-a� 4 ,r�.
0 0
Chairman Aktipis questioned the length of the license agreement and was told that it if for ten years
and renewable.
Tappin questioned the safety of the two-lane driveway and ingress and egress. Fichter said the
columns cannot be moved and are on the national register.
Chairman Aktipis asked if anyone would like to speak in favor of the request.
Father Barr, resident of Briarwood said that if anyone wanted to tour the property he would arrange
it.
Howard Trier, resident and President of the Oak Brook Historical Society said that this is a unique
opportunity for Oak Brook.
Rhoda Rottschafer, 124 St. Francis Circle said that traffic and the time of the activities should be
regulated. It should be patrolled by the police. She said that she believes this will be a great
addition to Oak Brook and the county.
No one spoke in opposition to the petition request.
Member Mueller moved, seconded by Member Dudek, to recommend for approval the Text
Amendment as requested.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 5 - Dudek, Goel, Mueller, Tappin, and Aktipis.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 - Pequet. Motion carried.
Member Mueller moved, seconded by Member Dudek, to recommend for approval the Special Use
for the subject property as requested and with conditions as presented (see petition pages -12 and
12a).
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 5 - Dudek, Goel, Mueller, Tappin, and Aktipis.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 - Pequet. Motion carried.
V. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Hawk reported that no new petitions have been filed and all other business matters have been
concluded. There are no agenda items for the regular December Plan Commission meeting.
Member Mueller, seconded by Member Goel, moved to cancel the December 18, 1995 Plan
Commission meeting. The next regular Plan Commission meeting will be held on January 15,
1996.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried.
PLAN COMMISSION Minutes November 20, 1995
David IL Fichter
Address To Plannin g Board
11-20-95
Ito 1924, the Peabody mansion was sold to the Franciscans for use as a retreat house. From 1924 to 1991,
the Franciscans conducted many activities at the Peabody mansion on a daily basis. There were retreats
conducted on weekdays as .%vil as Hukcuds and it constant Slow of counseling and other personal retreats.
Various clubs and organizations also utilized the facilities for corporate meetings and board meetings.
Memorial surviccs and baptisms were conducted in the Portiuncula Chapel. During many evenings,
especially during the liturgical year, there were scheduled events and meetings, According to Lana
Green, Public Relations Director of the Ma y slake Retreat facility,, the activity schedule was so full that
many people were turned away, Many of the meeting areas held as many as 150 persons and the overall
capacity of the facility was approximately 200 persons.
The mansion will be restored under the direction of a historic architect; a historic structure report was
completed 12.5-94, giving specific direction on what must be done to restore the mansion. Some of the
activities in the mansion will include: catered luncheons,exhibits,daily tours, cultural and educational
programs, lectures. corporate training, concerts, performing arts, organization mating, receptions and
social guttherings. The Portiuncula Chapel will be available for weddings,baptisms and memorial
services. There will be a gift and sale shop on the premises, which will be generally similar to the pro-
shops at the park district bath&tennis club and golf course. A caretaker will reside in the convent living
quarters adjacent to the mansion.
The distance between the Peabody mansion and the nearest property line of a residence is 330 feet. In the
event that the generation of noise is a concern,Mayslake Landmark Conservancy will agtree to the same
noise generation restrictions as under the ordinance with Atelier International at the friary. No outdoor
performances will be conducted before 9 AM nor after 10 PM on any day. Generally the museum and
cultural arts following is not particularly a noisy group.
Parking is available for 100 vehicles at Lite mansion. 25 spaces exist in and around the mansion. A
parking area will, 75 spaces is available to the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy tinder the existing
license agreement; this parking lot is approximately 100 feet west of the mansion. Since there is more
than adequate parking, no parking will be allowed along the access roads.
In discussions with the Franciscans, it was indicated that the events at the mansion never created a traffic
problem taking in or discharging 100 cars frorn the facility. Although the constriction at the front gate Is
14'-2", there has never been a problem with access through the area in the 70 years of operation. Since
the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy will operate within the same capacity as the Franciscans, traffic will
not exceed what was created by the Franciscans in previous use.
The Mayslake Landmark Conservancy N711 not add any new buildings, nor will there be any increase in
operating capacity of 200 persons. Essentially, Mayslake Landmark Conservancy will operate in a Very
similar manner as the Franciscans operated for the past 70 years.
RcCEI
i
VILLAGE C<0-
PLQ iJ X11�!G
r—
Plan Commission November 20, 1995
Mayslake is a very special place! The Crown Jewel of Oak Brook - if not all
of DuPage County. Mayslake has bed a very private place until now. Most
citizens were not aware of itsq ignificance.
The entire 90 acre site is on the National Register of Historic Places. . .
because of the architecture of the Peabody mansion. Tudor Revival design .--
our architectural historian has used the terms Old England Manor House and
Baronial Castle. One will have to travel to England to see a similar design.
As Howard Decker pointed out in the video, the ornamentation is all handcrafted.
The walnut staircase is handcarved as is the walnut and oak throughout the library.
The fireplaces and archways are sculptured stone. The mansion is an architectural
treasure.
The architect was Benjamin Marshall , one of Chicago's most prominent architects,
who designed the Drake Hotel , Blackstone Hotel , South Shore Country Club and
Edgewater Beach Hotel . The first three are on the NRHP. His work is known
throughout the country but his greatest works are in Chicago.
The Mayslake Landmark Conservancy has a license agreement with the Forest Preserve
District of DuPage County to restore the building and intiate programs, maintain
and operate the Peabody mansion and Portiuncula Chapel .
The MLC has contracted with the Office of John Vinci to prepare an Historic
Structure Report (157 pages) outlining the needs of the building and the guidelines
for restoration.
A $40,000 Tourism Attraction grant has been awarded to the MLC by the Illinois
Department of Tourism. The Peabody mansion -Mayslake - has a great potential
for tourism dollars. Certainly, Oak Brook will be a beneficiary.
r3.
Historic and architectural tours will be conducted regularly and in conjunction
with the Cuneo mansion (also designed by Benjamin Marshall ) . The Art Institute
of Chicago is waiting to include the Peabody mansion on their Benjamin Marshall
tours and architectural tours.
The comination of historic and architectural tours - the cultural and
educational programs will be of great value to all citizens in the community.
Audrey L. Muschler
I
j 11/20/95
MAYSLAKE LANDMARK CONSERVANCY
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
CONDITIONS
1. The daily use period for the special use property shall not
begin earlier than •7 a.m. nor last later than 11 p.m. Sunday
through Thursday, and on Fridays and Saturdays shall not be-
gin earlier than 7 a.m. nor last later than midnight.
2 . The Conservancy shall provide the Village on or before the
15th of each month with a list of events scheduled for the
following month.
3. No restaurant or other facility that provides regular food
service shall be operated on the special use property.
4. A minimum of 100 parking spaces shall be provided on the
special use property or on adjacent property for use in
connection with activities conducted on the special use
property.
5 . Noise coming from the special use property shall be subject
to the performance standards set forth below:
At no point on or beyond the westerly boundary line of
the special use property shall the sound pressure level
of any performance or operation coming from the special
use property (other than background noises produced by
sources not under control of the Conservancy and/or its
approved sublicensees, such an operation of motor vehicles
or other transportation facilities) exceed the decible limits
in the table below:
Octave Bank Maximum Permitted Sound
Level in Decibels
Frequency in Cycles
Per Second
20 to 75 72
75 to 150 67
150 to 300 59
300 to 600 52
600 to 1, 200 46
1, 200 to 2, 400• 40
2, 400 to 4 , 800 34
Above 4 , 800 32
-1-
Sound levels shall be measured with a sound level meter
and associated octove band filter manufactured according
to standards prescribed by the American Standards Associ-
ation. Measbrements shall be made using the flat network
of the sound level meter. Impulsive type noises shall be
subject to the limitations set forth below, provided that
such notices shall be capable of being accurately measured
and for the purpose of this special use permit, shall be
those notices which cause rapid fluctuation of the needle
of the sound level meter with a variation of no more than
plus or minus two decibles. Noises incapable of being so
measured, such as those of an irregular and intermittent
nature, shall be controlled so as not to become a nuisance
to adjacent uses.
6. All utilities constructed on the special use property shall
be placed underground.
7. The Special Use permit shall automatically terminate if
certificates of occupancy for buildings located on the
special use property have not been issued within two (2)
years from the date of adoption of this ordinance.
8 . In the event that there are more than two incidents in-
volving the offense of disorderly conduct occurring at
the special use property in any twelve-month period, this
special use permit shall be subject to revocation upon
notice and hearing. The offense of disorderly conduct is
presently set forth in Section 9-19 of the Oak Brook Code
of Ordinances, as may be amended from time to time.
9 . In the event that one or more of the above conditions
are not met, the Village Manager shall promptly initiate
enforcement action, including, but not limited to revocation
proceedings, as may be warranted under the circumstances .
I
I
-2-
LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE OPERATION OF CERTAIN BUILDINGS
LOCATED IN THE MAYSLARE FOR ST PRESERVE--PEAHODY MANSION
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the
FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF DUPAGE COUNTY, a body corporate and
Politic, hereinafter referred to as the "District, " and the
MAYSLAKE LANDMARK CONSERVANCY, an Illinois not-for-profit
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Licensee. "
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the District owns certain property in DuPage County
commonly known as the Mayslake Forest Preserve; and
WHEREAS, there is located on said property certain buildings
commonly known as the Peabody Mansion and Portiuncula Chapel; and
WHEREAS, the Peabody Mansion is a structure of significant
historical interest, which is registered on the National Register
of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, the District desires to provide for the operation and
maintenance of the aforementioned buildings and their grounds (as
described below) collectivelyZa's an educational and informational
center for furthering the purposes and objec 'ves of the District
in the area of natural resource conservatio s a cultural center
and place where members of the pu 'c may hold meetings, seminars,
conferences and other events; an as an historical exhibit; and
WHEREAS, the District is incurring substantial costs in
maintaining the buildings; and
WHEREAS, the buildings require extensive renovation and
repairs in order to make them suitable for public use; and
jv/Bob/Mayslake3/71395 Exhibit 1 to Ordinance No. 95.229
WHEREAS, the District is committed to making the necessary
renovation and repairs without cost to the taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, due to its limited resources, the District has
determined that the most efficient and cost-effective manner of
improving and operating the buildings is through an independent
organization; and
WHEREAS, Licensee was incorporated for the primary purpose of
assisting the District with the renovation, repair, operation and
management of the buildings; and
WHEREAS, the District is authorized to issue a license for any
activity reasonably connected with forest preserve purposes; and
WHEREAS, the District and Licensee desire to establish a
license agreement for the renovation, repair, operation, and
management of the buildings as provided for herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, terms
and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.00 LICENSE GRANTED
1.01 Purpose: Licensee is authorized to restore, repair,
operate and manage the License Premises defined in Section 1.02 as
Oan informational and educational center for furthering the purposes
and objectives of the District in the area of natural resource
conservations a cultural center and place where members of the
public may, ld tours, meetings, conferences, seminars and other
events; and--Is an historical exhibit. The License Premises shall
I
not be used for any other purpose unless prior written approval is
obtained from the District's Executive Director.
jv/Bob/Me alake3/71395 -L 70 2
Y r c.! s Exhibit t to Ordinance No. 95-229
/flat
4
1*02 License Premises: The License Premises shall consist of
the buildings known as the Peabody Mansion and Portiuncula Chapel
and the grounds described in Exhibit A and generally depicted in
Exhibit 8, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The operation
and use of the License Premises shall be subject to the
restrictions, if any, contained in the occupancy permit and
associated documents referred to in Section 3 . 04 .
1.03 Use of Parking Areas and Driveways: Licensee shall have
the right to utilizxhe main parking lot adjacent to the building
commonly known as the Retreat House an he driveway servicing the
License Premises. Licensee acknowledges that the parking lot is
not part of the License Premises and that the District reserves the
right to allow other groups or other organizations to utilize the
lot. If Licensee requires additional overflow parking that extends
beyond the established parking lot Licensee shall obtain a Special
Use Permit from the District.
1.04 Condition of the License Premises: Licensee
acknowledges that it has inspected the License Premises, including
all mechanical systems located thereon, and agrees that it accepts
the same in "AS IS" condition and further agrees to make no demands
on the District for any improvements, repairs, modifications or
alterations.
1.05 Term: This Agreement shall be for a term commencing on
the date of this Agreement and ending May 31, 2005. Licensee may,
subject to the written approval of the District, renew this
Agreement for two additional 10-year terms provided Licensee i s
jv/Bob/Mayslake3/71395 3 Exhibit 1 to Ordinance No. 95-229
FPD EX DID' OFG P«;GE 42
'
Sent BY Facsimile - 708 990-0747
November 17, 1995
W
Dear Mr. Gooder:
Y This letter is in support of the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy to secure
�« the appropriate Special Use for the Peabody Mansion.
The Forest Preserve District of DuPage County supports the special use
request submitted by the Mayslake Landmark Conservancy for the Peabody
' Mansion at Mayslake. During the licensing process, the Forest Preserve
District Board of Commissioners committed to the use of the existing retreat
parking facility consisting of approximately 100 parking spaces to support
parking needs for programs at the Peabody Mansion and Mayslake.
The Forest Preserve District has also agreed to work closely with the
Mayslake Landmark Conservancy to provide temporary off road parking at
an appropriate location, on the property, if and when an event would in fact
exceed the existing parking availability.
i In addition to this, the District has been authorized by the Forest Preserve
:. District Commission to construct an approved parking lot for 30 cars off St.
Pascals Drive. This project is scheduled for construction in 1996 upon
`F r. receipt of required permits from the Village of Oak Brook.
i
r'
7.`
i
`l 1`17/1995 10:11 7087903739 FPD EX DIR OFC PAGE 03
Page Two
November 17, 1995
The current license agreement does not include this extra parkingsince the,-bistric t,has
assumed the maintenance of the lot in question until the new lot is construct9d6'ea'r
St. Pascals Drive.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or request my participation at appropriate zoning
meetings to reaffirm the District's position.
Sincerely,
Franz Mh rStrong
Executive Director
cc: David Fichter
Stephen B. Veitch -Village of Oak Brook Manager
Karen M. Bushy -Village of Oak Brook President
i
9
G �
O
of 04k
9O @COUNt4'`�y`2
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
PHONE: 708 990-3000
FAX: 708 990-0876
MEMO
November 15, 1995
TO: Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Tom Hawk
SUBJECT., Mayslake Landmark Conservancy Petition - Peabody Mansion and Portiuncula Chapel
This property is located within the Forest Preserve District's Mayslake site. It includes the Peabody Mansion,
the Portiuncula Chapel,and the adjacent grounds. It does not include the Retreat Dormitory building and its
parking area.
The entire Mayslake site is zoned CR Conservation/Recreation District None of the CR permitted uses are
suitable for these structures nor do any of the permitted uses fit the needs of the Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy to preserve and make use of the historic Peabody Mansion.
The proposal before you will establish a new Special use for historic facilities in a CR District and seeks
approval of this new Special Use for the subject property.
The proposed uses for the property speaks to uses necessary or appropriate to the maintenance, public
benefit,and enjoyment of the historic facilities. The approved uses are not defined any further. This seems
rather broad in scope and could allow uses that may not be deemed desirable by the general public.
November 15, 1995
Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals
RE.Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
Page Two
Over the past few years, many use possibilities have been put forth by the people interested in preserving
these structures. They include:
1. libraries and museums.
2. weddings, receptions, and other social gathering events.
3. corporate training and meetings.
4. interior design showcase for commercial interests.
Some of the above could lead to population densities that generate problems in the areas of noise,parking,
and traffic.
The site is within a couple of hundred feet of homes in Trinity Lakes. The parking currently available is
limited to approximately 25 spaces total, some of which are not suitable for visitors. The parking available
consists of.
1. 15 spaces in front of the mansion, including 1 handicap space.
2. 4 interior garage spaces and an area suitable for approximately 6 additional spaces in the
garage vicinity.
The driveway lanes on the site are 12 feet to 16 feet wide and are not wide enough to permit parking along
them.
The driveway entrance at Oak Brook Road narrows to a single lane where it passes between columns that
are near the edge of the fight-of-way.
Conclusion
The buildings, with modifications to bring them into compliance with the building codes,can be made suitable
for public assembly uses. However, a more detailed definition of approved uses needs to be developed.
Also, the lack of available parking and driveway design at Oak Brook Road are elements that will limit the
number of people that can safely and effectively use the site.
The floor plans submitted are not dimensioned adequately to allow estimation of occupancy loads under
different usage scenarios. This information along with specific use designation is necessary to determine
required parking and building occupant loads.
TRH/gp
cc: Petition Files
�'Q
$OF OAK
O A,4
v v
G C
r
OACOUNTli
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
PHONE: 708 990-3000
November 8, 1995 FAX: 708 990-0876
Dear Resident:
The Oak Brook Plan Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals, and the Village Board will be considering a
Zoning Ordinance text amendment and special use at the meetings as scheduled on the reverse side of this
notice.
The application has been filed by: Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
185 Spring Road
Glen Ellyn, IL 60138
Relationship of applicant to property: Licensee
The property in question is located at. Peabody Mansion and adjacent grounds
1717 Oak Brook Road
The request which has been made is as follows:
To amend the Zoning Ordinance to establish a new Special Use in a CR Conservation/Recreation
District for use of historic structures and for approval of such special use for the Peabody Mansion,
Portiuncula Chapel, and grounds adjacent to these structures. A copy of the proposed text
amendment and special use is attached for your information.
If you desire more detailed information,please contact me at the Building Department to review the file on
this application. 1 look forward to your attendance at the public meetings.
Sincerely yours,
/ Z
Thomas R. Hawk
Director of Code Enforcement
TRH/gp
Attachment
In accord with the P rovisionstof the American with Disabilities Act, an Pndividual who is in need of a
reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should
contact Thomas Hawk, the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 7081590-3045 as soon as possible before the
meeting date.
All meetings are held in the Samuel E.Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, on Oak Brook Road
(31st Street)and Spring Road, Oak Brook, Illinois.
Plan Commission . . . . . . . . . . . 7.30 p.m., Monday, November 20, 1995
Zoning Board of Appeals . . . • • 7.•30 p.m., Tuesday, December 5, 1995
Board of Trustees Meeting. . . 7.30 p.m., Tuesday, January 9, 1996*
*tentative
---�— -� BROOK ROAD
,, ; I �..". I »,., •"'--)��---��.(_ ,T,-.fit .._
•. � � ; . 'N'ry.Oylir i NNNMrf.. I •
1IN'II.1 A 4 J
f
no
�-- ��f Me• aawaw-••�
• i7RA•"�'- O
Area Liu#oed by thy.
Forest Grarlerve- District ,� " • , �� ; ��+
(Aug ��,lags} ' •Y �„'"�; \ ��•: '
I ' ¢ ' SUBJECT
PROPERTY
IN QUESTION
wr \-r•
•"L
357H STREE'
'Note: The map provided is only an ayoroximation of the area in question and is intended to be used only as a visual aid to determine W
your relationship to the property.
Public Hearing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pubi1.heaIf
Board of Appeals on the VlYap�ss of Oak Brook Duw'
Cook nties,10ki6W,wB be held oni0ecember 5,l wi at 7: p.m.'
�u oByak�IltgeIAv; 'Gl B lfa ;�`138i��• ERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
Conesrvancy,185 g�fr�klgo Avenue,Glen Ellyn,Illinois 80138 forT
Amendment and Speclafuse as provkfed under Section XIII(I 3,n
the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook,Illinois,Ordk,an a
G-60 as amended. ' "' paddock Publications Inc.
this petition will also be subject to review and recommendation
by the Plan Commission at their November 20,1959 meeting at the
same location.
The petitioner seeks the following:
1.Amendment of the Zoning Ordnance Section VI-A(2)Speolsl
Uses as follows:
"Amend Subsection(2)of Section VI-A of the Village Zoning Or •
present to add the 2)(g)following new Subsection(2) and refetter,*Heitd D aly Herald�Talue s
presen f Subsections(2)(g)and(h)as Subsections( (h)and(2)(h
respedivel
(g Historic facilities for uses necessary or,appropriate,
to their maintenance and Rubiic benefit." -:•! i'
2.Approval of this Special Use for the subject property es:tol
lows:
ia se arm a o use tion organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the
"Specl U Pit uthrizing the of historic`r fib
Peabody Mansion and the PortiuncuIs Chapel located on the
s f cJil rothn wa rsuchaarea es ;date to their manor - Illinois DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of
is facilities in ways which are appropriate to their mainte• ;' ,
nance and the public beneft and enjoyment form their con-
tinuede hegro arty e." ERALD. That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper
The property may be generally described as the Peabody man.
sion,Portiuncula Chapel,and ad
11scent grounds all located on the
DuPage County Forest Preserve District of DuPageCounNproperty been published daily in the Village of Oak Brook
known as Mayslake.The common street address is 1717 Oak
Road.
The legal description for the propperty is as follows: COUnt //lee Of
That part of fractional Section 34,lying North and South of the In- y l )
dian Bound Line,all in Township 39 North Range 11 East of the
ThirdPr+ncipp Meridian DuPage County,Illjnois,describedaafol-_, DuPage and State of Illinois,
lows: (b
Commencing at the Northeast comer of Trinity Lakes Uric 1 bs-;
ing a Subdivision of part of the Northeast fractional gunner, for more than one year prior to the date of the first publication
North and South of the Indian Boundarryy ifne in said fractional Y Y P P
34 recorded as Document No.R79-74435 in DuPage Countyt
nois;thence south o degree$as minutes 09 seconds Vilest ice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout
Easterly line of said Trinity Lakes Unit 1,a distance of 216.44, g g
thence South T degrees s minutes 33 seconds East e, County(ies) and State.
EasterN line of Trinity Lakes Unit 1.a distance of 72.11 test•
North 69 degrees 14 minutes 51 seconds east akmg said
line of Trinitylakes Unit 1,a dlatance'of 155.00 feet;thence South
degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds East along said Easte Ana of
ty es Unit 1,a distance of 150.00 feet;thence 51 "-
34 minutes 55 seconds East abng saki Easterly line of Trim
Unit 1,a distance of 150.00 feet;lfhence soot,29 degrees 4 certify that DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an
utes 58 seconds East along said Easterly line of Trin Lakes
s distance s ecnd ast along�Easterly line of Trinity es u i vise the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois
fence of 165.00 feet;thence South 10 rees 00 minutes
o 12 83f et"the ceSouth,,110deg�s"' inu es�t:.d Statutes, Chapter 715, Act 5, Section 1 and 5.
of 309 feet to the point of beginning
Southeasterly,perpendicular to the last describedcou .,a
tance of 375 feet fo the point of beginning;thence south 6D
54 minutes east,.a distance of 37 teat;thence north 26 degrees ;;
minutes east,a distant:of 270 feet•,thence South 63 degr . otice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, was
minutes east,a distance of 100 feet;thence south 28 degresra, p p ply
minutes west,a distance of 270 feet;thence south 63 degrees: 14
minutes east,a distance of 70 feet;thence south 03 degrees 3231 November $, 1995
utes east,a distance of 325 feet;thence north 87 degrees 05 m
west,a distance of 400 feet;thence north 26 degrees O6 minutet''
east,a distance of 440 feet to said point of beginning contamin9 1,2 AILY HERALD.
acres more or less.
PERMANENT INDEX NUMBER 06-34-200-015(includes other
property).
The petitioner's request will accomplish the following:
1. Establishment of a CR Conservation/Recreation'. .t'..,
Special Use for historic structures. c"NESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK
2.Approval of this new Special Use for the subject prop-'c£
e
AI persons desiring to be heard in support of or in opposlt °'. TIONS, Inc., has caused this certificate to be signed by
the proposed Text Amendment and Special Use or any pro
thereof,will be afforded an opportunity to do so and may submit their
statements orally or in writing or both.The hearing may be recessed: FLANDERS, its Treasurer, at Arlington Heights, Illinois.
to another date if notice of time and place thereof is public an-
nounced at the hearing or is given by newspaper publication no less
than five(5)days Friorto the date of the recessed hearingg. a
In accord with the provisions of the Americ$n with Disabilities
Act,any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in
order to participate in or benefit from attendance at this public meet-
ing should contact Thomas Hawk,the Village's ADA Coordinator,as
soon as possible before the meeting date.
The petitioner s application is on file with the wishing t Clerk and PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC.
with the Director of Code Enforcement.Persons with to examine
the petition documents may arrange to do so with the Director of
code Enforcement,Thomas Hawk,�/illage of oak Brook,1212 oak - DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS
Brook Road,Oak Brook,IL 60521,telephone 708-990-3045.
LINDA GONNELLA
Village Clerk
Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak brook,DuPage and
Cook Counties,ltlinois.
Published in Lombard-Villa Park-Oak Brook-Oakbrook Ter-
race Herald November 8,1995. (197419)D
BY
ssistait reasurer
91,
s
Absent: 2 - Trustees Payovich and Shumate. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF:
BILLS -
A. APPROVAL OF BILLS: Approved Omnibus Vote. $211,204.95
PAYROLL -
B. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL: Approved Omnibus Vote. $209,469.83
C. CHANGE ORDERS: None.
D. PAYOUTS: PAYOUTS:
1. SWALLOW CONSTRUCTION - PAYOUT#4 & FINAL - 1994 1994 DRAINAGE
DRAINAGE PROJECT - $1.781.26: Approved Omnibus Vote. PROJECT
2. JAMES J. BENES & ASSOCIATES - PAYOUT 41 - 22nD/YORK -
22ND/YORK DESIGN - $7,859.89: Approved Omnibus Vote. DESIGN
3. CIVILTECH ENGINEERING - PAYOUT#13 - YORK ROAD YORK ROAD
BIKE TRAIL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING - $439.80: BIKE TRAIL
Approved Omnibus Vote.
4. CIVILTECH ENGINEERING - PAYOUT 42 - YORK YORK ROAD/HARGER
ROAD/HARGER ROAD BIKE TRAIL PRELIMINARY ROAD BIKE TRAIL
ENGINEERING - $4.129.91: Approved Omnibus Vote.
5. CIVILTECH ENGINEERING - PAYOUT#4 - 31 ST STREET 31ST STREET
BIKE TRAIL PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING - $1,994.07: BIKE TRAIL
Approved Omnibus Vote.
6. JAMES J. BENES & ASSOCIATES -PAYOUT #1 - 1996 1996 PAVING
PAVING PROJECT- DESIGN - $605.20: Approved Omnibus PROJECT
Vote.
7. JAMES J. BENES & ASSOCIATES - PAYOUT#15 - 1995 1995 PAVING
PAVING PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION - PROJECT
$7.408.09: Approved Omnibus Vote.
8. JAMES J. BENES & ASSOCIATES - PAYOUT#26 & FINAL - 1994 PAVING AND
1994 PAVING AND WATER MAIN PROJECT - $50.85: WATER MAIN
Approved Omnibus Vote. PROJECT
( E.) REFERRAL - MAYSLAKE LANDMARK V 7 7
I✓ MAYSLAKE LAND-
OAK BROOK ROAD (PEABODY MANSION). TEXT MARK CONSERVANCY
AMENDMENT AND SPECIAL USE -- REFER TO PLAN (1717 Oak Brook
COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20. 1995 AND (PEABODY MANSION
TEXT AMENDMENT &'
SPECIAL USE
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 2 of 14 24 er October 1995
II
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF DECEMBER 5.
-� 1995: Approved Omnibus Vote.
F. J REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES - MAYSLAKE LANDMARK MAYSLAKE LANTbMAR:
CONSERVANCY - 1717 OAK BROOK ROAD (PEABODY CONSERVANCY -
MANSION): Approved Omnibus Vote. WAIVER OF FEES
G. ACCEPT AND PLACE ON FILE - TREASURER'S REPORT - TREASURER'S
SEPTEMBER. 1995: Approved Omnibus Vote. REPORT - SEPT.
H. BID AUTHORIZATION - GOLF CAR FLEET- SPORTS CORE: GOLF CAR FLEET -
Approved Omnibus Vote. BID AUTHORIZATIO'
6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM OMNIBUS AGENDA: None
7. ACTIVE AGENDA (Items For Final Action):
A. ORDINANCE 95-TX-UT-G-563 AN ORDINANCE FURTHER ORD.95-TX-UT-
AMENDING ORDINANCE G-470, "AN ORDINANCE G-563
ESTABLISHING A UTILITY TAX WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF FURTHER AMEND
OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS": UTILITY TAX
Based upon the 1996-2000 Five-Year Financial Plan as adopted by
the Board on September 26, 1995, the Village Manager recommends
that the Board adopt Ordinance 95-TX-UT-G-563 to extend the
Village's utility tax, on its existing terms,through 1996.
The current tax is at the rate of 4 percent on electric and natural gas
service, and 3 percent on local telephone service. All receipts from
the tax are deposited in the Infrastructure Fund, which supports
improvements to and major maintenance of the Village's roads,
drainage systems and safety pathways.
Sue Lanham, York Woods, requested the Board to consider reducing
the telephone tax of commercial residents. President Bushy
explained that many Oak Brook businesses do not generate sales tax
revenue, rather revenue through the utility tax. Our commercial
residents are aware they pay no property taxes in Oak Brook, and the
utility tax generates revenue for the Village. Many communities in
the western suburbs have property taxes and a utility tax in the same
range as the Village.
Motion by Trustee Bartecki, seconded by Trustee Savino, to pass
Ordinance 95-TX-UT-G-563, "An Ordinance Further Amending
Ordinance G-470, `An Ordinance Establishing a Utility Tax Within
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 3 of 14 October 24, 1995
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes October 24, 1995
UNOFFICIAL
UNTIL APPROVED AS WRITTEN
S AMENDED_BY VILLAGE BOARD ON
1. MEETING CALL: MEETING CALL
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order by President
Bushy in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons at 7:32
p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL
The Clerk called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: President Bushy, Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney and
Savino.
ABSENT: Trustees Payovich and Shumate.
IN ATTENDANCE: Stephen B. Veitch, Village Manager; Dale L. Durfey,Jr.,
Village Engineer; Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement; Bruce F. Kapff,
Purchasing Director/Grants Coordinator; Darrell J. Langlois, Finance
Officer/Treasurer; Richard A. Martens, Village Attorney; Ruth A. Martin,
Librarian; Robert Nielsen, Fire Chief/Building Commissioner; Bonnie Sartore,
Bath and Tennis Club Manager; Trey VanDyke, Golf Club Manager; Anne C.
Buser, Civil Engineer; Lt. Allen Pisarek, Police Department; and Safety
Pathway Committee Members Jill Fleishman, Connie Craig, Tom Richardson
and Ana Sisson.
3.
ANNOUNCEMENTS & OPEN FORUM: ANNOUNCEMENTS
AND
President Bushy announced the availability of hearing devices for the public OPEN FORUM
during meetings in the Board Room. Residents may contact the Village
Manager or Village Clerk for assistance.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to approve the
minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 10, 1995 as amended and waive the
full reading thereof. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
OMNIBUS AGENDA:
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Bartecki, to approve the
Omnibus Agenda. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney and Savino.
Nays: 0 - None.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 1 of 14 October 24, 1995
� 7,6
of o'�'r�
9�
d
G e
O `r0
r
VILLAGE F A
G O OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521-2255
708 990-3000
October 25, 1995
Mr. David M. Gooder
Lord, Bissell& Brook
1100 Jode Blvd., Suite 153
Oak Brook, X 60521
RE: Mayslake Landmark Conservancy- Text Amendment and Special Use
Dear Dave:
The Board of Trustees, at their meeting of October 24, 1995, referred the above zoning application to the
Plan Commission for review at their meeting of November 20, 1995 and to the Zoning Board of Appeals for
public hearing at their meeting of December 5, 1995.
In a second action, the Board of Trustees approved your request for waiver of fees less direct costs to the
Village. You will be billed for the cost of publication of the legal notice and any other direct expenses.
Sincerely,
Thomas R. Hawk
Director of Code Enforcement
TRH/gp
OF 04k 9 OOf
9
d
O a
G
r
COUNT"'`y
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990- 3000
MEMO
October 19, 1995
TO: President Bushy and Board of Trustees
FROM: Tom Hawk
SUBJECT.• Waiver of Fees - Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
1717 Oak Brook Road(Peabody Mansion) - Text Amendment and Special Use
We have received a request for the waiver of filing fees for the petitions pertaining to the planned use of the
Peabody Mansion (see letter attached).
The fees for this petition are$650 for the Text Amendment and $400 for the Special Use that totals$1050.
The Ordinance permits waiver of such fees (copy attached).
In recent similar requests,you have approved such request less direct costs to the Village such as postage
and legal notice publication costs.
9 it is your wish to approve this request it may be done by voice motion.
TRHIgp
cc: Petition files
Attachments
The following is excerpted from Chapter 5 - Section 5-7 of Building and Building Regulations
of the Oak Brook Code.
Certain entities permitted to request waiver. Any governmental unit or any charitable
organization,as defined in"An Act to Regulate Solicitation and Collection of Funds For Charitable
Purposes,Providing for Violations Thereof and Making an Appropriation Therefor," Chapter 23,
Illinois Revised Statutes, 1977, Sections 5101 et sequitur, may request a waiver of any fees
imposed pursuant to the terms of this section. Upon such requests,the president and the board of
trustees may,by motion,waive any such fees imposed pursuant to this section. (Ord.No.G-160,
SS III,6-11-74;Ord No.0-195,SS 1,7-27-76;Ord.No.0-244,SS 1,2-27-79;Ord.No.G-283,
SS 2, 3-24-81; Ord.No. G-246, SS 3, 3-14-89)
(pg. 312)
The following is excerpted from Chapter 2 - Administration, Article VIII. Fees pertaining to
applications for zoning and subdivision hearings of the Oak Brook Code.
Sec. 2-226. Waiver of Fees.
Any governmental unit or any charitable organization as defined in"an art to regulate solicitation
and collection of funds for charitable purposes, providing for violations thereof and making an
appropriation therefor," Chapter 23 Illinois Revised Statutes 1979,Sections 5101,et sequitur,may
request waiver of any fees established in this article. Upon such request the president and board
of trustees may in its discretion,waive any such fees imposed pursuant to the terms of this article.
(Ord.No. G-289, SS 1, 3-24-81)
(pg. 90.1)
waiv-bld.fee
pF Ogke Opp
9
C �
O
COUNT'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
MEMO
October 19, 1995
TO: President Bush and Board of Trustees
FROM. Tom Hawk
SUBJECT.• Referral-Mayslake Landmark Conservancy
1717 Oak Brook Road(Peabody Mansion)- Text Amendment and S cipe al Use
We have received a petition for a Text Amendment and Special Use that will enable the usage of the historic
Peabody Mansion.
Please refer this to the Plan Commission for review and recommendation at their meeting of November 20,
1995 and to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing and recommendation at their meeting of
December 5, 1995.
TRH/gp
cc: Petitioner
Petition files
ARTICLE VII
PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL-USE PERMITS
Section 7.1 The President and Board of Trustees may refer applications for special use
permits to the Plan Commission for the purpose of holding a public meeting to consider the
application and formulate a report, including a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals
and Village Board. The Commission may request at any time a written recommendation from
Village staff on applicable issues.
Section 7.2 The Commission shall,in formulating its report,consider the Standards for
special uses as set forth in Section 3M(n(5) of the Zoning Ordinance, to wit:
(a) For proposed uses operated by a public agency or proposed uses traditionally
affected with a public interest, the proposed building or use at the particular
location requested is necessary or desirable to provide a service or a facility which
is in the interest of the public convenience;
(b) The proposed building or use will not cause substantial injury to the value of other
property in the neighborhood in which it is located; and
(c) The proposed building or use will be so designed, located and operated that the
public health, safety and welfare will be protected.
Section 7.3 Following its consideration of the application, the Commission shall
transmit to the Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board a written report giving its findings
as to compliance of the proposed special use with the applicable standards governing the
particular special use, and giving its recommendations on the application.
ARTICLE VIII
PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS
FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 8.1 Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance may be proposed in writing by the
President and Board of Trustees, by the Plan Commission, by the Zoning Board of Appeals, by
the Department of Code Enforcement, by the Building Department, or by any person having a
proprietary interest in property in the Village.
Section 8.2 The President and Board of Trustees may refer applications for amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance to the Plan Commission, for the purpose of holding a public meeting
to consider the application and formulate a report, including a recommendation to the Zoning
Board of Appeals and Village Board. The Commission may request at any time a written
recommendation from Village staff on applicable issues.
5
.3
Section 8_3 The Commission shall consider the following factors in its consideration
Of a request for a zoning amendment:
(a) The character of the neighborhood;
(b) The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning
restrictions;
(c) The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the
value of other property in the area;
(d) The suitability of the property for the zoned purposes;
(e) The existing uses and zoning of nearby property;
(f) The length of time under the existing zoning that the property has remained
unimproved, considered in the context of land development;
(g) The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the
individual property owner,
(h) The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals or general
welfare of the public;
(i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan; and
(j) The community need for the use proposed by the property owner.
Section 8.4 Following consideration of the application, the Commission shall transmit
to the Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board a written report giving its findings and
recommendations.
ARTICLE EK
PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLATS OF SUBDIVISION
Section 9.1 Any applicant requesting approval of a plat of subdivision or resubdivision
shall submit documents and information in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations to the
Village Clerk.
Section 9.2 The Commission shall determine,in consultation with Village staff,whether
the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance have been met.
6
3
Sec. VIII OAK BROOK CODE
(?Amen(iments.Authority: This ordinance may be amended from time
to time by ordinance in accordance with applicable
Illinois Statutes. No vote shall be taken upon the
adoption of a proposed amendment by the Board of
Trustees until after a public hearing before the Zoning
Board of Appeals and a report of its findings and
recommendations has been submitted to the Board of
Trustees along with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission.
(2) Initiation of Amendment: Amendments may be
proposed by the Board of Trustees, Plan Commission
or Zoning Board of Appeals, and by any person, firm
or corporation having a freehold interest, a possessory
interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual
interest which may become a freehold interest or any
exclusive possessory interest which is specifically
enforceable on the land which is described in the
proposal for an amendment.
(3) Processing:
(a) A proposal for an amendment shall be filed with
the Village Clerk and thereafter entered into the
records of the first meeting thereafter of the Board
of Trustees.
(b) A copy of such proposal shall be forwarded by the
Village Clerk to the Zoning Board of Appeals with
a request to hold a public hearing and submit to
the Board of Trustees a report of its findings and
recommendations. Such public hearing shall be
held upon notice as required by Illinois Statutes.
(c) The Village Clerk shall also transmit a copy of
such proposal to the Plan Commission. The Plan
Commission shall submit an opinion report
relative to such proposed amendment to the
Zoning Board of Appeals and Board of Trustees.
(4) Decisions: The Board of Trustees, upon report of the
Plan Commission, if such report is made, and the
970
APPENDIX A—ZONI;iG Sec. XIII
report of the Zoning Board of Appeals, and without
further public hearing, may vote upon the adoption of
any proposed amendment in accordance with applica-
ble Illinois Statutes, or may refer it back to the Boards
for further consideration.
(5) Re-Applications: Any person, firm, or corporation
having been denied an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance respecting a specific parcel of property may
not re-apply for a like amendment on said real
property until the period of one (1) year has elapsed
since the denial of the application for a-mendment by
the President and Board of Trustees. (Ord. No. G137,
9-14-71)
( pecial Uses.
(1) Purpose. The development and execution of the zoning
ordinance is based upon the division of the Village
into districts, within any one of which the use of land
and buildings and the bulk and location of buildings
or structures, as related to the land, are essentially
uniform. It is recognized, however, that there are
special uses which, because of their unique character,
cannot be properly permitted in particular districts
without consideration, in each case, of the impact of
those uses upon neighboring lands and upon public
need for the particular use or the particular location.
Such special uses fall into two categories:
(a) Uses operated by public agency or publicly-regu-
lated utilities, or uses traditionally affected with a
public interest.
(b) Uses entirely private in character, but of such a
nature that the operation may give rise to unique
problems with respect to their impact upon
neighboring property or public faclities such as,
but not limited to, single-family attached and
semi-detached dwellings, horizontal condomini-
ums and other residential developments. (Ord. No.
G66, 12.19-66)
971
Sec. MII OAK BROOK CODE
(2) Authority: Special uses shall be authorized or denied
by the Village Board in accordance with the Statutes
of the State of Illinois applicable to a:nenda:ents of
this ordinance, and the regulations and conditions set
forth in this ordinance for special uses.
No application for a special use shall be acted upon by
the Village Board until after:
(a) A written report is prepared and forwarded to the
Board of Appeals and the Village Board by the
Plan Commission in a manner prescribed herein
for amendments to this ordinance; and
(b) A public hearing has been held by the Zoning
Board of Appeals, after due notice by publication
as provided by the applicable Statutes of the State
of Illinois for amendments and upon a report of
the Plan Commission to the Board of Trustees, if
such a report is made.
(3) Initiation: An application for a special use may be
made by any person, firm or corporation or by any
office, department, board, bureau or commission
requesting or intended to request a zoning certificate.
(4) Processing: An application for a special use, in such
form and accompanied by such information as shall
be established from time to time by the Plan
Commission, shall be filed with the Village Clerk and
thereafter processed in the manner prescribed thereto-
fore for applications and amendments. Special use
applications may be processed simultaneously with
requests for amendment of this ordinance. (Ord. No.
6-66, 12-19-66)
(5) Decisions: The Village Board, upon repert of the
Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission,
and without further hearing, may authorize or deny
an application for a special use in accordance with the
Statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amend-
ments, or may refer it back to the Board of Appeals
and the Plan Commission for further consideration.
972
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. XIU
No special use shall be authorized by the Village
Board unless the special use:
(a) Is of the type described in Section XIII J-1 (a) is
deemed necessary for the public convenience at
that location. (Ord. No. G-66, 12-19-66);
(b) Is so designed, located and proposed to be
operated that the public health, safety and welfare
will be protected; and
(c) Would not cause substantial injury to the value of
other property in the neighborhood in which it is
located.
(6) Conditions: The Plan Commission and Zoning Board
of Appeals may recommend, and the Village Board
may provide, such conditions and restrictions upon
the construction, location and operation of a special
use, including, but not limited to, provisions for
off-street parking and loading as may be deemed
necessary to promote the general objectives of this
ordinance and to minimize the injury to the value of
the property in the neighborhood.
(K) Fees.
Fees for any relief under this ordinance shall be as
otherwise established by separate ordinance. (Ord. No.
G-132, 5-25-71; Ord. No. G-289, § 2, 3-24-81)
(L) Violation, Penalty and Enforcement.
(1) Any person, firm or corporation who violates,
disobeys, omits, neglects, refuses to comply with or
who resists enforcement of any of the provisions of
this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined not less
than $25.00 nor more than $500.00 for each offense.
Each day that a violation is permitted to east shall
constitute a separate offense.
(2) The Building Inspector is hereby designated and
authorized to enforce this ordinance. However, it shall
also be the duty of all officers, citizens and employees
of the Village, particularly of all members of the police
Supp. NO. 49 973
of *#' VOLAGE OF OAK BSOOK
1212 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521
9903045
PETITION APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING:
ZONING ORDINANCE: APPEAL ($100) VARIATION ($300)
X AMENDMENT ($650) �_ SPECIAL USE ($400)
FLOOD PLAIN: VARIATION ($300) SPECIAL USE ($675)
ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE,PLAT OF SURVEY,AND 18 COPIES OF A SCALE DRAWING
SHOWING ALL PERTINENT APPLICABLE INFORMATION; I.e., PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS, LOCATION OF
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE
LOCATION Part of southwest corner of � p�
OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 83 & Oak Brook Road pg [ANENT PARCEL NO. 06 34 -_200 - 015
LOT NO: N/A SUBDMSION: N/A ADDRESS: 1717 Oak Brook Road - Legal description
attached as Exhibit A
ZONING DISTRICT: C_ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION:Section VI A(2)
ACTION REQUESTED: Text Amendment.of Section VI-A(2) and Special Use Permit under
Section VIE-A(2) , as amended. See Exhibit B attached
LKENSEE X
PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT
OWNER(S) OF RECORD Forest Preserve District of DuPage County - PHONE NO. 790-4900
ADDRESS 185 Spring Avenue, P.O. Box 2339, Glen Ellyn, IL ZIP 60138
BENEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST N/A PHONE NO.
ADDRESS ZIP
NAME OF APPLICANT MAYS AKE LVMMARC CWSEMWCY PHONE NO. 789-1779
A BILLING INFO)
1717 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL
ADDRESS ZIP 60521
I (we) certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the
best of my (our) knowledge and belief.
•ay .4�fi,C�wir ,p�.r� �G/lif/�
s
( tgnature) Applicant Date (Signature) Applicant Date
T DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SP CE••FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Filed: 10/16/95 Board of Trust.Referral: 10/24/95 Staff RcfeTw: 11/10/95
Notice Published: 11/8/95 Newspaper. The Daily Herald
Date Adj.Property Owners Notified: 11/8/95
Public Hearing Dates: Plan Comm. Zion: 11/20/95 Zoning Board: r-2/5/95
Board of Trustees: 1/9/96 Board of Trunces: 1/23/96
(Approval of Otdizmce)
FEE PAID: S 0 No. N/A Received By: Gail Polanek
SIGNED-VEUAGE CLERK: a Date:
A *amios+w;.�
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS 'J
A Variation is a zoning adjustment which permits minor changes of district requirements where individual properties are both harshly
and uniquely burdened by the strict application of the law. The power to vary is restricted and the degree of Variation is limited to
the minimum change necessary to overcome the inequality inherent in the property.
1. A Variation recognizes that the some district requirements do not affect all properties equally. Variations permit minor
changes to allow hardship properties to enjoy equal opportunities with properties similarly zoned. You must prove that your land is
affected by special circumstances or unusual conditions. These must result in uncommon hardship and unequal treatment under the
strict application of the Zoning Ordinance. Where hardship conditions extend to other properties, in general, a variation cannot be
granted. The remedy for general hardship is a change of the map or the text of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. You must prove that the combination of the Zoning Ordinance and the uncommon conditions of your property prevents
you from making reasonable use of your land as permitted by your zoning district. Since zoning regulates land and not people, the
following conditions cannot be considered pertinent to the application for a Variation:
(a) proof that a Variation would increase the financial return from the land,
(b) personal hardship,
(c) self-imposed hardship.
3. No Variation may be granted which would adversely affect surrounding property or the general neighborhood All
Variations must be in harmony with the intent and purposes of the Zoning Ordinance.
Names of Surrounding Property Owners
Following are the names and addresses of surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of 250 feet in all
directions,and the number of feet occupied by all public roads,streets,alleys.and public ways have been excluded in computing the
250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the
County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County.
NAME ADDRESS
FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF. DUPAt3E COUNTY 185 Spring Avenue, P.O. Box 2339, Gli-n F11�m' TT.
Telephone: (703) 790-4900 60138
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
AM
�/
EXHIBIT B
TO
MAYSLAKE LANDMARK CONSERVANCY'S
APPLICATION
Requested Village Action
1. Approval of a text amendment reading as follows:
"Amend Subsection (2) of Section VI-A of the Village
Zoning Ordinance to add the following new Subsection
(2) (g) and reletter present Subsections (2) (g) and (h)
as Subsections (2) (h) and (2) (i) respectively:
' (g) Historic facilities for uses necessary or,
appropriate, to their maintenance and public
benefit. and enjoyment.' is
2. Approval of -a Special Use Permit reading as follows:
"Special Use Permit authorizing the use of the historic
Peabody Mansion and the Portiuncula Chapel located on
the Subject Property for such activities as make use
of the historic facilities in ways which are appropriate
to their maintenance and the public benefit and enjoy-
ment from their continued existence."
EXHIBIT B A-A
• i
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 LOS ANGELES OFFICE
300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,8TH FLOOR
(312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071.3200
(213)485-1500
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO TELEX:18-1135
TELEX: 25-3070 TELECOPY:(213)485-1200
TELECOPY: (312) 443-0336 ATLANTA OFFICE
ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1100 Jorie Boulevard 1201 W. PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
Suite 243 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(404)870-4600
708/990-0561 Oak Brook IL 60521 TELECOPY:(404) 47
� LONDON OFFICE
LLOYD'S,SUITE 995
1 LIME STREET
LONDON EC3M 700 ENGLAND
071-327-4534
October 16, 1995 TELECOPY:071-929-2250
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Att'n: Thomas Hawk,
Director of Code Enforcement
Re: Application by Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy for Approval of Text
Amendment and Special Use Permit
Dear Tom:
Delivered herewith on behalf of my client, Mayslake
Landmark Conservancy, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation
classified as a Section 501(c) (3) organization by the Internal
Revenue Service, are the following materials:
1. Application for approval of a text amendment and special
use permit to which are attached a legal description of
the subject property and specific relief requested.
(Original only)
2. A Plat of Survey of the entire area owned by the Forest
Preserve District of DuPage County prepared by Midwest
Technical Consultants, Inc. and dated July 7, 1993, as
last revised. (18 copies)
3. Survey of the subject area licensed by the District to the
Conservancy prepared by the District as of August 11, 1995.
(18 copies)
4. Relevant portion of the Oak Brook Zoning Map. (18 copies)
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK Village of Oak Brook
Att'n: Thomas Hawk
October 16, 1995
Page Two
5. Scale drawing of the subject property. (18 copies)
Y P
In view of the fact that the Applicant is a not-for-profit
501 (c) (3) organization, it is respectfully requested that the required
filing fees be waived.
We have requested that the Forest Preserve District prepare
a formal letter of consent and approval for the subject Application.
I have been informed by Art Strong, Executive Director of the Forest
Preserve District, that such a letter is being prepared.
It is further respectfully requested that this Application
be referred to the Village Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of
Appeals for their preparation of recommendations to the Board of
Trustees.,
Res ctfu ly you
V4
David Gooder
DMG:pg
cc D. Fichter (with encl)
R. Mork ('with encl)
� S
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 LOS ANGELES OFFICE
300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,8TH FLOOR
(312) 443-0700 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071.3200
(213)485-1500
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO TELEX:16-1135
TELEX: 25-3070 TELECOPY:(213)485-1200
TELECOPY: (312) 443-0336 ATLANTA OFFICE
ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1100 Jorie Boulevard
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
Suite 243 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(404)870-4600
'
708/990-0561 Oak Brook, IL 60521 TELECOPY:(404)872-5547 LONDON OFFICE
LLOYD'S,SUITE 995
1 LIME STREET
LONDON EC3M 7D0 ENGLAND
071-327-4534
October 31, 1995 TELECOPY:071-929-2250
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Att n: Thomas Hawk
Director of Code Enforcement
Re: Application of Mayslake Landmark
Conservancy for Approval of Text
Amendment and Special Use Permit
T
Dear Tom:
m.
This will confirm that on behalf of my client,
Mayslake Landmark Conservancy, I have filed with you today
eighteen (18) copies of a revised legal description of the
subject property, one copy of which is attached hereto.
Si erely yours,
David M. Gooder
DMG:pg
Encl
cc D. Fichter (with attachment)
A. Muschler "
. t
A OF PREMISS
LICENSED TO MAYSLAKE LANDMARK
CONSERVANCY
THAT PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 34 , LYING NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE
INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF
THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOISIDESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT !ONE, BEING
A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST FRACTIONAL QUARTER, LYING
NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE IN SAID FRACTIONAL
SECTION 34 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO R79-74435 IN DUPAGE COUNTY,
ILLINOIS; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST ALONG
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DlISTANCE OF
218 .44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
72 . 11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 51. SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
155 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
150 , 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
150 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
150 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
165 . 00 FEET; TSE'NCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT ONE, A DISTANCE OF
121 . 83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 56 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF
309 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 63 ,DEGREES 54
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37 FEET; THENCE NORTH, 26 :DEGREES 06
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 270 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 ,DEGREES 54
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26 ' DEGREES 06
MINUTES WEST, A DISTANCE OF 270 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 54
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 32
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 325 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 05
MINUTES WEST, A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26 DEGREES 06
MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 440 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 3 . 2 ACRES MORE OR LESS .
PIN 06-36-200-015 (INCLUDE
OTHER PROPERTY)
VAYs m LOL
I
b
I Tit
«I.aI a
of,ete ' ,/ t ee
li 11 / 7S ¢ I 'e
1111 VI AW+MO OJar101 Y)aw'0)IO) I •r d' vwvwr /M
1w i M I1Y1 wO,IM)it;Y OMr 1,wO 1 ONO)11)0 Y)IrMNYOIt �!
3>1 V-7 GA VIN / el V9 Yf�
.M11'
/ E \ ('Sb'3W 9 9b' / / A
0 IF
jn
� �'• 3N�J? J.£3M
�w`�7R'71f'R317 � U
wwe�
I `w\ Iuru O �ty
Ott►/Y/Y'OM'1:1 b Alt
aMINIIYI MIr NYI Lr. e� et 'I+••/
I ■I/wt4 p{ ��y �pQ 1J��1
wfe T •Ufrltp9 PI�.IOM�y W1M111d1�ICY/Olb O
lw �,VgyYy �0
Ielr,I 110Y/ .0 wn•I.,re/o Mdlr]0,71rwf10Y1Ir r y. ,
mot IN -
E ' �...,
!w0)
owl a.w�� 1111 of f _
Olga
anI \IMwIM/N
I )OYYYO 'iii
its +vr �N frfei
I) rf
AW01111 Y1�4 Ailt Inewwln O ' A, •�A/IA W
as
IN, Owl
r �,� • ,. �; 4 ')tip $%I 1
.���e aawry 11SSdS e�
�11
•wewewi /Swbf • /� (,1
erjj
oe e
111.1; .NYe
w/a
1MH01 T� � r
1, Il
�v e
Iu'1 • Al, / 11wlP: 1
We f.
1111. /i,•/t 04101 M
lwel,M/e
OVA
I
y e AeE,
Mel,N/; ' I1w0� {.^� Alta
4 I�
11114 •. rf.Y
IN011 eY01�e'l
bf'a ( vO,tip led: too
LV O 8 S
0 � �` � Ir Iw1.111t '
0 0 owl,, 1 ^ rfu�ipft►t`
1°
0 0 ° +■
0 0 4A." C w j� IYOIf.
/jr0�i 0 0 O O � �fwf
r
0/1 ! e1.e/
� y9i
yF 4
4
` c
x m „
m R J
t „
2 ; I'
a „ „
o
i =
� 1
aR
4
� O I
k
1
Y
UI I'IC'li OP JOHN VINCI INC.
1111 w 1111111 11 Kitt E111 CMM.IL 60411
nul n,•uu
MAYSLAKE - THEfRANUS STUYVESANT PEABODY ESTATE OASEMENT
t ,t WEST 341 SIREE7 OOAK OaOOK, ILlu+015 EXISTING CONDITIONS III? -
�� t S'!iF
r
i
o A
A � Y
X ....... f
CA
G
r
Z _
9
sa
R
01'I,ICIi 01' JOIIN VINCI INC.
nn w nnul 51111 Er
t'lll l'Alil 1,11.(0111 ��
11111 rnrru
D e d MAYSLAKE - THE FRANCIS STUYVESANT PEABODY ESTATE FIRST FLOOR _
I 1717 WEST Sal STREET OAK(ROOK. K.LINOIS EXISTING CONDITIONS
N i
FT tr WN-—— ----- —
i
{{x 1
n
R
n A
n �
1
0m m
�
n __FFc
0 nlJ ti
O A
� I
z
i
1
9
f
ca
a
Ui l'IC'li 01' JOHN VINCI INC.
1111 W 1111111 11111 i.l l'llll'Alill,11.101!1
uul nrm�
D ' MAYSLAKE • THE FRANCIS STUYVESANT PEAUODY ESTATE SECOND FLOOR
fY ?,I WLST ,%w STOLLT OAK 111400K. 0.1.114015 EXISTING CONDITIONS
WEal Irc�crct _
• 1;t
— ��
•..rw•' 1 � � til j :ti �
S11 �Y+ �j'• yy�
tip« ►o.,y � .�:,'_, , .,�� , •� 5bb1 It � d�
y� y ♦ .O[C �
�• 1 n7� oaf o fi��xY►
I'svJw►��iiloo
y,l �•t41,
T O f •Y.11
-01
Ae
4OF kw
,w.w•.wk1Y.YFh 7.l1•J"1 \.\ J f,�*,Iro tft (y��J
t � r.�000r f•, rJ11YC Ce 6 ��....� ,
r'^ AO Ou v 7 Ic
ft�b+1 130)r.t tti•I �0
� QQ
f'O Y�yIOG Ol M./I.GG.1 M nt•1w f1lot
to *�Jitr 00 MI�C•O1
fOyflO0l1 M CI►O.11 G -a1 • '~I
DA1 G `
r�1Y •� �1t
'O)YAL�1O s.M.J 0.Cyl1 M �� CY'7�1(I.G�IC M•-,��"t
-wa,
,ter, ...._��� '�'«. .–�.� •' -'►i.rrrr+r.rr � l.�
— ���-�–
N•_ ,.._\ -- i -�� �((`� •, �`�-i i � L. _J .rte R'-
Rm 4 -%,j
-
_ s>a Y • l aL _ z_ R 3 , R,
IN
_4_��`j� ° all�/� 1 � s• j ! � �>- �, 4� a. •?�- l , » w .. w .r �►. .' y � , ! __-____
�1 i ���.Its..���,_..1�.���>,...���...�.,�� r r ���. �. 1 • - -
I�
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(2 13)48S-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 2S-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPY:(312)443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(4 04)870-4600
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: TELEX:543707
1100 Jorie Boulevard
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521 EIVED
A i s �
July 15, 1993 GE OF OAK E?S(�r'
PLANNING/z0a�p
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Att'n: Thomas Hawk
Re: Shannon/Sanctuary Proposal
1801 Oak Brook Road
Dear Tom:
This will confirm that my client, Shannon &
Associates, Ltd. , wishes to withdraw all of the zoning
requests now pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals
with regard to the proposed Mayslake development.
As you undoubtedly know, the sale of the property
to the Forest Preserve District of DuPage County was closed
on Friday, July 9 , 1993, at which time title was transferred
to the District.
S ncere yours ,
David M G000der
DMG:pg
cc T. Shannon
6
VILLAGE OF OAK` BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL MINUTES
June 1, 1993
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis
Members Dorothy Dosedlo
Hans Hasen
Paul Martis
MEMBERS ABSENT: Louis Aldini
Manu Shah
ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner
Director of Code Enforcement Thomas Hawk
A quorum was present
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Hasen moved, seconded by Member Martis, to waive the reading of the minutes and to
approve them as written.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III. SHANNON/SANCTUARY - Preliminary Plat of Subdivision with Special Use, and
Amendments.
Hawk advised the members that Shannon has requested his petition be continued to September
7, 1993. Member Martis moved, seconded by Member Dosedlo to table the Shannon/Sanctuary
petition to the September 7, 1993 meeting.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion P assed.
IV. KATSIS - Horse Stabling Undersized Lot - 1124 35th Street.
Kevin Katsis, attorney for petitioner has requested the petition be continued to July 6, 1993
Member Martis moved, seconded by member Hasen to table the Katsis petition to July 6, 1993.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes have 1. 1993
. ,J 1
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTHGRAN O AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(213)485-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO COO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX' 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPY:(312) 443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: (404)870-4600
TELEX:543707
1100 Jorie Boulevard
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521 RECEIVED
MAY 2 7 1993
May 26 , 19 9 3 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
PLANNING/ZONING
Mr. Champ Davis, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re : Shannon/Sanctuary Proposal
1801 Oak Brook Road
Dear Mr. Davis :
My client, Shannon & Associates , Ltd. , respectfully
requests that the matter now pending before the Zoning Board
of Appeals be continued to the meeting scheduled for September
7, 1993. The reason for the continuance is because negotiations
are continuing with the DuPage County Forest Preserve Commis-
sion but it is not yet clear how they are going to turn out.
R pecty ully ou
David M. Gooder
DMG:pg
cc T. Shannon
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL MINUTES
May 4, 1993
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Paul Martis
Members Louis Aldini
Champ Davis
Hans.Hasen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dorothy Dosedlo
Manu Shah
ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner
Director of Code Enforcement Thomas Hawk
A quorum was present
Hawk advised the members that it was necessary for a member to volunteer as Acting Chairman
in the absence of an appointed Chairman. Member Martis volunteered. Member Davis moved,
seconded by member Aldini to appoint Member Martis Acting Chairman in the absence of an
appointed Chairman.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed
H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Davis moved, seconded by Member Hasen, to waive the reading of the minutes and to
approve them as written.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III. SHANNON/SANCTUARY - Preliminary Plat of Subdivision with Special Use, and
Amendments.
Hawk advised the members that Shannon has requested his petition be continued to June.
Member Davis moved, seconded by Member Aldini to table the Shannon/Sanctuary petition to
the June 1, 1993 meeting.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes � May 4,1993
•
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRANO AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(213)485-ISOO
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO COO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPN:(312)443-0870 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
WRITER'S OIRECT DIAL NUMBER: (404)870-4600 TCLE%:543707
1100 Jorie Boulevard
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521 RECEIVE D
L.OFWBR3FK 22INEW
April 21, 1993
NING
Mr. William E. Kenny, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re: Shannon/Sanctuary Proposal
1801 Oak Brook Road
Dear Bill:
My client, Shannon & Associates , Ltd. , respectfully
requests that the matter now pending before the Zoning Board
of Appeals be continued to the meeting scheduled for June 1,
1993. The reason for the continuance is because negotiations
are continuing with the DuPage County Forest Preserve Commission
but it is not yet clear how they are going to turn out.
Resp ctful y yours ,
V
David bi. Goo
DMG:pg
cc T. Shannon
Of 04ir
vJo 090
b d
w
s
` o�COUNtr•`
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
NOTICE OF CANCELLED MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of
Tuesday, March 2, 1993 is hereby .CANCELLED.
r'
Shannon/Sanctuary has requested postponement of the hearings on their petition for
a period of two months. Their Zoning Board of Appeals hearing is therefore rescheduled
for the May 4, 1993 meeting.
VU-LAGE OF OAK BROOK
0y
OF 04K A OCf
9
G o
9O�COUNS"'`y
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 940- 3000
MEMO
February 24, 1993
TO: Zoning Board f Appeals
FROM: Tom Hawk
SUBJECT: Cancelled meeting - March 2, 1993
The Shannon/Sanctuary has requested postponement of their hearing before you for a period of
two months due to their pending negotiations with the DuPage County Forest Preserve
Commission (See copy of their attached letter). We will reschedule the hearing on their petition
for the May 4, 1993 meeting.
Since this was the only item on Tuesday, March 2, 1993's agenda, the meeting is cancelled.
Your meeting for April is still scheduled for April 6, 1993.
TRH/gp
cc: President Bushy and the Board of Trustees
Bruce Kapff, Robert Nielsen, Dick Martens
petition files
/6
3
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
I I S SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(2 13)485-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPY:(312)443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(4 O 4)670-4600
WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: 1100 Jorie Boulevard TELEX:543707
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521 RECEIVED
FEB 2 3 19Q
February 23 , 1993
Mr. William E. Kenny, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re : Shannon/Sanctuary Proposal
1801 Oak Brook Road
Dear Bill:
My client, Shannon & Associates , Ltd. , respectfully
requests that the matter now pending before the Zoning Board of
Appeals be continued to the meeting scheduled for May 4 , 1993 .
The reason for the continuance is because negotiations are
continuing with the DuPage County Forest Preserve Commission
but it is not yet clear how they are going to turn out.
Re ectful y yours ,
David M. Gooder
DMG:pg
cc T. Shannon
AaAl
Of O,k•0�1
A
c o
4 Zi
COUNT'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
MEMO
December 22, 1992
TO: Zoning Bo d f Appeals
FROM: Tom Ha
SUBJECT: January , 1993 - Meeting
The scheduled meeting of January 5, 1993 is hereby CANCELLED due to lack of agenda.
The Shannon/Santuary Petitioner has requested that this matter be tabled to the March 2, 1993
meeting.
Please mark your schedules accordingly.
cc: President and Board of Trustees
Dick Martens
/i
p�pF OgKe
S �
� o
O�Cpu NS'4'`y
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
December 2, 1992
708 990-3000
Mr. Dave Gooder
Lord, Bissell & Brooks
1100 Jorie Blvd. , Suite 122
Oakbrook, IL 60521
RE: Shannon/Sanctuary proposal
1801 Oakbrook Road
Dear Dave:
The Zoning Board of Appeals at their meeting of December 1, 1992,
tabled the Shannon/Sanctuary proposal to their January 5, 1992
meeting.
Sincerely,
Thomas Hawk
cc: pet. file
1600
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL MINUTES
December 1, 1992
I . CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7 : 32 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Kenny
Members Louis Aldini
Champ Davis
Dorothy Dosedlo
Manu Shah
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Martis
ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner
Director of Code Enforcement Thomas Hawk
A quorum was present
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Dosedlo moved, seconded by Member Davis, to waive the
reading of the minutes and to approve them .as written.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III . SHANNON/SANCTUARY - 1801 Oak Brook Road - Preliminary Plat of
Subdivision with Special Use and Amendments
Mr. Hawk reported that Dave Gooder the attorney for the petitioner,
has asked that their petition be tabled until January 5, 1993 . The
petitioner is expecting to be contacted by the Forest Preserve
District and this may have an effect on their proposal to the
Village.
Member Aldini moved, seconded by Member Dosedlo, to table until the
January 5, 1993 meeting.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
IV. GERALD' S VARIATION - 2124 Oak Brook Road - Enlargement of an
Existing Non-conforming Structure
Attorney John Brechin was present to represent the petitioner and
was sworn.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes December 1, 1992
1
9
,L
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING
November 3, 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:34 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Kenny
Members Louis Aldini
Champ Davis
Paul Martis
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dorothy Dosedlo
Manu Shah
ALSO PRESENT: Trustee Kelly Skinner
Director of Code Enforcement Tom Hawk
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Martis moved, seconded by Member Aldini, to waive the reading of
minutes and to approve them as written for the meeting of October 6, 1992.
�., VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
Member Aldini moved, seconded by Member Davis, to waive the reading of the
minutes and to approve them as written for the Special Meeting of October 21, 1992.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III. SHANNON/SANCTUARY - 1801 Oak Brook Road - Preliminary Plat of Subdivision
with Special Use and Amendments - Public Hearing continued
All those who were to testify were sworn in. .
Attorney David Gooder described proposed revisions to the R-3 cluster housing
text amendment (written copies of the proposed revised text have been requested
for the December 1, 1992 meeting) .
Audrey Muschler and Valerie Spale testified in opposition.
A general discussion took place involving the relationship between this proposal
and the referendum regarding Mayslake.
Member Davis moved, seconded by Member Aldini, to table this issue until the
December 1, 1992 meeting to allow for the following:
a.) the results of the referendum
b.) an opinion from Attorney Martens regarding the relationship of the
two issues.
The motion was not based on any intent to delay a decision indefinitely.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes; Aldini, Davis Nayes: Paul Martis Motion failed.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -1- November 3, 1992
•
Member Martis indicated that he would be in favor if the reference to the
referendum results was deleted from the motion.
Member Davis moved, seconded by Member Martis, to table this issue to the
December 1, 1992 meeting in order to get the advice of Attorney Martens regarding
the relationship between this proposal and the referendum. This motion was not
based on any intent to delay a decision indefinitely.
ROLL CALL VOTE. All in favor. Motion passed.
IV. HINDMARCH - 506 Wood Road - Front and Side yard variations - public hearing.
The petition was represented by Mrs. Hindmarch, the owner and Mr. Joseph
Bush, of A.W. Wendell, the building contractor.
Both were sworn in.
A brief presentation was made which .included the following:
a.) The home dates from the 1880's.
b.) The proposed construction includes a 2 bedroom, 2 story addition and
a roofed open porch to replace the existing open porch.
c.) The present front and. side yard setbacks are non-conforming.
d.) The existing floor plan only has 2 bedrooms which are not adequate
for a family's needs.
e.) The proposed construction will be historically consistent and enhance
this historic area.
A letter in support of the petition has been received from the Porterfields of
509 Wood Road.
There was no other public testimony.
A general discussion ensued.
Member Martis moved, seconded by Member Aldini, to recommend approval of the
variations as requested and including the stipulations that the proposed construction
shall be in accordance with the submitted plans and that the porch is to remain
open and unenclosed. This motion is based on the following findings:
a.) The ordinance, if strictly enforced, would constitute a hardship.
b.) The building is historically significant and the design complements
that character.
c.) The character of the area will not be altered.
d.) The circumstances are unique and do not apply to R-2 properties in general.
e.) There should be no detrimental effects.
f.) The owner's motivation is not wholly based on profit motive but rather
is to improve the habitability of the home - the additional bedroom
and improved front entryway.
ROLL CALL VOTE. All in Favor. Motion passed.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Member Aldini moved, seconded by Member Davis to adjourn.
VOICE VOTE. All in Favor. Motion passed.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:48 P.M.
Approved /!
fix . l. /gs -.?
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- Date November 3, 1992
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
October 21, 1992
SPECIAL MEETING
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Kenny
Members Champ Davis
Dale Durfey
MEMBERS ABSENT: Louis Aldini
Paul Martis
Manu Shah
ALSO PRESENT: Director of Code Enforcement Tom Hawk
A quorum was not present.
After waiting until 7:45 P.M. , the meeting was cancelled due to a lack of
quorum.
Approved
Date Approved
TRH/11
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes - Special Meeting October 21, 1992
/gee*
CF 04K 9 oOP
9
o �
C O
4 �1
r�
p�COUNT4'`�
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
October 20, 1992 708 990-3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Rich Vaiciulis
SUBJECT: Trinity Lakes Subdivision
As you requested, the following information regarding Trinity Lakes lot
areas is as follows':
COMMON AREA 15. 204 acres
RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA 106 .385 acres
R.O.W. AREA 31 . 104 acres
TOTAL 152 . 693 acres
Stormwater Detention Easements on
Common Lots 14 . 14 acres 616,030 sq. ft .
Stormwater Detention Easements on
Residential Lots 1 .33 acres 58,000 sq. ft .
Bicycle, Pedestrian Path Easements on
Common Lots 1 . 86 acres 81 , 225 sq. ft .
Bicycle, Pdestrian Path Easements on
Residential Lots 0.36 acres 15, 650 sq. ft .
Re tfully submitted,
Richard Vaiciulis ,
RV/etk Engineering Department
cc: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. , Village Engineer
/of
I � I
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
I
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
October 6, 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Kenny
Members Louis Aldini
Champ Davis
Dorothy Dosedlo
Paul Martis
Manu Shah (arrived at 7:40)
ALSO PRESENT: Village Trustee Kelly Skinner
Village Engineer Dale Durfey
Director of Code Enforcement Tom Hawk
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Aldini moved, Member Dosedlo seconded, a motion to waive the reading of the
Minutes of the August 24, 1992 meeting and to approve them as written.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
Member Davis moved, Member Dosedlo seconded, a motion to waive the reading of the
Minutes of the September 1, 1992 meeting and to approve them as written.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
"'PI II. SHANNON/SANCTUARY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH AMENDMENTS AND SPECIAL
USE - 1801 Oak Brook Road - Public Hearing continued
All persons giving testimony pertaining to this issue were sworn in.
The petition was represented by:
Thomas Shannon, Developer
Dave Gooder, Attorney
John Glynn, Land Planner
Tracy Cross, Market Analyst
The above gave a presentation reviewing the proposal including the following
additional comments.
a. The open space per resident of Oak Brook is approximately 4 to 6 times the
"standard" of 30 acres per thousand population.
b. Based on the lack of need, purpose, and cost, recreational components in a
development are not desired by the buyers.
c. The proposed R-4 overall dwelling unit density of 1.45 dwelling units per acre
compares favorably with Trinity Lakes dwelling unit density of 1.37 dwelling
units per acre.
Plan Commission members questioned how the R-3 and R-4 proposals satisfied the
ordinance requirement for 10% park and recreational lands in order to qualify for the
lot area reduction (see pages 900.2 and 901 of the Zoning Ordinance.)
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -1- October 6, 1992
I �
f
The following persons testified in opposition to the proposal:
Valerie Spale, Salt Creek Greenway Association
Lisa Gengler, International Cultural Exchanges
Princess Elizabeth of Germany
Kate Cunningham, Hinsdale resident and representative of the Sierra Club
Robert Antoniolli, Oak Brook resident
The above covered the following points.
a. Only 2% of DuPage County's Forest Preserves are in this area.
b. Open space, wildlife, and historical values of the site.
c. Adaptive reuses of the buildings for cultural activities, ballet and
music use, museums, College of DuPage.
d. Defer decision until after the November 3, 1992 referendum.
Plan Commission member discussion included the following:
a. The R-3 plat does not adhere to the Subdivision Regulations calling for
all lots to front on a public way.
b. The R-3 plat does not provide the necessary park and recreational lands
to qualify for lot area reduction
C. } acre lots are marketable in this area.
d. The R-3 present zoning is appropriate.
Member Martis moved, Member Aldini seconded, to recommend denial of the rezoning
from R-3 to R-4.
ROLL CALL VOTE. All in favor. Motion passed.
Member Davis moved, Member Aldini seconded, to recommend approval of the "Sound
Barrier" zoning text amendment with the following text in the last two lines removed
(see page 118) - "and such approval shall not unreasonably be withheld".
ROLL CALL VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
Member Davis moved, Member Shah seconded, to table further consideration to a
special meeting to be held on Wednesday, October 21, 1992. The Commission is not
yet prepared to make a recommendation regarding the R-3 cluster housing text
amendment.
VOICE VOTE. All in favor. Motion passed.
IV. GERALD'S VARIATION - ENLARGEMENT OF AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE - 2124
Oak Brook Road - Public Hearing Continued j
Mr. and Mrs. Geralds and Attorney John Brechin were sworn and gave testimony that
included the following:
a. The proposed increase in floor area from 1197 square feet to 1760 square
feet will bring the structure into compliance with the R-3 minimum of
1500 square feet.
b. The structure is historically significant and saving it is important.
C. The lot has been reduced in size by widening of Oak Brook Road and Midwest
Road.
d. The above constitute hardships and unique circumstances which justify the
granting of the requested variation.
Member Martis moved, Member Dosedlo seconded, a motion to recommend approval based on
the work being done according to the following schedule:
a. The building permit will be obtained within 6 months of the date of the
approving ordinance.
b. Work will commence within 12 months of the date of the approving ordinance.
c. Work will be completed within 18 months of the date of the approving ordinance.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- October 6, 1992
163
The motion is based on the following findings:
a. The undersize floor area and land area takings constitute a hardship.
b. To repair this building will be beneficial to the neighborhood.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: Kenny, Aldini, Cavis, Durfey, Martis. Nayes: Shah
Motion passed.
The petitioner was in agreement .with the proposed timetable.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Member Martis moved, Member Aldini seconded, a motion. to adjourn.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
Meeting was adjourned at 11: 14 P.M.
Approved
Date Approved
TRH/11
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -3- October 6, 1992
1'5
OF GAAr •
0
G �
4 20
�COUNS'i'
VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990. 3000
COMPARISON
R-4 CLUSTER HOUSING WITH PROPOSED R-3 CLUSTER HOUSING
R-4 R-3
LOT SIZE 18,000 25,000
LOT SIZE RATIO - R-3/R-4 = 1.39
THEORETICAL GROSS DENSITY EXCLUSIVE 2.0 du/a 1.5 du/a
OF OPEN SPACE.
GROSS DENSITY RATIO - R-3/R-4 = .75
R-4 CLUSTER HOUSING DENSITY 3 . 0 du/a
RATIO - R-4 CLSTR HSG DEN TO R-4 BASE DENSITY
3 .0 du/a / 2 .0 du/a = 1.5
CALCULATED R-3 CLUSTER HSG DENSITY BASED ON:
LOT SIZE RATIO
THE LOT SIZE IS INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL TO DENSITY
THEREFORE: (1/1.39) x 3 du/a = 2 . 16 du/a
GROSS DENSITY RATIO .75 x 3 du/a = 2 .25 du/a
R-4 RATIO 1.5 x 1. 5 du/a = 2.25 du/a
PROPOSED R-3 CLUSTER HOUSING DENSITY 2 .5 du/a
mayslake.ltr
OF OgkA
9
3 v
G �
O
CAF `w`?
COUNty'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
October 12 , 1992 708 990-3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E.
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary - Preliminary Plat
Sound Barriers Text Amendment
On July 21 , 1992, I provided you with some preliminary comments concerning
the proposed subdivision Sound Barriers Text Amendment as proposed by Dave
Gooder within his letter of July 16 , 1992 to the Plan Commission. Within
Mr . Gooder ' s letter of October 1 , 1992 to the Zoning Board, I note that the
same request is being applied for .
In order to formalize my comments concerning this subject , I offer the
following:
1 . The term "solid fences" may be inappropriate within a sound barrier
regulation. There are probably some solid fences on the market
which have little or no effect on noise mitigation. Common usage
of the word "fence" is also probably not what is utilized when one
refers to noise mitigation measures , such as sound walls .
2 . The requested language states "collectively not exceeding ten ( 10 ' )
feet in height" . I question from what datum this would be
measured. Would it be measured from the edge of the pavement , the
tow of the ground slope or wall , etc. ?
I also question the ten ( 10 ' ) foot requirement . A ten ( 10 ' ) foot
high noise mitigation measure may be ineffective in providing any
real noise mitigation effects . For example, the noise walls being
considered along the Tri-State Tollway are generally in the fifteen
to twenty ( 15 ' - 20 ' ) range. The requested ten ( 10 ' ) foot language
is therefore also inconsistent with the noise walls that hopefully
will be constructed along the Tri-State Tollway.
3 . The recommended language also states that "The sound barrier design
shall be in accordance with the Village ' s Building Codes and
Engineering regulations . . . " . Since the Village does not currently
have any Engineering regulations regarding sound barriers , some
would have to be generated. This would probably entail a detailed
analysis of what the Village deems appropriate concerning sound
barriers including input from consultants who are expert in this
particular field. This of course can be accomplished either at the
staff level or at the Village Board level .
r 0
4 . The language " . . .which approval shall not unreasonably be withheld"
does not appear to be language which is normally found within a
statute; it is language which is commonly placed within agreements .
Attorney Martens would of course have the final say on this
specific issue.
It appears to me that the question of a Sound Barrier Text Amendment
requires further detailed analysis . Perhaps the Village Board will direct
that such further detailed analysis take place after they have approved of
the general concept of a sound barrier regulation.
Respe t ul submitted,
Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etk
cc: Tom Shannon, Shannon & Associates , Inc.
149 .
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS A NGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(213)485-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:IB-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPY:(312)443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(404)670-4600
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: 1100 Jorie Boulevard TELEX:543707
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521
October 1, 1992
Mr. William E. Kenny
Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re: Zoning Applications
Shannon & Associates, Ltd.
Mayslake Properties
Dear Chairman Kenny:
My client, Shannon & Associates, Ltd. , respectfully
urges that at the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals to be
held on Tuesday evening, October 5, final action be taken on the
Shannon requests for zoning map and text amendments and special
use permits now on filed with the Board. However, before such
action is taken, my client requests that it be given an oppor-
tunity to have its expert witnesses , as briefly as possible,
present a summary of the presentation each made to the Board on
August 24.
In taking final action it is requested that recommend-
ations be made on each of the following matters :
1. Rezoning the 90 acres to R-4 as requested on condition
that approval of any plat of subdivision be conditioned
on a minimum lot size of 20,000 s .f. (or 2 ,000 s .f. more
than the R-4 standard of 18 ,000 s .f. ) and subject to
other conditions suggested by the applicant.
(See Exhibit A attached)
2 . Assuming Board of Trustees approves rezoning to R-4 ,
approval of the issuance of special use permit for
36 clustered, detached dwelling units on the north-
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK Chairman Kenny
October 1, 1992
Page Two
east 15 acres of the subject 90 acres as shown on
the plat on file, on condition that a covenant be
recorded forbidding parking on access drives . (It
should be understood that such a development would
have a density of 2 .5 units to the acre which is
less than the 3 units permitted by the R-4 regula-
tions.)
3 . Assuming Board of Trustees disapproves rezoning
to R-4, approval of the requested text amendment
authorizing, as a special use, clustered housing
in R-3 districts.
(See Exhibit B attached)
4 . Assuming Board of Trustees approves such text amend-
ment, approval of issuance of special use permit for
36 clustered, detached dwelling units on the northeast
15 acres of the subject 90 acres as shown on plat on
file on condition that a covenant be recorded for-
bidding parking on access drives .
5. Regardless of action of Board of Trustees on items
1 through 4 above, approval of text amendment with
regard to sound barriers as requested.
(See Exhibit C attached)
It should also be noted that my client has not requested
any zoning variations and has withdrawn the proposed text amendment
with regard to structure height.
Re ect ully yo rs ,
David Goo er
DMG:pg
Encl
XtkA
EXHIBIT A .
CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
APPLICABLE TO
REQUESTED SPECIAL USE
The requested Special Use is to be subject .to the
following perpetual restrictions and conditions which will
run with the land:
1. All residential lots on the subject property
which touch one or more lots or a part there-
of which are located in the Trinity Lakes
Subdivision shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Minimum size - 21,780 sq.ft.
(b) Minimum width - 100 ft.
(c) Minimum rear yard- 40 ft.
(d) Minimum side yard - 12 ft.
2 . All other residential lots not included in the
area to which the special use is applicable shall
have an area of not less than 20,000 sq. ft . and
shall meet all the other bulk regulations applicable
to full-size , single-family lots in an R-4 District.
3. The maximum gross density of the area subject to
the Special Use shall not exceed 2-1/2 detached
dwelling units to the gross acre .
b
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT
Amend Section VII (E) (2) by adding a new subsection (c) reading
as followss
" (c) Single-family detached, attached and semi-detached
dwellings--in subdivisions of not less than 50 acres
in area , provided that the gross density of each such
development shall not exceed 2 . 5 dwelling units per
acre; the structure heights shall not exceed 30 feet;
no structure shall contain more than two and one-half
stories ; the ground floor living area per dwelling
shall not be less than 1 , 500 square feet for a- one-story
dwelling and 1 , 000 square feet for a dwelling of more
than one story ; and minimum distance between principal
buildings , as measured between bearing walls , shall be
not less than 24 feet, except that this distance may be
reduced by two (2) feet if one of such walls encloses
an attached garage or carport and by four (4) feet if
each of such walls encloses an attached garage or car-
port; provided further that each principal building
shall be set back at least forty ( 40) feet from dedicated
public streets , off-street loading and off-street
parking requirements shall be as provided in Section XI ;
and provided that a preliminary development plan indicates
sufficiently clearly the proposed streets , rights-of-
ways , lot sizes and setbacks , so that the village board
in granting approval of such preliminary plan may clearly
define the areas of any special restrictions it may wish
to impose and that approval of the final subdivision plan
shall be subject to same . "
I
EXHIBIT B 46
EXHIBIT C •
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT RE SOUND BARRIERS
Amend Section V to add a new subsection (s) reading as follows :
" (s) Sound barrier accessory structures consisting of berms ,
solid fences , freestanding walls , landscaping, and re-
taining walls , collectively not exceeding 10 feet in
height may be erected on residential subdivision property
adjacent to:
(1) Roosevelt Road, Route 83, I-88 , I-294 , or
22nd Street.
(2) A frontage road adjacent to such streets.--
(3) Other arterial streets which intersect such
streets and within 800 feet of such inter-
section.
The sound barrier design shall be in accordance with the
Village' s building codes and engineering regulations and
shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Trustees
which approval shall not unreasonably be withheld. "
EXHTBIT C
•
Personnel & Library: Trustee Mayer - There has been an adjustment in
the personnel structure of the Finance Department and Bureau of
Inspections.
Planning & Zoning: Trustee Skinner - Public Hearings have been held for
the yslake property. The first Tuesday in October should be the final
hearing regarding said property.
President Bushy noted properties outside of the Village of Oak Brook
merchandising the property as within the Village boundaries. The
Village will pursue this, as they misrepresent to their residents, as
our public service departments would not service this area.
Public Safety: Trustee Winters - Absent. President Bushy read a report
from Police Chief Fleming announcing two new probationary patrolmen:
Robin Aylor and Jason Cates. Mr. Aylor is replacing Officer Leck who
was recently transferred to the B.A.T.T.L.E. Program. Mr. Cates is
replacing Officer Ciolino who went on disability pension August 28,
1992.
Sports Core: Trustee Shumate - The Sports Core has recorded its best
season since its opening, the highest membership, and may show a profit
in the areas of golf, tennis, pool and restaurant. '
Trustee Payovich arrived at 7:57 p.m.
The Staff and the Golf Club Committee are requesting quotes to correct
soil erosion areas on the Golf Course. The project would require bid
procedure for work to be done in November.
The last major Polo event is scheduled this week. Four (4) parties have
been scheduled at the Bath & Tennis Club.-for the Polo events this season
and have been well attended.
The engineering plans and power drop for the Tennis Bubble should be
completed soon so that bids can be received. One meeting has been
scheduled with the planner.
Village President: President Bushy - Addressed the Board's deliberation
on issues to develop ideas for the Sports Core and Library. The Sports
Core and Library staffs are having meetings to develop the feasibility
of the Sports Core property for a Library site. These proceedings are
for discussion only. The Board has not received any proposals nor has
any decisions been made by the Village Board.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. REQUEST TO ACCEPT OUOTES FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE - EMERGENCY SIREN EMERGENCY SIR
SYSTEM: SYSTEMM
ELECTRICAL
1. COMMONWEALTH EDISON SERVICE: SERVICE
Recently Commonwealth Edison advised the Village that to
provide power to the warning siren at Route 83/22nd Street
would require a new Commonwealth Edison service, including
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 4 September 8, 1992
�3
777-7 r�-TrT �T 7'7�� Tt'TTTT�-rrT— r'T� r�
.w-a.� �.rJJ..�.1J�J d .JJ �.� .�.�.�.i-�.� �d•�.r��.i.�-i �.r.� .i.1�i.i.1.�
T7
September 1, 1992
Mr. William Kenny, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
RE: Request of Tom Shannon & Associates to Change the Zoning of the Mayslake
Property from R3 to R4
Dear Mr. Kenny:
I am writing to ask the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook to
deny the request of Tom Shannon & Associates to change the zoning density of the
Mayslake property from R3 to R4.. This increase in density will pave the way for the
destruction of significant cultural, historic and natural resources located on the site.
Several experts, respected in their fields in Illinois and nationally, have testified in
the past and will again testify before you as to the outstanding resources present at
the Mayslake site. These include:
o architectural resources such as the Peabody Mansion and the Portincula
Chapel, both of which are eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places, the nation's inventory of properties worthy of preservation;
o archeological resources of Native American cultures which date from 3,000
B.C. to later habitation by the Potowatomie;
o its history as the estate of Francis Stuyvesant Peabody, a coal magnate; and
o almost seventy years of operation by the Franciscans.
We are also concerned about the valuable role the landscape plays in providing
wildlife habitat, open space and numerous educational and recreational opportunities.
'Aidwesc Re,ional Office Nati•)1,ai i:i ilC:
•
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
September 1, 1992
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kenny at 7:40 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Member William Kenny
Champ Davis
Paul Martis
Manu Shah
MEMBERS ABSENT: Member Louis Aldini
Dorothy Doseldo
ALSO PRESENT: Village Attorney Dick Martens
Village Engineer Dale Durfey
SHANNON/SANCTUARY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH AMENDMENTS AND
SPECIAL USE
Chairman Kenny asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak in
favor of the proposal for the Sanctuary subdivision. Village resident, Anna
Walsh, Forest Glen spoke in favor of the proposed berm and fence on the property
located at 1801 Oak Brook Road. She urged the board to reconsider the present
fencing regulations and allow higher berms and fences as a sound barrier,
particularly in those subdivisions such as Forest Glen that are located along
major thoroughfares. No one else in the audience wished to speak in favor of
the proposed development.
Chairman Kenny then asked for a volunteer to introduce those in the audience who
were opposed to the development. Audrey Muschler, resident, agreed to do so and
Chairman Kenny swore in all those who wished to speak.
Mr. Howard Decker, Historic Architect, spoke both as a-large estate preservation
counselor and as a representative of the Landmark's Preservation Council. He
informed the board that the Mayslake property is a local, regional, and national
landmark and urged them to deny the application and encourage looking into
other uses for the site. He also spoke to the matter of what a housing develop-
ment would mean to village services and facilities such as the schools,
road ways, parks, etc. , indicating some substantial increases in both the usage
and costs of such facilities. Mr. Decker answered questions from the board
members and explained the process by which a building or site becomes a National
Landmark. He also gave the board some insight as to whether or not a landmark
building could house a for profit enterprise.
Ms. Susan Benjamin, Architectural Historian, continued the discussion by giving
the board some history of the building and urged "adaptive reuse" of the facility,
such as using it for the Park District, the Salt Creek Ballet, small conferences,
concerts, and receptions.
Resident Lisa Gengler spoke as a member of the Mayslake Heritage Council, urging
preservation of the site and comparing it to the preservation of the Iroquois
County Courthouse.
Valerie Spale, preservationist and President of the Salt Creek Greenway Association,
stated that the purpose of the Green way Association is to identify and promote 1�
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -1- September 1, 1992
natural resources in the region.
Susan Johnson, President of the Park District, stated that the County had asked
the Park District if they would consider responsibility for the buildings. As
there has not been a Park Board meeting since the request was made, the Commissioners
had not yet investigated the details thoroughly, but preliminary informal talk
among the commissioners indicated they were not opposed to such a suggestion. She
also noted that the configuration of the proposed buildings did not allow for parks
as is the practice of new residential developments.
Resident Nora Jackson, as well as resident Dorothy Dean Cavenaugh, urged the board
'to keep the open space for now and in the future. Additional support was given
by resident Robert .Antoniolli, who is an intern architect. Resident Bob Waite
urged the board to give the Nov. 3 referendum a chance and to not make a decision
until after the referendum.
Audrey Muschler then read a portion of a letter from Mr. Turner, Regional Director
of the National Trust for Historic Preservation regarding legal cases in similar
instances. She further noted that if the development would be aliowed, .it would
have a substantial impact on the. Village's.water allotment,-:schools, etc.-..
. etc.-. '-She
also encouraged the board not to act on berms until after the referendum.
Resident Howard Trier spoke as a resident and pyschologist, and stated his views
that open space should be preserved. He opposes berms as they tend to "close up"
a community and take away open relaxation areas that are valuable to society.
Concern over a small portion of land between Trinity Lakes and Mayslake was voiced
by Ron Cullum, Trinity Lakes Homeowners Association. The land, referred to as
"the grotto" is only accessible through Mayslake but contains a dam that is vital
to Trinity Lakes. He also noted that the proposed development did not come
about as a "hardship", one of the criteria for granting a variation.
At this point, with no other audience members wishing to speak, Member Davis
made a motion, seconded by Member Shah to table this matter to the next Zoning
Board meeting, at which time the developer, Tom Shannon, will have a chance to present
his proposal and to answer the concerns raised at this meeting.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III W00 VARIATION - 38 Devonshire Drive, rear yard variation
Mr. Mike Campbell, Normandy Builders, presented Mrs. Woo's request for the variation
to allow the Woo family to construct a 2 story addition to the rear of their home.
Because of the angled rear yard, they are not able to enlarge their kitchen area,
and maintain the required 40 ft. setback. The board agreed that such a variation
would not alter the character of the neighborhood and would help the homeowner
get a reasonable return on their property.
Member Martis made the motion to approve the variation to allow a 36' back yard
instead of the required 40' setback. Member Davis seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
IV. GERALD'S VARIATION - 2124 Oak Brook Road, enlargement of an existing non-
conforming structure
Attorney John Brechin made an introductory presentation of the location and history
of the property in question. It is adjacent to, but not part of, Brook Forest.
Originally built as a schoolhouse, it has been a single family residence since
the 1920's. The present owner seeks to renovate and reconstruct the residence.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -2- September 1, 1992
F-F
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
August 24, 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:36 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Member William Kenny
Louis Aldini
Champ Davis
• Manu Shah
MEMBERS ABSENTi Dorothy Doseldo
Paul Martis .
ALSO PRESENT: Village Trustee Kelly Skinner
Village Engineer Dale Durfey
Director of Code Enforcement Tom Hawk
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Davis moved, Member Shah seconded, a motion to approve the Minutes
and waive the reading thereof for the meeting of-July 7, 1992.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
III. GERALD'S VARIATION - 2124 Oak Brook Road, Variation to expand a noncon-
forming structure.
The petitioner has requested that this item be tabled until the September 1, 1992
meeting. There was no public comment about this.
Member Shah moved, Member Aldini seconded, a motion to table until the September
1, 1992 meeting at the petitioner's request.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
IV. SHANNON/SANCTUARY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH AMENDMENTS AND SPECIAL
1801 Oak Brook Road.
All persons to testify on behalf of the petitioner were sworn in.
Attorney Dave Gooder described the proposals contained within the petition
including the following:
1. The property was rezoned from Institutional to R-3 in the late 1970's
over the objections of the Franciscan Fathers.
2. The R-3 proposal includes a text amendment and Special Use for the
cluster housing areas.
3. The R-4 proposal includes a map amendment and Special Use for the
cluster housing area.
4. The proposed sound barrier amendment will us used for both proposals.
5. Likens this area with the R-4 to the north along Route 83 (Briarwood
Lakes Villas) .
6. Compliance with all local, state and federal requirements regarding
archaeological and historical properties will be accomplished.
Brother Kevin, representing the Franciscans, gave a brief history of the property.
Mr. Shannon described his background as a developer and home builder.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes -1- August 24, 1992
13 q
0
John Green of Tracy Cross and Associates presented his market analysis. He
indicated that the proposal is marketable and also than any feasible adaptive
re-use of the existing buildings would be non-residential in nature.
Dr. William Southern summarized his environmental analysis.
John Glynn described the planning process he used in developing the plats. The
plan takes into account existing drainage patterns, ridgelines, trees and other
amenities. The R-3 and R-4 plats are virtually identical and only differ in
details.
. -.This concluded the petitioners presentation.
Audrey Muschler indicated that she would have several expert witnesses to testify
at the next meeting.
Member Shah moved, Member Aldini seconded, a motion to table this until the
September 1, 1992 meeting.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Member Shah moved, Member Davis seconded, a motion to adjourn.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor. Motion passed.
Meeting was, adjourned at 10:12 P.M.
i
. i
Approved - - - -
Date Approved
TRH/11
1
3 �
� , 4
1 a!
On K 13 ROOK H ISTOR IC A L SOC I F. TY
P O BOX 1921 OAK BROOK. ILLINOIS 60522
August 24, 1992
Mr. William E. Kenny, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Dear Mr. Kenny:
We realize the Zoning Board of Appealt is' guided by specific requirements
in making a recommendation to the Village Trustees. In your deliberations,
however, you must also consider the significant features of this historic
property, as outlined by. historic architect Howard Decker in the enclosed
study.
You are aware the Committee for the Preservation of Mayslake is petitioning
the full Forest Preserve Commission to place the purchase of the Mayslake
Historic Site for referendum on the November ballot. We expect final action ,
by the full commission in the meeting tomorrow morning.
At that time, we urge you to work jointly with the Forest Preserve District,
as other communities have done, to preserve this site in perpetuity.
At the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, September 1 , we
will be presenting professional testimony concerning the preservation of this
historic property.
You must be aware that recommending an increase in zoning, as has been requested
by the contract developer, Tom -Shannon, increases the value of the property
for development and increases the price we as tax-payers must pay to preserve
the irreplaceable ecological , historic and cultural resource for this community,
the county, for the state and region.
Sincerely,
Audrey L. Muschler
enclosures
� 3
1
Trustee Bartecki moved to approve Voucher List of Bills in the
total amount of $453,521.46 and authorize the Village President to
affix her signature thereon. Seconded by Trustee Skinner.
Trustee Winters abstained from voting on the bills from Illinois
Bell due to employment by same. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5-Trustees Bartecki, Mayer, Payovich, Skinner
and Winters.
Nays: 0-None.
Absent: 1-Trustee Shumate.
Abstain: 1-Trustee Winters as noted above. Motion carried.
S. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: None.
9. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - SPECIALTY AREAS: DEPARTP"wNTAL
REPORTS
Finance; Purchasing; and Hotel, Convention and Visitors Committee:
Trustee Bartecki - No report.
Sports Core: Trustee Shumate - Absent.
Environmental Concerns & Public Works: Trustee Payovich - The
consultant design for the Elmhurst Quarry project will be finished by
the end of the year. Construction will be in five phases. The first
phase will be bid late this year with subsequent phases bid in early
1993.
Village Engineer Durfey stated the County extended an invitation to tour
the Quarry and underground mine. The County is investigating the
feasibility of selling hydropower to Commonwealth Edison.
Personnel & Library: Trustee Mayer - The Library Commission held a
quarterly meeting. The Library Commission is meeting with Sports Core
staff and a land planner/landscape architect to examine five
alternatives for a Library for review by the Board. It further requests
the Village Board's approval to finance one of the proposed
alternatives. Trustee Mayer requested the Board give the Library
Commission some guidelines as to what is acceptable.
President Bushy and Trustee Mayer met with Public Works employees and
found the meeting to be very beneficial to all concerned.
� o Planning & zoning: Trustee Skinner - August 24, 1992 a Public Hearing
will be held for the.Airayslake property.
Public Safety: Trustee Winters - The Fire Department responded on July
25 to an electrical fire at 35 Regent Drive resulting in $30,000.00
smoke damage. On July 31st, the Police and Fire Departments responded
to a multiple vehicle accident on Interstate 88 involving a fatality.
Manpower was involved in the accident from 1-7 p.m. resulting in three
firefighters slightly injured due to muscle strain.
Village President: President Bushy - Attended meetings with developers
regarding commercial vacant office space withi n the Village. Remodeling
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 3 August 11, 1992
4�- l
36
0 0
1. The age and architecture of the buildings will benefit from the
proposed canopies.
2. The three foot permitted canopies are not functional and do not pro-
vide desirable protection from the elements, espically for the aged
and the handicapped.
3. The proposal won't alter the essential character of the area and will
have no detrimental effects on neighboring properties.
4. The request is in accord with the purpose and intent of the Ordinance.
ROLL CALL VOTE: All in favor - motion passed..
Mr. Jarvis was advised that his petition would be placed on the Board of Trustees
agenda of July 28, 1992.
V. OTHER AGENDA ITEMS
Member Martis moved, seconded by Member Aldini, to table th anno and Hsu
petitions until the next meeting.
VI. NEXT MEETING
Due to member schedule conflicts, the August 4, 1992 meeting was moved to
August 24, 1992.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Member White moved, seconded by Member Martis to adjourn.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:11 P.M.
Appifo,fed
Date Agfroved
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes 2 July 7, 1992
1
3 �
s 3�
O�OF OAk
-4 9
7
G �
20
4
yc `yam.
�COUNt4'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
August 23, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Thomas R. Haw
SUBJECT: Shannon / Sanctuary Petitions
Following are several key elements to be kept in mind when re-
viewing these petitions.
1) The ZBA's responsibilities regarding these petitions
include:
a) The text amendments pertaining to the R-3 cluster
housing. This proposal is patterned after the R-4
cluster housing Special Use.
b) Whether or not either the R-3 or the R-4 proposal
meets the lot area reduction requirement contained
within the Zoning Ordinance:
" . . . the lot area may be reduced. . . . .provided that
lands equal to ten percent of the total area be
dedicated to the Village of Oak Brook, or agency
approved by the Village Board, for park or recrea-
tional uses and no portion of which shall be less
than four acres. The dedicated land shall be
appropriate for park or recreational uses, and
shall not include wet drainage ways in excess of
25% of the total dedicated area. "
c) The text amendment pertaining to the proposed
Sound Barrier section.
d) The text amendment pertaining to Structure Height
has been within by the proponent.
sanctry.doc pg4&5
r Lj
2) The proposed R-3 prelim. plat uses dedicated easements
to provide access to the individual lots and the area
of these easements is included in the lot area calcula-
tions. This does not appear to conflict with the
Zoning Ordinance but it does conflict with Subdivision
Regulations that each lot have access to a public or
private street.
3) Both of the cluster housing layouts have had the ques-
tions of emergency vehicle access and parking avail-
ability raised. Both of these problem areas need to
be resolved. With respect to emergency vehicle access,
we need to insure that no parking takes place on the
access driveways (designated fire lanes) ; and with
respect to parking, equivalent parking to a standard
subdivision needs to be provided.
4) The Sound Barrier proposal has been tailored to be
effective for all subdivisions meeting the qualifying
criteria. We have recieved several requests from
people in other subdivisions pertaining to problems of
noise, security, and privacy screening in similar
situations along these busy highways.
sanctry.doc pg4&5 j% �"
��.• /.. n 5 fi U
�7 i July 24, 1992
The DOINGS
118 West First Street
Hinsdale, I1 60521
Gentlemen:
Please publish the following legal notice on July 29, 1992.
LEGAL NOTICE
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS
. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook
Counties, Illinois, will be held on Aug. 24, 1992 at 7: 30 p.m. in
the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Illinois, for
the purpose of considering the application of Shannon and
Associates for the following:
1) Approval of the following zoning ordinance text amendments as
provided under Section XIII (I) of the Zoning Ordinance G-60,
as amended:
a) Amend Section XIV (B) (141) by striking the work "structure"
and the period at end of subsection and adding the following:
"roof for flat roofs, or to the deck line for mansard roofs,
or to mean height between eaves and ridge for gable, hip
and gambrel roofs, or to the highest point of the structure
for structures without a roof. "
b) Amend Section VII (E) (2) by adding a new subsection (c)
reading as follows:
" (c) Single-family detached, attached and semi-detached
dwellings--in subdivisions of not less than 50 acres
in area, provided that the gross density of each such
development shall not exceed 2 . 5 dwelling units per
acre; the structure heights shall not exceed 30 feet;
no structure shall contain more than two and one-half
stories; the ground floor living area per dwelling
shall not be less 1, 500 square feet for a one-story
dwelling and 1, 000 square feet for a dwelling of more
than one story; and minimum distance between princi-
pal buildings, as measured between bearing walls,
shall be not less than 24 feet, except that this
distance may be reduced by two (2) feet if one of
such walls encloses an attached garage or carport and
by four (4) feet if each of such walls encloses and
attached garage or carport; provided further that
each principle building shall be set back at least
forty (40) feet from dedicated public streets, off-
street loading and off-street parking requirements
shall be as provided in Section XI; and provided
that a preliminary development plan indicates suffi-
ciently clearly the proposed streets, rights-of-ways,
lot sizes and setbacks, so that the village board in
granting approval of such preliminary plan may clear-
ly define the areas of any special restrictions it
may wish to impose and that approval of the final
subdivision plan shall be subject to same. "
c) Amend Sec. V(G) (3) (h) of the Village Zoning Ordinance by
inserting a new subsection (7) reading as follows and
renumbering the present subsection (7) and all following
subsections:
11 (7) Fences, solid - not more 42 inches in height
above finished grade level may be erected to
provide a sound barrier not less than ten (10)
feet from the nearest lot line which shall be
a right-or-way for:
(i) Roosevelt Road, Route 83, I-88, or I-294
(ii) a •frontage road adjacent to such street,
or
(iii) a road roughly perpendicular to such
street provided the fence shall not
located more than 800 feet from the
right-of-way of such street;
provided that such sound barriers shall (a) be
substantially screened from public view by trees
shrubs, and other plantings and (b) extend the
full width of all contiguous lots in a subdi-
vision. "
(2) Approval of a special use as provided for in Sect. XIII (J)
of the Zoning Ordinance G-60 as amended and in accordance with
the above proposed Section VII (E) (2) (c) for thirty-six lots
to be located in the northeast 15 acres more or less of the
proposed subdivision to be named "The Sanctuary" as depicted
on the preliminary plat of said subdivision.
(3) As an alternative to (1)b) and (2) above, rezone the subject
property from R-3 to R-4 ; and approval of a special use as
provided for in Section XIII (J) of the Zoning Ordinance
G-60 as amended and in accordance with the above proposed
Section VII (F) (2) (c) for thirty-six lots to be located in
the northeast 15 acres more or less of the proposed subdivi-
sion to be named "The Sanctuary" as depicted on the prelimi-
nary plat of said subdivision.
I
The property may be generally described as 1801 Oak Brook Road,
including the Peabody Mansion, Retreat House, St. Pascal ' s Fri-
ary, and adjacent lands, Oak Brook , Illinois, and the legal
description is as follows:
INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM ATTACHEMENT!
Permanent Parcel #06-34-200-016
06-35-100-010
06-34-200-015
06-35-100-008
06-35-100-009
The petitioner is proposing to develop the property for 134
single-family detached residences with 36 of the lots in accord-
ance with the above text amendment - Section VII (E) (2) (c) or to
rezone the property from R-3 to R-4 and to develop it for 130
single-family detached residences with 36 of the lots in accord-
ance with the above special use - Section VII (F) (2) (c) . Also
requested are Zoning Ordinance amendments to redefine the defini-
tion of structure height and to insert a new provision which will
permit the construction of sound barriers for subdivisions which
lie along highways such as Route 83, I-88, and I-294.
All persons desiring to be heard in support of or in opposition
to the proposed Text Amendments and Special Use or any provision
therof, will be afforded an opportunity to do so and may submit
their statements orally or in writing or both. The hearing may
be recessed to another date if notice of time and place therof
is publicly announced at the hearing or is given by newspaper
publication not less than five (5) days prior to the date of the
recessed hearing.
Linda Gonnella
Village Clerk
Published at the -direction of the Corporate Authorities and the
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and
Cook Counties, Illinois.
The petitioner' s application is on file with the Village Clerk
and with the Director of Code Enforcement. Persons wishing to
examine the petition documents may arrange to do so with the
Director of Code Enforcement, Thomas R. Hawk, 1212 Oak Brook
Road, Oak Brook, IL 60521, telephone 708-990-3045.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
pj. THAT PART OF CTION 35 AND FRACTIONAL SECTION 34, WNG NORTH AND
i SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11
EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. IN OUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF TRINITY
LAKES UNIT 1 , BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH EAST FRACTIONAL
114, LYING NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE IN SAID SECTION
34 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 879-74435, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS: THENCE
SOUTH 0 DEGREES, 45 MINUTES, 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE
' < OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1, A DISTANCE OF 218.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
34 DEGREES, 26 MINUTES, 33 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 . A DISTANCE OF 72. 11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES, 14 MINUTES, 51 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62
DEGREES, 37 MINUTES, 12 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT I , A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51
DEGREES, 34 MINUTES, 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29
DEGREES, 14 MINUTES, 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10
DEGREES, 18 MINUTES, 17 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 165.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10
DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 121.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30
DEGREES, 11 MINUTES, 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 432.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52
DEGREES, 21 MINUTES, 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 43.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8
DEGREES, 08 MINUTES, 40 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 439.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 36
; .; DEGREES, 06 MINUTES, 17 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 83.46 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 60
DEGREES, 22 MINUTES, 14 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF
TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1 , A DISTANCE OF 376. 11 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF
THE NORTH EAST FRACTIONAL 114 AND PART OF THE SOUTH EAST 1/4 OF
FRACTIONAL SECTION 34, AND PART OF THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 35,
TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
LYING SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 881-07240,
'.r IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; THENCE NORTH 63 DEGREES, 45 MINUTES, 27
SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3, A
DISTANCE OF 577.28 FEET; THENCE .CONTINUING NORTH 63 DEGREES, 45
MINUTES, 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 367, 13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26
DEGREES, 14 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 225.62 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 26 DEGREES, 14 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF
472.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 99 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 352.86
FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 35TH STREET; THENCE NORTH
90 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF 35TH STREET, A DISTANCE OF 591. 18 FEET TO THE WESTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A. ROUTE 102; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES, 13
t MINUTES, 38 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A.
ROUTE 102 A DISTANCE OF 600.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A. ROUTE 102
BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 5018.71 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 1193.67 FEET TO A POINT OF
TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 22 DEGREES, 21 MINUTES, 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG
SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A. ROUTE 102 AND BEING TANGENT TO
THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 204.05 FEET: THENCE NORTH 30
DEGREES- 21 MINUTES, 59 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF F, A. ROUTE 102, A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET 10 A POINT OF
CURVATURE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF F. A. ROUTE 102 BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF THE LAST DESCRIBED
COURSE EXTENDED AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 485.87 FEET , A DISTANCE OF
609.56 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES, 25
MINUTES, 08 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A.
ROUTE 102 BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
230.08 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A. ROUTE 102 BEING A CURVE TO THE
RIGHT OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE EXTENDED AND HAVING A RADIUS OF
110.00 FEET , A DISTANCE OF 193.24 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE
NORTH 01 DEGREES, 55 MINUTES, 47 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F. A. ROUTE 102, BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST
DESCRIBED COURSE EXTENDED, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET 10 A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP
OF SAID F. A. ROUTE 102; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES, 04 MINUTES, 13
SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD
AS SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP OF F . A. ROUTE 102, A DISTANCE OF 82.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES. 04 MINUTES, 13 SECONDS 'NEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP
C•F F. A. ROUTE 102, A DISTANCE OF 201 .00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88
DEGREES, 04 MINUTES, 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP OF F. A. ROUTE 102, A
DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES, 37 MINUTES, 11
SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD
AS SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP OF F. A. ROUTE 102, A DISTANCE OF 101.98 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD
PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 631572, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, I
ILLINOIS; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES, 01 MINUTES, 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD PREVIOUSLY
rpmirATFn A r',ISTANCF nF 310. 15 FFFT TO THE POINT OF BF,iNNING.
Of OA r "
r � r
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
August 10, 1992
Dear President Bushy, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board
of Appeals:
The Plan Commission, at its regular meeting of July 27, 1992,
has concluded Its review of the Shannon/Sanctuary petition for
preliminary plat of subdivision, special uses, and text amend-
ments.
Its conclusions are as follows:
a) Recommend denial of both the R-3 and R-4 plats as
proposed.
b) A consensus, by motion, that if the R-3 proposal ,
including the proposed cluster housing Special Use,
were drawn in accordance with all applicable Village
standards, approval would be recommended.
c) Due to difficulties expressed by the Plan Commission,
the amendment to the structure height definition was
withdrawn by the petitioner.
d) Recommended approval of a text amendment to allow for
sound barriers along the perimeters of residential
subdivisions where they abutt I-88, I-94, 22nd Street,
Route 83, and Roosevelt Road. This amendment should be
based on the draft text amendment on page 118 of the
petition file.
Respectfully submitted,
Al Savino
Chairman
Plan Commission
lag
OF 04Ar
�v"p Ao0
G O
4 �2
v
v
C�COUNt�`
VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
July 29, 1992 OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
Dear Resident: 708 990-3000
The Oak Brook Plan Commission and/or Zoning Board of Appeals,
and the Village Board will be considering a:
Preliminary plat of subdivision, zoning ordinance amendment, and
special use.
at the meetings as scheduled . on the reverse: side.:;of this notice.._.:_
The application_ has. been .fil.ed by: Shannon. and.. Associates;
Relationship of ap.p1icant to property: . Contract to purchase..
Name of subdivision (if applicable) : N/A- -
The property in question is loclated. at: 1801 Oak Brook. Road-
The Franciscan property- including. the Peabody Mansion,,-retreat
house and St. Pascalls.. Friary.
Also shown on the reverse side is a map of the area-to assist you
in determining your relationship to the property in question.
The request which has- been made is as follows:
To subdivide the property into a 134 lot single-family residen-
tial subdivision or to rezone to R-4 for a 130 lot subdivision,
either with amendments to the zoning ordinance and Special Use
approval for 36 of the above lots to have a minimum lot area of
13,000 square feet.
If you desire more detailed information, please contact me at the
Building Department to review the file on this application. I
look forward to your attendance at the public meetings.
Sin erely y rs
hom2�v! Ha
Director of Code Enforcement
mayslake.ltr
1 a'I
All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak
Brook Village Hall, on Oak Brook Road (31st Street) and Spring
Road, Oak Brook, Illinois.
Plan Commission Meeting . . 7 : 30 p.m. , Mon. , May 18 , 1992
Zoning Board of Appeals . . . . 7 : 30 p.m. , Tues. , Aug. 24 , 1992
Board of Trustees Meeting . 7 : 30 p.m. , Tues. , Sept. 22 , 1992*
*tentative
JAI
\A A
AN
,^ U
I. t ) 4R .0 ..�- y P � . !�\\,t r•' / ��� \
, -t,r '� •t : '' �/ r.'a 141 t I t. nr.
T
L
OA-
P
� 1
'd ."i"G I'''i '- '�� � •111 t) ,l , f.,,,,, 4
nP, ^' ,' •ii '' It',`1,`,.',.rti•.� \ 11 '\tr/ ' rla.
1 i 1 ,1 j � �•1, � ,
•� i � � .: t '` „t , gam, .. 1 ,./14?,� _ �
1 •�r,'r, l� '• 'a
mayslake.ltr
Ayes: 5-Trustees Bartecki, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner
and Winters.
Nays: 0-None.
Absent: 0-None.
Abstain: 1-Trustee Winters as noted above. Motion carried.
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS:
A. RESOLUTION NO. R-566 OAK BROOK ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY RES. R-566
(OBACI) 25th Anniversary: OBACI
President Bushy read in its entirety the proposed resolution
commending the Oak Brook Association of Commerce and Industry on
its 25th Anniversary and presented said Resolution to the Director
and the President of the Association.
Trustee Skinner moved to pass Resolution No. R-566 as presented,.
Seconded by Trustee Winters. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
9. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - SPECIALTY AREAS:
Finance; Purchasing; and Hotel, Convention and Visitors Committee:
Trustee Bartecki - No report.
Sports Core: Trustee Shumate - Stated the Bath & Tennis has the largest
membership this year with improvements in the showers and painting of
the Clubhouse. Finance Officer Powers has instituted improved cash
controls for the Sports Core. The 'food and beverage sales from Polo has
been excellent. Advertisement in the local newspapers will be
forthcoming on the special August family rate membership for the Bath &
Tennis Club. Sean Creed has been installing improved dart paths on the
golf course with the newly purchased Bob Cat (ditch witch) equipment.
Environmental Concerns & Public Works: Trustee Payovich - The DuPage
County Forest Preserve has invited the public to comment on the future
of the Forest Preserve from July 13-17 from 8-9 p.m. and July 18 from '9
a.m. to 6 p.m.
Personnel & Library: President Bushy noted that Librarian Joanne
Fritter, Library Commission and the Library Association presented a
proposed Library facility at the July Committee-of-the-Whole meeting.
They will make a presentation to the Village Board at the next Regular
Meeting addressing a firm proposal on the direction they would like to
proceed in proposing a new Library within the Village of Oak Brook.
President Bushy extended sympathies from the Village to Assistant to
Village Manager Vince Long in the passing of his father.
Planning & Zoning: Trustee Skinner - Welcomed interested residents to
attend the proceedings of the Plan Commission which is addressing the
issue of the,4ayslake property/Shannon development; and the Institute of
Basic Life Principles and the property in the Forest Preserve/
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 4 July 14, 1992
� , as-
� f
7T�,,
W RE
i
Anne Morgan
7 JUL 2 i�2 l
805 Me
17 Lane
0" Brook Illunois 60521-1420 u
(708) 571-0118
July 20, 1992
Dear Village Trustees and ^_dviscry Board Members;
in making your decis=on about the :,r eservat4Lcn = demol =on
o f Oak `rook' s historical roots and cultural 1"uture, ilease de-c' de
what we should be giv=ng our Cn:laren today and 1__ future o e erat4ons.
-
T urge you to the people c_ Oak =rook reserT,e t.._ ^istoric
`��ayslake :1te 1n SteaC+G_ a, 7 __ .,n„ d TiGloer to Ce'`1G__S1
r,
ouildings and (aesTrcy the ez)en saace alcn:r ti tie c.-ar=c-e- and "4 stOr-
i Cal sio'ni ficance of this site.
I urge you to e1D its preserve cur cultural (?er_ta_-3 or cur
— �... dren 2.nsteaa c a__c'.ring _4 -L' to be bullGCZed to Make y
another new subdi'vi'sion t lat only ':r1__ enrich the level ccc_ at a
great Cost to Oak Brock resiae nts and tax—cayers. (I understand t;:e
13L home—subdivision would increase Oak Brook' s population by
and increase its school _population by ILO' The added demand for
C t`7 services and dra2.n on our Infrastructure Could place a big
ancial burden on Oak Brook res_dent s, while the developer mere l y
vnll take riffs Dro_1ts from a luxury subdivision and leave us vrit�cr
the problems, finan cial and other rise)
I urge you to encourage and allow the Forest Preserve District
Commissioners to place the issue back on the ballot in November.
The first referendum was narrowly defeated in March, 1992, but it
passed in Oak Brook, and in York, Downers Grove, Lisle and Naperville
Townships. Oak Brook Village Trustees and Advisory Board Members
should view this as a direct statement from the people of Oak Brook.
We want to preserve our historic and architectural character of the
Mayslake site and open land. Se do not want to allow a developer
to destroy one of our few historically and culturally significant sites
for his own personal profit. Oak Brook certainly does not need another
lu=xury subdivision.
Finally, I urge you to consider the proposed use of the Mayslake
site by the Atelier International arts group as reported in Press
Publications on Friday, July 32 1992. This is one use of the site
that could add to the quality of life here along with the added bonus
of putting Oak Brook on an international cultural map.
My friends, neighbors and family urge you to do everything you can
to help us preserve the Mayslake site for our children and for future
generations. It may be the most valuable help you ever could give to
Oak Brook residents. Thank you for your support.
C� A7"L)
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(213)485-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO COO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPV:(312) 443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
WRITER'S OIRECT plAl NUMBER: (404)670-4600 TELE x: 543707
1100 Jorie Boulevard
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521
July 16 , 1992
Revised July 20 , 1992
Mr. Alfred P. Savino, Chairman
Oak Brook Plan Commission
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re: Zoning and Subdivision Applications
filed by Shannon & Associates , Ltd.
re Land Owned by the Franciscan Fathers
Dear Chairman Savino:
This will confirm that my client, Shannon & Associates,
Ltd. , has filed with the Village two alternate plans for develop-
ment of the Franciscan Fathers property both of which would have
substantially the same density. We urge that the Plan Commission
approve both plans with final selection to be left to the Board
of Trustees .
The two plans can be summarized as follows:
PLAN A PLAN B
Dwelling Units-detached
Clustered on 15 acres 36 36
On lots of 21, 780 sq. ft.
(1/2 acre) or more 98 24
On lots between
20 ,000 sq. ft. and
21, 780 sq.ft. 0 70
Total dwelling units 134 130
i
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK Alfred P . Savino
July 20 , 1992
Page Two
Lakes , wetlands and
other open space: 22 .150 ac 26 .55 ac
Road pavement: 6 .65 ac 6 .65 ac
Sound barriers and From entrance west same
landscape berms : and south along St .
Paschal ' s Drive .
From intersection
with 35th St. west
along 35th St. to
west border of sub-
division.
Bike trail : To be constructed same
by Shannon on public
right-of-way on the
north, east & south
sides of subdivision.
Storm water To be located on site same
detention: with suitable control
of release rate to
meet all legal require-
ments .
Wetlands : To be modified in same
full compliance with
requirements of U .S .
Corps of Engineers &
DuPage County.
Sanitary sewer Designed to meet all same
system: requirements of Hins-
dale Sanitary District
and Illinois Environ-
mental Agency.
Distribution of water Designed to meet all same
for domestic use and requirements of the
fire protection: Village .
Both plans involve gate entrances, local security and private
streets (snowplowing, repair and maintenance) at no cost to the
Village .
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK 41fred P. Savino
July 16 , 1992
Page Three
In both plans all lots adjoining the Trinity Lakes Subdivision
would be a minimum of 1/2 acre in size as are the lots in Trinity
Lakes.
It should be kept in mind that the Village decided in
1978 that should the Franciscan Fathers terminate the use of the
property it should be devoted to residential uses . A standard
subdivision under the existing R-3 zoning can be developed with
about 110 lots. All that would be required would be approval of
a plat of subdivision.
Each of the Shannon plans make possible additional open
space and a clustered housing community of detached dwellings
similar to the Burr Ridge Club community - a style of housing
much in demand in Oak Brook.
It should be kept in mind that the property is bounded
on the east by a major traffic artery generating automobile and
truck traffic in excess of 48 ,000 vehicles per day.
To the south is the Oakmont Corporate Center; to the
north is Briarwood Lakes zoned R-4 Special Use with 211 townhouses .
The basic pattern of zoning and development north of Oak Brook
Road between Midwest Road and Route 83 is R-3 to the west with
R-4 to the east for more than 500 of the area.
Shannon Alternate B would provide a similar but less
dense zoning south of Oak Brook Road.
There has been considerable testimony with regard to
maintaining the Franciscan Fathers property as it presently is .
However, no agency, public or private, has made any offer to
acquire it. The Franciscan Fathers have presented evidence as
to their need to obtain full market value to which they should
be entitled as would any other owner of private property.
Arguments have been presented as to the impact of
development on (a) endangered species, (b) wetlands , (c) archeo-
logical and historic sites (d) historic structures , and (e)
existing undeveloped land.
With regard to endangered species the Village has been
advised by the Illinois Department of Conservation that the
proposed development will have no adverse impact on such species
or their habitats .
I
� I
LORD, BISSELL 6 BROOK Alfred P. Savino
July 16 , 1992
Page Four
With regard to impact on wetlands , no action will be
taken without a permit from the U.S . Corps of Engineers . The
proposed modifications of low grade wetlands on the site will
be properly mitigated.
With regard to the possible impact on historic buildings
or historic or archeological sites , it should be kept in mind that
applicable existing laws both federal and state do not prohibit
development of such sites or removal of such buildings . What the
laws require is as follows:
(1) A careful study to determine the liklihood such a
site exists or that a building has historic value.
(2) If such a site is determined to exist, then it must
be excavated and relics removed. Thereafter it can
be developed.
(3) If such a building exists, then studies must be
undertaken to determine whether adaptive reuses
with reasonable economic value exist or if some
agency, public or private, will purchase the property
for its market value . If none of these alternatives
exist, then the building may be removed. Studies
conducted by Shannon indicate no adaptive reuses ,
either residential or commercial, are feasible .
In any event, Mr. Shannon has supplied the Illinois Historic
Preservation Agency with substantial materials and is preparing
to submit additional data. Under no circumstances will he pro-
ceed to remove structures or develop in violation of any state
or federal law.
In further support of his plans, Mr. Shannon has asked
the specialists who testified in support thereof on May 18 , 1992 ,
to attend the July 20 meeting to summarize their testimony and
to respond to questions .
In conclusion it is respectfully urged that the Plan
Commission recommend that the Board of Trustees take favorable
action on one or the other of Mr. Shannon' s plans .
R pect lly b to
c
David M. Gooder n
DMG:pg f I
Enc I �/
r
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK Alfred P . Savino
July 20 , 1992
Page Two
Lakes , wetlands and
other open space : 22 .150 ac 26 .55 ac
Road pavement: 6 .65 ac 6 .65 ac
Sound barriers and From entrance west same
landscape berms : and south along St .
Paschal ' s Drive .
From intersection
with 35th St. west
along 35th St. to
west border of sub-
division.
Bike trail : To be constructed same
by Shannon on public
right-of-way on the
north, east & south
sides of subdivision.
Storm water To be located on site same
detention: with suitable control
of release rate to
meet all legal require-
ments .
Wetlands : To be modified in same
full compliance with
requirements of U.S .
Corps of Engineers &
DuPage County.
Sanitary sewer Designed to meet all same
system: requirements of Hins-
dale Sanitary District
and Illinois Environ-
mental Agency.
Distribution of water Designed to meet all same
for domestic use and requirements of the
fire protection: Village.
Both plans involve gate entrances, local security and private
streets (snowplowing, repair and maintenance) at no cost to the
Village .
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK wlfred P. Savino
July 16 , 1992
Page Three
In both plans all lots adjoining the Trinity Lakes Subdivision
would be a minimum of 1/2 acre in size as are the lots in Trinity
Lakes.
It should be kept in mind that the Village decided in
1978 that should the Franciscan Fathers terminate the use of the
property it should be devoted to residential uses . A standard
subdivision under the existing R-3 zoning can be developed with
about 110 lots. All that would be required would be approval of
a plat of subdivision.
Each of the Shannon plans make possible additional open
space and a clustered housing community of detached dwellings
similar to the Burr Ridge Club community - a style of housing
much in demand in Oak Brook.
It should be kept in mind that the property is bounded
on the east by a major traffic artery generating automobile and
truck traffic in excess of 48 ,000 vehicles per day.
To the south is the Oakmont Corporate Center; to the
north is Briarwood Lakes zoned R-4 Special Use with 211 townhouses .
The basic pattern of zoning and development north of Oak Brook
Road between Midwest Road and Route 83 is R-3 to the west with
R-4 to the east for more than 50% of the area.
Shannon Alternate B would provide a similar but less
dense zoning south of Oak Brook Road.
There has been considerable testimony with regard to
maintaining the Franciscan Fathers property as it presently is .
However, no agency, public or private, has made any offer to
acquire it. The Franciscan Fathers have presented evidence as
to their need to obtain full market value to which they should
be entitled as would any other owner of private property.
Arguments have been presented as to the impact of
development on (a) endangered species, (b) wetlands , (c) archeo-
logical and historic sites (d) historic structures , and (e)
existing undeveloped land.
With regard to endangered species the Village has been
advised by the Illinois Department of Conservation that the
proposed development will have no adverse impact on such species
or their habitats .
I
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK *Alfred P. Savino
July 16 , 1992
Page Four
With regard to impact on wetlands , no action will be
taken without a permit from the U.S . Corps of Engineers . The
proposed modifications of low grade wetlands on the site will
be properly mitigated.
With regard to the possible impact on historic buildings
or historic or archeological sites, it should be kept in mind that
applicable existing laws both federal and state do not prohibit
development of such sites or removal of such buildings . What the
laws require is as follows:
(1) A careful study to determine the liklihood such a
site exists or that a building has historic value.
(2) If such a site is determined to exist, then it must
be excavated and relics removed. Thereafter it can
be developed.
(3) If such a building exists, then studies must be
undertaken to determine whether adaptive reuses
with reasonable economic value exist or if some
agency, public or private, will purchase the property
for its market value. If none of these alternatives
exist, then the building may be removed. Studies
conducted by Shannon indicate no adaptive reuses ,
either residential or commercial, are feasible .
In any event, Mr. Shannon has supplied the Illinois Historic
Preservation Agency with substantial materials and is preparing
to submit additional data. Under no circumstances will he pro-
ceed to remove structures or develop in violation of any state
or federal law.
In further support of his plans, Mr. Shannon has asked
the specialists who testified in support thereof on May 18 , 1992,
to attend the July 20 meeting to summarize their testimony and
to respond to questions.
In conclusion it is respectfully urged that the Plan
Commission recommend that the Board of Trustees take favorable
action on one or the other of Mr. Shannon' s plans .
R Vd . ly� b to ,
Dooder
DMG:pg
Enc I
' . 7/1/92
DMG
7/16/92 revised
M E M O R A N D U M
MATERIALS FILED BY SHANNON & ASSOCIATES , LTD . AS OF
JUNE 26 , 1992
A. Original Applications filed April 22 , 1992 .
1. Application for zoning text amendments and special
use permit.
- Exhibits attached:
Exhibit AA - Text Amendment re sound barriers
Exhibit A - Text Amendment re Cluster Housing
in R-3 District and also Text
Amendment re calculation of building
heights .
2 . Application for Approval of Original Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision (revised as of May 14 , 1992) consisting
of the following three sheets;
i
Sheet 1 - Site Plan
Sheet 2 - Preliminary Engineering
Sheet 3 - 14ap of Topography
B. Alternate Applications filed June 19 , 1992
1 . Application for zoning text amendments , map amendment
rezoning property from R-3 to R-4 and special use permit .
- Exhibits attached:
Exhibit A - Text Amendment re sound barriers .
Text Amendment re calculation of building
heights .
Exhibit B - Conditions and Restrictions Applicable
to the Entire Property Under the Special
Use Permit.
- Plat of cluster area; and drawing of sound barriers.
2 . Application for Approval of Alternate Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision dated June 19 , 1992 , revised July 10 , 1992 ,
consisting of one sheet on which the Site Plan is depicted .
(The preliminary engineering for the Alternate Plat is
substantially the same as that for the Original Plat . The
topographic map will be identical to that attached to the
Original Preliminary Plat.)
1 It
4 1 � •
Cf�OF 041,
p •, '4
o
G9CFCr'`y�0
OUNt
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
Draft 7/16/92
ALTERNATIVE TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION V(G) (3) (h)
SECTION V (S) SUBDIVISION SOUND BARRIERS
Sound barrier accessory structures consisting of berms, solid
fences, freestanding walls, landscaping, and retaining walls,
collectively not exceeding 10 feet in height may be erected on
residential subdivision property adjacent to:
(1) Roosevelt Road, Rout 83 , I-88, I-294, or 22nd Street
(2) A frontage road adjacent to such streets.
(3) Other arterial streets which intersect such streets and
within 800 feet of such intersection.
The sound barrier design shall be in accordance with the Villages'
building codes and engineering regulations and shall be subject to the
approval of the Board of Trustees; and such approval shall not
unreasonably be withheld.
1
OF OA 9
O N
C O
4 `?
COUNt'4'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
July 15, 1992 708 990-3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., Village Engineer
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary - Preliminary Plat
Since my memo to you of June 10, 1992, Mike Meranda has informed me of a possible
water system problem with the additional development of The Sanctuary property. This
relates to the fact that The Sanctuary property lies within the high pressure zone within
our water system and additional homes and sprinkler uses may negatively affect the
ability of our existing booster pumps to maintain the higher pressure. One solution
might be increasing the pump sizes. Of course any improvements necessitated by The
Sanctuary should be paid for by the developer.
It is the recommendation of both Mike and me that the developer, during the final plat
stage, hire an engineer to fully review the implications of this development on our
existing high pressure system.
Respe Ily submitted,
Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E.
Village Engineer
DLD:sps
cc: Mr. David Gooder
f �
G�pF 04Ke •
2
�COuly-0
VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
June 26 , 1992 708 990- 3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, -Jr . , P.E.
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary - Preliminary Plat
Sound Barriers
[Upon my review of David Gooder ' s proposed amendment to Section V(G) ( 3 ) (h) ,
it seems to me that a sound barrier should be defined and utilized as a
sound barrier rather than stretching the concept of a fence. It seems to
me to be more appropriate to incorporate sound barrier standards within our
ordinances .
Of course any such change to the Zoning Ordinance would require a full
Public Hearing before the Zoning Board and decision by the Village Board.
During that process , the pros and cons of this entire issue can be reviewed
in depth.
Respe,p1jully submitted,
6c-
Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etk ?
l
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION l
V. SHANNON/SANCTUARY _ 1801 OAK BROOK ROAD -
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH AMENDMENT AND
SPECIAL USE
Chairman Savino introduced Mr. Gene Ognibene, President of the
District 53 School Board, who addressed what impact the Sanctuary
would have on the elementary schools . At present time, Brook
Forest School is at capacity. Butler School has two rooms that
could be utilized for additional pupils . However, Mr. Ognibene
noted that it is impossible to predict the ages of incoming
students and therefore, could not determine where new students
would be attending. Mr. Ognibene submitted an enrollment break-
down and a data sheet from the Capital Development Board.
Park District Commissioner, Mr. Howard Trier, then outlined the
Park District involvement in the Franciscan property and noted
that the Park District did not see how the land could be utilized
for sports and other recreation programs due to the irregular
topography. While the Park District would gain revenue if the
property is developed, Commissioner Trier stated that the Park
District board favored keeping the area in its natural state.
Following Commissioner Trier' s comments, Chairman Savino returned
to item 5 on the agenda.
VI. MANULIFE-1211 & 1301 22ND STREET - TEXT AMENDMENT
ON VARIATION
Mr. Jeff Jarvis from Lucien Lagrange and Associates spoke on
behalf of Manulife. He explained that extensive renovation was
underway on these two buildings and Manulife was requesting
relief from the Zoning Ordinance to allow cantilever canopies to
be constructed 10 feet into the required front yard instead of
the 3 feet that is permitted. The request was made both for
the purpose of visibility and to make the building more accessi-
ble as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Discussion ensued as to whether relief should be sought through
means of a text amendment or a variation. Following discussion,
Member Haglund moved, seconded by Member Sandstedt, the motion to
recommend to the Village Board that a variation be granted allow-
ing Manulife to erect canopies at 1211 and 1301 22nd Street
approximately 912" into the front yard, as the standards set
forth in Section XIII (G) (4) had been satisfied.
ROLL CALL VOTE: All in favor - motion passed.
Member Doyle moved, seconded by Member Mueller, a motion to
recommend to the Village Staff that a text amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance be made to take into account the relation of a
building height to the size of the canopy allowed.
VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed.
PLAN COMMISSION Minutes June 15, 1992
2.
VII. SHANNON Z SANCTUARY _ 1801 OAK BROOK ROAD _
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH AMENDMENT AND
SPECIAL USE - CONTINUED
The meeting then returned to the Shannon / Sanctuary item.
Testimony for preserving the site was given by Howard Dicker,
President of the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois ;
Nancy Wagner, State Program Director of the Landmarks Preserva-
tion Council of Illinois; Susan Benjamin, Architectural Histori-
an; Joyce O 'Keefe, Policy Director of Openlands Project; William
Borden, DuPage Environmental Awareness Center; Lana Green, Public
Relations Director of Mayslake Retreat House ; Barbara Turner,
Cuneo Mansion in Libertyville; Arno Ertas, Ateiler International ;
Wanda Sudak, psychologist. Residents Dorothy Dean Cavenaugh and
Kathy Sievertsen spoke in favor of preservation as did Kathy
Schabel from Westmont. Audrey Muschler asked the commissioners
to be aware of the letter sent from Stuyvesant Peabody III in
favor of preservation.
The discussion then centered around several concerns the Plan
Commission members had over the handling of roads in a gated
community as well as the concept of a gated community itself. Mr.
Shannon, the developer, and Mr. David Gooder, attorney, answered
questions and responded to some of the points raised by the
previous speakers.
Mr. John Glyman, planner, spoke to the need for cluster homes.
Both R-3 and R-4 zoning were discussed. Noise pollution along
Rte 83 was discussed. The developer' s proposal to put up a berm
and concrete wall brought some concern from the commissioners .
Commissioner Doyle raised questions regarding the bike path and
lighting, particularly along Rte 83 . After considerable discus-
sion the developer asked the Commission for some direction.
The Plan Commission members were in agreement with the cluster
homes concept, but several disagreed with the zoning for the
remainder of the property. It was suggested that the developer
bring 2 plans to the Plan Commission at its next meeting repre-
senting both R-3 and R-4 zoning.
Member Doyle moved, seconded by Member Haglund, to table the
matter until July 20, 1992 .
VOICE VOTE: All in favor - motion passed.
PLAN COMMISSION Minutes June 15, 1992
3.
V/
ALTERi1
�PRELIMtY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPL.
V
L LA?E OF
OAK B R O O K a FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
q C10-30,00 ASSESSMENT PLAT APPLICATION
1200 Oak Brook Road To Be Filed With Village Clerk
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
SUBDIVISION TITLE: THE SANCTUARY
DATE FIND:
GLNERAL 1XMICN OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE SUBDIVIDED:
Franciscan property at the co_f Oak Brook BQdd anc3 Rout-a 23, south
of 31st Street and west to Trinity Lakes
LWE OF APPLICANT: SHANNO14 & ASSOCIATES, LTD, pHCNE x. (708) 655-0960
ADDRESS: 1801 Oak Brook Road CITY Oak Brook STATE IL 60521
Zip Code
RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROpERTy:
Contract Purchaser
OSdR OF RECORD: Franciscan Fathers of the State of Illinois P110HE N0. (413) 353-3421
ADDRESS: 3140 Meranec Street CITY St. Louis STATE 140 63118
Zip Code
BENEFICIARY(IFS) OF TRUST:
NAME:
PHCNE NO.
ADDRESS: CITY STATE
IANNON
�ASSCOCJTAAM
Zip e
II '
(Signature of App1 cant
OWNERS AFFIDAVIT FOR SUBDIVISIONS OF NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) LOTS CTS
This plat contains the entire contiguous undeveloped land area in which I have
any interest.
(Signature of Owner)
IDENTIFY STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY:
St. Paschal's Friary; Peabody Mansion and adjacent 1layslake Retreat facilities;
Portiuncula QhapelL asphalt drives -and Parking areas; various sewer and water
Flood Plains: - Sq. Ft. are under Flood Plain Ordinance and are graphically
depicted on attached plans.
SIZING BY LAND USE CATEGORY
RESIDENTIAL CCbAlF WIAI, OPEN SPACE ERi�ht TOTAL
f-t,1
NO. OF LOTS 130 8 139
NO. OF ACRES 57.76 18.15 13.80 89.716
NO. OF SQ. FT. 2,516,026 790,614 601,128 3,908,029
Page 1 / ( 3
0
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(213)465-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX: 18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPT:(312)443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
(404)870-4600
WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: 1100 Jorie Boulevard TELEX:543707
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521
June 26 , 1992
Mr. Thomas Hawk
Director of Code Enforcement
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Re: The Sanctuary
Franciscan Property
Shannon & Associates, Ltd.
Dear Tom:
Filed herewith is an Alternate Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision Application. Please substitute this application
for the one previously filed on June 19 , 1992 .
Si rely yours,
David M. Gooder
DMG:pg
Encl
cc T. Shannon (with enclosure)
W-
SHANNON&ASSOCIATES,LTD. 001766
210 QUAIL RIDGE DRIVE
WESTMONT,IL 60559
700SM9
DATE AMOUNT
OLE TAYLOR BANK/YORKTONN
LOMBARD,ILLINOIS 6/26/92 *$1 ,3 0 0 . 0 0**
AY **1300**DOLLARS AND **00**CENTS
SHANNON It ASSOCIATES.LTD. ,
TO THE
ORDER OFVi 11 age of Oak Brook
11000176611, I:0 7 190906 21: 11' S 3/114069 111'
.. s:1,:.iiN�ld.fa^'.X11.7'�'�-i::aK.v.eM• 'YMfilN6p1YM)Rf'i �}e. � ..ii.-,:,.'tR s"IGV.iIA�PaN`.'�'..:.J.-:.,i.:A6'W'f�:<.�'ia.R0. .�":�..,`'-Cv^1".'s'>1T ... - �-.— .�c�.• -
I�� oL Qi1'l1 �222TL��i
HECK 9 CHECKS ! CASH INV N DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT X DESCRIPTION
1MBER
t
INVALID
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK S GINATURE
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
B 03695
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
r OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
u PHONE: (708) 990-3000
'7lrau�
RETAIN THIS RECEIPT
FOR YOUR RECORDS
GUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS
`ALTERN
PRELIM Y PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPL.
VI LLAPE OF
E] FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATICN
OAK BROOK
Cf yo-- 00 Q ASSESSMENT PLAT APPLICATION
o
1200 Oak Brook Road Filed With Village.Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
SUBDIVISION TITLE: THE SANCTUARY DATE FTT
GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE SUBDIVIDED:
Franciscan property at the corner of Oak Brook Road and Route 83, south of
35th Street and west to Trinity Lakes.
14AM OF APPLICANT: SHANNON & ASSOCIATES, L'I'D• PINE NO. (708) 655-0960
ADDRESS: 1801 Oak Brook Road CITY Oak Brook STATE IL 60521
Zip Code
RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY:
Contract Purchaser
0VjjER O' RECORD: Franciscan Fathers of the State of Illinois p-1 j= NO. (314) 353-3421
ADDRESS: 3140 Meramec Street CITY St. Louis STATE MO 63118
Zip Code
BENEFICIARY(IFS) OF TRUST:
Yom: PHCNE NO.
ADDRESS: CITY STAVE
Zip Code
S & AS L
By:
(Signature of Applic;
OWNERS AFFIDAVIT FOR SUBDIVISIONS OF NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) ICTS: �LL
This plat contains the entire contiguous undeveloped land area in which I have
any interest.
(Signature of Owner)
IDENTIFY STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPER'T'Y:
St. Paschal's Friary; Peabody Mansion and adjacent Mayslake Retreat facilities;
Portiuncula Chapel; asphalt drives and parking areas; various sewer and water
mains.
Flood Plains: - Sq. Ft. are under Flood Plain Ordinance and are graphically
depicted on attached plans.
SIZING BY LAND USE CATEGORY
RESIDENTIAL CCRAMIAL OPEN SPACE OTHER TOTAL,
NO. OF LOTS
NO. OF ACRES 22.150 89.716
NO. OF SQ. FT. 1 964,854 3,908,029
Page 1 // 0
0
VILLAGE E O F ZONING ORDINANCE. FLOOD PLAIN
OAK B KOO K
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD APPEAL F--1 VARIATION
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 $100 $300
• -
990 30 00
--- VARIATION
SPECIAL USE
1--!
$300 $675
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENTS
x
TO BE FILED WITH VILLAGE CLERK $650
SPECIAL USE
$400
(Section 2-225, 8/11/81)
•---------------------------------------r--------------------------•---
ALL APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPER FEE, PLAT OF SURVEY, AND (18) COPIES OF A SCALE
DRAWING, SHOWING ALL PERTINENT APPLICABLE INFORMATION, i.e. , PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING BUILDINGS,
LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WITHIN 100 FEET OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY.
•----------------------------------------------------------------------
T WRITE IN THIS SPACE -- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Filed: G/ Board of Trustees Referral AZ 1,V41�- Vr- 7
Notice Published: �1/y Newspaper: 100 / G s
Date Adjacent Property Owners Notified: //,4 S if Staff Referral:
Public Hearing Dates: Plan Commission Z/u /� /r� Zoning Board of Appeals ���s
Board of Trustees /D /3 [)f,- TEard�o Trustees tees
(Approval of Ordinance
FEE PAID: $ 1,3 00 Receipt No. : f�6 Received By: G
1412o TT O.v `
Village Clerk
-------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 06-34-200-016
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE 06-35-100-010
06-34-200-015
06-35-100-008
LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: S.W. Corner of Route 83 & PERMANENT PARCEL NUMBERS 06-35-100-009
Oak Brook Road
LOT NO. N/A SUBDIVISION N/A ADDRESS N/A
Sec-V(G) (3) (h) ,
ZONING R-3 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION Sec VII(E) , Sec VII(F) . Sec_VII(F)
Sec. V(G) (3) (h) and and Sec. XIV(B) (141) (�
ACTION REQUESTED Amend text of.Sec XIV(B) (141) as set forth in T_h i ;
� 1 .�
rezone subject property from R-3 to R-4; and approve special use for the northeasterly
15 acres, nore or less, of the subject property subject to the conditions and restrictions
set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto.
PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT
Franciscan Fathers of the State
OWNER(S) OF RECORD of Illinois PHONE NUMBER (314) 353-3421
ADDRESS 3140 14eramec Street, St. Louis, 140 ZIP 63118
BENEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST: N/A PHONE NUMBER
ADDRESS ZIP
NAME OF APPLICANT Shannon & Associates, Ltd. PHONE NUMBER (708) 655-0960
ADDRESS 1801 Oak Brook Read, Oak Brook, IL ZIP 60521 -
I (we) certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers
or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my (ou nowledge and belief.
S & ASS , LTD.
B
(signature) Applicant Date
(signature A , ate
lD� I
0 EXHIBIT A • 6/18/92
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION V(G) (3) (h)
Amend Sec. V(G) (3) (h) of the Village Zoning Ordinance by
inserting a new subsection (7) reading as follows and
renumbering the present subsection (7) and all following
subsections:
11 (7) Fences , solid - not more than 42 inches in height
above finished grade level may be erected to pro-
vide a sound barrier not less than ten (10) feet
from the nearest lot line which shall be a right-
of-way line for
(i) Roosevelt Road, Route 83 , I-88 or I-294 ,
(ii) a frontage road adjacent to such street,
or
(iii) a road roughly perpendicular to such street
provided the fence shall not be located
more than 800 feet from the right-of-way
of such street;
provided that all such sound barriers shall (a) be
substantially screened from public view by trees ,
shrubs and other plantings and (b) extend the full
width of all contiguous lots in a subdivision. "
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION XIV(B) (141)
Amend Section XIV(B) (141) by striking the word "structure"
and the period at end of subsection and adding the following:
"roof for flat roofs , or to the deck line for mansard roofs,
or to the mean height between eaves and ridge for gable,
hip and gambrel roofs, or to the highest point of the
structure for structures without a roof . "
I�
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B • 6/4/92
CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
APPLICABLE TO
REQUESTED SPECIAL USE
The requested Special Use is to be subject to the
following perpetual restrictions and conditions which will
run with the land:
1. All residential lots on the subject property
which touch one or more lots or a part there-
of which are located in the Trinity Lakes
Subdivision shall meet the following requirements :
(a) Minimum size - 21, 780 sq.ft.
(b) Minimum width - 100 ft.
(c) Minimum rear yard - 40 ft.
(d) Minimum side yard - 12 ft.
2 . All other residential lots not included in the
area to which the special use is applicable shall
have an area of not less than 18 ,000 sq. ft. and
shall meet all the other bulk regulations applicable
to full-size, single-family lots in an R-4 District.
3. The maximum gross density of the area subject to
the Special Use shall not exceed 2-1/2 detached
dwelling units to the gross acre .
EXHIBIT B
LORD, BISSELL & BROOK
115 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET LOS ANGELES OFFICE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE,SUITE 3900
LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-3200
(2 13)485-1500
(312) 443-0700 TELEX:18-1135
CABLE: LOWIRCO CGO ATLANTA OFFICE
TELEX: 25-3070 ONE ATLANTIC CENTER
1201 W.PEACHTREE STREET,SUITE 3700
TELECOPY:(312)443-0570 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30309
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: (404)870-4600
1100 Jorie Boulevard TELEX: 543707
708/990-0561 Suite 153
Oak Brook, IL 60521
June 19, 1992
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Att'n: Tom Hawk,
Director of Code Enforcement
Re: Zoning and Subdivision Applications
filed by Shannon & Associates , Ltd.
re 90 acres of land with buildings
thereon owned by the Franciscan
Fathers
Dear Tom:
My client, Shannon & Associates, Ltd. , took steps
immediately after the Plan Commission meeting of May 18 , 1992 ,
to begin preparation of a modified alternate development plan
in response to Dale Durfey' s suggestion, as set forth in his
memorandum of May 14 , 1992 , that all stormwater detention and
wetlands should be placed within common area lots and that the
roadways should also be placed in common area lots .
To accomplish this without any increase in density -
in fact a slight decrease - an alternate plan has been developed
which has resulted in an alternate proposal which Mr. Shannon
wishes to place before the Village. Therefore I have filed to-
day on his behalf the following materials which collectively
make up the alternate proposal:
1. Application for approval of the following under the
Village Zoning Ordinance:
(a) Text amendment modifying the method of measuring
building height;
LORD, BISSELL 6 BROOK Village of Oak Brook
Att'n: Tom Hawk
June 19 , 1992
Page Two
(b) Text amendment authorizing solid fences as
sound barriers along streets with high traffic
volumes;
(c) Map amendment rezoning the subject property
from R-3 Single-Family Residential to R-4
Single-Family Residential; and
(d) Issuance of a special use under Sec. VII (F) (2)
(c) authorizing detached single-family cluster
development of the northeast 15 acres, more or
less, of the subject property subject to the
conditions and restrictions applicable to the
entire property as set forth in Exhibit B to
said Application.
2. Application for approval of the alternate preliminary
plat of subdivision prepared by The Glyman Design
Group, Inc . , and dated June 19 , 1992 .
It also has become clear that a sound barrier should
be installed as part of the original plan as well as the alter-
nate plan. We therefore hereby amend the original application
by requesting an additional text amendment as set forth in
Exhibit AA delivered herewith which should be attached to the
Application filed April 22 , 1992. In addition I have also filed
today a revised version of the original plat of subdivision
which now consists of 3 sheets and places the open space, storm-
water detention and wetland areas within common area lots . This
plat is now dated May 14 , 1992, as revised.
Finally, in support of the requested sound barrier
text amendment, there are being filed today two separate drawings
dated June 19 , 1992 , one of which depicts the cluster housing
area together with the portion of the sound barrier to be
located adjacent thereto. The other drawing is a detail sheet
depicting the sound barrier. Both of these drawings have been
prepared by The Glyman Design Group, Inc.
My client requests that both its original proposal,
as modified, and the alternate proposal be reviewed and acted
on favorably by the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of
Appeals so that a final selection may be made by the Board of
Trustees.
/0�
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK Village of Oak Brook
Att'n: Tom Hawk
June 19 , 1992
Page Three
Please let me know if additional files fees are
required.
Res ctf lly yours,
David M. Gooder
DMG:pg
Encl
l��
i ►
EXHIBIT A A 6/18/92
i
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION V G h
Amend Sec . V (G) (3) (h) of the Village Zoning Ordinance by
inserting a new subsection (7) reading as follows and
renumbering the present subsection (7) and all following
subsections :
" (7) Fences , solid - not more than 42 inches in height
above finished grade level may be erected to pro-
vide a sound barrier not less than ten (10) feet
from the nearest lot line which shall be a right-
of-way line for
(i) Roosevelt Road, Route 83 , I-88 or I-294 ,
(ii) a frontage road adjacent to such street,
or
(iii) a road roughly perpendicular to such street
provided the fence shall not be located
more than 800 feet from the right-of-way
of such street;
provided that all such sound barriers shall (a) be
substantially screened from public view by trees ,
shrubs and other plantings and (b) extend the full
width of all contiguous lots in a subdivision. "
EXHIBIT A A //��
6/19/92
LORD, BISSELL &BROOK
M E M O R A N D U M
MATERIALS FILED BY SHANNON & ASSOCIATES, LTD . AS OF
JUNE 19 , 1992
A. Original Applications filed April 22 , 1992
1. Application for zoning text amendments and special
use permit.
- Exhibits attached:
Exhibit AA - Text Amendment re sound barriers
Exhibit A - Text Amendment re Cluster Housing
in R-3 Districts and also Text
Amendment re calculation of building
heights
2 . Application for Approval of Original Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision (revised as of May 15 , 1992) consisting
of the following three sheets:
Sheet 1 - Site Plan
Sheet 2 - Preliminary Engineering
Sheet 3 - Topographic Survey
B. Alternate Applications filed June 19 , 1992
1. Application for zoning text amendments, map amendment
rezoning property from R-3 to R-4 and special use permit.
Exhibits attached:
Exhibit A - Text Amendment re sound barriers
Text Amendment re calculation of building
heights
Exhibit B - Conditions and Restrictions Applicable
to the Entire Property Under the Special
Use Permit
2. Application for Approval of Alternate Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision dated June 19 , 1992, consisting of one
sheet on which the Site Plan is depicted . (The preliminary
engineering for the Alternate Plat is substantially the
same as that for the Original Plat. The topographic
survey will be identical to that attached to the Original
Preliminary Plat.)
i nh
June 9, 1992
ENROLLMENTS BY SUBDIVISION
Trinity Lakes Midwest Club Brook Forest Other Total
Kindergarten 15 9 9 22 55
1 9 13 12
2 3 10 9 43
3 10 15 12 129 56
4 15 13 16 33 77
5 14 13 16 40 83
6 7 23 13 34 77
7 8 14 24 32 78
8 17 12 22 41 92
98 122 129 256 605
Other subdivisions: Ginger Creek, York Woods, Hunter Trails, Robinhood Ranch, Fullersburg,
Breakenridge Farm, Steeple Chase, Saddle Brook
1991 -1992 Budget - $4,996,744.00
o r� r� � �► � � D
U ij I j9�2
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
DEVELOPER'S DONATIONS
Basic Data (Information supplied by the Capital Development Board)
Per square foot construction cost - $62.59
120 gross square feet per student
15 years, typical building bond retirement schedule
house lots and total anticipated enrollment ( .8 pupils
estimated per home site)
Computation (for developer contribution to School District 53)
house lots multiplied by .8 equals pupils
pupils multiplied by 120 square feet per pupil equals sq. ft.
sq. ft. multiplied by $62.59 equals
divided by 15 years equals
divided by house lots equals (developer's
donation per house lot sold)
D
5 �a 'Z
GE OF OAK BROOK
VILLA �SPEO-TIO14
suREAu OF
108 Carriage Way, A201
Burr Ridge, Illinois 60521 ,
June 8, 1992
Ms. Karen Bushy, President
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Dear Ms. Bushy:
Since 1924, the Mayslake property has served the citizens of
Illinois as a sanctuary. The 39 room Peabody Mansion was
converted to a Retreat House, where thousands visited and
found solace. -
The beauty of the landscape, the ecological and archaeological
resources, and especially the historic and architectural
significance of the buildings must be preserved for future
generations.
I want to convey to you the wish of the Peabody family that
this cultural heritage be preserved for the enrichment of the
community, of Du Page County and of the region.
Sincerely yours,
Stuyvesant Peabody,I11
d
1 a 1992
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
U'C.9
Illinois Historic
-- Preservation Agency
A'
-� Old State Capitol • Springfield, Illinois 62701 • (217) 782-4836
June 9 , 1992
Lt. Col . Randall R. Inouye
District Engineer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District
111 North Canal Street, 6th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
ATTN: Regulatory Functions Branch
RE: Shannon Associates Ltd. development of the former Franciscan
(Mayslake) property in Oak Brook, DuPage County, Twp. 39 N R.
11 E. Sec. 34 and 35 incipient permit application.
Dear Lt. Col . Inouye:
We have been made aware of the referenced project and the
developer' s need for a wetland removal/modification permit. We have
also had an opportunity to review the project' s potential to affect
historic resources pursuant to Section 106 of, the National Historic
Preservation Act. The proposed development of the parcel of land
for residential use, which will require a Corps permit, includes
plans to demolish a structure commonly known as the Peabody
Mansion. In our opinion, this structure is eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places under criterion "C" .
Criterion "C" is defined, in part, as structures that " . . .embody
the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of
construction, or that represent the works of a master. . . " The
Peabody Mansion was designed by Marshall and Fox, a nationally
recognized Chicago architectural firm that designed the Drake and
Blackstone hotels and the South Shore Country Club, structures that
are listed on the National Register of Historic Places . The Peabody
mansion is an excellent example of the Tudor Revival style of
architecture and has retained most of its historic design and
interior finishes .
The Peabody mansion also may be eligible for the National Register
under criteria "A" and "B" . Criterion "A" is defined, in part, as
" . . .buildings . . . (T)hat are associated with events that have made a
significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. . . "
and criterion "B" as buildings "That are associated with the lives
of persons significant in our past. " Fu a s�aar�c e
development of country estates in the Chic n I.a3
or statewide significance of coal magnat ancis Peabody, o
built the Peabody mansion, would be req it d j tl6t*8jin f
criteria "A" and "B" apply to this structu e.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
Printed on Recvcled Paper v/
Shannon & Assoc. proposed Mayslake development
Chicago Corps of Engineers
June 9 , 1992
Page 2
Additionally, the proposed development would result in the
demolition of a chapel built near the Peabody mansion. This
structure requires further research into the physical integrity of
its historic materials and its architectural context before a
determination of eligibility under criterion "C" can be made.
We have also received and reviewed an archaeological report "An
Archeological Survey of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois" by Lois
Braverman and Stewart Streuver ( 1974 ) . The report provides a
limited overview of the distribution and status of archeological
sites in the general area.
Based on the information in this report, we will require additional
investigations before the National Register eligibility of any
archeological resources can be determined. The requirements for
archeological resource evaluation are outlined in the U.S.
Department of the Interior's "Standards and Guidelines for
Archaeology and Historic Preservation" and this office 's
"Guidelines for Archaeological Reconnaissance Surveys/Reports"
(copies of both enclosed) .
Specifically, survey requirements that need to be addressed
include: research of documents pertaining to early Euro-American
use and development of the project area; a survey of the entire
project area using standard reconnaissance procedures and;
completed IAS site forms for all sites encountered. Enclosed please
find an attachment briefly describing Phase I survey requirements
and a listing of archeological contracting services . A copy of our
letter should be provided to the contractor for their information.
Demolition of the Peabody Mansion, possibly the chapel and
potentially significant but unknown archeological sites would have
an adverse effect on historic properties as defined at 36 CFR Part
800 . 9 . The Chicago Corps should, therefore, begin consultation with
this office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
pursuant to 36 CFR 800 .5(e) to seek ways to avoid or reduce the
adverse effect once a permit application is received or, if
possible, even before a permit is applied for.
This consultation should result in the development of a Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA) between this office and the Corps to be accepted
by the Advisory Council . If the Council wishes to be a consulting
party in this process, they will be signa r
opinion the project developer should be allc d Mo (pe (� 1pa#f if�i t
in the consultation process and a concurri
J J V 1 5 1552
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
Shannon & Assoc. proposed Mayslake development
Chicago Corps of Engineers
June 9, 1992
Page 3
Possible stipulations in an MOA may include, but not be limited to
Historic American Buildings Survey documentation of the Peabody
mansion; a time-limited marketing plan for the building that would
incorporate the structure into the proposed development; procedures
for archeological investigations/mitigation and, dependent upon its
eligibility status, mitigation procedures for the chapel . This MOA
and its procedural requirements will be very similar to the
consultation procedures the Corps and this office recently followed
for the Elgin Farm Colony project. We will forward a draft copy of
a potential Memorandum of Agreement for review to your office, the
Advisory Council and the developer in the near future.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. William J. Callahan,
Cultural Resources Assistant, Illinois Historic Preservation
Agency, Old State Capitol, Springfield, Illinois 62701, 217/785-
3977 .
7 Si erely,
l
l
Theodore W. Hild
Deputy State Historic
Preservation Officer
TWH:WJC
cc: ACHP-Valerie DeCarlo
Shannon and Associates Ltd.
Keith Ryder
W1 T
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
N 0
PRESIDENT SECRETARY/TREASURER
� ,JASON HEINRICH TIFANIE HANSM
ANN
VICE-PRESIDENT R[;CYCLING
JENNIIER WHITE
PAT McCAIt I IIY
KyVF1E COGDAL
1250 S. ARDW)RE AVE.
VILLA PARK, I1.,. 60181
May 27, 1992
De.nr DuPnge (county Board Member,
Recently, the Willowbrook High School Students For a Better Environment
received news concerning the present situation of the Mayslake Historic Site.
It is shocking to imagine that beautiful and- history—rich land such as that of
the Mayslake area is even subject to consideration for development, but
unfortunately this is a dilemma we- face with increasing frequency. It is my
belief, though, that the final decision in development such as this should be
made by the people who are being affected, both directly and indirectly. My
feelings are shared by many other students, faculty members, and people of the
surrounding communities as well. We must not allow yet another piece of history
and natural beauty to fall into'the hands of yet another developer.
By purchasing these endangered lands, we could preserve what little history
remains of our community. As is done with similar properties across the country,
historical tours of the buildings could be given, benefiting all of the residents
of DuPage County. At the same time, we would be saving beautiful and valuable
forest, marsh and wetlands. As an elected representative of the people of your
community, we ask you to consider the fate of the Mayslake Historic Site when
the referendum appears on the November ballot. Please truly represent the feelings
of the people and do all that you can to save a piece of our history, as well as
a piece of our world. The future is now; if we don't take a stand and put an end
to the destruction of our natural and historical wonders, we will be leaving our
children a world of shopping malls, skyscrapers and superhighways. As we live
our lives today, we must always remember that we alone are responsible for the
future.
Sincerely,
Thomas Dan
"Preservation rogress
J t�
ti 15 190.2
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
.� CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY VISUAL AESTHETICS
INTERNATIONAL
Atelier International
NM A' Background:
A.A.ERTAS
Atelier ( ,at-el-y'a ) International, is a studio or workshop in the old European
tradition where fine artists and students of the arts engage in direct collaboration in
WLS the creative process.
JOSEPH KNION This not for profit organization, was formed exclusively to promote the education
LAWRENCE PUCCI and appreciation of the arts by bringing together all members of the community,
children,teens,adults, senior citizens and the disadvantaged as well as the aspiring
LARRY WHOI,OW artists interested in furthering their education in all arts media.
Studio arts programs including, sculpture, painting, drawing, design, and
�vIt , one, photography, will be developed by the Atelier and availed in a format where studio
AIWREW BRAND visits are open to all members to come and observe and/or take part in the execution
of minimal or scale work,interacting with international and local artists in residence.
A program of constructive critique,essential to the artistic growth,will be developed
ROF MOW by the Atelier for review of portfolios and works-in-progress. This is an area much
needed and hertofore underdeveloped for emerging artists in the community to have
JOSEPH C.NICHOLAS access and exposure to available international resources.
The Atelier will eliminate duplicity within existing institutions by availing its
a MOB resources to members of other leagues and councils.
DOROTHY I.OREUY The Atelier will be open to students and artists from other countries, such as
Belgium, France, Israel, Greece, Turkey, Germany, etc.. We have strong
international ties to those countries and have International liaisons in place. These
L artists will be sponsored by their cultural ministries in the course of their stay and
WA CEiNLER they will interact in a format for a most productive cultural exchange. This new
concept has been very well received by representatives of the countries where
overtures have been made.
MC QOM The directors and charter members are outstanding members,businessmen,lawyers,
DOROTHY BAKER architects,cultural leaders,bankers,and leaders of higher institutions of learning.
UABETH A feasibility study conducted by a major academic institution indicated that a
Bet 11 BROWN such as this,was most essential to avail the communities remote to cultural
resources of Chicago. We have impressive support from the leading members of the
C.D FIREMNE Chicago Communities for the Arts, including Andrew Brainerd, attorney, artist,
JOAN CABRIC author, and art historian; Mr. Lawrence Pucci, busines , tar,C rma,nN of
IICHA''[� the reknown, Wedgwood Society, Elizabet Boitsov of Bo t►o ( nd( a[boWov 9 D
EL J.ism Classical Ballet and Mrs. Brooks McCormick, philan avi supporter o
R.E,ROUSH the arts. J U� 1 �199
2
EDITH WAGNER
2 SOUTI 179 MADISON ST., WHATON, ILLINOIS 11111 - ISS IARI01 DIR 4414, CIICACO, ILLI IS NNIwL11 gTSp9.RP
708465.5654 BUREAU OF INSdE , NBW IYU Illtl
4714
67a
Direction-Goal/Strategy
Our objective to concentrate on the two sites that are most conducive and can
modestly respond to the program. The projected 25,000 sq.ft. space would be
designed to accommodate the execution of scale, two and three dimensional works
while members of the Atelier attending,review the student-master interaction in the
creative process.
A workshop, a gallery, a critique/lecture arena, will be open for the community
members to have access and to share in the Atelier and community resources.
Finished works will be able to be acquired by all segments of the community directly
from the Atelier artists. These revenues will help maintain the program.Some works
will be donated to local schools,hospitals and public buildings and parks.
The community cultural resource center open to other forms of cultural engagement
will be wheel chair accessible.
The main thrust of our program will be to avail the arts,hopefully,in every form,to
the socially,economically,and above all,the culturally disadvantaged. The program
will have volunteer artists working within the community and in its initial stages in
tandem with Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital and Clinics in Wheaton,Illinois,the
county seat of DuPage County,and will test the feasibility of the arts in therapy.
The program will place the host community on the world map as an International
Cultural Center without any cost incurred to the taxpayer.
In order to promote the space that we need for this program,we,the directing council
of the Atelier International, have embarked on a fund raising effort to raise
$5,000,000. Targeted resources are the International Community who have vested
interests in promoting their cultural resources,the corporate and private endowments.
In the course of the program and planning stages, we have enlisted impressive
volunteer services and commitments from the community members at large.
Services in kind include law, architecture, real estate, development, publicity and
fund raising.
We have received financial support from the Fist Chicago,Gary-Wheaton Bank and
have been received favorably by other financial institutions.
The first major benefit is designated to be hosted by the Consul General of Italy to
bring this program to reality.
A.Ano Ertas
Director
Atelier International
VILLAGE OF OAK '10,'K
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
l
I
OPENLANDS PROJECT
POLICY STATEMENT: MAYSLAKE
June 15, 1992
PROJECT
Openlands Project is a private non-profit
220 S. State Street organization dedicated to increasing both the amount and
Chicago, Illinois of public open space in northeastern Illinois.
Chicago, Illinois
60604-2103 Openlands works with local governments throughout the
312 427 4256 region to identify important parcels of land which should
Fax 312 427 6.251 be preserved for future generations.
Board of Directors Openlands supports the preservation of the Mayslake
President property because of its rare combination of buildings with
Shaun C. Block historical and architectural significance and its
Treasurer landscape of great natural beauty. The 89-acre site is
Thomas M. Flavin
Secretary one of the last remaining pieces of open land in the
Donn F. Bailey, Ph.D. eastern portion of DuPage County. The property's oak
Vice President grove, restored prairie, and lakes and wetlands are of
Administration particular importance in an area which is surrounded by
Gerald B. Frank development.
Vice President
Marketing
Jeanine McNally DuPage County has enjoyed tremendous growth over the
Vice President last twenty years. Its population has grown from
Governmental Affairs approximately 488,000 in 1970 to 782,000 in 1990. As
Kenneth V. Fiske growth continues to fill in the remaining undeveloped land
Vice President
Program in eastern DuPage County and in Oak Brook itself, the
H. James Fox importance of preserving Mayslake for the benefit of all
Directors citizens is greater than ever.
Stephen W. Baird
Stephen M. Bartram The Mayslake property is a beautiful, serene open
Frederick N. Bates ace area which is important in its own right. It also
George E. Bullwinkel space p
George Davis could become a key attraction in the regional greenway
Anthony Dean network. As you may know, a primary focus of Openlands
Richard ger
Robert H.. Fesmiesmi re work is our Greenways initiative. This program will link
Sarah N. Garvey together more than 1,000 miles of linear parks, paths and
Sylvia Gordon trails in a network that uses the region's stream
Jacques A. Kimble corridors--such as the Salt Creek-- as a planning element.
Beverly A. Kimble p g
Susan L. Krasny Although Mayslake doesn't directly adjoin existing Salt
Iris Krieg Creek pathways, it falls within the effective area of this
Samuel tz T. Lawton, Jr. important greenway corridor and could provide a wonderful
Janis Notz p
David Novick anchor to enhance a vital open lands system.
George W. Overton
Albert E. According to almost any criteria, Mayslake ranks high
Jr.James Reedd,, r.
Charles Saltzman on the list of properties that should be preserved. Its
Jeffrey R. Short, Jr. diverse natural resources provide a rich opportunity for
Mrs. William L. Taylor, Jr. studying t g
Oran F. Whiting y g he land and wildlife and its buildings offer
insights into the culture and traditions of the past. Oak
Honorary Directors Brook is fortunate to have such a unique piece of property
William J. Beecher, Ph.D. CI p� p p y
Gaylord Donnelley within its borders. We urge you make it possible to
Marshall Field V preserve Mayslake intact for fj1*11re ge erations.
Jack E. Guth
Brooks McCormick
Harry M. Weese D O Joyce O' Keefe
Louise Young
Executive Director �i 1., Policy Director
Gerald W. Adelmann J v 1�
Affiliates
CorLands VILLAGE OF OAK 13ROOK
Wetlands Research. Inc. CUREAU OF INSPECTION
LANDMARKS
PRESERVATION
� OUNCI L•OF
rrrI L L I N O I S
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Howard S.Decker
President
Daniel E.Powell
Executive Vice President
TESTIMONY OF LPCI BEFORE THE OAR BROOK PLAN COMMISSION Victoria Gtamc►i
IN FAVOR OF PRESERVATION OF THE MAYSLAKE ESTATE Vice President,Chicago Programs
Susan M.Baldwin
Vice President.Development
JUNE 15, 1992 Bradford J.White
Vice President. Statewide Programs
OAK BROOK VILLAGE HALL
&Legislation
Susan Glover Godlewski
Vice President.Membership
Cheryl Inghram
Members of the Plan Commission: Chairman.Preservation Fund
Susan Shipper-Smith
Secretary
Jan P.Romenesko
My name is Nancy Wagner, and I am the Statewide Treasurer
Courtney J.McEniry
Programs Director of the Landmarks Preservation chaabethTrraidenYsCommitt«
Elizabeth Trrary
Vice President.Public Relations
Council of Illinois (LPCI) . LPCI is a private, not for BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Diane Patricia Atwood
profit organization dedicated to preserving historic Susan Merritt Baird
Susan S.Benjamin
Marianne Guer=Boe
resources throughout the state. Beth Ingram Davis
John Eider
Albert M.Friedman
We strongly believe that by maintaining historic Janet A.Gowy
Gregory L Gleason
sites and structures, communities enhance the quality WWafliamA.Hargrave
Amy R.Hecker
of life for their residents; saving historic resources William L Hood,Jr.
Richard J.Hoskins
Thomas E.Lanctot
links community to its past and creates a distinct FidelLopm
John E.McFadden
Constance Mortell Lambrnt
sense of place. In addition, LPCI promotes Ernest W.Nance
Roger R.Nelson
Gail A-Niemann
preservation projects which are economically feasible Christopher L Nyweide
Seymour H.Persky
for their owners and communities. Preserving and radon P�oa
Caries Ruiz
adaptively using the Mayslake estate would meet both of J�oF �«
Martin C.Tangora
these objectives. Edward ILUhlir
Anne B.Voshel
Rolf A.Weil
As Statewide Director, I have visited and worked Gail R.White
Judith Carmack York
to preserve properties throughout Illinois. Mayslake HONORARYBOARD
Lachlan Blair
stands out amore these because of its combination of �iWreehli
g Stanlry Freehling
Lucia Woods Lindley Markin
significant architectural, archaeological and natural IrAngM
H ck
Nang Stevenson
resources. It is even more impressive given its Harryweese
location - surrounded by housin u i s(-oitis�y� ( RarolS. yant DIRECTOR
D Carol S.Wyant
The Monadnock Building
.� ) , 53 W.Jackson Blvd.,#7S2
Chicago,IL 606043699
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Tel:312-922-1742
BUREAU OF INSPECTION Fax:312-922-8112
In each of the communities that we have assisted -
Lake Forest, Barrington, Elmhurst, Hinsdale or
Winnetka - preservation issues have gone hand and hand
with planning issues. Each has entailed a community
identifying historic resources that were important to
its past, and incorporating those resources into the
community's future. The development of the Gruae Mill
in Hinsdale as an interpretive park is just one
example.
The Oak Brook Historical Society has identified
Mayslake as significant to this community. In fact,
many individuals and organizations believe that the
estate is an important resource for the area.
There are now communities that, after years of
promoting unmanaged growth, are frantically searching
for any visible reminder of their pasts. A recent
Chicago Tribune article quotes a Schaumburg planner as
stating "I think (character) is very important. . . It
creates a stability, a sense of community and
neighborhood. " Since so much of this has been lost
already in Schaumburg, the village is considering
I
building a completely new historic downtown.
Oak Brook is fortunate to still have a gem of a
resource - Mayslake. The State
Office considers Mayslake elig 8 e � � i � (� e
J r� 1 9 1952 �J
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
National Register of Historic Places. The property has
the support of a National organization, the National
Trust For Historic Preservation, several statewide
groups, and many local organizations.
The Peabody Mansion is not a white elephant and the
surrounding grounds are waiting to be enjoyed by the
residents of DuPage County. There are viable plans
for the estate' s use as a historic and natural
resource.
LPCI has extensive experience with preservation
issues in Chicago's suburbs, including providing
assistance throughout DuPage County. In
particular, we are familiar with developing plans for
the preservation and use of large estates, and for
maintaining the value of the properties surrounding
these estates. We offer our assistance too for a
Mayslake plan.
I urge you to plan for future of Oak Brook and
DuPage County by supporting the preservation of
Mayslake.
o � � _ � D
5 '992
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
7-C4
i !
BIOGRAPHIES
HOWARD DECKER received his Bachelor of Science degree from Northwestern University
in 1972, studied in Versailles, France, and received his Masters in Architecture
degree from the University of Illinois in Chicago, in 1978. Before becoming a
founding principal in the firm of Decker and Kemp, he was an associate partner in
the Chicago firm of Nagle, Hartray and Associates, supervising the design and
construction of projects ranging from urban and office-campus planning studies to
major corporate interiors, l.ibrary facilities and residential projects. Mr. Decker
has taught architecture and lectured at several of the midwestern achools of
architecture. He is a regular columnist and contributing editor for Inland Architect
Magazine; has published in the Chicago Architectural Journal , which he co-edited, and
is a former executive committee member of the Chicago Architectural Club and the
Evanston Historic Preservation Commission. He currently serves as President,
Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois.
ANN V. SWALLOW is a graduate of the University of Rochester with a Bachelor of Arts
degree in history and a Masters of Architectural History. She holds a certificate
in historic preservation from the University of Virginia. Her historic preservation
experience includes three years as education supervisor at Strawberry Banke, Inc.
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and as an education/information assistance at two historic
properties with the National Trust for Scotland. She has been with the Illinois
Historic Preservation Agency since 1985; first as the Assistant National Register
Coordinator, and since 1987 as Survey and National Register Coordinator.
GERALD W. ADELMANN holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Georgetown University and
Master of Philosophy degree in American Studies from George Washington University.
He did graduate work in Paris, Boston and Washington and was a pre-doctoral fellow
at the Smithsonian Institution. In 1988, he was appointed as a commissioner of the
Illinois and Michigan Canal Nationai Heritage Corridor Commission. He serves as
Midwest Regional Chairman of the Board of Advisors of the National Trust for Historic
Preservation and as a member of the Illinois Preserves Commission and numerous civic
organizations. Mr. Adelmann is Executive Director of Openlands Project and President
of Canal Corridor Association (formerly Upper Illinois Valley Association) , the two
being not-for-profit organizations working within Illinois. Adelmann assumed the
directorship of Openlands Projects, a conservation organization working to protect
and enhance open space in northeastern Illinois, in January, 1988. He has been
director of Canal Corridor since 1982.
DR. ROCHELLE LURIE holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Zoology from the University
of Wisconsin 1962) and a Master degree (1976) and Ph.D. degree from Northwestern
University, awarded in 1982. She has lectured at several major universities and
colleges in the midwest, published papers and books and conducted many symposiums.
In 1982-83, she was an instructor at the Field Museum of Natural History. She
currently is President of Midwest Archaeological Research Services, Inc.
SUSAN BENJAMIN received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Pembroke College in Brown
University, Providence, Rhode Island (1964) and a Master of Arts degree (minor in
American History and Political Science) from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
Minnesota (1966) . She is an architectural historian, historic consultant, preparing
National Register nominations, giving semi s, le u s cpnc tours and doing
architectural surveys for communities. Su ePeNe ely and has been
involved in the Chicago Architure Foundati ocent program.
A N 15 191
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
• 0
ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING THE MAYSLAKE ACQUISITION
Preservation of the Mayslake site is a high priority for
many local and regional organizations. These include:
Du Page Environmental Awareness Center
DEAC is a locally-based environmental education and
advocacy organization which works to educate residents,
teachers, public officials and business leaders about the
environment and environmentally responsible policies and
practices. The group initiated Earth Day 1990 in Du Page
County, and played a key role in the protection of Lyman
Woods, Swift Meadows and Mc Dowell Grove.
Contact: William Borden 708-719-2452
Du Page County Historical Society
The Society works to protect records and artifacts
relating to the history of Du Page County and of historical
interest to the people. It publishes various books about
the county's history, conducts educational programs, and
supports the public Du Page County Historical Museum through
special events and fundraisers.
Contact: Fran Vestuto 708-664-2309
Fullersburg Historic Foundation
The Foundation was formed in 1986 to plan and raise
funds for the historic Fullersburg area. This includes land
on both sides of York Road adjacent to Salt Creek near Graue
Mill and the Ben Fuller homestead.
Contact: Fred Cue 708-655-0549.
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency
This state agency manages the state's historic
preservation program, operates dozens of historic sites and
memorials and houses a major historical research library.
The agency provides a variety of technical assistance to
anyone involved in preserving Illinois' historic resources.
It also operates the National Register of Historic
Program for Illinois.
o pContact: Ann Swallow 217-785-0315
J U N 15 199`2
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION Q h
Landmark Preservation Council
The Council is a private, nonprofit preservation
organization, which is based in Chicago and works throughout
the state. Its mission is to preserve and to re-use
historic resources statewide. In its 20-year existence, the
Council has participated in hundreds of preservation
projects. Staff consider Mayslake perhaps the most
important effort undertaken to date.
Contact: Nancy Wagner 312-922-1742
National Trust For Historic Preservation
Chartered by Congress nearly 50 years ago, the Trust is
a nonprofit organization whose mission is to lead the United
States in the historic preservation movement. It helps
America understand and appreciate its diverse heritage
through authentic settings. During 1991, the Trust funded a
workshop to promote collaboration among community groups on
the preservation of Mayslake.
Contact: Ben Hanby, 312-939-5547
Oak Brook Historical Society
I
The Society's purpose is the preservation of the
history and heritage of Oak Brook. It is working to secure
a museum, is collecting historical data and artifacts, and
recently sponsored a pictorial history of the area.
Contact: Audrey Muschler 708-833-8154
Openlands Project
Established in 1963 , Openlands Project is a private,
nonprofit conservation organization which works to protect
and enhance open space in northeastern Illinois. It is
particularly concerned with the quantity and quality of open
space in the city and throughout region. Its activities
include advocacy, technical assistance and coordination of
special projects, such as the thousand-mile network of
greenways in Northeastern Illinois .
Contact: Joyce O'Keefe 312-427-42
,!�U, 1y9L
NnLLAGE OF OAK BROOK
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
Salt Creek Greenway Association
The Association mission is to identify, preserve and
promote the natural , historic, cultural and leisure
resources of the Salt Creek Greenway. It is working to
create a linear park connecting the I & M Canal National
Heritage Corridor to the Illinois Prairie Path and northward
to Busse Woods. The Greenway provides landscape relief ,
recreational opportunities and habitat for wildlife.
Contact: Valerie Spale 708-865-8736
Sierra Club - River Prairie Group
The Sierra Club is a nationwide grassroots organization
whose goal is to preserve and protect the environment. In
addition to support of regional and national projects, the
River Prairie Group works for preservation of local open
space. A wide variety of recreational outings provides the
opportunity for club members to experience firsthand the
beauty of nature and become stronger advocates for its
preservation.
Contact: Christine Philip 708-960-0655
no
D
JUN 1 5 15Gll
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
I5UREAU OF INSPECTION
Prepared by the Mayslake Preservation Committee
• O�OF Oqk e •
O
C p
4
CFCOUNt4'�
OAK BROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
ROBERT NIELSEN,Chief
Business Phone:708-990-3040
June 18 , 1992
TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Robert Nielsen , Fire Chief/Bldg. Commissioner
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary Preliminary Plat
Based upon comments made at the June meeting of the Plan Commission,
I have reviewed the Preliminary Plat submitted for the Sanctuary. My
review dictates the following comments :
1 . I note a 33 ft. radius on the cul-de-sacs on the following
streets : River Birch; Honey Locust. These are not sufficient
for our vehicles to turn around. Dale will further review.
2. I note no radius on the following streets : Redbud; Laurel
Oak; and, Weeping Willow Ct. Dale will also look into.
3. I have a concern with the access to the lots located in the
cluster area. I do not feel that the 20 ft. width is suffic-
ient. This width will virtually preclude the use of our aerial
ladder truck, for a fire , as its use requires outriggers that
will virtually shut off access . If vehicles were to park
on this road , F. D . access will be doubtful.
a. It is my belief that the four-house cluster will all face
the access road. If this is the case , the possibility of
blockage, due to parked cars , increases greatly.
b. Although the 20 foot width is sufficient , coupled with the
length , any FD vehicle taken down the drive will have
to back out. Although we do have some similiar situations
elsewhere, the best solution is to eliminate them in the
review process .
4. Several years ago, we devised a uniform street number system.
I would like to see this incorporated into this subdivision ,
at the proper time. This system eliminates the use of "vanity"
type addresses , and, at the same time provides a system that
is easily understood by public safety personnel. It should be
impressed upon the developer that the Village determines the
numbers .
Please review these comments with Mr. Shannon , so that we can eliminate
any future problems with the Plat.
• �pf Oqk 9
�COUNtV
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
June 10, 1992
708 990-3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E.
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary - Preliminary Plat
Additional review of the Preliminary Plat has been accomplished since my
memo to you of May 14 , 1992. This memo will include all outstanding issues
as well as any new issues.
1 . Preliminary Plat
A. From the documents submitted, it appears that the preliminary plat
will become a three (3) page document , the first page being the
subdivision layout , the second page being the preliminary
engineering and the third page being the topography.
B. The lot layout and configuration will depend upon the Village ' s
granting, revising or denying the applicant ' s various zoning
requests. Therefore, the final layout of the preliminary plat will
not be known until final board action on those requests.
C. All stormwater detention and wetlands should be placed within
common area lots and not on private lots within easements. Since
this is a 90 acre development , the land plan is large enough to
accommodate these uses without resorting to private lot easements
(small subdivisions within Oak Brook utilize private lot easements
due to land size restraints; this parcel does not have that
restriction. Also, the current problems being experienced with the
Forest Glen Dry Bottom Detention Basin on private lots within
easements shows the undesirableness of that situation) .
D. Many drafting revisions need to be made to the plat . Staff has
concluded with the developer that these drafting revisions not be
made until the Village Board determines the zoning requirements
regarding the applicant ' s requests. This would allow for one
comprehensive drafting revision and should save the developer
money.
E. The proposal calls for a private street concept with private storm
sewers and private street lights . The proposed layout has the lots
extending to the centerline of the streets. However, on other
large private subdivisions within Oak Brook, the roadways were
placed on common area lots and were not part of the residential
lots (Midwest Club, Hunter Trails , Steeplechase, and Briarwood
J
Lakes) . Only on past subdivisions where the land areas were much
smaller did the Village allow the lots to extend to the centerline
of the pavements . This 90 acre site is sufficiently large so that
the need for lots extending into the street is not necessary.
Therefore, the Village should seriously consider requiring the
developer to allocate common area land for a private right-of-way,
encompassing not only the pavement , but sufficient parkway for
utilities.
F. There exists a grotto structure between the two (2) Mayslakes which
has recently become of some concern. While apparently not on the
Sanctuary property, it does control the water level of the upper
lake which is on Sanctuary property. Additionally, the question of
access to the grotto area has come up. It appears that sufficient
access through the Trinity Lakes Subdivision is not available;
access should therfore be provided within the Sanctuary site. I
recommend that an access strip to the grotto area be a minimum of
twenty (20 ' ) feet wide. This access area should be common property
so that private property owners do not landscape it and make access
difficult .
A meeting was held on Thursday, June 4, 1992 with Tom Shannon, the
Trinity Lakes Association and myself concerning this subject . It
appears that all parties are in agreement concerning the basic
concept of improving the drainage and appearance of the grotto
area. It is now a matter of fine tuning what is to be constructed
and how it will be paid for.
Permanent access to the grotto area will also provide access to the
upper lake area for both the Trinity Lakes Subdivision as well as
the Sanctuary. This is another reason for providing a sufficiently
wide permanent access area to the grotto area.
G. The proposed entry signage, or subdivision gateway, needs to be
submitted for review.
2. Preliminary Engineering
A. The attached letter dated June 8, 1992 from Eric Loucks of SEC
Donohue, the Village ' s consulting engineer regarding compliance
with the new Countywide Ordinance, states that it appeas that all
ordinance requirements can be met within the final plat . This
means that the documentation submitted regarding drainage,
detention, floodplains, and wetlands, are sufficient to conclude
that the conceptual requirements of the ordinance can be met within
the final plat . Mr . Loucks goes on to point out several issues
which need to be addressed by the applicant ' s engineer during the
final plat stage.
�I
I
B. Many drafting revisions need to be made.
C. I am presently working with Public Works Superintendent Meranda in
reviewing the adequacy of the proposed water system.
D. We need to receive some indication from the Hinsdale Sanitary
District regarding the accuracy of the proposed sanitary sewer
system.
E. The developer , at the May Plan Commission meeting, stated that he
would construct a bike trail system along the south side of 31st
Street and the southerly/westerly side of St . Paschal Drive. This
needs to be added to the preliminary plat .
3. Traffic
A. The Village ' s consulting traffic engineer, Norm Roden, has reviewed
the traffic impact study as prepared by James J. Benes &
Associates , Inc. Mr . Roden' s conclusions include the following:
1) The left turn lane for westbound 31st Street will be adequate
for existing and Sanctuary traffic. If future left turns
increase by fifty (50) vehicles an hour or more, the left turn
lane will have to be lengthened. The Village should consider
whether or not it wishes a financial contribution from the
Sanctuary project for this issue in the future.
2) A 150 ' long right turn lane for northbound traffic on St .
Paschal Drive should be constructed at 31st Street if the
Sanctuary driveway is allowed to remain anywhere on St. Paschal
Drive. This should be constructed by the developer at his
cost .
3) It is Mr . Roden' s opinion that the proposed entrance location
for the Sanctuary is less than ideal ; however, no provable
traffic operations problems pertain to the location proposed in
the preliminary concept plan. In addition, there is no strong
traffic related argument for relocating the Sanctuary entrance
to 31st Street . Also, relocating the driveway further south on
St . Paschal Drive will alleviate some concerns over the close
proximity of turning movements from 31st Street and in and out
of the Sanctuary; however , this is not a clear cut issue and
Mr . Roden could not definitely recommend it . I therefore am of
the opinion that the requested access location is appropriate.
B. The Benes report also states that traffic signals were investigated
at the intersection of 31st Street and St . Paschal Drive/Regent
Drive. It was concluded that a traffic signal would not be
warranted at this location under existing conditions. When this
site is fully developed, volumes may marginally meet warrants and
should be looked into at some future time.
IfIl
C. The Benes report concludes that the proposed development would add
2 - 4% to the volumes on 31st Street which normally would not be
perceived by the average driver. In summary, the traffic volume
generated by this development would not negatively impact the area.
The applicant ' s attorney, David Gooder , informed the Plan Commission at
their May meeting, that a revised plat had been submitted. It is my
understanding that that revised plat was taken back by the developer and
that the only plat under consideration is the one as originally submitted.
Therefore, I have not seen any revised plat and have reviewed only the
original submittal .
It appears that one of the major issues of this preliminary plat layout
concerns the zoning requests of the applicant . Since the layout does not
currently comply with the R3 Zoning classification, it will remain in limbo
pending final action by the Village Board. Following that action, the plat
can then be finalized as to concept layout and engineering.
Respec lly submitted,
ve&x
Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etg
cc: Tom Shannon, Shannon & Associates
v
t I
SEC DoNoHuE
AN Environment& Infrastructure
June 8, 1992
Mr. Dale Durfey, P.E. I
Village Engineer
Village of Oakbrook
M EX
1200 Oakbrook Rd.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 GINEER N O ARTMENT
Subject: The Sanctuary Preliminary Plat
Countywide Stormwater and Floodplain Ordinance Compliance
Dear Dale:
We have reviewed preliminary plat data submittals to determine whether general
compliance is being achieved with the countywide stormwater and floodplain ordinance.
The preliminary plat stage does not include detailed reviews but only looks for conceptual
adherence to the ordinance. A detailed review and analysis will be conducted during the
final plat stage.
Based on our review of the submitted data, it appears that all ordinance requirements can
be met within the final plat. However we cannot guarantee that problems won't arise
during the final plat review which are unforeseen at this preliminary stage. As the review
process proceeds, we will communicate our findings as quickly as possible.
This letter presents our comments on the preliminary plat and additional requirement that
the final plat must conform with. These comments have been organized according to the
County Ordinance section containing the requirements to which the comment applies.
A. General Requirements (Section 15-112)
It appears that these requirements can be met in the final plat stage. However, we
note the following potential problems:
1501 Woodfield Road •Suite 200 East•Schaumburg, Illinois 60173• (708)605-8800• Fax: (708) 605-8914 it.?
r :%
Mr. Dale Durfey
June 8, 1992
Page 2
1. The General Requirements include provisions that apply to all streams and
floodplains including non-regulatory floodplains. Among these, developments
must not:
- increase flood elevations
- decrease the flood conveyance capacity of the stream
- impair the hydrologic or hydraulic function of the stream.
In the preliminary plat, the developer proposes to use a stream corridor for
detention storage. This use of the stream will violate the above rules unless the
floodplain is expanded to accommodate the additional flow volume. The final
plat submittal must document no impairment of the hydrologic and hydraulic
function of the stream and floodplain.
2. New buildings within the 500-year floodplain must be floodproofed to an
elevation 1 foot above the base flood elevation. We understand the developer
will comply with this provision.
B. Site Runoff/Site Detention Requirements (See 15-113, 114)
The preliminary plat submittal included a preliminary stormwater and detention plan
dated April 15, 1992. We have the following comments on the stormwater and
detention plan:
1. The engineering methods used in the preliminary submittal meet the
requirements of the ordinance except that the entire site was considered in a
single runoff/storage analysis. In the final submittal, each subwatershed within
the site must be analyzed individually and-the following computed for design
conditions.
- Pre-development runoff rate.
- Post-development runoff rate (actual).
- Required storage
If the pre-development runoff rate is less than 0.10 cfs per acre then the post-
development release rate is limited to the pre-development runoff rate.
2. Computations should be provided with the final plat which demonstrate the
operation of each detention facility. These computations should show:
- The desired maximum release rate is not exceeded.
- All tributary area, including offsite areas, draining to each facility has
been accounted for.
Mr. Dale Durfey • •
June 8, 1992
Page 3
- The maximum storage volume achieved and the corresponding water
surface elevation.
- Each facility operates properly under the full range of expected
downstream conditions.
The submittal should include complete flow hydrographs in table form. The
hydrograph in the preliminary submittal was cut off at each end.
3. In the final plat, storage facilities shall be designed such that water surface
depths two feet above the base flood elevation will not damage the storage
facility.
4. We have conducted a review of the storage provided as indicated on the
preliminary plan. We find the stated storage volumes are generally consistent
with our computed volumes. This analysis assumes the high water level stated
on the plans will actually be achieved during the design event. This assumption
must be verified per comment B.2. above.
5. The stormwater conveyance system is difficult to review as pipe diameters and
manhole inverts have not been specified in this Preliminary Plat stage (these will
be tied down in the Final Plat). However, we have a few comments that will be
discussed with the developer's engineer. These comments include the following:
- The connection indicated on Attachment 1 should be avoided to
increase the area draining to the detention pond.
- Direct drainage to the Mays Lakes should be avoided where feasible
such as indicated in Attachment 2.
- The plan indicates connections with the existing 30-inch storm sewer
which drains Trinity Lakes Unit 1. The final submittal must verify
that the pipe has sufficient capacity to accept these flows and the flow
from Trinity Lakes must be included in any associated analysis of
system operation.
6. The developer should be aware of the submittal requirements specified in
Exhibit E-6 in the DuPage County Criteria and Technical Guidance Document.
This exhibit was provided to the developer's engineer.
C. Riparian Environment Requirements (Sec. 15-115)
We have determined the property contains no regulatory riparian environments
because the lakes and streams all drain less than 640 acres and the lakes also have
detention characteristics.
Mr. Dale Durfey • •
June 8, 1992
Page 4
D. Sediment and Erosion Control Requirements (Sec. 15-116)
These requirements refer to sediment and erosion control during construction and are
not relevant at the preliminary plat stage.
E. Floodplain/Floodway Requirements (Sec. 15-132, 133)
The site contains no regulatory floodplains according to the latest IDOT DWR and
FEMA maps. It is our understanding that Oak Brook will not require the developer
to perform a project specific floodplain study. Further, it appears that no IDOT-
DWR permit is required because the site drains less than 640 acres. We recommend
that the developer, at final plat stage, prepare a submittal to IDOT-DWR and obtain
their letter stating that a permit is not required.
F. Wetland Requirements (Sec. 15-134, 135)
The final wetland delineation and preliminary wetland mitigation plans were received
in submittals on May 14 and May 19, 1992. A field study was conducted by John
Keener, wildlife specialist for DuPage County and Anya Kirykowicz,wetland biologist
for SEC Donohue on May 20, 1992. Our findings are as follows:
1. The results of the field study included the following:
- Further wildlife investigations will not be necessary. There is no evidence
that the wetlands on the site include important wildlife habitat or breeding
sites.
- There are no additional wetland areas on the site beyond those identified
in the developer's submittal.
2. The site contains no critical wetlands and all wetlands identified in the
delineation are regulatory wetlands.
3. Wetland mitigation will be accomplished through creation of new wetlands and
enhancement of existing wetlands. The mitigation plan to be submitted with the
final plat must specify acres of filled wetland, acres of new wetland and acres of
enhanced wetland and must comply with the following:
- Mitigation shall provide for the replacement of the wetland environment
lost to development at a minimum proportional rate of one and one half to
one for regulatory wetlands.
Mr. Dale Durfey • .
June 8, 1992
Page 5
The Village has the discretion to allow an existing wetland contiguous to a
proposed regulatory wetland mitigation site to be enhanced in exchange for
a partial reduction in the mitigation area required. In no case shall the
area replacement fall below a one to one ratio.
4. The developer proposes to perform some wetland enhancement as part of the
required wetland mitigation. The wetland enhancement will include a sediment
control basin to protect the wetland from sediment in stormwater discharges.
5. A wetland mitigation plan must be submitted with the final plat which specifies
the design of the new and enhanced wetlands. This plan must also include
recommendations for the continued monitoring and maintenance of the
wetlands. The Village Administrator should consider these recommendations in
the Village's review of the long-term wetland maintenance plan.
ADDMONAL ISSUE
The developer also contemplates making improvements in the Grotto area. These
improvements will either be part of this development or will a separate development
possibly requiring a separate stormwater management permit. If this work becomes part of
the Sanctuary development it could affect the overall evaluation of the site. The final plat
stage must provide the necessary documentation for review of proposed improvements in
this area.
Very truly yours,
SEC D NOHUE, INC.
Eric D. Loucks, P.E.
EDL/sp
T/L/M8
^ r � p�pF OAIr 9 •
P t a 1r O
coUNSy
V I LLAG E OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990-3000
June 10, 1992
MEMO TO: Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals.
FROM: Thomas. Hawk
SUBJECT: Shannon / Sanctuary Petition
The Shannon / Sanctuary proposal requests approval of several
elements which differ from most of our subdivisions..
They are:
1) A special use covering a different concept.-of detached sin,,ii.f:
family housing (commonly--called Cluster-Housing) .
2) To include the land area.. used: for access. in the,. lot area
aeterminations.
3) To revise the definition .of structure height.
4) Change of land use - (Inst.itutianal to Resid.ential) ' and possi-
ble historical resources.-. •
The following may be helpful in -reviewing these elements. Also,
attached are copies of various portions of the Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Regulations which pertain
to these issues.
Special Use - Cluster Housing
The petitioner is requesting approval of 36 lots regulated by a
new special use provision - see page 7 of this file.
This special use category is very similar to the special use
which was used for the Briarwood Lakes Villages and Steeplchase -
sf a page 901 of the Zoning Ordinance, a . copy of which is at-
taChed.
p•-zbe.doc
7,1
Also, please review pages 63 and 64 of the Comprehensive Plan -
copy attached, and page 888 . 3 of the Zoning Ordinance - copy
attached.
Lot Area
The petitioner is requesting approval of a subdivision where
access to the individual lots is provided by a private street on
easements that are part of the individual lots. Consequently,
the land area needed for access to a lot is being included in the
determination of lot areas.
Most of the subdivisions which have developed under the Oak Brook
standards have not used the land area required for access in
their lot area determinations, however, the following subdivi-
sions did:
Brenneman, 1 lot, 1977, R-2 Zoning
Wendel Woods, 4 lots, 1976, R-2 Zoning
Brush Hill, 7 lots, 1990, R-2 Zoning
Saddlebrook Chase, 38 lots, 1982, R-2 & R-3 Zoning
Jorge's, 7 lots, 1990, R-3 Zoning
Heritage Oaks, 16 lots, 1980, R-2 Zoning
Heritage Oaks Unit Two, 11 lots, 1989, R-2 Zoning
Neither the Zoning Ordinance or the Subdivision Regulations
specifically address this. Please see the attachments excerpted
from the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations which cover
various definitions and requirements you may find useful in this
instance.
Structure Height
The current ordinance measures structure height to the highest
point of the structure.
The proposal is to determine this height as the mean between the
eave height and the height of the ridge of a gable, hip, or
gambrel roof.
The limitation to 2 1/2 stories would still apply.
Approving this change would allow homes to be built which are
several feet higher than is currently permitted. This could lead
to problems, especially within other subdivisions that still have
vacant lots.
pc-zbe.doc
72
Since the communities residential land area is, for the most
part, already subdivided and built upon, to change the height
standard at this time will lead to confusion and criticism from
existing property owners.
Land Use Change and Historical Resources
Please see pages 57, 65, 66, and 70 of the Comperhensive Plan
(copies attached) .
I
pc-zba.dm
7�
kC ROrs RDA^ TN
CrOm Oie o
B. Institutional-Objectives
1. To preserve the low density and open space character of existing
institutional uses in the Village.
2. Provide densities consistent with surrounding residential
properties for all discontinued institutional uses in the
Village.
3. Require any proposed rezoning of lard in Institutional Districts
may be done only after presentation of a site plan for the
proposed land to be rezoned. PA b F Ste,
• • Co^�o• �`Aiv
Chapter 6
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LAND USE
As is stated in the 1971 Comprehensive Plan, Village of Oak Brook, a community
development plan is intended:
(1) as a statement of public policy which will guide and control future
development in the Village, and
(2) to remove as much uncertainty as possible from the development process.
This plan, therefore, represents not only a set of recommended future land
uses within the community, but also a statement of the manner in which the
various land uses relate to each other. The land use recommendations provide
the framework for the development of the Comprehensive Plan. In the following
sections, the functional classifications of land use in the Village of Oak
Brook are summarized to provide a framework for future planning decisions.
Residential
The Village of Oak Brook is a low density, suburban, estate and semi-rural
residential community. The Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook sets
forth standards which are designed to achieve this objective. The objective
of the Comprehensive Plan regarding residential land use is to be consistent
with the existing zoning district classifications, except where good planning
requires revision. Revision is recommended in the following areas:
1. Twenty-seven (27) acres located on the northwest corner of Jorie Boulevard
and Oak Brook Road (31st Street) : This area, referred to as "Village
Green", is presently zoned R-3. This area is being highlighted since the
property is still vacant, but has been the subject of litigation regarding
its use. As in the 1978 update, it is recommended that this area retain
its R-3 zoning and be developed residentially, or as open space.
To be consistent, zoning in the "Village Green" was made low density
residential, R-3, similar to the classification of Hunter Trails to the
south (R-2) . This was also compatible with the open space use of the Park
District immediately north. This area should continue to be zoned R-3 and
developed residentially. It seems certain that other uses would be less
attractive and more intense than a residential development, and would
contribute substantially to the traffic burden on Oak Brook Road (31st
Street) and Jorie Boulevard.
2. There are-many unique physical characteristics within the Village of Oak
Brook. Where these include flood plains, scenic vistas, heavily wooded
areas or unsuitable soils, special use housing configurations as provided
for in the Zoning Ordinance will be considered.
- 63 -
r�_l
The rationale behind special use housing configurations is to preserve the
natural and rural setting of the community and protect the environment,
while providing land owners an opportunity to develop their properties.
A location which may be considered for R-4 special use housing
configurations, or for park space is the area south of Kensington Road and
west of Jorie Boulevard. This area of approximately thirty-four (34)
acres provides a natural transition from office-research-assembly
districts on the north to the park lands on the south. In addition, Route
83 and Jorie Boulevard are busy traffic arteries which restrict certain
conventional residential planning options.
Examples of special use housing configurations already developed or
approved are Steeplechase along Salt Creek and Briarwood Lakes along
Ginger Creek. The Salt Creek and Ginger Creek basins are natural
constraints for development which also provides opportunities for
imaginative planning in the Village of Oak Brook. Care should be taken to
preserve the natural floodways. and floodway fringes. Future development
should be abated along any floodways and should be controlled in the
floodway fringes to assure that protection is afforded to property owners
on the site and upstream, downstream and cross-stream neighbors.
Briarwood Lakes represents an attached, cluster-type special use housing
configuration in Oak Brook, which is compatible with the surrounding water
environment. It provides a buffer between Route 83 and single family
detached houses to the west.
Steeplechase represents a single family special use housing configuration
that preserves an existing flood plain. It provides a buffer to
office-research-assembly uses to the south. t
0
3. Twenty-five (25) acres of land located at the northwest corner of 16th
Street and Spring Road (Oak Brook Club) was annexed to the Village in
July, 1986.
This area was originally developed under.County zoning and contains five
(5) condominium buildings with 316 units, a recreation building, and a
three-story office building of 22,000 sq. ft.
Oak Brook Club was brought into the Village with an R-1 classification by
default. None of the Village's current zoning districts would allow the
existing development, and the Village chose not to create a special
category for this area.
The Oak Brook Club should retain its R-1 classification. To create a new
category covering this type of development would tend to encourage similar
developments elsewhere in the Village, which runs counter to the Village's
goal of maintaining low density residential areas.
4. Vacant properties located generally south of 35th Street and west of Adams
Road, which are presently zoned residential, should be developed with
single family detached houses.
64 -
• CHAT �L A"!
Open Space/Vacant Land
Open space continues to be one of the principal attractions in the Village of
Oak Brook. All possible efforts should be made to preserve existing open
space for aesthetic,. recreational and environmental purposes. In addition,
open space is ideally suited to implement storm water management and ground
water recharge programs. Care should be taken to retain the open space
inventory in Oak Brook and eastern DuPage County.
Two major golf courses are the Butler National Golf Course and the Butterfield
Country Club. Although Butterfield Country Club is surrounded by the Village,
it is not within the Oak Brook corporate boundaries. It is anticipated that.
these golf courses will continue to flourish and remain as open space for
recreational uses.
If necessary, preservation of these major open space areas by public
acquisition should be considered as the opportunities present themselves.
Butterfield Country Club is a major recreational open space in the western
portion of the Village. Butler National Golf Club provides 180 acres of open
space in the eastern portion of the Village, and, when coupled with the 270-
acre Sports Core properties to the east, 71-acre Central Park, and the forest
preserve property to the south, creates an area approximately three miles long
and one-half mile wide of primal forest and recreational open space. This
objective, preservation of open space, can only be accomplished by close
coordination and cooperation on the part of all governmental agencies --
local, county, state, and federal.
In 1977, the Village of Oak Brook, as approved by referendum, purchased the
276-acre Sports Core property, and in 1983 rezoned the property to the
Conservation/Recreation zoning district in order to preserve the area for open
space purposes.
The Village of Oak Brook has adopted a plan for and will continue to require
dedication of an open space network for bicycle and pedestrian pathway
purposes in all subdivisions. Care is to be taken in all future planning to
secure easements and access for pathway systems pursuant to the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Pathway Plan and require, when appropriate, that subdividers
install the improvements. The objective is to provide a network for
non-motorized transportation that permits residents access to recreation,
school, community and commercial facilities. In addition, it will provide a
means for residents to enjoy the natural and architectural beauty of the
Village.
There should be open space networks in new subdivisions consisting of lineal
parks, tot lots, mini-parks, and sub-regional parks. Consideration should
also be given to establishing parks and other recreational facilities in
existing residential and commercial areas.
The preservation of open space for environmental reasons is a paramount
consideration. Sound flood plain management necessitates the preservation of
existing floodway, permitting only strictly controlled development in the
floodway fringe areas. The basins of Salt Creek and Ginger Creek should be
maintained in their natural state. If altered, compensatory storage and other
modifications must be applied to any improvement to insure that upstream,
downstream, and cross-stream residents do not suffer from the effects of
65
nstitutionai
P AA)
Institutional uses whe Village of Oak Brook inclu4ocemetery, educational
and church/synagogue uses and enhance the open characteristics of the
community.
These uses are unique, and any proposal for modification should be subject to
the following guidelines:
1. Proposals should be compatible with the use, density and zoning of
surrounding properties. Traffic, community facilities and services, and
environmental characteristics must be adequately considered.
2. A complete e p lan must be submitted to the Village showing the entire
institutional property, the proposed modification and its impact on the
factors set forth in the above.
Historical and Archaeological Interests
The Oak Brook Historical Society, Ben Fuller Association, Graue Mill Associa-
tion, Fullersburg Historic Foundation, and Salt Creek Greenway Association are
responsible for the preservation of the local history which includes
collection of material relating to pre-history, exploration, settlement and
development. The purpose of the organizations is to research, gather,
preserve, display and promote interest in Oak Brook's history. The Oak Brook
Park District has taken the responsibility for the preservation of Oak Brook
history. The Village will be enhanced by the continuing development of the
Fullersburg Woods and Graue Mill Historical Districts.
The Graue Gateway District is located at the intersection of Spring and York
Roads, as shown on Plate 3. Development of this area shall adhere to the
regulations as stated in Section VIII-A of the Zoning Ordinance, and the
following objectives while conforming to the present land uses:
1. To encourage and foster development in the area consistent with the Graue
Mill, its site and the historic period it represents.
2. To encourage and promote the attractiveness, cohesiveness and compati-
bility of new buildings, development, remodeling, and additions so as to
maintain and improve established standards of property values within the
area consistent with its historical character, through the requirement of
a Certificate of Appropriateness.
3. To encourage and promote the preservation of historical structures,
buildings and natural resources including the Graue Mill, the old St. John
Church, the Fred Graue residence, the Ben Fuller farmhouse, the York
Tavern, and other historic structures in the village with development and
passage of a historic preservation ordinance that notes sites, even though
they may have been destroyed or changed.
All development within this area shall enhance the historical and archaeolog-
ical value of this portion of DuPage County. The Village should encourage the
preservation of historical buildings and other landmarks.
Consideration should be given to the creation of subdivision design standards
for the protection and enhancement of the rural qualities of the Fullersburg n
area. The Oak Brook Fullersburg Committee has recommended developing
Subdivision design standards governing the Fullersburg area concerning land
improvements in public and private rights-of-way including: 1) signage; 2)
types of streets; 3) landscaping, and 4) other matters relevant to the rural (\Q
nature of the area. These items should be studied by the Plan Commission and
specific changes recommended to the Village Board as deemed necessary. �`�
C.. D AV. AAA)
ercial uses in Planning District 3, all located in the southeast c er of
the llage near the intersection of Spring and York roads, occupy acres, 1%
of the anning district developed area.
Accounting fo one-third of the planning district develo area, parks,
recreation and w er areas occupy 302 acres of land. a largest portion of
this acreage is in est preserve lands. The Full sburg Forest Preserve, a
heavily wooded recreati area, is located alon alt Creek. The facilities of
the Fullersburg Forest Pres a Area will be Cussed in greater detail in
the community facilities sectio f this �recrea t. The Oak Brook Farms Stables
on 35th Street is classified as a va tio facility, occupying 6
acres. The two churches and the lan voted to cemeteries in the Fullersburg
Planning District occupy 42 acres. This unts to 5% of the total developed
area in the planning district. a churches, hrist Church of Oak Brook, at
the corner of Oak Brook Road nd York Road, and urch on the County Line
(formerly St. John's Comm ity Church) on Washingt Street, occupy 10 acres,
while land devoted to t cemeteries amounts to 32 ac Streets and
thoroughfares in Pla ing District 3 occupy 83 acres, 9%. f the developed
area.
The Fullers g Planning District is served by Butler Elementary chool
District 53, for the largest proportion of the district, while he
southe tern section is served by Hinsdale Community Consolidated Sc of
Dis ict No. 181. Hinsdale Township High School District No. 86 serve all
h' h school students in Planning District 3.
Planning District 4: (Brook Forest)
Planning District 4 encompasses the middle section of Oak Brook and is bounded
on the east by Illinois Route 83, on the south by the corporate limits, on the
west by Midwest Road, and on the north by the corporate limits. Planning
District 4 occupies a total of 774 acres of land, of which 83%, or 644 acres,
is classified as developed area. Since the primary activity in this area is
residential, the district will be called the Brook Forest Planning District
(see Table 17) . Those lands classified as vacant, or agricultural areas,
occupy 130 acres, or 17% of the planning district. Brook Forest Planning
District is essentially flat, open land. In addition to lakes, Ginger Creek
forms several lagoons and pond areas; Briarwood Lakes Villas are built around
these water courses. St. Paschal's Franciscan Friary occupies 25 acres in the
southeast corner of this planning district. This amounts to 4% of the total
developed area.
Residential uses account for 289 acres of land, or 47% of the total developed
area within the planning district. The largest proportion of residential uses
is in single-family homes which account for 228 acres, 36% of the developed
area. The Brook Forest Subdivision is zoned R-3 and R-4. Trinity Lakes
Subdivision is zoned R-3. Multiple-family residential uses in Planning
District 4 occupy approximately 61 acres, 9% of the developed area. These are
the villas in Briarwood Lakes area, R-4 zoning. The Briarwood Lakes Villas
are condominiums with the buyer having title to the building and a small
outside area, and rights to an individual interest in the home owners
association, which owns and controls the common grounds to be enjoyed equally
by all owners of a villa. The rest of the area in Briarwood Lakes is
maintained through common maintenance, supported by an annual assessment made
by the Briarwood Lakes Home Owners Association. This maintenance includes
- 26 -
to
lawn mowing, leaf raking, shrubbery maintenance and snow removal, as well as
exterior repainting on a planned schedule.
Table 17
EXISTING LAND USE: PLANNING DISTRICT 4
% of % of
Total Developed
Acres Area Area
Residential
Single Family 228 30 36
Multi Family 61 8 9
Commercial
Local Commercial 13 2 2
ORA 18 2 3
Institutional 71 9 11
Parks, Open Space, Water 44 6 7
Streets, Thoroughfares,
Utility Corridors 209 27 32
TOTAL Developed Area 644 83
Vacant, Agricultural, Undeveloped 130 17
TOTAL Area of Planning Area 4 774 100 100
The net density of dwelling units per acre of residential land in Planning
District 4 is 2.4 dwelling units per residential acre based on 717 total
dwelling units. The gross density in this planning district is .9 dwelling
units per acre of the total planning district area. The estimated current
population of Brook Forest Planning District is approximately 2,323 people.
Commercial uses in Planning District 4 account for 5% of the developed area in
the planning district. Local Commercial uses amount to 13 acres of land.
Most of this land is occupied by Eastman Kodak facilities.
Public uses in Planning District 4 occupy 24 acres of land, 4% of the total
planning district area. The Brook Forest Elementary School site occupies
about 10 acres, and the Illinois State Toll Highway Commission occupies 14
acres located east of Midwest Road between' 22nd Street and the tollway. Land
utilized by St. Paschal.'s Franciscan Friary accounts for 25 acres of developed
area.
Streets and thoroughfares in this planning district occupy 209 acres. This
amounts to 32% of the total developed area. Butler Elementary School District
No. 53 and Hinsdale Township High School District No. 86 serve all the
residences in this district.
- 27 -
IY' d
� x c �R/orEv o try
.(F) Setbacks Along Streets.
Minimum setbacks 'on lots abutting a street shall be as
required for yards in the district in which they are located
and shall be measured from the street line—or from the
proposed street line if one has been designated on the
Official Map; except that the setbacks along 22nd Street and
Supp.No.23
877
(P) Access.
All publicly dedicated rights-of-way for roadway or highway
purposes or any land used, by easement or other means, for ve-
hicular access which may be developed in any zoning district in
the Village of Oak Brook, shall meet all requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations Ordinance of the Village and shall be for
the principal use of areas within the corporate limits of the Vil-
lage. Where such access may be developed as part of a larger,
continuous, regional street system, or where it may serve a sub-
division located in part outside the corporate limits of the Village
of Oak Brook, the design of said system shall be reviewed in
accordance with the applicable provisions of all governing ordi-
nances and shall be subject to a public hearing before the Plan
Commission,Zoning Board of Appeals and President and Board of
Trustees prior to development. (Ord. No. G-105, 7-11-72)
SECTION VII. RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(A) Preamble.
The residence districts provide for the development of
various types of dwelling units within 'a framework of
standards designed to:
(1) Preserve and further promote low-density single-fam-
ily detached dwelling neighborhoods consistent with
the predominant character of the Village.
(2) Encourage the development of medium-density sin-
gle-family detached dwelling neighborhoods where it
is possible to employ modern, efficient land planning
techniques with smaller networks of utilities and
pavements.
(3) Provide for the economically sound and aesthetically
pleasing use of areas characterized by their proximity
to heavy traffic, the regional shopping center and
light industry—including the use of "town houses"
and garden-type low-density multiple-family dwell-
ings.
APPENDLY A—ZONI.iG ec. VII
(4) Ot er 1 as approved by the
Board of Tr S.
(5) A ory uses and structures incidental to
e above recreational uses.
(c) Single-family detached, attached and semi-de-
tached dwellings—on parcels not less than 50
acres in area, provided that the gross density of
each such development shall not' exceed three
dwelling units per acre; the structure heights shall
not exceed 30 feet; no structure shall contain more
than two and one-half stories; the ground floor
living area per dwelling shall not be less than
1,300 square feet for a one-story dwelling and 900
square feet for a dwelling of more than one story;
the minimum distance between principal build-
ings, as measured between bearing walls, shall be
not less than 20 feet, except that this distance
may be reduced by two (2) feet if one of such walls
encloses an attached garage or carport and by
four (4) feet if each of such walls encloses an
attached garage or carport; provided further that
each principal building shall be set back at least
thirty (30) feet from dedicated public streets,
off-street loading and off-street parking require-
ments shall be as provided in Section XI;. and
provided that a preliminary development plan
indicates sufficiently clearly the proposed streets,
right-of-ways, lot sizes and set-backs, so that the
village board in granting approval of such
preliminary plan may clearly define the areas of
any special restrictions it may wish to impose and
that* approval of the final subdivision plan shall
be subject to same.
( t Area: Not less than 18,000 square feet—
that in 'lions 40 acres or more ' a, the lot
area may be re u " 0 uare feet provided
that lands equal to ercen otal area be
dedicated to illage of Oak Brook, or
appr y the Village Board, for park or recreation-
Sapp.No.1 901
b RvrNAaCC .vhf /N r T,�ivs
(76) Lot—a parcel of land consisting of adjoining parts which(at QQ t f
the time of filing for a building permit)is designated by its
owner or developer as a parcel to be used, developed, or
built upon as a unit, under single ownership or control.
Therefore, a "lot" may or may not coincide with a lot of
record.
(77) Lot area—the area of a horizontal plane bounded by lot P y $
lines.
(80) Lot lines—the property lines bounding a lot.
(81) Lot line, front—the boundary of a lot abutting a '
street. On a corner lot, either lot line may be construed
to be the front lot line by the owner.
(135) Street—a permanent public or private right-of-way yy ,
which affords a primary means of access to abutting
property.
(157) Yard, front—a yard which is bounded by the side lot PAW yf�
lines, front lot line, and the front yard line.
�x GAR ro
�
(7) Easement area is a designated parcel of land on, over
or under which a liberty, privilege, or advantage for
use of land (dedicated and distinct from ownership of
- the land), is granted either to the public, a particular P or firm, or a combination of both.
(13) Lot is a designated parcel of land in a subdivision or
other parcel of land intended for transfer of ownership
or for building develoament as a complete and
individual unit. PRre /Ofd, /
(25) Right-of-Way—A strip of land deicated to the public
for access Purposes including. but not limited to,
streets, alleys and pedestrian ways and may include
' surface access for vehicles or pedestrians, overhead
access, when permitted, for certain public utilities, and
underground access for sewers and public utilities. pod! lei'$–
(28) Street is a right-of-way to afford primary means of
r access for pedestrians and vehicles to abutting
s _ J properties, and to-provide area for underground utility
installation, whether designated as a street, avenue,
P highway, road, boulevard, lane or however otherwise
1 designated 12A«r 1491,G
(B) Lot design standards:
(1) Lots shall abut on a street. Flag or Interior Lots shall �L A !s
not be permitted unless after review by the Village
Engineer, Plan Commission, and Board of Trustees, a
determination is made that the land in question
cannot be reasonably developed in any other way.
When a Flag or Interior Lot is permitted, the area of
s _ any such lot which is used for access shall not be
construed as the front yard of said lot nor shall the
access area be used to satisfy any other yard, setback
or minimum lot area requirement as set forth in the
Zoning Ordinance, and said access area shall be a
minimum of 20 feet in width except when the Plan Com-
mission may deem additional width to be necessary. GE /070.1 7
tee r
1 ,
w•-
APPENDIX B—SUBDIVISIONS Art VII,§3
- Section 3. Land improvement standards.
The following improvements and standards for those
improvements are hereby required for all subdivisions in the
planning jurisdiction area of the Village of Oak Brook.
' (A) Streets: A paved street system designed and construct-
_ ed in accordance with Village of Oak Brook
Standards shall be installed to serve all lots in the
subdivision.
(1) Street layout shall be in accordance with the
official plan of the Village of Oak Brook and
environs, or Federal, State or County authorities
- having jurisdiction, whichever has the greater
requirements.
(2) Minimum right-of-way and pavement widths
- shall be as follows:
1 -1
II
n
1073
fA
Collector Minor
Thoroughfares Streets Street Frontage
s
ROW WIDTH Roads
100'* 80' 66'
40' residen.
60' non-res. w
Residential 2 @ 24'* 32'
Pavement 27' 27'
Width Alternate
2 @20' •
Non- 2 @ 24'* 40'*
Residential 32' 32'
Alternate 0
0 2 @20'
Separate turn w
lanes required o
0
for all left x
turn movements 0
0
Median Strip 18 recommended Optional Optional
10' Minimum (10' Min. (10' Min.
(8' Min @ turn if used) if used)
lanes)
•Additional width may be required by the Plan Commission if doomed necessary to carry projected traffic load
ommended by the Village Engineer and applicable County and State Agencies. a when rec-
•
v`
r
G
A
H
G
a s
aq
W
OAK BROOK HISTORICAL SbCIE.TY
P.O. iBOX 3821 OAK BROOK. ILLINOIS .60522
May 26, 1992
1
1
Mr'. William E. Kenny, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals ,
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Dear Mr. Kenny:`
1
As the Zoning` Board of Appeals reviews the Shannon& Associates
development plan for Mayslake, please keep i'n mind that the effort
for preservation of the Mayslake' H,istori,c Site continues!
The Land Acquisition Committee of the Forest Preserve Districi,' on
April 16, voted unanimously to place the referendum back on the November-
ballot. 'The one condition is that'a "plan and cost estimates for the
use of the buildings be established. The adaptive uses for the Peabody
Mansion and St. Paschal Fr9ary are in process .of being explored, and
are very promising.
I am enclosing for your information the letter addressed to President
Bushy from the Oak Brook Historical Society, the lettee-from Ann Swallow
Survey & Natioanl Register Coordinator, Illinois Historic Preservation
Agency, and the critical features chapter- of the Preliminary.Use Study
prepared by Howard Decker, Decker and Kemp Architects.
A detailed archaeological survey will be required by the State of Illinois.
The property contains two registered' archaeologfcal' sites DU-20 and OU-23.
Wetlands, in addition to the 9.5 acres of lakes," total 12.6 acres and the
EPA must approve any, development so as to provide full ,protection for these
Areas.
We request that no authorization be granted for disturbance of the terrain
or demolition of the buildings' until such federal and state requirements
are met.
The proposed development would destroy a -valuablelhistoric,'ecological and
cultural resource. : Self-evident,, as the Village has no property tax, such
developement as proposed would add only an additional cost burden fdr services '
for the Village'of-Oak Brook and be an additional drain on the water resources.
Sincerely, L I
Audrey L. 7ushler
enclosures
CC:Louis Aldini ,/ Paul Goeken Martis
Champ Davis Manu Shah
Dorothy Desedio Dr. Raymond White
Illinois Historic
•—— Preservation Agency
Old State Capitol Springfield, Illinois 62701 (217) 782-4936
I
Suite 4-900 State of Illinois Center 100 W. Randolph Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 814-1409
AP r- i 1 14 , 1992
Karen M. Bushy , Village President
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook , IL 60521-2255
Dear President Busily:
I am writing to you about Mayslake, the historic Peabody
estate in Oak Brook , with important information about the
archaeological sites that are located. on the property and the
estate ' s historic significance. I would very much appreciate it
if you would send a copy of this letter to the Trustees of the
Village of Oak Brook. , as I think it is important that the
community ' s elected officers be aware of Mayslale ' s pre-
historical and historical value.
According to Thomas Emerson, Chief Archaeologist with the
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, two known prehistoric
archaeological sites, DU-20 and DU-23, are located on the
ihayslake property. He also states that since this area has never
been systematically surveyed for archaeological rerrrains. it is
highly probable that other , unreported sites are also present .
It is so rare to find surviving evidence of the ancient peoples
who once inhabited the Greater Chicago area, that this property
has the potential to yield important information about the lives
and cultures of Oal< Brook ' s earliest residents.
Also , the Mayslake property is exemplary for- its association
with the development of country estates in the Chicagoland area
during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These estates
were located , for the most part , on the North Shore or in
northwestern suburbs, such as Barrington Hills. However . Francis
Peabody had lived for several years in a large Queen Anne style
residence in Hinsdale, a community immediatel.v to the south of
Oak Brook. . The selection of a near-by site for- his new country
house made perfect sense.
When Francis Peabody Bought the property that oecame
Mayslatce he was 60 years old and a naticnal figure in the coal
industry. In 1919 he built a new, residential orope,- ty to r. ef --ect
his Prominent position in Ame►- ican ind_,strv . Fie envisiencd arrc
President Karen M. Busby
April 14', 1992
Paae 2
had cone,tructed an elaborate estate with more than Boo acres,
seven farmsteads, a countryhouse valued at $750,000, and a lodge,
stable and greenhouse worth $285,000. Relatively few country
estates were built in the western suburbs , and the remaining
acreage and historic buildings at Mayslake has historical
associations with this important pattern of development in the
Chicagoland area .
Lastly , the Peabody Mansion on the Mayslake property is an
architecturally significant building . It was designed by a
prominent and nationally-recognized Chicago architectural firm,
Marshall & Fox . Marshall & Fox had been commissioned to design
residences and clubs, including the Edgewater Beach Hotel , the
Drake Hotel , the Blackstone Hotel , and the South Shore Country
Club . The latter three buildings are currently listed in the
National Register of Historic Places . The Peabody Mansion is an
excellent example of the Tudor Revival style of architecture, and
it has retained most of its historic design and interior finishes
from the time when Francis Peabody lived there.
The preservation of the Mayslake property and its pre-
historic and historic resources is certainly a worthy goal . This
Agency strongly encourages all efforts made to retain and further
study its important resources.
Sincerely yo rs.
Ann V. Swallow
Survey & National Register
Coordinator
�a'i
) AR I11? 00K II IS7ORICA1. SOCir 1 Y
1• t IlfNX IR71 . t,AY 1117ntIK 11.1 I1IM!" ht,:?7
April 1s, 1942
firs. Karen Rushy, President:
village of flak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Rn,Arl
DAk Brook , illinnis 00521
hear Karen-
n Cotitlly-wide effort rot- the preservation of tht? histneic MayslAke bite
continues on the part of the 5everAl consehvation and historic orgAniiations .
We are enclosinq, for your information4 a copy of the map which illustrates
the current. Fnr•esl. Preserve holdings . District 2 has only 420 acres of Forest
Preserve land, 1 .9% of the Forest Preserve land and 16% of the population.
in atidition, We are enclosing the vote tally, by township, for the referendum.
lime ditl tint permit full distribution of information throughout the county.
11; is apparent that the referendum lost in the arres where information was not
c.ircltlated anti the issue tint; understood. Yds, the strength of the vote was
impressive. The refPr•Pndum passed in York atid Downers Grove townships, in spite
of fir : Shannon's highly misleading letter and advertisement.
the snhsetluent: PRESS Publicatinns edil;orial which Is enclosers reflects the
thinking of so many who rlutlerstand the true value of preservation of open space
and ou►• herit;age., anti especially the merit in preserving this historic site and
its buildings .
the adapl.tve uses for St. Paschal Friary and the peahody Mansion are in the
prncess of being explored and look very promising.
in addil.inn In all Wetland regtliv-r, tits, we requt?st the Oak llrook Trustees
he.colne familiar with t:he state and federal requirements in respect to a registered
archavningical bite. We request the Oak Ornok Trustees to not allow any demolitio,
of the huil(lings or distttrhance of the property until Mr. Shannon has met all the
state and federal rpquirements1regarding this property.
The unnecessary destrt
ticlnn of St: Joseph Seminary/Whitehall is a valuable lesson,
the once beautiful building probably will be demolished soon. The building had
local and cnttnty sign; icAnt;e but did not qualify for the National Register of
Historic Places.
in comparison, both tale Peabody Mansion and the Portitlncula Chapel (in quAl I fy
for the 11a1;innA1 Register of Illstoric Places . Any demolition of these structures ,
or of St. Paschal Friary, would bo a disgrace to Du Page Cnuni.y, and to Oak Brook.
Sincerely,
CrnnmitteP of the hreservAl:ion of Mayslakp
Audrey I.. Muschl er
CC: Oak Brook Trustees
Pnclosures
EDITORIAL
frets t'ilhllcnlinnl._
1Vefisesdny,April 1, 1991 . n '
t'ight. 116f ove-r
The battle to gave Mitysiake isn't
Iaver yet, at least trot AS tar as various
groups behind the failed March 17 ref-
erelidum are cotrcet-ned.
Tile Coalition to Save Mayslake will
meet. April G to decide the next plan of
action since a to joril.y of voters on
March 17 denied the DuPage Forest
Preserve District the opportunity to
buy tiie properly, which includes 22
acres of wetlands, for no more than $15
million.
Members of the coalition were dis-
apl)ointed with the referendum's result
Nit encom•aged by the close vole —
79,1 t1 people voted in favor of the
purchase, while 84,218 voted against it.
Behhid some of the "tin" votes were
sent.itnents citing "no new faxes," no
matter what the merits of any 1woject
wet,(".
This is short-sighted ,1nd narrow-
mittded thillkingg. '.t'hose who voted
against the purchase likely fall into one
or more of three categories: those who
have t'lever seen the properly and beets
taken by its tare beauty in 8 county of
roadways; those *Ito don't care about
saving a milque portion of the county's
history 1.11,11 includes ils turcltt•ologicttl
mid hrchit.edut•a) importance; be those
who don't believe that it has any real
importance, - aesthetic, historical. or
otherwise.
To take hny ot.het viewpoint would
have been to vote for f.he purchase,
which would have' cost the average
taxpayer only about $5.50 a year,
Atid those who fall itito the above
categories are dead wrong.
The coalitionl is optimistic! something
can still he dope to gave flit' property
from developtttettt. We Nolte so. The
loss of Maysialce to the bulldozer wo111d
signal Ill" epitome of cynicisut in Du-
Page County. z
•
MIIYSLAK,E REFERENDUM - March 17, 1992
Township Yes No Difference % did not vote Total
WIIYNE 2.964 4350 - 1386 Yip 7.6 7829
BLOOMINGDALE 6625 10928 - 4303 Pfi' 7.4 18.948
ADDISON 5493 6015 - 522 11 .8 13,055
WINFIFLD 3067 4344 - 1277 8.7 8,114
MILTON 12,977 15,215 - 2238 8.6 30,842
YORK, 15,159 13,234 + 1925 9.0 31 ,218
NAPFRVILLF 4709 4589 + 120 8.5 10,166
LISLE 10,511 9,654 + 857 8.6 22,058
DOWNERS GROVE 17,497 15,807 1. 1690 7.5 36,016
- 5234
i
nf'u 4
06 1,
l i
Total_Registered Voters : 355,480
Total Voted: 178,460
79,111 YES
84 ,2.18 NO
I
A Chapter in the Preliminary Use Study
prepared 5- 1lowar-3_Uecker,__Decker and _Kemp Architiects
PART ONE - CRITICAL FEATURES
I'hc Mayslake Ilistoric Site contains a wide range of resources of critical value to the citizens
of Oak Brook, the surrounding region, and in some aspects, the nation. The presence of these
features underscores in a powerful way the need to preserve and conserve the site. Prior to
midertakhig planning related to preservation, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of
what elements of the highest importance should be taken into consideration.
De•rmirig "Critical Feamt-cs" is a standard part of the process of evaluating landmark properties.
The methodology for this process involves research, verification by empowered agencies and
groups, and documentation through site visits and analysis. The Critical Feahtres list below
includes references to opinions offered by the Illinois Ilistoric Preservation Agency, the Open
1-mds Project mud the Ianclniarks Preservation Council of Illinois. Other supporting testimony
has previously been offered by the Oak Brook Historical Society and the Salt Creek Greenway
Association. Consensus has been achieved: the Mayslake i listoric Site has substantial significance
anti should he preserved to the absolute greatest extent possible.
The Critical 1,cattires list below identifies areas of concern throughout the site. As the project
moves forward, each area of importance will need to he surveyed in greater depth in order
to more thoroughl)• detail elements needing attention and conservation: this preliminary listing
is intended to identify major areas of concern.
Critical Area One: Architecture
Construction of the Francis Peabody estate began in 1919, on what was then just over 800
acres of land. Peabody was a successful busittesstttatt: lie owned and operated the well known
Peabody Coal Company.
'I'hc horse «vhic•h. Peabody Commissioned, now known as the 39 room Peabody Mansion, was
designed in the Tudor Gothic style, a style of estate architecture not uncommon in our region
in tite first decades of the twentieth century. The large and rambling two-and-a-half story
masonry building is characterized by a very high level of detailing and artisanship, hoth inside
and out. The exterior of the building features extensive use of cut and carved limestone,
sophisticated masonry bonding patterns, and umtsual and highly resolved half timbering and
stucco detailing in the second Story and gables. The level of architectural resolution of file
exterior of the house makes it a rare and fine example of this nio(le of construction, and the
c•trrreut integrity of the mansion underscores its value.
The interior of the house is likewise very highly detailed. Plaster work in ceilings, sophisticated
tine of flooring materials, and extensive interior woodwork make many aspects of the rooms
critical targets for restoration. Remarkably, the integrity of the interior of the huilcling is Unite
good: this is somewhat ttttcxpcctcd in light of its uses over the last 70 years. The huilcling was
purchased by the I"ranciscatt Order in 1921 following the death of Mr. Peahocly: at that time
the house was converted to a retreat center, and over the following years ad(litions were nta(le
to the structure in order for the overall c•on)plex of huildings to meet the needs of the Order.
i
1
i
Part One - Critical Features, continued
The issue of overall integrity is important in considering the building's potential landmark
status. In offering a supporting opinion of the value of preserving this unique resource, Ann
Swallow, Survey and National Register Coordinator for the Illinois I Iistoric Preservation Agency,
has said:
After reviewing the information (sent to IIIPA by Decker and Kemp), and touring the
site...it is my opinion that the Peabody Mansion may have potential for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places. My opinion of the building's potential for listing is
based on two factors: the historic importance of the residence and its physical
integrity...there is no question that the house is a very good example of the Tudor
Revival style of architecture, and therefore could be nominated for Criterion C, as it
does "embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of
construction".
This opinion is supported and endorsed by the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois.
They also advocate the preservation of the structure. Nancy Wagner, Director of Statewide
Programs for the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois, has said:
The Peabody Mansion is an outstanding example of Tudor Revival architecture in our
region. We fully support its preservation and adaptive reuse. This resource represents
a unique opportunity to preserve a significant and important part of the Village's past.
In addition, we support the preservation of the overall site: the site itself has much to
do with the interpretive potential of the building.
Other buildings on site have varying potential for Landmark status. Tile Portiuncula Chapel,
constructed in 1926, was restored in 1974: at that time much of the historic interior was not
retained. If the Chapel were to be more thoroughly restored, it too may qualify for landmark
status.
It is worth noting that adjacent to the Chapel is a small cemetery for two members of the
Peabody Family (Stuyvesant Peabody and his son "Jack"), as well as members of the Franciscan
Order. Obviously, this too should be preserved.
The Friary, constructed by the Franciscans in the 1950's, is not currently old enough to be
considered for landmark status.
Critical Area Two - Archeology
The Mayslake Historic Site has long been the site of important events in our region: Native
American cultures have been present on and around the site since 8,000 B.C. In the 1974
Archeological Survey commissioned by the Village of Oak Brook and performed by the
Foundation for Illinois Archeology, Dr. Stuart Streuver of Northwestern University notes:
PIndian cultures were present in the Oak brook area from at least the Early Archaic
eriod (8,000 to 5,000 B.C) through the period of pioneer settlement in the early
1800's."
Part One - Critical Features, continued
Artifacts of significance have been found on the Mayslake Historic Site, some of which date
from approximately 3,000 B.C. We recommend that a more detailed archeological survey be
undertaken: it is extremely likely that there were significant encampments and other activities
taking place on the site during the Early Archaic period, and dating from times earlier than
recovered artifacts to date have indicated.
In addition, it is now known that the site was the location of a large Potawatomi encampment,
from the late 17th century into the first decades of the nineteenth century. The site should
be investigated for further evidence of this activity.
As an additional note of significance, an Indian Boundary Line ordained by the Treaty of 1816
crosses the site, and is acknowledged in the Plat of Survey.
Often the prehistoric and early historic activities of native cultures in our region are not widely
recognized by the region's indwellers. One of the most significant opportunities represented
by the preservation of the Mayslake Historic Site is the extent to which this story of the
development and character of the region can be unearthed, and widely shared. Uses of the
site other than preservation of the grounds would clearly jeopardize the extent to which these
resources can be identified and conserved for all citizens to appreciate and treasure.
Critical Area Three - Geology and Topography
The Mayslake historic Site is part of a geologic and topographic system known as the
Palustrine System. This system is characterized by soils of a loamy type, wetlands, ponds, and
fens or marshes. Few of these natural land types remain in the region: most have been
redeveloped. In acknowledgement of the low-lying and water retaining character of the site,
Mayslake has been designated a "Zone B" floodway (as defined the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers). Further, the U.S. Department of National Wetlands Inventory has designated a
portion of the site as a Wetlands.
The site also includes portions of three small lakes or ponds, one of which is vernal (a natural
and native pond fed by a natural spring). These play a critical role in the detention of
stormwater runoff in the area surrounding the site. Without respect to their aesthetic qualities,
which are indeed noteworthy, it is important to establish that the site plays a pivotal role in
the waterway and drainage systems of the entire region.
These natural features are increasingly disappearing in our region: conservation of these
characteristics should be an important part of the preservation project. The extent to which
these resources can play an active role in the physics of the region, and act as well as in an
1 important environmental/educational/recreational role, should not be underestimated.
5 � L
0
Part One - Critical Features, continued
Critical Area Four - Open Lands
In evaluating the open lands potential of the Mayslake Historic Site, Gerald Adelmann,
Executive Director of the Open Lands Project, has said:
On behalf of the Open Lands Project, I am writing you to state our support for the
preservation of the St. Francis Retreat House and Mayslake Property in Oak Brook,
Illinois.
We are working with the Salt Creek Greenway Association to get the public to view the
entire length of Salt Creek...as a greenway...In our view, Mayslake and the Retreat
House fall within the effective area of this important greenway corridor.
Mayslake is a beautiful, serene open space and offers an outstanding opportunity to
complement the natural lands directly along Salt Creek. The Retreat House, with its
cultural and historic significance, provides a wonderful historic anchor to enhance the
Salt Creek Greenway Corridor.
In summary, we view this property as a rare and important enhance ent to a vital open
en n p
lands system. As growth continues to fill in the little undeveloped land left in Oak
Brook, the importance of preserving the Mayslake property for the benefit of all citizens
Is greater that ever.
Currently the site also includes the following natural or open lands features of importance:
A managed native prairie restoration project.
A designation of"Urban Acres for Wildlife" by the Illinois Department Conservation. This
designation refers to the role that the site plays in providing habitat for resident and
migratory wildlife.
Critical Area Five - Cultural and Social History
'I1iough the Mayslake Historic Site once included over 800 acres and now is less than 90 acres,
the site can still play an active role in telling the story of the growth and development of both
Oak Brook specifically, and the larger region generally. Not only was the site the original home
for one of the region's pioneering businessmen, whose story can be told through the
interpretive resources of site and building, but its life as a part of the Franciscan Order is
likewise of historic importance. The Franciscan Order has been present Oil the site for over
65 years, and has provided a focus and home for hundreds of thousands of retreatants during
that period. As an aspect of the spiritual life of our region, their presence on the Mayslake
Site should be a part of the historic/interpretive program developed as the site is preserved.
Part One - Critical Features, continued
Conclusions
In summary, there are many aspects of the site and grounds that offer rare and unique
resources worthy of conservation and preservation. As we have stated elsewhere, these
resources need to be studied individually and at much greater depth. Nonetheless we
recommend, based on the wide ranging array of critical resources represented by the Mayslake
Historic Site, that to the extent possible all of these critical features be retained and preserved
as reuse of the site is considered.
1
I
r
e 1A
Illinois Department of Conservation -
Ift arxJ land togetw 0
LINCOLN CHICAGO OFFICE P ROOM 0 524 SOUTH SECOND 4-300 - 100 WEST RANDOLPH 60601NG n 621 (2 Q (U► R Y-
, T-+:? U LS U L5
BRENT MANNING, DIRECTOR MAY 2 2 W2 U
MAY 1 1992 ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSULTATION
of`•,ataral e~ita� , AGENCY ACTION REPORT VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Date 3*abm3'.t1W-.ed: May 7, 1992 PROJCODE:
Date Due:
For Office Use Only
Agency Name: Village of Oak Brook
Contact Person: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. phone: (708) 990-3010
Agency Address: 1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
DESCRIBE PRECISE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION
County(ies) : DuPage __-
City/Town: Oak Brook
Township/Range/Section: Township 39 North, Range 11 East, Section 34 & 35
U.S.G.S. Quad Map Name(s): Hinsdale
Brief Description of the Proposed Action: Developer proposing single
family residential subdivision on 90 acres.
Please enclose a map delineating the location of the proposed action.
GFOR NATURAL HERITAGE USE ONLY
QUADCODE (S) : n
Are there threatened/endangered species or natural areas located within the vicinity of the project? E Yes No�
The consultation process is terminated? 'Y >l No I
If 'No', complete the enclosed Detailed Agern Action Report to continue the consultation process.
Evaluation Approved by: `l
Deanna Glosser, Ph.D. Date
Endangered & Threatened Species Program Manager
sa 4ot tot
- a Oc na k .. IS' elt fl ell 11911 Tt\ Li 11 GJ L S i 1 t s'•1 lott
IM t 11
as vcl l aal as 1.a ,S pri ea� \It < v '
- 1 1 •: �ea � I I. Eri a'.\ •ti Lbl IU pL CI Jt"fI�'2 K 9t .
'is _J [.� .r •'4t ` s•1 9a"L' • 1 21 +y_ ii.. Z se =` p •172
;• J tit [2\ U •I��i= 1\ 1 cG --
.. osl
I �.'~ r• ce tol Lr sr 4-• Ls 14t a• -► sl f
,yam,' IeC i
Siff �. lit ! ...• it•i oav
-- K r • •t�Sr I ►I if r G L41 t• /f tl t fZ r u iL u
t 1= N � ft n 1• QI .
,�Ni ��N s �. W. LL 9[ft ►L
L\, /es 1• t• al a
It
„ of a• a ---�
a. //
.a `a a I� - rt tc ti tt LZ I ss i�n f>» a� t•
_ K
�.J:iii �� /^�E� ••l •�� LI t w hl iIt �' 1 .1 •p 1 tpt ::�i
� ^�' < t.T-'.. /• /as .« �• u 1 1 .► zc a t: i ao;
ea+ aa� at `�` H- „ ,_ •t �i .w J ttI tG► • • ^z ..cr.
°>t�� •a � .l nl '1 } SI �_ /L Sl � .<�r S�'2 '
• 1 1S •J X1,1 IT 11;'w Y•
•at 1 •I
al Ht rw at
► tia:: 1 •• 1• .at -of la lif-� ' � f u� N cc 9f sr b-itt i[I nt n uI �Zvi rl
5 e• , se t n .:ta. t.a •'•1 / el • �,: 1 1 Stir Stt r 1
SO
�, U ► t► 1a Shl Nt
•\-i r ..\1:-/ st - al � '• a � a i t t► 7 :C �1 a �u n*1 w �;•
�c ► i
- a t>,. �� o/' �- _ • ''a - < , t.i 1 E rr �_ n'vt•t rn
•iav as �.R-T- . -
1 It ,a� ca, •rr ,o ea. 1 l_, �_e.�•5
T'� ' �k .f0)_- .• --
• y1 ral,t91
.. .. •M� su x aip;s• 1
7100tG T/V O - � la rr K •,e 1a e K GL ee• t rtil 't. w
�-,�— k ,7.,. Y //_t- - •r'�INw., .rL••\ Lt aL iF n ob .la nt taa:l•o[ .. t
t rvy , • 1 1, r,s %F G N�•• •L K t►t �^ :L r•s'►li Ta• - nl
•a • a• '\ It +•• at G'.
it i � _ _ "�. ..0 to .° o: L• .IM 1••,11e - 91L �� i'�
_ 1`\ - 1 .i - 1�J %•t`s �r � `` '• N •% a• oa ;•rt,o►1 LGl/%,� u,me e:1 Cn
- e aN. F ,s c t•t 1 iel•`SL w
ttt• t t aeS •i 'al ►il •ss at KI al•'1— OLI
7g-
'It pt J? <a e< a tev ccl
�2t.•e.. •••a c e.. % •s `t\ + t) c < r °' .n , ••a you ,eJ su
eaq nwea � �1'w • ••✓ ►\ RJ• � 6 4 a1+ J ft: � t1
ox ,t. .at Iel p tw. a1 a• •st lK ed >a•
11 _ �.-. - I /� •�- .• •ct r C`hl ? to, as ,� K• n Iss yl w sL sit
\Y°� ,1' /� 1't •,t t' 'e f YL w .•a ert • ►L, '
11 1 ��` ' k �(.• •wr Itt Ra in art ••'t,;
_ 1 � .1I i a,t •.
11 sl:• •• 1� tM�� t• i4 t' wit Llr •aZ att [•t =Le+� \41�,ealiLa w
04
Z.1 _ ?C .. -� 1 - I t •�a,�'i ax :r' ar r'• _ • t • e a w
'a
Ia
k. V
.•rc
s
o e.c
I I-
'.�t. :_ ,, •. .' 2 •: 'i la.• •1 • ��
• e.w• MLOwlaWIM A ,\ i ) t„ t • �14 eet 4•a •.t Va
I �
a'••1 1 -f !I '. •� LOf fir^' 4t
.. - A e . 1ar M • •tr •a[ Mt .a W
•a. 1 r a1 r 4� ,"' `t• car as aec .•a au ear •a)
,,J• .a + 1 ti 'a _w.y! {' 4 ast ac f arr »r ..yr •a•
Aa <Kt wa 1M
1
-- pwZZ — • __•_ ia�tiL:
A Chapter in the liminar, Use Stud
p Y Y
prepared by Howar Decker, Decker .and Kemp Architie s
PART ONE - CRITICAL FEATURES
'I'hc Mayslake Ilistoric Site contains a wide range of resources of critical value to the citizens
of Oak Brook, the surrounding region, and in some aspects, the nation. 'llre presence of these
features underscores in a powerful way the need to preserve and conserve the site. Prior to
undertaking planning related to preservation, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of
what elements of the highest importance should be taken into consideration.
Defining "Critical Features" is a standard part of the process of evaluating Landmark properties.
The methodology for this process involves research, verification by empowered agencies and
groups, and documentation through site visits and analysis. The Critical Features list below
includes references to opinions offered by the Illinois Ilistoric Preservation Agency, the Open
lands Project and the landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois. Other supporting testimony
has previously been offered by the Oak Brook historical Society and the Salt Creek Greenway
Association. Consensus has been achieved: the Mayslake Ilistoric Site has substantial significance
and should be preserved to the absolute greatest extent possible.
The Critical Features list below identifies areas of concern throughout the site. As the project
moves forward, each area of importance will need to be surveyed in greater depth in order
to more thoroughly detail elements needing attention and conservation: this preliminary listing
is intended to identify major areas of concern.
Critical Area One: Architecture
Construction of the Francis Peabody estate began in 1919, on what was then just over 800
acres of land. Peabody was a successful businessman: he owned and operated the well known
Peabody Coal Company.
The house which Peabody commissioned, now known as the 39 room Peabody Mansion, was
designed in the 'Tudor Gothic style, a style of estate architecture not uncommon in our region
in the first decades of the twentieth century. 'llte large and rambling two-and-a-half story
masonry building is characterized by a very high level of detailing and artisanship, both inside
and out. 'llie exterior of the building features extensive use of cut and carved limestone,
sophisticated masonry bonding patterns, and unusual and highly resolved half timbering and
stucco detailing in the second story and gables. The level of architectural resolution of the
exterior of the house makes it a rare and fine example of this mode of construction, and the
current integrity of the mansion underscores its value.
The interior of the house is likewise very highly detailed. Plaster work in ceilings, sophisticated
use of flooring materials, and extensive interior woodwork make many aspects of the rooms
critical targets for restoration. Remarkably, the integrity of the interior of the building is quite
good: this is somewhat unexpected in light of its uses over the last 70 years. 71ie building was
purchased by the Franciscan Order in 1924 following the death of Mr. Peabody: at that time
the house was converted to a retreat center, and over the following years additions were made
to the structure in order for the overall complex of buildings to meet the needs of the Order.
t,Slo
I
Part One - Critical Features, continued
The issue of overall integrity is important in considering the building's potential landmark
status. in offering a supporting opinion of the value of preserving this unique resource, Ann
Swallow, Survey and National Register Coordinator for the Illinois I Iistoric Preservation Agency,
has said:
After reviewing the information (sent to IiIPA by Decker and Kemp), and touring the
site...it is my opinion that the Peabody Mansion may have potential for listing in the
National Register of historic Places. My opinion of the building's potential for listing is
based on two factors: the historic importance of the residence and its physical
integrity...there is no question that the house is a very good example of the "Tudor
Revival stele of architecture, and therefore could be nominated for Criterion C, as it
does "embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,I period, or method of
construction".
This opinion is supported and endorsed by the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois.
They also advocate the preservation of the structure. Nancy Wagner, Director of Statewide
Programs for the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois, has said:
The Peabody Mansion is an outstanding example of Tudor Revival architecture in our
region. We fully support its preservation and adaptive reuse. 'Phis resource represents
a unique opportunity to preserve a significant and important part of the Village's past.
In addition, we support the preservation of the overall site: the site itself has much to
do with the interpretive potential of the building.
Other buildings on site have varying potential for Iandmark status. The Portiuncula Chapel,
constructed in 1926, was restored in 1974: at that time much of the historic interior was not
retained. if the Chapel were to he more thoroughly restored, it too may qualify for landmark
status.
It is worth noting that adjacent to the Chapel is a small cemetery for two members of the
Peabody Family (Stuyvesant Peabody and his son "Jack"), as well as members of the Franciscan
Order. Obviously, this too should be preserved.
The Friary, constructed by the Franciscans in the 1.950'x, is not currently old enough to be
considered for landmark status.
Critical Area Two - Archeology
The Mayslake historic Site has long been the site of important events in our region: Native
American cultures have been present on and around the site since 8,000 B.C. In the 1974
Archeological Survey commissioned by the Village of Oak Brook and performed by the
foundation for Illinois Archeology, Dr. Stuart Streuver of Northwestern University notes:
"Indian cultures were present in the Oak brook area from at least the Early Archaic
Period (8,000 to 5,000 B.C) through the period of pioneer settlement in the early
180011-1.11
Part One - Critical features, continued
Artifacts of significance have been found on the Mayslake Ilistoric Site, some of which date
from approximately 3,000 B.C. We recommend that a more detailed archeological survey be
undertaken: it is extremely likely that there were significant encampments and other activities
taking place on the site during the iiarly Archaic period, and dating from times earlier than
recovered artifacts to date have indicated.
in addition, it is now known that the site was the location of a large Potawatomi encampment,
from the late 17th century into the first decades of the nineteenth century. The site should
be investigated for further evidence of this activity.
As an additional note of significance, an Indian Boundary Line ordained by the Treaty of 1816
crosses the site, and is acknowledged in the Plat of Survey.
Often the prehistoric and early historic activities of native cultures in our region are not widely
recognized by the region's indwellers. one of the most significant opportunities represented
by the preservation of the Mayslake Historic Site is the extent to which this story of the
development and character of the region can be unearthed, and widely shared. Uses of the
site other than preservation of the grounds would clearly jeopardize the extent to which these
resources can be identified and conserved for all citizens to appreciate and treasure.
Critical Area Three - Geology and Topography
The Mayslake Historic Site is part of a geologic and topographic system knovm as the
Pahistrine System. This system is characterized by soils of a loamy type, wetlands, ponds, and
fens or marshes. Few of these natural land types remain in the region: most have been
redeveloped. in acknowledgement of the low-lying and water retaining character of the site,
Mayslake has been designated a "Zone I3" floodway (as defined the U.S. Army Corps of
1?ngineers). Further, the U.S. Department of National Wetlands Inventory has designated a
portion of the site as a'Wetlands.
The site also includes portions of three small lakes or ponds, one of which is vernal (a natural
and native pond fed by a natural spring). 'These play a critical role in the detention of
stormwater runoff in the area surrounding the site. Without respect to their aesthetic qualities,
which are indeed noteworthy, it is important to establish that the site plays a pivotal role in
the waterway and drainage systems of the entire region.
"These natural features are increasingly disappearing in our region: conservation of these
characteristics should be an important part of the preservation project. The extent to which
these resources can play an active role in the physics of the region, and act as well as in an
important environmental/educational/recreational role, should not be underestimated.
Part One - Critical Features, continued
Critical Area Four - Open Lands
in evaluating the open lands potential of the Mayslake Historic Site, Gerald Adelmann,
E=xecutive Director of the Open Lands Project, has said:
On behalf,of the Open Lands Project, I am writing you to state our support for the
preservation of the St. Francis Retreat House and Mayslake Property in Oak Brook,
Illinois.
We are working with the Salt Creek Greenway Association to get the public to view the
entire length of Salt Creek...as a greenway...in our view, Mayslake and the Retreat
Ilouse fall within the effective area of this important greenway corridor.
Mayslake is a beautiful, serene open space and offers an outstanding opportunity to
complement the natural lands directly along Salt Creek. The Retreat Ilouse, with its
cultural and historic significance, provides a wonderful historic anchor to enhance the
Salt Creek Greenway Corridor.
in summary, we view this property as a rare and important enhancement to a vital open
lands system. As growth continues to fill in the little undeveloped land left in Oak
Brook, the importance of preserving the Mayslake property for the benefit of all citizens
is greater that ever.
Currently the site also includes the following natural or open lands features of importance:
A managed native prairie restoration project.
A designation of"Urban Acres for Wildlife" by the Illinois Department Conservation. This
designation refers to the role that the site plays in providing habitat for resident and
migratory wildlife.
Critical Area Five - Cultural and Social History
Though the Mayslake Ilistoric Site once included over 800 acres and now is less than 90 acres,
the site can still play an active role in telling the story of the growth and development of both
Oak Brook specifically, and the larger region generally. Not only was the site the original home
for one of the region's pioneering businessmen, whose story can be told through the
interpretive resources of site and building, but its life as a part of the Franciscan Order is
likewise of historic importance. 77ie Franciscan Order has been present on the site for over
65 years, and has provided a focus and home for hundreds of thousands of retreatants during
that period. As an aspect of the spiritual life of our region, their presence on the Mayslake
Site should be a part of the historic/interpretive program developed as the site is preserved.
.S3
i
Part One - Critical Features, continued
Conclusions
In summary, there are many aspects of the site and grounds that offer rare and unique
resources worthy of conservation and preservation. As we have stated elsewhere, these
resources need to he studied individually and at much greater depth. Nonetheless we
recommend, based on the wide ranging array of critical resources represented by the Mayslake
Historic Site, that to the extent possible all of these critical features be retained and preserved
as reuse of the site is considered.
OF Oqk •
vPG� � 'eAG
G
V
CFC0UN1 y.\
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1 200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
May 14 , 1992
708 990- 3000
MEMO TO: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E.
SUBJECT: The Sanctuary - Preliminary Plat
I have reviewed the Preliminary Plat received on April 27 , 1992 and its
associated documents and offer the following comments :
1 . Preliminary Plat
A. From the documents submitted, it appears that the preliminary plat
will become a three (3) page document , the first page being the
subdivision layout , the second page being the preliminary
engineering and the third page being the topography.
B. The lot layout and configuration will depend upon the Village ' s
granting, revising or denying the applicant ' s various zoning
requests . Therefore, the final layout of the preliminary plat will
not be known until final board action on those requests .
C. All stormwater detention and wetlands should be placed within
common area lots and not on private lots within easements . Since
this is a 90 acre development , the land plan is large enough to
accommodate these uses without resorting to private lot easements
(small subdivisions within Oak Brook utilize private lot easements
due to land size restraints ; this parcel does not have that
restriction. Also, the current problems being experienced with the
Forest Glen Dry Bottom Detention Basin on private lots within
easements shows the undesirableness of that situation) .
D. Many drafting revisions need to be made to the plat . Staff has
concluded with the developer that these drafting revisions not be
made until the Village Board determines the zoning requirements
regarding the applicant ' s requests . This would allow for one
comprehensive drafting revision and should save the developer
money.
E. The proposal calls for a private street concept with private storm
sewers and private street lights . The proposed layout has the lots
extending to the centerline of the streets . However , on other
large private subdivisions within Oak Brook, the roadways were
placed on common area lots and were not part of the residential
lots (Midwest Club, Hunter Trails , Steeplechase, and Briarwood
Lakes) . Only on past subdivisions where the land areas were much
smaller did the Village allow the lots to extend to the centerline
of the pavements . This 90 acre site is sufficiently large so that
the need for lots extending into the street is not necessary.
Therefore , the Village should seriously consider requiring the
developer to allocate common area land for a private right-of-way,
encompassing not only the pavement , but sufficient parkway for
utilities .
F. There exists a grotto structure between the two ( 2 ) Mayslakes which
has recently become of some concern. While apparently not on the
Sanctuary property, it does control the water level of the upper
lake which is on Sanctuary property. Additionally, the question of
access to the grotto area has come up. Initial discussions with
the developer have included the Sanctuary providing access to the
grotto area for future maintenance or this developer working with
the Trinity Lakes Association to have it removed.
G. The proposed entry signage, or subdivision gateway, needs to be
submitted for review.
2 . Preliminary Engineering
A. A meeting was held last Friday, May 8, 1992 , with the applicant ,
his consulting engineer , his wetland specialist , yourself , the
Village ' s consulting drainage engineer (Donohue) , and myself to
familiarize all parties with the development . Copies of
information are being sent from the developer to Donohue for
Donohue ' s review of the detention system, the drainage system, and
the wetland system. In addition, a site walk-thru is scheduled for
this afternoon by all of the parties . Because of the timing and
information submittals, these technical reviews are not finished at
this time.
The concept here is to have enough of the submitted information so
as to determine its reasonableness regarding quantity and quality
so that gross errors are found prior to the final plat stage. In
other words , we want to inform the developer of major discrepancies
which can be fixed at the preliminary plat stage prior to his
expending funds into the final plat stage.
B. Many drafting revisions need to be made.
C. I am presently working with Public Works Superintendent Meranda in
reviewing the adequacy of the proposed water system.
D. We need to receive some indication from the Hinsdale Sanitary
District regarding the accuracy of the proposed sanitary sewer
system.
,-
E. The Village should consider whether or not wishes the developer to
construct a bicycle trail system along the south side of 31st
Street and/or the southerly/westerly side of St . Paschal Drive.
These locations are currently depicted on the Village ' s bike trail
map as future trails .
The bike trail map also depicts a future trail system around the
two ( 2) Mayslakes . This may not be feasible with the currently
proposed private subdivision concept .
3 . Traffic
A. I have reviewed the traffic impact study as prepared by James J .
Benes & Associates , Inc . The one concern I have regards the
location of the access roadway to this site . Therefore, I have
. sent the report to the Village ' s consulting traffic engineer , Norm
Roden, seeking his review and comments .
B. The Benes Report also states that traffic signals were investigated
at the intersection of 31st Street and St . Paschal Drive/Regent
Drive . It was concluded that a traffic signal would not be
warranted at this location under existing conditions . When this
site is fully developed, volumes may marginally meet warrants and
should be looked into at some future time.
C. The report concludes that the proposed development would add 2 - 4%
to the volumes on 31st Street which normally would not be perceived
by the average driver . In summary, the traffic volume generated by
this development would not negatively impact the area.
It appears that one of the major issues of this preliminary plat layout
concerns the zoning requests of the applicant . Since the layout does not
currently comply with the R3 Zoning classification, it will remain in limbo
pending final action by the Village Board. Following that action, the plat
can then be finalized as to concept layout and engineering.
Respec my submitted,
Dale L . Durfey, Jr . , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etg
-5/9
G�Op Oqk •
FCOUN,
VI LLACE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
May 13 , 1992
708 990- 3000
Mr . Norm Roden
NC Roden & Associates , Inc.
772 Penny Court
Ballwin, Missouri 63011
RE: The Sanctuary Preliminary Plat
Traffic Analysis
Dear Norm:
As per our recent telephone conversation, enclosed please find one ( 1 )
small Official Map of the Village of Oak Brook and one ( 1 ) Traffic Impact
Study for the Sanctuary as prepared by James J. Benes & Associates , Inc.
I would appreciate your review of these materials .
My primary concern regards the location of the entrance roadway serving the
Sanctuary Development . I am not sure if the proposed location is the
optimum location or if another location along 31st Street or St . Paschal
Drive would be better . I would appreciate your review of this specific
subject .
After you have reviewed this material , please call me and let me know if
you have enough information from which to hypothesis your conclusions . Oak
Brook is trying to keep our costs down due to current budgetary constraints
and I am hopeful that you can make your conclusions and recommendations
without the expense of a site visit to Chicago. However , if you feel that
a site visit is necessary, please call me to receive authorization prior to
that expense.
Thank you for your help in this matter and I look forward to hearing from
you.
Sin51ZZ
Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etg
Enc.
cc: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement /
Tom Shannon, Shannon & Associates , Inc.
f �
PGb OF OAK 9 •
9
CO3
�COUN,0,
VILLAGE O F OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990- 3000
May 12 , 1992
MEMO TO: Village Preside hand Board of Trustees
FROM: Thomas R. Haw
SUBJECT: State Requirements Re: Historical and Archaeological
Resources
General Information
I have been in touch with members of the Illinois Historic Pres-
ervation Agency (IHPA) . This agency has the responsibility for
protection of historic, architectural , and archaeological re-
sources within the State of Illinois.
The "State Agency Historic Resources Preservation Act" , the
"Archaeological and Palaeontological Resources Protection Act" ,
and the "Human Grave Protection Act" are the principal pieces of
legislation which direct the agencies activities.
Most of the provisions of these Acts apply to State owned or
public lands . For private undertakings , the State requires
surveys and reports by the IHPA at the time permits are applied
for with the IEPA and DWR for sewer and water main construction
(this usually takes place during the final engineering approval
of the public improvements for a subdivision) .
All actions suggested by the IHPA survey ' s are subject to the
voluntary cooperation of the property owner unless State funding
is involved. Properties which are nominated for the National
Register will only be classified as "eligible" if the property
owner objects to listing on the National Register of Historic
Places . The Illinois State Register of Historic Places is not
active at this time due to litigation.
p&bthar.doc
47b
I
Mayslake [ Shannon's "Sanctuary"
Per IHPA personnel , these properties have never been nominated
for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, however,
IHPA staff member Ann Swallow feels they may qualify as a histor-
ic / architectural resource.
IHPA Chief Archaeologist Tom Emerson related to me that their are
two archaeological sites identified on the property in a survey
performed during the 701s. He doubts that there are any notable
or important archaeological sites on the property, however a more
detailed survey will give better information.
Tom Shannon has told me that all known graves bave been removed
from the site. If unregistered grave sites are to be found at
any time, all activity must cease until the IHPA can investigate
and take the necessary steps called for by the "Human Graves
Protection Act" .
Dave Gooder is representing Shannon and Associates on this mat-
ter. He has indicated that they will act immediately on the IHPA
requirements.
Please call if you have any questions.
p&bthar.doc
- - - \ • G��F�4Ke
�� w Qp0
G � O
4 _... - .•., `sue
F •
COUNTI,
VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
May 12 , 1992 708 990. 3000
Mr . Tom Shannon
Shannon & Associates , Inc.
210 Quail Ridge Drive
Westmont , Illinois 60559
RE: The Sanctuary Preliminary Plat
Illinois Historic Preservation
Agency
Dear Tom:
On April 7 , 1992 , I wrote a letter to the Illinois Historic Preservation
Agency and asked if private developments within the Village require review
and comment from it . The attached letter dated May 6 , 1992 from William L .
Wheeler , State Historic Preservation Officer , states that construction
actions which require State of Federal permitting or funding do require his
agency to comment prior to issuance of such permits or funds . Mr . Wheeler
goes on to state that he recommends that IHPA form be filled out and
submitted to his agency at the earliest opportunity if any private or
public institution plans to receive State or Federal funding and/or
permits .
It is my understanding that the Sanctuary project will , at a minimum,
require a US Army Corp of Engineers Permit since wetlands are present on
the site. It therefore appears that you should apply to the Illinois
Historic Preservation agency for their review and comment .
For your information, I am attaching the following:
1 . William L. Wheeler ' s letter to me of May 6 , 1992 .
2 . Archeological and Paleontological Resources Protection Act .
3. Human Grave Protection Act .
4 . New Illinois Historic Preservation Laws .
5 . Illinois State Historic Preservation Office - Guidelines for
Archeological Reconnaissance Surveys/Reports .
6 . Protecting Illinois ' Cultural Resources .
7. Archeological Survey Short Report .
8 . Illinois Historic Preservation Agency Project Review.
�7
Please forward to me the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency ' s comments
and conclusions so that they can be made part of the file .
Since -eIy,
A
Dale L . Durfey, Jr . , P .E. ,
Village Engineer
I
DLD/etg
cc : Tom Hawk , Director of Code Enforcement
Eric Loucks , Donohue & Associates
Enc .
II
Illinois Historic
._--. Preservation Agency
Old State Capitol Springfield, Illinois 62701 (217) 782-3836
Suite 4-900 State of Illinois Center 100 W. Randolph Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 814-1409
217/785-4997 nn M
ILLINOIS PRESERVATION ACTS
ILLI '
MAY I 1 1992
May 6, 1992 VILLAGE OF e.
ENGINEERI"G
Mr. Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E.
Village Engineer
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521-2255
Dear Mr. Durfey:
Thank you for writing to inquire about procedures associated with resource
protection legislation. I hope that the following clarifies the issues that
you are concerned about.
All activities that receive federal or state funding (in whole or in part) , or
that require the issuing of permits by federal or state agencies , must, by
law, take into account what impact those activities will have on cultural
resources. Our Agency provides the evaluation of that impact. There are a
variety of procedures to achieve this end. The following addresses the
specific instances that you are concerned about:
Projects accomplished by the Village.
If you require federal or state permits and/or funding for the four
activities that you have cited, our Agency must review those projects
for their potential impact to historic resources . Historic resources
include architectural , historical , and archaeological
manifestations . If you do not require such permits or funding, then
you, and the permitting agencies do not need comments from our Agency.
As a municipality, you should also be aware of the stipulations in
the Archeological and Paleontological Resources Protection Act
(APRPA, copy enclosed) . Pursuant to this Act, archaeological and
fossil resources on your land are protected, and cannot be knowingly
disturbed. A request from our office concerning the location of
archaeological sites on any given non—permitted, project is advisable.
Page 2
Dale Durfey, Village of Oak Brook
Illinois Preservation Acts
May 6, 1992
Private developers within the Village.
The action of subdividing land does not ordinarily constitute an
undertaking pursuant to the Historic Resources Preservation Act
(HRPA, copy enclosed) . The action does not require IHPA coordination
and review.
Construction of single family homes on single lots, commercial
buildings -on single lots , or roads and activities for each of the
above, do not, in and of themselves, do not require IHPA
involvement. When any of these actions require state or federal
permitting and/or funding, then our Agency is required to comment
prior to issuance of such permits and funds. Permits and/or funding
for these activities are almost always required from the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, and are often required from the
Illinois Department of Transportation ' s Division of Water Resources ,
the U. S. Housing and Urban Development, the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and the Illinois Department of Conservation.
In summary, it is the state and federal involvement, through funding and
permitting, that requires that our Agency comment on the impact that such
activities may have on historic resources in Illinois . In addition, resources
on public lands such as yours are protected by APRPA. With this in mind, we
recommend that the IHPA form be filled out and submitted to our Agency at the
earliest opportunity if any private or public institution plans to receive
state or federal funding and/or permits. Please feel free to contact us if
you need additional information.
Sincerely,
William L. Wheeler
State Historic
Preservation Officer
217/785-9045
WLW:TRW/1049A:37-38
Enclosures: Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Protection Act; and
Historic Resources Preservation Act
(A-FO FO) pter 127 , T 133c.01 .
AF.C.iAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL
RESOURCES PROTECTION
AN ACT to protect and preserve• and to regulate the
taking of aboriginal records and antiquities within the 133c3. Violations
State of Illinois, and to provide penalties for the viola. § 3. (a) It is unlawful for any person, either by himself
tion of this Act Law's 1961, p. 3776, approved and eff. or through an agent, to explore, excavate or collect any of
Aug. 21, 1961. the archaeological or paleontological resources protected
by this act, unless such person obtains a permit issued by
133e.01. Short title
the historic Preservation Agency.
§ .01. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the (b) It is unlawful for any person, either by himself or
"Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Protection through an agent, to knowingly disturb any archaeological
Act".
or paleontological resource protected under this Act_
Added by P.A. 86--159, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 86-707, (c) It is unlawful for any person, either by himself or
§ 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. through an agent, to offer any object for sale or exchange
with the knowledge that it has been previously collected or
P.A. 86-459 and P.A. 86-707 added identical versions of the pan• excavated in violation of this ACL
graph' Amended by P.A. S6-159, § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A.
133c.02. Definitions 86-707, § 6, eff.Jan. 1, 1990.
§ 133e.02. For purposes of this Act: The amendmcnts by P.A. 86-459 and P.A. 86-707 were identical.
(a) "archaeological resource"means any significant ma-
terial remains or localities of past human life or activities 133c3.1. Prosecutions
on public land,including but not limited to artifacts,histor• § 3.1. The State's Attorney of the county in which a
is and prehistoric human skeletal remains, mounds, earth- violation of Section 3 1 is alleged to have occurred, or the
works, shipwrecks• fors, village sites or mines. Attorney General,may be requested by the Director of the
Historic Preservation a ency to initiate criminal rosecu-
"Disturb" includes defacing, mutilatin injuring, ex. B P
lions 'v'
sin removing, t: •' or to se_k civil damages, injunctive relief and an
des destroying,, desec:atin or molesting in S }
Po 6 } g g g
any way. other appropriate rig
a relief. The Historic Preservation A
en-
(c) "Paleontological resource" means an y significant
cy shall co-operate with the State's Attorney or the Attor•fossil or material remains on public lanes including traces ney General. Persons aware of any violation of this Act shall contact the Historic Preservation Agency.
or impressions of animals or plants that occur as part of
the geological record that are known and are included in Added by P.A. 8659, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 56-707,
the files maintained by the Illinois Sate Museum under § 6, eff.Jan. 1, 1990.
Section 10.1 1 Paragraph 133c3 of-this chapter.
(d) "Person" means any natural individual, firm, trust, P.A. 66,459 and P.A. 86-707 added identical versions of the p■ra•
estate, partnership, association,joint stock company,joint graph•
venture, corporation or a receiver, trustee, guardian or
other representative appointed by order of any court, the 133c3.2. Reward
federal and State governments, including Sate universi• § 3.2. The Historic Preservation Agency is authorized
ties created by statute or any city, town, count} or other to offer.a reward of up to S2,000 for information leading
political subdivision of this State. to the arrest and conviction of persons who violate Section
(e) "Public land" means any land owned, but does not 3.1
include land leased as lessee, by the State of Illinois or is Added by P.A. 8659, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 86-707,
agencies, a State university created by statute, a munici- § b, eff.Jan. 1, 1990.
pality or a unit of local government. 1 Paagaph 133c3 of this chapter.
Added by P.A. 86-459, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 66-707, P.A. 86-459 a.•td P.A. 86-707 added identical versions of the para.
§ 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. graph.
•1 Paragraph 133c.10 of this chapter.
P.A. 86-459 and P.A. 86-707 added identical versions of the para- 133e4. § 4. Repealed by P.A. 86 459, § 2, eff. Jan. 1,
graph. 1990; P.A. 86-707, § i, eff. Jan. 1, 1990.
133c1. Reservation of right to State 133c5. Penalties-Damages
§ 1. The Sate of Illinois reserves to itself the exclu- § 5• any violation of Section 3 1 not involving the dis-
sive right and privilege of regulating, exploring, excavat- turbance of human skeletal remains is a Class A misde-
ing or surve}ing, through the Historic Preservation Agen- meanor and the violator shall be subject to imprisonment
cy, all archaeological and paleontological resources found and a fine not in excess of $5,000; any subsequent viola-
upon or within any public lands. tion is a Class 4 felony. Any violation of Section 3
Amended by P.A. 8659, § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. involving disturbance of human skeletal remains is a Class
86-707, § 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. 4 felony. Each disturbance of an archaeological site or a
paleontological site shall constitute a single offense. Per-
The amendments by P.A. 86-459 and P.A. 86-707 were identical. sons convicted of a violation of Section 3 shall also be
liable for civil damages to be assessed by the land marag-
133c2. Reservations in deeds from State ing agency and the Historic Preservation Agency. Civil
§ 2. Any deed hereafter given by the owner of public damages may include:
land may contain a clause reserving to the State a proper- (a) forfeiture of any and all equipment used in acquiring
ty right in any archaeological and paleontological re- the protected material;
sources or portion thereof and also reserving the right to (b) any and all cosy incurred in cleaning, restoring,
explore and excavate for the same. analyzing, accessioning and curating the recovered materi•
Amended by P.A. 86-459. § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. als;
86-707, § 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. (c) an}• and all toss associated with restoring the land
The amendments by P.A. 86-459 and P.A. 86-707 were identical. to its orb.nal contour;
(Continued) �;�
(d) any and all costs associated with recovery of dmm (b) Any agency or department of the State of Illinois
and analyzing, publishing, accessioning and curating rnutc- which has on its staff a professional archaeologist or
rials when tie prohibited activity is to extensive as to paleontologist v ho meets the minimum qualifications es-
preclude the restoration. e.` ^: a:ch:teologicai or paleonto- ttblished in Section 9: and which has in effect a memoran-
logical site; dum of agreement with the Historc P:esen•ation Agency
(e) any and all costs associated with the determination for the protection, preservation and management of ar-
chaeological and paleontological resources shall be exempt
and collection of the civil damages. from the permit requirements established by this Act.
When civil damages arc recovered through the Attorney (Agency c) Actirieies revieµed by the historic Preservation General, the proceeds shall be deposited into the Historic pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Sites Fund; when civil damages are recovered through the preser'ation Act (-6 U.S.C. 470 shall be exempt from
State's Attorney, the proceeds shall be deposited into the these permitting requirements.
county fund designated by the county board.
Amended by P.A. S6-159. § 2, eft. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. (d) Where a local government's activities are funded in
S6-707, § 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. whole or in part by a Mate agency ry and the funded activi-
ties are supervised o: controlled by the State agency, the
local government shall be exempt from the permit require-
The amendments by P.A. 66=59 and P.A. S6-707 wcra identical. ments established by this Act to the same extent that the
State agency is exempt. The State agency shall be re-
133c6. Regulations—Permits sponsible for undertaking or, causing to be undertaken any
§ 6. (a) The Historic Preservation Agency, in consulta- steps necessary to comply with this Act for those local
tion with the various State agencies owning or managing government actions so exempted.
land for the use of the State of Illinois, shall develop added by P.A. S6-459, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 56-707,
regulations whereby permits may be issued for explora- § 6, eff.Jan. 1, 1990.
tion or excavation of archaeological and paleontological t Paragraph 1336 of this chapter..
resources. These permits shall be issued by the Historic
Preservation Agency after consultation with the head of :Paragraph 1'3c9 of this chapter.
the land managing agency. P.A. 66-=59 and P.A. f6-707 added identical versions of the para-
(b) Permits to any person or entity other than the State graph.
of Illinois shall be issued in accordance with regulations
which shall be promulgated by the Historic Preservation 133c9. Standards of education and experience
Agency. § 9. The Historic Preservation Agency shall, through
(c) Each peratit shall specify all terms and conditions rulemaking, es abii;h minimum standards of education
under which the investigation shall be carried out, includ- and experience for an archaeologist or paleontologist to
ing,but not limited to,location and nature of the investiga- qualify as a professional for the :•trpose of conducting
tion and plans for analysis and publication of the results. activities for which a permit is required.
Upon completion of tae project, the permit holder shall
report it's results to the Historic Preservation Agency for 4 5 ee by A E P.A. § 2, e...Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 56-707,
approval.
Amended by P.A. 56-469, § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. P.A. 66=59 and ?:A. 56-%07 added identical vcrs.ons of the para-
S6-707, § 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1000. graph.
The amendments by P.A. 56=59 and P.A. 66-707 were identical. 133e10. Files
133c7. Record management § 10. The III;ncis State Muses_rn, in cooperation with
§ 7. All materials and associated records remain the the Historic Preservation Agency•shall develop and main-
property of the State and are managed by the Illinois rain ;hies containing tn: -ma-,ion or known archaeological
State Museum. The Illinois State Museum, in consultation and oaleontologica; sites in the SWts, µ'heeler on State
with the Historic Preservation Agency, is authorized to con roiled or priva e:y owned pro. y. The ristoric P:es-
establish long-term cu:ation agreements with universities,
erasion agency s.`.all east re the safety of those sites by
museums and other organizations. promuigating regulations limiting access to those files as
?, eff. Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. S6407, necessan•.
Added by P.A. 56-:0. § o A. ^- a Fr, • > >_oo p.:
§ 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990. Added by . a co•�-t�_ § , e., pan. ., _..0; � 56-707,
P.A. 86_459 and P.A. 66-'07 added identical versions of the pars-
§ 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1950.
graph. P.A. 96"59 and P.A. 86-707 added identical versions of the para-
graph
133cS. Exemptions
§ S. (a) The Illinois State Museum shall be exempt 133c11. Regulations
from the permit requirements established by this Act for § 11. The Historic Preser•a-ion Agency, in consulta-
lards under its direct management but shall register that Lion with other State agencies and Departments that own
exploration with the Historic Preservation Agency; such or tong of land, shall promulgae such regulations as may
registration shall include the information required under be necessary to carry out the purses of this Act
subsection (c) of Section 6.1 Added by P.A. 56-459, § 2, eff.Jan. 1, 1990; P.A. 56-707,
§ 6, eff. Jan. 1, 1990.
P.A. 86-59 and P.A. 16-707 addad leentical versions of the Para.
graph.
Source: Illinois Revised Statutes, 1989
Chapter 127 , 1i 2661
E
.UMAN GRAVE PROTECTION
AN ACT in relation to the Historic Preservation Agency, will:love their operations to Illinois to avoid the increased
amending acts named herein. P.A. 56-151, approved penalties being imposed in neighboring states. There is an
and eff. Aug. 11, 1959. immediate need for legislation to protect the graves of
these earlier Illinoians from such desecration. The Cer.er-
2661. Definitions al Assembly intends to assure with this Act that all human
§ 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this Act: burials be accorded equal treatment and respect for hu-
(a) "Human skeletal remains" include the bones and man dignity without reference to ethnic origins, cultural
decomposed fleshy pars of a deceased human body. backgrounds or religious affiliations.
(b) "(unregistered graves" are any graves or locations The General Assembly also finds that those persons
where a human body has been buried or deposited; is over enga_ed in the scientific study or collecting of artifacts
100 years old: and is not in a cemetery registered with the which have not been acquired in violation of law are
State Com.troller under the Cemetery Care ACLt engaged in legtimate and worhy scientific, educational
and recreational activities. This Act is not intended to
(c) "Grave artifacts" are any item of human manufac interfere with the continued legitimate collecting activities
ture or use that is associated with the human skeletal or studies of such persons; nor is it intended to interfere
remains in an unregistered grave. with the normal enjoyment of private property owners.
(d) "Grave markers" are any tomb, monument, stone, farmers, or -:rose engaged in the development, mining or
ornament, mound, or other item of human manufacture improvement of real property.
that is associated with an unregistered grave.
(e) "Person" means any natural individual,.firm, Lust, 2663. Discovery of unregistered graves
estate, parmership, association,joint stock company, joint
venture, corporation or a receiver, trustee, guardian or § 3. :.n} pe son who discovers human skeletal remains
other representatives appointed b} order of any court, the subject to this Act shall promptly notify the coroner. :.r.v
Federal and State governments, including State Universi- Peron who knowingly fails to report such a discover}
ties created by statute or any city, town, county or other within 48 hours is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor, unless
political subdivision of this State.
such person has reasonable cause to believe that the
coroner had already been so notified. If the human skele-
(f) "Disturb" includes excavating, removing, exposing, tzl remains ap=ezr t.o be from an unregistered grove, `ne
de.acing, mutilating,destroying, molesting, or desecrating coroner shall promptly no-if} the Historic ?reservation
in any way human skeletal remains, unregistered graves, agency prior to -heir removal. Nothing in this Act shall
and grave markets. be ecnstrued to apply to human skeletal remains subjec -to
t Chapter 21.:6:.1 et seq. n Act to revise the law in relation to co:oners".t
t Chapter 31, :: et seq.
2662. Legislative finding and intentions
§ 2. LA-gislative finding and intentions. The General :66;. Permit—Disturbing human skeletal remains and
Assembly finds that existing laws do not provide equal or artifacts
adequate protection for all 'human graves. There is'a
and growing threat to the safety and sanctity of un:egis- § 4. It is unia•.-Iul for any person, either by himself or
tered and unmarked g-mves. Numerous incidents in Illi- through an agent, to knowingly disturb human skeletal
nois have resulted in the desecration of human remains remains and g.mve artifacts in unregistered graves pro-
and vandalism to grave markers. Similar incidents have tected by this :.ct unless such person obtains a permit
occurred in neighboring states and as a result those states issued by the Historic Preservation Agency.
have increased their criminal penalties for such conduct.
There is a st ong likelihood that persons engaged for 2663. Permit—Disturbing grave markers
personal or financial gain in the mining of prehistoric and § 5, It is uriav•ful for any person, either by himself or
historic Indian, pioneer. and Civil War veteran's graves through an agent, to knowingly disturb a grave marker
protected by this Act unless such person obtains a permit
issued by the :iistaric Preservation Agency.
(Continued)
127 fl 266S STATE G0VERN.NIENT 1206
2666. Sale or exchange of human skeletal remains, (c) any and all costs associated with restoring the land
grnve artifacts or markers to its original contour or the grave marker to it, original
§ 6. It is unlawful for any person, either by himself or
condition;
through stn agent. to offer any human skeletal remains, (d) any and all cost, associated with recovery of data,
and analyzing, publishing, accessioning and curating mate-
grace artifacts knowledge a the maskers for sale c exchange rims when the prohibited :activity' is so extensive as to
with the knowledge that they have been collected or
excavated in violation of this act preclude the restoration of t),e unregistered burials or
grave markers;
2667. Authori:y to allow disturbance of human skeletal (e) any and all costs associated with the reinterment of
remains. unregistered graves or markers the human skeletal remains;
§ 7. It is u-iauiul for any person, either by himself or (f) any and all costs associated with the determination
Li:rough an agent, to knowingly allow the disturbance of and collection of the civil damages.
human skeletal remains, unregistered graves, or grave When civil damages are recovered through the Attornev
markers on par.-r:y controlled by that person unless such General, the proceeds shall be d,::,osited into the :historic
disturbance is a.tnorized by a permit issued by the Histor- Sites Fund; when civil damages rc recovered through the
is Preservation Agency. State's Attorney. tiie proceeds shall be deposited into the
count• funds designated by the county board.
2668. Criminal prosecutions—Civil damages
Paragraph 2664 or 2665 of this chapter.
§ 8. The State's Attorney of the county in which a 2673. Regulations—Permits
violation of Sections 4, 5, 6 or 7 of this act t is alleged to § 13. (a) The historic Preservation .agency shall devel•
have occurred. or the Attorney General, may be requested op regulations, in consultation with the Illinois State\fuse-
bv the Director of the Historic Preservation Agency to U. whereby permits may be issued for the removal of
initiate criminal prosecutions or to seek civil damages, human skeletal remains and grave artifacts fro . u regis-
injunctive relief and any other appropriate relief. The tered graves or the removal of grave rankers.
Historic Preservation :.gent} shall co-operate with the (p) Each p a nit shill specify ail terms and conditions
State's Attorney or the .=.tzorney General. Persons aware
under which the removal of human skeletal remains, grave
of anv violations of this Act shall contact the historic artifacts, or grave markers shall be carried out all costs
Preservation Agency accrued in the removal of the aforementioned materials
I Paragraphs 2:64 to 2667 of this chapter• shall be borne by the permit applicant, Umn completion
0. the project the Del. it holder s^all submit a ,eDort of
2669. Reward the results to tie Historic Preservation A.gerlcy.
§ 9. The Historic Preser-,ation Agency is zu:io:i_ed to
offer a reward o` up to 52000 for information leading to 2674. Remains and er ifects held in trtst
the arrest and conviction of Dersons who viola:e –Z?:70ns § .4. All hu-an skeletal remains and gave aRlfacts
4, 5, 6 and 7 of t:s Act.t in unregistered graves are held in ::t t for the peopie of
I ?ara;r•^.s 2664 to 2667 of„is chanter. Illinois by the Stare and are tinder the ju-4sdiction of the
Historic Preser.-a--ion Agency. All .materials collected un-
2670. Sentence and punishment de: this Act shall be n zi-wined, w•i:= dignity and respect,
§ 10. for the people of tire State under the care of the Illinois
A. violation'of Section 6 0:7 of this Act t is a
Class A misdemeanor and •ie violator shall be subject to . ate Museum.
imprisonment for not more than 1 year and a fine not in
excess of 510,00•?; any subsequent violation is a Class 4 2675. P.egvtauona
felony. -ac:^. disturbance of an unregistered grave consti § 1J Ther.isaric P:esenz::on Age.^.c} shall pro^ul-
gate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out
totes a separate offense. the purposes of this Act.
I Paragraph 2654, 2666 or 2667 of this chapter.
2676. Exemptions—Federal review of activities
2671. Sentence and punishment § 16. Activities reviewed by tie istoric Presen•ation.
§ il. Any violation of Section 5 of ^is Act t is z Class ;.gencv pursuant to Section 106 of the National •r'iswric
B misdemeanor and the violaw:shall be subject w :-D:is Preservation Ac: (16 U.S.C. 470r) and activities permitted
onment for not more than 6 months and a fine not in pursuant to the Federal Surface Mining Control and i?ecla-
excess of 5500: any subsecuent violation is a Class A station Act of 197 7 (P.L. 9i ),] or the rules and regula•
misdemeanor. Each disturbance of a grave marker consti• tions promulgated thereunder or any law, rule or regula-
Lutes a separate offense. tion adopted by the -ta:.e of Illinois thereunder shall be
I Par-agmph 2r.5 of this cha pter. exempt from these permitting requirements.
t 30 U.S.C.A. § :201 e:seq.
2672. Assessment of civil damages
§ 12. Persons convicted of a violation of Section 4 or 5
of this Act shall also be liable for civil damages to be
assessed by :.ate Historic Presenva-ion Agency. Civil darn- SOURCE: Illinois Revised Stdtu zeS, 1989
ages may include:
(a) forfeiture of any and all equipment used in disturb-
ing the protected unregistered graves or grave markers; `
(b) any and all toss incurred in cleaning, restoring,
analyzing,accessioning and curating the recovered materi-
als;
NEW ILLINOIS HISIORTCPR.-�CRVAIION LAWS is
The Illinci*s General Assembly has passed, and Governor Thompson has signed,
three new laws which will have major impacts on historic preservation and
archaeological resources . What follows is a brief description of each of
these new laws .
Human Grave Protection
Public Act 86-151 makes it unlawful for anyone without a permit to knowingly
disturb human skeletal remains or a grave marker, defined to include burial
mounds . The act applies to any burial on public or private property, but only
if the burial is over 100 years old and is not in a registered cemetery.
Penalties can be quite severe as certain violations are Class 4 felonies with
potential fines of $10,000 and imprisonment of as much as three years . The
act authorizes the Historic Preservation Agency to offer rewards of uo to
$2,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of violators .
The law was prompted by the "mining" of archaeological burials . This practice
was a growing problem in Illinois and surrounding states , most notably on the
Slack farm in Kentucky, as outlined in a recent issue of National Geographic
Magazine. As surrounding states have passed and are passing new laws to deal
with this problem it was even more critical that Illinois take action.
The act states that it is intended " . . .that all human burials be accorded
equal treatment and respect for human dignity without reference to ethnic
origins , cultural backgrounds or religious affiliation. " The law will protect
Indian burials and any other burials such as early settler craves . The act
also provides that it is not intended to interfere with legitimate collection
activities or with normal enjoyment of private property owners , farmers ,
developers or miners .
The bills underlying premises are: ( 1 ) the use of private property should not
be unreasonably bridled and (2) unnecessary disturbance of human burials is
generally revulsive to members of our society and should not be permitte.d.
The law beca,ime effective when it was signed by te- Governer on August 11 ,
1989.
The ;;1StCr1C Preservation Agency is presently drafting imple..msnting
regulations for this new law. Landowners will be encouraged to avoid
buriais . Hhen this is not feasible permits will be issued to remove , document
and relocate the affected burials .
Illinois State Acencv Historic Resources Preservation Act
Often referred to as 'C'e "State 106" law, this act is modeled after Section
106 Of t..c National Historic PreservatlCn ACt Of 1966 . The new law aeolies to
all state acenci =s and requires that they take into account the effect their
activities imay have on historic resources . An agency planning a construction
project, for exa-ple , is required t0 nortify the Historic Preservation Agency
and then take into account any comments .:,ode by the .cency within the
prescribed 30—day coimment period .
The act _1S0 provides an numb-_r of ne^_O:ia:iCn end ap-._1
not a^ply to proj=c:s already cove-red by -_d2ra1 law.
;his law will assure --at stale agencies give consideration to historic
feSGUrCeS and ShGUId minlmiZe the 1mNact Mat state pro]eCtS Of aCtlVlti �S
might have on such resources . It should also result in the state setting a
good examples for others in managing and protecting historic resources .
This law is found in sections 1 through 5 of Public Act 86--707 and becomes
effective January 1 , 1990.
ArchaaolGgical and Paleontological Fesourc_s Pro`ecyi0n Act
This new law applies only to public lands . It contains strengthened criminal
sanctions for anyone who disturbs burial mounds , human remains , shipwrecks or
other archaeological resources on public lands , with potential penalties as
severe as three years imprisonment and $10,000 in fines . It also affords
protection for fossil remains .
In addition to strengthened criminal provisions , the new law establishes an
administrative system for affected agencies to follow. Under this new syst=m
any excavations cn public property must be authorized by a permit from the
Historic Preservation Aeency conducted by an acency having the appropriate
professional staff. Excavations must be documented in written reports . The
Illinc : s State Museum is made the official curator for any objects removed
from public property.
This new law is found in sections 6 and 7 of Public. Act 86-707 and becomes
effective January 1 , 1959 .
Further Tnfcrmation
Anyone wanting additional information about these new laws should write to
-ill - am Wheeler, Associate Director, Illinois historic Preservation Acency,
Division of Preservation Services , Old State Capitol , S�rincrield , Illinois
62-01 . Telephone inquiries should be directed to Marge Lewis , (217) 7ES-1153.
I
0 •
Revised 10/90
ILLINOIS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
GUIDELINES FOR
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS/REPORTS
Introduction
In recent years public concern over the increasingly rapid loss of our
country' s prehistoric and historic heritage led to the enactment of Federal
legislation designed to assist in protecting such resources . As a result of
these laws all construction projects which receive federal assistance,
permits, or licenses must be reviewed for their potential impact on cultural
resources . The responsibility for performing this review belongs to the State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) . In Illinois the SHPO' s staff is the
Preservation Services Division, Illinois Historic Preservation Agency.
This document has been prepared both to inform and assist those firms and
agencies who must employ archaeological contractors and to serve as minimum
guidelines for such contractors .
Archaeological Contractors
There are a number of private archaeological consulting firms operating in the
State and most state universities ' Departments of Anthropology have contract
archaeologists on staff. The SHPO maintains a list of IAS certified
archaeological contractors that is available upon request. Assistance in
finding a qualified archaeologist for your project can also be obtained
through the not—for—profit organization of professional archaeologists working
within the State: The Illinois Archaeological Survey, (Charles J . Bareis ,
Secretary—Treasurer) , 109 Davenport Hall , 607 South Mathews , University of
Illinois , Urbana, Illinois 61801 ; Telephone 217/333-1708. However, you may
employ any archaeologist who meets the minimum qualifications as set forth in
Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations , Draft Part 66, Appendix C.
"b. "Archaeology. The minimum professional qualifications in
archaeology are (a) a graduate degree in archaeology,
anthropology, or closely related field, or equivalent
training accepted for accreditation purposes by the Society
of Professional Archaeologists , (b) demonstrated ability to
carry research to completion, usually evidenced by timely
completion of theses , research reports , or similar
documents , and (c) at least 16 months of professional
experience and/or specialized training in archaeological
field, laboratory, or library research, administration, or
management, including at least 4 months experience in
archaeological field research and at least one year of
experience and/or specialized training in the kind of
activity the individual proposes to practice. "
All professional archaeologists working in Illinois are also expected to abide
by the Illinois Archaeological Survey' s Professional Standards , 1983.
�3 7
Survey (Phase I)
The initial archaeological reconnaissance survey involves both literature
search and the actual field examination of the project area to determine if
there is any evidence of prehistoric or historic occupations or activities .
This survey need only cover those areas which were specified in the survey
request from the SHPO but 100 percent of these areas must be examined. If
possible, in the case of small areas , the survey sf:ould include any minor
testing which is necessary to evaluate the site for National Register
eligibility. All such work should be carried out in accordance with the
Secretary of the Interior' s Standard and Guidelines (1983) for
identification. Archaeological surveys can be time—consuming and you should
try to build several months of lead time into your planning schedules .
Surveys are best done in the spring or fall when vegetation cover is reduced.
Survey Procedures
The purpose of such surveys is to determine if cultural remains are present.
Since such remains are often buried beneath the present ground surface
archaeologists have developed three main techniques to assist in their
detection. These techniques involve pedestrian survey in association with
plowing and discing, systematic shovel testing, and deep coring or backhoe
trenching for deeply buried sites .
A. Pedestrian survey of plowed and disced areas . Where feasible, the
plowing, discing, and subsequent pedestrian survey of project areas is the
most archaeologically thorough and cost effective technique presently
available. To maximize this m:thod' s usefulness multiple controlled
surface collections are necessary, therefore, this process does require
sufficent lead—time to be implemented. However this technicue can only
be utilized in areas which have been previously plowed. Pedestrian survey
can also be employed in areas with good surface visibility that have not
been recently plowed. Visibility must equal 25 percent or greater of the
ground surface area to use pedestrian survey techniques . The suggested
interval is 5 meters .
B. Svstematic shovel testing. Systematic shovel testing on a maximum 15m
grid interval is less thorough than plowing but often must be resorted to
�
n areas which have not been previously disturbed, or where forested
conditions , topographic features , or structures prohibit plowing. Such
shovel testing involves the excavation of holes about 40 x 40 cm across
down to archaeologically sterile soil (usually the B horizon) . The fill
from each shovel unit should. be screened. Where cultural materials are
encountered the grid interval should close up to 5 meters to more
accurately delineate site boundaries .
C. Deep testing. When dealing with areas that potentially contain deeply
buried cultural remains it will be necessary to utilize techniques that
can investigate deep strata. Usually such techniques include hand cr
mechanical systematic deep coring, or deep trenches or block excavations
dug either by hand or using heavy equip—nent (typically a backhoe) .
Examples of geomorphic features requiring such testing are floodplains ,
alluvial fans , and occasionally some uplands and terraces where
post—Pleistocene loess deposition has occurred.
— 2 — �3C�
D. Other testing procedures . Variations of survey/testing procedures should
be thoroughly explained and justified in the report. If there is a
question concerning the appropriateness of such survey/testing methods the
contracting archaeologist should check with the SHPO.
Survey Report
At the completion of the field survey a report of the archaeological findings
and recommendations must be sent to the SHPO Archaeology Section for
evaluation. This report will be in keeping with the Secretary of the Interior
Standards and Guideline (1983) for archaeological documentation. To assist in
this evaluation and to avoid delays in processing, the report should contain a
discussion of the following minimal topics:
A. Background Information
1 . Full description of project.
2. Previous archaeological research based on examination of published
and unpublished literature, site files , and contact with
archaeologists working in area. Thorough examination of historical
documents to ascertain presence and extent of historical
occupation/land use of project area. This should include, at a
minimum, copies of relevant plat maps , and atlases which document
historic habitation with a discussion of length of occupation and use.
3. Delination of important regional research questions based on cultural
history and past investigations .
4. Thorough discussion and description of present and past environment
and their implications for interpreting the local archaeological
record. This should include such topics as climate, vegetational
patterns, fauna, geology, topography, soils , etc.
B. Survev Information
1 . Complete description of project area including acreage, ground cover,
topography, and any other factors which are important to interpreting
the survey results .
2. Survey techniques thoroughly described and variations justified.
3. Naps are very important to aid in evaluating reports . At a minimum
such maps should indicate position of project area in state/county,
within township, location on topography and a detailed map of actual
project.
C. Site Information (if present)
1 . A full description of the site location, material recovered, and a
preliminary interpretation of its place in the local culture history.
2. A completed site form and map must be submitted to the SHPO for each
site. Although each contractor may use their own site forms the
information included must include at a minimum that requested on the
Illinois Archaeological Survey' s site form. These site forms are not
to be included with the general report (report should include a
statement on the confidentiality of this information) .
— 3 -
3�_
3. Testing procedures used to determine whether the site is significant
should be carefully defined and the eligibility of the site for the
National Register of Historic Places should be addressed.
D. Recommendations
1 . This section must include the archaeologists recommendations for
further testing, possible mitigation of impact, or clearance as the
case may be. Any suggestions concerning site disposition should be
stated in terms of their relationships to relevant regional research
questions and the State Archaeological Preservation Plan.
E. y Short Report (ASSR)
1 . If the project is fairly small and few archaeological resources are
encountered the contractor may choose to use the SHPO ASSR form to
submit their report.
F. Archaeological Contractor' s Vita
1 . All contract archaeologists working in Illinois must either have a
current vita on file with the SHPO or submit one with each report.
G. Project Correspondence
1 . Project Correspondence must be included as an appendix. This should
include such letters as the initial SHPO survey request, project
letters between the contractor and archaeologist, the SHPO review of
the draft, and the final SHPO sign—off letter. Please do not include
budget information.
Report Submission
At the completion of the archaeological reconnaissance survey a report of the
archaeological contractor' s findings and recommendations will be prepared.
This report must be submitted to the State Historic Preservation Officer for
evaluation and approval . The actual submission is the responsibility of the
agencies ' or firms ' project managers .
Address
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency
Division of Preservation Services
Attention: Archaeology Section
Old State Capital
Springfield, Illinois 62701
For further information contact:
Joyce A. Williams Thomas R. Wolforth
Staff Archaeologist OR Staff Archaeologist
217/785-1279 217/782-0,345
— 4 —
0044A
I_
P? 'I�rT ^^ i^ t T�JR4.1- r O R^�
Prepared by
ILLINOIS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
you rend the accompanying letter, you Were notified that your Federal er State
funded , or licensed project will require an archaeological survey. The purpose
c' ;his survey will be to determine if prehisloicantoroulha�el had pl�ttlesorinopeeperiencahin
;;,e project area. If you are the c�erage app S
such surveys - this short introduction is designed to help you fulfill the
-=deral /State requirements and complete the process .
PROTECT HISTORIC RESOURCES? issandahi�toreclherit�geginwthe�w�ketof public
concern for the rapid loss of our prehistoric
i�;reasingly large-scale Federal /State and private development. The legislation is an
attempt to protect our heritage while at the same time allowing economic development to CO
forward.
t;:=�.T IS TH= LEGAL E=.SiS? The basis for all on subsequent
Actuof 1966t(NHPA) - Section 106Qof1NHPA
li2S Within the Natlonal Historic Preservatlon�Ac' 0' t" their effect On
-_cuires all Federal Agencies ' "undertakings ,o 'take into account"
Resources
historic properties. As of January 1 , 1990, the State Agency 1 , p oncy undertaF;ings. A
Preservation Act (Public Act 66-707) requires 'he same for all State Ag_
F2• eral or State "undertaking" is defined to cover a wide range of permitting, funding, and
licensing activities. Zt is the responsibility o.f Federal/State Acenc}es `Historic rho
orGtection of historic resources and this effort is regulated by the Sate
Preservation Office (SHPO) . in Illinois the SHPO is part of the Illinois Historic
•-eservation Agency (IHPA) .
h:',AT IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY? An archaeological surveincludes
b th (1)aanexamination I
of the written records , such as county plat books , published
r_�orts , state site files, and (2) a field investigation of the project area to determine if
prehistoric or historic resources are present. This process of resGUrce identificztion is
called a Phase i survey.
�;_=.T DO=S A PHA$= SURV=Y P,=QUIR_? Archaeological evidence is no. mally buried beneath the
_ arch site is present it is neceSSary to
5 , , 2`Of file G ound. TO date mine f a.. ar _ r `" 2_
_ _ below 111 5 SL'rf ih? roost e- ci en' h'-Y is by plow 1 inc. 1 -_p ---'
he project
a l� Or
b_ l c' e ^once wi I i be broucn is to the Star and sys .:.,_:. _
nod :ten ^ i f Vi u
p :n. °r' e _e ent. Thos wzll;GVe�s are
-=-=s-rizr� Surveys (tizlkovers) will cet2rrine it a si __ is p. s _y
_ _ ^y rr in the gall Or SPr1nC. If the prOJc_ : Er` i5 Covered
_c_t cone when the VeCc�atl0n 15 IO + V -,;,atlC-Crid pattern
:ion than Small Shovel probes (1 ' SG ) are excavated On a S St.
r:-tl v2c2ta F'h eepIy ,,u e Si :_s may b_
sully intervzIS) to sa::�i2 the subsurface deposits. „ere d
r,, od -� a a
_52!1:, SUCK 2 tr, flOCdplair.S , Ce27 coring Or machine trenching may be r2gUirEd.
y 1. meet ;Fie Fede, al standares
=1 - "'='OLOGIC.'.L S'��`�_�S? Pr Of es Si on.al arChaeO l G�i j :5 �' a _ Li.e
D��S „R.� - _ed,_ -veys while tnos meting :
Set forth in �6 CFR Part Gam, App2nd1X C may Condom. : "a SU. ' ion Act
S-a-e standards Sgt forth in the Archae010gi a1 and rzi2ontGlociczl 'ReS0UrC25 PrOteCt
1S-_c) _y
conduct State SU veys (See the Other side Of this Sheet`f r
(C .. 127 , par. may r �s
i-,^or..ation on o5=.zi;,ing the S_rvicgs of z contract zrchz2.iocist) Tn2 applicant
Sponsibi2 for obtzining and paying for such services . Y
l e ed -he F. ch�eo109i S l
J W-AT t'�Y.T? ;hen `he field investi..ations zr Comp t
-.-'=R TH= SURV=Y - - "he applicant -
T -is the
will Submit' a report of their findincs and reco,,:m2nda;lons to y i-�ires
coo to the S"o0 for evalUatiC and
-:nn sibility of the acoli ant Lo -,o-, w-.rd a coo _ n
no Slt2$ Were fCt:nd Or the S1teS found are not eligible Tor the-�atlCnal ReGiSt2r the
-^ eCt may prG'.ee0. Occasionally an Slc^ifitant crCnaeClocical site may be 2nC0Un'er c.
��� the S=�O and the Federal or S' t. Acenc: wi , l wGrE; with the ap^licany�toe
_ � .Cil a Cc �h: Jac , y C 2ti0n Of }Our r. CjeC:•
-6 -he Cultural resources a^d t0 TaCliita,c ;he ompl
: ,.:cC t tii : '
?� her_ ist you and the Feerzi /S:ate agencies in
__D FURi".- ^.SS_ST'J,= The I.. is = -o ass _ _ _ t.G. s
-p r h2 mandates Of the h`. StGric preservation legislation. = . =- '
V^• ha e CUe5 = 1
lying with t -ion or 2 1 /S` = c MP1
e :'l haeoloaical resources prot2, : Feed ra _a o' ice- e
need aSSiStanC with arc -` Ce-ti n Preserva: •on Services Divi 11 -lino:S
Se CCnteCt the Ar:haeOl^_-' _ 7U1 (2i7/7cE- ...7) •
'-e Capit :uildinc Springfield, Illinois o2
-. _-2rvaticn r _2ncy, Old St__ �l OV"
�F.
J�
ILLINOIS-BASED ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTRACTING SERVICES (1991)
:n order to assist agencies, engineering firms, and others who require professional archaeological services the
:llinois Historic Preservation Agency (IHPA) has listed below Illinois-based professional archaeologists
currently performing contract archaeological compliance work. These individuals fulfill Federal qualifications
and are members of the Illinois Archaeological Survey which is a not-for-profit organization of professional
archaeologists who do research and business in Illinois. This list is provided for your assistance, however,
you may use any archaeologist who meets the minimum qualifications as set forth in Title 36 Code of Federal
;.eculations, Part 66, Appendix c. Federal regulations require a graduate degree in anthropology/archaeology and
16 months of professional experience. If you have any questions concerning an archaeologist's qualifications
please contact the IHPA at 217/785-4997. The inclusion of organizations on this list does not constitute any
recommendation or endorsement of their qualifications, professional exoertise, or performance record by the IHPA
cr the IAS.
Mr. MICHAEL J. MCNERNEY Mr. LAWRENCE A. CONRAD
618/529-2741 309/298-1188
American Resources Group, Limited Archaeology Laboratory
127 North Washington Street Western Illinois University
Carbondale, Illinois 62901 201 Tillman Hall
Macomb, Illinois 61455
Mr. KENNETH B. FARNSWORTH
618/653-4316 Dr. BRIAN M. BUTLER
Center for American Archaeology 618/453-5031
(Kampsville Archaeological Center) Center for Archaeological Investigations
Post Office Box 22 Southern Illinois University
Kampsville, Illinois 62053 Carbondale, Illinois 52901
Dr. WILLIAM I. WOODS Mr. CHARLES BAREIS
618/692-3641 Resources Investigation Program
Ms. CHRISTY L. WELLS 217/333-1708
618/692-2059 Dr. KEVIN P. MCGOWAN
Contract Archaeology Program, Box 1451 Public Service Archaeology Program
Southern Illinois University 217/333-3616
Edwardsville, Illinois 62025 Department of Anthropology
University of Illinois
Dr, NARK MEHRER 109 Davenport Hall
815/753-0245 / 0293 607 South Matthews Avenue
Department of Anthropology Urbana, Illinois 61801
Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, Illinois 60115 Dr. JAMES BROWN
708/491-5402
Mr. DAVID KEENE Department of Anthropology
312/243-8282 Northwestern University
Archaeological Research, Inc. Evanston, Illinois 60201
222 South Morgan, Suite 3c
Chicago, Illinois 60502 Dr. MICHAEL WIANT
Illinois State Museum Society
Dr. CHARLES ORSER 217/785-0134
309/438-2271 Illinois State Museum
Midwestern Archaeological Research Center Spring and =-dwards Streets
104 Edwards Hall Springfield, Illinois 62705
Illinois State University
Normal , Illinois 61761 Mr. DOUGLAS KULLEN
708/858-7050
Mr. FLOYD MANSBERGER Patrick Engineering, Inc.
217/787-2854 346 Taft Avenue
Fever River Research Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Post Office Box 5234
Springfield, Illinois 62705 Dr. ROCHELLE LURIE
815/943-3399
Dr. CHARLES L. ROHRBAUGH Midwestern Archaeological Research
309/454-6590 Services, Inc.
Archaeological Consultants 18906 Hebron Road
320 Robert Drive Harvard, Illinois 60033
Normal, Illinois 61761
Mr. JOSEPH CRAIG
217/788-2450
Hanson Engineers Incorporated
1525 South Sixth Street
Springfield, Illinois 62703
.1A-05/24/91
Jv2
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency Dale:
Old State Capital Bldg., Sp*ield, IL 62701 Accepted Rejected
(217) 785-4997 IHPA use only (FORM ASSRC886)
LOCATIONAL INFORMATION AND SURVEY CONDITIONS
County: Quadrangle:
Project type/title:
Responsible federal/state agencies:
Legal location: Sec. T. R.
U.T.M.
Project description:
Topography:
(Soils)
Drainage:
Land use/ground cover (include X visibility):
Survey limitations:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL INFORMATION
Historic plats/atlases/sources:
Previously reported sites:
Previous surveys:
Regional Arch, contacted:
Investigation techniques:
Time expended:
Sites/find spots located:
Cultural material :
(Curated at)
Collection techniques:
Area surveyed (acres & square meters):
;1
vt
ASSA0386
RESULTS OF INVESTIGr.TION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: (check cne)
❑ Phase I archaeological reconnaissance has located no archaeological material ; project clearance
is recor mended.
❑ Phase I archaeological reconnaissance has located archaeological materials; sites) does(do) not
meet requirements for National Register eligibility; project clearance is recommended.
ED Phase I archaeological reconnaissance has located archaeological materials; sites) may meet
------�� requirements for National Register eligibility; further testing is recommended.
(_I Phase II archaeological investigation has indicated that site(s) does(do) not meet requirements
for National Register eligibility; project clearance is recommended.
❑ Phase II archaeological investigation has indicated that site(s) meet requirements for National
Register eligibility; formal report is pending and a determination of eligibility is recommended.
COMMENTS:
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:
Arch. contractor:
Address/phone:
Surveyor(s): Survey Date(s):
Report completed by: Date:
Submitted by (signature and title):
ATTACHMENT CHECK LIST: (#1 through #4 are MANDATORY)
i) Relevant portion of USGS 7.5' topographic quandrangle map(s) showing project location and any
recorded sites;
_ 2) protect maps) depicting survey limits and, when applicable, approximate site limits and
concentrations ofr cultural materials;
_ 3) site form(s) : (two copies of each form);
_ 4) all relevant project correspondence;
_ 5) additional information sheets as necessary.
Address o' contracting agency to whom SHPO torment should be mailed:
Reviewers Cor=enis:
: !T.1"-r::r Strr For Irstrrcrlats) 1015 IIS1011C iIESEIIAI101 AiEI(1 iIa it*UyiIV
STATE AUICT RIST01;: IESOIICES itESElY1TIDt
(ILL. IEY. Slll. 1119, CA. 121, 1115. 135(21, IT TI/.)
tIVECT TITLE: iIOJECi 1111E1: RIA iSE 0111
DATE trio:
!IOJECT ADDRESS OR AIRICIPALI1i: LOG 1:
h/A IEY:
(01117; ISES 1.5' OldIIIGLE: AICNLEO try:
MIE) AGENCY:
SEC: i1P: IAIGE:
CCISILTTIi Eii11EEI: COPE OF 110JECT LID ILIIIIIVE U ICL[DE EIiiIE PICJECI AIEL):
WE
CGIPLI7 iLIE
AGDIESS
CITY, STATE IIP+fO11
ITELEPHOIE: I EXTENT OF PROJECT WIND DISi (LICE:
ACREAGE LID/OR LINEAR FEET:
PIEYIays DISTIIILICE TO iiOJECT AIEA: -
CHECK ONE: CHECK ONE:
IIDEITAIiIG iIIYATE BADEIiLKIiG PIILiC LAID Pt1YATE LAND
NOR IHiCH STATE AGENCIES OR FIiDiIG SOIICES TILL PERAIT, LICEISES, APPIOYALS Ot FINDS RE OBTAINED Of REIIIRED (CHECK APPIOPIIITE EO[ES1?
_MI-DIYISIOR OF WATER IESOIICES _IEPA WLTEI iOLLI110R COITIOL _IEPA PIlL1C WLTE1 SIPPLIES _OTHEI:
FEG:ILL AGENCIES FIOR NHICH PERI M, LICENSES, APPIOYALS, Ot FINDS ALT BE IERIiIED (I.E., CORPS, BID)
THiS REYIEI PROCESS DOES NOT EXERPT 7011 PROJECT FIOA CONPLILICE 11TH SECTION 116 OF THE I010111 HISTGIIC PIESEIYATIOR ACT OF 196E, AS AREIDED.
I UTOIT EICIOSIIES:
j ISIS 1.5' TOPOGILPHICAL RAP 01 CITY RAP CLEARLY INDICATING PROJECT AREA. LID STREET ADDRESS (IF AYLILLBLE).
C1IIEIT PHOTOGRAPHS (10 PHOTOCOPIES) OF ALL STANDING STIICTitES.
e IF IBIS PROJECT NIS BEEN PIEY101SLT IEYiEY BY iRIA, iICLIDE ALL PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE.
ILIE LID ADDRESS OF APPLICLIT/DEYELOPEI: THE LBOYE iIFOtRLTIOI IS CDIIECT TO THE BEST OF AT 1101LEDGE.
SiGIITIIE DATE
MATED WE
1ELEPIONE
TITLE
F01 OFFiCF ISF OUT!
IEYIEWEI IECOIIEID11101: AUIC1 IEYEEW ACTiCI:
_EIENPiEO FICA REYIEY PURSUANT 10: _ ROT HIGH PROBABILITY AREA
_DISTURBED
_DETAILS 1EOUESTED _ PREYIOOS SUIYEY
_CLEARED ET FEYIEI _ RO COUNTY RAP/INOYN SITE
_ SPECIAL LETTER (ERCLOSED)
_SIIYET P.EQUIRED (SEE LTTACHAENT)
_[BOTH SITE(S)
_HiGH PROBABILITY AREA
HISTORIC STF.00TURES NARRATiYE
i.EYiETED EY: I
(DATE)
.EPF.ONE IiUrEER:
0
IKE II11MpIS SIAIF AFEIE! RI$IOPIt FF set.FETS PPESFPY1110i ACT PIQUIRES Si M AGENCIES 10 111E 1110 A((0"11 ihE EFfECI Of PTOJECI
ACIIYITIES OA HISMI( iESOURCES ;H1 k: 1) A PROJICI IS PAK11AL11 OR WHOLLY FUNDED E1 STATE ROWS; 2) A PSOJECI THICK REQUIRES A STATE
PERRIi LIES 111N1A A NIGH PROBABILM Y AREA 101 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, OR 3) A KIM HISiO11C PIOPEIIT IS 1111111 IN[ PROJECi AREA.
THE ILLINOIS HISTORIC PIESEiYA11ON AGENCY 1ESEIYES THE RIGHT 10 REQUEST FII11HE1 INFORAATIOI, SUCH AS PROJECT PLANS, IF THE PROJECT
DESCRIP110x OR OTHER (CLIEGORY) GIVEN ON THIS FORA IS INSUFFICIEXI. 11PON RECEIPT OF COAPLEi1 DOCUAEXIA110N YOUR PROJECT VILL BE
PROCESSED WITHIN A 38 DAY PERIOD.
SEND COAPLETED FOIA AND All ENCLOSURES 10: ILLINOIS HIS101IC PRESERVATION AGENCY
DIYISiOA OF PRESERVATION SEIYICES
REYIEW AND COAPLIANCE SECTION
ATTENTION: MA[ OF PEYIEVEP AT BOTTOM, LEFT OF FRONT PIG()
OLD STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62181
IF YOU HAVE CUESiIONS ON THE COAP M ON OF THIS FORA, PLEASE 00 NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR AGENCY AT 2111115-4512 AND ASK FOR THE
REYiEVER LISTED AT THE BOiTOR OF YOUR PROJECT REVIEW SHEET.
PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF THIS FORK 10 ALL OTHER STATE APPLICAIIOKS FOR PERKITS, LICENSES, APPROVALS, AND FUNDINC.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FITTING IN THE FORA:
THiS FORK'WAS DEVELOPED TO EIFEDITE REVIEW AND INSURE ADEQUATE IKFORM,ATIOR IS PROYIDED. EVERY BLANK REQUIRES COAP M ON 01 A 'NOT
APPLICABLE' CURRENT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY.
PROJECT (CABER: AGENCY 01 COAPAKY PROJECT NURSER
PROJECT ADDRESS 01 1011CiPALITi: STREEi ADDRESS WITH CiTY OR TOWNSHIP AND RANGE DESIGNATION
SCOPE OF PROJECT AID IAR1A11YE: DESCRIPTIVE NARRATIVE OF PROJECT ACIIYITIES, E.G., CONSTRUCTION OF 49 ACRE SUEDIVISEON; 5.5 RiLE BIKE
TRAIL ON ABANDONED FAIL LIKE; 5 98 FOOT OF KEW SEVER LIKE THROUGH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREA; OR KEW DEYELOPRERT
E11E11 OF PROJECT 61001D DISTURBANCE: HOW THE GROUND SURFACE WILL BE DISTURBED BY PROJECT ACTIVITIES, E.G., PLACEAEKT OF E' LiKE
WITHIN 19' RIGHT-OF-WAY; GRADING AND LANDSCAPING OF ENTiR.E 4B ACRE SUCDIYiSIOR
ACIEAU AID/01 LiREAR FEET: NURSER OF ACRES VITHIK PROJECT AREA; LINEAR FEET OF KEY SEVER OR WATER LIKE; LINEAR FEET OF LIKE PLUS
ACRES OF KEW DEYELOPAENT
PIEYIOIS DiSTURIAICE TO PROJECT AREA: INCLUDE ANY PRIOR GROUND SURFACE DISTURBANCE, E.G., AGRICULTURAL FIELDS; AASSIYE GRADING DURING
PREVIOUS DEYELOPAENT; OLD INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WHICH HAYE BEEK PREVIOUSLY DEROLISHED
BIDEIIACIA6: ANY PROJECT WHICH HAS STATE/PUBLIC FUNDING OF ASSISTANCE, E.G., DCCA iOUIISA GRANTS; ECONOAEC DEVELOPKENi GRANTS; IDOA
CONSERVATION SERVICE COSI-SHARE PROGRAM,
MUTE DIDEITAIII6: A PROJECT WHICH HAS NO STATE FUNDING (ONLY PRIVATE FUNDS USED) BUT IS REQUIRED 10 OBILIK A STATE PEIKII 01
LICENSE, E.G., IDOi-DIYISiOK OF MATER RESOURCES; IEPA PERAITS; PUBLIC HEALTH
PRILIC LAID: PROJECT ViLL TAKE PLACE ON PUBLIC LAKDS, E.G., PUBLIC RIGHT-OR-110; PARK DISTRICT LANDS; FOREST PRESERYE PROPERTY;
AUNiCIFAl PROPERTY
IE1/§1)
• G_oF ogke9
v
O
FCoUNt�'
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
May 7 , 1992 708 990-3000
Deanna Glosser , Ph.D.
Endangered & Threatened Species Program Manager
Illinois Department of Conservation
Division of Natural Heritage
524 South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 62701-1787
RE: The Sanctuary Preliminary Plat
Endangered Species Consultation
Dear Dr . Glosser :
Enclosed please find your "Endangered Species Consultation Agency Action
Report" along with a location map. Shannon Associates , Ltd. are contract
purchasers of this 90 acre tract and is proposing single-family residential
development .
Please provide your usual review and let me know your conclusions .
Since y,
Dale L. Durfey, Jr . , P.E. ,
Village Engineer
DLD/etg /
cc: Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement✓
Tom Shannon, Shannon Associates , Ltd.
Illinois Depa rtment of Conservation
life and land togethw
LINCOLN TOWER PLAZA • 524 SOUTH SECOND STREET • SPRINGFIELD 62701-1787
CHICAGO OFFICE • ROOM 4-300 • 100 WEST RANDOLPH 60601
BRENT MANNING,DIRECTOR
ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSULTATION
AGENCY ACTION REPORT
)" May 7 1992 PROJCODE
Date Submitted.. y Date Due:
For Office Use Only
Agency Name: Village of Oak Brook
Contact Person: Dale L. Durfey, Jr. , P.E. Phone: (708) 990-3010
Agency Address: 1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
DESCRIBE PRECISE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION
County(ies) : DuPaQe
City/Town: Oak Brook
Township/Range/section: Township 39 North, Range 11 East, Section 34 & 35
U.S.G.S. Quad Map Name(s) : - Hinsdale
Brief Description of the Proposed Action: Developer proposing single
family residential subdivision on 90 acres.
a ma delineating ' on of the proposed action.
Please enclose in the locate p p
P g
FOR NATURAL HERITAGE USE ONLY
QUADCODE(S) :
Are there threatened/endangered species or natural areas located within the vicinity of the project? [ Yes No I
The consultation process is terminated? [ Yes i No
If 'No', complete the enctosed Detailed Agency Action Report to continue the consultation process.
Evaluation Approved by:
Deanna Glosser, Ph.D. Date
Endangered & Threatened Species Program Manager
^1(le
o t ' Iz :I
_ •) .•i �_a .° g
— f-TREET ZZh`+ -
`�
t1 aff if•••° t•f i•• O � ]]) 1ff �,'L . e1, -_ 1 ► I
e« iN ae• f° w 1 i
'
an far•+ aor ay +� ab, 1 •S- L•Y. a
aef aof aa, � •
if' aft ,a )) _]� ♦+ 1'J
an - ++ • \• W rawalrOTer /i0�0
� ■•a f tN1 tf• aaa fJ �, ♦ O I
' afi N• a•a af• for. i»e fft A�
i.a f tFj 1
Kaf 4
>Q 'r:1 >•> aia as u• �_u1 •o / 1 a) n. �-` t�tl _ i `
a. a •f 1 � �• / .I� I
Iro sa ul u• a �\ ,• S�t �. ^'Iw -
'' 2•f a r. >.e aa«°• a i0f• y\ �.r�j . � I�,h 2 —
IZ
/. -`ot `'$.__1 ,'b ter• �� e� \ I 1 t .. 'it .,.
� I a • e 7 - a♦a/ a• •j .x> e• s, 'td��,� .It 1 ~ ._. �O _ n2 \
' I •a ' /1 M (K,° a,q /Il Ita, r)�t� K' ' otia+siJ• I - i a0 00
\.i0' r f'• 1E117 •r 1 y ' / i\ a � a[
� n Iw! w,w.•sa< iM e � 0,1.♦YS r i, ti��,�j,� . ' • :.11
170 J tao '•i.i L. a•a71 „ •Vf -41r-� ;,+ ,I•�� - 1,u�y"/'-�\,\`1�
Its •f.• I•, sal u •M n1 13Z ,g y 14 1A d ai ]]` �`•_ '• a/ �• •i�1
.' ' Is< _ Na iai aO s•S.e. 1eT o .1 a\. is•• r° - 11 L 11
' �S If1 a.a ., � »J o. g ., ]N \rP �• . r,l�• /• ro•aaT e.fa• a- Y4aiss•D•r J1`
� 17s �' a )) - •
:' t • (. w
t, q L oba !°C ar7 .ai, \ ' i• ` /�� / 'a i it
171 'Itt��« l99 'f �1a• 1af1 � �/ ` � a0 �)\S tLT , /.E '�, a' . 11.1
o_ 170 1\ , � , • t `).
bT I.0 ,ea .t+�1•a \fB . )» H �r to°.. s/ �• ``wa e.f<a 1 -. - `• 7=: ^'
117 1K�19T If011•ie • Ta '� ly ��,
�t .a7 21c 611...E t+t •a ' c, t .� • •) y,l`'. w t tl, —...
a n
1aa 217 ••a u•pu lS- 1.r, lu 9• 7s a♦\aa �:, a 1 a • R �t 1 1
r,.'� MS SO• all yj 7a 7• \`•C •t� �a. - ) � F; ;1 '\))
r. 1N SO•I-•0,9t to rya ►7•1 vOM uwNSr ). __1 •,1 `•\s
Ie)+Na t1+1 w tlq!•T•w�s'ajN_eQ=. W 7!78 3=� � •��•t'",' :'�7 OAK'B2QOK ---_
7TTIT:I I,
1''O u 1♦^4 f ; •- .`? � o.• • ::i�/�foli• 71 \ toa• MY�,� q
<_�^ rye ,K., f1L3: L rJ • • 9 q L•. 7 ) 11 ash\
7„1 1•/s , \x A4. U as < 1 11 /� t• •o l
kool
2•L ue1./174 t73 a. a, sa Ss t2 �)� s le !• a •�' �t •� i •• 5
1 taa tat- sb ai :7 '.. :! � la - _ 2 11 ° .aa• I r.i• •1 T.. 4
- 7nS w tr.•f t1 a/ N ;t R ... .... - ti.ll is. a• c /� ' - .• -(
YY• 7 M' w • tj O/ r !�' a• :1- K .. �- t� s• �•e 71 7s•L1i. 7s ,.
Y
11a 11I 7I a'I 1 17 h 1+• a j
as / �Tlr••� , \
Y •S :7 GG u V p at 42 21 !,7= SI ae •la .. •
`j.I •1 a0 ]w / /r /•1 7e��1 .T= T 7
3 71 •/< 7S n 77 a 10 is u � a r:C���°—`�y�� /`s�•
7i 73 s 11 �. a ;` `•'')\ 117 af' L: as 192 S i aS ri I♦S j14 j •. •a` e- --- -3--
/ tG -�/�. 1S a: L< tSt l''LI13 r •; - - a7 at. ai ✓ wa\ ►� 1.
/L_KI Q!G ">r 9S 9i -\) _/ � lj� - IRG I ` �!f ;7 eo �_iol" Yi/' - s•
\�
•. Y n 1= T1 1 ?Qi,1J. d, 1e 4O Ytl 12414 \:1 �wj _ 31 +e sa Iss 1 Iis' Iss s° sT
MO
.•a w /� 7 < I o 700.3 tt is yst IK ll Il4 1!t 110 a.SI r7 t<G M r KI_ — _ w ♦. 73 _jkCWT a
10� t
]art laly as
Mr
1,U.,L OF UAI1 9HV,)K
DUPAGE'NO COOK COUNTIES,ILLINOIS
NOTICE IS HEhE B'G GIVEN that public hearing before the
Zoning Board d Appeals d the Villa e d Oak Brook,DuPage
and Cook Counllss,Illinois will be held on June 2,1992 al 730
P.m. In the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road,
Illinois, for the purpose of considering the application of
Shannon and Associates lot the following:
(1)Approval of the following minp ordinance text amendments
as Provided under Section XIII(Q d the Zoning Ordinance G-60,
as amended:
a)Amend Section XIV(B)(141)by striking the work
'structure' and the period at end of subsection and
adding the following:
•roof for Bat roofs.or to the deck sine for mansard rods.or
to mean helphl betwee^eaves and ridge for cable.hip BLISHER'S CERTIFICATE
and ganbrel rods.or to the highest point d the structure
for structures whhout a rod'
b)Amend Section VII(E)(2)by adding a now subsection
(c)reading as follows:
(c) Slnple-family detached, attached and semi.delached dwellings—in subdivisions of not less
than 50 acres in area,Provided that the gross density
of each such development per shall not xced not he notice, a true copy of which is attached to this certificate,
dwelling units Per eas;the structure heights shall not !
1 and one hall stories;the shall
roud floor IHing'arrea
Per dwelling shall not be lose 1,500 square feet fora ► once each week for : .one . . . . weeks successively; that the
one-story dwelling and 1,000 square feel for a
dwelling d more than one story; and minimum the . . . . .tit. . . . . day of . .May. . . . . . . A. D. 1992 , and
distance between principal bulidings,ore n,oasurod • •
between bearing walls,shall be not less than 24 fret,
except that 1hls distance may be reduced by two(pl on was the . day of A. D. 19 .
- rust s ar,s er tncn—1e-Omss an attached garage
or cwrPort and by four(1)teal si each d such oasis
su"f+«mr walachad gns°s Or carpnrt;Provided IFIED That THE DOINGS is a secular newspaper of general
W it Nast PrinI ror building shall be sat balk p Y" b
b"r�±9 fee'fron d Public street*, 1 the Villages of Hinsdale, Clarendon Hills, Oak Brook, Burr
o8-street bad ggad o8-erred parking requirements
Shall be as provided in Section xl;and provided that if Darien and Oakbrook Terrace and circulated generally in the
a prrly t nary development plan Indicates suhiclentl
Nearly the Proposed streets,rights-of-ways.lot sizes
and setback.,so that the village board In granting Hills,Oak Brook,Burr Ridge, Willowbrook and Cities of Darien j
��or�sped l re plan may clearly define ;ent unincorporated and incorporated areas,and in DuPage and !
Y pedal restrictions h may wish to
Impose and that approval of the final subdivision "newspaper"plan°hall le aubiOct to same.* ther areas; that said THE DOINGS is a newspaper as defined
(2)Approval d a special use as Provided for and Section X111(J)
of the Zoning Ordinance G-60 as amended and In accordance 1 provided for such situations, to wit;by Section 5 of u An Act to
with the above poposed Section VII(E)(2)(c)for thMy-six bls
Pt be located vi the northeast 15 acres more or 1038 of the yes," 1874, Feb. 13, R.S. 1874, p. 723, § 5,as amended 1959,Ju-
propasd l rrbdlvlslpl to be id Subi'The Sanctuary as depicted at
en the a°""unary w�of said subdivision. . nd is also a"newspaper"as defined by Section I of An Act con-
The
Brix*re Property the yPe°agenerally od sion�Rot eat House�St. lotices," 1909,June 8, Laws 1909, p. 288, § 1,as amended 1927,
THAT PART ary,ands folio adjacent lands,Oak Brook,Illlnols,and the , and as further amended 1945, April 12, Laws 1945, p. 1089, §
legal desFAplbn k ee follows; AND SECTION 34,LYING NOR'TH3AND OURTHCOFOTHE 957
INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE ALL , July 9; Laws 1957, p. 2270, § 1, and as further amended
NORTH.RANGE 111 EAST OF THEITH RD PRINCIPAL t 496, § 1; and that said THE DOINGS has been continuously
DESCRIBED AS DUPAGE OLLOWS: BEGINNING ILLINOIS,OTHE f at least once each week with a minimum of 50 issues per year
BEING A SUBDIVISION OFF PART OF THE NORTH EIASI
FRACTIONAL 1/4,LYING NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE first publication of the attached notice.
INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE IN SAID SECTION 34
RECORDED AS DOCUMENT R79-74435,IN DUPAGE
COUNTY,ILLINOIS:THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES,45 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, one of the co-publishers of said
EASTER MINUTES.LINE 18 SAID EET;TRINITY H LAKES OUT 1'34 THE DOINGS has affixed his hand and seal this
DISTANCE OF 218.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34
DEGREES,26 MINUTES,33 SECONDS EAST ALONG
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A
DISTANCE OF 72.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES,14 MINUTES,51 SECONDS EAST ALONG "'••" "' '�° ' '°' --
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A NORTH 30 DEGREES, 21 MINUTES, 59 SECONDS A.D. 19 92. . . .
DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 I WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE ,
DEGREES,37 MINUTES,12 SECONDS EAST ALONG OF F.A.ROUTE 102,A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET TO
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT t,A A POINT OF CURVATURE;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY
DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51 ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.
DEGREES,34 MINUTES,55 SECONDS EAST ALONG ROUTE 102 BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF THE j
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A LAST DESCRIBED COURSE EXTENDED AND HAVING
DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 A RADIUS OF 485.87 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 609.56 _
DEGREES,14 MINUTES,58 SECONDS EAST ALONG FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;THENCE SOUTH 77
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A DEGREES,25 MINUTES,08 SECONDS WEST ALONG r
DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE
DEGREES,18 MINUTES,17 SECONDS EAST ALONG 102 BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A CURVE.A DISTANCE OF 230.08 FEET TO A POINT OF . . . . . . ,
DISTANCE OF 165.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 CURVATURE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG Publisher �'YL
DEGREES,00 MINUTES,29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE !
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A 102 BEING A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF THE LAST !
DISTANCE OF 121.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DESCRIBED COURSE EXTENDED AND HAVING A
DEGREES,11 MINUTES,56 SECONDS WEST ALONG RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 193.24 FEET
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 01
DEGRE SE 21 MINUTES,1E0 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY'RIGHHT OF 47 WAY LINE O F F.A.ROUTE i
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A 102, BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED -
DISTANCE OF 43.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8 I COURSE EXTENDED,A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO
DEGREES,08 MINUTES,40 SECONDS EAST ALONG I A POINT ON 714E SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A OAS BROOK ROAD S SHOWN N THE STRIP MAP OF
DISTANCE OF 439.55 FEET- THENCE SOUTH 36 SAID F.A.ROUTE 102;THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES,
DEGREES,06 MINUTES,17 SECONDS EAST ALONG 04 MINUTES, 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 1,A SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK
DISTANCE OF 83.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80 ROAD S SHOWN ON THE STRIP MAP OF F.A.ROUTE
DEGREES,22 MINUTES,14 SECONDS EAST ALONG 102,A DISTANCE OF 82.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 86
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF TRINITY I.AKES UNIT 1.A DEGREES,04 MINUTES,13 SECONDS WEST ALONG
DISTANCE OF 376.11 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK
NORTHERLY LINE OF TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3,BEING A BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN N THE STRIP MAP OF F.A.
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH EAST ROUTE 102,A DISTANCE OF 201.00 FEET;THENCE
101 FRACTIONAL 114 AND PART OF THE SOUTH EAST 1/4 , SOUTH 88 DEGREES, 04 MINUTES, 13 SECONDS
OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 34,AND PART OF THE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
DET: NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 39 OF OAK BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN N THE STRIP MAP
IN C ATM•RANGE 11,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL OF F.A.ROUTE 102,A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET;
DEC MERIDIAN,LYING SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES, 37 MINUTES, 11
SAII LINE RECORDED AS DOCUMENT R81.07240, IN SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF
BRC DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; THENCE NORTH 63 WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE 3�
DEGREES,45 MINUTES,27 SECONDS EAST ALONG STRIP MAP OF F.A.ROUTE 102,A DISTANCE OF
OF: THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 101.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT
wffW 3, A DISTANCE OF 577.28 FEET: THENCE OF WAY LINE OF OAK BROOK ROAD PREVIOUSLY ]
i CONTINUING NORTH 63 DEGREES,45 MINUTES,27 I DEDICATED AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 631572,
SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 367.13 FEET; IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS;THENCE SOUTH Be IS'
THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES, 14 MINUTES, 34 DEGREES,of MINUTES,18 SECONDS WEST ALONG
SECONDS EAST,A DISTANCE OF 226.62 FEET TO A SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OAK
The POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY BROOK ROAD PREVIOUSLY DEDICATTED A DISTANCE
Ingle-h LAKES UNIT 3: THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 26
do DEGREES: 14 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS EAST A OF 318,115 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
DISTANCE OF 472.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 Permanent Parcel$08-34.200-016
Asp DEGREES 99 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG 00.35= 015 t
the I THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRINITY LAKES UNIT 3, ,
evkbl A DISTANCE OF 352.86 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY 06-35-100-008 .
y out RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 35TH STREET; THENCE 06-35-100-009
ring I NORTH 90 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 00 SECONDS The petitioner Is proposing to develop the property for 134
^as the EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE single-fanny detached residences with 36 of the late In
OF 35TH STREET,A DISTANCE OF 591.16 FEET TO BCODtde"ce with the above text amendment-Section VII(E)(2).-1 S'
spap
rtscel THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE (c)• 6LL
102;THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES, 13 MINUTES,30 All persons desiring to be heard In support of or In opposition t(7
!
SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF to the proposed Text Amendment and Spdal Use or any V1
Pub WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE 102 A DISTANCE OF 600.30 provision thereof,will be afforded an opportunity to do so and 17?
Zen FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE: THENCE may submit their statements orally or In writing or both.The d)
p . NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY hearing may be recessed to another date B notice of time and
TM LINE OF F.A.ROUTE 102 BEING A CURVE TO THE Place thereof Is publicly announced at the hearing or Is given by Fr,
III h LEFT OF THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE AND HAVING newspaper publication not less than(5)days prior to the date of
rN A RADIUS OF 5018.71 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 1193.67 the recessed hearing.
or FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;THENCE NORTH 22 Lida Gonnella
fi DEGREES,21 MINUTES,29 SECONDS WEST ALONG t
go SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE Village Clerk
M 102 AND BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED Published at the direction d the Corporate Authorities and
the Zoning Board of Appeals d the Village of Oak Brook,
CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 204.05 FEET: THENCE 9 '381
NOnty+M K��c.-a �. ...,,,,rye �„ �.....,__ DuPage and Cook Counties.Illinois.
The Petition application Is on file with the Village CNrk and''I011gTK
d
with the Director Code Enforcement. Persons wishing to 6U gL
examine the Million documonts may arrangpe to d°s°with thole t
Director d Corte Enforcement, Thomas R. Hawk, 1212 Oak 1010%Er '7
Brook Road,990.3045.
1 Published In Tito Doings May 6.1902 I
v�OF O4k e9
„p O
c ?;IV,..
FCOUNtr�
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
May 7 , 1992 OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
Dear Resident: 708 990-3000
The Oak Brook Plan commission and/or Zoning Board of Appeals,
and the Village Board will be considerinQ a:
tYE'iilili:l:.Z"T plat of sUl`Cli`!']. :G1:t camc.ndmen`, and
Sp Scial
it1r t.l).t' 1Tl'^,' -1-t?i'r - as Vt...'•^ S4d C`7 t-.(1 :; TItJ{:.1CL?.
r.. _ - .-... ... ,-, r � � '-. .•� �7 .ern._\f?.e.C,.ie tw�,.. ..a..s ., .._.� .
4 `J p� =rat-t eo purchase l.cla ionsh 1 _
'l:r:.I,.�iJ x v viwTis?.on rt.�t.
i, '• r•- r}�r +rl "i � _ .. .t.. .^. .. rr lii%1�.. �.,._ �I�i_ -�Y'Fs;� �:.\`i �i!.. . Y .. Y_. _y-U•:.
..l
LT L
it ,i`.? . J �• .:i a 11111 y r.y..
w•.�'h r'�..L�1 t.l:�l. �i'�J�... �i :L.i. »`._. z a.t;c-i•1a 0t I.i.3 ve a jit.1_I,.a.lil un,
f 1..3
1` T(:1, ("l t.�� f .:.,� )�.�.i',.. lri .'.-C. f �t. 1- r �-..ii.i i t .,� 1 `,-,'.
S`ri
i C,•,]- i'7?-Wr11 .c _.� v'.7',..- :ter _...?il"l ('r.'`.' ? t". � ]l = 1�Y._�.�._c ?T1,°E'•!-l Tl;l:..
411 .�--
t:Ciis of Ccdc F`:
c:/.+s:;;ina/reslcr.trim
sanctry.doc p3
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES
Trustee Skinner moved to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of
April 14, 1992 as presented and waive the full reading thereof.
Seconded by Trustee Winters. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
5. CONSENT AGENDA:
Trustee Skinner moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Seconded by
Trustee Shumate. Roll Call Vote:
Ayes: 6-Trustees Bartecki, Krafthefer, Payovich, Shumate, Skinner
and Winters.
Nays: 0-None.
Absent: 0-None. Motion carried.
A. RESOLUTION NO. R-559 A RESOLUTION APPROVING BEAR MANOR ASSESSMENT RES. R-559
PLAT (2803 & 2809 Oak Brook Road - Feldman) : Approved Omnibus ;TEAR MANOR
Vote. ASSESSMENT PLAT
(2803 & 2809 O:B. Rd.
B. ANNEXATION AGREEMENT/ZONING (Illinois State Toll Highway ANNEXATION/ZON.
Authority) - REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE TO OCTOBER 13, 1992: AGMT. (ISTHA)
Approved Omnibus Vote.
C. 1992/93 STATE JOINT PURCHASE REQUISITION - DEICER SALT: Approved 1992/93
Omnibus Vote. DE ICER SALT
D. ONE-DAY LIQUOR LICENSE REQUEST - ILLINOIS SAINT ANDREW HIGHLAND 1-DAY LIQUOR
GAMES: Approved Omnibus Vote. LICENSE--ILL. ST
ANDREW HIGHLAND GAME.
E. CHICAGO COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE - 5K RUN/RACE WALK: OSTEOPATHIC
Approved Omnibus Vote. COLLEGE-5K RUv/RACE WA-
F. PAYOUTS: PAYOUTS:
1. DuPaae Water Commission - Payout #39 Fixed Costs and O&M: DWC-FIXED COSTS
Approved Omnibus Vote. and 0&M
2. DuPage Mayors & Managers Conference - 1992/93 Membership M&M MEMBERSHIP
Dues: Approved Omnibus Vote. DUES-$5,662.83
3. Lindley & Sons, Inc. - Payout #3 - Consulting Services - Old OLD OAK BROOK
Oak Brook Dam: Approved Omnibus Vote. DAM-$1,522.50
G. REFERRAL - MAYSLAKE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT - Refer to May 18, 1992 REFERRAL:
Plan Commission Meeting and June 2, 1992 Zoning Board of Appeals MAYSLAKE
Meeting: Approved Omnibus Vote. DEVELOPMENT
6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA:
None.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK'Minutes 2 April 28, 1992
�--to
Sec. VII OAK BROOK CODE
al uses and no portion of which shall be less than 4
acres. (Single-family Detached Dwellings) The dedi-
cated land shall be appropriate for park or recreation-
al uses, and shall not include wet drainage ways in
excess of 25%, of the total dedicated area.
(4) Lot Width: Not less than 75 feet within the buildable
area.
(5) Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.4 for nonresidential
uses.
(6) Structure Height:
(a) Residential uses: Not more than 30 feet and not
more than two and one-half stories.
(b) Institutional and other nonresidential uses: Not
more than 45 feet.
(7) Ground Floor Area per Dwelling:
(a) One story—not less than 1,300 square feet.
(b) Bi-level—not less than 1,100 square feet (floors at
grade and above basement).
(c) Dwellings having more than one story—not less
than 900 square feet.
(8) Yards: Except as required in Section VII, C-1-g (2)
and (4) of this ordinance, yards shall be provided as
follows:
(a) front: Not less than 30 feet in depth—except front
yards abutting York Road and 22nd Street shall
have a depth of not less than 100 feet.
(b) Side: Not less than 10 feet in depth—except (1) a
side yard may be reduced to not less than 8 feet
provided the adjoining lot contains a dwelling
with an attached garage or carport adjacent to
such side yard; (2) a side yard abutting a street
shall be not less than 30 feet in depth, and (3) for
nonresidential uses each side yard abutting a
street shall be not less than 30 feet in depth and
increased by not less than 2 feet for each one foot
of structure height over 30 feet.
Supp. No. 1 902
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. VII
(4) Other recreational uses as approved by the
Board of Trustees.
(5) Accessory uses and structures incidental to
the above recreational uses.
(c) Single-family detached, attached and semi-de-
tached dwellings—on parcels not less than 50
acres in area, provided that the gross density of
each such development shall not exceed three
dwelling units per acre; the structure heights shall
not exceed 30 feet; no structure shall contain more
than two and one-half stories; the ground floor
living area per dwelling shall not be less than
1,300 square feet for a one-story dwelling and 900
square feet for a dwelling of more than one story;
the minimum distance between principal build-
ings, as measured between bearing walls, shall be
not less than 20 feet, except that this distance
may be reduced by two (2) feet if one of such walls
encloses an attached garage or carport and by
four (4) feet if each of such walls encloses an
attached garage or carport; provided further that
each principal building shall be set back at least
thirty (30) feet from dedicated public streets,
off-street loading and off-street parking require-
ments shall be as provided in Section XI; and
provided that a preliminary development plan
indicates sufficiently clearly the proposed streets,
right-of-ways, lot sizes and set-backs, so that the
village board in granting approval of such
preliminary plan may clearly define the areas of
any special restrictions it may wish to impose and
that approval of the final subdivision plan shall
be subject to same.
(3) Lot Area: Not less than 18,000 square feet—except
that in subdivisions 40 acres or more in area, the lot
area may be reduced to 15,000 square feet provided
that lands equal to ten percent of the total area be
dedicated to the Village of Oak Brook, or agency
approved by the Village Board, for park or recreation-
duPp. rre. 1 901
Sec. VII OAK BROOK CODE
not less than 2 feet for each foot of structure
height over 30 feet; (3) side yards abutting York
Road and Cermak Road shall have a depth of not
less than 100 feet.
(c) Rear: Not less than 40 feet in depth.
(9) Off-:Street Loading and Off-Street Parking: As in
Section XI of this ordinance.
(Ord. No. G-83, 4-9-68; Ord. No. G-203, § 6, 12-14-76)
(F) R4 Single-Family Detached Residence District.
(1) Permitted Uses: As in R1 Single-family Detached
Residence District.
(2) Special Uses:
(a) As in the R1 Single-family Detached Residence
District, except airports.
(b) Recreational uses other than accessory uses, not
for profit—on lots not less than 2 acres in area.
(1) Ice skating rinks—open.
(2) Parks and playgrounds.
(3) Tennis and swimming facilities.
Supp. No. 18
900.4
j�.
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. VII
provided that lands equal to ten percent of the total
area be dedicated to the Village of Oak Brook, or
agency approved by the Village Board, for park or
recreational uses and no portion of which shall be less
than 4 acres. The dedicated land shall be appropriate
for park or recreational uses, and shall not include
wet drainage ways in excess of 25% of the total
dedicated area.
(4) Lot Width: Not less than 100 feet within the buildable
area.
(5) Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.4 for nonresidential
uses.
(6) Structure Height:
(a) Residential uses: Not more than 30 feet and not
more than two and one-half stories.
(b) Institutional and other nonresidential uses: Not
more than 45 feet.
(7) Ground Floor Area per Dwelling:
(a) One story—not less than 1,500 square feet.
(b) Bi-level—not less than 1,300 square feet (floors at
grade and above basement).
(c) Dwellings having more than one story—not less
than 1,000 square feet.
(8) Yards: Except as required in Section VII C-1-g (2)
and (4) in this ordinance, yards shall be provided as
follows:
(a) Front: Not less than 40 feet a in depth—except front
yards abutting York Road and 22nd Street shall
have a depth of not less than 100 feet.
(b) Side: Not less than 12 feet in depth—except (1) a
side yard abutting a street shall be not less than
40 feet in depth; (2) for nonresidential uses each
side yard abutting a street shall be not less than
50 feet in depth and each interior side yard shall
be not less than 30 feet in depth and increased by
Supp.No. 18 900.3
Sec. VII OAK BROOK CODE
section (4xd) be submitted to and approved by
the corporate authorities within a reasonable
time as specified in the ordinance approving
the special use.
(d) The final preservation plan shall be accom-
panied by:
(i) Final plans and specifications for all pub-
lic improvements reasonably required for im-
plementation of the preservation plan. Such
plans and specifications shall comply with all
applicable standards of the Village for said
public improvements; -
(ii) A draft of all necessary or.advisable cov-
enants, easements, preservation restrictions,
and condominium declarations acceptable in
form and substance to the Village.
(5) Bulk standards: The bulk standards established
in this section shall apply except as follows:
(a) Structure height: Structure height of existing
buildings shall be established as necessary 'to
preserve and restore such buildings, provided
that no existing structure may exceed its ex-
isting structure height or elevation.
(b) Ground floor area per dwelling: Not less than
900 square feet.
(c) Floor area per dwelling: Not less than 2400
square feet.
(d) Parking:
(i) Two parking spaces for each dwelling unit
and reserved for each said dwelling unit; and
(ii) One parking space for each dwelling unit
for visitor and guest parking.
(e) Density: No more than 3.0 dwelling units per
acre.
(f) Preservation vista: Not less than 150 feet.
(g) Lot area: Not less than 12 acres.
(Ord. No. G-328, § 2, 8-24-82)
(3) [Reduction of lot area] Not less than 25,000 square
feet—except that in subdivisions of 80 acres or more in
area, the lot area may be reduced to one-half acre
Supp.No. 19 900.2
G
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. VII
(ii) Floor plans showing, in detail, existing
and proposed uses of all areas of the building;
(iii) A plat of survey of the property involved
showing the location of all existing structures
and a site plan showing the location of all
proposed structures and existing structures
to be retained;
(iv) A statement detailing the nature of any
alteration to existing interior or exterior ar-
chitectural features specifically identifying those
features to be preserved and/or restored;
(v) A topographical analysis of the site with
contour intervals of not more than two feet;
(vi) Information on existing and proposed
water mains, sanitary sewers, storm sewers,
storm water retention and runoff, stream
channels, floodplains and floodways, lakes,
ponds, or other public improvements;
(vii) A study of traffic engineers providing
information on the impact of the development
on public streets and intersections;
(viii) A plat or map showing the land uses,
_ physical features, and zoning of all adjacent
lands within 400 yards of the property involved;
(ix) A proposed fire protection plan detailing
the description and location of proposed fire
protection equipment and automatic sprink-
ler systems;
(x) A set of plans detailing existing and pro-
posed exterior elevations, a list of any items
being removed from the exterior of the build-
ing, and typical details for existing and pro-
posed windows, doors, bays and balconies.
(c) No special use as provided herein may be is-
sued until a preservation plan has been ap-
proved as provided herein, provided that such
a special use may be approved upon the con-
dition that the final preservation plan, detail-
ing the information required in subsection (Ob)
and accompanying documents required in sub-
Supp.No. 19
90(1.1
17
i
Sec. VI[ OAK 11ROOK COUP:
(v) Its identification as the work of'a master
builder, designer or architect whose individ-
ual work has influenced the development of
the community, county, state or country;
NO Its embodiment of elements of architec-
tural design, detail, materials, or draftsman-
ship which represent a significant architec-
tural innovation;
(vii) Its unique location or singular physical
characteristics representing an established or
familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or
the community;
and
(b) The building is suitable for preservation and
continued use of conversion as residential
dwellings.
(3) Findings: In addition to the findings required under
Section XIII(JX5) hereof, no special use may be
granted hereunder unless findings are made that:
(a) The building in question has historical, ar-
chitectural or cultural significance according
to one or more of the criteria set forth in
subsection (2) hereof;
(b) The proposed preservation plan does in fact
preserve the existing building as a historical,
architectural or culturally significant structure;
(c) The building is suitable for preservation and
continued use or conversion as residential
dwellings.
(4) Procedure:
(a) The applicant shall file concurrently:
(1) An application for a special use as herein
provided; and
(ii) An application for approval of a proposed
preservation plan, which applications shall
be processed in the manner prescribed in Sec
tion XIII(J) hereof.
(b) The proposed preservation plan shall include:
(i) Information addressing the criteria set forth
in subsection (2) hereof;
Supp.No. 18 900
Sec.VII OAK BROOK CODE
i
(v) Its identification as the work of a master
huilder, designer or architect whose individ-
ual work has influenced the development of
the community, county, state or country;
NO Its embodiment of elements of architec-
tural design, detail, materials, or draftsman-
ship which represent a significant architec-
tural innovation;
(vii) Its unique location or singular physical
characteristics representing an established or
familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or
the community;
and
(h) The building is suitable for preservation and
continued use of conversion as residential
dwellings.
(3) Findings: In addition to the findings required under
Section Xill(,JNS) hereof, no special use may he
granted hereunder unless findings are made that:
(a) The huilding in question has historical, ar-
chitectural or cultural significance according
to one or more of the criteria set forth in
subsection (2) hereof;
(h) The proposer) preservation plan does in fact
preserve the existing building as it historical,
architectural or culturally significant structure;
(c) The building is suitable for preservation and
continued use or conversion as residential
dwellings.
(4) Procedure:
(a) The applicant shall file concurrently:
(i) An application for it special use as herein
provided; and
(ii) An application for approval of a proposed
preservation plan, which applications shall
he processed in the manner prescribed in Sec-
tion XIII(J) hereof.
(h) The proposed preservation plan shall include:
(i) Information addressing the criteria set forth
in subsection (2) hereof;
Supp.No.18
S)OO
i
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. VII
I
increased by not less than 2 feet for each one foot
of structure height over 30 feet.
(c) Rear: Not less than 60 feet in depth.
(9) Off-Street Loading and Off-Street Parking: As in
Section XI of this ordinance.
(E) R3 Single-Family Detached Residence District.
(1) Permitted Uses: As in the R1 Single-family Detached
Residence District.
(2) Special Uses:
(a) As in the R-1 Single-family Detached Residence Dis-
trict, except airports; and
(b) Residential development of existing buildings of his-
torical, architectural or cultural significance.
(1) Purpose: The purpose of this special use category
is to provide a method of preserving institutional
buildings in existence prior to the incorporation of
the Village which are of historical, architectural
or cultural significance for use as residential
dwellings.
(2) Criteria: In addition to the standards set forth in
Section XIII(JX5) hereof, no special use may be
granted hereunder unless:
(a) The existing building has historical, architec-
tural or cultural significance according to one
or more of the following criteria:
(i) Its character, interest or value as part of
the development, heritage, or cultural char-
acteristics;
(ii) Its identification with a person or persons
who significantly contributed to the development
of the community, county, state or country;
(iii) Its exemplification of the cultural, reli-
gious, economic, social, political or historic
heritage, of the community;
(iv) Its embodiment of distinguishing charac-
teristics of an architectural style valuable for
the study of a period, type, method of construc-
tion, or use of indigenous materials;
Supp.No. 18 899
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. XIII
No special use shall be authorized by the Vill aNc
Board unless the special use:
(a) Is of the type described in Section XIII J-L (a) is
deemed necessary for the public convenience at
that location. (Ord. No. G-66, 12-19-66);
(b) Is so designed, located and proposed to be
operated that the public health, safety and welfare
will be protected; and
(c) Would not cause substantial injury to the value of
other property in the neighborhood in which it is
located.
(6) Conditions: The Plan Commission and Zorunt 1 e"Ird
of Appeals may recommend, and the Village I-loard
may provide, such conditions and restrictions upon
the construction, location and operation of a -g1wciW.
use, including, but not limited to, provisions for
off-street parldng and loading as may be deemed
necessary to promote the general objectives of this
ordinance and to minimize the injury to the value of
the property in the neighborhood.
(K) Fees.
Fees for any relief under this ordinance shall he as
otherwise established by separate ordinance. (Ord. IAo.
G-132, 5-25-71; Ord. No. G-289, § 2, 3-24-81)
(L) Violation, Penalty and Enforcement.
(1) Any person, firm or corporation who plate
disobeys, omits, neglects, refuses to comply with of
who resists enforcement of any of the pro-visions of
this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined not 1-psis
than $25.00 nor more than $500.00 for each offense.
Each day that a violation is permitted to eNi.st shall
constitute a separate offense.
(2) The Building Inspector is hereby designated find
authorized to enforce this ordinance. However, it shall
also be the duty of all officers, citizens and employs
of the Village, particularly of all members of the police
Supp. No. 49 973
Sec. XIII OAK BROOK CODE
(2) Authority. Special uses shall be authorized or denied
by the Village Board in accordance with the Statutes
of the State of Illinois applicable to amendments of
this ordinance, and the regulations and conditions set
forth in this ordinance for special uses.
No application for a special use shall be acted upon by
the Village Board until after:
(a) A written report is prepared and forwarded to the
Board of Appeals and the Village Board by the
Plan Commission in a manner prescribed herein
for amendments to this ordinance; and
(b) A public hearing has been held by the Zoning
Board of Appeals, after due notice by publication
as provided by the applicable Statutes of the State
of Illinois for amendments and upon a report of
the Plan Commission to the Board of Trustees, if
such a report is made.
(3) Initiation: An application for a special use may be
made by any person, firm or corporation or by any
office, department, board, bureau or commission
requesting or intended to request a zoning certificate.
(4) Processing. An application for a special use, in such
form and accompanied by such information as shall
be established from time to time by the Plan
Commission, shall be filed with the Village Clerk and
thereafter processed in the manner prescribed thereto-
fore for applications and amendments. Special use
applications may be processed simultaneously with
requests for amendment of this ordinance. (Ord. No.
6-66, 12-19-66)
(5) Decisions: The Village Board, upon report of the
Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission,
and without further hearing, may authorize or deny
an application for a special use in accordance with the
Statutes of the State of Illinois applicable to amend-
ments, or may refer it back to the Board of Appeals
and the Plan Commission for further consideration.
972
APPENDIX A—ZONING Sec. XIII
report of the Zoning Board of Appeals, and without
further public hearing, may vote upon the adoption of
any proposed amendment in accordance with applica-
ble Illinois Statutes, or may refer it back to the Boards
for further consideration.
(5) Re-Applications: Any person, firm, or corporation
having been denied an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance respecting a specific parcel of property may
not re-apply for a like amendment on said real
property until the period of one (1) year has elapsed
since the denial of the application for amendment by
the President and Board of Trustees. (Ord. No. G-137,
9-14-71)
(J) Special Uses.
(1) Purpose: The development and execution of the zoning
ordinance is based upon the divisJon of the Village
into districts, within any one of which the use of land
and buildings and the bulk and lw,.ation `of buildings
or structures, as related to the la�zd, are essentially
uniform. It is recognized, however, that there are
special uses which, because of their unique character,
cannot be properly permitted in particular districts
without consideration, in each case, of the impact of
those uses upon neighboring lands and upon public
need for the particular use or the particular location.
Such special uses fall into two categories:
(a) Uses operated by public agency or publicly-regu-
lated utilities, or uses traditionally affected with a
public interest.
(b) Uses entirely private in character, but of such a
nature that the operation may give rise to unique
problems with respect to their impact upon
neighboring property or public facilities such as,
but not limited to, single-family attached and
semi-detached dwellings, horizontal condomini- •
ums and other residential developments. (Ord. No.
G-66, 12-19-66)
971
Sec. XIII OAK BROOK CODE
(I) Amendments.
(1) Authority: This ordinance may be amended from time
to time by ordinance in accordance with applicable
Illinois Statutes. No vote shall be taken upon the
adoption of a proposed amendment by the Board of
Trustees until after a public hearing before the Zoning
Board of Appeals and a report of its findings and
recommendations has been submitted to the Board of
Trustees along with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission.
(2) Initiation of Amendment: Amendments may be
proposed by the Board of Trustees, Plan Commission
or Zoning Board of Appeals, and by any person, firm
or corporation having a freehold. interest, a possessory
interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual
interest which may become a freehold interest or any
exclusive possessory interest which is specifically
enforceable on the land which is described in the
proposal for an amendment.
(3) Processing:
(a) A proposal for an amendment shall be filed with
the Village Clerk and thereafter entered into the
records of the first meeting thereafter of the Board
of Trustees.
(b) A copy of such proposal shall be forwarded by the
Village Clerk to the Zoning Board of Appeals with
a request to hold a public hearing and submit to
the Board of Trustees a report of its findings and
recommendations. Such public hearing shall be
held upon notice as required by Illinois Statutes.
(c) The Village Clerk shall also transmit a copy of
such proposal to the Plan Commission. The Plan
Commission shall submit an opinion report
relative to such proposed amendment to the
Zoning Board of Appeals and Board of Trustees.
(4) Decisions: The Board of Trustees, upon report of the
Plan Commission, if such report is made, and the
970
/O
pGE OF pqk e •
O � N
G -�.,:....;:...} O
CoUNT-4
VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255
708 990- 3000
April 21, 1992
MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees
FROM: Thomas R. Hawk
SUBJECT: Board Referral - Mayslake property
We have received petitions to allow for the development of this
property as an R-3 detached single - family residential zoning
district.
Please. refer this to the Plan Commission at their meeting of May
18, 1992 and to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at
their meeting of June 2 , 1992 .
cc: Stephen Berley
Robert Nielsen
Margaret Rimbo
mayslake.doc pg1
O A K B R O O K H I S T O R I C A L SO C I E T Y
P.O. BOX 3821 • OAK BROOK. ILLINOIS 60522
April 15, 1992
Mrs. Karen Bushy, President
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Dear Karen:
A county-wide effort for the preservation of- the historic Mayslake site
continues on the -part of the several 'conset•vation and historic organizations.
We are enclosing, for your information, a copy of the map which illustrates
the current Forest Preserve holdings. District 2 has only 420 acres of Forest
Preserve land, 1 .9% of the Forest Preserve land and 16% of the population.
In addition, we are enclosing the vote tally, by township, for the referendum.
Time did not permit full distribution of information throughout the county.
It is apparent that the referendum lost in the areas where information was not
circulated and the issue not understood. Yes, the strength of the vote was
impressive. The referendum passed in York acid Downers Grove Townships, in spite
of Mr. Shannon's highly misleading letter and advertisement.
The subsequent PRESS Publications editorial which is enclosed reflects the
thinking of so many who understand the true value of preservation of open space
and our heritage, and especially the merit in preserving this historic site and
its buildings.
The adaptive uses for St. Paschal Friary and the Peabody Mansion are in the
process of being explored and .look very promising.
In addition to al-1 wetland requirements, we request the Oak Brook Trustees
become familiar with the state and federal requirements in respect to a registered
archaeological site. We request the Oak Brook Trustees to not allow any demolition
of the buildings or disturbance of the property until Mr. Shannon has met all the
state and federal requirements regarding this property.
The unnecessary destruction of St. Joseph Seminary/Whitehall is a valuable lesson.
The once beautiful building probably will be demolished soon. The building had
local and county significance but did not qualify for the National Register of
Historic Places.
In comparison, both the Peabody Mansion and the Portiuncula Chapel do qualify
for the National Register of Historic Places. Any demolition of these structures,
or of St. Paschal Friary, would be a disgrace to DuPage County, and to Oak Brook.
Sincerely,
Committee of the Preservation of Mayslake
1
Audrey L. MSt chler
CC: Oak Brook, Trustees
enclosures
�G
MAYSLAKE REFERENDUM - March 17, 1992
N
Township Yes No Difference ,,, did not. Vol.(, Iol,il
WAYNE 2964 4350 - 1386
13 L OOM I N G 1)A L E 6625 10928 - 430.1 i . ) l:c . ,r 1:•
AM)ISON 5493 6015 - 5P2 Il .:t
WINFIEI_D 3067 4344 - 1277 8.7 8,114
MILTON 12,977 15,215 - 2238 8.6 30,(342
YORK. 15,159 13,234 + 1925 9.0 31 ,218
NAPERVILLE 4709 4589 + 120 8.5 10,166
LISLE 10,511 9,654 + 857 8.6 22,O5S
DOWNERS GROVE 17,497 15,807 + 1690 7.5 36,016
- 5234
Total Registered Voters : 355,480
Total Voted : 178,460
79,111 YES
84,218 NO
r
•
DU PAGE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVES
TO ELGIN TO SCHAUMBUAG
700 u RI
l
HANOVFR DI]PAGE CD. too o"5 tNK RO p'NARe
® IA. RASP IF 'Nv x A W R0 tNr NAP70MAt
SIFt"Nr 7jn 'S� N
oa Ben. .nville° Arr
� N •0 8
Ci
W R "0
+tn m
— -� Blooming le I � • -�v m
C7 � -��� 61evo1Aldo SJ Rrt r) x
II I
� j3 S V OIL AAGtsnn^
trR Carol '- e e
y tvl sbeam i v...
Is
; Vlt Tint I
/ Ifhiel ors ° "0 .O t O-Q• 1
`R� "013
FII n• '.
X �W'firm - f wn.IA U
3 t^ IO
'fit r dX� Iw
Iwo
• ) Co �-
t5°" �' 1 NMf Ott�S` 77Mn ft• S I`�
'Aar mR ID 5 ,, na rook
rARn
F „een� O
� ll / Sft r0 A TORE NM t•`
t uI'^ Al _- oanu wt
ot" a vvI a DOW^ 11S `4 r, "°n .vt
GROV p vN cu Flinn -
wru nn1 NNS IIIN t"i
� /•�' �� •1IM "t
PN RYI tp N lli5 vvt
t _ Pvnl� • .r."t"R— ti C WrNnWM•nl .
moo." w:, ---�� WRndlldpR v°,
vso"
D ■ O
G „'�a�o ntn FN a11RR
•
DU PA
SS M. AT
O
AROONNE N `t0 In
NAr10NAt Ir'
TOR
Ti
Q i
4
J
TOTAL 21 ,657 acres
In
Eastern Du Page
District 1 3,567 • F)1$IIFILI
0-0 o- rnnmlrrnnF IWAlx)unnlFne
District 2 L85 Y.2o
District 3 2,843
Illinois Historic APR 6 1992
.--_. Preservation Agency
A' Old State Capitol Springfield, Illinois 62701 (217) 782-4836 -
Suite 4-900 State of Illinois Center 100 W. Randolph Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 814-1409
April 14, 1992
Karen M. Busey, Village President
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook , IL 60521-2255
Dear President Busey:
I am writing to you about Mayslake, the historic Peabody
estate in Oak Brook , with important information about the
archaeological sites that are located on the property and the
estate ' s historic significance. I would very much appreciate it
if you would send a copy of this . letter to the Trustees of the
Village of Oak Brook , as I think it is important that the
community ' s elected officers be aware of Mayslake ' s pre-
historical and historical value.
According to Thomas Emerson, Chief Archaeologist with the
Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, two known prehistoric
archaeological sites , DU-20 and DU-23, are located on the
Mayslake property. He also states that since this area has never
been systematically surveyed for archaeological remains, it is
highly probable that other , unreported sites are also present .
It is so rare to find surviving evidence of the ancient peoples
who once inhabited the Greater Chicago area, that this property
has the potential to yield important information about. the lives
and cultures of Oak Brook ' s earliest residents.
Also , the Mayslake property is exemplary for its association
with the development of country estates in the Chicagoland area
during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These estates
were located , for the most part , on the North Shore or in
northwestern suburbs, such as Barrington Hills. However , Francis
Peabody had lived for several years in a large Queen Anne style
residence in Hinsdale, a community immediately to the south of
Oak Brook . The selection of a nearby site for his new country
house made perfect sense.
When Francis Peabody bought the property that became
Mayslake he was 60 years old and a national figure in the coal
industry. In 1919 he built a new residential property to reflect
his prominent position in American industry. He envisioned and
n
• - 0
President Karen M. Busey
April 14•, 1992
Page 2
had constructed an elaborate estate with more than 870 acres,
seven farmsteads, a countryhouse valued at $750,000 , and a lodge,
stable and greenhouse worth $285,000. Relatively few country
estates were built in the western suburbs , and the remaining
acreage and historic buildings at Mayslake has historical
associations with this important pattern of development in the
Chicagoland area.
Lastly, the Peabody Mansion on the Mayslake property is an
architecturally significant building . It was designed .by a
prominent and nationally-recognized Chicago architectural firm,
Marshall & Fox . Marshall & Fox had been commissioned to design
residences and clubs, including the Edgewater Beach Hotel , the
Drake Hotel , the Blackstone Hotel , and the South Shore Country
Club . The latter three buildings are currently listed in the
National Register of Historic Places. The Peabody Mansion is an
excellent example of the Tudor Revival style of architecture, and
it has retained most of its historic design and interior finishes
from the time when Francis Peabody lived there.
The preservation of the Mayslake property and its pre-
historic and historic resources is certainly a worthy goal . This
Agency strongly encourages all efforts made to retain and further
study its important resources.
Sincerely yo rs,
Ann V. Swallow
Survey & National Register
Coordinator
I
d'CC,
I w •. • i •
,
� r
A u'
r
V
V I L LA G L- 01: OAK B P-O O K ZONING ORDINANCE VLOUD PLAIN
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD Appeal 0 Variation
OAK BROOK, .TL 60521 $100 $300
990-3000
GVariation a Special Use
APPLICATION FOR FUDL1C 111MI(ING $300 $675
QAmendment (Text)
TO BE FILED WITH VILLAGE CLIi12K $650
G Special Use
$400
ALL APPLICATIONS MUST I11?
f NOTICE TO APPI-TCANTS
{
Filing Schedule - Available on Request
A Variation is a zoning adjustment which permits minor changes of district requirements
Il where individual properties are both harshly and uniquely burdened by the- stricL
' 1 applicaLlon of Lite law. The power to vary is restricted and Lite deyree of Variation Is
limited to Lite minimum change necessary to overcome the inequal.iLy inherent in the
! property.
l 1. A Variation recognizes that Lhe same district requirements do not affect all
1�1 properties equally; it was invented to perw iL minor changes to allow hardship properties
i
to enjoy equal opportunities with properties similarly zoned. You must prove thaL your
I land is affected by special circumstances or unusual. conditions. These must result In
uncommon hardship and unequal treatment. under Lite strict application of the Zoning
Ordinance. Where hardship conditions extend to other properties, a Variation cannot be
! � granted. The remedy for general. hardship is a change of Lite oral) or Lite text of Lite
Zoning Ordinance.
i
4 2. You must prove that tl►e combination of Lite Zoning Ordinance and Lire uncommon
( conditions of your property prevents you from making any reasonable use of your land as
i permitted by your present zoning district, since zoning regulaLes land and not people,
1 Lite following conditions cannot be considered pertinent- Lo Hie application for a
! � Variation: ( 1 ) proof that a Variation would Increase Lite financial return from Lite
land, (2) personal hardship, (3) self-imposed hardship. In Like last case, Lite
recognition of conditions created after Lite enactment of the Zoning Ordinance would
encourage and condone violation of l.he law.
r 3. No Variation may be granted which would adversely affect surrounding properly or Lire
1
general neighborhood. All Variations must he .in harmony with like intent. and purposes of
! the Zoning Ordinance.
Names of Surrounding Property Owners
1 Following are Lite names and addresses of surroundinq 1>170perty owners from l:he properly
in question for a distance of 250 feet in all directions, and Like numbor of feet
occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways havo boon excluded In
comp►►ting the 250-foot requirement. Said uamos are as recorded in Lho office of Lite
i County Recorder of Deeds (or Lite Reylstrar of '1'iLles of Lire County) and as appear from
Lite authentic Lax records of Lhis County.
NAME ADDRESS
s
` SEE LIST ATTACHED TO APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
i
1
r
1
1
1 -
i
,I
J --
i
r
4/22/92
r
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT
1. Amend Section VII (E) (2) by adding a new subsection (c) reading
as follows :
" (c) Single-family detached, attached and semi-detached
dwellings--in subdivisions of not less than 50 acres
in area, provided that the gross density of each such
development shall not exceed 2 . 5 dwelling units per
acre; the structure heights shall not exceed 30 feet;
no structure shall contain more than two and one-half
stories; the ground floor living area per dwelling
shall not be less than 1 , 500 square feet for a one-story
dwelling and 1,000 square feet for a dwelling of more
than one story; and minimum distance between principal
buildings , as measured between bearing walls , shall be
not less than 24 feet, except that this distance may be
reduced by two (2) feet if one of such walls encloses
an attached garage or carport and by four (4) feet if
each of such walls encloses an attached garage or car-
port; provided further that each principal building
shall be set back at least forty (40) feet from dedicated
public streets, off-street loading and off-street
parking requirements shall be as provided in Section XI ;
and provided that a preliminary development plan indicates
sufficiently clearly the proposed streets , rights-of-
ways , lot sizes and setbacks , so that the village board
in granting approval of such preliminary plan may clearly
define the areas of any special restrictions it may wish
to impose and that approval of the final subdivision plan
shall be subject to same . "
2 . Amend Section XIV(B) 141 by striking the work "structure" and
the period at end of subsection and adding the following:
"roof for flat roofs, or to the deck line for mansard roofs ,
or to the mean height between eaves and ridge for gable , hip
and gambrel roofs , or to the highest point of the structure
for structures without a roof . "
EXHIBIT A
' rr
`.' 6� ^ N A n y � M 7 0 f0 • C C U .. n p � n 0 " � M W C r y ^ � ^
M • A " � C � � O � •7 7 C 0. ^ � n � � 7 p� � � M� � ...' 0 r' V � M " I+. r 0 C
7
7 , 0 " M 0.+ .,,, • ,� ^ ^ 7 0 N M
= ��� � �'� 8xa3 . • 0 > oa °' � � voT � ' � MC , : y ; nnn (
it
II
I '
I
G �
r
I �
I U
V I L (_A G L O F O A K B RO 0 K ZONING ORDINANCE ['LUUU PLAIN
1200 OAK IIROOK ROAD Appeal Variation
OAK IIROOK, .LL 60521 $100 $300
990-3000
UVariation 0 Special Use
Al'E'LICATION FOR 1I111LIC HEARING $300 $675
Amendment
1O IlL' k'1LL'D HI'I'll VILLAGE CLL'!iR $650
Special Use
$400
AL1, 11I1I1LICATIOUS RUST' BE ACCOMPANI.E'D IIY PROPEIt FEE, PLAT OF SURVEY, AND IU COPIES OF A
SC_AIX DRAWING, SHOWING ALI, PERTINENT AI111LICAULE INFORMATION; I.e., PROPERTY LINES,
EXISTING I3UI.1,UI.NGS, LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, ANY BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT
PROPGR'i'Y W11,111tJ 100 FEET OF SUlJJFC'I PROPERTY.
IX) NOT WR1'I'L' 1N TII15 SPACE -- FUR OE'FICE USL ONLY
Date C'iled: 4/15/92 Doard of Trustees Referral: 4/28/92
Notice I'ubil shed: 5/6/92 Newspaper: The DOINGS
Dale Adjacent Property Owners Notified: 5/6/92 Staff Referral: 5/14/92
Public lienr.ing Dale. Plan Colrunl sslon: 5/18/92 Zoning hoard: 6/2/92
Dual-(] of Trustees: 6/23/92 Hoard of Trustees:
(Approval of Ordinance)
FEF PAID: $_400.00 Itece iht No. 3690 Received My:
Village Cleric
APPLICANT 'I" CONPLIiTE 06-34-200-016
LOCATIOII 06-35-100-010
OF SUIML''CT PIlo1'I;R'PY: S.W. Corner of Route 83 & PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 06 734-200-015
Oak Brook Road 06-35-1G0-009
LOT NO. _Sj/A SUM)I V LS I ON: N/A ADDRESS: N/A
ZOIIING: R-3 ZOIIING ORDINANCE SEC'T'ION: Sec.VII(E) (2) (c)
Ac;'I'LOII RI:QUES'cF.D: _Approval of a special use for thirty-six lots to be located.
in the northeast 15 acres more or less of the proposed sub-`
division to be named "The Sanctuary" as depicted.on the preliminary
plat of said si Wiyision
PROPER'T'Y INTI.REST OF' APPLI(:11I1'1': OWNER U CONTRACT PURCHASER [ XI AGENT Q
Franciscan Fathers of the
OWlllill(;;) OF ITECORI) _State c)f T1 1 i not c; PIIONE No. (314) 353-3421
ADDRESS 3140 Meramec Street, St. Louis, MO ZIP 63118
NI:lll"F I C I ARY(1 ES) OF' 'J'RII;;T' N/A PIIONE NO.
nl)URI:S; ZIP
NAME OF APPLICANT SHANNON & ASSOCIATES, LTD. PHONE 110. (708) 655-0960
1
ADDRESS 1801 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, IL ZIP 60521
I 1 (we) certify that all of )ale above statements and the statements contained in any
Rapers or plans submitted herewith nr:e true to the b f of my (our) knowledge and
belie[ .
S 1NN & AS , L
__
(` '� t\I•I•I {�•:11�1 hilt H✓
Applicant's Attorney
I NOTICL TO APPLLCANTS
['i) Schedule - Available oil Request
A Variation is a zoning adjusLinenL which permits minor changes of district requirements
where individual properties are both harshly and uniquely burdened by Lhe 1;1.ricL
1 application of Lhe law. The power to vary is restricted and Clio degree of Variation Is
limited to Lite minimum change necessary Lo overcome the inequality inherent in (lie
property.
1. A Variation recognizes that Lite saine district requirements do not affect all
' properties equally; It was invented to permit minor changes to allow hardship properties
i to enjoy equal opportunities with properties similarly zoned. You must prove LhaL your
land is affecLed by special circumstances or unusual. conditions. 'These must result in
unconunon hardship and unequal. treatment under Cite strict application of the Zoning
Ordinance. Where hardship condi.Lions extend to other properties, a Variation cannot be
granted. The remedy for general. hardship is a change of the map or Lite text of Lite
` Zoning Ordinance.
t 2. You must prove that Clio combination of the Zoning Ordinance and Lite unconunon
! conditions of your property prevenLs you from malting any reasonable use of your land as
'i permitted by your present zoning district. Since zoninq requlales land and not people,
Lite following conditions cannot be considered perLinenl: to the application for a
Variation: (1 ) proof Chat a Variation would Increase Lite financial rel:urn from the
land, (2) personal hardship, (3) self-imposed hardship. In Hie 1asC case, Lhe
recognition of conditions created after the enactment of the 'Zoning Ordinance would
encourage and condone viol.alion of Lite law.
c 3. No Variation may be ranted which would adversely affect surrounding property or the
i Y 9 Y g l f Y
general neighborhood. A1.1 Variations must. be lt► harmony with the intent and purposes of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Names of Surrounding Property Owners
Following are Lite names and addresses of surrounding property owners from the property
In question for a distance of 250 feet in all directions, and Lite number of feet
occupied by all. public roads, streets, alleys, arid public ways havo boon excluded In
computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded fit the offico of Lhe
t County Recorder of Deeds (or Lhe . Regisl.rar of 'I'll-lea of the (,'ounty) and as appear from
Lite authentic Lax records of this Comity.
NAME ADDnLSS
SEE LIST ATTACHED TO APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
i
I
1 -
Y.
9
i
. 1
i
,i
1
1 ENSINf TON -
S[
61 '� a•, .• s •� .. ,. , \`fir // Il ,�
]uale s es F a.v 1+ x,zz s ----
[lay y• "- 1+, ,l x» - ra ,a a> tsi� --- r � �/ � -o}_a-"
d I] f r+ .)w a " ,o V y x>' 1a $ .4 •'x »r at t7 ` '� Jj`{ i o �— -•,`.
zot
/} y� „r '• ,n » rtr ° t, .,e C ,nPGG DC,'rl2 1 \ M� no
00'I0. 169 ,) Y.
IWO 160
9
R , 1
9 4]. d R 3
u^Gqs .� o 0 ff 0
ef
sainul
!• Plf „t v N ,• ,�, ° -
rW +
;o ax _
ftb - -- cCH.aal-
_ 's
µ
t- I z w 17 ie1 �,e11s.2 + - \\ 1(/ r
TO 4317
1 teo 191. MIN)r9La !� 1 1 ,1 _.� \ I >o ,j'e ea es�7 70
30 fnl ps
• Tula �/ tol 0 115 taNE .>d r •Ba` ar • J4 •,•//�•'r 1. \ e� `. l 2 IG
[/ ,.A•A,b. j ao - L ss P i i .O a 12 i et 5 ti
a�u ay] 2e5 :o.:,itl O)n75 ,B)'
1
ay] 01 1 ♦4 -. 62 tri yy v ss r ra 2 0 ♦s 1 er T .I. 4 ��
ay
f UO�
r9E 2e5 .:n:s r.a r:)',::' '.FO• �Dr I )i y <. _ s[ „�Il 1Y 29 a.' I j 16
D r'1r8) ter 7 Magi-S t..Ff •rli .. >. s.. / '.� i .t {"{ •♦ `t ie '� ` I I
j0 63utt _tibi n's_c7.•sa rs, 'o >' >eo"jil Ty Z to 79 I
�' a
5 tY /
] O \'its 2e8 � _, _-d \a=-a sl�\ __.. `• \ �r o' .-�i.t�a w° Zl1
ay ; •f.7Xi eE '1 , 'P L-/1J1 __ -_ )� fly/k.e ?� \•>t• 4
PI•f ILIA
_ p at 1„ •e _h
ZI
• 'LO[_ t.sS,, b �r" - �.r!.. zv i z,. _.� i +`-
f� nu t tl to A)I7a 17 771 i "-1_{ .yL� i,- a, m ° \j ' •� `_- 1= -_-�
' I �`�•s7 - 72 7 8t 8r 9 : )_s ,'' .:1 az-1+ /Ir�2 f ) a) as ^as a4 -
]f• at xla \ ,56 1°, r.A d B) a, t 24 [1 '
9uo{• rid/ -� a 8 G -4 t td / )7�3) oH`+ a' • �" 7 --- -----'��
n 97 94 ° 9• 95 9a �3i . 37 a1 ae at ie�
, 95 1 _ .�� 26,71 o EFa
' =' r :4.w`'t
a,Ge B9 9I 98�� I
[ ,•,r.Q. m 91 . �..itj n ' - 21 ,21123 Kd ,'F�e„ s49 '� '� 1 I-T ` s�
t - -
ctl -- �'� •., Aso too
^ �- ° se
'�'1 i V�
axt•af '� °) 5 709 � � s.1 .•j _. - — — -- 11l — - _ _ --
I
w
llanu ■ — lot Ids s_-r ►�l�ll fl I 'S' �_'"
a4] oa /1�1 fl�III�IIoamII�I
•4a fu0
PRELINIINAP-Y PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPL.
VILLAGE OF
OAK BROOK a FINAL, PLAT OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
ASSESS= PLAT APPLICATION
654-2220
1200 Oak Brook Road to Be Filed with village Clerk
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
SUBDIVISION T=: THE SANCTUARY DATE FIT 4/ 15/92
G NERAL I=ICN OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE SUBDIVIDED:
Franciscan property at the corner of Oakbrook Road and Route 83 , south
to 35th Street and west to Trinity Lakes .
NAME OF APPLICANT: SHANNON & ASSOCIATES , LTD. PHONE NO. (708) 655-0960
ADDRESS: 1801 Oakbrook Road CITY Oak Brook STATE IL 60521
Zip Code
RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY:
Contract Purchaser
Illinois
OVER OF RECORD: Franciscan Fathers of the State of Flier NO. (3.14) 353-3421
ADDRESS: 3140 Meramec Street CITY St . Louis STATE MO 63118
Zip Code
BEViEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST:
NAME: PHONE NO.
ADDRESS: CITY STATE
Zip Code
SHANNON ASSOCIATES LTD .
ignature of Applicant)
OK,L,U RS AFFIDAVIT FOR SUBDIVISIONS OF NOT MORE ThIAN FIVE (5) LOTS
This plat contains the entire contiguous undeveloped land area in which I have
arry interest.
(Signature of Owner)
IDENTIFY STRUCTURES AND MIER I14PRO 24ENT'S ON THE PROPERTY:
St . Paschal ' s Friary ; Peabody Mansion and adjacent Mayslake Retreat
facilities ; Portiuncula Chapel ; asphalt drives and parking areas ;
various sewer and water mains .
Flood Plains: ----- 0 Sq. Ft. are under Flood Plain Ordinance and are graphically
depicted on attached plans.
SIZING BY LAND USE CA [MRY
RESIDENTIAL CMSERCTAL OPEN SPACE OTTER T•CITAL
NO. OF LC TS 134 0
NO. OF ACRES lo' r S
22 . 150 89 .716
NO. OF SQ. FP. 2- �y"Zi 9�� 964 , 854 3, 908 ,029
!
i
IWIES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS:
Following are the narres and addresses of surrounding property owners from the property in
question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions, and the number of
feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in
computing the 250 foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the
County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the County) and as appear frm
the authentic tax records of this County. {,
i
NAME ADDRESS
See attached address list M
t
i
j
f
4
1
I
{
!
i.
Refer to Oak Brook Code: Appendix B - Subdivision Regulations
t
i
All applications mint be acccupani.ed by proper fee and (18) copies of the proposed sub-
division, and must be received prior to the 15th of the month for Plan Commission review
on the third Monday of the following month.
G-289 Preliminary Plat $20.00 per lot or $25.00 minimum
3/24/81 Final plat $100.00 - NO IMPROVEMENTS
(Plus Plan Review & Inspection Fees,
if required)
G-259
12/11/79 Assessment Plat No charge
$2,680.00
RECEIVED: 3691 Nom_ Shannon-'and Associates DATE. 4/15/92
. AMOUNT
Check No.
RF,CEIVED BY: i DATE:
Village 'Clerk
- - - - - - - - -APPLICANT SHOULD BE PRESENT AT MEETINGS CHECK - - - - - - -
All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Roan of the Oak Brook Village Camrens
9 ,
1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521.
Board of Trustees (Referral) .. ...... . . . .. . 7:30 P.M., Tuesday
X Plan Conini_ssio
n Meeting. . .. . ... ... ... . . . . .. . 7:30 P.M. , Monday
X Board of Trustees Meeting... . . .... . ... . . .. 7:30 P.M., Tuesday
PRIOR TO SCIi TJ= MEETING, APPLICANT IS TO CONTACT VILLAGE
f ENGR= AND REQQEST STATUS OF PLAT REVM-1, ALLOWING FOR
Nom' SUFFICIENT TIME TO RESLU11T WITH ANY I=SSARY ADDITIOIIS OR
CORRECri'IONS.
Page 2 � {
' r
S
06-27-403-012 06-27-403-013
LaSalle National 10-3184 2-09 Lory L. Divita
135 S. LaSalle St. 4 Concord Drive
Chicago, IL 60603 Oak Brook, IL 1 60521
06-27-403-048 06-27-403-049
Ist Nat'l Bank of Cicero Trust #4788 Eugene T. Pepich
6000 Cermak Road 11 Cambridge Dr.
Cicero, IL 60650 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-001 06-27-404-002
Jean Pancotto Frank R. Bobek
2 Concord Dr. 4 Cambridge Dr.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-003 06-27-404-004
Roy B. Lynch Choong H. & Keum H. Lee
6 Cambridge Dr. 8 Cambridge Dr.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-005 06-27-404-006
Emil Cic Marianne T. Huber
10 Cambridge Dr. 12 Cambridge Dr.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-007 06-27-404-025
Richard & M.W. DeCamara Nadine H. Pracyk
16 Cambridge Dr. 8 Heather Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-026 06-27-404-027
Laila Awad Henry O. Marcy III
10 Heather Lane 12 Heather Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-404-028 06-27-404-029
Terry Ashwill Oak Brook Bank Trust #2450
14 Heather Lane 2021 Spring Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-001 06-27-405-002
Gopal K. & Subhash Popli Doris M. Martel
17 Heather Lane 15 Heather Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-003 06-27-405-004
Walter J. & J. O'Brian, II Frank H. Mungo
11 Heather Lane 9 Heather Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-005 06-27-405-006
Superior Bank Trust #1202 Robert E. Gibbs
One Lincoln Centre 5 Heather Lane
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-010 06-27-405-011
Klaus G. & Crista Knapp Jerry & Marilyn Matustik
5 Regent Dr. 15 Lambeth Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-012 06-27-405-013
Alan & Kathleen Miller William & Roberta Krause
11 Lambeth Court 9 Lambeth Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-022 06-27-405-023
Amer. Midwest Bank & Trust, Tr. #689 Sidney VanChieri
1600 W. Lake St. 5 Lambeth Court
Melrose Park, IL 60160 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-024 06-27-405-025
Kamran & N. Amir Ebrahimi Reginald & Gail Garratt
3 Lambeth Court 3 Regent Dr.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-026 06-27-405-027
Raymond & Alice Ziemer Oak Brook Forest Unit #2
1 Regent Dr. 9 Lambeth Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-405-020 06-27-405-021
Oak Brook Forest Comm. Assoc. Oak Brook Forest Unit #2
9 Lambeth Court 9 Lambeth Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-406-014 06-27-406-015
Paul A. & Violet Sivak Midwest Bank & Trust
8 Regent Dr. Trust #89-04-5757
Oak Brook, IL 60521 1606 N. Harlem Ave.
Elmwood Park, IL 60635
06-27-406-016 06-27-407-022
Rudolph & S.C. Misurec 1st Nat'l. Bank of Hinsdale
4 Regent Dr. Trust #L-345
Oak Brook, IL 60521 22 Briarwood
Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-407-023 06-27-407-024
Thomas P. Cooper Trust Grace F. Ingue
Gail Domontelle, Trustee 24 S. Briarwood South
262 E. Wilson Oak Brook, IL 60521
Elmhurst, IL 60126
06-27-407-025 06-27-407-026
Adolph & Marion Rolandi Constantine L. Chones
25 Briarwood South 26 Briarwood South
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-27-407-027 06-27-407-028
Midwest Bank & Trust Frank Christopher
Turst #88-04-5477 28 Briarwood Lane South
1606 Harlem Ave. Oak Brook, IL 60521
Elmwood Park, IL 60635
06-27-407-029 06-27-407-113
Peter P. & B.S. Mackinnon Edward & Mary Ann Mize
29 Briarwood South 62 Briarwood South
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-004 06-34-201-005
William E. DeWitt Billy H. & Ann S. Chan
118 E. Vallette St. 108 St. Francis Circle
Elmhurst, IL 60126 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-006 06-34-201-007
William & Helena Wan Carl J. & Carol A. Nemec
333 Addison Road 112 St. Francis Circle
Riverside, IL 60546 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-008 06-34-201-009
Trinity lakes Improvement Sandrea L. Kuhlman
402 St. Mark's Circle 114 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-010 06-34-201-011
Bom 1. & Gui H. Lee Kenneth & Caroline Choe
116 St. Francis Circle 2819 Meyers Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-012 06-34-201-013
Muhammond A. & Saida Amjad H.K. & Mary R. DyiBoniface
120 St. Francis Circle 122 St. Francis Drive
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-014 06-34-201-015
Gary Wheaton Bank Trust #5784 Geedipalley Reddy
120 E. Wesley St. 126 St. Francis Circle
Wheaton, IL 60187 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-016 06-34-201-017
Jerome A. Pinaro Odell & Ruby Segers
P. O. Box 3066 130 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-018 06-34-201-019
V & R Spinivasan Trinity lakes Improvements
132 St. Francis Circle 402 St. Marks Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-020 06-34-201-021
Vincent P. Allegra Robert & Carol Koenemah
15 Devonshire 203 St. Michael Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-022 06-34-201-023
Ken Pavichevich William & Helena Wan
10853 Kingston 333 Addison St.
Westchester, IL 60153 Riverside, IL 60546
06-34-201-024 06-34-201-025
Raymond & Andrea Andre Villa Park Trust & Savings
209 St. Michael Court Trust #1428
Oak Brook, IL 60521 10 S. Villa
Villa Park, IL 60181
06-34-201-037 06-34-201-038
Terry G. Lee Kandankumar & Nairnj Giri
140 St. Francis Dr. 138 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-039 06-34-201-040
James & Lanette Gallagher Henry & Elizabeth Chiu
136 St. Francis Circle 200 St. Michael Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-201-041 06-34-201-042
Thomas & Mary Rodts LaSalle Nat'l Bank #10-37308-09
1009 N. Linden 135 S. LaSalle St.
Oak Park, IL 60302 Chicago, IL 60603
06-34-201-043 06-34-201-044
Gregorio & Mary Delgado Michael & Marte Goldblatt
206 St. Michael Court 208 St. Michael Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-045 06-34-204-046
James M. Merrion Avenue Bank & Trust Co.
210 St. Michael Court Trust #4408
Oak Brook, IL 60521 104 N. Oak Park Ave.
Oak Park, IL 60301
06-34-204-047 06-34-202-001
Trinity Lakes Improvements River Forest State Bank & Trust
402 St. Marks Court Trust #2680
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Lake St. & Franklin Ave.
River Forest, IL 60305
06-34-202-002 06-34-202-003
Robert C. & K.M. Keck 1 st Federal - Mtg. Dept.
135 St. Francis Court For Comm. Nat'l Bank Brwyn
Oak Brook, IL 60521 840413
84000 Louisana Ave.
Merrillville, IN 46411
06-34-202-004 06-34-202-005
Tadikonda L. Rao Berthold & D.A. Rudnick
1914 Midwest Club 129 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-202-006 06-34-202-007
Wing Kam Liu Marcellus H. Moore
127 St. Francis Circle 125 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-202-008 06-34-202-009
Spero Karuelas Anthony Cappetta
113 St. Francis Circle 1 st Bank of Oak Park
Oak Brook, IL 60521 11 W. Madison St.
Oak Park, IL 60302
06-34-202-010 06-34-202-011
Mercedes Redondo Alma E. & G.G. Gutierrez
117 St. Francis Circle 119 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-202-012 06-34-202-013
George & L.L. Padzamsky Stamos & Maria Liossis
121 St. Francis Circle 123 St. Francis Circle
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-001 06-34-204-002
Trinity Lakes Improvements Mario & Vivian Yu
402 St. Marks Court 818 St. Stephens
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-003 06-34-204-004
Mukesh C. & Charlene Jain Franke Diaz
816 St. Stephens 812 St. Stephens
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-005 03-34-204-006
Robert & B. Willamschen, Jr. Sonal & Upendra Shah
810 St. Stephens 808 St. Stephens
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-007 06-34-204-008
George & Linda Golemes Ramabrahmam Tummala
806 St. Stephens 1496 Teeway Drive
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Columbus, OH 43220
06-34-204-009 06-34-204-010
Henry & Dorothy Bronson Ramesh & Kiran Gandi
904 St. Stephens 260 E. Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Elmhurst, IL 60126
06-34-204-011 06-34-204-012
Ronald & Beth Cullum Josephine Marano % A. Marano
908 St. Stephens 4 S. Watermarket
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Chicago, IL 60608
06-34-204-013 06-34-204-014
A. W. Wendell & Sons, Inc. Jit Kim & Ursula S. Lim
1121 Warren Ave. 914 St. Stephens Green
Downers Grove, IL 60515 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-015 06-34-204-016
West Suburban Bank Trust #3343 Becnam Zakhireh
916 St. Stephens Green 918 St. Stephens Green
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-017 06-34-204-021
American Nat'l Bank #102011-01 F. Edward & S. Gustafson
33 N. LaSalle St. 913 St. Stephens Green
Chicago, IL 60690 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-022 06-34-204-023
New Lenox State Bank Trust #958 John & Alice Demetra
110 W. Maple St. 909 St. Stephens Green
New Lenox, IL 60451 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-204-024 06-34-204-025
Cynthia L. Cunningham Harris Bank Hinsdale L-2899
907 St. Stephens Green 50 S. Lincoln St.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Hinsdale, IL 60521
06-34-204-026 06-34-204-027
Damir Missbrenner Vasudevan Rajaram
3020 W. 35th St. 900 St. Stephens Green
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-205-001 06-34-205-002
Brian & Darlene Kern M. Lee
801 St. Stephens Green 405 Stonegate Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Willowbrook, IL 60521
06-34-205-003 06-34-205-004
Owen D. Bekkum Edmund Bolton
805 St. Stephens Green 741 Oakwood Court
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Westmont, IL 60559
06-34-205-005 06-34-205-006
1st Illinois Bank & Trust #10174 Tenkasi V. Subramania
14 S. LaGrange Road 811 St. Stephens Green
LaGrange, IL 60525 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-205-007 06-34-205-008
Steven & Grace Kim Laurence & Coralie Zung
813 St. Stephens Green 815 St. Stephens Green
P P
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-205-009 06-34-205-010
Eileen O'Malley John A. & Gaim M. Williams
817 St. Stephens Green 819 St. Stephens Green
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-34-200-016 06-34-200-015
Beverly Bank & Trust #8-6615 Assn. Franciscian Fathers
1357 W. 103rd St. 3313 Midwest Road, Box 449
Chicago, IL 60643 Oak Brook, IL . 60521
06-34-200-005 06-34-200-007
State of Illinois State of Illinois
Plat of Lands of F.O. & J.K. Plat of Lands of F.O. & J.K.
201 W. Center Court 201 W. Center Court
Schaumburg, IL 60196 Schaumburg, IL 60196
06-35-300-003 06-35-300-005
Amoco Oil Co. Re-Mast (record not found)
P. O. Box 3428
Oak Brook, IL 60522
06-35-301-001 06-35-301-002
Institute of Basic Life Institute of Basic Life
P. O. Box 1 P. O. Box 1
Oak Brook, IL 60522 Oak Brook, IL 60522
06-35-303-004 06-35-303-005
American National Bank Quail Hollow Venture
Trust #102993-03 C/O Epstein Real Estate
33 N. LaSalle St. 600 W. Fulton
Chicago, IL 60690 Chicago, IL 60661
06-35-303-006 06-26-300-002
American National Bank Steven G. Carlson
Trust #106595-06 3517 Madison
33 N. LaSalle St. Oak Brook, IL 60521
Chicago, IL 60690
06-26-300-003 06-35-100-004
1 st Nat'l. Bank of LaGrange Tr. #1039 State of Illinois
620 W. Burlington Road 201 W. Center Court
LaGrange, IL 60525 Schaumburg, IL 60196
06-35-100-006 06-35-100-008
State of Illinois Association Franciscian Fathers
201 W. Center Court 1717 - 31st St.
Schaumburg, IL 60196 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-100-009 06-35-100-010
Association Franciscian Fathers Beverly Bank & Trust #8-6615
171 - 31 st St. 1357 W. 103rd St.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Chicago, IL 60643
06-35-108-001 06-35-108-002
1st Nat'l. Bank of Joliet #2995 1st Nat'l. Bank of Joliet #2995
78 N. Chicago St. 78 N. Chicago St.
Joliet, IL 60431 Joliet, IL 60431
06-35-108-003 06-35-108-004
Rex A. & Asuncion Juardo Louis & Helen Adlini
824 St. Stephens Green 825 St. Stephens Green
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-108-005 06-35-108-006
Joseph & Kay Paik Prairie Development, Ltd.
823 St. Stephens Green 1 Prairie Center
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Matteson, IL 60443
06-35-102-006 06-35-102-007
Midwest Bank & Trust #895825 Dominic Rossi
1606 N. Harlem 212 Indian Trail Court
Elmwood Park, IL 60635 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-102-008 06-35-102-009
Vedp & Rita YaDava 1 st Midwest Bank/Joliet#5000
214 Indian Trail Court 50 W. Jefferson St.
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Joliet, IL 60431
06-35-102-010 06-35-102-011
John & Cynthia Monteverde Prasade Neerukonda
218 Indian Trail Road 220 Indian Trail Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-102-012 06-35-102-013
Althuru S. & Sarada Reddy Sam & Elor Tembria
222 Indian Trail Road 224 Indian Trail Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-102-014 06-35-102-015
Nat'l Bank of Austin Trust #5805 Munesh Ahluwalia
5645 W. Lake St. 217 Indian Trail Road
Chicago, IL 60644 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-102-041 06-35-102-042
Shibban K. & A. Ganju James R. Kirchner
604 Mallard Lane 606 Mallard Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-102-043 06-35-102-044
Hasmukh & Pushpa Shah Hunters Trails
608 Mallard Lane 211 W. Chicago Ave., No. 10
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Hinsdale, IL 60521
06-35-104-001 06-35-104-002
Khalik H. & Labibeh Zayed LaGrange State Bank #4315
607 Mallard Lane P. O. Box 234
Oak Brook, IL 60521 LaGrange, IL 60525
06-35-104-003 06-35-104-004
Thomas J. Lally Ozcenancia Bungcayao
603 Mallard lake 6709 Wedgewood Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Willowbrook, IL 60521
06-35-104-005 06-35-104-006
Ozcenancia Bungcayao Kovacevic Trust #2078
6709 Wedgewood lane C/O Citizens National Bank
Willowbrook, IL 60521 5100 Main St.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
06-35-104-007 06-35-104-008
Bank of Lisle Trust #86-19 Azizur R. Arain
4733 Main St. 116 Indian Trail
Lisle, IL 60532 Oak Brook, IL 60521
06-35-106-001 06-35-106-002
Adele Fahey Hunters Trails
807 Deer Trail Lane 711 W. Chicago Ave., No. 10
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Hinsdale, IL 60521
06-35-106-003 06-35-106-004
George & Virginia Hlavac Dr. & Mrs. Jeng Su
803 Deer Trail Lane 801 Deer Trail Lane
Oak Brook, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60521
SHANNON &ASSOCIATES, LTD.
210 QUAIL RIDGE DRIVE 001657
WESTMONT,IL 60559
70-90em9
COLE TAYLOR BANK/YORKTOWN AMOUNT I
LOMBARD,ILLINOIS
74/22/92 *$1 , 050 . 00**
PAY **1050**DOLLARS AND **00**CENTS
TO THE SHANNON&ASSOCIATES,LTD.
OnDERor Village of Oak Brook
11'00 65711' 1:071I9090621: 118S3- ,069Ln•
CHECK , CHECKS CASH INV N NUMBER DATE
NAME G.L.ACCOUNT A DESCRIPTION
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK INVALID
'VC Ak WITHOUT
SIGNATURE
BUREAU OF INSPECTION B 03690
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
VDU
PHONE: (708) 990-3000
RETAIN THIS RECEIPT 7�tctK�
FOR YOUR RECORDS
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS
SHANNON &ASSOCIATES, LTD.
210 QUAIL RIDGE DRIVE 001655
WESTMONT,IL 60559
M90srn9
COLE TAYLOR BANKNORKTOWN
LOMBARD,ILLINOIS
4/ 15/ 92 *$2 , 680 . 00**
PAY **2680**DOLLARS AND **00**CENTS
SHANNON&ASSOCIATES,LTD.
To THE
ORDEP.OF Vi 11 age of Oak Brook
C
II'OO16SSum I:0 ? L9090621: I'm S3/1L1069Lill
r — — - - - -- r
CHECK S CHECKS $ CASH INV# DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT# DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
1<
INVALID
E ,K VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK WITHOUT
SIGNATURE
BUREAU OF INSPECTION
B 03691
o
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
you
PHONE: (708) 990-3000
7lcct�u�
RETAIN THIS RECEIPT
FOR YOUR RECORDS
AFEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS
SHANNON / SANCTUARY - 1801 Oak Brook Road
Preliminary Plat of Subdivision - Amendment - Special. Use
Document Inventory List
The packets will consist of:
Submittal Documents:
1) Preliminary Plat of Subdivision
2) Lot sizes and open space calculations
3) Preliminary Engineering
4) Preliminary Drainage Calculations
5) Routine Wetlands Delineation
6) Land Title Survey
7) Traffic Impact Study
8) Map of Topography
9) Application Forms
a) Preliminary Plat of Subdivision
b) Amendments with text
c) Special Use
10) List of adjacent propery owners
11) Legal description
12) Copy of fee payment checks
Initial Additions
1) Copy of "document inventory"
2) Board referral memo
3) Copy of R-3 and R-4 section of 2 . 0 (pages 899 to 902)
4) Copy of Amendment Section and Special Use Section
(pages 970 to 973)
sanctry.doc pg2
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
for
THESANCTUARY
Residential Development
Oak Brook, Illinois
April 15, 1992
Prepared for:
SHANNON ASSOCIATES, LTD.
210 Quail Ridge Drive
Westmont, Illinois 60559
Prepared by:
JAMES J. BENES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 Jorie Boulevard
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
(708) 990-4244
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1
TRIP GENERATION 6
TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7
TRAFFIC IMPACTS 7
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8
APPENDIX 9
•
INTRODUCTION
i
THE SANCTUARY is a residential development that is being planned by Shannon Associates,
LTD, which will be located south of 31st Street and west of Illinois Route 83 in Oak Brook,
Illinois. (See Figure 1., General Location Map.) THE SANCTUARY will be located on the
Mayslake (St. Francis) property and will provide 96 units of single family homes on 0.5 to 1.0
acre lots and 36 units of cluster single family homes on smaller lots. (See Figure 2.,
Conceptual Development Plan.)
This report presents the results of a Traffic Impact Study conducted for the proposed
development. The report contains a discussion of existing traffic conditions, the trip generation
and trip distribution for the proposed development, the traffic impacts, and a summary of
findings and recommendations.
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
To identify existing traffic conditions, manual turning movement counts were taken at the
intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal Drive/Regent Drive and at four signalized
intersections along 31st Street: Illinois Route 83 northbound ramps, Illinois Route 83
southbound ramps, Concord Drive/Trinity Lane, and Midwest Road. The traffic counts were
taken during the weekday peak traffic volume periods. At each intersection, the turning
movements and the through movements were recorded by vehicle type in fifteen minute
intervals from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. The counts were taken on a
Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday to correspond to average weekday conditions. The tabulation
and summaries of the counts at the intersections are included in the Appendix of this report.
The peak hours for the traffic volumes were determined to be from 7:30 to 8:30 AM and from
4:30 to 5:30 PM. The peak fifteen minute period at the Illinois Route 83 intersections was from
7:30 to 7:45 AM. The volume during this fifteen minute period was about 3 percent above the
average for the peak hour, indicating very steady traffic flow. In the evening, the peak fifteen
minute period was from 4:45 to 5:00 PM and the volume during this period was about 7 percent
above the average for the evening peak hour, indicating a greater variation in flow than in the
morning.
The conditions at the intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal Drive/Regent, just west of
Illinois Route 83, were of particular interest because traffic from the proposed development
would use that intersection to reach 31st Street. On page 4, the morning and evening peak hour
traffic volumes are shown in a diagram. The existing turning movements to and from St.
Paschal Drive/Regent Drive are tabulated below:
AM PM
Northbound, left 2 8
Northbound, thru 0 1
Northbound, right 124 329
Southbound, left 73 26
Southbound, thru 2 1
Southbound, right 28 20
Westbound, left 50 90
Eastbound, right 10 18
Page 1
far
} If(L I ►I I !i , .!l :i► �I LI
II Il.:l!Arllw°rw r0^ .�1 W.�� .!� ...�1 IL ��_ I �1.....� i 'Y ...�.� .g r•"_' ";if' �j "`I I �1.c rvoA Ar A»�� ��� �� ,�
_ ,�?:':;ll III )��II, ► IIj(« ��1,•"_auew.t I •••.1�_"-,I�tf "�,,,t�•'l`if��
'! 'wS ' '►. I 1 � � .�� S 'E pt, n �Ib l_. BSI I .E1�:5, L f�S � 1•.b .� r.....,....1 Irk±" i:.. q .,.(,Ifl�•.��
�F I•�
>:• 'I ��, III 3��: 3 ��J �� �, 11 ....�.�.. n
it
1 .'�tMIIM '•� I I L, {'DrM1 Ir JI[ !Mew! �1/ .=` !I,✓
'1K
1 �► Figure 1. � 1
M.I 1
j
► 1 L� I I,:►► tw .r ,- �.%d']i GENERAL LOCATION �t-N- �I�� I
1 ON MAP � J�.,.i
'\ S I
/. t W tY , Y r•.r r ' .-,."^d1 t��" �' I rAwwwcw, .-1"�•
> k.°"� `��\1t 11 IL' 1 JLJL-1!,.J!~4 ,:,, } eu
'r II. n Ill.ww• M �'�. a -I!r � .�. ti:ti tit'rk,�.. 1 I(,w7oAj 74]01, �Ly�, .('v r Y,{• ter}._._:-_..._.
I .I x: 'a1°`>~'+•xa q .J.:+"'y +'• I : t�eM -'i. �• ,, :1 )f I, � 1" / ,,''✓eso'ot it �'✓�
1�naw�r'.1�i Y 5•ra, m' ';t I� s 'E '? .I,?'!yl I., '7' ..r 5 1 k.', i °J II., 'r a. "
•s yQ' x its ' {�yg ,r t}
�';j`COOP.i .r, }'Iwlr°is`°IM11Wrw1 r1 MrxMni •r y I }1 o ti: �� �.r� I_,Dti, ' I d//°.�o�,'`� ' / `.'7t r,: 7 a a`t
)':S .... }5 wwwrnM..I.wrar Vii. 8 I r' I{ �•!%�J:(1•��� ,`►.r''� 1 '/s��y'h�l� I,��,j i � { , �::4.{ti _.. ^' t 0 - � ���.
4I '� /0•MO Ir T,✓:.ira°'rMrlMw :"'rr.wra :,)MDr°OR� ,�C ��C � +�':, ` I`"/'!�If�V(/� �„�/ � p '� r:.?r:{4}?kd ..: I- - b, '-Q �`
r r,rw.•rou •iirwmrMM -•Q + � { y�., •�' / 'C� \� �1 .. ru orr Ds —�
+� -,:'•� ; yrwuwMW Il awtu 'S !I ` �� .►; I !II ltly �;' C II � � t.l� z � ,-= -,� ! �y
•f;I �.i ��, "i{i1IIr1I11/ :,� y r, �ff{ y3 teD�y� 1 ��..: I.
• .�' 4 �.' � y.¢►S r •'•r{ �i•I'.+'N[rr r h� 7�� -
'T•L'' ,err ar tj,7 >y �' t.:y,. } t•.'�I � � - sd ivPl'V'At� - ... .. � ` Iw.
•� rr rr TERRAC r 1
titre I y S Y IiDweM leu oAr r I�it�A� ,,t �Y'' ••'* �R yr
n •' 1 1 r r. I if .{. ';: � �7 441 ..•.a".":') u;Yg000s f.P�,�,
' {' r / " v.. ---•'.1 l(fi �� rtl..•t�b vY/rv{cr/l•S��✓ a.-(A�Q, + ,
« L �.a1 r Dr i ♦ kj alv= ... { v'•{r 11 ^-`��(
11 '\ •,� � '•roMlwoljblow }. 5t r ��i'r`�.�� r f1,�J I'h" '�'r � y �' �,t, A) t� � 1 ]�s7+ ' �]'
I y;:; .,•? ,tA I +� 4 to IAC�y K bry � x1M •o'P a 1."
i =� I � Y ♦ r e1'Yilhif.�{{,y � l a�c`i IEA•r E � „� � sjPd��t,".
�'f• -0.`}, ..]y�I 'A:. t� 4t iF,�F �i:� l" .'' t
t IIIMIr'` _� ' 1 1 Y✓ •• P,� '4z
M Ir t A 3
I I
Ir =• Vii; .• T3 Ir Y • !h r• •"• '/��`✓�I S ' H�., 1nw ...+ a xr J 1a tsx'. a�1 ck,t la+�i 4f 4'•f, zi. iJ ar$ C.!t
, �a,.�rr:'�v72aSnKy7?,�a�• , ?k>J�t+ v ti: {�r»• ��J/'�w 1_..�.�...a�-..:� 4 v r "''' t t'•-�Y:r {v � �`r�a` .f w '`' A 1 "vv„.'(i w ,}?J,. �. I���(����I 4s I
• ? .., ,.. ..'..I � sv.SV^: if I ... T�.l '��. , \l: '� ';v ��\ 4;�Yt fr��>;.^"` `i�S � 1 g n y:.7�9t';
/A�f��
v :...TER .' { <• o '``. R K
��
RACE f �� R,� 7 { ! � ,. ✓//'(/y , x
',,�,."�°�✓ilj�!! ,f Z I g ' ,,0�./ `'/d /��),aeuM ra Mme• 3
' r ���r '..1 s }. �` ♦N'�"oire M I 1 ' o, S
�j I jr
.lG•:•..•):. � �w i' ': r+�- ��. "7" �w�r1•w�r •� , � IMO1. A,�►�� �1 F.��'rf � � � ✓t- S k �
...........Mr✓r yy.:tiv:Ki,— ... _ >c:... D J.aK, .� •�,,, i''.. .,. "'s' •,,,, \,
• J ZE r 1 �� �r�A a �I•v ���
I' �`�'�r.)a'�J � l5 � •� / �' r/_.':' i /��`
U"�1. ;{•>x::,r':,v.+�f il.,�Dw.wWral' v •/r/ \ n � bil } OAKi, !.
A 1 K•,
».y `r f A ,�'a v r •�Deluoraw M r J±I��'/}� t t�v.'e �},r 1 S C`, �(
;i�i � �� �`e, i26 '(.B�1J
� ��'L .r...r.1, I
1 to�y''"-�- f(a�w..nA /r✓,/. /j$�: I •'' E /
!f'--�'II 1 i' �rr •,"� 'I AIiiMMD�s, d/�rr( � � 1�� +� � ;; 1, 1 "r ry a t `t a s�11r W
•J r"1�(`�`4S-...
. 11 �� i-.:�:�� �. ���5 (/ ����•'r-+...-.'vAA4 F 1 r r s,. ' ��r � ,W yrj - s r Y i " w7.�- � n 4 I s
t I I I.reeexlp -.:1 ::5 ?I ` /,: X1..°0 ,;,\} ` �a rownt ro M I+ :i. •T f r r5 a�r4 �t a k v 1 I s c,
11f .r I L.
f I•r• f! r ��
���`��: � � ..,;'•� °^ >..�y:; l l�x •._ r r i\�/\ 'r�y 4' 1/+c+ J � ':��'^��.: 71ST ST�.�Iy 1'
f..,,..�
01"! ~ .. '., LetYDwa4M i( °C•/ � ). Ill lur Ir t k x.Sr.{ ,r} v^:: h Y
" .l2rS$:�7�Y —:.c.ITS � a.. '"" •�"`3mY.tkc.�'l�"¢`,/C �xry �arn..s... ���•...^•i
.:t� _ �P M� .°rao' I�alru'�..!► !^--•'""'/•�ry� . I re��--•..,v/•�q��^�� Y'�t y,'�y,,�L!6 1',' •:, � {1 r �Ar�
Imo'_... l ��.. l��` „I I �'.. C " g { i� iG,a U � :es /� Lw ✓�."' 7r�LI I, t
�I .i�,,b�:_ •'! �w ) � !!!s-._I� �...4! €rrM w � '/ , � � �:' y, �1 /rt A/ 4 v' '+1„t,'4�' , y1 1 r
. �.� .r�"U' ►, y v I�_,//j �'t� b �^J �'- C- r „� 't'.��r..er3µy (�st 7�I.r'.,i a Y,I�wwuuaArw
al�re Jf1�er.Jr �Ei.i17 � �� �1-s t y+e ,l �J� .+'� ti, I a. `!•. ,J h,"!+.
�\ i ( L-::_--y\� \ ,.•,.:�yw w'r"rIWC--u1'�.Y i<+c. / �r "•Y ;•\ ,
//// � ., ,�'" .� '-'-,J'�.�•!{ _.:.,,�� '; ' , Fullersbur
II b /,/ 0�3/
:...'Jl. � F� lT U.:� �/\•�'-v, V 1.r - :-'�1,_'+Ci`'_i 1,/���`,� nMn "..1 '� 1'`t. 1��*«'r+ ;•K•.j �a�q I 1�r ,,
VIII Ir V � ,� S. J 1 �L `vy4a,,, � } � \�� \� •�\::°�' S
.�3. _.�:•:rs,,: •.{I�•'.�'. r_ y'L'"'Lp• � I �....;•'r-•t-�a�` -�.1 t vt '., � t t, err �� t
'''���•••�� IItA1_. .7 'SA w � vv r 4 w
�M
r t \•�,Sr",^r•c:....•r-"� /.w..r
♦ R.. 4rSS.){ rM wnM.'.�' Ef St I `l ;:� 1 "7 , :yr I ,I►
7w
It
�\
,aP�
MMaDM �'I .., y ,{t ( �p ?\ itt•'�1r('• ,.,1
8 g � Yii07•S �� ��.yy��MaM��� a '�I S(�M � } .a r 2 r"�I {Y !: t�-S NN w I� '"��V� 4 F rr/
g •! fp• 7t T$ , � i , lr. I I.; �, t ,11
Y 6� :• owr.olwwl►o11�wa+wlr•wM°,Aw Mr• wwrr1111���I11��YYIII4rrrlo� IMEI!aar-wwNw'rw1 �s1u�Illt
1 •
°° 'I CxltrwY M• —,r M} °At f0 M j(I �I J @LIICLI" M D It l4
Jti .w. ,�n�....�.i I.1�, I .•..-..,1 1 aIAM L � 1y 1 I + ti.1 IIIICw OOD AD �_«.•.JIID '• � A �r+''
}4 I •t'p rn�`,:Cfv 1.� I \ \ a� �} '^ r rowAeAre ruIr �4' '•'f'I r1 y
Base Ma Source: DuPa a Count 9pb" M :• .W i
Assessment Maps and Plats De
! P .A; 3nII4�INlu�...1 y+r1 I r ..,\ }i f.}{ I 1 I:wwYia_rl ✓"It--.�,,,.tle .;+x ,tss,e v
s I■pjt.
a 'ill :.A., ( � �I wq •v.- Mrrw. a p>.r�_... I pwlo r ► ;,,�
�,.rr n i4�1 I.(11,._51...91 � i ' 'I' // ��+��4v, \t, � �� �.., f��'ir' r Y uw w�L•-V'"` f/"�± I I fit' s
'/ilf `��1 .1 �tf� '•.' ", 1 'I EST O NT
11. c� a 't j ! \ i1 t t`,1.1'.. , .•PS 5+1; .I eD, L�„•.1 ..., t,
• .Yr � .•yy{{ I '+ n
•, - � r•A �' • ' � Jlr� 4 1�..:l 1 ► ( ••f I ,,.,.a^rn� y�l 1 � IVt:.� •� �MMII�
�I� It ..����'7�� {r. 3►wr[-?��OQDFrN AV Uyt,RT•7�,__(l \ �'',r ,,�.`:ss:•:4:.KS1.�.'�:.�'�';°'Ir?µ'Ys'h?'v'\_V" _ ' !I t I IIi I�'��(•�Dn` r(A•;,rhiurll l
-- .___.._. .::._....�...... • Clrt,r�i�-..ell �I:«Y�h. it .;>aG�l�
r 3191 STREET -
LVI
\ \ frG it ,1 •,b 4�� -
•\ iPtt\p TC... . \ M W.t wt.. \ zil
IS
- t t
/ SI 'crl�i i 11 s. 1I I y �\_ \ C '�i'. 'F.• z
7 �, 1 �8 .•.. '�• a � x
KENa Aoow.to L.Ra •�� ��IY ., .-
. L .•(X\►' Il. �� 1 < = \ I, 1'� MAYS LAKE t Z, Ai L1 m
•iw� t t
Ji-_t 3 \m It
w�
a.
LAKE. .,..�•'`y ,x t ,il\
I MAYS LAKE.
•
W 1
K, • d [ rm..
/
Conceptual Developirw Plan for �'' ,R ,;4 ��I ji•.
1100 SM&FNF*Lob®25,000 SF.
140 Shya F-*Clbbrs®15,000 S.F. R7Y... �'°' ` ''. •�. I!°.
,� ..,.
SHANNON A880Cf9te8,ltd THE c;LYMAH CESKiN T3FlOUP,WC. � •� �._r_'_ __ _ `•L'�. .
CONTRACT PURCHASERS/DEVELOPEM
PLANNERS/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
WESTMONT.K DALLAS,T% NORTH
-Dar.',inER
44w:
oil.
192 31 st Street
103 89
28 2 73
Right Thru Left Right 67
902 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 872 989
INTERSECTION ,Left 50
2�2 2978 2914
22 Left
1760 1728 Thru 1925
10 Right Left Thru Right
2 0 124
62 126 ^
188
November 21,1991 St.Paschal/Regent N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
176 31 st Street
47 129
20
T-261
Right Thru Left Right 102
1443 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1415 1607
INTERSECTION Left 90
2559 3108 3034
26 Left
1116 1072 Thru 1427
18 Right Left Thru Right
8 1 329
109 338 ^
447 �
November 21,1991 St.Paschal/Regent N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
St.Paschal/Regent
The northbound right turns for traffic bound for Illinois Route 83 and points east were heavy in
the morning, 124 vehicles, and very heavy in the evening, 329 vehicles. There were very few
northbound left turns, 2 vehicles in the morning peak hour and 8 vehicles in the evening peak
hours. The lack of a traffic signal at this location and the heavy volume on 31st Street may
encourage vehicles left turning vehicles to consider other routes. Vehicles with destinations to
the west and northwest could use 35th Street to reach Midwest Road.
During the traffic counts, the times were recorded when eastbound traffic was backed-up from
the traffic signals at Illinois Route 83 past the intersection of St. Paschal Drive/Regent Drive.
31ST STREET - EASTBOUND
LENGTH OF TIME TRAFFIC BACKED-UP PAST ST. PASCHAL/REGENT
7:35 to 7:56 AM 21 minutes
8:06 to 8:07 AM 1 minute
8:14 to 8:27 AM 13 minutes
4:41 to 4:43 PM 2 minutes
It should be noted, however, that despite the heavy volume on 31st Street, southbound traffic
from Regent Drive made 73 left turns in the morning and 26 left turns in the evening through
the traffic on 31st Street.
The turning movements at 31st Street and Concord Drive/Trinity Lane, the next intersection to
the west, were checked to determine if traffic from the north at Regent Drive may be diverting
to the Concord Drive/Trinity Lane intersection to make left turns onto eastbound 31st Street.
At the Concord Drive/Trinity Lane intersection, there were 43 southbound left turns in the
morning peak hour and 20 southbound left turns in the evening peak hour. If there was
diversion to that intersection, it was very limited.
The extent of the northbound back-up on St. Paschal Drive was observed during the traffic
counts. During the morning counts, the largest back-up observed was 3-4 vehicles. During the
evening counts, the largest back-up was 6-8 vehicles. It was noted that the back-ups tended to
clear quickly.
Traffic signal warrants were investigated at the intersection of 31st and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive. The "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", 1988 Edition, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, which is used by the Illinois
Department of Transportation and local agencies provides eleven warrants for the installation of
traffic signals. At this intersection, Warrant 11, Peak Hour Volume Warrant would be the most
likely to be met. The charts for this warrant are included in the Appendix of this report. With
the volume on 31st Street, the high volume minor street approach would need to reach 100
vehicles per hour (left turns plus only a discounted portion of the right turns). The northbound
approach in the morning has only 2 left turns and 31 right turns (after discount). In the
evening, the northbound approach has only 8 left turns and 82 right turns (after discount). The
southbound approach (Regent Drive) has more left turns (73 AM and 26 PM), but a low number
of right turns. After reviewing the existing traffic volumes, it was concluded that a traffic
signal would not be warranted at this location.
Page 5
TRIP GENERATION
In the trip generation phase of the study, the rates published in � Generation. Fifth Edition,
Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991, were used for the proposed development. The rates
for Single Family Detached Housing, Land Use Code 210, are shown below, as well as the
number of peak hour trips produced for the 132 units (96 units + 36 units).
TRIP GENERATION RATES
Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Per Dwelling Unit
AM PM
Enter 0.19 0.66
Exit 0.55
Total 0.74 1.01
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION
Peak Hour Vehicle Trips
AM PM
Enter 25 87
Exit 73 46
Total 98 133
Page 6
•
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
In the trip distribution phase of the study, the directional distribution of trips to and from the
proposed development was developed. The turning movements to and from 31st Street at
Regent Drive and Concord Drive/Trinity Lane from the existing residential developments were
used as a guide to develop the directional distribution for the site: 1) 72 percent to and from the
east on 31st Street, 2) 20 percent to and from the west on 31st Street, and 3) 8 percent to and
from the southwest on 35th Street.
The trip generation and the trip distribution values were used to estimated turning movements to
and from the proposed development at the intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive.
SITE TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT
31ST STREET AND ST. PASCHAL DRIVE/REGENT DRIVE
AM AM PM PM
Site Exist. Site Exist.
Exit Site
Northbound, left 15 2 9 8
Northbound, right 52 124 33 329
(to 35th Street) 6 4
Enter Site
Eastbound, right 5 10 17 18
Westbound, left 18 50 63 90
(to 35th Street) 2 7
As these volumes are examined, it is helpful to recall that 30 vehicles during the peak hour
would represent an average of one vehicle every two minutes.
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
The traffic impacts of the proposed development were viewed from the perspective of the
existing traffic on the roadway system and the perspective of the traffic from the proposed
development. The traffic on 31st Street during the morning and evening peak hours by
direction would increase between 2 and 4 percent because of the traffic from the proposed
development. Changes in volumes of less than 5 percent are normally not perceived by the
average driver. Therefore, the traffic impacts on 31st Street would be considered to be
minimal.
The proposed development would increase the traffic volume on St. Paschal Drive, but it is
counter-flow to the existing traffic. The heaviest traffic from the proposed development would
be exiting northbound in the morning, whereas, the heaviest flow on St. Paschal Drive is
northbound in the evening. The evening traffic from the site would increase the northbound
right turn by 33 vehicles (10 percent) which would be an average of one vehicle every two
minutes. This increase could be accommodated by the existing gaps in the 31st Street traffic.
Page 7
From the perspective of the site traffic, the northbound left turn in the morning will be only
one-fifth of the southbound left turn from Regent Drive that is being made today. The
additional northbound left turns can be made but delay may be encountered. The extent of the
delay would be weighed by the drivers against the time required to follow another route and use
35th Street to reach Midwest Road. Traffic returning to the site in the evening from the east or
the west would not encounter excessive delay in turning from 31st Street onto St. Paschal
Drive.
The traffic signal warrants were reviewed for existing traffic plus the site traffic. During the
morning peak hour, the warrants still would not be met. During the evening peak hour when
the site is fully developed, the additional northbound left turns (9) and northbound right turns
(33) could bring the total volume (after discounting the right turns) to 107 vehicles which would
be marginally above the warrant threshold of 100 vehicles. However, if the trip generation
rates are not as high as expected or if the number of left turns is lower than estimated, the
warrant may not be met.
SUNEVIARY OF FINDINGS AND RECONEUENDATIONS
1. The proposed development would generate 98 vehicle trips during the morning peak hour
(25 entering the site and 73 exiting) and 133 vehicle trips during the evening peak hour (82
entering the site and 46 exiting the site).
2. The trips from the proposed development would add 2 to 4 percent to the volumes on 31st
Street and normally would not be perceived by the average driver.
3. The increase in traffic on St. Paschal Drive would be counter-flow to existing traffic. The
increase could be accommodated by the existing gaps in 31st Street traffic.
4. Existing traffic volumes do not meet traffic signal warrants at 31st Street and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive. When the site is fully developed, the volumes may marginally meet
the warrants.
5. Vehicles exiting the site may encounter a back-up from 31st Street for brief periods in the
evening. However, the location of the entrance to the development is better on the outside
of the curve (as shown) from a sight distance viewpoint than on the inside of a curve as
would occur if the entrance was moved further east/south. A change in location of the
entrance would not be recommended.
-- END --
Page 8
6 a��d
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Beck/Paul Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 northbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 41 259 0 300 0 86 17 103 403 27 0 51 78 0 0 0 0 78 481 2751
7:15 81 301 0 382 0 150 21 171 553 32 0 71 103 0 0 0 0 103 656 2952
7:30 83 375 0 458 0 204 31 235 693 36 0 82 118 0 0 0 0 118 811 3148
7:45 66 386 0 452 0 184 36 220 672 45 0 86 131 0 0 0 0 131 803 2901
8:00 46 312 0 358 0 144 35 179 537 39 0 106 145 0 0 0 0 145 682 2700
8:15 108 420 0 528 0 156 23 179 707 55 0 90 145 0 0 0 0 145 852
8:30 62 233 0 295 0 132 20 152 447 36 0 81 117 0 0 0 0 117 564
8:45 83 234 0 317 0 156 14 170 487 37 0 78 115 0 0 0 0 115 602
Total 570 2520 0 3090 0 1212 197 1409 4499 307 0 645 952 0 0 0 0 952 5451
Peak
Hour 303 1493 0 1796 0 688 125 813 2609 175 0 _. 364 539 0 0 0 0 539 3148
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Beck/Paul Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 northbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 65 245 0 310 0 278 33 311 621 29 0 27 56 0 0 0 0 56 677 3009
4:15 46 192 0 238 0 307 40 347 585 36 0 30 66 0 0 0 0 66 651 3088
4:30 89 232 0 321 0 368 50 418 739 34 0 22 56 0 0 0 0 56 795 3321
4:45 109 278 0 387 0 380 50 430 817 41 0 28 69 0 0 0 0 69 886 3142
5:00 71 179 0 250 0 398 49 447 697 45 0 14 59 0 0 0 0 59 756 2937
5:15 95 277 0 372 0 396 58 454 826 30 0 28 58 0 0 0 0 58 884
5:30 42 171 0 213 0 288 29 317 530 49 0 37 86 0 0 0 0 86 616
5:45 65 224 0 289 0 285 34 319 608 47 0 26 73 0 0 0 0 73 681
Total 582 1798 0 2380 0 2700 343 3043 5423 311 0 212 523 0 0 0 0 523 5946
Peak
Hour 364 966 0 1330 0 1542 207 1749 3079 150 0 92 242 0 0 0 0 242 3321
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
w*w,r*rw**rsww,tws*,e•,rww,►,r,rw,rw*
Observer: Jama/Fratamico Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 southbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 0 279 36 315 17 107 0 124 439 0 0 0 0 19 0 21 40 40 479 2610
7:15 0 330 38 368 49 164 0 213 581 0 0 0 0 23 0 21 44 44 625 2886
7:30 0 433 58 491 29 160 0 189 680 0 0 0 0 44 0 36 80 80 760 2971
7:45 0 371 64 435 50 178 0 228 663 0 0 0 0 42 1 40 83 83 746 2865
8:00 0 415 31 446 42 171 0 213 659 0 0 0 0 53 0 43 96 96 755 2754
8:15 0 414 28 442 17 156 0 173 615 0 0 0 0 61 0 34 95 95 710
8:30 0 327 31 358 33 182 0 215 573. 0 0 0 0 45 0 36 81 81 654
8:45 0 309 37 346 32 160 0 192 538 0 0 0 0 46 0 51 97 97 635
Total 0 2878 323 3201 269 1278 0 1547 4748 0 0 0 0 333 1 282 616 616 5364
Peak
Hour 0 1633 181 1814 138 665 0 803 2617 0 0 0 0 . 200 1 153 354 354 2971
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Jama/Fratamico Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 southbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 0 220 60 280 74 255 0 329 609 0 0 0 0 49 0 104 153 153 762 3460
4:15 0 207 54 261 66 288 0 354 615 0 0 0 0 37 0 108 145 145 760 3618
4:30 0 281 62 343 109 310 0 419 762 0 0 0 0 43 0 105 148 148 910 3820
4:45 0 392 58 450 94 297 0 391 841 0 0 0 0 46 0 141 187 187 1028 3792
5:00 0 281 35 316 82 317 0 399 715 0 0 0 0 36 0 169 205 205 920 3603
5:15 0 284 59 343 98 323 0 421 764 0 0 0 0 51 0 147 198 198 962
5:30 0 267 55 322 81 292 0 373 695 0 0 0 0 37 0 150 187 187 882
5:45 0 228 58 286 80 282 0 362 648 0 0 0 0 36 0 155 191 191 839
Total 0 2160 441 2601 684 2364 0 3048 5649 0 0 0 0 335 0 1079 1414 1414 7063
Peak
Hour 0 1238 214 1452 383 1247 0 1630 3082 0 0 0 0 176 0 562 738 738 3820
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
**■,e***w,t,t rt*•w,r,r*,�*r*,t,r*w,r
Observer: Jama/Paul Date: November 21, 1991 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: St. Paschal/Regent
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Totat South
7:00 0 319 0 319 7 151 9 167 486 0 0 17 17 12 0 2 14 31 517 2671
7:15 4 381 4 389 13 180 6 199 588 0 0 27 27 14 0 4 18 45 633 2864
7:30 2 461 3 466 14 207 9 230 696 0 0 29 29 16 0 6 22 51 747 2978
7:45 7 442 1 450 18 237 17 272 722 1 0 28 29 13 1 9 23 52 774 2866
8:00 388 2 397 5 219 30 254 651 1 0 35 36 17 1 5 23 59 710 2654
8:15 6 437 4 447 13 209 11 233 680 0 0 32 32 27 0 8 35 67 747
8:30 2 318 2 322 11 208 19 238 560 0 0 32 32 36 3 4 43 75 635
8:45 4 290 4 298 14 173 13 200 498 0 0 24 24 26 2 12 40 64 562
Total 32 3036 20 3088 95 1584 114 1793 4881 2 0 224 226 161 7 50 218 444 5325
Peak
Hour 22 1728 10 1760 50 872 67 989 2749 2 0__. 124 126 73 2 28 103 229 2978
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Jame/Paul Date: November 21, 1991 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: St. Paschal/Regent
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 9 228 1 238 15 230 15 260 498 0 0 48 48 9 2 7 18 66 564 2739
4:15 7 232 2 241 11 360 18 389 630 1 0 38 39 6 1 0 7 46 676 2991
4:30 12 238 10 260 21 366 26 413 673 1 0 126 127 7 0 8 15 142 815 3108
4:45 4 278 4 286 12 260 25 297 583 2 1 86 89 8 0 4 12 101 684 2978
5:00 3 292 3 298 31 370 28 429 727 4 0 75 79 5 0 5 10 89 816 2920
5:15 7 264 1 272 26 419 23 468 740 1 0 42 43 6 1 3 10 53 793
5:30 7 186 5 198 26 382 31 439 637 0 0 39 39 6 0 3 9 48 685
5:45 6 203 2 211 21 306 19 346 557 0 0 47 47 16 0 6 22 69 626
Total 55 1921 28 2004 163 2693 185 3041 5045 9 1 501 511 63 4 36 103 614 5659
Peak
Hour 26 1072 18 1116 90 1415 102 1607 2723 8 1 329 338 26 1 20 47 385 3108
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
t,r,r•w,r,r,rw*,ttr*rtrt***,t,r***,►+r,trt*w
Observer: Fratamico/Paul Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Concord/Trinity,
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right- Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 0 324 1 325 3 132 1 136 461 1 0 11 12 3 0 0 3 15 476 2373
7:15 0 368 2 370 5 193 1 199 569 3 1 10 14 9 0 6 15 29 598 2479
7:30 0 413 3 416 3 182 1 186 602 1 1 10 12 11 1 2 14 26 628 2468
7:45 6 406 1 413 2 222 1 225 638 2 2 12 16 11 1 5 17 33 671 2376
8:00 5 324 3 332 2 209 4 215 547 5 2 10 17 12 2 4 18 35 582 2198
8:15 4 317 1 322 6 205 2 213 535 3 5 11 19 16 5 12 33 52 587
8:30 2 295 4 301 5 200 2 207 508 0 3 11 14 6 0 8 14 28 536
8:45 5 243 2 250 6 201 4 211 461 2 3 10 15 10 4 3 17 32 493
Total 22 2690 17 2729 32 1544 16 1592 4321 17 17 85 119 78 13 40 131 250 4571
Peak
Hour 11 1511 9 1531 12 806 7 825 2356 11 6 42 59 43 4 17 64 123 2479
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
rw,rw,rww***,►.•*,►,►,r,r,r,r,rww«**r+r,r
Observer: Fratamico/Paul Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Concord/Trinity
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 3 236 5 249 11 297 4 312 561 6 0 8 14 2 0 5 7 21 582 2439
4:15 3 209 2 214 7 303 5 315 529 1 1 4 6 6 1 0 7 13 542 2620
4:30 6 280 2 288 9 340 5 354 642 2 3 3 8 5 2 4 11 19 661 2855
4:45 3 243 3 249 7 376 4 387 636 5 2 2 9 3 2 4 9 18 654 2818
5:00 2 276 7 285 15 432 4 451 736 3 2 8 13 5 2 7 14 27 763 2792
5:15 7 296 4 307 7 433 8 448 755 1 3 7 11 7 1 3 11 22 777
5:30 3 234 5 242 15 344 6 365 607 2 1 2 5 6 1 5 12 17 624
5:45 2 234 4 240 8 352 6 366 606 7 0 9 16 2 1 3 6 22 628
Total 34 2008 32 2074 79 2877 42 2998 5072 27 12 43 82 36 10 31 77 159 5231
Peak
Hour 18 1095 16 1129 38 1581 21 1640 2769 11 10 20 41 20 7 18 45 86 2855
V
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Jama/Beck Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Midwest Road
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 18 229 22 269 27 98 7 132 401 17 91 71 179 34 32 3 69 248 649 3361
7:15 21 266 42 329 26 133 13 172 501 12 97 96 205 36 66 11 113 318 819 3572
7:30 24 286 62 372 28 140 19 187 559 32 124 104 260 49 40 4 93 353 912 3613
7:45 34 279 56 369 37 176 31 244 613 27 118 103 248 37 61 22 120 368 981 3461
8:00 28 245 56 329 28 151 20 199 528 37 113 91 241 29 53 9 91 332 860 3195
8:15 29 253 56 338 37 171 25 233 571 36 93 56 185 32 55 17 104 289 860
8:30 28 184 40 252 38 140 16 194 446 33 120 54 207 35 62 10 107 314 760
8:45 26 164 35 225 55 145 26 226 451 32 83 44 159 30 66 9 105 264 715
Total 208 1906 369 2483 276 1154 157 1587 4070 226 839 619 1684 282 435 85 802 2486 6556
Peak
Hour 115 1063 230 1408 130 638 95 863 2271 132 448 354 934 147 209 52 408 1342 3613
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Jame/Beck Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Midwest Road
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - . . - - . - - . - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 12 177 29 218 71 181 37 289 507 35 93 36 164 39 124 25 188 352 859 3770
4:15 11 145 33 189 99 208 20 327 516 37 60 31 128 40 93 39 172 300 816 4133
4:30 25 200 33 258 102 306 12 420 678 70 90 42 202 53 126 32 211 413 1091 4522
4:45 17 147 33 197 94 251 38 383 580 61 92 50 203 40 142 39 221 424 1004 4441
5:00 27 232 54 313 133 323 29 485 798 81 74 31 186 57 133 48 238 424 1222 4336
5:15 17 197 45 259 123 329 31 483 742 71 73 43 187 58 164 54 276 463 1205
5:30 3 174 34 211 143 239 38 420 631 61 89 28 178 38 131 32 201 379 1010
5:45 15 144 30 189 127 245 44 416 605 36 62 21 119 36 109 30 175 294 899
Total 127 1416 291 1834 892 2082 249 3223 5057 452 633 282 1367 361 1022 299 1682 3049 8106
Peek
Hour 86 776 165 1027 452 1209 110 1771 2798 283 329 166 778 208 565 173 946 1724 4522
428 31 st Street
0 428
0 0 0
Right Thru Left Right 125
TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 688 813
INTERSECTION Left 0
3148 2670
303 Left
1796 1493 Thru 1857
0 Right Left Thru Right
175 0 364
539 ^
539 �
April 8,1992 Rte 83 northbound ramps N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
571 31 st Street
1 0 0 571
0 0
Right Thru Left Right 207
1692 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1542 1749
INTERSECTION Left 0
3321 2807
364 Left
1330 966 Thru 1058
0 Right Left Thru Right
150 92
f:�d ^
242
April 8,1992 Rte 83 northbound ramps N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Rte 83 northbound ramps
354 31 st Street
354
153 1 1 200
Right Thru Left Right 0
818 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 665 803
INTERSECTION Left 138
2632 2971 2636
0 Left
1814 1633 Thru 1833
181 Right Left Thru Right
0 0 0
320 0 ^
320
April 8,1992 Rte 83 southbound ramps N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
738 � 31st Street
562 Fi �0
iO] 176
Right Thru Left Right 0
1809 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1247 1630
INTERSECTION Left 383
3261 3820 3044
0 Left
1452 1238 Thru 1414
214 Right Left Thru Right
0 0 0
- -L 597 0 ^
597 �
April 8,1992 Rte 83 southbound ramps N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Rte 83 southbound ramps
31 st Street
64 24
17 4 43
Right Thru Left Right 7
TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 806 825
INTERSECTION 'Left 12
2365 2479 2421
M1511 Left
1531 Thru 1596
9 Right Left Thru Right
11 6 42
25 59 ^
April 9,1992 Concord/Trinity N
7:15-8:15 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
31 st Street
45 49
18 7 20
Right Thru Left Right 21
1610 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1581 1640
INTERSECTION Left 38
2739 2855 2775
18 Left
1129 1095 Thru 1135
16 Right Left Thru Right
11 10 20
61 41 ^
102 �
April 9,1992 Concord/Trinity N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31stStreet
Concord/Trinity
1066 31 st Street
F: 408 658
52 209 147
Right Thru Left Right 95
TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 638 863
INTERSECTION ,Left 130
2230 3613 2427
115 Left
1408 1063 Thru 1564
230 Right Left Thru Right
132 448 354
569 934 ^
1503
April 9,1992 Midwest Road N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
1471 31 st Street
946 525
173 565 208
Right Thru Left Right 110
1665 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1209 1771
INTERSECTION Left 452
2692 4522 2921
86 Left
1027 776 Thru 1150
165 Right Left Thru Right
283 329 166
1182 778 ^
1960 �
April 9,1992 Midwest Road N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Midwest Road
FIGURE 45. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
a
>
1 600
= 2 OR MORE LANES £t 2 OR MORE LANES
I- v 500
w 2 OR MORE LANES £t 1 LANE
cc 0
cc 400
U) a 1 LANE >:t 1 LANE
0 w 300
z
2 p 200
i
> 100
Boom-
2
C7
= 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH
"NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
I
�itJF/GG�R�Tlo� T"cc�2,v�N� Va�lc`ES /�N�nl 1!f4lAA4JAj5' TifIPaurr-�`/
oJ� /LriNo,� S�E��' yvL co,�c�r � -�00 yeG►�/a„e
>0,7A
� Q
0,7A >, R >0.35,q T7YEN red kce l� by 40
j 041>
�T-
ao
(,017)} AV OXGc.uS/VE REDuGG /� ICY . 7�lo IAJ 0-4,L
R c GeY 7'14RN 447i)e
L. > use s4m lion
L R
L x TAR (+l D vel►� r'edk�e b y
Lz7-- > 3R (If�N re-d�� R by 2 o:Pt7
RNr> 3L rede
R�L aTk> c�FS rP,aucc R �y So
T R > T
6a '� R > f reduce h 4y 30 P.
A R 4 `r/¢. .fir �5 P.
� T IL = 1e1 T4 _4,A Veh%/eS
4kOder Anla;� Jc,/ef �f���AI-L�N� Govt ES rio�► �A^„1��7-0,2
/
` —.TOE Evc`QY I.vckEA3� v� /�� �elLa „ �-
IQ =
�Z4-'”be r o r: A-F �krnir� ve l&Iew �tl P�'k ,vy � R yac.Y10,� wI L
7 Mo+lN4lAle x,90"60 -I&-AVttJG 7?f9044fr i-4N s ovro wAwvew eluwr 7-aAwmm v"t irS w«.1. Tuen,,
• Oo
Routine Wetland Delineation
Mayslake
Submitted to: Cowhey Gudmundson
300 Park Boulevard, Suite 295
Itasca, Illinois 60143
Attn: Mr. Paul Leder
Date submitted: 8 April 1992
E'CAP, Inc. D F�X_ 2
Environmental Consultants and Planners APR 1 5 1992
P.O.BOX 721 COWHE `,SSOCIATES, I.M.
DEKALB, IL 60115
TELEPHONE: 815/758-1621
Routine Wetland Delineation
Project: Mayslake
Location: Illinois, DuPage County, Oak Brook, T39N R11E, Sections 34 and 35
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Quad: Hinsdale, IL
Date of site visit: 31 March 1992
Field Investigators: Dr. W. E. Southern, B. Sheffer and J. vonWahlde
Introduction
This site is located in the village of Oak Brook. The boundaries are as
follows: Oak Brook Road to the north, St. Pascals Drive to the east, 35th
Street to the south and residential properties to the west. Portions of Mays
Lakes are on-site in the southwestern part of the property. The two lakes are
connected by a system of locks.
The topography of the property is slightly rolling. The eastern half of
the site is maintained as mowed fields and woodlots. The remaining property
is manicured for residential purposes.
The purpose of this site visit was to determine if any jurisdictional
wetlands existed on-site, and if so, their size and location. Wetlands
encountered were delineated utilizing standard methods sanctioned by the
United States Army Corps of Engineers in the Federal Manual for Identifyinq
and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1987) . Jurisdictional wetlands must
meet three criteria: hydrophytic vegetation must be dominant, hydric soils
must be present, and wetland hydrology must exist for more than 5% of the
growing season.
Methods
Prior to the site visit, a preliminary site evaluation was performed
utilizing a 1990 aerial photograph (1 inch = 100 feet) , National Wetland
Inventory (NWI) maps and Soil Conservation Service soil maps. These materials
assisted in determining the location of apparent wetlands and areas that could
have wetland characteristics. Areas so identified were investigated by the
field team.
The characteristics of wetland and boundary locations were determined
from information collected from one or more transects across the wetland.
Points along the transect were sampled for the three criteria to ascertain the
staked boundary and to describe the characteristics of the plant community
within the wetland. Photographs were taken on each transect and Corps data
forms were prepared for each sampling point along the transect.
1
i
1`
NWI Wetlands
The National Wetland Inventory maps identified six wetlands located
partially or wholly on-site. Two of these wetlands had portions that fell
into different NWI classifications. Six areas were shown by NWI to be wholly
or partially excavated open water areas. We located only three of these
wetlands: 1) Wetland 2 (see below) , 2) Mays Lake-West and 3) Mays Lake-East.
The other three open water NWI wetlands were mapped as occurring in the
eastern portion of the property. There was no evidence of excavated wetlands
in this area, possibly because the topsoil had been removed and the area
graded. We located a PEMC wetland (palustrine, emergent vegetation and
seasonally flooded) catalogued by NWI (Wetland 3) . The remaining wetland
identified on NWI was categorized as palustrine, emergent vegetation and semi-
permanently flooded (PEMF) , but upon investigation was found to be the open
water of Mays Lake-East.
soils
Soil Conservation Service Soil for Dupage County list the following
soils as occurring on-site: Blount Silt Loam (23) , Morley Silt Loam (194) ,
Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) , Beecher Silt Loam (298) , Peotone Silty Clay Loam
(330) , Dumps (536) , Muskego and Houghton Mucks (903) and Urban Land and Morley
Complex (2194) . Of these soils, Ashkum, Peotone and Muskego are hydric.
Soil pits were dug at the sampling points (see aerial) along the
transect and around the perimeter of the wetland to a depth of 16 inches.
Soil color (matrix) , mottle and gley color (if present) were determined
utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts (1990) .
Hydrology
For an area to be considered a wetland, there must be inundation or
saturation to the soil surface for more than 5% of the growing season (about 9
to 12 days in northern Illinois. Soil is considered to be saturated when a
pit dug to 16 inches in has standing water within the root zone or 12 inches
below the ground surface. Hydrologic disturbance, such as soil deposited in
drainways, eroded gullies, or drift lines of debris are considered to be
supplemental evidence of hydrology in the absence of standing water or
saturated soils. Saturated soil and standing water were observed in the five
wetlands delineated on-site.
Vegetation
To be considered a wetland, an area must have more than 50% of the plant
species must be included in the hydrophytic plant list. Dominance is defined
as species which control the nature of, or define the character of the plant
community. These may come from any of three classes of plants with differing
wetland affinity; these are obligate wetland species (OBL) , facultative wet
species (FACW) , or facultative species (FAC) . The latter category is excluded
from determination of dominance, but included as wetland species. The classes
are based on the probability of species occurring in wetlands and national and
regional lists of such species have been prepared by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) .
Staking
Boundaries of jurisdictional wetlands and Waters of the U.S. were staked
with 4-foot lath stakes, numbered in consecutive order and tied with blue
2
flagging. The last stake in a sequence was labeled END. Stake locations were
mapped on an aerial photo (1 inch= 100 feet) and the area digitized to obtain
an approximate acreage calculation. For exact acreage figures, a survey must
be performed.
Threatened and Endangered Species
The site was assessed for habitat suitable for the growth of various
species of threatened and endangered plants. No threatened or endangered
plants were observed during our survey. It is unlikely that any of the
habitats are suitable for listed species.
The emergent wetlands are too small to provide nesting habitat for any
threatened or endangered birds and no other listed animals are likely to
occur. one endangered species, the Pied-billed Grebe (Podilymbus podicens)
was observed on Mays Lake-east. Two grebes were foraging in the lake. It is
unlikely, however, that this species breeds on the property as suitable
habitat does not exist. The lakes apparently provide an occasional stopping
area for migrants.
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Five wetlands were identified on the subject property. Wetland 1, the
drainway from Mays Lake-East, extends from the north property boundary at St.
Pascal Drive, south to the lake. Wetland 2, an emergent vegetation/open water
marsh is located east of the Chapel. Wetland 3, a sedge meadow, lies just
west and south of Wetland 2. Wetland 4, a small wetland extending west from
the powerline right-of-way, is located along St. Pascal Drive on the eastern
property boundary. Wetland 5, a drainage channel, occurs just south of
Wetland 4 and extends west to Mays Lake-East.
Wetland 1. This 0.36 acre wetland is a north flowing drainage channel
fed by the overflow from Mays Lake-East. It was not identified on the NWI
maps. It starts at Mays Lake-East and extends north to St. Pascals Drive at
the northern property boundary. It is approximately 4-6 feet wide and the
water was 6-8 inches deep. The banks rise approximately 45 degrees to a
height of 3-5 feet above the channel. At stake 11B, a drainage pipe empties
into the channel. Stakes were located at the apparent high water level along
the channel banks.
Transect 1, Point A (outside the wetland boundary) had upland type plant
species such as Wild Onion (Allium canadense) , Tartarian Honeysuckle (Lonicera
tartarica) and a thicket of Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) . Soils were
mapped Beecher Silt Loam (non-hydric) and no water was observed in a soil pit
dug to 16 inches. Points B and C (inside the wetland boundary) had a domi-
nance of hydrophytic vegetation. Species present included: Cottonwood
(Populus deltoides) , Common Cattail (Typha latifolia) , Silver Maple (Acer
saccharinum) , and Rough Avens (Geum lacineatum) . Mottling was observed in the
soil indicating anaerobic conditions in the hydric soils. Water was observed
at a 6 inches depth in a soil pit. All three wetland criteria were met at
sampling Points B and C.
Transect 2, Point A (outside the wetland) was mowed to the banks of the
channel which made plant identification difficult. Blue grass Poa pratensis)
appeared to be the dominant vegetation and it is not hydrophytic. The soils
were mapped as Ashkum (232) , a hydric soil. Hydrology was not observed in a
soil pit dug to a depth of 16 inches. Points B and C (inside the wetland) had
dominant plant species of Common Cattail, Cottonwood, Black Willow (Salix
nigra) and Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) which satisfies the hydroph-
ytic vegetation criterion. The soil is mapped as Ashkum (hydric) and water
3
1 • •
was observed at depth of 6 inches in a soil pit. The wetland parameters were
met at Points B and C.
The Swink and Wilhelm Index applied to this wetland yielded a Rating
Index of 2.8. A plant survey performed at a more ideal time of the year could
raise or lower this rating, but it is a poor quality wetland regardless.
Staking started at the north end of the channel by St. Pascal Drive and
extended south. Stake numbers on the east side of the drainway ended at 22a,
and on the west side the end stake was 28b.
Wetland 2. This NWI wetland is classified as palustrine, open water,
permanently flooded and excavated (POWHx) . Approximately 10% of the wetland
was open water, but the majority of the wetland had emergent vegetation. It
was approximately 1.17 acres in size and located in a depressional area east
of the chapel. Water runoff from the Chapel grounds and from side-hill
seepage collects in the depression. This seepage made delineation very
difficult as areas of adequate hydrology at this season extended beyond areas
where the hydrophytic vegetation criterion was met. Soil pits were dug and
vegetation assessed carefully to determine stake locations.
Transect 1, Point A (outside the wetland boundary) satisfied two of the
three wetland criteria. Soils were mapped as Muskego and Houghton Muck (903)
and exhibited a low chroma (10YR 2/1) typical of hydric soils. Water was
observed at 12 inches in a soil pit which is, the minimum criterion for
hydrology. Vegetation, however, did not satisfy the wetland criterion.
Species identified were Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis) , Queen Anne's
Lake (Daucus carota) , Heath Aster (Aster pilosus) and Willow Aster (Aster
prealtus) .
Points B,C and D (inside the wetland boundary) also had Muskego and
Houghton Muck (903) soils with the same chromas as Point A. All three
sampling points satisfied the criteria for hydrophytic vegetation and hydrolo-
gy. Point B had Willow Aster, Purple Loosestrife, and Box Elder (Acer negund-
21. Water was observed at 8 inches in a soil pit. Point C had Willow Aster,
Cottonwood, River Bulrush (Scirpus fluviatilis) and Pussy Willow (Salix
discolor) . The ground at this point was inundated with water to 1 inch.
Point D had Willow Aster, Cottonwood and Sandbar Willow (Salix interior) .
Water was observed at a depth of 6 inches in a soil pit.
The Swink and Wilhelm Index yielded a Rating Index of 7.9. The wetland
is of moderate quality. A plant survey performed at a more ideal time of year
could raise or lower the Index Rating.
Stake Number 1 was placed on the north side of the wetland and the
remaining stakes are aligned in a counterclockwise direction. The last stake
was numbered 24.
Wetland 3 was described by NWI as palustrine, emergent and seasonally
flooded. It is approximately 0.52 acres in size and located south and west of
Wetland 2. It receives drainage and sidehill seepage from the same sources as
Wetland 2. The boundaries were difficult to delineate.
Transect 1, Point A (outside the wetland) had Common Buckthorn, Tartar-
ian Honeysuckle and Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) none of which are hydrop-
hytic. Soils were mapped as Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) which is hydric. No
water was observed in a soil pit dug to 16 inches. Only one of the three
criteria was satisfied at Point A. Points B and C were sampled within the
wetland boundaries. Both were mapped as hydric Ashkum soil. Point B had
Uptight Sedge (Carex stricta) which is found in wetlands 99% of the time. The
soil was saturated. Point C had Uptight Sedge, Purple Loosestrife and Reed
Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) which are hydrophytic plants. The ground
4
i
was saturated and pooled in pockets to 1 inch depth. Points B and C were
within the wetland boundary as they satisfied all three wetland criteria.
Transect 2, Point A was sampled outside the wetland boundary. Dominant
vegetation was Queen Anne's Lace, Heath Aster and Reed Canary Grass. The
proportion of hydrophytic is less than 50%, therefore the wetland vegetation
criterion is not met. Soils were mapped as Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) which
is hydric. The hydrology criterion was not met as water was not observed in a
16 inch deep soil pit. Points B and C were sampled within the wetland. Point
B had Pussy Willow and Taper-Tip Rush (Juncus acuminatus) both of which are
hydrophytic. The soil was saturated to the surface. Point C had Uptight
Sedge, Reed Canary Grass and Purple Loosestrife as hydrophytic dominants. The
soil surface was saturated and water was pooled in pockets up to 1 inch deep.
Points B and C are within the wetland since they satisfied all three wetland
criteria.
The Swink and Wilhelm Index yielded a Rating Index of 1.6. The index
rates this as a poor quality wetland but its proximity to Wetland 2 as
additional buffer is worth some note. The rating index could be higher or
lower if a plant survey were performed at a more ideal time of year.
Stakes start on the southern boundary of the wetland, proceed in a
counterclockwise direction, and end at number 23.
Wetland 4. This is a small (0.01 acre) depressional wetland located in
a powerline right-of-way parallel to St. Pascal Drive. It was not identified
on NWI. The area had been mowed. Soils were mapped as Ashkum Silty Clay Loam
(232) , which is a hydric soil. The soil was very rocky and disturbed,
probably as a result of topsoil being removed. A stockpile of topsoil was
located nearby. Transect 1, Point A had a dominance of Blue Grass (Poa
Aratensis) which is not hydrophytic. Other grass species present were
impossible to identify because of mowing. No water was observed in a soil pit
dry to 16 inches. Point A was determined to be outside the wetland boundary.
Points B and C were located within the wetland and were a homogenous colony of
Common Cattail which is found in wetlands 99% of the time. Water was 3-10
inches deep in the basin. Points B and C meet the wetland criteria.
The Swink and Wilhelm Index was 1.0, this low quality wetland being a
homogenous colony of Common Cattail.
Stakes start at the north end of the wetland and end at stake 5.
Wetland 5. This wetland (0.16 acres) is located just south of Wetland
4. It was not identified on the NWI. It is a drainage ditch which carries
water runoff from the road west to Mays Lake-East. The soils for this wetland
were mapped as Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) , hydric soil, but the topsoil had
been removed thereby creating an unnatural situation.
At Transect 1, the drainway was a depression rather than being trenched.
Transect 1 Point A was outside the wetland boundary and had Blue Grass
as the dominant vegetation. Again mowing made the identification of other
grass species impossible. No water was observed in a soil pit dug to 16
inches. Points B and C (within the wetland) had River Bulrush, Common Cattail
and Green Ash saplings. The water depth was 6 inches. Points B and C
satisfied all three wetland criteria.
Transect 2 is a portion of the drainway that traverses a woodland, but a
mowed right-of-way borders the ditch on either side. The banks rise up at
about 45 degrees for 3-5 feet. The soils were mapped Ashkum, but here too,
the topsoil had been removed. Point A, outside the wetland, had Evening
Primrose, Common Buckthorn and Blue Grass, all upland vegetation, as the domi-
nants. No water was observed in a soil pit dug to 16 inches. Points B and C
5
r�
within the wetland had Common Cattail. Water in the channel was 2 inches
deep. Points B and C satisfied the three wetland criteria.
The Swink and Wilhelm Index yielded a rating of 8. This is a moderate
quality wetland, because of the presence of River Bulrush and Green Ash. It
is however, a drainage ditch and does not provide the habitat quality of
Wetland 2. The western portion of the wetland which traverses the woodland
only contains Common Cattail. If this portion were calculated separately from
the eastern segment it would yield a rating of 1, making it poor quality. The
rating index could be higher or lower if the plant survey were performed at a
more ideal time of year.
Description of Suspect Areas Determined not to be Wetland
Area 1. An inundated area was investigated in the northeastern corner
of the subject property. A transect was run and points sampled. The soil is
mapped as Morley Silt Loam (194C2) , a non-hydric soil, but was observed to be
very rocky and disturbed, because the topsoil had been removed. The area had
been mowed making herbaceous plant identification difficult. At Point A, the
dominant vegetation was Blue Grass and Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) ,
neither of which is hydrophytic. Surface water reached a depth of 6 inches.
At Point B, the dominant vegetation was Black Willow, Sandbar Willow and Red
Pine Pinus resinosa) . Surface water was 6 inches deep. The willows are
hydrophytic plants but they were growing in a straight line suggesting they
are aligned along a poorly maintained tile system. This area does not qualify
as a jurisdictional wetland because it fails to satisfy the three criteria.
Waters of the United States
These areas lack emergent vegetation and are considered deep water
habitats. They are therefore considered as Waters of the United States.
These areas also are regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Mays Lake-East
Mays Lake-East is approximately 9.9 acres in size with about 8.8 acres
occurring on-site. It is predominantly open water of an undetermined depth.
Rock rip-rap surrounds the lake perimeter with the bottom dropping off within
5-10 feet of the shore. Rip-rap extends 3-5 feet above the current water
level. Soil and grass cover the rip-rap in some areas. The banks along most
of the lake slope at about a 30 degree angle at the rip-rap and then level
off. A road along the northeast side of the lake is about 10 feet above the
lake and the banks are steeper here. Black Locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia) ,
Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) , Black Alder (Alnus glutinosa) , Green Ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and Grey Dogwood (Corpus racemosa) occurred along
this bank. The perimeter of the lake was, for the most part, mowed or main-
tained as lawn and paths. Vegetation occurred in a few pockets along the bank.
The banks were staked at approximately the high water level. Stakes run
counterclockwise and end at Stake Number 46. Storm water drain pipes enter
the lake at Stake 4. Wetland 5 drains into the lake at Stake 21. The lake
outflow (Wetland 1) is located at Stake 29. The outflow from Mays Lake-West
enters this lake just off-site at the west end of the lake.
Mays Lake-West.
Mays Lake-West is located west of Mays Lake-East and is approximately 20
feet higher. The total lake area is approximately 5.7 acres with 1.9 acres
occurring on-site. The area between the two lakes is mostly wooded with a
maintained path on the east side of the lake. The northern portion of the
lake that is on-site is manicured lawn down to the lake bank. Green Ash,
6
Black Locust and Black Alder are found along the bank west of the path, but no
vegetation was growing elsewhere around the lake.
Stakes start at the property line on the east side of the lake and run
counterclockwise to the property line on the west side ending at Stake Number
17. A stormwater drain feeds into the lake at Stake 14.
Summary of Wetlands
Five jurisdictional wetlands were delineated on-site for an approximate
total acreage of 2.22. Wetlands 1, 3 and 4 are low in quality. Wetlands 1
and 5 are drainage ditches whereas wetland 4 is a depression along the
powerline right-of-way. Wetlands 2 and 5 are moderate in quality, though it
should be noted that the western portion of Wetland 5 traversing the woodland
is of poor quality. In addition, two lakes referred as Waters of the United
States occur on-site.
Of the 8 wetland areas (6 contiguous wetlands) identified by NWI, only
four were verified by our investigation. Of the remaining four areas, three
wetlands, classified as POWHx, were mapped as occurring in an area where the
topsoil had been removed, possibly changing the grade and are no longer in
existence. The remaining NWI wetland which was classified as emergent is the
open water of Mays Lake-East. No threatened or endangered plants are believed
to occur on-site. One endangered bird species was observed but it is a
migrant, not likely to breed on-site.
Regulatory Statement
The Corps may allow wetland acreage of less than 10 acres to be filled
under a Nationwide permit. Under existing regulations secondary impacts from
filling also must be evaluated. That is, if a project would significantly
alter wetland functions such as stormwater detention, water filtration,
sediment trapping, and/or wildlife habitat, mitigation may be required at
higher rates. Once your site plan is finalized, the Corps and DuPage County
must be notified of the desired action. Mitigation for DuPage County is
required at a rate of 1.5:1. Before mitigation will be approved, reasonable
proof that avoidance or minimization of wetland impacts has been attempted,
must be provided to the Corps. Avoidance of wetlands is recommended.
Recommendation
Wetland 1 functions as the overflow for Mays Lake-East. Wetland 5
carries road water runoff to Mays Lake-East. Wetland 4 collects road water
runoff and during heavy storms probably drains to Wetland 5. Wetlands 1 and 4
are low quality, and Wetland 5 is moderate in quality. Since these drainages
to and from the lake are necessary, we recommend they remain in place.
Wetland 2 is moderate quality. Wetland 3, while of lower quality, adds
addition wetland buffer to Wetland 2. They are located in a large depression-
al bowl and collect rain water runoff from upland to the west and also water
from sidehill seepage. This area could be combined with a detention structure
that probably would be required by the County.
7
� 1 1
r �
Wetland
Facing South
Facing West
'
�/
µ
t.
Wetland ♦,.y�,e f�e !!41r4Arq 1. NI►ffr.{, .d':n. '
Facing South
i
I•-
., . _ •
Facing Northeast
h)
d -
EN-CAP,
Facing Northwest f Y/
On
Facing South
EN—CAP, Inc.
t •1
;w
� y•
Wetland 5 Transect T ..•? �,.a..h•.r
Facing West V• xv'
1 �* � •.�Mr0�1's• �i� <
ham:. • l( t �q-'^j/� � , i�+
r.
Wetland 5 Transect
Facing East
E-NCAP, Inc.
w r
• '�1 } ,� � I� I t�' ,/ 1._ �,
4
Area 1 - Transect 1
Facing Southeast
1
� I
Mayslake-East
J
Facing ng South
EN—C Inc.
Mayslake-West
Facing South
t .
40" , 4
AX
E—NCAP, Inc.
dew u0i1eao1 `
ina ular.�o�O Y«I'WMcro.IN.i MY
.. ... -.._....___... .-._)1...—__._�__.nll1).�u1f�_.__.__-�__.1f�tc_—_—.11n ).nl1A•
V 9C"inS II1NVi 00011 NIBOi V 91• 11 03 it l0OI I,003113 I'J O It—01 IsmI 4 AY 10VJ
YIIS)nto 8 St"""""""'• I Ott IV1.1 1 11""'•""""V,V IJ MM
I SC""Will I.WSSV IAN IW113 V iv—ont➢iV1 i11U11 is1M Y (t""" SVIIIA JNIMAntI
Y's 1 SC'wow IIIA 11SVY Nn Ism N It, Ynsli SJOIno IN11i1V V Ct"""'J403 NNI AWIIl
,a.)u1 'uY 'ql ')�t •unll Na�J ',aV 'rn '�,t a,rrl„ Ir,)r4 'r)V 'rll 7sf a.u.„
Sl)Vbl 11VWS
I
� 't Y S'LV Wi��^In^�. lit I V/l !U id 'r• C �, ::_
1 1"'Y Jw IUY 1' r , I
v � ,�.� � ��-[ll a�a. k 1. �, __ . r��lrvl N
r / Icons I . 1 P?o�a r 7 ciri 'x,tl�� � F � 11, , x or / rr r n [\• S i V ld -- t r
Iw ) , ._ '»Si•1SI11�'iR�) `,� I - J....w:r un ♦� 1 ✓d�/n�� �
T -ar.r(
�I
J -15ton Ul1S ..�-r.hl '1�UnS .I,:—i11
n61 _ 1V r.. @ IIU
(�,1 rr 1 I jNN qr y, + !�OOM� y`WS -,J
Ii'�rSI� I r
,l__I �ii r` �Jl1nS / r��f c°_ > r�,u]I,�:/i•'..rim A1cI\x''•11111".41,•) j to •t_:max Y� I /•
a Illlnl. :r �1 rl I,�Ic/ �illc - 4 .U�l�-i I..I;/.� �� \ rrs• �.
�� l ICS ) r 1 V U 11;� u •1� "'i;i;A� 't� I :L ``14 I - o . /� GS// I' 1 :
1���LL')./i�Jpy�, r i r'r Ins Ins '.d„ C'I �r:,.i`-''n� '/e � 2." - �•Y .
/'x'l7 '•',��"I ! r B� .: Ur•/r' r I
� na e.� 1«_.�_'- •)'r• �S.�t% t- -i ''j �^?� d�\ ;f.l.;><� 311S .. I� .L.,:n)�
1V-Id n�
> .alnv ,
11�T ( , :, : I•vur , A lul° 11111
It oN I : z oN Will 31 n4i, .: :xf�v/
1,WSSV 'dns i�r
NOOU"VO 0-10, w. -Icy O CJ
Y
.�
'SLS3 IY V^ r (., 6.r Y,
, i y I]] ___
NOOIIU / .? ---�"- re; Ons ll L
O ,
sI VO, c SOnS,L �1�-1';I n .. 1.. J'r//9S 3• Vl-IIA
III""�l`�• �1 ` .t,n-ooc ~ /'GJ� ,1.f.e. r -/ >•(�ODUNVO ' I}S � \�� R � 111P �YII� Ia�_ r` f
.a. U� ' f
a-� O �- / •;/yl4 � 5 /1-- �,'�> �.--._ . 311 T I 1• V�
��)l� /1 U wi' I _ V l.!"Id+i mn
sHYb NWn1nV �P.)3. w L � u 3'-"" If•1 •\)�
loins
,iP - ry 1)/_L�.r •cYi S '� �/ �.,ti`r,,aA 1Y U1 ..Mn,, ( ` j
- ---- -- a- :+r,-,w i �/-, `.�.l�S.�,r-✓ �• 04>IVId — ' br. ,/ �lI 1
.-s �„`r' / :6�a r /�)� ✓/Y)/ '� _Iy 001 Divoli r�T!' J -i%J :id r•�-IVV 1 li -u n
t x ,
S N "'
,' 'O ly
�/ �/ 7Wl �! e• M
CS 00M —�ia11�a. C) r 1� � L'�,g�I� ��I_ I/t'••• � _1-1�'
iR ,A,. sons if F)..#A
NUOA sons
VI
tins
V iv 1 wS:v
/ Y ' OA- ... onS 3lll `� '07 NVOON AYMy7�pll'1.11 _.'J ,: .
_31114 �, 1 nNVW YIVW 1fV7 n211!lll"
1 ,-t'-T7a'7'-' •-1-.- - .�7 ,,nom_ � _'./_ _�� ___
i I. ��= 1-W 1I]]lfl• y a✓P : IV:UI
nl
A,j �I -V J�` •Zl-"' �.)� I�
r• I �y a'Sr ja 6' pY 30U3WWO3 U]1N3O
'A30 ONIdJONS !!r PY� 1. '
x NOOt1UNV NOOUONVO l'' �4I I /
�I�� ori5 .0�• cu Z1, a �•C Y✓ ' *,i C"1� " 1
m �'�w;• , I S I
Juo1 a. u Il),wt/-r• Jq..l . I �� InS, t
�IO,S
y
L4
-/ U Yuu" 1 _�'f �rw II •) �Is�u N� t O yS* (� 1
O� J]lX1J1 l ry
�V.1 t • [. e� ,i" a r
�
an S y •�Q�� N 1. :i r1n
a]o(^Moot allvo y ! u3 I1 i V• .-= 1 1� -�_- 1 Y u_c,•.— �a
— Ir..�, ..,v 1 IIS.` ___—'.- ens ^.T A a•i_ t - ,���{lam) L n r� I Z; a 0 .
n �f 11.n. nt r ')_ SWnIN Y 7 CB II) �r l I I n to .�-
^7_rur ��;. i-tt� �-j{tl"�Yt YY yOnl J�j•�, r �C,i" �r d =i
s ,'t� [•f� ='�' � v� >• / �LJ 1p'
11
1 3n-31s•tJ1p. '''a•3�'N S"I'ISV1USI�3,i��! �; _,�J W V, sao m F LK U o_') - C3OU,,..0 1•I I yd�z„' �_-1'°>
1
177
N V
��' g) ' ,, s •a r %12/JS32Id s r _ -1•`,. ➢ -- tY /i 7 ar li� � - 14 ,.:�
1w.,�.,Y��-�•.�r1 BB � ;�:,� 30W11��r�-
L.L • Si.l l31/1� I Jf�[YJIiJ.il i/� __:,w,r`�._ s! 'CT ^;
BC
�
` I
I I' d — • N 6 C.• 11 � � O� LSV3H1-n6s '
dVW IMN
,p
� L..:�j �•
W3d r•. ° � Mod
= d ac i
a _
_ I
p, t
• • r
• r NV� I
_\ x3MOd ,l;s , �I���`�'.� .
,:l. �... L
> ms`s a'1• ' la
mod
rd
97P _ PW3d I
W
xNmod
04 All-
Od
VIO=ld rf I (
H _ HM x Q
M
1 ,
•� x .
x HMO
t:j�l� � ��_ .l_„JL,. 1�-- .,,,rte..�'�`_`-7(j'jMOd -.:.Hl Gf �:�� .7 � • _ :. ,�.
I
�! lot)
Q
HMOd
y.M..M,• 1 �- ��
v�. I 1 y �
°xHM ? ,S.vulu,aS isaMpl ♦xHMOd
214, • - ���• ii L ,
4 Mir ,yr y /� •L '.M d�/j/^f
xvfm
)kHMod. HMO I- %N34 xHMOd H�¢ � p .1 T.. W3d4
ell
x Mod
r •� max[ �, ♦ ` ' --
• IPA` ^• Ij '•.. ``� r , ` :._ \ Y y S xH
(r J.qn 03
:pl
I -, � ti � d � '� '� qqo�• .�..1,� MOd'� i�, la II� .`J 1• ,.
In• �O y�y ;4HM d • (i : :11� )p �'�1 �, y.
Mod
T-
II ,: .. --_- • � ,,. ,;�, � "ice'.• � - X H P
� ..
: ��` 1�� it w. . ,...� � �. i 3 n� ', I�• Mo�•+,�
�.
rvl '• T'
if
`-' — -- 4dMOd rELI- HMOd
.�Ahti7
069 r--- ; 11 I ..y J / .: 9j b . ���. i ..
` "V '
l a " i'I / J •F, ' �� :� (• xH QXHMOd
N U.
..;l7:la4.:r :., :_ _ . .e tl �. .`•. .c•.M' L�•Ir• y
IRW
.,� � � ��Prii!'lIl t' 1, t I� 7r,R?�i' Y LWS+• .. �� ,ti:' �' �k ' r �t',.,*�h, t � �
DU PAGE COUNTY AND PART OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS S
ALI
�M. '���jpyiq• ..'� k' •�. �' • ,.� ! �} 4, �! �
��1 r,r.♦ � .1 'w' � a� Ptak ,...��Y•�;- tiS'%�.:t�1 1�' � � ,'�, � 8 �.
tai !n,t� .,�,.t :c '•y{�rti +SC .�'^. +1?*~
Own
I TM
IN 44'
>>"' ;'�m'�,!i, ''�"i?S•T!d��� ,4�• '� ,� fir, 1
���i���d .^r`��'•r.^'�.1[�''��' �'. 1 ��.J Fa � `r t-� �� `� -� 4"�,e d �� 1_+ 7 .kr 1
,� 2"i - .I�.�t .T.LM ,h./ .i 11 g4'y15,y1,��'' :?;yi", ,1'i'(•
j� d
�� •r.,A. I' �.p.�:I y �.aJ 4�jI,!�'��'R'•:..r..`.K�__V ~6� Vii' ��.� j' �' Iw.r.
1._i���� wf I ,• a ."V ' •,_,Y" �t►�f"�`� '�GI{."'!�' �'�I' � Tyjl�, .✓":, 14'
r+ ".'' 4yv "y'�/�1� ��y� r�•� � 'k�'r 3 _ �f rf�? �j���YJ ��.t �
_t ^ 1• � f .� !�1 '11,•++G.1 �I 1 �r� �� F, !•�+'F�•y`,�y'',` ,�1 rt1F !:��•n<
��,�• R,
!� ��t� �`:1"�:arA�� � y r :Y,yf'FiI1FS:• �.,a-�'*;4 Ay rp
f� '�. ^.'ny.. ::S f �1"}G •'F'�yore. �X.I�.Y! � 'tip;
"t�,, ��,j• FI
r g
lot
TIT Fclqm
3'S ,�.`•? ariiitl' ai^ .k. t� ,� Ly, ',f3 'i,"7•".Y yt`��'�t �C•I:i' , •i/Mi�", * .7IppiA1 a. �.• `a..
Ar*� ,b. S. w •. r !l `t('v.� i."� '�Y' ,�f�"iP� ;"�Y��.J������(, t w•a. ?;� ,v
.. '. •tYJ •*j ' �-{" 71A 'r JilY1p• �(., c � •�. �!��,�J� '��;I+�1., �C� v� �r�«•1f
}p ,+ r .Iw•�� �. — '}a '"' qq "' �'`� t •r:• �a.t�,i�4; � �� j� ��i y0+!��' ,�i 11�����`��i
" t �• i +lyCLMJ^1Nl v. y:
�'t ��' y �,�. 1 �. ..�Y.f 711��. t ,�.,.;!n j`bl'�jY?"''ai;T1�1r�'���L�, '-c �Y. ��'"a'f' 1�Ztt�, •<y(,7�:.�+�i
L•, �. '.a yL iTr"• r.n.� ii,(1�, .e•n dR•..�Y �!'Y 1`f•� ..! R• ,p,��ff�y"fit'.': :�1. S:'� ,�.'�/ I.7i:e�` I f
a �11r' :{t � a 11�` .r R• t1M• V;:'.T:; ,r ..n7�S.s,��5��'R �..x'14'. }� �d �
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 1, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Allium canadense FACU Herb
2. Lonicera tartarica FACU Shrub
3. Rhamnus cathartica FACU Tree
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criteria not met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Beecher Silt Loam (298) Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No X
8
Wetland 1, Transect 1 Point A (outside)
Rationale: Minimum criteria not met.
HYDROLOGY
Is the 4 round surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criteria not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Meets no wetland criteria.
9
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 1, Transect 1 Points B and C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Populus deltoides FAC+ Sapling
2. Typha latifolia OBL Herb
3. Acer saccharinum FACW Tree
4. Geum lacineatum FACW Herb
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Beecher Silt Loam (298) Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes X No Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: IOYR 2/1 Mottle Colors: 2.5YR 7/6
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
10
4 • ,
Wetland 1, Transect 1 Points B and C (inside)
Rationale: Mottling indicates anaerobic conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil: 6 inches.
List other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
11
4 ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 1, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Area has been mowed to banks of drainage ditch.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Poa pratensis FAC Herb
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Area has been mowed to ditch banks making grass identification
very difficult. No indication of hydrophytic vegetation observed.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
12
Wetland 1, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: One of three criteria met.
13
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 1, Transect 2, Points B and C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Typha latifolia OBL Herb
2. Lythrum salicaria OBL Herb
3. Populus deltoides FAC+ Sapling
4. Salix nigra FAC+ Sapling
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 4/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
14
Wetland 1, Transect 2, Points B and C (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil: 6 inches.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criteria met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
15
Q
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Oenothera biennis FACU Herb
2. Daucus carota UPL Herb
3. Aster pilosus FACU Herb
4. Aster prealtus FACW Herb
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 25%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Less than 50% of dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
16
Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: 12 inches.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Hydrophytic vegetation criteria not met.
17
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point B (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Aster prealtus FACW Herb
2. Lythrum salicaria OBL Herb
3. Acer negundo FACW Sapling
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
18
Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point B (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: 8 inches.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
I
�I
19
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1, Aster prealtus FACW Herb
2. Srirpus fluviatilis OBL Herb
3. Populus deltoides FAC+ Sapling
4. Salix discolor FACW Shrub
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
20
Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point C (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 1 inch.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria are met.
21
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant community #/Name: Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point D (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Aster prealtus FACW Herb
2. Salix interior OBL Shrub
3. Populus deltoides FAC+ Sapling
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
22
Wetland 2, Transect 1, Point D (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil: 6 inches.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
23
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Rhamnus cathartica FACU Shrub
2. Juniperus virginiana FACU Sapling
3. Lonicera tartarica FACU Shrub
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: No hydrophytic vegetation.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
24
Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only one criteria met.
25
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point B (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Carex stricta OBL Herb
2. Phalaris arundinacea FACW Herb
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Muskego and Houghton Muck (903) Subgroup: Limnic Medisaprists
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 2/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
26
Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point B (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL. DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
27
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Carex stricta OBL Herb
2. Phalaris arundinacea FACW Herb
3. Lythrum salicaria OBL Herb
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
28
Wetland 3, Transect 1, Point C (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 1 inch
in pockets.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
29
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Phalaris arundinacea FACW Herb
2. Daucus carota UPL Herb
3. Aster pilosus FACU Herb
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 33%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Less than 50% dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
30
Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only one criteria met.
31
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point B (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Juncus acuminatus OBL Herb
2. Salix discolor FACW Herb
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes X No Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
32
Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point B (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed: Hummocks
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
33
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(a): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Carex stricta OBL Herb
2. Phalaris arundinacea FACW Herb
3. Lythrum salicaria OBL Herb
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 10YR 3/3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
34
Wetland 3, Transect 2, Point C (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 1 inch
in pockets.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria met.
35
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORK
Field Investigator(s): Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 4, Transect 1, Point A (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Area has been mowed. Topsoil has been scraped off.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Poa pratensis FAC Herb
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Mowed area makes identification of grasses extremely difficult.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
36
Wetland 4, Transect 1, Point A (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Soil mapped as Ashkum Silty Clay Loam but the soil is to disturbed
to see hydric characteristics.
37
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 4, Transect 1, Points B and C (inside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Area has been mowed, topsoil has been scraped off.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Typha latifolia OBL Herb
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
s.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
38
Wetland 4, Transect 1, Points B and C (inside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 3-10 inches.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: Water from road runoff appears to keep this low area inundated
enough to support cattail growth. Soil has been too disturbed to access
hydric soil indicators.
39
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 5, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Topsoil has been scraped off and area has been mowed.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Poa pratensis FAC Herb
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met but soil is very disturbed.
40
Wetland 5, Transect 1, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met. Drain tile uncovered when digging soil
pit.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only one criterion met.
41
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant community #/Name: Wetland 5, Transect 1, Points B and C (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Topsoil has been scraped.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Scripus fluviatilis OBL Herb
2. Typha latifolia OBL Herb
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW Sapling
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met but soil is very disturbed.
42
• Wetland 5, Transect 1, Points B and C (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 6 inches.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: All three criteria are met.
43
• ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 5, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Topsoil has been scraped off and area has been mowed.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Oenothera biennis FACU Herb
2. Rhamnus cathartica FACU Sapling
3. Poa pratensis FAC Herb
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met but soil is very disturbed.
44
Wetland 5, Transect 2, Point A (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X Depth to saturated soil: No water.
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only one criteria met.
45
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Wetland 5, Transect 2, Points B and C (outside)
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Topsoil has been scraped and area has been mowed.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Typha latifolia OBL Herb
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Ashkum Silty Clay Loam (232) Subgroup: Typic Haplaquolls
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 5/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met but soil is very disturbed.
46
•• Wetland 5, Transect 2, Points B and C (outside)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 2 inches.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
47
' • ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Area 1, Transect 1, Point A
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes X No Area has been mowed and top soil has been scraped off.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Xanthium strumarium FAC Herb
2. Poa pratensis FAC Herb
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: No hydrophytic vegetation.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Morley Silt Loam (19402) Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 4/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
48
•
Area 1, Transect 1, Point A
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 6 inches.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only one criteria met.
49
! !
ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM
Field Investigator(s) : Dr. W. E. Southern, J. vonWahlde and B. Sheffer
Date: 31 March 1992
Project Name: Mayslake
State: Illinois County: DuPage
Applicant/Owner: Cowhey Gudmundson
Plant Community #/Name: Area 1, Transect 1, Point B
Do normal environmental conditions exist at this plant community? Yes X No
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X Topsoil has been scraped.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Status Stratum
1. Salix nigra FAC+ Tree
2. Salix interior FACW Tree
3. Pinus resinosa FACU Tree
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 66%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
SOILS
Series/Phase: Morley Silt Loam (194C2) Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil Mottled: Yes No X Gleyed: Yes No X
Matrix Color: 2.5YR 4/2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale: Minimum criterion not met.
50
Area 1, Transect 1, Point B
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 6 inches.
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No Depth to saturated soil:
Other field evidence observed:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Minimum criterion met.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No X
Rationale: Only two criteria met. Sali.x species growing in straight line
suggesting a poorly maintained tile system is located in this area.
51
THE SANCTUARY
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
OAR BROOK, ILLINOIS
PREPARED FOR:
SHANNON ASSOCIATES, LTD.
210 QUAIL RIDGE DRIVE
WESTMONT, IL 60559
PREPARED BY:
COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LEDER, LTD.
300 PARK BOULEVARD
ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143
I
FILE #1170-301
APRIL 14, 1992
COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LEW, LTD. JOB #)170 d1mr gye-- UARY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
300 PARK BOULEVARD-SUITE 295 SHEET NO. OF 10
ITASCA, ILLINOIS 80143 f
CALCULATED BY DLL,; DATE q11 q
'iZ
TELEPHONE (708)250-9595 CHECKED BY DATE
FAX(708)250-9844
SCALE
..
ON- S 1 TE VVT OA) QEQU
b6T£,vr low RpuikcD k4S : M YES 'l Us l ti T+[C sus 'TR-53"
Foa sJ TE d• o S�AP D4R VOIMS; AlD✓ LC
O .ID.Gas/etc. x 89. E . 97 cF5
Gompos ITS cu was_ BTMT 4T:
-IMF _a F Go ul, ill7' T ID�t/ r„ 1 W�5 9sT,MAT5S 4T
PR��I P_I�rA riOA) 15 �A �b_ oti Ti ck. Burr, r►ti '10
sTDQ Rf,�lUIREb _ .WfkS .7ffw. __ STiMATD Ta $ 31• S__AG-FT
.
31 s4c-Fr .
FOA ;PREL I'm 1 u�4 y ,AvRPosEs sT�AG� 00
h6 F1'
$q•7 MFG Q 35 ....... ...
4
..........:...... : ....... . ..... .... ..
FORM 204.1 Av&N"from®Inc,Groton.Mus.01450
COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LEW, LTD. #
JOB -
CONSULTING ENGINEERS h
300 PARK BOULEVARD-SUITE 295 SHEET NO. OF IV
ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 t / '
CALCULATED BY �L`� DATE
TELEPHONE(708)250-9595 CHECKED BY DATE
FAX(708)250-9644
SCALE
R► �7>q�Y A� �s _ Tv PRoPosD_ BSluS WT�Q ►1� � ANDS
Ar.KMl _H/A M 14T I P�I ED AY _0:3�'_ -Fr/,�c. To G BT nI A PR LIrII NARY
A�c-fit
-GOOMW P09TIDN 'OF -4)TE, , �• NAG• X 0.3s /c. = 2.08 AL-
t-AST G4kE_hP�A � 38.31 AG- 'x 0.35 ' -��AIG- 13. N1 46-FT NEr,)�ED
c / - =,T u�E �D 9.70 46. 0.39 FT3 ¢
ND W 5T OR N D. S 3X17 X 35 AG-!r 4 - I. 2I AG- FT.
.
�'�W T �. 'i`R�B• �1� 12 . dd x 0..3�. AL-F�G. 46 47
...... . ...
~_MIDI, o> S�T� Iq `]q qc x p 35 N �ED
.
TO 1
TAIL 3 I.
......... ,..
....................... .......
..
..
...: .... .
`a .. .. ...... ..... .. .... ... ...... ...... .. ......
FOAM 204.1 Aw*NmDN from®hro..Groton.Mon.01450
COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LES, LTD. JOB
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
300 PARK BOULEVARD-SUITE 295 SHEET NO. OF 1 0
ITASCA, ILLINOIS 80143 CALCULATED BY DI,� DATE—
TELEPHONE (708) 250-9595
FAX(708) 250-9844 CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
_.. .._
ExisTIJ4 sroR�� �Rvv�aEla . iN �w� ,� KF. 3? o4:-_ T. :__
sTbRA -� P, l�v i R FO+e �x �sT�.v . b Vi�LPMf-AIrs = Z2. 4- FT
PRsIvTroRAL��. � ►�q�i, �aR pRoPos�D siT _ 7 0 -22. �. ? ►' l: -
46-'PT _OF 57DK (x ; I 13.N < )q.9
aK
_ .
x►s7 I%1! sToR�}G�E P2ovi�ED I�. vPR Cwsr)L = 1'� N �4G-FT.
TQRGcE. R�QVL ._ FdR tX IST1�/lx �E VEt.vPME,vTS 10
..
iN
:
o OVA IL 46. ..FOR PROPosCI ATE h6- FT
Wr.......... � �. G_-FT of STO�!9 Iu vPPtR_ (► Sl").LkE . . 3. ..� 3... .... .f"r.ok ...
FORM 204-1 AVO M Mo flan®Me..Gmion.Mb..01450
5
Quick TR-55 Ver. 5. 42 S/N: 1240540208
Executed: 13: 32:39 04-15-1992
__ -MAYS-LAKE ft 1-170-
PRELIMINARY PROPOSED
CURVE NUMBER ESTIMATE FOR
TOTAL ON-SITE AREA
RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA
w • Y • • • • • • • • • • Y • • . • . • • • • • • . . . w w • • . w • • • • N • • N w . » w w w . . w N w . N w w
Composite Area: TOTAL SITE
AREA CN
SURFACE DESCRIPTION (acres)
SINGLE FAMILY - 25 K 57. 4o - 00 -
SINGLE FAMILY - 15 K 13. 88 of
LAKES 11 . 00 100
ROADS 7. 50 92
COMPOSITE AREA ---:> 89. 70 0 83. 6 ( 84 )
Quick' TR-55 Version: 5. 42 S/N: 1240540208 Page 1
TR-55 TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD
Type II Distribution
(24 hr. Duration Storm)
Executed: 04-15-1992 13: 34: 46
Watershed file: --> A: NTOTPR . WSD
Hydrograph file: --> A: NTOTPR . HYD
MAYS LAKE N1170
PRELIMINARY OVERALL
DETENTION REQUIREMENTS
>>>> Input Parameters Used to Compute Hydrograph <<<<
_______________________________________________________________________________
Subarea AREA CN Tc * Tt Precip. W Runoff Ia/p
Description (acres) (hrs) (hrs) (in) ?; (in) input/used
_______________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 89. 70 84. 0 0. 50 0. 00 7. 58 W 5. 69 . 05 . 10
_______________________________________________________________________________
* Travel time from subarea outfall to composite watershed outfall point.
Total area = 89. 70 acres or 0. 14016 sq. mi
Peak discharge = 422 cfs
>>>> Computer Modifications of Input Parameters <<<<< �
_______________________________________________________________________________
Input Values Rounded Values Ia/p
Subarea Tc * Tt Tc * Tt Interpolated Ia/p �
�
Description (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (Yes/No) Messages
_______________________________________________________________________________
TOTAL 0. 50 0. 00 ** ** No Computed Ia/p < . 1
_______________________________________________________________________________
*
Travel time from subarea outfall to composite watershed outfall point.
** Tc & Tt are available in the hYdrograph tables.
� ^
�
�
�
�
/
��
��- ���
- /
Quick TR-55 Version: 5. 42 G/N: 1240540208 Page 2
TR-55 TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD
Type II Distribution
(24 hr. Duration Storm)
Executed: 04-15-1992 13: 34: 46
Watershed file: --> A: NTOTPR . WSD
Hydrograph file: --> A: ATOTPR . HYD
MAYS LAKE N1170
PRELIMINARY OVERALL
DETENTION REQUIREMENTS
>>>> Summary of Subarea Times to Peak <<<<
Peak Discharge at Time to Peak at
Composite Outfall Composite Outfall
Subarea (cfs) (hrs)
______________ ______________ ____________
TOTAL 422 12. 4
______________ ______________ ____________
Composite Watershed 422 12. 4
~
�
-
� m
~ @
POND-2 Version: 5. 13 S/N: 1220510361 �^
>>>>> HYDROGRAPH OVERLAY OPTION <<<<<
Inflow Hydrograph: A: KTOTPR . HYD
Qpeak = 422.0 cfs
� Overlay Hydrograph: A: KTOTPROUT. HYD
Qpeak = 9. 0 cfs
'
..
Approximate Storage Volume
(computed from t= 11 . 00 to 22. 30 hrs)
31 . 5 acre-ft
Warning: Hydrographs did not cross on rising limb of inflow hydrograph.
�
�
• •
POND-2 Version: 5. 13 S/N: 1220510361
Platted: 04-15-1992
Flaw (cfs)
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 405 450 495
n----- r�_____r�___.__r�_
11.7 —n x #
n x #
11.8 -n x #
h x #
11. 9 -n x #
W x #
12. 0 —n ., #
W x #
12. 1 —n x #
n x #
12.2 -n x #
n x #
12.3 —n x #
n x
12.4 -n „ #
n x
12. 5 —n x �
n x #
12.6 —n x #
n x #
t. #
. r-, —n x
W x #
12. 8 -n x #
n x #
12. 9 —n x #
n x #
13. 0 -n x #
? x #
13. 1 —n x �t
a x #
13. 2 -n x #
n x #
13. 3 -n x #
W x #
13. 4 —n x #
W x #
13.5 —n x #
n x #
13. 6 -n x at
W x 9E
13. 7 —9 x #
n x #
13. 8 —n x #
n
TIME
(hr•s)
File: A: raTOTPR . HYD Qma;, - 422. 0 cf s
x
File: A:FaTOTPROUT.HYD Omax = 9. 0 c+5
....- onl uitook Itiiiw _ ----
TfIf AID �ZOAIE A
, - nl` FL.00_bP1_kIA! DA/ T►f b S IT&. p
o i
ZONE C
�` a ;.t�,'t �,��5•,�'/ye9"tj;,. { III
I.� i
'IdJ � •' rr a d�r �fi''L�'�` i,
R
• �,•±�tx�,'/,��i f ,,1�� ., l�iRw�IP>Ya7�t1t 3t�n�lf+� t t
1t t Y
V .' , t}iMjM' r!1 ,a }/)1.• 1 {' ' 1aLi')�t'te' "er �,r
,� t',��1�A�r/.,, ;I'}�r/��� J,I . ��gr ���ty'tt•�r:t�s �
ZONE B t; ,r iAf'S' s } 'Rt' xfi YbcFj ± M ;' "` , *• ' I�.
�,t
, 1
SUBJECT PROPERTY
a l; '1,11:
.f•..r° ���qq,, 2 7f 77��
STREET
......� .. r.. •-. , ,yam. .:, ,..
NA110NAL YOU INtNNANCEPNOCNAY KEY TO MAP *EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
„L
` i 500-Year Flood Boundary ZONE EXPLANATION
FIRM 100-Year Flood Boundary A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations an
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP flood hazard factors not determined.
Zone Designations*With
AO Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where deptl
j :,l Date of Identification are between one (1) and three(3) feet;average deptl
e.g.,12/2/74 of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard facto
I L, VILLAUE,Of' _
' j
100-Year Flood Boundary are determined.
OAK BROOK,
' l AH Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depU
ILLINOIS 500-Year Flood Boundary are between one (1) and three (3) feet; base floo
li DU PAUL COUNTY elevations are shown, but no flood hazard facto
1 i Base Flood Elevation Line 513"x""~ are determined.
PANEL 3 OF / With Elevation In Feet** AI-A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations ar
"I flood hazard factors determined.
�i
Base Flood Elevation In Feet (EL9B7) A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by floo
i Where Uniform Within Zone** protection system under construction; base floc
lil elevations and flood hazard factors not determine(
Elevation Reference Mark RM7X B Areas between limits areas the subject o Flood and 50
1I year flood;or certain areas subject to 100•year floo,
ing with average depths less than one(1)foot or whe,
COMMUNIIT•PANEI NUMBER ! River Mile •M1.5 the contributing drainage area is less than one squa
i 110211 0001 0 mile;or areas protected by levees from the base floo
i I **Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (Medium shading)
EFFECTIVE DATE: C Areas of minimal flooding.(No shading)
FEBRUARY 11, 1911 D Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazard
„
�+.';i� bdw1A«e«Mnar�IMwgMw,t wwlaY
r,a..t wN11/�1,N Mmin,,volMn
LOT SIZES &.,OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS
1/2 ACRE LOTS
1. 23,500 43. 28, 000 85. 32, 000
2. 22, 500 44. 28, 100 86. 22, 300
3 . 21, 900 45. 31,700 87. 23, 100
4. 27, 300 46. 27, 300 88. 22, 000
5. 22, 300 47. 26, 500 89. 21,900
6. 24,700 48. 30,900 90. 27,900
7. 26,400 49. 26, 900 91. 21,900
8. 21,900 50. 27,900 92 . 26, 100
9. 21,900 51. 26, 900 93. 28, 100
10. 21,900 52. 50, 100 94 . 23, 000
11. 21,900 53 . 36, 000 95. 22,900
12. 22, 000 54 . 23,800 96. 22,900
13. 21,900 55. 22, 000 97. 26,900
14 . 23, 100 56., 22,400 98. 22,400
15. 24, 200 57. 22, 600
16. 21,900 58. 21,900
17. 23, 600 59. 24,800
18. 27,900 60. 22, 100
19. 33, 000 61. 23, 000
20. 21,900 62. 24, 100
21. 21,900 63 . 21, 900
22 . 22,400 64. 22,400
23. 22, 600 65. 24,430
24. 22,300 66. 23,400
25. 22,200 67. 24, 100
26. 23,900 68. 23,800
27. 22,400 69. 23, 200
28. 21,900 70. 23 , 500
29. 22, 200 71. 26,900
30. 25, 200 72. 28,500
31. 24, 600 73 . 21,900
32 . 41, 300 74 . 24 , 200
33. 26,700 75. 26, 600
34 . 23,800 76. 25, 500
35. 22,400 77. 23, 300
36. 24, 300 78. 25,800
37. 22, 000 79. 24, 800
38. 22,900 80. 24,900
39. 22, 500 81. 23 , 300
40. 21,900 82. 23,500
41. 22, 000 83. 21,900
42. 29, 100 84. 24,700
1
CLUSTER LOTS
1. 18,800
2. 13,500
3. 13,800
4. 17, 500
5. 17,500
6. 15,200
7. 14,800
8. 17, 600
9. 17,300
10. 13, 600
11. 13,900
12. 18,900
13. 19,600
14. 13, 300
15. 14,000
16. 16,900
17. 13,700
18. 14, 300
19. 13,900
20. 15,900
21. 16, 100
22. 15,900
23. 15,300
24. 15, 100
25. 13,800
26. 20,300
27. 15,700
28. 20,400
29. 14,200
30. 15, 600
31. 14, 100
32. 14,000
33. 13,900
34. 14,600
35. 13,800
36. 18,200
ALL LOT AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO NEAREST 100 SQUARE FEET.
TOTAL AREA IN SITE 89.716 AC.
• REQUIRED OPEN SPACE/PARK AREA 8. 972 AC.
OPEN SPACE/PARK AREA PROVIDED 10. 00 AC.
• AREA @ NORMAL WATER LEVEL 1.950 AC.
• AREA ABOVE NORMAL WATER LEVEL 8. 05 AC.
• AREA ON MAYSLAKES 9. 10 AC.
TOTAL AREA IN OPEN SPACE 19. 10 AC.
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
for
THESANCTUARY
Residential Development
Oak Brook, Illinois
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
April 15, 1992
Prepared for:
SHANNON ASSOCIATES, LTD.
210 Quail Ridge Drive
Westmont, Illinois 60559
Prepared by:
JAMES J. BENES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 Jorie Boulevard
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
(708) 990-4244
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1
TRIP GENERATION 6
TRIP DISTRIBUTION 7
TRAFFIC IMPACTS 7
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8
APPENDIX 9
INTRODUCTION
THE SANCTUARY is a residential development that is being planned by Shannon Associates,
LTD, which will be located south of 31st Street and west of Illinois Route 83 in Oak Brook,
Illinois. (See Figure 1., General Location Map.) THE SANCTUARY will be located on the
Mayslake (St. Francis) property and will provide 96 units of single family homes on 0.5 to 1.0
acre lots and 36 units of cluster single family homes on smaller lots. (See Figure 2.,
Conceptual Development Plan.)
This report presents the results of a Traffic Impact Study conducted for the proposed
development. The report contains a discussion of existing traffic conditions, the trip generation
and trip distribution for the proposed development, the traffic impacts, and a summary of
findings and recommendations.
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
To identify existing traffic conditions, manual turning movement counts were taken at the
intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal Drive/Regent Drive and at four signalized
intersections along 31st Street: Illinois Route 83 northbound ramps, Illinois Route 83
southbound ramps, Concord Drive/Trinity Lane, and Midwest Road. The traffic counts were
taken during the weekday peak traffic volume periods. At each intersection, the turning
movements and the through movements were recorded by vehicle type in fifteen minute
intervals from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. The counts were taken on a
Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday to correspond to average weekday conditions. The tabulation
and summaries of the counts at the intersections are included in the Appendix of this report.
The peak hours for the traffic volumes were determined to be from 7:30 to 8:30 AM and from
4:30 to 5:30 PM. The peak fifteen minute period at the Illinois Route 83 intersections was from
7:30 to 7:45 AM. The volume during this fifteen minute period was about 3 percent above the
average for the peak hour, indicating very steady traffic flow. In the evening, the peak fifteen
minute period was from 4:45 to 5:00 PM and the volume during this period was about 7 percent
above the average for the evening peak hour, indicating a greater variation in flow than in the
morning.
The conditions at the intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal Drive/Regent, just west of
Illinois Route 83, were of particular interest because traffic from the proposed development
would use that intersection to reach 31st Street. On page 4, the morning and evening peak hour
traffic volumes are shown in a diagram. The existing turning movements to and from St.
Paschal Drive/Regent Drive are tabulated below:
AM PM
Northbound, left 2 8
Northbound, thru 0 1
Northbound, right 124 329
Southbound, left 73 26
Southbound, thru 2 1
Southbound, right 28 20
Westbound, left 50 90
Eastbound, right 10 18
Page 1
...IL_.I I FI !I I j II• {;•. •:i.�f iI I I ! 1 (r I (I �I 1\¢ J ���l I I� -1( i.
♦� .� }� Ib I� �L. 11 �I li ,i' }: y �! tir l`�lL...lt,...(L..IL.If �l ��.i ,I, ! ;Z r±rtr•N _ Gsall_._1 �(il•a lt.
r...._.�Ir�� ��_.�� .a: .. _. 1. _.; _
,;•----11...:.1 �-••�. 1(�r
(:. `J9'.
II ; W ',. I !! y 1YI I s II � r, 9 1,�I_:' °I z II I I .�'•. ' s� s a .ai._._—•.'s==•,,..__.._ nV1 �•t�!�e
1 ! ! '� � s Z I ''� :+N a,,glJ �•:-.+ �_s s ••sip:..:•s'! , s r i If _ s 1 •Ji- rMlri J 13
�I# , Z I I Z G aw'w J'er��:.rG.'.�.-.wf t•.�
R J' '��:� y ;I �� •5 gs sl� �II :�I! �i; �! 1�£ Yr ,,mill��i���'�(i�I� tl�c��l sIl el!N1�9 3I �. 'd�lc-••-'•'~•1'� „'•i �l, '��R� � r'i.••.
'i(, ' Il,n I'.�a. •�s� ��
'1vww- � s I ! wulil !Ilww Jr���.. �•. ' Z�., �I-
.view Ir ��.>il
'i I( Fi Figure 1. _r (-,
( I ��L....�!..��i'a,nn•`I{ ijl w Jn.., '� 1. (�..J!.. g I :l. I..I-•�.
N �I .
1
GENERAL LOCATION MAP �� '1
`�� — 4
/� 1. .}. `• �S: • .' •.I �~ iFa•I•ui��Y�l/,� I I l`I_r.w 1l-.wu�. , n I o„IG a„ 'r
i
� n , . .L���I�IaN lr lief li .� I if• v:'•.. \!l.:11 11 It lI_J.._1!•_.r. ��I=Its•� t ••:ti�3c♦:'J Ltari�•i
( rJwY• y I }:•. i�i,M F I. - ` �+ -_ 1 {'_ �.. •- ••
' � ,+ram y l: � ? ':� �� � • ,, ,��� .% M f1 4.plr Y}
a
•( �. j I: S•`.� }. ! II I!� � .aar cacwe a
{�•�Ziiaa}}.11 .rt• ,?,I»Iwru Jlnl.vw+• t.,� ��i II p _
:y 4.ri.0 r•w u fIN°war _..�I �,(! ._.�L` { ;`.y`,�,,F•, i' /f , i{ •{.},<....I•~... :.. ,.+T..:
i..
v.:� i rLwa r.w,rr ;n..w. �v �... � .. ( �r(��(�"\ '}�7% r•r•'lr%.t^">� r F7 Y _ 4
I /1
1% j.:.S 1•Ml AM7• +III I{ 1 'r { J \\��/^� �,� ;.�.' i-I_ •\ ,4b\
S' • S S ,r.r.uwu Il ruwu -i G7 I1. SII '.S'f ''' \e r• ea� ♦ F:W •�1 J
t'r •..� ,� ':jlYl•�\1/ ',„Ilrrrlrlu.. �•`7 1f ` �"k.'\)` •/r`1 1 I 3 � I i• \
I r
if
§, r.rrr..•rr +.INr ii :r { 'p�: ,:. (}'ilitalrorfi�•}: `\J \ l j I °i•'
1-
I
". �•'. ._.-.,..�_ • J }t� Y •-•• 'YiYVI•IIV»�IfYtl't'17O IL.N1.70. ••• _" •Y
--
., OAKBROOK (` rock
7ERRAC� Woods F.P: ,
\ � •o
., ' S'r •• , !��•., l' f'S !I�� ( �!! ��� ` YiJS r}yr%p♦„t,,{;�JJLF rt3::•� �; ayC i".•
-i�,, Y. f r• 1 yr �' I ✓` / •i'
,rr U �$v �I JI}Si'.I• � 1 1 � �l �,\x'1,11 �r•_ '1, „�,. /•J�..
g• 1 j � •' _� li } .J i t, I rhi H_ ''�'� 1��11 �u Jtn••'Di , !+'(,�� r-N.P,r^ C �� ,� ...
':, j ,•� ,I .�.r .,.. :,' �✓1�' S Z aNU \v /d _ 1 J i �1�NIeWY
Jr �• �'i .• rr� '•^ I_ !r• 's.((.�ifr��} . Y �..
��?:{ry•17iQV,0�T,7;j��... s ..n•' .a.r"•iGF,'• R.4;'J�..+Ili
J '.C.•"�• r 1a1N 11 l `3 1 J � u e•
S •~ f L:.:}: ;p fo Yl"�ri,r`(_— `�. y�,,l�'; 4♦,l ` r'I(� ♦1,\♦ .. �R 0� �w✓�4. � ie4 . ! �`
00 �)
Y `4L ,e,K K
TERRACE RRR
r.w' L a• '.:vnk.:, S rl.r• �+4; \ 1jP •'1 RA ! r c�r�r+1a� /i ,� eu•ww rtJ w ' ♦\
e
; :{! } r ;o�� cY, � -��•� 911^; Z _ -; jai � �• r ' f ��:
_..,..!.....�...."—AAA..•.1
;r#ivN7:r••341!.•'4.;: {.1V frl•L �\IY}':' UIO/lyy=1 I .i..�"•_. 111 .•i r�- ...
I '
vo•r ,e � ' 3a � ';�� 9 JNea•!'•:
.}.:� -t I J �r ,I •P♦�p'•.�.�.Z=J 1 � ,�r�♦d � _�., (1 /�_-� e ! �a ry� .7 I $ i ` ��
'1
.t' r �I•r. +I I•.(. w ew.»erol!S I'3 U� r .i(, '111, c`•, IS 1
,: »�q•r�•r __� r. /lam.� .,i 19\,\ �J - r���y t, s. ' � 1 ��
y~ 'f LU J ..rr>1r.4t <' l�s°\/f7''`� i� �126 V���.�I1\y�OV/11
� // !C ��\ �Ir I !� 1 •I I I L l �` '1l)1/�iw,orrw
} �' 1 } r .f �1 N •\ tearer"It W ! 1
�N � !I� '; f�Z�rLe4. \ J /�-`-7�. ��•�� t Zf l t I r n. :(, � 1
'.j;i g � . � .' �1 3 f3���:eL Ji �$�1( �v��`�\ � ilk l 1 •ti1,i t tl
1 elluM•d w ! 1•' ... 1�... ......._{.._ I J,ur_rvr rr vts/s _)l �L ?1!7—!T
WraJwlw, 1 .,S C�of C.i ':"•°r' i 1 ' uir Jr i t
J.
�...�..,.. �1�_• }: f `: _� _ r. l `��: ti'r ';"" `�kr�t ..:�—
n � 9� .i J 1I C7rioru/ "Ilj-°rr+.. � r4y j-• ' �-a1 ��1• r .a 1 ,;. 1 \... i
w�rw- �\ �• 1 T�4 r, 'tr lJ III \� �..; 'G �`, e` , ':ar �/^ �(.._4a U 1\: er ♦� J r♦ � / 1 ) =�i
Clir-:•�(� �i.'h 'y�l��tl a t! !�•"-•M."J I _ �'� if (l• �" , r e.ir ,� c •,'•r B?I
w»rr eye\ aw er Jla r_, c7.iJ7 I} t ..� ®,,• a �\ �A
- ✓� `Fullersburg 1�
Z r-/'",\
J�• \/�)��9 �•. � )'rl / 11�1� J �/ •ra rvJ I••• _ �•:
iiwn � � V V U U � �� �Y'•� ! r��.l�f��• i'•n.1`♦ ..;Y� L-a rw1'G -�� 1 1 .. r� :`IJ .1'}(�,a1ga!�'�� ♦
_� �..�=__ .r,.:�i•:iSGr.=nn•,•.,.v .�`�:• "-.i! '�. \�. � fir \ �"� a
�2r� ` ! I If ww Jt l G -�� r\w. r! wrwN Ir r
(�-•1� "•'_`�,J*,'$, 1.•x.}Ax•n rn •�.'' 1 "; I !f �G g• \\t. . J "ii /�A.
i.1�(R/'aJ ar �R_j y\ :. ...ru. Zest ! J4 •.w Iw 'c ..On
't "JJFF1J :i: I 1 9 ' ♦ r I t''r.�,,•''I' I �1. f / e
••�-�• n�1s•�j���4�__✓�.'''*�I�'.'� �I• 1 j � � :,N�,.1•" ' ,.11.1r,.•7!� �',,r. 1-_�., +sif:N• ''
•Jlxt } !c' 1 d.wwp I �I 'l I.c•ow Iuf u\
yttV�
on"Own /��r111�M�� MMYMt Mtj IIMF ��/ u.•i I II }ICY ;1 i
,S.O'`}xe':<'o'�w�� � �'""�ll�l. .. ". -.r ,. ; �� � I .,, .µ.yea�, ••'l;/�'�•
.•r ;ti ..,r�wl III �'.wfrj' Y14�..:u�.'r»••
ilv.r w►wlw Irr»Ir.•r. i.w •1!1'1 i14F.NC11•w»wN w-�v114MAK3iKIMF -yli3iRMa .'•I�I"'•+9t
w ue \l
{g ��( cwJllw w ..._. _
-_•1i. :f..INNAtl.�:.._JI SS r :.!i; _...�..__...._.. ..J f �•IU 411•Mw t
C Wit
I NJC eeJ eJ �IJ ( '•l �;
'1 Base Map Source: DuPage County �, .-�;� a '�
f
t C I�.. �♦ "<r\�•t \•\rir iee qwa r l e ,i.•• ' 'I
Assessment Maps and Plats Dept. �� << ,N,�t, ,' } �L_,der!�pl•1► )IL�l_ V.
w ( •0 I.•" I _ J �"1.`
f.wn tQJK.lhl_Rit.!ii`t' =•.y13 ' Fil
t ; ilfl;f--,i Ni I WEST ONT ; e� ,; . ,- ��1��°'^`r- ,; r =i� I�� r�aL�,i, i
! ♦ 1! u-`{�• r. �� I I •'I 0 I I) I!{Mglw� Jt wUMtt
I�l l� �}�Ili 'a7�J• I. . Z .�'i,'OIIGLi1 AY N:5;117,�1 �' r;{,v::: l�V1rtF•S•r11r. � ! I p,l
.'FI.1•;:...hs:.:l}:e •1.•11, r.l l... :?r •i::4i6ifhY,
• _ -•F -'31d- _ sLREE r•t=—.-lOBK pB •OK.- t-�r,'„'-RO•/101Jw.ff'1!''•,'•�rs. t 31.1 STREET •.
.N• •' 'SY'IA.J Y• �f�. \ p2/,• �!t.. OwfAlwpMFrVY F Iw.. 1 1
.., A" \ 1 •1 .a. �_'. awl.
!i I\.
• Tla _
•/ 1 1 \ 1 �Sy
1 �, \ '.( it w•IlAnal•Igpwu«I\' ) i" \ 1 �' x
z
v• ,'\ �\'.y^ [ 9.71 W.I.F«il.• it Y.. 11 P
A.
-T Vc Ac—s to Lakes
4 1:lam �` •� �� 1.1 1 )1�' T.Y / ;1` I
• r. fanL. '� � _-; '> ,. 1,'11 ` MAYS LAKE � W�
TrIll
m
..• '•; .."T r 1 :.,•/ � � '�rl /i, .£ .•.� E.1•INp 7f Jr. �`
-r , l t� ! $ , MAYS LAKE • _ T 1 I"
t •' MAYS LAKE r! / •MAYS•LAKE ., . a•, ✓' ••II�+
1'
l yyy JI. ETt_ j I .g
Co rWual Dembp m t Plan for -'� w - 11
-'100 SYlyr OM*LOU
(+25.000 SF. .`J,. ..rr r ; .{'. ✓4 s+'' \_ r 1.1.
140 BYlyt FJtdy CWst A LS 000 SF.
hL
%W#M ABSOCa91B6.lld THE OLYMAN OESIGr'1 OFiOIF,tdC. � •� � r_ � �w' �`•�1 !-.,..
\ --
ull7aACr rlticllAw °t ..�,L.•y.:.
aMOtVlIOMIq ILANKEaB/LANDtCAPH ARCHITECTS NORTH P•100' ..
MIEtTYOKT.l OALLA TX — ..... .
192 31 st Street
103 89
28 2 73
Right Thru Left Right 67
902 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 872 989
INTERSECTION Left 5o
• � 2978 2914
22 Left
1760 1728 Thru 1925
10 Right Left Thru Right
2 0 124
62 126 ^
188
November 21,1991 St.Paschal/Regent N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
176 31st Street
H 20 26
Right Thru Left Right 102
1443 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1415 1607
INTERSECTION Left 90
2559 3108 3034
261 Left
1116 1072 Thru 1427
18 Right Left Thru Right
8 1 329
109 338 ^
447
November 21,1991 St.Paschal/Regent N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
St.Paschal/Regent
The northbound right turns for traffic bound for Illinois Route 83 and points east were heavy in
the morning, 124 vehicles, and very heavy in the evening, 329 vehicles. There were very few
northbound left turns, 2 vehicles in the morning peak hour and 8 vehicles in the evening peak
hours. The lack of a traffic signal at this location and the heavy volume on 31st Street may
encourage vehicles left turning vehicles to consider other routes. Vehicles with destinations to
the west and northwest could use 35th Street to reach Midwest Road.
During the traffic counts, the times were recorded when eastbound traffic was backed-up from
the traffic signals at Illinois Route 83 past the intersection of St. Paschal Drive/Regent Drive.
31ST STREET - EASTBOUND
LENGTH OF TIME TRAFFIC BACKED-UP PAST ST. PASCHAL/REGENT
7:35 to 7:56 AM 21 minutes
8:06 to 8:07 AM 1 minute
8:14 to 8:27 AM 13 minutes
4:41 to 4:43 PM 2 minutes
It should be noted, however, that despite the heavy volume on 31st Street, southbound traffic
from Regent Drive made 73 left turns in the morning and 26 left turns in the evening through
the traffic on 31st Street.
The turning movements at 31st Street and Concord Drive/Trinity Lane, the next intersection to
the west, were checked to determine if traffic from the north at Regent Drive may be diverting
to the Concord Drive/Trinity Lane intersection to make left turns onto eastbound 31st Street.
At the Concord Drive/Trinity Lane intersection, there were 43 southbound left turns in the
morning peak hour and 20 southbound left turns in the evening peak hour. If there was
diversion to that intersection, it was very limited.
The extent of the northbound back-up on St. Paschal Drive was observed during the traffic
counts. During the morning counts, the largest back-up observed was 3-4 vehicles. During the
evening counts, the largest back-up was 6-8 vehicles. It was noted that the back-ups tended to
clear quickly.
Traffic signal warrants were investigated at the intersection of 31st and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive. The "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", 1988 Edition, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, which is used by the Illinois
Department of Transportation and local agencies provides eleven warrants for the installation of
traffic signals. At this intersection, Warrant 11, Peak Hour Volume Warrant would be the most
likely to be met. The charts for this warrant are included in the Appendix of this report. With
the volume on 31st Street, the high volume minor street approach would need to reach 100
vehicles per hour (left turns plus only a discounted portion of the right turns). The northbound
approach in the morning has only 2 left turns and 31 right turns (after discount). In the
evening, the northbound approach has only 8 left turns and 82 right turns (after discount). The
southbound approach (Regent Drive) has more left turns (73 AM and 26 PM), but a low number
of right turns. After reviewing the existing traffic volumes, it was concluded that a traffic
signal would not be warranted at this location.
Page 5
TRIP GENERATION
In the trip generation phase of the study, the rates published in Trin Generation, Fifth Edition,
Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991, were used for the proposed development. The rates
for Single Family Detached Housing, Land Use Code 210, are shown below, as well as the
number of peak hour trips produced for the 132 units (96 units + 36 units).
TRIP GENERATION RATES
Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Per Dwelling Unit
AM PM
Enter 0.19 0.66
Exit 0.55 0.35
Total 0.74 1.01
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION
Peak Hour Vehicle Trips
AM PM
Enter 25 87
Exit 73 46
Total 98 133
Page 6
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
In the trip distribution phase of the study, the directional distribution of trips to and from the
proposed development was developed. The turning movements to and from 31st Street at
Regent Drive and Concord Drive/Trinity Lane from the existing residential developments were
used as a guide to develop the directional distribution for the site: 1) 72 percent to and from the
east on 31st Street, 2) 20 percent to and from the west on 31st Street, and 3) 8 percent to and
from the southwest on 35th Street.
The trip generation and the trip distribution values were used to estimated turning movements to
and from the proposed development at the intersection of 31st Street and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive.
SITE TRAFFIC PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT
31ST STREET AND ST. PASCHAL DRIVE/REGENT DRIVE
AM AM PM PM
Site Exist. Site Exist.
Exit Site
Northbound, left 15 2 9 8
Northbound, right 52 124 33 329
(to 35th Street) 6 4
Enter Site
Eastbound, right 5 10 17 18
Westbound, left 18 50 63 90
(to 35th Street) 2 7
As these volumes are examined, it is helpful to recall that 30 vehicles during the peak hour
would represent an average of one vehicle every two minutes.
TRAFFIC IMPACTS
The traffic impacts of the proposed development were viewed from the perspective of the
existing traffic on the roadway system and the perspective of the traffic from the proposed
development. The traffic on 31st Street during the morning and evening peak hours by
direction would increase between 2 and 4 percent because of the traffic from the proposed
development. Changes in volumes of less than 5 percent are normally not perceived by the
average driver. Therefore, the traffic impacts on 31st Street would be considered to be
minimal.
The proposed development would increase the traffic volume on St. Paschal Drive, but it is
counter-flow to the existing traffic. The heaviest traffic from the proposed development would
be exiting northbound in the morning, whereas, the heaviest flow on St. Paschal Drive is
northbound in the evening. The evening traffic from the site would increase the northbound
right turn by 33 vehicles (10 percent) which would be an average of one vehicle every two
minutes. This increase could be accommodated by the existing gaps in the 31st Street traffic.
Page 7
L
From the perspective of the site traffic, the northbound left turn in the morning will be only
one-fifth of the southbound left turn from Regent Drive that is being made today. The
additional northbound left turns can be made but delay may be encountered. The extent of the
delay would be weighed by the drivers against the time required to follow another route and use
35th Street to reach Midwest Road. Traffic returning to the site in the evening from the east or
the west would not encounter excessive delay in turning from 31st Street onto St. Paschal
Drive.
The traffic signal warrants were reviewed for existing traffic plus the site traffic. During the
morning peak hour, the warrants still would not be met. During the evening peak hour when
the site is fully developed, the additional northbound left turns (9) and northbound right turns
(33) could bring the total volume (after discounting the right turns) to 107 vehicles which would
be marginally above the warrant threshold of 100 vehicles. However, if the trip generation
rates are not as high as expected or if the number of left turns is lower than estimated, the
warrant may not be met.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The proposed development would generate 98 vehicle trips during the morning peak hour
(25 entering the site and 73 exiting) and 133 vehicle trips during the evening peak hour (82
entering the site and 46 exiting the site).
2. The trips from the proposed development would add 2 to 4 percent to the volumes on 31st
Street and normally would not be perceived by the average driver.
3. The increase in traffic on St. Paschal Drive would be counter-flow to existing traffic. The
increase could be accommodated by the existing gaps in 31st Street traffic.
4. Existing traffic volumes do not meet traffic signal warrants at 31st Street and St. Paschal
Drive/Regent Drive. When the site is fully developed, the volumes may marginally meet
the warrants.
5. Vehicles exiting the site may encounter a back-up from 31st Street for brief periods in the
evening. However, the location of the entrance to the development is better on the outside
of the curve (as shown) from a sight distance viewpoint than on the inside of a curve as
would occur if the entrance was moved further east/south. A change in location of the
entrance would not be recommended.
-- END --
Page 8
6 a2t'd
XICNHddd
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Beck/Paul Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 northbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 41 259 0 300 0 86 17 103 403 27 0 51 78 0 0 0 0 78 481 2751
7:15 81 301 0 382 0 150 21 171 553 32 0 71 103 0 0 0 0 103 656 2952
7:30 83 375 0 458 0 204 31 235 693 36 0 82 118 0 0 0 0 118 811 3148
7:45 66 386 0 452 0 184 36 220 672 45 0 86 131 0 0 0 0 131 803 2901
8:00 46 312 0 358 0 144 35 179 537 39 0 106 145 0 0 0 0 145 682 2700
8:15 108 420 0 528 0 156 23 179 707 55 0 90 145 0 0 0 0 145 852
8:30 62 233 0 295 0 132 20 152 447 36 0 81 117 0 0 0 0 117 564
8:45 83 234 0 317 0 156 14 170 487 37 0 78 115 0 0 0 0 115 602
Total 570 2520 0 3090 0 1212 197 1409 4499 307 0 645 952 0 0 0 0 952 5451
Peak
Hour 303 1493 0 1796 0 688 125 813 2609 175 0 364 539 0 0 0 0 539 3148
w**+r it*#,t,t,t A**i M A•r,r*w,t*,t r,t,r ir,r
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Beck/Paul Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 northbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 65 245 0 310 0 278 33 311 621 29 0 27 56 0 0 0 0 56 677 3009
4:15 46 192 0 238 0 307 40 347 585 36 0 30 66 0 0 0 0 66 651 3088
4:30 89 232 0 321 0 368 50 418 739 34 0 22 56 0 0 0 0 56 795 3321
4:45 109 278 0 387 0 380 50 430 817 41 0 28 69 0 0 0 0 69 886 3142
5:00 71 179 0 250 0 398 49 447 697 45 0 14 59 0 0 0 0 59 756 2937
5:15 95 277 0 372 0 396 58 454 826 30 0 28 58 0 0 0 0 58 884
5:30 42 171 0 213 0 288 29 317 530 49 0 37 86 0 0 0 0 86 616
5:45 65 224 0 289 0 285 34 319 608 47 0 26 73 0 0 0 0 73 681
Total 582 1798 0 2380 0 2700 343 3043 5423 311 0 212 523 0 0 0 0 523 5946
Peak
Hour 364 966 0 1330 0 1542 207 1749 3079 150 0 92 242 0 0 0 0 242 3321
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
wwwwrrwww,rw**+r,t,rr,eww**«wwwr*w
Observer: Jama/Fratamico Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 southbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 0 279 36 315 17 107 0 124 439 0 0 0 0 19 0 21 40 40 479 2610
7:15 0 330 38 368 49 164 0 213 581 0 0 0 0 23 0 21 44 44 625 2886
7:30 0 433 58 491 29 160 0 189 680 0 0 0 0 44 0 36 80 80 760 2971
7:45 0 371 64 435 50 178 0 228 663 0 0 0 0 42 1 40 83 83 746 2865
8:00 0 415 31 446 42 171 0 213 659 0 0 0 0 53 0 43 96 96 755 2754
8:15 0 414 28 442 17 156 0 173 615 0 0 0 0 61 0 34 95 95 710
8:30 0 327 31 358 33 182 0 215 573 0 0 0 0 45 0 36 81 81 654
8:45 0 309 37 346 32 160 0 192 538 0 0 0 0 46 0 51 97 97 635
Total 0 2878 323 3201 269 1278 0 1547 4748 0 0 0 0 333 1 282 616 616 5364
Peak
Hour 0 1633 181 1814 138 665 0 803 2617 0 0 0 0 200 1 153 354 354 2971
+rr,►,t,t,r*,r•,r**rr,►***�rrr+r*,►rr*rr,r**,r
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
**r•,r,r*r,t,trt,r*•w,r,►r,►,t,trr,rwrr,r,r*,r
Observer: Jame/Fratamico Date: April 8, 1992 Day: Wednesday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Rte 83 southbound ramps
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 0 220 60 280 74 255 0 329 609 0 0 0 0 49 0 104 153 153 762 3460
4:15 0 207 54 261 66 288 0 354 615 0 0 0 0 37 0 108 145 145 760 3618
4:30 0 281 62 343 109 310 0 419 762 0 0 0 0 43 0 105 148 148 910 3820
4:45 0 392 58 450 94 297 0 391 841 0 0 0 0 46 0 141 187 187 1028 3792
5:00 0 281 35 316 82 317 0 399 715 0 0 0 0 36 0 169 205 205 920 3603
5:15 0 284 59 343 98 323 0 421 764 0 0 0 0 51 0 147 198 198 962
5:30 0 267 55 322 81 292 0 373 695 0 0 0 0 37 0 150 187 187 882
5:45 0 228 58 286 80 282 0 362 648 0 0 0 0 36 0 155 191 191 839
Total 0 2160 441 2601 684 2364 0 3048 5649 0 0 0 0 335 0 1079 1414 1414 7063
Peak
Hour 0 1238 214 1452 383 1247 0 1630 3082 0 0 0 0 176 0 562 738 738 3820
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
rw*,t,►,rr,r,r,r***,►*,r,r,rwwrw*ww,►*,►*
Observer: Jame/Paul Date: November 21, 1991 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: St. Paschal/Regent
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 0 319 0 319 7 151 9 167 486 0 0 17 17 12 0 2 14 31 517 2671
7:15 4 381 4 389 13 180 6 199 588 0 0 27 27 14 0 4 18 45 633 2864
7:30 2 461 3 466 14 207 9 230 696 0 0 29 29 16 0 6 22 51 747 2978
7:45 7 442 1 450 18 237 17 272 722 1 0 28 29 13 1 9 23 52 774 2866
8:00 1 388 2 397 5 219 30 254 651 1 0 35 36 17 1 5 23 59 710 2654
8:15 6 437 4 447 13 209 11 233 680 0 0 32 32 27 0 8 35 67 747
8:30 2 318 2 322 11 208 19 238 560 0 0 32 32 36 3 4 43 75 635
8:45 4 290 4 298 14 173 13 200 498 0 0 24 24 26 2 12 40 64 562
Total 32 3036 20 3088 95 1584 114 1793 4881 2 0 224 226 161 7 50 218 444 5325
Peak
Hour 22 1728 10 1760 50 872 67 989 2749 2 0 124 126 73 2 28 103 229 2978
*rr*r,t,t*,►r,rww**,rr***,r*rw*w****
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
*w*rw,r•w*r*+t,t*,►,r*,►,r,r,r,r,rr•,r«,r*
Observer: Jama/Paul Date: November 21, 1991 Day: Thursday City: oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: St. Paschal/Regent
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 9 228 1 238 15 230 15 260 498 0 0 48 48 9 2 7 18 66 564 2739
4:15 7 232 2 241 11 360 18 389 630 1 0 38 39 6 1 0 7 46 676 2991
4:30 12 238 10 260 21 366 26 413 673 1 0 126 127 7 0 8 15 142 815 3108
4:45 4 278 4 286 12 260 25 297 583 2 1 86 89 8 0 4 12 101 684 2978
5:00 3 292 3 298 31 370 28 429 727 4 0 75 79 5 0 5 10 89 816 2920
5:15 7 264 1 272 26 419 23 468 740 1 0 42 43 6 1 3 10 53 793
5:30 7 186 5 198 26 382 31 439 637 0 0 39 39 6 0 3 9 48 685
5:45 6 203 2 211 21 306 19 346 557 0 0 47 47 16 0 6 22 69 626
Totat 55 1921 28 2004 163 2693 185 3041 5045 9 1 501 511 63 4 36 103 614 5659
Peak
Hour 26 1072 18 1116 90 1415 102 1607 2723 8 1 329 338 26 1 20 47 385 3108
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
,r**,►r�*,t**,t w,t*w w r r w,t,t rt w,t*,t rr w,t w
Observer: Fratamico/Paul Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Concord/Trinity.
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right- Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 0 324 1 325 3 132 1 136 461 1 0 11 12 3 0 0 3 15 476 2373
7:15 0 368 2 370 5 193 1 199 569 3 1 10 14 9 0 6 15 29 598 2479
7:30 0 413 3 416 3 182 1 186 602 1 1 10 12 11 1 2 14 26 628 2468
7:45 6 406 1 413 2 222 1 225 638 2 2 12 16 11 1 5 17 33 671 2376
8:00 5 324 3 332 2 209 4 215 547 5 2 10 17 12 2 4 18 35 582 2198
8:15 4 317 1 322 6 205 2 213 535 3 5 11 19 16 5 12 33 52 587
8:30 2 295 4 301 5 200 2 207 508 0 3 11 14 6 0 8 14 28 536
8:45 5 243 2 250 6 201 4 211 461 2 3 10 15 10 4 3 17 32 493
Total 22 2690 17 2729 32 1544 16 1592 4321 17 17 85 119 78 13 40 131 250 4571
Peak
Hour 11 1511 9 1531 12 806 7 825 2356 11 6 42 59 43 4 17 64 123 2479
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
Observer: Fratamico/Paul Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Concord/Trinity
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 3 236 5 249 11 297 4 312 561 6 0 8 14 2 0 5 7 21 582 2439
4:15 3 209 2 214 7 303 5 315 529 1 1 4 6 6 1 0 7 13 542 2620
4:30 6 280 2 288 9 340 5 354 642 2 3 3 8 5 2 4 11 19 661 2855
4:45 3 243 3 249 7 376 4 387 636 5 2 2 9 3 2 4 9 18 654 2818
5:00 2 276 7 285 15 432 4 451 736 3 2 8 13 5 2 7 14 27 763 2792
5:15 7 296 4 307 7 433 8 448 755 1 3 7 11 7 1 3 11 22 777
5:30 3 234 5 242 15 344 6 365 607 2 1 2 5 6 1 5 12 17 624
5:45 2 234 4 240 8 352 6 366 606 7 0 9 16 2 1 3 6 22 628
Total 34 2008 32 2074 79 2877 42 2998 5072 27 12 43 82 36 10 31 77 159 5231
Peak
Hour 18 1095 16 1129 38 1581 21 1640 2769 11 10 20 41 20 7 18 45 86 2855
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
MORNING PEAK PERIOD
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Observer: Jame/Beck Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: Oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Midwest Road
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
A.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
7:00 18 229 22 269 27 98 7 132 401 17 91 71 179 34 32 3 69 248 649 3361
7:15 21 266 42 329 26 133 13 172 501 12 97 96 205 36 66 11 113 318 819 3572
7:30 24 286 62 372 28 140 19 187 559 32 124 104 260 49 40 4 93 353 912 3613
7:45 34 279 56 369 37 176 31 244 613 27 118 103 248 37 61 22 120 368 981 3461
8:00 28 245 56 329 28 151 20 199 528 37 113 91 241 29 53 9 91 332 860 3195
8:15 29 253 56 338 37 171 25 233 571 36 93 56 185 32 55 17 104 289 860
8:30 28 184 40 252 38 140 16 194 446 33 120 54 207 35 62 10 107 314 760
8:45 26 164 35 225 55 145 26 226 451 32 83 44 159 30 66 9 105 264 715
Total 208 1906 369 2483 276 1154 157 1587 4070 226 839 619 1684 282 435 85 802 2486 6556
Peak
Hour 115 1063 230 1408 130 638 95 863 2271 132 448 354 934 147 209 52 408 1342 3613
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
EVENING PEAK PERIOD
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Observer: Jame/Beck Date: April 9, 1992 Day: Thursday City: oak Brook, Illinois
East-West Street: 31st Street North-South Street: Midwest Road
Time EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Total
Begins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - East - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - North Total
P.M. Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total West Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total South
4:00 12 177 29 218 71 181 37 289 507 35 93 36 164 39 124 25 188 352 859 3770
4:15 11 145 33 189 99 208 20 327 516 37 60 31 128 40 93 39 172 300 816 4133
4:30 25 200 33 258 102 306 12 420 678 70 90 42 202 53 126 32 211 413 1091 4522
4:45 17 147 33 197 94 251 38 383 580 61 92 50 203 40 142 39 221 424 1004 4441
5:00 27 232 54 313 133 323 29 485 798 81 74 31 186 57 133 48 238 424 1222 4336
5:15 17 197 45 259 123 329 31 483 742 71 73 43 187 58 164 54 276 463 1205
5:30 3 174 34 211 143 239 38 420 631 61 89 28 178 38 131 32 201 379 1010
5:45 15 144 30 189 127 245 44 416 605 36 62 21 119 36 109 30 175 294 899
Total 127 1416 291 1834 892 2082 249 3223 5057 452 633 282 1367 361 1022 299 1682 3049 8106
Peak
Hour 86 776 165 1027 452 1209 110 1771 2798 283 329 166 778 208 565 173 946 1724 4522
428 31 st Street
0 428
0 0 0
Right Thru Left Right 125
TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 688 813
INTERSECTION Left 0
2659 3148 2670
303 Left
1796 1493 Thru 1857
0 Right Left Thru Right
175 0 364
539 ^
539
April 8,1992 Rte 83 northbound ramps N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
31st Street
0 571
0 0 0
Right Thru Left Right 207
1692 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1542 1749
INTERSECTION Left 0
3321 r 2807
364 Left
1330 966 Thru 1058
0 Right Left Thru Right
150 0 1 92
242 ^
I IF
242
April S.1992 Rte 83 northbound ramps N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Rte 83 northbound ramps
354 1 200 31st Street
354
153
Right Thru Left Right 0
818 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 665 803
INTERSECTION Left 138
2971 2636
0 Left
1814 1633 Thru 1833
181 Right Left Thru Right
0 0 0
320 0 ^
320 �
April 8,1992 Rte 83 southbound ramps N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
738 31 st Street
738
562 0 17(i
Right Thru Left Right 0
1809 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1247 1630
INTERSECTION Left 383
3261 3820 3044
0 Left
1452 1238 Thru 1414
214 Right Left Thru Right
0 0 0
597 0 ^
597
April 8,1992 Rte 83 southbound ramps N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Rte 83 southbound ramps
31st Street
64 24
17 4 43
Right Thru Left Right 7
TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 806 825
INTERSECTION Left 12
2365 2479 2421
111 Left
1531 1511 Thru 1596
9 Right Left Thru Right
11 6 42
25 59 ^
April 9,1992 Concord/Trinity N
7:15-8:15 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
31st Street
45 49
18 7 20
Right Thru Left Right 21
1610 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1581 1640
INTERSECTION Left 38
2739 2855 2775
18 Left
1129 1095 Thru 1135
16 Right Left Thru Right
11 10 20
61 41 ^
102 �
April 9,1992 Concord/Trinity N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Concord/Trinity
I
1066 31 st Street
408 658
52 209 147
Right Thru Left Right 95
822 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 638 863
INTERSECTION Left 130
3613 2427
1151 Left
1408 1063 1 Thru 1564
230 Right Left Thru Right
132 448 1 354
569 934 ^
1503 �
April 9,1992 Midwest Road N
7:30-8:30 AM
MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
1471 31 st Street
946 525
173 565 208
Right Thru Left Right 110
1665 TOTAL VOLUME THROUGH Thru 1209 1771
INTERSECTION Left 452
2692 4522 2921
86 Left
1027 776 Thru 1150
165 Right Left Thru Right
283 329 166
1182 778 ^
1960
April 9,1992 Midwest Road N
4:30-5:30 PM
EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
31 st Street
Midwest Road
FIGURE 45. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
r
a
1 600
2 OR MORE LANES £t 2 OR MORE LANES
w Q 500
H 0 400 2 OR MORE LANES Fr 1 LANE
U 1 LANE & 1 LANE
0 w 300
z
j 200
> 100
r
c�
= 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH
'NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
LAA1E PG,e�G�r Je�vu�no�v �� �lr
coNF;GU�e.g-noa ru�N,N� v���Gt.Es w�-N M. A'IN�.JNE T�-,eo� '+�
oJC XfiVOA SL'EeT Vv�c�.��s t00 Ve4�la„e
R >O.7,q 0,0
� Q
L R O,7A > R >0.35,x} .�FN redace 9 ��, 40 2
A- R < D,3S,4 �dttce �. dY 0207
> ET , redo« R . qty
IF 3r } R >,T-x rH91v r adkce Pe lY
f1'JvY C�.v�i�u,N�9'r�on�
Aw EXCt.usivE KE'Duce oy .. 7-,5'10 /N *-i-L
Y'aRN 47%),6
reduce
--✓ �. �Cr-r�� u�e sifti t�yon
L R
L l D vel►� redtc�e by ��
YIEN redu� R by ao�o
PeN 1''> 3L reti e �Q by �o�
All. 67FR r.4.5CX rP� tcc
y
L R T
R > reduce by 30
.0 /'� L / /1'IfNNLIN� GaNGESrio�► �A-�-T-a,2
L hurn6er o rrr leTT A w,,� vehicles ,�- I DD ✓e�
T= ntcw6cr- e7'. rvay� ✓' !c%f __ � EVcQY I.vC*ggn= off' �
urn �7R bQ r o r 9 A ' 4krn%� vet%lef 7 ec5', E
Rg�Dac-noN wii-L
/'1�INLntI� rW,,901161+ Il Ar WIAI , T#90kalr L/flVti�� OAMO c✓/14h .eA6Mr raZVIn14 V9Wte t,CS' wit L.
PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLAN COMMISSION
OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
I
I
I
Hearing was held in the Village of Oak
Brook, Village Hall, Oak Brook, Illinois , on Monday,
June 15 , 1992 , at the hour of 7 : 30 o ' clock p .m . to
hear a request by Tom Shannon and his representatives
to develop the Mayslake property .
PRESENT; MR. ALFRED P . SAVING, Chairman
MR. THOMAS B. DOYLE
MR. ANTHONY G. TAPPIN
MR. DONALD A. SANDSTEDT
MR. DONALD 0. HAGLUND
MR. GEORGE C . MUELLER
MR. BERNARD J . DUDEK
MR. RICHARD MARTENS , Attorney for
Oak Brook
MR. DALE DURFEY, Village Engineer
MR. DAVID GOODER, appeared for
Tom Shannon
MRS . JO ANN DALEO, Court reporter
1 MR. SAVING: I have asked to have somebody speak
eak
2 from the school . Gene, give us your thoughts on this
3 Shannon proposal .
4 MR. OGNIBENE; Okay, sure, thank you for the
5 opportunity to address you . Our position really is
6 nothing more than giving some data to the Commission;
7 that is in regard to the primarily ninety-eight homes
8 that are anticipated in the development .
9 The Illinois Capital Development Board
10 has established a formula, . 8 pupils per home site in
11 their planning with regard to future expansion or need
12 of a school district .
13 At the present time we have six
14 hundred and five children enrolled in both schools , and
15 I would like to give you a copy of that enrollment by
16 subdivision . There are primarily three major
17 subdivisions , and the others are grouped together.
18 At the present time we are at what we
19 would call capacity in terms of space available at
20 Brook Forest School . We have two classrooms that are
21 special purpose type rooms at Butler which could be
22 made available for additional students .
23 The difficulty with planning for
24 additional space, however, is that you don ' t know
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 2
1 obviously what age the children are and how many there
2 are going to be .
3 Although using this planning data, we
4 can anticipate some increase of enrollment; we don ' t
5 know what levels and what period of time . It ' s a little
6 difficult .
7 The only other thought that we have,
8 and that again was presented by the Illinois Capital
9 Development Board; that is, if there were -- They also
10 estimate one hundred and twenty-five square feet of
11 space available per student with a construction cost
12 per square foot of sixty-two dollars and fifty-nine
13 cents .
I
14 I haven ' t done any of the calculations
15 because we don ' t have any factual data to deal with,
I
16 but I would like to leave you with the data that we
17 just submitted . I ' d be happy to answer any other
18 questions .
19 MR. SAVINO; What would the impact of the
20 development be on the school , Gene? Would it be
21 detrimental?
22 MR. OGNIBENE; I don ' t know how to answer the
23 question . If there ' s going to be one hundred children
24 in 1994, available to come into our school district,
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 3
1 and it is K through 5 , I would tell you that we would
2 need to add space at Brook Forest .
3 That lead time is about a year for us
4 to anticipate doing that . Also it would because of the
5 caps that have been proposed on us by the State
6 Legislature, require a referendum to expand the
7 facilities because we can ' t go over the five percent
8 cap this year, and it ' s 3 . 4 percent next year . It would
9 require additional space given those facts .
10 If it was a piecemeal additioning, and
11 it was two in kindergarten, three in first grade next
12 year, we might be able to absorb it, depending upon the
13 normal attrition that we would receive .
14 MR. SAVINO; Okay, and have you looked at the
15 building over there; is there any use for the school
16 with the existing buildings that are there?
17 MR. OGNIBENE; No. We have looked at the buildings ,
18 and there ' s no apparent use that we ' d be able to
19 determine, not without considerable expense in terms of
20 renovation . It ' s almost cheaper to build it on our own
21 property .
22 MR. DOYLE; What is the ratio of students; how many
23 students in the schools?
24 MR. OGNIBENE; Almost fifty, fifty, about two
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 4
'I
1 hundred and fifty at Butler and three fifty at Brook
2 Forest ; K through 5 at Brook Forest .
3 MR. DOYLE; Maximum development, assuming one
4 child per household, you are talking about the
5 possibility over a three year period of fifty
6 additional children in each of the schools?
7 MR. OGNIBENE; If that was the age . It would be
8 easier to absorb at Butler, because we have space
9 available at Butler right now for about forty
10 additional students, two classrooms .
11 MR. TAPPIN; We don' t know the make-up if the
12 Shannon Project goes ahead; maybe somebody from the
13 Shannon Organization can tell us approximately what
14 percent of the homes would be for empty nesters that
15 have no children at all .
i
16 I understand there ' s a fair percent
17 which would bring the average down to whatever is
18 there . It probably would be less than what you
19 indicated .
20 MR. SAVINO; They are proposing ninety-eight half
21 acre lots; in addition thirty-six cluster sites, so
22 ninety-eight would be multiplied times . 8 .
23 MR. GOODER; Dave Gooder speaking on behalf of the
24 Shannon Group . We are in the process of putting
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 5
1 together the kind of information you are looking for .
2 We have not completed it . We have been in touch with
3 Dr . Block, and we are getting the data and we will have
4 it for you at the meeting in July .
5 MR. SAVINO: Do we have a representative for the
6 Park District with us?
7 MR. TRIER; Howard Trier, Vice President of Oak
8 Brook Park District . I first joined the Board twenty-
9 three years ago. I ' d like to review a little bit of our
10 experience with the Mayslake property .
11 Susan Johnson, President of the
12 Board, and myself visited a tour of the property prior
13 to the sale while it was still in the early
14 consideration.
15 She and I attended two meetings held
16 by the Forest Preserve Board prior to the referendum.
17 Park District Staff has toured the facility several
18 times, and we have reviewed the plans of the St .
19 Paschal Friary .
20 January, ' 91 , our Board discussed the
21 possibility for these facilities, for the buildings . A
22 brief summary, these points were made; some were in a
23 staff report .
24 First is a quote, the property ' s
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 6
1 natural rolling topography forest station, small lakes ,
2 ponds, potential wetland preservation and drainage
3 swales would best be served if all the property
4 remained in an open natural state and preserved for the
5 public as a natural park .
6 Properties do not lend themselves to
7 games of sport that are normally carried out and played
8 on relatively flat level surfaces . Sports game usage
9 would not be compatible with the topography and should
10 not be pursued at this time .
11 Thirdly the Peabody Mansion was
12 considered to have potential community use such as a
13 general Administration headquarters for the Park
14 District . Park District needs additional facilities for
15 our general office .
16 We need a facility for the Oak Brook
17 Historical Society, Community Museum and restoration .
18 Program and space for classrooms and general community
19 rooms, program facilities, art study class , dance
20 studios, photography, dark rooms etcetera.
21 An interesting point that was raised
22 was that it has a possible use as a back drop for site
23 location for professional film making. There was
24 discussion on that .
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 7
I
1 There would, however, require
2 extensive interior changes to make the facility
3 possible for this use . Also because of the Life Safety
4 Code, as a public building, it would have additional
5 expense to bring it up to code .
6 As Mr . Ognibene pointed out, the Park
7 District does not have the funds available and has
8 present financial obligations . Like most public bodies
9 dependent on tax dollars , we are trying to live
10 comfortably between the three and five percent cap .
11 At the moment we do not have the
12 funds . We chose not to pursue what I have discussed. We
13 are fully supportive of this property remaining public
14 land to enhance the community .
15 Should it be developed, the Park
16 District would gain substantially in new tax revenues .
17 If it is developed as the proposal asks, it would be a
18 bonanza for the Park District .
19 If we were only selfishly interested,
20 we might , therefore, support the development of the
21 property . Contrary to selfish interests , our Board is
22 taking the position of supporting it as a public land
23 to enhance the community .
24 In relation to the Oak Brook
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 8
1 Historical Society, we are seeking a permanent home for
2 the site . We are the public body with the legal right
3 and obligation to support the facility, as does the
4 Chicago Park District with its museums .
5 We do feel that this facility has some
6 potential if used for a historic museum. That concludes
7 the Park District ' s comments .
8 As a citizen, I would like to add, I
9 feel that Shannon has a long history of doing quality
10 work . I respect that he would again do the same .
11 However, one aspect I am disappointed
12 with the proposal if it should go ahead, it is being
13 proposed as another gated community in Oak Brook . Oak
14 Brook has long suffered from a negative reputation in
15 the area .
16 One writer described Oak Brook; Oak
17 Brook, something like a collection of separate housing
18 areas with nothing tying them together . I feel
19 personally that gated communities perpetuate the
20 separateness in Oak Brook.
21 When a developer comments on the open
22 space, such open space in a gated community can no way
23 be seen, experience or enjoyed any way by the residents
24 of Oak Brook who do not reside in such development .
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 9
I
1 With present day security systems as
2 sophisticated and reliable as they have become,
3 security is less justified today than a decade ago.
4 Old Oak Brook has attracted some
5 outstanding and palatial homes . It was the Oak Brook
6 Doings that described them as mega-houses . I would like
7 to thank the Board for asking for the opinion of the
8 Oak Brook Park District . I ' m available for questions .
9 MR. SAVINO; Howard, are they interested in having
10 land for a park or anything of that nature?
11 MR. TRIER; As I have indicated, out staff felt for
12 sport facilities it would not be feasible . If we ' re
13 talking about a playground sort of area, certainly we ' d
14 be interested if there were a need for it .
15 We get into situations like the
16 Trinity Lakes people have come to the Park District
17 after the development was done and wanted us to provide
18 a parking area; where the Park District and Saddle
19 Brook, where the Park District does have parks , there ' s
20 no usable space .
21 Their public space is not acceptable
22 for a tot lot or that sort of thing. The few
23 available spaces are unsafe for recreation uses . If it
24 were not developed, I would think not . We ' d be willing
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 10
1 to consider if there were requests .
2 MR. DOYLE; Would the Park District put a park in a
3 gated community?
4 MR. TRIER; No, it would not . Park District has to
5 be available to all citizens . I would make a comment
6 about bike paths . I am sort of a pro bike path person;
7 gated communities remove areas for people who enjoy
8 riding .
9
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 11
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS
2 COUNTY OF DU PAGE
3 I , JO ANN DALEO, being first duly
4 sworn, on oath say that I am a Certified Court
5 Reporter, doing business in the State of Illinois; that
6 I reported in stenotype the proceedings given at the
7 hearing of said cause .
8 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto
9 set my hand and affixed my notarial seal this 22nd day
10 of June, 1992 .
11
12 Notary Public .
II
v
JO ANN DALEO
Court Reporter
655-9117 Page 12