Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes - 12/10/1979 - Committee of the Whole
—. tee- 1rJM'E� � �..� � � � � � �h F'. • Ah 1 T®: i r RE: - ul" MEMORANDUM - VILLAGE �� BROOK DATE: /p TO: RE: \V... cce C. - I I v e G 6R ps 0 U VILLAGE O E OAK B R ®O K 1200 OAK BROOK RO A D OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654 -2220 December 11, 1979 MEMO TO., All Department Reads SUBJECT: Policy - Road Improvements At the Committee -of- the -Whole meeting of December 100 1979, the Village Board reviewed in detail its policy relative to road improvements. After careful review and considerations., the Village has adopted a policy which calls for the Village to maintain the roadways to their constructed standards, gravel roads for instance, will be maintained as gravel roads and will call for oil and chip where asphalt pavements will be maintained as asphalt pavements with the proper seal coating and resurfacing from time to time, curb and gutter sections will be maintained as curb and gutter sections with the appropriate maintenance work to be done. Any upgrading from level of roadway to another level of roadway will be done only with the participation of the property owners in the_incre- mental increase in cost for the increase in standard from one level to the next. Any roadways that need to be upgraded because of particular mainten =e problems will be reviewed in detail by the Village Board at such time with the appropriate information being provided to the Board so they can then make some decision. KGC /cak Re ectfull su itted� a eth G. Carmi ;naini Vi a Manage. e A� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS ssa -2220 December 7, 1979 MEMO TO: President and Board of 'rtustee SUBJECT: Policy - Road Improvements With the preparation of the budget for the coming fiscal year, Staff is re- questing direction from the Village Board regarding road improvements for roads which are presently substandard. The latest edition of the Comprehensive Plan depicts several typical road cross sections. There presently exists within the Village of Oak Brook sever- al individual roads and several roads within subdivisions which are substandard to the typical road cross sections. A determination needs to be made regarding the Village's intention, which includes the following alternatives: 1. Up -grade all existing sub - standard roads to Comprehen- sive Plan Standards, with the Village of Oak Brook assuming the cost. 2. Up -grade all sub - standard roads to the Comprehensive Plan standards, with the affected citizen,j assuming the cost. ' 3. Maintaining the sub - standard roads as they presently exist. These sub - standard roads include both asphalt roadways and "gravel" roadways (streets which have received ship and seal applications and have, as a result, an asphalt -like surface). The present long -range financial plan contemplates improving some sub- standard streets, such as Glendele Avenue, Washington Street, and Wood Avenue, to comply U � I� II W N December 7, 1979 Page two President and Board of Trustees with the minimums as set forth within the Comprehensive Plan. Other streets, such as those within Yorkshire Woods Subdivision, Woodside, and Timber Trails, are contemplated as a maintenance operation of the sub - standard section. These items have been discussed with Trustees Congreve and Philip, who have asked that this item be placed on the Committee -of- the -Whole Agenda for December 10, 1979. Trustees Congreve and Philip have also asked that a discussion concerning the Village's role in drainage improvements, both major, such as Yorkshire Woods, and minor, such as individual drainage problems within Saddle Brook Subdivision, be undertaken. toDLD /ck s ec tf ully mi ed , f Dale L. Durfey, Jr. P.-. Village Engineer M C C:7 U -we o u.) 1A-10-79 0 `v A .. 1 a G VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 200 OAK BROOK RO A D OAK BROOK, 1 LUNOIS Village President and Board of Trustees At the November 27, 1979 meeting of the `,pillage Board, concern about the direction that the Village Board was the Proposed Zoning amendment - "Definition of Lot of 654 -2220 I expressed my taking regarding Record." The problem was brought to light because a number of residents wanted to put additions on their house or add accessory buildings on their property but were refused a building permit by the Building Department. This has been an administrative procedure inconsistently being followed based upon the statement in the subdivision Ordinance, Article III, which states that "No building permit shall be issued for any building or other structure on a lot, tract or parcel of land which does not meet the applicable provisions of this ordinance." Keep in mind that the Subdivision Ordinance was written to control the division of land as stated in Article II. Purpose, Scope and Jurisdiction. "The purpose of these standards is to set forth rules, regulations, and standards to guide the subdivision of land, in order to promote the public health, safety, ccnvenience, and general welfare within the jurisdiction of the Village. Standards should be administered to insure orderly growth and development, the conservation, protection, and proper use of land, and adequate provisions for traffic circul- ation, utilities and services." The lot referred to in Article II clearly refers to lots created by the division of land under the Subdiv -sion ordinance. Definition (31) under Article IV goes to great lengths to show the difference. It states "Subdivision is the division of any tract or , jarcel of land into two or more lots or Parcels, or any division of land when a new street or easement for access is involved. The division or sub- division of land into parcels or tracts of five acres or more in size and not involving any new streets, easements of access, or the sale or exchange of existing lots, parcels or tracts of land with no change in their boundries shall not be termed to be a subdivision." From the Zoning Ordinance, Section XIV (B)(76) is "Lot - A parcel of land consiting of adjoining parts which (at the time of filing for a building permit) is designated by its owner or developer as a parcel to be used, developed, or built on as a unit under single ownership or control. Therefore a "lot" may or may not coincide with a lot of record." 0 Page 2 and XIV (B) (86) "Lot of Record - a single lot which is part of a subdivision." The "lots" or parcels in question do not involve the division of land, addition of streets nor will their boundries be altered. The owners want a building permit to construct various structures which are fully controlled by our Zoning Ordinances and building codes. it is my opinion that the sole purpose is to acquire easements for the bicycle path system. The number of properties involved for the pathway is minimal compared to the hundreds that will be affected by the proposed ordinance. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the job would be accomplished because it would require that all of the properties along the pathway system get caught in the building permit trap. That may not happen in our collective life time. The time, trouble and expense we would cause our residents is unwarranted and I think we should just drop the whole thing and issue the building permits. 0 4 ..Z "ov -/ Jo h H. Rush f;: n FWI V • der ./ � � � p � ® i ORDINANCE NO. G- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION XIV(B)(86) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ORDINANCE G -60, AS AMENDED, AND AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF "LOT OF RECORD" WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore filed an application for a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance definition of "lot of record "; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such application has been con- ducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook on November 6, 1979 pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, a recommendation has been made by the said Zoning Board of Appeals that the amendment requested be granted; WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has submitted its report on the proposed amendment to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees deem the passage of this Ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the preamble herein - above set rorthare- hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: That Sectioi: ;'IV(B) (86) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Ordi i,:e G -60, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: Lot of Record: a single lot which is part of a sub- division, the plat of which has been recorded in the office of Cie Recorder of Deeds of DuPage County, Illinois or any lot legally created prior to November 9, 1971 which (1) meets the lot area requirements of the zoning district within which the lot is located, and (2) for which an assessment plat has been recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of DuPage County,'Illinois pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 516 of Chapter 120 of the Illinois Revised Statutes. Section 3: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval pursuant to law. Passed this day of ftb� - - - - ._ ,1979. Ayes: Nays Absert: Ordinance G- "Lot of Record Page two Approved this day of 91979. Village President ATTEST: 1p ' Village Clerk Approved as to Form: 1 lage ttorney NOT PUBLISHED PUBLISHED _ ante Paper v AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. G -60, AS AMENDED, THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES, DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FILING, PROCESSING AND APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT PLATS WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore filed an application for a text amendment to the Subdivision Regulations, Ordinance G -140, as amended, to create definitions, procedures and Ak requirements for the filing, processing and approval of assessment MY plats; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the said Village con- ducted a public hearing on the proposed amendment, as required by Section 2 of Article XII of the Subdivision Regulations, on November 19, 1979 pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, the said Plan Commission has recommended approval of the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees deem the passage of this Ordinance to be in the best interest and in further- ance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, Section 11 -15 -1 of Chapter 24 of the Illinois Re- vised Statutes specifically authorizes municipalities to require ap- proved by the corporate authorities of any such map, plat or sub- division; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD CF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the provisions of the Preamble herein- above set orb are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: That the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Broom, Illinois, Ordinance G -140, as amended, be and is hereby further amended by adding thereto the following: ASSESSMENT PLAT PROCEDURES Purpose: The purpose of these provisions is to provide a method and procedures for the platting of property into lots not involving a subdivision as defined by the Subdivi- sion Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois. Jurisdiction: The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be utilize to evade the intent and purpose of the Subdivi- sion Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook, but are appli- cable only to the platting of single lots legally created prior to November 9, 1971 or hte consolidation of such lots. Ordinance G- Assessment Plat roceT res Page two Nothing contained herein sahll otherwise permit the subdivision of property under the jurisdiction of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook .r.om being so subdivided except in accordance with the Lerms of said Subdivision Regulations. No assessment Plat shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds for DuPage County, Illinois until such assess- ment plat has been properly reviewed and officially approved by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook. Definiti .i Assessment Plat: A plat of property prepared in accordance Wit t e Plat Act, Chapter 109 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, which describes property as a single lot other than by a metes and bounds description and as referred to in paragraph 516 of Chapter 120 of the Illinci.s Revised Statutes," hich plat does not involve a subdivision as defined in the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook. Lea11 Created Lot: A lot created pursuant to the pro- visions of the rat Act, Chapter 109 of the Illinois Re- vised Statutes or created pursuant to an exception thereto. Procedure: A) The owner shall file an application for approval of the assessment plat with the Village Clerk. Such appli- cation shall be accompanied by the original ink racing on linen or mylar, 17 prints of the assessment plat and 4 copies of all required supporting data, drawings and documents. B) Within 60 days from the date of filing the last required document or other paper or, within 60 days from the date the application for approval of the assessment plat was filed with the Village Clerk, whichever date is later, the President and Board of Trustees shall appr(ve such plat. Upon approval of an assessment plat, the Village Clerk shall certify such approval and affix the corporate seal of the Village on the assessment plat. C) Upon approval by the President and Board of Trustees and receipt if any remaining required documents, the Village Clerk s'1a :1 have the plat as approved by the President and Board of Trustees recorded and on its return to the Village have 1 mylar or equal transparency made and de- liver a copy of the assessment plat or transparency to the owner. The cost of recording and the transparency shall be paid by the owner. D) On recording, 1 copy of the recorded plat and 1 set Of supporting data shall be retained in the Clerk's files, 2 sets by the Village Engineer and 1 approved set returned to the owner. Assessment Plat Requirements: The requirements for an assessment plat shall be the same as those established For a final plat of subdivision as detailed in Article VI, Section 2(A) through 2(D), inclusive, of the Subdivision Regu7- ,tions of the Village. In addition to all of the requirements herein contained, the assessment plat shall clearly delineate any dedications or grants of ease- ment to the 'tillage as required by the President and Board of Trustees including, but not limited to, public bicycle and pedestrian path easements, dedication for roadways, and easements for public utilities and shall depict all other existing easements of dedications. N a Ordinance G. Assessment P a �'t Trocedures Page three Iva Ayes:__ Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from an after its passage and approval provided by law. Section 4: All ordinances, of the Village of Oak Brook in can 13.ct with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section S: If any part of this Ordinance is for any reason hela such determination shall not affect the vali- dity of any remaining portion of this Ordinance. Passed this day of 1979. Approved this day of i Village Clerk Approved as to Form: 6age Attorney 1 , 1979. village President--- resi ent I Published Date Paper Not Published i I .p -t 4V. VILLAGE OF OAK B R-0(.) K 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 654 -2220 November 27, 1979 MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Solid Waste Disposal On November 20, 1979, Trustees Congreve, Rush, Philip, and I met with representa- tives of Elmhurst Trucking Company and Oak Brook Disposal. Company, the two current licensed disposal companies in the Village of Oak Brook to discuss the proposal whereby. the Village of Oak Brook were to cover the cost of once - -a� -week pick up at the back door for all residents of the Village of Oak Brook and paid for by the municipality. The representatives of the two companies indicated that the current rates which are presently being charged in Oak Brook are too low and that they are requiring an adjustment in the rate currently for the various levels of service, Considerable discussion was held dealing with the once -a -week back door service which was supposed to be the minimal level of service. The representatives of the companies indicated that if that was to be, the basic service of Oak Brook, and all solid waste was to be disposed in that manner, that a rate of between $15.00 and $20.00 per month /per customer would need to be charged in order to cover the expenses and cost of doing business. The current distribution of customers are as follows: TYPE OF SERVICE OAK BROOK DISPOSAL COMPANY EURIURST TRUCKING COMPAW- Once --a -week curb 544 300 Twice -a -week curb 315 --0- Once --a -week back door 440 -0- Twice -a -week back door 119 -0- After reviewing the alternatives, it was the concensus of agreement among the three trustees, that the Village of Oak Brook could consider paying for once -a -week at the curb service for all residential units in the Village of Oak. Brook. The second parr of the discussion dealt with the proposed rate increase. The two disposal companies have requested the following adjustments in rate schedules. � A November 27, 1979 Page two President and Board of Trustees Solid Waste Disposal SERVICE CURRENT OAK BROOK PROPOSED OAK BROOK AVERAGE RATE -- ---- -� MONTHLY RATE MONTHLY RATE WITHIN AREA Once -a --week curb $ 3.70 $ 5.50 $ 5.00 Two per week curb $ 6.40 $ 8.25 $ 6190 Once -a -week back door $ 6.00 $ 10.00 $ 8.15 Twice -a -week back door $ 11.00 $ 15.00 $ 8.10 In analyzing the various rates we surveyed some 12 to 15 communities in order to Adek determine the present average of the various levels of service. However, it is important to note that in most cases therh was a limitation on the amount of waste which would be put out for pick up. In addition to the information I have attached, the analysis prepared by Elm - hu4st Trucking Company and the analysis that was prepared by the Oak Brook Dis- posal Company indicating their October, 1979 analysis. Also, the previous in- formation that was submitted in 1978, along with various articles that were pro- vided by the contractors in presenting their case for a rate Adjustment. The Trustees have asked that this matter be placed on the Committee -of --the Whole agenda for the meeting of December 10, 1979 for the Village Board to review in detail. Si cep ly ours �'•ie eth G. Carmigna Vill ge Manager XGC/ cak . 1 , r � � � '' �� � .. - �' rr ' t`' : r! ♦ r'yiJfi�'f'ik4'�Ja, ^ �. •8 . j .1 t ♦ 3 + r• 7 . 1: ;d tral'•fa, �` • 1� �� ^ f`T�_• %f e�tr 4� 1 . !. ��f' n �f 4+ . -, . Via'• ,'V •�� •. . , .. r.,• .ti•{'. ' t• ^i •.Z r . , •' 1 ,..: ..,: •. .A`•w •r • •�. :.1 % ::, r,..•.1 '�• •, -, L „ . ,• , •, • ," • .r � . �.. !•Iw • . M. ".: , - . "rir� f' ,.. «�,•w,,,a •t..lri."alti:•..�,.i'+�� `'V... -• ..,.a ':..� N+••,t••.••:Ssrw I `•a�.7 "•- • «. + • • .. � .' ",!1►"'pN.i.- .M'Vlli%'N+.Rr 4 .6•'' S p .' �'. ••J �' .....,.� • `. , -{ +f"�' aer.•ue.eNS.•rp'nr.l. w•«"t►LYiav►lY'••�•er• 'tiMnri.:.inbM:7�''LK �. i n ' - IN ♦. ran �.r »'. I •• i s. :�'+./., .! +.rr wo " ~ }SJ'' •r .,r1; •�' - •l •e• •r -;• ,�• .,,7uw ��.. �•.'.'•..".Y;n•Jf l.,ja {�•• ,. ,µ1'. ."• I. Y .wi .+aJew ',+'„ :%. -•I,�i �.{ .;,�.,tr'� •.'..�. ;,- '•,•....�+r x.45 -w r.�'Ja�.,,j tiYY,'� •,S.K •. i'p'Pi +� .13 `•+ wry '. 7.nm Ell -,.4r ll,• 7 + • , !y +. i `.'i .�•«; 11 • r•A� ' 1' • '� tt. is i -')� fn 1 •s'4n;.t; • t•t >� •''Yr' ^' '1.•.i ,bq.; �„+ r �!'�•� ;, ar ' .•, + ;,,,.'. .. t H .. .« . . . + • • � � ` `•+ �. ` ..r � :� •,- • ^ .r J 1 1 •cI ._ , •1 "•1 j:YR•ai•. . ,,��..[[!! I.x i •..• _ � •• Mme... �. - ••`,, .' i'' _ . '•, ♦,�y _:a Vii«,'= . 4 r _•, r fi -t• •... •�•Ya ..0 _' •• •+�''R• r`r:?1•�'Caf✓,.'.1 `f:f�"iN 7,`�, � -C :'pl.M 4' .�•MS..� - ! ,�ti _ •~ � -... « •• w rj � �.- .•.r• `.• -IN - •y..r: !'` •„� � Nr.y ♦I;j�� i +. ... M` ,r' .:,.sy:1- :r.;���. ` r y M_ a .- ...J .. �••. .� .'• -� a .�.••' .6 '..t..• ta3;:'••:: .'Y �7,L;�•• t' r -': Yet ✓• ;?,•ti, tea. •4 �.y � - J'�_ �.•r•N,�•„••�• `.}tJ,. '• f -v..t . °`�...�fS'S�.�ar r • t�+'i: �k .•t 71!tlJ�J4Fi w,�.' .L .� a •W,�r •a l•.; ..ri/rr :.•a ; .s r y.'n.r vSr- r►' „Y^d� . By'L1� V/ p. �,•s. "' ' "�K'`+�•'•2�•~ i�f'•�s.s�F'~° :-: ` y'«e -" Y•%i- ."Ji �.: , •x. ''1•. ,fir•. „j+y�w.N•.{,•"r'r "- »` .�•:. �-.:.: Yc =:~.t� "� ' � -E•_ .•.,vim_ , w�:�, `buC'dtkreceritty why dosed 16 -- prbi7gewak.3 � ; :c ►= ;�,.N yy � �•. ... . r • r,s, Y nY•• � »•it• J;�,u.•w4T..�� ... e.•�,;= �.-S�•��sZ.i..ar'r"�:SJ '4=�i'y ;�y= 4._,r,_� .•y •�q: •« fY1q . •C.�• .�1 !• :> Frivate sc.ave g �rms_ttiat op ra a in the- '" �trasha'- _ : ,,: ,,. _.:- lr, _ •,:aw . :��? f^'•�:.�,�. >� e t ..:,�.., W Y. n er .r,.q /Now =our truck §;h Q��ala -. , +t.; _ , .f,x , cs city -and suburbs'are.pleking up mare fh :: --" ave�'t� g a bite t garbage and trash= the y y're also Id and .California�'•P Vandct Klok.said' _.:.. , collectin se, da s.::The - ,wants: landfills en. tho - f _ big b• ndI ca -one n'+�ar_:them ev • ` �y �. gel u es of.. cash, from the-" =:.t '• : r � �R "�,:�;.„ =r•-:.:r -._s - companies and.x apartment •buiTdia y `= = ®whey, -r� ne�essary:;�t,s. {l, Ise Y�olon�_-w ants`�to� ,. r-':,ti • ... v"� �' tell lou `t.✓ ...sears.,.• - �f rtr• :r.- -•:x,` Fc.An. r= 1�•,.,aY +d- a 'neRt•_a••�slaitg� •but `eve 1 Ma +ae •ral5iF2 �..;.. , '•�' %, *,:i =wants;to eat^ 1. �, - their ales steak. st' a° :1S .,.a. - g -x - by �I 0 to - ' , ;, : >.•� �•sraw r • ' srs; ►•:.: � .:. _ . J. per cent �as customers' coat - -- - - �- - - '�._ -.� -- ,•.,.-: •'' _- :,, �- - .... �' �� : _ 4.z,,.z -. . survey NORTH ' Aerator - showed Fria rates •t�cpire, a ONE ,NOR SID •restaurant' - -o -t' �•- �°`'- y ay. And- some admitted_ Complained that his garbage icku�_rat L that they're reducjng their services at, the, being aised b 10 P e was _• x -r g y, per cectt.�vhile his service < - same time..' :r -was being cut- bar 25 per deal. We don't have any chose but -to raise "I was told I'd- have to .pad• SI Z• i�:' ' ;� �';. . � rates. said Roy Vander' Klok, m rtager of _ lno%nth instead of the $165 I've be-wx pays g - - - } Meyer • Brothers •Scavenger Service. "Our but that I'll get only three weekI e y pickups x - costs, have been going up constantly, so,we --instead of four,"'said the restaurateur, ,who `. have to pass the increase along." asked not to be fndentified. • _ `.•� - - L Vander K[ok and - others said the major Casey Dykstra, manager of :Ace Disposal - - �•,, factors in their higher- 'operating costs are Systems, observed that diesel fuel costs have w soaring prices fc, diesel fuel a,•td gasoline, risen 40 per cent since Oct. I whip: the costs r� increased truck repair costs, longer hauls to of truck repair tarts and tires have each ri= dump loads, and employe pay demands. -_ sen by about 8 pek cent. •s_ THE HIGHER BI' - _ • ' : .: _ _ �.LS by private scavenger "WE`VE BEEN DOING everything we car : fi ` rms don't affect most Chicago residents di- _ to try to hold the line," he said, "but we still ? rectly, since the city Bureau of Sanitation haven't 'been very successful." makes weekly pickups without *charge at Dykstra said his firm, which serves •arts homes and at a g P P apartment buildings of u to • of the Loop area•and the South Side, is rais- four flats. Taxes foot the bill.. - ing its Vander Klok, whose firm operates 40 Edward t- Eenhouseo m per cent. wagger of Garden . trucks on the South Side and in the south City Disposal Co., said his firm is having dif- M suburbs, said his rates are being boosted by ficulty keeping *its increases to no more than 10 to 12 per cent as one -year contracts with ,10 - . customers expire: _ Per cent. _we, Garden which e;•_Y:.s:.. . Y ••Now re City,. ch serves part's of _the• • '•'- ' � _ = . .. , reluctant to sign tract y and. northw ' - h a customer• for a whole gn a=cvn _ city .the est'suburbs y- "� -' =� ` - • -_ "` with f has a cvn, ole yea.: he said. ' tract for trash- collection !tr homes in Elk* "We just don't know what our, costs ' .Grove V' Ing to• be_" " ' ~`• costs. go-- = _ Village. -• •":; . .: �.: � - -;, :�: :� We r going uo from $4.25 �. - - _ - �_ - e. a week • He noted that his eom n 's tru ' �' "-• - _ V: Pay cats had $4.75-for each house in Elk Grove:on Oct,r --,z,� : • . 'been dumping their loads is• a - landfill- site at L" 1st and Wolf d 'said• •Evenhouse, `•but -'it's still mot ti,I; x �:_ . �,,R .a ip-� the- westerw suburbs, enough."*' nough: * _ - -! A,. 0 till �. r V r r to -.a p g a - °••, i 'd� ✓ r Cs"J C G c3 '_ V .C.._ h n� . 1 F y ^ - C • '�; �„ p y „p„ a l".' •- � V CS C w U �_ _ a :Y'�ry {)�'• N � O �. .. V L G -• y Lam, F '..' ti' �, � ' It r S K 4 L.i ^ N u yd V O 'O N .iC+1 • r - ` - ... - , 'S C. r 14 V •.4• vy�'[/) CJ � C„ It Y q Fx RE E E. °:~' ,Ax _ p a vi-':4V n +o•°oco o t7• C '4 H 'aO ... .Vi V A p .Y. C, I .. .. � W hD a N V RV w S q� :J &Y f°. .O.,T.� nODtyiCG.� re CCii.w7 C O 6 V p tn -'_• '_� cZr 915. a 1 Olawl-I C, 'i7 'O C3 A • S ppv+v'to v m 0 � w e m>sa 3 w•w • Q �°°-s N OO a) a,X t. w•V � �m £ q V - Via' u4 C, :: y w • I s Q w y ice.. ; M C q .0 C� � v• 7 f7 � C. X� w p 9.. c v�E, o- C3 >- s •h. A ai w x A G A at H h w w o a 6 v o v rn o ZO / •G • b C wp 7 C� � V �.UD'F G � � . _ iu� MQ0 > ` a. Nw .p p cl y LIS p 06.0 ca I 'r o 00 a ° Am - .800 510 A v tr:'4 Ila RE o ca Q'i.. y,t'Or O�w yi r bo j cL V- _ `+. a3 u o j aC a.� ✓f x o9ri SO w Agh .5 cc ta c o .. Pit uv cC, w • P •y .•t N V- w ley .L7 > ^+'� N 3. 88 'p O 7 A L A ,,, y y U " t~ ,6 L tia 1>1 W = +iorwyr_-- �ar,A^ unHU Z o L. CL > y C PL • r t t l r T r t s z .ti a • r t � r �, .t': -C;r ��:q y` 1���` '�T �YI�" �►�:w'�'- h'�'r'�'�a��. "�gtan C:n� N .""'� p � �+ Of ±y.Gi .'�' q � p aV • ti �00j ...+�j1 '� }•t•.', ,�Y^ • S"i�yyy(*«««,^r L•� .� h . a• ,� �' :7A-.- .- a • S ��Yi wO A u w 'y Q. - i a+ �•7^'Y� . e L ..; .y �,{� 1i - •'.^• •ti :°^;� .ci+ ;-LL ^'G .' * ' = � : h\ "'l - � � •�':}••a.�' ` \. F�a"•'a` a, "tifs ', ` .t t % �t �:'1L'+J•.•'•• '' ii"t{i`A•'•b�t .+ PtY,jf ^ 'i�� ',ANA j'7` �F'• �.j�" •rw , 1 C .�a • .N L .,a H V ti 4 'G t�/1 V i* p u ej y A � i •dt Ic, " M milk. N 4 yr}C G 43►'?�'1`'�`• lti �, �,� N N cl �{ ��S � � a�'•' ':�„ ♦ Sr ,;�C � +` � e • r rI •., � t � � • �• ►• '• � N C10 � •� •••. by � S. CIO �Y1.+�att �^ �y ' O , �iSl4�1 � ryi y . R3 a A p• ° . f y G t t t } ; •SAS T� ` • ' O1 �-• L W C'r .0 0 01 to Fy►••• -; ;- >, A!: ,t' .t ;`•••rte 45' 11 +ita r.^ °/ i ��V�� i 0)•a �• ° 1. CJA V G.i�•fir 7 AVM1Tat 3 h • y ^�ptl �yv�+t�i:9 �s • ..�1'*/� `�`�'.` Ci% 'a� [G� .> s ap. > O :A Co y ` k. r • 1�' } 4 ► + 00 O �J 'z • &.1 t+ .O +w•rr > ,✓7^'� D - �+'•' 'H• t } • � '� ' •�• ..�� :.. . � !t%r D �- \ • �•q__�: fA N .� L•"' 'C C�9! 1'p+ y •gyp ..G•a p O *` ' e� a e�/qf 4„�' •ra. °� �^ C earl ca .s 'y "' eLo N "�'x �"3! •r� �� .... ti+,� .. ..e F� .'^ L 't�.', -t Ca w��1 3• `• � � F/ � � r:r %' V � M u V aOr .C'i R1Jri+' •r ! E y �1 • t ' E. �L'•lii., � +�.% _ �r �Y. �• p ' •;,� �► = �, 3# ar c �. 1177 pry � i 99 ~ d a y a 1w. �v ` _ Cyr a Vic. �'F" \� ♦ ;� v% d0 L+ 61 A .4 O p x � 31 f. f yy a, n„ fir, f .. • ',,��i G� -9b Co � •�L i r l� F �. � ba , +�.. ,a3 t eS 5�: ` �• e ^� s �`�' v ti ` 0�i M r S aos O. �w a 1. eri + fill Mrs �• t +i d1 - p ,C� G' 'ri i. O p' •�� '{;tom »'�'' `•_ �,r \.�lr y i. ''•1 R' {: y,,„t, o w°•a'�`, `} • ^y�?, `�"� ai (/j - C +++.. "p' y 0 Gj �j R• O "p i • r , ^ '`r•R7e' a s art -�G�1 ?�-Y'� ''`K Z;+�9. r• a •* as r a •.r ��"a q ; m.�• CIS b Q.= .. O C) ,trre"t�:. :�sai a`` • R G es > Gt2 e, •% •'"••, *T ��7 \M t r7 yyT� =.' , • Ir _.a.►�a m�ti- c yam. y ; �s" ++ i w, 'd .4• R .}y. j ,•M I' 1 \ i i ' W% M ,ti r �ni�.iG:��+: G� C•yp, in R+ :3 C) '_ ^ �i ,y; ;+t •ItL", 1, , •��i 4• x ..,,C :� ii••i►`Y \ •7�"�"f e -J ±titt`3'r.. n';:n.� `.' a'CD N Yr ' 1 - ..r ` N uc i li, A~ •a,� ' t. �'t ' c^: ,{. v r _. . ' \ ►!� i a 0) .a G .n r,,, ", :r ba \ . � • w, 7 .. , .. • ����a�rr����+±!.. ����sl.c � ± Rs «.-• ► ' � j�.. ;rd ��+ `w' ,•'� (C � ^ t L1. �i AJ tail 'a � %3, Ci y Tf { Pik r N age* • � i c3di «�•��'r°/a�d't'D�O c°.a°id a�'i°r,O, �,'�:'v�aNi+,e� O •• �+ d. O y eL� .E O �0 ot2 to .C.' .p N ,.,. t�S. L C i" . •C �'' .... " p Frei O w-•� �a:S "=A R�tCJ �d!a•+ .y vp�� ° M .�•' ° O) cO. q� ..+ •'Jr N > �tLj ' y yp O O Ry OO y to w L-5 O) !� i s C3a G E •A.. 'O a �yi d M V A 0� aal Q r! O N A S2 cp C yOr aNti 'L7 Oa 0 C i+ V Z7 Ca A J O O L G N O r C�. N n3 ..a O CS M C7 C> O •C :° o u cn -•a `' Sri• 0�•j cc WA 0, -0,00-- .e a �' a•� a3 o �!� „��':�"ee•°r cS3v iv�•:s av 06 �.� 00OC�cG a?d ep►NC �C* O a to.l.7 w s�aNsCpV OCR 0w •v.aa G ai .>. iri S L 3 .L o'.0 Oa $ ,ta' c to S ° A m •es tv ; , cC A G O• a° > Co A °� 'k,ac'3.r�y °at�ac°vc�.Gp�°° ~qA'•�vo0�',� S�u0° D: r,'wv•Cgox pro e,c 5 w,o`a,oc�:s.cc°k'w W °ct�. •4" OC °�tz c� N ONE �.� '► "'au,� 9t a� �oG0 t~�- 'ivlN. 5� .��Geou °� °a W 4•„,0 �+;"w ^ +' J d G A .� ,C ai A a L i ..v 4a - d ° .Q C4 > .t) a B N G) O 4 t0 D At3 4.w 07++ .0 .0 .r C'7 G 3 N p pp w raV to C)w U.0. G Z y LL R G C,0 N U C'a O p A ."'i. � .a•+4 a 1 9 P ca C 'COO OD C! o •t7 � k + ° u° +� ^+ !' O 'U M cO..w � CO. C3 CJ -a G Q OJ eN. C4..L.a � 0.— V) UO G s. W R ¢'..• E � ca. - I ca 5 -S o �+ '•� a �•.y .L� G `0{ d y _ ."%� tL. w 03 y 'Ty✓s O 'a L"•i ca Q! dW CL.Cp0=r 7`` E' er' $c•'C °"' L'7>+Ct'$ 2:- =N -;A'Oa L.bllR� V ~ •� C'� 01 ^•3 ►+°i O G .+N �' O '.� M W •-• CC�� O - ..�i cn a•�' C7',pG w CO, p t� to G L to •� O w •C w C t0 W C! Ca N i.► �" CJ a :.� N W O 6 ° y ° r 'U O o.bS �� ���'�:� A aim u uSW 4 M. :343 °.� �,�, a� a, ay 00'0 �S.°c'� °� a ocao vs :.. .cs.5 > aS c* c kav ?_�W dS6 a u° d / w ' w d� C,G 0) / •p C N t. ^" p �. o o C... G a o'a o «+ 3 o I n a3c a, a...o �ca ~►.nt �oto00`a�t0 =�o `° Sc G qj y� y O A� a�,� C.. „CJr Gcs �.. -O.•'' G �� L D4 �f .d• rcwnrs $.:OGni�''3w3 0 °pca ro�a°iG�aa ° 'v- 'iwa�v`a°':'G o ,c�t�s N c4•,� z mow• d ....R o, .. o v O ri y c� oAa >� way 4l.O.. '0 �V� 00= to ca ul y� "� C to t�0 w N Q � OR ••� G w t� .w � � N Ca ^ CC, O �" O Oy .� � C. c0 � �' w CS C" ' b a+ OG! 4 D p' 0 G .•rj i�� .�O ba'L! Q C'' G •�O � w� .C'r t2 ' H G C! ^.�+�5 Lis 0� iO� 1. ' '• V y O CA A U �ddrr Op p• .Gi O .. �. ""` r, N L..O b '.'7. .AC m � t+ �! 'Sc G 0! ti C rr CU rci O> L C j OJ .0 - U W CO tt US ;1GLO t'Gsb W, .�� vy O.«o�,vr"A .+ 3 O Q C3 OA A .^' ca O I� ..a A, 41 G ►•. O M .•i C 93 a" i R..°�.� .0 � M 6J ..0. � p" ai al ADO• 'op N � t� m � v t,.,,l. C„ � 3 � i.. � AR p ,p L" �. 0 pp •y.r aC •n G •.r d CL > y O ✓ '•O� w p C3 A p ••� C* C � r N U 6� cz C �` > C<i r O •-' 4, COH '>, G CS O C, d O. L. A Oa O y a �+ iY+ U 0 u w G ^y O' O ul C� ly ca -0 � ^ '��Cl a3 x5 °o y ,a�uo�.9 �wO csf CA o csc� W^ , to jt •' $ ' A L M .� v �. o p ... ra... N N F M ^ > a C'o,. to '�' 03 o >•��d DNS �;° O C� z N p V Cy a G a0 ° .d OJ p'C�--s.. O C «= (D >. 6! rr $ (� iy d 01 0 0 L a I=— � V .� e3 �C Ol �' t: .c] d G pi. Cy �j, b 0) ..► �, OF •:� .`.d W A Oi OJ M F 6A E Ncla� 7$^�' C��C >niL diitwfn >L~ G V`r.' 00C~!L v �'''• i a =S 'a�r >�> a da C ac0.0 a oo, o.`e` fZoo a0 o.�xv m -• 3 ,a - .• - -' - - - ^� � .-. _,,,'..__,., -.. .art• -• � ,r S•� cis 4) M ; M 3�0 ° 3 °p ' ae� cif .~'p~•7`�'c' 0� 7 cyJ,�Op tOJ •, °vM rO.x•p > U) .0 7 W `� .� ,5 ens c• >, 3 y ( cI 'd a y m ° .d e`", n> ^' u c0, ) .ntr. Oy ^C► COQ t~. O N F �� v •� .' CO CLS Q,r•"1w R CO O :J G •C-' F,r' �.+ CO 'a V 41 .� U CU O O O O O y CJ v o Q I • m y u 7 •O v . s• .yy w, cs OD MAO c>w0.0 c •c $� ��, G4 :3aI$oo 10 ;'ty °O. as ci � •� ' H tea• u m y c"'0 v a aO�i � L a g ,.9 3 E— � in 'Jt.•b V t0 i0i V co ►+ w •t j O d y yU .�+ U U H d .r.7 cry! �.y C .-mi ,O m d O OD �}'. y d w ..• O 00 .�, G , c0 CL �r7►C m �'' �� C Q•U+O -• O to NCO'' 61 `� 41 v.2 0 =.0 Cc3 .3•+Q•+�- 1 r t1D I.• •�+ N a.+ O Cb ry C3 y . N R.. N .� it U -" %' . e .�}'- 0 toci.. N N b' 000 idD .CaW C .+ aNa. •` � �$ C;3 ✓>- s �' ,�i `� � rui ��. °.,' �w � cc tll~ C + ��, 3 0 n W � �o •a>i N ,7 : i C C� .O. S r a . Ci C) ar. w '�j En G ►r. .. i. i !j ' +.:- " 7s N t� O ti .�I X' CA t- }� U r+' j i+. a ,'rr� i ,` 7? cff a r Z � G ... 0 O '.•' m U A• t'+ i. O F. V a+ �• N A 3 • ^ to .� .L0i' D}i•y -� .O > p ,� y. W N 0 R• �,,. i�+ V c0 C! CON O N =.5.— d N R• C O L. ca O ►,i• baU, -I9DO GH.aNN �:'"� [au0r ��mi;CJ..•�'at". �� Cas n�uC) w Q 'J.; ,D u '" - Ccr cs °J ice. . °. rt_1 rte. C. ca :� c. + O tp o • u U .1, v..� �a u 0 L► u x c, .» °� m � u � gL 0 C, � � �+ � ci .S a, oui 0 % 0 .o. Jj1""•`ir?a1�k y.� ,.• K• l +. w i'♦ �r r .• � *!� � r ► i� �'� �. ... �S �: , 1 ���° � T � Y gt�a`�Rvx� �r .•.. «�•�„ r�� a.'s i � it ! t. a iCi /�.:t� �'`� rS .f��, O O � ,.� I- , ya �v"� yW ;'b }•%i:r.t�`�•',! v • �� t tt ~,t ° r��. %'i.'°�.�i �.K f7•i �•fY d � �.f i •M..r �,C •. � ;�,,,;x� Pert - .. ?�w; :,r' j �s M N.�' � ��:it��; � y�i :�t"~- o •1ri n^•/y � r y�;��.�. •�`,. •l?� -. ,iz2'�`,�. rr.��.t �.�7!� . ' �• 3••. ;+1,1 '.. w�F '•q , ->�I �•~ � V�� 'rir,1 �` ia" ti��•� '� 4• o 2 x'��,7. •F.�s'� ' `zk��Y'` i;y �'i'v�i%v ' � �'�.� >a�.S'r {i'�1 '`.,r'1 •vet+ i �.! k � �� • Z' �n��� ���•i1v'�p'\.,?�` � � r'�' t.Le:i% �' � ,"`�.••, "7;"r-,tt'�,y��` -,i�ZL «�,,. �,}. y. 4.�1 Y ,� �' q 1r- nyi•�R�� Y"z �l }� O �ra� �y fe•nt °d�.y t t� !rr :,ta��q'tl" ��x�1`.r'';yy. rt,'Y. }a ,I +t'�� � 1 ` � I '��•'� l�la �t�R 't'y OV '+�� ��F'�. ^� �. .�r�•�� .5: ,.�'1 .'1r���i�. � ` Y `e.a�•lt _ i_ ..S ti`••�'��•� V•ii`o'� ,`nja..� � l �.r�-r,, +.•$Ka �� r` :.0'_JY•,.. {.`'t5.��ty�;•. p ` -�ti 3A • i �: ••�"'�'�,rr :„`•f1= 1�'ti.-± r ; �.k':S n is eii�•^ S•3i* ! r� h �.t' •22 A{ •' fb+e� - y .t` �! A" �� � +� ^�r ?. �� Y . `[[� \`� ., '��.i f }I r`:�w � ti ��� "�•t,�+•r ' a i•` � f •' If,. �.. _ ° 4 •:'J'+TS� ;, 4"�.• ' 2 '. ` � �" ,tri�'��. •'Mn 1•y "rn •a <�::Y' -tiiv ` R. � ' �, �^'' k ,i w'�"r.•(a%#�� 1'.� L� Ir "! •vN��i•� ; r;i�� ti. °;i. � 'ri�� 1' ':.v, . � r �..r i 3 .. *' � }' K � ♦t r.; , , y,. r;. � ' f as` A.+�, ,R t• �-r �'l.= •_ ' � :'f %� � � • tr' . • ,., `�.�i �xv.: ` ti t ' ' w��tJ y*� Z•� i .- •� s - • ` +S r 't • * "i, f i �'}N1?�-�s� ��� �,rry�• '1 R.�.1��•_�..''� �+ r5t,y�` ��r "i:.t�, i�f'; :• r1• s�f W, � Z,�'Z. ir'�7 �.� - ,.AV W. �i'' -K: w., :4; ,ss,.3.:C 'rFv , ♦•� . ��rrX, 'A -,>.w •t s.r a=r'#�+rti. - 1 �' r L f Yt +. • } '•. .t � 1 ;, "1 ' . 7' i ��` 1 �t r.`.�t&.'.•r e �o � � � -� � J r t �. � •`�+abj.4't!''•��;� f.4i••q�YHia i ��'�'o- i�.s �o �.,� ✓•��C^� "•thi y�•:�±w.3�aM,�.t d.J + M ~•� y,�t y � i r) •�'. •r;�fr =e- `�' " ��.r,����.t+ ••.,YR W�' "'� Pr •+ ,i�.9 •. ^y- r�:.�r; ARM '!.•��r•�3`•C'�caso_L*����,',, ,23�'j,�h��•��'f�1 ,�� '� d t1 :,, ie r r�t+r c`, .�^�pY •� ti -Yy�� }'* i', �• ! • � rK {� +a.`�M1�•. 7_Y "r. . .S rM ^1 n +}l�%! .t+y �.. i3S.. �,:i` *.S,K j (� "P,i. �4� ?y• r _ •f., 44 u, •Y�r -th 6v� ,n. w.pe�'3y7yw, -•i,' - -� `o Y .ir43•�' ��, � ^,V it -i �' 1 R ,� •� ��• t Z7� ... L..'"•.Q'^t1t`' �`!.' ``•_ t _ s. 'e \.' ' an '' f� ']R• '�•, % T �,I,:. +f 9•`1t, L ' 3••( , �?.itih ••fir �• `v,�•; t C"..t"�•y �,,:1••`: "�.r�•tt• � •�.•'��. tic.R1'� s`i, � f'f,0 1•Y t` ' , ; "�M:: �"�' t ,��f"}. `t•IPR ,� .S . • i '< 6 ": ..i' • _ �<'•:al :• a rs,,r7 -.t' i i4 3' 'AA •i. Y�i,r +.r _ • , i <: •2j, r C� •a ''y �P +his+ A' ✓ Y.•(.:1' 'l+'y.,, "•, ^.,` Yy;.?rrfJ' } r - �' '.,� "+- .,� •� r •' �',, •i )� w'• r � ; =' K;�'" ,�%+, �A'+p"' ^a t.s3�e; � s7 {, .`•rt•s d` 1� A �+�� �> ,•1 d S y :ar : r t 4 S� +r �r•�+'�?� �tls rii;... �'Si.':ia °i�lani'trsi iu'�i; , v ey. i•�s,, cwt, v �\ / . C "r g r �, 3•T j> r ;' ...C' 4?' r .r. �w;" - r."i�_`+ /K' �[�yy:�e.�`y 1 �� h � /{�.�� '1 �1,,I� y� � •!1� ' w..- a!•`�'F 3��GT 'LN r• .••,`� �' •I �. \�.Itln \'r '�Sy �.R'1.7�.,IR,,•77T * �, 1`'Y j�S�� .i y i -.t ^ .wr•' '� "i��r r � �+.'f� % +-� s :'yt:'t" •_!! � . Y+' � +��y, C`;l"A�'� r ",3� j •Sh .•"� ai�' •�. 1i'�h li�M ` •'} _ t . .. ., l• 't t•, � �•` '1jl'.- +'f5 '„ .�.. y? .��• t�• , 1 r �''"� i �4 ���� t, = t . .�. . ' � " "tit '�'..j.r��r'a�u'��tT�: } �t i��~.'.•�'� °r" �+`�i.' k � "`t ^ *,r�. .w }- •�'����L= 1M2+,�,� } jn�, � `+.zr'rn•'�+C�.tie.�"F1.1J'��� 4 .� �..e.�ti �''7.��'J�,^. ��„t.tti� - ii ,rY) A/J"r'J`�•' ,3'•� �,: ..... ':'m•nl'.iy -' `'•;��7 •'7:j"•✓•Fyi ' 1 nom-- -���•a al.: 1 iri :Q, �' , �r•'�r �� ; ;'}'� r�=�• I .' i r _ _ E _? :s•, .av �- . � .'` =""= •�rCa. ri�o•.. 'Kr •• .i .. r :i3, ia� 1,wtr�,Y� x i � r �t J ...+ �1 2•.y� E- Ii � S•• 7 iJ`I9 t' ;.►:� S7 vwtoWi� l� =t,�c - .+s1�'� i_ t v'��Fi *w< �` ' : _L� `'' r�: 9el Q.�i ! G•� • r _ '' i �- b 'CJs .y Ji %d�' �•YS Yjj�f�• f �f�?� 1t � ♦r t� � t i •' .y C CD CAD ► vea c O C I .260 ca N I C Ca OCXM _ 0 tan a) J1 O v"0 � V Ef • �y� .`gyp SI�Y � _ ^.. 'r • �.j�_'4 tit : +�� }'•• �iy1:.,Yi y i :.a � •+� tii ., �L• S �- b 'CJs .y Ji %d�' �•YS Yjj�f�• f �f�?� 1t � ♦r t� � t i •' .y C CD CAD ► vea c O C I .260 ca N I C Ca OCXM _ 0 tan a) J1 O v"0 � V Ef Business: 834-6732 Elmhurst Trucking Co. DISPOSAL SERVICE P. 0• Box 275 Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 INFORMATION GATHERED ON AtIERAGL DAY FOR Residence: M1600 THE PICK -UP OF 270 HOMES IN OAK BROOK RECEIPTS: 270 Names $44.40 Yearo. o .000••oo•oor•o...oe..$1I,988000 Year ($230.50 Per Day) DEBTS PARTIAL: Laborro •o••oo••a••rr••oe9•$ll5r00 Per Day •o•e. 5®980.00 Year Gas.•••......•.••..e.•a•.e 45°00 it ti •..e• 2,340,00 ti Trick Allowance. • f • o O 0 • .. N 40 • 00 ii it **too 2 v 080.00 ti Daxmp....rr••...•.....•..r. 70000 t: ti 3,640.00 it . i TOTAL COST...e.e♦•.00.re.e ♦0.•.$270.00 tt ti r..•r$I4,040,00 + OJ�S.• o.•.•. oeo• s. e.• ••a••eow.•o.♦•ee•e•••.••e•s.•►• $3f052.00 tt ACTURAL COST TRUCK & DRIVER �� r re•. � ...oerr$256.00 Per Day ....$13,312.00 Year License, Insurance, Tires and Repairs, Truck. Repairs a. d Maintenance., Garage and Utilities, Office Help, Postage, Gas, Oil Equipment Replacement Duump...•• ................. 70 ♦00 Per Day se•. 3#640.00 Year TOTAL COST. e...... a.•.• ....... .........•......a•...$16,952.00 Year RECEIPTS .D PROJECTED INCREASE 270 Hone ®...••.•re....•.a 66.00 Year ..•..•. 178820.00 Year PROFIT•♦r•rrrr.••r••o••••eeoo • r•r•r•.o••r•••o••o• ®• $968.00 Year w_ Businen: 834.6732 &t Oidence: 834 -1600 • a imhu st 'JL if I Coo DISP ®SAL SERVICE P. Q. Box 275 Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 PROJECTED PRICES FOR SURROUNDING AREA: Hinsdale - Claredon Hills - Downers Grove .. Bolling brook Oak Brook Terrace a Elmhurst CURB SERVICE: Ij k. ., Una imited.. 0 0 ... O•• O O A qg$ 5 O `00 2/Wk. of 090906000000.10000 a BACK DOOR SERVICE: 1 /Wk, 2 Can 8000 2 /1ark. 2 i1 it 0609a6000001 0950 NOTE: Genera. Lot Size 50* X 150 f . NOTE: Prices And Costs Not ror Publication 0 w • OAK BROOK 7DISPOSA Cost Analysis Oak Broak Home Roue 11 -20 8 Monthly Sales: 350 homes �} 3.35 � 1073 544 homes @ 3.70 440 homes @ 6.00 $ 2 9013 2,640 39P, homes @ 4.50 19791 480 95 homes @ 6.40 608 8o homes @ 6.00 1i9 homes 011.00 12k3o 95 1 `mes @ 9.00 _ $ 43,299 $ 69570 Monthly Expenses: S 3, 180 49753 Wages 289 467 payroll taxes 195 249 Union. welfare & pension 160 200 r Vacation help °� 326 - 19425 Dumping expense 9 352 948 Gas 3 85 Oil & grease 95 234 Tires 267 275 Insurance Office supplies & postage 60 65 1000 0 Telephone &, answering service 45 1 �5 Truck licenses Garage - 165 - parking 465 97? 'truck depreciation Interest expense — Trucks 150 466 75 Route supplies — Carrybarrels, gloves 30 00 —1,360 Track repairs .7,45-8 1112227- monthly Expenses over Monthly Income �P _ 7� • b ' P Oqk r r i VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK � 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS . Grid -2'220 Ifece�' "er 22, 1978 ISLE 40 TO: President . & 'Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Adjustment in the Rate for Garbage Pick --up On December 18, 1978, Trustee Rush and I met with representatives of Healthway Rubbish Disposal Services, Inc., Elmhurst Trucking Company, and Oak Brook Disposal Company, the three licensed disposal companies in the Village of Oak Brook. The representatives indicated that a rate adjustment is necessary in order for them to continue to adequately service the Village of Oak Brook. Attached please find are Operating Statements for the past twelve- -month period end- ed September 30, 1978 for all three companies analyzing, their revenue and expenses. Ask Also attached is letter dated November 21, 1978 relative to Healthway Disposal's increases that can be expected to occur in the next twelve -month period. The three disposal companies have requested the following adjuster znt in rate schedule: ter -' Current OB Proposed OB Village of Village of �=` Service Monthly _Rate I�Ionthly Rate Hinsdale Rate DG Rate Once a wee' . at curb $3.35 4d $4.50 ' "- Twice a week at curb 6.00 Xt&i 8..00 -- $5.75 Once a wee' Back Door : _ j: 4.50 w 6.00 $6.00 -� Twice a week Back Door 11, C � 9.00 lo• wo 12.00 6.50 ;�. � 8.25 f In analyzing the various rates, we surveyed some 15 communities and determined that the present average at curb once a ,reek pickup is about $4.25. The other service varied so much that it was difficult to determine an average rate. Trustee Rush asked that I list the service and rates for Hinsdale and Downers Grove since they are the closest to Oak Brook even though they do not compare in lot size and density. It is important to note that Hinsdale and Downers Grove limit the. amount of solid waste to two containers. The service for the Village of Oak Brook is not limited. y A . 2 December 22, 1978. Trustee R* sh has requested that this matter be placed on the Commitrte'- of-the- Whole agenda for the meeting of January 8, 1979 for- the village board to discuss in detail.. The current three -year contract terminates on December 31, 1978. However,'the disposal companies have extended that contract for a two -month period, . S3 cer�'ly yours, ' • Ken eth G . Carmigna ' Village Manager KGC f Is ' att. . IP • �I I� 1 w JAMES M. CAMPBELL ASSOCIATES, LTDa _ November 219 1978 Healt "nti.7a, �is., r2.. - aaZ..�.... ..�. � Post Off ice Box 419 Downers Grove, Illinois 60515 RE : • Analysis of Oak Brock Operations Dear Ted and Bob: Enclosed please find a schedule of operations -for the twelve month period ended September 30, 1978, which is a composite of your residential operation in that area. You will note that the *gross margin before any ad�ainistrative expense is only 37 and the overall loss of the operation is $281.08 for the period. As I indicated to you in prior communications, you can expect the following increases to occur in the next twelve months of operations: . 1. Drivers' and Helpers` wages, taxes- and' ' benefits -�d5� 2. Truck maintenance 14.5% + • 3: Duu-kp gees 30% 4. Gasoline and Diesel oil . • (Shown respectively) 9.5% _ 19.2% 5. 'Equipment- rental 15% . 6. Containers 11.5% 7. Insurance (Liability -and li!orkmens' ' Compensation) 46.5% If there are any further questions regarding this, *'or any ocher matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very t my yours, ' • JAMES r . CAS PBELL AND ASSOCIATES, LTD. i w Jam M. Campbe�.�. ' 162381OUIS AVENUE ' • ° . SOUTH HOLLAND* I ZN0�5 6CO473 PHONE 312 /331 -4180 ` . w ...ww,r.••. ... •_w_... .•. w. M.wraa.. w++ ; . w.. ..M w.«..r _♦. .N ' w ••• ra.w.ti.r. .. . • 1a.1•a.ar. . Mw.aibw....1� i a.I�.. 6M HEALTHWAY DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. Ah • ANALYSIS OF "OAK BROOK OPERATIONS TWELVE MONTH ER OD ENDED SEPTEMBER 0 1978 Income Ke—sidential Income 8.,284.60 Direct' Expetis:es F_ Wages 2,932.75 Payroll Tax 1. 7 7. 0 Gas, Oil, Repairs, Etc. 1o682.42 Insurance 1,412.11 Dumping Fees 326.65• Depreciation 1,217.14 Pnsion and Benefits 184.20 Other Expenses 102.80 8 03) 5.50 Gross Mar in .249.10 -Lulrl Ad istrative7*arfd Other Operating Ex -aenses -(Exclusive of Officers' Salary) 530.18 Net Loss From OPefa:t`i`qns,. 281. 08 6M 1 Anew 854-6732 Residence: 834-1600 , Elmhurst Trucking DISPOSAL SERVICE P. 0. Box 275 Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 Dec. 11, 1978 OUR COST FOR RUBBISH REMOVAL FOR OAK BROOK. HOMES . PER MONTH .. TRUCK•COST $60,000 @5 YEAR LIFE ®OUR COST PER DAY-- $40.00 . $173933 ' 7 TRUCK. EXPENSE: GAS, OIL, REPAIRS, INSURANCE w LICENSE, USE TAX PER DAY . $62.00 250.00 DISPOSAL COST: 1 -112 LOADS PER DAY' PER YARD— @1.30 227.50 SALARY: I MAN @11.00 PER HOUR PEP, DAY 88.00 381,30 I MAN 11.00 PER HOUR — FART TII�1E PER MONTH 88.00 8 HOURS 88.00 ' PRINTING & POSTAGE 20.00 TOTAL COST PER MONTH $1,140.I.3 300 HOMES @3.35 PER MONTH 19005.00 LOSSPER MONTH ..... a. ....�........, ®.... ®.p.$135.1.3 _ ' I ♦ I . ' -J " W i P,0c0 -rte? ��-•► 0•`�� • OAK BROOK MSPOSAL - - ' Cost Analysis -- Oak Brook llomne Route . . 1 I J2QZh8 ' Monthly Sales: _ - • . 398 homes a 4.50 95 homes @ 9.00 - . 855 - • .. . 350 home; @ 3.35 I Y1 ?3 80 homes 0 6.00 .. - - I�.299 40 . - At Cur? Projected Costs Monthly Expenses: Costs for Next Year Vages -2 men., at union scale $3,180 $32180 Payroll takes-Fica & 'Unemployment 289 s 305. • Union welfare & version 195 - " • 195 - V'acatio.d help -4 4 wks 160 .161 . Dumping expense --52 loads per month • 0 $25.50 1,326 - 13,593 Gas -- 568 gallons @ 620 352 ' . 408 . • Oil & grease 43 • : 47- Tires - 95 100 - L3z=e - ce - Trcxck ?: Wwe=ens Comp. 267 280- Office supplies & postage 6o-- .65 Telephone & Answerer sernee ' • 75 licenses x�..'6.•5 445 � '5 �True2. 67CL.Le rent °° ia�i,.S. ��'ifr'T S� $ J •• True•. deprecia -ion 416 416. . - interest expense- Trzzcl. loan 150 150 Doute supplies- Ca...ri7barrels, gloves, etc. 30 30 TxuCIc repairs 700, •.,__.Z2. . • Total monthly expenses: g7.858 8.2 2 . E 0 MEMORANDUM %: President and Board of Trustees From: Floyd Wilson Date; December 5, 1979 Subject: Phase 11 Water Report East DuPage Water Commission The Phase 11 Report, prepared by Alvord, Burdick and Howson for the text DuPage communities who received a Lake Michigan water allocation, was distributed at the November 15, 1979 Commission meeting. This report defined thirteen alternatives for bringing Lake water to DuPage County and distributing it to the ten communities. It also examined expanding the water service to fifteen additional communities that a previous report determined Lake Wstsr would be a cost effective supply. A Commission meeting, has been scheduled for December 129 1979 for the purpose of selecting one of the alternatives. When selected, Phase 111 of the study can commence. Phase 111 will produce the preliminary design of the alternate selected. A summary of the thirteen alternatives and the estimated cost of each is attached. Based on the information provided in the Phase 11 report, I would recommend alternative ,-7a This would provide 105 Aip x.D. capacity which is the .forecasted maxim -uni day demand for the year 2020 for the ten communities that now have an allocation. It also appears to he the most economical plan for delivering the maximum day demand. Tho report also claims this alternative can be reinforced at a later date to provide 230 M,G.D. a.Thich is the forecasted maximum day demand for all 25 DuPage coiNiminities where Lake water is a cost effective supply. Also attached is a draft Ordinance that when enacted will snake the Village of O-ak Brook a member of the East DuPage ;rater Commission. The Ordinance also provides for a Commissioner to be appointed by the Village President with the approval of the * Board. The Commissioner will be a member of the East DuPage Water Commission and represent the Village. The East DuPage :Tate, Commission will acquire and operate a coi xilon water supply sourer: for the member communities. Initially ten communities will be included in the COIImissioxl. They are Addison, Bensenville, Carol. S treari9 Downers Grove, I:lrrthurs t, Glendale 1Jeig,hts9 Lowbard9 Oak Brook, Villa Park and Westmont. This enlargement of the Commissionz is to become effective Jnnuary 1, 19$0. All PTI JANUM 1, 1979 (b) Brush or branches must be 'se=ely taped in five -foot bundles, places at the curb, and weighing riot :more than 80 pounds per bindle (d) Christmas tress rrnast be placed at the curbs (e) Exceptional item, including household furniture, hot water heaters and used appliances of not n.-)re than 300 pounds in weight, shall be collected and dis- posed of by the Contractor when placed at the curb. Such exceptional henna do not include building materials. �1- OWN i ]Refuse collection, service will rx:)t be provided under the following oorxUticns or for the naterials listed below. 3. SERVICE AND RAMS "M2- Weight 1321 t: —00 pounds any one ccnta!IWr, and cmtent No one article over 300 powli-r Location. —at edge of roadway Bags and Brush at edge of roadway - no limit Service B $6,04%, Picky. twice per Material to be collected: —solid waste with no limiting definition eight limit —80 pounds any one cmtaai ner i and contFMt No article over 300 pounds I- ccation: -°-�at edge of roadway Bags and Brush at edge of roadway - no limit -3- } (pR a4 yqL yb C 1 Y Service c $6000 Pickup once pe r week Material to be collect —solid waste with no li i.tinz def i.nition Might limit: —80 pounds any one container and content No one article over 300 pounds Iocation: —at rear of custc n I s presses Baas and Brush at edge of roadway ® no limit Service B $11 000 Pickup twice per week Material too be collected: —solid waste with no ,iinitting definition Weight limit : —80 pounds `any one container and content No one article over 300 pounds Location: ----at rear of cix- star's prealse s Bags and Brush at edge of roadway - no limit The following hours of operation shall be observed by all Refuse tractors: 4- F . Residential � ' i b - Hours 00 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday No refuse collections will occur on the follwing clays: • Years ,a, • Mworial Da (c) Independence Day Labor Day (e) Thanksgiving Day Christmas w Makeup service ce for these days will be wed Finn (b) Elmhurst Trucking Co P.O. Box 275 Elmhurst, Illinois 6 0126 Phone: 834°-6732 Mrs John Stob r� W �r^(Y UFO Jack T. Knuepfer DuPage County COUNTY BOARD CHAIRMAN 682 -72 ®2 November 26, 1979 Honorable Wence S. Cerne President, Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oakbrook Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 Dear President Cerne: Some two decades ago Elmhurst, V'i,lla Park and Lombard formed a water commission to attempt to secure Lake Michigan water. An immense number of hurdles have been placed in their way and they have spent many thousands of dollars moving the project forward. Nevertheless, they must get credit for having the vision to see the needs of the future. AIM The original water commission has now been expanded to 10 members and they are considering a total of 25. The purpose of this letter is to ask that consideration be given to a plan that encompasses the whole county, including the western communities such as Naperville, Aurora and Hanover Park, It is our belief that an area wide solution is neces- sary and that the 20 years since the Tree Towns Water Com- mission was formed have shown the need for a much broader based water system than was originally conceived. Next year IDOT, Division of V7ater Resources will hold hearings on future water needs of communities who were not granted an allocation of Lake Michigan water and there appears to be no doubt that additional needs can be documented. Some possible problems and potential contradictions ought to be considered if the system is anything but area wide. 1.. If only some DuPage Communities participate in the program to secure Lake Michigan water the distinct possibility exists that those communities which have been most far sighted will incurr higher water charges for their constituencies and will make additional ground waters available to the noncontributing communities, thus solving their problem. This two tier cost system can only work Go to the detriment of the larder community. O U PAGE CENTER o 421 N. COUNTY FARM ROAD 6 WHEA►TON. IL 601 ®7 2. A second scenario posits the possibility of the western DuPage communities bijilding their own system by 1990 or 2000. The cost of two main trunk lines connected to a Lake Michigan source. With the view to approaching these problems let us then propose a possible resolution of this dilemma. 1. That the main trunk from the lake be sized to take care of all of DuPage as well as communities who desire to participate and who spill over into other counties, such as Aurora and Hanover Park. 2. That the capital costs for the construction /of the main trunk lines be spread by a tax levy through- out the district. (A tax levy has the distinct advantage of being deductable from the federal income tax.) Consideration should be given in construction of the main feeders to additional charges for communities who are farther from the main trunk line to Lake Michigan, although to the extent costs are uniform and not arbitrary or discriminatory the proposition will be easier to sell. 3. That the proposed district assume control of pumpage from all of the deep wells in the county to prevent completion for this source of water and to bring an end to the mining of water. 4. That consideration be given to the question as to whether an area wide policy is necessary for wells in the shallow aquafor. 5. That an area wide agency wholesale the water to communities for resale to their citizens. 6. That in so far as possible the wholesale rates for water be equalized throughout the county. 7. That the county, as well, needs to participate in requesting allocations, since most of those living in the unincorporated areas will one day be members of .a municipality and we need to start counting them right now to assure adequate future water supplies. s We hope that consideration can be given to these sug- gestions as a means of equalizing the cost of water through- out the county, but even more important, to mi.',� certain that adequate supplies of water are available ix the future to all of its citizens. I Sincerely yours, 4 � � 6� JACK T. KNUEVF 1R County Board Chairman JTK jbld e s We hope that consideration can be given to these sug- gestions as a means of equalizing the cost of water through- out the county, but even more important, to mi.',� certain that adequate supplies of water are available ix the future to all of its citizens. I Sincerely yours, 4 � � 6� JACK T. KNUEVF 1R County Board Chairman JTK jbld tAft 1(.0 November 1, 1979. Elmhurst -Villa Park- Lombard water Commission 119 Schiller Street Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 Gentlemen: For the past year we have been studying the practical alternatives of a Lake Michigan water supply from.the City of Chicago to communities in DuPage County. This study is divided into three phases. The first phase of our study forecast the water demands of 25 communities in DuPage County each decade to the year 2020. The report was submitted to each of the communities in DuPage County which now have an allocation of Lake Michigan water and with their concurrence that the fore- casts were reasonable, the report was accepted by the Commission on April 25, 1979. PHASE I The major conclusions from the first phase of the report were: 1. There are 10 communities in DuPage Count;r which have received an aggregate allocation of Lake Michigan water of 23 MGD. There are in addition 15 communities which the State of Illinois has determined Lake Michigan water is an apparent cost - effective source of supply. 2. • 2. The annual average day water demand of the 10 communities is forecasted to increase from 35 MGD in•1980 to 60 MGD in the year 2020. The annual average day for the 25 -,:ommuniti.es is forecasted to increase from 63 MCTD in 1980 to 123 MGD in the year 2020. 3. The maximum day water demand was forecasted to increase from 61 MGD in 1980 to 105 MGD in 2020 and from 118 MGD in 1980 to 230 MGD in the year 2020 for the 10 and 25 communities, re- spectively. 4. The Illinois State Water Survey has forecast that the demand for groundwater will exceed its availability in pants of DuPage County as early as 1995 and by the year 2020 more than 506 of the County will be in the same sit:Uation. 5. The communities now are delivering groundwater to their customers with a hardness of 200 to 600 mg /l. It was esti- mated most of these customers pay, in addition to their water bills, from $1.15 to $2.20 per 1000 gallons for home softening this water. The foregoing itemizes the major parts of the first phase of our report. Having now completed the second phase, we have summarized for your convenience our principal findings and conclusions therein: PHASE II 1. The 1889 Sanitary District Act requires the City of Chicago to furnish water at its city limits to any incorporated suburban area within the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago at a metered water rate no greater than charged to large consumers in Chicago. 7 N&II. U 3. • The communities in DuPage County are not covered by this portion of the Act and, therefore, the price and conditions under which water may be purchased from the Ci L,)7 of Chicago will have to be negotiated. This has not yet been undertaken and therefore none of the annual costs in this report reflect the cost of purchasing water from the City of Chicago. 2. A study of Chicago's Filtration plants, tunnel systems and Pumping stations revealed the greatest capacity available for additional water supply is at the Central Park Pumping Station. The Central Tunnel Zone in Chicago, which serves the Central Park Pumping Station, is the only tunnel zone which has adequate capacity for meeting maximum day demands of the 10 communities until the year 2020, it does not have available capacity to meet the requirements for the 25 com- munities beyond 1990. 3. Thirteen alternatives for bringing Lake*=4.ichigan water via the City of Chicago to DuuPape County were investigated, some of which would be adequate for only the 10 communities and others which could be phased to provide initially for the water requirements of the 10 communities or expanded to meet the requirements of the 25 communities. 4. One of the alternatives, Plan #1, kras designed to pro- vide only the current allocation of 23 MGD for the 10 com- munities. This lake supply plus present well capacity would be adequate only to the years 1990 -95. 4. 5. Three of the alternatives, Plans ##3, 5 and 8, were de- i signed to accept water from Chicago's system off -peak. As i the construction costs of all of these projects are greater than similar projects taking water on -peak, they would only be attractive if the City of Chicago provides a preferential rate for taking water off -peak. 6. The 10 communities currently have 77 MGD in well capacity with an estimated value of $21 million. Two of the alternatives. Plans #2 and 4, considered supplementing lake water with the present groundwater supply. Plan #2 requires 44 MGD of lake supply and utilization of the present safe (largest well in each community out of service) well capacity of -the 10 com- munities to aneet maximum day requirements in the year 20204. Plan #4 requires 72 MGD of lake- supply and utilizes only present c=ells that meet the 1978 Illinois Pollution Control ]Board Standards for peaking, i.e., average day demands which occur about 70% of the time would be met with a Lake Michigan supply. These alternatives are the most economical and re� quire less water from Lake Michigan than any of the other plans. 7. Based on data from the I17.in.ois State.dater Survey either of the tT.vo plans for supplementing lake with groimdwater would defer predicted groundwater deficits beyond the year 2020. 80 Two of the projects, Plans ##6 and 79 were designed and the water demands of the 10 j costs estimated upon supplying . ,M U 11 5• • communities with 100% Lake Michigan water. Flan #6 transports water from Chicago to DuPage County by tunnel and #7 by pipe. It is estimated that the tunnel project wall. cost approximately $24 million more than the pipe project. It is also estimated the annual costs for the tunnel project will be 13% greater than the pipe project. The pipe project utilizes water at the high- est elevation available to consumers in DuPage County, therefore, unless there is a difference in the rate for purchasing water from the City of Chicago, the tunnel project would not utilize the hydraulic head already provided by the Chicago water system. 9. Three of the alternatives investigated, Plans #9, 10 and 11, are two -phase projects; the first phase is designed and costs estimated for providing water to the 10 communities and the second phase for constructing those facilities necessary to provide water for the additional 15 communities in DuPage County. It will cost more for the 10 communities to be a part of any of these plans than if they constructed an independent water supply system for themselves only. 10. Bensenville, which is one of the 10 communities receiving an allocation, is located immediately adjacent to the City of Chicago at O'Hare Field. We therefore investigated the possi- bility of Bensenville purchasing water directly from the City of Chicago at that point (Plan 12). We have been advised by Chicago that the City will not sell water to*Bensenvil]e from the North Tunnel Zone. 11. One of the alternatives (Plan 13) considered a project to 0 supply water to the 10 communities in DuPage County and 13 communities in Northwest Cook County. The estimated cost of that project is approximately $422 million. The cost per capita for the population in the 10 communities would more than double if they joined the communities in Northwest Cook County for that project. 12. Capital Costs - The construction cost for each of the projects include the cost of work within the City of Chicago water system, if any; the cost of all facilities to bring water from the City of Chicago to DuPage County and those additional facilities necessary to supply water to each of the present reservoirs in all of the communities. Capital. costs include construction., engineering contingencies, inter- est during construction, and are based on an ENR Index of 3200 which is forecast to occur during 1980. 13. Annual Co -z-�-s - Energy costs were estimated to double within the next decade and total operation and maintenance expenses were forecasted to increase about 239/6 each decade to the year 2020. Annual costs are based Lnnn the fixed charges for paying interest and amortization of bonds neces- sary to pay for the project plus forecasted operation and maintenance expenses. For projects which consider supple- menting Lake Michigan water with groundwater, the average cost of 320 per 1000 gallons in 1980 was utilized for that portion of water to be provided by wells and added to the total annual cost. b. D 0 a 14. Storage - Seven of the 10.communities currently have suffi- cient storage to provide for meeting forecasted maximum hour demands plus fire I-E-2o w in the year 2020. Ll "he present contracts the City of Chicago has with communities purchasing water require a minimum storage of two times average day use. Part of this storage would be in the transmission system between the City of Chicago and the communities and part of it would be storage in the county distribution systems. At the present time the 10 communities have storage in the aggregate amount of 39 MG which is equivalent to 122% cf the annual average day use. The esti- mated construction costs include storage costs for construction of additional storage of from 11 to 49 MG, averaging 28 MG per project to serve the 10 communities. The maximum hour demand of the 10 communities is forecast to be 143 MGD in the year 2020. By providing sufficient storage in the distribution systems of the individual communities, the capacity of the transmission system between Chicago and DuPage County can be reduced by 27% to 105 MGD which is the forecasted maximum day demand in 2020. Sufficient storage has already been constructed in seven of the communities and it is esti- mated an expenditure of about $2 million is required to provide adequate storage in the remaining communities. 15. All of the projects, except Plan #1, are designed to meet the forecasted maximum day demands in the year 2020. Maximum hour demands would be provided by storage within the individual I II I 8. I communities. Table I is a summary and shows the design capac- ity of each of the projects, the number of communities it -is intended to s %rve, the estimated construction cost and the cost per capita based on the forecast of population in 1980. The table also shows the estimated cost per 1000 gallons of water sold in 1980 and 2000. For those projects which supplement lake water with well water, the cost includes expenditures I� for both. The costs do not include the purchase price of water from the City of Chicago. i For the reasoning and details leading to the foregoing summary and conclusions, we respectfully refer you-to the body of the report which follows. 0 46 0 r. .. r. .. 1 z �a W N :r 1-1 `.3% iH-+ .��' O 't 0 Or W V %D OD J VI W N F••' O Ea U) Uw) U)* UN) N •. N (D N Q (D (D 0 H H H H H H O N N H N ►� H N N H N IJ O O O O O O O O �H.F'•O w O H V1 O H V1 O H V . O cD (a 1.71 O W 0 W O %.A O O O O J �1 � •� N V1 OD 171 O %IJI O V1 O 111 1J1 171 171 N N .91 Pl• W 'd 0 r d b d C d G d d Cy C d b d d b C �< ► A WP ►dON N N O F�• O IOF+• c)F(�D 1071 aNF�• O�R'' Nr'• N O ►dNp ~icy '0HE oNP'W%SF I- N Gi fA H ch U7 co (D 0 U� N � N• ?C• (A ' 3 ED O Y• cf• P, ?j N M• bN ON OU7 bN bc+N(A ouJ �N H•NmN H f✓ p� m o to P. wy � M M 1 0 CH d y y Nw d' w H•(i•0 cD ��af W'd 09 0H. H•O'd P, 0) N �(D c+'d W 0) oH• %0d, A� � y� Q � �� W� �'d and n O cHhcd+►�i C OO ON Fn(DU7 N:31 NFJI C • ''i McFPuw ' C CD O N ►d 0 O C N f+) tv W O O O ',Y O cF• cF• O N Q O N d 4< O CsJ O C.i. p) !� +d c! N W .4 u. ty Id O chu. ►d I'd $ 0) 04 W Ul M CJ. F-�u. f-+u. p1 J. O F•� cD u. u. p1 u. Z 0) N u• N cF• H ►d 11 1- W W y '"f (D b M p7 H• N H• W 0) 0 (D Q N 0 ''S (D � N tti Q R+ 1--::4 N (D 13 N NNN KP)o F, P. O O 11.iq FN N cDn $n �C1 cDa ^mil n wo mo cD oh+O F cF• O H• FJ F Q ch ch N u. C+ �C FS x 1 0 • O c+ H• c * P. c , C+ OD ch cF ct t2 CF• W $ O (+ �. cD ►d pi 0) w n (D R m b o M: �• C+ (D (D w o W N 'w O 07 rd D• N W H•►d 0 W H H• cF N c+ d+ N H• d' H• W H• A) P. H P+ $ I P. N 0 P. cF P. 0 W CA cF• >r y C 0) 0 O� d (D O ry cF N O W � � p) � cf cF N (A N c - U) 4V'' b W U1 cF O 0 (D cl• (A H•'d 4 $ FJ �i (A � O'd 0 c+ O W M O (D co w d' O Al A) 0 (D 0 0 -F-•' M (D d 1 0' H. 0►d m R• F••'� Q W ='d 1r C. N 1 (n N Q rn M� (n w p1 i N w 1J 11 N cf �U, m o w (n F J �n N P� m '1 o H• o X H• M (D H• r sa. r �. w O w � w b N►d H• ch N 0 04 s ig N O ts X b 0) I- v M 9 Emil m (D O 9 N cf N 13 9 p d m 0 N L- P' :U W (D H• N O O'O UNi N m 1 0 N O G C (oD. O M e O O W W G (D Hi N O S "O'd cF• F~-J N P• (D `'dd N :. N N N O ►d t►. (D U1 y $ (D p7 [/)►d c..i. ►Q (D u. � W p) W 1 ID N � (D ►d d' N '1 N F- p (D 7 $ a P. • H (D Ir H• c+ d �i (+ ci- 0. G (CD 'i cF' C+ b 1 O P, a FJ m I � c+<< � cI-t•N W H'�ycc+ 0 c+ td N f � K ci• �cNFO cC'+ cN+m CF Rc+ �O f7 O m c+ � �`4 C)c+ G cH-h � McwF O r' tj A N H (D ►-' F-+ w o (D H• � y • cD m m o 0 1- 0 E4 cH+ � C+ 'mod (N'f n O 3 :y EQ H co Id WC+ C+ P. A) ON1-y C+0))l0 P•C701 0dw0 00 P. �s CM ;g 'Mi4 $�1 �N �0 Nh+�tOi•�F � N O N ►d ci• (D u• cF '1 O c l N H• Y cF H (D ►i c0 cF c+ N' m O H• cF 0) O N P. C+ (D � w c+ 11 ' m P. (D h 0 P. M Ur (n ps � O d �' `C Q m (0.1• uJ CD Ci. 13 M N � 4 M k o'd `.+• N coil �cl• H 0 O o' M 0 w coil p %+ P. '7 k ~ R• M w w K ro o 0 d d cF n o �i cD F,, N P. ►-► °o d z O •< w (OO o ro d m ►d � F- N o � cn F-y, ►d 'd �' cD �d Fd W (D cF rn (n �'d Id t� pp�7 b m Id A) M b 1114 H•'0 d' CO 1�'d 7± O p W c+ P. d << t cF'd O c+ 8 0 cF N � N ch c+ O (D 0 cF N (D ca �h m 0 gypp,, 0 0, O' P. cF (D d IR F-'• (D• 0 = ca m 0� N N ch I-A N 0'd H proj Q O 0 • � � � � sr �• "74i � • 9 +H((D , (D 0 Ea b 0 (D :A 0 � Q 131 p� 00 O (D ad o �C+ C+ CD (w+ �. lD W N M 110 0 iD Am 0 t:J CHIP �K WP. w (aD O FO•+ CND 010 H. P A 9 P. W 0 < N b•� :3mh tl,,m -ern N 60(NDM �� CD 'd0 cc 0 dM 14. x N 0 N a O cwF cNF 1 1 (p 0 O N (CD N N 0'0 W �< C+ N (D (D H• rn a: mo O `+ (Du, a `° 5 P V1 0.N N(n 010 11 P) N p' N P) ►7 It En I ► C O ro o c+ � cF va N N iA N W ct C+ 0 ~ cw+ N o N M D N (c+ to (DOO OO 'd A.� WNW !~'• N• (�D N• m `< FN•+ N s; N w N c+ W ay C+ S, P• O 0 C F' p M O H o H H O O O N 0 O H O O O O O # 10 # # ; ,40, 0 # 0 No o o N � N N N Q FN' W � IH' H W O t.0 OO .� .F• �4`+ c0 tm N •• x v ao w o Oo w J N ON J rn O y ia. y + J J QO 1] O\ ON V l0 Y O D V O W i2 O J 0 co 1�J1 W O W OD N Vl O1 lW7) O y O V V V O V O V O V O O V Op Y O V O V O V O V O C+ O 0 HM O O O O O O O O S O O O O O O 04 p O n 0 CD M V - ¢, m OD - OHO Oq o 0 N � N %n � N � to � °w W H � v rn 34 la0 � � 01 01 rn 0 w N coo u, o CCD o ON 1Jn K cF 0 wEn CD 'd `< 1., N H f✓ Fa N N i-' O O O ~• I W N O 11) N N N O O l0 OD GT M P w V) ON N ON 111 N ON .� O N •R' �l co $ N .(D (D K � M O N N 1J W H N O O N O O O O O 1 N OD 0O 1,0 O W 01% l0 J W O W N N c+ W ay C+ S, P• O 0 C F' p M O H o H H O O O N 0 O H O O O O O s0T4Tunmm00 TBnPTATPuT 3:0 sq.uGM9- xTnbaa o a Oa ss sdmnd ua.TM 's9P.Turomoo :.uai9g;TP OTTn�e,zpAU at�q. �Tns � P � T etI4 off. Alddns J94sM TvnpTATpuT BuTsaadsTp ao; p9q.on.4suoa aq p jn0A suoT::.VgS .xa4sooq ao saan40nxq.s uoT4B49 BuTdmnd pue aTOAaasaa 'ma:.sAs uOT *nqT- xq.sTp etj::� uT 'qq.TM suOTZvOOT srIOT.MA qy' °Pua JBJ atla- rB 11j,7z on tAop ,181.9MTP 11z*� WO-11 azTs uT RuTRusa ' SaT:.Tunmmoo OT at{q, oq. AZddns aaglem ueSTt;OTN axe? 4iodsueaq. oq. paAo-Edme aq p"Lnom m94sAs SuTdTd uoTZngTa:.sTp PTOXP m a qu Tod spa PuoAaa • a.zra.ana�.s gova puvj So saaOB oA. ATe4vmTxoaddB So pease ue SuTAdn000 'ATZTOP; punoiRiepun atla. o4 keMayegx t8 asnou oq. 9angOn,i4s eou-e xqua I -pms s aoj q.deoxe punolgiopun ATaaTqua paq.onaq.suao eq pinom ean?.OrtxZs uoTZVZs BuTdmnd puE JTOAaasaJ t;OEH •AZiedoad pvoalTEH uaaq.samu4.x0,- pus o-?soT. qo eqq pue veo-d :.xox To Aq.TuTOTA atlq. UT paZBOOI aTOAaasaa VUT. U IeZ 014 of E OJ94 A 4GJnqMTa UT OUT' AZUno0 auz 31000 auq. Mau uTPM uoTssTmsu�e lq. 1109 E BuTZTTTZ n . I . adid ssa,zdxa eqq. So uoTsualxa ue TgBnoaqq. aaq.E14 aaATtaP uegq. ptnoM uoT4vZs 2utdmnd at;j •punoaSaapun AZaaTqua aq pTn.om uoTq. -eqs Su-rdamd GriN gol SZT pug xToAaasea sTgl - Asfi&sse xdxa aemoquasTa auk. So TIZiou We SZTmTT ALTO Zsem oj9vOTg3 aggq- 'Mau paZoalas AJOAT�.VZUeq. 0ZT9 aTOAaasaa ON OT V oZ auTledTd ssaadxa 1i09 v eTA uOT4.-eq.9 2=dmnd armiamf xascl -paqueo mo.x; ATddns 2uTATOOa-x saatoAuT saTq.Tun=oo OZ M4 o4 a94vA u89TqOTN OyLsl BuTpTAoad NOIZdIZ30SH-a a0N 901 a as jLva N+ux+t asimaHod UK 09 a sa Lva 51'DVUaA ' USIMaNO9 am GOT. iLridans NVADIHOIN M7 ozoe 9\ al L 11-D1SEQ OT SaIlINCIMOO aO *ON L 'OBI NVId TT—IA J../ ,a a_-P i e" 0 -QSI i x.q -mr Rive ........—. n.......�s..�.,�...- .......___- ii I I I sa-rq.Tunamoo 5;z a"tq- .zoo puomap Aep M=Txem paq.sBoajo; atla. Alddns oq. papuedxe aq Avm GM nJ OTT: uT pue f.zaq.BM ueB gOTN 048r, gq_TM saT4Turam�aoa OZ ATddns off. paq,ox -.suoo eq. ITT :u'� pTnoo L ' ON �1Cc3 °Tam- .Ia�.ame . p q ooh 9T �- uasaad a�t�- ,tTTaTTeTed ' anuaA�r X.Mcl TO -'4ua0 pine anuOAV o�eoT� �o uoT�.oun� off. q aeaq -S paq -sTBH �8 4-Jmgs JOATJ mOJJ: leuur4 "ea.amezp ou OAT -T* waq.sAS Tau- -n,I lea;ueo quasoad a -qa. BuToaoSuTGJ We uoTgvZg 2uTdumd anuaA V Xavc, maq.ua:) q.B f4foLzdeo S=dmnd q.uaTOTS;ns SuTppre sntd IuoTq.*eq-S Su-rdwid anuaA.y Xaiea je jqua3 pine q sangmTs uaaP.aq uo-.�.�e�.s Aft i aaq.sooq B BuippB Aq r4unoo aped oq. aow ocz o4 do jeATZap i s 94vp jagBT B �B pazTsap JI off. pao,zo,�uTa�x aq RB�a ueTd sTqq. i i ZT -IA . c h� to b A �O Op 0 a r•-- 1. r y IE'j 1 � •rIe _1. 1 � • 1 `� I y � •err_ r 1 bpi � ' �,•� i t +i.lo h y ' •, I r -•_� 1 ' i1 r- 1. k V I I ! A It Ld I r.J � I � y L• 1 •• r tr- P� + rn.r ti . J �rJ I 1 "• , •A r • r _r ,...J i Y i._ , ��; l� l V1� f i. . f f\ /`1 -1 O ` 'AI ; li r l,.l•� ttjtt , A 0 , 0 c1 i r, �•+ � ' 1 ta �. L.r�-'• ' J! ♦ $ ill... a r•-- 1. r y IE'j 1 � •rIe _1. 1 � • 1 `� I 1 �1 � _r hey, 1 � 1•. a � � u .' +! it r -� i r1 Lt 4 »._.,Y ,y..__- l .r 1` i $�;. as r••___ ,A'y' t P" � (lrl�•" 1 r� r t `y i2 l oy �_ _r �_•;�� �� /`i��, `�' ; r r•NA�� 1....d�.� Alf �` r- \\ r +, pr 1, f=�.a ,1•+14, ��r �f-r LI , r r j n f-•n._ -r...y .. _...�•r 11..J J I jig 1 N." f J 1 ii l 1 1 tr_• r °•� r +yr_ -~ i e � � -� tit 1 S L.__ Jt_.._ }. - -_.11 <z 1 x 7 �f.� 1 • t rt#_ I FsY J I I h va JrL M Ap =•a INoI v 11% 1 I ' 1 rti_s ly 1 , I >R>f l r1�,� C;1' If 1 411 IS � 1 � .GIY +•'As'NL AArfr 4V !t, '� 1f _1 O -- v 1 � _ _I ^' � _ •' I I �A j �IS la_I � I ( I .1 ` ,� v o s;rrre sr_.I � _ ;. �}. - ,rK.{• rt . I , _I I � � ' � J11,R T1r11,..✓, tYu4:Y/' � U 1 I, r \t �1 I �0 raa��_<ri�Nrl_racw4l�wJr_ -' I __ �_ �/, <,:• � � �� !;1� r tl � 70 ti y i t t 2 1 y y 'rl Y Y v �'y srfly �__.i y >np !11 ~ M� rn 2 t ! 1 1 I rJ 0 k h b nib r a v 0 0 3 y d L' Mill, y � •err_ . 1 i.y' ARA�r ('O � ,A �� `� ' i t +i.lo t ' It Ld •• r; r tr- . � 1; 1. • _r _ 1LL•r Y� V' 1 1'Nrl 1 1._J rr I...J • r _r jk qovl Y i._ , ��; l� l V1� f i. . f f\ /`1 -1 O ` 'AI ; li r l,.l•� ttjtt , A 0 , 0 c1 i r, �•+ � ' 1 ta r. 1 1 1 rr- 'lr -.,t'e i r� • �� � � rr 4 Jim 1 �1 � _r hey, 1 � 1•. a � � u .' +! it r -� i r1 Lt 4 »._.,Y ,y..__- l .r 1` i $�;. as r••___ ,A'y' t P" � (lrl�•" 1 r� r t `y i2 l oy �_ _r �_•;�� �� /`i��, `�' ; r r•NA�� 1....d�.� Alf �` r- \\ r +, pr 1, f=�.a ,1•+14, ��r �f-r LI , r r j n f-•n._ -r...y .. _...�•r 11..J J I jig 1 N." f J 1 ii l 1 1 tr_• r °•� r +yr_ -~ i e � � -� tit 1 S L.__ Jt_.._ }. - -_.11 <z 1 x 7 �f.� 1 • t rt#_ I FsY J I I h va JrL M Ap =•a INoI v 11% 1 I ' 1 rti_s ly 1 , I >R>f l r1�,� C;1' If 1 411 IS � 1 � .GIY +•'As'NL AArfr 4V !t, '� 1f _1 O -- v 1 � _ _I ^' � _ •' I I �A j �IS la_I � I ( I .1 ` ,� v o s;rrre sr_.I � _ ;. �}. - ,rK.{• rt . I , _I I � � ' � J11,R T1r11,..✓, tYu4:Y/' � U 1 I, r \t �1 I �0 raa��_<ri�Nrl_racw4l�wJr_ -' I __ �_ �/, <,:• � � �� !;1� r tl � 70 ti y i t t 2 1 y y 'rl Y Y v �'y srfly �__.i y >np !11 ~ M� rn 2 t ! 1 1 I rJ 0 k h b nib r a v 0 0 3 y d L' Mill, 000 `99L `CITS L# tmid — i8401 oo p ' ' * o°Z %FT- uoT4oru4suoo RuTama 498a9WI 000 49+roZ s L1 %0Z `4uoo )p BuT.10auT2uz 000 9oZ 98 taa- os —qnS i; 000 00 17 uOTgXN-S Suldumd X.Md tQaWOO 4B pa- zTnba-d f.ToiedEo RuTdmnd WN 9Zi ZEuoTVfPPV 000 ` 6Ltl ` 1Z S 000 t7L8 6 t 000 `059 000 ` 7E `1 .uou .saM 0004005 -° 0004009 X-md E11TA 0009ZOL -- 000`ZOL xoosg xeo 0006LO941 0006059 0006L98 sq. 'qBTaH a-'epuaTO 00019686L 00040OL4Z 000`86169 q-s -meta 000'969'L 000 `OOL `ZO 000496169 :trad snquntoo 0009001`1 -- o00`001`Zq p.mgmoZ- uosipp-f S?HIOAUaSaH SNOIIVIS ao - NoISiiool DNI&Md 0006Z0661Z 9 000 ZV7 • 000`LOt 000 ` ut, ` Z 000 ` 9Z17 `Z 0006061`Z 000 8f7L Z 000 `88Z `17 000`6ZZ`9 000`99L`Z 000 `LWZ S 00019Z6`LC S 17 3:o T 8 -IA g'ISVs 000 0 t 000 `009 117 000`09869 000`000`Z 00049Zt`9Zs Xaad EITTA :qoo.zg Ne0 P -mgmo'I squRTaH aT-epua710 a -seta aao.z0 s.�auMOQ �rea.z� -S 1o.xao aTTTAuasuag uosTppV 000 `Z-: "17Z OOZ`t2 lloc 005`9Z 1199 000`11 107 ®3' l 000 ` L9 ° a Tp 4109 SNIW NOZSSINSNVEI I a00 NoIlonxISNOO cMIVNzlsa aoN got ricidns NTOZHOIN MfI ozoZ uva. N -0isaa L# RVICI . wrLL•. �_.:... a�j. �".. �"..+ i.. �. a•.- ..a...w...................K�.� . J.......ti..,,.... �..+..,.: w»-. �.— �.. �....,......-•....,...............r.».. w. �.. ...�..,..,«. +„- .rs..ieni..... -� .�- _... «........+,.-- �,. �......,_......,•. rn,......,... �..... .�.�.........,.�fir,awn..,r..... __.-.- ..�- I 000 1 q 9 0096L 000 0O 000007 000`009 000`OZL 0oo`88Z6i7 S 000`6ZZ4C 0 00019CL`Z 0 0001 L17C6 Z 9 17 TO Z a -IA szEIVs 000 160 Z 000 `L+! I18T 000`0Lo`T 1102 000408091 1072 000r,goclIT 000`L05 000 6 81 000`L91 004-49 000 a 09V T 0 000,181 1101 000`ZS9 I18T 000`ZCZ 1102 000`C96 1072 000`0178 'ISTP 1100 000 1T 1101 000 Z I18T 000 `V 1102 000,19 1072 '3'Z 00049 'ISTP 1100 00L 9Z 11Z1 005 1191 000 OT 1IOZ ad "I 00046 *e T. P 11713 aAOJD SJ9U jog 000 6 81 110T 004-49 u ZI 008 6 T 119T `3" 1 005 6 TT * IeTP 11OZ meai4s Toavo O5Z 11OT o5L `8 11ZT 005 `Z 1191 000'6 &1 OZ '3" I 000`L OPT. P 07Z a1°�T�uasuag 000 000 11 1 000 `t/1 110T 000,19 OOT II ET 00046CT 005111 119T 000 s OOZ `1 a °'I 000411 IIOZ u0sTpPW WaISIs NOMnsimssia panuTquoo ) 1900 NOison s� sx0o QsisvNzlss LION OT sINaWaH ME HaIVA OZOZ IdVsX NoIsaa L# ia r 0 ANk �TnT Z aox +!Z _- am 9 ° s -- a0N CT 0 000 6 009 6 T a014 13 0 9T OLD OT a0w 90T ON OT C[ow 90T S4:q TaH --- MON TZ SHIOAUaST.d SNOM&S 7DNI cl 000 6 ZT17 S 000`LOT $ quom4sem X-md V TTTA %oo.lq h -s0 S:.gSTaH aTepuaTD q-sanqmTa x ,md sngtunToo pavgmoZ -uo s Tppx 000 _ Z E 000 6.� „ZT 0006001 °a.q 00061 °eTp 4191 I.uomq sem oQO LOT -j ° a 000 61 ' ET'P „OZ x.Md VTITA 0006W76T • 000 OoT T 0C�T „oT 000 6 TZC s ° d' Z Ooo 6 c • ETp H oZ 3joojE[ xe0 AMNL 000 6 5Zi16 Z S 0006LTZ 000 6 C 1101 0006809 00$6L „ZT 000 6 009 6 T • .3 - ?I 000 6 LT ° V Tp 119T pi-eq IIorj 000 6 06T 6 Z Psq.VmTq -sa 4900 - paATaoa,z uoTq.vmjo j:uT ,OX ` S4:q TaH aTL�puaUL) l aanuTluoo ) ISOD N0zLI0n IsNo0 aalVKzssa ON 0t SINSMIM HH 19sVA ' ozou ��. N0isaa 47 ;o L# tmcl Ig-rA M9Vl 95,009 00 11 TS L6000 66909 Z111 TS 'TV2 0001 Ojai -v-ft 90 4-900 LO6 `81 05Z `8z +�9Z `LT TOO `TT 986 `OT ON - p-Eos .104.VA 3:0 atunToA usm ao isoo im. CIllVNIISa 006 `ACS `OT 9L8 `99 `8T ZLV66L `9T C69 r9i i7T C8Z `tLZ `ZZS IVIOs 000 L�1. 6 000 L51 6 000 L '� OOO ' , r 000499L `cus uo sas.m.gO pexTa 006aCC9`01 9L8'86136 ZLVZi794L C69468919 C9Z`Lit`C$ aou-eugq.UT N OZ�OZ OTOZ 000Z 0 6T 002 T sa �.�euntntIIOO OT SZSOO 'Iv.O v craSywIZsa a.ow 90T - XrIcicMS NVOIHOIN Mq oZOZ - uvn Noiszm �gd 17 3:o 47 C7 Lm go aoanos uommoo s notssx�o0 aa3sM aseana 3sn aq3 14iin ATaugo f a3saacc pure aatnbas IT avid stou;TTI 1d3uno0 agsdna go 2°BIT7 ag3 ;o s3saaa3uT 3ssq aq3 ao; pus Aaessajau sT IT Ivg1 •T : SmOTTo3 ss 'stouTTTI 1Ajuno0 'aSaana ' go a2sT r < < aqi go pasog OSPITTA 8q3 xS GZMIV(MO lI 39 4RX0aZNTl1 `M" °uozssTr =o0 aa3ea agsdna gsag SuYPszxa 9143 ut aiedzoz1 =a puv STddns aalLm To aoanos uommoo v i5j3utof a3vaado pus aaTnbaa oa guT3oa7[0 aau-euTpao us 3cops 5:j-r-[udTrtunm v aRu3 Aayssaoau sT 3T 30z p�zs 30 smaa3 843 g3Tm aauspaoozu uz gulpaaooad aaotaq `sVauaHr, puu !S£T *Ala JZ "EP 6L6T °3w3S'Aag °TTI jo A3Taog3ns aq3 aapun uoTssT=oo aa39rl ag3 uTOC 01 S3iTsd-co-cunn aq, �o asaaa3ut 3sOq aq3 uT sT 3T 'SZI�HH,`"_ pue !s9TITTsdizTunm aag3o 3o uoT3vdzuT2avd aq3 3nog3TM u93TgoT14 a l?l '=093 A-Iddns To aoanos s dola .&ap STauapnada; Sou uEa go(ag'ETTtA" ag3 `smum pua `sSE:a7a2vM to uotsTATQ uoT3v2aodsvv3y 3o 3uez:12vLa! stouTTTI aqa eoa; aalvA Uv2T143-M a--tsq 1o3 uoTIEOOTTE u9 pan:a� =a ssq 10 02v1TT , aq3 `SVTdM pus :sasodand oz3s =op pug oTTgnd ao; s3uvaTququT saT puat82s1TTA'0g3 to spaau aq3 dTdcrs ATaadoad o3 3uaTaT?tnsuT pus a32nb9pvut aq TTTm puv sT puv 'paaT=71 sT. sTTam 2uias :xa aqa moxt aa:Mm 3o AOT3 9119 ' SVnSF,", `•sTTam 30 sasTsuoa 'stoutlTI `AjuncD agaana 3o; c-:3 ?o STddi,s cairn 1u,s2ad soissm -mo E IM 30dd i1a ISV3 3HL 30 Tx a V SV SMITUIOIM 2831110 NIIM mono mrA00 NI AIMS 2131yT; 30 30y: ?OS ,ZOIC400 V ONIQIAMIa 30 S3SOd2illd 2111 F-03 30 30VIIIA,-3111 d0 OMIMIOr Hill '803 ONIQIAOHd 30u.1►NTQ2i0 � � . -Z- r i I ReSs E -Avj 4q paaTnbas su `uoT:t2OTTgnd pus TUAoadde `aSussud sIT uodn dTaos-Fp2a=' 13alia pua OOIOJ TTn3 UT aq TTegs aauuUTpao sTgI lug1 *V •3oaaau aTgmeaad eq2 uT oa 91nauis aq4 UT pagTaosaae sU saTInp pua saamod agj.1q4TM „uotss r o; za:.eA aggan(j Isg3 aqj,,, se umou -y pua paaTUL -910 aa030-3aaaq uoTssTmmoo aq:1 ?o a-e q� =u e se Sae 02 aauoTss;p=o3 U juxodde of `paUog 82eTTTA aqj 30 TsAOacc= aq q2T.n `pajaajTp psU paaiaogane Agaaaq st IUapFsaad 2111 `30ea.= t aTgmeaad aqj UT o-3 paaaa3aa aanau '3s aqq 3o smug, aql of qu- ensand `aq Aum se aouuuTpao sTgI 3o a2ussud aaax3e uoos se 3ugt •C .za:tum 30 XTddns 3o aaanos uommoo a uoTssTc=-O ,glut, a$eana Ise3 aqi 30 saT1TZUdTaTunm aagmam aq4 MITM XT2UTOr a32xa�. pug eaTnboU 02 auTwOlaP Pug IaaTa Agaaaq op `sTOUTTTI `AIMOJ a9u En! - - 3o aoUTTTA aq3 3o pasog aguTT'FA Pu$ lu9PTsaaa az . 03 paaaa3al ajn3aas aq2 30 S-maal aqj of auensand jggy •Z - gazers 3o Alddns 1uaToT33ns a SuTiTS:� uT TUOTaiouoaa Aso- aul guTaq poglam PTus `ATddn% 3o aOxnos La i uoTssTmmo:D ja3E. +1 aSeana isva aql 3o saaquram SuTaq saTITTudTOTunm zec;o g3Trs Allutor a,Uxado pus aaTnlbOe IT 1UgI pug sataTI Ile 3a aTcUTTr. _. aq sasodand OT -4samop pur OTTgnd ao3 slue SIT Fug' �i�TT2dT ^T�_'w plus 3o asn aqi ao; aalum 1UaTOT33ns 7Ugj aapao UT .zaaer. 30 41d a m w M • i CONNISS103NERS arl Lundgren . Chairman James Bauer James Cekal .Tack Schumacher EAST DU PACE WATER COKMSION 119 Schiller Street Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 A G E N D A December 12, 1979 8:00 P.M. i I . CLERK Robert T. Palmer TREASURER James Ce:kal 1. Report on Lake Michigan Water Supply from the City of Chicago for communities in DuPage County (Phase II) . Discus::ion of Alternatives 2. Other Business -- - . 654 -2220 December 7, 1979 MEMO TO: President and Board of Trustees SUBJECT: Policy Road Improvements With the preparation of the budget for the coming fiscal year, Staff is re- questing direction from the Village Board regarding road improvements for roads which are presently substandard. The latest edition of the Comprehensive Plan depicts several typical road cross sections. There presently exists within the Village of Oak Brook sever- al individual roads and several roads within subdivisions which are substandard to the typical road cross sections. A determination needs to be made regarding the Village's intention, which includes the following alternatives: I. Up -grade all existing sub- standard roads to Comprehen- sive Plan Standards, with the Village of Oak Brook assuming the cost. 2. Up -grade all sub - standard roads to the Comprehensive Plan standards, with the a4fected citizens assuming the cost. 3. Maintaining the sub - standard roads as they presently exist. These sub- standard roads include both asphalt roadways and "gravel" roadways (streets which have received chip and seal applications and have, as a result, an asphalt -like surface). The present long -range financial plan contemplates improving some sub - standard streets, such as Glendale Avenue, Washington Street, and Wood Avenue, to comply I' a December 7, 1979 Page two President and Board of Trustees with the minimums as set forth within the Comprehensive Plan. Other streets, such as those within Yorkshire Woods Subdivision, Woodside, and Timber Trails, are contemplated as a maintenance operation of the sub - standard section. These items have been discussed with Trustees Congreve and Philip, who have asked that this item be placed on the Committee -of- the - -Whole Aganda for December 10, 1979. Trustees Congreve and Philip have also asked that a discussion concerning the Village's role in drainage improvements, both major, such as Yorkshire Woods, and minor, such as individual drainage problems within Saddle Brook Subdivision, be undertaken. RAM)) ec t f ul ly mi e(I , Dale L. Durfey, Jr. P. Village Engineer DLD/ck CY b VILLAGE OF OAK B OCK. 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS December 49 1979 654.2220 President and Board of Trustees A problem with a section of 1211 water main has been discovered. The section of main is located along the 35th Street- Midwes -b Road curve and has been found to be laying in a bed of peat approximately 3501 long. This line was installed in December and January of 1977_ 1978 as part of the Oak Brook Christian Center water main extension. The main functioned trouble free until the last week of October when a leak developed. During the course of repairing the leaf it was discovered that the main had been laid in a peat bog. Another leak developed in the same area on the 15th of November. Because of the second leak and the knowledge of the peat bog it was decided to explore our options as to the best way to make a Permanent repair. Paul Meves of Tornrose, Campbell and Associates was engaged to investigate the problem and determine methods of permanent repair. Attached is his report,. Trustee Congreve and staff �- . --luated the eight alternatives in the report and determined that alternative #3 was the best method to eliminate future problems. Alternative k3 calls for the routing of a new amain through Court 17 and around the North side of the retention pond and back to Midwest Road. To do this will require additional easements from Midwest Club and plans and specifications. This will take time and in the interim, arrangements have been rude to repair the existing leak. I would recommend approval of alternate 1113 and authorize staff to obtain the easements and prepare plans and specifications for replacing the section of main in the peat bog. The estimated cost of relaying this main is 4'48,000 which can be budgeted in the 1980 -1981 FY or in case the existing main fails, there are funds available in the Depreciation, Improvement and Lxtension AccoLuit of the Revenue Bond Fund. The present balance in this account is ;120,000. In either event I third; the preliminary steps should be taken as soon as possible in case there is a major failure in the existing main before the next F.Y. Respectfully subinitted, I'lo d Wilson Supt. Public Works FW/im C I VILLAGE OF OAI. BROOK f ILLINOIS Corrections to 12-Inch Water. Main in Midwest Road at 35th Street November 1979 Tornrose, Campbell & Associates, Inc. Chicago Consulting Engineers A. INTRODUCTION • 1. Location The 12" water main is located on the west and north sides of the bend in 35th Street and Midwest Road. See Figure 1. To the west is the former Midwest County Club property now known as Midwest Club Subdivision. To the east is the St. Joseph Seminary property, also now being subdivided. 2. Hi s Cory The water main was constructed two years ago as a part of the subdivision of Midwest Country Club. Its function within the system is to serve as a feeder loop for all of the developing land between Meyers and Midwest Roads and between 31st and 35th Streets. All of that ]Loop has already been constructed, except for approximately 400 feet in Midwest Road, south of 31st Street. At a location roughly corresponding 4.r 34th Street and Midwest Road -if 34th Street had been developed, the water main passes through an area of unstable underlying soils. Evidence of poor soil is still present to the east where a large cat -tail swamp still thrives. To the west, where the original topography has been modified by Midwest Club subdivision, only a a large landscaped retention pond remains as a witness, Formerly this area was an extension of the existing bog. Soil borings from the adjoining subdivision afford reasonable dimensions of the unstable material. A maximum depth of 14.5 feet is indicated by boring 44. Other borings show that the poor material extends about 350 feet from north to south, while the easterly and westerly limits are much greater. The locations of four pertinent borings are shown on Figure 1, while an estimated surface and subsurface profile through the peat area is shown on Figure 2. For two years the ductile iron water main served its intended purpose without failing. But in October, while construction equipment from this adjacent subdivision regularly traversed the site, the first failure occurred. A pipe joint had opened up'when two adjoining pipe lengths were deflected under heavy loads. This failure was corrected by a contractor hired to make the repair for an amount expected to be about $2,500 Then in November a second failure occurred, apparently from the same cause. Flow appears more moderate than the first and is still taking place. This series of two sudden breaks precipitated this investigation. —3— 3® Maintenance of Flow Only one water customer is-dependent upon flow from the 12" main north of 35th Street - the parochial 'school at the southwest corner of 31st Street and Midwest Road. If necessary that customer could be adequately served with a temporary ground level connection from the main in 31st Street. The number of days such a temporary connection would be necessary will depend upon the repair alternative selected. But in any case we believe that maintenance of flow during the repair period will not be extremely difficult or objectionable. B. REPAIR ALTERNATIVES 1. Complete Excavation According to available soil borings, the marsh is only about 14.5 feet deep at its deepest point and 350 feet long. Since normal depth of excavation for a water main is about 6.5 feet, complete excavation would require only an additional 8 feet of excavation at the deepest point and less at all other points. See Figure 3. As a first step, control valves at 33rd Street and 35th Street would be closed. Then a backhoe would uncover and salvage the existing pipe. This operation would simultaneously fix the north and south limits of the repair procedure by finding the extent of M4- D R�� underlying bad soil. When limits are determined and existing pipe salvaged, a tracked endloader would excavate all surface material down to firm soils. To accomplish this,a dewatering procedure would be needed. The endloader would simultaneously remove surface material and build itself a granular roadbed upon firm ground. When completed the roadbed would serve as the base for reconstruction of the 12" main. Excavated material would be returned as backfill over the pipe. We believe this method would take about 3 weeks and cost $80, 000, including an allowance for contingencies. Width required for this method would vary from 20 to 50 feet, depending upon depth. B(cause of this large lateral dimension, costs become excessive. In the area where the two breaks have occurred, not more than 20 to 30 feet are available between fixed utilities and other restraints. Consequently this procedure could not be used for the entire 350 -foot length. 2. Piling Concrete piling could be drilled along the pipeline as pipe supports. Truck - mounted au.gets are available that will drill 24 -inch diameter holes in the ground to 20 feet or more. These holes would be spaced along the pipeline at 9-foot intervals - half C7 the length of the 18-foot pipe sections. Each hole would be filled with concrete to the level of the reconstructed pipe line. If necessary, sonotubes could be used to prevent caving of the hole between drilling and pouring operations. Sulphate resistant-concrete is available at a small premium if chemical tests indicate that corrosive soil elements are present. See Figure 4. After the piles are poured, a t: each would be excavated by ordinary means doTni to the level of the piles. Details can be provided in the top of each piling to anchor the pipe if lateral movement is expected. Individual pipe sections would then be laid across the tops of the piling. Ordinary bedding and backfilling would follow. On either end of the repair section, piling would not be needed. Unsuitable material could be removed by conventional trench methods. We believe this repair procedure would take about 3 weeks and cost $48,000,including an allowance for contingencies. If a suitable obtained, and if ground this procedure would be Each condition, however drilling rig can be readily water conditions are benign, simple, direct and economical. introduces a definite amount of risk. Water shutdown time could be limited to only about one week with this method. ..6 C7 • 3. End Run ' -if the main could be relocated to by --pass the all associated problems could-be eliminated. peat area, is not practicable due to the • to the east By- passing . remaining marsh in that area. , - passing to the west . is frustrated somewhat by the presence of the nearly completed subdivision in that area. See Figures 1 and 6. But it still retrains possible to select an alignment throw h the westerly area that would offer g disruption and no permanent injuries. Such an minimal p alignment would loo around the north, west, and south sides of the retention pond. About 70% would probably fal 1 within seeded park lands, where construction scars disappear. The remaining 30% would probably quickly pp fall 'Within the pavement of Court 17 which is completely - paved except for the bituminous surface. Again the p construction scars would disappear quickly when bituminous surface is placed, although Mire costs would be higher. It should be noted that all peat within the rigI4 of of Court 17 was supposed to be removed during way construction of the subdiva , siZPn. Water service could remain uninterrupted except fo r perhaps erha s one day when conections must be made I the existing line. The by-pass line could be separately I t® it could be pressure-tested and chlorinated valved so that independently before connection to the existing line. I' 007- We believe this method would take about 2 weeks and cost $48,000, including an'allowance for contingencies. . This method is simple, economical, and direct, but in addition it can be carried out by any competent utility contractor without resorting to special methods or equipment. 4. Sheeting Tight permanent sheeting could be driven to retain a granular base course fvr the pipeline after the enclosed peat is removed.- A double row of -R piles could be driven on 8 -foot centers to form the two trench walls. Rough lumber or precast concrete planks f could be laced through the flanges of adjacent piles to retain the surrounding peat. As the interior peat is excavated, granular material would be placed between the walls to -act as the support for the water main. Sheeting and piles would be left in place below the water twain as a permanent support. Above the pipe, piles would be removed. See Figure 7. Sheeting would not be needed on either end of the new construction where conventional trench methods would be adequate. Water service might remain uninterrVpted ' except for perhaps the final week if vibrations from pile driving permit. !7 We believe this method would take about 4 weeks and would cost $78,000, including an allowance for contingencies. This method does not appear to adapt well to this particular problem. ' 5. Restrained Joint Pipe The existing pipe is ordinary I." ductLle iron push -on joint pipe. This type of pipe tolerates only a limited joint deflection of 30 t:. 40. Only friction holds the push -on joints together. Alternative types of pipe can be purchased that offer restrained joints.' One such pipe is river crossing pipe. This is a heavy gauge pipe with a joint flexible enough to tolerate declections up to 150. The pipe costs about 5 times ordinary pipe and takes 6 weeks for delivery. After delivery of the pipe, we believe this 3 method would take about 2 weeks and cost about $46,000, including an allowance for contingencies. Another alternative pipe is ductile iron 111--]IF Super -Lock pipe, ,a modification of river crossing pipe. This pipe comes in ordinary thicknesses and costs about 40% mire than ordinary ductile iron pipe. The joint is, adequately restrained but it tolerates no more deflection than ordinary pipe. Delivery time is roughly 6 weeks. .r M .r • . 1/ } After delivt ry of the pipe, we believe this method would take about two weeks and cost about $23,00, including envies. allowance for conincluding an g We do not believe these alternatives are completely comparable to others so far discussed. Neither type of pipe alters the supporting strength of underlying material, which is the basic problem. And Super -Lock offers no iTprovement in joint deflection capability. 6. Joint restraining Devices Various mechanical devices exist that will tie together a push -on joint so that it iv no longer free to pull apart. These devices are known as socket clamps or bell clamps and tie rods. Each individual existing joint could be excavated and fitted with a clamping device. We believe this would take about 2 weeks and cost about $22,000 including contingencies. We do not believe this alternative is completely comparable -to others so far discussed, because it does not improve the supporting strength of the underlying bad material. It merely prevents opening of joints and transfers high stresse -! to another location along the pipe barrel. On an individual joint basis, if other failures Aia occur in the future,.the use of these devices may be adv.-L able:. 1 e ' 7. PVC Pipe PVC or polyvinylchloride pipe has the chemical inertness to withstand the corrosion often found in peat areas. For that reason PVC pipe could be considered on this project if tests indicate corrosive.soia conditions. • In addition, joints in PVC pipe have a consid- erably greater bell depth than in ductile iron pipe, and presumably offer more rigidity. Engineering, data to support this contention is not available at this time. Even if adequate supporting data would be available, we believe the long term solution to this problem lies in improving the supporting strength of the underlying material. Simply exchanging the ductile iron pipe for PVC pipe does not alter the basic problem. Consequently we do not believe this alternative is completely comparable to others so far discussed:.. The installed cost of PVC pipe i's very close to that of ductile iron. We believe installation of PVC pipe would take about 2 weeks and would cost about $21,004, including contingencies. 8. Do Nothing Doing absolutely nothing is always an alternative to be considered. But it should be pointed out that it is not an engineering solution, but rather a policy determination. 0 • 1 I� r..r..4u.a...ww.......��.. MwM As previously discussed, the eater main laid out there for 24 months without failure. This would seen to imply that a certain Liability of forces had been achieved underground prior to the imposition of heavy equipment this October. ' Now that the subdivision is completed and heavy loads will ber.ome rare again, perhaps the under- ground stability will be reinstated. If a single minor repair job costs $2,500, as contrasted with a major repair costing in excess of $40,0008 careful consideration of all alternatives is warranted. C. RECUhMNDATIONS The following tabulations of data is given in summary of the previous results. -12- Estimated Estimated Repair Alternative cost -- $ Duration -weeks 1. Complete Excavation 80,000 3 2. Piling 48,9000 3 3. End Run 48,000 2 4. Sheeting 789000 4 5. Restrained Joint Pipe River Crossing 46,000 8 Super -Lock 23,000 8 6. Joint Restraining Devices 223,000 2 7. PVC Pipe 21,000 2 0 ° 8. Do Nothing 0 -12- P For reasons previously cited, we believe Alternatives 1 through 4-are the only-fully equatable AOL and viable eng:i.neering solutions. Of these alternatives, 1 and 4 can be quickly eliminated for cost reasons. D Alternative 2 invites delays and problems because of its relatively unusual methodology. Not every water wain contractor has access to a truck- mounted drill rig of correct capacity. The alignment would continue to traverse the peat area., inviting problems both during and after construction. It appears to us that the 'pillage may want to hire a contractor working near the site in order to get the job done both economically and quickly. The best chance of accomplishing this, we believe, is 'to tailor the project for the average water main contractor. Alternative 3 does this best by being limited to common water main construction elements. We believe that subsoil tests should be made along the by --pass alignment to determine potential corrosivity. If the soil is benign, ductile iron pipe without wrappings would be suitable. if corrosion is apparent, either PVC pipe or wrapped ductile iron pipe can be used. As a safety precaution, a few soil borings might be taken along the proposed alignment to eliminate the possibility of encountering more substantial peat 11 • ..�.+...... W...- ...+..��.,r..... --'w..+: wow. ..ww..•,..n...._....a.....r.�r. . r..«««.,.... �, a. w.._,_. �. W.«....,... �..,..-......._.... W^_«..«..»... _,m..-- w.- •- .•- wn,- .•,�«..e..�, I ..�.� • I I Tornrose, Campbell & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers Fat jest /7. 'f YV /-I I A,4 3 d Y / ! alw G-s T i 9 G File No. Page No. �— . —.,..- PL A M lei 9 Made By p....., Date - Chkd By ..._.__ Date J3 ss pp � Q 4 4 4. oe v d t 0 3r' r � � t � ` r � r o� Pe- I ot I � 4 , Z� I� ,577, Tornrose, Campbell & Ast oclates, incV Consulting Engineers j- Subject —.. 39 B V v -J.� � s J J J 4� 4S I e File No. '71 1 0 4 Page No ..... Made By ~ M D ate Chkd. By Cate �fL s � r S f 1 PL-t A T' C.-g ° Ale A- Ide CIO / f / 14's, 10 "t 3 So , s ti a� %rnr ®se, Campbell & Assodates, Inc. Consulting Engineers Subject 1 'G ,a W t-1 /r7�• t7 1 d w e File No. ? 9 1 i� ter No. Made By Date /' 3-.. Chkd By ._ .._ Date -eRr 75 41 # ® dr CIA ��t i o ar f� i _ _�_ • �- ® v � w � to 4 0 1c, r o� 1 ii -o 4--¢D t o iC Peon. 4 ';r C4 $ AS r (_r F x Get v t �-1 *o &4 (( r A tort u (t r F i f/ .d e �d �� °7-0 4-&. l (. Y. 7-y C s4- whh (p * 10 G, Y. Ca 01 G ld�+r Y *1o. #O � �►• o It a. S / 0 - 4 0 � '%.• 7•S 4.1 47.- 0.4 :3 e,4* 8, 6o 6°:. - E•S 4.4- "✓+1S 6.x.1 L l -0 14 14. - tm. Eo go, O?o 8.4 yF. S 94,- 0 '`s, 10 13, G o 1 V3, yo e. T 10.4 3ti•. S ra4.-- d v.4 "1"1• JE,4o 16, 4o 166.80 till 34.S 131. - s 3,%- tiS 51,1.a !°�.8® 'I•o7., ... r �., s IS,� 4o.S 1Sq. - c 4.ro- 1.8 G ?• ^,•a ti3,4p 't'4`I•Go 18.4 4 4, 5 If I. - S. 3 3 / '04.80 1-7.1-o .1 0 1. 4E. S S 34 134.- 31. pro IF A. o e�C r''rs L.l r 41 1, A- [*C a 45x '' eAA j; 1. S 1.0 ?a. 8s - 1.s 30 11,3. U0 - io. S 1 3o 140. 8o 4$z.4,•- ��, s' ¢0 1.0'4.. - 8 0 z 0. -- �z,S 40. Z '+y, 4 o 1184.- �4. S 40 C.0. y;vci ca S 1 3.3'01 Sur. rGS'�o r�.�i @v► So a �c So /9 x � 1. ��4 0 0 i® r { � x Tornrose, Campbell & associates, Inc.. Consulting Engineers i'L" w/'i Subject -- -�-- -- File No -% a i ua 4 Page No. 4 Made By .. Pe- se. Date < <° Chkd, By Date �--- -- t e�S ix f ; r c�1A .S v i l c� i Lt a3 � vt� r'vi • t m4 � w= e %tee 1. ,—'o r mA f iI /+ ' w to ! VG , J, CI 1 d e �. � �c p i /e -o �A e..s .s /--I w va . SIV,L LA Faes�z-atAll V e4csJJ-✓✓o-rz� v1 ,*, trovt�t �ierr�,�t . Pi l r,.s I ' o, G° . rl*o r 1.1 'f a .3 ! � i /e s -1,4' C0Kc. .4sSu.cvrc �!/ Go $ h (T � too* �CY i h'rl - t Oeyo k �eu yr Ar leas L Vo lit rime. Co s 14.SH. 40Ff. S /o,04. 1.0 CY 44000 13.S' +0 ."' 4 ,S14 S¢00 rt.S 40 t 3.8 3800 r t• S 40 S' 1 4. 'V 4%-Po 30 3 G °b, ti. 1.1.00 9•s' 30 3 5' I• E /to 0 �.S 100 3 S j. $ 1100 �.< 4.o 3 S' t.8 Ie00 exC'avo- -4�0tA 6t�dr����G��� / /•�� 3S-o' Cd Av C-O S z 3S"o' LD r D 'x.350 0 .pc t r a G e r e- S 4 r #- � i o H S-009 So/ q y 'f S!o o 0 4o o o r I 3J Tornrose, Campbell & Associates, Inc. ® Consulting Engineers Subject ae9lC' •4' x- - - - Mx-r=--'O z of Re No Page NO Made By �.....�. - Date Chkd By - Date AV = r .;517 I _ . GG l � Of I OF rZ •/7X t t .• r �: f t l 8 � 4; 0) 7)1 if V";"Y ✓2 ,� � �' � � � 2.71 75 P. 7o o-1 z A Y.;:;P/ 4oF4 d 7:16 ):4 A Tornrose, Campbell & Associates, Inc. . Consulting Engineers Subject 0'V q Py m rt. File No. 7 1 1 Page No. o..._..�..�r.,.�. Made By p__.__�.,_._.. Date Chkd. By Date Am a %a mot t al A-/; r4 C a u, o w e s � / a /o - y�o C'ou,r 17 <Go��1e�t exGe-oT for bi�rt•iwv• .5'ur�atc socA;44 at 1 o vc.q a K r-'- t-71 '1'l� e.�s.R S o u z it ot /e u.1 o io -C e r 1.7 o r f�iPc VL dcr C r0-P- .r90 er /0aVCK10" ec *z-7 x dro *Ion too ,e Y ,4 G 4 4 4 o x It- 0 goo drat vt tic• f ce r 6 Oc. s C V7 o x .- x Q. S'/ E J'%- o �►'r of of I G r vi & x 4% 1 K1-34 7. o o a x'1 31 S*o o 0P, d G r Ga. r- k► S41 ® x# 4-o 1- 6 0 0 64r" fit• t•N V&titf S00 .E"d eocr so. ems¢`at-t -/s (%-) 000 •ire r 1(a.t t T -, �s'l i 'W7 3 S' /1--7 x 114 GGSS C.oS'� of exrs` r e S'.so�x x'14 A/94.5 C.a S T 07C S OL/ V A1 r" % SS' o x l ®) + S S o Gl �e- 7 O ct. f '*A 0 3#-o I �I I Adak Tornrese, Campbell & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers ,k � 1 v" Py el A l 3 S- = L /7 r'd es r Subject .a._._. t 41 tna i yr . Tr �.cic c G, w r d i'L► i File No. *7 a Page No .. - -.f.•• Made By p....._.......�..•. Date -� 3-79 Chkd By Date Dr-;Ve '{v r•a w3 14 Pifs,s 1a °G . 7- &t44t r`wiH. r(. t!rW orovA LQ ce rov.1A 4" lu "46&r or C•0"C:rc-�e p1A'2'-tk -S L� vt r °rat �ol� ct wi � r�ret vLl lc 1 l Wow w• n. ZP�f e,s /e, r 8 L F r '1.°?o LF = GS lotj�3 D, It Qrr yr/�i� bey f'% !c tit v► P! �r✓S L l:�vs.� J44 I �0 3 '1a 4.e /t F t4.S' 4or to 181 ?•t.00 13.11 4o /0 17 CIO o tb,S 4o to tb GQ-a a tl.T •�f-o ro /S L000 /o• S ?a t 14- 4¢80 9. S 3* 8 t 3 -f $. S 1-0 G Me I- $ So 7.S 40 I 40 t$ �4o5'Ga L u be r %a..� 71 pti a.,r S S F 1E x 11'70 x 5.1 �� ve, x 3 8 �[o t 8o x 4 x 6 .S/z°7 x to 3.77 o x+ x PV. S o vt v l A r 6A. S C 'W7 o x 4- x 8. S/ W7 X 14 LaYi / / 6GLC olf, s S o X IT I 'b s °�vwtt�t 4oA.1 &7? o #Saoo $S *4o Tomr ®se, Campbell & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineem Subject P `l. it W /mil Q-r ,3 �� /'7! G� v ✓f o '1 Fife No. 71/ e 4 Page No .........- ••.•f� Made By a Date / / - ,,, L ®11 Cnhd By Dates O / T S. GS r-At uGd Jowl `k - ,e i v G r G r o ,s S t'vsJ 14 fl; t icy vi vc.�. �+ r f%c 3 S-0 r x A o a f- F le-SS SittvAIC v&1cee 02C ofd /Ve, 3So x G !v d .3u,r4ac res4rxboy4 Soex g'o�q x y �60aoo 00 3 8 o e -e. r — /o c. tC e /ve, I4 .1 S'o t! i -7 so x? 1 /ess S &t/v",- va /ue Of a /rW,Pil e 3S°o A E G -- 010- 1 o ir ,S'ur4a.cc reS rorx i�10;n S'v a S'a/9 x ` J '�A9AZ.3'o G. 7-o (%-t 4 12 eS�ra i v►r.v -f De vices 14 0. oT jor -'"Is rvs 3S'©` - 3JrD /(8 ¢° / - ifa Jaws s e lee 4 e IA f S tr` ti '�r e ra a�S �C r �t re,•r r x- ( � «S'� S /a, b o r $ S �v ;fix. l / .s' oo x 'ti a s ►3 v o 0 Sur-4Ge- r-c, z!oF- —Jr !* ct J% o 0 ,eX G R vd.;'(�o it G r " le -' 4-0, o -,K 00 00 r El j; i tom..._ M o Tornrose, Campbell & Assoclatea, Inc. _ Consulting Engineers Ah wi *I Ah n Subject i i� I Fite No. *77 ! if 4. Page No Made By L- tl +.. Date f f Chkd. By -- Date - - 7 rr'lS Ax t f /0 ;/2, C ,BSc x ¢o re J r- A. oC va /uC osr olAl �� � 3 S Y i 4- i Do .S"Lo0 /-7 roo VDrv��w/ r • G y C t Cp VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS November 19, 1979 MEMO TO. President & board of Trustees SUBJECT: Mood Street Water Connection Charge 654 -2220 Attached please find is all the information relative to a request to reduce the current charges can Wood Street for water connection fee. If you recall the ordinance was passed on July 10 effective July 20, 1979 changing the connection charges fcr water service. John Brechin's memorandum clearly indicates the alternatives. Trustees Congreve and Rush have zaviewed the situation, and Mr. Skinner is await- ing an answer from the village board. The matter has been placed on the Committee-of-the-Whole agenda for November 26, 1979 for determinate n. S cerely yours, KGC> /is att. �J Ken eth G. Ca ani Village Manager i i i �f i i V C7 . •A . c c CQU14 . V1 LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS September 7, 1979 MEMO TO: Trustees Congreve and Rush SUBJECT: Skinner Water Connection Charges 654 -2220 Staff was asked to review the particulars as it related to the water connection charges paid by representatives of good Street; specifically, Ken Skinner. Attorney Brechin's memorandum summarizes the circumstances related to this incident. There are no extenuating circumstances that would set this aside from other applications which have been received during the same period. If the board wishes to pass an amendment to extend the time frame, I be- lieve we could accommodate that, however, three permit applications have been received during the same period of time and have paid the full amount of the fee. Perhaps we can review at your earliest convenience and decide what reco =endation we would like to make to the board or respond to Mr. Skinner. Respectfully yours, a Kenn th G. Carmignani Village Manager KGC /is att. cc: President Cerne �rustees Brown, Marquardt, Philip, Attorney Brechin A G .off � fDU VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK. BROOK ROAD OAK BILOOK, ILLINOIS August 31, 1979 654-2220 MEMO TO: Kenneth G. Carmignani FROM: John H. Brechin SUBJECT: Skinner Water Connection Charges Recently you asked me to review the situation as explained. in Marianne Lakosil's August 16, 1979 memo. The time frames expressed in that memo clearly describe the effective date of the 0rdinance and the other relevant facts of this situation. If application by Mr. Skinner was made on July 20 or thereafter, Ordinance Ho. G -251 is applicable to the property, and thus the increased connection fees were validly imposed. I'am unaware of any extenuating circumstances which would dis- tinguish the Skinner situation from other potential applicants in the time period involved. Granting any relief from the connection charges would require an amendment to the Ordinance. Such an amendment could, for example, provide that the connection fees involved woul`_ not be applicable to 6 ny permit applications made between July 10s and August 10. However, if this amendment were made, it woulc require the readjustment of any permit fees received from any persons during whatever time frame is selected for deferring implementation of the increased rates. Please advise ghat further action you wish me to take on this'matter. Respectfully submitted, 7;V ?'Jo n H, rec i l e Attorney JH3 /cak Encl. cc: Floyd Wilson - Supt. of Public Works - w /attch. .0 y t QP August 16, 1979 Memo Toe Ken Carmignani Tried to get back to you by phone IMPOSSIBLE. - Here's the chronological information I had' on the Skinner water permit; 7/1 0/79 - Ord G -251, amending the water fee schedule, approved by Board of Trustees - 7/20/79 Effective-date m (18 days later) 7/31/79 !+ Mater Main Expansion fee paid to K. Gregory. It was at this time that he was told to return the applications with site plans. 8/8/79 -- Received the completed applications and referred same to E. Wilson. ` s J Marianne 'thkosil Assistant to Building Commissioner ML /js 11 1 U November 26, 1979 The Village Board at their Committee of the Whole meeting of November 26, 1979 carefully reviewed the request dealing with a reduction in the eater connection charge which you paid to the Village of Oak Brook. As you recall, the fees were changed in July, 1979 and were increased by $50.00 for single- family residential connections. The Board had considerable discussion on terms of the alternatives available to it. It would have necessitated a change in the Ordinance which was passed by the Board in order to modify the effective date of the Ordinance. After care- fully reviewing the matter, the Village Board indicated that no change should be made to the Ordinance and that the charge for water connection which was made should stand as adopted under Ordinance G -251. If we can be of any further assistance in this matter., please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely yours, KGC /cak Kenneth G. Carmignani Village Manager f I� I! i