S-1163 - 06/13/2006 - SUBDIVISION - OrdinancesORDINANCE 2006-SD-DP+CA-S-1163
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS
AND ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
(York Tavern 3702 York Road, Oak Brook, Illinois - 06-36-402-001)
WHEREAS, the owner of certain property described herein has petitioned the corporate
authorities of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, for a Certificate of
Appropriateness and provided the Village with plans for a certain development in the Historic Graue Mill
Gateway Area, as more fully described in Section 4-D of this Ordinance (York Tavern Development
Plans), under Section VIII -A of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance G-60, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing on such petition has been conducted by the Plan Commission of
the Village on May 15, 2006, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the York Tavern Development Plans, the Plan Commission
recommended that such Plans be approved and that a Certificate of Appropriateness be issued subject to
certain conditions, and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Oak Brook deem passage of this
Ordinance to be in the best interest and in furtherance of the general welfare of the Village of Oak Brook,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF OAKBROOK, DUPAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows
Section 1 The provisions of the preambles hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as
though fully set forth herein
Section 2- Subject to the conditions set forth below, the York Tavern Development Plans
are approved, as said Plans are appropriate to the development of the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area,
are consistent with the Area's historic nature, and meet the applicable standards set forth in Section VIII-
A(F) of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance G-60, as amended.
Section 3- Because the York Tavern Development Plans meet the intent and purpose of the
Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area, a Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby issued, subject to the
conditions set forth below
Section 4 The approval of the York Tavern Development Plans and the issuance of a
Certificate of Appropriateness are subject to the following conditions
A The current policy towards establishing capacity based upon current adopted codes shall
be maintained.
B Parking shall be constructed as shown on the existing site plan
C The applicant is encouraged to seek landmark status
D The building alterations and addition shall be constructed in substantial conformance with
the plans submitted and contained in the case file, including: Foodservice Equipment
Plans approved by the DuPage County Health Department, dated April 20, 2006, page 6,
Proposed Building Elevations, page O (concept plan) and page R (Sheet A-5, dated April
17, 2006), Landscape Plan, page Q, and Floor Plans, page S (Sheet A-4, dated April 17,
2006)
Ordinance 2006-SD-DP+CA-S-1162
Approving Gateway Deve! Plan,
Cert of Appropriateness — York Tavern,
3702 York Rd , Oak Brook, IL
06-36-402-001 Page 2 of 2
E The applicant shall obtain final Engineering Department and DuPage County Health
Department approval.
F There shall be compliance with the commitments made in the May 18 letter of the
petitioner's counsel regarding construction of a bike path in a manner subject to
engineering review and consideration of safety and other pertinent considerations.
Section 5 The Certificate of Appropriateness herein issued pursuant to this ordinance is
limited to the property located at 3702 York Road, which property is legally described as follows.
LOT 5 IN WENNES SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1962, AS
DOCUMENT 33493, IN DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Section 6 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of the conflict
Section 7 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication as required by law
APPROVED THIS 13th day of June, 2006
v
Kevin inlan
Villag,4 President
PASSED THIS 13th day of June, 2006.
Ayes Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Kennedy, Manofsky, Sanford and Yusuf
Nays- None
Absent. None
ATTEST
rinaGonnella CMC
ge Clerk
.. ►s;�r r <,ti01
f� i' T *1 i
D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts:
E. Budget Adjustments
1) Public Works — Postage/Business Forms
2) Library — Structural Improvements
F. Treasurer's Report — April, 2006
G An Ordinance Authorizing the Sale, Donation or Disposal of Certain Items of Personal Property
owned by the Village of Oak Brook
7. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
8. BOARD & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
A Beard's Subdivision #2 — 3711 Madison, 403 Glendale & Vacant Land — Final Plat with Variations
— 4 -Lot Subdivision
9 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A Confirmation of Appointments
0 Ordinances & Resolutions
1) An Ordinance Approving Development Plans and Issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness
C. Award of Contracts
D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts•
1) Library HVAC Screening
2) Butler Government Center HVAC Screening/Relocation
E. Discussion — Residential Scavenger Service continued from May 23, 2006
10 NEW BUSINESS
A. Confirmation of Appointments
B Ordinances & Resolutions
1) An Ordinance amending Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 8A of the Village Code of the Village of
Oak Brook, Illinois Relative to the Number of Authorized Liquor Licenses - Nieman Marcus
C. Award of Contracts
1) Cancellation of Landscape Services Contract and Award of Landscape Maintenance Services
2) High Volume Copier - West Wmg
3) Cart Path Paving
8. A Staff Comments:
In response to the issues raised in the Zahran letter dated May 12, 2006, Village staff
from the Community Development and Engineering Department's could not locate
any documents that would support the existence of any covenants that would be in
conflict with the proposed resubdivision. In addition, Ken Beard's surveyor Mr. Gil
Evans (Bollinger, Lach & Associates) has provided information that he obtained from
the Title Commitments for the subject properties that contain no information that can
support the issues alluded to in the Zahran letter.
A suggestion was made to change the configuration so that the front yard, for setback
reasons, be located on the west side. The petitioner, his engineer and surveyor
responded that the configuration was designed in order to be in keeping with the
current look of the neighborhood and because of how the driveway came into the lot.
It was believed that the division and realignment were addressed in order to minimize
the concerns of surrounding residents. The resident who raised the issue, Mr. Zubi,
spoke to his concerns. His concern was related to the trees that buffered his home
from the new lot and the probability that they would be destroyed during construction
of a new home.
Motion by Trustee Kennedy, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to concur with the Plan
Commission recommendation to approve the Beard's Resubdivision No 2 and
requested variations and waivers to the Subdivision Regulations and authorize the
Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for adoption at the June 27, 2006
Village Board Meeting. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Kennedy, Manofsky and Sanford.
Nays: 1 - Trustee Yusuf.
Absent: 0 - None. Motion carried.
Trustee Manofsky abstained from the vote. An abstention becomes part of the
prevailing vote.
(9 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS — None presented.
aORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
1) AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND ISSUING A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
This Ordinance approves development plans and authorizes issuance of a
Certificate of Appropriateness for the York Tavern in the Historic Graue Mill
Gateway Area, pursuant to the recommendation of the Plan Commission at its
May 15, 2006 meeting, with an additional condition requiring compliance with
the commitments made by the petitioner's counsel in his May 18 letter, as
proposed by Trustee Kennedy and approved by the Board on May 23, 2006.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 13 June 13, 2006
9. B 1) Motion by Trustee Kennedy, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, for passage of
Ordinance S-1163, "An Ordinance Approving Development Plans and Issuing a
Certificate of Appropriateness" (York Tavern: 3702 York Road). ROLL CALL
VOTE:
Ayes: 6 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Kennedy, Manofsky, Sanford and Yusuf.
Nays- 0 - None.
Absent: 0 - None Motion carried.
C AWARD OF CONTRACTS
1) LIBRARY HVAC SCREENING
At the January 23rd Committee -of -the -Whole meeting, the Board consensus was
to have Legat Architects proceed with a final design for screening of the Library's
roof top HVAC unit and present same at a future meeting.
Recommendation:
That Legat's final design is approved and that staff be authorized to proceed with
obtaining competitive bids.
Once bids are received, the item will be brought back for Village Board
consideration.
Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Kennedy, that the Library roof-
top HVAC screening design, as submitted by Legat Architects, is accepted and
that staff are authorized to proceed with obtaining competitive bids for the
installation of same. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 6 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Kennedy, Manofsky, Sanford and Yusuf.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 0 - None. Motion carried.
2) BUTLER GOVERNMENT CENTER HVAC SCREENING/RELOCATION
At the January 23rd Committee -of -the -Whole meeting, staff was instructed to
explore the feasibility of relocating the Village Hall east -side HVAC units thus
negating the need for extensive screening.
Staff contracted with Metro Design and it was their opinion that the units could in
fact be relocated to the area referred to as the courtyard. Metro Design also
estimated the cost to undertake said work and after staff assigned additional costs
that would be associated with the relocation, notified the Board of same via the
Manager's Weekly Memorandum of March 24, 2006.
Since that time, other alternatives/locations for the HVAC units have surfaced
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 13 June 13, 2006
MrY MAL L06A WN of WATER wrtH THE VUA66 OF OAX MOOR
WATER -WATER—
vv en --n- ------Court►a" M�ALOWCAAMRWN OF S'ATN(U63Rl 5eM 0A)WAMMT
WZXAMm C*7ft0323-4236C*
�cl
' r
366.25353,37'
CteOwN
Z7O
12.88'
h ( / �' /
yDp"
w CHAAve To OX6TM 61PIAPE
684
...... .. ..
J.U.L.I.E.
Cs MICate OtAnWVWAWA is Prot an
AqWnst ln*Wwm Vft UrAsigmuid
Pubk Ullty F*dM"
am" or DOW wwk
Mlldaq jncrsftt._fta[__2_
WIN" M~
M— ...... aiwr
ATaTQMw
mod
41 fAmmom
WNW ma
7712'.'6'rx2'ChWh (134), SmwFmwdGrpwjdSlVw4h9'Eppv
&0' low RabodP* 4ftWMA"WLMMFOr (Ywkravwx),
3, N P Eppw A 3"Law AdmdArbo Vroom A"WL*Mrj & Mmbffxfor
(JM YGP*Rodd).
-z $0 byw A%V 4• Carver ve* Ls 6r. & E wood Cc m ma Fa wo "M To Dr
CA AIM *0 t. %ftwft O—mww.
Nww
CALL JULIE
1800 M-0123
MOM
AVW SANTARY SWMV
6, Pw OR 26
®10 2 SLIOPV
654.0 aZAtkXr
1653.0
"I
LE
SIS
fl)
6A TV VW.4 oc
A40 VALLr ri., 06,
z 10--
I
0
—A�ko
NO
co
www
00
6RCLPD 546N
NO C
To CX14TM
)N IN5 AREA
AMO LOT64 PARKOMO-7
P
0
/ /� / /
10
WOE OF PAWMIK
fill,
N
I
%j ffil/
/1®R,
JUN -18-1998 17:02 FR01 LElTZB| AGB4CY lNC TO 1630990QEm: 76 P. (-711
TOTAL P.01
ATE (MMAD
06 18 98
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
Leitzen Agency, Inc.
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
P.O. Box 320
COMPANY
Heyworth, IL 61745
A ICW GROUP/VARK UNDERWRITERS AGENCY
INSURED
COMPANY
YORK TAVERN
B
COMPANY
YORK AT SALT CREEK TAVERN INC DBA
3702 YORK RD
C
OAK BROOK, IL 60521
COMPANY
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITICN OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIL) CLAIMS.
001
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POUCYIEFIFECTIVE
DATE (MMIDDft-Y)
POUCYEXPIRATION
DATF(MWDID"
Umffs
13ENERAL
LIABILITY
GENERAL AGGREGATE $1,000, 000
A I OCCUR
PERSONAL ADV INJURY $ 500, 000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one Pro) $ 100, 000
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
ANYAUTO
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT s
WOVILY INJURY
(Per perBon)
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per accicleno
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
PROPERTY DAMAGE s
43AAAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $
ANY AUTO
OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE S
EXCESS LIABILITY
EACH RRENCE $
AGGREGATE
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WOAKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
T7SrA
Ry UA
EL EACH ACCIDENT $
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPEFtAnoms/Lor-ATIONGNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
TAVERN
FAX # 630-990-0876
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
1200 OAK BROOK
ID mys wRrn-Ex NOME TO THE CIERTIRCATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
OAK BROOK IL 60521
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICI�SMAUL IMPOSE NO OBUQATION OR LIABILITY
TOTAL P.01
ACORDL
PRODUCER.
...............
Leitzen Agency, Inc.
P.O. Box 320
He orth, IL 61745
INSURED
YORK TAVERN
YORK AT SALT CREEK TAVERN INC D
3702 YORK RD
OAK BROOK, IL 60521
COMPANY
A ILLINOIS CASUALTY COMPANY
COMPANY
B
COMPANY
C
COMPANY
D
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY)CO I LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIUTY
FCLAIMS MADE � OCCUR
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
GENERAL AGGREGATE $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
EACH OCCURRENCE $
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $
MED EXP (Any one person) S
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1 $
BODILY INJURYI $
(Per person)
BODILY INJURYI $
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE I $
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
TAVERN
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK
OAK BROOK IL 60521
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SH NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
OF ANY KIND UPON THE R REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV _ _
GARAGE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $
OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE $
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
EACH OCCURRENCE $
AGGREGATE $
$
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE: R EXCL
WCSTATU-OTH
TORY LIMITS ER_
EL EACH ACCIDENT $
EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S
EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE 1 $
A
OTHER LIQUOR
LIABILTY
LL65452
LL65452
5/04/98
7/01/98
07/01/98
07/01/99
CSL 1,000,000
CSL 1,000,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
TAVERN
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK
OAK BROOK IL 60521
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SH NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
OF ANY KIND UPON THE R REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV _ _
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
654-2220
May 1, 1986
TO: Managers All Places of Assembly
FROM: Lt. Robert Nielsen
SUBJECT: "Occupant Load" Card Posting
Pursuant to the Fire Prevention Code of the Village of Oak Brook,
Sect. 27.11, your facility is required to posted with an "Occupant
Card," stating the maximum number of occupants permitted. This figure
is determined utilizing one of two calculations. These calculations
are:
7 square feet, net, per person: concentrated use without
fixed seating.
15 square feet, net, per person: less concentrated use, such
as dining rooms, lounge, etc.
Utilizing these figures, the Occupant Load for the Assembly area of
your facility has been calculated. Your total Occupant Load is:
54
Pursuant to Sect. 27.11, of the Village Fire Prevention Code, you are
directed to post the attached "Occupant Load" card in a conspicuous
space in the public area of the facility. If you do not agree with
this number, you may feel free to contact my office to ascertain its
calculation.
I am sure that you will agree that any severe overcrowding in a Place
of Assembly poses a distinct panic threat to the occupants. Keeping
this number at a level that will prevent panic is in the best interest
of both your facility and your customers. We thank you and your facility
for cooperation,in this vital matter.
Sincerely,
Lt. Robert Nielsen, Director
Bureau of Fire Prevention
cc.: File
1 a4
I t -
OCCUPANCY BY MORE THAN
C q 'DrRSONS
mmmm�
Ic
DANGER AW 'now S
AND IN VIOLATION Of THE
FIRE PREVENTION CODE OF
7HlE VIIIAGE OF OAK BROOx
BUREAU Of FIRE PREVEN71ON
OA X BROOK FIRE DEPART MEN7
Ve_"T
Flow nn, .
Qtv. Size
Common Name
ID*ciduous T
4c�
Common Name
56�,
GMAC Rides egmvm'Gmen Movrq'
10 JG.l
Green Mound ftp Conant
RO Ouercusnmra
3
J'
Red Ona
ON N e equerpldb
6 JG.1
0.kk. drangea
SWO Quercus drmb-
I
]
Bicep VMde Oak
MV Vidvmum lenlana'Modican'
6 J'
Nonran Vdurnum
CLS Rnus emmuKe '._[
16 3G.,
G,,—S.—
oty.Sine
CBR EwnYmus aletus'Cwnpecb
< 7'
CprbaU Burni Busn
$B Amelancnrer carieda.niis
I
.
5^,aCdbw SemCeder
AM 1iyNarryae arda.xent'MnedWa
9 )Gal
AnnadalbM ra a
NAW raraepus wspah ver urerm,s
J
fi'
Tmm�bea CocJupurla.Mtlpn
RTD Cornus serrpe'AWmen
a Sal
Nkm.n's Rb
GD Caput oras
J
3'
Comalwcn.r
SS Rnus va 18rpnrab'
7
1 T
IC M st Swore
Eve reap Shru
Size
Common Nam.
I
Dr taus, rmdw'Oenvldmus
3 2a'
Dema Yaw
v reen Tme
GSJ Junrpsrus rnmrrvt ru serpent
IB J Gal
Green 5a enl Juniper
NS Ptae Dares
J
.'
Now Spun
NS Pe eo,as
7
la
Npw Space
Omamentai r s
a
Name
ws aglavice
2
12'
Nowa Sputa
PMfi a15ce+fnus vrwnvs Puryvsscv
to 2G.1
Puryb Ma_en Grass
WP Porus srmous
1
Y
WnC. Pine
FG Pomtalun abpecvrdides
3 3Gal
Fow .n Grass
VIP Fbus vmdus
2
to
Wnae Prro
SSG Prxcwn wyarum 'SMnerWoen'
10 2G.1
rondo
5ne an 5ii+nt�Grats
WP P
3
'r
NTaa Pro
c05 Pweeurgens ver yleuce
3
a'
Co.-. Give Splum
nnisb
Size
Common Nam
ARB to
3
3'
r.[ne A nrtae
—
SDD abmem 1 S.—
26 1 Gal
S— 00'. Da sl
Grountlew
Size
Com n Name
�
-
Bis s.me trwams'ue r
AJS Sedwn sPe[ladde'Autumn JPy
A 1 Ger
2. 1G.,
w n t same
A.—NI,Sedum
VM mnro-na-Ys eWe
voice
I.en
J'
D.Tt aloe Verr«inx,e
W
r,
CAT naple. laessenv WenWS Low'
13 I—
calmim
BES Ruddecxia lurryda'Gddsnum'
17 1 Gal
BbQ E Susan
Ye
•
PC Fcdmacea Pvrpuma'Mapnus'
WPA ASNr. dumosus WOMS Pmk'
11 'Gal
a ,Gal
Puryb Cq 11—
Wood'S Pink
J
_
weA Airer t d.mdil,i wddas B1ae
.c Co.amvt vert;clleta Mwndsam'
„ ,cal
. 1-1am
woods 81-
veMe
Moonde.m Coraopis
' 'y :�
'E~r`•"r
�
_-
`,...\
1 � r
�' - --1--- 14
' t
!
I 4
4wblger ,�Ep—
�� QA IiC i 1
M*T -LAS
I-.r✓r�rt�P U!-I�sTl�i� P+•� t.�,� I,�i�-�
s W _vim r5n a -L-5
o� fWA � -`Ir ; t-MUV
1!I.4�slwiC ¢�arph
(:,tie rat s c AI i
i
4j•PN� �
\
4c�
56�,
_ .._4. fH&j
5+5 • lf+Ac�
petit)
-- - –115 CIO')
w'�'sltA�t
3•oµ
l ,6 (e)
Landscape Plan
1,8r. - rr-on
Verily with electrical —trfinal location ojgroand
sign and pier morin( caa.'h lights
with Land—ping
E
■
Sneer
A_Z
PAGE
CONTENTS
0
INDEX
•
YORK TAVERN
3702 YORK TAVERN
CERTIFICATE OFAPPROPRIATENESS
17-17.b Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien - Village Board Agenda
dated May 23, 2006
16-16.a Letter from Water O'Brien re: Bike Path dated May 18, 2006
15-15.d Pictures of the Existing York Tavern Property
14-14.b Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission to Village Board dated May 17, 2006
13-13.h Plan Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 15, 2006
12-12.a Framework for Proposed Recommendation from Director of Community Development dated
May 12, 2006
11-11.e Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien to Plan Commission dated
May 10, 2006
10 Memorandum from Village Engineer Durfey re: Detention Requirements
9 Forest Preserve District of DuPage County letter dated May 11, 2006
8 Letter of Support from the Oak Brook Historical Society dated May 6, 2006
7 DuPage County Health Dept Approval of Plans dated April 20, 2006
6 Plans Approved by DuPage County Health Dept. dated April 20, 2006
5 Resident Letter dated April 25, 2006
4 Certificate of Publication — Plan Commission Public Hearing dated April 25, 2006
3-3.b Letter from Attorney O'Brien re: Meeting with the Residents and List of Residents Contacted
dated April 25, 2006
2-2.a Referral Memo to Village Board - Agenda Dated April 25, 2006
1-1d Certificate of Appropriateness, Zoning Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 8 Section 6 through 11
*************************************
A Petition Application — Certificate of Appropriateness
B -B.1 Letter of Explanation
C -C.1 Letter from Attorney O'Brien re: Health Dept. Deadline dated March 14, 2006
D Response to Gateway Development Plan Standards — Section 13-8-7 and 13-8-8
E -E.1 Letter from Restoration Architect, LZT /Filiung re: Restoration/Expansion of York Tavern
Dated April 11, 2006
F -F.1 DuPage County Health Dept Letter re: Expiration of Conditional Permit dated February 27, 2006
G -G.2 DuPage County Health Dept Preliminary Plan Approval and Plans Subject to Correction
H -H.1 Surrounding Property Owners List
I Fee/Receipt
J Subject Property Verification and Legal Description
K Certification
L Copy of General Permit Application
M Ground Sign Details
N -N.1 Existing Building Elevations
0-0.2 Proposed Building Elevation Views
P Site Plan dated April 17, 2006 (Included — Not Attached)
Q Color Landscape Plans (Included — Not Attached)
R Elevations (included — Not Attached)
S Floor Plans (Included — Not Attached)
T Topographic Survey (Included — Not Attached)
U Plat of Survey — Key Files Only
•
saw
AGENDA ITEM
Regular Board of Trustees Meeting
of
May 23, 2006
SUBJECT: York Tavern - 3702 York Road — Certificate of Appropriateness — Historic Graue
Gateway Area
FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director
BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: — I move to concur with the recommendation from the
Plan Commission and approve the request for a certificate of appropriateness to permit the
expansion of the York Tavern and related site improvements authorize the Village
Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the June 13, 2006
Board of Trustees meeting.
Background/History:
At its meeting on May 15, 2006, the Plan Commission completed its review and deliberation on
an application from Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci, the owners of the York Tavern located
at 3702 York Road for a building permit as well as an application and all required supporting
documents seeking approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill
Gateway Area in order to modify the existing building by adding approximately 1100 sq. ft. and
making interior modifications to address issues raised by the DuPage County Health Department
and to come into compliance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
The York Tavern structure has existed since 1843 at its present location and encompasses
approximately 1055 square feet. Because the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of
Oak Brook and adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the subject property is
classified as a legal nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the Zoning Ordinance. Normally,
any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary repairs and alterations, which do
not involve an expansion of the nonconforming nature of the use. However, in Section 13-13-2;
Last saved by GPOLANEK I:\ComDev\GPOLANEK\l-FROM BOB\Bot - PC - ZBA\BOT-Rec-York Tavern-CertAppr-2006.doc /I
•
•
"Repairs And Alterations: Ordinary repairs and alterations may be
made to a nonconforming building or structure, provided that no
structural alterations shall be made in or to such building or structure,
all of which is designed or intended for a use not permitted in the
district in which it is located, except those required by law, or except to
make the building or structure and use thereof conform to the
regulations of the district in which it is located."
As such, the proposed building alterations and addition is in response to issues raised by other
governmental entities, specifically DuPage County Health Department and the State of Illinois
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Mr. Vito Moreci, the owner of the York Tavern located at 3702 York Road has submitted an
application and required supporting documents seeking approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area in order to modify the existing
building to address issues raised by the DuPage County Health Department and to come into
compliance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Recommendation
By a vote of 7 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the petitioner's request for
the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area subject
to the following conditions:
1. Maintain the current policy towards establishing capacity based upon current adopted
codes;
2. Parking to be constructed as shown on the existing site plan;
3. The applicant is encouraged to seek landmark status;
4. To be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and contained in
the case file, including: Foodservice Equipment Plans approved by the DuPage County
Health Department dated April 20, 2006 on page 6; Proposed building elevations on
pages O (concept plan) and R (Sheet A-5, dated April 17, 2006); Site Plan dated April 17,
2006 on page P (Sheet A-1, dated April 17, 2006); Landscape Plan page Q; and Floor
Plans on page S (Sheet A-4, dated April 17, 2006).
5. Final Engineering and DuPage County Health Department approval.
In making the recommendation, the Plan Commission found that:
1. The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present location. The
existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square feet.
2. Even though the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak Brook and
adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the subject property is zoned
R-2 Single -Family Detached Residence District and is classified as a legal
nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Normally, any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary repairs and
alterations, which do not involve an expansion of the nonconforming nature of the use.
Last saved by GPOLANEK I:\ComDev\GPOLANEK\l-FROM BOB\Bot - PC - ZBA\BOT-Rec-York Tavern-CertAppr-2006.doc /10,
4. However, Section 13-13-2 of the Zoning Ordinance states:
"Ordinary repairs and alterations may be made to a nonconforming building or structure,
provided that no structural alterations shall be made in or to such building or structure, all
of which is designed or intended for a use not permitted in the district in which it is
located, except those required by law, or except to make the building or structure and use
thereof conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located."
Therefore, the proposed modifications to the building addresses issues raised by the
DuPage County Health Department and to also come into compliance with requirements
of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Without these building improvements,
the DuPage County Health Department has stated in writing that, "they will not have a
valid permit to serve food or beverages and must cease operations."
5. In accordance to Section 13-8-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant has submitted all
documents and information to satisfy the Gateway Development Plan requirements,
which must be included in the application for a certificate of appropriateness.
6. The plans that have been submitted for this request have been reviewed and approved by
the DuPage County Health Department.
7. The plans have also been reviewed and approved by the Oak Brook Historical Society as
well as the LZT/Filiung Architects, an architectural firm who has experience in working
with historical structures.
8. The proposed interior modifications will include improvements that relate to the
Village's life safety and building codes that enhance the public, health, safety and welfare
of those persons who work and visit the York Tavern facility.
9. The proposed building elevations and site improvements appear to be consistent with the
Graue Mill Gateway area and historical area that is adjacent to the York Tavern property.
10. Even though the building will be physically improved, the integrity of the residential
zoning of the area has not been compromised.
Staff Comments
In addition to the issues raised by the Plan Commission as part of their deliberations on the
Certificate of Appropriateness, Staff has received several comments relative to the potential
opportunity to locate a bike path on the west side of York Road as part of the planned
improvements to the York Tavern property. These comments have been communicated with the
applicant and his Attorney. Please see the attached response from Attorney Walter J. O'Brien.
In addition, one of the conditions attached to the recommendation from the Plan Commission
was final engineering approval. To comply with the Village's engineering standards for parking
lots, specifically stall dimensions and drive aisle location/spacing, the paved parking area will
need to be increased by several feet in some specific locations including the west edge of the lot.
Finally, a couple of individuals (Audrey Muschler and Jean Follett) who spoke on the matter,
requested that the Village Board consider adding language to the Village Code that would permit
the reconstruction of the York Tavern if ever destroyed. Such a provision could also be extended
to the other historic structures in the Graue Mill area.
X7.6
Last saved by GPOLANEK I:\ComDev\GPOLANEK\i-FROM BOB\Bot - PC - ZBA\BOT-Rec-York Tavern-CertAppr-2006.doc
•
LAW OFFICES OF
O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1900 SPRING ROAD, SUITE 501
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523
Mr. Robert Kallien
Director of Community Development
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Dear Mr. Kallien:
•
TELEPHONE
(630)832-6000
FACszmz
(630) 684-0243
&MAIL
May 18, 2006 OBRIENLAW@MSN.COM
In re: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for the York Tavern
This letter is written on behalf of our clients, the Moreci family, regarding a question brought
up after the close of the Public Hearing held Monday night, May 15, 2006. Trustee Kennedy inquired
whether or not our clients would contribute toward the cost of the installation of a bike path contiguous
to their East property line. They agree to this on the following conditions:
1. The bike path is constructed adjacent or close to our clients' East property line but
entirely within the Right of Way for York Road and not over their property.
2. That the Village Engineer issue specifications for the work to be completed so that my
clients can have the bike path bid out as an extra to the cost of paving the parking lot on
their property.
3. Our clients' paving contractor is allowed, if possible, to install the bike path at the time
the parking lot is paved.
4. The Village obtains the permission of the County to build within the Right of Way for
York Road and evidence said permission to our office on or before our clients complete
the installation of their parking lot on the York Tavern property.
5. In the event that permission to build the bike path within the Right of Way is not
granted before our clients' paving contractor completes the parking lot; our clients will
only be responsible for reimbursing the Village up to, but not exceeding, the cost set
forth on their contractor's bid for this work. This obligation for our clients to reimburse
the Village shall terminate within one year of the date of issuance of the Village's
building permit to our clients for the construction of the alterations to the York Tavern.
14•
•
•
6. Assuming the bike path is constructed by either our clients' or the Village's contractor,
the Village shall be solely responsible for the maintenance or removal of the bike path,
if and when required. The Village, at its cost, will install stop signs on the bike path on
either side of the driveway serving our clients' property.
After having said all that, I visited the site this morning and have some personal comments
regarding this request. Mr. Durfey has said that to build the bike path in the Right of Way would
require that the existing trees in the Right of Way would have to be removed and the path would have
to be cut into about a six (6) foot drop-off. After my observation of the site, I respectfully disagree. If
the you and the Board will review the survey and the pictures that I am e -mailing to you, you will
notice that the drop-off is close to the roadway, where the trees and power lines are located. However,
west of the trees and drop-off, along my clients' East property line there is a wide open space for the
installation of the path directly over the abandoned cistern located in the Right of Way. True, bikers
would have to peddle up hill and down again, but this little extra exercise should not be a burden.
However, and most importantly, if the Board does require my clients to pay for this bike path, I
have to ask - "Why"? This new path would not connect to any existing bike path to the North of my
clients' property. The existing bike trail, going over the bridge crossing Ginger Creek, now naturally
flows into the pathway running through the Forest Preserve. If we were to extend it north it would
send riders either onto York Road, a dangerous situation, or onto Wennes Court through the residential
area with nowhere to go.
Please present this letter agreement to the Village Board for inclusion in the President's and the
Trustees' information packages for the meeting scheduled for next Tuesday, May 23, 2006. If there is
anything additional you require please phone me at your convenience.
Lastly, and on behalf of myself and our clients, I want to personally thank you and Ken
Kubiesa for your cooperation and guidance through this very unusual process. We truly appreciate it.
Very truly yours,
O'Brien & Associates, P.C.
By:
)Walter J. O' rien II
WJO'B:ss
cc: President Quinlan and the Board of Trustees
Mr. and Mrs. Vito Moreci
Mr. Pasquale Moreci
Mr. Frank Lucchese
Mr. Kenneth Kubiesa
Mr. Dale Durfey
y�,{Z d- *. � f r ' 3 s.Y .'Y rs. r �s �'`7�e—rr � ♦ S . - � '+�t� �' � t,
• A t ♦3'a, �wM
fig• '� l�. - •: "W'"�:^ � 1 d `� ,�,% �
'. t.:;=�- r ; " t7f' 1 fi ssy f . S ,.� p ♦ 1 ily , 'r..:
'Ct - - •- - Y _ ♦T, t11 'il 'is + .r{ _ at_F ,. 1. iii � � � -�"
�.�. y- .. }�'r T _ Y v., `$ �' 9 �`11'�� .iJ; " F ialf - ,1�♦ / rJ.\
� t r'� t1"`�.a8` �' _ �, _...L • ¢ • t - � j 1;�1� �i�y��R ��� t�� l •�� iit• g��� F �
- �'' .-.' r�'yt{,_ k'�'.. _.e!!k� it�\ �, �, �\ - a� \C' � _1 _ j'`� �- f� f -• _ r
? c. �` is -�+\iS � 3r ' 4 7 • �� -1 • a
'�' rpt' 0 1t�� :��. , ,♦ti; i `' ... :�- -
Ny
51,
NO At
7-1
-18
'us
• � 4 � - Y -+' y ��1 .�� `jai yJ :�I � ;�•,}\ `F jy���y�j �]t [�.4
�v
. `t� .. �? P,: . a �`�� � - � f � .�, rc.,' • e • � .. � ,v •�,� .�y *+'' '�' '1 ice^^ �' ,�
t
���°i; ' � � - � ��,. 1`.,w ..tip } t♦ r•r t � � ,>� '` 141_.
• i �4tili+y'
Xn
Ito
ZI
Ap-
Ft
y«,
_
-
•
p:
r
y J i
s
s
-
,
e
r. ....:
t » 4^
e
1 w tr
3 .s
t -
1
5 b
A5,11
JC.�¢>r Z •� hfr'F !°�` rf"t X.
y
7i V
i •,� "„"""°r"'... yet
�Jr•{' �''$ �.T br1 f Fri t ` m
rM' ��� p �i•. a ;'.: 't'fJy�"4 $t� Sri+ �,.
It
4'L! ,� L�z,K w,e; '',d .' it~ r s_�•w .S }' � '•� yy�1 1 �R�� J
_ �r•> ,r�>'RY'� � +�,� iF.�! -� 1 P �� .�`t �~HV i y sl t�#��_
Oa :'�''• ! s F,;•;.-'.a •75r .,�` •' ' l t dre S". P � r6., �k'`.u\''ar�'vT+,' y! a t \a9�/s��� .a-:
77;t '` ar �'1 � •��� i8 t � Lat '� Rt I'd rt �� lAja � :_ira+t
�. T �, � r ,f ..�F i � � �'rY ��yp��``r ��� �?. �' .]f ry6i,,i�y},�^ti� .,• 7,y t /.
a y�i,- -: ► 1_Yji.F, /r•ye, -s �v. V•r r r F x t ! yr,' "V.l L�e�'I
< � ' -`°' � � ,aSA'-. f� !' , � ..r;tw` tiLf�a ! 't1 �•+� ?r�i °fit'• > ' ��g;t
s
a 51. i
� , __ "•�:°� .. � , '",fir � � �. >i �i''
��r':�,,�
_ #�`.- -K ,fig.: `.•.:+Ca�,,,'k `. ?�v_ + F
WenneS Ct
Vp
9
n a
' a
z>
s
?sR��r a�„Sak �~„vim fi
S F- �`fiYu
_. ___— __.._ ✓�X a .3 _ �� n. ',17 i5 - �!.Z+�••
Fir
r
ter°F � �,•r,� q i.F`' '. �`�' .�Y°�.
d
'7
1r
iw.
t ,
} A �- _dry � �i - 4 i°,$ �' ,v� �d''S .'i "�" 1 iti :YF i� &v r 4 •4, w 4
_ I
vti
K +
6�Of 04
Q' e9
� o
e
G o May 17, 2006
9C�00UNT4 ' Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees
Village of Village of Oak Brook
Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road
1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523
Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255
Website SUBJECT: York Tavern—3702 York Road—Certificate of Appropriateness
www.oak-brook.org
Administration Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees:
630.990.3000
FAX 630.990.0876 Background
Community At its meetings on May 15, 2006, the Plan Commission completed its review and
Development deliberation on an application from Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci, the
630.990.3045 owners of the York Tavern located at 3702 York Road for a building permit as
FAX 630.990.3985 well as an application and all required supporting documents seeking approval of
Engineering
a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area in order
Department to modify the existing building by adding approximately 1100 square feet and
630.990.3010 making interior modifications to address issues raised by the DuPage County
FAX 630.990.3985 Health Department and to come into compliance with the requirements of the
Fire Department Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).
630.990.3040
FAX 630.990.2392 The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present location.
The existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square feet. Because the
Police Department tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak Brook and adoption of the
630.990.2358 p � p
FAX 630.990.7484 current zoning provisions for the property, the subject property is classified as a
legal nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the Zoning Ordinance. Normally,
Public Works any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary repairs and
Department
630.990.3044 alterations, which do not involve an expansion of the nonconforming nature of the
FAX 630.472.0223 use. However, in Sec+',)n 13-13-2;
Oak Brook "Repairs And Alterations: Ordinary repairs and alterations may be
Public Library made to a nonconforming building or structure, provided that no
structural alterations shall be made in or to such building or
600 Oak Brook Road structure, all of which is designed or intended for a use not
Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200
630.990.2222 permitted in the district in which it is located, except those required
FAX 630.990.4509 by law, or except to make the building or structure and use thereof
conform to the regulations of the district in which it is located."
Oak Brook Sports Core
As such, the proposed building alterations and addition is in response to issues
Bath&Tennis Club
700 Oak Brook Road raised by other governmental entities, specifically the DuPa e County Health
Oak Brook, IL 60523-4600 Department and the State of Illinois Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
630.990.3020
FAX 630.990.1002
The applicant has provided information that details how the proposed addition
Golf Club and site improvements meet the requirements for approval of a certificate of
2606 York Road appropriateness.
Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602
630.990.3032
FAX 630.990.0245
r
Public Comment
All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. Several neighboring property owners
attended the hearing and provided comments and testimony on issues relative to the proposed
plan for the York Tavern.
Plan Commission Discussion
There was a discussion regarding whether the expansion was larger than required. Contained in
the case file is a letter from the DuPage County Health Department stating that the proposal has
been approved and has met their minimum requirements. It was also noted that any further
changes to that approved plan would require an advance review by the Health Department. The
Health Department was made aware of the intricacies of providing a minimum expansion to
address the food items prepared/served at this location.
I
With regards to the building addition, there is a sense of scale that needs to be looked at too; in
terms of whether the addition fits in with the overall scale of the building. The footprint of the
building shows that symmetry has been provided. It does meet the County requirements and
does fit in aesthetically, with what exists, which is one of the requirements of the Graue Mill
Gateway requirements and it appears that they have satisfied that requirement.
Recommendation
By a vote of 7 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the petitioner's request for
the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area. This
will allow for the issuance of the building permit to allow the construction that will increase the
size of the existing building approximately 1100 square feet, and to meet the interior and exterior
building alterations as required by the DuPage County Health Department and improvements to
the physical appearance of the site. The recommendation is subject to the following conditions:
1. Maintain the current policy towards establishing capacity based upon current adopted
codes;
2. Parking to be constructed as shown on the existing site plan;
3. The applicant is encouraged to seek landmark status;
4. To be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and contained in
the case file, including: Foodservice Equipment Plans approved by the DuPage County
Health Department dated April 20, 2006 on page 6; Proposed building elevations on
pages O (concept plan) and R(Sheet A-5, dated April 17, 2006); Site Plan dated April
17, 2006 on page P (Sheet A-1, dated April 17, 2006); Landscape Plan page Q; and
Floor Plans on page S (Sheet A-4, dated April 17, 2006).
5. Final Engineering and DuPage County Health Department approval.
In making the recommendation, the Plan Commission found that:
1. The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present location. The
existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square feet.
2. Even though the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak Brook and
adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the subject property is zoned
R-2 Single-Family Detached Residence District and is classified as a legal
nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the Zoning Ordinance.
r
3. Normally, any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary repairs and
alterations,which do not involve an expansion of the nonconforming nature of the use.
4. However, Section 13-13-2 of the Zoning Ordinance states:
"Ordinary repairs and alterations may be made to a nonconforming building or
structure, provided that no structural alterations shall be made in or to such building
or structure, all of which is designed or intended for a use not permitted in the
district in which it is located, except those required by law, or except to make the
building or structure and use thereof conform to the regulations of the district in
which it is located."
Therefore, the proposed modifications to the building addresses issues raised by the
DuPage County Health Department and to also come into compliance with
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Without these building
improvements, the DuPage County Health Department has stated in writing that, "they
will not have a valid permit to serve food or beverages and must cease operations."
5. In accordance to Section 13-8-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant has submitted
all documents and information to satisfy the Gateway Development Plan requirements,
which must be included in the application for a certificate of appropriateness.
6. The plans that have been submitted for this request have been reviewed and approved
by the DuPage County Health Department.
7. The plans have also been reviewed and approved by the Oak Brook Historical Society
as well as the LZT/Filiung Architects, an architectural firm who has experience in
working with historical structures.
8. The proposed interior modifications will include improvements that relate to the
Village's life safety and building codes that enhance the public, health, safety and
welfare of those persons who work and visit the York Tavern facility.
9. The proposed building elevations and site improvements appear to be consistent with
the Graue Mill Gateway area and historical area that is adjacent to the York Tavern
property.
10. Even though the building will be physically improved, the integrity of the residential
zoning of the area has not been compromised.
Very truly yours, NOTE: Chairwoman Payovich has reviewed and verbally
approved the content of this letter pending her
signature. The signed original will be placed in
the official file upon receipt.
Barbara(Lexi)Payovich
Chairwoman
Plan Commission
��fr6
5. N NEW BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
B YORK TAVERN — 3702 YORK ROAD — CERTIFICATE OF YORK TAVERN
-3702 YORK-
APPROPRIATENESS —TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF THE KITCHEN CERTIFICATE
TO MEET CURRENT MINIMUM HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF
REQUIREMENTS AND THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT ESSROPRIATEN
ADA
Director of Community Development Kallien provided a review of the request.
York Tavern is on approximately 1.75 acres and is zoned R-2, which is a Single-
Family Residence District with a minimum 1-acre lot size. The York Tavern
significantly predates the Village of Oak Brook and its zoning. The Zoning
Ordinance was adopted in 1966 and the property easily predates it by over 100
years. The DuPage County Health Department, which has a responsibility to protect
the public health, safety and welfare of the residents and patrons relative to food
safety has provided in letter form, some directives for the owner to adhere to and if
these issued are not reconciled, they will lose the ability to continue business as it
exists. There are underlying setbacks that affect the property. York Road has a 100-
foot setback, which is measured by the centerline of the road. The applicant has
addressed that by proposing an addition that does not encroach into that area. In his
opinion, the 100-foot setback becomes moot. The issue of nonconformity is
included in his staff report, that by the rule of law, some modifications can be made
to a building as long as it conforms to a higher standing of law.
Chairwoman swore in all applicants and witness that would provide testimony.
Frank Lucchese, 512 West Van Buren, Elmhurst, Illinois, Project Architect for York
Tavern. He acknowledged and thanked the Community Development Department,
since a Certificate of Appropriateness does not come forward very often and they
felt somewhat like pioneers going through this process because there was not a
standard to go through. Through the help, insight and counsel of staff they were
able to create a presentation that will meet with the Village approval.
York Tavern has a special place in the hearts and minds of its residents in the
community and they are very sensitive to that; and the fact that it is in the historical
district, it is even more so important, thus they hired a historical architect. In
addition, they went out into the community, went out, sought the advice and counsel
of two highly respected historical consultants, Jean Follett and Audrey Muschler,
and have had many meetings with them, where they were advised of the historical
aspects of this building. They believe they have put together a good project based
on that. They met with Al Savino, President of the Oak Brook Historical Society
and had 2 meetings with residents who surround the property. They advised and
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 10 of 18 May 15, 2006
/3
kept them apprised of what they were doing. Included in those meetings was the
Fullersburg Association and the Robin Hood Ranch Association. It is their belief
that they agree with what they are doing.
Walter O'Brien, 1900 Spring Road, Oak Brook, attorney for the petitioner and
resident of the Village. He said that there was a great deal of community concern
originally because there were two plans that had been drawn up to address the health
department issues. This issue is not a zoning issue and will remain R-2 is the
request is approved for the Certificate of Appropriateness. They are looking at a
June 7th date. The historical architect and consultants believe the structure should
stand on its own and be able to be viewed for what it was. It is a legal
nonconforming use and will remain that way if the certificate of appropriateness is
approved. Some concern was raised that the alteration is almost as big as the
existing structure. There are federal, county and village requirements that must be
met; the first being the health, safety and welfare mandates of the health department.
The village is requiring compliance with its fire codes and fire sprinkling the
building. The reason the structure is of this size is because they are dealing with
ADA compliance, Health Dept compliance which includes the kitchen, dry storage,
refrigerated storage on both levels and an outside ingress has to be brought to the
lower level. Not only are the required to provide ADA bathrooms, but ADA access
for ingress/egress. These requirements have created the size of the building. The
letter included from the Health Department states that they are meeting the
minimum health requirements, so there should not be an issue regarding the size of
the footprint of the building.
Terrence Russell, Larson and Darby Group, 324 W. State Street, Geneva, IL, said
that he was the restoration architect on the Frederick Graue House. The York
Tavern was built in 1843 and has been in continuous operation as a tavern for 163
years, and that is what really gives it, its historic significance. The building itself is
a folk style or early railroad style building. It is not the prettiest of buildings, but it
was never intended to be. It was always intended to be a rather simple style
building, which is still reflected today. Its significance is the fact that it has been in
use for 163 years as a tavern, except for a brief period in the 1920's during
prohibition. The building is mostly timber frame construction based on what they
see in the basement. The addition on the south is much later; probably early 20`h
century built dimensional lumber. The existing siding is a simple clapboard exterior
and the windows are 9 over 6 style. The trim on the building is somewhat minimal,
which is very consistent with this type of building for this time period. The roof was
most likely wood shingle. There are 2 non-historic additions to the building that
will be removed. The photographs in the case file show a concrete block addition
and a small air lock entrance to the front; both will be removed as part of the
renovation. The addition does not infringe on the front yard setback. They want to
emphasis the 1843 building so the addition is pushed off to the side so that the major
elevation from the south and east really emphasizes the existing building with the
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 11 of 18 May 15, 2006
major elevations being restored to the way they were when they were new. The
ridge of the roof is specifically kept lower than the existing ridgeline, which
emphasizes the original building. Due to the Health Department upgrades, they
have created a well on the roof to hide the kitchen exhaust and the mechanicals that
would distract from the historic building. The detailing on the addition will match
the existing building exactly. They will keep the 9 over 6 windows, simple trim,
clapboards and the wood-shingled roof. There is a new entrance that is accessible
from the southwest. The existing entrance would remain just as an emergency
egress from the dining area. It appears that the building is surrounded by parking,
but the parking configuration is exactly the way it is now with planting and
landscape islands being added. It will be repaved and restriped. The parking from
the north and the east, which is one of the major views from the parking lot would
all be screened with pine trees so that in the winter you would not have to see the
parking lot. It also helps the view from Wennes Court. The existing signage will be
removed. The new signage fits within the historic guidelines. It is a small
monument sign, stone with letters applied to it.
Audrey Muschler, Interim President of the Fullersburg Historic Foundation spoke in
favor of the proposal and its historic preservation. The Foundation was formed 20
years ago at the request of the Forest Preserve District, so that there is one voice that
would speak for the entire district. It includes the Graue Mill, Ben Fuller Hinsdale
and Oak Brook Historical Societies. They are very pleased at the sensitivity of the
owner and the architect. They have been very receptive to the integrity of the tavern
and they support the approval of the plan to allow the owner to continue to operate
the tavern by complying with the DuPage County Health Department requirements
and the expansion of the kitchen, handicapped bathrooms, dry storage, and inside
staircase. They noted that there is no increase in the size of the service area, no
increase in parking, and no change to the zoning. The York Tavern was built in
1843 by Benjamin Fuller and qualifies for the listing in the National Register of
Historic Places under the criteria of history according to Tracey Sculle of the Illinois
Historic Preservation Agency. In addition, they would like to request that Village
review the Gateway Ordinance and possibly revise the ordinance to allow that if any
of the historic buildings and there are five historic buildings that they could be
rebuilt and the tavern could also be rebuilt.
Jean Follett, 425 Bonnie Brae Road, Hinsdale, also Hinsdale Village Trustee, and
has been working in the area of historic preservation for 30 years. York Tavern is
near and dear to her heart for many reasons. This group of buildings at Salt Creek is
extraordinary in Northeastern Illinois; there is nothing else like it where you have
multiple first generation buildings that are in their original location; with the
exception of the Ben Fuller House, and that was just moved across the street. They
all tell a story that the rural in the Comprehensive Plan refers to. It is the rural
history of Oak Brook. It is amazing that they are still there. The timbers in the
York Tavern were milled at the sawmill that stood on the site that is today Graue
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 12 of 18 May 15, 2006
13-L
Mill. She is grateful there is a plan that saves this building and does not
dramatically alters or demolishes it, which is what they were worried about six
months ago. It is great that it is going to be added on to in a way that makes it
useful in the 21St century and maybe there will be another 160 years worth of use out
of it. She agrees with Audrey statements and applauds the fact that the two villages
have worked out this ordinance 20 years ago, and thinks it needs to be reviewed
again. She also would like to see stronger protection in the ordinance, due to the
extraordinary character of this area. It has been a long 15-20 year struggle to protect
this group of buildings. She hopes that the Village Board in Oak Brook takes a
serious look at strengthening the ordinance to provide better protection for this
amazing group of buildings that includes the York Tavern.
Larry Herman, 413 Luthin Road, said that in a way he is speaking for his neighbors.
He thanked the Moraci's and advisors for soliciting the input of the neighbors as
well as working closely with Audrey Muschler and Jean Follett. They have worked
out a good working relationship over the last couple of months and the plan this
evening is a vast improvement from where the project started. He reminded the
Commission that this is a nonconforming use and while they are sensitive and
empathetic to the Health Departments edicts, that does not in of itself present a
hardship because they are operating which is a nonconforming use. The fact that the
Health Department may have problems with the way it is being operated is not
really an issue that the Village needs to respond to. They would like to see what has
been substantially proposed here, completed. Mr. O'Brien said that he believed the
neighbors support the project, that is generally true, but there are a number of
conditions that the neighbors would like to see included in whatever legislation is
adopted. 1. They do not have the expertise themselves, and are not sure if the size
of the addition is the minimal size to comply with the Health Department and are
concerned that the size is larger than what really might be required. 2. It has been
suggested that the proposed addition would not increase the occupancy, number of
seats or parking spaces and they would like that incorporated into the legislation as
well. 3.- 4. The understand that Audrey and Jean have been working with the York
Tavern to attain landmark status and that help to assure them that the use proposed
here would be preserved in the future. They would like to subject approval on
landmark status being sought and accepted by the owners. Finally, it is their
understanding that there was an ongoing discussion with the owners to sell the back
portion of the lot to the Forest Preserve District. They strongly support that as well
and ask that something be included in the legislation that would mandate that as part
of any other approvals needed that it be conditioned on the sale of that back piece of
land to the forest preserve district. He thanked everyone for coming up with a very
nice proposal.
Al Savino, President of the Oak Brook Historical Society, said that they are very
interested in preserving the York Tavern because of its historical significance dating
back to 1843 and is one of the oldest structures still standing and in use in DuPage
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 13 of 18 May 15, 2006
t
County. The York Tavern also brings something to Oak Brook that is good and
unique. There is a lot of white tablecloth dining, but there is nothing else like the
York Tavern. Its hamburgers seem to be mystical, it brings in a lot of business
people, college students, and a lot of residents enjoy stopping there to have a
hamburger or sandwich. For these reasons, and those that were stated in their letter,
they urge the Plan Commission to recommend approval of the request.
Richard Allison, 31 Robin Hood Ranch, and Acting President of the Homeowners
Association. He said that Mr. Herman was very eloquent and spoke about most of
the critical issues. He pledged their support as residents in the area of the Moraci's
concept. Last fall when the original proposal was offered to the neighbors, they
contemplated tearing it down and putting up a large masonry structure. In response
to the neighbor's issues with that plan, they were invited to a meeting at the York
Tavern where they listened to the neighbor's opposition and they listened, and came
up with a new footprint. They will be very happy to see the York Tavern built in the
fashion proposed. As a board member in the Fullersburg Woods Area Association,
their prime concern was any deviation from the current zoning for this property. He
would like to see the nonconforming issued codified to some extent should the
Moraci's sell the property in the future and the issue would be revisited as a
potential zoning issue. Most of the residents on York Road with Christ Church
encroaching on Robin Hood Ranch from the north, and York Tavern to the south
would fight a zoning change. They would like to see it approved tonight.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that from his understanding the
Certificate of Appropriateness is very similar to a special use, which sets very
restrictive and specific standards that apply to the use and layout of the property.
Any changes to the approvals would require that the new owner would have to go
back through the process. What you see is what you get relative to the potential
approvals. The applicant, residents and staff have worked hard to work out an
arrangement that satisfies the maintenance of this use while maintaining the integrity
of the zoning. He had advised the applicant when they first came forward to work
out the issues with the neighbors and they have done that.
Samuel Girgis, 506 Wennes Court, said that they appreciate the responsiveness to
the neighbors concerns and questioned how large the addition is going to be and
how large the existing structure is today. Mr. Lucchese responded that the existing
building is almost 1400 square feet, which includes the second floor and does not
include the basement. When the storage to the east and the front entry is removed
but not including the second floor, they end up with 915 square feet. The new
addition is 1168 square feet without the basement and there is no second floor. The
basement duplicates the square footage on the existing as well as the new addition,
both,which is 915 square feet for the existing and 1168 for the new addition.
Mr. Girgis wanted to know if this is the most reasonable size to satisfy the Health
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 14 of 18 May 15, 2006
�3
Department requirements. Mr. Lucchese responded yes; that he has talked to the
Health Department many times, and in their letter, it is stated that the approved plan
meets the minimum requirements. The have met with them and reviewed a number
of different schemes.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that the Village enforces zoning
and building codes but the issue of food service is solely a county function; so we
have to rely upon their expertise. A number of meetings were held with the Health
Department and in fact talked about what would be the minimum and the letter
stands on its own.
Member Wolin said that it was important to address the points addressed by Mr.
Herman.
1. It appears that the proposed size of the addition is what it is.
2. There was a discussion regarding occupancy, which currently is 50 seats.
Fire Chief Bodony responded that occupancy is a blended calculation of
square footage and seating capacity. They really do not have a function for
standing room only for public assembly occupancy due to egress. The
occupancy load for the York Tavern may have been diminished due to its
combustible nature and lack of some fire protection. It can be researched
and allow it on the finished product. Director of Community Development
Kallien said that there are 50 seats there now and we are not adding to the
use.
3. The current parking lot is gravel and it meanders. The new lot will be paved
and will have handicapped parking stalls, which do not currently exist. Mr.
Lucchese noted that the Village code requires 10 spaces per 1000 square feet
and they exceed that. They will have about 36 spaces, which exists today.
4. Attaining landmark status is something Mr. Moraci could be encouraged to
do, but can not require it. They would have to apply for it. Mr. O'Brien
responded that there is not enough time to go through the process before
their June deadline. The building is in the historical district and the owner
gets a credit for doing the remodeling work and would be a larger credit if
the building were actually on the registry, so it is in their best economic
interest to get that done. They intend to maintain the structure as a historical
structure. They also would like more protection for the structure because if
it would be destroyed, under the nonconforming provisions of the ordinance
it could not be rebuilt. However, this is not a zoning hearing and they will
work with staff to work on the possibility of a text amendment to allow
structures completing this process to rebuild. They will not agree to
contribute their property to the forest preserve.
5. To require the owner to sell it to the forest preserve district would be very
complicated. Director of Community Development Kallien said that it the
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 15 of 18 May 15, 2006
. 0 • l3-e_
owner tried to take the piece of property off to sell it to anyone, there is no
way to divide it because it is less than 2 acres and the zoning district in that
area is a 1 acre minimum lot area. The village would create a new
nonconforming issue that would have to be reconciled. There are zoning
issues.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that he reviewed the Gateway
Development Plan requirements and he could not find a case where the petitioner
could not meet the requirements. He was unsure of a few issues related to lighting
that have been clarified by the architect; and as part of the building permit process, it
can be easily reconciled. There are not any outstanding issues relative to the code.
There was a discussion regarding whether the expansion was larger than required.
Contained in the case file is a letter from the DuPage County Health Department
stating that the proposal has been approved and has met their minimum
requirements. It was also noted that any further changes to that approved plan
would require an advance review by the Health Department. Director of Community
Development Kallien said that the Health Department is aware of the intricacies of
providing a minimum expansion. There were several meetings held with them on
the site. If the food items are going to be served as proposed at this location, this
type of facility is required, so we need to rely upon their expertise in this area.
Mr. O'Brien added that the requirements are a legal opinion. The kitchen is just a
part of the expansion there is handicapped bathrooms that need to be provided for as
well as ingress/egress, plus a HVAC system. These are the minimum requirements
by law.
Director of Community Development Kallien added that we not only have had the
input of the applicant's architect, but also the input by the historical architect, the
Oak Brook Historical Society, and Audrey Muschler. There is a sense of scale that
needs to be looked at too; in terms of whether the addition fits in with the overall
scale of the building. .The footprint of the building shows that symmetry has been
provided. It does meet the County requirements and does fit in aesthetically, with
what exists, which is one of the requirements of the Graue Mill Gateway
requirements and it appears that they have satisfied that requirement.
Member Wolin said that in making the recommendation, the Plan Commission
found that:
1. The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present
location. The existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square
feet.
2. Even though the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak
Brook and adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the
subject property is zoned R-2 Single-Family Detached Residence District
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 16 of 18 May 15, 2006
13 J
and is classified as a legal nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
3. Normally, any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary
repairs and alterations, which do not involve an expansion of the
nonconforming nature of the use.
4. However, Section 13-13-2 of the Zoning Ordinance states:
"Ordinary repairs and alterations may be made to a nonconforming building
or structure, provided that no structural alterations shall be made in or to
such building or structure, all of which is designed or intended for a use not
permitted in the district in which it is located, except those required by law,
or except to make the building or structure and use thereof conform to the
regulations of the district in which it is located."
Therefore, the proposed modifications to the building addresses issues raised
by the DuPage County Health Department and to also come into compliance
with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Without
these building improvements, the DuPage County Health Department has
stated in writing that, "they will not have a valid permit to serve food or
beverages and must cease operations."
5. In accordance to Section 13-8-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant has
submitted all documents and information to satisfy the Gateway
Development Plan requirements, which must be included in the application
for a certificate of appropriateness.
6. The plans that have been submitted for this request have been reviewed and
approved by the DuPage County Health Department.
7. The plans have also been reviewed and approved by the Oak Brook
Historical Society as well as the LZT/Filiung Architects, an architectural
firm who has experience in working with historical structures.
8. The proposed interior modifications will include improvements that relate to
the Village's life safety and building codes that enhance the public, health,
safety and welfare of those persons who work and visit the York Tavern
facility.
9. The proposed building elevations and site improvements appear to be
consistent with the Graue Mill Gateway area and historical area that is
adjacent to the York Tavern property.
10. Even though the building will be physically improved, the integrity of the
residential zoning of the area has not been compromised.
Motion by Member Wolin, seconded by Member Saiyed to recommend approval of
the petitioner's request for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the
Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area. This will allow for the issuance of the building
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 17 of 18 May 15, 2006
• •
131
permit to allow the construction that will increase the size of the existing building
approximately 1100 square feet, and to meet the interior and exterior building
alterations as required by the DuPage County Health Department and improvements
to the physical appearance of the site. The recommendation is subject to the
following conditions:
1. Maintain the current policy towards establishing seating capacity of 50
based upon current adopted codes;
2. Parking to be constructed as shown on the existing site plan;
3. The applicant is encouraged to seek landmark status;
4. To be constructed in substantial conformance with the plans submitted and
contained in the case file, including: Foodservice Equipment Plans approved
by the DuPage County Health Department dated April 20, 2006 on page 6;
Proposed building elevations on pages O (concept plan) and R (Sheet A-5,
dated April 17, 2006); Site Plan dated April 17, 2006 on page P (Sheet A-1,
dated April 17, 2006); Landscape Plan page Q; and Floor Plans on page S
(Sheet A-4, dated April 17, 2006).
5. Final Engineering and DuPage County Health Department approval.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 7— Members Adrian, Iyer, Lalmalani, Saiyed, Tropinski, Wolin and
Chairwoman Payovich
Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried.
6. OTHER BUSINESS OTHER
BUSINESS
There was no other business to discuss.
7. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Member Adrian, seconded by Member Saiyed to adjourn the meeting at
10:20 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
Robert Kallien, Director of Community Development
Secretary
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 18 of 18 May 15, 2006
E OF 04,V • •
G
P ego
� o
O y
2
COUNT Date: May 12, 2006
cF '� '\�\
Village of To: Plan Commission
Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director
Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255
Website Subject: Framework for Proposed Recommendation — York Tavern —
www.oak-brook.org Certificate of Appropriateness
Administration
630.990.3000 At the request of the Plan Commission, I have prepared a draft motion
FAX 630.990.0876 (including specific findings) relative to the requested action for the above
Community referenced case.
Development Certificate of Appropriateness If it is your decision to recommend approval,
630.990.3045
FAX 630.990.3985 it would be appropriate to move that the Plan Commission recommends
approval of the request from Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci, who are
Engineering seeking approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill
Department Gateway Area to increase the size of the existing building by approximately
630.990.3010
FAX 630.990.3985 1000 sq.ft., to make interior and exterior building alterations and improvement
to the physical appearance of the site. In making this recommendation, the Plan
Fire Department Commission finds that:
630.990.3040
FAX 630.990.2392 1. The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present
Police Department location. The existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square
630.990.2358 feet.
FAX 630.990.7484 2. Even though the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak
Brook and adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the
Public Works subject property is zoned R-2 Single-Family Detached Residence District
Department
630.990.3044 g noncon g use under 1�
and is classified as a legal nonconforming d Chapter 13 of the
FAX 630.472.0223 Zoning Ordinance.
3. Normally, any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to ordinary
Oak Brook repairs and alterations, which do not involve an expansion of the
Public Library nonconforming nature of the use.
4. However, Section 13-13-2 of the Zoning Ordinance states:
600 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 "Ordinary repairs and alterations may be made to a nonconforming
630.990.2222 building or structure, provided that no structural alterations shall be
FAX 630.990.4509 made in or to such building or structure, all of which is designed or
intended for a use not permitted in the district in which it is located,
Oak Brook Sports Core except those required by law, or except to make the building or structure
Bath&Tennis Club and use thereof conform to the regulations of the district in which it is
700 Oak Brook Road located."
Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 Therefore, the proposed modifications to the building address issues raised
630.990.3020 by the DuPage County Health Department and to also come into
FAX 630.990.1002
compliance with the requirements of the American Disabilities Act (ADA).
Golf Club Without these building improvements, the DuPage County Health
2606 York Road Department has stated in writing that, "they will not have a valid permit to
Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 serve food or beverages and must cease operations."
630.990.3032
FAX 630.990.0245
/07
May 12, 2006
Plan Commission
RE: York Tavern
Page 2
5. In accordance to Section 13-8-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant has
submitted all documents and information to satisfy the Gateway
Development Plan requirements, which must be included in the application
for a certificate of appropriateness.
6. The plans that have been submitted for this request have been reviewed and
approved by the DuPage County Health Department.
7. The plans have also been reviewed and approved by the Oak Brook
Historical Society as well the LZT/Filliung Architects, an architectural firm
who has experience in working with historical structures.
8. The proposed interior modifications will include improvements that relate to
the Village's life safety and building codes that enhance the public, health,
safety and welfare of those persons who work and visit the York Tavern
facility.
9. The proposed building elevations and site improvements appear to be
consistent with the Graue Mill Gateway area and historical area that is
adjacent to the York Tavern property.
10. Finally, even though the building will be physically improved, the integrity
of the residential zoning of the area has not been compromised.
Certificate of Appropriateness If it is your decision to recommend denial, it
would be appropriate to move that the Plan Commission recommend denial of
the request from Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci, who are seeking approval
of a Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area to
increase the size of the existing building by approximately 1000 sq.ft., to make
interior and exterior building alterations and improvement of the physical
appearance of the site. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission
finds that:
1. One or more of the items listed above (you would need to list) have not been
met and therefore the applicant's request for a certificate of appropriateness
cannot be approved.
PC-York Tavem-Cert Appr-FINDINGS.doc
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Plan Commission
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 10, 2006
CASE NO: 2006-009-ZO-APP
DESCRIPTION: Certificate of Appropriateness—Expansion of York Tavern
PETITIONER: Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci
4 York Court
Oak Brook, IL 60523
LOCATION: South of Oak Brook Road, west of Rte. 83
ADDRESS: 3702 York Road (York Tavern)
ACREAGE: 1.7 acres
EXISTING ZONING: R-2, Single-Family Detached Residence District improved. with the York
Tavern. Subject property is also located within the Historic Graue Mill
Gateway Area(Section 13-8-1) of the Zoning Ordinance.
ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY:
North: R-2 Single Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes.
South: CR Conservation/Recreation District, Graue Mill and Open space.
East: R-2 Single Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes.
Subdivision.
West: CR Conservation/Recreation District, Open space — Fullersburg Woods Forest
Preserve.
DISCUSSION: Vito, Marianna and Pasquale Moreci, the owners of the York Tavern located at
3702 York Road have submitted an application for a building permit as well as
an application and all required supporting documents seeking approval of a
Certificate of Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area in
order to modify the existing building by adding approximately 1000 sq.ft. and
making interior modifications to address issues raised by the DuPage County
Health Department and to come into compliance with the requirements of the
American Disabilities Act (ADA).
The York Tavern structure has existed since the mid 1840's at its present
location. The existing building encompasses approximately 1055 square feet.
Because the tavern use has existed prior to the incorporation of Oak Brook and
adoption of the current zoning provisions for the property, the subject property
is classified as a legal nonconforming use under Chapter 13 of the Zoning
STAFF REPORT-CERTIFICATE PROPRIATENESS
MoRECI-YORK TAVERN-3306 YORK ROAD
CASE No.2006-009-APP
Ordinance. Normally, any modification to a nonconforming use is limited to
ordinary repairs and alterations, which do not involve an expansion of the
nonconforming nature of the use. However, in Section 13-13-2;
A. Repairs And Alterations: Ordinary repairs and alterations may be made
to a nonconforming building or structure, provided that no structural
alterations shall be made in or to such building or structure, all of
which is designed or intended for a use not permitted in the district in
which it is located, except those required by law, or except to make the
building or structure and use thereof conform to the regulations of the
district in which it is located.
As such, the proposed building alterations and addition is in response to issues
raised by other governmental entities, specifically DuPage County Health
Department and the State of Illinois American Disabilities Act(ADA).
Certificate of Appropriateness
Because of the Tavern's location within the Gateway Area, no modifications to
the exterior of the building can occur without satisfying all requirements of the
Historic Graue Gateway Area provisions, which then qualifies the project for
approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness.
Citing the Zoning Ordinance, Section 13-8-6 (A and B) states;
A. Required: No building permit or other permit otherwise required under
the ordinances of the Village for the erection, construction, exterior
alteration or repair of any building or structure in the Historic Graue
Mill Gateway Area shall be issued by the Director of Community
Development except upon the issuance of a certificate of
appropriateness by the President and Board of Trustees. Such
certificate of appropriateness may only be issued after a public hearing
has been held before the Plan Commission of the Village in accordance
with the public hearing procedures set forth herein and after the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village approve the gateway
development plan for the property involved.
B. Application And Hearing: Upon the filing of an application for a
building permit for which a certificate of appropriateness is or may be
required, the applicant shall concurrently file with the Village Clerk an
application for a certificate of appropriateness, which application shall
include all the information and material required pursuant to Sections
13-8-7 and 13-8-8 of this Chapter. Such application shall be referred to
the plan commission by the president and board of trustees upon
verification of the completeness of said application. The fact that an
2
STAFF REPORT-CERTIFICATE WPROPRIATENESS
MoRECI-YORK TAVERN-3306 YORK ROAD
CASE No.2006-009-APP
application for a certificate of appropriateness has been filed shall not
be cause for the director of community development to delay the
review of plans relating to the building and zoning aspects of the
project while said application is pending. The plan commission shall
thereupon fix a reasonable time, within forty-five (45) days, for a
hearing and give a written five (5) day notice thereof to the applicant.
Upon such hearing the commission shall consider the application for a
certificate of appropriateness and, if necessary, receive additional
evidence (such as exterior elevation renderings) from the applicant or
his agent or attorney and from the village personnel or other persons as
to whether the external architectural features of the proposed building
or structure comply with the provisions of this chapter. All testimony
given at such hearing shall be under oath."
Gateway Development Plan
In accordance to Section 13-8-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, a Gateway
Development Plan must be included in the application for a certificate of
appropriateness, which demonstrates how the proposed project is consistent
with the historic area. Specific details that must be provided are listed in the
following. For the benefit of the Commission, I have provided staff comments
relative to whether the applicant satisfies each of the requirements (Y), fails to
satisfy a requirement (1) or is unsure(U).
A. Relationship of Proposed Building to Site and Adjoining Area:
1. Setbacks in excess of zoning ordinance.
2. Treatment of parking areas to screen from view.
3. Underground installation of utilities.
Staff Comments — See colored site plan. The applicant proposes; the building
expansion be located outside of the 100-ft. setback area along York Road (Y),
the parking areas are extensively landscaped (Y), and the utilities along York
will be buried(Y).
B. Building Design:
1. Quality of the design, relationship to Graue Mill and historic
period.
2. Compatibility of design and materials with intent of area.
3. Screening of mechanical equipment and other facilities from public
view.
4. Harmony of lighting, fixtures and standards with building design.
Staff Comments — See supplemental information and letter from LZT/Fillung
Architects. The applicant proposes; the addition to the Tavern is in keeping
with the existing historic design of the existing building (Y), the design and
3
STAFF REPORT-CERTIFICATE eXPROPRIATENESS
MoRECI—YORK TAVERN—3306 YORK RoAD
CASE No.2006-009-APP
materials used are consistent with the area (Y), the roof mechanicals and
dumpster will be screened from view (Y), harmony of lighting with building
design (U).
C. Street Hardware:
1. Street hardware located on private property and designed to be part
of architectural concept.
2. Wall and ground signs shall be part of the architectural concept.
Staff Comments — See supplemental information. The applicant proposes;
street hardware on private property, which is in keeping with the architectural
concept (Y), and wall/ground signs are in keeping with architectural concept
(Y).
D. Landscape Design Considerations:
1. Compatibility of the design and size of landscaping.
2. Preservation, protection and development of existing topographic
patterns and plant materials.
3. Placement of trees in parkway or paved areas.
4. Method of screening of service yards.
5. Enhancement of parking areas with landscaping.
6. Use of unobtrusive exterior lighting.
7. Use of landscape materials and lighting with low maintenance.
Staff Comments — See colored site plan and supplemental information. The
applicant proposes; compatible landscaping (Y), preservation of existing plant
materials (Y), placement of trees and vegetation around parking areas (Y),
screening of the dumpster (Y), significant enhancement of landscaping on site
(Y), use of unobtrusive exterior lighting (U), use of landscaping and lighting
with low maintenance (U).
E. Landscape Plan:
1. Location of existing plant material to remain/be removed.
2. Designation of parkway trees and protection of trees to be
preserved.
3. List of scientific and common names of proposed landscaping.
4. Landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect or
qualified nurseryman.
Staff Comments — See colored site plan. The applicant proposes; location of
plant material to remain/be removed (Y), designation of parkway trees and
protection of trees to be preserved (U), list of scientific and common names
(Y), and landscape plan shall be prepared by landscape architect or qualified
nurseryman(U).
4
if 4-
STAFF REPORT-CERTIFICATE PPROPRIATENESS
MoRECI-YORK TAVERN-3306 YORK RoAD
CASE No.2006-009-APP
F. Site Plan;
1. Location of buildings on site.
2. Location of drives, walks,parking areas,parking layout, etc.
3. Building elevations showing all sides and materials used.
4. Existing grades.
5. Location of utilities.
Staff Comments — See color site plan. The applicant proposes; location of all
buildings (Y), location of all site improvements (Y), building elevations (Y),
existing grades (U), location of utilities (Y).
In addition to the above listed requirements that are to be addressed in the
Gateway Development Plan, Section 13-8-8 requires that the applicant set
aside a sum of money equal to not less than five (5) percent of the total project
construction cost for the purchase and installation of mature vegetation. The
Village Board can waive this requirement if certain conditions are found to
exist on the property.
For further information and technical information relating to the project,please
see letters in the case file from the DuPage County Health Department (June 7,
2005, February 27, 2006 and May 2, 2006), the Oak Brook Historical Society
(May 6, 2006), and LZT/Filliung Architects (April 11, 2006)
RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES:
Prior to making its decision, the Plan Commission may make
recommendations to the applicant as to changes in the exterior drawings,
sketches, landscaping, site plans and materials which in the judgment of the
commission would tend to affect the general purposes of the Historic Graue
Mill Gateway Area requirements. The Commission shall make its decision
within fifteen (15) days after the hearing is closed and shall issue to the
President and Board of Trustees its findings and recommendation concerning
the proposed gateway development plan. If the Plan Commission recommends
denial of a gateway development plan it shall specifically point out such
deficiency in its findings.
The Village President and Board of Trustees may approve or disapprove the
proposed gateway development plan or refer the matter back to the Plan
Commission for further consideration. Upon approval of any proposed
gateway development plan, the President and Board of Trustees shall issue a
certificate of appropriateness as to the approved gateway development plan.
5
r
f
STAFF REPORT-CERTIFICATE PPROPRIATENESS is
MoREcI-YORK TAVERN-3306 YORK RoAD
CASE No.2006-009-APP
CONCLUSION: If the Commission is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the
requirements for a certificate of appropriateness in the Historic Graue Gateway
Area, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request. Because
Staff is not sure that all items required for the gateway plan have been
provided by the applicant, any recommendation should be subject to the
condition that all such items be addressed.
As such, the following conditions might be appropriate for inclusion in the
recommendation:
• The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as
submitted and meet the requirements of the Building and Stormwater
Regulations of the Village.
• Final Engineering approval.
• All items required for the gateway plan identified by Staff shall be
addressed prior to action by the Village Board.
Respectfully Submitted,
Robert L. Ka en Jr. CP
Director of CbnrVulnity Development
6
.,a X90
0 oe
o o
v
F0OU1471
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Interoffice Memorandum
DATE: May 11, 2006
TO: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development
FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr.,P.E., Village Engineer
SUBJECT: York Tavern
After we discussed the potential detention requirement for this site this morning, I reviewed Title
9 of the Village Code concerning detention. Section 9-5-1B3 states:
B. All developments, with consideration given to those developments noted in subsection
C of this section, shall comply with the site runoff storage requirements provided in
section 9-5-4 of this chapter in which:
3. The parcels being developed total one acre or greater for multiple-family (more
than 2 dwelling units) or nonresidential developments and the new development
totals either individually or in the aggregate after February 15, 1992, to more than
twenty five thousand(25,000) square feet;
It appears that as long as the development area is less than 25,000 square feet, detention is not
required on this existing developed site. If the development area is more that 25,000 square feet,
detention is required.
As always, if detention is required, the applicant could seek a variation depending upon its
particular characteristics and hardships.
York Tavem detention.doc /0.
®5/11/2006 10:05 6309337686 DUPAGE FOREST 6ER PAGE 02
Forest Preserve District of DuPage County
.. 3 S.580 Naperville Road Wheaton, IL 60187-8761 630.933.7200 Fax 630.933.7204 TTY 800.526.0857
VIA FACSIMILE and REGULAR MAIL
May 11, 2006
Robert Kallien
Director of Community Development
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255
Re: Public Hearing Notice on York Tavern Property
Dear Mr. Kallien:
The Forest Preserve District of DuPage County recently received not of a proposed
project on the York Tavern property located at 3702 York Road. We appreciate receiving timely
notification of such projects that may have an impact on our adjacent property, and thank you
for the opportunity to comment.
District Staff has reviewed the public hearing notice and the proposed project, and does
not have any comments at this time. We hope you will allow us the opportunity to review and
comment on any major revisions that may be proposed as this project moves.forward.
Please call me at 933-7684 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Marcia Thomas
Land Acquisition Specialist
cc: Karen Zilly, Director of Land Preservation
Mailing Address: P.O.'l3ox 5000 Wheaton, IL 60189-5000 www.dupagdoresttom.
MR -
� m�
O A K B R O O K H I S T O R I CAL SO C I E T Y
P.O. BOX 3821 • OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60522
May 6,2006
Mr. Robert L. Kallien Jr.,A.I.C.P.
Village of Oak Brook Dept. of Community Development
1212 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2203
RE: York Tavern Petition
Dear Mr. Kallien:
Kindly add this letter to the file for the York Tavern's request for a certificate of
appropriateness.
The Oak Brook Historical Society would very much like to see the York Tavern
preserved, and we feel that best way for this to happen is for the current owners to be able
to expand it to accommodate the necessary bathroom and kitchen facilities. In meetings
with the current owners,we find that they are welling to restore the current building to
much its original exterior design. And working with a historic architect,they have
developed a plan for the new addition that is both handsome and compatible with the
current building.
The Tavern is one of the oldest, if not the oldest, structure in Oak Brook dating back to
1843. What a shame it would be to lose it. We all have fond memories of some buildings
and businesses that are now gone. What fun and unique places the Saddle Club and
Andy's Steak House where. They played important roles in the early formation of this
Village and its character. Let's not lose another icon in the York Tavern. Keeping it by
permitting the expansion retains it and permits it to exist. Denying the expansion possibly
condemns it to destruction.
The Society thanks the commissioners and trustees for their diligent work and thoughtful
consideration and we look forward to a positive conclusion for the requested expansion.
Sincerely,
Alfred P. Savino
President
• Dufige County Health Depa tent
Central Office
111 North County Farm Road
Wheaton,IL 60187-3988
Telephone: (630)682-7400 Fag: (630)462-9463 Review
#
www.dupagehealth.org #
May 2, 2006
County Tracking
TO#
Pasquale Moreci
487 Spring Road CORRECTED COPY
Elmhurst, IL 60126
Dear Pasquale:
PLAN APPROVAL FOR: York Tavern located at 3702 S. York Road, Oak Brook, IL
The plans dated April 20, 2006, for the above food service facility have been reviewed and
approved and has met the minimum standards of this Department.
The following inspections are required:
• Underground plumbing installations
(as it pertains to the food service equipment).
• Pre-final inspection.
Without approval from the DuPage County Health Department, food and drystock
cannot be received into the establishment.
• Final inspection.
The establishment must also receive the final inspection prior to opening. A
certificate of occupancy can then be obtained through the municipality.
Allow 72 hours advance notice to be given when scheduling each inspection. Any further
changes to the plans or the plan review form must receive advance approval. If you have
additional questions and/or to schedule inspection(s), please contact me at 630-682-7979,
extension 7197.
Sincerely, qq
ara Burton-Zick, R.S.
Senior Plan Review and Construction Coordinator
Environmental Health Services
SBZ:gc
Enclosure:
cc: Don Hastings, Village of Oak Brook, Building Department
Bryan Lee, Area Sanitarian, East Public Health Center
Sue Kowalczyk, Food Program Manager, DuPage County Health Department
Mike Perinna, Edward Don Co.
Frank Lucchese, 512 W. Van Buren, Elmhurst, IL 60126
"We promote health,prevent illness, and provide quality service"
PGE of OA4.e
`' 90
" o
e _ �
o y
� o
A t1
9CFOOUN7I
Village of
Oak Brook April 25, 2006
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255
Website Dear Resident:
www.oak-brook.org
Administration The Oak Brook Plan Commission and the Village Board will be considering the Issuance
630.990.3000 of a Certificate of Appropriateness at the meetings scheduled on the back of this notice.
FAX 630.990.0876
The application has been filed by: Vito,Marianna and Pasquale Moreci
Community
Development 4 York Lake Court
630.990.3045 Oak Brook, Illinois
FAX 630.990.3985
The property in question is located at: 3702 York Road
Engineering
a
Deprtment
Dep 0.3010 Relationship of applicant to property: Owner
FAX 630.990.3985
The property may be generally described as 3702 York Road, Oak Brook, Illinois,
Fire Department 60523, commonly known as the York Tavern
630.990.3040 Also shown on the reverse side of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you in
FAX 630.990.2392
determining your relationship to the property in question.
Police Department
630.990.2358 The request,which has been made, is as follows:
FAX 630.990.7484
The petitioner is seeking approval for the Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness
Public Works under Section 13-8-6 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit an addition to the York
Department
630.990.3044 Tavern in compliance with the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area. The addition is to
FAX 630.472.0223 allow the expansion of the kitchen in the Tavern to meet the current minimum health
requirements and to allow the structure to be in compliance with the requirements of the
Oak Brook American with Disabilities Act("ADA").
Public Library
If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development
600 Oak Brook Road Department at 630-990-3045 to review the file on this application.
Oak Brook, IL 60523-2200
630.990.2222
FAX 630.990.4509 Sincerely,
Oak Brook Sports Core
Bath&Tennis Club Robert L. Kal en, Jr CP
700 Oak Brook Road Director of Community Development
Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600
630.990.3020 RLK/gp
FAX 630.990.1002
Golf Club
2606 York Road
Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602
630.990.3032
FAX 630.990.0245
In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a
reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting
should contact Jeffrey Moline, the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible
before the meeting date.
All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, Butler
Government Center located on Oak Brook Road(31 st Street) and Spring Road, Oak Brook,Illinois.
Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Monday, May 15, 2006
Board of Trustees Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,May 23,2006**
** Tentative
31 st OAK BROOK ROAD — —
� ! 411
Sol a 215
F4LLtR�W R4 C M RIe T
Weoos 311 '3113 Z19 117 11! 107
LNYRCM •114 ,0- Sid
91113 9121
3$o1 322
>tso7 3>ie! I
. � 311s 3113 I
1114 No 114 1M_ 1 114 1e4
at 21' C6 T RISCHR 1N
asei 33oa 401 I 313 30S Its
Flew 11.111 9a11 I slob
Weep ` 4 1 331S3317
t i
G 3 1 9321
-- 34
5411
so
3413 _ o Z 4 4 .0
L I 11 S er. a
I _ vtt i i � ssae I gyp{ 1 S 7
is 20 it JJ 31f1:} it
MY f1K1 N I I lSbi BJIi
3H! M1 1 R�o 1 0 li
3!0 ills 1
Ml�ee
1
L�MpIVS 1
3ie9 4
. s snarl i 1 ro
3617 3>br 3a1S' S61i 52'l soy '"., Ir
1�� wsNnu you 1 � 6 7
3111 4141Li lGt3 311
S763 16 71; 710 701 i22 `•
370! •MAD•f7a1. 37N ;711 rle - �`O
'A3 7o1 ! !1; W10 11 v0GP ��CO
lTla 3715 e 0` QTR
QRO
6peD s1
lust 1 .L
1 sal sl s� � O I I
�In ��
31 '901
O \\.
v
*Note: The map provided is only an a roximation of the area in question ano ?intended to be used only as a visual aid to
determine your relationship to the prop •
York Tavern-Certif Appropriateness-2006 RES.Ltr.doc
LEGAL NOTICE • • / VAN
NOTICE a HEREBY
GIVEN that a public hear-
ing before the Plan Commis
Con ti the V)ois, of Oak
be CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION
Brook, DuPage and Cook
Counties, Illinois, will be
held on May 15,2006,of 7:30
p.m. in the Oak Brook Vil-
lage Hall, 1200 Oak Brook
Road Brook, Illinois Paddock Publications, Inc.
60523 for the purpose of con-
sidering the application of
Vito, Marianna and Pas-
quale Moreci, 4 York Lake
Court, Oak Brook, Illinois, Daily Hea for a Certificate of Appropri-
s as provided for under
under Title 13 of the Zoning
Ordinance of the Village of
Oak Brook, Illinois, Ordi-
nance G-60 as amended.
The petitioner is seeking
the issuance of a Certificate
of Appropriateness under
Section 13-8.6 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to Per-
mit an addition to the York
the ern Hl in compl ogee with the organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois,
Gateway Area.The addition DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD.
i5 t0 ay the expansion he addition
Of
the kitchen in the Tavern to
meet the current minimum
health requirements and to That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the
allow the structure to be in
compliance of the American with the re-
quiremenis Village(s) of Addison, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Glendale Heights, Glen Ellyn,
with Disabilities Act
("ADAM.
The property may be Itasca, Keeneyville, Lisle, Lombard, Medinah, Naperville, Oak Brook, Oakbrook Terrace,erally described as 3702 3702
York Road,Oak Brook, Illi-
nois, 60523, commonly Roselle, Villa Park, Warrenville, West Chicago, Wheaton, Winfield, Wood Dale
known as the York Tavern
and the legal description is
as follows:
LOT 5 IN WENNES SUB-
DIVISION OF PART OF
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SEC-
TION 36, TOWNSHIP 39
NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST
OF THE THIRD PRINCI-
PAL MERIDIAN, AC-
County(ies) of DuPage
CORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 21, 1962. AS and State of Illinois, continuously for more than one year prior to the date of the first
DOCUMENT 33493, IN DU
PAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.
Permanent Index Number.
06-36-402-001: publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said
All persons desiring to be
heard will be afforded an Villages) County(les) and State.
Portunity to do so and maay y jj l 1, \ 1
submit their statements
orally or in writing or both.
The hearing may be re-
cessed fa time her date"Place I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an Act to revise
Lice of time and place
thereof is publicly an-
nounced at the hearing or is
given by newspaper publi- the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715,
cation not;ess than five(5)
days Prior to the date of the
recessed hearing.
In accord with the provi-
Act 5, Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, was
sions of the American with
vi ' hse d
wo in indi-
vidual f published April 25, 2006 in said DAILY HERALD.
reasonable accommodation
in order to participate in or
benefit from attendance at
this public meeting should
contact Jeffrey Moline,the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATI Inc.,
Village's ADA Coordinator,
at 630-990.5738 as soon as
Possible before the meeting has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent,- at Arlington Heights,
date.
The petitioner's applica-
tion is on file with the Village Illinois.
Published in Daily Herald
April 25,2006
(3727131)S -
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC.
DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS
BY c/C
Authorized Agent
Control # T3727131
I
• LAW OFFICES OF •
O'BRIEN &.ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1900 SPRING ROAD,SUITE 501
OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523
TELEPHONE
(630)832-6000
FASCIMLIE
(630)684-0243
E-MAIL
OBRIENLAWCDMSN.COM
April 25, 2006
To: Neighbors of the York Tavern
You have probably heard that our client has been required by the DuPage County Health
Department to remodel or the York Tavern will be shut down on June 7, 2006. We have been working
with the Village and the Oak Brook Historical Society on a plan to preserve this structure, continue the
business and comply with all of the various governmental regulations involved with this project.
As promised in our last meeting, our client wishes to be a good neighbor and keep you
informed as to his intentions regarding the future of this property. He has retained the services of a
historical architect, Mr. Terry Russell, to consult with the building architect, Mr. Frank Lucchese, who
you met at our last meeting. Mr. Lucchese has prepared a set of plans for the expansion of the existing
structure, which has been required by the Health Department and approved by them. These plans will
be reviewed by the Oak Brook Plan Commission and they will make a recommendation to the Village
Board as to whether or not this project should be granted a Certificate of Appropriateness for
construction within the confines of the Graue Mill Historical District.
Our client would like to invite you to a ain meet with him and his architect at the York
Tap on Sunday, May 7, 2006 at 11.:00 A. M. to 20 over, in detail, his plans for the remodellna of
the York Tavern.
We hope you can attend.
Very truly yours,
O'Brien &Associates, P.C.
By:
Walter J. O'Brien II
3.
Ms. Alice Song and Julia
11868 Westminister Ct
Loma Linda CA 92354-4175
Richard Allison, President
Robinwood Ranch Association
31 Robin Hood Ranch
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
OWNER OF RECORD
523 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
OWNER OF RECORD
522 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Ali Nili or OWNER OF RECORD
511 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
i
Mr. Charlie Zhang or OWNER OF RECORD
425 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. Wayne Hummer or OWNER OF RECORD
419 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. Laurence Herman or OWNER OF RECORD
413 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Girgis
506 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Litvay Family Trust or OWNER OF RECORD
3622 York Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
3%A-.
Mw. Dorothy Retzel or OWNER OF RECORD
3610 York Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Gary Shorter or OWNER OF RECORD
314 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. David Esczarraz or OWNER OF RECORD
316 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Bulin or OWNER OF RECORD
320 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. James Svoboda or OWNER OF RECORD
402 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Edward Cladek or OWNER OF RECORD
408 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. Gary Kroncin or OWNER OF RECORD
418 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Peterson or OWNER OF RECORD
412 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
3.b ,
PGA OF 0A1 e9
v 0
ML AM
e - �
9
v
CF COU TV,��•.
AGENDA ITEM
Regular Board of Trustees Meeting
of
April 25, 2006
SUBJECT: Referral - York Tavern- 3702 York Road—Certificate of Appropriateness—
Historic Graue Gateway Area
FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director
BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer this request for a Certificate of Appropriateness
in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area to the Plan Commission at its May 15, 2006 meeting.
Background/History:
Mr. Vito Moreci, the owner of the York Tavern located at 3702 York Road has submitted an
application and required supporting documents seeking approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area in order to modify the existing
building to address issues raised by the DuPage County Health Department.
Citing the Zoning Ordinance, Section 13-8-6: Certificate of Appropriateness states;
"A. Required: No building permit or other permit otherwise required
under the ordinances of the Village for the erection, construction,
exterior alteration or repair of any building or structure in the Historic
Graue Mill Gateway Area shall be issued by the Director of
Community Development except upon the issuance of a certificate of
appropriateness by the President and Board of Trustees. Such
certificate of appropriateness may only be issued after a public hearing
has been held before the Plan Commission of the Village in
accordance with the public hearing procedures set forth herein and
after the President and Board of Trustees of the Village approve the
gateway development plan for the property involved.
Last saved by Wallien J:\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-York Tavern-Certificate of appropriateness.doc ��/�,�
Last printed 4/20/2006 4:12 PM ✓
• •
B. Application And Hearing: Upon the filing of an application for a
building permit for which a certificate of appropriateness is or may be
required, the applicant shall concurrently file with the Village Clerk an
application for a certificate of appropriateness, which application shall
include all the information and material required pursuant to Sections
13-8-7 and 13-8-8 of this Chapter. Such application shall be referred to
the plan commission by the president and board of trustees upon
verification of the completeness of said application. The fact that an
application for a certificate of appropriateness has been filed shall not
be cause for the director of community development to delay the
review of plans relating to the building and zoning aspects of the
project while said application is pending. The plan commission shall
thereupon fix a reasonable time, within forty five (45) days, for a
hearing and give a written five (5) day notice thereof to the applicant.
Upon such hearing the commission shall consider the application for a
certificate of appropriateness and, if necessary, receive additional
evidence (such as exterior elevation renderings) from the applicant or
his agent or attorney and from the village personnel or other persons as
to whether the external architectural features of the proposed building
or structure comply with the provisions of this chapter. All testimony
given at such hearing shall be under oath."
Recommendation:
Please refer this request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Plan Commission for public
hearing at its May 15, 2006 meeting.
Last saved by RKallien J:\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-York Tavern-Certificate of appropriateness.doc
Last printed 4/20/2006 4:12 PM
• •
13-8-6: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. Required: No building permit or other permit otherwise required under the ordinances of the
Village for the erection, construction, exterior alteration or repair of any building or structure
in the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area shall be issued by the Director of Community
Development except upon the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness by the President
and Board of Trustees. Such certificate of appropriateness may only be issued after a public
hearing has been held before the Plan Commission of the Village in accordance with the
public hearing procedures set forth herein and after the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village approve the gateway development plan for the property involved.
B. Application And Hearing: Upon the filing of an application for a building permit for which a
certificate of appropriateness is or may be required, the applicant shall concurrently file with
the Village Clerk an application for a certificate of appropriateness, which application shall
include all the information and material required pursuant to Sections 13-8-7 and 13-8-8 of
this Chapter. Such application shall be referred to the plan commission by the president and
board of trustees upon verification of the completeness of said application. The fact that an
application for a certificate of appropriateness has been filed shall not be cause for the
director of community development to delay the review of plans relating to the building and
zoning aspects of the project while said application is pending. The plan commission shall
thereupon fix a reasonable time, within forty five(45) days, for a hearing and give a written
five (5) day notice thereof to the applicant. Upon such hearing the commission shall consider
the application for a certificate of appropriateness and, if necessary, receive additional
evidence (such as exterior elevation renderings) from the applicant or his agent or attorney
and from the village personnel or other persons as to whether the external architectural
features of the proposed building or structure comply with the provisions of this chapter. All
testimony given at such hearing shall be under oath. (Ord. G-272, § 1, 11-11-1980)
13-8-7: GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
The gateway development plan must be appropriate to the development of the area consistent
with its historic character and shall provide detailed information in regards to the following:
A. Relationship Of Proposed Buildings Or Structures To Site And Adjoining Area: The site
shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape, and to provide for
adequate planting,pedestrian movement, and parking areas, and shall be evaluated pursuant
to the following criteria:
1. The provision, where practical, of setbacks in excess of zoning restrictions to provide an
interesting relationship between buildings;
2. The treatment of parking areas with decorative elements,building wall extensions,
plantings,berms or other innovative means so as to screen parking from view;
3. The underground installation of newly installed utility services, and service revisions
necessitated by exterior alterations.
B. Building Design: Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the following
criteria:
1. The quality of the design and its relationship to the Graue Mill, its site, and the historic
period it represents;
2. The compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials of the proposed
buildings or structures with the intent and purpose of the area;
3. The screening and location of mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof,
ground, or buildings from public view with materials harmonious to the building, so as not
to be visible from any public ways;
4. The unobtrusiveness and harmoniousness of exterior lighting and the compatibility of
fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories with the building design.
C. Street Hardware And Signs: See chapter 11 of this title.
D. Landscaping Design Considerations: Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance
architectural features and provide shade and screening, and shall be evaluated pursuant to the
following criteria:
1. The compatibility of the design and size of all landscaping effects with the building or
structure and adjacent areas;
2. The preservation, protection and development of existing topographic patterns and plant
materials which contribute to the beauty and utility of a development;
3. Where building sites limit plantings, the placement of trees in the parkway or paved areas.
Parkway trees shall be of a minimum three inch(3") caliper. Buildings of three (3) stories or
more shall have parkway and front and/or side yard trees of a minimum of five inch(5")
caliper;
4. The method of screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly,by
fencing,plantings, or a combination of these. Screening shall be equally effective in all
seasons and may be accomplished by use of any combination of walls, fencing or plantings;
5. The enhancement of parking areas and traffic ways with landscaped spaces containing
trees and tree groupings and low shrubs or ground cover;
1 �•
6. The use of unobstrusive exterior lighting to enhance the landscaping;
7. The use of landscaping materials and lighting which have low demand for annual
maintenance.
E. Landscape Plan: A detailed landscape plan shall show:
1. Location of existing plant materials to remain and those to be removed;
2. Designation of parkway"street trees". Existing parkway trees shall be preserved and
protected during construction;
3. Scientific (genus-species) and common names of proposed landscape material and
proposed quantities and sizes of same;
4. Landscape materials other than plant materials shall be designated in detail.
The landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect or qualified nurseryman in
accordance with the criteria set forth in subsection D of this section. The plan shall be signed
and dated by the designer.
F. Site Plan: A detailed site plan shall show:
1. Exact location of the building(s) or structure(s) on the site;
2. Exact location of drives, walks,parking areas,parking layout, freestanding or retaining
walls, fences, and drainage accommodations;
3. Elevations showing all sides of the proposed structure. Elevations should indicate the type
of materials to be used on the structure as well as their proportions;
4. Existing grades or topographic details to be retained and proposed grading;
5. Location of utilities. (Ord. G-272, 11-11-1980; Ord. G-695, 3-26-2002)
13-8-8: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF GATEWAY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
In addition to the information required pursuant to subsection 13-8-7F of this chapter, the
following requirements must be met prior to the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness:
A. Visual Environment: In order to ensure an adequate and pleasant natural environment, a sum
of money equal to not less than five percent(5%) of the total project construction cost, as set
forth on the approved building permits, shall be budgeted and used by the owners and
developers to purchase and install mature sized trees, shrubbery, grass and other suitable
landscaping upon the grounds,which budgeted amount shall be expended to comply with the
v�
provisions of subsections 13-8-7D and E of this chapter. The president and board of trustees
may vary from or waive the requirement for such expenditure where such expenditure would
cause a hardship on the applicant. Hardship, for purposes of this chapter shall include,but
not be limited to, the following situations:
1. Irregular shaped lots where landscaping is not practical;
2. Lots with minimal frontage;
3. Development does not cause any visual impact; e.g., development to the rear of a lot or
building; and
4. Those instances where there is an abundance of existing natural vegetation precluding the
necessity for further landscaping treatment.
B. Public Utilities: All utility lines, including,but not limited to, telephone and electric, in the
right of way adjacent to and in the development property shall be placed underground.
Underground utility lines shall be placed within easements or dedicated public ways in a
manner which will not conflict with other underground services. All transformer boxes and
service posts shall be located so as not to be unsightly or hazardous. (Ord. G-272,
11-11-1980)
13-8-9: ACTION BY GOVERNMENTAL BODIES:
A. Plan Commission: Prior to making its decision the commission may make recommendations
to the applicant as to changes in the exterior drawings, sketches, landscaping, site plans and
materials which in the judgment of the commission would tend to effect the general
purposes of this chapter. The commission shall make its decision within fifteen(15) days
after the hearing is closed and shall issue to the president and board of trustees its findings
and recommendation concerning the proposed gateway development plan. If the plan
commission recommends denial of a gateway development plan it shall specifically point out
such deficiency in its findings.
B. Corporate Authorities: The village president and board of trustees may approve or
disapprove the proposed gateway development plan or refer the matter back to the plan
commission for further consideration. Upon approval of any proposed gateway development
plan the president and board of trustees shall issue a certificate of appropriateness as to the
approved gateway development plan. (Ord. G-272, 11-11-1980)
13-8-10: IMPLEMENTATION OF GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
Upon granting of a certificate of appropriateness,the gateway development plan, including the
exterior drawings, sketches, landscape and site plans, renderings and materials upon which said
Ac .
• •
certificate was granted, shall be referred to the director of community development,whose
responsibility it shall be to determine, from time to time as the project is in progress and upon its
completion, that there have been no unauthorized deviations from the gateway development plan
upon which the granting of the certificate of appropriateness was based. (Ord. G-272,
11-11-1980)
13-8-11: EXCEPTIONS TO PLAN PROCEDURES:
The requirements of this chapter for submission and approval of a gateway development plan and
the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall not be applicable to:
A. Renovation, restoration and preservation of structures designated by the president and board
of trustees as historically or culturally significant;
B. Ordinary repairs or interior renovations;
C. Renovations or additions to existing single-family detached residential buildings or
structures accessory thereto. (Ord. G-272, 11-11-1980)
1��
t)P Oq � xrl § alE! ais��"kEp �Slr " 'g
! , u
314T bP E !P
ge
9�eR00K``•y I!E i x ; �� r6
PETITION APPLICATION for
PUBLIC HEARING
ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750)
❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750)
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ($500) STORMWATER: ❑ VARIATION ($750)
PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) ® - Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel
Mai.
APPLICANT TO COMPLETES ,3 "Itu d I f fi l. .
3
' .�- i, .x• �,,, d,� ,nip ._.,,: ! 'zr „
LOCATION OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY 310a YDrzk KU&N PERMANENT PARCEL NO*.Qb .-,Sle -
LOT NO, SUBDIVISION 6--r LEGAL ADDRESS' -2 149
ZONING DISTRICT -Z- ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13 -S-7 ,� J- _�- g
ACTION REQUESTED a k-- ��>2/ZOl�2-j-i9TE��` -
PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT:r� OWNERS' X CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT
OWNER(S)OF RECORD V =1 Ir��t_all�t y `1r�rr�C t PHONE ,9") - `- °y? �
ADDRESS Y o C k k ke 01: CITY Q AV, STATE �_ZIP
BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE
ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information)' T D � N I C- , f HONE
ADDRESS a Le 0 CITY Qa� f zu.k_STATE I_ZIP_J,�,C�`�3
Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) /ZDG✓t�S y?�9�L �� ®�B/. ��J�-'�
I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our)
knowledge a belief. I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing signs)on the lot fro an„�ac,_n ve subject property as
desc'b Village Code. In addition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburs i age for publication co within 30 d s of billing.
�i3 -o� -/3-
Signature of Owner Date 8 ig natu 47TT551 icant Date
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
.x�k �:.e`°� .,.t �( � ,r f�z>S�r 3?; � a� � 3r �� ; n� �, y i rr�" i.a
'�"ry,� �° C�`��l� "�:. �t,*A.s �Ca y „g s M. � � t� uA
1.
w =ER / ,1;y� 4, �y t�.y�y a ^. X 4�y Sac
lo
i toe .t �feC`r �^ rR° � F
tw
21 , "' t3
a 0"111
Y ' T
opE
a
+t_} f
it<:,
PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-3/2006
•
LAW OFFICES OF
UMEN &.ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1900 SPRING Rona,Sum 501
OAK BRom,II IjNOLs 60523
TTLEPHONE
(630)832-6000
FnsCm,&
(630)6840243
E-MAIL
OBRMNLAW@MSN.COM
April 17, 2006
Mr. Robert Kallien
Director,Department of Community Development
Village of Oak Brook
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523
In re: Letter of Explanation, Application for Building
Permit for required addition to the York Tavern within the
Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area and request for
Certificate of Appropriateness
Dear Mr. Kallien:
Please consider this a Letter of Explanation required under paragraph 5 of the
Public Hearing Submittal Documents Guideline you have tendered to my clients, Mr. and
Mrs. Vito Moreci, owners of the York Tavern. As you are aware, from my previous
letter to the Village attorney dated March 14, 2006, a copy of which was sent to you, my
clients have been required by the DuPage County Health Department to expand the
kitchen in the York Tavern to meet current minimum health requirements. Additionally,
this structure must be brought in compliance with the requirements of the American with
Disabilities Act("ADA") and the Village's own Fire Code.
Since the York Tavern is a legal nonconforming use under the Village's Zoning
Ordinance, I have maintained that these modifications, which are required by law, allow
our client to immediately apply for a Building Permit. Without waiving any of my
clients' rights and in an attempt to avoid any unnecessary litigation over this matter, our
clients are willing to have their plan reviewed by the Plan Commission and the Village
Board in an effort to obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct the required
addition within the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area.
My clients have engaged a historical architect, Mr. Terry Russell from the firm of
LZT/FILLUNG Architects, Geneva, Illinois, to consult with their architect, Mr. Frank
Lucchese, in an attempt to present an appropriate design for construction within the
Graue Mill Gateway Area, preserve the existing structure, and comply with the
requirements of the DuPage County Health Department, ADA and the Village's Building
and Fire Codes. My clients are faced with a very short timeframe for the Village to
approve their plan, since the DuPage County Health Department has only given them
until June 7, 2006 to bring the structure into compliance or the business will be shut
down. Therefore,we request expedited handling of my clients' application.
The requested Certificate of Appropriateness is clearly within the Intent and
Purpose of Section 13-8-3 of the Village Ordinance, which declares that the purpose of
the Historic Graue Mill Gateway Area, among other tings, is to "...promote the public
health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the citizens of said area..."and
"... to encourage and promote the preservation of historical structures...": (Sections
13-8-3 A and E)
Section 13-8-4 of the Village's Ordinance does not define "historical structure";
however, one would think that the York Tavern, parts of which date back to the period of
the Civil War, would qualify. The Standards or Factors mentioned under paragraph 5 of
the Public Hearing Submittal Documents Guideline are not specifically applicable to this
application; however, the documentation required for a Certificate of Appropriateness are
set forth in Sections 13-8-7 and Section 13-8-8 of the Village Ordinance, all of which
have been complied with by my clients' architect and the consulting historical architect
and are hereby submitted and incorporated by reference with this Letter of Explanation.
Should you require anything additional from me, please contact me at your
earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
O'Brien&Associates, P.C.
By:
Wal er J. O'Brien II
WJO'B:ss
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Vito Moreci
President Kevin Quinlan and Members of the Board of Trustees
Mr. Frank Lucchese
Mr. Kenneth Kubiesa
•
LAW OFFICES OF
UMEN&ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1900 SPRING ROAD,SurrE 501
OAK BRoox,ILLINOIS 60523
TELEPHONE
(630)832-6000
FACSII14I u
(630)684-0243
E-MAIL
March 14, 2006 OBRIENI.AW@MSN.COM
Mr. Kenneth Kubiesa
Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar, Acker&Kern, P. C.
533 W. North Avenue, Suite 204
Elmhurst, Illinois 60126
In re: Application for Building Permit for the York Tap
Dear Ken:
Our clients, Mr. and Mrs. Vito Moreci, have been required by the DuPage County Health
Department to expand the existing kitchen in order to receive a license to continue operating the York
Tap. We have attempted to submit plans, which have been approved by the Health Department, to the
Village of Oak Brook's Building Department for their guidance in obtaining a building permit. The
Building Department has turned our client's request over to Robert Kallien, Director of the Department
of Community Development, who has stated that the required addition to the structure cannot be
approved without a hearing before the Zoning Board and the issuance of both a Certificate of
Appropriateness and the grant of a setback Variation by the Village Board.
It is our position that this Mr. Kallien's opinion does not follow the requirements of the
Village's Ordinances. In the first place, I believe our clients and the Village both agree that the York
Tap is a legal nonconforming use that has been granted the right to continue operations under Section
13-13-2 of the Village's Ordinance. Although Mr. Kallien's Department does have jurisdiction to
control "ordinary repairs and alterations" to nonconforming structures, alterations "required by law"
are an exception under Setion 13-13-2 A of the Village's own Ordinance. There is no question that
Ms. Sue Kowalczyk, EHS Program Manager of the DuPage County Health Department in her letter of
February 27, 2006(a copy of which is enclosed) stated,
"It is our understanding that you have been unable to secure the required building and zoning
approval needed to begin remodeling. During the inspection on February 20, it was noted that
completion of the required corrections could not be accomplished without significant
modifications and expansion of the existing building requiring approval of the local building
authorities." (emphasis supplied).
Without this required expansion of the existing building required by the DuPage County Health
Department, our clients' business will be shut down June 7, 2006. Obviously, this is a very serious
situation, which we need the Village to assist us with. , e.
Given that this is requested addition is "required by law" and; therefore, an exception under
the nonconforming Ordinance (Section 13-13-2 A) we believe Mr. Kallien's statements are in
Opposition to the intent of this Ordinance. Additionally, since the existing kitchen is located in the
Northeast corner of the existing structure, for Mr. Kallien to take the position that the building should
be expanded to the West is not practical nor is it what the DuPage County Health Department required.
I have enclosed a copy of the floor plan of the addition that was approved by the DuPage County
Health Department. As you can see, there is no way to add on to the existing kitchen with a westerly
expansion of the building. Furthermore, Mr. Kallien's statement to you that the addition "doubles"the
size of the bar area is simply inaccurate.
Secondly, the existing structure is a legal nonconforming structure under all overlapping
Ordinances of the Village, including the setback requirements. As you can see from the enclosed plan,
the addition does not further encroach on the existing building line. In fact, the proposed addition is
further back from York Road than the existing structure.
Lastly, since the required addition is being requested to comply with the County Health
Department regulations, the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the Village's own Fire
Codes the approval of this addition also falls outside the application of the Historical District
Ordinance. This Ordinance in Section 13-8-5 clearly states that its applicability "shall be in addition to
and not in derogation of any provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Village; provided, however, that
where any provision of the said zoning ordinance may conflict with any provision of this Chapter, the
more restrictive provisions shall apply': (emphasis supplied) Certainly, compliance with the health
and safety codes as well ADA is, in this case more restrictive than the compliance with the terms of
the Ordinance dealing with the aesthetic requirements of the historical district.
By the way, I have spoken to Mrs. Audry Muschler, of the Fullersburg Historic District, and
she and the Foundation have expressed their desire to work with my client in the restoration and
preservation of the York Tap. I have enclosed a copy of her most recent letter to me in this regard.
Time is really of the essence here. If the Village's Building Department is not going to
cooperate with our client in the issuance of the building permit allowing for these required
improvements to the structure, I really need to know as soon as possible. Thank you for your attention
to this matter.
Very truly yours,
O'Brien& Associates, P.C.
By:
Walter J. O'Brien II
cc: WJO'B:ss
Enclosures
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Vito Moreci
Mr. Frank Lucchese
President Kevin Quinlan
Mr. Robert Kallien
Gateway Development Plan -Supplemental Information
The applicant hereby request an Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness under Section 8
(Sections 13-8-7 and Section 13-8-8) of the Village of Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance to permit
constriction (renovation and addition) and landscaping in compliance with the Historic Graue
Mill Gateway Area for the York Tavern located at 3702 S. York Road.
The applicant has f led the following documentation to justify the issuance of such Permit.
1. Topographic Survey with Legal Description - P° i
2. Site Plan -PA r-c P
3. Landscaping Plan; Ground Sign Design ---- p a yt M.
4. Exterior Elevation and Colored Renderings - P464!rn.- Al-
S. DuPage Health Department Approval v t'AL c's- <,07
The site planning, landscaping and architectural concept is planned to accomplish a desirable
transition from the existing York Tavern to the proposed addition by means of placing the new
addition north and west of the existing building. This will allow the original York Tavern to
retain its visual dominance when view from York Road.
The overall challenge from an historic/preservation standpoint is the placement and massing of
the new addition so that the historic portion is easily identifiable, while at the same time be
sympathetic to the original design details so that the new addition appears compatible when
viewed in context with the existing York Tavern. The will be accomplished by means of texture,
matching size and profile of existing siding, trim and windows, in addition, the introduction of
street scape, landscaping(presently non-existing) and parking areas.
The landscaping design treatment shall enhance both the historic aspects of the existing building
and new addition; while enhancing parking areas with landscaping islands with trees. The
landscaping adjacent to and surrounding the existing and new structures will be developed with
low landscaped retaining walls, tree groupings and low shrubs/ground cover.
a. The setback of the proposed addition is not within the required front year 100'setback
b. The treatment of the parking area is based upon "screening"the views from York Road
on the east and Wennes Court on the north by means of landscape
C. Provide underground electrical service; remove overhead service from York Road.
d. The mechanical equipment for the exhaust hood will be screened from public view at the
roof;the on grade equipment such as a/c compressors and cooler compressors will be
screened by landscaping.
e. The "trash dumpster"shall be enclosedlscreen from public view by means of a fence, gate
landscaping.
f. The ground sign shall be provided with the historical "logo"symbol.
h. DuPage Health Department has approved the proposed food service equipment layout.
LZT/Filliung Architects D XT-J—s n ii
s
b ifT
Larson 8 Darby Group
p
A '
3 20
April 11, 2006 PR
1 0L
Lii44:iZ-JL Vi:IN �Cj'T l LTD'D
Mr. Robert L. Kallien, Jr.
ARCHITECTS Director of Community Development
Village of Oak Brook
ENGINEERS Department of Community Development
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60523
PLANNERS
RE: Restoration/Expansion of the York Tavern
Offices In:
Rockford, Illinois Dear Mr. Kallien:
Peoria,Illinois
Chicago, Illinois I have been retained by Mr. Frank Lucchese to assist with the restoration and
Glen Ellyn, Illinois expansion plans of the York Tavern. As you may recall, I was the restoration
Geneva,Illinois architect for the nearby Frederick C. Graue House several years ago.
During the past several weeks, I have met with Mr. Lucchese and Mr. Vito
Moreci, the Tavern's current owner,to discuss the plans for the proposed
addition/renovation of the building. Last Friday (April 7), after several of these
meetings, Frank and I met with Ms.Audrey Muschler(Oak Brook Historical
Society) and Ms. Jean Follett to present our initial ideas and thoughts as well
as to gather input from their perspective on how to approach this project.
The overall challenge from an historic/preservation standpoint is how to
expand this building functionally and still leave enough of the existing structure
intact so that the historic portion is easily identifiable from the addition, while at
the same time being sympathetic to the original design details so that the
addition appears compatible when viewed in context with the existing building.
The following items listed below were agreed upon by the group as the best
way to accomplish this goal.
1. The building addition will be placed to the north and west of the existing
building. This will allow the-original building to retain its visual
dominance of the site when viewed from York Road.
2. Two small 20'"century additions, the airlock on the south and the block
masonry store room on the east will be removed in their entirety. This
will allow the east elevation to be restored to its 19"' century
appearance and the south elevation to be returned to its early 20'"
century appearance. The exposed portions of the west and.north
elevations will receive similar restorative efforts. It was suggested and
agreed that the original style, size and locations of the 9 over 6
windows be maintained where visible. This would include locations
behind the existing bar.
324 W.State Street,Geneva,IL 60134 Tel 630-232-0551,Fax 630232-4150
LZT/Filliung Architects
Larson&Darby Group
Page 2.
3. The group agreed that the proposed building addition will be
ARCHITECTS constructed of the same materials used to restore the original structure.
Historic window details, trim profiles, siding dimensions and roof pitches
will be replicated. The roof pitch on the north roof of the addition will be
ENGINEERS reduced intentionally to keep the ridge of the new roof lower than the
ridge of the existing building in order to emphasize the historic portion
and to allow for a concealed cut out in the roof where the kitchen
PLANNERS exhausts can be screened from view. A covered porch on the addition
will provide a new accessible entrance to the building.
Offices in:
Rockford, Illinois 4. Frank reviewed general site issues with the group. It was discussed
Peoria,Illinois that the existing lot will be repaved in its existing configuration and the
Chicago,Illinois landscaping will be increased to meet current standards. Pedestrian
Glen Ellyn, Illinois paths to the door will be a combination of hard fired brick pavers and
Geneva, Illinois blue stone slabs.
5. The group spent some time discussing the interior design. The
challenge here is to determine ways to preserve the best of the current
atmosphere while skillfully blending in much needed improvements. It
was recommended to the Owner that the existing memorabilia be
retained and reused and the front of the bar be salvaged and
reinstalled. Nothing from the original 1840's interior remains. Most of
the current finishes date to the mid 20'" Century.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the approach to the restoration/expansion
was agreed to based on the drawings presented and the changes that were
recommended as a result of our discussion. If those present find any additions
or revisions to these minutes, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely yours,
Terence Russell, AIA
Partner
Jla
cc: Frank Lucchese
Ms. Audrey Muschler, Oak Brook Historical Society
Ms. Jean Follett
Mr. Pasquale Moreci
324 W.State Street,Geneva,IL 60134 Tel 630-232-0551.Fax 630-232-4150 �''
• 0 1
DuPage County Health Department
North Public Health Center
! 1111 West Lake Street
Addison,IL 60101
Telephone: (630) 620-3325 Fax: (630) 543-9276
www.dupagehealth.org
February 27`h, 2006
Vito &Mariana Moreci R E
York Tavern
3702 York Road MAR - 6 2006
Oak Brook, Illinois 60532
90MMUNITY DEUELOPNIE ;'f
Re: Food Establishment Permit#63745 - • - --
Dear Mr. &Mrs. Moreci:
On February 24`h, 2005 our Department met with you on site at the York Tavern to
discuss the status of the facilities food service permit. At that meeting ,we reviewed the
violations of the Illinois Food Service Sanitation Code and the'Dupage County Food
Service Ordinance first noted during a change of owner inspection conducted by our
Department on April 26, 2004. In September, 2004,you submitted plans to remodel the
facility to address those violations and bring it into compliance with current construction
requirements. On June 7`h, 2005, you obtained approval of those plans from our
Department. However to date, construction has not been initiated and the violations are
still present. During this time,the establishment has been operating under a conditional
permit pending completion of planned renovations.
It is our understanding that you have been unable to secure the required building and
zoning approval needed to begin remodeling. During the inspection on February 24`h, it
was noted that completion of the required corrections could not be accomplished without
significant modification and expansion of the existing building requiring approval of the
local building authorities. At the meeting, you were notified that your plan approval and
conditional permit status expires on June 7`h, 2006. After that date, you will not have a
valid permit to serve food or beverages and must cease operations . If you obtain the
required zoning and building approval prior to this date, you must cease operations
during the construction process and apply for a new annual permit.after inspection and
approval of the work. Any changes to the plans you have previously submitted must
receive advance approval from our Department. If construction is not initiated prior to
June 7`h,2006, it will be necessary to resubmit plan review documents and fees before
any foodservice construction can be done at this site.
DuPage County Health Department
York Tavern letter
February 27th, 2006
Page two
I have enclosed a typed copy of the original change of ownership inspection and plan
approval letter for your review. If you have any questions about this information,please
contact me at(630) 682-7979 Ext. 4620.
Sincerely,
Sue Kowalczyk, LE 9, MPH
EHS.Prograni.Manager
Enclosure: Typed Summary Inspection April 26, 2004
Plan Approval letter June 7"'2006
CC: Bruce Schroer,EPHC Supervisor
Bryan Lee, Area Sanitarian
Sara Burton-Zick, Sr. Plan Reviewer
Walter O,Brien, Attorney At Law
Frank Lucchese, Architect
Robert Kallien, Director Oak Brook.Community Development
Don Hastings, Village Of Oakbrook Building Department
Peg O'Connell,Village of Oak Brook
l � G'
DuG g a County ealth Depa0hent
tY
Central Office
111 North County Farm Road
Wheaton,IL 60187-3988 P1anReview
Telephone:(630)682-7400 Fax:(630)462-9463 #
www.dupagehealth.org
June 7, 2005
County Tracking
TO#
Pasquale Moreci
487 Spring Road
Elmhurst, IL 60126
Dear Pasquale:
PLAN APPROVAL FOR: York Tavern located at 3702 S. York Road, Oak Brook, IL
The plans dated March 15, 2005, for the above food service facility have been approved by this
Department. This plan approval is dependent upon incorporating the items noted from the
attached itemized list onto the plans, (see enclosure).
The following inspections are required:
• Underground plumbing installations
(as it pertains to the food service equipment).
• Pre-final inspection.
Without approval from the DuPage County Health Department,food and drystock
cannot be received into the establishment.
• Final inspection.
The establishment must also receive the final inspection prior to opening. A
certificate of occupancy can then be obtained through the municipality.
Allow 72 hours advance notice to be given when scheduling each inspection. .Any further
changes to the plans or the plan review form must receive advance approval. If you have
additional questions and/or.to schedule inspection(s), please contact me at 630-682-7979,
extension 7197.
Sincerely,
Gage Rosti, L.E.H.P.
Plan Reviewer
Environmental Health Services
GR:gc
Enclosure: Reminder List, Attachments
cc: Don Hastings, Village of Oak Brook, Building Department
Bryan Lee, Area Sanitarian, East Public Health Center
..__ . . ... ., ,.. ., lam►
31 06 07: 29a Geor a Zick 8477410244 P• 1
Mar 29 06 02:59P Pr ucchese 630-8 474 P•2
&AMEND 6
Tv : ��
PIC
a yes
Lr
l3k.01
Y ❑ �, ..
�� i ;R. � \/X��`'(P�MSS �/�1'1/1� ��.'W •
! _- 0
t5 ub j � 1T
F-moH ib* A L
tit
LOIN
• - s
V. A
lick
_ __ . . r..
Mar 29 06 02:81 Frank Lucchese 630-833-0474
V
es - j-
.w PA r I
_ p 41%
• � fE
d
ldl-
�-° �•�• � x`o� .• �ter. � �e �
lit luml
7 X36'b5 •. \ _. .._._.�..__. _ R c
GdY 1we,
i1
NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of
approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads streets alleys and public ways have
been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of
Deeds(or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 days of
the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed.
Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule.
NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL
OWNER PROPERTY OWNER
S�� Q 44
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
A
PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-3/2006
Ms.'Alice Song and Julia Mr. Laurence He or Owner of Record
11868 Westminister Court • 413 Luthin Roa
Aloma Linda, CA 62645 Oak Brook, I160
Mr. Gary Kroncn or Owner of Record Mr. Wayne Hummer or Owner of Record
418 Luthin Road 419 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, 1160523 Oak Brook, I160523
Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Peterson or Owner of Record Mr. Charlie Zhang or Owner of Record
412 Luthin Road 425 Luthin Road
Oak Brook, I160523 Oak Brook, I160523
Mr. and Mrs. Edward Cladek or Owner of Record Mr. and Mrs. Ali Nili or Owner of Record
408 Luthin Road 511 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, I160523 Oak Brook, Il 60523
Mr. and Mrs. James Svoboda or Owner of Record Owner of Record
402 Luthin Road 522 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, I160523 Oak Brook, I160523
Mr. and Mrs. Jeffery Bulin or Owner of Record Owner of Record
320 Luthin Road 523 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Il 60523 Oak Brook, 1160523
Mr. David Escarraz or Owner of Record DuPage Forest Preserve
316 Luthin Road Street Address:
Oak Brook, I160523
3 S 580 Naperville Road
Mr. and Mrs. Gary Shorter or Owner of Record Wheaton, IL 60187-8761
314 Luthin Road Or
Oak Brook, I160523 Mailing Address:
Ms. Dorothy Retzel or Owner of Record P.O. Box 5000
3610 York Road Wheaton, IL 60189-5000
Oak Brook, I160523
Litvay Family Trust or Owner of Record Oak Brook Park District
3622 York Road 1450 Forest Gate Road
Oak Brook, Il 60523 Oak Brook, Illinois - 60523-2151
Dr. and Mrs. Girgis
506 Wennes Court
Oak Brook, Il 60523
224.6
MEDITERRANEAN PARTNERS, INC. LASALLE BANK NA
DBA THE YORK TAVERN 2-501710
3702 YORK ROAD
OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523 3
m
0
w
'm
PAY **** FIVE HUNDRED &0/100 DOLLARS
DATE AMOUNT c
TO THE **500.00 8
ORDER OF 04/12/06 $
v
w
9
7
u
c
a
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 Oak Brook Road LL
Oak Brook, IL 60523
AUTHORIZED SIGNI; E
11300 2 24611' 1:0 7 1000 50 5l: 5 20 15 784 7 211'
2247
MEDITERRANEAN PARTNERS, INC. LASALLE BANK NA
DBA THE YORK TAVERN 2-50/710
3702 YORK ROAD
OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523 Ji
A
m
C
0
w
PAY ****ONE HUNDRED &0/100 DOLLARS DATE AMOUNT
TO THE
ORDER OF 04/12/06 $ **100.00
u
c
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
1200 Oak Brook Road
Oak Brook, IL 60523 Z,
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
1180022L. ?"' 1:0 7 1000 50 5': 5 20 15 784 7 211'
If
CHECK $ CHECKS $ CASH INV k DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT If DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
INVALID
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK SIGNATURE
WITHOUT
'P o, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15488
O �
1200 OAK BROOK ROAD
r OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
PHONE: (630)990-3045
low
7kaKk
RETAIN THIS RECEIPT
FOR YOUR RECORDS
Subj&t Property VerificatJ&
(Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.)
1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 3 G tI Q
2. Common Address: 3"1 b Q A b C r kDa-6 Doak gra)k IL L-05;A
3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided)
4. Email the Legal Description to anolanekCaD-oak-brook.org
LOT 5 IN WENNES SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1962, AS
DOCUMENT 33493, IN DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
COMMON ADDRESS: 3702 YORK ROAD
The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows:
DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: el�✓%SS�/
Date called: _ -/3 (P4
DuPage County Clerk's Office-
Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: -
Date called: — r494y
1 verify the information provided above is accurate.
Printed Name Signature
Date: �,3 ��lo Relationship to Applicant:
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................
� �a rx fir.... �„�.,�. ,T,b"��'�r a•'�'��:.. �:;. � r a ���s°q 3 ,��".':'. „���a �'" E�� �" r�a.r
�^,,y�t xk?� p � �r�sj g 3��ur��r'e�'�� .R`.€3 �a Fa,: � ' .<�.: ,..^g� � fir, z y �,s�•�'� �"�"�` s.,a:.
PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-3/2006
. Certification •
Surrounding Property Owners
I (we) certify that the names and addresses of all the surrounding property owners including mailing
labels submitted with this application are located within a minimum distance of 250 feet in all
directions from the perimeter of the subject property and that the number of feet occupied by all
public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways has been excluded in computing the 250-foot
requirement.
Said names and addresses are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the
Registrar of Titles of the County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County. The
property owners as listed have been obtained from the Township Assessors office within 30 days of
the filing of this application.
The surrounding property owners list as submitted herewith and supporting attachments are true to
the best of my (our) knowledge and belief.
I (we) give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s) on the lot frontages of the
subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the required application fees,
applicant/owner agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs, recording fees, and any other
associated costs or fees within 30 days of billing.
U till -t M.AV-to"NA MDR-C.C, [�✓�t' D�ZEe;i
Printed Name of Owner Print A licant
Signature of Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date
8► � ra 1NF IRMA r�a�►
Print Name/Company Contact Person Contact Phone
Address To be Billed Alternate Phone
NOTE: If the applicant/owner has not complied with these requirements and notification has not
been sent to a neighboring property owner within the 250-foot requirement less than 10 days prior
to the scheduled hearing, the hearing on this matter will be postponed to the next regular meeting,
or until such time as all neighbors within the 250-foot requirement have been sent proper
notification.
PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-3/2006
'GE OF 04kB9 •
GENERAL RMIT APPLICATION
VILLAGE OF OAK ROOK
Permit No.
1 200 OAK BROOK ROAD • OAKBROOK, ILLINOIS 60523 Date Issued
'cF Don NT'A'\*" 630/990-3045
�Q1/� ��A/
Application is hereby made for address ;70 2 Suite/Floor
Lot# 5 Subdivision Tax Parcel No.
Residential New Non-residential Add/Alt/Acc - 'A - Other
Zoning /'` (i Lot Area y, a q' 8 41- 5�, Total Estimated Cost$
ADDRESS(sTREET&TOWN) �� PHONE
Tenant 0- CDll�7� �1/�1,� � 207
Owner ,/�
Architect LG�GG 1 s�. 5oc. /Z (�, Vui ,�GLf/ew'I
Gen.Contractor
Excavator —
Concrete
Carpenter
>t Electrician
Plumber
Sewer
'k Heating
�k Brick
Roofer --�-�-
i��tv1� V (J No.of Stories / No. of Bedrooms
Type of Construction I . 2 JV 25 5F
Square Feet �� SFd�y�55 Height 2 T< ��� Cubic Content qi
No.of Plumbing Fixtures: Lavatory Bathtub °— Shower Laundry Tub�_ Sink Toilet �✓ Floor Drains 7
Type of Heating
g_ `/ow No.of Heating Units
Type of Air Conditioning 5kz' G� r�BSS�✓ No.of A/C Units
Owner/Agent
I Hereby Certify The Above Information is True Signature Date
And Correct To The Best Of My Knowledge.
Address
Phone City State Zip
Contact Name Phone/Cell #
(Please Print)
�
Accoun ting Code OFFICE USE ONLY AMOUNT APPROVED
4210 Structure $
4212 Plumbing Plan Review Date
4211 Electrical Plan Review Date
4301 Elevator Inspections
E4216 Inspection Fee
Accessory Structures
(pools/fences/signs/driveways)
HVAC
RA:n.. I innnoeo and Dnrmifc
4"Limestone Cap
-
StolJe - -•�-• -
1-
r �a r
4-Ledge , =�
I
Elevation Yz.,=1=o"
4"Limestone Cap
1
r
1 A
'
rPlan �z"_1'-DGround Sign
x 6=0"x 2'-6"high(15 s f.);Stone Faced Ground Sign with 9"Upper
&6"Lower Raised Poly Ejection Molded Letters For (York Tavern);
S"Upper&3"Lower Raised Poly Ejection Molded Letters&Numbers for
(3702 YorkRoad).
® Set Stone into 4"Concrete Ledge;No Exposed Concrete Foundation To Be Seen.
El- El Historic o Synth ol:Plaque sball be attached on each side of the 12"
LO
Ground Sign
Electrical Ground Sign-provide circuit from timer/service panel to ground
up light fixture.
Landscaping Area to extend 36"around perimeter of all sides of ground sign
4 t .
r.
- a�
•
rdM•
_az
LL A t
j -
,;,;rrr
Aw
f�YF•AP
,vr
Y a. �
F
ui , F/r
j1
�N
�r �#gip. ( ! '
41 JJ
} 4 4
i
s�
/ ,.. ,•#� � �� a i, t `� it ',� t��•': t
f
a
I
E $1 9
MLLr
s
� y
y t4k� a T
t�£i
g € �" x'•r: Y '� N .it-3 } €"fie "�
&f
I
a
+'&4i taro
Aft
.,A
M
tea e
� � �• �. a w..- #'e x� � �., fps � �\���� �
""^� �F� s � i a � gam,. e e�:: �� 3 •I''.i � � �",� .���g •
A
c "a
s
y�
t
a
sM�
Y ,
e
1 r d ..
t a n a N YA a
A
ef
r m `:
d<
`
� .... 4t.
INC
<
<
w
y
a�''`��,.,^ ,"tea' � .�� c. t�, �e+�a�•o �� 'M '�
{ p �
�.vg €
y �l ' aAxwiNA �
f "'gym � uY_�,,a-•"^ �'3 s4g-
emwi '
Rear View Looking Southwest _