Loading...
S-1085 - 10/26/2004 - ZONING - Ordinances J.P. "RICK" CARNEY UPAGE COUNTY RECORDER NOV.17,2004 3:47 PM OTHER 06—24—206—044 005 PAGES R2004-293142 (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document ORDINANCE 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13-6D-3F(3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Bhargava/Agrawal — 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, IL 60523/ P.I.N. 06-24-206- 044) Property Address/es: 722 FOREST GLEN, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 (If vacant land, state vacant land and list nearest cross streets, Oak Brook, IL 60523.) Pin/s Number 06-24-206-044 Name &Address of Applicant PRADEEP BHARGAVA 722 FOREST GLEN LANE OAK BROOK IL 60523 Name &Address of Responsible PRADEEP BHARGAVA Party to Receive Recorded 722 FOREST GLEN LANE Copy of Document and Billing: OAK BROOK, IL 60523 G/L Account#to be Charged 10-1365 Prepared By: Village of Oak Brook Return To Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Name &Address of Recipient of Consideration (when applicable): N/A G/L Account# to be Charged ORDINANCE 2004- ZO -V -S -1085 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13- 6D -3F(3) OF TITLE 13 ( "ZONING REGULATIONS ") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Bhargava /Agrawal — 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, IL 60523 / P I N 06 -24- 206 -044 ) WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore adopted an ordinance setting forth the Zoning Regulations for the Village of Oak Brook in Title 13 of the Village Code, and WHEREAS, Section 13 -14 -6 of the Village Code sets forth the authority and standards of the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations, WHEREAS, Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal ( "Petitioners ") are the owners of certain property legally described as follows. LOT 23 IN FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION UNIT 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND OF PART OF THE FRACTIONAL NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 13, 1977 AS DOCUMENT R77- 35731, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the R -4 Single - Family Detached Residence District, the regulations of which require a rear yard setback of not less than thirty feet (30') in depth, and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has submitted a petition for a variation to reduce the required rear yard setback to approximately fifteen feet (15) for the purpose of constructing a room addition with an attached deck to the single - family dwelling on the Subject Property , and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2004, and October 5, 2004, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook conducted a public hearing at the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois in connection with the aforesaid petition, after due and appropriate legal notice was given, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals specifically considered the standards set forth in Section 13 -14 -6 (D) of the Village Code and made the following findings of fact • The petitioners satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of a variation • The applicants' hardship is due to the unique circumstance that their lot is undersized being 14,000 square feet when the minimum standard in the R -4 district is 18,000 square feet • The Subject Property is a corner lot • The placement of the existing home on the lot offered very little opportunity for any type of room addition. • Granting this variation would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood -1 6E OF 04 4- P d `' 90 o f O fq G C 9CFC0UN7j Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 May 4, 2005 Website www.oak-brook.org Administration 630.990.3000 Pradeep Bhargava FAX 630.990.0876 722 Forest Glen Lane Community Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Development 630.990.3045 Re: Recorded Document on November 17, 2004 FAX 630.9900.990.33 985 ORDINANCE 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 Engineering 722 Forest Glen Lane Department Oak Brook, IL 60523 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 R2004-293142 Fire Department Dear Applicant: 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 A copy of the above noted recorded document is enclosed for your information. Police Department This is an important record and should be retained in a secure area within your 630.990.2358 files. FAX 630.990.7484 Public Works If you need any further assistance in this matter, feel free to contact me at 630- Department 990-5770 on Monday through Friday from 9am to 5pm. 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 Sincerely, Oak Brook Public Library 600 Oak Brook Road Linda M. Andrys Oak Brook,IL 60523 72200 Records Management Clerk 630.990.2222 g FAX 630.990.4509 /lma Oak Brook Sports Core Enclosure Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 cc: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., Village Engineer �/ 630.990.3020 Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development/ FAX 630.990.1002 Official Files Golf Club 2606 York Road /RECDOG2005-RECLTR-ORD 2004-ZO-V-S-1085-BHARGAVA-722 FOREST GLEN Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 • • ORDINANCE 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13-6D-3F(3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Bhargava/Agrawal—722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, IL 60523/ P.I.N. 06-24-206-044 ) WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore adopted an ordinance setting forth the Zoning Regulations for the Village of Oak Brook in Title 13 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code sets forth the authority and standards of the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations; WHEREAS, Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal ("Petitioners") are the owners of certain property legally described as follows: LOT 23 IN FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION UNIT 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND OF PART OF THE FRACTIONAL NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 13, 1.977 AS DOCUMENT R77-35731, IN DUPAGE. COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the R-4 Single-Family Detached Residence District, the regulations of which require a rear yard setback of not less than thirty feet(30') in depth; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has submitted a petition for a variation to reduce the required rear yard setback to approximately fifteen feet (15') for the purpose of constructing a room addition with an attached deck to the single-family dwelling on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2004, and October 5, 2004, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook conducted a public hearing at the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois in connection with the aforesaid petition, after due and appropriate legal notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals specifically considered the standards set forth in Section 13-14-6 (D) of the Village Code and made the following findings of fact: • The petitioners satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of a variation. • The applicants' hardship is due to the unique circumstance that their lot is undersized being 14,000 square feet when the minimum standard in the R-4 district is 18,000 square feet. • The Subject Property is a corner lot. • The placement of the existing home on the lot offered very little opportunity for any type of room addition. • Granting this variation would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Ordinance 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 Granting Variation from Sec. 13-6D-3F(3) Page 2 of 3 (Bhargava/Agrawal 06-24-206-044) WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation subject to the conditions stated in Section 2 of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the findings and .recommendations made by the Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code relating to the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations have been met. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, Du Page and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals hereto are incorporated as part of this ordinance. SECTION 2. A variation to Section 13-6D-3F(3) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to permit the construction of a room addition and deck on the single-family dwelling at 722 Forest Glen and allow a rear yard setback of approximately fifteen feet (15') subject to the following conditions: 1. the proposed additions encroach no more than fifteen (15) feet into the required rear yard; and 2. the proposed room addition is built with a mansard roof; and 3. the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted including the proposed building elevations (see page 14a of the case file) as amended to include a mansard roof and the revised site plan on page 21 of the case file dated October 19, 2004 prepared by Joseph J. Hoendervoogt. SECTION 3. This Ordinance is limited and restricted to the property commonly known as 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, Illinois, P.I.N. 06-24-206-044. SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. APPROVED THIS 26th day of October, 2004. Ke,/n Quinlan V' age Presiden Ordinance 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 Granting Variation from Sec. 13-6D-3F(3) Page 3 of 3 (Bhargava/Agrawal 06-24-206-044) PASSED THIS 26t'day of October, 2004. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None ATTEST: a F )Ai( Linda K. Gonnella, CMC �l ' "r1. u,! Village Clerk W 00UN14 „ STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS. COUNTIES OF COOK AND DUPAGE ) I, Linda K. Gonnella, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting. Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that on October 2.6, 2004 , the corporate authorities of the above municipality passed and approved Ordinance 2004-ZO-V-S-1085 , AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13-6D-3F(3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Bhargava/Agrawal - 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, IL 60523 / P.I.N. 06-24-206-044) I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original documents, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records, journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 15th day of November , 2004 . vQG� OF U,qk'�� a K. Gonnella, CMC ge Clerk ,e r ge of Oak Brook 9G+F, age and Cook Counties, IL ter_ 40 so BHARGA VA/GRA WAL 722 Forest Glen Variation - Rear Yard Setback INDEX PAGE CONTENTS 24-24.a. Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to Village Board for October 26, 2004 Agenda. 23. Approval letter from the Forest Glen Homeowner Association 22 Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman to Village Board dated October 15, 2004 21 Revised Site Plan dated October 19, 2004 Showing the Proposed 15 foot Rear Yard Encroachment and Increased Length of the Proposed Addition 20-20. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated October 5, 2004 19 Additional Information— Staff Comments — Director of Community Development Kallien dated October 5, 2004 19.a-19.b Copy of a Portion of the Forest Glen Subdivision Plat (Included — Not Attached) 18 Revised Site Plan dated October 5, 2004 Showing Rear Setback Changed to 12 feet also Shows There is Not an Encroachment into the Side Easement (Included — Not Attached) 17 Revised Survey Showing Rear Yard Setback changed to 12 feet (Included — Not Attached) 16-16.b E-mails of Concern from Frank Manas, neighbor at 802 Wildwood Ct 15 Additional Information— Staff Comments Director of Community Development Kallien 14-14.a Site Plan and Elevations dated 9-10-04 (Included — Not Attached) 13-13.a Amended Response to Variation Standards 12 Amended Letter of Explanation 11 Amended Application 10 Scope of Work for the Proposed Room Addition 9-9.f Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated September 7, 2004 8-8.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien to Zoning Board of Appeals dated August 27, 2004 7 Letter of Preliminary Approval from the Forest Glen Homeowners Association dated August 31, 2004 6 Certificate of Publication dated August 16, 2004 5 Resident Letter dated August 16, 2004 4 Board of Trustees Referral Meeting Minutes dated August 10, 2004 (Not Included) 3 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Director of Community Development 2-2.a Rear Yard Setback, Zoning Ordinance R4 Single-Family, Section 13-6D-3F.3 1-1.b Variations, Zoning Ordinance, Section 13-14-6 ******************* A Application/Petition -Variation B Surrounding Property Owners List C Fee/Receipt D Subject Property Verification E Letter of Explanation dated F-F.1 Applicant's Response to Standards for Variation G Letter of Support from Neighbor at 721 Forest Glen H Pictures of site and Line Drawn Showing Location of Proposed Addition I Elevation of Addition J Site Plan/Survey Showing Encroachment into Rear Yard Setback K Plat of Survey dated November 26, 2002— (Not Included) - Official File Only PGE OF 0gke9 v 0 0 8 G `r c C UNTV,` AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of October 26, 2004 SUBJECT: Bhargava/Agrawal—722 Forest Glen—Variation—Rear Yard Setback FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr.,AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested variation and approve the attached ordinance. Backizround/History: Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal, the owners of the property located at 722 Forest Glen have submitted a petition seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-6D-3-F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the construction of a room addition and deck to their existing single- family home. The applicant's original request proposed that these additions encroach into the required 30-ft. rear yard by approximately 18-ft. Comments were received from the Forest Glen Homeowners Association as well as from the neighboring property owner who resides at 802 Wildwood Ct. who expressed concerns over the original proposal to permit an 18-ft. encroachment into the required setback. As a result of these comments, the applicant has modified the proposed addition and has limited the encroachment to 15-feet. The petitioner testified that the modification to reduce the encroachment has satisfied the neighbors concerns. The Forest Glen Homeowners Association has met and supports the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals (see page 23 of the case file). Recommendation: The Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 1 has recommended approval of the requested variation (as revised) to permit the construction of a room addition and deck subject to the following conditions: Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-Bhargava-Grawal-VAR.doc • The proposed addition and deck will encroach no more than 15-ft.into the required rear yard, and The proposed room addition is to have a mansard roof, and • The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted(see page 14.a of the case file—the proposed building elevations as amended to include a mansard roof and the revised site plan on page 21 of the case file dated October 19, 2004 prepared by Joseph J. Hoendervoogt. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the petitioner has satisfactorily addressed the factors as required for approval of a variation. In particular, the applicant has provided testimony that the hardship is due to unique circumstances, which include that the lot is undersized being 14,000 square feet and the R-4 zoning district minimum standards are 18,000 square feet; it is a corner lot; the placement of the existing home on the lot offered very little opportunity for any type of room addition; and that granting the variation would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GPOLA NEK\t-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-Bhargava-Grawal-VAR.doc FoYd&Glen; .� Horneriers: Y ASSt1Gi1 doff Mr. Bob Kallien Village of Oak Brook 1212 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Dear Bob, The Forest Glen Board has met and discussed the variance request for 722 Forest Glen Ln. and have voted to accept the Zoning Board's recommendation that the owner be granted the easement variance so the structure proposed can come to 15 feet from the "back" property line. We have not vet approved the revised plans for the addition as the requested material samples have not been provided to the FGHA Board at this time. His material list did not give enough specific information for our Board to know the materials to be used would be equal to or better than his home. Point of information: the neighbor (Mr. Frank Manas) who is directly affected by the variance and addition has agreed to Mr. Bhragava's changes and has signed a document stating those changes were acceptable to him. We have reviewed the plans for design, location, drainage etc. and do not have objections to those parts of the plans. Once our Architectural Chairman-Mr. Frank Knight has the samples, he will go to each Board Member (six of them!) and obtain their vote on the matter(this is something we generally will not do,but given the "closing season" Frank Knight is willing to do this special effort on Mr. Bhragava's behalf. Mr. Bhragava has been notified of this requirement, and depending on his ability to provide these samples, the FGHA Board will approve the project. Bob,I want to compliment you and your staff on the close working relationship you have developed with the Homeowners Boards. For this reason Oak Brook will become an even better community to live in the years ahead! Sincerely, Harry N. Peters President Forest Glen Homeowners Association CC FGHA Board, Bhragava ,�PGE OF 044.g90 ® f� o y G r � A I V c�COUNTV \�\ Village of October 19, 2004 Oak Brook Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees 1200 Oak Brook Road Village of Oak Brook Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 1200 Oak Brook Road Website www.oak-brook.org Oak Brook, IL 60523 Administration SUBJECT: 722 Forest Glen—Bhar ava/A awal—Variation—Rear Yard Setback 630.990.3000 g FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: Community Development At its meeting n October 5 2004 the Zoning Board of Appeals completed its review of a 630.990.3045 g g pp p FAX 630.990.3985 request from Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal, the owners of the property located at 722 Forest Glen. They are seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-6D-3-F.3 of the Engineering Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the construction of a room addition and deck to their Department existing single-family home. The applicant's original plans proposed that these additions 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3 985 encroach into the required 30 foot rear yard by approximately 18 feet. All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. Comments were received from Fire Department 630.990.3040 the Forest Glen Homeowners Association as well as from the neighboring property hborin g owner FAX 630.990.2392 who resides at 802 Wildwood Ct. who expressed concerns over the original proposal to permit an 18 foot encroachment into the required rear yard setback. As a result of these Police Department comments, the applicant agreed to limit the encroachment to 15 feet. 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 The Zoning Board of Appeals,by a vote of 4 to 1 recommended approval of the requested Public Works variation in order to permit the construction of a room addition and deck subject to the Department following conditions: 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 • The proposed addition and deck are to encroach no more than 15 feet into the required rear yard, and Oak Brook . The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the revised Public Library plans which are to be submitted to the Village Board. p g 600 Oak Brook Road In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the petitioner Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 has satisfactorily addressed the factors as required for approval of a variation. In 630.990.2222 30.99 .4 articular, the applicant has provided testimony that the hardship is due to unique FAX 630.990.4509 p pp � p Y p q circumstances, which include that the lot is undersized being 14,000 square feet and the Oak Brook Sports Core R-4 zoning district minimum standards are 18,000 square feet; it is a corner lot; the placement of the existing home on the lot offered very little opportunity for any type of Bath&Tennis Club room addition; and that granting the variation would not alter the essential character of the 700 Oak Brook Road neighborhood. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 Very t y yours, Golf Club -- 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 ChaAip bris 630.990.3032 Chairman FAX 630.990.0245 Zoning Board of Appeals R PVE of OqIre o e A o h G � A 2 0UNTI Village of Oak Brook Date: October 5, 2004 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website To: Zoning Board of Appeals www.oak-brook.org Administration From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Subject: Bhargava/Agrawal — Variation — Additional Community Information/Clarification Development 630.990.3045 In addition to the materials submitted to you dated September 28, 2004, the FAX 630.990.3985 applicant has submitted some additional materials to clarify some comments Engineering made by the neighbor who owns the lot directly to the south. Department In the revised site plan, the distance between the planned addition and the 630.990.3010.3 south property line is 12 feet, not 9.8 feet as reported in a co of an email FAX 630.990.3985 p p Y p copy which you have been provided. Also, the along the south property line, Fire Department there exists a 641. easement, as described in the approved subdivision plat. 630.990.3040 The 10-ft. easement that is described in the plat along all rear yard setbacks FAX 630.990.2392 exists along the west property line on the applicant's parcel. Police Department Please consider this additional information/clarification as you continue 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 your deliberations on this request. Public Works Department attachments 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 Oak Brook Public Library 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 Al ff• r Message • • Yage 1 of 1 Gail Polanek From: Robert Kallien Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:16 AM To: Gail Polanek Subject: FW: 722 Forest Glen Ln -----Original Message----- From: Frank_Manas @ios.staffpath.com [mailto:Frank_Manas @ios.staffpath.com] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:01 PM To: Robert Kallien Cc: hnpeters @ssminc.org Subject: 722 Forest Glen Ln Dear Mr. Kallien, I just concluded a phone conversation with Mr. Harry Peters, Forest Glen homeowners association president. Mr. Peters advised me that upon review of the architectural plans today, the proposed addition at 722 Forest Glen Lane would place the structure a mere 9.8 ft from the property line! Up to today, we had absolutely no idea how close to the property line they intended to build this structure. As I pointed out in my previous e-mail we have several concerns regarding this project however we are extremely alarmed by this new revelation. At this point I would appreciate if you would forward my concerns as well as my earlier e-mail to the entire board for their immediate review. Thank you for reviewing this matter. Frank Manas 802 Wildwood Ct. Oak Brook IL, 60523 (630) 516-0802 10/5/2004 �`�' Message • • Page 1 ofL Gail Polanek From: Robert Kallien Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:15 AM To: Gail Polanek Subject: FW: 722 Forest Glen Lane -----Original Message----- From: Frank_Manas@ios.staffpath.com [ma i Ito:Frank—Ma nas @ios.staffpath.com] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:56 AM To: Robert Kallien Cc: hnpeters @ssminc.org Subject: 722 Forest Glen Lane Dear Mr. Kallien, My family and I reside at 802 Wildwood Ct. in the Forest Glen subdivision. Our next door neighbors Pradeep &Rekha Bhargava who reside at 722 Forest Glen Ln. mentioned to me this past summer that they have interest in expanding on the backside (southside) of their home. As I mentioned to Pradeep, I certainly appreciate him informing me about this proposed project. I discussed with Pradeep that as far as I was concerned what any homeowner cares to build on their own property with proper Oak Brook Village and, Forest Glen Home Owners board approval, permits etc... is well within any homeowners rights and we certainly continue to wish our neighbors well with their plans. A matter that did come up is a possible request for a variance change that may be needed to build into the existing easement and that is the purpose of my writing you. Pradeep did mention that he may need one considering the proposed size of his addition. Currently I do not know how far into the easement this project may go. Speaking recently with Mr. Harry Peters, the Forest Glen homeowners president he too was not quite sure. He just recently receive actual architectural plans and was unable to tell how far this project would project toward my property. Forest Glen is a unique subdivision in many ways including the quality of homes, landscaping, mature trees, open space and privacy. With all this said, I have just a few comments and a question or two regarding any sort of variance change and it's potential impact on this uniqueness as well as my property. Forest Glen lot sizes range from 15,000 sq. ft up to 29,815. The subdivisions average is approximately 18,000. In my neighborhood and the adjoining blocks,the average is more in the lines of 18,500. 722 Forest Glen has a square footage of 15,500 and my lot is 15,784, so as you can see we are pretty tight here already. Currently the way my home is situated on my lot, I or some future owner of my home have enough room along the entire back side of my residence for future expansion without any sort of variance request needed.Naturally I understand one has to go to the village for permits, and get homeowners 10/5/2004 16- 0,- Message • • Page 2 of 2 board approval etc.. but the issue is, I have plenty of room to expand as things stand right now. In order to protect my own rights and property value I really need to get Village and Forest Glen Homeowners verification that this situation for my property still exists if any sort of variance request at 722 was granted. I would also like to know if indeed the proposed project will encroach into the easement, and if so, how far. Lastly, I have no doubt that we all have the best interest of the neighborhood and subdivision in mind. We have a huge investment in our home and we simply want to protect that asset and the aesthetics and quality of the Forest Glen neighborhood and subdivision Thank you for reviewing this matter. Frank Manas 802 Wildwood Ct. Oak Brook, IL, 60523 (630) 516-0802 10/5/2004 6E OF OAM P 9 � 90 o ® �C1 O y G O 2 X01104 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Date: September 28, 2004 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website To: Zoning Board of Appeals www.oak-brook.org Administration From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Subject: Bhargava/Agrawal—Variation—Additional Information Community Development At your meeting on September 7, 2004, the Bhargava/Agrawal request for a 630.990.3045 variation to the rear yard setback did not receive the required four votes to FAX 630.990.3985 either approve or deny the request. According to the Zoning Board of Engineering Appeals Rules of Procedure, if a motion fails to receive four (4) votes in Department favor of the application, a motion denying the application shall be formally 630.990.3010 entered on the record. However, if the votes of absent but eligible FAX 630.990.3985 members, when added to the number voting in favor of the applicant, would Fire Department total four (4) or more, the matter shall be postponed to the next meeting of 630.990.3040 the Board. If the motion to approve an application fails to receive four (4) FAX 630.990.2392 affirmative votes at the next meeting, a motion denying the application shall Police Department be formally entered on the record. 630.990.2358 Accordingly, this request has been placed on your current agenda for FAX 630.990.7484 consideration. Since your last meeting, the applicant has submitted a Public works revised application, letter of explanation and building elevations to more Department clearly define the scope of the request to permit an 18-ft. encroachment into 630.990.3044 the required rear yard in order to construct an 18-ft. by 21-ft. room addition FAX 630.472.0223 along with an 18-ft. by 10-ft. attached deck. Oak Brook Please consider this additional information as you continue your Public Library deliberations on this request. 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 attachments FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 • a S APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIANCE Q. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances A. The property is approximately 14000 sq.ft much smaller than the standard 18000 sq.ft properties. B. The house has been built with a significant setback in the front and side. Area in the back has been minimized. C. The house is bounded by two streets and placed on a corner lot. D. Without variance allowance, additions can be made in front or side of the house. However, such additions will not add to the property's aesthetics and will not be welcome in the neighborhood. Also, additions in the front or side do not complement the interior layout of the house and would be very costly to construct. Hence this approach is not recommended. E. The requested variance is for an encroachment of approximately 18 ft in depth and 31 feet in width which includes loft for a wood deck It is a small area relative to the total backyard. Q. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality A. The variation does not effect the visual description of the property or its surroundings. It is our belief that it will add to the character of the neighborhood. Q. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out A. We bought the property in Dec 2002. We were not informed of the variance restrictions at that time. The lot is smaller than standard,and the setbacks in the front and side constrain any additions without the variance allowance. The construction of the house (i.e.limited access) restrains the usage of the backyard and is quite inconvenient. Q. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification A. Yes. The standard size of the properties in this zoning area are 18000 sq. ft. The house was built in 1980 and its layout was designed at that time. We are trying to update the property and make it more livable. The other properties in the zoning area have usually have a bigger and deeper backyard and an addition similar to the proposed will not infringe on any zoning laws for these properties.. My property due to its position, layout of the house and setbacks is an exception. Q. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. A. The variation will not cause any change to the neighborbood and will not be disruptive or detrimental or injurious to other property. Q. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. A. The variation will not cause any of the above. A letter from the adjacent property owner supporting the variation is attached. The addition,for which the variance is sought, will be approx 18ft by 31 ft and will be in the middle of the backyard. It will leave more than 40 ft on one side and 90 feet on the other side. Q. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. A. We,the current residents, intend to stay in this property for several years. The addition will make the house more comfortable , convenient and up-to-date Q. That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property A. The house was built and designed nearly 25 years ago and the constraints indicated here were all established at that time. We,the current owners, had no knowledge nor input in its location, design or position respective to the lot. The variance will enhance the property and the house and make it more attractive. We would like the Board to give due consideration to our application and approve the requested variation. Thank you. Amewbeb 0 0 REASONS FOR REQUESTING VARIANCE • We bought the current property located at 722 Forest Glen Lane, Oak Brook in the year 2002. • The property was built nearly 25 years ago. • The property is on a corner lot at the juncture of Forest Glen Lane and Wildwood RESTRAINTS • The property is approximately 14000 sq ft much smaller than the standard 18000 sq.ft properties in this area. • The house was built with a significant setback from the streets. With less than standard land and the setbacks from the streets, not much land was left in the back and one side. • If the house was built with the proper setback,practically no variance would be required for this addition. But since the house was moved further back than required, a variance requirement becomes necessary • The design of the house has only one exit to the backyard through the laundry room. Other ways to get to the backyard are through the garage and through the front door. Both these exits require going around the house. • There is a cement patio but due to the inconvenient ways of accessing it, is not used frequently. PROPOSAL • The proposed addition ties into the house through a bay window and makes the backyard much more accessible. • The encroachment is approx 18 ft feet . The total encroached area to be covered is 18.0 ft by 31 ft. which includes 10 ft for an attached wood deck It is relatively small area and does not change the land area around the house. • The boundary between our house and of our neighbor is defined by several bushes and plants and the construction will cause very little visual disruption, if any. SUMMARY • The hardships placed on the property with the smaller area and the setbacks require that any addition to the house WILL require a zoning variance. The approach we have taken which is to add an addition to the back is the only option that does not affect the neighborhood and does not disrupt the character of the house. We believe that the addition will add to the beauty of the house and enhance the property within the neighborhood. • Building in the front or the side does not complement the interior of the house nor does it appear attractive from outside. To do any of these modifications would also be very expensive and require zoning variance. We have,therefore, settled on the addition in the rear. • Due to the layout of the house, the smaller-than-normal parcel of land and the setbacks in the front and side, the request for variance is justified and we request the committee to approve the request. The encroachment area is relatively small and does not cause any disruptions in the aesthetics of the house or the neighborhood. It will improve the property. ROOK �S A � PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ® VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ SPECIAL USE ($675) APPLICANT TO COMPLETE a� LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 722 Forest Glen Lane PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 24 - 206 - 044 LOT NO. 23 SUBDIVISION Forest Glen LEGAL ADDRESS* 722 Forest Glen Lane ZONING DISTRICT R4 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-6D-3-F.3 ACTION REQUESTED i/c��'•;�� �c-� �a ��c�a� ab b2�x.�- � ,�` °`-�' t ' i K oy'LC'- t� b u Q i `d� ?t 21 A--C>)vA c--Zf k PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER X CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT OWNER(S)OF RECORD Rt:KNA ASRAyA-L 4- Po-ADDE LP 614 A,"AVA PHONE b3° S-3° >©33 ADDRESS 72-t FnR sT 61-e'v .4^., CITY U 131L°°K STATE X L ZIP 6<--:,-!;-;z3 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) �IEI.F� I4�Got- s,Q-� d' p/Lh�c �P PHONE 6 ° 3o 1 033 ADDRESS Z� 2 Il-���` G�Eti �� CITY 64-&6Q -t< STATE L ZIP kp5-2.3 E-mail Address '`a S"`- 6°'y. I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our)knowledge and belief. In addition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of billing .......................................................................... gnature..of..A pGcant.........._................................................................Date...............................................................................Signature..of.Applicant_......_........._...._.._............_....._..._....Date......................._..................... DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE—FOR OFFICE USE ONLY t�+g�`aa'� .�:a•-:^. a° a. � >^Tk, 3��'° ,' �,�' �o- r �3 gs.: F� a . APP-RESIDENTIAL VARIATION5 /1.5 � 722 FOREST GLEN LANE OAKBROOK Room Addition Scope • Construct a room approximately 17 ft by 21 ft at the back of the house • It will be over a 21 ft by 22 ft patio • Excavate 17' by 21' area in back of building • Foundation will be trench 42' below grade. Rods drilled into existing foundation • All walls to be out of 2 x 4 construction 16"in center • Roof to be stick build with cathedral/vaulted ceilings • Roof top will be 14 feet above ground • Roof to be constructed out of 2 x 8 rafters 16"on center. • '/2"sheeting on all outside walls and roof • Furnish and install clad double hung windows ( 6 in total) • Furnish and install 2 trapezoid windows in the peaks of the roof • Furnish and install skylights • Flooring to be Brazilian Maple finished to match the interior of current house • Bay window to be taken out. Roman columns to be installed at the opening • Roofing to cedar shingles to match existing roof. Gutters and down spouts to be installed to match existing gutters • Exterior will be stucco and wood trimming to match house • All walls to be insulated—walls R-13, floor-R-30, Ceiling R-19 • All wiring will be in metal conduits. Switches and receptacles to be standard • Electrical outlets to be no more than 11 feet apart • Lights inside will be can lights and 4 sconces • Duct work will be installed and tied to existing HVAC • All drywall to be '/2" installed, mudded, sanded primed and painted • Ceiling fan(1)will be installed • There will be two doors. One- a French sliding patio door facing east. The other will be a single door facing west • A 10 feet by 17 feet deck will be added on the east side of the room. It will over an existing flower bed. The material will pressure treated. • All exterior walls will be Tyvek vapor wrapped • All work will be done by licensed workers and subject to building codes of Oak Brook city. r e MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 7 2004 REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPROVED AS WRITTEN ON OCTOBER 5, 2004. 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL.TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Chairman Champ Davis in the West Wing Training Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Members Richard Ascher, George Mueller, and Robert Sanford ABSENT: Members Manu Shah and Steven Young IN ATTENDANCE: Director of Community Development, Robert Kallien, Jr. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JUNE 29, 200 Motion by Member Ascher, seconded by Member Mueller, to approve the minutes of the June 29, 2004 Regular Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting as written. The June 29, 2004 meeting was rescheduled from July 5, 2004 due to the holiday. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: There was no unfinished business to discuss S W BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS A. HARGAVA/GRAWAL — 722 FOREST GLEN LANE — VARIATION BHARGAVA/GRAW AL- FOREST — TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE - ZONING ORDINANCE GLENzLANE- SECTION 13-6D-3F-3 — VARIATION TO THE REAR YARD VARIATION-REAR SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION YARD SETBACK Chairman Davis swore in Pradeep Bhargava, the petitioner and owner of the property at 722 Forest Glen Lane. Mr. Pradeep Bhargava said that they purchased the home a couple of years VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 1 of 16 September 7, 2004 r • • ago. They really like Oak Brook and intend to stay. The lot is only 14,000 square feet and the zoning district minimum is 18,000 square feet. The plat on page J of the file shows the position of the house on the lot. To add any addition to the existing house, which is only 2800-2900 square feet, there is no other option without receiving a variation. There are very few options available to add onto the house. They are looking to build the addition on a slab located at the rear of the house. The backyard is about 40 feet deep, but it is about 160 feet wide. The proposed 18 foot encroachment will only be about 21 feet of the length of the backyard. There was a discussion regarding the existing setbacks for the property. It was determined that the rear yard setback is 30 feet. The property abuts 2 streets so there are two frontages. Chainnan Davis confirmed that there are two neighbors and there is a letter in the file from the Homeowners Association. He asked if there were any objections from any of the neighbors. Mr. Bhargava said that he spoke to the neighbors and not one has objected. He has received a letter from the Forest Glen Homeowners Association, which has given preliminary approval of the variation requested. The Members reviewed Mr. Bhargava's response to standards on page F of the case file. Chairman Davis said that in the petitioner's response to the standards it appears that the hardship is believed to be that his lot is much smaller than the other lots. Mr. Bhargava said that the hardship exists due to the location and layout of the house when it was built. The backyard would be more accessible to them by adding the room addition. He said that the location would also help with the flow of the house. Member Mueller asked if the addition was one story. Mr. Bhargava responded that it would be a one story addition with a cathedral ceiling. Chairman Davis asked if they had ruled out placing it to the side of the lot. Mr. Bhargava responded, yes they had because it would look very odd on the side of the lot and would not work with the flow of the house.. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 2 of 16 September 7, 2004 Chairman Davis asked about architectural plans being submitted. Mr. Bhargava responded that he did not have plans prepared because they are very expensive; and based on the decision would determine whether he would be able to go forward to be able to build the addition. He did prepare a rough drawing by hand. He said that it will have a cathedral ceiling with skylights and windows. Member Ascher confirmed that the property is zoned R-4 and the setbacks are 30 foot front, 10 foot side and 30 foot rear. Member Ascher said that his only problem is when the next neighbor comes in and asks for 10 or 20 more feet. The Code has been set up to set some sort of standards. When people buy houses they should be aware of those. He drove by it and it is a very nice property and does not see the addition as a big problem. However, he would hate to be sitting on the Zoning Board when the next neighbor shows up also asking for a variation he asked where do you stop? Mr. Bhargava responded that there are very few houses in the area that have the same problem. The rest of the lots are much bigger and deeper lots. There is a lot of construction going on all the time, but they do not need to come in for a variance because they have the land to work with. He said that his lot is the exception. He said that he discussed it in detail with Harry Peters from the Homeowners Association. He is very stringent and knows what goes on in the subdivision and he clearly stated to him that this lot is very different. This is a corner lot and most of the other lots in the subdivision have substantial back yards. Chairman Davis said he also drove by the property and does not believe there are many corner lots and there can be particular hardships with confer lots. The addition would not be exposed by being located in the rear. He said that he is going to assume that the Homeowners Association is quite familiar with all the properties in the Subdivision and if they thought that they this would be setting a precedent in the neighborhood they would not want to give an approval. Mr. Bhargava said that he drove around and it appears that the other lots have substantial backyards. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 3 of 16 September 7, 2004 Director of Community Development Kallien said that the setback on the site plan does not make sense for this lot. The property is zoned R-4 and should have a front yard setback of 30 feet, not 40 feet as noted on the plat of survey. The ten feet on each frontage cannot be gotten back short of demolishing the house. Traditionally corner lots are bigger because of the two frontages, this one is not. Member Asher confirmed that Forest Glen Subdivision was part of Oak Brook when this house was built. Member Sanford said it is a very attractive home and asked if the standards meet the hardship when someone did not know what the setbacks were when they bought the home. Chairman Davis said that while it is a consideration to know the setbacks when you buy property, you still have the right to seek a variation, whether or not you knew the setbacks at the time of the sale. The concern is whether there would be a flood of additional requests, if this one is granted. He cannot think of any time, that anyone has ever come in asking for a variation because someone else received it. Member Sanford asked if it meets the standards for a variation when the lot is small. Chairman Davis said that it is important to meet the standards and to not set a precedent. The circumstances need to be unique to this piece of property. Based on the testimony, the minimum lot size is 18,000 or 15,000 under certain circumstances; this lot is 14,000 square feet, which is much smaller than most of the lots in the Forest Glen Subdivision. Member Ascher said that should this be approved, he would want it stated that if anyone comes in to request a variation that it be noted that the exception was made due to the lot being a 14,000 square foot comer lot. Director of Community Development Kallien said that a question would be what type of hardship would be placed upon the property owner to locate the addition in the front of the home. Most homes are oriented that it would be difficult to add to the front of the house. There are also a number of large trees in the front of the home. Mr. Bhargava said that the exterior would match the existing house. The addition is not a significant amount of area. The home is restricted by VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 4 of 16 September 7, 2004 7ia 419 large setbacks and they have very few options to build onto the house. The proposed area is approximately 18 x21 feet and they believe that it is the best place to put an addition. A list of the materials was given to the Homeowner Association to ensure that they met the standards of the Association. There are no blueprints yet. The blueprints are $2500 and they felt it was better to see if they can even do it first. No one in the audience spoke in support of or in opposition to the request. Chairman Davis motioned, seconded by Member Mueller to recommend approval of the variation for the construction of a room addition as requested by approximately 18 feet into the rear yard setback. The standards have been addressed on Pages F and F1 and the situation is due to unique circumstances which include that the lot is undersized being 14,000 square feet and the R-4 zoning district minimum standards are 18,000 square feet; it is a corner lot; and from an aesthetic standpoint will not impact other homes in the neighborhood. The homeowner association has given its preliminary approval. There is a rough sketch of the proposed addition on page G of the case file and the addition is to be built in substantial conformance with the plan submitted. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 3 —Members Mueller, Sanford and Chairman Davis Nays: 1 —Member Ascher Absent: 2—Members Shah and Young. Motion Failed According to the Zoning Board of Appeals Rules of Procedure, if a motion fails to receive four (4) votes in favor of the application, a motion denying the application shall be formally entered on the record. However, if the votes of absent but eligible members, when added to the number voting in favor of the applicant, would total four (4) or more, the matter shall be postponed to the next meeting of the Board. If the motion to approve an application fails to receive four (4) affirmative votes at the next meeting, a motion denying the application shall be formally entered on the record. Chairman Davis said under the Rules this matter will be continued to the next meeting on October 5, 2004. Member Sanford asked at what point plans would be drawn. ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑H❑❑❑❑1❑\❑❑❑that normally there are conceptual Chairman Davis said that normally there are conceptual drawings of the proposal in the case file. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 16 September 7, 2004 Mr. Bhargava said that the plans would need to be provided at the time they applied for permits to the Village and to the Homeowner Association for architectural review. If they think it is not appropriate for the subdivision they would not approve it, even if they receive the variation. Member Ascher said that he looked for drawings and he wondered why the presentation would not be made to the Zoning Board. This Board is responsible for granting the variation not the architectural review committee. He would have felt much more comfortable having had plans to review. Reading the material he thought he could see how it would work. When he looked at the plan and a statement was made that the only way to get to the patio was through the garage around the side of the house. If the variation is granted, what will happen after the plans are drawn (that would not be seen by the Zoning Board), that there would be some way to access the back yard. That is why he thinks it is important to see the plans, approve it based upon the plans and be assured that what is will be built. Instead of granting an architectural committee the right to supersede the Zoning Board of its decision. He would be reluctant to change his decision unless he could see the plans that are going to be presented to the architectural committee. It may cost $2500, but the variation has a certain amount of expense, but there are certain things that need to happen to grant a variation. Most people bring in plans and final drawings, so that when the Zoning Board gives their approval they know what they are recommending and what it will look like. Chairman Davis and the other members agreed. Mr. Bhargava responded that he was told this would be adequate. He said that he is trying to preserve everything in the backyard there will be doors to access the backyard from the east and west. The room will be attached to a dinette between the kitchen and the family room. They will preserve the backyard and said that he was told blueprints were not absolutely necessary for this hearing. Director of Community Development Kallien said that in reviewing the Code there is no explicit requirement to provide detailed plans. Most applicants do take that next step to ensure that the Board's are comfortable with what the request actually is. When the applicant presented this, he felt it was sufficient to give an understanding of what was requested The Zoning Board is well within its power to require additional plans in order to make a decision. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 16 September 7, 2004 7• There was a general discussion regarding the construction timeframe. Mr. Bhargava submitted a list of all the materials and construction. It is a very simple room. After reviewing this document Member Ascher said that a deck was listed that is not shown or mentioned in the variation request. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the deck would require a variation, but an at-grade patio would not. Chairman Davis asked if the petitioner had mentioned the construction of the deck with the neighbors. Mr. Bhargava said that he has and they did not have any objection. He also added that he could remove the deck from the plan. Director of Community Development Kallien said that it is important to show how the addition will look from the outside. Member Ascher added that if he came back with a deck shown on the plans it may be approved. Chairman Davis said that a patio is not part of the structure, but that a deck is part of the structure. If he intends to add a deck, the application needs to be amended to reflect that and it should be shown on the plans. Member Mueller said that seeing how it would look from the exterior would be beneficial to the Board. A discussion ensued regarding documents that the members would like to review. It was suggested that the petitioner submit the following documents prior to the next meeting: 1. Amend the application to include the proposed deck. 2. Submit architectural plans, to include the deck. 3. Plans showing the proposed exterior. The matter will be on the October 5, 2004 agenda. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 7 of 16 September 7, 2004 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: August 27, 2004 FILE NOS: 2004-017-VAR DESCRIPTION: Variation to the rear yard setback to accommodate the construction of a room addition to an existing single family home. PETITIONER: Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal 722 Forest Glen Lane Oak Brook, IL 60523 LOCATION: Southwest corner of Forest Glen Lane and Wildwood Court, in the Forest Glen Subdivision. ADDRESS: 722 Forest Glen Lane EXISTING ZONING/USE: R-4 Single-Family Detached Residence District,presently improved with a single-family home. ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: R-4, Single-Family Detached Residence District, single-family homes in the Forest Glen Subdivision. South: Same. East: Same. West: R-3 DISCUSSION: Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal, the owners of the subject property at 722 Forest Glen Lane have submitted a petition seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-613-3-17.3 of the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the construction of an approximate 378 sq.ft. addition to an existing single-family home. The addition would encroach approximately 18-ft. into the required 30-ft. rear yard. The lot area encompasses approximately 14,000 sq.ft. which is less than the 18,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size in the R-4 Zoning District. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of this request. 00 STAFF REPORT—VARIATION BHARGAVA/AGRAWAL-722 FOREST GLEN CASE No.2004-017-VAR RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to hold the required public hearing on the variation request and make a recommendation. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a variation. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address these standards. CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by Staff, if it is the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for a variation, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request. The following conditions might be appropriate for inclusion in a recommendation: 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted. 2. Also, the Zoning Board of Appeals is authorized to recommend additional conditions as they see fit. However, if it is the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has not satisfied the applicable ordinance requirements and factors for a variation, a recommendation would be in order to deny this request. Respectfully Submitted, Robert L. Kal` Jr., AICP Director of CIinm pity Development 2 BOARD O DIRECT FG OR Harry N.Peters-IIters-President Jim Lazzarini-Vice President Forest Glen Greg Luczak-Secretary Dario DelFiacco-Treasurer HoIILeOWnerS Frank Knoght Association Richard Olson Mike Majewski Tuesday,August 31,2004 Pradeef Bhargava 722 FOREST GLEN LN OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Dear Pradeea, This letter will serve as a preliminary non-binding approval of the Forest Glen Homeowners Association Board on your proposed addition to your home. This is being done to accommodate your presentation to the Zoning Board for a variance in set back. I have reviewed your plans and talked to Mr. Frank Manas who would be most directly affected. They appear to be in keeping with our traditionally approved plans and therefore I don't see any reason why Forest Glen would oppose the variance you need to do this addition. I understand that the plans you submitted to me where your own hand drawings and that the appropriate Architectural Drawings will be completed once the Village grants you the variance you seek. The Forest Glen Architectural Chairman (Mr. Frank Knight, 213 Woodglen Lane, 630-782-6050) will have to review the plans your Architect draws up and then present them to the full FGHA. Board for approval. You will also need to have a landscape plan for around your addition as well(does not have to be professionally drawn). There will be a $1,000 performance Bond and a $50.00 review fee due upon submittal of the final Plans. The Bond will be returned upon successful completion in accordance with the approved plans. We meet the second Wednesday of the month (generally) and would review your plans at that meeting. Good luck with your effort. Since y, Peters President 808 Wildwood Ct. Oak Brook, IL 60523 cc Frank Knight �i • 0 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION Public Hearing NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that pic hearing Paddock Publications, Inc. a ubl before the Zoningg Board of Appeals of the Viliagaof Oak Brook age and Look Daily Herald Counifes, Illinols, will be held on June 29,2004,at 7:30 2 m.in the S.E.Dean Board Room of the Bufler Govern• ment Center,12000ak Brook Road, Oak Brook, ""no's 60523 for the purpose of con• siderin9 the application of Pradeep Bh°rpava and Rek- h°Agrawol,722 Forest Glen Lane, Oak Brook, IL 60523 for a Variation as provided under Title in Ordi«,13-1,- Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, 6 of the Zoning9 Ordinance of the Village aak Brook,III(- amendedrdinance G60 as DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD. The petitioner Is seeking Section I of a variation to That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the Section 13-bDa va The earl- atlon being sought is to the required rear yarn setback Village(s) of Addison Bloomingdale Carol Stream, Glendale Heights, Glen Ellyn, (approximdletY 19 feet) to permit ihe,consiruttign of q > > room addition onto the exist• in hare• Itasca Keeneyville Lisle Lombard Medinah, Naperville, Oak Brook, Oakbrook Terrace, The pr°pentY may be gen- ' s eraliy describedas 722 For- lin is 60523 with the legal Roselle Villa Park Warrenville West Chicago, Wheaton,. Winfield, Wood Dale Beats on with the legal , , description as follows: Lot 23 in Forest Glen Sub- divsion Unit 2,being a sub• division of the Northeast quarter 9 aNSection angTown- ship Egst of the Third.Principal County Illinols and of tot the Fractional Northwest County(ies) of DuPage quarter of Section 19,Town. ship 39 North Range- 1T East of the Third Prin y Ila year- Y P and State of Illinois, continuously for more than one prior to the date of the first Meridian,in Cook County I 1he leaf cieeo rdedtoMaYyP13, publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said 1977 as Document R77.35731, p 06 DuPage County, imnar: Village(s), Counn' ies and State. Per 4 20 e I Index Number:. `J(• ) All persons des irin0o to be. heard wilt be afforded an o! portunity lo do so and'no submit their statements I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an Act to revise TTe' In writing or both. The he'.ring may e I re- cessed toeandPl Place no. the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715, LiceofTimeand ounce atrhof Is publicly announced of the roperhearing or is given by news- Act 5, Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true co publication not less was �fhan five (S) days prior to 11 the date of the recessed copy, heIn accord with the provi. published August 16, 2004 in said DAILY HERALD. dons of the American with Disabilities Act,any Individ- ual who Is in need of a rea- sonable a apaommodatla„ in IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS Inc.,order to parattende in or benefit from attendance at ' , this public meeting should c t natter JeffieyeAAoADeA has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent, at Arlington Heights, Assistant Village Monger: Illinois. at 630-990-5738 as soon as Melble before the meeting The Petitioner's applied= tion is on fi a Ph the.Village Clerk and with the Director of Community Development.. Persons wishing to examine the petition documents may arrange to do so with the.DI- redar of CommunityY Devel- opment,Robert KallI.,VII: In of Oak Brook,1200 Oak ,rook 3, Rteeph Oak Brook,600,400-_ PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. Linda Gonnell° Village Clerk DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board of Ap- peols of the Village of Oak Brook DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinols. Published in Daily Herald August 16,2004(3359523)5 BY Authori Agent Control # T3359523 G� OF Oqq, O ® A O y G O A f tl. co 11 Village of Oak Brook August 16,2004 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Dear Resident: www.oak-brook.org Administration The Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be considering a Variation at the 630.990.3000 meetings as scheduled on the reverse side of this notice. FAX 630.990.0876 The application has been filed by: Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal Community 722 Forest Glen Lane Development 630.990.3045 Oak Brook,IL 60523 FAX 630.990.3985 The property in question is located at: 722 Forest Glen Lane Engineering Department Relationship of applicant to property: Owner 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 Subdivision: Forest Glen Fire Department 630.990.3040 Also shown on the reverse side of this notice is a map*of the area to assist you in determining FAX 630.990.2392 your relationship to the property in question. Police Department The request that has been made is as follows: 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 The petitioner is seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-6D-3F-3. The variation being sought is to the required rear yard setback Public Works 18 feet to permit the construction of a room addition onto Department (approximately ) P 630.990.3044 the existing home. FAX 630.472.0223 If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development Oak Brook Department at 630-990-3045 to review the file on this application. I look forward to your Public Library attendance at the public meetings. 600 Oak Brook Road Sincerely, Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core Robert L.Kall' r. Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Director Oak Brook,1L 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 R,K/gp Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 Bhargak-a-722 Forest Glen-VAr' Itr.doc In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline,the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center, 1200 Oak Brook Road,(31st Street),Oak Brook,Illinois. Zoning Board Of Appeals............................................7:30 P.M.,Tuesday, September 7,2004 Board Of Trustees Meeting....................................7:30 P.M.,Tuesday, September 28,2004** **Tentative o 26 ' 4 14 tt3 22 D o0a 1` I t I 11 � 2 502 r � 3 213z foo 10 E01 F} 5 5 310 Kup,.i 106 I 0 �r 5 319 xti 21a ct, la5 11 V-"` ` ' LOCATION X06"01 20 OF SUBJECT "E„ °` a% PROPERTY r 709 46.C"& a I 1 C 7 10, It 19 I �O o 7 9 ! 7I6 n .NS 81 t u 3G < 21 `90t r I 733 4 0 3S 33 32 3 4j p%A 4os g0'; 7as RJ !7 71 $ 0°wo ow-r o u i'� gol 8°5752 �.j 71 25 7 v ?8 T/ � 9to 91 409 QoB : Sol 7 9 /8ab 1 ° ° Z 3 4 6 1 % 1806 wOOOwtDOR Cq r2 It 10 9 a 7 i 1 1800 „ 11!08 310 1\200 loo 1915 30o s RE SIM0016L I!I 14x9 r -- — O 1r4ri w 2eso0, 1 1 \ —201`0 01` ! QI *Note: The map provided is only an approximation of the area in question and is intended to be used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the property. • Bhargava-722 Forest Glen-VAR.res Itr.doc 6. Ayes: 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 - None. Absent: 1 - Trustee Caleel. Motion carried. A. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FOR PERIOD ENDING AUGUST 6 2004 - $470,112.52 Significant Items included in Above: 1) James J. Benes &Associates—Payout#12—2004 Paving Project-- $13,427.90 2) Dominic Fiordirosa Construction —Payout#6 and Final—2003 Water Main and Drainage Project- $916.90 3) James D. Fiala Paving—Payout#4—2004 Paving Project-- $150,625.83 B. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING JULY 31 2004 - $681,581.88 C. OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REFERRALS 61)) Bhargava/Agrawal 722 Forest Glen Lane—Variation Rear Yard Setback D. AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS OR PROPOSALS OR NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS -None. E. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS—OAK BROOK HOTEL, CONVENTION AND VISITORS COMMITTEE F. ORDINANCE 2004-PP-S-1079 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK G. ORDINANCE 2004-ZO-V-S-1080, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13-6C-3F (1) AND (2) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS -- CHOU—301 ASHLEY COURT 7. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: 6. C. 2) 970 PAULY LLC—CF 2020 SWIFT LLC—2020 SWIFT DRIVE—VARIATION— FRONT YARD PARKING REGULATIONS Trustee Aktipis asked that a meeting be held with staff and the applicant as there are some issues to be clarified before it is presented to the Village Board for approval. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 18 of 29 August 10, 2004 • V.G� pF 0qV�90 0 ork AL o co A CF coUNSV,`� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of August 10, 2004 SUBJECT: Referral—Bhargava/Agrawal—722 Forest Glen Lane -Variation -Rear Yard Setback FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its September 7, 2004 meeting the request for a variation to the rear yard setback at 722 Forest Glen Lane. Backeround/History: Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal, the owners of the property at 722 Forest Glen Lane in the Forest Glen Subdivision have submitted a petition seeking approval of variation to the rear yard setback in order to construct a room addition to their home. Recommendation: Please refer this request to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its September 7, 2004 meeting. Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\users\ComDev\GPOLANEK\l-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-722 Forest GLen Lane-VAR.doc i act_;.t—i R/innna R•11 AWA • 13-6D-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Lot Area: 1. Not less than eighteen thousand (18,000) square feet, except that in subdivisions forty(40) acres or more in area,the lot area may be reduced to fifteen thousand(15,000) square feet provided that lands equal to ten percent(10%) of the total area be dedicated to the village, or agency approved by the village board, for park or recreational uses and no portion of which shall be less than four(4) acres. 2. For single-family detached dwellings, the dedicated land shall be appropriate for park or recreational uses, and shall not include wet drainageways in excess of twenty five percent (25%) of the total dedicated area. B. Lot Width: Not less than seventy five feet(75')within the buildable area. C. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.4 for nonresidential uses. D. Structure Height: 1. Residential Uses: Not more than thirty five feet (35') except for continuous flat roofs, which shall be not more than thirty feet(30')to the top of any parapet wall. However,where residential building heights exceed thirty feet(30'), the highest space that can be occupied must have an emergency escape and rescue opening at a maximum elevation of thirty two feet (32') above grade. 2. Institutional And Other Nonresidential Uses: Not more than forty five feet(45'). E. Ground Floor Area Per Dwelling: 1. One Story: Not less than one thousand three hundred(1,300) square feet. 2. Bilevel: Not less than one thousand one hundred(1,100) square feet(floors at grade and above basement). 3. Dwellings Having More Than One Story: Not less than nine hundred(900) square feet. F. Yards: Except as required in subsections B and D under"accessory uses and structures" in section 13-6A-1 of this chapter, yards shall be provided as follows: 1. Front: Not less than thirty feet(30') in depth, except front yards abutting York Road and 22nd Street shall have a depth of not less than one hundred feet(100'). 2. Side: Not less than ten feet(10') in depth except: a. A side yard may be reduced to not less than eight feet(8')provided the adjoining lot r contains a dwelling with an attached garage or carport adjacent to such side yard unless a side load garage is present; b. A side yard abutting a street shall be not less than thirty feet(30') in depth; c. To accommodate a side load garage, the minimum side yard setback(on 1 side yard) must be at least twenty three feet (23'); the width of the pavement opposite of the garage door must be a minimum of twenty three feet(23'); d. For nonresidential uses each side yard abutting a street shall be not less than thirty feet (30') in depth and each interior side yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30') in depth and increased by not less than two feet(2') for each one foot (1') of structure height over thirty feet (30'). 3. Rear: Not less than thirty feet(30') in depth. i 13-14-5 • • 13-14-6 on notice to the officer from whom the appeal is taken, and on due cause being shown. C. Processing: 1. An appeal shall be filed with the Village Clerk. The Village Clerk shall forward the appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals for processing in accordance with the Illinois Compiled Statutes. 2. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give due notice thereof to parties and shall decide the appeal within reasonable time. The Board may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement or decision or determination as in its opinion ought to be made on the premises and to that end has all the powers of the official from whom the appeal is taken. D. Decisions: All decisions, after hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals on appeals from an administrative order, requirement, decision or determination of the Director of Community Development or other authorized official of the Village, shall, in all instances, be final administrative determinations and shall be subject to judicial review only in accordance with applicable statutes of the State. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966) 13-14-6: VARIATIONS: VARIATIONS A. u ority: The Board of Trustees shall decide all applications for variations of the provisions of this Title after a public hearing held before the Zoning Board of Appeals on such notice as shall be required by the Illinois Compiled Statutes. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall hold public hearings upon all applications for variations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of Trustees as to whether a requested variation would be in harmony with its general purpose and intent, and shall recommend a variation only where it shall have made findings of fact specifying the reason or reasons for recommending the variations. Such findings shall be based upon the standards prescribed in subsection D of this Section. No variation shall be granted by the Board of Trustees without such findings of fact. In the case of a variation where the Zoning Board of Appeals fails to recommend the variation, it can only be adopted by ordinance with the favorable vote of two-thirds C/O of the Trustees. Village of Oak Brook r 13-14-6 13-14-6 B. Initiation: An application for a variation shall be in triplicate and may be made by any governmental office, department, board, bureau or commission, or by any person having a freehold interest, a possessory interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual interest which may become a freehold interest, or any exclusive possessory interest applicable to the land, or land and improvements described in the application for a variation. C. Processing: An application for a variation shall be filed with the Village Clerk who shall forward one copy of such application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for processing in accordance with applicable statutes of the State and one copy to the Board of Trustees. D. Standards: 1 The Zoning Board of Appeals shall not recommend a variation of the provisions of this Title as authorized in this Section unless it shall have made findings of fact based upon the evidence presented to it on the following specific issues that: a. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. b. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. c. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. For the purpose of. supplementing the above standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in making the determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, shall also take into consideration the extent to which the following facts, favorable to the applicant, have been established by the evidence that: a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulation were to be carried out. b. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. Village of Oak Brook 13-14-6 • - - 13 14 7 c. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. d. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. e. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. f. That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 3. The Zoning Board of Appeals may recommend and the Board of Trustees may require such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefitted by a variation as may be necessary to comply with the standards set forth in this Section to reduce or minimize the injurious effect of such variation upon other property in the neighborhood, and to implement the general purpose and intent of this Title. E. Unauthorized Variations: The variation procedure shall in no case be used to accomplish a result which could otherwise be achieved by a rezoning of the property involved, such as, but not limited to, establishment or expansion of a use not permitted in a residence district; authorizing the construction of residences in other than residence districts; nor authorizing other than single-family detached residences in the R1, R2, R3 and R4 Districts. F. Reapplications: Any person having been denied a variation to the provisions of this Title respecting a specific parcel of property may not reapply for a like variation on said real property until the period of one year has elapsed since the denial of the application for variation by the Village President and Board of Trustees. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-137, 9-14-1971) 13-14-7: PLAN COMMISSION JURISDICTION`: The Plan Commis- sion of the Village, which has been duly established with 1. See Title 2, Chapter 1 of this Code for the Planning Commission. Village of Oak Brook �6 . r , � pF Oqk S � to O9�eR0 OK�vv° PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER REGULATIONS: ❑ VARIATION ($750) f APPLICANT TO COMPLETE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY PERMANENT PARCEL N0. LOT NO. 2,3 SUBDIVISION F0 E15 r 6 rrJ aN IT 2- LEGAL ADDRESS -72 2 -ve-s ZONING DISTRICT 9 -`{ ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13 - (, D _ -3. — F, 3 iICJ�Y.i c�r u }p �cP• f g i n fta l t^e ACTION REQUESTED: �- _ reM� yd.Pvd S'e ��li tr '�r cue a� b-,CA;t 17 y zj Itoan+� cR_di l °cn PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER u CONTRACT PURCHASER ] AGENT ...v NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) A,!Z Ca PHONE 36 ADDRESS T% 2_40. -rf- (4c, k`` CITY d STATE L ZIP E-mail Address f")- �V b Ct;P 6 ff A-A 64W A 'Lz' M 4 IV- Cj' M I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my (our)knowledge and belief. In addition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of billing. yy��,�, Si ature of Applicant Date Signature f Applicant Date DO N T WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Emu ,Y Names Surrounding Property Ow& Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the Count Recorder of Deeds P 9 q Y (or the Registrar of Titles of the County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Cr NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ez n k Igct At Q s 2- °.ke Le S o 0 J CT, D >t,LL OS 't-13 ®`r ►wv�� Cd- dot"h �0 g -u:04K AIJ C M EY IrJQ s / 7�o Fep� S, �Oe/n. )A, � � G •��le l"i'o y cam , 04c,AL v 72Y 4 /-I CL/L-k— t{ 3 3 y X G (Attach additional sheets if necessary) �r PRADEEP BHARGAVA 9-0900 1.0 7 REKHA.AGRAWAL 2467194 722 FOREST GLEN LANE 'L (� OAKBROOK,IL 60523 DATE l �7r ,1 PAV TO THE _ �°"�+�'� $ / �v ORDER OF /I V�f� �(/��'� •W�/� '-�'7JCLL4R5 U �....=.,a„� BANKINONE® 9enk One NA s 5:870 Chicaggoo Illlno. •�/ _ MEMO V V��-s•-C /�_ >.L __ / ... .._ x:0 7 10000 131: 2467 19411.0 10 NUMBER S CHECKS $ CASH INV It DATE NAME G G.L.ACCOUNT M DESCRIPTION INVALID VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK U WITHOUT � q SIGNATURE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15607 O N 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD G : OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS ` u PHONE: (630)990-3045 74W4 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS rty VeriPro a ficata Sub�t p (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) Y 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): �6 :2q to� Y f 2. Common Address: 12 2 fi�.�r�. s C I e--t, ,2 a`�. E)0�-k 1 65,�a& , 6,Ds� :3 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Lot 23 in Forest Glen Subdivision Unit 2,being a subdivision of part of the Northest quarter of Section 24,Township 39 North,Range 1 l,East of the Third Principal Meridian in Dupage County, Illinois and of part of the Fractional Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 38 North Range 12,East of the third Principal Meridian in Cook County Illinois. The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: ke S 0-� Date ca'lled: 2 2-1 oN •fib 7 ��t'°r ��a`� DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Date called: DuPage County Clerk's Office-Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: _. Date called: 7 I z2 --If I verify that the information provided above is accurate. Printed Name Signature Date: ��5 2 o q Relationship to Applicant: REASONS FOR REQUESTING VARIANCE • We bought the current property located at 722 Forest Glen Lane, Oak Brook in the year 2002. • The property was built nearly 25 years ago. • The property is on a corner lot at the juncture of Forest Glen Lane and Wildwood Ct. RESTRAINTS • The property is approximately 14000 sq ft much smaller than the standard 18000 sq.ft properties in this area. • The house was built with a significant setback from the streets. With less than standard land and the setbacks from the streets, not much land was left in the back and one side. • The design of the house has only one exit to the backyard through the laundry room. Other ways to get to the backyard are through the garage and through the front door. Both these exits require going around the house. • There is a cement patio but due to the inconvenient ways of accessing it, is not used frequently. PROPOSAL • The proposed addition ties into the house through a bay window and makes the backyard much more accessible. • The encroachment is approx 18 ft feet . The total encroached area to be covered is 18.0 ft by 21 ft. It is relatively small area and does not change the land area around the house. • The boundary between our house and of our neighbor is defined by several bushes and plants and the construction will cause very little visual disruption, if any. SUMMARY • The hardships placed on the property with the smaller area and the setbacks require that any addition to the house WILL require a zoning variance. The approach we have taken which is to add an addition to the back is the only option that does not affect the neighborhood and does not disrupt the character of the house. We believe that the addition will add to the beauty of the house and enhance the property within the neighborhood. • Building in the front or the side does not complement the interior of the house nor does it appear attractive from outside. To do any of these modifications would also be very expensive and require zoning variance. We have, therefore, settled on the addition in the rear. • Due to the layout of the house, the smaller-than-normal parcel of land and the setbacks in the front and side, the request for variance is justified and we request the committee to approve the request. The encroachment area is relatively small and does not cause any disruptions in the aesthetics of the house or the neighborhood. It will improve the property. • APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIANCE Q. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances A. The property is approximately 14000 sq.ft much smaller than the standard 18000 sq.ft properties. B. The house has been built with a significant setback in the front and side. Area in the back has been minimized. C. The house is bounded by two streets and placed on a corner lot. D. Without variance allowance, additions can be made in front or side of the house. However, such additions will not add to the property's aesthetics and will not be welcome in the neighborhood. Also, additions in the front or side do not complement the interior layout of the house and would be very costly to construct. Hence this approach is not recommended. E. The requested variance is for an encroachment of approximately 18 ft in depth and 21 feet in width. It is a small area relative to the total backyard. Q. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality A. The variation does not effect the visual description of the property or its surroundings. It is our belief that it will add to the character of the neighborhood. Q. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out A. We bought the property in Dec 2002. We were not informed of the variance restrictions at that time. The lot is smaller than standard,and the setbacks in the front and side constrain any additions without the variance allowance. The construction of the house(i.e.limited access) restrains the usage of the backyard and is quite inconvenient. Q. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification A. Yes. The standard size of the properties in this zoning area are 18000 sq. ft. The house was built in 1980 and its layout was designed at that time. We are trying to update the property and make it more livable. The other properties in the zoning area have usually have a bigger and deeper backyard and an addition similar to the proposed will not infringe on any zoning laws for these properties.. My property due to its position, layout of the house and setbacks is an exception. ' • Q. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. A. The variation will not cause any change to the neighborbood and will not be disruptive or detrimental or injurious to other property. Q. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. A. The variation will not cause any of the above. A letter from the adjacent property owner supporting the variation is attached. The addition,for which the variance is sought, will be approx 18ft by 21 ft and will be in the middle of the backyard. It will leave more than 40 ft on one side and 80 feet on the other side. Q. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. A. We,the current residents, intend to stay in this property for several years. The addition will make the house more comfortable, convenient and up-to-date Q. That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property A. The house was built and designed 25 years ago and the constraints indicated here were all established at that time. We,the current owners, had no knowledge nor input in its location, design or position respective to the lot. The variance will enhance the property and the house and make it more attractive. We would like the Board to give due consideration to our application and approve the requested variation. Thank you. r . r• July 16,2004 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, I1160523 Ref: Request for Variance at 722 Forest Glen Lane, Oak Brook Dear Sir: Our neighbors,Pradeep Bhargava and Rekha Agrawal, have informed us that they intend building an addition to their house at 722 Forest Glen Lane, Oakbrook, I1160523. We have no objections for this addition and feel that this addition will add aesthetic value to their house. We ,therefore, support their request to the Village for the allowance of a zoning variance to detached single family residences. Sin erely, Gerard and Rose Aranha 721 Forest Glen Lane Oak Brook, I1160523 e r s � 5 to -'vim, k n $uA r 5 i v 4z s' y CT Cl v �' 1 �cr 1 'Ad s.LtI7f.7 rJ/,,7 //)I f mss r m ar „z8 ' v-7 X„7F ff rA Lot 23 in Forest Glen Subdivision Unit 2, being a subdivision of part of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in DuPoge. County, Illinois and of part of the Fractional Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 39 North, Range 12, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 13, 1977 as Document R77-35731, in DuPage County, Illinois. i Lane Forest GI en Iron I (Four a N 83°-49'-16" E Iron P1 a rod - 305.00 ° 122's (Found 28.11 are I ..r 1 L y 1 d 1 N j 0 w° i Line O Bid p 3 i 40' .9 a 0,53 .o cone 66.20 0 1 r- 20.48 ------ 16.85 27.62 N N & Frame 1 O °' lt drive r Z i 2 #722 a m c 66.00 1 � 0 6aY Boy �°►'�.Y c) 1 1 I Q 1 160.00 N 83°'49'_16" E j i a.p a- 00 0 0 i I I I i Please check Legal Description with Deed and report any discrepancy immediately. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK Surveyed November 26 20 02 i, STEPHEN J. BAL n n< Building Located November 26 2O 02 `���� N'� �//// hereby certify that Ij h s e `y��'er""�"`�'4<��iv of said survey, plat Ih a awn Scale: 1 inch 25 X772 ON Dimensions are I fe n e� ft, (PFR,OFESo"ZAL LAND � '�'_ corrected to a temp to 62 j NEW /NEW ONE STORY WD. /FRAME% U%DEGK ADDITION W EXISTING � 2 STORY N 5RI GK/FRAME W RESIDENCE � . .. \\\101giltlNfllry/y� o ``\�p�``��\�SEp Af�Cy�T�rrrrr' JOSEPHJAY HOENDERVOOGT / 001-004057 ry�arrngq►KU\�'_ exOMS 11-30-2004 FOREST �! LANE DESIf,N ANM LOADING A!LOKA51.1!MIT STRE55 NO LOADING:N ACCORDANCE ATM THE APPLICABLE 9PVIN5=XD LIVE LOADS L=J iN DE.`•5N w I?.s PER SO Fr.ARE As FOL'CP51 - • RacP_.- ♦ TYPICAL FLOOR, •O • AND n • SNOw_ - SOIL ,fQWTION5 • ALL F2OTINS SHALL SEAR ON SOLID UNDISTURBED SOIL OF 5000 F5F.BEAS46 CAPACITY NO CONCRETE .SMALL BE POURED IN EX'CA'VATION CONTAINING WATER OR FROZEN 6ROLND. • ALL 5,45GN-61RADE AREAS SMALL BE PROOF ROLLEV A'H HEAVIEST AVAI ABLE ECUIPPENT:MINIMUM 25 TONS)..ALT.SOFT SPOTS ENCOUNTERED SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO F!N19!9D GRACE AT.H APPROF_D FILL MATERIAL FILL MATERIAL FOR ALL SLAB.AREAS SMALL.BE P,,.ACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDI% •�-'� /� —I— /� ) P'AND VE SOIL)O TO MINIMUM rr=DE OF RS%OBTAINED IN ACCORDANCE 4TH,ASTM 0--bTO V -71 1- -71 O 1�l"'t I T'l I A.? ?! FjandH:GT "COM.E_NE SOILS OR T5#RELATIVE TENSITY OBTAIN®:N ACCORDANCE YiTY.ASTM O 20k.-65 ICF£SHIONLE55 __-O:LS).UNTIL FINAL GRADE 15 ATTANW. P ' assoc. . • PLACE 5PCKFILL EQUALLY ON BATH SIDES OF FOUNDATION M-LS. ArTUAIL GENERAL CONDITIONS I L*'"T / - rim. /'� +�%/8 I L USE OF SPACE 9Q TT. L056 REVARK9 �� oEC+c ADmrcH i 6 6LA9 VERT eLA9 I VQlf BIU N I J I / a ,�_ • ALL A;FJ.SHALL BE DOTE IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE REQ�REM'cNTS OF APPICABLE CODES fF: am ROOM 974 97.4 Ia.7 I Ine 109.1 i 19700 1 /'�•/%/C j \/'A BALD;NG PERMIT SNAIL 6E REOIESTE"iC ON IEVI WORK. J 1 - ♦ THE 5ENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF ALL REQUIRED 911.01%PERMITS.AID >J I =95 I PAYMENT OF&L APPICABLB F'S PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED SORE PROCEEDING W!T.M CONSTRUCnCN, BRICK,TRNME r i W ' _. It THE 6EHRA.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LABOR AND FACILIT:E5'.O MAINTAIN'HE SITE IN A BROOM.LEAN \ rczEGlvsHCe I II O CONDI T ICON AND SHALL!NGLUDE THE COST ATH!N..IS PROPOSAL.TRASH AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED NIGHTLY TO A O VIP'P5'R PROVIDED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 1 ! AT THE'='C1.U51ON OF 1N5 PROJECT AND PRIOR TO ITS FINAL ACCEPTANCE•ALL AREAS OF COF5TRUCTIO4'_'HA__BE SiVB+T♦ND`✓ACiAAED AND ALL CONSTRUCPON DE5R!5,MATERIAL AND TOOLS 4E7 AVED FROM DE CONSY'CTICN SITE. ♦ ALL YORK IN THI5 CONTRACT SHALL BE 6UARAN'r�AGAINST ANY DEFECTI'JE MIA,M.AL OR HNOR CMAN5HRP FOR A MI/AMJM OF ONE YEAR AFTER DATE OF FINAL COMPLETION,AN:DEF•ECTVE MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP SHALBE REPAIRED OR J I REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OPNER (1 O GO_IS,W= AND REINFORCING KSf 4 ALL CCNi-&M WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE'AMERICAN CONCRETE F ITUf'c SU!LDIN6 CODE"{ACT 519)AND YPTH'F,'!FICATION5 FOR ST!WCTURAL CONCRETE FOR BUILDINGS'(ACT SOU;,LATEST EDITION STANDARD ALY NG STRE55ES USED IN DESIGN: MN.T MFG- 404 HOOK I I ♦ ALL CCWR_FFE WORK 5HALL.4TTA!N PSI 26 DAYS ULTMATE COMPRE%Pr STRENGTH WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 BASS OF CEMENT I I IJ FER UQFG YARD OF COKCRETE,ANY 5TCP!4 CONCRETE ACRK MIST BE MADE AT CENTER OF SPAN ATH 13L.LKHEADS AID I 1 HORIZONTAL KEYS. REINFORCEMENT GRADES- I _ ♦ BAR REFFORCEMENT SMALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615,GRADE 60,VELDED"RE FABR'C SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 ♦ COSIER BAITS SHALL 5 BE E MADEFIJ'AT ALL WALL CORERS EQUAL TO TF15 ACT HOR17 30i SP WALL ENFORC�R'ENi FOREST GLEN LANE • TEST CY_ORCI5 SMALL PF_MALE AND TESTED AS OUTLINED iN CMAP;ER 15 AC ?Oi 5°ECIF;CAPOA5. • ALL R:INFORCIN6 7+AiL BE COLD NOT APPLY HEAT Cam.�•�1��1001 r�+T�FI '� ♦ 5TF4•OTAAL 5TH$SHALL BE DETAILED,FABRICAT°pV AND ERECTED!N ACWRDANCE Y2T'r.-C A5:C-FECIFICAnc S FOR THE EXCE DESIGN.FABRICATION I-ERECTION OF NS:5-KXTLMAL CEFI STEEL FOR Sl'ITECT-'AND ASIC"CODE OF STANDARDS PRACTICE' ,� / WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FO..LONNS ScCTONS:12 iDEFIN:T!ON OF ARCM-cCT-EHiGIFEFFa ONLY)41.i.?6;''LAST LIFE ONLY) GO�R ,. � IF LAN'•.!i S. MASONRY TYPICAL WALL REINFORCEMENT °'2, d SCALP!W4SI'W O ♦ ALL HOLLOW CA`KRETE BLOCK AITM ILL 7 COFFORMiCD?O.AST`!Cr90 GRADE NLO LOADING BEARING. • MORTAR SHALL CCTIF S S TO ASST R-O-I TYPE 5' -` ♦ MASONRY REI>FORC.N6 SHALL BE MR-O-Y4•.L OR EOUPL,TRrecTi ARE CISTPoKTON,N1F1BCi?6A.,ARE MMIMLM. - SALVANI'ED. ♦ ALL MA50FRY WALLS M45T 8E.A.rQ'A 'Y°JRACCED DU21N6 THEIR ERxPOk,FIND WASHED AFTER GOMPL�TION- V _. ELEGTRIGA_. MEGFIANICAL AND PLUMBING g _< - • ALL ELECTRICAL.MECHANICAL AND PL"I W WORK 51HALL COMELY WITH T$REIIIIRENENTS OF THE AFFL!CABLE CODES: • THE CONTRACTOR FOR EACH TRADE SHALL BE FAMILIAR ATH THE EXISTING CONMYOPS AND S+ALL PLAN THIS WORK IN 340 ' ACCORDANCE THERE WI iH IN.. Ytl-/Y` 111 • WORK SHALL BE ORGAN D SIC AS TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE r0 ALL EXISTINS SYSTEMS. y sw KEY 7HI roe• �• ,1,��• lu • ALL CLOSET LIGHTS EXCEPT WALK-iN CL05ET5 SHALL BE FUORE5SUNT OR W-CE55W FAT.RE5. 1� e' 20-69/4' ♦ ALL LIGHT FIXTJRES ABOVE TLBE,SM'JYEK VHRLPOCL AND VANITY TO BE OF 6 FJ.SPECIF CAPONS. ♦ KiTCH6r RL.CC TACLES TO BE SERVED BY MINIMUM OF:M CIRCUITS ATHH NO OTHER OUTLETS M�� • ALL SMOKE DETxTORS TO BE CONNECTED IN SERIES AND 15'-0'FROM ANY P,EJRODM5 8 BATTERY BACKUP. !r V W&OHM DQllele ! • ALL VENT TERMINA'ICK5 FOR ALL GAS APPLIANCES TO BE EXHAUST DIRECT CU751DE g OW _ I 1 _ _ _ _ _ omm TG I AL�♦ MATERALOPEFUN55 AROUND'✓EKS,PFLE,CNMYEYS AND PIR3*_PCE$AT CE1L:N5,FLOOR L @/EL A?Hik NON-COMBUSTIBLE 0' •IOi00 OeOC q _- ___ _ - - � �� 4>yK.•j I , ♦ ALL BATH EIWAU5T FAN5 AND PRYER'VENTS TERMINATED TO THE EXTERIOR NNOIIO I L�!Aa012 9Y IWf YtlOD 1 ! .� P - a416f.?AG®11�ji! ]r-3 I I V / �6 ERA6 NO �7049F4'ALL BUILDING COR'ER5 SHEATH IN6 TO BE!R'PTAWD FOR BRACINGALL AHDOW9 i COORS,OPEN!M5 EXTERIOR AND BEASN6AALL MBADERS TO BE(2)2•XI*4 JR i,'2'PYfroOD BETr# N f`6k E LW-XGAVAT�D ALL GLASS ABO`IE BATHTUB TO 'EMFEREV SLASS 16LA_'!N6 FOR THE 5HY'YER EhZ_CSJRESe' COIYR ! �0•PO7I'�6•�1►�%4. 0: ] 4�ALL Akcrnvs WH13RE LCYEST EDbc_LEY THLAN 18'ABOVE FIMSHm ft.00R AND PAVE.IS:SO.FT OR GREATR SLA7.`NG I 1 ' I NNLL VlEblml Vd p I TO 61.455 !- 4•STOW RLL ET q ICE DAM,FROTC^ONl V.NIMA`136'TO TIE INSIDE OF ALL EXTEROR hALL5. I 19 I p FT j rCCO oKK\ iF _ j EDGE AT ALL FASiCA,FOLL014 MANFACTURER•S INSTR4TION(I•MIN)AND ALONG THE RAKE AND EAVES EDGES C ' IIC• ALL FF.WINS,_WBE'R AND JOISTS TO BE DOUGLAS FIR NORTH.NO U, 2. "♦ M43MHM HEADROOM LSl STAIRS 6'-E I I _�♦ MIN:FU&M OF 2 ANCHOR BOLTS PER 5ECTON OF TREADED PATE AND is MAX.FROM EACH CORNER I ' I C 1 t-I]1N TImINm,MT — /Miyj1M 3 STUDS IN EACH CORFHt +7 — — — }- — — — — — — 1 r LL/. _ )rvW6W.ILL S!C59+ALK PATIOS AND DRIVE5 TO BE 4'BZ.'•W TOP OF FCWDATIQI WALL 1 +�ALL CONLIZErE EXPOSED TO ELEMENTS TO BE 6-BA6 MX!ALL(CONCRETE TO A!R-ENTRAIN 6,% 1 APPRO/BJ A65LY 70 INSPECT iYE EIF3 SYSBM. . I' I I t- $ANDERS:THE ADTH OF THE TREAD AT POINT NOT MORE THAN:2'FROM TE 5!0 { I �3 "Im rem p ~j `1 e'4sr I a'o •I� ew»• I \�LWAD°^.4RO°II �I ARGFfI=GTS PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS I �I �n made I — I — Doer.IR711D. I C— — — s �- HO PAR*OF.T1ESE DRA MSS MAT BE USED,REPRODUCED.COPIED OR CHAISES:N ANY FORM OR BY ANY 10- MEANS ATHOL7 WST'EJ PRMISSiGN FROM J.J HOEFDERV06HR AND.455DCI.4TE5. 11130m ew..NNOION O.Nb IQ 6W N2eSeN04 1 " THE USE OF THEE DRAW!N65 IS L-E.J' AND INTENPW AS PERMISSION TC CONTRRACT ONLY ONE BUILDING AND 1 Te TG THe ••\LOIIGIL NYJOTeIe KEY 1 I i rS VALID ONLY V44EN THE ARCH::G'TS SEAL 5 AFNAW,RE ETTVE USE IS 9ALEC7 TO AN AM'YONAL FEE. II , DY'!T.fl011D. 11TIfJL Nq FRAME�. I I _ V/ J.J.HOE'DERJCG'.IT AND ASSOCIATES YNLL NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE EULDING CONSTRUCTION MEAN5. METHODS,T5C RI4UE 5EOU1!WFS OR FROCED.RF5 OR"-HE SAFE'Y PRECN1f1C75 AND PROGRAMS IN. W I j N \SM.LA gLy ' � `�aQsTW Dee .. CONNECTION AIR ANY WORK DONE FLRSUANT TO-H-E PLANS.WNCH MIST COMPLY A'H ALL LOCAL 5PLDIN6 AND Welelf �. - W I Plan: SAFETY CODES AND ORDINAKE5 INCLUD!N6 THE LATEST iLL 1015 SCAFFOI.DIN6 ACT,NOR SHALL J J.HOE•DERVCShT / OOeTele Kln'AQI AHD A-;SCVATE5 BE LIABLE OR RE5PCN51ELE FOR THE QUALITY OF YORKMAVS'HIP PR°ORRED ON TIE jOB,OR PE BASEMENT AND FOUNDATION PLAN S�„CrOH OF MATERIALS OR THERR 2•ALXY AS 1)56p ON TIE JOB. TLtE&BOEAL CONTRACTOR AND)CR CLNSTfdGr/JN MANAGER SHALL SAVE HARM-55 AND INDEMNIFY.L J.HOBDRVO6H? I �'I / __J r .. AND Ay_-CG;A c5 AGAINST AL;.Kr!ON Mp CLAh{5 ARISING Ql"OF:N!S Rt0_ECT.NOT THE RESULT OF^I'_ARCM.-' �I o ARII *y. I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER OATH THAT THESE PLANS YlERE 'P�_q _ PREPARED BY RE O'UNDER R7 DMECT SUPERVTSIOX,ANO v ' s _ _ LONO'JCT,INCLUDING FEES AND COST. TO THE BEST 0�i.•.Y 1<Nv:.'r".:' ^•., `NIDENUER`F.,IXiT _ . TH�$_MANIN65 ARE IN75CW TC BE USED ONLY BY COMPETENT CONTRACTORS�!N THE 9HLDIN6 TRADE, w1777E9 AY.O OL'!FB APPLICABLE CODES ca!,aHRSF NHO At.L CCIC'CK AND`/BRlFY AL DINE15ON6 AND wNDlrc♦5,AND BE RLPONS!BLE-OR SAME BEFORE EAEGIT!NG ANY `• " � ... .' o - 11CRK REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES AT ONCE IN PRYING TO J.J NO@IDRYOGHT AND ASSOCIATES. OF THE I IE O CITY OF O/>� 1=Ieb0� s'•n a�n�-v''�V � o...�- FIRST FLOOR PLAN exp n iT-30. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS -FIGURED DIMENSIONS 5FFALL ��ITW ' TAKE PREFERENCE 201 I ,. HOENDERVOOGT nw m cmm w FwYme /\. and assoc.arch. YO POOF M 221AL TO 4700 M te 1BO 'M OF ROOF ATM APIA lay 1 hoendervoogt 100 Tower Dr. caaa COAM AU~'r �\ BUR Ridge �urlBnAMVa*aMM 9gi11eNi `a77Mt9Ml� \\ IL.80521 % 830 887 7444 k now C j Mow BATROG. vow pax Ln I I ��� FNBI MIOB Z,INN ROw Po44 - I 111v ADDITION EXI5TIN6 SPAM LEFT 51DE ELEVATION 2..S+I ASPHALT SHINGLES i r I IS><ROOFING FELT 4211 PLYY400 2'x10 9 16"0/G 1 9 i/2"BATT.INSUL R-50 `�� ! Rm!!VM _ - _� VENT CHUTES ALT.FLAT GEIL. POiOl716 GOIfIR.M � '- i ROOF VHIIS M=F T AF M \\ � Vi50EEN V.B. i � � OF PL\7F ATM AfaA ALUM.FASG!. "`•�1 1'2•G?'P5UM BD I ( I ociew lily <awAsvm - -. SEE ELEYAT10N5 `•1 JAUL•.GEIL. - -- __. -. ; i wri mDua aw - %6BtlE6 AND 00!•erODl7 _ MTB INN 4 ALLM.6U=--R — - - - - - - — I O 5460 W -. ALUM.50M7 11!7"GYPS:IN. I I I - ro00BAT70M 78 DENT TAPED AND SAND. SS WLPLODK mI RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION trEwADDirioN —1 WOOD BATTENS i TYPAR HOUSE WRAP -� V4544' I - -FMS TO 90.10 BEWKBOQD FS�. - - - 'i2`PLYWOOD Sk+EAT. i.._ \ 1 LU 7"x4°'S alb•O.G. W 3 11'BAT-INSUL.R-13 11/7'DRYWALL TAP.AND SAND -- \ j - ''11 ^I 2'X4'PLATE LL NO00 BASE l 314'T 3 G PLYW00D 2•x1o•a IE°o/c V-000,ISTS I LU r 7'x114'BLOCKING _- _ F!N15H 2vRADE e OdP wOF R lb F 4"GONGR SLAB N6 I14JI4C _ - ROOFvans 104L ro t41OD M i 6 MILL V!SOJEEN V3. OF 11140E ATT10 AMA I *�� 4"STONE FI'_L .Iwwvw J �',kNr IUr,BO MO wNSW17 \12 TREATS^r aysF - 2"x4" PLATE YVI;7'D!A.AS MIN.10•LONG 90'I.IBR1 4F 12 \\ x SEAL PLATE "OiG 4 � / \ NSUL4 IP.ON I i Cam aMTIV ALI~ RIGID 4 4UITM my 401NNWWm < lot K= FIX F6. Me. aid FLOW j �I I Poop aTTee e4 w 74 w roo4 mTno § i I Plan: c43 INN ROO4 PAL N P00D B/il67RS 7FASA M OG A,. 3000 PS F.SOIL 4RI NG EXISTINb NI9M ADDITION NEW ADDITION aTlw T FA@ D Y LiE OR DNOEH NY DIRECT SUFERYISICY.AND� I G�L Y�l�.L L S�G T. TH SET 0.EA LriRO'N.LE.GE CCL1%Y ryITY.TIIE BUIIDIPG I S, HG Oro♦'A7:f.?;.A;iC Oi HER APPLICAD(F CODES REAR ELEVATION a ' T — — — — na7m7a:m mMel.aao F'"— _ _ = D THE; rGE CRC^'O7 /1ta expires it-:fO-D�. -- - - - - �: Y{'4'4 Ordinance 2004- ZO -V -S -1085 Granting Variation from Sec 13- 6D -3F(3) Page 2 of 3 (Bhargava /Ag ra wa 106 -24- 206 -044 ) WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation subject to the conditions stated in Section 2 of this ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the findings and recommendations made by the Zoning Board of Appeals, and WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of Section 13 -14 -6 of the Village Code relating to the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations have been met NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, Du Page and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows SECTION 1 The recitals hereto are incorporated as part of this ordinance SECTION 2 A variation to Section 13- 6D -3F(3) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to permit the construction of a room addition and deck on the single - family dwelling at 722 Forest Glen and allow a rear yard setback of approximately fifteen feet (15') subject to the following conditions 1 the proposed additions encroach no more than fifteen (15) feet into the required rear yard, and 2 the proposed room addition is built with a mansard roof, and 3 the proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted including the proposed building elevations (see page 14a of the case file) as amended to include a mansard roof and the revised site plan on page 21 of the case file dated October 19, 2004 prepared by Joseph J Hoendervoogt. SECTION 3 This Ordinance is limited and restricted to the property commonly known as 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, Illinois, P.I N 06 -24- 206 -044 SECTION 4 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. APPROVED THIS 26th day of October, 2004 KeyA Quinlan V age Preside/ Ayes Nays - Absent Ordinance 2004- ZO -V -S -1085 Granting Variation from Sec 13- 6D -3F(3) Page 3 of 3 (Bhargava /Agrawal 06-24-206-044) PASSED THIS 26th day of October, 2004 Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis None None F 1/I I J Y � � ,/ ♦ �`t A COUN -ij ATTEST Linda K Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk