Minutes - 08/15/2016 - Plan CommissionvltLAct: bF MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 15, 2016
OAK BR 2 �K REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLAN COMMISSION OF THE
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
APPROVED AS WRITTEN ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER
2.
3
2
The Meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairwoman Tropinski
in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:08 p.m.
ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL
Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: Chairwoman Marcia Tropinski, Members Thomas Doyle, Raj Lal,
Simon Sheers and Kenneth Wilczak
ABSENT: Member Raju Iyer and Naveen Jain
IN ATTENDANCE: Planner Rebecca Von Drasek and Planning Technician Gail
Polanek
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES
MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF JUNE 20, 2016 .TUNE 20, 2016
Motion by Member Doyle, seconded by Member Lal to waive the reading of the
minutes and to approve the minutes of the June 20, 2016 Regular Plan Commission
meeting as written. VOICE VOTE: Motion Carried.
MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF JULY 11, 2016 JULY 11, 2016
Motion by Member Doyle, seconded by Member Lal to waive the reading of the
minutes and to approve the minutes of the June 20, 2016 Rescheduled Regular Plan
Commission meeting as written. VOICE VOTE: Motion Carried.
Chairwoman Tropinski noted that New Business would be heard before continuing
the ongoing review of the Zoning Ordinance update.
NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS
A. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK — ZONING REGULATIONS — OFF - PREMISES vOB - TEXT
AMENDMENT -
PARKING REGULATIONS — TEXT AMENDMENT OFF - PREMISES
PARKING REGS
Rebecca Von Drasek, Village Planner provided an overview of the requested text
amendment, noting that it was being sought to correct an oversight within the Code
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 1 of 9 August 15, 2016
that allowed for uses outside of Oak Brook to possibly suggest accessory parking
within the community. Staff was directed to seek a text amendment to address the
issue as well as update some distances contained with the ordinance that had
previously been amended to 300 feet and then again to 550 feet. Staff found that
governmental facilities, including the forest preserve and park district that in some
instances will need to park farther than 550 feet. The proposed text also includes an
expansion to 1500 feet for these governmental facilities. The ordinance has required
an encumbrance or shared parking agreement as part of it, which is generally found
in commercial districts where there is shared parking. However, there was not the
stipulation that the use be within the municipality, which is the major portion of the
text amendment.
Proposed Text Amendment:
A. Existing Parking Facilities: Accessory off street parking facilities in existence
on the effective date hereof and located on the same lot as the structure or use served
shall not hereafter be reduced below the requirements for a similar new structure or
use under the provisions of this chapter.
(1) B. Location: After the effective date hereof, all off street parking spaces
shall be located on the same lot as the building, structure or use of land
served; however, for buildings, structures or uses other than single -
family residences: Off street parking spaces may also be located on a lot
other than the lot on which the building, structure or use of land served is
located, in accordance with 13 -12 -3 K., provided that:
a. said spaces are also within five hundred fifty feet (550') walking
distance of such building, structure, or use of land, or
b. there is a commercial vehicle providing shuttle service between
the parking spaces and the building, structure or use of land, and
c. both the parking spaces and the building, structure or use of land
are within the Village of Oak Brook.
(2) Off street parking spaces for any event sponsored by a governmental
entity having property within the Village, provided said spaces are
located within one thousand five hundred feet (1500') of such building,
structure or land which is used for the event.
h1 addition, for single - family residences- no required spaces may be located in any
front or side yard.
Any and all other use of off- street parking spaces in the Village that is in conflict
with this section is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Village Board of
Trustees.
K. Control Of Off - Street Parking Facilities: In cases where parking facilities are
permitted on a lot other than the lot on which the structure or use served is located, a
covenant running with the land must be recorded in the office of the recorder of
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 2 of 9 August 15, 2016
deeds of DuPage County, Illinois, on the lot upon which the accessory off - street
parking is located which prohibits any other use on that lot, and a copy of the
recorded covenant certified by the office of the recorder of deeds of DuPage County,
Illinois, shall be deposited with the director of community development. The
covenant shall not be released until such time as either one of the following
conditions occurs:
1. The structure on the lot containing the principal use is removed and the
principal use terminated.
2. Another lot of the required size within the required distance is properly
developed and used for the required accessory off - street parking in place of and
in lieu of the initial lot used for accessory off-street parking with the same
requirements, covenants, and conditions attaching to such substitute accessory
use lot as approved by the same authority as required for approval of such
initial lot.
Member Doyle noted that in the proposed text under 1.13, asked if the language
suggested that at any time there is off -site parking that is within 550 feet that a bus is
required. The wording is that there is a commercial vehicle providing shuttle service.
Planner Von Drasek responded that it was not necessary to have a bus; the ordinance
requires that there is an agreement with the property owner where you are parking.
She clarified that it did not require a bus, but that it was in accordance with Section
13- 12 -3.K. She noted that the requirement was not that you have it, but that there is
an allowance for a commercial vehicle to provide it.
Member Doyle added that the wording states that it is required. It does not seem for
a distance that small you would want to require a commercial vehicle and the
proposed language seems to read that way.
Member Wilczak said that he read it that if it exceeded 550 feet a commercial
vehicle was required.
Member Doyle felt uncertain about the meaning intended.
Chairwoman Tropinski agreed.
Planner Von Drasek said that originally in the ordinance when the 300 -foot walking
distance was included there was not a requirement for a commercial vehicle. It was
an attempt to restructure the paragraph and suggested that it would need to be
revised, because we did not want it appear to be a requirement that you have it, but a
provision that you may have a commercial vehicle.
Member Lal questioned how it was handled for the seniors or anyone else that may
have some disability. Five hundred feet may be too much to walls. This may be
why there is a need for a commercial vehicle.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 August 15, 2016
Gail Polanek, Planning Technician noted that individual buildings can have a valet
service and the church has made provisions for that.
Member Doyle said that Member Wilczak made sense that it could apply to some
parking spaces that are beyond 550 feet, but it did not make sense and needs some
kind of clarification.
Planning Technician Polanek suggested that the matter could be continued to allow
time to tweak the language or take the Commissions comments and see that the
language is revised to clarify the language in regards to the Commissioners
comments; whatever the Commission felt the most comfortable doing.
Chairwoman Tropinski suggested that it be continued to the next meeting, as it was
important that the Commission fully understand the language.
Member Doyle motioned, seconded by Member Lal to continue the text amendment
for the off-premises parking to the next regular Plan Commission meeting in order to
revise the proposed text. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
5 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. ZONING CONSULTANTS TESKA ASSOCIATES — COMPREHENSIVE
REVIEW OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ZONING ORDINANCE
Kon Savoy, Teska Associates, provided a brief overview of the zoning ordinance
update. Accessory structures and uses, telecommunication facilities in regards to
standards and location, along with an expansion and improvement of the existing
planned development standards would primarily be discussed at this meeting. In
addition, energy conservation and best practices are coming up more in communities
as a more frequent issue.
Mr. Savoy reviewed the changes in the Group #2 and #3 Revisions, as revised on
August 9, 2016.
Accessory Uses and Structures — General Regulations.
® Keeping of livestock — Currently it is only allowed if a property is agriculturally
zoned land, so it is essentially prohibited.
Chairwoman Tropinski suggested that perhaps it should be put out to the
public to address those that would like to have more foods that are organic.
They may be interested in being able to have their own chicken coop.
Member Lal said that he agreed with the way that it is currently written.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 August 15, 2016
UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
ZONING
CONSULTANTS,
TESKA ASSOC -
REVIEW ZONING
ORDINANCE
Member Doyle noted that he is aware of several residents that keep bees.
Member Wilczak noted that in another area outside of Oak Brook, there were
people that kept two chickens in order to have their own eggs and when they
started to get loud, they would go out and try to quiet them so as not to
disturb the neighbors and questioned as to what would happen when they
were not home. He thought it was a recipe for disaster.
After a brief discussion, it was agreed keep the current language.
Member Doyle questioned that the provisions for permitted uses and structures
applied to both commercial and residential districts. Mr. Savoy agreed that they
apply to both.
® Arbors, pergolas or trellises, not attached to the principal structures were added
along with definitions.
® Detached accessory garages in the rear yard. The structures can be located
within five feet of the rear yard and side yard lot line. There was a clarification
as to the detached garages being allowed to be taller, with the height determined
by the zoning district and increased setback for garages structures over 15 feet as
provided in Section 13 -3 -6.h of the zoning ordinance.
® Consistency with setbacks of 12 -feet was added for commercial awnings,
generators and solar panels.
Trailers, Boats and Habitable Vehicles have technical changes.
Structure Height
® Minor technical change. There was also a concern that the first floor elevation
above grade can raise significantly so that it is stepped up. In some instances, it
has been taken advantage. Question was to whether there should be other
standard, as was raised by a Trustee. He question if a provision should be
included that dense landscaping be added that would grow to a significant height
to block the view into a neighboring property. Nothing has changed concerning
the measurement of the structure from grade that controls the overall height of
the structure. There is nothing in the Code stating where the first floor elevation
shall or shall not be.
Member Wilczak commented that some surrounding communities that tried to
get too restrictive found that it backfired. The height should be set where the
Village wants it to be, and should not tell people how to design their houses.
They are probably more qualified than the boards.
Chairwoman Tropinski added that it almost becomes a design preference by
telling them how to design it. The consensus of the Plan Commission was to
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 August 15, 2016
leave it as it is.
Performance Standards
Mr. Savoy explained that the first paragraph is a statement of purpose to clarify
the purpose of what the performance standards are intended to accomplish and
the applicability of where they are to be complied.
There were no suggested changes to the Noise standards.
Some of the performance standards that should have been in this section of the
code were actually in the ORA District section of the code. For consistency,
those regulations were moved to this section so that it applies to all of the zoning
districts. There were several revisions as recommended to other communities is
to reference state or federal regulations or best practices.
Electromagnetic Interference was added to the ordinance, in reference to the cell
towers and consistent with the Federal Communications Commission act.
Fence Regulations
All fence regulations definitions were relocated to the Definitions section of the
code.
The fence regulations were clarified to allow the code to be better regulated. In
addition, the fence panels or sections shall not exceed 48- inches.
Member Wilczak questioned the 24 -inch solid fence height.
Mr. Savoy noted that they are more of an architectural feature of the house.
Trustee Tiesenga suggested that the 48 -inch post not be allowed with a 24 -inch
solid fence.
Ms. Von Drasek also suggested that in the swimming pool fencing requirements
language should be included prohibit a pool fence to be used as a perimeter
fence in order to have a taller fence of 48 -60 inches.
Telecommunication Towers and Antennae
Location to be permitted in the ORAI and ORA3 districts. These are association
with highway - oriented uses. It could be modified to allow it along all highway
frontage that is not residential or abutting a residential area and to be located
within 1000 feet of the highway. Without a restriction on distance on some
select parcels, it could be close to a residential subdivision.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 August 15, 2016
Planning Technician Polanek noted that presently telecommunication towers are
required to go through the Special Use process for approval.
The Commission discussed revisions to this section and the Commission agreed
to leave it as proposed with the 1000 -foot limitation. In addition, highways
should be identified so that it is clear.
Tower Design restricts rooftop towers to be placed on a minimum of a 5 -story
building. Tower height restricts the maximum height to the maximum height of
buildings within the district it is located. Co- Location is encouraged to control a
proliferation of towers.
Member Wilczak questioned that the fall distance of a tower be included. Mr.
Savoy noted that the 1000 distance eliminate the fall distance issue.
Energy Conservation, Green Building and Stormwater Best Management Practices.
Mr. Savoy noted that these contain guidelines that are encouraged but are not
requirements in most instances.
Site Design: Encourages natural resources with better site design with best
plarming practices. It includes the use of permeable pavers, etc.
Solar Energy Systems: Creates some standards for solar panels and shall not
cover more than 60 percent of the total roof surface facing a public street or
within 50 feet of residential areas. They cannot be on the backside of the home
facing the neighbor. It is more about glare, reflection and appearance.
Chairwoman Tropinski lilted it and thought it important to have energy
conservation. Member Doyle questioned whether there were federal regulations
that the Commission that should be considered. Mr. Savoy was not aware of any
such regulation, but would verify. Member Sheers questioned why it was
limited to 60 percent. Mr. Savoy said that the research standard was consistent
among the communities with similar standards. The intent is to allow it and
create a balance aesthetically. If allowed it needs to produce enough energy.
Member Wilczak commented that the 6 foot above the roofline should be
reviewed.
Wind Energy System: Roof mounted energy systems are only allowed on
commercial buildings, not residential. It was agreed to eliminate the wind
towers.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 August 15, 2016
Nonconforming buildings, structures, uses and lots.
Mr. Savoy noted that these were things that are currently being done and the
proposed language codifies the current practice.
Planned Development.
Mr. Savoy noted that the district was included in 2009. It has been expanded in
order to clarify. A minimum lot size of 5 acres was added. Anything regarding
residential uses that is common in other communities. Density bonuses are
added so that if there are increased buffer yard there is a bonus, however the
bonus never exceeds 20 percent.
Determination of permitted density for a residential cluster subdivision. There
are design standards for open spaces. Specifics were added, but substantial
changes were not made.
Member Wilczak suggested that the language relating to the Illinois Statues
relating to condominiums should be changed to the Common Interest
Communities Act.
Mr. Savoy noted that the bonuses are a more modern PUD practice. At the end
of the day, everything comes before the Village for approval.
The Commission discussed bonuses for design elements.
Mr. Savoy briefly reviewed the continuing process with the Zoning Ordinance
update review. If on target, development review procedures for all the types of
zoning approvals would be the next topic covered including submittal requirements.
There will be a significant amount of material to review when the site design review
standards, procedures and parking regulations. It includes updating the sign
regulations, introducing landscaping regulations and site plan review to a process
and updating the parking standards. He estimated another 6 months to completion.
Member Wilczak motioned, seconded by Member Sheers to continue the zoning
ordinance updated review to the next regular meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion
carried.
4. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business to discuss.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made from the public.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 8 of 9 August 15, 2016
OTHER
BUSINESS
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Motion by Member Wilezak, seconded by Member Doyle to adjourn the meeting at
9:09 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert L. Kallien Jr.
Robert Kallien, Director of Community Development
Secretary
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 9 of 9 August 15, 2016
ADJOURNMENT