The URL can be used to link to this page

S-1104 - 02/08/2005 - VARIATION - Ordinances Supporting Documents FRED BUCHOL OUPAGE COUNTY RECORDER 3:51 PM MAR.03,2005 OTHER . 06-35-206-009 005 PAGES R2005-043462 (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-V-S-1104 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 13-6A-3F (3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Property Address/es 3404 ADAMS ROAD (If vacant land, state vacant land and list nearest cross streets, Oak Brook, IL 60523.) OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Pin/s Number 06-35-206-009 Name & Address of Applicant: JAMES E. WILLETT AND KATHRYN A. WILLETT 3404 ADAMS ROAD, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Name & Address of Responsible JAMES E. WILLETT AND KATHRYN A. WILLETT Party to Receive Copy of 3404 ADAMS ROAD Recorded Document and Billing: OAK BROOK, IL 60523 G/L Account #to be Charged: 10-1365 Prepared By: Village of Oak-Brook Return To: /Village of Oak Brook _ 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Name & Address of Recipient N/A of Consideration (when applicable): G/L Account # to be Charged: ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-V-S-1104 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 13-6A-3F (3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Willett—3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523/ P.I.N. 06-35-206-009) WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore adopted an ordinance setting forth the Zoning Regulations for the Village of Oak Brook in Title 13 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code sets forth the authority and standards of the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations; WHEREAS, James and Kathryn Willett ("Petitioners") are the owners of certain property legally described as follows: Lot One in Melissa's Assessment Plat of that part of the West%of the Northeast '/4 of Section 35, Township 39 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 10 chains thereof; and lying South of and adjoining the South line of Lot 59, and the Easterly extension of said South line in Hunter Trails Subdivision recorded July 1, 1973 as Document R75- 32184 (aforesaid South line labeled as 214.50 feet, North 89 Degrees 39 Minutes 49 Seconds West, on said Plat of Hunter Trails); and lying East of and adjoining the East line of Lot 59, in said Hunter Trails Subdivision (aforesaid East line labeled as 165.00 feet, South 0 Degrees 19 Minutes 30 Seconds West on said Plat of Hunter Trails); and lying North of and adjoining the North line Lot 58, and the Easterly extension of said North line, in said Hunter Trails Subdivision (aforesaid North line labeled as 264.03 feet, South 89 Degrees 39 Minutes 49 Seconds East on said Plat of Hunter Trails); in DuPage County, Illinois. Also described and conveyed as: That part of the Southwest '/4 of the Northeast '/4 of Section 35, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northeast '/4 of said Section 35, thence North along the West line of said Northeast '/4 a distance of 663.52 feet; thence East a distance of 396.99 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing East a distance of 264.5 feet; thence South a distance of 165 feet; thence West a distance of 264.5 feet; thence North a distance of 165 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the R-1 Single-Family Detached Residence District, the regulations of which require a rear yard setback of not less than one hundred feet (100') in depth; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has submitted a petition for a variation to reduce the required rear yard setback to approximately sixty feet (60') for the purpose of constructing an addition to the existing single-family home on the Subject Property; and Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S-1104 Granting Variation from Sec. 13-6A-3F(3) Page 2 (Willett 06-35-206-009) WHEREAS, on January 4, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook conducted a public hearing at the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois in connection with the aforesaid petition, after due and appropriate legal notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals specifically considered the standards set forth in Section 13-14-6 (D) of the Village Code and recommended approval of the requested variation; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the findings and recommendations made by the Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code relating to the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations have been met. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Oak Brook, Du Page and Cook Counties, Illinois as follows: Section 1. The recitals hereto are incorporated as part of this ordinance. Section 2. A variation to Sections 13-6A-3F(3) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to permit the construction of an addition to the existing single-family dwelling and allow an approximate 60-foot encroachment in the rear yard setback in order to build the addition in the footprint as proposed in the zoning file subject to the condition that the addition is built in substantial conformance with the Proposed Site Plan as submitted on page H, Sheet S-1, prepared by Erik Johnson &Associates, dated November 4, 2004. Section 3. This Ordinance is limited and restricted to the property commonly known as 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook, Illinois, P.I.N. 06-35-206-009. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. APPROVED THIS 8th day of February, 2005. v Kevi Quinlan Vil ge President PASSED THIS 8th day of February, 2005. Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S-1104 Granting Variation from Sec. 13-6A-3F(3) Page 3 (Willett 06-35-206-009) Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf Nays: None Absent: Trustees Caleel and Zannis r. 04 ATTEST: 1}q aj Linda K. Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTIES OF COOK AND DUPAGE ) I, Linda K. Gonnella, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that on FEBRUARY 8th, 2005 , the corporate authorities of the above municipality passed and approved Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S-1104 , AN ORDINANCE GRANTTNG A VARTATTON FROM THE PROVTSTONg OF S CTTONS 13-6A-3F (3) OF TITLE 13 ("ZONING REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO REAR YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original documents, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records, journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 28thday of FEBRUARY 92005 w� O F OAS Gonnella, CMC r e Clerk a of Oak Brook �G'� age and Cook Counties, IL • Item 51 < £ & Y AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: James and Kathryn Willet Variation FROM: Kenneth T. Kubiesa, Village Attorney BUDGET SOURCE /BUDGET IMPACT: None RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to pass Ordinance 2005- ZO -V -S -1104 "An Ordinance Granting A Variation From The Provisions Of Section 13- 6A -3F(3) of Title 13 ( "Zoning Regulations ") Of The Village Code Of The Village Of Oak Brook Relative To Rear Yard Setback Requirements ". Backjlround/History: This ordinance grants a variation to James and Kathryn Willet for a rear yard setback at the property located at 3404 Adams. This variation is requested in order to allow the construction of an addition to the existing single- family home on the property. Recommendation: I recommend that this ordinance be passed. Last saved by Default J \WORDDOC\BOARD MEMOSMllet var doc Last printed 2/4/2005 9 04 AM �� 0 Oq�\ P � 0 coUN`jy VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: March 4, 2005 TO: Richard B Boehm Kenneth T Kubiesa Linda K Gonnella Dale L Durfey Robert L Kallien Sharon Dangles FROM: Linda Andrys SUBJECT: Recorded Documents s -/ivLf The following documents were recorded on March 3, 2005 at the DuPage County Recorder's Office 1 RESOLUTION 2005- AG -TX- PRPTY -EXI -R -893 (Authorizing Execution of Real Estate Sale Contract) Village of Oak Brook and Harnsh Shownkeen Vacant Land -Lots 1 & 2 Sports Core /Westchester Park Subdivision E Side of Lincoln Rd & N of Oak Brook Rd /31" St Oak Brook, IL 60523 PIN #06 -25- 302 -043 and #06 -25- 302 -045 R2005- 043461 Recording Fee $22 00 G /L# to be Charged 111 -7700 2 ORDINANCE 2005- ZO -V -S -1104 James E Willett & Kathryn A Willett 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook, M 60523 PIN #06 -35- 206 -009 R2005- 043462 Recording Fee $1900 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 3 GRANT OF SIDEWALK EASEMENT & TERMINATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS McDonald's Corporation and Village of Oak Brook 110022 ad St., 1120 22nd St , 2105 Spring Rd & 1111 Commerce Dr Oak Brook, IL 60523 PIN #06 -23- 406 -006, 06 -23 -406 -008, 06 -23- 406 -009 & 06 -23- 406 -010 R2005- 043463 Recording Fee $35 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 Easement Consideration Check $1 00 G /L# to be Charged 460 -6010 /RECDOC /2005- RECMEMO -03 -04 doc pGti p oA�. O . F. a a � o - � G r O 00 U N'T ' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: December 3, 2004 TO: Richard B Boehm Kenneth T Kubiesa Linda K Gonnella Dale L Durfey Robert L Kallien Darrell Langlois FROM: Linda Andrys SUBJECT: Recorded Documents The following documents were recorded on November 17, 2004 at the DuPage County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE 2004- ZO -V -S -1085 Pradeep Bhargava 722 Forest Glen, Oak Brook, IL 60523 PIN #06 -24- 206 -044 R2004- 293142 Recording Fee $19 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 2 ORDINANCE 2004- ZO- V -EX1 -S -1086 Butler National Golf Club /Mike Sauls 2616 York Road, West of York, South of 22 °d St, East of Jorie Blvd, Oak Brook, IL 60523 PIN #06 -26 -401 -002 and 06 -26- 202 -002, 06 -25- 101 -002 & 06 -25- 300 -018 R2004- 293143 Recording Fee $23 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 3 ORDINANCE 2004- ZO -V -S -1087 Keith Sherry 2020 Swift Drive, Oak Brook, IL 60523/PIN #06 -24- 402 -036 R2004- 293144 Recording Fee $19 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 4 ORDINANCE 2004- ZO- SU- HE -EX1 -S -1088 Center Point Properties Trust/Chuck Henschel 2001 York Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 PIN #06 -24- 403 -008, 06 -24- 403 -009 and 06 -24- 403 -010 R2004- 293145 Recording Fee $21 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 5 LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM COVENANT RUNNING WITH LAND Mr Daniel Wollensak 3604 York Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523/PIN #06 -36- 400 -009 R2004- 293146 Recording Fee $18 00 G /L# to be Charged 10 -1365 6 LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM COVENANT RUNNING WITH LAND B Azar -Kia, MD and P Azar -Kia 312 Ottawa Lane, Oak Brook, IL 60523/PIN #06 -35- 205 -006 R2004- 293147 Recording Fee $18 00 G /1# to be Charged 10 -1365 /RECDOC /2004- RECMEMO -12 -03 doc 0 R D S'1V$!r �Dr Gt OF 04.t P d � 90 o O y G � � 9C�COUNT1 •\��\ Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 May 4, 2005 Website www.oak-6rook.org Administration 630.990.3000 Jaynes E. Willett and Kathryn A. Willett FAX 630.990.0876 3404 Adams Road Community Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Development 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 Re: Recorded Document on March 3, 2005 ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-V-S-1104/R2005-043462 Engineering 3404 Adams Road Department Oak Brook, IL 60523 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 Dear Applicants: Fire Department 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 A copy of the above noted recorded document is enclosed for your information. This is an important record and should be retained in a secure area within your Police Department files. 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 If you need any further assistance in this matter, feel free to contact me at 630- Public Works 990-5770 on Monday through Friday from 9am to 5pm. Department 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 Sincerely, Oak Brook Public Library Linda M. Andrys 600 Oak Brook Road Records Management Clerk Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 FAX 630.990.4509 /lma Oak Brook Sports Core Enclosure Bath&Tennis Club cc: Dale L. Durfe Jr., Village Engineer 700 Oak Brook Road y' g Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development 630.990.3020 Official Files FAX 630.990.1002 IRECDOG2005-RECLTR-ORD 2005-ZO-V-S-1104-WILLETT-3404 ADAMS RD. Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 5 A. SPECIAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2005 Motion by Trustee Yusuf, seconded by Trustee Korin, to approve the Minutes of the Special Board of Trustees Meeting of January 17, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. B. REGULAR BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 2005 Motion by Trustee Yusuf, seconded by Trustee Korin, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of January 25, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. C. SPECIAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF JANUARY 31, 2005 Motion by Trustee Craig, seconded by Trustee Korin, to approve the Minutes of the Special Board of Trustees Meeting of January 31, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. Motion by Trustee Korin, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as presented. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin and Yusuf. Nays: 0 - None. Absent: 2 - Trustees Caleel and Zannis Motion carried. A. Accounts Payable for Period Ending February 4, 2005 - $188,392.52 Significant Items included in Above: 1) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar and Acker, P.C. — Legal Fees - November, 2004 - $14,050.30 2) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar and Acker, P.C. — Legal Fees — December, 2004 - $11,412.00 B. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 29, 2005 - $618,586.30 C. Community Development Referrals 1) Bohne — 3305 York Road - Variation D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts: 1) 2005 Pavement Rejuvenation Project 2) 2005 Crack Seal Project VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 14 February 8, 2005 5. E. Authorization to Hire, Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees F. Budget Adjustments G. An Ordinance Granting A Variation from the Provisions of Section 13- 10A -3C(2) of Title 13 ( "Zoning Regulations ") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Side Yard Setback Requirements H. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Subdivision Known as CSA Fraternal Life Resubdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14 -6 -3 -J and K of Title 14 ( "Subdivision Regulations ") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Dedication of Public Utility Easements" I. An Ordinance Granting a Variation from the Provisions of Section 13- 6A -3F(3) of Title 13 ( "Zoning Regulations ") Of The Village Code Of The Village Of Oak Brook Relative To Rear Yard Setback Requirements - Willet — 3404 Adams — Variation J Amendment to Final Plat of Forest Gate 6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA - None. 7. BOARD & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS - None. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS- A. 814 COMMERCE LLC — VARIATION TO SECTION 13- 12 -3H.2 CHAPTER 12 OFFICE STREET PARKING AND LOADING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 25, 2005 At the January 25, 2005 meeting, the Village Board continued a request from 814 Commerce, LLC regarding a variation request to construct 96 additional parking spaces in the required front yard setback for the building located at 814 Commerce, to give the applicant time to consider additional alternatives to the original variation request. Since that time, the applicant and Village Staff have been in contact relative to the preparation of additional alternative parking lot configurations. Because more time is needed to develop the additional materials, the applicant's attorney has requested that this matter be continued to the February 22, 2005 Board meeting. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to concur with the applicant's request to continue the variation request for 814 Commerce, to the February 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. A. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS B. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS 1) RESOLUTION FOR MAINTENANCE OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS BY VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 14 February 8, 2005 7. B. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a final plat of subdivision as well as the requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Zannis, to concur with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve a final plat and requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations for the CSA property at 122 22 "a Street and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for final consideration at the February 8, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. C. WILLET — 3404 ADAMS — VARIATION TO SECTION 13- 6A -3F.3 — REAR YARD At its meeting on January 4, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition from James and Kathryn Willet as beneficiaries of Northern Trust Co. Trust 9747 seeking approval of a variation to Section 13- 6A -3F.3 to permit a rear yard setback of sixty feet instead of the required 100 feet for the property located at 3404 Adams Road. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing single- family home which would encroach into the required rear yard. Even though the lot is approximately one -half the size required in the R -1 District, the existing home appears to conform to all required setbacks. The proposed variation request is somewhat unusual in that the applicant is seeking a variation to reduce the 100 foot rear yard setback to 60 feet for the entire parcel. Accordingly, with the requested variation, the applicant could construct further additions to the home without the benefit of an additional variation. The Zoning Board of Appeals requested that the applicant to limit their request to the proposed building footprint submitted. The applicant agreed to modify the request to the footprint of the proposed addition. Recommendation: By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the petitioner met the required standards to recommend approval of the variation request as modified and agreed to by the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variation request is limited to allow an approximate 60 -foot encroachment in the rear yard setback in order to build the addition in the footprint as proposed. 2. The addition is to be built in substantial conformance with the Proposed Site Plan as submitted on page H, Sheet S -1, prepared by Erik Johnson & Associates dated November 45 2004. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested variation VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 8 of 21 January 25, 2005 7. C. to Section 13- 6A -3F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the February 8, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. D. 814 COMMERCE LLC — VARI_ATION TO SECTION 13- 12 -31-1.2, CHAPTER 12 OFFICE STREET PARKING AND LOADING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 17, 2005 At the January 17, 2005 meeting, the Board requested that Staff provide information relative to the approved variations for 815 Commerce and 2020 Swift. 815 Commerce 1. Variation for relief to the Village's parking and loading regulations was approved on November 22, 1983 as ordinance S -512. 2. Variation permitted 54 parking spaces in the front yard. Parking spaces in front yard can be no closer than 25 feet from property line. 4 Variation also permitted additional relief for parking spaces that are only 7'10" wide (current regulations require 8'6" for office use) and aisle widths that are 21'9" wide (current regulations require 24' for office use). 2020 Swift 1. Variation for relief to the Village's parking setback regulations was approved on November 9, 2004 as ordinance S -1087. 2. Variation permitted 27 additional parking spaces in the front yard. 3. Parking spaces in front yard can be no closer than 50 feet from property line. 4.,- Detailed landscape plan was approved which also required the construction of a 3 -ft. high berm along the east side of the new parking lot. 5. Even with new parking spaces, the overall parking ratio is less than 19 spaces per 1000 sq.ft. of gross floor area of the building. Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to reconsider the 814 Commerce LLC — Variation to Section 13- 12 -3h.2, Chapter 12 Office Street Parking and Loading Continued from January 17, 2005. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 - None. Absent: 1 - Trustee Caleel. Motion carried. The applicant Larry Debb addressed the Board of Trustees of his request. He explained that allowing only one row for parking vehicles does not meet the current zoning codes and that is why they have requested additional parking in front of their building with two rows of parking. They are the only building in Oak Brook that their front yard sits on a dead end commercial street with only office buildings and where the rear of the building is adjacent to residential areas. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 9 of 21 January 25, 2005 _(12�6 Gail Polanek From: Tara [tara_degeer @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:02 AM To: Gail Polanek Subject: 3404 Adams Road Hi Gail- Thanks again for spending time with me a couple weeks ago to go over the 3404 Adams Road file. My husband and I are going to walk through the house one more time on Thursday and make a final decision this weekend. We have a lot of ideas about renovations to be made to the home, so we will be measuring during our walk through, but I was wondering if I could take a peek at the plans the current owners had approved one more time. Because of budget constraints, we are now throwing out the idea of a garage that would sit outside the buildable footprint as shown in those plans, but we are adamant about the home needing an eat-in kitchen and I wanted to see what was previously approved to accommodate one. I believe an eat-in kitchen would be located within the buildable footprint. We envision a room that would connect the existing kitchen and family room. We would like to understand what the current owners had approved in their plans, and how easy it would be to obtain permission to add on an eat-in kitchen should we purchase the home. We are also considering doing the following renovations to the interior of the house if we purchased it and would like to understand what permits would be needed and the process to obtain those permits: • As stated above, eliminate an outside wall in the kitchen to build on an eat-in kitchen with a walk through to the existing family room thereby connecting the existing kitchen and family room via a new eat-in kitchen area. • Relocate an exterior doorway located in the master bathroom to the master bedroom • Gut the master bathroom to add a new bathtub, shower, commode surround, vanities, tiling, etc... • Add two windows to the master bathroom (one in place of the doorway we would relocate, one small window to add light into the existing closed of commode area.) • Remove a window on the third floor to allow us to build a wall full of cabinetry to contain an entertainment center • Add a skylight on the 3rd floor to let light into an upstairs bathroom that has no windows • Remove walls in the basement to create one larger room in the basement instead of two smaller rooms. • Potentially add a very small kitchen/wetbar to the basement area in place of an existing closet • Relocate walls on the 2rd floor to create a larger bathroom by incorporating an existing long adjacent hallway into that bathroom • Add a hot tub outside the master bedroom (this would imply that the hot tub be located in the front or side yard set-back—is this okay? I know you said a pool had to be in the backyard setback, but a hot tub is much smaller and can be above or below ground depending on ordinances.) If you have any advice for a neophyte embarking on the above list, I would be grateful! O Would it be possible for me to drop in later this afternoon or tomorrow afternoon to look at the file again? I then might have a couple quick follow-up questions for you. I am happy to complete a FOIA form if needed. Thank you, Gail! Tara i t Gail Polanek From: Gail Polanek Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:52 PM To: 'Tara' Subject: RE: 3404 Adams Road Hi Tara, I'm sorry that I have not had the opportunity to respond to you earlier today, but it has been an extremely busy day. If you would like to come in tomorrow to look over those plans again, that would be fine,just send an email as soon as you know when you will be coming, so that I can be sure that the conference room is available to reserve. It is available right now between 2 p.m.—3:30 p.m., unless something gets scheduled in the meantime. I will tentatively hold it, until I hear from you. I am on a tight deadline right now and will not have much time tomorrow, but after looking over your questions,the majority of your issues really relate to building permits and the building code (highlighted below). I may be able to have Bill Hudson, Building Inspection Supervisor,who does the plan review for all of the building permits, meet with you for a little while to discuss your questions and issues. I checked his schedule and right now he is also available between 2:30-3:30, if you can make it in at that time. If the proposed addition to construct an eat-in kitchen is within the buildable area then a building permit is all that is needed. All interior renovations would require a permit. The rule typically is if there are any changes/modifications to the structure,electric or plumbing, a permit is required. You can show Bill where you envision the hot tub and he will be able to tell you whether or not it would be permitted,without going through the public hearing process. The approved variation ordinance is really based upon the setback encroachment and footprint of the proposed addition that was approved. Send me an email as soon as you have a minute, I will be here for a while this evening. Thank you, Gail Gail Polanek Planning and Zoning Administrative Technician Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Rd. Oak Brook,IL 60523 Phone: 630.368.5106 Fax: 630.368.5107 Email: goolaneK oak-brook.org Web: htti)://www.oak-brook.org Follow us: From:Tara [mailto:tara—degeer @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:02 AM To: Gail Polanek Subject: 3404 Adams Road Hi Gail- Thanks again for spending time with me a couple weeks ago to go over the 3404 Adams Road file. My husband and I are going to walk through the house one more time on Thursday and make a final decision this weekend. We have a lot of 1 Gail Polanek From: Tara [tara_degeer @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:53 PM To: Gail Polanek Subject: RE: 3404 Adams Road Hi Gail- Thanks so much for your email. I appreciate you allowing me to come in and look at the file tomorrow at 2:15pm and also appreciate being able to briefly speak with Bill Hudson at 2:30pm if he is still free at that time. If he is available, please tell him that I will be in your conference room and that I will try to take up very little of his time. Again, thanks for all of your help! Have a nice evening- Tara From: Gail Polanek [mailto:gpolanek @oak-brook.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:53 PM To: Tara Subject: RE: 3404 Adams Road Hi Tara, I'm sorry that I have not had the opportunity to respond to you earlier today, but it has been an extremely busy day. If you would like to come in tomorrow to look over those plans again,that would be fine,just send an email as soon as you know when you will be coming, so that I can be sure that the conference room is available to reserve. It is available right now between 2 p.m.—3:30 p.m., unless something gets scheduled in the meantime. I will tentatively hold it, until I hear from you. I am on a tight deadline right now and will not have much time tomorrow, but after looking over your questions,the majority of your issues really relate to building permits and the building code (highlighted below). I may be able to have Bill Hudson, Building Inspection Supervisor,who does the plan review for all of the building permits, meet with you for a little while to discuss your questions and issues. I checked his schedule and right now he is also available between 2:30-3:30, if you can make it in at that time. If the proposed addition to construct an eat-in kitchen is within the buildable area then a building permit is all that is needed. All interior renovations would require a permit. The rule typically is if there are any changes/modifications to the structure, electric or plumbing, a permit is required. You can show Bill where you envision the hot tub and he will be able to tell you whether or not it would be permitted,without going through the public hearing process. The approved variation ordinance is really based upon the setback encroachment and footprint of the proposed addition that was approved. Send me an email as soon as you have a minute, I will be here for a while this evening. Thank you, Gail Gail Polanek 1 Subject: FW: Easement Information Hi Elaine, We have put together pretty much all we know about the property in question. Our files are attached. We would be happy to produce any graphics or details which we can. We do this for any resident of Oak Brook. The Village is not the custodian of records for plats. The definitive source is the County of Du Page clerk's office. I will be happy to review all of the information we have on file with anyone interested. Thanks. Mike Hullihan P.E. Village Engineer From: Jim Fox Sent:Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:25 PM To: Michael Hullihan Subject: Easement Information Mike, I spoke with Trustee Zannis a few moments ago and she is requesting that you send an email to her before 12:00 Noon on Friday 1/27 stating in writing what we discussed earlier today. I have worked with Gail Polanek, Eileen Kulis, and Jim Kelly on this request. There is one other Plat of Survey in the file, however Eileen K thought we should have an official FOIA request to release the info. I Elaine's email address is ezannis(ftak-brook.org I did explain that this is the best information the Village has for the property (3404 Adams) and that DuPage County should be contacted as a definitive source. Trustee Zannis would like something from you confirming this. Thanks. Jim 5174 his electronic message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual(s)or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain Information that is proprietary,confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including protected health information (PHI).If you are not the Intended recipient or the employee or agent,you are hereby notified that any viewing,copying,disclosure or distribution of the information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by return electronic message or telephone,and destroy the original message without making any copies. Unless otherwise stated,any opinions expressed in this electronic message are those of the author and are not endorsed by the Village. Electronic messages sent to and from the Village of Oak Brook may be subject to discovery under the IL Freedom of Information Act. 2 Gail Polanek From: Tara [tara_degeer @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:35 PM To: Gail Polanek Subject: FW: Easement Information Attachments: 20120124_Propertylnfo_3404_Adams.pdf; 2005-ZO-V-S-1 104.PDF; Zoning.pdf; 3404 Adams.pdf; 3404 Adams Watermain.pdf Hi Gail- Thanks for your time this afternoon. I look forward to meeting with you in your offices this Thursday, Feb 2 at 1:30pm to discuss the questions I have about 3404 Adams Rd., Oakbrook, IL, the property my husband and I are considering purchasing. I am forwarding the email I received from the seller's agent, Elaine Zannis, that has attached to it a rear yard setback variance dated 2005, in addition to several surveys and the zoning ordinance district standards. Here are my key questions about the 3404 Adams and adjacent property: • We understand that the land directly south of 3404 Adams Rd (shown on an ariel map as an irregular shaped lot containing a pond in the middle and the address 709") is owned by the homeowner directly south of the pond. Documents you had in your office indicated that this homeowner's address is 1110 35th street. We are wondering: • If the land east of the pond is buildable? If so, what are the set-backs and other restrictions? If not, what variances would be needed? • If a right-of-way could be granted (or currently exists)from 35th Street across the eastern portion of the 111035 th street property to access the land east of the pond?Again, we believe the owner of 1110 35th street also owns the lot with the pond directly south of 3404. • We are aware of a rear yard setback variance being granted on 3404 Adams Rd. for a specific structure to be built. We'd like to know if the variance is still in force, what the approved structure looks like (attached or detached from the main house) and where the approved footprint for the structure is on the parcel. • We are interested in eventually adding a stand-alone garage within the 100 foot backyard set back in the land lying between the existing attached garage and the western property lot line(the North West corner of the property). Would a new variance be needed to accomplish this? (The 100 foot back yard set back is a requirement for 2 acre lots in this R-1 zoned area and 3404 is a 1 acre lot.) • Would the local zoning allow us to eventually place a swimming pool in the back yard, south of the house, and what would the restrictions be on its size and placement? • Would the local zoning code allow us to cantilever one large front window on the home to add a few feet of space to allow an eat-in kitchen? From the ariel map, this project would be within the existing required setbacks. Thank you again for your assistance with my questions. If you need to reach me, my phone number is 630/455-1918. Best regards, Tara From: e.zannis @comcast.net [mailto:e.zannis @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:15 AM To: Tara_Degeer @hotmail.com Subject: Fwd: Easement Information From: "Michael Hullihan" <mhullihan @oak-brook.org> To: "Elaine Zannis" <e.zannis @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:43:58 PM i WILLETT 3404 Adams Road Variations to Rear Yard Setback INDEX PAGE CONTENTS 12-12.a Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien on Village Board Agenda dated January 25, 2005 11 Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman dated January 20, 2005 10-10.b Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated January 4, 2005 9 Letter of concern from neighbor at 1124 35th Street received by fax 8-8.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien to Zoning Board of Appeals dated December 15, 2004 7 Engineering Review of Variation application plans dated December 3, 2004 6 Certificate of Publication dated December 14, 2004 5 Resident Letter dated December 9, 2004 4 Board of Trustees Referral Meeting Minutes dated December 14, 2004 (Not Included) 3 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Director of Community Development 2 Rear Yard Setback— R-1 Zoning District—Zoning Ordinance Section 13-6A-3F.3 1-1.b Variations, Zoning Ordinance, Section 13-14-6 A Application/Petition - Variation B Surrounding Property Owners List C Fee/Receipt D Letter of Explanation E-E.2 Applicant's Response to Standards for Variation F Subject Property Verification and Legal Description G-G.5 Letters of Support From Neighbors Re: Addition H Proposed Site Plan - Includes Floor Plans and Proposed Elevations (Included — Not Attached) I Location Map of Property J Plat of Survey dated April 20, 2004(Included — Not Attached) i OF Oqte v 0 ` 0 e - 9 cF �N, CpUN1*4 AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of January 25, 2005 SUBJECT: Willett—3404 Adams Road—Variation to Section 13-6A-3F.3 —Rear Yard FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested variation to Section 13-6A-3F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the February 8, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. Background/History: At its meeting on January 4, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition from James and Kathryn Willet as beneficiaries of Northern Trust Co. Trust 9747 seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-6A-3F.3 to permit a rear yard setback of sixty feet instead of the required 100 feet for the property located at 3404 Adams Road. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing single-family home which would encroach into the required rear yard. Even though the lot is approximately one-half the size required in the R-1 District, the existing home appears to conform to all required setbacks. The proposed variation request is somewhat unusual in that the applicant is seeking a variation to reduce the 100 foot rear yard setback to 60 feet for the entire parcel. Accordingly, with the requested variation, the applicant could construct further additions to the home without the benefit of an additional variation. The Zoning Board of Appeals requested that the applicant to limit their request to the proposed building footprint submitted. The applicant agreed to modify the request to the footprint of the proposed addition. Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\CornDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\B0T-Rec-3404 Adams-Willet-VAR.doc Last printed 1/21/2005 12:46 PM IQ. I Recommendation: By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the petitioner met the required standards to recommend approval of the variation request as modified and agreed to by the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variation request is limited to allow an approximate 60-foot encroachment in the rear yard setback in order to build the addition in the footprint as proposed. 2. The addition is to be built in substantial conformance with the Proposed Site Plan as submitted on page H, Sheet S-1, prepared by Erik Johnson&Associates dated November 4, 2004. Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ConiDev\GPOLANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-3404 Adams-Willet-VAR.doc Last printed 1/21/2005 12:46 PM v�of 04,i. P ego � o January 20, 2005 A r tl. c01IgTI Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Village of Village of Oak Brook Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website SUBJECT: Willett — 3404 Adams Road — Variation to Section 13-6A-3F.3 — Rear www.oak-brook.org Yard Setback Administration 630.990.3000 Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.990.0876 Community At its meeting on January 4, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition from Development James and Kathryn Willett as beneficiaries of Northern Trust Co. Trust 9747, seeking 630.990.3045 approval of a variation to Section 13-6A-3F.3 to permit a rear-yard setback of sixty feet FAX 630.990.3985 instead of the required 100-ft. for the property located at 3404 Adams Road. The Engineering applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing single-family home which Department would encroach into the required rear yard. Even though the lot is approximately one- 630.990.3010 half the size required in the R-1 District, the existing home appears to conform to all FAX 630.990.3985 required setbacks. Fire Department 630.990.3040 All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. No one spoke in support or in FAX 630.990.2392 opposition to the proposed text amendment. However, the applicant did provide signed letters from a number of the surrounding property owners who did not object to the Police Department 630.990.2358 a pp roval of a variation for the proposed building addition. FAX 630.990.7484 One distant homeowner objected to the fact the request extended across the entire Public Works property rather than just the proposed addition. The petitioner modified his request at the Department 630.990.3044 hearing in response to this objection. FAX 630.472.0223 The proposed variation request was somewhat unusual in that the applicant was seeking a Oak Brook variation to reduce the 100-ft. rear yard setback to 60-ft. for the entire parcel. Public Library Accordingly, with the variation as requested, the applicant would have been able to 600 Oak Brook Road construct further additions to the home without the benefit of an additional variation. Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the petitioner met the FAX 630.990.4509 required standards to recommend approval of the variation request as modified and Oak Brook Snorts Core agreed to by the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variation request is limited to allow an approximate 60-foot encroachment in Bath&Tennis Club the rear yard setback in order to build the addition in the footprint as proposed. 700 Oak Brook Road 2. The addition is to be built in substantial conformance with the Proposed Site Plan Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 as submitted on page H Sheet S-1, prepared by Erik Johnson & Associates dated 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 November 4, 2004. Golf Club Very truly yours, NOTE: Chairman Davis has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this letter 2606 York Road endin his signature. The si Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 p g !m ature. geed original will be placed in the official file upon receipt 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 Champ Davis Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals it` Motion by Member Shah, seconded by Member Ascher to recommend approval of the variation as requested subject to the following conditions: 1. Reduce the required 30-foot setback to allow a 0' (zero foot) side yard setback for each lot for approximately 14 feet, which is the extent of the covered walkway, and a 25.9-foot setback for the remainder of both lots in substantial conformance with the plan on page G of the case file. 2. In the event that any portion of the covered walkway is removed, then the entire walkway is to be removed and the side yard setback would be 25.9 feet for each lot. 3. The variation is subject to the approval of the Final Plat of Subdivision. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 - Members Ascher, Mueller, Shah and Chairman Davis Nays: 0 - Absent: 2 - Members Sanford and Young. Motion Carried 5 B. WILLETT—3404 ADAMS ROAD— TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE WILLETT-3404 ADAMSROAD- - ZONING ORDINANCE vA VARIATION— SECTION 13-6A.3-F.3 — TO RIATION- ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROOM ADDITION IN THE SECTION 13-6A.3-F.3 REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK -REAR YARD SETBACK Chairman Davis swore in James Willett, the petitioner and owner of the subject property. Steven Norgaard, attorney for the petitioner reviewed the history of the property and the request. They are requesting a change in the rear yard setback from 100 feet to 60 feet. The lot is unusual in that it is a slightly over one acre in area and zoned R-1 in a zoning district that requires 2 acre lots. The building was built within the R-1 District setbacks and placed diagonally. across the lot as shown on page H of the case file. The homeowner is requesting the change in setback to the 60 feet required in the R-2 District,which lots are required to be one acre. Chairman Davis asked if the standards have been addressed. Mr. Norgaard said that the standards are addressed on pages E to E.2 of the case file. The neighbors have been notified, and there are six letters of neighbors in support. Another letter was received from a neighbor this evening from Joan Katsis that appears to be objecting to any kind of building in the area that she refers to as open countryside. They see it as a wooded area, not an open countryside. There are residences throughout the area. Page I of the file shows the zoning parcels and each lot has a home with the exception of one, which is Ms. Katsis' property. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 8 January 4, 2005 /V. After a brief discussion on the issue, Chairman Davis said that it appears the objection in the letter is based on the requested variation being sought for the entire rear yard, which is an unusual request. He asked if the applicant would be willing to restrict the variation request. The applicant agreed to limit the request to the proposed footprint for the addition. Member Mueller asked if the owner knew the restrictions for the property prior to buying it. Mr. Norgaard responded that when the Willett's were looking at properties they inquired whether they would be able to put on an addition. The owner at the time, who was very eager to sell, said that he would check with the Village. He said that he was given a plan that was a general print of what could be built on the property. He advised that they could place a 25,000 square foot house on the property. It came to pass that could not be done; and if so, that would have been accomplished by maxing out the existing footprint with height, width and depth. In a sense he believes he was misled but does not believe it was ill intent on anyone's part. An addition could be built with a structure that would have a similar square footage as the proposed structure, but it would be put up on the front or the back of the home and it would not match the style of the home or fit into the existing space that is available in the front. Since the home is set diagonally this seems to be the only place architecturally that make sense to keep the home consistent with its current style. They think that the same size structure could be put within the same envelope it would just make the home inconsistent with the neighborhood and the character with the area. Chairman Davis asked Mr. Willett if a representation was made to him prior to the purchase of the property that he could build an addition similar to that shown in the proposed plan. Mr. Willett responded that he was led to believe that an addition could be placed on the home. When he spoke with the owner he told him that he would place the addition toward the rear. The way the house is tilted on an angle, it is set up for the sunrise and the windows are viewing the back portion of the yard, which makes the most sense where the addition would go. Within the addition is a two-car garage and currently the house only has a two car garage; the location of which plays into where the addition would be placed. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 8 January 4, 2005 Chairman Davis said that the unique circumstance would be the position of the house on the lot and the undersized lot area for the zoning district. Mr. Norgaard said that the lot is an irregular shaped lot within other irregular shaped lots and he does not know at what point in time the lots were ever subdivided. Member Ascher reviewed the location of the lot with respect to Ms. Katsis property and the proposed addition. Mr. Willett said that there are elevation changes in the area and there is approximately 500 feet between her lots and his. Her lot is vacant and the entire area is very heavily wooded. Member Ascher questioned that the other neighbors had no objection to the proposed addition. Mr. Willett responded that letters were submitted from the neighbors that reviewed the plans and did not object. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the previous owner did come into the office and he did show him where the setbacks were on the lot. Ideally, if you could take the house down you could build a 25,000 square foot home. At that time he told him that he would need the variance and he said that a detached garage could be placed in the rear yard. Chairman Davis said that the unique circumstance appears to be the placement of the house on the lot and the lot is undersized for the area. No one in the audience spoke in support or in opposition to the request. Motion by Chairman Davis seconded by Member Shah that the petitioner has met the required standards to recommend approval of the variation request as modified and agreed to by the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variation request is limited to allow an approximate 60-foot encroachment in the rear yard setback in order to build the addition within the footprint as proposed. 2. The addition is to be built in substantial conformance with the Proposed Site Plan as submitted on page H, Sheet S-1, prepared by Erik Johnson&Associates dated November 4, 2004. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4— Members Ascher, Mueller, Shah and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— Absent: 2— Members Sanford and Young. Motion Carried. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 7 of 8 January 4, 2005 FROM :SALLY • FAX NO. :6306553492 �n. 04 2005 07:44PM P1 Dear Members of the Village Board and Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, This letter is in reference to the Willett addition located at 3404 Adams Road. We are property owners at 1124 W 35t' Street. I have some concerns regarding the setback variation. 1 .Thi.s area is known for its "open countryside". Since the lot is already half the size it should be; an addition of this size would consume more of the property taking away from the "open feeling" of this area. 2.A setback of 60 feet for the entire parcel would enable the owners to build again without any variances. 3.A variation from 100 feet to 60 feet seems extreme. That is almost half. Please consider these facts when you make your decision. Thank you, Joan. Katsis 9. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: December 3, 2004 TO: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E., Village Engineer w/ SUBJECT: 3404 Adams Road—Rear Yard Variation I The Engineering Department does not have any comments concerning the above stated subject since it appears that no engineering issues are involved. 3404 adams rear yard rk.doc • "Wift3fi FIFi � °� • /�/� �3 4Lp� /t/��+tt S :NOTIEL.IS•;11EREBT G1VEN,that-aifubllcliejsring be-• fOre,�th.Zoning Bbartl of-�Appeals of TheaV(Ilag�of Oak Brook DuPago;and.'Cd Counties,IlilXO wlll.be heldons, January 4 280.5,ufo�fg7.31 pcm in the Sdmuel'yE.Dea:BOard Room rookok , eppgqR Brook Rand fk'Brook IU1111oIs 68b23�for Kathry poSe.1,e," n51i)ering m+�bpv-,0ok of Jo and• CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION Kathryn Willett 3404 Adams Road;tMiDn rook),Ihihois 60523 for tl Varlail=,proyitledfor 1;the Zoning Ord1.ance of the Village Code)irntlec 3ectton 13 14-6 The petiTloner-is seekinita oval of a variation foSection )3fi•A 3 P 3 of the Zoning Or I ance to dhow a reduction of PSfICIOCk P11b11CSt1011S, Inc. The required 100'-foot rear yard selbat6CM approximately.60 feel fo.atloW.ihe aonstructlon of do addition To ihe:existing 1 Single-familYhouse r , - •, The bropertymaY be generally described tls 3404 Atlarn fall Oak Braokr llllnoi§60523 w4thMe legaldesc7iption as Daily Heral d follows Lot One in Metl essment Plnf at~that p6rt of the West Vt of the Northeast�A of Section 35:TOwnshiPp 39 North; Ranee 11 East of theThirdi6rid!. IF rldiang lying West of The:East,lOchoihsthereof'andly)ng outh of and:odioining !. ttryrye5outh IlneotL'o164�oral the EdsTeclr'eMens on of said South line.in•HUdterTroilsSubdivision'recorded JUlyl„]973 ast Document R75-32184(dforesaid,4outh Ilne:looeled�as 214.50 feet;Nor'89 Duress 39 Mihutes 495econds West;on Satd:PlatofHunterTraIsI-, dIying;EasTofandddloining the a§t line of lot 59,.In,<sattl.Hunter�Trails Subdivislon.. (a/oresaid.Eastline Iabeled'as 165:00 feet,South 8-Degrees 19MMinutes IM Setonds Weston sagaid Pldt of Hunter Tr ails),. n or anized and existing under and b virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, t ,Ens erlyyo eMenslon oflsdid,Nohretfi Ithe,lin said Hunteer g g y Trans Subdivision•(aforesaid North line labeled as 264.Id EREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD. feet,:SOUth 89 Degrees 39 Minutes 49 58c nd5 East on sold Plat of HunterTrails);in DuPage County,Illinois.Also de- scribed and conveye a5: DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the That part of the Sbuthwest'A of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35,Township 39 Norih;.ROnge 11,East of the Third Principal Merldian,described as follows: Commencing.•at The Southwest corder of the Northeast,to Of Addison, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Glendale Heights, Glen Ellyn, Of said Section 3St thence.North along the West'ilne of said ofo,96 fit o7Ta p°e f 5beginnittige t:""Td,1t.�g eneyville Lisle Lombard Medinah Naperville Oak Brook Oakbrook Terrace, East a distance.oT 264.5 feet;thence SouM aAlstance of.165 ° s , feet;:abeI c WeST a distance Of 264,5 feet;thence North a dls+• tanceof165fee1.toihepla ceofbeginnin9>inAUPageCounty;'rilla Park Warrenville West Chicago, Wheaton, Winfield, Wood Dale Illinois. _ s , All Persons desiring to be-heard will betfforaed an oppor-. tdnifY to da so and may submit Theirstatements orally or r wrtting or both:The<hearing may be,recessed to another date if notice of:time and place thereof rsPubliclyannounced at the ITring on is given by newspaper publicatibnnot less thanflVe(5)days prior to:the date of:the recessed hear In accord wlth the fle ppro visions of e American with Disa ` O f DuPage bililtes.Act,an tndividual.who is in need of areasonable dc- �) commodation n order to participate inor benefit from at+ Tendance at this Public meeting should contact Jeffrey Mo- line;;The Village's ADA•Cbordinator�at.630-990;5738 as soon of Illinois,as possible nefore the meeting dare. ' , continuously for more than one year prior to the date of the first The petitioner's.appliwtioq.is-on file with the Village- Clerk and with'ihel Director of.Community Development... Per panawl5htng,to examine;the perition;documents may ar•< of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said range to do.so�wlth•the Director of Community Develop. Rent,Gak,Br ok,In4652":c1l6le Oak Brook,12000akBraok: COunty�les) and State. Ra lnda,G Brook,Village terep ne630.990.3045. Lintla.Gonnella.village Clerlw Published At ihe.dtr'-tion of The Corporcte Authorities antl The Zoning.Board of Appeals of,the Village of Odk Brook, DuPage antl Cook Counties,Illinois Published in_Daily Herald Dec 141 2004(3441163)5 ;ertify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an Act to revise the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715, Act 5, Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, was published December 14, 2004 in said DAILY HERALD. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, Inc., has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent, at Arlington Heights, Illinois. PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS BY 6 —Auth-orized A g e t Control # T3441071 6 . G� OF Oq/. P d � 9 °o � o V C�COUN1I Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road December 9,2004 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website www.oak-brook.org Dear Resident: Administration 630.990.3000 The Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be considering a FAX 630.990.0876 variation at the meetings scheduled on the back of this notice. Community The application has been filed by: James and Kathryn Willett Development 3404 Adams Road 630.990.3045 Oak Brook,IL 60523 FAX 630.990.3985 Engineering The property in question is located at: 3404 Adams Road Department 630.990.3010 Relationship of applicant to property: Owner FAX 630.990.3985 Also shown on the reverse side of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you in Fire Department determining your relationship to the property in question. 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 The applicant is seeking the following: Police Department 630.990.2358 The'petitioner is seeking approval of a variation to Section 13-6-A-3.17.3 of the FAX 630.990.7484 Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction of the required 100-foot rear yard setback to approximately 60 feet to allow the construction of an addition to the Public Works Department existing single-family house. 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development Department at 630-990-3045 to review the file on this application. Oak Brook Public Library Sincerely, 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 FAX 630.990.4509 Robert L. llien, P Oak Brook Sports Core Director of CommurfiPfDevelopment Bath&Tennis Club RLI/gp 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline,the Village's ADA Coordinator,at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, Butler Government Center located on Oak Brook Road(31st Street)and Spring Road, Oak Brook,Illinois. Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,January 4,2005 Board of Trustees Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,January 25,2005** **Tentative try % W' �0yh. fir,o Ave �VILLA411 i —z►'g ``�iEa1463t L�}./ts ,,,.r.tStt.V3 `� I OMMONS 1220 non. e.ws o i �++ I OAK BROOK ROAD ►�� t3o 10 9+1 904,+ LI$FSRR A K 13Rda1L ROAD Zit. 210 2 204 a2 tI�' 304 sob Q8 :21 Y� A A •� l9 IT }=u�a&R4t4R& 310 xp 1S Woo*& Us 243 Lot. SLIb 718 2oT }pp X103 y,�r31Z IB li 1+ 2ryj SD$ 102 3 1I .aryl Sob 10+ as 3a9 314 r -1 ( .64 106 40b 4a8 LOCATION 0 gO7 4,fpi+z 'lag o4 gea 4S7! a 2�bt a.1S SOS • � S00 aa: tss OF SUBJECT 17 X03 \y\,;/ sn�+4� r 110 1 4 4*7 4a9 PROPERTY G6b bob 664 602 113 411 loo `` r li5 � al .•••, bo7 6o5 603 601 114117 706 s3Z4 Sao Sot 11 1 704 1 y6 --------- ,eu a 111A6 ty �� }1�i 702 ,i� 7e9 3406, 3412 I + `. 7� r T i I–► �� 3a1 3+l3 1 A"" b.«I_ $01 701 7b3 i• 1 35TH STREET I } 1+�4 luo 1010 0:2E.: �s t: qOO TH 1�0+ 7 3501 liot 33t7 D.W.C. nos us3 ios i 1017 3502 m wr oN SvltCAUK i X503 � � 0 I UIC4 0. 1; 35 f b. 0 35 c Is sszt N 34' 'c i 300 .3601 � I 1I1 40 3L 9Q *Note: The map provided is only an app mao t'to of the area in question and is intended t used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the property Willett-3404 Adams-VAR-Res.ltr.doc pGS OF OA lr v 0 O e - d v ca 6 v 9�F CpUNT4,� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of December 14, 2004 SUBJECT: Referral - 3404 Adams Road- Variation FROM: Robert L. Kallien,Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer to the Zoning Board of Appeals for Public Hearing at its January 4, 2004 meeting a request for a variation to 3404 Adams Road. Backeround/History: James and Kathryn Willet, the beneficiaries of the trust owning the property at 3404 Adams Road have submited a petition seeking approval of a variation to allow for the construction of an addition to the existing single-family home. Recommendation: Please refer this request to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its January 4, 2005 meeting. Last saved by RKallien \\ash\users\ComDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-3404Adams-VAR.doc T ac,n i.f A 17/7/)And i•di PAA 13-6A-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Lot Area: Except as otherwise required in this title for a specific use, not less than two (2) acres. B. Lot Width: Not less than two hundred twenty feet(220')within the buildable area. C. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.4 for nonresidential uses. D. Structure Height: 1. Residential Uses: Not more than fifty feet(50'), except for continuous flat roofs,which shall be not more than thirty five feet (35') to the top of any parapet wall. However, where residential building heights exceed thirty feet(30'), the highest space that can be occupied must have an emergency escape and rescue opening at a maximum elevation of thirty two feet(32') above grade. 2.Nonresidential Uses: Not more than forty five feet (45'). E. Ground Floor Area Per Dwelling: 1. One Story: Not less than two thousand(2,000) square feet. 2. Bilevel: Not less than one thousand eight hundred(1,800) square feet. 3. Dwellings Having More Than One Story: Not less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet. F. Yards: Except as required in subsections B and D under "accessory uses and structures" in section 13-6A-1 of this article, yards shall be provided as follows: 1. Front: Not less than fifty feet(50') in depth, except front yards abutting York and Cermak Roads shall have a depth of not less than one hundred feet(100'). 2. Side: Not less than thirty feet (30') in depth, except: a) a side yard abutting a street shall be not less than fifty feet(50) in depth, and for nonresidential uses each interior side yard shall be increased by not less than two feet (2') for each one foot (1') of structure height over thirty feet 30' • and b side yards a have ( ), ) y butting 22nd Street, York Road and Butterfield Road shall ha a depth of not less than one hundred feet (100'). 3. Rear: Not less than one hundred feet (100) in depth. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-616, 8-11-1998; Ord. G-730, 9-23-2003) 2 . 13-14-5 • • 13-14-6 on notice to the officer from whom the appeal is taken, and on due cause being shown. C. Processing: 1. An appeal shall be filed with the Village Clerk. The Village Clerk shall forward the appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals for processing in accordance with the Illinois Compiled Statutes. 2. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give due notice thereof to parties and shall decide the appeal within reasonable time. The Board may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement or decision or determination as in its opinion ought to be made on the premises and to that end has all the powers of the official from whom the appeal is taken. D. Decisions: All decisions, after hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals on appeals from an administrative order, requirement, decision or determination of the Director of Community Development or other authorized official of the Village, shall, in all instances, be final administrative determinations and shall be subject to judicial review only in accordance with applicable statutes of the State. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966) 13-14-6: VARIATIONS: VARIATIONS A. u ority: The Board of Trustees shall decide all applications for variations of the provisions of this Title after a public hearing held before the Zoning Board of Appeals on such notice as shall be required by the Illinois Compiled Statutes. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall hold public hearings upon all applications for variations and shall report its recommendations to the Board of Trustees as to whether a requested variation would be in harmony with its general purpose and intent, and shall recommend a variation only where it shall have made findings of fact specifying the reason or reasons for recommending the variations. Such findings shall be based upon the standards prescribed in subsection D of this Section. No variation shall be granted by the Board of Trustees without such findings of fact. In the case of a variation where the Zoning Board of Appeals .fails to recommend the variation, it can only be adopted by ordinance with the favorable vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Trustees. Village of Oak Brook 13-14-6 13-14-6 B. Initiation: An application for a variation shall be in triplicate and may be made by any governmental office, department, board, bureau or commission, or by any person having a freehold -interest, a possessory interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual interest which may become a freehold interest, or any exclusive possessory interest applicable to the land, or land and improvements described in the application for a variation. C. Processing: An application for a variation shall be filed with the Village Clerk who shall forward one copy of such application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for processing in accordance with applicable statutes of the State and one copy to the Board of Trustees. D. Standards: 1. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall not recommend a variation of the provisions of this Title as authorized in this Section unless it shall have made findings of fact based upon the evidence presented to it on the following specific issues that: a. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. b. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. c. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. For the purpose of. supplementing the above standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in making the determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, shall also take into consideration the extent to which the following facts, favorable to the applicant, have been established by the evidence that: a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulation were to be carried out. b. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. Village of Oak Brook • • 13-14-6 13-14-7 c. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. d. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. e. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. f. That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 3. The Zoning Board of Appeals may recommend and the Board of Trustees may require such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefitted by a variation as may be necessary to comply with the standards set forth in this Section to reduce or minimize the injurious effect of such variation upon other property in the neighborhood, and to implement the general purpose and intent of this Title. E. Unauthorized Variations: The variation procedure shall in no case be used to accomplish a result which could otherwise be achieved by a rezoning of the property involved, such as, but not limited to, establishment or expansion of a use not permitted in a residence district; authorizing the construction of residences in other than residence districts; nor authorizing other than single-family detached residences in the R1, R2, R3 and R4 Districts. F. Reapplications: Any person having been denied a variation to the provisions of this Title respecting a specific parcel of property may not reapply for a like variation on said real property until the period of one year has elapsed since the denial of the application for variation by the Village President and Board of Trustees. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-137, 9-14-1971) 13-14-7: PLAN COMMISSION JURISDICTION`: The Plan Commis- sion of the Village, which has been duly established with 1. See Title 2, Chapter 1 of this Code for the Planning Commission. Village of Oak Brook QF Oqk e is t �r o9�eR0oK��• PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑x VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER REGULATIONS: ❑ VARIATION ($750) APPLICANT TO COMPLETE Y. L �1 RAa� c ' LOCATION OF 3404 Adams Road SUBJECT PROPERTY PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 06 _ 35 206 _ 009 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS 3404 Adams Road ZONING DISTRICT R-1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-6A-3F.3. — Rear Yard Set Back ACTION REQUESTED: Variation of Rear Yard Set Back from one hundred feet (1001) in depth to sixty feet (601) in depth. PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER x CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT OWNER(S)OF,RECORD " The Northern.:firust Co. :under;:gust"No.;9747 PHONE:847-2347S100" ADDRESS 265 -E:. Deerpath Road;: CITY Lake Forest . STATE , IL ZIR. 60045 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST James'`E Willett & Kathryn`A Willett PHONE 630 789 `0245 ADDRESS: 3404 Adams Road, " Oak Broak IL ` " 60523 CITY STATE _ " ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information)_James E Willett & Kathryn A. Wi11etVHONE 630-789-0245 ADDRESS 3404 Adams Road CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 E-mail Address: jkc!,IP @ comcacj -nt- I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my (our)knowledge and belief. In addition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs ithin 30 days of billing. Signature of Applicant Date Si0 ture of Applicant ate DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY f� Date Flied ff (=ee Paid„ �, {s Receipt No; � RgCei�ed By r ��t, � tw °! 7 's;Fyk ` << ..'+ x.,.dy. rsy Board of Trustee§` Refe7a�a ," t .<•.,?I�jOlIC6U�I SI18(i �.€ e 5$i3 a �' II 's s w.'r n � k rfl ( N w. p..per I' Adj<:Pcoperty OWnQrs No�itied PUBLIG.IEARING DATESI�laroihmssldn � � onus t �A�� gar o pPeais a ::r m ,Y'°vhyzl;Ypk" '{. �'�,gt rN4', .",� `Es�^k:. "9 � F �tE $��.�•p g�, F7 6` S y°�` SIGNED;="VILLAG�GLRs .:. APP-PUBLIC HEARING-2004.doc NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads,streets,alleys,and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds(or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 da s of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule. NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS Mary Stewart Creed Mather, trustee 3401 Adams Road 3401 Adams Road of the Mary Stewart Creed Mather Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Revocable Trust dated 10/14/93 William J. Gilligan 3400 N. Adams Road 3400 N. Adams Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Lee Munder, trustee of the Lee 3406 Adams Road 3406 Adams Road Munder Revocable Trust dated Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 10/6/99 Frank R. Krohn and Karen A. 101035 1h Street 101035 1h Street Krohn, as trustees of the Karen A. Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Living Trust dated 3/13/92 Harris Bank Hinsdale Trust L-3253 50 S. Lincoln 102035 1h Street Hinsdale, IL 60521 Oak Brook, IL 60523 35`h Street Oak Brook, LLC 111035 1h Street 111035 1h Street Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 John Katsis and 710 Acorn Hill Lane 710 Acorn Hill Lane Joan Katsis Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Narain D. Sawlani and 708 Deer Trail 708 Deer Trail Lane Sarla Sawlani Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Mitch Investments Co., Inc. 709 Deer Trail Lane 709 Deer Trail Lane Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 (Attach additional sheets if necessary) `See Item#2-3 of Submittal Documents Guideline R APP-RESIDENTIAL VARIATION 5-2004 i KATHRYN A. WILLETT »0 6399 JAMES E. WILLETT 0005074592 3404 N.ADAMS ROAD OAK BROOK,IL 60523 DAB Oq 1[PA E v v _'` �_ r $ 70,E DOLLARS THE NOR HERN TRUST COMPANY Northern Trust 000 50 7 4 5 9 211' 639 74 1 CHECK S CHECKS S CASH INV M DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT M ESCRIPTION 1 NUMBER i INVALID VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK SIGNATURE- DEPARTMENT WITHOUT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15 615 e 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS PHONE: (630)990-3045 7karE RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS LETTER OF EXPLANATION After searching for years, the owners believed they had found the perfect place to live and raise their family, the property commonly known as 3404 Adams. They investigated the feasibility of adding on to the existing home before purchasing the property in August. The owners were willing to pay a premium price for the property believing they could construct an addition which was architecturally balanced and consistent in style to the existing home. The property is a one acre rectangular lot and the existing home was built diagonally across it. One acre lots typically lie within the R-2 zoning district which requires a rear yard set back of sixty feet. Somewhat curiously, the property lies within the R-1 zoning district which requires a lot size of two acres and a rear yard set back of one hundred feet. The difference between the set backs for the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts (forty feet) combined with the diagonal placement of the existing home on the property significantly decreases the envelope upon which the owners may build an addition. This is a unique circumstance because.the property's lot size is smaller(by one acre)than the lot size required by the R-1 zoning district in which it lies. It is also unique because one acre lots are normally subject to requirements of the R-2 zoning district which would permit construction of an addition up to a sixty foot rear yard set back. Large wooded lots with larger homes make up the neighborhood. Residents access their homes mainly by private road. Granting the variation will not change the size of the property nor will it increase the number of lots in the neighborhood. The rear sixty feet of the property would be unaffected by the change, keeping neighboring homes a significant distance from one another. While granting the variation will increase the building envelope for the owner's proposed addition, the resulting structure would not be out of character with other homes in the neighborhood. There would be no change in the general topography of the property. Although the view from surrounding properties could change, albeit slightly, the owner is committed to maintaining the neighborhood's beauty and privacy and would undertake landscaping improvements to preserve the same. The owners have notified their neighbors by letter of their intent to seek this variation of the rear yard set back and have provided the neighbors current plans to review, though such plans could change. Of the nine surrounding neighbors required to be notified of the application for variation,to date six of them have signed letters indicating their support. The remaining three neighbors did not respond to the owners' letter. The owners respectfully request your support of this application. STANDARDS (1) The Zoning Board of Appeals shall not recommend a variation of the provisions of this Title as authorized in this Section unless it shall have made findings of fact based upon the evidence presented to it on the following specific issues that: (a) The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. Prior to their acquisition of the property in August 2004, the owners were led to believe the property had a rear yard set back of sixty feet(60')and thus they could construct a desired addition to the existing residence which would be balanced architecturally and consistent in style. The owners acquired the property at a premium purchase price based on this belief. With a rear yard set back of one hundred(100) feet it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to increase the size of the home to recoup the owner's investment in the property. (b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The property lies within the R-1 zoning district, which typically requires a lot area of not less than two (2)acres. The R-1 zoning district requires a rear yard set back of not less than one hundred feet(100'). The lot area of the property,however, is only one (1) acre. Properties of one (1) acre in size typically lie within the R-2 zoning district. The R-2 zoning district requires a rear yard set back of not less than sixty feet(60'). This is a unique circumstance because (i) the property's lot size is smaller than that required by the R-1 zoning district in which it lies, and(ii) one acre lots within the Village typically lie within the R-2 zoning district which requires a rear yard set back of only sixty feet(60'). (c) The variation, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. The essential character of the locality is large wooded lots containing larger homes. Granting the variation will not change the lot size of the property, increase the number of lots within the neighborhood or effect the rear sixty feet(60') of the property. Granting the variation would allow a larger envelope for an addition to the existing home on the property, but the size of the home after completion of such an addition would not be out of character with other homes in the neighborhood. (2) For the purpose of supplementing the above standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in making the determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships,shall also take into consideration the extent to which the following facts,favorable to the applicant, have been established by the S-1 evidence that: (a) The particular physical surroundings,shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. Although the property is rectangular in shape the existing home was constructed diagonally across the lot. This has left a small envelope within which to add on to the structure despite the property's one acre lot size. While it may be theoretically possible to add on to the home while conforming to the R-1 zoning district set backs,the architectural style and interior layout of the home would be substantially compromised. (b) The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to other property within the same zoning classification. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable to other property within the R-1 zoning classification because such properties have lot areas of two (2) acres or more. (c) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. Granting the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare because it would simply change the buildable area envelope for this one property. Further,the proposed addition to the existing home on the property would conform to the set backs for the R-1 zoning district with the sole exception of that for the rear yard. The proposed addition would conform to all of the set backs in the R-2 zoning district normally governing one(1) acre lots. Granting the variation will have little, if any, impact on other property or improvements in the neighborhood. There would be no change in the general topography of the property or to the rear sixty feet(60') of the property. The view from surrounding properties could change, albeit slightly, but there would still be substantial distance between neighboring homes (a minimum of 160' feet). The owner is committed to maintaining the neighborhood's beauty and privacy and would undertake landscaping improvements to preserve the same. (d) The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire,or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Because of the substantial distance which would remain between neighboring homes (a minimum of 160' feet),the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air S-2 to adjacent property or increase the danger of fire. Public safety would be unaffected. The proposed variation would permit the owners to construct an addition which would likely increase the property's value. If anything, such an increase would enhance, not diminish, property values within the neighborhood. (e) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. The owners hope to increase the size of their home and make it more comfortable for their family. They have three active children and a dog. As it exists, the home has a two car garage and no mud room. The family needs more room for their bikes, sports equipment, and other gear. S-3 �-2. Subject Property Verification (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 35 206 009 2. Common Address: 3404 Adams Road, oak Brook, IL 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Lot 1 in Melissa's Assessment Plat of that part of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 39 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of the East 10 chains thereof; and lying South of and adjoining the South line of Lot 59, and the Easterly extension of said South line in Hunter Trails Subdivision recorded July 1, 1973 as document R75-32184 (aforesaid South line labeled as 214.50 feet, North 89 Degrees 39 Minutes 49 Seconds West, on said Plat of Hunter Trails); and lying East of and adjoining the East line of Lot 59, in said Hunter Trails Subdivision (aforesaid East line labeled as 165.00 feet, South 0 Degrees 19 Minutes 30 Seconds West on said Plat of Hunter Trails); and lying North of and adjoining the North line of Lot 58, and the Easterly extension of said North line, in said Hunter Trails Subdivision (aforesaid North line labeled as 264.03 feet, South 89 Degrees 39 Minutes 49 Seconds East on said Plat of Hunter Trails); in DuPage County, Illinois. Also described and conveyed as: That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35,Township 39 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 35; thence North along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 a distance of 663.52 feet; thence East a distance of 396.99 feet for a place of beginning; thence continuing East a distance of 264.5 feet; thence South a distance of 165 feet; thence West a distance of 264.5 feet; thence North a distance of 165 feet to the place of beginning, in DuPage County, Illinois. The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Marianne Date called: DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Marianne Date called: 11/17/04 DuPage County Clerk's Office—Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Andrea Date called: I verify that the information provided above is accurate. Steven K. Norgaard Printed Name Signature Date: 11/19/04 Relationship to Applicant: Attorney APP-RESIDENTIAL VARIATION 5-2004 7 November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely, " I Print N r Signature lh ld Address Phone Number • i i November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely Print Name IV Signalure' 7-717- Address Phone Number 1 • • November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely, Print Name Signature Address X30- 3z3 � s sr4� � Phone Number I .y November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely, :r: &iv, A Pri Name Signature V6V- �ReQ= . t L (oSz, Address Phone Number 1��JQ W�# November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely, XA-04 0%„, Print Na Signatur /"�' Address Aft Phone Number November 5, 2004 Dear Village of Oak Brook, Please accept this letter as indication that we are comfortable with the addition plans of Jim and Kathi Willett at 3404 Adams Road, Oak Brook and are in favor of them receiving the necessary variance for their planned addition. Sincerely, y. A/'G got, ,4 3 A . J�. A S Print Name �0 Signature Address Co3o • 3�. 1 - C1 32 Phone Number EXHIBITS FOR ORDINANCE S- I10'f �,.. 14 r �k�� T ..f ; •r.. r - �s �7 V' N �= s s t•'. F: ki t . �' 'IN`s•^f \ \ \ { ' { L �t N °' rn { 1 ON to r1a i ko 0 1'0 ) 9 rn I ° 1r J J r� N -^ c S1 TE BE t�FNCf /.O FRd� CQ , � ! 1 r SE7 RAI w ' ! I 1 Ki I / SOUTHWE �- r POWER P F'- ? OL / "Pvc- ! o-C-26) �t - yr i r �� ELEVATI La r 15' PALIC UTILITY\EASEMENT \ ! ( !' Sl LF -/Z'P�� e�o 0/0 \ \ \ \ 1 N 89°I55' 04 -- 1 DEED L.!INE C �� INV= OE ED & (MEAS. 2-64.50 / / ! , r , \ \ SOUTH LINE OF LOST 59 -(H I NTER f1IL) - / NV= .69 Do < - - EASEMENT FOV INGRESS 8, Q--- OVERHEAD WIR' � \ \ (HUNTER TRAIL) 214.50 0 %6rI , \ \ '4 t 110 w/ r rr- / \ \ t b i EGRESS PER Of'SC. 53865 v\lE Ld.4 7 A 51 N C G E SE Ni b �T-4 w Y y 1 ! I ` , I I � •,� J J '�� i -" O 7`o ;I � �\ � -� � r \ '\ �j � I ( f'�Et,',� f E r2!R', I � ASPHALT) a SAN ARY 56 FO U09 TI N 5 \i' J rD LD l a ! `" i Z I ' b b�1` F' A1S f`\ \ =701. 3 s \ ' 0 � m ( i `L G RAGE °' \ \ A� NHOLE \- ( l pJ�� W ,o \ I V\FULL OF , 7E \ LLJ CU cr 1; rr rf �j n ti OO \\ �` 1� - O ^y \ \ \` Q � r ',�' � w Z % ! i % , ^ ` 3, \ 69 .4 °' O \ w , ~ST RY �� 10 ,RESIDENCES_ ' woof; I/� � - / / ! \ \\ o tpR1 a X99 � = roo'o" I DECK i ® (] eI /I °° a / i"i/ ri ! l� '\ J �' \ \ b =rte /' I I I MANLON E �? 1 to d t �� c ` .� 0 13 ( it N NOT USE z \ .�% I i.iLET f I \ o v` - \ o _ _ ! RIM=691.06 01 LLI o N ;a F- , t \ _ [� ' ti . 53.93. �vb'�i84. r' ° oZ5 w z ! } \ \ A t ( f 4.JREEN HOUSE) (� i d\l \4. 7 \ I:NV=684. Z W a } I ! r \ \J ` ! PTIC AN o) Ico ! : ANHOLE L 0 \ / ,�h ! OT IM IN US 9 W; � LOT 1 IN / j =( 0.55 q� b � } � � f � ��' � % �j r ! ,./ i --• [[�� /' :51� MUNDER'S aSSE55; 514 7' ! `PtA-. DOC. R88-0; 1 � ? I I J1/ ! / ��— j r / , if ! — ( ° r uj INLET --W 4.74 1 \ rn \ r EEC\ LIN `\ \ ! S �° 55'Q4.,, W\ \ _ I � 1 E DEED & MEAS. `d�64 .50; a0 " DRAIN H /( � ` NORTH ►:ICE OF LOT 58 LHUNTER TF\AIL) �S MO MEN ED a \ / 15 P, _E I E.lJT I l I TY EAS' N€NT \ \ �� 0 , ` ,c \ \ \ \\ \0^9 �`<s v� EAST LINE OF\�T 5 Y L _ _ _ - HUNT i3 TRAIL MEAS. ) 263 r75 \ \ \ — _� (HUNT-ER T�2AIL REC. ) 264.03' — S NOSNHOC'3 A9 Papago NHVeVI'C Ag UMPaQ NOSNHOC'3 afuey�uI �' � I � ,' . S t Y• r"�r v c e (I,n F.4 0"7 a► a, n' u, ", I t l ! -I ON'WW03 _, . pRarf,rTY ZJ,ME� .o-,OZ=„i ' ,” PLMOLIC UTILITY\EASEMENT i r / l r Q1F-J Pvc- 4 _0 -2ff N`d�d 311S l j N $9°155 O4" S « •�2''PvC c'7 ?�d °lo '1 ,� •r `� + E 9 MEAS. 2�6#.5fl —; DEED INE r s 03SOdO2Jd __ - o SOUTH LINE CF Ltt�ft 59 ,C INTER �►IL ? r I' / (HUNTER TRAIL ) Zo,4.5 o -- ; - s ....}. ..... . —I............:. ........... ...... {q t � '[1 ' �i ..... . `... �'hl .... Q EGENT �`O5i' INGRESS & W3S •�lfi', \........ . ......... .......... .�..... .. ... sr-Ri--0 �- -3sg••-- �'. I i i N E SE N f r r ( s r f - ( tii f d 1 • iG9e -T �0d , S adtlA 21d3N 3SOd0ad t i' I �` f I i \ t ASPHAL Tl °0—,09 La f Aid t f ' r ii f `, L• �; C AGE - HOLE 3 o Ljj �; I — } `� 1 �� o I�Y ULL OFD (TE CA OD r z Itn r z 3d013AM3 Mlalln8 4 t ,� ti ~ j p z j �t (� I f t MY ,aJ r L 1' `' 'I I r' /- ' ' ti l l �S woo m = _ "p _ r, cii r �r i' j { �• i d 6yq D : l0O=o" i GCCK I bI t z 0 t— c F ll'ladl004 JNlallnt 3a 3 s' i .� ,�`�.� 1 t f °r t v '0—,001L 91 C. n 0 > r t ; ,� r �0d913S ON'dA Y3a 1VNI'JIt10 4 c fl ` 3 I z_ + �o r R : in c f I, ti t 3 93` - � Qo � � °� � t ' 1 �1� *i.�REEN H �tSyl � 53. j n f fi I�Ilidl00d JNlalln8 JNIISIx� 1 IC AN o z N Q ° 5 f 3d013AN39NlalIMSK- ` ti -- - -- ------ �f---�+� --' 1a' s°a t r f _. m 0 5 I '+ 4 i ti INW&00d 9 Iallf �{ Y L t / rnO m G., j •ZW- f ; f -- i '\ "�J; tit ! ,' ti A° -- � m I j f t 1 j IF z !1 f �• '� + ,,' ' ell !� INLET j RIM�'69b./1 L INE l\ t $ •55� 4" __y_ NOIlOfl2ilSN0O idOi lON �- —� — — �l .� x.6.3,,, DEED lld$A3. 64.60 ► ORTI tItf COF LOT 6C= 44UNTER TRCL MEN 0 ` 1 +. r NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION V) N O N Z d � N W M J 0 w U 0 Z p (n W O v ° co CRAWL SPACE p m Q 0 cu O C:8 Z ° STORAGE W �° Cu D Lo MECH. ~ cn O ' w v BASEMENT BATHR�M cn STAIR HALL 0 = (D M Q CRAWL SPACE BASEMENT ¢ RECREATION RECREATION ` <'" s ROOM ROOM o w z 9'-6"CEILING HT, r LINEXCAVATED ' ---- , (2)CAR GARAGE ` . ABOVE PROPOSED BASEMENT PLAN NTS Comm.No. In Charge E.JOHNSON Drawn By J.LABAHN FEiEiKE.]OHNSONA P - 0 I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 I 1 ' I j 1 N Z I I 1 C7 I � M I U LLJ J 0 o 0 W 2 cn o / I 2 w Q W 0 w — U) � z o W 0 = / i I cn W U 100'REAR LOT 60'REAR LOT i E o D � BACK PORCH > 1 SETBACK SETBACK 1 U) � v F— -----------------� FAMILY ROOM i I W Q c] �I c W 7 I i 1 ' M � � m \ I L MASTER BATHRM LIBRARY/ VEST. 1 -Y Q Q POWD a t STUDY \\ I CLOSET r f S6At w 00 LO ti, Ia OPEN\ FOYER DINING! ,; DINING LOGIA `\ LOG ' ROOM STORAGE NEW SITTING 1 CORRIDOR 1 STAIR', \ I HALL MASTER BEDROOM i KITCHEN \ wm LOCKERS 1 \ � SH WER LAUNDRY ' " VESTIBUL L------------------- Ij MUD (2)CAR GARAGE ROOM ----- __--_ "VIEW(Z}CAR i \ 1 REAR GAF�4GE i > ENTRY ' ' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN NTS MOTOR COURT 1 1 11-4- 4 1 ` I Comm.No. to Cha I I rgo E.JOHNSON Drawn By I 1 ].LABAHN AP - 1 I Che*ed By E.JOHNSON I 1 I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION U N O N N z W U M —y U o0 Z o � x ° W O2 Uo W to Q X 'o Y w c Ca ~ O 6 z o W M N U I.i. C/) c w = U OPEN TO cu it o BELOW W = aAXILLARY Q v w READING RM BEDROOM#2: �� J 0 = BAT CUSTOM SKYLIGHT ` a enrx�z STAIR M U ' � HALL UNDIR ®® ¢ s 9TH#3 0 HALL w z Q EXIST. ti BEDROOM#1 VESTIBULE HER OFFICE TERRACE ATTIC BEDROOM#3:1 E, CLOS. 0 - STAIR HAL ; COMP.ALCO4,,, CLOS. ` PLAYROOM ----- - HIS OFFICE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN NTS 11-4-04 Comm.No. In Charge E.JOHNSON Drawn By J.LABAHN Chocked BY E.JOHNSON -- AP- 2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (n N O N N F Z p C7 N Irl W U) M J U w U Oo " Z M ° �o W O c ° c cl m Q o Y w c Oz o W � m U) C w t E 0 U H Cu D 0 V) I.- v W Q � U m U.1 n 125'-8'UPPER RIDGE HEIGHT O.� O 127.8'LOWER RIDGE HEIGHT M U N Q J w 1118'40"21,11)FLOOR HEADER ® L O LL1 00 W 111'-8"UPPER FINISH FLOOR THREE LO ti 110'-2"UPPER FINISH FLOOR TWO 109'-10"UPPER HEADER 108'x"BOTTOM RAFTER 106'48"LOWER TRANSOM HEADER 101'-4"FINISH FLOOR 9T-W FOUNDATION EXISTING NEW PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION NTS Comm, No, In Charge E. JOHNSON Drawn By J. LABAHN Checked By E. JOHNSONA P — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION co N N N Z W N M V J v w o ° Z O W O ° 0 0 M < o Y w c Cn C O M � Z ° _ W HIMNEY (0 U X131'-0'BIRD HOUSE/fINN1AL � (n C W t O x U C ° LO 125'-8'UPPER RIDGE HEIGHT U N l 122-0'LOWER RIDGE HEIGHT O W o = 118'-10'2ND FLOOR HEADER M U 1N d ® Y Q J g t 111'48'UPPER FINISH FLOOR THREE 110-2 UPPER FINISH FLOOR TWO O 10D'-10'UPPER HEADER w z 108'-8'8 OTTOM RAFTER Lp X108'4'LOWER TRANSOM HEADER ti 1101'4'FINISH FLOOR 19T-0'FOUNDATION 4) W-0'FOUNDATION l W-V FOUNDATION EXISTING NEW PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION NTS Comm, No. In Charge E. JOHNSON Drawn By J. LABAHN Checked By E. JOHNSONA P — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION U N O U N + Z 17 U N_ W cl? J ° w U _ ° o Y Z Y 0 ° W O c ° Lo°o L to 0 m Q -O Y w c C!� 0 ,:;6 Z o 132'-0"CHIMNEY L�u 131'-0"BIRD HOUSE/FINNIAL LL w x U ° Ln 125'-8'UPPER RIDGE HEIGHT W U J w 122'-0'LOWER RIDGE HEIGHT _ _ O L I.- d' ° z Q) M - U 118'-10'2ND FLOOR HEADER ` Y Q J •— t 111'8"UPPER FINISH FLOOR - L O PREUPPER FINISH FLOOR TWO - Z 109'-1D'UPPERHEADER LLJ 00 108'-8'BOTTOM RAFTER ti 108'48'LOWER TRANSOM HEADER IF 101'-'FINISH FLOOR 97'-0'FOUNDATION 90'-0"FOUNDATION 88'-0'FOUNDATION I EXISTING PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION NTS Comm, No, In Charge E. JOHNSON Drawn By J. LABAHN Checked By E. JOHNSONA P — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION V) N O O N Z O C9 — N LiJ M U W U oo " Z V, ° LLI O v ° co 0 m N Q � 'o Ile w c U) � � Z o W 37-T - o JY cn c: w L E U O CQ ,t4-0'IFFER NIXiE HBGIff - - LU Q N J 0 = y M ,WlW2DF,000.N:1OER - o: a w - s ,OIY-10'LPP1FMHt w Z B3 roar LonEn rnuaaMHFirac ONO FINSH FLOOR wa rou a 101 10 WT FOLMATIM NEW PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION va• = Y-o Comm, No. In Charge E. JOHNSON Drawn By J. LABAHN Checked By E. JOHNSONA P - 6 u• 1 i yB1 ';3,h W_a W_Ya.y CV KO Af O NOYW,Y v.iN;Bt/:N.tl uV1u^/.Aa W wn.ba.,l Oyr n p#A.➢.PI'cwOJ O.rc d yM.W.:s4.J/P�N+N y 11. �f4,� r�40'010606W16��(Vaf�ta�N l�;wY r"l^Y O'"_'w iy a p " ✓W14 O as t •49£-9 s• roor"mw:pOnm—a 000 YNN•➢YIw"m 7' Iifi Y :. a..t L9 W9.194'tl•tII4N roaY IWaYN1YWa'x lc9i•'aeaMO oMYBPa YN 100 WdfN➢IluiilW OeG1e1 MuoNNuwu wpMlY Naq•10ty1 nOAYI e➢YOYO• ` ItM t• 10 00 `D jtw.OA�14�NIW Mtl�»40YPM 1 a�iNAq MN 4?tM'gW9 wPNNOq glp�a A W 10400 ,!N (�(� ,�■"r11� 133�N/31CJS .. 0�. 0' ,'Yta[u Y - a (1�dB dye B a0YYy0110'AIyMaWpMtwPgVM�e^Ba O1n0 Aw nllpOga M�87G_9 > V _ -- HHI NY BO WI ►0 YMV AIM y1�N++NW"ONW IOO a000AW93S 11101WRAl rle LLL`M0114e�e0a YaaCUO�I fIWA9 W fD�1 :: .._�' �- V 0affl :Mtgl16NVN4M'•6•Y0010Htle17 V10 u,+014AMN 0.w 0WpINaA yawO qM N41 ruepwwp AIa0Yq P61awe00/1aP�NNnoa T OOY OOf OOL 00J �0 �� W �',;�lc9a�N>••PbalNpwN�iVa 3.1 wINd'MI•u90anO1wlwn Wpaua OMaWgyi � M•a9Z-9 e :' a ... :':.: -.• "; - ..bOIM➢( 000 'OOLM91 OOCM➢1 pia• 'rl / A � �.' a00 i A BB Y•'tt[ S kY. fmaJ Mw.yiQ Hk9 aY.Ja f._.... �4ry . _ 9a9 F:., 9..Y,.J, S Q Y nz .r.•a _` _na` oY.1 rrr j �•�[< v fIY BB r_ 610-1 IJ a < Y ^ AA xx S MM B Z 10' .tt S[•Yt 9['M[ I'[a J�. •`1� - Y[[ M 900.92 Y.aa q 11 ss U) 900 9101 ➢ Lei • SaC`�Y� N ;, tltl S JVOB't 49 YOZ tY� ooa •aWOMEN f° 00 p 800' � Q 90Z lelJ y as �, occ c ��rrc of f•1 00 �: ♦ ,.. 9 LOO-69 bar NN it"' 9l'LB• WW ` f 9101 9 Lt9.i l81 �f n LOO- iA r ,N Yr1 EE ' 4[Yb t[mss•�_� <, tl B YS HH L1 10B026C90 . L3 BB Id OIy2 90Z a, 31 OY n fe tSE o 00 ti a0 � 4• $ N� '11tltl1 (Bas sr� ,PY IL �/•� �J " e t \� frS S- 020'91 d O i rr {s L X O• A w � Y [z CUOe g f' 9(0"([ X rt atl O M tl 6tp B( - 9 A 5. 0 10-IB <0 E Q iai n 10 bM'04 HN Y __ t7 _i r• 8pp-Le coN[ R 92 c 2 0i ..w 900'BW 900's �lQ Lpo'is f C c0'tB • `y d Y sOZ QL YYaI 0 • 9r7--- �Y U' a-Y.t 60p0 9 •g o. LOZ 10 '. Y' Y.ot q o 9 .68 e " c3•e /p YVy / g; 5 g � " y w ao .Y •, 01 yA• p`p Uf y�,,w -.0 of S Y •Y�o P4 $ C ya / b of W 4Yla 1W96V 9.WYHxN1UU �• Y' ` e c0 , Bro d" , " h 19tt04YY. < 1 D q'N16Ni}00 w YVU OVU n` m g W b. �' 4arW rYtllu Y V; !rL 1Wf2r f.bfUMIW h rYtl (9YE1 YYi.tl Y lr1J lWSSY 4YVU HUn. oll t9t ' faf� (C'i1t �u VOr11.tS7 �•,�,:� .... , yivN:r YwuN J••."+""• `�' IY YOOwfVUUNI U �• 'tiE � tYYf a �..... .o _ .. to al ma.Y u,uw uJYY•11 a It.aW YeY�Y 9 'M9'HJ3YU['S.V YH90V f 001AA91 oorM➢( OOhY19/ 942110 YYV�tl Y 9LCIB'(➢' C➢➢I➢'L9'. BILI9YF 'eH4 Y33b09HN VY ..:..., . .n.; .�.. ..,.... ,....:;,..: tlY1IIY13!t'i. SCHOMIG LANf SURVEYORS, LTD. 909 EAST 31ST STREET RUSSELL W. SCHOMIG PLS 035-002446 PLAT 0 SURVEY LA GRANGE PARK, ILLINOIS 60526 WILLIAM K. SCHOMIG OFFICE (708) 352-1452 LOT 1 IN MELISSA'S ASSESSMENT PLAT OF THAT OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35. FAX (708) 352-1454 TOWNSHIP Jo NORIN, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIO NINC1RAt MERIOUN,LYINt wESr of TIE EASE 10 CHAINS HEREOF; Me LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH OF LOT 59.AND THE EASTERLY EMENSION OF SAID SOUTH LINE. IN HUNTER TRAILS SUBDMSION RECORDED JULY 1, 197 AI DOCUMENT R75-32154 (AFORESAID SOUTH LINE LABELED AS 214.50 FEET. NORTH 5p DEGREES 39 MIN TES 49 SECONDS .ON SAID PLAT OF HUNTER TRAILS); AND LYING EAST OF AND ADJONIIG THE EAST UNE OF LOT 59, IN SAID TRW SUBDMSION (AFORESAID EAST UWE LABELED AS 10.5.00 FEET, SOUTH 0 DEMO 19 MINUTES 30 SECONDS ON SO PLAT OF HUNTER TRAILS);AM LYING ROM OF AND ADJOINING THE NOON LINE OF LOT 51.AND THE Y E!L►EN90N OF SAID NORTH U IE. IN SAD WPM TRAILS .. SUSOMSION(AORESAO NORTH LINE LABELED AS 03 FEET.SOUTH SO DEOREES 39 ARGJTES 49'SECONDS EAST ON SAID PLAT OF HUNTER TRAILS); IN DU PAGE:COUNTY.I UNOIS. . COMMON ADDRESS 3404 INNS ROAD OAK BROOK ROAD roRTN uNE a Ram iIN11EA a SECTM n-»-,1 (Sle ST1BiEh ♦� ".i 465��` X01 9A L l 59 I 01 ,1p LC, T 1 WC,PRU-40M E OOC.NR76 u,t{A us ao1W C�O tam FV"5.9T IWAl1 1(F y. COVER OF roan wtZ O..r IcM,ll N IS'MIBLIC Nt/1T GLSfH1BNr 5 Bbr3I.4,'E rare N1N,FEE m uNE•Iqr t4sf - - _________________ G�ti 9M.47' NC f N ulc Or TME'Sa1M t 11. -- --- ---- - U souro urt or Im s9 N wr,tr mrls v.u. wws.!AMC.er000' _ tnAtss s� 4 t PER oafmm F --. — --_ ]tt0/2 4. QSt/f ][1812.27tNJ9,421261 I I�zl_wca oAS usc�I aER ooc.FN2-sil-o_ -..— 25' --{/1�- — — - - 20' - I g I I F - f I I I I calve s ram vela zaT TAST I I I 'Ar• ( I 'I - I I L 0 T 5 9 OOC OM-321 1141[5 tat Rg yI x I Ia glro 0 s< I I 8 All _ 18 L 0 T 1 I >x� I i� \lo '= EAST 1/x a,TIE ryry 5 I I � NoR1R s aNws a 111E PN F86-34-200-ON I saUfM to C4VM OF THE T Y. o 91CIE rN1a I I 1 w EAST 19 CA—S O TINE WT YU DER'S ASSESSW NT LEST,/x C 1,E N019-11ST + : o I I I vur ooc.ABt-aB.t9s � °r SECllar]t-]9-11 'x' \ I I I I A \ 1 L.___________________________________ II= \ t•P.ut. I g LIME O MDT Ss W MMOI 7RAIL5 7B6.OI - FOM etN Pft a.OW M1111N,lwr VEST IS'PUBLIC NNJN EASEMENT s Br39'W'E �J L 0 T 5 8 — — — — — — — — FAST 1AE LOT» WII �1 .B,at �gp��Q�y°�' — — — L 0 T 5' 8 -U DO C.- — —— —— — — — — — — C'.OM-32184 — — — — — — Falco oEn woN Pre as sm m sourN UNt a»TN srREtT 35TH STREET !' same uE a TIE NoRREASr�WIIEW a scc110n x-»-11 I S°Ur"KST COAEA OF 111E NamWM 1/4 OF 5=M 3539--1 COMPARE 1 COMPARE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WIN OECD AND REPORT ANY OtSCREPMICI' - _ MAEDRIMY.'A TILE COMWFW M WAS NOT FURNIS EO FOR USE w STATE OF ILLINOIS COOK ) PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY.IF TIM,%COAMIMEM WAS NOT COUNTY a COOK ) r. FUWIISFED.THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS.BUILDING LINES OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS IIOf SHOWN ON THIS PUT.TM PUT ODES NOT SHOW PRCiES510/NLEW D�tiURY TWAT]WE t MMLOING RESTRICTIONS ESTABLISHED BY LOCH.ORDINANCES.LOCAL CAPTION TO THE PUT AUDNORRES MUST BE CONSLAim RECORDING ANY RESTRICTIONS. HE DNS A THE SAID PLAT B A TRUE REPRESEIRATgN OF 711E SANE - - DO NOT SCALE DIENSIONS FROM THIS PUT.NO VITRAPOLATM1Hs SHOULD BE MADE FROM THE INFORMATION SHOWN WTHOUT THE ALL CORRECT IRE W FEET RE DECIMAL F 65 PMTS O1 A FOOT AND PERMISSION OF SCHOMIG LAND SURVEYORS. LTD.THIS PUT IS ARE 170RAECT AT A TEMPERATURE OF M DF.OHE PJW OF NOT TRANSFERABLE.ONLY PRINTS WITH AN EMBOSSED SEAL ME SOLD"Nb SHOWN ON BUILDINGS ARE 10 THE 011TlIOC OF OFFICIAL COPIES.t CopnWHT,ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS PIGS. REVISED• APRIL 2O 2004 THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONFORMS D THE GIRRENf BEFORE ILIINOIS IMSIARIN STANDARDS FOR A BOUNDARY SLIRYkY. SURVEYED: MARCH 29 2004 YW) 'I CALF. CW W LINK►DICE w t a9 w., CALL D.E. - DRAwwc S"E"T �vL_A L Iy� I.rel�.RINGE BUILDING LOCATED: MATCH 29 2OD4 f-�-i -01 G 74 WP UE : A# LmLI WF7tM tWrE1i tWr Pr.n *-*M�4-9wI &L- BUI,OpO LWE ORDERED BY. ANDY ANTHER JULE _ ` '.'�.+'• .. 4-FS. 102-158 9GLE: 1'.._JD T1r tar Wgi�&OSI ILIp6 LAO D IN PUT NUMBER: 96217 Li