The URL can be used to link to this page

G-687 - 10/23/2001 - ZONING - Ordinances Supporting DocumentsD. 3) JA.NfES J. BENZES_ & ASSOCIATES, INC. —PAYOUT #114 — 2001 2001 PvG & DRNG PAVING & DRAINAGE PROJECT - S 12,156.30 PRO1 4) HARBOUR CONTRACTORS, INC. — PAYOUT �S — MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL ��tPLX PROJECT COMPLEX PROJECT - S207,159.22 CO E. REFERRALS: None. F. AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS OR PROPOSALS OR NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS: None. 6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: None. R.NWD C AGNDA 7. BOARD & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: sD/CO,%I,%I RECotii A. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK — ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW ZON OR-1) REVIEW PROJECT — TEXT AMENDMENT — TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE TITLE 13 CHaPT l? CODE — REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 12 OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING The Plan Commission at its meeting on July 16, 2001 voted 5 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeal at its meeting on September 4, 2001, voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the request from the Village of Oak Brook for text amendments to Chapter 12 — Off - Street Parking and Loading These amendments represent the next phase of a multi -phase project to update the Zoning Ordinance. Prior to forwarding this petition to the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals, the Zoning Ordinance Review Committee (ZORC) consisting of Village yianager Veitch, Village Trustee Savino — Community Development Liaison, Village Attorney Martens, Village Engineer Durfey and Community Development Director Kallien had met to review and recommend the amendment. The amendments for Chapter 12 may be divided into two categories: a) those that are more general in nature which clarify conflicting and/or vague terminology, and b) changes being recommended to address specific issues or concerns. Minor editing has been proposed to improve readability In some instances, sections of the chapter have been moved to more appropriate locations or have been deleted if found to be repetitive Trustee Savino asked Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development, to explain in detail the most significant changes VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 3 of 19 October 9, 2001 M 7. A. 13- 12 -1 -A. Decreasing the timeframe to begin construction of required parking. Director Kallien commented that currently the ordinance allows 180 days and the change reduces it to 90 days which is consistent with building permit time periods. 13- 12 -1 -D. Clarify the authority of the Village Engineer. Director Kallien explained that currently'within this chapter the Village Engineer oversaw enforcement but that the Community Development Director held that responsibility for all other sections of the zoning ordinance. This change would provide that enforcement and interpretation for issues within this section would be handled by the Community Development Director and the Village Engineer would have the ability to approve the engineering drawings where necessary and be intimately involved in the process. 13 -12 -3. Damage and destruction of uses. Director Kallien indicated that this section was just being moved to the end of the ordinance because it would be easier to delete when other changes that are under consideration could replace it. 13- 12 -3 -B. Location of required parking on adjacent property. Director Kallien described that this was a confirmation of the approved scenario that allowed required parking facilities on adjacent property. 13- 12 -3 -C. Width of Parking spaces for office and hotel use. Director Kallien reported that in many instances office and hotel parking commingle and it made more sense to provide for a consistent space size rather than requiring a different size for each usage. Discussion ensued related to hotel garage parking space size. Director Kallien affirmed that if a hotel requested a restriping based on this change it would be reviewed to be sure that the safety of the public and appropriate traffic movement would be maintained. 13- 12 -3 -D. Timing of construction or required parking spaces. Director Kallien stated that the concept was for a very large redevelopment project to allow the developer to provide only 75% of the required parking dunng the phases of the development since the occupancy would be phased in as sections were completed and all of the parking would not be required until the total project was complete. He added that it would be conditioned upon approval of future building or occupancy permits for the property. 13- 12-34. Clarify the concept o f collective parking arrangement. Director Kallien reiterated that this was similar to the previous discussion on adjacent parking but allowed use of excess capacity for another use. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 19 October 9, 2001 7. A. He assured the Board that it would be reviewed so that there would be adequate parking for the two uses together and that there would not be a deficiency situation that could not be easily remedied. 13- 12 -3 -M. Repair and service. Director Kallien explained that the current ordinance stated that commercial repair had to occur within a building, but with the emergence of parking decks the wording has been corrected to indicate no such activity in "off- street" parking areas to include parking decks and lots. He added that a clause was included to permit emergency repairs. 13- 12 -4 -A. Design and maintenance of off - street parking spaces. Director Kallien offered that this change required all new off - street parking to be a hard surface except in the residential R -1 and R -2 districts. 13- 12 -4 -B. Maintenance of landscaped areas. Director Kallien stated that this provided for adherence to property maintenance codes. He stated that the addition was made to assure maintenance of landscape areas within off - street parking areas. 13- 12 -4 -C. Interior parking lot landscaping. Director Kallien reported that there was a lot of discussion between the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board on this provision. He said that current code required a tree every 75 feet within the longitudinal landscaped area and that a tree island be provided every 20 spaces. It has been recommended that the space between trees be 40 feet, that a tree island be provided every 15 spaces, and that the minimum size of the tree be three inches or more in diameter President Bushy commented that if the required size of the tree was increased it might be necessary to increase the size of the median to accommodate it. Director Kallien agreed and indicated that this would be reconciled through the engineering process. 13 -12 -4 -(Old E -1 -3). Methods of landscaping. Director Kallien indicated that currently the ordinance made recommendations for certain types of landscape treatments, but it was being recommended that it be left up to the property owner to propose the landscaping treatment subject to review and approval of the Village. 13- 12 -4 -H. Striping and circulation. Director Kallien commented that it is the recommendation of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board that the current language requiring parking spaces to be delineated by double white lines approximately 18 inches apart be retained. He observed that historically it had been difficult to enforce and ultimately increases the cost of constructing and maintaining parking facilities. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 19 October 9, 2001 1�; 7. A. He indicated that staff has recommended that this language be deleted. Engineer Durfey gave history that indicated in many instances the correct striping was not done, it was noted during the final inspection, the bond was not returned as a result and nothing further was done to enforce the requirement. Comments were made that indicated it was a desirable requirement and that occupancy permits should not be issued until stnping is done in compliance with the ordinance. 13- 12 -4 -J. Parking structures. Director Kallien reported that this topic received a great deal of scrutiny and comments because it was the goal of the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board through redevelopment efforts to use the opportunity to improve the look of parking structures and decks in Oak Brook. He offered that they would require more landscaping, that there would be more attention given to lighting and that they truly try to tie together the architectural and design of the building and parking structure. 13 -12 -5. Off - Street parking areas. Director Kallien explained that some of the calculations in the current ordinance were very difficult and would change as the usage might change. The modest changes in the calculations are widely accepted through the Traffic Engineers Society. 13- 12- 6 -D -2. Handicap parking signage. Director Kallien noted that this was a confirmation of State law which stipulates that the parking fine for illegal use is S100.00. 13- 12 -7 -A. Landscaping of loading berths. Director Kallien stated that current policy was to use a landscaping or some type of a physical bamer to screen loading berths. He indicated that loading berths adjacent to residential property would be required to have a combination of a solid bamer and landscaping. In making these recommendations, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission finding that the petitioner has satisfactorily addressed the factors applicable to text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Discussion revolved around additional and larger trees. Comment was made that many people did not want to park a car under a tree Further discussion revolved around the size of the landscape area and suggested vaned landscaping rather than rows of trees. Manager Veitch responded that the ordinance was established for minimum requirements, that nothing prevented a developer from doing more. Attorney Martens suggested that variances could be considered for creative placement. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 6 of 19 October 9, 2001 I la, 7. A. Consensus of the Board was reached to direct Attorney Martens to develop language that the island area set aside for landscaping be substantially the size of a parking space. Comment was made that the recommendation would retain the language requiring parking spaces to be delineated by double white lines in lieu of staffs recommendation that it be deleted. It was the consensus of the Board to retain that requirement. Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance with the added language relating to landscape island area for consideration at the October 23, 2001 Village Board meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carved. S. ACTIVE AGENDA (Items for Final Action): A. APPOINTMENTS: None. B. ORDNANCES & RESOLUTIONS: ACTIVE AGENDA 1) ORDINANCE 2001- ZO -SU -EX 1 -S -1005 AN ORDINANCE oRD =oI - zo -su- AMENDNG ORDINANCE G -68 AND GRANTNG AN SPEC I E SPEC USE — BRWD AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT (BRIARWOOD LAKES LAKES SUB SUBDIVISION, OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523) This ordinance grants an amendment to a special use permit to permit limited encroachments into the common areas at Bnarwood Lakes The amendments will allow construction of decks in the common areas in this subdivision. Trustee Savino asked for a clarification that approval of the Bnarwood Lakes Homeowners Association would be required before a permit is issued for construction of a deck in the common area. Vllla�e Manager Veitch confirmed that would be the case. Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Konn, to approve Ordinance 2001- ZO -SU -EX 1 -S -1005, An Ordinance Amending Ordinance G -0 and Granting an Amended Special Use Permit (Briarwood Lakes Subdivision, Oak Brook, IL 60523), as presented and waive the full reading thereof ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes 5 — Trustees Butler, Caleel, Craig, Konn and Savino Nays: 0 - None. Absent: 1 - Trustee Miologos Motion carried VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 7 of 19 October 9, 2001 VE OF yak P Bq � o O y G � � lab 9 � COUNT�� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice iV1emorandimi DATE: October 161 2001 TO: Stephen B. Veitch, Village Manager FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E., Village Enginee SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Review Parking Lot Striping — Single/Double Lines 'As per your request, I have queried several traffic engineering professionals concerning the single /double line issue. Their comments are: • Paul Box authored an article entitled "Effect of Single vs Double Line Parking Stall Nfarkings" in the iMay 1994 issue of the ITE Journal (attached). iNIr Box studied more than 6,800 occupied parking stalls in 14 parking sites in North Dakota, Arizona and Illinois. Over 3,476 observations were made of 90 degree parking areas and 3,383 observations of 60 degree areas He concluded that double line markings do not improve parking efficiency In fact, just the opposite was found. i\/Ir. Box stated, "These findings show that the added cost of double line markings (about 70% more) is not warranted today from the standpoint of reducing encroachment " • Tom Adomshick, P.E., James J. Benes and Associates, Inc. — Tom is aware of the Box study He also thinks it is more of an intuitive perception than an actual benefit. • Robert B Hamilton, P.E., Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc — Bob only recommends double lines inside parking structures where it is tighter than outside areas. He also said he believes the benefits of double lines is largely perceived and not actual, except within structures. He is not aware of specific traffic studies or statements • Neil S Kenig, P.E — Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. — At one time, Neil recommended double lines because he felt it better directed people into the parking stalls. Then he heard of the Box report which concluded that cars within the single lined spaces had better compliance than those in double lined spaces. He now recommends single lines which also saves money. Pkg Double Stripe doc it/10/2001 12: 50 t 8476736853 PAUL C BOX $ ASSOC Effect of Single vs. Double Line Parking Stall Markings BY PAUL C. BOX Engineers have had differences of opinions for many years concerning the -,slue of making parking stalls with a suite line %-s. a doubl: Lnc (common - Iv called a "hairpin "). The statement was made in Parking Principles, pub- lished in 1971, that "Many owners have painted double tunes between stalls and are of the opinion that this causes dri- vers to center their cars better within each stall.'t The subject also was d:s- c=cd at the Highway Research Hoard ?3rk9 Commiree meeting in January 1571, where it was lisccd as an Brea requiring further research.-' In a 1971 P,srking Standards report, Conrad Associates and Roti associates illus- trated a hairpin marking as a -stan- dard" design element.3 In the Dimensions of Parkins, published in 1979, Get ald Stocs, author of the Surface Lot Design chapter, stated, "All stalls need double, 4 -inch stripes, approximately two feet apart between each car, "{ He made the same state- ment in the second edition of Dimensions of Parking published in 19SV In the Eno book Parking in 1990, Weant and Levinson stated, "Double - dash line stall striping encourages better vehicle po3i6oring in stalls than single line stripes. "6 The 1992 Traffic Engineering Handbook, Chsptex 7 con- -Conversion Factors To convert from LL mujdpjL�,X in, cm 2J4 h m 0.30-Q taisu the same statement as in Parking Principles but with the added comment, - However, there is some question that the addteiohal lines are worth the added cast. "1 This study was initiated to actually compare how drivers position their vehicles in parking stalls that are marked with a single line, typically ; inches (in.) wide or a double line. Method of Study There are two general parking angles in use- 90 degree and 60 degree. The typical stall widdh is 9 feet (ft), measured at right angles to the stall line. With the single stall line masking, the reftseucc used in this study is from center -of -Line to center -of -lice. Where double lines arc used, the reference Ls to the geometric centerlines between each of the double stall markings. Figure 1 illustrates these two methods of marlang. Several facilities were found that used single Lines in some areas and hwr- pin lines in other parts. In most cases, different facilities were studied to obtain data on vehicle positioning with only one type of marking in place. Parking module widths (the space required for a parking row on each side of ac access aisle) were checked for comparability, however, Little or no encroachment dif- ference was noted as a result of minor variations. A fcw spacca were also found to be marked at 8.S -ft width, but again no difference in vehicle centering was noted. Data were therefore consolidated for the various coadidons PAGE 02 ca.ua+ STALL Nnon+ i l I i MMI MAACNa oausat XARTNa Figure L Stall maricing reference lines. Fourteen sites were studied in North Dakota, Arizona and Illinois, with checks made of more than 6,800 occu- pied parking stalls. Each vehicle was identified in one of three categories: ■ No part of the vehicle overhanging or touching either side of the true stall centerliae (center of the lute for a single marking or the midpoint between lines for double marking). ■ Touching one of the stall lunit lines, defined as above x Encroaching over the stall lunit center lines. In a few cases, dnven were observed to have deliberately straddled a stall marking line in an apparent effort to miniauze any "dingiug" to their .ehicle sides. These were not tabulated. Also, when a car was found to be parked sub- stantially beyond its limit line, and adja- tTE JOURNAL • MAY 1994 • 27 e . 1-3/1 3/ =931 12: 53 8476736853 PAUL C BOX $ ASSOC Table 3. 60- Degree Angle Comparative Vehicle Piacemenh in Single and Double Line Parking Stalls PAGE 04 i Venice Po,&' ton 77 1 A08 5% 11 315 32 C.rNe Double Una 547 3% 173 i On cr % on or On or % on or Fully Cver Over Fully Over Over Ste Wlthln Cent 9r- Center- tMthln Canter- Center- ; .4 Start fine Totcl fine Stall Una Total fine 6 1,331 77 1 A08 5% 11 315 32 837 4 A 12 534 17 547 3% 173 3 176 2% 1.3 383 32 415 8% 1 X 49 1,384 444, 1.887 112 1,999 6% Table A. Comparlson of Encroachnttents $Ingle Une Double Une # % of rotas % of Totcl C-Degr" Angie To, cl Obsarva lions 1,822 — Erc^oachments Cn centerline 40 2.4% 82 45% 3aycrb centertlr•.e 50 3 C% 68 3.7% &%Degree Angle Totd Obsarvc:lorzs 1.384 — 1,999 — cncncc•.civnents On centedlr•.a 23 1.7% 74 3 7 q Beyond centerine 26 1.91% 39 2 0°", Table S. Encroachment by Land Use* Typo (All Parking Angles Combined) Assoaates. A Parku:g Standards Reporr Conrad Assouates and Richard Ron and Sr;, oing Center Omer Uses Assocates, 1971 d Urban Land Institute and National S ,io Llro Parking Association. The Durenscons of U,y u+thin step 2L66 1 A 13 Parking. Wash=gton, DC: Urban land Cn or ever centefline 93 43 Institute and National Parting Total scrr ple 2.179 1,0,59 Association, 1979 ce�cent on or over ce,n;er'�ne 43% d d% S. Urban Land Institute and National Deubte tine ?arking Association. The DLnenswrs of FL y witrw) stcjl 2,971 588 Parking, Second Edition Washington, On cr over centefilne 244 39 DC. Urban Land Insutute and National Total scmcte 3,195 626 Parking Assoaanon. 1983. Percent on or over centefilne 70% 6 1% 6. Weant, Robert A. and Herbert S. L.: vinson Parking. Lansdowne, VA- The Eno Foundation, 1994 efficiency. The findings shoes' they do aesthetically pleasing. Thus, the deci- Institute of Transportation Engineers not. In fact, all but two studies found lion to go with one- or two lines appears "Parking and Terminals," Chapter 7. greater efficiency with the single line, to be a management consideration— Traffic Engineering Handbook and the ovemll averages clearly favored Weighing costs vs. less tangible benefits. Washington. DC. Institute of the single line. These findLlgs show that It would be helpful if a future shopper Tc asispvrtatwa Ea3iaccn, I992. l the added cost of double line markings interview study could include a question (ebout 70 percent more) is not wsr=t- on line preference ed today erom the standpoint of rtduc- �- ir;b encroachmenL References , • .r. - Paul C. Box, There might be other reasons for 1• Highway Research Board. Parking = t P.E., u president of painting double tints that are totally es. Report Principles. Special RE 4125 p � F Paul C. Box unrelated to efficiency One shopper Washington, DC: Highway Research - Assoccates Inc. in :4 reported she found it easier to park Board, 1971. - :;. Skokie, 111. He rs a within the double lines. A puking oiler- 2 Highway Research Board Parking Fellow of ITF_ Atoc stated the doubly lines were more Cottiuuctcc tneehag r- unites, Jan. 13,1971 3. Conrad Assocatas and Ricbard Rot, and fit= JOURNAL - MAY 1994 - 29 AGE pF 04.t 9 P 9 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK O Village Board Transmittal Memorandum c�CQUNT`t '. DATE: October 181 2001 SUBJECT: Amendment to Chapter 12, Off - Street Parking and Loading FROM: Richard A. Martens, Village Attorney RECOMMENDATION: That Title 13, Chapter 12, Off - Street Parking and Loading, of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook be amended Pursuant to your direction, I have drafted the attached ordinance which adopts a comprehensive amendment to Chapter 12 (Off - Street Parking and Loading) of the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance. I would note that Section 13 -12 -4H entitled, "Striping and Traffic Circulation ", presently states: "Parking spaces shall be delineated by double white or yellow lines approximately eighteen inches (18 ") apart. For one way movements along aisles and driveways, direction of movement shall be indicated by pavement markings or directional signs or both as determined by the Village." In the event that there is a desire to delineate parking spaces by single white lines, the section would read. "Parking spaces shall be delineated by white or yellow lines For one way movements along aisles and dnveways, direction of movement shall be indicated by pavement markings or directional signs or both as determined by the Village." I understand you will consider this matter at your regular meeting on October 23, 2001. Attachment S. B. 1) At the September 25, 2001 Village Board meeting, staff proposed an ordinance that would update several of the fees associated with new construction. After considerable discussion on the issue, staff was directed to prepare a more extensive analysis and recommendation concerning all fees assessed for new construction. Based on the complexity of this task, which requires gathering fee schedules for a number of communities, analyzing the information (e.g., the basis for calculating building permit fees varies widely from community to community), and developing examples for comparison, staff is requesting that this matter be continued to the November 13, 2001 Board meeting. Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to continue the proposed update to Section 10 -4 -1B of the Village Code regarding Fees until the Village Board meeting of November 13, 2001. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 2) ORDINANCE 2001- ZO- ORD -EXl -G -687 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING - A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 12 ( "OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING ") OF TITLE 13 ENTITLED, "ZONING REGULATIONS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ILLINOIS Village Attorney Martens drafted Ordinance 2001- ZO- ORD -EX 1- G -687, "An Ordinance Adopting a Comprehensive Amendment to Chapter 12 ("Off - Street Parking and Loading ") of Title 13 Entitled, "Zoning Regulations" of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois " Section 13 -12 -4H entitled, "Striping and Traffic Circulation ", presently states "Parking spaces shall be delineated by double white or yellow lines approximately eighteen inches (IS") apart For one way movements along aisles and dnveways, direction of movement shall be indicated by pavement markings or directional signs or both as determined by the Village." In the event that there is a desire to delineate parking spaces by single white lines, the section would read "Parking spaces shall be delineated by white or yellow lines For one way movements along aisles and driveways, direction of movement shall be indicated by pavement markings or directional signs or both as determined by the Village " VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 6 of 14 OCTOBER 23, 2001 01- ZO -ORD -E \ I -G- 637 CH \P 12 TITLE 13 OFF- STREET PRKG & LO -\DING i i 8. B. 2) Trustee Savino commented that since the last discussion on this topic, Village Engineer Durfey had provided studies that showed that there was no real benefit to either method and that the requirement for the double lines was costly. Stehos Atkipis, Chairman of the Plan Commission, was asked the rationale of the Commission when they suggested keeping the double line requirement Chairman Atkipis responded that there was not a clear decision, but that since one member felt very strongly about keeping the double line requirement, the rest of the Commission agreed because it was felt not to be an extremely critical issue. Trustee Savino commented that the Plan Commission had not read the studies recently provided. Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to amend Section 13 -124H entitled, "Striping and Traffic Circulation" to read: "Parking spaces shall be delineated by white or yellow lines. For one way movements along aisles and driveways, direction of movement shall be indicated by pavement markings or directional signs or both as determined by the Village" of Chapter 12 (Off- Street Parking and Loading) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to adopt Ordinance 2001- ZO- ORD -EX 1 -G -687, "An Ordinance Adopting a Comprehensive Amendment to Chapter 12 ( "Off- Street Parking and Loading ") of Title 13 Entitled, "Zoning Regulations" of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois" as amended. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: 5 — Trustees Caleel, Craig, Korin, Muologos and Savino Nays 0 - None. Absent: 0 - None Motion carved 3) RESOLUTION 2001 -P -R -790 A RESOLUTION WHICH RES E- H 7`,o- v��lE � H BUTLER RENAMES THE VILLAGE HALL TO THE BUTLER ooVN %,\TCrR GOVER.NIIENT CENTER Village Attorney Martens drafted a resolution which renames the Village Hall to the Butler Government Center in honor of Paul Butler VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 7 of 14 OCTOBER 23, 2001 U �.P 9 OF 0,4 G \A 4 r a Village of O k Bivok 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -2255 'Wermte www.aak- i)rook.org Administration 630 990 3000 FAX 630 990 0876 Community Development 630 990 3045 FAX 6' )0 990 3985 Engineering Department 630 990 3010 FAX 630 990 3985 Fire Department 630 990 3040 FAX 630 990 2392 Police Department 630 990 2358 FAX 630 990 7484 Public works Department 630 990 3044 FAX 630 472 0223 ()k 1` rnnk Public Library 1112 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -4623 630 990 2222 FAX 630 990 0170 Oak Brook Sports Core Bath & Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -4600 630 990 3020 FAX 630 990 1002 -oif Glum 2606 Yoi k Road z Oak Brook, IL 60523 -4602 630 990 3032 FAX 6')0 990 0245 October 30, 2001 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Attention: Robertson S. Rollins, General Manager 7600 Mineral Drive Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Dear Rob: The Village Board, at their Board Meeting of Tuesday, October 23, 2001, passed and approved the following ordinance: ORDINANCE 2001- ZO -ORD -G -687 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 12 ( "OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING ") OF TITLE 13 ENTITLED, "ZONING REGULATIONS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS The above Ordinance is being forwarded to your for inclusion in the Code of Ordinances of the Village of Oak Brook. I would appreciate your acknowledging receipt of this Ordinance. Sincerely, I Richard A. Martens Village Attorney RAM/jr Enclosure