Loading...
S-1177 (2) - 12/12/2006 - ZONING - Ordinances Supporting DocumentsOF P 'q _N A J o 9C� co U Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -2255 Website www oak - brook.oi g Administration 630 368 5000 FAX 630 368 5045 Community Development 630 368 5101 FAX 630 368 5128 Engineering Department 630 368 5130 FAX 630 368 5128 Eire Department 630 368 5200 FAX 630 368 5250 Police Department 630 368 8700 FAX 630 368 8739 Public works Department 630 368 5270 FAX 630 368 5295 Oak Brook Public Library 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -2200 630 368 7700 FAX 630 368 7704 Oak Brook Sports Core Bath & Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -4600 630 368 6420 FAX 630 368 6439 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 -4602 630 368 6400 FAX 630 368 6419 a •� a90S May 1, 2007 Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies 2311 22"d Street, Suite 208 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Re Recorded Documents on December 19, 2006 ORDINANCE 2006- ZO- R- S- 1175/R2006- 243964 ORDINANCE 2006- ZO- SU- S- 1176/R2006- 243965 ORDINANCE 2006- ZO -V -S -I 177/R2006- 243966�el 2407 224D Street Oak Brook, IL 60523 Dear Sirs Copies of the above noted recorded documents are enclosed for your information These are important records and should be retained in a secure area within your files If you need any further assistance in this matter, feel free to contact me at 630- 368 -5056 on Monday through Friday from 9am to 5pm Sincerely, a"t7' ,A" �` Linda M Andrys Records Management Clerk /Ima Enclosures cc Dale L Durfey, Jr, Village Engineer Robert L Kallien, Jr , Director of Community Development Official Files — C>R-I>— S_1 '7rt /RECDOC /2007- RECLTR -ORD 2006- ZO -[t -S -1175 ZO -3U -S -1176, ZO- V -S -11 77- STARBUCKS -2407 22ND ST M FRED BUCHOLZ OUPpGE COUNTY RECORDER DEC .19,2006 3:32 PM OTHER 06- 28 - 202 -007 004 PAGES R2006- 243966 (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 -2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document ORDINANCE 2006- ZO -V -S -1177 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13- 7C -3.0 AND SECTION 13- 12 -3.1-1 OF TITLE 13 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS ALONG 22 ND STREET & YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF - STREET PARKING SPACES IN A FRONT YARD ADJOINING A STREET Property Address /es 240722 ND STREET (If vacant land, state vacant land and list nearest cross streets, Oak Brook, IL 60523 ) OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523 Pin /s Number 06 -28- 202 -007 Name & Address of Applicant: STARBUCKS COFFEE c/o TJ DESIGN STRATEGIES 2311 22 N11 STREET, SUITE 208, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Name & Address of Responsible STARBUCKS COFFEE c/o TJ DESIGN STRATEGIES Party to Receive Copy of 2311 22 NU STREET, SUITE 208 Recorded Document and Billing: OAK BROOK, IL 60523 G/L Account # to be Charged: 10 -1365 Prepared By: Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Name & Address of Recipient of Consideration (when applicable): G/L Account # to be Charged: N/A Return To: Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 ORDINANCE 2006- ZO -V -S -1177 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13- 7C -3.0 AND SECTION 13- 12 -3.H OF TITLE 13 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS ALONG 22ND STREET AND YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF - STREET PARKING SPACES IN A FRONT YARD ADJOINING A STREET (Starbucks Coffee, 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, P I N 06 -28- 202 -007) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by TJ Design Strategies, authorized representative of the Starbucks Coffee Company, on behalf of The Mary Ann R. Monty Trust #8 -1995 (the "Petitioner'), requesting certain variations from the provisions of Sections 13 -7C -3 C (Lot Area Requirements -- Yards), and 13 -12 -3 H (Off- Street Parking Regulations -- In Yards) of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code, as follows (i) a variation from the required front yard of one hundred feet (100') along 22nd Street, to allow a reduction of the required front yard along 22nd Street to approximately sixty -nine feet (69'), and (ii) a variation from the required yard for off - street parking in a front yard adjoining a street of ten feet (10'), to allow a reduction of the required front yard adjoining Tower Road to approximately five feet (5'), in order to construct a new Starbucks Coffee on the property commonly known as 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois, legally described below; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on such application has been conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook on August 1 and September 5, 2006, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals made explicit findings of fact that the variations requested conform to the standards set forth in Sections 13 -14 -6D of the Village Code, and - 4 WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the recommendations and findings made by the Zoning Board of Appeals NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows. Section 1 That the provisions of the preamble hereinabove set forth are hereby adopted as though fully set forth herein Section 2 That the Petitioner is hereby granted a variation from the required front yard of one hundred feet (100') along 22nd Street, as provided in Section 13 -7C -3 C (Lot Area Requirements -- Yards) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook, to allow a reduction of the required front yard along 22nd Street to approximately sixty -nine feet (69'), in order to construct a new Starbucks Coffee on the property commonly known as 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois Section 3 That the Petitioner is hereby granted a variation from the required yard for off - street parking in a front yard adjoining a street of ten feet (10'), as provided in Section 13 -12 -3 H (Off- Street Parking Regulations -- In Yards) of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook, to allow a reduction of the required front yard adjoining Tower Road to approximately five feet (5'), in order to construct a new Starbucks Coffee on the property commonly known as 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois Section 3 That the variations granted herein shall be subject to the following conditions i 0 P Ordinance 2006- ZO -V -S -1177 Yard Variations Front and Off - Street Parking 240722 Id Street Page 2 of 2 1) Development of the property shall be in substantial conformance with the revised plans submitted on page 23 of the case file 2) If Starbucks obtains a cross - connection easement between the subject property and such property to the east, as depicted on the plans submitted, it shall submit such easement to the Village of Oak Brook 3) Starbucks shall provide additional landscaping, as determined by the Village's Community Development Director Section 4 That this Ordinance is limited and restricted to the property known as 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois, which property is legally described as follows Lot 3 in Butler Company M -1, Inc Assessment Plat No 6 of part of the North West' /4 of Section 27 and part of the North East % of Section 28, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded July 20, 1964, as Document R64- 25649, in DuPage, County, Illinois , P I N # 06- 28- 202 -007 Section 5 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict Section 6 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law APPROVED THIS 12th day of December, 2006. i Kevin Quinlan � Village'President PASSED THIS 12th day of December, 2006 Ayes Trustees Aktipis Craig, Kennedy Manofsky, Sanford and Yusuf Nays` None Absent None ATTEST Linda K Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk s STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS. COUNTIES OF COOK AND DUPAGE ) I, Linda K. Gonnella, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that on December 12, 2006, the corporate authorities of the above municipality passed and approved Ordinance 2006- ZO -V -S -1177 , AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 13- 7C -3.0 AND SECTION 13- 12 -3.H OF TITLE 13 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS ALONG 22ND STREET AND YARD REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF - STREET PARKING SPACES IN A FRONT YARD ADJOINING A STREET (Starbucks Coffee, 2407 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, P I N 06 -28- 202 -007) I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records, journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 14th day of December , 2006. .,erg u'�ar •��'° n �� � r �° w 4? '� ,, Linda K. Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk Village of Oak Brook DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois STARBUCKS COFFEE 2407 22ND STREET Map Amendment, Text Amendment, Special Use and Variation INDEX PAGE CONTENTS 45-45.c Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien -Village Board Agenda dated September 26, 2006 44-44.c Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman to President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Dated 43 Starbucks Corporate Social Responsibility handout (Included - Not Attached) 42-42.r Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated September 5, 2006 41 Aerial View of Starbucks Locations in the Immediate Area 40-40.a Additional Information from Director of Community Development Kallien 39 Letter from Scott Day re: Objection of Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre dated August 24, 2006 38 Objection from Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre dated August 24, 2006 (Included- - Not Attached) 37-37.a Metro Transportation Review of Butterfield Road Construction Impact dated August 22, 2006 36 Objection letter from Employee at 2425 22nd Street 35 Metro Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis dated August 17, 2006(Included-Not Attached) 34-34.e Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated August 1, 2006 (Incomplete) 33-33.c Traffic Impact Report from Metro Transportation dated July 24, 2006 32-32.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien re: Variation dated July 26, 2006 31 Follow-up from Director of Community Development Kallien dated July 26, 2006 30-30.f Statistical Report of Accidents at the Area of 22nd Street and Tower and the Traffic Crash Reports 29-29.b Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairwoman to Village Board and Zoning Board of Appeals dated July 26, 2006 28-28.d Plan Commission meeting minutes dated July 17, 2006 27-27.a Follow-up from Director of Community Development Kallien dated July 12, 2006 26 Memorandum from Public Works Director Meranda dated July 5, 2006 25 Memorandum from Fire Chief Bodony dated June 30, 2006 24 Letter from Director of Community Development Kallien to Fire Chief and Public Works Director dated June 29, 2006 23 Revised Elevation and Site Plan Details dated July 12, 2006 (Included - Not Attached) 22-22.a Bollard Design and Specifications 21 Drive-Thru Lane Averages 20 Letter of Objection from Commercial Neighbor (2425 22nd St) dated July 10, 2006 20.a-20.b Petition from 25 Employees of Commercial Neighbor (2425 22"d St) 19-19.i Plan Commission meeting minutes dated June 19, 2006 18 Proposed Building Elevations and Design Received at June 19, 2006 Meeting 17 Reduced Color Site Plan dated June 19, 2006 16 Example of Outdoor Dining Area with Barrier and Table Style Shown 15 Zoning Surrounding Subject Property 14 Letter from Forest Preserve District of DuPage County dated June 16, 2006 13-13.a Memorandum from Village Engineer Durfey re: Initial Review dated June 19, 2006 12-12.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien re: Map Amendment dated June 15, 2006 11-11.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien re: Text Amendment dated June 15, 2006 10-10.b Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien re: Special Uses dated June 15, 2006 9 Resident Letter dated June 13, 2006 8 Certificate of Publication dated June 7, 2006 7-7.a Memorandum from Village Engineer Durfey re: Initial Review dated June 6, 2006 6 Board of Trustees Referral Meeting Minutes dated May 23, 2006 5 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Director of Community Development 4 B-3 District-Zoning Ordinance- Section 13-7C-2- Special Uses 3 Variation Issue- Parking Lot Setback-Zoning Ordinance- Section 13-12-413 2 Variation Issue- Parking Requirement Setback-Zoning Ordinance- Section 13-12-3H-1 1 Variation Issue- B-1 Lot Area Requirements, Zoning Ordinance, - 13-7A-3.C.1 - 22nd Street Setback ******************* PAGE CONTENTS A Applicant's Project Narrative Map Amendment Application and Standards B Application/Petition -To Rezone the Property from ORA-1 to B-3 C-C.2 Applicant's Response to Standards for Map Amendment Text Amendment Application and Standards D Application/Petition -Text Amendment to Section 13-7C-2, Special Uses to add the text "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" E-E.2 Applicant's Response to Standards for Text Amendments Special Use Application and Standards F Application/Petition - Special Uses, Section 13-7C-2 to Allow Outdoor Dining and a Drive-In Facility G Applicant's Response to Standards for Special Use Variation Application and Standards H Application/Petition -Variation to 22"d Street Setback and Parking Setback on Tower Drive 1-1.2 Applicant's Response to Standards for Variations Supporting Documents J-J.1 Letter of Standing from Property Owner and Starbucks Coffee Authorizing Request for Relief K-K.1 Fee/Receipt L. Certification of Surrounding Property Owners M Surrounding Property Owners List N Subject Property Verification and Legal Description 0-0.1 Transmittal Letter dated June 6, 2006 P-P.1 Transmittal Letter dated May 15, 2006 Q Aerial Photograph of the Location and Surrounding Buildings R Pictures of the Existing Site Conditions (Included - Not Attached) S Revised Site Plan dated June 12, 2006 (Included - Not Attached) T Revised Landscape Plan dated June 12, 2006 (Included - Not Attached) U Proposed Elevations (Included - Not Attached) V Survey dated May 9, 2006 (Not Included -Official and Key Files Only) W Site Plan dated May 11, 2006-SUPERSEDED SEE Page S(Not Included-Official File Only) X Landscape Plan dated May 11 2006 -SUPERSEDED SEE Page T (Not Included-Official File Only) OF OAk v G �90 0 v AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of September 26, 2006 SUBJECT: Starbucks — 2407 22nd Street — Map Amendment, Text Amendment, Special Uses and Variations FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: 1. Map Amendment - I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested map amendment from ORA-1 to B3 for the property located at 2407 22"d Street and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the October 10, 2006 Board of Trustees meeting. 2. Text Amendment — I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested text amendment to Section 13-7C-2 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants as a special use in B3 District and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the October 10, 2006 Board of Trustees meeting. 3. Special Uses — I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested special uses for drive-thru and outdoor dining at 2407 22"d Street and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the October 10, 2006 Village Board of Trustees meeting. 4. Variations — I move to concur with the recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals to approve the requested variation to Section 13-7C-3.c to allow an approximate 31-foot encroachment into the required 100 foot setback on 22nd Street; and approval of the variation to Section 13-12-3.h to allow an approximate 5- foot encroachment into the 10-foot setback required for the parking along Tower Drive and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the October 10, 2006 Board of Trustees meeting. Last saved by GPOLANEK JAI-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-Starbucks-240722nd-MA-TA-SU-VAR.doc Backaround/History: At its meetings on August 1 and September 5, 2006, the Zoning Board of Appeals held the required public hearing and completed its review of several petitions from TJ Design Strategies, q P g authorized representative of the Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 2407 22nd Street. They are seeking approval of a map amendment, text amendment, two special uses and two variations in order to construct a new stand-alone Starbucks. The existing one-story building on the property will be demolished to accommodate the proposed 1925 square foot Starbucks building, which will also include a drive-in facility(east side of building) and an outdoor dining area(north side of building). Map Amendment The applicant is seeking a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-3. The adjacent property to the east improved with two office buildings is zoned B-3. By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of a map amendment to rezone the subject property at 2407 22nd Street from ORA-1 to B-3 finding that the applicant has addressed the required factors on pages C and C.3 of the case file Text Amendment Outdoor dining is permitted as a special use in the B-1 and B-2 Districts, but not in the B-3 District. The applicant is seeking a text amendment to Section 13-7C-2 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants as a special use in the B-3 District. By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested text amendment to Section 13-7C.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, to add "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a special use in the B-3 District finding that the applicant has addressed the required factors on page E of the case file. Special Uses The applicant is seeking two special uses. One special use is necessary to construct a drive-in facility along the east side of the building for patrons wishing to make purchases from their vehicle. The other special use will permit the construction of an outdoor dining area to be located on the north side of the building. (Drive-thru) By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested special use for approval of the requested special use for a drive-thru facility finding that the applicant has addressed the required standards on pages G of the case file subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file. 2. Suggest that the owner use reasonable efforts to negotiate a cross-access easement to satisfy the concerns raised. 3. If signalization at the intersection of Tower Drive and 22nd Street is installed, the property owner agrees to pay 25% of the costs of the installation to be shared between the property owners utilizing that intersection. 4. The village to consider the imposition of cross-access easement requirements in the Commercial Corridor Revitalization Project. y�� Last saved by GPOLANEK JAI-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-Starbucks-240722nd-MA-TA-SU-VAR.doc (Outdoor Dining) By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested special use for outdoor dining, finding that the applicant has addressed the standards on page G of the case file, to recommend approval of the requested special use for an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file, bollard design on page 22, Building design on page 18 and Outdoor dining area with table and umbrella design as shown on page 16 of the case file and the following conditions imposed by the Plan Commission. 2. Operation between April 1 and October 15 of each year. 3. Tables and chairs to be removed during the winter months. 4. No live music or other live entertainment is allowed in the exterior seating area. 5. No wait service to be provided to the exterior seating area. Variations In order to construct the stand-alone Starbucks facility, the applicant is seeking approval of two variations to the Zoning Ordinance. The first variation to Section 13-7C-3c is requesting an approximate 31-ft. encroachment into the 100-ft. front yard along 22nd Street. The second variation to Section 13-12-3h is requesting an approximate 5-ft. encroachment into the 10-ft. setback for parking along Tower Drive. By a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation to Section 13-7C-3.c, to allow an approximate 31-foot encroachment into the required 100 foot setback on 22nd Street; and approval of the variation to Section 13-12-3.11 to allow an approximate 5-foot encroachment into the 10-foot setback required for the parking along Tower Drive finding that the applicant has addressed the required standards on page I of the case file subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property shall be in substantial conformance with the revised plans submitted on page 23 of the case file. 2. That the owner grants the Cross-access easement to the Village as provided on the plans submitted should it be obtained. 3. Additional landscape to be provided. Recommendations If you concur with the findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals, separate motions should be made approving the requests from Starbucks for a map amendment, text amendment, special uses and variations in order to construct a stand alone Starbucks at 2407 22nd Street. Last saved by GPOLANEK JAI-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-Starbucks-240722nd-MA-TA-SU-VAR.doc 4�1c-' PGE of 04.t � 90 o ® �A o n G � 9C�CouNT`I • September 19, 2006 Village of Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Website www.oak-brook.org SUBJECT: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street—Map Amendment, Text Amendment, Administration Special Uses and Variations 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: Community Development Background 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 At its meetings on August 1 and September 5, 2006, the Zoning Board of Appeals held the required public hearing and completed its review of several petitions from Engineering TJ Design Strategies, authorized representative of the Starbucks Coffee Company Department on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 2407 22nd Street. They are seeking approval of a map amendment, text amendment, two special uses and two variations in order to construct a new stand Fire Department alone Starbucks. The existing one-story building on the property will be 630.990.3040 demolished to accommodate the proposed 1925 square foot Starbucks building, FAX 630.9930.99 0..2323 92 which will also include a drive-in facility (east side of building) and an outdoor Police Department dining area (north side of building). Each of these requests is summarized in the 630.990.2358 following: FAX 630.990.7484 Public Works Map Amendment — the applicant is seeking a map amendment from Department ORA-1 to B-3. 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 Text Amendment — the applicant is seeking a text amendment to Oak Brook Section 13-7C-2 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit outdoor dining Public Library areas adjacent to restaurants as a special use. 600 Oak Brook Road Special Uses—the applicant is seeking two special uses. One special Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 use is necessary to construct a drive-in facility along the east side of 630.990.2222 the building for patrons wishing to make purchases from their FAX 630.990.4509 vehicle. The other special use will permit the construction of an Oak Brook Sports Core outdoor dining area to be located on the north side of the building. Bath&Tennis Club With regards to the drive-in facility, the petitioner is proposing a 700 Oak Brook Road single-lane that is designed to accommodate the stacking of Oak Brook, IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 approximately nine vehicles. One menu/order pedestal and one FAX 630.990.1002 customer window is also proposed. Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 September 19, 2006 President Quinlan,Board of Trustees RE: Starbucks Coffee—2407 22nd Street Page 2 With regards to the outdoor dining area, the petitioner is proposing an outdoor dining/seating area for approximately 24 patrons. Variations — the applicant is seeking approval of two variations to the Zoning Ordinance. The first variation to Section 13-7C-3c is requesting an approximate 31-foot encroachment into the 100-foot front yard along 22nd Street. The second variation to Section 13-12-3h is requesting an approximate 5-foot encroachment into the 10-foot setback for parking along Tower Drive. Public Comment All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. A formal objection was received by the owner of the building located at 2425 W. 22nd Street. Several tenants of the building also voiced their objection to the proposed redevelopment of the property based on safety concerns for cars turning into/exiting Tower Drive. Discussion/Recommendation As part of the Zoning Board of Appeal's deliberations, a number of issues and questions were raised regarding the impact that the proposed Starbuck's will have on public safety issue as it relates to the existing medical office use located at the southwest corner of 22nd Street and Tower. Accordingly, several additional traffic studies were prepared and submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Starbuck's traffic consultant Metro Transportation Group prepared the first. Metro also provided comments on the impact that the planned improvements to Butterfield Road will have on the subject property. From the report filed by the objectors, a traffic analysis was prepared by KLOA, which commented on Metro's traffic findings. In addition to the traffic analyses, Staff had conducted its own assessment of the parking use/availability along Tower Drive, because Dr. Jafari provided testimony that the parking situation at both his building and along Tower Drive would be negatively impacted by the Starbuck's facility. Staff focused its analysis to the building at 2425 W. 22"d Street and parking along Tower Drive. Staff visited the area 22 times over a three-week timeframe. On each visit, the number of cars parked along west side of Tower was counted as well as the number of vacant spaces that were found in the three parking areas at 2425 W. 22"d Street. In every visit, even though a minimum of 50 parking spaces were unused in the parking lots located at 2425 W. 22nd Street, people continued to park along the west side of Tower Drive. Finally, with regards to the traffic safety issue raised by the adjoining property owner, information was received from the Police Chief relative to accident history and traffic safety issues at the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. Map Amendment — by a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of a map amendment to rezone the subject property at 7 September 19, 2006 President Quinlan, Board of Trustees RE: Starbucks Coffee—2407 22nd Street Page 3 240722 nd Street from ORA-1 to B-3 finding that the applicant addressed the required factors on pages C and C.3 of the case file Text Amendment — by a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested text amendment to Section 13-7C.2 of the Zoning Ordinance to add "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a special use in the B-3 District finding that the applicant addressed the required factors on page E of the case file. Special Use (drive-thru) — by a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested special use for approval of the requested special use for a drive-thru facility finding that the applicant addressed the required standards on pages G of the case file subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file. 2. Suggest that the owner use reasonable efforts to negotiate a cross-access easement to satisfy the concerns raised. 3. If signalization at the intersection of Tower Drive and 22nd Street is installed, the property owner agrees to pay 25% of the costs of the installation to be shared between the property owners utilizing that intersection. 4. The village to consider the imposition of cross-access easement requirements in the Commercial Corridor Revitalization Project. Special Use(outdoor dining) — by a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation for approval of the requested special use for outdoor dining finding that the applicant addressed the standards on page G of the case file, to recommend approval of the requested special use for an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file, bollard design on page 22, Building design on page 18 and Outdoor dining area with table and umbrella design as shown on page 16 of the case file and the following conditions imposed by the Plan Commission. 2. Operation between April 1 and October 15 of each year. 3. Tables and chairs to be removed during the winter months. 4. No live music or other live entertainment is allowed in the exterior seating area. 5. No wait service to be provided to the exterior seating area. Variations — by a vote of 7 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation to Section 13-7C-3.c to allow an approximate 31-foot encroachment into the required 100 foot setback on 22 nd Street; and approval of the variation to Section 13-12-3.h to September 19, 2006 President Quinlan, Board of Trustees RE: Starbucks Coffee—2407 22°a Street Page 4 allow an approximate 5-foot encroachment into the 10-foot setback required for the parking along Tower Drive finding that the applicant has addressed the required standards on page I of the case file subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property shall be in substantial conformance with the revised plans submitted on page 23 of the case file. 2. That the owner grants the Cross-access easement to the Village as provided on the plans submitted should it be obtained. 3. Additional landscape to be provided. Very truly yours, NOTE: Chairman Davis has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this letter pending her signature. The signed original will be placed in the official file upon receipt. Champ Davis Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals I yy� OF THE SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 REGULAR D,MFTMINUTES TIHE VILLAGE BOARD LAGE OF OAK UUNOFFIAL UNTIL APPROVED AS WRITTEN OR AS AMENDED ON 52006 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Chairman Champ Davis in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:31 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Members Richard Ascher, Jeffrey Bulin, Glenn Krietsch, Baker Nimry, Manu Shah and Steven Young IN ATTENDANCE: Jeffrey Kennedy, Trustee, Robert Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development and Daley Durfey, Village Engineer Acting Chairman Ascher announced with the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals the agenda items will be taken out of order 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JULY 26, 2006 Motion by Member Bulin, seconded by Member Nimry, to approve the minutes of the July 26, 2007 Regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting as written. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 4 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. STARBUCKS COFFEE — 2407 22ND STREET — MAP AMENDMENT — s ID ST – 2407 AP 22 ST – MAP TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM ORA-1 TO B-3, TEXT AMENDMENT – TO AMENDMENT — SECTION 13-7C.2 SPECIAL USES, TO ADD THE ZONE FROM ORA-1 TO B-3, TEXT TEXT "OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ADJACENT TO AMENDMENT - SPECIAL USES– and RESTAURANTS" SPECIAL USE — TO ALLOW AN OUTDOOR VARIATIONS – TO DINING AREA ADJACENT TO A RESTAURANT, SPECIAL USE — CONSTRUCT STAND ALONESTARBUCKS TO ALLOW A DRIVE-IN FACILITY. Chairman Davis stated that he was not present at the last meeting, but he VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 1 of 25 September 5, 2006 received the DVD and reviewed the entire proceeding, has reviewed the packet and inspected the premises. On two occasions, he had professional matters with Mr. Ted Johnson in 1998-1999 where he was an expert when a client was challenging a TIF and he recently consulted with him regarding a TIF. He has dealt with many other experts in this general area and asked Mr. Jafrri and his attorney, Scott Day whether there was any objection to him continuing in the matter. They responded there was no objection. Chairman Davis noted that he would render a fair and impartial decision in this matter. Chairman Davis said that they received an official objection dated August 24, 2006 and a Traffic Impact Analysis dated August 17, 2006 from the applicant. Chairman Davis swore in Ted Johnson, President of TJ Design Strategies, 2311 22nd Street, Oak Brook is the authorized representative of Starbucks. At the last meeting, the members of the board asked that they provide supplemental traffic information. They asked Metro Transportation to take a traffic count at the intersection of Tower and 22nd Street. Chairman Davis swore in Rolf Killian, Executive Vice President, Metro Transportation Group. Mr. Killian said that they undertook data collection activities that included traffic counts from Tower Road and 22r'd Street. The counts were conducted on Thursday, August 10, 2006 from 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m. They determined that the actual peak hour occurs from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 to 5:45 p.m. In order to determine the impact that Starbucks would have on this intersection they obtained survey data from 3 existing mature Starbucks locations. The Naperville location has been in existence for eight years which is a good site and can be used as a reference tool; Lake Zurich has been open for six years; and Lake in the Hills has been open for four years, so all of the sites are mature and have been around for a while. Of the three, the Naperville is the busiest location. It is about 2/3 drive up and 1/3 walk in. The morning peak hours are between 7:00 to 10:00 a.m. and are the busiest hours for Starbucks. It is prior to any other retail facilities opening up down the street. The mid-day period is about half of the traffic generated and the evening is about half again. The traffic significantly decreases hour by hour. They estimate that in the morning they will generate about 100 inbound vehicle trips. Because it is a pass by use, very little new traffic will be generated. It is similar to a gas station why you drive in and pull out in the same direction. The reason they think this will operate this way is because there is a Starbucks by Fountain Square for westbound traffic, so it is very unlikely that people will be turning left in and left out. They estimate that about 90 percent of the traffic will make a right turn from 22nd Street into Tower Drive and then make a right turn out from Tower to go east onto 22nd Street. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 2 of 25 September 5, 2006 y�� Comparing the existing conditions with the after conditions, they determined that the northbound traffic on Tower Road would have difficulty turning left onto 22nd Street. 22nd Street carries over 41,000 cars per day. However, a local road with traffic turning onto a major arterial, it is not unusual to have that traffic operate at a low level of service, particularly the left turns. The level of service today is level of service D, which is acceptable and drops down in the afternoon to level of service E. With the proposed development, they expect it to drop down to a level of service F. However, when you do a queuing analysis for this traffic they estimate that no more than 3 vehicles at a time will be waiting to turn onto 22nd Street. This is acceptable for a low volume roadway coming onto a high volume arterial. Given the statistics and projections, they do not believe the proposed development will have a negative impact on traffic conditions at that location. IDOT does have plans to widen 22nd Street sometime in the future to six lanes in this area. The intersection is to be considered for a traffic signal in the future. Once that occurs, traffic conditions will change at that intersection and would not only make it easier,but safer. Member Young asked how the roads at the other sites compare to this road. Mr. Killian responded that the Naperville site was chosen for the reason that is similar to this location. It is located on 75th Street, which carries approximately 39,000-40,000 vehicles per day, so it is very similar to this location. Member Young asked how the 100 trips were determined. Mr. Killian responded that it was based on survey data obtained from the other facilities. Chairman Davis swore in the petitioner and all its witnesses. Member Nimry asked how long it would take this store to become a mature store. Chip Beltchenko, Development Manager, Starbucks Coffee Company responded that generally it takes between 3-5 years. Scott Day, attorney representing Mr. Jafari, (the neighbor located at 2425 22nd Street) said that there is no mountable barrier median for vehicles turning left off of Tower Drive because there is a left turn lane into the Home Depot. Because of that, a vehicle could not pull out of Tower Road and make a turn waiting upon the barrier median to then be able to enter the westbound 22nd Street traffic. Mr. Killian agreed. Mr. Day asked Mr. Killian if he was aware that there was a previous application by Home Depot for a signal at that intersection that was rejected by the Dept. of Transportation. Mr. Killian responded that it was rejected because it did not VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 3 of 25 September 5, 2006 meet the warrants. Mr. Day stated that currently there is no reasonable anticipation that a traffic tight will be installed. Mr. Killian agreed. Mr. Day asked if Starbucks would be willing to wait until IDOT expands 22nd Street to six lanes before they site the new facility. Mr. Beltchenko responded that he did not believe they would. Mr. Day asked if they had any information as to when IDOT planned to expand 22nd Street. Mr. Killian responded no. Mr. Day said that there is no reason for the Zoning Board to anticipate that would happen any time soon, but it was stated that the problem would go away when that happened. Mr. Killian responded that he did not state that it was going to happen soon, however it is a plan that IDOT has prepared in its long- range plans. Mr. Day said that until a signal is installed left turns could not be made safely out of Tower Drive. Mr. Killian responded that was true, but looking at volumes of traffic coming out of Home Depot, which are extremely low (4-5 per hour) is an indication that it is extremely difficult to make that maneuver. He also indicated that the proposed use for this site is a pass-by use, which means that the majority of the traffic will be turning right in and right out onto 22nd Street and there will be very few left turns expected. Mr. Day said that in the report from Metro Transportation it states that level of service F indicates that it takes 50 seconds or greater to make the exit and represents forced or break down flow, exceeds discharge flow thereby causing a queue to form. Operations within the queue are characterized by stop and go conditions and delay per vehicle is greater than 50 seconds. Because of the introduction of over 100 cars per hour in the peak hours exceeds 50 seconds represents a breakdown of the traffic flow. Mr. Killian responded that is correct in the strict interpretation; however, the analysis does not indicate the location of this particular intersection with respect to signals up and down the stream that creates artificial gaps in traffic. Capacity analysis technique looks at random arrivals rather than platoon traffic. While the results would indicate the stated delay, in actuality the delays will be less than that. Mr. Day asked for Mr. Killian's calculations of the present traffic and after Starbucks. Mr. Killian responded that presently it is an E, and afterwards it would be an F. Mr. Day said that after Starbucks there would essentially be a VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 4 of 25 September 5, 2006 break down of the traffic coming off of Tower Drive. Mr. Killian responded that there would be additional delays and longer queues. Chairman Davis asked the difference of the delays between E and F, and at what time of day that would occur. Mr. Killian responded that it varies. Level of service E can vary from 35.1 seconds to 50 seconds. Level of service F is in excess of 50 seconds per vehicle. Level of service F would occur in the evening and they are anticipating generating 40 vehicles inbound and outbound. Member Ascher questioned how many vehicles are anticipated to be making a left turn and the additional number of vehicles changes it from an E to F service. Mr. Killian responded about 10 percent of those 40 vehicles. He said that if the level of service is currently at the upper end of range of the level E service and the service is increased by a couple of seconds then it could jump to the F level just by adding those seconds to the delay. Member Shah said that looking at the high range of level E and F there is not much difference, it is just the matter of a couple of seconds. Mike Stratas, 2311 22°a Street said that he knows both Dr. Jafari and the property owner of 2407 22°a Street Mary Ann Monty. On October 1, 1996,he wrote a letter to Dr. Jafari on behalf of Ed Monty inquiring whether he would be interested in installing a traffic signal. Dr. Jafari responded to the letter, which he read into the record as follows: "Dear Mr. Stratas, Thank you for your letter dated October 1, 1996. Please be advised that I am interested in having a traffic signal at the intersection of 22°d Street and Tower Drive. The proposal is of great interest to me. This intersection has become a very active street and I am sure that Alphagraphics facility and Venture as well as myself would benefit from this traffic signal. If there is any information that I can provide you with please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Kianoonsh Jafari" Subsequent to that, Ed Monty hired Metro Transportation and did a full traffic study, which and Mr. Monty and Dr. Jafari shared the expense. The result of that study was that there were not enough traffic warrants to establish the light. What came out of the report was that if Alphagraphics was developed for a more intense use it probably would qualify. In addition, if they put in a breakthrough to the office building to the east in all likelihood the warrants would be established. Two years ago, Home Depot, who happens to be one of his clients, came to him and asked if Mr. Monty would still be willing to pay one quarter of the cost VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 25 September 5, 2006 4V#A of a light, which he said he would. Home Depot contracted with a transportation consultant, which may have been KLOA and the results of that study was that there was not enough warrants. It was a level of service E and wasn't enough to get IDOT to agree to it. In regards to the issue of 22"d Street being increased to six lanes, IDOT has already completed the preliminary engineering-for it. They have copies in their office showing the six lanes and a traffic signal, so it is well beyond the conceptual stage. They do not have the funding for it, but IDOT does intend to put a traffic signal there. Mr. Monty has always and would still agree to share the cost in a traffic signal, but he is not the cause of the traffic. They cannot think of another use that would create more of a complimentary pattern than Starbucks. Mr. Day said that there have been multiple efforts to try to obtain signalization at this intersection and multiple traffic engineers have said that it is necessary, but IDOT has refused to install the safety device. Mr. Stratas agreed with the statement. Chairman Davis questioned if Village Engineer Durfey had seen the preliminary plans from IDOT. Mr. Durfey responded that they have the preliminary plans from the Phase 1 study. Phase 1 is where they look at the preliminary engineering concepts, drainage and traffic issues and they have a concept design. Phase 2 would be when they have actual design plans and Phase 3 would be construction. Chairman Davis questioned what is necessary to move through the Phases. Village Engineer Durfey responded money or the lack of it. 22°a Street is a state highway and they would have to find the funding to proceed; and they have not found the money to date they inform them. Chairman Davis asked if he had seen a traffic signal on the report. Village Engineer Durfey responded that it did not meet the warrants, but it might reach future warrants if there is a development of the area. Chairman Davis swore in Mr. Day and Mr. Aboona. Mr. Day said that he represents Dr. Mari, who is the owner of the Oak Brook Surgical Center and it is the only one in Oak Brook. As a result of the way the roads have been configured, with the advent of I-88 there was a dedication that was necessary for Tower Drive. The facility has been there for many years and has been serving the community and needs safe ingress and egress. They have been placed upon a road that now faces the designation of an regional arterial roadway with that designation the State of Illinois is attempting to limit access VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 25 September 5, 2006 to those roads. They are trying to widen out the spacing that is located between the stoplights. With that designation, you limit the ability to get out onto the road. The surgical facility has been there before the roadway obtained this strategic arterial designation and they are stuck with the traffic situation that they have, but you do not have to make it worse. They have submitted a traffic report from KLOA and there are similarities between the two reports. Everyone agrees there will be a new inflow of additional traffic on Tower Drive. Everyone agrees that the traffic on 22nd Street is going to feed the Starbucks facility. It is not going to generate brand new destination traffic; the question is the traffic that is coming in and off of Tower Drive. Both parties agree that the peak hours in the morning will create additional 70-100 vehicles per hour, more than one car per minute. They disagree in the way that they analyze traffic movements in and out of the facility. There is an assumption built into their report that only 10 percent of the cars will turn left. If they are wrong by just 10 percent then there is already a problem because all of the numbers and the movement generations are wrong. There existing condition is a one-minute average turn movement coming out of the facility. If 100 cars are added with an average turn movement of one minute then you have already exceeded the capacity of Tower Drive, then the vehicles cannot get in or out and gridlock is achieved. There is a safety concern with vehicles being able to access and exit Tower Drive and a tremendous increase in the number of vehicles using Tower Drive at the peak hours when the traffic is worst. There is no way to turn onto a suicide lane at the intersection because with the advent of Home Depot the mountable barrier and median was removed. There have been multiple applications and IDOT is refusing. There could be a 10-year wait for 22nd Street to become a six-lane road. If the KLOA report is believed that it will greatly exasperated by this land use it should be rejected. If a decision cannot be made on which report should be believed, it should be rejected. They included accident photography in their report showing the dangers that they do not believe are hypothetical they are real. Luay Aboona, principal with KLOA and a licensed engineer said that the studies were similar in the data collection. The difference is the assumption of how traffic will arrive. It is hard for him to believe that only 10 percent of people heading westbound would enter the facility. They believe it will be closer to 30-40 percent. They analyzed the intersection and those making left turns would have to complete the turn in one maneuver. If there is a vehicle trying to make a left hand turn into Home Depot then someone trying to exit left from Tower Drive would miss the opportunity to turn. The additional traffic from Starbucks the delays will increase considerably and not only for the left turn to exit but also for those vehicles that are stuck behind waiting to make a right hand turn. In summary, they believe the additional traffic from VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 7 of 25 September 5, 2006 9�¢ Starbucks is going to add more delays to the intersection and will make it inconvenient for the future customers of Starbucks as well as the patients and staff of the surgical center. IDOT does have a lot of Phase 1 plans out for many of their routes and at this time, they are in the maintenance mode, not the construction mode. They have no money or funding to do anything. If they had the funding, it would take 5-7 years to go from Phase 1 'to Phase 3. If the signal is not warranted, they will not install one, even if it shown on the plan now. Chairman Davis asked if the addition of the Starbucks would increase the warrants to add a signal. Mr. Aboona responded that there will be added activity, but it would not be enough to trigger a signal, which would be a volume that meet an 8-hour warrant and that requires a certain amount of traffic. The reason it was not warranted with the Home Depot was when the count was done; people were avoiding the intersection and use alternate routes. At the time they did the count there were only 4 people turning left in the morning and 10 in the evening. Chairman Davis asked if someone did not want to turn left there to go into Home Depot, why would they believed that 40 percent would want to make a left hand turn to get a cup of coffee. Mr. Aboona responded that Home Depot has an alternate access, at Starbucks there would be no way to get out except at Tower. Chairman Davis questioned that the market place would probably decide that issue. He would not wait to long to make a turn to get a cup of coffee. He said that is possible but hard for him to believe that only 10 percent would be doing it at a peak hour. Member Nimry said that you may go in there once and if you get frustrated and cannot get in or out, you would not go back you would go to another store because there are 4 Starbucks east and 2 west of the location. Mr. Aboona said that on the other hand, if they are willing to wait in a drive thru they might be willing to wait to make the left turn and holding up everyone else behind them. Member Nimry said that although he understood there are a lot of baseless assumptions being made. It is human nature that if you go someplace once and it is very difficult you would not do it again. Mr. Monty should not be held hostage because of the surgical center you cannot do that. If Mr. Monty opened a clinical center in that building with 3 doctors, you would have the same traffic going in; it has nothing to do with Starbucks. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 8 of 25 September 5, 2006 Mr. Aboona said that he is trying to point out that there is a very good potential for increased delays over what has been presented by the applicant's traffic study. Member Nimry said that he agreed, and that the new Promenade shopping mall will be generating a lot of traffic on 22nd Street. Everyone knows the traffic and every intersection along 22nd is a problem. Chairman Davis asked if there was a problem for those turning into the surgical center now without the Starbucks. Mr. Aboona said that there were delays today, but it is not a problem. With the Starbucks if there were customers waiting to make the left out that would be the problem especially in the morning because that is when the traffic is more significant. However, it is also difficult in the evening because the traffic on 22nd Street is higher in the evening. Chairman Davis asked if the market itself would have an impact on the traffic. Mr. Aboona responded that it is possible, but given there is a drive-thru facility and none at Fountain Square. Member Shah said that normally people making a left turn are a very small percentage. Mr. Aboona agreed that left turns are probably 30 percent. Member Bulin said that the number used in the study was 50 percent. Mr. Aboona responded that was based on the split of traffic on 22nd Street. Member Young questioned how much revenue would be brought to the village when the store matures. Mr. Beltchenko responded that around $1 million. Member Nimry added that would be $12,000 to the Village. Chairman Davis asked if the traffic was a safety concern for Starbucks. Mr. Beltchenko responded that it is not; they are a convenience business and people will pass them by. If something is difficult to get to people will pass them by and go to another location or to a Dunkin Donuts, BP or Panera that serve coffee. There are a lot of opportunities for coffee and they want to be able to serve a portion of the market from this location. Member Nimry asked what would happen if they put a no left turn on the corner of Tower and 22nd Street. Village Engineer Durfey said that everyone would have to turn right. Member Nimry said that if the biggest issue is the left turn then have everyone turn right out of Tower Drive, and then he does not see any other problem. Mr. Day said that would be a problem for the patients that turn left out of the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 9 of 25 September 5, 2006 facility. Nearly 20 years ago a zoning authority licensed the surgical center. Some of the patients are emergency services and situations where a 1-3 minute delay trying to leave Tower to get to Good Samaritan Hospital can mean the difference as to whether a patient survives. This is a corporate citizen in Oak Brook that has a previously designated land use; and already generates a defined traffic demand on this particular roadway. Starbucks is a good company, but they are an institution that uniquely places extreme traffic demands at certain hours of the day. If they would be generating 3 times more traffic than Alphagraphics then a landlocked access problem has been created and it is particularly dangerous for this land use. Member Nimry said that the people that created the traffic on Tower Drive was the surgical center; there is a problem with traffic now and Starbucks is not there. Mr. Day responded that the records would show that 22nd Street was a full access at this location, but the access was closed off by the Department of Transportation and the sole access for this property was Tower Drive. The regulatory control over access has been government at this location not the surgical center. It has been at this location for 20 years trying to access 22nd Street with the layers of authority placed over this particular roadway. The traffic will be tripled on Tower Drive and to just say close the left turn lane in order to accommodate Starbucks. Dr. Jafari's land use should not suffer a detriment in value in order to accommodate variances and changes in the map text. Chairman Davis said that he reviewed the entire proceedings, there has been no testimony, and the argument regarding'100 surgeons and so forth and delays to get to the hospital is something that should be heard. Mr. Day responded that the reference is in Dr. Jafari's letter where he states that it would be difficult to lease space when the patients cannot get in and out and they do treat emergency patients at this particular facility. Dr. Jafari was sworn in and said that he likes Starbucks, but the circumstance they already have is a dangerous situation. There was an article in the Doings showing how bad the traffic is on 22nd Street and how the business owners are suffering and it is well known. They have 100 physician staff and medical center that come to see emergency patients and they exit out to an emergency at the hospital. The matter of an extra minute or so can be the difference between life and death. The village is aware of the number of times they come on an emergency. The area is totally unsafe and submitted numerous statements from people at the facility. They were about the current state of traffic and how much worse it could be. No one can get the patient out of the facility if there were an emergency. It was granted for them, but the village should not make it VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 10 of 25 September 5, 2006 more difficult for them. Member Bulin asked if the current situation is so bad now, why the cross- access had not been pursued between parking lots at the rear of the buildings. The Starbucks does propose a cross-access across parking lots, which seems to be a way to alleviate some of the current conditions. Cross-access should be sought from the neighbors to the east and west. Dr. Jafari responded said that he was not aware that was the type of solution that he could approach until the views were presented here. Member Bulin said that might be a good solution to seek cross access to the west. Director of Community Development Kallien said that it would be a matter of securing a physical connection with the lots and also working out easement agreements that would stay with the property. Member Bulin commented that should be easier to pursue than IDOT's solution. Mr. Day said that cross-access easements are a great idea and are most often best facilitated by the governmental institution, like Naperville that mandate in situations like this that the petitioner establish these cross-access easements. Starbucks is going to aggravate the problem so they should be obligated to go out and create the easements agreements with the adjacent property owners. The village should demand that Starbucks go out and participate in the cost and expense for the legal work to secure those property rights. The village could serve as an assist to those business communities. If the traffic is spread against multiple curb cuts onto 22°a Street, it is spread to different locations and the vehicles could go out to 3-lanes of traffic rather than when it is reduced to 2 lanes at Tower Drive. Member Bulin noted that Starbucks has presented and provided for the cross- access so at least they are making the attempt to solve the issue. The surgical center could have already tried to pursue it to the west. Member Nimry added that there is a signal to the west but not to the east so there would be a benefit for cross-access to the west. Mr. Day said at this point in time they have not pursued those easements, nor have they been procured from the property owner to the east. They are only proposing the easement on their property. They have not negotiated an easement with the adjacent property owner to provide an easement that does not go anywhere and does not permit the surgical center to get those rights. The VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 11 of 25 September 5, 2006 J community could insist that the easement rights be accomplished before Starbucks be permitted to proceed. Member Bulin said that the surgical center already has a condition that is bad and should it be imposed that the surgical center gets those rights to the west. Mr. Day responded that the surgical center is not asking for privilege or new rules or regulations. The village has the ability to force Starbucks to negotiate those property rights and conditioned approval of the petition on gaining the easement rights to guarantee that the patrons of the facility could use the 2 other curb cuts through the office building to the east. It should not be the obligation of the surgical center as a citizen of more than 20 years, when their property is going to be negatively impacted if this is approved. They believe that conditions should be imposed upon Starbucks. Member Bulin said that he does not understand why the surgical center would not try to alleviate some of their problems by going to the west with a cross- access. Chairman Davis questioned if physicians have not been able to get where they need to be and whether it has already occurred. Dr. Jafari said that it has happened. It is every day living although he cannot remember an instance. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the village is in its very early stages of its commercial revitalization planning effort. One of the very important issues that the consultant will look at as part of the redevelopment scenario is the provision of cross-access along 22°a and Butterfield Road. Many communities do mandate a cross-access up front as part of a development proposal that is one of Oak Brook's shortcomings and doing it after the fact is difficult. It is not impossible, but it is problematic. It will take a lot of parties to agree and the consultant will assist to achieve some of that. There is a lack of physical connections between parking lots. Marshall Field and Costco have some cross-access easement, but the building to the west the Shops of Oak Brook has a lack of cross-access. Member Young asked Dr. Jafari if his building was a trauma center. Dr. Jafari responded that the patients come even though they are not advertised that way or it may be they have more confidence in them. In some circumstance, the patient does not recognize how serious they are and it arises at the office. Member Young questioned how easy it would be to convert the practice over to an elective surgical center. Dr. Jafari responded that they are multi-specialty and licensed by the Department of Public Health. There is a day surgery and VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 12 of 25 September 5, 2006 physicians office located there. Member Young asked how much revenue is brought into the village. Dr. Jafari did not know. Director of Community Development Kallien said that there is not a property tax imposed by the village; the only source of revenue is sales tax, utility tax, and telecommunication tax. Mr. Johnson said that they have been in discussion with the owners of the office building to the east and they have not come back and fully endorsed it. This plan is to provide that area for that to occur. What they and the Village needs to happen is when the sub area plan is being developed by the consultants a frontage or cross access road has to be designated on the plan, approved and adopted by the village. The village through eminent domain then has some teeth to make the property owners work together. The access would serve a public purpose for the village and those areas if not provided could eventually be condemned. In their case, they are providing on their entire southern property line the necessary width for a frontage road to be placed on the property. They could continue to work with the owners to the east,but until the village has adopted it they can only really have discussions about it. Dr. Forutan was sworn in by Chairman Davis. He said that he is not an owner of the surgical center but he just wants to see better traffic for the surgical center because he has trauma patients that he wants to get them in fast, treat them, and get them out. Many times when he is on the operating table some of the patients despite the proper work up develop problems and there are things they cannot control at the surgical center. That is the time when they have to go to Good Samaritan Hospital and get the patient to the intensive care unit. These are the occasions that are a matter of life and death. It is a dangerous situation and getting worse and he does not want the village to make it worse than it is. There is only one-day surgical center available in Oak Brook. If it is approved, he would think about not doing surgery there, and would instead advise his patients to go to Downers Grove. Chairman Davis asked if they would be transported by ambulance. Dr. Forutan said yes, or whatever conditions they are in they race and make a left hand turn and try to get to Good Samaritan Hospital. They cannot do that if the cars were standing there getting their coffee at Starbucks would be blocking them. He said that if the village wants another Starbucks in Oak Brook rather than the surgical center, do it and he will move his practice out of the surgery center. The only thing he has in mind is the safety and availability for his patients. Starbucks has noticed that for the first year the numbers at new VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 13 of 25 September 5, 2006 facilities are higher, which is why Starbucks wants to develop more locations in America. He asked them not ruin his practice and send his patients to Downers Grove. Chairman Davis questioned what his normal hours were. Dr. Forutan said that he did not have normal hours he has his cell phone and at any hour could be called. Mr. Killian reviewed the existing traffic volumes on Tower Drive. In the morning, northbound on Tower Drive there are less than 5 vehicles turning left and 15 turning right. In the afternoon, they have 5 vehicles turning left and 25 turning right. This is existing today during the peak hours. He said that Mr. Day talked about delays, and if we assume that IDOT widens the road and we are successful in getting a signal. Under SRA guidelines under major arterials IDOT will give preference to the major arterial and penalize the minor street or driveways with a signal control. The signal cycle that would be used in a situation like this would be between 2 and 3 minutes. During the peak hours it is most likely 150-second cycle, which means that the majority of the green time would be allocated to 22nd Street. Tower Drive that has a low volume of traffic would be given very little green time. That would mean that the delay on Tower Drive would exceed the delay they are estimating under stop sign control. When talking about delay, IDOT is not concerned about delay on side streets, they are concerned about progressing traffic on their arterial streets and minimizing delay for the 3-4,00 cars an hour that travel on 22nd Street. Chairman Davis asked if he had addressed the safety concerns of the surgical center. Mr. Killian responded that he would ask if the patients are transported by ambulance, because they are obviously given priority with lights and sirens and does not wait for other vehicles to exit. He is not sure what the safety issue is in an emergency situation like that he cannot see patients driving themselves to the hospital or a doctor driving them to the hospital. Mr. Johnson said that in summary, they would like to demolish an existing building that contains 6,250 square feet that was built in 1968 and they want to cut the size down by one-third. They want to put in a 1,925 square foot Starbucks. They have presented testimony regarding standards for amendments, variations, and special uses. They are not asking for anything that really does not exist within the corridor and they believe that their land use is complimentary. If Mr. Monty leased his 6,000 square foot, building with doctors under ORA-1 it would exacerbate the problem with the traffic. The property to their east is B-3 and they believe that Tower Drive makes a very sensible, planning demarcation between zoning districts. They believe the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 14 of 25 September 5, 2006 request for outdoor dining and the drive-thru are complimentary and consistent with those land uses in the corridor today. The cross-access agreement would allow anyone to use it. Mr. Stratas said that Mr. and Mrs. Monty suggested that the applicant will use good faith share to negotiate with the neighbor to the east and would pay their fair share in the event of the installation of a traffic signal. Mr. Day said that you only have one opportunity with redevelopment and this is the one opportunity to require cross-access easement as a condition of approval and strongly recommended that it be mandated that cross-access easements be negotiated with the petitioner as a condition of approval. The safety concern is simple the objectors of the 55,000 square foot surgical center generates about 20 traffic movements per hour. They are suggesting that the existing 6,000 square foot building, if converted to a doctor's office would create a traffic problem and that is an absurd argument. There will be over 100 new movements per hour at a critical time that it is punched in at this location, if approved make sure that it is spread over at least 3 access points instead of 1. Have the cross-access easement as a condition. Mr. Johnson said that with respect to safety he would suggest that the village look at the parking that is currently allowed on Tower Drive if they are going to be putting traffic. Tower, which is a village street, should be a village street and not a private parking lot. The cross-access agreement would be problematic if the neighbor to the east says no. If the village would be behind them and help them, that would be very beneficial. If need be the village could use the powers of eminent domain to get property owners to work together. Chairman Davis asked if a good faith agreement would be acceptable. Mr. Stratas agreed. Chairman Davis said that the Commercial Revitalization take whatever action they can to alleviate traffic conditions that they have heard on this issue. Member Nimry asked Village Engineer Durfey, that if this is a trauma center would that enhance the chances of getting a signal. According to the doctor, he is going to move his business somewhere else because it is a trauma center. Would that enhance the chance to get a traffic light? Village Engineer Durfey said that he is not aware of in the past where that has come into play so he does not know if it would or not. Member Bulin said that on page 40-40.a staff had gathered information on parking at the surgical center and the use of the street for parking was one of the concerns. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 15 of 25 September 5, 2006 Director of Community Development Kallien said that one of the issues that came up at the last Zoning Board of Appeals meeting was that the potential realization that the Alphagraphics or Starbucks was going to degrade the access onto Tower Drive and the ability to get patients in and out of the surgical center. One issue they could study was Tower Drive parking and the parking that was utilized at the medical building. They went out 22 different times, by three different people and all used the same criteria. They analyzed the number of cars that were parked on Tower Drive and it was their estimation that approximately 10-11 parking spaces depending on how the cars were oriented. Dr. Jafari has 2 small parking lots in the front of the property, one is a handicapped and the other is a smaller lot. There is a much larger facility to the south of his property. They went out and analyzed how many cars were parked and how many vacant spots were seen in the three locations. On average, on the 22 visits, 5 '/2 out of the 11 spaces were parked on Tower Road, but there were as many as 55 on average available parking spaces in the three lots. Member Bulin asked what the criteria was years ago when they granted the parking on Tower because supposedly there was no parking in the lot. Director of Community Development Kallien said that at that time it was Village Manager Veitch and Dr. Jafari presented them with the request for the ability to park on that street; and the Village Board at that time approved it. He said that the aerial photograph provided in the Starbucks case file dated May 13, 2006 shows the available parking in Dr. Jafari's parking lot, which really seemed to be quite the norm during the 22 times the village visited the property. Member Nimry said that there is a safety issue on the road going in or out and although Trustee Sanford was not able to attend this meeting and that the study should be given to him along with the recommendation that the parking along the street be revoked. These are based on the village study and the safety issue that has been brought up by Dr. Jafari so that the road is left wide open and free of cars. Director of Community Development Kallien said that would take a separate action by the Village Board. Chairman Davis said that was something the Village Board could look at, but is not before the Zoning Board of Appeals in the present action. Dr. Jafari said that the study presented by the Village was probably a recent one. There was a reason why parking was allowed on the street when the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 16 of 25 September 5, 2006 village approved it. During the summer, some of the physicians are on vacation and some patients chose to come to see the doctors less often. In addition, one of the very busy orthopedic surgeons vacated the building and there is a vacancy. Once the full capacity is resumed, they will be in the same situation as when the village approved the parking on the street. He appreciates the considerations given for the needs of the patients and physicians, but do not make it more difficult for the patients and physicians because of the fact that they are objecting to further utilization on the street; so they should not be punished for it. Chairman Davis said that the parties have addressed the standards, which are set forth in writing in the case file. Map Amendment Motion by Member Krietsch, seconded by Member Nimry, that the applicant has addressed the required factors on pages C to C.2 of the case file and to recommend the request for a map amendment to rezone the subject property at 240722 nd Street from ORA-1 to B-3. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 7— Members Ascher, Bulin, Krietsch, Nimry, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— None. Motion Carried. Text Amendment Motion by Member Shah, seconded by Member Bulin, that the applicant has addressed the factors on page E of the case file, and to recommend approval of the requested text amendment to Section 13-7C.2, of the Zoning Ordinance to add "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a Special Use in the B-3 District. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 7— Members Ascher, Bulin, Krietsch, Nimry, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— None. Motion Carried. Special Use—Drive-Thru Motion by Member Bulin, seconded by Member Shah, that the applicant has addressed the standards on page G of the case file, to recommend approval of the requested special use for a drive-thru subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file. 2. Suggest that the owner use reasonable efforts to negotiate a cross-access easement to satisfy the concerns raised. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 17 of 25 September 5, 2006 0 3. If signalization at the intersection of Tower Drive and 22°a Street is installed, the property owner agrees to pay 25% of the costs of the installation to be shared between the property owners utilizing that intersection. 4. The village to consider the imposition of cross-access easement requirements in the Commercial Corridor Revitalization Project ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 7— Members Ascher, Bulin, Krietsch, Nimry, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— None. Motion Carried. Special Use—Outdoor Dining Motion by Member Bulin, seconded by Member Young, that the applicant has addressed the standards on page G of the case file, to recommend approval of the requested special use for an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the revised Elevation and Site Plan dated July 12, 2006 on page 23 of the case file, bollard design on page 22, Building design on page 18 and Outdoor dining area with table and umbrella design as shown on page 16 of the case file and the following conditions imposed by the Plan Commission. 2. Operation between April 1 and October 15 of each year. 3. Tables and chairs to be removed during the winter months. 4. No live music or other live entertainment is allowed in the exterior seating area. 5. No wait service to be provided to the exterior seating area. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 7— Members Ascher, Bulin, Krietsch, Nimry, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— None. Motion Carried. Variations Motion by Member Shah, seconded by Member Young, that the applicant has addressed the standards on page I of the case file, to recommend approval of the variation to Section 13-7C-3.c to allow an approximate 31-foot encroachment into the required 100 foot setback on 22°a Street; and approval of the variation to Section 13-12-31 to allow an approximate 5-foot encroachment into the 10- foot setback required for the parking along Tower Drive. The variations are subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property shall be in substantial conformance with the revised plans submitted on page 23 of the case file. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 18 of 25 September 5, 2006 Y 2. That the owner grants the Cross-access easement to the Village as provided on the plans submitted should it be obtained. 3. Additional landscape to be provided. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 7— Members Ascher, Bulin, Krietsch, Nimry, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0— None. Motion Carried. Chairman Davis called for a 5-minute recess. The meeting was reconvened at 9:43 p.m. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. CUBELLIS MGDF AS AUTHORIZED BY PANERA BREAD ON cUBELLIS BY PANERA BREAD- BEHALF OF MID-AMERICA ASSET MANAGEMENT — 1600 16th 1600 160'ST-SU- STREET — SPECIAL USE — SECTION 13-7A-2 — OUTDOOR DINING OUTDOOR DINfNG ADJ. ADJACENT TO A RESTAURANT RES AURANTO A Chairman Davis swore in Wally Funk, Cubellis MGDF, architects for Panera Bread, Chris Skiles, Senior Construction Manager for Panera Bread and Peter Dugan from Cubellis MGDF. Mr. Funk reviewed the request. They are located at the Oaks of Oak Brook located at 16th Street and Route 83 on the south end of the strip. They are seeking an outdoor seating area with 28 seats. It would be located along the south and east edge of the space, occupying what is currently a walkway. They will not be doing any additional expansion to the building. They will provide a protective barrier along each area. It will be an ornamental railing with decorative finished piers to address some of the safety concerns. There will be 6 tables on the south side and 3 tables on the east side. Access will only be from the exterior and maintaining a clear entrance at the corner and a clear exit way at the south side. Chairman Davis noted that the matter was presented to the Plan Commission and approved unanimously, subject to the conditions set forth on page 7-7.a of the case file. He asked if they were agreeable to those conditions. Mr. Funk agreed. Chairman Davis questioned whether there was vehicular traffic surrounding the seating area. Mr. Funk responded that there is a two-way traffic aisle, which runs adjacent (east/west) to the area. There is and a traffic aisle that runs north/south directly across from the small area. There is very little traffic in the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 19 of 25 September 5, 2006 y� - a b .- AW j' •ilk! y Ae- ' i • e r Ar a :`r 1 , L ° 3 Cm f s a .'f1 1 � 4� f 1 OF Oq,i.ego Date: August 30, 2006 e � To: Zoning Board of Appeals 9Cec0UN14 \��\ From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director Village of Oak Brook Subject: Starbucks—2407 22"d Street—Additional Information 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 At the August 8, 2006 meeting, a number of issues and questions were raised Website regarding the impact that the proposed Starbuck's will have on public safety issue as it www.oak-brook.org relates to the existing medical office use located at the southwest corner of 22° Street Administration and Tower. 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Accordingly, the Zoning Board requested additional traffic information from the applicant. Also, Staff requested that the owner of the adjacent medical office building Community provide in writing detailing how the proposed Starbuck's would impact his existing Development 630.990.3045 use. FAX 630.990.3985 In response to these requests for additional information, Staff has received several Engineering submittals from both the applicant and objectors. Each of these items is summarized Department in the following: 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 1. Traffic Impact Analysis (dated August 17, 2006) — Starbuck's traffic consultant Metro Transportation Group. Please see page 12 of the report Fire Department for the consultant's conclusions. A copy of this study has been provided to 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 the Village Engineer for his review and comments. 2. Additional Comments (dated August 22, 2006) — Starbuck's traffic Police Department consultant Metro Transportation Group provides comments on the impact 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 that the planned improvements to Butterfield Road will have on the subject property. Public Works Department 3. Official Objection from the Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre (dated 630.990.3044 August 24, 2006) — Dr. Kianoosh Jafari, owner of the referenced entity FAX 630.472.0223 located at 2425 W. 22nd Street has submitted an official objection to the Starbuck's requests. Contained within this objection is an analysis from Oak Brook KLOA (traffic consultant retained by Dr. Jafari) on the Starbuck's traffic Public Library data. 600 Oak Brook Road In addition to the new information that has been submitted in either support for or Oak Brook,630.990.20 223-2200 against the proposed Starbuck's, Staff has conducted its own assessment of the FAX 630.990.4509 parking use/availability along Tower Road. Because Dr. Jafari provided testimony that the parking situation at both his building and along Tower Road will be negatively Oak Brook Sports Core impacted by the Starbuck's, Staff has focused its analysis to the building at 2425 W. 22nd Street and parking along Tower Road. Staff visited the area 22 times over a three Bath&Tennis Club week timeframe. On each visit, the number of cars parked along west side of Tower 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 was counted as well as the number of vacant spaces that were found in the three 630.990.3020 parking areas at 2425 W. 22nd Street. Please see the attached for a summary of the FAX 630.990.1002 findings. Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 attachments 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 Parking Analysis 2425 W 22nd Street and On-Street Parking Along Tower Road 2425 W. 22nd St. 2425 W. 22nd St. 2425 W. 22nd St. Total Cars Parked Vacant Spaces Vacant Spaces Vacant Spaces Vacant Spaces Date Time On Tower Road (Front of Building) (Main Parking Lot - Rear) (Handicapped Spaces) 2425 W. 22nd St. 4-Aug 8:45 AM 8 0 79 2 81 7-Aug 10:00 AM 7 0 46 2 48 7-Aug 1:30 PM 8 3 45 0 48 8-Aug 10:45 AM 5 0 42 2 44 8-Aug 2:30 PM 7 1 46 1 48 • 9-Aug 9:15 AM 4 1 59 4 64 9-Aug 12:56 PM 5 1 52 5 58 10-Aug 10:35 AM 5 0 46 2 48 11-Aug 8:45 AM 5 0 65 1 66 11-Aug 4:00 PM 2 1 77 3 81 14-Aug 10:00 AM 4 0 50 0 50 14-Aug 2:00 PM 3 0 61 2 63 15-Aug 11:15 AM 6 0 42 0 42 16-Aug 9:00 AM 6 0 59 3 62 17-Aug 9:30 AM 4 0 58 1 59 17-Aug 3:30 PM 4 0 47 2 49 18-Aug 10:45 AM 9 0 29 2 31 21-Aug 9:30 AM 4 1 45 3 49 21-Aug 3:30 PM 5 3 54 3 60 22-Aug 10:30 PM 7 0 54 1 55 22-Aug 2:30 PM 6 0 44 0 44 23-Aug 1:15 PM 7 1 55 3 59 Average (22 visits) 5.5 0.5 52.5 1.9 55.0 Source: V.O.B. Dept. of Community Development r Day&Robert, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 300 E.5th Avenue Suite 365 Naperville,Illinois 60563 630-637-9811 Fax 637-9814 SCOTT M.DAY RACHEL K.ROBERT SHELLY Z.HURTA EDWARD R.SHERMAN ROBERT G.BLACK KELLI M.SMITH Of Counsel August 24, 2006 Mr. Robert L. Kallien Jr. Director, Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 RE: Petitioner: Starbucks Coffee Company Village of Oak Brook Case No.: 2006-01 S-ZO-VAR Dear Mr. Kallien: Our offices represent Dr. Kianoosh Jafari, M.D., owner of the Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre located at 2425 West 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois. Our client is an objector in the above-captioned Plan Commission case related to the proposal to rezone the adjacent property to permit Starbucks Coffee to open up a drive thru restaurant facility. I am enclosing a copy of our client's Letter of Objection, inclusive of a Traffic Report prepared by Luay Aboona of KLOA. Please make sure that the enclosures are distributed to the appropriate authorities at the Plan Commission and included within the official file with respect to this parcel of property. It is my understanding that this matter will next be heard on September 5, 2006. Please advise me if the continuation of the public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals is changed. Very truly yours, Scott M. Day SMD:kg Enclosure cc: Kianoosh Jafari, M.D. Day&Robert.P.C. A Professional Corporstlon 31 • • 3100 W. HIGGINS ROAD,STE. 100 HOFFMAN ESTATES,IL 60195-2093 ' TELEPHONE:630.213.1000 FACSIMILE:630-2133227 www.metrotransportation.com TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METRO TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN Your Transportation Resource August 22,2006 Mr.Ted Johnson President TJ Design Strategies,Ltd. 2311 West 22nd Street Oak Brook,IL 60523 Re: Proposed Starbucks Coffee Oak Brook,Illinois Dear Mr.Johnson: As requested, we have assessed the traffic impact of the construction activities on Butterfield Road (IL Route 56) to 22nd Street and, as a result, to the proposed Starbucks coffee shop to be located at the southeast comer of the 22nd Street and Tower Road intersection in Oak Brook, Illinois. The construction activities include the widening of Butterfield Road to four lanes. Currently, Butterfield Road is under construction and, therefore, a percentage of traffic is utilizing 22nd Street, instead. As a result, traffic counts conducted for the purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis titled "Oak Brook Starbucks", dated August 17, 2006, correspond to higher traffic volumes than anticipated. However, to provide a conservative analysis, no reduction factors were applied to the existing traffic data. With the completion of the project, the capacity of Butterfield Road will be increased and it is anticipated that some traffic now using 22nd Street will be diverted to Butterfield Road. This CHICAGO,ILLINOIS • HOFFMAN ESTATES,ILLINOIS • FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 31 will result in additional gaps in traffic flow and,therefore, access to the proposed Starbucks will be facilitated. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Rolf .Kilian Executive Vice President August 22, 2006 Mr. Robert L. Kallien, Jr., ALCP Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2253 Re: Proposed Starbucks Coffee 2407 West 22'd Street Oak Brook, IL 60523 Dear Mr. Kallien: I am writing to you as an employee of the Oak Brook Medical and Surgical Centre located at 2425 West 22nd Street in Oak Brook adjacent to the proposed Starbucks Coffee shop and would like to express my concern regarding increased traffic from 22nd Street to Tower Road(where my office is located), and with no traffic light, it will make it very difficult and extremely dangerous to enter or leave the building and it surely will affect Public Safety.. Respectfully, ' Ali Nili 511 Wennes Court Oak Brook, IL 60523 34 . } , 3100 W. HIGGINS ROAD, STE. 100 HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60195-2093 W TELEPHONE: 630.213.1000 FACSIMILE:630.213.3227 www.metrotransportation.COM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METRO TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN Your Transportation Resource July 24,2006 Mr.Ted Johnson President TJ Design Strategies,Ltd. 2311 West 22nd Street Oak Brook,IL 60523 Re: Proposed Starbucks Coffee Oak Brook, Illinois Dear Mr.Johnson:: As requested, we have reviewed the traffic impact of the proposed Starbucks to be located at the southeast corner of the 22°x'Street and Tower Road intersection in Oak Brook, Illinois.Our review consists of several elements, each of which is described below. Access The northern portion of the site is currently occupied by Alpha Graphics.The southern portion,formerly occupied by a travel agency is now vacant. Access to the site is provided via two driveways on Tower Road.The existing development is served by two driveways that are located approximately 150 feet and 360 feet south of the south 22nd Street curbline. Although the proposed Starbucks will also be served by two driveways, their location is slightly different.The south driveway will remain a two-way driveway but the north driveway will be modified to serve as a right-turn exit only providing direct egress from the drive-up window as well as from the customer parking area on the west side of the building.This access system locates the ingress to the site approximately 340 feet south of 22°4 Street.This eliminates potential for traffic turning from 22nd Street and then wanting to enter the site from backing up onto 22nd Street. Provision has also been made at the south end of the property to provide a two-way future cross-access road between Tower Road and the existing office development located east of the Starbucks site. Site Layout and Parking The site layout is well planned in that a one-way circulation system is essentially developed.Traffic enters the south driveway and either directly enters the drive-up lane CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - HOFFMAN ESTATES, ILLINOIS FORT MYERS, FLORIDA �� ` • • Mr.Ted Johnson WAJuly 24,2006 Page 2 or turns left to park.Both the drive-up traffic and the walk-in traffic exit the site at the north. Fourteen regular and two handicapped parking spaces are provided along the west side of the building. An additional 10 parking spaces are provided at the south end of the site for employee parking and overflow customer parking.In similar situations, walk-in traffic represents approximately 35 to 40 percent of the customer traffic, this amount of parking is more than adequate, particularly since the parking spaces will turn over several times per hour. The drive-up window provides protected stacking for 8 to 9 vehicles.Based on observations at existing Starbucks sites,this too is more than adequate. Traffic In order to determine the traffic impact of the proposed Starbucks, data from three existing Starbucks sites was obtained.The sites surveyed are located in Naperville, Lake Zurich and Deerfield,Illinois.These stores are considered mature in nature.The Naperville store has been in operation for eight years, the Lake Zurich store six years and the Deerfield store four years.This data includes hourly breakdowns of drive-thru and walk-in customers for seven days at each location.Table 1 indicates the average hourly volume of traffic generated on weekdays and weekend days. Table 1 also indicates that the AM Peak hours are from 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM.After 10:00 AM,the volumes decrease almost in half and then in half again after 5:00 PM.The volumes peak late morning and throughout the afternoon on Saturday ad Sunday.This indicates that this is more associated with shopping activities than work activities.This shows that the morning is the critical period for a coffee shop and is frequented by people on their way to work. A coffee shop is similar to a gas station in that it draws its traffic from the adjacent roadway and generates very little new traffic to the roadway system. It is a pass-by use rather than a destination use.It is critical for this type of land use to be located where it is easy to enter and exit the traffic stream.As such,the majority of the traffic entering this site from 22^a Street will turn right onto Tower Road and when exiting,turn right onto 22^x'Street from Tower Road. ` • . Mr.Ted Johnson ' July 24,2006 Page 3 Table 1 Average Hourly Traffic Na erville Site Lake Zurich Site Deerfield Site Time Drive- Walk- Total Drive- Walk- Total Drive- Walk- Total Thru in Thru in Thru in 5-6 AM 22 15 37 13 3 16 9 9 18 6-7 AM 51 34 85 42 17 59 27 31 58 7-8 AM 64 58 122 51 29 80 51 52 103 8-9 AM 74 53 127 62 24 86 59 54 113 9-10 AM 66 46 112 58 26 84 54 53 107 10-11 AM 56 32 88 52 23 75 49 30 79 11-12 PM 55 23 78 45 17 62 39 19 58 12-1 PM 41 19 60 39 12 51 35 21 56 1-2 PM 47 20 67 33 18 51 37 20 57 2-3 PM IL42 44 23 67 44 14 58 37 23 60 3-4 PM 45 26 71 40 11 51 38 19 57 4-5 PM 18 60 35 14 49 35 16 51 5-6 PM 22 9 31 27 7 34 18 13 31 6-7 PM 23 13 36 13 5 18 13 12 25 7-8 PM 19 15 34 13 3 16 12 7 19 8-9 PM 16 10 26 7 4 11 7 12 19 9-10 PM 9 4 13 3 2 5 8 9 17 10-11 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Total 697 418 1 1115 577 229 806 528 401 929 Percent 63% 37% 72% 28% 57% 43% Table 2 indicates the percent distribution between the drive-thru and the walk-in customers for each day and for each location. Table 2 Drive-Thru vs.Walk-in Distribution Naperville Site Lake Zurich Site Deerfield Site Drive-Thru Walk-in Drive-Thru Walk-in Drive-Thru Walk-in Monday 65% 35% 74% 26% 56% 44% Tuesday 60% 40% 73% 27% 56% 44% Wednesday 65% 35% 74% 26% 58% 42% Thursday_ 62% 38% 68% 32% 56% 44% Friday 61% 39% 67% 33% 58% 42% Saturday 59% 41% 68% 32% 54% 46% Sunda 57% 43% 72% 28% 58% 42% Average 61% 39% 71% 29% 57% 43% �i� • • ---- Mr.Teti lt>tnst)n ` July 24,2006 _. gage 4 As shown in Table 2,the distribution of traffic using the drive-up ranges between 57% and 71%4 or-an average of 63%.The high use of the drive-thru further indicates that this is a pass-by use. While not all traffic will be`right-turning traffic from and to 22n"Street,the number of left-turn movements generated by the Starbucks at the intersection of 22„x►Street and Tower Load will be minimal.The convenience nature of the Starbucks basically dictates' traffic patterns. It should be pointed out that the highest hourly volumes of traffic generated by the Starbucks occur in the morning.The morning rush hour volumes on 22nd Street are considerably lower than the afternoon rush h.pur volumes because little to no retail traffic is ors the roadway at this time since most retail facilities don't open until 10k,00 AM. During the aftemoon rush hours,Starbucks genera tes almost 25 to 301/6 of morning traffic volumes.Therefore,the impact is minimal. It should also be pointed out that another Starbucks;is locsteed an the rit rth side of Butterfield Road west of the propz�sed location at Fountain Square, making it easier for westbound traffic to.use that facility than the proposed location.This will.further reduce the potential left-turn dernand at the intersection: Also, the Illinois Department of Transportation is planning towiden 2 ad Street to six lanes, three lanes in each direction with a raved median.The intersection of 2204 Street anal Tower Road has been'identifted as a future traffic signal location.,in thist event,left- turns in and out of Tower.<Road,can be, trade safely under,signal control.. Finally,as mentioned above,,provision is made to provide for an access road linking Tower Road with the office development to the east.This will not only allow cross access between the office development and Starbucks t but will also allow office workers to use Tower Road in the future-to use the signal at 22-d Street. If you have any queStionsr please do not hesitate to call; Yours truly, R l'.Kilian - Executive Vice President 33 •C VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: July 27, 2006 CASE NO: 2006-015-ZO-VAR DESCRIPTION: Variation to Section 13-7C-3c and Section 13-12-3h of the Zoning Ordinance. PETITIONER: Starbucks Coffee Company c/o TJ Design Strategies LOCATION: Southeast Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive ADDRESS: 240722 d Street EXISTING ZONING: ORA-1 ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Office and Retail uses in the City of Oakbrook Terrace. South: R2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes in the Ginger Creek Subdivision. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, office buildings. West: Same. DISCUSSION: TJ Design Strategies as authorized representative of Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 2407 22nd Street has submitted a petition seeking approval of two variations-to the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a new stand alone Starbucks Coffee. The first variation to Section 13-7C-3c is requesting an approximate 31-ft. encroachment into the 100-ft. front yard along 22nd Street. The second variation to Section 13-12-3h is requesting an approximate 5-ft. encroachment into the 10-ft. setback for parking along Tower Drive. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of these requests. f AMML STAFF REPORT-SPECIAL USEPP STARBUCK'S COFFEE CASE No.2006-015-ZO-VAR RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to make a recommendation on a request for a variation. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for each of these variations. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: If the Zoning Board of Appeals is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for the requested variations, a recommendation would be in order to approve each of these requests subject to the following conditions: 1. Development in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted. Respectfully Submitted, Robert . Kal en r,AICP Director of Ckni fliftnity Development 2 a OAK BROOK MIA Medical & Surgical Centre, Inc. August 24, 2006 Mr. Robert Kallien Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RE: Petitioner: Starbucks Coffee Company Village of Oak Brook Case No.: 2006-015-ZO-VAR Dear Mr. Kallien: I, Dr. Kianoosh Jafari, am the owner, operator and Medical Director of the 55,000 square foot Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre, ("Objector') located at 2425 W. 22"d Street, Oak Brook, Illinois. This letter shall serve as my official objection in opposition to the above- referenced Petition. As will be detailed below, the Petition should be rejected by the Village of Oak Brook as it fails to meet the Village's requirements for the requested rezoning. Specifically, if approved, the increased traffic and congestion resulting from the proposed Starbuck's facility will: a. Endanger the safety of the public; b. Detrimentally effect the general welfare and health of the public; and C. Depreciate the value of the Oak Brook Medical &Surgical Centre property. 1. Background Information: The proposed Starbucks location will be on the east side of Tower Drive, south of 22"d Street and is currently occupied by Alpha Graphics/Median Travel. The proposed Starbucks building will be 1,925 square feet in size, will have indoor seating for 40 customers plus outdoor seating, and will provide a drive-through service. Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre is immediately adjacent to the site, on the west side of Tower Drive. The sole ingress and egress to both facilities is 22nd Street via Tower Drive. 2425 WEST 22ND STREET•OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523 - PHONE:(630)990-2045 - FAX: (630)990-3130 _2? .t Mr. Robert Kallien August 24, 2006 Page 2 Tower Drive has a two-lane cross-section along its entire length including its approach to 22"d Street which is under stop sign control. The north leg of its intersection with 22nd Street is the access drive to a shopping center that is anchored by the Home Depot store. The north approach of this access drive to 22nd Street is wide enough to accommodate two lanes and is also under stop sign control. Twenty-second Street east of Tower Drive has two through lanes in each direction. Between Tower Drive and Butterfield Road, 22nd Street has two through lanes in the westbound direction and three eastbound through lanes tapering to two through lanes at Tower Drive. West of Butterfield Road, 22nd Street has three through lanes in each direction. Twenty-second Street has a median that is striped at Tower Drive to provide an eastbound left-turn lane. Westbound left turns to Tower Drive are accommodated via the mountable median. Traffic signals control 22nd Street intersections with Butterfield Road to the west and Midwest Road to the east. Twenty-second Street is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), is designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), has a 40 mph speed limit, and carries approximately 42,000 daily two- way trips. (See Exhibit A) 11. Village of Oak Brook Standards for Starbuck's Requested Rezoning Action and Objector's Response In its Petition, Starbuck's requests a Map Amendment from ORA1 to B3 District. Section 8.3 of the Village of Oak Brook Code specifies that the Plan Commission shall consider a number of factors in its consideration of a request for a zoning amendment, including: • The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions; • The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the value of other property in the area; The existing uses and zoning of nearby property; • The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner; • The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public. The Objector respectfully submits that the foregoing factors require rejection of the Petition. As outlined below, the proposed Starbucks location would pose an undue hardship on the Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre because of serious safety issues and-..M-e decrease in property value that will result from the increased traffic generated n:4he Starbucks. For the same reasons, the health and general welfare of the public Wit!also be adversely affected by allowing the proposed Starbucks location to proceed. Mr. Robert Kallien August 24, 2006 Page 3 A. Traffic Accidents With Existing Uses Then= is a safety issue already in existence as referenced by the volume of accidents at the intersection of 22"d Street and Tower Drive. Indeed, this intersection has already been identified as a "high accident location" in the July 2002 Project Report prepared by Patrick Engineering obtained by Objector in its FOIA request submitted to the Village of Oak Brook. Additional traffic studies and accident reports obtained from the City of Oakbrook Terrace and the Village of Oak Brook verify the following accident data: Year Accidents on 22nd Street from Tower Drive to Midwest Road 1997 27 1998 43 1999 30 Year Accidents at 22nd Street and Tower Drive 2003 6 2004 6 2005 3 2006 2 (partial year) In fact, as recent as last week, a serious accident occurred at this very intersection. Copies of pictures from this accident are attached hereto as Exhibit B. B. Increased Traffic and Resulting Impact on the Safety, Health and Welfare of the General Public from Starbucks Objector retained the firm of Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. ("KLOA") to perform a Site Traffic Assessment outlining the impacts of the proposed Starbucks facility. Attached hereto has Exhibit C is a copy of KLOA's August 21, 2006, report. It should be initially noted that KLOA has performed previous studies of Starbuck's restaurants in Deerfield, Northfield, Bartlett and Rolling Meadows. These surveys generally indicate that the proposed Starbucks will generate 100 trips in and 100 trips out in the peak AM hour. For this site, KLOA did a field survey of the existing Starbucks drive-through store located on Roosevelt Road in Villa Park. The report indicates that the Village of Oak Brook should expect an additional 70 trips in and 70 trips out during peak hours. Both sets of data esfablish that more than one car per minute should be expected to enter, and more than one car per minute should be expected to attempt to exit. With many of the turns onto 22nd Street, and onto Tower already experiencing delays in excess of one Mr. Robert Kallien August 24, 2006 Page 4 minute, introduction of a 300 percent increase in volume will result and will create access gridlock that is unworkable, unsafe, and dysfunctional for the adjacent Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre. KLOA's report goes on to state unequivocally that "with the addition of Starbucks traffic, the amount of traffic that will traverse the Tower Drive at its approach to 22nd Street will increase by over three times. . . the result of the capacity analysis show that delays on the Tower Drive approach will increase considerably resulting in excessive delays for existing and future traffic exiting onto 22nd Street during both the AM and PM peak hours." Because the Surgical Centre is the sole surgical facility in Oak Brook, we deal with both scheduled and emergency health care issues. Patients need adequate access into our facility at times of critical health care crises. The surgeons who provide care to patients both at Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre and at area hospitals, need dependable egress from the facility to assure the ability to care for patients at local hospitals. Not only is the introduction of a 300 percent increase in peak traffic unsafe for passengers in vehicles confronted with the proposed gridlock, but it is detrimental to the public health by making access to and from health services unworkable for patients and doctors alike. In a nutshell, the proposed Starbuck's facility will not only increase the potential for more accidents at an already dangerous intersection, but will dramatically increase the delays drivers will experience. For example, according to the KLOA report, the delay for Tower Drive south bound approaches to 22nd Street will likely increase from 184 seconds (approximately 3 minutes per vehicles) to 243 seconds (approximately 4 minutes per vehicle) in the morning with excessive delays in the afternoon. Further, the Tower Drive northbound approach to 22nd Street will increase from 75.4 seconds (approximately 1 minute) to excessive delays in the morning and 60.2 seconds (1 minute) to excessive delays in the afternoon. These excessive delays will pose a severe threat to Oak Brook Surgical and Medical Centre, as well as the public health, as doctors will be delayed in their ability to treat patients at the Oak Brook Medic6i &,Surgical Centre as well as local hospitals. Further, patients who are in need of both emergency and non-emergency care will also be delayed in receiving said treatment as a result of this traffic increase. I Mr. Robert Kallien August 24, 2006 Page 5 C. Decrease In Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre Property 1%ai The property value of Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Centre will be adversely and negatively. impacted as a result of the increase in traffic. The dysfunctional ingress/egress will make it much more difficult to attract quality physicians as tenants. Consequently, the factors for an amendment with respect to adjacent property owners and the public health and safety have not been met, and the proposed Starbucks location should not be allowed. Y�q truly yours, I� ..Jafari, M.D. KJ/bkm Enclosures NORTH LEG NOT STRIPPED AS SHOWN, BUT IT IS WIDE ENOUGH TO OPERATE AS SHOWN NOT TO SCALE t. t g `F Sk �45 VEHICLES DESIRING TO TURN LEFT ONTO TOWER DRIVE CAN USE THE MOUNTABLE MEDIAN AS A LEFT-TURN LANE LEGEND -► - TRAVEL LANE i - EXISTING STOP SIGN PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 06-250 STARBUCKS DRIVE-THROUGH EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS FIGURE N0: I Exhibit A • fir: w•, ,, s .�. s - _i �• • -� • >. i•�- - �, %% ,�.-� •. .� pit' " � .. � ..p �- '�R ! � ` A -.. a.�t `,� `s"' t'' `'�yW ¢R" {� '�+ { '• ' ,r s u va'.grt 4 'y"i 4 � � yyfi ! �,F�i f, �'4'��{�`4 � � ��a1 1� .�sa '$'s'�a'.-4 .�r,�- ��} y'•i'� ` . ,y . ' i�.CI� .Y .�� •'�N �tR,.� ; 1 �s`� •,_y;ir�.r'�.�f��rf�YF�l .• � slpa�.. ` .K,,."'.'r% s -.+."' p�w y.'• } t 'L' fsf t �t a'7 j .P' ' �s' ►i' .i ,,�, :.sli�- .�• ! • i „ �/ A' �R 4'. !t• ,'. s` s t• `lt �'si.►' t'!%y?`�, a Y €3Y,,'q �✓ + „ !.:✓. a ,r� � `, ` •tl�t+ `•� `r _C r ' {tom-►,}_,4 e i'�+� }�T�a� + ty 'i{y����(y4s. t �' �Fi+i.��i �� �♦ ' I�{,i�� ' ;''iY" � "+ • t 'I�iR',7 + �F�.�S'1{ ��� � `��• ,j .�' a ,!1' C!'.'S's. �1..���[�i�ir.�: =.0 i ..yy ® � � -� 'Y►' ipbk���� �+ k1' ,may ,�. t:••j•� }{, aI ' .�, � r: TR �'^ F� ��t}3 A`1" ���.�� y.gif'lq 4w• �'�� �� .• star � f t l .4 l��' 'n:�i�`M'ir�����/ ! �) "�'�' .}, • • + .•.' s��+ �1�`Yaat f�FR �'. 41i,(�: j�'� .{;�+� �. � X;•'•�h, �y�,�w ,,����3'^'.�� .?`• 4� '�'••.s'+ ..V�Se �Yf��`7� `r+ f � . . 'sue � I��i •���'.I.l ~���r 4 ' • y It STOP ` t .. 9 I FA m r 3' t- A _.. �. rives Ssa:,'4 (a � s "� • � `+'`. � N } �Y -.� a� _ + a JF �. w .:tyrt _a.a ''i `--s _."..ss C ..- •� a��. � -,�'�* 'd` :'vt tI �C r ' m ° t rfv' y ' 3 . �. dC nc y. N a , : I A "GA 5 V -A=n �.„ ,�,�' If i �j,ia� t I M M, N � t•« 1 A K Ak Ilk 1 p.r7r• ..arZwl 9y^7,1 d- mr A - (f l,1 V O V F# "4 4h lu y� 'rE ,0s f KL *Aba1n1%Ik Kenig,Lindgren,O'Ha , \ t I 16i,1il,"III! V10 I Itu.k[11"111 .liir MEMORANDUM TO: Scott Day Day & Robert FROM: Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: August 21, 2006 SUBJECT: Site Traffic Assessment Proposed Starbucks Drive-Through Coffee Shop Oak Brook,Illinois This memorandum presents a summary and findings of a site traffic assessment conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) of a proposed Starbucks drive-through coffee shop proposed in Oak Brook, Illinois. The site of the proposed facility is located on the east side of Tower Drive south of 22nd Street and is currently occupied by Alpha Graphics/Median Travel. Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Center is located on the west side of Tower Drive which also uses Tower Drive to access 22"d Street (see Figure 1). The proposed Starbucks building will be 1,925 square feet in size, will have indoor seating for 40 customers plus outdoor seating, and will provide a drive-through service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current traffic conditions along Tower Drive and its intersection with 22nd Street and evaluate future traffic conditions with the increase in traffic resulting from the proposed coffee shop. Existing Conditions As indicated earlier, "Power Drive is the only roadway that provides access to 22,d Street for both the Starbucks site and Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Center. Tower Drive has a two-lane cross-section along its entire. length including its approach to 22"6' Street which is under stop sign control. The north leg of its intersection with 22" Street is the access drive to a shopping center that is anchored by the Home Depot store. The north approach of this access drive to 22"d Street is wide enough to accommodate two lanes and is also under stop sign control. 22"d Street east of Tower Drive has two through lanes in each direction. Between Tower Drive and Butterfield Road, 22"d Street has two through lanes in the westbound direction and three eastbound through lanes tapering to two through lanes at Tower Drive. West of Butterfield Road, 22"d Street has three through lanes in each direction. 22n" Street has a median that is striped at Tower Drive to provide an eastbound left-turn lane. Westbound left turns to Tower Drive are accommodated via the mountable median. Traffic signals control 22"d Street intersections with Butterfield Road to the west and Midwest Road to the east. 22nd Street is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), is designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA), has a 40 mph speed limit, and carries approximately 42,000 daily two-way trips. KLOA,Inc. It,m,,I) t I,iI un 'JI'd P it' I't: I'Luu a ..t 11,111 tnl EXHIBIT C Park a aOYc°64'�� t���`�'• 4a Unoolh 01 I I d OW zv t W 22nd St _ ... _ _ ......A 2��as, •, ��_. Proposed m Oakbrook Medical Starbucks &Surgical Center r Ia# oom A 9°ybtook Ln 4 0S lit Q° pemK° x a 8uuerfrald � " Country ti Okwr Club } Creck Site Location Figure 1 In order to evaluate current traffic conditions, manual traffic counts were conducted at the intersection of 22 n Street with Tower Drive/access drive. The counts were conducted on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 from 6:30 to 9:00 A M. and from 4:00 to 6:30 P.M. Summaries of the count data indicated that the morning peak hour occurs from 7:30 to 8:30 A.M. with 2,740 vehicles traveling through the intersection and the evening peak hour occurs from 5:00 to 6.00 P.M. with 3,618 vehicles traveling through the intersection. Figure 2 is prepared illustrating the A.M. and P.M peak hour traffic volumes. Capacity analyses were conducted at this intersection to determine the current level of service and average delay experienced by traffic exiting from Tower Drive and the access drive onto 22nd Street. The results of the capacity analyses, expressed in terms of level of service and average delays, are summarized in Table 1. (For an explanation of level of service, please see the Appendix.) Table 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY—EXISTING CONDITIONS A M P.M. Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay 22"d Street/Tower Drive/Access Drive - Eastbound Lefts B 12.5 C 202 - Westbound Lefts B 12.8 B 145 - Southbound Approach: Left Turns F 1844 F Excessive Delays - Southbound Approach. Right Tunis C 23 9 D 263 - Northbound Approach F 75 4 F 602 LOS- Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds As can be seen from the table, exiting left turns from both Tower Drive and the access drive are experiencing long delays during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. This is due to the heavy volume of through traffic along 22°d Street and the fact that traffic from Tower Drive and the access drive having to compete for available gaps in the 22nd Street traffic stream. 3 v7 LW W> u IS Q c HOME DEPOT NOT TO SCALE 38 (37) 1 •— 1250 (1834) j— 29 (3) T 22ND STREET 33 (60) 1325 (1602) 1 t (' 18 (3) —o i;; O PROPOSED STARBUCKS OAKBROOK MEDICAL & SURGICAL CENTER 3 LEGEND 0 - STOP SIGN 00 - (7:30-8:30) AM (00) - (5:00-6:00) PM PROJECTi TITLEi PROJECT Noe 06-250 PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE EXISTING WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES OAKBROOK, ILLINOIS FIGURE Nos 2 Proposed Starbucks 'traffic Characteristics In order to deternvne the amount of traffic that will be generated by the proposed drive-through Starbucks,KLOA,Inc. utilized the following: Previous surveys conducted at a number of existing Starbucks coffee shops including Deerfield, Northfield, Bartlett, and Rolling Meadows. These surveys generally indicated that the Starbucks will generate the following amount of trips: 100 trips in and 100 trips out during the A.M. peak hour 30 trips in and 30 trips out during the P.M. peak hour A trip generation survey conducted by KLOA, Inc. at the existing Starbucks drive-through store located on 198 West Roosevelt Road in Villa Park. The results of the survey, conducted on Thursday,August 10, 2006, indicated the following: 70 trips in and 70 trips out were generated during the A.M. peak hour. - 33 trips in and 33 trips out were generated during the P.M. peak hour. For the purpose of this analysis, data collected at the Villa Park location was utilized. Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed use generates up to 70 percent of its traffic from the existing traffic on the adjoining roadway.system (pass-by) which in this case will be 22"d Street. Table 2 summarizes the estimated site-generated traffic. Table 2 ESTIMATED SITE'-GENERAT D 'TRAFFIC A.M. P M Land Use In Out In Out Proposed Starbucks - New Trips 21 21 10 10 - Pass-By Trips 49 49 23 23 Total 70 70 33 33 Figure 3 illustrates the assignment of Starbucks traffic (both new and pass-by) to the area roadway system while Figure 4 illustrates the addition of site traffic to the existing traffic volumes. V]W W_> U� a° HOME DEPOT NOT TO SCALE `— 34 (17) 'T 22ND STREET 36 (16) � .!. Ln Ln In M PROPOSED `r STARBUCKS OAKBROOK MEDICAL & SURGICAL CENTER w LEGEND O AL - STOP SIGN PROJECTi TITLEI PROJECT HO: 06-250 PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE ESTIMATED SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES OAKBROOK. ILLINOIS FIGURE N01 3 (�W W> U� Up Q HOME DEPOT Go o_ NOT TO SCALE 38 (37) 1 f- 122.6 (1822) � 63 (20) T 22ND STREET 33 (60) ' '_ 1300 (1591) --► 41 t r 54 (19) —0 0+ m o ul .n v PROPOSED STARBUCKS OAKBROOK MEDICAL & SURGICAL CENTER cr '+' LEGEND O J. - STOP SIGN 00 - (7:30-8:30) AM (00) - (5:00-6:00) PM PROJECTe T17LE1 PROJECT Not 06-250 PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES laallix OAKBROOK. ILLINOIS FIGURE NOt 4 Findings and Recommendations As can be seen from Figure 3, with the addition of Starbucks traffic, the amount of traffic that will traverse Tower Drive at its approach to 22"d Street will increase by over three times in the A.M. peak hour (from 62 to 202 trips) and in the P.M. peak hour(from 30 to 96 trips). When the intersection was re-analyzed under future conditions, the results of the capacity analyses (summarized in Table 3) show that delays on the 'Power Drive approach will increase considerably resulting in excessive delays for existing and future traffic exiting onto 22"d Street during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. 1?ven when analyzed with Tower Drive providing two northbound lanes, the delays will remain excessive. The only improvement that will ensure efficient access for 'lower Drive traffic would be signalizing the intersection. However, such improvement will require approval by IDOT which, given the designation of 22"`{ Street as an SRA, traffic volumes would need to meet an eight-hour warrant (Warrant 1) which is unlikely given the amount of existing and projected volumes on Tower Drive and the access drive Table 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY—FUTURE CONDI'T'IONS A M P M. Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay 22"" Street/Tower Drive/Access Drive - Eastbound Lefts B 12 3 C 20 0 - Westbound Lefts B 13 6 B 1510 - Southbound Approach: Left Turns F 243 3 F Excessive Delays Southbound Approach Right Turns D 26 3 D 26 0 I: - Northbound Approach F Excessive Excessive Delays Delays LOS - Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds 8 Conclusion In conclusion, it is clear based on the analyses that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed Starbucks drive-through coffee shop will have a detrimental impact on Tower Drive and its intersection with 22"d Street. This additional traffic will increase the long delays currently experienced at this intersection. Given that Tower Drive provides the only access to the Oak Brook Medical & Surgical Center, the accessibility of the facility will be negatively impacted for both staff, employees and patient traffic. For these conditions to be mitigated, we offer the following recommendations: Tower Drive at its approach to 22"d Street be widened to provide two northbound lanes. - A traffic signal is pursued with IDOT to be installed at the intersection of 22nd Street with Tower Drive. Cross-access connection is pursued with the office buildings to the east of the Starbucks site. The first two recommendations need to occur simultaneously in order for the intersection to work adequately. The third recommendation will allow for interconnection with the adjoining use as well as help in meeting the necessary warrants for traffic signal installation at the intersection of 22"d Street with Tower Drive/access drive. LRA\ps Day Site Traffic Assessment for Starbucks Drive-Through in Oak Brook August 21.2006 Ira 9 xipuaddV LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Delay per Vehicle Level of Service Interpretation (seconds) A Very short delay, with extremely favorable progression. c10.0 Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop at all B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 and S20 0 Level of Service A,causing higher levels of average delay C Light congestion, with individual cycle failures beginning to >20 and 535 appear Number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level though many still pass through the intersection without stopping D Congestion is more noticeable, with longer delays resulting >35 and <_55 from combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios Many vehicles stop and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines E Limit of acceptable delay High delays result from poor >55 and 580 progression,high cycle lengths and high V/C ratios. F Unacceptable delay occurring, with oversaturation >90 0 Source Highway('apacily Munval, 2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay(SEC/VEH) A _<10 B >10 and_<15 C >15 and <_25 D >25 and !05 E >35 and<_50 F >50 SOUNI- Highway Capacity Manual,2000 i 09/01/2006 09:57 6306379814 DAY AND ROBERT PC PAGE 02/03 Day&Robert, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 300 E.Sth Avenuo Suite 365 Naperville,lllinois 60563 530-537-9811 Fax 637-9814 SCOTT M.DAY RACHEL K.ROBERT SHELLY Z.HURTA EDWARD R.SHERMAN ROBERT Q.BLACK NEtLI M,SMITH of Counsel September 1, 2006 VIA F.A,CSIMILE Mr. Robert Kallien Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak brook Road Oak Brook,II.60523 RE: Petitioner: Starbucks Coffec Company Village of Oak Brook Casc No.: 2006-015-ZO-V. ,R Dear Mr. Kallien: In further support of my client's August 24, 2006, official abjection to the above-mentioned matter., attached please find a copy of an August 24, 2006, %ewspt.per article highlighting the traffic problems on 22 Street in Oak Brook and Oakbrook ]!-,trace, Illinois. Please review and consider as part of my client's position. Thank you. Very truly yours, Velly Z. Enclosure cc Dr. Jafari Ken Kubiesa(via fax) Scott M. Day ow,a Rob.n.P.c. A PnOofti—t 00M* fkV% THE DOINGS NEWSPAPERS Thursday,August 24, 2006 NIN 5 OB — 22nd St. traffic a source of frus tration By JIM COLLINS STAFF WRITER ; _ ' •_ Heavy rush s c C ^ hourtraffi ^ on 22nd If you have somewhere to be 3 Street in Oak on 22nd Street,you might want Brook and to give yourself a little extra �' `, w �• ,. _. Oakbrook Terrace frus- time to get there. t Those who regularly tra ; Y ? ` ' tra t es both r a° motorists verse the busy,stretch through s f _ ' the commercial district in Oak and busi- Brook and Oakbrook Terrace nesses locat- ed well aware of how bad traf '' ed along the i >s � - stretch. In an fic can get. effort to ease K When Drew DiDomenico `B` the conges- general manager of Vie's _ tion, officials Classic Italian Steakhouse, " : �`? aj3 are trying to hires a new waitress, traffic is ' i - secure fund- .. �:r bx � '4Y � � '� 3 ..: x part of the training. ing for a : K,.: d ._, > . widenin g It is to the point where I tell new servers to add on an extra ,, project. 30 minutes to get here," he :.�� ssz � � �� (Doings h ot by said. a s,eq ;F� .. .3* ;, Mike During the lunch and after- x' Johnson) noon rush hours, it can take drivers about 10 minutes to travel less than mile from ies that are more convenient to The high volume of traffic whose office is in the Oakbrook to Butterfield Road. Route 83 to his restaurant, get to. also means a higher incidence Center professional building,is The plan, which would which is located in a retail cen- When guests make reserva- of traffic accidents. frustrated with the amount of increase.the roadway from ter just east of Midwest Road. tions at notoriously busy times, In Oak Brook,the four inter- time it takes to escape the mall four to six lanes,also involves From Nov 15 to Jan. 15 — staff will notify them of delays. sections with the most reported area. intersection improvements, during holiday shopping sea- "We do explain the traffic:sit- accidents are all found in the "Depending on what-time-it including an additional east- son—the same trip might take uation and tell them to plan a general area—22nd Street and is, it can take three or four bound turn lane at the _between 20 and 30 minutes, little ahead, but we don't go Route 83, Butterfield and lights to go south on Route 83," Butterfield Road intersection DiDomenico said. into too much detail because I Meyers roads, 22nd Street and he said, pointing out that left and a second right turn lane Although business at Vie's is think it can be a negative," Spring Road and 22nd Street turn signal seems to be shorter for drivers on westbound good, DiDomenico'thinks traf- Wierbicki said. and Midwest Road. than it has been in the past. Butterfield. fic has a negative impact. With restaurants, retail, Ben Kadolph of the Oak "You would think there Although the project start "People are not going to offices and access to other Brook police department said would be enough complaints date remains unknown, come at certain times because major roads located up and most of the accidents occur about it that things would DiDomenico thinks the it is so hard to get in and out of down 22nd Street;this particu- during morning and afternoon change,"Moeller added, widening will help,despite the the restaurant,"he said. lar strip is very heavily traf- rush hours Monday through Officials from Oak Brook added delays of construction. At Tin lush, a restaurant ficked at about 150,000 vehicles Friday. and Oakbrook Terrace are "It will be hard getting located along the same strip, a day, according to the Illinois "It can be horrendous — working together to lobby the through the (construction) owner Curtis Wierbicki agrees Department of Transportation's there is no good way to put it," state to secure funding to process,. but once you get that heavy traffic can push average daily traffic count fig- Kadolph said. widen 22nd Street in both through it,you say why didn't f some customers away to eater- ures. Raymond Moeller, a doctor directions from Route 83 west we do that before,"he said. OAK BROOK STARBUCKS Traffic Impact Analysis P Y Oak Brook, Illinois August 17, 2006 4 i Prepared for: TJ Design Strategies, Ltd. Prepare d by: 1 Metro Transportation Group, Inc. r J Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 INTRODUCTION Metro Transportation Group, Inc. (Metro) was retained by TJ Design Strategies, Ltd. to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a proposed Starbucks coffee shop with drive-through in Oak Brook, Illinois. The site is located on the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. I This analysis assesses the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent roadways during the morning and evening peak hours and makes recommendations to accommodate the proposed site traffic. The scope of this analysis included the following items: 1. Data Collection -A field reconnaissance of the site and adjacent roadways was conducted to determine the physical and operational aspects of the roadway network. Weekday morning (7:00-9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00-6:00 PM) peak-hour traffic counts were conducted in August 2006 at the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. 2. Site Traffic Characteristics — The monting and evening peak-hour trips generated by the project site were based on traffic data collected for Starbucks coffee shops with drive-through facilities in the Chicago six-county area. The travel directions of site traffic on the roadway network were estimated based on existing travel patterns of the area's street network and the proposed land use. Peak-hour trips generated by the site were then assigned to the street system and analyzed. 3. Evaluation and Recommendation — Capacity analyses were conducted at the study intersections to determine the roadways' ability to accommodate future traffic levels. Based on these analyses, recommendations for future roadway improvements and site access were developed. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 1 1 ! Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 EXISTING CONDITIONS Metro conducted field visits to collect relevant information pertaining to existing land uses in the area, the surrounding roadway network, existing traffic volumes, traffic controls, and roadway lane usage at the critical intersection. This section of the report provides a description of these existing characteristics. Site Location The subject site is located on the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive in Oak Brook, Illinois. The northern portion of the site is currently occupied by Alpha Graphics. The southern portion, formerly occupied by a travel agency is now vacant. Land uses in the area are mostly commercial. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in respect to the surrounding street system. All figures are presented in the Appendix of this report. Existing Street Characteristics The area roadways most directly affected by the proposed residential development are 22nd Street and Tower Drive. These roadways are described below in more detail. 22,,d Street is an east-west arterial with a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour (MPH. At its intersection with Tower Drive, 22nd Street provides eastbound traffic a through lane, a shared through/right-turn lane and a left-turn lane. Westbound traffic is served by a shared through/right-turn lane and a shared through/left-turn lane and is separated from eastbound traffic with a mountable median. 22nd Street is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), which is planning to widen 22nd Street to six lanes, three lanes in each direction of travel. Tower Drive is a north-south two-way roadway that serves the commercial uses south of 22nd Street. A driveway opposite Tower Drive serves a medical facility and the Home Depot development. At its stop-controlled intersection with 22nd Street, turn lanes are not provided on Tower Drive, which is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Oak Brook. Parking is prohibited on the east side of Tower Drive. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 2 I i r Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes were determined by manual traffic counts taken on a weekday during the hours of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM at the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. The results of the traffic counts indicate that the weekday morning peak hour occurred from 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the weekday evening peak hour occurred from 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM. Based on information provided on DuPage County's official website, the average annual daily traffic on 22W Street in the vicinity of the site is 41,600 vehicles. The existing weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 2. Metro Transportation Group,Inc Page 3 e , Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 SITE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS This section of the report presents the traffic characteristics associated with the proposed development. This includes discussions regarding site development plans, site-generated traffic volumes and their distributions on the surrounding roadway network. Site access, site traffic assignment and future traffic volumes will also be discussed. Development Plans The proposed development will replace the existing land uses on the site (Alpha Graphics and a former travel agency) with a Starbucks coffee shop with a drive-through facility. The existing development is served by two driveways that are located approximately 150 feet and 360 feet south of the south 22nd Street curbline.Although the proposed Starbucks will also be served by two driveways, their location is slightly different.The south driveway will remain a two-way driveway but the north driveway will be modified to serve as a right-turn exit only providing direct egress from the drive-up window as well as from the customer parking area on the west side of the building. This access system locates the ingress to the site approximately 340 feet south of 22nd Street. This eliminates potential for traffic turning from 22nd Street and then wanting to enter the site from backing up onto 22nd Street. Provision has also been made at the south end of the property to provide a two-way future cross- access road between Tower Drive and the existing office development located east of the Starbucks site. I Trip Generation In order to determine the traffic impact of the proposed Starbucks, data from three existing Starbucks sites was obtained. The sites surveyed are located in Naperville, Lake Zurich and Lake in the Hills, Illinois. These stores are considered mature in nature. The Naperville store on 751h Street has been in operation for eight years, the Lake Zurich store six years and the Lake in the Hills store four years. This data includes hourly breakdowns of drive-thru and walk-in customers for seven days at each location.Table 1 indicates the average hourly volume of traffic generated on weekdays and weekend days. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 4 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 TABLE 1 AVERAGE HOURLY TRAFFIC N"ERVILLE SITE LAKE ZURICH SITE LAKE IN THE HILLS SITE ---------- - --------- - ---------- --------- - --------- - --------- TIME DRIVE- -WALK- ----------- -DRIVE- -WALK- ----------- -DRIVE--_ -WALK- ------------ TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL THRU IN THRU IN THRU IN 5-6 AM 22 15 37 13 3 16 15 3 18 ----------------- -----------=------------;----------- -----------=------------ ------ ----------- ------------ ------------ 6-7 AM 51 34 85 42 17 59 39 12 51 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- 7-8 AM 64 58 122 51 29 80 56 23 79 1 ---I------------ -------------------- ----- ------------------------------------------- ----------- --------------------- ----------- -- 8-9 AM 74 53 127 62 24 86 61 37 1: 98 L------------ ------------------------------ ----------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------- 9-10 AM 66 46 112 58 26 84 57 30 87 ----------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ 10-11 AM 56 32 88 52 23 75 50 27 77 ----------------- -------------------------I----------- ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ 11-12 PM 55 23 78 45 17 62 41 19 60 ----------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ 12-1 PM 41 19 ; 60 39 12 : 51 33 15 48 ------------------------------ ----------- -------------------------*-------------I----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- 1-2 PM 47 20 67 33 18 51 30 15 45 ----------------- ------------ ----------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ 2-3 PM 44 23 67 44 14 58 33 17 50 ----------------- ------------------------ ----------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------------------------------- 3-4 PM 45 26 71 40 11 51 37 17 54 ----------------- ------------------------ ----------- ------------------------ ----------- ----------- -------------I----------- 4-5 PM 42 18 60 35 14 49 28 15 43 ----------------- ------------------------ ----------- ------------------------- ----------- -----------;------------------------- 5-6 PM 22 9 31 27 7 34 23 13 36 ------------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------•------------ -----------I------------- ------------ 6-7 PM 23 13 36 13 5 18 22 11 33 ------------------------------------------------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------------------------------- 7-8 PM 19 15 34 13 3 16 18 12 30 ---------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------I------------ ------------I------------- ------------ 8-9 PM 16 10 26 7 4 11 17 17 34 ----------------- ------------ - ----------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- --- 9 --------------------- 9-10 PM 4 13 3 2 5 20 16 36 ------------------------------I-----------r----------------------- ------------r------------ -------------------------r------------ 10-11 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 7 13 TOTAL 697 418 1115 577 229 806 586 306 892 PERCENT 63% 37% 100% 72% 28% 100% 66% 34% 100% As indicated in Table 1, the morning peak hours of a Starbucks coffee shop are from 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM. After 10:00 AM, the volumes decrease almost in half and then in half again after 5:00 PM. The volumes peak late morning and throughout the afternoon on Saturday and Sunday. This Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 5 f Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 indicates that this is more associated with shopping activities than work activities. This shows that the morning is the critical period for a coffee shop and is frequented by people on their way to work. Table 2 indicates the percent distribution between the drive-thru and the walk-in customers for each day and for each location. TABLE 2 DRIVE-THRU VS.WALK-IN DISTRIBUTION NAPERVILLE SITE LAKE ZURICH SITE LAKE IN THE HILLS SITE ------------------ ----------------------------------- ------------- -------------------,--------------- DRIVE-THRU WALK-IN DRIVE-THRU WALK-IN DRIVE-THRU WALK-IN MONDAY 65% 35% 74% 26% 71% 29% ---•----------- ------------------••------------- ------------------ -------------- ----------------------------------- TUESDAY 60% 40% 73% N/A N/A --------- WEDNESDAY 65% 35% 74% 26% 69% 31% THURSDAY 62% 38% 68% 32% 70% 30% ------ -------- ------------------;----- ----- --------------------------------- -------------------,--------------- FRIDAY 61% 39/° 67% 33% 66% 34% -------------- ------------------;--------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------ --------------- SATURDAY 59% 41% 68% 32% 61% 39% -------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------28% 59% --- ------- --------------------- SUNDAY 57% 43% 72% 41% AVERAGE 63% 37% 72% 28% 669/6 34% As shown in Table 2, the distribution of traffic using the drive-through ranges between 63% and 72% or an average of 67%. The high use of the drive-thru further indicates that the proposed Starbucks is a pass-by use. It should be noted that the Naperville site on 7511, Street has very similar characteristics with the proposed Starbucks. Specifically, 75th Street has two lanes in each direction of travel and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on 75th Street (39,200 vehicles) is similar to the ADT of 22nd Street (41,600 vehicles). In addition, since the Naperville site is the most conservative in terms of customer's population, the trip generation and the percentage of drive-through trips for the proposed Starbucks was primarily based on the particular site. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 6 r r Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 As a result, the proposed Starbucks coffee shop is anticipated to serve 125 customers (70 drive- through and 55 walk-in)during the morning peak hour and 45 customers(30 drive-through and 15 walk-in)during the evening peak hour. Assuming all drive-through customers use the proposed coffee shop as a pass-by use rather than a destination use, and a conservative figure of 1.5 customers per vehicle for walk-in customers, trip generation estimates were made for the morning and evening peak hour. The total trips to be generated by the proposed Starbucks coffee shop are detailed in Table 3. TABLE 3 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY AM PEAK WEEKDAY PM PEAK LAND USE ----------z-----------r-------- IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Trips generated by Ip 10 20 Starbucks walk-in customers -------------------------------- --- - -; 70 ---------- Coffee Shop Pass-by Trips (Drive-Through) 70 140 30 30 60 TOTAL 100 100 200 40 40 80 Directional Distribution The directions from which the site traffic will approach and depart the site are a function of several variables including the operational characteristics of the street system, the ease that motorists can travel over various sections of the system,the existing traffic volumes and the proposed land use. A coffee shop is similar to a gas station in that it draws its traffic from the adjacent roadway and generates very little new traffic to the roadway system. It is a pass-by use rather than a destination use. It is critical for this type of land use to be located where it is easy to enter and exit the traffic stream. As such, the majority of the traffic entering this site from 22^d Street will turn right onto Tower Drive and when exiting,turn right onto 22nd Street from Tower Drive Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 7 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 While not all traffic will be right-turning traffic from and to 22^a Street, the number of left-turn movements generated by the Starbucks at the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive will be minimal. This is further supported by the fact that another Starbucks is located on the north side of Butterfield Road west of the proposed location at Fountain Square, less than one mile to the west, making it easier for westbound traffic to use that facility than the proposed location. Therefore, the convenience nature of the Starbucks basically dictates traffic patterns. The anticipated directional distribution of the generated site traffic is shown in Table 4. TABLE 4 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION TO/FROM... DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION West on 22^x'Street 900/0 •--------------------------- ------------------;---------------------------------------------- East on 22^a Street 10% TOTAL 100% Site Traffic Assignment Based on the direction of travel and the preferred access usage,the site-generated trips were assigned to the roadway network by utilizing the site estimated trips listed in Table 3 and the directional distribution outlined in Table 4. The site traffic assignment is illustrated on Figure 3. Total Traffic Assignment The total traffic assignment presents the overall projected traffic volumes upon construction of the proposed development and was determined by combining the site-estimated volumes(Figure 3)plus the existing traffic (Figure 2). To provide a conservative analysis, the trips generated by the existing development on the site (Alpha Graphics) were not subtracted from the projected traffic volumes. The total traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 8 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Analyses were conducted to determine whether the adjacent roadway network would be able to accommodate the needs of the proposed development. The analyses conducted include a capacity evaluation for the existing and future weekday morning and evening peak hours and a discussion regarding the site's internal circulation. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses were conducted for the existing and the future conditions using the methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual'. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of Level of Service (LOS), which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average total delay experienced by each vehicle passing through an intersection. Level of Service A is the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest (oversaturated conditions). Typically, Level of Service D is the lowest satisfactory level accepted by public agencies in Northeastern Illinois for design of peak-hour conditions. The Highway Capacity Manual definition, for the level of service and the corresponding delay for unsignalized intersections, is contained in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the capacity analysis results indicating the LOS for all study intersections are presented in Table 5.All output worksheets used for these analyses are contained in the Appendix. 'Highway Capacity Mamuil,Transportation Research Board,National Research Council,Washington,D.C.,2000 Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 9 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 TABLE 5 INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE SUMMARY EXISTING CONDITIONS BUILD CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AM PEAK PM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK EB-B EB-C EB-B EB-C 22nd Street and WB-B WB-C WB-B WB-C Tower Drive NB-D NB-E NB-D NB-F SB_C SB-E SB-C SB-E -------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Tower Drive and N/A N/A SB-A SB-A South Access WB-A WB-A -------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Tower Drive and N/A N/A WB-A WB-A Outbound Access EB-Eastbound Movement WB-Westbound Movement NB-Northbound Movement SB-Southbound Movement As reflected in the capacity analysis, the trips generated by the development are expected to have a negligible impact on the LOS of the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. It should be noted that upon operation of the proposed Starbucks, the northbound movement at the intersection of 22rJ Street and Tower Drive is expected to operate at LOS F during the evening peak hour, which is not an uncommon situation for stop controlled intersections along a major arterial such as 22nd Street. Queue lengths for the particular movement are equivalent to less than three vehicles, a typical and acceptable length for minor streets intersecting with a major suburban highway. In addition, field observations revealed that there are adequate gaps in the traffic flow of 22nd Street to accommodate right and left-turn maneuvers from Tower Drive. Also, the Illinois Department of Transportation is planning to widen 22nd Street to six lanes, three lanes in each direction with a raised median. The intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive has been identified as a future traffic signal location. In this event, left-turns in and out of Tower Drive can be made safely under signal control. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 10 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006 The two access drives on Tower Drive are expected to operate under desirable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours. Internal Circulation and Parking The site layout is well planned in that a one-way circulation system is essentially developed. Traffic enters the south driveway and either directly enters the drive-up lane or turns left to park. Both the drive-up traffic and the walk-in traffic exit the site at the north. Fourteen regular and two handicapped parking spaces are provided along the west side of the building. An additional 10 parking spaces are provided at the south end of the site for employee parking and overflow customer parking. In similar situations, walk-in traffic represents approximately 35 to 40 percent of the customer traffic; this amount of parking is more than adequate,particularly since the parking spaces will turn over several times per hour. The drive-up window provides protected stacking for 8 to 9 vehicles. Based on observations at existing Starbucks sites,this is more than adequate,as well. Metro Transportation Group,Inc. Page 11 Oak Brook Starbucks August 17,2006_ CONCLUSIONS A traffic impact analysis was conducted for the proposed Starbucks coffee shop in Oak Brook, Illinois. Based on the conducted analyses, the following conclusions were developed: > The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 200 bi-directional trips during the AM peak hour and 80 bi-directional trips during the PM peak hour. ➢ Since the proposed Starbucks coffee shop is a pass-by use rather than a destination use,it is anticipated that the majority of the traffic entering this site from 22^d Street will turn right onto Tower Drive and when exiting, turn right onto 22^d Street from Tower Drive. Left- turn movements generated by the Starbucks at the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive are expected to be minimal. y The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the intersection of 22nd Street and Tower Drive and the two coffee shop access drives on Tower Drive are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service under future conditions. ➢ The site layout is well planned in terms of internal circulation and adequacy of parking. Metro Transportation Croup,Inc. Page 12 APPENDICES Figures Level of Service (LOS) Summary Intersection Capacity Analysis Traffic Counts Site Plan sa�n��3 ��'. .fib �r�: r '4 �- � �-� �•' a �;s� ^� ;� � �. � .... �+r a r h i Y tv 4 ro .r r lwnm Of am sow ka < o- . NOT TO SCALE cn 4-25(15) -�1285(1810) ' (41,600) t 25(5) 41400 22nd STREET (55)45 ' f (1810)1360— (5)20 -- i PROPOSED STARBUCKS 0 LEGEND -- -- XX Weekday A.M. Peak Hour (7:30.8:30 AM) (XX) - Weekday P.M. Peak Hour (5:00-8:00 PM) [XX] - Average Daily Traffic EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE:2 4Nj NOT TO SCALE 5(5) 22nd STREET (35)95-1 -� r w � O Bt �-80(35) PROPOSED g v STARBUCKS og LEGEND - XX - Weekday A.M. Peak Hour X (7:30-8:30 AM) (XX) - Weekday P.M. Peek Hour (5:00-8:00 PM) - Proposed Access Drive �� TRIP GENERATION FIGURE:3 N�- NOT TO SCALE z 4-25(25) �-1285(1610) 1 30(f0) 22nd STREET (55)45 (1785)1335- (40)115--1 $ o rw 4 r 1 4-80(35) 4 � PROPOSED S STARBUCKS l L 20(5) 1 LEGEND - XX Weekday A.M. Peak Hour (7:30-8:30 AM) (XX) - Weekday P.M. Peak Hour (5:00-8:00 PM) Proposed Access Drive TOTAL TRAFFIC FIGURER Level of Service (LOS) Summary UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The capacity analyses are summarized into levels of service(LOS) ranging from A(the best) to F (the worst). Immediately following is a more thorough description of each level of service. • LOS A represents free flow. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorists is excellent. Delay per vehicle is less than or equal to 10.0 seconds. LOS B is in the range of stable flow. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than that of LOS A because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. Delay per vehicle 10.1 to 15.0 seconds. LOS C is in the range of stable flow but marks the beginning of significant interference to an individual's movement caused by others in the traffic stream. The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. Delay per vehicle 15.1 - 25.0 seconds. LOS D represents high density,but stable, flow. The driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Delay per vehicle 25.1 -35.0 seconds. • LOS E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. Operations at this level are usually unstable and driver comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor. Delay per vehicle 35.1-50.0 seconds. • LOS-F represents forced or breakdown flow. It is the point at which arrival flow exceeds discharge flow thereby causing a queue to form. Operations within the queue are characterized by stop-and-go conditions. Delay per vehicle is greater than or equal to 50.1 seconds. Intersection Capacity Analysis TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 07 Analyst CDA Intersection 22nd Street and Tower Drive Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 8115 12006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Existing Project Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: 22nd Street North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 45 1360 20 25 1285 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 1446 21 26 1367 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — -- 2 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration L T TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 0 15 5 0 25 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 15 5 0 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 O 0 1 0 Confi uration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 47 26 20 31 C(m) (veh/h) 487 456 188 250 Vic 0.10 0.06 all 0.12 95%queue length 0.32 0.18 0.36 0.42 Control Delay(s/Veh) 13.2 13.4 26.4 21.4 LOS B B D C Approach Delay(s/Veh) -- -- 26.4 21.4 Approach LOS -- D C Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/1812006 11:56 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection 22nd Street and Tower Drive Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 8115 12006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Existing Project Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks North/South Street: Tower Drive East/West Street: 22nd Street Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Major Street astbound Westbound Movement 7771810 2 3 4 5 6 T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 5 1610 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1925 5 5 1712 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 2 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration L T TR LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 0 25 10 0 80 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 26 10 0 85 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 58 5 31 95 C(m) (veh/h) 358 301 129 204 v/c 0.16 0.02 0.24 0.47 95%queue length 0.58 0.05 0.93 2.50 Control Delay(s/veh) 17.0 17.2 41.7 37.8 LOS C C E E Approach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 41.7 37.8 Approach LOS -- — E E Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,Al Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.2 Generated: 8/1e/2M 12:00 PM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection 22nd Street and Tower Drive Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 811512006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Proposed Proiect Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: 22nd Street North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 45 1360 115 30 1285 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 1446 122 31 1367 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Raised curb FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration L T TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(ve") 5 0 100 5 0 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 5 0 106 5 0 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade(°/.) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 47 31 111 31 C (m) (veh/h) 487 417 288 229 v/c 0.10 0.07 0.39 0.14 95%queue length 0.32 0.24 1.84 0.47 Control Delay(s/veh) 13.2 14.3 25.3 23.2 LOS B B D C Approach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 25.3 23.2 Approach LOS -- -- D C Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,AB Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.2 Generated: 8118/2008 11:56 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection 22nd Street and Tower Drive Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 811512006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Proposed Project Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: 22nd Street N h/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStugy Period hrs : 1.00 Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 55 1785 40 10 1610 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 1878 42 10 1694 26 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- — 2 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration L T TR LT TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 0 60 10 0 80 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 0 63 10 0 84 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 57 10 73 94 C(m) (veh/h) 364 304 142 200 V/c 0.16 0.03 0.51 0.47 95%queue length 0.55 0.10 2.93 2.54 Control Delay(s/veh) 16.7 17.2 56.4 36.7 LOS C C F E Approach Delay(stveh) -- -- 56.4 36.7 Approach LOS -- -- F E Copyright 0 2005 University of Fbrida.AN Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/16/2006 12:00 PM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection Tower Drive and South Access Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 8115 12006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Proposed Project Description H06OZ 10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: South Access Drive North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period Mrs): 1.00 Ma or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 15 0 100 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 16 0 111 50 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 20 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 22 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT R v(veh/h) 111 22 C(m) (veh/h) 1602 1069 Vic a07 0.02 95%queue length 0.22 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 8.4 LOS A A Approach Delay(s/veh) — — 8.4 Approach LOS — A Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/16/2006 11:57 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection Tower Drive and South Access Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 811512006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Proposed Project Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: South Access Drive North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Ma or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 35 0 40 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 38 0 44 11 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — -- 2 — -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 5 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration I I I I I R Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT R v(veh/h) 44 5 C(m) (veh/h) 1572 1040 Vic Q03 0.00 95%queue length 0.09 0.01 Control Delay(s/veh) 74 8.5 LOS A A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 8.5 Approach LOS — -- A Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8116/2006 11:57 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection Tower Drive and Exit-Only Dr. Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 8115/2006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Proposed Project Description H0607.10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks East/West Street: Exit-Only Drive North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(ve") 35 145 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 38 0 0 161 0 veh/tl Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I T T Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 80 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 88 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 Configuration R Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v(veh/h) 88 C(m)(veh/h) 1040 v/c 0.08 95%queue length 0.28 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.8 LOS A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 8.8 Approach LOS — -- A copyright 0 2006 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8/16/2006 11:57 AM TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDA Intersection Tower Drive and Exit-Only Dr. Agency/Co. Metro Jurisdiction State Date Performed 811512006 Analysis Year 2006 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Proposed Project Description H06OZ 10-10 Oak Brook Starbucks EastNVest Street: Exit-Only Drive North/South Street: Tower Drive Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 R 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 40 50 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 44 0 0 55 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 __ _- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 O 0 0 38 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 2 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized O 0 Lanes 0 0 O 0 0 1 Configuration I R Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v(veh/h) 38 C(m) (veh/h) 1032 v/c 0.04 95%queue length 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.6 LOS A Approach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 8.6 Approach LOS -- — A Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 8116/2006 11:57 AM sluno:) :)l PROJECT: "0607.10 DATE: 8/1012006 DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF ALL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TOWER RD. &22ND ST. 1S MIN TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT q4LLEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 293 3 303 4 218 1 223 530 7:15 AM 0 0 2 2 2 0 3 5 8 326 3 337 9 246 6 261 605 7:30 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 7 8 364 S 377 3 298 2 303 688 7:45 AM 0 0 7 7 2 0 8 10 i8 379 7 404 7 313 6 326 747 &00 AM 1 0 4 5 0 0 4 4 12 328 2 342 9 338 10 357 708 8:15 AM 0 0 4 4 0 0 7 7 6 289 4 301 8 337 9 354 666 8:30 AM 1 0 3 4 1 0 3 4 9 280 5 294 12 314 11 337 639 8:45 AM 1 2 0 3 5 1 0 11 12 9 229 3 241 7 253 11 271 529 TOTAL: 4 0 24 28 7 0 46 63 79 2188 32 2599 59 2317 56 2432 5112 HOURLY SUMMARY OF ALL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER. BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION L THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7R0 AM 0 0 10 10 5 0 21 26 41 1362 18 1421 23 1075 15 1113 70 7:15 AM 1 0 14 15 5 0 21 26 46 1397 17 1460 28 1195 24 1247 2748 7:30 AM 1 0 16 17 3 0 25 28 46 1360 18 1424 27 1288 27 1340 2809 7:45 AM 2 0 18 20 3 0 22 25 47 1276 18 1341 36 1302 36 1374 2760 8:00 AM 4 0 14 18 2 0 25 27 38 1126 14 1178 36 1242 41 1319 2542 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY FOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 7:30 AM 1 0 18 1 17 1 3 0 25 1 46 1380 18 1424 1 27 1288 27 1 1340 2809 PHF= 0.94 PROJECT: H0607.10 DATE: BMO/20W DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL TRUCK MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. 15 MIN TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT qTOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 7:15AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 8 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 3 0 3 0 7 0 7 10 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 6 0 5 0 5 13 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 1 4 1 8 SASAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 S 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 8 8:45 AM O 0 0 0 0 O 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 8 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 20 0 21 1 36 1 38 81 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL TRUCK MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LE THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 10 0 11 1 20 0 21 33 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 14 0 15 1 21 1 23 39 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 18 0 18 1 19 37 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 14 0 15 0 17 1 18 33 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 O 0 1 1 1 0 f0 0 10 0 16 1 17 28 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 14 0 1 15 1 1 21 1 1 23 39 PHF: 0.76 PROJECT: "0607.10 DATE: 8/102006 DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL CAR MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. 15 MIN TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 7 293 3 303 4 216 1 221 526 7:15 AM 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 4 8 326 3 337 8 240 6 254 597 7:30 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 7 8 361 5 374 3 291 2 296 678 7:45 AM 0 0 7 7 2 0 8 10 17 372 7 396 7 306 6 321 734 8:00 AM 1 0 4 5 0 0 4 4 12 324 2 338 9 335 9 353 700 8:15 AM 0 0 4 4 0 0 7 7 B 286 4 298 8 334 9 351 860 8:30 AM 1 0 3 4 1 0 3 4 9 280 5 294 12 308 11 331 633 8:45 AM 2 0 3 1 5 1 1 0 10 11 9 226 3 238 7 249 11 267 521 TOTAL 4 0 24 28 8 0 45 51 78 2468 32 2578 58 2281 55 2394 5051 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL CAR MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. HOUR TOWER R0. 22NO ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 10 10 4 0 21 25 40 1352 18 1410 22 1055 15 1092 2537 7:15 AM 1 0 14 15 4 0 21 25 45 1383 17 1445 27 1174 23 1224 2709 7:30 AM 1 0 16 17 3 0 25 28 45 1343 18 1408 27 1268 26 1321 2772 7:45 AM 2 0 18 ' 20 3 0 22 25 46 1262 18 1326 36 1285 35 1356 2727 8:00 AM 4 0 14 18 1 2 0 24 28 38 1116 14 1168 36 1226 40 1302 2514 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:30 AM 1 0 16 17 3 0 25 28 45 1343 18 1406 27 1268 28 1321 2772 PHF= 0.94 i 101 LOCATION: TOWER R0.A 22ND ST. ^ DATE: 8/10/2006 1 DAY- THURSDAY 1% 1 3"k ^ PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM-8:30 AM 28 v 73 I ^ N I I " v I 25 0 3 I I I I I I I I I < v > 47% 1312<---- ^ 27 48% <.—..— 1286 <.....—1340 v-- 27 2736 2719 46 --- ^ 1424--> 1360 --> —>1379 51% 18 —v 49% < ^ > I I I I i I I I 1 0 16 Mote: Total Intersection Traffic Percents(%)represent movement volumes 2809 divided by the total intersection traffic 1 ^ I I I I v I 45 17 2°k ^ 1% I I v 62 PROJECT: H0607.10 DATE: 8J70/2006 DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF ALL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. 15 MIN TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 5 0 12 17 3 0 22 25 11 371 1 383 5 377 12 394 819 4:15 PM 2 0 3 5 3 0 15 18 10 410 1 421 3 392 11 406 850 410 PM 1 0 11 12 4 0 21 25 13 394 2 409 1 398 2 401 847 4:45 PM 3 0 6 11 1 0 11 12 13 445 1 459 3 416 5 424 906 5:00 PM 2 0 8 10 0 0 28 28 14 493 0 507 1 407 12 420 965 5:15 PM 0 0 7 7 3 0 20 23 13 435 1 449 1 390 4 395 674 5:30 PM 2 0 1 3 4 0 21 25 15 437 0 452 1 397 5 403 883 5:45 PM 0 0 8 1 8 1 2 0 15 17 16 347 2 365 4 423 7 434 824 TOTAL: 15 0 58 73 20 0 153 173 105 3332 8 3445 19 3200 58 3277 1 8968 HOURLY SUMMARY OF ALL VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TOWER RD. &22ND ST. HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUNO SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 11 0 34 45 11 0 69 80 47 1820 5 1672 1 12 1583 30 1625 3422 4:15 PM 6 0 30 38 8 0 75 83 50 1742 4 1798 8 1613 30 1651 35W 4:30 PM 6 0 34 40 8 0 80 88 53 1767 4 1824 6 1611 23 1640 3592 4:45 PM 7 0 24 31 8 0 80 as 55 1810 2 1867 8 1610 26 1842 3828 5:00 PM 4 0 24 28 9 0 84 93 58 1712 3 1773 7 1617 28 1652 3548 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR i TOWER RD. 22X0 ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RMONT I TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:45 PM 7 0 24 31 8 0 80 88 55 1810 2 1887 6 1610 28 1642 3628 PHF. 0.94 PROJECT: H0607.10 DATE: 810/2006 DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL TRUCK MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. 13 MIN TOWER RO. 22ND ST. INTER- Beal/4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 1 5 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 b 8 4:45 PM 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 3 5:00 PM 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 6:15PM 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 3 4 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 4 TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 7 O 15 2 14 0 18 31 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL.TRUCK MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. FOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND ELTEFr EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT !TOTAL HRU RK3HT TOTAL LEFT 7HFiU FlfiHf TOTAL TOTAL 4:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 1 0 14:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 1 5 0 9 16 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 O 7 1 10 0 11 18 4:46 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 O 4 1 7 0 8 12 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 6 0 6 1 6 0 7 13 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR TOWER RD. 22ND ST. I INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU FIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 7 1 1 10 0 11 18 PHF= 0.68 PROJECT: H0807.10 DATE: W1012006 DAY: THURSDAY WEATHER: SUNNY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL CAR MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. 1S MIN TOWER RD. 22N0 ST. INTER• BEGAN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 5 0 12 17 3 0 22 25 11 367 1 379 5 376 12 393 814 4:15 PM 2 0 3 5 3 0 15 16 10 409 1 420 2 392 11 405 848 4:30 PM t 0 11 12 4 0 21 25 13 391 2 406 1 393 2 396 839 4:45 PM 3 0 8 11 1 0 11 12 13 444 1 458 3 414 5 422 903 5:00 PM 2 0 8 10 0 0 28 28 14 491 0 505 1 406 12 419 962 5:15 PM 0 0 7 7 3 0 20 23 13 434 1 448 0 388 4 392 870 5;30 PM 2 0 1 3 4 0 21 25 15 437 0 452 1 395 5 401 881 5.45 PM 1 0 0 8 8 1 2 0 15 1 17 1 6 344 2 362 4 422 7 433 820 TOTAL: 15 0 58 73 20 0 153 173 105 3317 8 3430 17 3186 58 3281 8937 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL CAR MOVEMENTS TOWER RD.&22ND ST. HOUR TOWFARm. 22ND ST. INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM I1 0 34 45 11 0 69 80 47 1611 5 1883 tl 1575 30 1818 3404 4:15 PM 8 0 30 38 8 0 75 83 50 1735 4 1789 7 1605 30 1642 35W 4.30 PM 6 0 34 40 8 0 80 88 53 1760 4 1817 5 1601 23 1629 3574 4:45 PM 7 0 24 31 8 0 80 SS 55 1806 2 1863 5 1603 26 1634 3616 5;00 PM 4 0 24 28 9 0 84 93 58 1706 3 1787 8 1811 28 1845 3533 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR T D. 22ND ST. INTEW BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL THRU RIGHT TOT LEFT HRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:45 PM 7 0 24 31 8 0 80 88 55 1808 2 1863 5 1603 26 1634 38th F- 0.94 i 169 LOCATION: TOWER RD.8 22ND ST. A DATE: 8/10/2006 1 DAY: THURSDAY 2% 1 2% A PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM•5:45 PM 88 v 81 A 1 ^ N I I A I I A v 80 0 8 I I I I I I < v > 47% 1697 26 45% <-- 1610 <—1642 v--- 6 3564 3484 55 1867--> 1810 —> — -> 1842 51% 2 V 510 < ^ > I I I I I I I i I 7 0 24 NOte: Total irtersection Traffic PercerAs(%)represent movement volumes 3628 divided by the total intersection traffic 1 A I I v 1 8 31 0% A 1% I I v 39 75th SL-Naperville Customer Counts (December 2005) WEEK DAY WEEKEND Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday AVERAGE Saturday Sunday AVERAGE QJye Thru In Stona Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Qnyg Thru In Store DRIVE THRU Drive In§Vre Drive Thru to Stom DRIVE THRU "AM 22 5 27 15 19 11 18 13 26 14 22.4 1 2 0 1 0.5 6-7 AM 55 28 46 36 61 28 48 36 46 38 50.8 22 7 12 5 17 7-6 AM 68 51 62 71 Be 54 62 69 62 68 63.6 48 34 29 16 36.5 8-9 AM 72 54 74 56 79 51 74 61 70 64 73.8 65 54 49 42 57 9-10 AM 61 46 89 50 65 48 64 48 69 50 65.6 71 87 55 60 63 10.11 AM 55 34 62 32 58 37 57 29 49 29 56.2 67 63 49 42 58 11-12 PM 64 21 52 26 59 19 48 21 52 26 55 52 41 47 42 49.5 12-1 PM 40 15 44 21 34 18 44 21 44 21 41.2 49 37 46 29 48.5 1.2 PM 45 18 48 21 48 17 48 21 48 24 47.4 35 29 45 37 40 2-3 PM 39 31 60 22 41 28 38 14 51 19 43.6 40 26 49 31 44.5 3-4 PM 41 22 49 31 46 24 41 25 48 29 45 52 32 48 40 50 4-5 PM 38 13 49 20 31 18 45 18 48 19 42.2 38 25 45 19 41.5 5-6 PM 22 6 22 13 24 3 23 12 21 12 22A 30 11 28 16 29 6-7 PM 28 9 21 16 22 7 21 18 23 15 23 35 9 17 14 28 7-8 PM 17 8 21 20 15 10 23 19 19 16 19 23 9 22 18 22.5 8-9 PM 19 8 13 13 22 5 11 12 14 12 15.8 16 10 15 10 15.6 9-10 PM 8 1 9 8 13 2 7 5 9 6 9.2 16 4 6 9 12 10-11 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0.6 3 1 0 0 1.5 892 371 718 473 703 378 671 420 701 442 863 461 566 431 Total 1063 1191 1081 1091 1143 1124 997 7690 % 65.10% 34.90% 60.29% 39.71% 65.03% 34.97% 61.50% 38.50% 61.33% 38.67% 55.99% 41.01% 56.77% 43.23% Lake Zurich Customer Counts (February 2006) WEEK DAY WEEKEND Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday AVERAGE Saturday Sunday AVERAGE Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive jJL In Store Drive Thru In Store DRIVE THRU Drive Thru In Store Qft Thru In Store DRIVE THRU 5.6AM 11 3 17 3 17 3 17 4 2 0 12.6 5 2 4 O 4.5 6-7 AM 51 14 51 26 47 20 54 24 6 2 41.8 25 8 13 2 19 7-8 AM 67 26 80 30 55 36 56 42 18 13 51.2 48 16 36 12 42 8-9 AM 62 29 69 28 67 20 65 25 46 20 61.8 55 27 46 19 51 9-10 AM 56 21 59 32 62 25 61 36 52 18 58 60 40 56 24 58 10-11 AM 57 19 49 24 60 21 48 12 45 41 51.8 59 46 54 28 56.5 11-12 PM 42 23 47 10 51 14 42 13 45 27 45.4 55 22 59 21 57 12-1 PM 35 10 39 10 35 12 37 11 48 15 38.8 46 23 47 19 46.5 1-2 PM 21 11 51 8 35 10 22 33 37 29 33.4 51 14 56 20 53.5 2-3 PM 47 6 49 16 48 14 26 20 51 14 44.2 50 16 53 20 51.5 3-4 PM 36 9 37 11 39 7 44 12 44 16 40 49 45 43 14 46 4-5 PM 39 18 32 9 43 10 24 9 36 22 35.2 55 18 43 16 49 5-8 PM 24 8 22 10 23 5 22 3 45 11 27.2 33 10 12 9 22.5 6-7 PM 12 5 13 2 14 6 15 2 12 11 13.2 16 9 21 6 18.5 7-8 PM 20 4 15 6 13 4 10 0 7 0 13 14 2 8 0 10 8-9 PM 12 0 6 4 11 6 4 8 3 4 7.2 11 1 5 3 8 9-10 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 9 9 2.6 9 9 0 0 4.5 10-11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 593 208 619 229 621 213 547 255 508 253 542 309 554 213 5784 Total 801 848 834 802 761 951 767 % 74.03% 25.97% 73.00% 27.00% 74.46% 25.54% 88.209E 31.80% 66.75% 33.25% 67AI% 32.49% 7223% 27.77% Lake in the Hills Customer Counts (week of 7/31/06) ' Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Drive In Store Qrive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store Drive Thru In Store 5-6 AM 21 8 0 0 20 1 21 4 17 4 8 1 3- 1 6-7 AM 51 11 0 0 43 13 46 14 49 15 27 13 17 6 7-8 AM 59 17 0 0 65 30 66 18 67 26 46 25 35 22 8-9 AM 56 25 0 0 72 38 63 28 63 33 69 41 41 55 9-10 AM 54 22 0 0 61 21 57 20 56 32 61 51 54 35 10-11 AM 43 19 0 0 53 29 52 15 44 29 59 38 48 31 11-12 PM 43 14 0 0 28 11 48 15 28 11 46 28 50 32 12-1 PM 30 10 0 0 25 11 27 11 33 12 38 19 42 28 1-2 PM 31 16 0 0 26 10 29 11 29 17 28 11 35 22 2-3 PM 26 18 0 0 35 12 45 22 31 22 35 12 27 17 3-4 PM 30 10 0 0 42 13 36 13 40 21 39 22 33 22 4-5 PM 23 11 0 0 30 17 31 18 31 12 28 16 27 18 5-6 PM 20 12 0 0 23 6 23 14 24 10 29 19 21 14 6-7 PM 24 12 0 0 21 9 31 7 12 12 24 12 22 14 7-8 PM 23 9 0 0 17 16 13 8 19 10 18 19 19 12 8-9 PM 25 10 0 0 15 17 23 21 10 20 16 22 15 10 9-10 PM 25 10 0 0 12 9 21 31 21 10 19 24 21 14 10-11 PM 3 3 0 0 4 3 11 10 10 10 8 12 2 4 587 237 0 0 592 266 643 280 584 306 598 385 512 357 Total 824 0 858 923 890 983 869 % 71% 29% 0% 0% 69% 31% 70% 30% 66% 34% 61% 39% 59% 41% I ill I ICI ULlId a}IS r AREA RESERVED FOR FW.Lw ♦. cRCSS-ACCESS 0R TOWER ROAD PAPoBIGACCESS ROAD z. t -- .............. _.. t Rec.283.4 —Meo.283.08' rr 'yt tF A4. — 22nd STREET z' - . � t+AR4 :nom t Sri. L SITE PLAN _ Sarfatty Associates.Ltd. Architects P R O P O S E D G� "°'°°`"��" `w'°' STARBUCKS COFFEE STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY . r 60091.1994 550 WEST WASHINGTON BLVD. (847)92%1100 f- * �. (�847)9°1p1 `° 2407 W.22ND STREET, SUITE 200 dp� 4;"5 wre19,2oab OAKBROOK.IL CHICAGO,IL 60661 vPC, OF 044- B9 o � f 0 A O y G Q A `2 V COUNT, '\ Village of Date: July 26, 2006 Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road To: Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director www.oak-brook.org Administration Subject: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street—Additional Information 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 At the July 17, 2006 meeting, as part of the final deliberations on the proposed Community redevelopment of the property at the southeast corner of Tower Drive and 22nd Street Development for a Starbucks Coffee, a traffic safety issue was raised by an adjoining property 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 owner. Accordingly, the Plan Commission requested that historical accident data be generated for this location and provided to the Zoning Board. Please see the requested Engineering information for the subject intersection, which includes an extended area along 22nd Department Street (January 1, 2005 thru July 18, 2006). The research generated from the Police 630.990.3010 Department indicated that there has never been a report of a traffic fatality at that FAX 630.9900.990.33 985 1� location. Fire Department 630.990.3040 In addition, the Plan Commission requested that the Police Chief attend the Zoning FAX 630.990.2392 Board of Appeals meeting to answer any questions that the Zoning Board of Appeals may have on the traffic safety issue. Police Department 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 attachments Public Works Department 630.990.3044 FAX 630.472.0223 Oak Brook Public Library 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,1L 60523-2200 630.990.2222 FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 3/. O A K B R O O K P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T M E M O DATE: JULY 20, 2006 TO: PEGGY FROM: KASSY SUBJECT: ACCIDENT LOCATIONS (FROM JAUARY 01, 2005 THRU JULY 18, 2006) 1 22ND ST & TOWER RD 5 2311 W 22ND ST 5 2407 W 22ND ST 1 2425 W 22ND ST 0 2525 W 22ND ST 0 22ND ST & MIDWEST RD 22 3� 2096228 DIAGRAM COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0. any CARRIER NAME SOURCE irtib .... ............... .. ./:.t./.../....:9....�....".�.:......y: . Qc..w...t':. .... ❑ Side rs t truck ADDRESS Papers .... CITY S4E ZIP ....... ............•.............. ....... .. ... .. .. ... ... NDICATE NORTH ❑ Log Book >.....:...........:......:............:....... : BY ARROW ID NUMBER R :....._.......................:....................... _........... US DOT ICCMC or State No. State Name ❑None :. ....:......;.....;......:......:......:......;.................. .... .. .... HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes []No if Yes:4-Di its 1-Di it or Name . .......................................................... .. .. :......:.... .. Unk :.. " Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ ....:............................... .......%.......... .. .. .. ............. .. ..:......:......•.... Violation of HAZMAT regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ ;.....;......... Violation of MCS regs.contrib ute to crash? .. .. .. .. ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? YY Farm N.. ...................:.................: .. ........... ............ .. .. .. .. .. .. AT Out of Service? u LJ .:.. ..:.. ..:.. .. _HAZM LJ LJ �k MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ :......:......:......:......;.....:......:......;.....:.... • ... � IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ Cl ...:......:......'......:......:....._.....: : T RAILE R WIDTH S) TRA ILER LENGTH(S)-ft VEHICLE LE NC TR .... ._.....7..... ....... .. :.... .:..... (TOUL)-h 0-9fi' 97-102° Over 102" ....................:................ Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NO OF AXLES _.....:..... ............ .. .. " Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: NARRATIVE(Refer to vehicle by U ' No.) INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO �L VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE J/ d CC / � UNIT N0. / � n /�. � ���� CARRIER NAME SOURCE ( � l ❑ Side of truck /- -'7 ADDRESS Lr•— �' -2-11'07 l/ ,/• o' ^/g -fr- ❑ Papers ❑ Driver CITY STATE ZIP ❑ Log Book 1D,-t X/ef l/� iC�L� oZ ID NUMBER jGVWR US DOT ICCMC or State No. State Name El None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑ �N.�>! �6 �� 0 if Yes:4-DI its 1-DI it or Name 77t� C.1-�6�//.s�-r`�-�! / Y N Unk Hazardous cargo released from truck? (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ Violation of HAZMAT regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ �– Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ /O D/3S'�"7L�JC Uc/C7j�L r /� Inspection form completed? � ��� �C �l>�� �–� /� �G1�� ��/C�� /� ��,✓�� HAZMAT [y] k Out of Service? 6 8 Form v L -MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ 1 . 57 TRAILER PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ SI TRAILER WIDTHS) TRAILER LENGTHS)-ft VEHICLE LENGTH -It LOCAL USE ONLY 0.96' 97.102' Over 102" (TOTAL)•tt Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NO OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ 11 El Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: U2 17,"-,C7'to �r 2 lowed by to INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO k 1,4 N14 VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE ILLINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT / � Sheet z Of_Sheets 1:3 Ui TRD ORVA � VIS VEH D U2 :-,= MANV Ps PA U1 2 U U2 Ui g9 IIIIII�IIIiIIIII�I�II��I���II�IIII��II�I�i��� TFIFIN INVESTIGATING AGENCY AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO. 2 0 9 6 2 2 8 ON SCENE .ANo.k>keyfDltyeAway. _ _ Q/�y NOTONSCENE �T AA AMENDED ❑B"old 111,Too To Crash ADDRESS ... HIGHWAY a STREET NAME. INTERSECTION �r CODE VENT L/wl --/ IP eSfJ o DATE U4 ` �f e� ona %F CRASH -TIME �Y rtp PM. (CIRCLE) (CIRCLE) r :` PROPERTY ANYSINQLE CODE- COUNTY . 4J r�❑No MOST OH ; LABS ❑' FT-! MI N E. S W ' . .'- ,( C,� DAMAGEDOVERy 00- { ,I .0 d HR RUN Yes o Yesr1 ❑ AT INTERSECTION WITH r, tuunNneorc� V .6171 (NAME OF:IN INTERSECTION OR ROAD FEATU NCI LM ER - — — — — . --- S � r ID 0 7 T LL is PASS] Ui !EV EVNO DAMAGED PROPER Y.OMERNAME' ROPERTY- IB A DAMAGED P COWM UTO Y. POST D UMIT C(lY STATE PRNAARY SECTION CITATION NO. SECONDARY ARRESTNAME *P 2 0 1-3 1 ry.1 SECTION CITATION N0. y� y.� . ARREST NAME CJE a6 .J ❑PM RE BEAT/DISC SUPERVISOR ID. COURT DATE COURTTIME ❑AM 3 a 7 wv n —'_ ❑PM *IF YES TO HAZMAT SPILL OR90M VEH ABOVE, COMPLETE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AREA ON BACK OF FORM t DIAGRAM COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT NO. 20960 4 5 CARRIER NAME SOURCE ........ .. .. .. ..: ..... ..... :.....:.....:...'. '" "i ""..".... ADDRESS ESS G ❑❑ Side o f truck Papers .... .... . ....... '1 .......... D rier crn AT E P .......... El Log Book I NDICATE NORTH ID NUMBER BY ARROW ............:............... c ...... US DOT ICCMC.... _. .. _..... or State No. State Name None ........._ : :.... _:.... i "' - > •• •• ....;�...... HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑No HAZAR if Yes:4-Digits 1-D( it or Name U k ;= Y� "' "" Hazardous cargo released from truck? n .•.�.^.... . ..�.r..�••? H dour Y N o not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ . :......:............ .....:..... h ...................... ? Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ :. ),,,•• ,,,•,:,,_ a S rags.Contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ . Violation of MC . Inspection ? ram Na Viol ....._............. I nspe '.......... L` Y Inc Y �" : -HAZMAT foil LJ a Out of Service? LJ m completed? ...................Q. :. .. ... Out of Service? ❑ . . . . ..:.. . ...... . . -MCS ❑ ❑ :......:......:.... �. _ .. _ TRAILER RAILER LENG ( ) 1t (rOTA) :.....:.....:..... _ .. PERMIT# WIDE LOAD p TRA R WID7H(S) T TH S • VEHICLE LEHCTH r Na OF AXLE :. OQ' 971❑02' :......:.....;......:............7 ........._....._.......... _ .. _ .. _ Trailer 1 � ❑ Trailer 2 t N (Circe) t S " Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: NARRATIVE(Refer to vehicle by Unit No.) v V r7 INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO VEHICLE CONRGURAMON CARGO BODY TYPB LOAD TYPE ® 4 f r COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0. CARRIER NAME SOURCE. ADDRESS ❑ Side Of truck- Papers ❑ Driver . . CITY STATE ZIP ❑ Log Book O T ID NUMBER 7w I _ US DOT ICCMC or State No State Name ❑No HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑ r f if Yes:4-DI its 1-DI it or Name Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk 71 �. (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ �J �—�—s ^� a �' Violation of HAZMAT regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ _ Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ T Inspecfion form completed? �c Y �L ro� HAZMAT 1 LI Out of Service? LJ LJ - MCS Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ ❑ 57 TRAILERWIDTH(S) TRAILERLENGTH(S)-ri I VEHICLEtEPic TH L (TOTA)•fl LOCAL USE ONLY Trailer 1 0•e6' 97.102' Over 102' Trailer 1 [3 ❑ ❑ NO.OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: (Circle) Mlles N E S W of: 1 Color - 2 Color 1 Towed by - U2 TO o INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO r VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE ' ILLINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Sheet—L of i Sheets AAM c ! 1 2b I DRAC : . PEDVTRFD TAFC':, WEAT DRVA VIS PPA- PL IIII II III III IIII TRFW i,.*' •i _ � � 2 U1 U2 ° : U1-_,. U .:... VIII II III II III II III II IIII . . U� U .,: Ui U2 U7 U TYPE OF REPORT ❑A No In*.'DiW Away AC'E/NCY CRASH REPORT Na ,� 2 0 9 6 0 4 5 INVESTIGATING AGENCY ON SCENE Q NOT ON SCENE !�a d AMENDED 'B I.Jwy snd I or Tow Due To GYesll YR CODE �!INr ADDRESS NO. IGHWAY orSTREEf NAME „CRY/fOWNSHIP,(Ctdaoro)- INTERSECTION ❑No. :© . _.. ATE OF CRASH_ TIME -x - a Yes ��QU Q PRNA b NUMBER MOTOR,. V�RS CODE J ❑Yes( Ip ANY SINGLE .(CIRCLE) ,:T_(CIRCLET; - -, COUNTY - ... -x - ' - - . .. ROPERTY M1 yEHIC OPERTY ❑ FT. / MI N' E-S W ::..; NIT&RUN ❑Yes p DAMAGED O o OU r�i encs VEHICLES INVLQ'. . _ � :. AT INTERSECTION WITH , E OF TNT SE ON OR ROADFEATUR .NAMF 11 AST PPST L.111 ro,.,�. .n e�.,.:n....:.:..n r.4- r1.._.,.c..ez<,c oi— ...�_ t 2 E J D 7 D J e j u 0 L OCCS.. IIII IIII IIII 1* o � ' w cou N.N !c�uRT TIME AM SUPERVISOR ID ❑Pm BEAT : 2 OFFICER I Iaar *IC vac Tr) Na7MAT SPILL OR C' M VEH ABOVE, COMPLETE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AREA ON BAC K OF FORM 1413772 �� � � UNIT NO. DIAGRAM ..................................... ... ... .. :. .. . e o ck CARRIER NAME SOURCE ADDRESS ❑ Side f W ❑ Papers :...... ......................:.....:.....:... .. .. ... .. • ❑ Driver .. ...; ...r... ..'.....-.....:...:.:.... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. STATE LP Log Book ... ..:.....: ..:. ..:. ..:.. ..:.. .:: CITY ❑INDM NORTH ID NUMBER -'BY ARROW;...... ... ........... or State No. State Name El None .. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? C1 Yes 0 No if Yes:4-Digits 1-Di it or Name ..... ......... .y..... ' . ❑ ❑ Unk Hazardous . : ! ot odeeahorom fel ncium from ...: ................. .. .. Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ .._....._.....,. ...:......:.....•.... .. y... .. .. .. .. .. .. ' Inspe ction form completed . ; Form Na .... ........... .....:.....:.....:.. .........;.....t......;' ...... ....;......;......:.....:.....:..... ........ HAZM AT Out of Se rvicaT YY LJ �LJ 1 MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ ................:............... .. :... .......................... : IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD :......:...... ..... .....:..... .... - _ .. _ .. TRAILER RAILER LENGTH(S) ft R i n ..'. ..7. .: .. '. :. T R WIDTHS) T VEHICLE LENGTH oTU- 0.96' 97-1 OY Over 10r Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NO OF AXLES :. .........:. ....:...........:........... _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. .. .. :. ..:. " Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: NARRATIVE(Refer to vehicle by Unlit No.) I ICI vILJ,- O✓ l/N) O,-3t- S'TATt_o S 14 g- ey!%A-n, I� R-I V .t- ply V� T�/�/� INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE ONTd j= 4 [� s e A-�.'� i7 1 v�� DY UN)i Dti►f- S r kT�pA+i COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0. V 9.8!«-� S 0M-D fJ f-,-o,J T o►= N��— 5o S1-(` '570 PP-90 APO CARRIER NAME SOURCE ADORLSS ❑ Side of truck (�AS ST�J �-� 11-� % a= IL,Vtr/- St Ot. Ric/�L [� VN I ❑ Papers El Driver CITY STATE LP ❑ Log Book i ST-AT-P-0 Stfp_ o a�.>J� Ta-«�� /���7 Eti i U)J/i Or A_ ID NUMBER TWF _ US DOT ICCMC 'T/(>r ,� I v 1.10 /'N TV!t-r�/�G L�1-i 10 �.pA rT Or ��- ate Na State Name ❑None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑ I WO 51 N � T�•A T / 1-1 V rx A- OY vt� , ,—' oJV CL n Yes:4-Di its 1-Di r or Name Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ •r,-PPcp f NL-7r O I, -��ti- (,J a (r/Nue_ A NQ T t_ ��/ !•-- Violation of HAZMAT regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ G r V f-t )i O Y__�a;- Inspection form completed? Y tE Fom Na HAZMAT 6 8 LJ 11pfc Out of Service? LI LJ - CS ❑ ❑ C1 Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ ❑ 57 TRAILER WIDTHS) TRAILER LENGTH(S)•If VEHICLE LENGTH LOCAL USE ONLY ass' 97-10T Over 10r Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NO OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: • U1 Color LRL, 2 oor U2 Towed by I to �i■ U1 owe oy to �/ INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO !� VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE P° LLIINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT sneet�ot�sneets DRAG PEDV �TRFD I TRFC I WEAT IDRVA VIS VEND rl COLL MANY PPA PPL 3 q q U1 U2 U1 U2 U1 U2 U1 U2 U1 U2 INVESTIGATING AGENCY E OF REPORT A No Injury/Drive Away AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO. * 1 4 1 3 7 7 2 " �IMENDED N SCENE NOT t L 3/'�00�— �E ❑B Injury and/or,T To Crash YR � O 0 ADDRESS N0. HIGHWAY or STREET NAME CITY/r SHIP(ChUe Om) INTERSECTION DATE OF CRASH TIME CODE vE7HT RELATED []Yes X0 O / L,O(P i :© ❑AM 1 f ri-d No 9-1 © RK– �13 PRIVATE mo day yr t M r pp (CIRCLE) (CIRCLE) COUNTY PROPERTY ❑Yes�7o ANY SINGLE NUMBER MOTOR LABS CODE 1 f�47 FT ( M I N E S W �^r VEHICLEJPROPERTY VEHICLES INVLD ❑ AT INTERSECTION WITH ��(NAME O �A� HR B RUN ❑Ye>No D GE OVER$500 P AME OF INTERSECTION OR ROAD FEATURE) �I! P(L�k"" es❑No C7`— NAME(LAST,FIRST,M.I.) NER ❑Pm ❑PEDAL ❑EGUES ❑NMv ❑NV DATE OF BIRTH MAKE MODEL YEAR CIRCLE NUMEIER(S)_. MONT Y bf i 5 D C Ui - DA- vt Uz DIN, EVNO (MOST) EVN (LOG) DAMAGED PROPERTY OWNER NAME DAMAGED PROPERTY CONTRIBUTORY POSTED 1 I CAUSE(S) SPEED 2 ❑ PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PR( LIMIT I IfHlllilllNllll�lflllilllllll 3 ❑ ARREST NAME SECTION CRATION NO. SECONDARY *P1201* 1 { ARREST NAME # SECTION CfTATION N0. DATE PoucE Flm erne NonFlm . AM S2 / /rt-' .� PM w. �S 2 ❑ OFFICER ID. SIGNATURE BEAT/DIST.. SUPERVISOR ID, GOURT DATE COURT T ME []AM rD 3 ❑ I /aar In ❑P M ip *IF YES TO HAZMAT SPILL OR C H ABOVE, COMPLETE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AREA ON BACK OF FORM 6647679 DIAGRAM COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT NO. ' CARRIER NAME SOURCE ,. ., ADDRESS ❑ Side Of truck ❑ Papers .... ........... 0 ❑ Driver .......... .....:...:....[....-...:... .. ... STATE ZIP [I CITY S Book INDICATE NORTH ID NUMBER JGVWR BY ARROW L� ti. _........_ . or US StaattNo. State Name ❑None jl A HAZARDOUS M TERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑No if Yes:4-Di its 1-Di it or Name _ ... ... ... Unk ^ D ^ Hazardous oat coat fuel from from truck? ll lank) ❑ f� Y N LO: � " .••� •��= Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? j� �qk Form Na - -•�• ••=• - -HAZM AT Ll LJ Out of Service? U LI MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ J . .... : .... IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ TRAILER WIDTH(S) TRAILER LENGTH(S)-It VEHICLE LEND (TOTAL)-n ...... . ................ 096' 97.102 Over 702' Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 Na OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) NARRATIVE(Refer t0 vehicle by Unit No.) CI IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: / I Lj D S 7-A—,1! 0 5�i� C j A� � � oLN�. �) V�-�y AN INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE SidFt��/, 13�c.AvS� Tt{� V�!-(1��� [ r� �-,��N� cF- rLti �TuP L�C� /',N� COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0. fE� (/✓� ST�tJ ���/.�-�Y (��!i �� • D�} lJ Q� CARRIER NAME SOURCE ADDRESS ❑ Side of truck V�' ; o S �A i�J? fl (�/AS ""_'� rN/�L( r1 G �3 oZa n! S i/>, ; ❑ Papers ❑ Dri Driver CITY STATE ZIP E] Log Book V /� C.i L 7 �-t'�t t tV �J i 1 / LJO ��l V��- F� t/1U ! ( Ql✓�^ {j ! P J 0 n ID NUMBER fJ� US DOT ICCMC i VO r r ST o QPy t) j A;-7I`:1 l'-) j O I- Wr- or State No. State Name ❑None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑ K!= 7—teL1-lP I L/ -i p F au (^JAS (//-���(_t_ Fl/�1� �j�t/�L (�� t� if Yes:4-DI fts 1-DI it or Name _ Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk w O ) YJ 1 (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) 1:1 El Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? Y ll�k Form I HAZMAT 6 8 IJ Out of Service? 6 -MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# I WIDE LOAD 1' ❑ 57 TRAILERWIDTH(S) TRAILERLENGTH(S)-ft I VEHICLE LENGTH LOCAL USE ONLY 0-96' 97.102' Over 1D2' (roTAL)•It Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NO.OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ 11 El Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: Co or `A` 2 0 or L.V t ✓'— U t ;gv:ed ay i to U2 Towed y/to INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO \ � n VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE ALLINO1S TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Street f of Sheets DRAC PEDV TRPD TRFC WEAT DRVA � 'AS VEHD � LGHTi COLL MANY I � PRA PPL I IIII II III II III II III II III II III I)III II III I II Il u, Uz I U, I Uz u, Uz u, Uz ` u�� )uz �� * 6 6 4 7 6 7 9 I TRFw INVESTIGATING AGENCY E OF REPORT A No Injury/Drive Away AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO. ON SCENE NOTO,o�� I_S� !� AMENDED �E ❑Et Injury and/or T To Crash FI a S I l ADDRESS NO. HIGHWAY or STREET NAME C SHIP(CCds One) INTERSECTION DATE OF CRASH TIME CODE ��RELATED ❑YeS No 0�/"] 7 Q AM , --ti 1) �~I 11-L i��j_ Q/�00� mo l Play yr I •J pM ' PRNATE Yes No ANY SINGLE NUMBER MOTOR LABS CODE (GRCIE) (CIRC COUNTY PROPERTY ❑ 1 �..�— VEHICLE/PROPERTY VEHICLESINVLD �b FT M 1 N E S p W E 1��9 t� (�� DAMAGED VE $500 ❑ AT INTERSECTION WITH NAME OF INTERSECTION OR ROAD FEATUR t G HR&RUN ❑ye No ❑Y� U LftF' NAME(LAST.FIRST,M.I.) DRIVER ❑PED ❑PEDAL ❑EQUES ❑NMV ❑NCV JDATE OF BIRTH• MAKE MODEL YEAR CIRCLE NUMBER(S) Y . • i U AM ADO H p I E ONLY U, NM Uz�- / / DIR. uz I EVNO MO ST) (EVN T) (LOC DAMAGED PROPERTY OWNER NAME DAMAGED PROPERTY CONTRIBUTORY 1 CAUSE(S) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PRIMARY 2 ❑ Q i 3 1:1 ARREST NAME SECTION CITATION NO. SECONDARY *1'1-1 2 Q 1 .0 r 1I SECTION CITATION NO. oA�1 Q �n nrnE NonFiEO ❑PM 1 I ' ARREST NAME uf9 PPt/ D 2 ❑ OFFICER ID. SIGNATURE BEAT/DIST. SUPERVISOR ID. COURT DATE COURT TIME El AM n s ❑ sl - *IF YES TO HAZMAT SPILL OR OOM VEH ABOVE, COMPLETE COMMkRtIAL VEHICLE AREA ON BACK OF FORM 6285015 DIAGRAM COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT NO. CARRIER NAME SOURCE ADDRESS ❑ Side of truck l�C ❑ Papers Driver CRY STATE 2tP ❑ Log Book INDICATE NORTH BY ARROW ID NUMBER US DOT ICCMC or State No. State Name ❑None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑No if Yes:4-Digits 1-Di it or Name Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? m No HAZMAT LI LJk Out of Service? LJ LJ MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# WID LOAD Li C) TRAILER WIDTH(S) TRAILER LENGTHS)-It VFHIOLE LENGTH . (TOTAL)-it "'-"' "' 0.96' 97-102• Over 102• Trailer.1 ❑ ❑ El Trailer 1 Na OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) NARRATIVE(Refer to vehicle by Unit No.) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: S ' T�-A�C-mob �-T AT —ZPO— DL ) 1T INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO . ' } VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0. (,.,f N rj'r �� —•fi-D c4-�,p ` .7p.L v,� , `� r CARRIER NAME SOURCE It 7" 4 W ( -� ADDRESS ❑ Side Of truck ❑ Papers J 4T rJ t C ' "` utT -LAtn ❑ Driver CITY STATE ZIP ❑ Log Book ID NUMBER JGVWR US DOT ICCMC r.)-oq—1 L) gqqsroz -r"kze,-' 1,l a te- ) -5T)W L or State No. State Name ❑None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? ❑Yes ❑ ),j Z>,I; tµQ if Yes:4-Di its 1-Di it or Name Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk ( (do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) ❑ ❑ Violation of HAZMAT regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? YY HAZMAT Out of Service? u _ -MCS El ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# WIDE LOAD ❑ ❑ 57 TRAILER WIDTH(S) TRAILER LENGTH(S)-ft VEHICLE LENGTH (TOTAL)•it LOCAL USE ONLY 0•96' 97-102' Over t02• Trailer t ❑ ❑ ❑ I Trailer 1 NO.OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: 1 ole ooi 1 awe byltO 2 Towed by to INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE ILLINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Sheet Lot I sheets r4 . PEDV lT1FD TRFC V/EAT [VA ( VIS VEH0 TA—y OLL MAW PPA PPL i i U2 �, U2 �, !U2 U, 1Z' X X TYPE O F REPORT AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO.IN1 ESTGATING AGENCY A No Injury/Drive ❑ON SCENE 6 a 5 5 NOT ON SCENE 0S �AMENpm ❑B Injury and!w Trash lw��/ _ ADDRESS NO. HAY or STREET NAME� C OWNSHIP(C4de One) INTERSECTION DATE OF CRASH E AM J� RELATED ❑Yes No 3 �/da V, r$ ,) ti� 0 v— mo day yr {!❑PM U1 PRNATE ❑Yesf]No ANY SINGLE NUMBER MOTOR LARS CODE (CIRCLE) (cIR COUNTY PROPERTY l j� VEHICLE/PROPERTY VEHICLES INV1D f , I FT ! hAI N E S W pQ � DAMAGED OVER ITY ry u .�l 2 j r--- -- HR&RUN Dye o Yes❑No (� t 4P lJ ii AT INTERSECTION WITH (NAMEOF INTERSECT]ONOR ROAD FEATURE) �t Y N NO LANES NAME BLAST,FIRST,M.I.) DRlv�a PED PEDAL EOUES NMV ❑NCV DATE OF BIRTH _MAKE MODE. _ YEAR CIRCLE NUMBER(S) y n U J T X C H SP E NT SEA D B PA NG R &WITNE ONLY NA ADD U1 U2 DIRP j I I Uz (EVNO) OS EVN (LOG) DAMAGED PROPERTY OWNER NAME DAMAGED PROPERTY CONTRIBUTORY _ CAUSE(S) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PRIMARY _ F 2 ❑ d 3 ❑ ARREST NAME SECTION CITATION NO. SECONDARY *P1201* �Ly— A w � SECTION CITATION NO. D oUC$$IfF�FO TIME N_gnrylEO : O PM �- 1 ❑ i ARREST NAME �J?,��if 1 t z BEAT/DIST. SUPERVIS ID. COURT DATE__�---- COURT T ME ❑AM 2 ❑ OFFICER lo. TuRE ^ j `wry lYr ❑PM 3 ❑ *IF YES TO HAZMAT SPILL OR COM ABOVE, COMPLETE COMM CIA VEHICLE AREA ON BACK OF FORM COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNIT N0.6647242 DIAGRAM CARRIER NAME SOURCE ❑ Side of truck ADDRESS ❑ Papers ❑ Driver CITY STATE ZIP ❑ Log Book INDICATE NORTH BY ARROW ID NUMBER US DOT ICCMC or State No. Stale Name ❑None HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? C3 Yes ❑No iv� TtJ�t,tJi C-S - Hazardous I hid fuel ) e Y N Unk if Yes:4-Di its 1-Di it or Nam H dous cargo released from truck? ........ ....... from vehicle ? ❑ ❑ ❑ (do not count fuel a ue tank ❑ Violation of HAZMAT rags contribute to crash ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS rags.contribute to brash? 5.........._. _ .. .... _ ... Inspection ? .. frorrn Na - Inspe form complete YY Pik Y HAZMAT u LJ Out ofService7 Ll ;f MCS ❑ ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ t ..... . IDOT PERMIT# ivi,npoAn D TRAILERWIDTH(S) TRAILERLENGTH(S)-ft VEHICLELEND (ToTAL)•n 0.96' 97-102' Over 102' i Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 NQ OF AXLES Trailer 2 El El [I Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/Cl NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: NARRAT (Rater to vehP'j,b Unit No.) _ -rf f•r �elp tl3 O� Zr�� fr/�+e r x�yy1,4 r6 . INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO "" NN VVV"`" VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE_ ¢e Q r ��sr �r 100Q1 ! LOA COMMER❑ALVEHICLE UNIT NO. ,/J CARRIER NAME SOURCE L ',j r i tL l�C v- r? / LPA✓t o/,- (/(N J r 7— ❑ Side of truck 0p�//''��)) / +/ (�JJ1r ADDRESS ❑ Papers 1-1 V P/ 0r L/,j f T f 7/i re� -1 r • 'e 4 1 t STATE ZIP ❑ Driver Cm ❑ Log Book ID NUMBER 1 US DOT ICCMC o j r L, J e�� C 1-r{ or State No. State Name 1:1 Non •1— HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PLACARDED? [I Yes if Yes:4-Digits 1-Di it or Name Hazardous cargo released from truck? Y N Unk E] El(do not count fuel from vehicle fuel tank) Violation of HAZMAT rags.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Violation of MCS regs.contribute to crash? ❑ ❑ ❑ Inspection form completed? Y lIn(c N HAZMAT 6 8 Ll Out of Service? � ❑ -MCS ❑ ❑ Out of Service? ❑ ❑ IDOT PERMIT# I WIDE LOAD ❑ ❑ 57 TRAILERWIDTH(S) TRAILERLENGTH(S)-It VEHICLE LENGTH (ro )-h 0.96' 97-102' Over 102' _XAL USE ONLY Trailer Trailer 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 1 Na OF AXLES Trailer 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Trailer 2 (Circle) ❑IN CITY OF/❑NEAREST CITY: Miles N E S W of: 1LV 2 Color /-e INSERT APPLICABLE NUMBERS FROM CHOICES ON BACK OF TEMPLATE TWO 2'fowed by rto N ya VEHICLE CONFIGURATION CARGO BODY TYPE LOAD TYPE LINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Sheet of—L Sheets TRFD TRFC WEAT JIMA "5 Ivev � LL PPS I llll it lii 11 111 11 111 11 111 it 111 11 111 11 111 l 11 Ui UZ U1 U2 U1 UZ U, lu � �1 INVESTIGATING AGENCY- CNOTONSCE E OF REPORT AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO. * 6 6 4 7 2 4 2 TAFW N SCENE lo;A No k�Jury/Ddve Away..- / NE lA� �T��" :�.� AMENDED ❑B 4q and/or Tow Due To Crash ' s ADDRESS NO HIO AY or STREET NAME WNSHIP(cads oral VEHT TEO D" ❑Y-I�o /J/CRASH/Q .I^` ❑AM (�TIME LARS CODE 'n! PRNATE U, '/ m WO(CIRCLE)" r _fyp COUNTY PROPERTY pYes;No ANY SINGLE_ - NUMBER MOTOR LARS CODE FT_ I ,N"V-S W ��IWC (,Jr" - f p :D HHIICGLE/PROPERTY YEHIC.ES MMD �AT.INTERSECTION WITH ..! i HRBRUN__ ❑Y. No- D� � 7ZLI;JTtok) U: �. E OF INITJISECTION OR ROAD.FEATUR -X"R,— JA J F.NI IMRPRISl NO LANES Y N. 0 s s 0 T n c c 1 PASSENGERS 3 E E U, DIRP, U;3 NO OS EVN T) DAMAGED PROPERTY OWNER NAME;" ._ DAMAGED PROPERTY B CONTRIS E SJO_Y . PROPEATYOVNVERADDRESS CITY STATE 21P PRIMARY I .2," -❑ `.". _ 3 ❑ ARREST NAME SECTION CITATION NO. SECONDARY *P1201* ARREST NAME SECTION ORATION NO. m /N n/D S nME Eo: ❑AM O 2 ❑ OFFl D. a �PM ' -.. ., _ DI$T. D. COURT DATE fiTn BEAT/ S SO I co COU ,,,E p� Ir a PM pm hl-1 /1' *IF YES TO HAZMAT SPILL OR COM VEH ABOVE, COMPLETE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AREA ON BACK OF FORM OF 0Ak49 cr °o ° July 26, 2006 UN" \\ Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Village of Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Website www.onk-brook.org SUBJECT: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street—Map Amendment, Text Amendment, Administration and Special Uses 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals: Community Development Background 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 At its meeting on July 17, 2006, the Plan Commission completed its review of several petitions from TJ Design Strategies, authorized representative of the Engineering Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, Department the owner of the property at 2407 22nd Street seeking approval of a map 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 amendment, text amendment, and two special uses in order to construct a new stand alone Starbucks. The existing one-story building on the property will be Fire Department demolished to accommodate the proposed 1925 square foot Starbucks building, 630.990.3040 Which will also include a drive-in facility (east side of building) and an outdoor FAX 630.990.2392 dining area (north side of building). Each of these requests is summarized in the Police Department following: 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 Map Amendment—the applicant is seeking a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-3. Public Works Department Text Amendment — the applicant is seeking a text amendment to Section 13-7C-2 630.990.3044 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants as a FAX 630.472.0223 special use. Oak Brook Public Library Special Uses — the applicant is seeking two special uses. One special use is necessary to construct a drive-in facility along the east side of the building for 600 Oak Brook Road patrons wishing to make purchases from their vehicle. The other special use will Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 permit the construction of an outdoor dining area to be located on the north side of 630.990.2222 the building. FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core With regards to the drive-in facility, the petitioner is proposing a single-lane that is designed to accommodate the stacking of approximately nine vehicles. One Bath&Tennis Club menu/order pedestal and one customer window is also proposed. 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 With regards to the outdoor dining area, the petitioner is proposing an outdoor FAX 630.990.1002 dining/seating area for approximately 24 patrons. Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 � qi July 26, 2006 President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board RE: Starbucks Coffee—2407 22'd Street Page 2 Public Comment One letter was received from the owner of an adjacent office building who objected to the proposed redevelopment of the property based on safety concerns for cars turning into and exiting Tower Drive. Discussion/Recommendation As part of the Plan Commission's review on these requests, Staff was directed to obtain the input from both the Oak Brook Fire Department and Department of Public Works to determine if the redevelopment of the property at 2407 22°a Street impacted the delivery of municipal services. Written comments were provided by the Fire Chief and Public Works Director (see case file). In addition, the Commission wanted the input from the consultant team of Houseal Lavigne (Commercial Revitalization Consultant). Houseal Lavigne reviewed the request with Staff and indicated that it was not in conflict with the commercial revitalization planning program. With regards to the traffic safety issue raised by the adjoining property owner, the Plan Commission requested that the Police Chief attend the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to answer any questions that the ZBA may have on the traffic safety issue. Map Amendment — by a vote of 4 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-3 finding that the applicant has addressed the required factors on pages C and C.3 of the case file. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission raised the traffic safety issue and requests that: 1. The Police Chief attend the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to discuss accident data for the intersection of Tower Road and 22°a Street 2. Historical accident data shall be generated for this location and provided to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Text Amendment — by a vote of 4 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the requested text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to add "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" to the special uses in the B-3 District finding that the applicant has addressed the required factors on page E of the case file. Special Uses—by a vote of 4 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the requested special use for outdoor dining and special use for a drive-thru facility finding that the applicant has addressed the required standards on pages F and I of the case file subject to the following conditions: Q�gk. July 26, 2006 President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board RE: Starbucks Coffee—2407 22nd Street Page 2 1. Development of the property shall be in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted; and 2. Discussion on the appropriateness for additional safety measures shall be considered between the parking lot and proposed outdoor dining area. Very truly yours, NOTE: Chairwoman Payovich has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this letter pending her signature. The signed original will be placed in the official file upon receipt. Barbara"Lexi"Payovich Chairwoman Plan Commission i Af-4 Ayes: 4 — Members Iyer, Lalmalani, Tropinski and Chairwoman Payovich Absent: 3 — Members Adrian, Saiyed, and Wolin Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS A, STARBUCKS COFFEE — 2407 22ND STREET — MAP AMENDMENT — TO i 0722 d St. - REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM ORA-1 TO B-3, TEXT AMENDMENT — MAP and TEXT SECTION 13-7C.2 SPECIAL USES TO ADD THE TEXT "OUTDOOR AW T - DINING AREAS ADJACENT TO RESTAURANTS", SPECIAL USE — TO OUTDOOR ALLOW AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA ADJACENT TO A DINING AND DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT SPECIAL USE—TO ALLOW A DRIVE-IN FACILITY. FACILITY Ted Johnson, President of Design Strategies, 2311 22nd Street, Oak Brook is the authorized representative of Starbucks said that at the last meeting they provided for the record, the findings of fact regarding the map and text amendments, and the special use requests. The request for the map amendment is to rezone the property from ORA-1 to B-3. They are seeking a text amendment to allow outdoor dining areas in the B-3 District and two special uses. One is to allow outdoor dining areas adjacent to the restaurant and the second is to allow a drive-thru facility. At the last meeting, the Plan Commission requested further information on the drive-thru as well as the outdoor dining area. They provided information (in the case file) regarding drive-thru lane usage. They looked at three different mature locations in operation and provided both weekday and weekend information on the a.m. and evening peak. The a.m. peak is for a range between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. The evening is from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The highest weekday usage of the drive- thru lane was 65 vehicles from 8-9 a.m. At the last meeting, they testified that the target time for processing at the drive-in window was 45 seconds. Based on that they felt they have enough stacking spaces. The average Starbucks has stacking for 6 vehicles and they are proposing 9 at this location. The Plan Commission expressed concerns regarding the vehicles potentially jumping the curb and going into the outdoor dining area. They provided a site plan as well as a detail of how they intend to secure that area. They will use bollards that also contain a light source and will be integrated into the railing around the outdoor seating area. The bollards will be spaced 6 feet apart and will be placed on all three sides of the outdoor dining area. He noted that the Director of Community Development Kallien had provided a memo in the case file regarding questions to the Fire Chief and Public Works Director and reviewed each at the request of Chairwoman Payovich. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 2 of 16 July 17, 2006 At 90OZ `L I Xinf 91 J° £ 32Vd salnu!W uotssiuzuro0 uVId mjnS3-d ,XOOUg?ISO JO aDV IIA •pow2v uosugo f jw •uotleuilsap u urril aagluz u3se atii ui ogjvji aril zoI asn orismnlioddo ue Io ajouz suns asn sitil zatilatinn pauotlsanb tioino��d ueuroA r N -anu(I JWAO L Io apis Isann aul uo pairooi jogg2i3u reio-iaurruoo aril uroij.rallai aril ur palnoipur su tuaigord ogluzl aril aas lou soop ati pue iowls P„ZZ II£Z lu alts aril oI Ixau pa1BOoi si ao9lo sits 178T Ares OH zopizroo aril of pappv ;)q pinonn Iutii saioirian iL,uoilippu iou si II -�ionq o2 put, `a011oo "3ql 132 `ui auroo Catil `,(nnnpeoJ aril uo xpuaziv are Izril sreo aril s3VI Xiiuoiseq `sjongrulS -funnpUoi aril Ohio Iuatuanour iuuotltpp-e pun oglnri sppe goninn `uoil misap Iutil of aidoad s2uuq IEtil asn aoglo aril st, dons joluaauo2 ogl-eil r lou si asn Io 3cUl sail iutil papuodsa.r uosutio f 'JW •Itii3ii oglutl ou si a.Iagl asn-eoaq sso.ro noS uatinn XIjuinoiwd `ua.re Inul ui uoilsafuoo Io Ioi v si araril luul Ares aH •tilnap oglnzl Ouo puu sanssi ogjuji 2uipxe23z Olis aril Io Isann aril of p31Uool Iuaptsoj iriorOurtuoo u Xq posrea ujaouoo suns aaatil lugl pins tuieilOuiit'I zagtu3w •Isua aril of Xpodord aril of ssaoou-ssozo aminl v.ro3 apinoid pinonn�Vodojd aril 3o uoiliod uioglnos Rio-eq aril Ivtil paluaswdw s)iongrelS `OuiWw Isei aril TV •luepodim suns kpodoid arilIo pu0 tilnos atp 2uoiu ssaoov-ssozo pasodo.id aril Iurii ivatutuoo pip Iuelinsuoo oul •zopinoo 13a4S PUZZ pazriuIinar pue padoianapaa Ll Jo iV02 ilMno aril Blinn IOiUuoo ui aq Iou pinonn iusodoid aril Irtil pareadd-e it poluoipui Iuelinsuoo Oul •iroIIO iuourdoi3n3p3J sNongzuiS aril of ijurlel3i sluaururoo Ioj p331su pur polls 2umueid uoilUztiellnaJ IUIOJaunzroo slt aoj pautrelaz uaaq suq 1Pu1 luelinsuoo MOUIPA aril oI sunn uotlsanb iuug atil •,,ituml sui Io asn aril roI f4.rado rd aril urela.z puu slongaulS of alis atil astai of satisim nunmo Xii3dozd aril •Oivs -ioj Iou st alis aril Ittil si Irril oI asuodsai saiong Is *j3 mol ioltm aril of luaonfpv si Ii sash u paou aril Ii `s3S s um asuodsaz aril pug zopuuoo IaazlS P„ZZ atil ui spaau 3SViols JOlenn sAU111A Otil puedxa of firuni.roddo XuL pazallo alis aql3i papist,pun joloazi(I sNioM oiignd aul of sum uotlsanb pzigl aril •Oig mo aril Io 9Z 32-ed uo paureluoo si asuodsw alaidtuoo aril puu Iou pinonn Ii Mil sum asuodsaa aril pun aanmol Jolunn jiuilsixa aril uo loudun anrltloau u aneti pinonn Xlradoid aril Io luaurdoianap 3gjJ! pajsU pue J0103JrQ sNJorn oiignd aril oI sum uotlsanb puooas aril •aig ospo aril Io SZ 32nd uo si asuodsai alaiduroo aril put, lou suns It Iuril papuodsaz 3aigD air3 aril put uotluls wg Mau n Io uoiiorulsuoo aril jol aiqulms aq pinonn sits posodozd atillt pxisu uotlsanb Is.r9 atil •rioua paziauuR=s uosugo f -jW Member Wolin said that he agrees to a certain extent that the bulk of the traffic that comes to Starbucks would be traffic that is going down the road anyhow. Some people really love their Starbucks coffee and he is concerned with people going westbound that try to go in, and then try to get back out to go westbound. A median strip does not exist that the cars could go into for a protected area. Immediately north of Tower is a Home Depot where cars are exiting at the same location. He believes it is a dangerous intersection and it behooves the Village along with the State to figure out what can be done in the way of traffic lights along the whole section of road along 22nd Street. He asked what could be done to improve the safety at that location. Mr. Johnson said that there may be a concern, but if anyone would be heading westbound and they find the maneuver at this location too difficult there is another Starbucks location 2 miles west. People find the easiest Starbucks to get your coffee of your way from the house to the office. They have reviewed initial IDOT plans for 22nd Street that shows a proposed light at the intersection at Tower Drive. Village Engineer Durfey responded that the IDOT report talks about traffic signal modernization and it lists the 4 signalized intersections along 22nd Street and that signals are not warranted at any other location. It refers to vacant property on Tower Drive and at such time the vacant property would be redeveloped traffic signal warrants would be re-evaluated based upon new traffic counts. When the report was done in 2002, a signal was not warranted at Tower Drive. Member Wolin asked if it were an automatic when traffic gets to a certain level. Village Engineer Durfey said that it must meet certain warrants. Several warrants are based upon accidents, some upon delay, and some upon traffic. You should not put a traffic signal in unless it meets one or more of the warrants within state guidelines before a signal is installed. Member Wolin stated that he did not attend the last meeting, but viewed the entire tape of the meeting. He believes the request meets all of the requirements, except that he has concerns regarding the safety issue. The property owner is entitled to develop the property with the highest and best use possible. With increased traffic, there will be a greater exposure for accidents, but where do you draw the line. He would motion to approve the request, however noting the concern of the Plan Commission about the safety along with a recommendation that the police or fire department provide some comments to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Member Tropinski suggested the possibility of restricting the exit to allow right turns only from Tower Drive onto 22nd Street. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 16 July 17, 2006 Member Wolin said that might be an option that Starbucks and the building across the street would be agreeable to the signage. He said that the tenants of the building across the street may not find the right out only unacceptable Mr. Johnson said that the Police Chief and Fire Chief might want to get involved regarding that type of restriction there should be on the land uses. Chairwoman Payovich said that it seems appropriate to have the Police Chief attend the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to answer questions. No one in the audience spoke in support of or in opposition to the request. Man Amendment Motion by Member Wolin, seconded by Member Lalmalani, that the applicant has addressed the required factors on pages C to C.2 of the case file and to recommend the request for a map amendment to rezone the subject property at 2407 22°a Street from ORA-1 to B-3. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission has raised concerns regarding traffic safety at this location and request the following: 1. They request that the Police Chief be present at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to discuss the prior safety history of this intersection, along with any concerns that he may have about safety at this intersection and any recommendations that he may have to minimize safety issues. 2. Data to be provided showing the number of accidents at that location. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 —Members Lalmalani, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Absent: 3 — Members Adrian, Iyer, and Saiyed Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried. Text Amendment Motion by Member Wolin, seconded by Member Lalmalani, that the applicant has addressed the factors on page E of the case file, and to recommend approval of the requested text amendment to Section 13-7C.2, of the Zoning Ordinance to add "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a Special Use in the B-3 District. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 — Members Lalmalani, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Absent: 3 — Members Adrian, Iyer, and Saiyed Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried. Special Uses Motion by Member Wolin, seconded by Member Lalmalani, that the applicant has addressed the standards on pages G and I of the case file, to recommend approval of the requested special use for an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant; and VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 5 of 16 July 17, 2006 r the special use for a drive-thru facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of the property in substantial conformance with the plans submitted. 2. Discussion on the appropriateness for additional safety measures to be considered between the parking lot and the proposed outdoor dining area. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 — Members Lalmalani, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Absent: 3 — Members Adrian, Iyer, and Saiyed Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried. �OL of 04,t 0 a x 0 A O �! G � 2 9cFC00NT,� ,���� Date: July 12, 2006 Village of To: Plan Commission Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Subj ect: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street—Follow-up www.oak-brook.org Administration At the June 19, 2006 meeting, the Plan Commission initiated its review and 630.990.3000 deliberations on several requests (map amendment, text amendment, and special uses) FAX 630.990.0876 from the Starbuck's Coffee Company as part of their proposal to construct a stand Community alone retail outlet at 2407 22nd Street (southeast corner of Tower Road and 22nd Development Street). 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 As part of the discussion on these requests, the Commission raised a number of Engineering questions that needed to be addressed prior to rendering a final decision. A summary Department of the questions and the Staff response is listed in the following: 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 Question 1 —Does this site have any future use as a potential location for a Village of Fire Department Oak Brook Fire Station? 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 Staff Response — No. Please see the June 30, 2006 memorandum from Fire Police Department Chief Jim Bodony. 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 Question 2 - Does the proposed redevelopment as a Starbuck's have any impact on the existing Village water storage facility located on Tower Road? Public Works Department 630.990.3044 Staff Response — No. Please see the July 5, 2006 memorandum from Public FAX 630.472.0223 Works Director Mike Meranda. Oak Brook Question 3 —Does this site offer any opportunity to expand the Village's water storage Public Library needs in the 22nd Street Corridor? 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Staff Response — Yes. Please see the July 5, 2006 memorandum from Public 630.990.2222 Works Director Mike Meranda. FAX 630.990.4509 Oak Brook Sports Core Question 4 — Since the Village of Oak Brook has retained the consultant firm of Houseal Lavigne for its commercial revitalization planning effort, what comments Bath&Tennis Club does the consultant have on the proposed Starbuck's redevelopment effort? 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 Staff Response—I briefly discussed the request with Devin Lavigne, one of the 630.990.3020 principals with the firm of Houseal Lavigne. He indicated that it appeared that FAX 630.990.1002 the proposal would not be in conflict with the overall goal of a redeveloped Golf Club and revitalized 22nd Street corridor. He did comment that the proposed cross- 2606 York Road access along the south end of the property was important. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 a7 July 12, 2006 Plan Commission RE: Starbuck's -Follow-up Page 2 Question 5 —Is the proposed stacking lane planned for 9 cars sufficiently sized? Applicant Response—Please see the attached matrix. Question 6 — The applicant needs to provide additional details on the type of materials that will be used to protect patrons in the outdoor seating area from an errant vehicle. Applicant Response—Please see the attached information. Please consider this additional information in your deliberations on this request. Attachments • �P6� O F OAx d� • a �c a o A \� CF 00 1 `\ VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: 7/5/06 MEMO TO: Robert Kallien, Community Development Director FROM: Michael J. Meranda, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Proposed Starbucks— SE Corner 22nd Street/Tower Dr. In regards to your memorandum dated June 29, 2006 regarding the above referenced subject, I offer the following: Question No. 1. With redevelopment of the property directly north of the Village's Tower Drive elevated water storage tank, the only issue I can foresee would be when the tank requires re- painting (this is needed every 10-12 years or so). Presently, there are no buildings with large traffic flows or parked cars within the fall-zone where paint overspray can easily land. Nevertheless, we use a dry fall paint system, but inevitably, complaints are registered from affected motorists/patrons. This can affect the cost of painting as the contractor takes the potential for claims into account when costing out the work; the closer the buildings/cars, the more claim potential, the higher the costs. Question No. 2. There already has been discussion at the Village Board level regarding the possibility of needed increased elevated water storage. This particular site, being adjacent to the existing elevated tank and certainly large enough to accommodate a larger tank (the existing tank footprint cannot be reutilized for a larger tank due to the nearby high-voltage power lines) would be ideal for the following reasons: The system's existing overflow elevation would be able to be maintained, operational changeover to the tank would be straightforward, and aesthetically, a better location would be hard, if not impossible, to find. uOAK OOK FIRE DEPA RTONT 3 - MEMORANDUM Date: June 30, 2006 To: Robert Kallien, Community Development From: Jim Bodony, Fire Chief Subject: Proposed Starbucks—Southwest Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive have reviewed your request on the suitability of the subject property for use as a Fire Station. I submit the following observations. 1. As a replacement site for our current station located at 22nd and Enterprise Drive, the site is not suited for our use. It is too small to for a facility to replace our current station. Even if we built a two story station, we still need a minimum of five drive through bays to house our fleet. The current station #2, constructed in 1972, is currently undersized for our needs. 2. As a replacement site for our station located at 22nd and Enterprise Drive, the site is also not suited for our use due to location. Over 37% of our calls for service come from an area between York Road and Route 83, essentially our high density office and retail occupancies. The current Station #2 is ideally located to serve this area. In addition, the response times from the proposed site on Tower Drive to our north west subdivisions would be excessive and would compromise our current ability to deliver prompt emergency medical care and fire protection. 3. As an additional site, the lot and location would be adequate but not optimum for a small station, housing perhaps a pumper and an ambulance. This location would help us deliver better service to the west and southwest areas of the Village, that currently require longer than acceptable response times. The site would require a fully signalized intersection for emergency response. A preferred location for a third station, however, would be more in the area of 31st Street and Meyers Road, to reduce our response times to the residential areas of Midwest Club, Heritage Oaks, Saddle Brook and Saddle Brook Chase. • tiP4�OF Oq,1.69 • e � G � co VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: June 29, 2006 TO: Jim Bodony,Fire Chief Mike Meranda,Public Works Director FROM: Robert Kallien, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Proposed Starbucks—Southeast Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive At the June 19, 2006 Plan Commission meeting, as part of the discussion on the request from Starbuck's Coffee Company, to locate a retail outlet at the .77 acre site now occupied by Alpha Graphics at 2451 22nd Street, questions were raised relative to the Village water tower located to the south and the suitability of the property for a Fire Station. As such,please respond(details are important)to the following questions: 1. DPW Would redevelopment of the property as a Starbuck's have a negative impact on the existing water tower? 2. DPW If additional water storage capacity is needed by the Village, does this site provide an opportunity to accommodate that storage? 3. Fire Is this site suitable for the construction of a new Fire Station? Since this matter will be discussed again at the July 17, 2006 Plan Commission meeting, I need your written comments no later than Thursday July 13, 2006 to ensure that the information can be included in the Commission packets. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter,please contact me. cc: Rick Boehm,Village Manager rlk VOB—Interoffice—Internal Communication 1 v PROJECT Design WFB-8 FIXTURE TYPE i CATALOG NUMBER DISTRIBUTIONS TYPE V Symmetrical(Vert.lamp) Ordering Example WFB-8-V-HPS-70-BK-120-33.5-FD MH=Std.Metal Hapde MHP=Pulse SW DESIGN DISTRIBUTION HPS MH/MHP LAMP WFB-8 V 35150 35/50 ED-17 V 70 70 ED-17 V 100 100 ED-17 *Available only in Pulse Start 35,50,70,100 MHP=Pulse Start REQUIRED CHOICES FINISH VOLTAGES HEIGHT BK Black 120 33.5 BW White 208 DB Bronze 240 SL Silver 277 FG Gray 347 CC Custom Specify Color SB Sand Blast OPTIONAL CHOICES ELECTRICAL OPTIONS FD Single Fusing 120V/277V FDFD Double Fusing 208V/240V FDC Single Fusing 347V }- A Cast 356 marine grade aluminum\ .135 thick steel tube- hot dipped galvanized C inside and out (3)3/8"rods B secure top and base Cast 356 marine grade aluminum base TUBE CONSTRUCTION D m DIMENSIONS WEIGHT A 10.00"Dia.(254 mm) 45.5 lbs. (20.6 kgs) B 8.00" (203 mm) C 33.50"Ht. (850.9 mm) BOLT CIRCLE ad2. D 5.50" (139.70 mm) SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING Each WFB bollard is constructed of 356 aluminum alloy castings.The head cap is mounted to the window housing.This cap is removable for servicing the lamp.The body tube section is manufactured from.135 thick steel wall tubing which is hot dipped gal- vanized(ASTM A-123)inside and out.All external threaded hardware shall be stainless steel and shall be of tamper proof design requiring a special tool for disassembly.The fixture is C-UL&UL listed"suitable for wet locations". LENS The flat polycarbonate lens is sealed to the window housing.Lens is fully gasketed with weatherproof, durable silicone foam gasketing material. I MOUNTING Mounting shall use a cast aluminum base which is secured by three(3)5/8"x 12"embedded anchor bolts. The bollard uses(3)3/8"internal rods which extend from the top ring down to the base casting. This system ensures a secure vandal resistant mounting. BALLAST All ballasts are CWA or HX-HPF type with power factor of 90%.Ballasts are rated for-20°F or-40°F operation. All ballasts are readily accessible,removable and insulated. FINISH Polyester powder coat,electrostatically applied,which is preceded by a five step pre-treatment process including an - iron phosphate priming stage for superior coating adhesion.This process meets or exceeds all ASTM testing requirements, including those for 1000-hour salt spray endurance testing. There is no substitute for A Division of JJI Lighting Group Inc. 11500 MELROSE AVE. FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 - Phone (847) 451-0040 - FAX (847) 451-6768 e-mail: quality @mcs.com - www.qualitylighting.com (52200) Specifications subject to change without notice.@2000 Quality Lighting DRIVE-THRU LANE TRAFFIC AVERAGES MATURE LOCATIONS I WEEK DAY AVERAGES WEEKEND AVERAGES Naperville Lake Zurich Deerfield TOTAL Naperville Lake Zurich Deerfield TOTAL 6 -7 AM 51 42 27 40 17 19 12 16 7 - 8 AM 64 51 51 55 39 42 36 39 8 - 9 AM 74 62 59 65 57 51 45 51 9 - 10 AM 66 58 54 59 63 58 44 55 3 -4 PM 45 40 38 41 50 46 37 44 4 -5 PM 42 35 35 38 42 49 33 41 5 -6 PM 22 27 18 23 29 23 15 22 6 -7 PM 23 13 13 1 17 26 19 1 9 18 -SENT -BY: KIANOOSH JAFARI MD, 6300000154; JUL-136 7:18AM; PAGE 1/1 Jul 12 2006 3:26PM HP &RJET 3330 PAVE V/2 JUL-12-08 8;25AU; SENT BY: TAN009H JAFARI MD; BROOK ical & .......... S-u—rgTc-q1 July 10.7u(% Xullicq,jr,ALCP Difecim or C49mimily mvelovintm v1LLA01"'OF()AX RROOK 1200 Onk Brook R4W Oak 3rook,IL 60523-2253 Per pr "Xi sturbue"Cuff" 2407 We$%V4 Street Oak j3molc,IL 60523 Dear MT. LTg j locittod at 2425 West Ficimic be adviled*UI OFA Brook Mcdilzu)& , " j; jMMCdigtCjy to thr 2214 Stroe,Ook Bruok, IL,which is ,WeSt of at*VC PrOposed pimicat, or()4%k Brook Modlcfd &Surgical Ca"re I oh ject ut such development fbr the following reasons: Lk 1) IncleiLwd traffic From 22"4 Shoat,W T W"With OW"hood no txoLfflo light 1W e Ibc irarric difr1cull vild daII&CL'OUS to Out patients and mft I witness the tXomplcxjty of getting in&nd Out of our building Curmily,and with sed project,thi"will*ffcct Public significant ixicreased tmfylc ft"n'PTOPO SaIdomr,i noludins a Safety. I personally 11AVII boon'I W►lasss 10 many fatal twctdent as ow Intcr3cW0A, will gleek yiegativaiy the value Qf prQpOSvd p,0*j with bicramd traffic y 2) my Vmperly. fore.l Nyould I ike out opinion to be voiced to fer-Pi`c"1140"bars of the 7.►ning Board of Appeals raid Boud Of Trustccs- VCry truly YOWA, Kianwsh Jafari,M.D. Medical Dirceor , nut Tyust,N.A. 113373 t j)onofic-lairy of L"zUo N xo Ats TrUsWt Sqq MIMI) old • MINUTES OF THE JUNE 19, 2006 REGULAR"MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPROVED AS WRITTEN ON JULY 17, 2006 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairwoman Payovich in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:33 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Payovich, Members, Raju Iyer, Gopal Lalmalani and Marcia Tropinski ABSENT: Members Paul Adrian, Moin Saiyed and Gerald Wolin IN ATTENDANCE: Jeffrey Kennedy, Trustee, Robert Kallien, Director of Community Development, Barbara Gosselar, Assistant Village Attorney and Dale Durfey, Village Engineer 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES REGULAR PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2006 Motion by Member Iyer, seconded by Member Lalmalani to approve of the minutes as written. VOICE VOTE: Motion Carried. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business to discuss. S. NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS ASTARBUCKS COFFEE — 2407 22ND STREET — MAP AMENDMENT — TO z o�i'KS St. - REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM ORA-1 TO B-3 TEXT AMENDMENT — MAP and TEXT SECTION 13-7C.2 SPECIAL USES TO ADD THE TEXT "OUTDOOR AMENDMENT - DINING AREAS ADJACENT TO RESTAURANTS" SPECIAL USE — TO OUTDOOR ALLOW AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA ADJACENT TO A DINING AND DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT SPECIAL USE—TO ALLOW A DRIVE-IN FACILITY. FACILITY Director of Community Development Kallien summarized the request. It is a small site located on the southeast corner of 22"d Street and Tower Drive and is presently used by Alpha-Graphics. It is less than one acre and is limited as to what can be developed there. About a year ago, Starbucks approached the Village about their VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 1 of 19 June 19, 2006 A19 desire to build a stand-alone facility. They are requesting a map amendment, text amendment, two special uses, and at least one variation. Ted Johnson, President of Design Strategies, 2311 22nd Street, Oak Brook is the authorized representative of Starbucks and summarized its request. He reviewed the zoning designation in the area. He noted that the zoning is B-3 just east of the property and ORA-1 including and just west of the property and they are requesting to rezone their property to B-3. Alpha-Graphics is the only tenant in the building and presently operates in the northern half of the building; the southern half is currently vacant. The building is approximately 6200 square feet in size on a .77- acre property, approximately 120 by 280 feet in depth. The proposal is for a freestanding facility approximately 2000 square feet, with an entrance on the west side of the building. There is a drive-thru with a window on the east side of the building and a drive-thru lane can accommodate up to 9 vehicles to stack for the drive-thru. On the north end of the building is the proposed outdoor dining area. There will be a patron parking area located on the west side of the building. Employee parking will be on the south side of the drive-thru. There are reserving an area on the far southern end of the site to accommodate a potential future cross- access drive to the property east of the site that would allow them to gain access to Tower Drive. When they met with staff earlier in the year it was indicated that in the entire corridor they would like some type of frontage road system that would accommodate a cross traffic maneuvering between the parcels so that all the traffic would not be required to go onto 22nd Street. At this stage, they have reserved an area where that drive could be accommodated. The building would be a one-story masonry structure, which would be about one-third of the size of the existing structure. In order to develop the proposal the site would need to be rezoned to B-3. He responded to the map amendment factors as follows: May Amendment 1. Character of the neighborhood The subject property is located at the southeast corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. 22nd Street is a retail/office corridor on both the north and south sides of the roadway adjacent to the subject property. The south side of 22nd Street is located in Oak Brook and the north side is within the City of Oakbrook Terrace. Tower Drive is a short stub terminating at the water tower property directly south of the subject property. Specific uses within this corridor include professional and medical offices, retail commercial and restaurants. 2. The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions. The applicant is seeking rezoning from ORA-1 to B-3 to permit the development of VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 2 of 19 June 19, 2006 i the proposed Starbucks building. The existing ORA-1 District permits some retail uses similar to the proposed use, although does not specifically permit the use as proposed. The adjacent property to the east is zoned B-3 and it is our opinion the proposed rezoning will not have a detrimental impact on surrounding property values. In fact, the redevelopment of the property to the proposed use will be providing adjacent users with an amenity. 3. The extent to which the removal of the Existing Limitations Would Depreciate the Value of Other Property in the Area. The rezoning of the subject property from ORA-1 to B-3 to permit the development of a freestanding Starbucks Coffee building will be compatible with the proximate land uses and will not have an adverse impact on the use or value of the properties in the surrounding area. 4. The suitability of the Property for Zoned Purposes The property is suitable for a limited number of uses identified in ORA-1 District. However, due to the subject property's small size (33,600 square feet) it is difficult to accommodate many of the uses permitted in the district. They are requesting a change in zoning from the ORA-1 to B-3 in order to redevelop the subject property as proposed. The B-3 classification is consistent with the zoning contained on the adjacent eastern property as well as the trend of development within the area. 5. Existing Uses and Zoning of Nearby Properties. The subject site is located within the ORA-1 District and contains a single story building currently being used by a retail printing establishment. The parcel to the south of the subject property is zoned ORA-1 and contains a municipal water tower. The area to the west is zoned ORA-1 contains a, medical office building further adjoined by a retail use. The parcel directly east of the subject property is zoned B-3 and contains professional office buildings, Uses directly north of the subject property on 22nd Street are located in the City of Oakbrook Terrace and are within their B-3 District. Uses within this area included retails commercial, medical and restaurants. The proposed redevelopment will be consistent with the land uses in the area. 6. The Length of Time Under the Existing Zoning that the property has remained unimproved considered in the context of land development. The existing building has been there since 1968. The property has been developed with a single story building. 7. The Relative Gain to the Public as Compared to the Hardship Imposed on the Individual Property Owner. There is no gain to the public associated with retaining the existing ORA-1 zoning VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 3 of 19 June 19, 2006 ASA classification, but there would be a substantial hardship imposed on the property owners. Due to the subject property's size, there are a limited number of uses permitted in the ORA-1 District, which would be accommodated on the property. Rezoning to the B-3 classification to permit the proposed redevelopment will increase the economic use of the property resulting in positive tax benefits to the Village of Oak Brook. 8. The Extent to Which the Proposal Promotes the Health, Safety, Morals or General Welfare of the Public. The proposed B-3 zoning classification, which currently exists directly east of the subject property, would permit the development of the proposed use, which is designed to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public. The proposed use is compatible with other retail and accessory uses in the immediate area, which provide amenities for the growing number of area workers, shoppers and residents. 9. The Relationship of the Proposed Use to the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the 1990 Comprehensive Plan and represents a rational use of the subject property in concert with, and complementary to the many significant retail, office and service uses within the adjacent area. 10. Community Need for the Use Proposed by the Property Owners. It is their opinion that there is a demonstrated need and demand for the proposed use at this location. The trend of development has been distinctly toward retail uses within the 22nd Street/Butterfield Road corridor. The residential density of the surrounding community as well as the high level of disposable income coupled with an extremely accessible location can be expected to provide a ready market for the proposed use. The proposal also includes the request for a text amendment. The B-3 District, does not have a provision for outdoor dining areas although the B-1 and B-2 District do allow it as a special use. They requested that the zoning ordinance be amended to allow the outdoor dining as a special use in the B-3 District. . In response to the standards for the Text Amendment, some of which do not apply to a text amendment. He stated as follows: Text Amendment 1. Character of the neighborhood The response would be the same as for the map amendment. There are many restaurants along the 22nd Street/Butterfield Road corridor that currently contains outdoor dining areas. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 19 June 19, 2006 Afe 2. The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions. Not applicable. 3. The extent to which the removal of the Existing Limitations Would Depreciate the Value of Other Property in the Area. Not applicable. 4. The suitability of the Property for Zoned Purposes Not applicable. 5. Existing Uses and Zoning of Nearby Properties. The subject site currently contains a single-story office building by a retail-printing establishment. The uses directly north of the subject property on 22"d Street are located in the City of Oakbrook Terrace and are within its B-3 District, which permits outdoor dining. 6. The Length of Time Under the Existing Zoning that the property has remained unimproved considered in the context of land development. Not applicable. 7. The Relative Gain to the Public as Compared to the Hardship Imposed on the Individual Property Owner. Amending the B-3 zoning classification to allow outdoor dining areas as a special use will permit the proposed redevelopment that will increase the economic use of the property resulting in positive tax benefits to the Village. Currently outdoor ding areas adjacent to restaurants are allowed, as a special uses, in the B-1 and B-2 districts. 8. The Extent to Which the Proposal Promotes the Health, Safety, Morals or General Welfare of the Public. Amending the B-3 zoning classification to allow outdoor dining areas as a special use will permit the proposal, which is compatible with other retail and accessory uses in the immediate area, which provide amenities for the growing number of area workers, shoppers and residents. 9. The Relationship of the Proposed Use to the Comprehensive Plan. Not applicable. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 5 of 19 June 19, 2006 121:r_ /1�64 10. Community Need for the Use Proposed by the Property Owners. It is their opinion that there is a demonstrated need and demand for the proposed use at this location. There currently exists many restaurants in the corridor, which have outdoor dining areas. The existing B-1 and B-2 districts permit, as special uses, outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants. The residential density of the surrounding community as well as the high level of disposable income coupled with an extremely accessible location can be expected to provide a ready market for the proposed use. There are two special uses that are required in order for the proposed development to be approved and developed. The special uses are the outdoor dining area and the drive-thru facility. In response to the Special Use factors, he responded as follows: Special Use Standards 1. Is of the type described in subsection Al of this Section, is deemed necessary for the public convenience at that location. This does not apply to this proposal. The proposed use is a Starbucks Coffee facility with drive-thru and outdoor patio area. Subsection Al describes public uses and the proposal is entirely private in character. 2. Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected; The two elements of the proposed Starbucks Coffee facility, which require a special use, are the drive-thru facility and outdoor patio area. The drive-thru area has been designed with a dedicated drive, separated from the parking area, and contains a stacking queue for(9) nine vehicles. The outdoor dining area is located on the north end of the proposed building with access to and from the building and parking area. The outdoor dining area is fenced from the drive-thru lane and is substantially set back from 22nd Street. 3. Would not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located. The special use elements of the proposed plan, drive-thru feature and outdoor patio area, have been designed and located, so as to not have an adverse impact on use and value of adjacent properties. It is commonly accepted that proximate food establishments are considered a desired amenity for office/professional buildings. This parcel is adjacent to two such buildings. Furthermore, retail uses similar to the proposed use are already established in the general area. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 6 of 19 June 19, 2006 --olet, C That concluded the required standards and factors. Chip Beltchenko, Development Manager, Starbucks Coffee Company, said that they are looking forward to working with the Village and being able to serve coffee to the residents and those that work and shop in Oak Brook. No one in the audience spoke in support of or in opposition to the request. Trustee Kennedy said that he is on the Commercial Revitalization Task Force for the Village, along with Chairwoman Payovich and Bob Kallien. This is an exciting proposal, but he is in a bit of a quandary, because this project does exactly what the objective is in the commercial revitalization, which is to see existing obsolete office buildings, demolished and then redeveloped as a modern office or retail facilities. Although this is a step forward viewed as a particular project and would be a nice amenity for that area. The problem is that the Village is just getting started on the commercial revitalization project and a consultant has just been hired. There is no question that the corridor on the south side of 22nd Street, between Midwest Road and Meyers Road, is going to be a major focus of commercial redevelopment in the Village of Oak Brook. There is a lot of interest in it. At this point, not having kicked off the urban planning process, we do not know what is going to happen there. There will probably be a combination of office, retail and some other things. His problem with the proposal is not the proposal itself, but where it is located. It is adjacent to one of the two major roads that currently lead into that entire sub area, from Midwest to Meyers Road. Tower Drive would probably end up being a major entrance into whatever happens in that whole corridor. At this time, he does not see how the Village could be confident that this particular development is going to fit into the overall picture. He would hate to see a project like this approved that would end up with a beautiful new facility, but in the wrong place; from the standpoint of the inner connectivity of the roads within the corridor area. The Village owned property, which is the location of the water tower (directly behind this parcel) has been under consideration to relocate Fire Station No. 2 somewhere in that area, which is on the south side of 22nd Street west of Midwest Road. There are a lot of long-term planning considerations. The planning process has not yet started, but soon will be. Although, he would like to see the Starbucks proposal move forward, he would hate to see it go forward before the input is received from the urban planning team. It is important to know that what is being proposed is not going to impede further development of the area in terms of aggregating individual properties to make projects happen in terms of the inner connectivity of the roadways to take traffic off of 22nd Street and let it pass within this property. Those are just a few concerns. He asked Director of Community Development Kallien if the commercial revitalization process consultants could focus on this sub area from Meyers to Midwest Road and provide a quick, but confident opinion on whether this project is going to be consistent with what eventually happens there. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 7 of 19 June 19, 2006 Director of Community Development Kallien responded that the consultant could be asked to at least weigh in on the request. One of the difficulties is that so much of the revitalization process will involve the input of the business community, the residents and stakeholders in the community. Beyond a quick review at this stage, they really would not have the opportunity to have the others weigh in. There is a certain risk,but we could at least have the consultant look at it. Trustee Kennedy asked if a very quick input could be received from the Village as to what the plans might be for the Village owned property by the water tower. Director of Community Development Kallien responded that the Village is and will probably continue to look at other alternatives for relocating the fire station, so a report would be needed from the Fire Chief. A report could be obtained from the Director of Public Works regarding the water tower facility located south of the proposal and what impediments or opportunities that the applicant's proposal would provide. Although it would probably come from the revitalization process,but this is a stub streets that is perpendicular, but does not connect to the tollway, and is there any long term development opportunity there so we would need the input of the toll authority. The site proposal does provide some much needed cross access with some properties to the east and possibly to the west, which is something our corridor is lacking. The building looks nice and there is some sense as to what they are proposing,but is part of the bigger issue. Trustee Kennedy said that it is at a crucial point at that corridor because it is one of the main entryways, of about 3 or 4 roads, or private drives to provide access to that entire one-mile plus swath of land. It lies at a very crucial crossroad as to what the Village may eventually be doing. He hates to delay the petitioners, but in this case, we need to try very hard and quickly to make sure that allowing this project to go through is not going to interfere with a broader plan for this very important commercial area of the Village. Director of Community Development Kallien said that we could get the communication process started, between the Village, the applicant and consultant. Chairwoman Payovich said that we would also like to have more members available from the Commission. In the interest of moving the matter forward she asked the Commissioners whether there were questions. Member Tropinski said that the proposal looks like it would be a very nice development, the car stacking is done is very nice and having the patio on the north end, so that the activity can be seen is very nice. Member Iyer said that he agreed with Trustee Kennedy and Director of Community VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 8 of 19 June 19, 2006 ,11_� Development Kallien as to how the proposal fits into the overall perspective and scheme of things. He questioned if more than 9 vehicles are stacked during peak hours,would the traffic spill over onto the road, and how it would be handled. Mr. Beltchenko responded that the standards call for a minimum stacking for 6 to a maximum of 8 vehicles; the 9 proposed, goes beyond their normal stacking requirement. They have an internal guideline of 45 seconds to drive through. There are cars moving through all the time, they do not have cars stacked out into the parking lot. If there were a case, where someone ordered 15 Frappacino's, they would ask them to move forward to park and they would bring them out to the car. Member Iyer questioned if there was enough protection for the outdoor dining area that would face 22nd Street, in case a car would go through. Mr. Beltchenko responded that there are wrought iron railings and posts for the outdoor seating area that provide for safety. Michael Achim, Construction Manager, Starbucks said that they can also address the concern by using concrete bollards that are able to stop a car. Director of Community Development Kallien said that a plan should be provided showing what would be installed to stop a car. In the staff report, an issue was raised regarding the cars in the parking lot that are facing the seating area. There have been issues with other buildings regarding safety concerns with the direction the parked cars are facing in relationship to the seating area and that a car may go in an unexpected direction and what protection device would be utilized. He asked that the applicant provide the peak hour stacking for some of their busy stores. Mr. Beltchenko said that they could provide the number of cars served each hour. Director of Community Development Kallien said that any issue relative to signage would be handled through a separate building permit and would be what is allowable by Code. If a ground sign would be desired, they would need to go through the hearing process. Member Lalmalani said that it appears to be a beautiful use of the site; however, he also has the same concern as Trustee Kennedy regarding what the bigger picture is going to be with the commercial corridor development. They would hate to approve something that would be a major conflict with what the corridor is planning to do. He said it would be a good idea to continue the matter until an analysis is received from the commercial revitalization consultant. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the Village needs the consultant to weigh in on the broader issue as to how this all fits. Issues raised by VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 9 of 19 June 19, 2006 /70# Trustee Kennedy relative to the other departments, such as the Public Works Department, regarding the water tower, and the Fire Department. If possible, they would like to get those departments represented at our next meeting. Motion by Member Lalmalani, seconded by Member Iyer, to continue the Starbucks Coffee applications hearing to the July 17, 2006 Plan Commission meeting. At that time, the concerns that have been raised are to be addressed if possible. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4 — Members Iyer, Lalmalani, Tropinski and Chairwoman Payovich Absent: 3 — Members Adrian, Saiyed, and Wolin Nays: 0 — None. Motion Carried. 5. A. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK — REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS vos-OBJECTS WITHIN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS—OBJECTS WITHIN PARKWAYS PARKWAYS Trustee Kennedy advised that several months ago the Village Board heard the presentation on this issue and also heard from a number of residents. They discussed the matter, which is a very complex subject. He made several points made by the Village Board. 1. The Village Board has a concern that "the horse is already out of the barn" in the sense that there are several hundred situations throughout the Village, where people have built things in the public right of way, that may or may not raise concerns. The Village has not enforced its standards for objects in the right of way for about six years. There are a lot of situations that now exist, which concerns the Village Board. 2. There was a consensus to continue to allow the ornate masonry/stone mailboxes that are popular in town. The Village Board's feeling was that we should try to accommodate those and maybe impose limits in the future as far as the size of the mailboxes and requiring a covenant by the property owner to hold the Village harmless in the event of damage or injury. 3. Almost all Trustees expressed concern about the safety and Village liability issues raised by large boulders, a berm and retaining walls in the public right of way. 4. They recognized a need for a consistent simply policy and consistent enforcement of whatever the Plan Commission recommends and the Village Board ultimately adopts. It has to be even handedly applied; and hopefully as self-enforcing as it can be. 5. They were concern ed with the man-hour burdens on staff and the cost to the Village in the enforcement of a very complicated solution and a very complicated set of rules. The concern with the burden and the cost to staff would be aggravated and magnified if a "grandfathering" was VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Regular Plan Commission Minutes Page 10 of 19 June 19, 2006 /f 4f t,,ra n STARSUCKMS +COFFEE. t:n w.�r �D w. r t.rr S'+= to xr�nw aw 14wv ee�raretrsrwr--/ -ra ooca... OSIDE ENTRANCE ELEVATION O REAR ELEVATION LIGHTING FIXTURE tw � ^ BRICK TYPES OcR R[F t'M1F.ICPAA � E 00N.CE.RwM..,S...... /3 9-<[SON:3 ' .aENE.,F O DRNE-THRU ELEVATION -- °'®° NOTE � - 1 • I ,w,rmuE swru STARBUCKS COFFEE DRIVE THRU FEW IIIIIIIIIIIIII _ • MAIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 550 W WASHINGTON BLVD,SUITE 200 STA R B U C KS COFFEE CHI CHICAGO.IL 60661 v —AREA RESERVED FOR CROSS-ACCESSSE OR ♦ TOWER ROAD PARKINGACCESS ROAD Rec.283.4 —Mea.283.08' �— 33`52 j 1 r -' EMPLOYE E — — RIGHT OF WAY PARKING 22nd STREET ---— _._ x 0 I : -- Si ARBUCKS COFFEE ' + .925 SF Q I II N00°31'27"E SITE PLAN _ Sarfatty Associates,Ltd. Architects P R O P O S E D STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY CZ—a I I I 3 0.Glnviw 301 \Xffl�t.Rli-h 60091.2 99 STA RB U C KS COFFEE 550 WEST WASHINGTON BLVD. (847)920:1100 "°'. * * SUITE 200 (847)920-1 01 r.. 2407 W.22ND STREET, —.mrfettv.mm JUNE 19.2006 ° OAKBROOK,IL CHICAGO,IL 60661 Copyright(ID 2005 k f� a� 27-- -�c t ` , y }k •.:� Y L11 7F' it ma ii ,�y \• . 1�1 f 2211tD EE - - -. -- - - - - a • b •�- VIA � � yes!•� ��)� '� �` F� � � 1 a � � +�. +�_`°; 4 ••yam • ¢ ' • t► �; � '�/J: fix �„ _��:r$A��•� ��. ,J **� , • Forest Preserve District o DuPage County 3 S. 580 Naperville Road Wheaton, IL 60187-8761 630.933.7200 Fax 630.933.7204 TTY 800.526.0857 i June 16, 2006 I Mr. Robert Kallien Director of Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 Re: Public Hearing Notice on Starbucks Project Dear Mr. Kallien: The Forest Preserve District of DuPage County recently received notice of a proposed project by Starbucks on the property located at 2407 22nd Street. We appreciate receiving timely notification of projects that may have an impact on our property, and thank you for the opportunity to comment. District Staff has reviewed the public hearing notice and the proposed project. This property is not near any forest preserve; therefore, we do not feel that this project will create any negative impacts on any of our land. Please call me at 933-7684 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Marcia Thomas Land Acquisition Specialist cc: Karen Zilly, Director of Land Preservation Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5000 Wheaton, IL 60189-5000 www.dupageforest.com o o � 9 �a COUN'!y ` VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: June 19, 2006 TO: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E., Village Engineer SUBJECT: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street Map Amendment—Special Uses—Variation We have reviewed the revised plans received on June 15 and offer the following comments: 1. The drawings' scale has been revised to 1" = 15' which is not an engineering scale (we do not have a 1"=15' scale to measure with). With the building permit, a normal engineering scale must be used(e.g., 1"=20'). 2. The main parking aisle has been moved so that there is a 5" area for landscape screening next to Tower Road. However, the southerly parking space is within the 10' area and should not be allowed without a variation. Section 13-12-3 discusses off-street parking spaces needing to be no less than 10' from the nearest lot line. 3. Landscape screening needs to be installed for the southerly parking area (between the parking and the "future cross-access" road). A 5' area (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) should be reserved here similar to the 5' area adjacent to Tower Drive. In addition, the following points need to be addressed for the building permit application: • Topography • Engineer seal • Pavement thickness detail • Curb detail • Show all utility lines (water, sanitary, storm sewer) • 2 Village benchmarks • Top of foundation elevation starbucks rkl.doc 1 100 t a i • Show any easements • Erosion control plan • More detailed screening plan, Latin names and sizes If any submitted drawings are used as exhibits to ordinances, a note should be added within the ordinance to the effect that: Notwithstanding the attached exhibits, the applicant shall meet all Village Ordinance requirements at the time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. This would prevent an applicant from forcing the Village to issue a permit based on sub-standard items that may be depicted on the drawings (these types of drawings are usually conceptual in nature and do not contain the detail necessary for a full review regarding building permit items). starbucks rkl.doc 2 II14� i VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 2006 CASE NO: 2006-013-ZO-MA DESCRIPTION: Map amendment from ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly District to B-3 General Business District. PETITIONER: Starbucks Coffee Company c/o TJ Design Strategies LOCATION: Southeast Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive ADDRESS: 240722 nd Street EXISTING ZONING: ORA-1 ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Office and Retail uses in the City of Oakbrook Terrace. South: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, Village of Oak Brook Water Tower. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, office buildings. West: Same. DISCUSSION: TJ Design Strategies as authorized representative of Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 2407 22nd Street has submitted a petition seeking approval of a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-3 in order to construct a stand along Starbucks facility. The existing one-story building on the property will be demolished to accommodate the proposed 1925 square foot Starbucks Coffee, which will also include a drive-in facility (east side of building) and an outdoor dining area (north side of building). With regard to the requested map amendment, the zoning to the east of the subject property is B-3. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of this request. Ate STAFF REPORT-MAP AMEN AT STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY CASE No.2006-013-ZO-MA Staff Comments: 1. Please see comments from the Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated June 6, 2006. 2. The Village of Oak Brook has approved the consultant team headed by Houseal Lavign to develop a comprehensive commercial revitalization plan for Oak Brook's commercial corridor. Without benefit of the expected analysis, which will come from the revitalization planning effort, Staff is unsure if the proposed use and zoning of this property for use as a Starbucks is consistent with the final recommendations/expectations for the 22°d Street commercial corridor. 3. Development of the property in accordance with the requested site plan will require in addition to the proposed map amendment, a text amendment, two special uses and several variations. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals have the responsibility to make a recommendation on a request for a map amendment. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for amendments. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: If the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals are of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for a map amendment, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request subject to the following condition: 1. Obtaining the input and analysis from the Village Commercial Revitalization consultant, Houseal Lavign as to the appropriateness for the proposed use. Respectfully Su ed, Robert L. allien Jr., AICP Director o velopment 2 �� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 2006 CASE NO: 2006-014-ZO-TA DESCRIPTION: Text Amendment to Section 13-7C-2 to add the text, "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a special use. PETITIONER: Starbucks Coffee Company c/o TJ Design Strategies LOCATION: Southeast Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive ADDRESS: 240722 d Street EXISTING ZONING: ORA-1 ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Office and Retail uses in the City of Oakbrook Terrace. South: R2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes in the Ginger Creek Subdivision. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, office buildings. West: Same. DISCUSSION: TJ Design Strategies as authorized representative of Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 2407 22"d Street has submitted a petition seeking approval of a text amendment to Section 13-7C-2 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants as a special use. With regards to the outdoor dining area, the petitioner is proposing an outdoor dining/seating area for approximately 24 patrons. The approval of the outdoor dining area is predicated on approval of a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of this request. Staff Comments: 1. Outdoor dining areas are permitted as a special use in a number of zoning districts, which permit restaurants as a permitted use. The B-3 district permits restaurants but has no provision for ,to i STAFF REPORT-TEXT AMENONT 40 STARBUCK'S COFFEE CASE No.2006-014-ZO-TA outdoor dining. Based on the recent approvals for outdoor dining associated with the Oak Brook Promenade, Oakbrook Center, and the new McDonald's on 22'd Street, creating the opportunity for outdoor dining in the B-3 district is reasonable. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals have the responsibility to make a recommendation on a request for a text amendment. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for amendments. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: If the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals are of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for a text amendment to create the opportunity for an outdoor dining area, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request. Respectfully Submitted, Robert L. K ien Jr. AICP Director o Co ity Development 2 `�.�. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 2006 CASE NO: 2006-016-ZO-SU DESCRIPTION: Special uses to construct an outdoor dining area adjacent to a restaurant and a drive-in facility. PETITIONER: Starbucks Coffee Company c/o TJ Design Strategies LOCATION: Southeast Corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive ADDRESS: 240722 d Street EXISTING ZONING: ORA-1 ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Office and Retail uses in the City of Oakbrook Terrace. South: R2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes in the Ginger Creek Subdivision. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, office buildings. West: Same. DISCUSSION: TJ Design Strategies as authorized representative of Starbucks Coffee Company on behalf of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995, the owner of the property at 2407 22nd Street has submitted a petition seeking approval of two special uses in order to construct a new stand alone Starbucks Coffee. The first special use is necessary to construct a drive-in facility along the east side of the building for patrons wishing to make purchases from their vehicle. The other special use will permit the construction of an outdoor dining area to be located on the north side of the building. With regards to the drive-in facility, the petitioner is proposing a single- lane that is designed to accommodate the stacking of approximately nine vehicles. One menu/order pedestal and one customer window is also proposed. With regards to the outdoor dining area, the petitioner is proposing an outdoor dining/seating area for approximately 24 patrons. The approval of the outdoor dining area is predicated on approval of the proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. A0 . STAFF REPORT-SPECIAL US STARBUCK'S COFFEE CASE No.2006-016-ZO-SU Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of these requests. Staff Comments: 1. Please review the comments from the Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated June 6, 2006. 2. Additional information is needed from the applicant to ensure that the proposed stacking for nine vehicles is sufficient during peak hour. 3. The proposed outdoor dining/seating area could be impacted by an errant vehicle. Additional details are needed to ensure proposed protective measures around the outdoor dining/seating area are sufficient. 4. If umbrella's are proposed for the outdoor dining/seating area, details are needed. 5. Proposed signage will be handled through the review and approval of a building permit. Any signage depicted on the proposed site plan is for representation purposes only. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: i Both the Plan Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals have the responsibility to make a recommendation on a request for a special use. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for each of these special uses. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: If the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals are of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for a special use for both a drive-in facility and outdoor dining area, recommendations would be in order to approve each of these requests subject to the following conditions: 1. Development in substantial conformance with the plans as submitted. 2. Discussion on the appropriateness for additional safety measures to be considered between the parking lot and the proposed outdoor dining area. 3. Determine if the proposed stacking for nine vehicles is sufficient during peak hour. 2 STAFF REPORT-SPECIAL US STARBUCK'S COFFEE CASE No.2006-016-ZO-SU 4. If umbrella's are proposed for the outdoor dining/seating area, details are needed. 5. The approval of the outdoor dining area is predicated on approval of the proposed map and text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Other conditions relevant to the special use request. Respectfully Submitted, Robert f Ka ien Jr AICP Director of Community Development 3 G�' U F UAK P X90 � o O y C � O a c�CO N14 Village of Oak Brook June 13,2006 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Dear Resident: www.oak-brook.org Administration The Oak Brook Plan Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be 630.990.3000 considering a Map Amendment, Text Amendment and Special Uses at the meetings FAX 630.990.0876 scheduled on the back of this notice. The Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will also be considering Variations at the meetings scheduled on the back of Community this notice. Development 630.990.3045 30.99 .3 The application has been filed b Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies FAX 630.990.3985 pp Y� gn g 2311 22nd Street, Suite 208 Engineering Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Department 630.990.3010 The property in question is located at: 240722 d Street FAX 630.990.3985 Fire Department Relationship of applicant to property: Applicant 630.990.3040 FAX 630.990.2392 Owner of the Property: Mary Ann R. Monty Trust#8-1995 Police Department Also shown on the reverse side of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you in 630.990.2358 determining your relationship to the property in question. FAX 630.990.7484 The applicant is seeking the following relief in order to construct a stand-alone Starbucks Public Works Department Coffee facility at 2407 22nd Street: 630.990.3044 1. Map Amendment from ORA-1 to B-3 District FAX 630.472.0223 2. Text Amendment to Section 13-7C.2, Special Uses to add the text "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants." Oak Brook 3. Special Uses. Approval of an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant and a Public Library drive-in facility 4. Variations. Approval of the setback along 22nd Street and the parking lot setback on 600 Oak Brook Road Tower Drive. Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development FAX 630.990.4509 Department at 630-990-3045 to review the file on this application. Oak Brook Sports Core Sincerely, Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 Robert L. Kallien r.,AIC FAX 630.990.1002 Director of Co evelOpment Golf Club RLK/gp 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 ! In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline,the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, Butler Government Center located on Oak Brook Road(31st Street)and Spring Road,Oak Brook,Illinois. Plan Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Monday,June 19,2006 Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,August 1,2006** Board of Trustees Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,August 22,2006*** **Tentative—Follows completion of the Plan Commission hearing ***Tentative—Follows the completion of the Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing 2111 KAIISA 2214D STREET 4 .and _ G Q a 2526 124 2 I Iss SHOPS AT 0` v G� iio3 a ¢ 0011P OAK OK K P4AGE �QQ 2 21 2607 ' silo 480.'1 I 2222 co• �py� 1707 6 4 p a ` z `� AL LAN 2015 NsV. 1! 4 1 an+a" If 8 6 2 � 11 3 7 5 3 1 II 13f� 12 14 11 � N o5 �...� ` w H i7 n � a I I �0 3 e 1. „►r �1 IS M �eMe 10 ■ c 1'J or4 8 G 16 yll y 7 c iz4 `0 23 Q 8 4 4 a! 11 a 10 IB > 2; C) I 1 3 1 3 5 7 a IL L q= 20 + 17 ♦�� W A+T IY' � �D � I U 30 s 21 34 a i 36 D 27 2S 23 36 3 LL, p g is 6 s 79 3 7 3 1 VI 35 S *Note: The map provided is only an aaoroximation of the area in question and is intended to be used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the prop Itr.doc • Starbucks-2407 22nd-MA-SU+VAR-2003 ELLegaI Notice NOTICE HEREBY . • GIVEN tha a t a public hear- ing before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION Cook Counties, Illinois,will be held on June 28,2006,at 7:30 p.m.In the Oak Brook Village Hall,1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 far the purpose coon Paddock PubUcatlonS Inc. sidering the application f ' from Starbucks Coffee do TJ Design Strategies, 2311 22nd Street, Suite 208,Oak Brook, Illinois for a mop Daily Herad amendment, special uses and variations as provided for under Title 13 of the Zon- ing Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook,Illinois,Ordi- nance G-60 as amended. The pettioner Is seeking the following relief In order to construct a stand-alone Starbucks facility at 2407 22nd Street: 1. Amendment from ORA-1 Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, •1 t to B•3 District 2.Text Amendment to Sec- tion he text outdo)Uses to DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD. add the text"outdoor dining areas adiacent to restau- rants 3 Special Uses.Section 13- That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the . 7C.2. A.Approval of an outdoor dining area adiacent to the Village(s) of Addison, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Glendale Heights, Glen Ellyn, restaurant. B.Approval of a drive-In facility tasca, Keeneyville, Lisle, Lombard, Medinah, Naperville, Oak Brook, Oakbrook Terrace, 4.Var4.Variations A.Variation to Section 13- 7C-3(c) to reduce the on Roselle, Villa Park, > >Warrenville West Chicago Wheaton, Winfield, Wood Dale too-foot e- setback quired 22nd street 10 approxi- mately 69 feet. B.Variation to Section 13- 12-3H.1 to reduce the re- quired 10-foot setback to the parking requirement on Tower Drive from 10 feet to the property (0 feet). County(les) of DuPage The Plan Commission will also review this proposal, with the exception of the variation requests at Its and State of Illinois continuously for more than one year prior to the date of the first June 19,2006 meeting. The property may be gen- 22ndI51reet,0ak Brook,2407 22nd publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said nois, 60523 (Southeast car. Dri ve e i h the legal de- 22ndStreetandTower Village(s), County(ies) and State. Drive scr(pt on was t follows: Lot 3 in Butler Company M•1, Inc. Assessment Plat No. 6 of part of the North West V4 of Section 27 and I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an .ict to revise Part of the North East Ih of Section 28, Township 39 Third,Range 11,Foetid)h" the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715, according to the Plat thereof recorded July 20, Act 5 Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, 1964, as Document R64- , was 25649,In DuPage,County,It- final P 1.N:06-28-202.007 published June 7, 2006 in said DAILY HERALD. All persons desiring to be heard will be afforded an op- portunity to do so and may orollyitor their or both IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, Inc., The hearing may be re- cessed to another date If no- tice off time public and Pla a has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent, at Arlington Heights, nounced at the hearing or is given by newspaper publi- cation not less than five(5) days prior to the date of the recessed heoring. In accord with the Provl- si0ns of the American with Disabilities Act, any indi- vidual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate In or benefit from attendance at this public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline the PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC. Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as Possible before the meeting date. DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS The petitioner's applica- tion is on file with the Village Clerk and with the Director of Community Develop- ment. Persons wishing to examine the petition docu- ments may arrange to do so with the Director of Com- munity Mc 12 Development, Rob- ert Kalli Village of Oak ak Brook, 1200 Oak Brook BY Road,Oak Brook, IL 60523, telephone 630-990.3045. Authorize Agent Linda Gonnella Village Clerk Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board of Ap- peals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois. Publis curie, 201� Herald Control # T3758658 (3758658)S 0 F CAI B9 e e o G C vv C0UNT't VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: June 6, 2006 TO: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E., Village Engineer SUBJECT: Starbucks—2407 22nd Street Map Amendment—Special Uses—Variation As per your request of May 19, 2006, and the P &Z policy, Phil and I have reviewed the file you forwarded since site plan drawings were included with the application. As we understand it, the applicant is seeking approval of a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-3, special uses for outdoor dining and a drive-thru facility, and variations to the setback along 22nd Street and Tower Drive. After reviewing the drawings, these items were observed: 1. The parking aisles need to be 27' wide, not 24'. If they wish 24', they should seek a variation. 2. The northerly one-way driveway may be too large at the lot line (the Code requires a maximum of 22' at the lot line). If they desire more than 22', they should seek a variation. 3. Even though the drawings state a scale of 1" = 30', that is not the scale of the drawing; therefore, we cannot approximate dimensions since there is not a proper scale. 4. There is no room along the Tower Road lot line for front yard screening since the proposed parking lot goes up to the right-of-way line. Section 13-12-3 discusses off- street parking spaces needing to be no less than 10' from the nearest lot line. In this particular case, this area would be an aisle rather than actual parking spaces so I am not exactly sure how this would be interpreted. Additionally, Section 13-12-413 requires screening and landscaping of parking areas; this cannot be accomplished along Tower Road if the parking aisle goes to the right-of-way. It appears that a variation should be sought here also. starbucks rk.doc 1 17S 5. The site plan depicts a "monument sign" and "directional sign drive-thru" within the Tower Road right-of-way. I question whether this is allowable within the right-of- way or if it should be back on the property. Additionally, the Plan Commission and the Village Board are currently analyzing the issue of objects in rights-of-way. We also checked with Tom Stanfa of the Fire Department who responded that they did not have any issues with the Site Plan. Since complete site plan drawings were not submitted, there may be other issues that will surface when a building permit is applied for and a full and complete review is accomplished. If any submitted drawings are used as exhibits to ordinances, a note should be added within the ordinance to the effect that: Notwithstanding the attached exhibits, the applicant shall meet all Village Ordinance requirements at the time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. This would prevent an applicant from forcing the Village to issue a permit based on sub-standard items that may be depicted on the drawings (these types of drawings are usually conceptual in nature and do not contain the detail necessary for a full review regarding building permit items). starbucks rk.doc 2 C� Community Development Referrals 1) Kitsutkin- 506 Wood—Variation—Side Yard Abutting a Street �Starbuck's Coffee Company—2407 22"d Street—Map Amendment, Special Uses and Variations D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts—None presented. E. Budget Adjustments—None Presented. F. DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference 2006-2007 Membership Dues and Annual Assessment G. Tuscan Woods Subdivision, Yorkshire Glen Subdivision—Extension of Completion H. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat Known as Villas of Oak Brook Subdivision and Granting Waivers and a Variation from the Provisions of Section 14-6-3 of Title 14 ("Subdivision Regulations") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Private Streets, Sidewalks and Street Lights 8. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA 7. A. Accounts Payable for Period Ending May 19, 2006 - $643,755.84 Significant Items included in Above: 1) DuPage Water Commission- $133,228.37 2) Debt Service Payment—2001 Installment Contract Certificates - $69,515.63 3) Debt Service Payment—2003 Installment Contract Certificates - $8,950.00 4) Payout# 1 —2006 Paving Project—Brothers Asphalt Paving - $186,597.00 Trustee Manofsky questioned a payment for stormwater engineering consultants for an evaluation of stormwater needs for the petition of a final plat for Brittwood. Village Engineer Durfey responded that these were considered "pass through" costs which will be paid by the petitioner. She also questioned a payment for cigars and cigarettes. Staff responded that the Golf Course sold tobacco in the pro-shop. Motion by Trustee Kennedy, seconded by Trustee Craig, to authorize payment of Accounts Payable for Period Ending May 19, 2006 in the amount of $643,755.84. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Kennedy, Manofsky, Sanford and Yusuf. Nays: 0 - None. Absent: 0 - None. Motion carried. 9. BOARD & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. YORK TAVERN—3702 YORK ROAD—CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS —HISTORIC GRAUE GATEWAY AREA VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 3 of 18 May 23, 2006 vG� Of 0gke90 0 �NL MM d G O .o i `Z qCF COU WTI, ��� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of May 23,2006 SUBJECT: Referral- Starbucks Coffee Company—2407 22nd Street—Map Amendment, Special Uses and Variations FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr.,AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer the requests from Starbucks for a map amendment and special uses to the Plan Commission meeting on June 19, 2006 and for public hearing on the map amendment, special uses and variations to the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting on June 28,2006. Background/History: Starbucks Coffee Company, on behalf of the Mary Ann R Monty Trust, the owners of the property at 2407 22nd Street has submitted petitions seeking approval of a map amendment (from ORA-1 to B-3), special uses (drive-thru and outdoor dining) and variations (setbacks along 22nd Street and Tower Drive) in order to permit the construction of a stand-alone Starbucks facility. The existing Alpha Graphics building which now occupies the .77 acre site will be demolished. Recommendation: Please refer these requests to the June 19, 2006 meeting of the Plan Commission at the June 28, 2006 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Last saved by RKallien \\ash\users\ComDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-Starbucks-2407 22nd St-MA-SU- ; ..r,;c 1—f a� .,rP,t a1 7nnnF in•za en,t • • 13-7C-2: SPECIAL USES: Accessory uses and structures, including but not limited to off-street parking and off-street loading spaces and business signs. Amusement establishments, including bowling alleys, gymnasiums, swimming pools and skating rinks. Automobile mini-market. Daycare center,provided such facility complies with all licensing requirements of the State of Illinois and maintains a direct alarm hookup to the Oak Brook Police Department. Drive-in establishments for permitted uses. Horse stables and riding academies, public, on a lot not less than ten(10) acres in area,provided building containing stables and accessory outdoor facilities are not less than one hundred fifty feet (150') from the nearest lot line. Nursing homes, on lots not less than three hundred feet(300') in width and not less than two (2) acres in area. Open sales lots, when accessory to new automobile, trailer or boat sales establishments. Public utility, governmental service and transportation uses. Bus turnarounds and passenger shelters. Sewage and storm water lift stations. Telephone exchanges and transmission buildings and equipment, and outdoor telephone booths and pedestals. Water filtration plants, wells,pumping stations and reservoirs. Recreation, outdoor, par 3 and miniature golf courses, golf driving ranges, swimming and tennis clubs, and other outdoor recreation uses as approved by the Village Board of Trustees. Trailer or boat sales establishments, for new trailer or boat sales. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-305, 9-8-1981; Ord. G-449, 8-14-1990; Ord. G-454, 10-9-1990) v Apn10IQ B. Screening And Landscaping: The following landscaped and planted areas shall be provided and maintained for all parking areas: 1. Front Yards: Permanent screening at least four feet(4')high shall be installed in front yard areas adjacent to parking areas. This screening may consist of a planted earth berm, densely planted shrubs or trees, or a combination of both. i 2. Side And Rear Yards: Permanent peripheral screening at least five feet (5') high shall be installed in side and rear yards adjacent to parking areas. This screening may consist of a planted earth berm, densely planted shrubs or trees, or a combination of both. In side and rear yards, the screening shall be so located and constructed as not to interfere or conflict with the use of any utility easements or utility installations existing or planned to be installed in these easement areas. C. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscaped areas shall occupy not less than ten percent (10%) of the total lot area excluding: 1 �c�►�� �3 ' � a" � l/A��'l1 orb H. In Yards: Off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts, may be located in required interior side yards and rear yards, no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line, except a parking area containing four(4) or more parking spaces shall be not less than forty feet (40') from an adjoining residence district boundary; provided, however, that: 1. On any lot in a B1 local shopping center district and a B3 general business district, the required off-street parking spaces may be located in a front yard or side yard adjoining a street not less than ten feet (10') from a street line; 2. On any lot in ORA1 or ORA2 office-research-assembly district and an 03 or 04 office district, not more than ten percent(10%) of the required off-street parking spaces, not to exceed six (6) spaces,may be located in a required front yard or along the side of the building adjoining the street and not less than twenty five feet (25') from a street line or fifty feet(50') from the street lines of Cermak and York Road; and II 1 ll 13-7A-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.5. B. Structure Height: Not more than fifty feet (50') and not more than two (2) stories. C. Yards: 1. No structure, other than access drives and paved parking areas, and signs as provided in subsection 13-7A-4A of this article, shall be erected or maintained within the following distances: a. Sixty feet (60') from the right of way of any public street; b. Thirty feet (30') from a district boundary which abuts a public right of way which does not afford a primary means of access to the district; and c. Sixty feet (60') from any other district boundary; except when adjacent to a B-2 district boundary line; provided, however, that the area between a building and the right of way of any street or other district boundary may be occupied by drives, drive-in banking facilities, vehicular parking, sidewalks, landscaping and similar facilities, except paved parking, areas shall not be located closer than ten feet(10') to any lot in a residence district or ten feet(10')to any public street; except that building shall be set back not less than one hundred feet (100') from the rights of way of York Road, 22nd Street and 31st Street. 2. For the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the yard regulations of this section, the entire area included within a B-1 district, except that portion separated by a dedicated public street, shall be considered as a single zoning lot; more than one building or structure may, however,be erected thereon; and the only front, side and rear yards that need to be observed are those provided for in subsection C1 of this section. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-513, 6-22-1993; Ord. G-778, 4-26-2005) • PROJECT NARRATIVE • FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET The Applicant, Starbucks Coffee Company, is proposing to redevelop the property located at 2407 W. 22nd Street for a free-standing Starbucks Coffee facility with drive-thru and outdoor patio seating. The site is at the southeast corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive, directly north of the municipal water tower. The parcel is 120 feet wide and approximately 280 feet deep containing approximately 33,600 square feet (0.77 acre). The property currently contains a one-story,building which is physically obsolete has limited parking and will be demolished as part of this project if approved. The subject property is presently zoned ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly. In order to develop its free-standing building containing 1 ,925 square feet, the applicant is seeking a map amendment to B-3 General Business District. In addition, a text amendment is being sought to the B-3 General Business District in order to allow "outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" as a special use. Besides the map and text amendments for the subject property, the applicant is seeking special use approvals for the drive-thru feature and outdoor patio area. The proposed plan requires two setback variations as well to address encroachments by the proposed building and parking area. If successful in gaining rezoning of the subject property as well as other approvals, Starbucks Coffee Company intends to proceed with the demolition of the existing site improvements and construction of their free- standing facility. Build out should take approximately five months and it is anticipated that the new facility will be open for business before August of 2007. 40 VILLAGE OF SK BROOK 9 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630-990.3045 PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) RI AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ VARIATION ($750) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) F2� - Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW WILL BE FILED WITH THE VILLAGE CLERK. LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 28 -202 -007 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS*2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook ZONING DISTRICT ORA1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-10 Article A ACTION REQUESTED Zoning Amendment from ORA1 to B3 PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT X OWNER(S)OF RECORD The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST Mary Ann R Monty PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information)Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies PHONE 630-368-0840 ADDRESS 2311 W 22nd Street, Suite 208 CITY Oak Brook STATE IL Zip 60523 Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASLA tjohnson @tjdesignitd.com I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowledge and belief.I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s)on the lot frontages of the a e subject property as de ed in the Village C e. I 7ddii s,a pplicant agrees to relm a Illa bli io co s within 30 days of billing. ��� 1 .t CDl. YC •12. 200(o Signature of Owner Date Signature of pplica t Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE OHL Date Filed 5-IS-06- Fee Pald$ Receipt No. Received By Board of Trustees(Referral) ' Notice Published 'S Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Plan Commission lv 9 O Zoning Board of Appeals -a r•�G Board of Trustees 7 n& Board of Trustees O (Approval of Ordinance) SIGNED-VILLAGE CLERK Z10 Date �O PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 ZONI&MENDMENT FACTORS RESPOES FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (a) The character of the neighborhood. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. 22nd Street is a retail/office corridor on both the north and south sides of the roadway adjacent to the subject property. The south side of 22nd Street is located in the Village of Oak Brook and the north side is within the City of Oakbrook Terrace. Tower Drive is a short stub terminating at the water tower property directly south of the subject property. Specific uses in the neighborhood include professional and medical offices, retail commercial and restaurants. (b) The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions; The applicant is seeking rezoning from ORA-1 (Office-Research- Assembly District) to B-3 (General Business District) to permit the development of a Starbucks Coffee building with a drive-thru feature and outdoor patio area. The existing ORA-1 District permits some retail uses similar to the proposed use, although does not specifically permit the use as proposed. The adjacent property to the east is zoned B-3 and it is our opinion the proposed rezoning will not have a detrimental impact on surrounding property values. In fact, redevelopment of the property to the proposed use will be providing adjacent users with an amenity. (c) The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the value of other property in the area; The rezoning of the subject property from ORA-1 to B-3 to permit the development of a free-standing Starbucks Coffee building will be compatible with the proximate land uses and will not have an adverse impact on the use or value of the properties in the surrounding area. es i ZONI&MENDMENT FACTORS RESPGQES FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (d) The suitability of the property for the zoned purposes. The property is suitable for a limited number of uses identified in ORA-1 District, however, due to the subject property's small size (33,600 SF) it is difficult to accommodate many of the uses permitted in the district. The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the ORA-1 classification to a B-3 classification in order to redevelop the subject property as proposed. The B-3 classification is consistent with the zoning contained on the adjacent eastern property as well as the trend of development within the area. (e) The existing uses and zoning of nearby property. The subject site is located within the ORA-1 Office-Research- Assembly District and contains a single story building currently being used by a retail printing establishment. The parcel to the south of the subject property is zoned ORA-1 and contains a municipal water tower. The area to the west is zoned ORA-1 and contains a medical office building further adjoined by a retail use (Workspace). The parcel directly east of the subject property is zoned B-3 General Business District and contains professional office buildings. Uses directly north of the subject property on 22"d Street are located in the City of Oakbrook Terrace and are within the B-3 General Retail District. Uses within this area include retail commercial, medical and restaurants. The proposed redevelopment will be consistent with the land uses in the area. (f) The length of time under the existing zoning that the property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of land development; The property has been developed with a single story retail building since 1968. ZONI&MENDMENT FACTORS RESPAES FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (g) The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner; There is no gain to the public associated with retaining the existing ORA-1 zoning classification, but there would be a substantial hardship imposed on the property owner. Due to the subject property's size, there are limited number of uses permitted in the District which would be accommodated on the property. Rezoning the B-3 classification to permit the proposed redevelopment will increase the economic use of the property resulting in positive tax benefits to the Village of Oak Brook. (h) The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public; The proposed B-3 zoning classification, which currently exists directly east of the subject property, would permit the development of the proposed use which is designed to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public. The proposed use is compatible with other retail and ancillary uses in the immediate area which provide amenities for the growing number of area workers, shoppers and residents. (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposed use is consistent with the 1990 Comprehensive Plan and represents a rational use of the subject property in concert with, and complementary to the many significant retail, office and service uses within the adjacent area. 0) The community need for the use proposed by the property owner. It is our opinion that there is a demonstrated need and demand for the proposed use at this location. The trend of development has been distinctly toward retail uses within the 22nd Street/Butterfield Road corridor. The residential density of the surrounding community as well as the high level of disposable income coupled with an extremely accessible location can be expected to provide a ready market for the proposed use. f . of o,4,�� • VILLAGE OF AK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, IL 60523 � eaooK ~� 630-990.3045 PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) X❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ VARIATION ($750) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) [ -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW WILL BE FILED WITH THE VILLAGE CLERK. LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 28 -202 -007 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS*2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook ZONING DISTRICT B-3 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-7C-2 Special Uses ACTION REQUESTED Text Amendment to Allow outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants in a B-3 district. PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT X OWNER(S)OF RECORD The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST Mary Ann R Monty PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information)Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies PHONE 630-368-0840 ADDRESS 2311 W 22nd Street, Suite 208 CITY Oak Brook STATE IL Zip 60523 Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASLA tlohnson @tldesignitd.com I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowledge and belief.I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s)on the lot frontages qfffie above subject property as 'bed in the ill e. n to the above fees,applicant agrees to re arse a Vil o ub ca ion costs within 30 days of billing. Signature of Owner Date Signat re of Applicant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE US .ONL Date Filed (!�- S" L Fee Paid$ '� Receipt No. T5(5_`f 2-- Received By_ Board of Trustees(Referral) S? � Notice Published "S'°C Newspaper Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified s' O4 PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Plan Commission -h Zoning Board of Appeals g �� Board of Trustees ' O L Board of Trustees �7, /.,2-0 G (Approval of Ordinance) SIGNED-VILLAGE CLERK�C.c A O Date t PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 TE)&ENDMENT FACTORS RESPOSS FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (a) The character of the neighborhood. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of 22"d Street and Tower Drive. 22nd Street is a retail/office corridor on both the north and south sides of the roadway adjacent to the subject property. The south side of 22nd Street is located in the Village of Oak Brook and the north side is within the City of Oakbrook Terrace. Tower Drive is a short stub terminating at the water tower property directly south of the subject property. Specific uses in the neighborhood include professional and medical offices, retail commercial and restaurants. Many of the restaurants on the 22nd Street/Butterfield Road corridor contain outdoor dining areas. (b) The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions; Not applicable. (c) The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the value of other property in the area; Not applicable. (d) The suitability.of the property for the zoned purposes. Not applicable. (e) The existing uses and zoning of nearby property. The subject site is located within the ORA-1 Office-Research- Assembly District and contains a single story building currently being used by a retail printing establishment. The parcel to the south of the subject property is zoned ORA-1 and contains a municipal water tower. The area to the west is zoned ORA-1 and contains a medical office building further adjoined by a retail use (Workspace). The parcel directly east of the subject property is zoned B-3 General Business District and contains professional office buildings. Uses directly north of the subject property on 22"d Street are located in the City of Oakbrook Terrace and are within its B-3 General Retail District. OF. TEX%ENDMENT FACTORS R ESPOARS FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET Uses within this area include retail commercial, medical and restaurants. The proposed redevelopment will be consistent with the land uses in the area. (f) The length of time under the existing zoning that the property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of land development; Not applicable. (g) The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner; Amending the B-3 zoning classification to allow outdoor dining areas as a special use will permit the proposed redevelopment that will increase the economic use of the property resulting in positive tax benefits to the Village of Oak Brook Currently, outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants are allowed, as a special use, in the B-1 and B- 2 Business Districts. (h) The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public; Amending the B-3 District to allow outdoor dining areas as a special use will permit a proposed use which is compatible with other retail and ancillary uses in the immediate area which provide amenities for the growing number of area workers, shoppers and residents. (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan; and Not applicable. E.� TE)&ENDMENT FACTORS RESPOGS FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (j) The community need for the use proposed by the property owner. It is our opinion that there is a demonstrated need and demand for the proposed use at this location. There currently exist many restaurants in the corridor which have outdoor dining areas. The existing B-1 and B-2 Business Districts permit, as a special use, these outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants. The residential density of the surrounding community as well as the high level of disposable income coupled with an extremely accessible location can be expected to provide a ready market for the proposed use. E-z VILLAGE OFVAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, IL 60523 630.990.3045 PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ VARIATION ($750) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) F -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPUCMT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW WILL BE FILED WITH THE VILLAGE CLERK. LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 28 - 202 -007 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS*2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook ZONING DISTRICT ORA1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-10 Article A I - ACTION REQUESTED Upon zoning amendment approval petitioned for; project will require two Special Uses: drive thru and outside seating/eating area PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT X OWNER(S)OF RECORD The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST Mary Ann R Monty PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information)Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies PHONE 630-368-0840 ADDRESS 2311 W 22nd Street, Suite 208 CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASL.A tiohnson @tidesianitd.com I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowledge and belief.I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s)on the lot fr es f t a ove subject property as Bribed in the 'llage Code. I ddition to the ove fees,applicant agrees to a th Villa or ubl a on sts within 30 da s of billing. Signature of Owner 0 Date Signatur of App cant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ? Date Filed 'O Fee Paid$ Receipt No, I�1,1170 Received By _ Board of Trustees(Referral)Notice Published l/�BOG Newspaper Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Plan Commission t!i - b G Zoning Board of Appeals �'' •�is Board of Trustees / A S=&6 Board of Trustees (Approval of Ordinance) �C SIGNED-VILLAGE CLERK d Da e PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 �, SOIAL USE FACTORS RESPONSLO FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (1) Is of the type described in subsection Al of this Section, is deemed necessary for the public convenience at that location. The proposed use is a Starbucks Coffee facility with drive-thru and outdoor patio area. Subsection Al describes public uses and the proposal is entirely private in character. (2) Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected; and The two elements of the proposed Starbucks Coffee facility which require a special use are the drive-thru feature and outdoor patio area. The drive-thru area has been designed with a dedicated drive, separate from the parking area, and contains a stacking cue for nine (9) vehicles. The outdoor dining area is located on the north end of the proposed building with access to and from the building and parking area. The outdoor dining area is fenced from the drive-thru lane and is substantially setback from 22nd Street. (3) Would not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located. The special use elements of the proposed plan, drive-thru feature and outdoor patio area, have been designed and located on the site as to not have an adverse impact on use and value of adjacent properties. Indeed it is commonly accepted that proximate food establishments are considered a desired amenity for office/professional buildings. This parcel is adjacent to two such buildings. Furthermore, retail uses similar to the proposed use are already established in the general area. V. 0 VILLAGE OF*K BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, IL 60523 �ooK 630-990-3045 0 5 PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) X❑ VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ VARIATION ($750) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) F -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW WILL BE FILED WITH THE VILLAGE CLERK. LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 28 -202 -007 LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS*2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook ZONING DISTRICT ORA1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-10 Article A ACTION REQUESTED Upon zoning amendment approval petitioned for; project will require two variations: front yard setback (22nd Street) and parking setback (Tower Drive) PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT X OWNER(S)OF RECORD The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST Mary Ann R Monty PHONE 630-852-8696 ADDRESS 663 Avenue East Chateau CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing information)Starbucks Coffee c/o TJ Design Strategies PHONE 630-368-0840 ADDRESS 2311 W 22nd Street, Suite 208 CITY Oak Brook STATE IL ZIP 60523 Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASLA tjohnson @tidesignitd.com I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowledge and belief.I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign t e to ge o e above subject property as ed i Vill o%=ti o the above fees,applicant agrees t e th Vi ag o p lic 'on costs within 30 days of billing. x- 11 (D( .5•I�,'2�10 Signature of Owner Date Signat re Jofpplicant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE Date Filed s'V 6 Fee Paid$ ^' Receipt No. 15y90 Received By C-- Board of Trustees(Referral) 13-0G Notice Published �'S'�` Newspaper Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Plan Commission °��' Zoning Board of Appeals tom' oG Board of Trustees L Board of Trustees 8 8 O C (Approval onance) SIGNED-VILLAGE CLERK O 2 I Date PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 0 MATION STANDARDS RESPONS FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (1)(a) The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. The subject property is 120' wide by 280' deep totaling approximately 33,600 square feet. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to B-3 in order to construct and operate a Starbucks Coffee facility. Two variations are being requested for the proposed use: • Section 13-7C-3(c) requires a 100'setback from 22"d Street for the building and the proposed plan indicates an approximately 69" setback. • Section 13-12-3(h) requires a 10'setback for parking within the front yard adjacent to Tower Drive and the plan indicates parking at the property line. The proposed plan also anticipates a future cross-access road located at the south end of the property which could potentially allow the adjacent eastern parcel access to Tower Drive. It also could allow for an expanded parking field to service present or future tenants. The limited size of the property and the provision for future cross- access/expansion parking along the rear yard desired by the Village create exceptional situations that are further burdened by the strict application of the zoning setbacks. (1)(b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The unique circumstances which exist on the subject property include the limited lot size (33,600 SF), lot width (120') and the provision for providing potential cross access for the adjacent eastern property. :77 SATION STANDARDS RESPONA FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET (1)(c) The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of,the locality. Numerous smaller businesses in the 22nd Street Corridor have similar setback conditions. The front yard setback (22nd Street) and parking setback (Tower), if granted, would be consistent with similar adjacent properties and not alter the character nor have an adverse impact on surrounding properties. (2)(a) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. The subject property is a corner lot located in the southeast corner of 22nd Street and Tower Drive. Due to its limited size, approximately 33,600 square feet,and 120 foot lot width, application of the required front yard setbacks place a restriction on the roe which p p �Y negatively impacts its development. (2)(b) The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. There are no other 33,600 SF corner lots having a lot width of 120 feet in the B-3 General Business District within the Village. (2)(c) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. OIATION STANDARDS RESPONIS FOR PROPOSED STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 2407 W 22ND STREET The proposed site plan which incorporates the required variations has been designed as to not have an adverse impact on other properties or improvements in the adjacent area. (2)(d) The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed site plan which incorporates the reduced setbacks provides sufficient open space, vehicular turning radii and adequate vehicular circulation as to not impair adjacent properties or endanger the public safety. The various elements of the proposed plan have been designed as to not have an adverse impact nor impair property values within the neighborhood. (2)(e) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. The existing building is physically obsolete with limited parking. The purpose of the variation is to allow redevelopment of a small corner lot consistent with the trend of development in the 22"d Street/Butterfield Road Corridor. Any redevelopment of this parcel will require similar variations. (2)(f) That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty is based on the physical characteristics of the small corner lot and not created by any person. May 10, 2006 Mr. Robert Kallien, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brood Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RE: Proposed Starbucks 2407 W 22nd Street Dear Mr. Kallien: This will confirm that Theodore R. Johnson of the firm TJ Design Strategies, Ltd. as the authorized representative of The Mary Ann R. Monty Trust #8-1995, to process the application(s) to the Village of Oak Brook for all necessary remedies required as it relates to the proposed Starbucks to be located at 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois. Please do not hesitate to call me at (630) 852-8696 should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, S " 6Z, �i Mary Ann R Monty Trustee of The Mary Ann R Monty Trust#8-1995 cc: T. Johnson • _ Starbucks Coffee Company Midwest Regional Office 550 West Washington Blvd.Suite 200 Chicago.IL 60661 M r May 9, 2006 Mr. Robert Kallien, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brood Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RE: Proposed Starbucks 2407 W 22nd Street Dear Mr. Kallien: This will confirm that Theodore R. Johnson of the firm TJ Design Strategies, Ltd. as the authorized representative of Starbucks Coffee Company, to process the application(s) to the Village of Oak Brook for all necessary remedies required as it relates to the proposed Starbucks to be located at 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois. Please do not hesitate to call me at (312) 775-6507 ext. 2243 should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY Chip Beltchenko Development Manager cc: T. Johnson 2479 TJ DESIGTEGIES,LTD. S BANK 2311 WEST DST.,SUITE 208 HARRIS INAND SAVINGS BANK IL OAK BROOK,IL 60523 WHEELING,760090 5/12/2006 630-368-0840 2 2565/7110 PAY TO THE Village of Oak Brook **3,750.00 a ORDER OF p€ Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and OO/100*************t*##*###'#####s######*######s##################*##**########## DOLLARS Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523 'a IL i MEMO A ORIZ SIGNATURE - 11'00247911' 1:0 7 10 2 566 1,1: 8 50 2 1,60 20 L110 2480 TJ DESIGN STRATEGIES,LTD. HARRIS BANK 2311 WEST 22ND ST.,SUITE 208 HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OAK BROOK,IL 60523 WHEELING,IL 80090 2-2566n10 5118/2006 630-366-0840 m 0 PAY TO THE �**100.00 ORDER OF Village of Oak Brook D One Hundred and OO/100•#***#####s###ss#######srs##t#r#t###tt#######r##t####s#######«##t###########tss##tr############# DOLLARS Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Po Oak Brook,IL 60523 DEC z MEMO �r.�C S A OR D 51 NATURE 'G i Op.848�10 1:07 10 2566 L1: 8 50 2 1,60 20 1,11' yySD 3 ISSti 17 I I 15wo �' •mob S s D�✓c,✓S �1� sd _ . I CHECK S CHECKS S CASH INV N DATE NAME G.L.ACCOUNT N DESCRIPTION I NUMBER INVALID VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK WITHOUT SIGNATURE o, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15490 e 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS c PHONE:(630)990-3045 7 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS •LMP12 • TJ DESIGN STRATEGIES,LTD. HARRIS BANK 2494 2311 WEST 22ND ST.,SUITE 208 HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OAK BROOK,IL 60523 WHEE 2N ,OW90 6/2006 - 630-368-0840 S RAY TO THE Village of Oak Brook **750.00 ORDER OF G Seven Hundred Fifty and 00/100***************************************************************** DOLLARS Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523 MEMO A HORI2 SIGNATURE 0002L,9110 40? L0 2 566 L1: 8 50 2 L60 20 Lu' Aw 1950 ,� I 1 y DESCRIPTION G.L.ACCOUNT N I CHECK 9 CASH INV If DATE NAME NUM-ER f CHECKS I INVALID WITHOUT SIGNATURE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK g 15492 /A o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS PHONE:(630)990-3045 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT 7kaek FOR YOUR RECORDS I •'i • Certification Surrounding Property Owners I (we) certify that the names and addresses of all the surrounding property owners including mailing labels submitted with this application are located within a minimum distance of 250 feet in all directions from the perimeter of the subject property and that the number of feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways has been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names and addresses are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County. The Property owners as listed have been obtained from the Township Assessors office within 30 days of the filing of this application. The surrounding property owners list as submitted herewith and supporting attachments are true to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. I (we) give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s) on the lot frontages of the subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the required application fees, applicant/owner agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs, recording fees, and any other associated costs or fees within 30 days of billing. Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASLA as Mary Ann R Monty as Trustee of authorized representative for Starbucks The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 Coffee Company Printed Name of Owner Printed me f licant IIM..-�- ignature of Owner Date Signature of plic nt Date BILL TO INFORMATION: Starbucks Coffee Company c/o TJ Design Strategies LTD Theodore R Johnson, AICP, ASLA 630-368-0840 Print Name/Company Contact Person Contact Phone 2311 W 22nd Street, Suite 208 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Address To be Billed Alternate Phone NOTE: If the applicant/owner has not complied with these requirements and notification has not been sent to a neighboring property owner within the 250-foot requirement less than 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing, the hearing on this matter will be postponed to the next regular meeting, or until such time as all neighbors within the 250-foot requirement have been sent proper notification. PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2008 ' NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads,streets,alleys,and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule. NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL OWNER PROPERTY OWNER Islam Eldewek 4 Berseem Court erseem ourt Oak Brook IL 60523 [a" k ak Brook, IL 60523 06-28-207-001 Thomas & Karen Greasel 6 Arden Court Arden Court Oak Brook IL 60523 Brook IL 60523 06-28-207-003 Donald C Trauscht 4 Arden Court 4 Arden Court 06-27-101-001 Oak Brook IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Realty Assoc. Fund VII LP T/A Assoc Realty; 28 State St 311 W 22nd Street No 10th Boston MA 02109 Oak Brook IL 60523 06-27-100-017 Nicor Gas Real Estate; P.O. Box 190 No Address Aurora IL 60507 - 06-27-100-006 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road No Address Oak Brook IL 60521 Water Tower location 06-28-202-009 LaSalle National Bank 135 S. LaSalle St #2500 -2425 22nd eet Trust 11357310 Chicaao, IL 60603 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-28-202-021 R & B Properties 170 Metropolitan Centre, 333 S. 2525 22nd Street 7th St. Minneapolis, MN 5 402 Oak Brook IL 60523 06-28-202-004 Nicor Gas Real Estate; P.O. Box 190 No Address Aurora. IL 60507 Right-of-way 06-28-202-011 Entrust Chicago 200 W Superior 18WO66 22nd St FBO IRA24004 Chicago, IL 60610 Oakbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-21-403-010 JoAnne Pobre 41 W2 2 Brown Road 18WO44-066 22nd St St Charles IL 60175 akbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-21-403-019 West Suburban Bank Comptroller Dept., 2800 S Finley 7W754 22nd St Road Downers Grove IL 60515 akbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-21-403-020 KRCV Corp 3333 New Hyde Park Rd, 17W740 22nd St c/o KIMCO Realty New Hyde Park NY 11042 akbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-21-403-023 KIMCO 837 O/P Inc 3333 New Hyde Park Rd, 17W744 22nd St c/o KIMCO Realty New Hyde Park NY 11042 Oakbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-21-403-024 KIMCO 837 O/P Inc 3333 New Hyde Park Rd, 17W744 0 22nd St o KIMCO Real New Hyde Park NY 11042 Oakbrook Terrace. I 06-22-301-059 KRCV Corp 3333 New Hyde Park Rd, 17W714-738 22nd St c/o KIMCO Realty New Hyde Park NY 11042 Oakbrook Terrace IL 6052 06-22-301-058 (Attach additional sheets if necessary) M . PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 R SuqLct Property Verificalln (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number(P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 202 007 2. Common Address: 2407 W 22nd Street, Oak Brook, IL 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) 4. Email the Legal Description to aDolaneke.oak-brook.ora That certain tract of land situated in the County of DuPage, State of Illinois and more particularly described below: Lot 3 in Bulter Company M-1, Inc. Assessment Plat No. 6 of part of the North West 1/4 of Section 27 and part of the North East 1/4 Section 28, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principle Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded July 20, 1964, as Document R64-25649, In DuPage County, Illinois The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Chrissy Dabbert Date called: May 9, 2006 DuPage County Clerk's Office— Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Dena Vautaw Date called: May 9, 2006 I verify that the information provided above is accurate. Jeri D Krieg Printed Name Si ature Date: May 9, 2006 Relationship to Applicant: Associate DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Legal Description Review Corrections Required Yes No Approved By: Date PUBLIC HEARING INFO Packet-5/2006 • Design Strategies, LTD. Ti >planning.site development.consulting June 6,2006 Mr. Robert Kallien,Jr.,AICP Director of Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brood Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RE: Proposed Starbucks 2407 W 22nd Street Dear Mr. Kallien: Starbucks Coffee Company (applicant) and The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 (owner) respectfully submit the following documents per discussions with Gail Polonek on June 1, 2006. We have enclosed the following items to be presented along with our initial submittal of May 15,2006 • Applications &Response to respective Standards or Factors for: a Text Amendment • Application Fees: a Text Amendment $ 750.00 The following documents should be used in place of the original documents as directed: • Project Narrative (Letter of Explanation) • Site Plan (revised to detail requested and required setbacks) • Variation Standards Response (revised as requested) 2311 W.22nd Street,Suite 208,Oak Brook,IL 60523 P:630.368.0840 F:630.368.0845 E:info@ designitd.com D• • The following is the relief being sought in order to allow the construction of the Starbucks facility at 2407 22nd Street : • Map Amendment from ORA-1 to B-3 District. • Text Amendment to Section 13-7C.2,Special Uses,to add the text"Outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants" in a B-3 District. • Special Uses. Section 13-7C.2. A. Approval of an outdoor dining area adjacent to the restaurant. B. Approval of a drive-in facility • Variations A. Variation to Section 13-7C-3(c) to reduce the required 100-foot setback on 22nd street to approximately 69 feet. B. Variation to Section 13-12-3H(1) to reduce the required 10-foot parking setback from 10 feet to the property line (0 feet). We look forward to working with the Village of Oak Brook on this project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, TJ Design Strategies,Ltd. Theodore R.Jo on, ICP, ASLA President ti17dk AP, sign Strategies, LTD. TJ ning.site development.consulting May 15,2006 Mr. Robert Kallien, Jr.,AICP Director of Community Development Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brood Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RE: Proposed Starbucks 2407 W 22nd Street Dear Mr. Kallien: Starbucks Coffee Company (applicant) and The Mary Ann R Monty Trust #8-1995 (owner) respectfully submit the following documents in support of the proposed Starbucks Coffee free- standing location at 2407 W 22nd Street. In support of the requests as outlined in the enclosed Project Narrative, we have enclosed the following items and 25 full size (24x36) documents, as well as an 8.5x11 reduced set for your review: • Applications&Response to respective Standards or Factors for. a Zoning Amendment b Special Use c Variation • Application Fees: a Zoning Amendment $ 750.00 b Special Use(2) 1,500.00 c Variations(2) 1,500.00 $3,750.00 d Public Hearing Signs(2) 100.00 • Legal Description (from original email sent to gpolonek @oak-brook.or&) and copy of current Real Estate Tax Bill • List of Surrounding Property Owners,Certification and mailing labels • Project Narrative (Letter of Explanation) 2311 W.22nd Street,Suite 208,Oak Brook,IL 60523 P:630.368.0840 F:630.368.0845 E:info@t designitd.com IPIb • Plat of Survey • Project Team List • Aerial Photograph identifying Project Location • Existing Conditions Photographs • Site Plan • Concept Landscape Plan • Elevations We look forward to working with the Village of Oak Brook on this project. Should you have any questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, TJ Design Strategies,Ltd. Theodore R.Jo on, ICP,ASLA President trj Jdk ====STA.RB_U C'1(S-C;O:FF�EE=_ __________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _I: ===_======== PARKING ACCESS AISLE 9'-0" ♦/w', WIDTH OF STALL J J H P A R I N G P A R Ix I N Go CL LLJ o I 0 W W z Y Q - J 0 3 J i �j lI z w U Q ® 4 r \w Of Of ° I 29'-1° 24'-6" WIDTH OF LANDSCAPING 12'-0" 96'-11" TO 22ND ST. PATIOCD u- 0 3 LLJ \ J Q z + + + + + + + 6'-0" O.C. TYP. �"1 I n< (� �o W z 0 Q ' Z Q Q' DRIVE—THRU LANE ° N ' SITE PLAN NORTH SCALE : 1:10 Sarfatty Associates, Ltd. Architects P R O P O S E D �� 3201 Old Glenview Road,Suite 301 STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY Wilmette,Illinoi:60091-2999 STA RB U C KS COFFEE 550 WEST WASHINGTON BLVD. I I I (847)920.1100 voice (847)920.1101 tai SUITE 200 2407 W. 22ND STREET, gM®� ,ULv12,2006 *rm OAKBROOK, IL CHICAGO, IL 60661 i t a r�. r �v ,n. •4 _r t*dF Aft sw aw t �I < t �' � � i • .� Cdr'1.,,- " • ° r r. •' t It IL • - S'�^-. ! • Q}ISM f� �- '- .. - • 1� �t � as ,� • i i up, - •li � itr: iw- 1 R 9 tr' fr • � r • s� t.. Y . ? w r •!t r F n H - p• ._ if .-v da.n Iry is 04 - ills • � '': $ T r•Y ems .. a. • .,. i , t ddrd w MOW ,tom' wt, at+ ♦ - y Al AM. 11L 4W W& jo IV qw tl•' �p" �' ��` t ,�,•� ' " ,'� �."'��" �`fie i "�w � fit_ ' '�.i•,�,t c i It • At irkm ` i11ir � � , �,et _. #w♦�' ,. " :w".`• �4 �il •.. ife •�t � � � � �[. -�, '¢ �a 1 .1R .+�.•.. �' d�_.mac I•I►. //��////+- ` STARBUCKS COFFEE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Design Strategies, LTD. ,I, planning.site development.consulting OAK BROOK ILLINOIS MAY 15 F 2006 2311 W.22nd Street Suite 208 Oak Brook,IL 60523 BROOK, P:630.368.0840 F:630.368.0845 E:info@gdesignitd.com (SZ- �.►'w" r,`x'< a ¢, ' mss In r� j��4..� ,i � ice* �'.'� �•_ ♦ .�T.. �e.r a _ ^''t I -�, „ +� •.�• . R I' . 11,E •, -_ .. .. .� ` i use f y s=p� 1 NORTH • ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION //N\ _max........__ ..-+.._. . .x t i 1. Yom, #a', ", - x ,W ^q .'#'• _ • • • � � = ' • development. OAK BROOK, 00, Tj 2311 W.22nd Street Suite 208 Oak Brook,IL 60523 P:630.368.0840 F:630.368.0845 E:info@tjdesign1td.co�