Minutes - 05/28/1996 - Board of Trustees.;n^'_ ^ix•; "'�" .'4t.',Ir,;.i'. "� ^'j', "1 #r -i`,.�s• ^; :i3,'�,r•_„�.Jy:i,:�.9r rr';,n+rr i��k;�znw�rr`(p, .;rr1�•'.1�,.7,kh.f, n�„:popr.o rz6• +F,. c rt+ t aFC;r,Ci�:?.r a,t
.a +i,•�t.) � > >����`"'k,.'s`S3'Mr ii°•.f�,_�,s "r,'; ffid"'r ,'�s;<, �§Yf�'
M I A/ 1994
VILLAGE OF OAK. BROOK Minutes MAY 28a 1996
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED AS WRITTEN,,.,-
OR AS AMENDED _ BY VILLAGE BOARD ON
--Or f f , 119 le
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order by President
Bushy in the Samuel E. Dean ,ioard Room of the Village Commons at 7:33
p.m. Pledge of Allegiance was given.
� L
The Cleric called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: President Bushy, Trustees Bartecki, Denny, McInerney and
Savino.
Trustee Shumate arrived at 7:35 p.m.
Trustee Payovich arrived at 7:50 p.m.
ABSENT: None.
IN ATTENDANCE: Stephen B. Veitch, Village Manager; Dale L. Durfey, Jr.,
Village Engineer; Tom Hawk, Director of Code Enforcement; Darrell J.
Langlois, Finance Officer/Treasurer; and Richard A. Martens, Village
Attorney.
Village President Bushy announced that Salt Creek is being monitored due to
the heavy rainfall, and there is sufficient time to notify the County to initiate
the water intake at the Elmhurst Quarry,
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to approve the
minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 14, 1996 as presented and waive the
fiZll reading thereof. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ul e3 j� :
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Shumate, to approve the
Omnibus Agenda. ROLI, CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 - Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 - Trustee Payovich. Motion carried.
A. APPROVAL QFBLS.: Approved Omnibus Vote.
VILLAGE OF OAK. BROOK Minutes 1 of 15 May 28, 1996
M11
MEETING CALL
ROLE. CALL
ANNOUNCEMENTS
AN'TD
OPEN FORAM
MINUTES
APPROVAL OF:
BILLS -
$430,124.44
�A 0,
II
II
PAYROLL
B. APPROVAL QE EAYRQLL: Approved Omnibus Vote. $308,442.98(gross:)
C.
A
E.
F.
1 111:
PAYOUTS:
I- GROUP I RE -SQU& S, INC, - I!AYQU-T #8 - MfOEMAIIQN INFORMATION
IIECHNOLOGY ELAN - PHASE 1I - $6,246.69: Approved TECHNOLOGY PLAN
Omnibus Vote.
2. JAMES J. B NES & ASS TES - PAYOUT # - X96 1996 PAVING
PAVINQTROIECT - DESIQN - $5.251,91: Approved Omnibus PROJECT
Vote.
0. 10,UM", I BUMS & ASSOCIAIES - PAYOUT, #20 - 1925
PAVINQ RROJECT - CQNST-RU-CT-IQN - $121.67; Approved
Omnibus Vote.
1995 PAVING
PROJECT
4. !QARQW ARCHITECTS„ PjA ER R - PAVr%T 7'-r aj LIBRARY DESIGN
LIBRARY DESIGN.. E ICES - $1.836.00: Approved Omnibus SERVICES
Vote.
!,WIN
APJULJ22�: Approved Omnibus Vote.
6, 11ENIS a A - - - a FROM ENUA: None.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 2 of 15 May 28, 1996
P-9
&0A
REFERRALS:
MONTALBANO-PRE. i
FINAL PLAT OF SUB.
& FP SU
MONTALBANO/HARGER,
RD. CONDOS - REZONE,
TA, SU, FP SU
SU WITH VAR.
TREASURER'S REP001'
APRIL, 1996 1
:+Al<"j' r�:b'P" �'•' '.ri "7'yc°1v 'r -. '• =;; .11 r'}'A. �. ._:; t °r u"„' =ua. = "9�m snC,x,irtix,�,�,;),y �ag��,; -. ,.¢tia .mow a1r... y;};,�? -t ^s` ,;.�; Px� "�', > „:+zyl: reVlca: ° "ss
,, _ 'Alt�'�i��`', �'.•..;:'� _ , ry !,� � s � ., _ � ., . , . � �•• ..a •. Y.';.'�'� -e-r' '�`'`. �°�4�•, ". �.u.�, #`..x•n� _ ., r•; ... ' -�� #� •
Vie. .. c; � , � ,. . �r : s:�; 9' � n >,r, , —•',
A APPMDAENTS; No Business.
As part of the Village of Oak Brook receiving Lake Michigan water
through the DuPage Water Commission, the Village was required to
grant to the Commission easements for Metering Stations and Feeder
Mains. The Village recently learned from Commission General
Manager James Holzwart that easements have not been granted for
several sites in Oak Brook as follows:
1. Site 16a - Reservoir A on York Road - the easements for the
,Aetering Station and Feeder Main;
2. Site l6b - Route 83/335th StretL - the easements for the Feeder
Main; and
3. Site 16c - Reservoir B on Meyers Road - the easements for the
Metering Station and Feeder Main.
The Commission is asking that these documents be executed as
required by the Village's agreements. Village Attorney Martens and
Village Engineer Durfey reviewed the documents and find their to be
in order.
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Btute=cki, to
approve Resolution 96- DWC -E3 -R. -671, "'A Resolution Authorizing
The Intergovernmental Transfer Of Easement Rights To The DuPage
Water Commission And Authorizing The Execution Of Final
Versions Of Metering Station And Pipeline Easement Agreements
Between The Village Of Oak Brook And The DuPage Water
Commission ", as presented and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL
CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 Trustees Bartecki. Kenny, McInerney, Savino and
Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 Trustee Payovich. Motion carried.
ViLLAOE OF OAK BROOK Minutes
3 of 15 May 28, 1"6
IIII
t�
I
RES.96- DWC -E3-
R -671
DWC METERING
STATION & PIPELINi
EASEMENT AGREE-
MENTS
I!
,I
ii
I'
-,, ,
C.
AWARD OFD() r,
W41 Is V W4111 It
Mot
At the January 23, 1996 Board meeting, the Village Board authorized
staff to restructure the insurance claims arrangement and issue
requests for proposals for benefits consulting services, third party
claims administration (TPA), stop loss insurance and group 'life
insurance. On March 26, 1 996, the Board awarded a contract to
Kennedy Consulting Group for the necessary consulting services.
This approach was taken in order to secure the services of the benefits
consultant on a pure fee- for - service basis. The major goals of the
process were to obtain TPA services and re- insurance contracts on a
net -of commission basis, improve claims administration service and
maintain or improve cost competitiveness.
Through the RFP process, the Village received a total of 16 proposals
for the performance of claims administration services - six from third
party administrators, four from insurance companies quoting on a
self - insured basis, and six from insurance companies quoting on a
fully- insured basis. In addition, the Village's current TPA., Health
Plan Management (HPM), provided its renewal rates on a net -of
commission basis. Staff is recommending that the contract between
Health Plan Management and the Village for administrative services
be renewed for a period of two years.
Conditions of this renewal include:
1. Direct claim submittal by participants (simpler, faster and more
efficient).
2. Annual loading of claim form data for each participant, thereby
eliminating the need to submit a new claim form each time a bill is
submitted.
3. Performance guarantees, standards and penalties to address service
issues such as claim turnaround time and financial quality
(overpayments/underpayments).
4. No increase in claim administration fee in the second year of the
contract.
Currently, the Village pays $1,05 per participant per month for plan
administration (i.e., consulting) services. In addition, the consultant
receives commissions on stop loss premiums. For the coming year,
Kennedy Consultant Group will be providing these services based on
VILLAU OF OAK. BROOK Minutes 4 of 15 May 28. 1996
HEALTH & DENTAL
PLAN, LIFE INS.
VISION INS.
RENEWALS
" 7,:,77,777, t7,
the pure cost of consulting (no commission). Including all services
related to the 1996 -97 plan year, this translates to $10.81 per
participant per month.
Stop loss quotes were received net- of- commissi�,, in conjunction with
the proposals for claims administration services. In addition, HPM
obtained quotes from a number of stop -loss carriers, including the
Village's current provider, SLI, a brokerage firm in Indianapolis
underwritten by Peoples Security Life.
Annual cost for both categories (specific and aggregate) was analyzed,
with SLI having an estimated annual cost of $91,257 as compared to
$103,168 from Harrington Benefits Systems. This compares with
$160,068 that the Village currently Pays annually based on the
Village's existing participant population. The rate reduction is
attributed partly to savings from commissions no longer being paid to
the plan administrator and TPA, and partly to the competitive
pressures of the RFP process. Although unlikely, it is still possible
that the rates could change depending on the Village's .Lune
experience. Barring any material price change, Staff recommends
that the Village retain SLI for stop -loss coverage. (Because the
Village would be continuing with its current carrier, all cases which
have reached, or potentially could reach, the $25,000 deductible will
be covered. This might not be the case if a stop loss change were to
occur. This is an important consideration given that the Village does
have a few such cases.)
Quotes were also received for PPO access premiums and utilization
review fees. Utilization review is necessary to pre - certify hospital
stays and treatments. HPM included its PPO access quote in the
utilization review fee. For those TPA.s proposing to use the Village's
current preferred provider organization, HPM quoted a rate of $4.50,
while The TPA quoted $5.0 (Utilization Review + PPO Access).
'This information also supports the staff recommendation to renew the
contract with HPM.
Conversion fee is a provision in the Village's plan which allows
former employees to elect to convert to an individual policy with the
selected vendor after their rights under COBRA have expired. This.
provides the participant with the ability for continued coverage. This
Option is provided by Celtic Life Insurance at the rate of $,60 per
participant per month, and is unchanged from the previous plan year,
The Village is 100% self-insured for its dental insurance coverage,
The Village received a total of 13 proposals for dental administrative
VILLAGE OFOAK BROOD Minutes ,5 of 15 May 28, 1996
' •: +;�+^'n °^;� , ;eta ,- :'t',yr. -, -' •_.' .C'r,,,,t^'., r „'+,u�sr ; 5cv ^,;,'''•$'z�'4: ?��{;.`'£ °,?fis ;,i;;a;�,.x_',.= air' 'rn':',< <:•S,`..;'r- lc��Y,,. ,.r+f�' ?1`g.
I;
II
pw
I,
services - five from TPAs, three from insurance carriers quoting on a
self- funded basis, and five from insurance carriers quoting on a fully -
insured basis. Health Plan Management submitted a renewal rate
contemplating no change in the current premium of $1.70. Because {
this rate is the lowest quoted, Staff recommends that the Village
renew for another year. In order to cover both expected claims and
administration for the upcoming year, staff recommends monthly !
premiums of $14.75 /single and $45.55 /family. This is based on actual
claims experienced in the current year, and represents an approximate
I�
12% decrease from the current premiums of $16.50 /single and
$51.50 /family.
The Village provides $50,000 of group term life insurance and AD &
D coverage to all full -tame employees. Quotes were received from
five carriers, and Staff recommends that the Village renew with its
current vendor, American International Group (AIG), at the rate of
$0.216 per $1,000 per month. This represents a reduction from the
current rate of $0.24 per $1,000 per month, due to the removal of
commissions.
The Village utilizes Vision Service Plan (VSP) as its vision insurance
provider. The monthly renewal rates are $6.84 for each employee and
$13.35 for dependent coverage. These rates are unchanged.
Employee coverage is paid for by the Village, with dependent
coverage being optional and fully paid for by the employee. Staff
recommends that the Village renew with VSP for the corning year.
In conclusion, the significant reductions in cost evident in staff s
recommendations can be attributed to both the competitive RFP
process, as well as the providing of services and insurance on a net -of-
commission basis. It is anticipated that the Village will save
approximately $64,000 in fixed costs ($42,000 after consultant fees)
as a result of this process. Further, by instituting direct submittal;
submitting annual claim data/forms; and instituting performance
guarantees, standards and penalties, the Village service concerns have
been address.
Motion by Trustee Kenny, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to
authorize the Village Manager to enter into agreements for specific
and aggregate stop -loss insurance and third party claims
administration for the Village of Oak Brook Health and Dental Plan;
group term life insurance; and group vision insurance, all for the
period beginning July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997. ROLL
PALL VOTE:
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 6 of 15 May 28, 1996
-� ,: ���_U fir,, `� ': - - � • _� ,, .
Ayes: S -
Nays: 0 -
Absent: 1
II
�I
i
I'
Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney, Savino and
Shumate.
None.
Trustee Payovich. Motion carried.
D. R'QR_K ROAD/H GER,�QAQ BICYC F/PF�E� AN T.RA�I _ YORK RD. /HARGER ;'RD.
G T WAY TRANSFER: BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN
TRAIL - ROW
The Village staff' and consultant have been progressing on the Phase I TRANSFER
Study for the York Road/Harger Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Path project
and have identified various alternative routings. The optimum routing
has the path along the west side of York Road starting north of
Clearwater Drive and heading north to the south side of the Fast -West
Tollway. The path would then turn northwesterly, crossing the East-
Nest Tollway at a 90- degree angle, and tie into Harger Road between
York Road and the East -West Tollway on -ramp. The :-emaini.ng
portion of the path would follow the southerly side of Harger Road to
the west side of Salt Creek, where it would connect to the existing
path.
In meetings with the Tollway, it was discovered that certain sections
of Harger Road (Salt Creek to York Road) are apparently still owned
by the Tollway. These parcels were originally purchased by the
Tollway when the East -Nest Tollway was constructed and Harger
Road was relocated from its original location. The Tollway is now
desirous of turning these parcels of Harger Road over to the Village
since Harger Road is part of the local street system. The Tollway has
also requested that the Harger Road Bridge be turned over to the
Village.
in reviewing this request, the parcels of land encompassing Harger
Road should be under Village control since Harger Road is, in fact,
part of the municipal street system. The Harger Road/Salt Creek
Bridge is another issue. Assuming ownership and control of this
bridge structure presents a significant long -term cost to the Village,
including biennial inspection reporting, periodic structural repairs,
and v.1;imate bridge replacement at the end of the bridge's useful life.
These costs could easily run into the six slid seven figure range.
To date, the Tollway, who currently owns f.he bridge, has been
responsible for the structure and the Village has been responsible for
the riding surface. Staff believes this arrangement should continue.
Motion by "Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Bartecki, to accept
right- of-way for Harger Road from the 'roll I-Iigh•,vay Authority and
VILLAGE, OF OAK BROOK Minutes 7 of 15 May 28, 1996
}5, ax., , �,- �, +9.�4ZVC�'- •.- ',�'i7- •_s�1iP.: 14;s'�'. -n' 1,. ,if�; f3'j ��t4;`°�y�";4£`y s' *,'
s.s - `LLB: _71-1111 , - ; �
decline the acceptance of the Harger Road/Salt Creek Bridge structure
from the Tollway. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 5 - Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney, Savino and
Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 1 - Trustee Payovich. Motion carried.
Trustee Payovich arrived at 7:50 p.m.
Both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have
completed their review of this proposal to delete the "college,
universities, convents, monasteries, seminaries, and accessory uses
thereto - on lots not less than 40 -acres in area". Special Use from all
Residential Zoning Districts.
The Plan Commission by a vote of 5 to 0 at their meeting of February
19, 1996, approved a motion to recommend approval of the Text
Amendment as requested with the additional recommendation that all
other Residential Zoning District Special Uses be reviewed for
viability and appropriateness at the current timefrarne in Oak Brook's
development.
The Zoning Board of Appeals held the necessary Public Hearing and
at their May 7, 1996 meeting, a motion to recommend approva' of the
Text Amendment as requested was passed by a vote of 6 to 0. The
Zoning Board of Appeals also included a recommendation for review
of the other Residential Zoning District Special Uses.
Mr. Robert Barth, General Counsel for the Institute in Basic Life
Principles, submitted written objections and testimony in opposition
at both hearings. Mr. Barth also filed an objection to the standing of
the petitioners in proposing this Text Amendment. Village Attorney
Martens responded to this objection in an attorney /client privileged
communication. Plan Commission Chairman Aktipis and Zoning
Board of Appeals Acting Chairman Aldini both ruled that the
petitioners did have standing to propose this Text Amcndment.
VILLAIDEOF OAK BROOK Minutes 8 of 15 May 28, 1996
w, .� r, ,r roe ' `' y - .tdp'i` } "' in _•
-a � s ,'r i r t`k4eki. "fre ';S . r •iT'.. �ls. {� »l•.• r .N a, +,b�w'�.;r keYs�19F "+�$�' pia �''?��.+ '��'9Y"��4L ?.. 3't?o r�F
- , , , ��- � • rt"a�a'3,`, -;; � ,j:�}r;�`vq � � �,r� * <`��5�� ;,; +;bu`r,x Y' _s�V; s -_� 7 r�,izu.
� z -
L
�I
�I
Mr. Barth stated on behalf of the Institute that they oppose this
proposed amendment. He requested the Board to consider the facts.
The petition has been submitted by four or five individuals who reside
in different residential districts. In reality, this proposed amendment
will only effect one piece of property in Oak Brook, and that properly
is owned by the institute in Basic Life Principles. It is the only tract
of land in the Village that is large enough that could be developed into
a university. The Institute is an institution of educational programs,
and very interested in the possibility of seeking another special use at
s( me point in time. Generally, the courts in Illinois look at two
things, whether there is a substantial change in the neighborhood and
whether the change was related to the health, welfare and safety of the
individuals. Although the area has development since 1966, it has
always been residential and this special use category has been there
since 1966 and as late as 1990, when amended. The Village already
has provisions and procedures to protect the health, safety and
welfare. When seeking a special use, the requested use roust satisfy
that it will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of its
citizens. With a Special Use provision, that protection is always
there. The Institute requests the Board to keep and maintain the
current Zoning Ordinance that does allow this Special Use in areas-
large enough to accommodate the use and that can meet the criteria
for that special use.
He cited page 970 of the Code of Ordinances rendering the opinion
that the individual property owners who filed the petition do not have
the right under the Oak Brook Zoning Ordinance to do so. The
section reads as follows:
"(2) Initiation of Amendment.- Amendments may be proposed by
the Board of Trustees, Plan Commission or Zoning Board of Appeals,
and by any person, firm or corporation having a freehold interest, a
possessory interest entitled to exclusive possession, a contractual
interest which may become a freehold interest or any exclusive
possessory interest which is specifically enforceable on the land
which is described in the proposal for an amendment."
David Gooder, Counsel for the applicants, commented that none of
the members of the Plan Commission or Zoning Board of Appeals
agree with the Institute in Basic Life Principles' interpretation of this
section of the Code of Ordinances.
Village Attorney Martens clarified that the applicants do have
standing to present their petition for this board to consider. He cited
G c N�anal Bang y, �wty-o�,(- a& 12 111.2d 40, 145 N.E,2d
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes
I'M
9 of 15 May 28, 1996
Y." ''d'� F >t,1 w °a•-• ,• a^ �:�,a - e.y,,. �i 'c 'i, - - r - � ,.x +u, a. :�rF n,s�:•,sr`
65 (1957) of factors relevant to zoning amendments as established in
Illinois law and incorporated into the Plan Commission's Rules of
Procedure. These factors are:
1. the existing uses and zoning of nearby property;
2. the extent to which property values are diminished by the
particular zoning restrictions;
3. the extent to which the destruction of property values of the
restricted property promotes the health, safety, morals or general
welfare of the public;
4, the relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed
upon the individual property owner;
5. the suitability of the subject property for the zoned purposes;
6. the length of time the property has been vacant as zoned
considered in the context of land development in the area in the
vicinity of the subject property;
7. the community need for the proposed use; and
8. the care with which the community has undertaken to plan its land
use development.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Savino, to direct the
Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final action at
the Regular meeting of June 11, 1996. VOICE VOTE: Motion
carried.
Trustee Savino asked the Board to consider requesting the Flan
Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals to review the Special Use
section of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village Code of Ordinances.
It was a consensus of the Village Board to refer the analysis of the
Special Use section of the Code of Ordinances to the Plan
Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals.
B. RECOMMIENDAUDIN - URBAN UJAIL PROEMBES, INC. - URBAN RETAIL
PROPERTIES
PORTABLE CARTS
R
This petition requests the establishment of a new Special Use in B -2
Zoning Districts and for approval of this Special Use for the
Oakbrook Center. The use requested is for limited food raid beverage
vendor carts to be placed at several locations in the outdoor courtyard
areas of the shopping center.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK M. inutes 10 of 15 May 28, 1996
i�
3, ns;S'a�a,,k "z' 7F" 7d.
`� i``• s��i ��u3x_ `�i:, lt' 1' � �, - ^; .pct' \,��n .J. ...^ �ln�Fi1 x i'.i s�.� >`� ; �.i. }-.fi�j w+<v'la,�,";R;, /s,','yi ,•y
t., �.. ,.; `rt£ �C.•�, ..a....tc �.' f,'. r, .ss ,. a;1�4 ,-.io3 i �l','r"
The Plan Commission, by a vote of 4 to 4, and the Zoning Board of
Appeals, by a vote of 6 to 4, recommended approval of the Text
Amendment as requested and the Special Use subjeci to the following
conditions:
a) a maximum of eight (8) such carts may be in use at any one time;
b) use shall be limited annually to the period of April 1 through
October 31;
c) each cart shall be owned and operated by an establishment
operating in a completely enclosed building in Oakbrook Center
( "the related store ") and cart sales items shall be limited to those
items also sold within the related store;
d) the hours of cart operation shall, at most, coincide with those of the
related store;
e) no alcoholic beverages will be sold from a cart;
f) at close of each day's operation, and whenever not in use, carts
shall be stored in a completely enclosed building within Oakbrook
Center;
g) when not in use, all connection areas for cart utilities, anchors, or
the like shall be properly secured so as to present no danger to
pedestrians;
h) all carts shall have a fixed operating location and the cart operator
shall first notify the Village's Building Department of the proposed
location or any change of same;
i) exclusive of hitches or canopies, the maximum exterior dimensions
of a cart shall not exceed seventy (70) square fet t;
j) cart will not be located in areas convenient to drive -up traffic or
proximate to theatres or office buildings within Oakbrook Center
but will be located in interior courtyard or similar areas proximate
to retail shops and convenient to pedestrian shoppers;
k) cart locations will leave no less than five (5) feet of sidewalk area
for pedestrian traffic and will be no closer than twenty (20) feet
from the exterior wall or entranceway of any enclosed
establishment in Oakbrook Center;
1) cart operatois shall be responsible for maintaining the cart and the
area of the cart's operations in a clean and safe condition;
m) all aspects of cart use shall comply with all other requirements for
such special uses as specified in Section VIII(D)(2)(g) of the Oak
Brook Zoning Ordinance;
and modified as follows:
1. reduce the number of permitted carts from 8 to 6;
2. add a new condition limiting the placement of carts to a minimtun
separation distance of 400 feet from a public street; and
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 11 of 15 May 28, 1996
�'r <s°t`si ;ti'�ed•:`ddAY�� ,� °�, fir; E�i y<e �r>r "�Rw �+ N'�$5�?Ftx., r.s�, .z•^ *r +'�� 5''' �t', :T.: ,r .`�: �r: .4 ,� ._` w K°��» x�y s
•
3. not be placed in parking areas or structures.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to
direct the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final
action at the Regular meeting of June 11, 1996 subject to the
following conditions:
a) a maximum of eight (S) such carts may be in use at any one time;
b) use shall be limited annually to the period of April I through
October 31;
c) eacu cart shall be owned and operated by an establishment
operating in a completely enclosed building in Oakbrook Center
("the related store) and cart sales items shall be limited to those
items also sold within the related store;
d) the hours of cart operation shall, at most, coincide with those of the
related store;
e) no alcoholic beverages will be sold from a cart;
f) at close of each day's operation, and whenever not in use, carts
shall be stored in a completely enclosed building within Oakbrook
Center;
g) when not in use, all connection areas for cart utilities, anchors, or
the like shall be properly secured so as to present no danger to
pedestrians;
h) all carts shall have a fixed operating location and the cart operator
shall first ,notify the Village's Building Department of the proposed
location or any change of same;
i) exclusive of hitches or canopies, the maximum exterior dimensions
of a cart shall not exceed seventy (70) square feet;
j) cart will not be located in areas convenient to drive -up traffic or
proximate to theatres or office buildings within Oakbrook Center
but will be located in interior courtyard or similar areas proximate
to retail shops and convenient to pedestrian shoppers;
k) cart locations will leave no less than five (5) feet of sidewalk area
for pedestrian traffic and will be no closer than twenty (20) feet
from the exterior wall or entranceway of any enclosed
establishment in Oakbrook Center;
1) cart operators shall be responsible for maintaining the cart and the
area of the cart's operations in a clean and safe condition;
m) all aspects of cart use shall comply with all other requirements for
such special uses as specified in Section VIII(D)(2)(g) of the Oak
Brook zoning Ordinance;
and modified as follows:
1. reduce the number of permitted carts from 8 to 6i
V1LLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 12 of 15 May 28, 1996
c' "•?�T � ;.Ag`i'�.'.��`{�^'1'�e "luHCet �; 3,.• -'. r , �l:l� <.L �'�i,�t,�s��.,n,°.WwR'. ° "X',." `(wa "j�a,�.> .•t ,�a�. j; *y^:rta•y.., ,rt�� ="��, � ^.� 'l''Ta` g^ x s�h�3'F, `f. ^a
` ` ��; � � .,t,aY ? i :�NM,r:,�^ � �qn:' P, • a Y 1 vd+ K• ^ �,2r �
Ll
C
2. add a new condition limiting the placement of carts to a r
separation distance of 400 feet from a public street; and
3. not be placed in parking areas or structures.
VOICE VOTE: Motion carrie(I
Chuck Fleming, General Manager, 3MB Retail Properties, distributed
a rendering to the Village Board members of the proposed food carts
at the Center. These food carts are supplemental to the existing
restaurants, and their purpose is to retain customers for a longer
duration to shop.
Trustee Shumate inquired as to why the proposed food carts were
reduced from 8 to 6. Mr. Fleming stated the Center felt it could be
too many food vendors that would detract from the landscape of the
Center. These food carts would serve snack foods only.
Trustee Kenny asked who would manage the food carts. The Center
management would ensure that vendors display their products
appropriately, wear appropriate attire and control their hours of
operation.
President Bushy announced the Village has been notified by DuPage County Board
Chairman Gayle Franzen that the Elmhurst. Quarry has been open for 90 minutes.
Village Engineer Durfey stated Salt Creek has maintained the identical water level
readings for the last 2 -1/2 hours.
Trustee Payovich commented she was tardy for the Board meeting due to notifying
concerned residents that the Village would notify DuPage County to request water
intake at the Elmhurst Quarry due to the rising level of Salt Creek.
President Bushy exited the meeting at 8:40 p.m. and returned at 8:41 p.m.
Director of Code Enforcement Hawk explained the existing location
of the Calinog home limits the ability of the applicant to reasonably
modify the residence. The current homeowner did not create the
present variation of the home.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, at their meeting of May 7, 1996, held
the necessary Public Hearing regarding the requested variation.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes
eel'
13 of 15 May, 28,1996
CALINOG (34 Roys1
Vale Dr.) - FROM
YARD SETBACK
VARIATION
_. .. �.'', " ?'-�� yj�r reyv "Y,. '��i:Ykd ",�',�`• r "4 .�yir i 4� s.a �'
"'�',' � - `ac �- - . ,�3 ��� �+,+t ^P�R�a '�, air � `�'=_••°� v
Aft
Most of the nearby neighbors indicated their support along with the j
Architectural Review Committee of they Ginger Creek Community
Association.
There have been no opposition comments.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 6 to 0, passed a motion
recommending approval of the variation as requested.
President Bushy announced that DuPage County Board Chairman Gayle Franzen
stated the Elmhurst Quarry was at 50% capacity due to one operational pump for water
removal. The Quarry would have to halt water intake if further rain occurs, as their
contractor has not completed installation of a second water pump.
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to direct the
Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final action at
the Regular meeting of June 11, 1996. VOICE VOTE: Motion
carried.
In response to the request received last month from the residents of
Old Oak Brook, the engineering staff completed a study of the
intersection of Spring Road and Adams/Natoma- The request was for
consideration of a 4 -way stop. The intersection study found that the
necessary traffic warrants for a 4 -way stop are not met. However, the
study did suggest a reduced speed limit on Spring Road and an
increase in sight distance at the intersection. Based on these findings,
staff recommends that the speed limit on Spring Road be reduced
from 30 MPH to 25 MPH between 31 st Street and Fork Road,
Regarding sight distance, staff is in contact with the Old Oak Brook
association concerning trimming and relocating plantings at the
intersection.
Motion by Trustee Payovich, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to
direct the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance, for
consideration at the Regular meeting of June 11, 1996, to reduce the
speed limit on Spring Road between 31 st Stre,. t and York Road from
30 MPH to 25 MPH. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
0j: WIF
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOD Minutes
Z-1
14 of 15 May 28, 1996
SPRING ROAD
SPEED LIMIT
^�-. _`.dpi � �'' ni ,, ;�Zr °' _ '°,` "'i:f ✓��+"- �`Jiy';;,�; fir. w,��PE:R�r:'Vi�,^„ji':[ti'x•+L, a��e"r��
aa�l�.ee.. t t� ^?c� 4 -y r• f- 'Y" tl "'re s^ ut"t� ,?:.•.. ;My z: , - ,
`�a.m
1 I . ADiS2UM T C QS MEE �:
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Payovich, to adjourn at
8:48 p.m. to a Closed Meeting to discuss the appointment, employment or
dismissal of an officer or an employee. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 6 - Trustees Bartecki, Kenny, McInerney, Payouich, Savino and
Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 0 - None. Motion carried.
Motion by Trustee Payovich, seconded by Trustee Saving, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:34 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
Ada Ionnella, CMC
Village Clerk
bo152896
VILLAGE Of OAK BROOK Minutes 15 of 15 May 285 1996
CLOSED MEETING
ADJOURWENT