Minutes - 10/28/1997 - Board of TrusteesVIIA,AGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes .C''ID 28 1997
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL, APPROVED AS WRITTEN _�-
OIZ AS AMENDED — BY VILLAGE BOARD ON
1. MEETING CALL: MEETING GALL
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order by President
Bushy in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Village Commons at 7:33
p.m. Pledge of Allegiance was given.
2. R_ QL , CALL: ROLL GALL
The Clerk called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: President Bushy, Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Savino and
Shumate.
ABSENT: Trustees Bartecki and Caleel.
IN ATTENDANCE: Stephen B. Veitch, Village Manager; Michael A. Crotty,
Assistant to the Village Manager; Dale L. Durfey, Jr., Village Engineer; Toni
Hawk, Director of Community Development; Debra J. Jarvis, Fire
Chief /Building Commissioner; Bruce F. Kapff, Director of Information
Services & Purchasing; Darrell J. Langlois. Finance Officer/Treasurer; Richard
A. Martens. Village Attorney; Michael J. Meranda, Superintendent of Public
Works; Allen W. Pisarek, Chief of Police; and Trey VanDyke, Golf Club
Manager.
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS & OPEN FORUM: ANNOUNCDfENTS
AND
Trustee McInerney expressed his disappointment in School District 5-3 OPEN FORUM
scheduling a parent meeting that conflicts with the Village Board meeting.
The Village had previously requested the District to consider scheduling their
meetings as to not conflict with the Village Board meetings. He further noted
that he had received resident complaints of election signs being posted in yards
without permission of the resident. He asked that candidates be courteous and
ask permission for displaying political signs on private property. President
Bushy noted that the Village Clerk had asked the School Superintendent of
District 181 to request candidates to properly place the signs on private
property and not in the public right-of-way.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES
Motion by Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to approve the
minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 14, 1997 as presented and waive
the full reading thereof. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes I of 14 October 28, 1997
Motion bN Trustee McInerney, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to approve the
Omnibus Agenda. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Kenny. McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 2 - Trustees Bartecki and Caleel. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF:
BILLS -
A. APPR(?VAL. OF BILLS: Approved Omnibus Vote. $415,513.26
B. AP TD-YAL OP PAYROLL: PAYROLL -
1) September 20. 1997: Approved Omnibus Vote. $335,694.33(gross
2) October 18. 1927: . Approved Omnibus Vote. $328,905.17(gross
C. CHANGE ORDERS: None.
1) K.LUBER FNGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE - PAYOUT #-: VILLAGE HALL
VILLAGE HALL MECHANICAL ,CAL AND ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND
SYSTEM ANALYSIS - $4,348.2 1: Approved Omnibus Vote. ELECTRICAL
SYSTEM ANALYSIS
2) SMYTH SYSTEMS_ INC - PAYOUT #2 - COMPUTER COMPUTER
SYSTE S - $1 I, 814.19: Approved Omnibus Vote. SYSTEMS
E. REFERRALS: None.
1) PUBLIC WORKS - UNIFORM SF-$VIC, ES: Approve Omnibus UNIFORM SERVICE
Vote. PUBLIC WORKS
G. ACCEPT AND PLACE ON FI - T�.RF SURFER'S REPORT OF TREASURER'S
SEPTEMBER, 927: Approved Omnibus Vote. REPORT -SEPT. 1997
H. RESOLUTION 97- WAIN -R -696 A RESOUTION RES . 97- WA -MAIN-
AUTHORI7ING SUBMJSSIQN OF APPI.ICA'Fl0N EQD pMMU R -696
FOR IUINOIS _R_OUYr iLGINGER CR .FK WATER MAIN ROUTE 83 /GINGER
EXTENSION: Approved Omnibus Vote. CREEK WATER MAIN
EXTENSION
6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM OMNIBUS A GFND : None.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 2 of 14 October 28, 1997
Y�.. -' Y" „ r.0 e�, ..' w . .. ,... .rk`p - i r .. .. .n.,... ,- ..�y.mr.•,s— ,em- �+-- •......... a.,a, ; ' sw r , 17-77 - < 77. 7_ 77 -7,7 '7777, �R" ` . �7w ..
7. ACTIVE A,GENIa�� 4X1nns Fir Finai pct_ io ):
A. APPOINI'ML:NTS: APPOINTMENTS:
Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Shumate, to ratify the ALLEN W. PISAREK
consensus reached at the Closed Meeting of October 14, 1997 and CHIEF OF POLICE
appoint Allen W. Pisarek as Police Chief effective October 23, 1997.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 2 - Trustees Bartecki and Caleel. Motion carried.
&Q I _; 6T.-Im ' • 9 i
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCES OE THE VILLAGE OF OAK BRQQK BY THE IMPOSING A
.:2 D
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE
Discussed and direction given at the Regular meeting of October 14,
1997.
The ordinance would replace the franchise fee compensation
currently received from telecs nmunications providers, which is
based primarily on the number of telephone access lines, with an
Infrastructure Maintenance Fee (IMF) of 1% of gross revenues.
Following a 90 -day notice to existing franchisees. State legislation
authorizes this ordinance to be effective January 1, 1998.
Motion by Trustee Mcinerciey, seconded by Trustee Savino, to pass
Ordinance 97- TX- TELCOM- IMFA -G -600, "An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 13 Of The Code Of Ordinances Of The Village Of
Oak Brook By The Addition Of Article IV Imposing A Municipal
Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee ", as presented
and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Kenny. McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 2 - Trustees Bartecki and Caleel. Motion carried.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 3 of 14 October 28, 1997
4
A 6011 UV
Discussed and direction given at the Regular meeting of October 14,
1 997. The resolution approves the Final Plat for the Adams -
Breakenridge Resubdivision with the following conditions:
1) Final engineering approval;
2) Waiver of the requirements for curbs and gutter streets, sidewalks,
street lights and parkway trees; and
3) That all other requirements, conditions and standards of the
Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook, except as
waived or limited by this Resolution, shall be applicable to the
resubdivision and development of said Adams - Breakenridge
Resubdivision.
Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee McInerney, to pass
Resolution 97- SD- R -FP -R -697, "A Resolution Approving The Final
Plat Known As Adams - Breakenridge Resubdivision (3700
Adams /25 Breakenridge Farm, Oak Brook, IL 60523) ", as presented
and waive the full reading thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
Absent: 2 - Trustees Bartecki and Caleel. Motion carried.
RES.97- SD -R -FP-
.m-697
ADAMS - BREAKEN-
RIDGE RESUBDIVI-
SION --
FINAL PLAT
FINAL AS
OAK BROOK.IL 60523): RESUBDIVISION
FINAL PLAT
Discussed and direction given at the Regular meeting of October 14,
1997. The resolution approves the Final Plat for the McGoldrick's
Resubdivision with the following conditions:
1) Final engineering approval;
2) Waiver of the requirements for curbs and gutter streets, sidewalks,
street lights and parkway trees;
3) Placement of a "No Vehicular Access Strip" easement along Oak
Brook Road; and
4) That all other requirements, conditions and standards of the
Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook, except as
waived or limited by this Resolution, shall be applicable to the
i:;subdivision and development of said McGoldric k's
Resubdivision.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 4 of 14 October 28, 1997
0
z »;a g as
3 i , "7 7-177 77 ,a'd nei
0 0
Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Shumate, to pass
Resolution 97- SD- R -FP -R -698, "A Resolution Approving The Final
Plat Known As McGoldrick's Resubdivision (3118 White Oak Lane,
Oak Brook, IL 60523) as presented and waive the full reading
thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: 4 - Trustees Kenny, McInerney, Savino and Shumate.
Nays: 0 - None.
A bsent: 2 - Trustees Bartecki and Caleel. Motion carried.
.•� lux •
....
A.
Code Enforcement
1.
Planning & Zoning
B.
Communications Center
J.
Police Department
C.
Engineering Department
K.
Public Works
D.
Finance Department
L.
recycling
E.
Fire Department/EMS
M.
Risk Management
F.
Information Services,/
N.
Sports Core - Bath & Tennis and
Purchasing
Golf
G.
Legal Department
O.
Village Clerk
H.
Library
All Departmental Quarterly Reports were discussed and accepted as presented.
The proposed ordinance would replace Article VI of Chapter 8 of the
Code and put in place an amended and restated set of regulations
regarding possession and sale of tobacco products in the Village.
Many of the provisions of the new ordinance are substantively similar
to those in the current Article VI (e.g., requirements for obtaining
tobacco dealer's licenses, unlawful sate to persons under 18; unlawful
possession, etc.). New provisions include twice yearly inspections of
licensed establishments (Section 8 -91), unlav`rful misrepresentation of
age (Section 8 -196), unlawful use by minors (Section 8 -197), and
regulation of the placement of vending machines within licensed
establishments (Section 8 -201). A number of other provisions have
been modernized and improved. In total, the ordinance constitutes an
update of this article which is designed to make it more effective in
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 5 of 14 O %sober 28, 1997
QUARTERLY
REPORTS
AMENDING
CHAPTER 8,
ARTICLE VI,
"TOBACCO
PRODUCTS"
El =m-*-
The proposed ordinance would replace Article VI of Chapter 8 of the
Code and put in place an amended and restated set of regulations
regarding possession and sale of tobacco products in the Village.
Many of the provisions of the new ordinance are substantively similar
to those in the current Article VI (e.g., requirements for obtaining
tobacco dealer's licenses, unlawful sate to persons under 18; unlawful
possession, etc.). New provisions include twice yearly inspections of
licensed establishments (Section 8 -91), unlav`rful misrepresentation of
age (Section 8 -196), unlawful use by minors (Section 8 -197), and
regulation of the placement of vending machines within licensed
establishments (Section 8 -201). A number of other provisions have
been modernized and improved. In total, the ordinance constitutes an
update of this article which is designed to make it more effective in
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 5 of 14 O %sober 28, 1997
QUARTERLY
REPORTS
AMENDING
CHAPTER 8,
ARTICLE VI,
"TOBACCO
PRODUCTS"
fulfilling its historical purpose, preventing access to tobacco products
by minors.
It was the consensus of the Village Board to place this ordinance on
the Active Agenda for the Regular meeting of November 11, 1997 fog-
formal consideration.
B. AN ORIaINANC1iAA12QPIINQ A COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
AMENDMENT TO CI-IAP'I'F,R 8, ARTICLE 1. "SICAVFNGER,S" AMENDMENT TO
O_ F THE CQDE OF Qi BI „ANCES OE T,�-I . VI� _AC ►E QF QA CHAPTER 8 ,
BROOK„ ILLIN i_dTICLE III,
"SCAVENGERS"
The proposed ordinance would adopt a comprehensive amendment to
Chapter 8, Article 111 of the r` ode of Ordinances. Its purpose is to
establish a new licensing structure for residential and commercial
scavenger service. Currently, the Code authorizes three scavenger
licenses that allow for the collection of both residential and
commercial waste. With the implementation of the new Residential
Municipal Waste Collection Contract on January 1, 1998, only one
residential scavenger license will be issued. Under the new contract,
the residential scavenger licensee will also be automatically eligible to
receive a commercial scavenger license. The principal remaining
issue pertains to the number of additional commercial scavenger
licenses to be authorized.
The ordinance provides for an unlimited number of commercial
licenses, provided certain standards are met (e.g., performance bond,
insurance requirements, proof of adequate and acceptable vehicles,
customer service provisions, etc.). The advantage of having unlimited
licenses is that the market keeps the rates competitive. The possible
disadvantage is that there might be increased truck traffic during the
week (fewer licensed haulers can better coordinate routes to maximize
the efficiency of the col,ections). Staff also solicited the input of the
business community. The businesses in Oak Brook are interested in a
licensing structure that provides at least as many choices as are
available presently, and which results in competitive rates for
commercial scavenger service.
It was the consensus of the Village Board to place this ordinance on
the Active Agenda for the Regular meeting of November 11, 1997 for
formal consideration.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 6 of 14 October 28, 1997
1W74
hs',
,
fulfilling its historical purpose, preventing access to tobacco products
by minors.
It was the consensus of the Village Board to place this ordinance on
the Active Agenda for the Regular meeting of November 11, 1997 fog-
formal consideration.
B. AN ORIaINANC1iAA12QPIINQ A COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
AMENDMENT TO CI-IAP'I'F,R 8, ARTICLE 1. "SICAVFNGER,S" AMENDMENT TO
O_ F THE CQDE OF Qi BI „ANCES OE T,�-I . VI� _AC ►E QF QA CHAPTER 8 ,
BROOK„ ILLIN i_dTICLE III,
"SCAVENGERS"
The proposed ordinance would adopt a comprehensive amendment to
Chapter 8, Article 111 of the r` ode of Ordinances. Its purpose is to
establish a new licensing structure for residential and commercial
scavenger service. Currently, the Code authorizes three scavenger
licenses that allow for the collection of both residential and
commercial waste. With the implementation of the new Residential
Municipal Waste Collection Contract on January 1, 1998, only one
residential scavenger license will be issued. Under the new contract,
the residential scavenger licensee will also be automatically eligible to
receive a commercial scavenger license. The principal remaining
issue pertains to the number of additional commercial scavenger
licenses to be authorized.
The ordinance provides for an unlimited number of commercial
licenses, provided certain standards are met (e.g., performance bond,
insurance requirements, proof of adequate and acceptable vehicles,
customer service provisions, etc.). The advantage of having unlimited
licenses is that the market keeps the rates competitive. The possible
disadvantage is that there might be increased truck traffic during the
week (fewer licensed haulers can better coordinate routes to maximize
the efficiency of the col,ections). Staff also solicited the input of the
business community. The businesses in Oak Brook are interested in a
licensing structure that provides at least as many choices as are
available presently, and which results in competitive rates for
commercial scavenger service.
It was the consensus of the Village Board to place this ordinance on
the Active Agenda for the Regular meeting of November 11, 1997 for
formal consideration.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 6 of 14 October 28, 1997
1W74
C.
7-7-77-
• e
1
The existing residential structure height limitation. which is
consistent across all of the residential zoning districts, is "not more
than third, feet (30) and not more than tu,o and one half (2 S!,)
stories " Structure height is measured to the top of the roof structure.
This requirement, as well as the other bulk regulations contained in
the Zoning Ordinance, has remained virtually unchanged since
adoption of the original ordinance in 1959. At that time and for many
years following, the size and style of homes being constructed was
such that the height limitation seldom was a factor in residential
design.
Over the past twenty years or so, the ize of the homes being
constructed in the Village has generany increased and the roof pitch
that is architecturally popular has become much steeper. The result is
that in order to meet the height limitation, roof structures are now
commonly truncated at the 30 foot level and completed with flat -
roofed areas. There are now a significant number of homes in the
Village with sections of flat roof at the 30 foot level. It is reported
that there have been problems with maintenance and water leaks with
some of these roof structures.
In practice, the height limitation is less of a problem in instances
where there is an engineered top of foundation elevation from which
to measure. It more often becomes a factor where no such elevation
has been established and average natural ground elevation is the only
benchmark from which to measure. Unfortunately, more than half of
Oak Brook lacks engineered T.F.'s, and that situation is not likely to
change unless vast areas of the Village are resubdivided.
There are basically two general approaches to regulating the bulk of
residential structures, the "fixed method and the "variable" or
"graduated" method. Oak Brook long ago adopted the fixed method,
involving a schedule of minimum setbacks and yards and a maximum
structure height that is consistently applied in all cases. The basic
bulk regulations for Oak Brook's four residential zoning districts are
as follows:
VILLtGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes
7 of 14 October 28, 1997
REVIEW OF
ZONING ORDINANCE
PROVISIONS:
RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURE
HEIGHT
y
` poll
11111,
...+.- .�i.i�F..i £
12iurkt
Lat WidthlArea
ErQ Yard
Side Yard
Rmr.Yard
R -1
220 ft 12 acres
50 feet
30 feet
100 feet
R -2
150 11./l acre
40 feet
18 feet
60 feet
R -3
100 ft.. 25,000 s.f.
40 feet
12 feet
40 feet
R -4
75 ft ' 18,000 s f
30 feet
10 feet
30 feet
All lots must meet the minimum lot area and width (at the building
line), and all of the required minimum yards. Height may not exceed
30 feet or 2'/2 stories, regardless of the size of the lot or of the yards
actually provided.
The graduated approach typically involves smaller required yards
(particularly side yards, the most critical dimension for this
discussion) and a lower basic permitted structure height. However,
additional height is allowed in exchange for larger yards, typically on
a 1:1 or 2:1 basis. For example, one nearby community requires, in
all of its single family residential zoning districts, a minimum side
yard of 5 feet plus 1 foot for every 1 foot of structure height over 20
feet. Under this formula, in order to construct a house with a height
of 30 feet, a side yard of 15 feet would be required, midway between
the R -2 and R -3 side yard requirements in the Oak Brook ordinance.
Lei
Any consideration of amending the Zoning Ordinance to provide
relief from the existing limitation on structure height should be
sensitive to certain issues. The Village is nearly built -out. The
number of lots left to build on represents less than ten percent of all
residential lots in the Village. Homeowners are sensitive to matters
pertaining to the size and height of their homes and nearby houses.
Increasing the allowable height may be seen by some owners of
existing homes as potentially injurious to the appearance and value of
their properties.
The Village could expect a substantial amount of residential
redevelopment in the years to come. Residential construction should
not be expected to cease. Owners of homes with flat roof sections
could elect to reconstruct portions of the roof structure in order to
address maintenance problems or improve appearance.
B•- Right" Increase, The simplest approach to providing relief, of
course, would be to (1) increase the allowable structure height. An
increase to 40 feet would virtually eliminate the need for flat roof
sections, so long as the 2'/2 story limitation remained in placti.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 8 of 14 October 28, 1997
IN
F . !w; 77
An alternate means of producing `ssentially the same result would be
to (2) amend the definition of "Structure Height" to provide for
measurement to the average height of the roof rather than the highest
point of the structure. With this alternative, it would be appropriate
to maintain the 30 foot and 2' /z story maximums.
Graduated Wards, One approach would be to introduce the
graduated method to the Oak Brook ordinance in some fashion. One
way to do this would be to (3) reduce the allowable heights and
required yards and institute a graduated formula upward from
that point, such as in the example cited above. Some would see this
as undesirable in that it would relax the required yards for single story
homes or two story homes that could meet the basic allowable height.
Another approach would be to (4) allow additional height above 30
feet where yards in excess of the exist' ig minimum sizes are
provided. The advantage of this approach is that the basic bulk
regulation scheme in the Ordinance is not disrupted; the additional
height would be available only if additional separation from property
lines was also provided. Relief would potentially be available equally
to new construction, reconstruction and remodeling of existing
homes.
Wi either alternative (3 ) or (4), staff recommends retention of the
2% story limitation and establishment of a not -to- exceed maximum
height. Again, based on a review of residential building permits, it
appears that a maximum of 40 feet would virtually eliminate the need
for flat roof sections.
It was a consensus of the Village Board to refer to the Plan
Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals for preliminary discussion
of a text amendment to establish a not -to- exceed 40 -foot maximum
height with a 1:1 increase in required side yards for structure heights
above 30 feet, with additional consideration of (1) whether or not to
retain the 2 1/2 story limitation, (2) prohibiting flat roof sections
above the 30 -foot level, (3) whether or not graduated yards fully
mitigate difference related to topography, and (4) whether or not the
amendments should apply in all residence districts.
President Bushy recessed the Village Board meeting at 9:27 p.m. due to a change in
the video tape of the meeting telecast. The meeting convened at 9:29 p.m.
Trustee Shumate asked if these considerations would aversely affect
the Village's water pressure. Village Manager Veitch commented it
should not affect our system. Director of Community Development
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 9 of 14 October 28, 1997
pen
' ;r u5'3"` .w 0. ,. <T: ,a. °3 ^+cc, r"'",'e^_a` °'^"�i`?mF S�*�, TT" F- -., rnR"r > *, G* tom. ' -«r"'^ =° `i.R S"..�'�„
f' t kg +'^" \ K• a �= �`z"�'^ w '`r `Fx Rio. y. ��yK_.,
- A �' -S �" l:�TM� 4T.ii fi?e�'e�+i; �' X� "�,
1 lawk noted there may be a S% loss of water pressure with the
additional height of homes.
President Bushy requested Fire Chief Jarvis to investigate a need for
residential sprinkling systems for this type of structured home.
In 1996, the Village Board adopted an ordinance that deleted from the
Zoning Ordinance a provision that permitted "('allures, universities,
Convents, monasteries, seminaries and accesson, uses thereto - on
lots not less than 40 acres in area " as a special use in the R -1 district
(and, as a result, all other residence districts). In connection with that
petition the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended further review of the residential special use provisions
of the Zoning Ordinance. The Village Board concurred and stated as
much in the find;ngs made in the preamble to the ordinance that
accomplished the aforementioned text amendment.
As part of the Code of Ordinances review project, the staff has
completed a review of the relevant Zoning Ordinance provisions and
has concluded that it would be appropriate to consider certain
amendments to the special uses available within residential zoning
districts.
Existing Provisions, The residential special use provisions are found
in Section VII of the Zoning Ordinance, "Residence Districts ".
Special Uses are specified for each district (R -1, R -2, R -3 and R -4),
with the greatest number defined in the R -1 District and continued
through the others.
The principal focus of staffs review was the list of special uses
provided in the R -1 section of the text. Many of these uses are either
relatively intense or require such extensive lot size as to appear
impractical to accommodate in the residential areas of the Village at
this stage of the Village's deg elopment. Many- are also provided for
as permitted or special uses in other districts, particularly the CR
(Conservation /Recreation) district.
R!ccgmmendatio,us, Based on staff s review, there is a concurrence
with the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals that many of
the special uses presently provided for in the Zoning Ordinance are
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 10 of 14 October 28, 1997
�i6'
REVIEW OF
ZONING ORDINANCE
PROVISIONS:
RESIDENT IAL
SPECIAL
USES
T S"x z;
7777777777 & 7i �7 3 :°� - +'
F
no longer appropriate in residence districts, or in the Village
generally.
Accordingly, staff has identified ten amendments for consideration by
the Board:
1. Sec. VII (C) (2) (c) - Hospitals - Delete.
Hospitals are a relatively intense use of land and Oak Brook is very
well served by three major hospitals located in adjacent communities.
2. Sec. VII (C) (2) (d) - The following recreational and cultural
uses.... - Delete or relocate as specified below.
This subsection enumerates fourteen "recreational and cultural" uses
that, variously, are or should be provided for elsewhere, or are
deemed to be inappropriate for the Village at this time. Specific
recommendations are as follows:
(1) Art galleries - Delete. Permitted use in the B -2 and B -3
districts.
(2) Dog show and field trial areas - Delete. Fits within the
pernaiiced uses in the CR district.
(3) Equestrian sports - Delete. Fits within the permitted
uses in the CR district.
(4) Game preserves and conservation clubs - Delete. Fits
within the special uses in the CR district.
(5) Golf courses and clubs, standard or par 3 - Delete.
Permitted use in the CR district.
(6) Hunt clubs - Deic:e. Not appropriate. The principal
activity involves the discharge of firearms.
(7) Libraries, public - Move to the next subsection (VII
(C) (2) (e)). Appropriate to group with other governmental
service uses.
(8) Museums - Delete. Special use in the CR district.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 11 of 14 October 28, 1997
a.
t •
(9) Tennis and swimming facilities - delete. Special use
in the CR District. Retain a provision (see below) for
common facilities in residential subdivisions.
(10) Winter sports - Movt to CR. district as a special use.
More appropriate in the CR district than in the residence
uistricts.
(11) Airports - Delete. Ceased to be relevant when the
airstrip at the Sports Core was eliminated many years ago.
(I2) Athletic Fields - Delete. Fits within the permitted uses
in the CR district.
(13) Gun clubs - Delete. Not appropriate. The principal
activity involves the discharge of firearms.
(14) Other similar outdoor and indoor recreational
facilities - Delete. Unnecessary.
3. Insert a new See. VII (C) (2) (c) to read substantially as
follows:
(c) Outdoor and indoor cultural and recreational facilities
including, but not limited to, swimming pools, tennis courts,
meeting facilities and other- similar facilities accessor•- to
and owned in common by the owners of properties within a
residential subdivision.
It is necessary to retain a provision whereby homeowners association
common facilities can exist as special uses, as.they can under the
existing provisions.
4. Sec. VII (C) (2) (e) - Amend to re -1 %*ter as subsection (d) and
revise, eliminating subsections, to read substantially as follows:
Public utility, transportation, and governmental service
facilities, including municipal offices and civic centers,
public libraries, police and fire stations, public works
facilities and similar uses.
This change groups these uses together, as is generally the case
elsewhere in the Ordinance. Notably, the existing Village Hall, Fire
Station 1, Library and Public Works Facility exist as special uses on
property zoned R -3.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 12 of 14 October 28, 1997
is Z' -77
;¢ "E`� m; -&vq � z a'4ra?i t;" .o- "',mr�* v3b•�w`� `i'x'r9', �t, ' �i`;� ^e" y "�+r' #'N?,. F°,'� i r1'U`
� "y � .�,�r ins �ea+*^,��gar _ „,,,, na r* 3 d "` mss^ � �'�,�; t
..
0 0 0
S. Sec. Vll (C) (2) (f) - Amend to re- letter as subsection (e).
Delete subparagraphs (1) and (2) and re- number subparagraph
(3) as subparagraph (1). Remove the reference in the eighth lute
to lodging and places of public assembly.
Dwelling units and club nouses as accessory to other special uses
become unnecessary with the deletion of those principal uses. Horse
stables and the like remain appropriate as accessories to agricultural
special uses, where proper separation exists from any dwelling. The
reference to lodging and places of public assembly is no longer
needed.
6. Sec. VII (D) (2) - Amend to delete the words "except airports"
The reference to airports is unnecessary with the deletion of airports
as a special use in the R -1 district.
7. Sec. VII (E) (2) (a) - Amend to delete the words "except
airports ".
The reference to airports is unnecessary with the deletion of airports
as a special use in the R- I district.
8. Sec. VII (F) (2) (a) - Amend to delete the words "except
airports ".
The reference to airports is unnecessary with the deletion of airports
as a special use in the R -1 district.
9. Sec. VII (F) (2) (b) - Recreational uses other than accessory
uses, not for profit - Delete.
All uses enumerated are either permitted uses in the R -1 district (and
all other residence districts), special uses in the R -1 district (and all
other residence districts) or covered by permitted or special uses in
the CR district.
10. Sec. VII (F) (2) (c) - Re- letter as subsection (b).
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 13 of 14 October 28, 1997
Y T1�4 -
17K, 7 17�1 177-
kl�' 4 , TV
17 77 .77 FFIrIT 11�111'nT74711 111'P 07 ,�,X7v'7xNT R'q �4 I 'V�'
WR
Vp
v
N, 0 11
Motion by Trustee Shumate, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to authorize
staff to prepare the appropriate petition document for referral to the
Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals. VOICE VOTE:
Motion carried.
0,10=11 91.4 "A W.-I NO IN42 0XII1.1 N-WA."Wil WUMN, 09WIM111am
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Trustee Savino, seconded by Trustee Kenny, to adjourn the meeting
at 10:18 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried.
ATTEST:
nda'$L. Gonnella, CMC
Village Clerk
bot102897
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes 14 of 14 October 28. 1997
49