Minutes - 01/26/2012 - Planned Development Commission MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 26, 2012 REGULAR
MEETING OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
APPROVED AS WRITTEN ON DECEMBER 12, 2013
1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Planned Development Commission was called to
order by Chairman Champ Davis, Jr. in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the
Butler Government Center at 6:59 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL
Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons
PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Jr., Vice Chairman Marcia Tropinski,
Members Jeffrey Bulin, Natalie Cappetta, Thomas Doyle and
Raju Iyer. Member Simon Sheers arrived 7:05 p.m.
IN ATTENDANCE: Gerald Wolin, Trustee, Robert Kallien, Jr., Director of
Community Development, Michael Hullihan, Village
Engineer/Public Works Director, James Kruger, Police Chief and
Thomas Stanfa, Fire Department
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF OCTOBER 4,2012
Motion by Member Bulin, seconded by Member Iyer to approve the minutes of
the October 4, 2011 Special Planned Development Commission meeting as
written. VOICE VOTE: Motion Carried.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
A. RULES OF PROCEDURE RULES of
PROCEDURE
The members had received and reviewed the revised Rules of Procedure from
the October 4, 2011 meeting. There was no further discussion or revisions.
Motion by Member Iyer, seconded by Member Bulin to approve and adopt the
Planned Development Rules of Procedure. VOICE VOTE: Motion Carried.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Pagel of l l January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
5. A. Case No. 2011-05-ZO-PUD — SEARS, ROEBUCK AND Co. No.2011-05-ZO-PUD
SEARS,ROEBUCK
PINSTRIPES — BOWLING, BOCCE AND BISTRO AND COMPANY-
ENTERTAINEMENT FACILITY — TO BE LOCATED ON PROPERTY PINSTRIPES-7
OAKBROOK CTR-
NW OF 2 OAKBROOK CENTER (PROPOSED TO BE 7 OAKBROOK PLANNED
CENTER DEVELOPMENT
)— PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Chairman Davis reviewed the request and rules for the proceedings.
Director of Community Development Kallien provided an overview of the
request and identified the applicant's requested waivers and variations as
follows:
1. Code Section: 13-713-3 — Relief from the 300 foot setback from Route
83 to allow for a proposed setback of approximately 139 feet.
This is a standard in the B-2 District, which is substantial compared to
the other zoning districts.
2. Code Section: 13-11-9—Relief from the prohibition on roof signage to
allow 2 roof signs.
The new sign regulations prohibit signs that extend beyond the roof line.
In the proposed building, the entranceways use a sloping type roof
design. They are proposing to allow two of the signs to go above the
roofline, but it is not above the ultimate roof line.
3. Code Section: 13-12-5 — Relief from the parking pace and aisle of 2 1/4
time building floor area.
In the B-2 District there is a unique way that parking spaces are
calculated, it is based on the size of the parcel, the length of the drive
aisles and the amount of roof top. All other districts have required
parking based upon use and gross floor area.
4. Code Section: 13-713-2 — Relief of amusement establishment and
outdoor dining.
Under the normal process the request for amusement establishment and
outdoor dining would have been required to go through the special use
request and has been included as part of the development.
All individuals that would provide testimony at the hearing were sworn in by
Chairman Davis.
Marl-, Gershon, Polsinelli Shughart PC, 161 N. Clark Street, Chicago, Illinois,
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 2 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
Attorney for Sears, Roebuck and Company introduced the applicant and owner
representative for Sears, Scott Miller,and the tenant and operator for Pinstripes,
Dale Schwartz. They are seeking planned development approval for Pinstripes,
a restaurant and entertainment facility, which under a special use would include
amusement establishments, bowling, bocce ball, outdoor dining patios, music
and fireplace. It is a fun location that will be a great addition to the community.
The waivers being sought include:
Relief from the 300 foot setback from Route 83 to allow a proposed
setback of approximately 139 feet.
Relief from the parking and aisle requirements. Although they do meet
the existing standard after reviewing with staff, they are including the
waiver to propose a more standard method of determining parking.
Relief from the prohibition on roof signage for two roof signs.
The Village's Commercial Areas Revitalization Plan, which relates to the
Oakbrook Center, appears to describe the planned development request that
they are seeking approval. The plan notes that the Oakbrook Center is vital to
the economic sustainability of the Village's commercial base. Expanded dining
opportunities that enhance the synergy of the Center; restaurant and
entertainment uses are an excellent compliment to retail and office; and with the
ability to attract visitors,this project meets all of those guidelines.
He requested that the material in the binder be incorporated into the record.
Dale Schwartz, Founder and CEO of Pinstripes thanked the Board and noted
that they have spent about 3 years looking for a location in the southwest
suburbs. Pinstripes offers a unique concept of combining the entertainment of
bowling and bocce with very exceptional Italian food and a very high end wine
selection. It has been very well received in the communities in which they have
been located for the last 4 years. Oak Brook is a very attractive location for
Pinstripes. The office and hotel concentration along with the surrounding
communities is what they look for so they tried to figure out how to do
something in the Oakbrook Center. Sears has been wonderful to work with and
they believe the project will be synergistic with the mall and anticipate that
their draw will reach out to Naperville. They spent a lot of time trying to marry
the concept of what has been constructed in Chicagoland with what was built in
Minneapolis. They are using the same design team and contractor that have
built the other 3 locations. They have tailored this location to fit in and to make
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 3 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
it the best designed location they have to date. They are very excited to be part
of Oak Brook. Dealing with the Oak Brook community and staff has been very
refreshing. The process has been great and they are in the midst of doing a
phased construction permit that has been running parallel with the zoning
process. From their perspective, they are poised to start construction sometime
in March and are anticipating opening sometime in September.. They do around
2000 parties, weddings and events yearly at each location. They will be
assembling a team of approximately 100 full and part team members to service
this location. They hope to do a substantial amount of business, which will
translate into sales tax.
Mack Poltorek, Architect, RDL Architects reviewed the site plan. The facility
has been strategically placed on the parcel in order to have a good visual aspect
of the building as you drive down Route 83. The two floors of the building will
be approximately 16,000 square feet each. There is a very large and vibrant
landscape plan to shield the outdoor experience in older to give it more of a
private effect down from Route 83. As you drive in, it creates a subtle quiet
effect of a family sit-down get-together. They are also using the landscape to
enhance the architecture of the structure to bring in the stone and wood theme
that is more of a Colorado venue. The facade will be neutrally based to be easy
on the eyes, with large expansive glass windows to allow a lot of natural light
in, which will help to keep down the lighting bills by using natural light during
the daytime. There are large stone elements in the front, with large cedar bands
going across to bring out more of the architecture to fit the area. The massing
of the building fits in with the mall and is not too large. The signage is
simplistic and fits in with the consistency of the architecture. The letters are
mounted and internally illuminated. They have stayed consistent with the mall
surroundings and the architecture of the building. The building is approximately
34 feet tall and the signs are not oversized for the building. The first floor
houses the bistro area, a lower bar, main back house kitchen, 8 bowling lanes
and 3 bocce courts and an extensive outdoor dining area, which will open up to
an outdoor seating area. There is a grand staircase going up along with an
elevator for handicapped access. There is a large expansive banquet facility for
large banquets or it can be broken down into 3 smaller banquets. It also
includes 10 more bowling lanes, 3 bocce courts with an outdoor court. There
will be a secondary kitchen to help house the banquet facilities. Theme is a large
outdoor balcony patio area so that people can go outdoors to enjoy the
atmosphere. The overall structure fits in with Oak Brook and does not have a
commercial effect. There is a nice water fountain element at the front of the
building to create a calming effect. There is a large entry structure to bring
people to the front of the structure.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 4 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes +�" ,
Lyn Means, Senior Transportation Engineer with Sam Schwartz Engineering,
which recently acquired the Metro Transportation Group, which was part of the
Clearwater project and Costco in Oak Brook. They performed a traffic and
parking analysis along with the traffic flow into and out of the proposed site.
They also worked with Village staff to meet the emergency equipment needs
and requirements for the proposed development. The parking analysis used
current parking standards for similar developments in the Chicagoland area.
The traffic circulation took into account the internal roadway and the primary
access into the development from 16t" Street and from Route 83. They would
expect some shared internal use. The parking analysis looked at the
cumbersome Village code and the plan does meet the code, however, they also
conducted a very detailed analysis of what this type of site would use. They
reviewed peak times for the site compared to Northbrook. The result indicated
that the proposed parking supply on the site would be more than adequate to
accommodate the proposed site use.
Ben Bussman Vice President with Webster McGrath Ahlberg in Wheaton
provided the civil engineering plans. They prepared a topographic and ALTA
survey for the Sears property, which included mapping the flood plain of the
Spring Road tributary that is adjacent to the property. The flood plain is
contained within the banks of the creek. There will be no impacts on the flood
plain or floodway. They will not be excavating in the creek channel. They will
meet all of the requirements of the storm water management ordinance.
Mark Gershon referred to Tab 4 of the binder which responds in writing to all
of the planned development standards. The proposed development will be a
benefit to the community. It will bring in new entertainment and restaurant to
the Oakbrook Center. It will revitalize an underused area of the Center. It will
not only bring in new visitors it will enhance the community and the Center.
The quality of the design is safe, fun and exciting. A new curb cut was added
due to the input of staff for easier access for emergency equipment. The
proposed development meets the Planned Development requirements and has
met the required standards. The project will bring significant benefits to the
Oakbrook Center,the Village and the entire community.
Chairman Davis asked for public testimony. All interested parties were notified
of the public hearing.
Trustee Wolin said that although he was a Trustee, he is also a resident of a
nearby area and he raised concerns regarding the music in the outdoor dining
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 5 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
area because music carries and causes concern. He questioned if they were
having music and the location of the speakers.
Dale Schwartz responded that the type of music and the level of music is
extremely important to them. They play Italian music or very tasteful
comfortable music for everyone ranging from 7 to 90 years old. They do not
play hip-hop, loud raucous rock and roll ever. Late nights they play Motown.
The emphasis is on fun. The volume is meant to never get in the way of two
people talking. On Friday or Saturday night they may have live sax players
with keyboard and they monitor it because they are hypersensitive to the music.
The outside music follows the same philosophy. The speakers are positioned to
shoot straight down. The only reason for the outside music is meant to create
subtle music in the background to mute the traffic noise. On occasion when
there is a live sax or guitar player there are no speakers used. They can always
control where the outside music is or the speakers. They will always comply
with whatever decibel level is standard for the Village.
Chairman Davis noted that staff included a recommended condition relative to
the outdoor dining and patio requiring the applicant to provide an operational
plan for staff review and approval prior to using the area for live music and that
any sound generated from the facility must comply with the Village's sound
regulations.
Mike Zupsich, 15471 Monterey Avenue, Oakbrook Terrace, said that his house
is located on the west side of Route 83 across from the proposed Pinstripes. He
raised several concerns regarding the proposed lighting that will be used on the
exterior of Pinstripes and wanted to know whether the lights from the facility
would be lighting up his backyard or shining into his bedroom windows. He
was also concerned about the music and questioned how late they would be
open because these things could affect him and his neighbors in the area. He
understood that the Village is looking for something that will generate revenue.
However, his backyard fence faces Route 83 and they have a lot of trees to
drown out the traffic from Route 83. He was concerned about the closeness of
the facility to Route 83 and understood that projects are worked on during the
night.
Director of Community Development Kallien responded that lighting and sound
is very important to the Village. He suggested that a condition could be
included that would require that any light coming from Pinstripes could be
required to be one-half-foot candle from the property line at Pinstripes. At the
time of building permit it could be inspected to make sure that it is properly
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 6 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes VPWO
shielded so that it does not go over into any of the residential areas. With the
sound regulations he did not see the music as being an issue. He noted that the
traffic on Route 83 will generate a much higher decibel level than what is
anticipated from the proposed facility.
Village Engineer Hullihan noted that there is transition lighting on 16"' Street is
up to two-foot candles.
Mr. Schwartz responded that he agreed with everything regarding the lighting
issue. He noted that the existing parking lot lights in the Oakbrook Center are
staying as is. The lighting on the building will nestle in with far less light than
the existing lights in the parking lot. In terms of construction, the crews are
done by 4:00 p.m., so there will not be any night time noise from construction.
Mr. Gershon noted that Tab 17 contains the photometric plait. The extensive
landscape will not only block the sound it will help to block the lighting too.
Member Bulin questioned the five-foot high cedar fence.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that the reason for the fence
was to provide safety and protection from the creek, but visually is not the
element that should be used unless it were intertwined with the landscaping.
Member Bulin suggested that perhaps the using some of the existing elements
with the wood and stone.
Mr. Schwartz responded that he wants the area to look gorgeous with the
landscaping. One reason for the fence was to protect families and small
children. They do not want to take any chances with a child wandering back
there. The purpose for the fence is to provide something safe enough to enclose
the patio area. Beautiful landscaping can be provided on both sides of the fence
so that the fence is not the main attraction. The plan can be adjusted.
Director of Community Development Kallien noted that whatever change is
made should be added in the conditions.
Member Cappetta did not believe they should be locked into the type offence.
There was a general discussion regarding the fencing to be combined with
landscaping.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 7 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
Member Doyle suggested that the area be treated as a swimming pool area,
which would give the applicant flexibility.
Member Sheers raised a concern that the backside of the building looked plain
and doesn't do the front or the sides of the building any justice and questioned
whether something could be done.
Mr. Schwartz responded that there is considerable landscaping that wraps
around the patio and the end of the building. A lot of the existing trees will
mask the backside of the building. He noted that the due to sunlight and the
location of the kitchen areas, it was intentionally designed that way for
functionality. There are large windows down further by the bowling areas.
Mr. Poltorek responded that they designed and oriented the building to the
actual site. There is a small tributary behind it and a large furniture store
structure that will also block a portion of the building as you visually travel
down Route 83. The landscaping that wraps around the side will break it up.
Member Bulin said that theme is so much vegetation in the tributary along with
the elevation that not much of the back of the building will be seen going south
on Route 83.
Mr. Schwartz said that from a pure aesthetic design they are trying to draw the
eye to the beautiful front entrance and to the gorgeous southwest patio fagade.
Vice Chair Tropinski agreed with Pinstripes that it was not architecturally
necessary to change the back of the building. The design is appropriate for the
uses in the building.
Member Doyle said that he has a real issue regarding the parking lot
configuration and safety of the pedestrians. There are only 45 parking spaces
located in front of the building. The parking spaces across the road would be
closer than those located on the same side of the facility and human nature will
have people parking as close as they can, so he suggested that marked and
lighted pedestrian crosswalks be added across the road. He also suggested that
the other crosswalk to the east of the building be moved closer towards the
building so that when people crossed that one, they would be on the same side
of the building and not in the line of cars turning to drop people off.
Mr. Schwartz noted that the cross walk was added at the recommendation of the
Police Department.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 8 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
Village Engineer Hullihan responded that both he and the Fire Chief were
concerned with the turning radius for a standard fire engine, which required the
curb cut with bollards so traffic could not get in, but fire apparatus could. As
long as the bollards were added it was the natural place for a pedestrian
crossing. It can be adjusted more southeast or southwest to accommodate the
concerns raised. A pedestrian crossing access across Oakbrook Center Drive is
something that will have to be engineered with General Growth.
Mr. Gershon noted that they will work with the Village on the final plans.
Chairman Davis questioned if the proposed pedestrian signage would be similar
to that atMcDonald's.
Village Engineer Hullihan responded that was exactly what he was referring to,
so that there would be double striped pedestrian crossing marking with stop
signs and flashing lights at night. The enhanced marking and lighting at the
pedestrian crossing is something that is available. If it becomes an issue the
Village will work with them and General Growth.
Vice Chair- Tiopinski noted that the Oakbrook Center is very special to the
Village and complimented the architecture with the cedar banding that wraps
around the building and it provides a very pedestrian friendly approach to the
building. Overall it is very nice companion to what exists.
Member Doyle brought up the issue of signage on the southwest elevation. He
noted that the Village spent a lot of time on signage and it goes against what
was adopted. There is nothing like it anywhere in the Village.
Mr. Schwartz said that they tend to be more understated than other places. In
this particular location, unlike the others, they are not envisioning any kind of
monument sign so it is a little unique at this location, so part of the intent of the
sign is to let people know as they are traveling down Route 83 that they are
there. The signage on the front entrance is intentionally smaller and more
tasteful. What is driving the placement of this sign is the very distinctive wood
roof covering. Absent the roof, placement of the sign would have been
mounted up against the building. The fayade has limited them in the location
because bringing the sign down further will put the signage in competition with
the landscaping, since the trees will be approximately 10 feet tall. The vast
majority of people will be using the northbound Route 83 access. It is lower
than other signs in the Center. The lower bar with bowling bocce bistro is part
of their corporate branding.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 9 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
Mr. Poltorek also noted that without a monument sign at the location there is
nothing to identify the building until someone comes around the corner.
Director of Community Development Kallien said that he would expect that the
bottom feature of the sign to be high quality and would have letters that are
individually routed out and not painted on the front, which would be consistent
with the sign regulations. When the sign code was adopted corporate identities
such as logos were intended to be allowed.
Member Cappetta questioned whether staff would review the pedestrian
signage at the drive lanes by Walter E. Smithe or should that be covered by the
Commission.
Director of Community Development Kallien responded that at this point in
time it would be difficult because we cannot be the greatest predictors of where
people will go, but human nature and the conditions of the day will dictate how
they will get to and from the facility. Crosswalks and signage could be added,
but people don't always follow that path, so where they shall all be at this point
in time may be difficult.
Member Iyer commented that this was a good project and we are very happy
that Pinstripes was coming to Oak Brook.
There were no other comments by the Members,
Chairman Davis noted that the standards for a planned development are very
detailed and are addressed in writing under Tab 4 of the case file. They were
also addressed as part of the presentation at this public hearing.
Motion by Member Doyle, seconded by Member Iyer to approve the proposed
planned development for Sears,Roebuck and Co to construct a Pinstripes on its
property at the address proposed to be 7 Oakbrook Center as presented, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans
including the use, location, size, design, landscaping and signage for the
Pinstripes project including the requested waivers and variations.
2. Relative to the outdoor dining and the patio area, the applicant must
present an operational plan for Village Staff review and approval prior to
using the area for live music. Access to the outdoor dining area is to be
from within Pinstripes and not accessed from outside the building.
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 10 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes
Similar to some other outdoor dining standards, the emergency egress
gates shall open out only and labeled"Exit Only."
3. The fence shown as the five foot cedar fence on Sheet Al Landscape
Plan(under Tab 5 of the case file)will be a minimum of 48-inches to 60-
inches in height, approximately 50 percent open, with appropriate
landscaping on both sides of the fence to ensure that there is an adequate
barrier between the patio area and the adjacent water feature. The
remainder of the fencing starting from the end of the water element
enclosing the adjacent outdoor dining area as shown on Sheet Al is to be
constructed with a wrought iron and stone element;
4. Any sound generated from the outdoor dining and patio area must be in
compliance with the sound regulations of the Village of Oak Brook,
5. Any lighting that would come from the Pinstripes to the west along
Route 83 is to be one-half-foot candle or less as measured along the
property line (excluding existing parking lot lighting) and all exterior
building lighting will be properly shielded.
ROLL CALL VOTE
Ayes: 7—Members Bulin, Cappetta,Doyle, Iyer, Sheers, Vice Chair Tropinski
and Chairman Davis
Nays: 0. Motion Carried.
4. OTHER BUSINESS OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business to discuss.
5. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Member Iyer, seconded by Member Doyle to adjourn the meeting at
9:01p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried
ATTEST:
/s/Robert L. Kallien Jr.
Robert Kallien Jr.
Director of Community Development
Secretary
VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK
Regular Planned Development Page 11 of 11 January 26, 2012
Commission Minutes