Loading...
S-1265 - 06/09/2009 - ZONING - OrdinancesORDINANCE 2009- ZO -V -S -1265 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3000 COOLIDGE STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK (PIN 06 -25- 302 -038) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by the property owners, Charles Blum and Catherine Blum (collectively, Petitioner), requesting a variation to Section 13 -6C -3 F 1 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the existing front yard setback from 100 feet to 40 feet for the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street, and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing on the request for variation, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and recommended approval of the variation, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the Petitioner satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of the requested variation and made specific findings, including that the variation will not endanger the public health, safety and welfare, and that there will be no substantial injury to other property in the neighborhood, and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and deem the variation, as set forth below, to be in the best interests of the Village NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows Section 1 The foregoing preambles are restated and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth herein Section 2 The Petitioner is hereby granted a variation to Section 13 -6C -3 F 1 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the existing 100 foot front yard setback to be reduced to 40 feet to comply with the zoning requirements in the R3 District for the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street Section 3 The variation and the scope of this ordinance are limited and restricted to the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street, which is legally described as follows LOT 2 OF KEEHN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN WESTCHESTER PARK RESUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 30, 1984 AS DOCUMENT R84 -23065 OF PARTS OF WESTCHESTER PARK SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE PLAT OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINICIPAL MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID WESTCHESTER PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1925 AS DOCUMENT 203037, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS Section 4 If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions of this ordinance Section 5 All ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict Ordinance 2009-ZO-V-S-1265 Variation — 3000 Coolidge Street (PIN 06-25-302-038) Page 2 of 2 Section 6 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law APPROVED THIS 9th day of June, 2009 PASSED THIS 9th day of June, 2009 Ayes Trustees Aktipis, Carson, Moy, Saiyed, Wolin and Zannis Nays None Absent None 13 F 04 All OUNT1 ATTEST Charlotte K Pruss Village Clerk BLUM 3000 COOLIDGE Variation— Front Yard Building Setback INDEX PAGE CONTENTS 10-10.a Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien -Village Board Agenda — Dated May 26, 2009 9 Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals dated May 21, 2009 8-8.e Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes dated May 5, 2009 7-7.a .Letters of Support from Surrounding Neighbors 6-6.a Staff Report from Director of Community Development Kallien —dated April 23, 20009 5 Certificate of Publication dated April 15, 2009 4 Resident Letter dated April 14, 2009 3-3.a Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes dated April 14, 2009 2 Referral Memo— Board of Trustees Agenda dated April 14, 2009 1 Zoning Ordinance Section 13-6C-3.F-1 — R-3 District Front Yard Setback PAGE CONTENTS A Petition Application —Variation B Letter of Explanation C-C.1 Variation Standards D Keehn's Resubdivision Approved April 9, 1991 — 3000 and 3006 Coolidge E Site Plan Showing 3000 and 3006 Front Yard Building Setbacks F Aerial View of Setbacks on Coolidge and Subject Property G Fee/Receipt H Certification of Surrounding Property Owners I Surrounding Property Owners List J- J.1 Subject Property Verification and Legal Description K Permit Plat for 3000 Coolidge L Site Plan Showing House and Accessory Structures at 3006 Coolidge vGE OF 041(e90 0 Moak mob,Alb. o 4cF oo uN tX,��_ AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of May 26, 2009 SUBJECT: Blum—3000 Coolidge Street—Variation FROM: Robert L. Kallien,Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals approving a variation to reduce the front yard setback from 100 feet to 40 feet for the lot at 3000 Coolidge Street and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the June 9, 2009 Board of Trustees meeting. Background/History: At its meeting on May 5, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals held the required public hearing on a petition from Charlie and Catherine Blum, the owners of the home at 3000 Coolidge Street seeking approval of a variation to the front yard setback on their parcel in order to construct an addition to the home. This is the only lot on Coolidge with a 100-foot front yard setback; all other properties meet the required minimum of 40 feet, which is the R-3 Zoning District front yard setback. The Blum property has a 100-foot front yard setback which was established as part of the Keehn's Resubdivision which was approved by the Village in 1992. The purpose for increasing the front yard was at the request of the homeowner at 3006 Coolidge who owned both parcels prior to the subdivision of the property and wanted to protect several large pine trees and ensure an open sight line from the existing screened porch to the golf course property located to the north in the event that a home was ever built on the then vacant lot at 3000 Coolidge. Since the approval of the Keehn's Resubdivision, the original home at 3006 Coolidge was sold, the house demolished and a new residence was constructed in 2004. The developer removed the pine trees and an attached garage and driveway are now located on that portion of the lot. The next door neighbor that now resides at 3006 Coolidge supports the request. Last saved by DEFAULT J:\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-VOB-BLum-VAR-2009.doc Recommendation By a vote of 5 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation to reduce the existing 100 foot front yard setback at 3000 Coolidge Street to 40 feet. /�A- Last saved by DEFAULT J:\l-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Ree-VOB-BLum-VAR-2009.doe 1 OJF 04 * • E k PG ey � O 1 0 � t � A o - h G � 9c�^0UNTV ,��'� May 21, 2009 Village of Oak Brook Village President Craig and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Website www.oak-brook.org SUBJECT: Blum—3000 Coolidge Street—Variation—Front Yard Setback Administration 630.368.5000 Dear President Craig and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.368.5045 Community BackEround Development At its meeting on May 5, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals held the required public hearing on 630.368.5101 a petition from Charles and Catherine Blum, the owners of the home at 3000 Coolidge Street FAX 630.368.5128 seeking approval of a variation to the front yard setback on their parcel in order to construct an addition to the home. Engineering Department 630.368.5130 With the exception of this parcel, all other properties on Coolidge Street have the R-3 District, FAX 630.368.5128 40-foot minimum front yard setback requirement. The Blum property has a 100-foot front yard setback which was established as part of the Keehn's Resubdivision approved by the Village in Fire Department 1992. This setback was imposed by the owner of the home at 3006 Coolidge who owned both 630.368.5200 FAX 630.368.5251 p arcels prior to the subdivision of the property and wanted to protect some large pine trees and ensure an open sight line from the existing screened porch to the golf course property located to Police Department the north in the event that a home was ever built on the then vacant lot at 3000 Coolidge. Since 630.368.8700 the approval of the Keehn's Resubdivision, the original home at 3006 Coolidge was sold, the FAX 630.368.8739 house demolished and a new residence was constructed in 2004. The developer removed the pine trees and an attached garage and driveway are now located on that portion of the lot that formerly Public Works contained the pine trees. Department 630.368.5270 FAX 630.368.5295 Public Comment All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. No one spoke in support of or in Oak Brook opposition to the request. However, letters in support of the request were received from the next Public Library door neighbor and the only other neighbor across the street from the property that could see the subject area. 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Recommendation 630.368.7700 Chairman Davis said that the applicant had addressed the standards in writing and in his FAX 630.368.7704 testimony as required in order to recommend approval of the requested variation. By a vote of 5 to 0,the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the requested variation to reduce the Oak Brook Sports Core existing 100-foot front yard setback at 3000 Coolidge Street to 40 feet. Bath&Tennis Club Very truly yours .700 Oak Brook Road NOTE: Chairman Davis has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 letter pending his signature. The signed original will be placed in the official file 630.368.6420 upon receipt. FAX 630.368.6439 Golf Chub Champ Davis 2606 York Road Chairman Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 Zoning Board of Appeals 630.368.6400 FAX 630.368.6419 i • • MINUTES OF THE MAY 5, 2009 REGULAR MEETING D)"FT VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK BOARD APPEALS APPROVED WRITTEN OR AMENDED ON_, 2009 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL To ORDER The Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was called to order by Chairman Champ Davis in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Members Jeffrey Bulin, Glenn Krietsch, Baker Nimry and Joseph Rush ABSENT: Members and Steven Young Wayne Ziemer IN ATTENDANCE: Robert Kallien, Jr., Director of Community Development 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 2009 Motion by Member Krietsch, seconded by Member Rush to approve the minutes of the January 6, 2009 Regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting as amended. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business to discuss. 5. NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS A. BLUM — 3000 COOLIDGE STREET — VARIATION — TO REDUCE BLUM - 3000 COOLIDGE STREET THE EXISTING 100-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONFORM - VARIATION - TO THE R-3 DISTRICT 40-FOOT FRONT YARD REQUIREMENT REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK Chairman Davis swore in Charlie and Cathie Blum, petitioners and owners of the property. The applicant is seeking a variation to change the existing 100- foot front yard setback to 40 feet so that it would be consistent with the other homes in the R-3 zoning district. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 1 of 14 May 5, 2009 Mr. Blum, reviewed the request and provided the history and background of the property located at 3000 Coolidge In 1992, they purchased the property from Sandy & Jonathan Keehn. At the time, they lived next door at 3006 Coolidge. Their residence had a screened porch at the minimum side yard setback facing our lot to the north. They explained to us that that the 100' front yard setback was specified on our plat because they used the porch frequently and did not want anyone to build very close to this area where it might impact their enjoyment. They also had some 40-foot spruce trees adjacent to the porch and they wanted to protect. The Keehn's sold their property nine years ago (2000) to a developer. The developer demolished the house and cleared the lot. Four years ago, the current neighbor built a house with a 40' front yard setback. A side entry drive and garage now occupy the space where the Keehn's spruce trees and screened porch once stood. Over the past four years they have explored many construction options to further enjoy their Oak Brook residence. They now feel the unusual circumstances of the Keehn's 1992 extraordinary 100-foot front yard setback are no longer pertinent and that the extraordinary front yard setback stipulated presents a significant hardship to any feasible addition to their residence and continued enjoyment in this village. All the houses on Coolidge,street have an approximate 40-foot front yard setback. They have discussed their situation with the neighbors, who are in agreement with their position and they submitted some letters in support of the request. They are seeking a 40-foot front yard setback consistent with the R-3 zoning requirements in their neighborhood. Mr. Blum reviewed the variation standards as follows: la) The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. RESPONSE: The unusual 100-foot front yard setback on only this parcel, in this subdivision, would probably restrict the value of the property if at any time in the future they wished to sell this property. The extraordinary setback impedes the value of the property. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 2 of 14 May 5, 2009 • s . lb) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. RESPONSE: When property was purchased in 1992, the plat contained a 100- foot front yard setback specification, not the 40-foot minimum requirement under R-3 zoning, because original seller used their nearby screened porch frequently and did not want anyone to build close to this area where it might affect their ambiance and mature spruce trees' root structure. The porch and trees removed when developer bought neighbor's land in 2000. The current neighbor built a garage and side entry drive in this area. lc) The variation, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. RESPONSE: The variation, if granted, would more likely improve the character and zoning consistency of the locality, since their residence is oddly the only one on the street with a front yard setback greater than 40 feet. 2a) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. RESPONSE: They have a natural ravine woodland prairie in the backyard, the useable backyard lawn is small, they have a masonry deck attached to the back of the home, the master bedroom and bath encompass the entire back of the 2nd floor of the house- these are significant reasons in addition to the layout of the existing home, why it is not economically feasible to construct any addition to the back of their home. 2b) The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. RESPONSE: The petition for variation is to allow the front yard setback of their property to be treated consistently with properties in the same zoning classification. Theirs is the only property in the area with the extraordinary 100-foot front yard setback restriction. 2c) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. RESPONSE: They do not believe that granting the variation will be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood whatsoever. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 3 of 14 May 5, 2009 1 2d) The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. RESPONSE: They do not believe the proposed variation will impair an adequate supply of light whatsoever to the closest neighbor to the south and the only other neighbor to the west. Additionally, there should not be any increase in the danger of fire or other endangerment with the proposed variation. They believe the proposed variation, being consistent with all the other front yard setbacks on the street, could only increase the property value within the neighborhood. 2e) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. RESPONSE: The purpose of the variation requested is to provide for greater utility of their residence by feasibly allowing for construction options of an additional bedroom/office, and further enhance their neighborhood experience. Having built a comfortable, modest home in 1992, they now have a larger family and would like to enlarge the space more in line with the average Oak Brook home today. 2f) That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. RESPONSE: The original seller created the hardship when he imposed the 100-foot setback to protect his personal interest at that time. In 2000 the original house and circumstances were no longer existent. The original seller has no current interest in their property whatsoever. Member Rush said that he did not understand why the board at that time ever approved this request, because it was an issue that could easily have been handled with covenants. The idea of zoning is to create all property in a district the same, as much as possible. The 100-foot setback imposed created an oddball lot. He suggested rescinding the original imposition of the 100-foot setback. Director of Community Development Kallien said that there were only two avenues for Mr. Blum to proceed for relief. One was to seek the variation as presented; the other would have been to amend the previous subdivision plat. Under that scenario, it would have taken both property owners to accomplish that. This is a hardship for the applicant, who did not impose the 100-foot setback on the plat. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 4 of 14 May 5, 2009 Member Rush expressed concerns that the variation would only allow the construction of the addition to the existing house, but would exclude any other accessory structures in the future. Chairman Davis noted that the applicant is not seeking relief to build a specific plan, but rather to have a 40-foot setback in order to be consistent with other lots in their subdivision. A variation would run with the land. Director of Community Development Kallien said that he talked to Village Engineer Durfey, who has been with the village for over 30 years and he could not recall another situation like this one. Chairman Davis noted that this lot is an anomaly because of the specific desire of the person who owned the two lots at that time in order to protect his view and the spruce trees. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the person who imposed the restriction of the 100-foot setback is gone and the original house no longer exists. Mrs. Blum said that the lot had been sold twice prior to the construction of their next-door neighbor's home. Member Krietsch questioned whether a letter of approval had been received from the next-door neighbor. Gail Polanek responded that she had personally spoken with the next-door neighbor at 3006 Coolidge and when he called stated that he supported the request to change the setback. Mr. Blum added that the next-door neighbor's wife had also signed one of the letters supporting the request and that they also received a letter of support from the only other neighbor at 3005 Coolidge that could see the subject area. Director of Community Development Kallien commented that the Village of Oak Brook is the neighbor to the north and did not object to the request. Chairman Davis said that the applicant had addressed the standards in writing on pages C-C.1 of the case file and in his testimony as required in order to recommend approval of the requested variation to change the 100-foot front yard setback at 3000 Coolidge to 40 feet. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 14 May 5, 2009 Z4 Motion by Member Rush, seconded by Member Nimry, that the applicant had addressed the standards as required in order to recommend approval of the requested variation to change the existing 100-foot front yard setback at 3000 Coolidge to 40 feet. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 5 — Members Bulin,Krietsch,Nimry, Rush and Davis Nays: 0— None Absent: 2—Members Young and Ziemer. Motion Carried. 5. B. THE CLUBHOUSE OAK BROOK — 298 OAKBROOK CENTER — THE CLUBHOUSE OAK BROOK - 298 SPECIAL USE — OUTDOOR DINING AREA ADJACENT TO A OBC-SPECIAL USE RESTAURANT -OUTDOOR DINING AREA Chairman Davis swore in Mark O'Sullivan, General Manager of The Clubhouse restaurant. He noted that the Zoning Board of Appeals was in receipt of the Plan Commission recommendation and that they unanimously approved the requested special use, subject to certain conditions. Mr. O'Sullivan said that The Clubhouse would like to amend its existing special use for outdoor dining that was granted in 1998. In the summer of 2008, the Barnes and Noble (located next to The Clubhouse) asked for and received permission to use part of the Clubhouse property for construction of their new facility in the Oakbrook Center. This caused significant changes to the facade, planter and railings on the existing west side patio. They believe by amending the existing special use permit it would be an opportunity to improve both the appearance and safety of the current patio that would not only protect the public safety and welfare, but would increase it. Pages J, K,N and O of the case file depict the existing and new railings that would be used. Part of the area was given to Barnes and Noble so that they could complete its design. The design change is primarily to provide for a more visually pleasing aesthetic between their restaurant and Barnes and Noble and also would provide better safety for the public by replacing the current wrought iron barriers with permanent steel barriers. The first request is to change the current barrier and design in order to improve the visual appearance and allow it to flow uniformly with the new barrier/fencing that has been installed at Barnes and Noble. The second part of the request is to make it a permanent barrier system; primarily for safety concerns because they believe a permanent barrier would provide more safety and stability than a temporary barrier. By taking the barriers in and out each year tends to lessen their structural integrity. When the new permanent barrier/fencing is installed they will re-core all of the holes in the cement. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 14 May 5, 2009 • • �'� • • To: The Oak Brook Zoning Board Re: Front yard setback 3000 Coolidge Street We understand that the Blum's extraordinary 100 foot front yard setback was implemented when the Keehns sold the Blum's the vacant lot at 3000 Coolidge in 1992. At the time, the Keehns resided next door at 3006 Coolidge and wanted to preserve an area around their screened porch and mature spruce trees which closely abutted the Blum's property approximately 80 feet from the street. Since this unusual circumstance no longer exists, and in the interest of increasing neighborhood property values, we are in favor of reducing the Blum's 100 foot front yard setback to 40 feet, consistent with the applicable R-3 zoning throughout Oak Brook. Kevin & Chris Koutsky 3006 Coolidge Street 1*70 I To: The Oak Brook Zoning Board Re: Front yard setback 3000 Coolidge Street We understand that the Blum's extraordinary 100 foot front yard setback was implemented when the Keehns sold the Blum's the vacant lot at 3000 Coolidge in 1992. At the time, the Keehns resided next door at 3006 Coolidge and wanted to preserve an area around their screened porch and mature spruce trees which closely abutted the Blum's property approximately 80 feet from the street. Since this unusual circumstance no longer exists, and in the interest of increasing neighborhood property values, we are in favor of reducing the Blum's 100 foot front yard setback to 40 feet, consistent with the applicable R-3 zoning throughout Oak Brook. A Apparao & Nirmala Devata 3005 Coolidge Street t VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: April 23, 2009 CASE NOS: 2009-008-ZO-VAR—Front Yard DESCRIPTION: Variation to Section 13-6C-3F.1 to reduce the existing 100-foot front yard setback to 40-feet to conform to other R-3 district property requirements PETITIONERS: Charles and Catherine Blum ADDRESS: 3000 Coolidge Street EXISTING ZONING: R-3 ACREAGE: 30,720 square feet. ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: CR, Conservation/Recreation District, Oak Brook Golf Club. South: R-3, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes. East: CR, Conservation/Recreation District, Oak Brook Sports Core. West: R-3, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Single-family homes. DISCUSSION: Charlie and Catherine Blum, the owners of the home at 3000 Coolidge Street have submitted a request seeking approval of a variation to the established front yard setback on their parcel in order to construct an addition to the home. At the present time, a 100-foot front yard setback has been established for the Blum property. This was done as part of the Keehn's Resubdivision which was approved by the Village in 1992. The purpose for increasing the front yard was at the request of the owner of the home at 3006 Coolidge who owned both parcels prior to the subdivision of the property and wanted to protect some large pine trees and ensure an open sight line from the existing screened porch to the golf course property located to the north in the event that a home was ever built on the then vacant lot at 3000 Coolidge. STAFF REPORT -VARIATION-BLUM 3000 COOLIDGE STREET CASE No.2009-008-ZO-VAR Since the approval of the Keehn's Resubdivision, the original home at 3006 Coolidge was sold, the house demolished and a new residence was constructed in 2004. The developer removed the pine trees and an attached garage and driveway are now located on that portion of the lot. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description of this request. Staff Comments: 1. From a planning perspective, the imposition of the existing 100-foot front yard setback at 3000 Coolidge was put in place to protect the interest of the former owner at that time and is no longer relevant since the home at 3006 Coolidge has been replaced. 2. All other neighboring properties on this street are zoned R-3 have a minimum 40- foot setback as required in the zoning regulations. 3. Village Engineer Durfey has no comments on this proposed variation request. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to make a recommendation on requests for variations. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for variations. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: If the Zoning Board of Appeals were of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied the requirements for the requested variation, a recommendation would be in order to approve the request to allow the front yard setback to 40 feet and to comply with all other provisions within the R-3 zoning district. Respectfully Submitted, Robert . Kallie r., AICP Directo ommunity Development 2 •OL Public Notice • • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hear- ing before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois,will be held on May 5; 2009, at 7:30 p.m. in the k roo B Oak CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION Village Hall(Butler rooGovern- ment Center), 1200 Oak Brook Road,Oak Brook,I III- nois 60523 for the purpose of Paddock Publications,Inc. consider the application of Charles and Catherine D&Jffedd Blum, 3000 Coolidge, Oak Brook, IL 60523, the prop- erty owners,for a variation as provided for under Title 13 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, Ordinance G-60 as Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of amended. The petitioner seeking approval of n variation to the State of Illinois,DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher bacexisting 1 feet front 40 feet a5 of the DAILY HERALD. That said DAILY HERALD is a secular required in other R-3 Dis- tricts in order to construct newspaper and has been circulated daily in the Village(s)of an addition to their home. The property may be gen• Addison,Algonquin,Antioch, Arlington Heights, Barrington, erally described as 3000 Coolidge, oak Brook, Illi- nois, Barrington Hills,Bartlett,Batavia,Bensenville,Bloomingdale, scrOT io 2 n is and the legal de- s as follows: LOT 2 OF KEEHN'S RE- Buffalo Grove,Burlington, Campton Hills,Carol Stream, SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN WESTCHESTER Cgoentersville, Cary,Deer Park,Des Plaines,East Dundee,Elbum, PARK RESUBDIVISION RECORDED R DO MARCH R84-30, Elgin,Elk Grove Village,Fox Lake,Fox River Grove,Geneva, CHESOTERAPARKFSUBDI- Gilberts,Glen Ellyn, Glendale Heights,Grayslake, Green Oaks, IHE TSAHOF THE PLAOFTE Gurnee,Hainesville,Hampshire,Hanover Park,Hawthorn Woods, EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Hoffinan Estates,Huntley, Inverness,Island Lake,Itasca, OF SECTION 25, TOWN- SHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE Keenevville,Kildeer,Lake Barrington,Lake Villa,Lake in the Hills, 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN Lake Zurich,Libertyville,Lincolnshire,Lindenhurst,Lisle, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID WEST- CHESTER PARK SUBDI- Lombard,Long Grove,Medinah,Mt.Prospect, Mundelein,Naperville, VISION RECORDED NO- VEMBER 13, 1925 AS North Aurora,North Barrington, Oakbrook, Oakbrook Terrace, DOCUMENT 203037, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLI- Palatine,Prospect Heights,Rolling Meadows, Roselle, Schaumburg, NOI S. Permanent Index Number 302-038 All Persons desiring to be Sleepy Hollow, South Barrington, South Elgin, St. Charles, heard will beaffso and may Streamwood,Tower Lakes,Vernon Hills,Villa Park,Volo,Warrenville, submit itv to it so and may submit their statements orally or in writing or bath. Wauconda,Wayne, West Chicago,West Dundee, Wheaton, Wheeling= The hearing may be re- cessed to another date if no- Wlldwood, Winfield,Wood Dale tice of time and place thereof Is the hearing or is publicly an- pounced at County(ies)of Cook,DuPage, Kane,Lake,McHeM given by newspaper publi- cation and State of Illinois continuously for more than one year prior to the carton not less than five li recessed hearing date of the date of the first publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of In accord with the provi- sions of the American with general circulation throughout said Village(s),County(ies)and State. Disabilities Act, any indi- vidual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in this public meeting should contact Baine Wing,the vii- "an Act to revise the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 lage's ADA Coordinator,at 630.368-5022 as soon as Pos- Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 7150,Act 5, Section 1 and 5.That a sible before the meeting dot he petitioner's tlppllaa- notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy,was published tion Clerk k on with the Village April 15,2009 in said DAILY HERALD. Clerk and with the Director of Community Develop- ment. Persons wishing to examine the petition docu- ments may arrange to do so IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned,the said PADDOCK with the Director of Com- munity Development, Rob- ert Kaliien, Village of Oak k PUBLICATIONS> >Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by,this Brook, 1200 oak Brook authorized agent, at Arlington Heights,Illinois. 0. Road,Oak Brook, 0 60523, g g $ telephone 63368-5103 3. Charlotte Pruss Village Clerk Published at the direction of PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board of Ap- DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS peals of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois. Published in Daily Herald April 15,2009(4148239)SN BY Authorized Kgent Control#4148239 OF 0q GE 4-B P � 90 o � f � A O - y G � A r � 9C�COUNTV Village of Oak Brook April 14, 2009 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website www.oak-brook.org Dear Resident: Administration The Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be considering 630.368.5000 FAX 630.368.5045 a variation request at the meetings scheduled on the back of this notice. Community The application has been filed by: Charles and Catherine Blum Development 3000 Coolidge 630.368.5101 FAX 630.368.5128 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Engineering The property in question is located at: 3000 Coolidge Department 630.368.5130 Relationship of applicant to property: Owner FAX 630.368.5128 Fire Department Also shown on the reverse side of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you 630.368.5200 in determining your relationship to the property in question. FAX 630.368.5251 Police Department The request, which has been made, is as follows: 630.368.8700 FAX 630.368.8739 The petitioner is seeking approval of a variation to the existing front yard setback of 100 feet to be reduced to 40 feet as required in other R-3 Districts in Public Works order to construct an addition to their home. Department 630.368.5270 FAX 630.368.5295 If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development at 630-368-5103 between 8-4, Monday through Friday. Oak Brook Public Library Sincerely, 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.368.7700 FAX 630.368.7704 Robert . Kallien, Jr , AICP Director nity Development Oak Brook Sports Core RLK/gp Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.368.6420 FAX 630.368.6439 Golf Club 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.368.6400 FAX 630.368.6419 In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-368-5022 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room located in the Butler Government Center of the Village of Oak Brook, located at 1200 Oak Brook Road (31st Street and Spring Road), Oak Brook, Illinois. Zoning Board of Appeals**. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, May 5, 2009 Board of Trustees Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, May 26, 2009*** ** Public Hearing Body ***Tentative—Follows the completion of the Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing PUMP 140jse „ _ W z! 31S 'f �UTLl1! � j r9 + � ScMoos. 1 en or 17 . 9 r, 1z ATH Tammis 40 2801 n 14 IS tl goo 2A� a o►c IKo. 0" 'q j��OA 1 I Z 43 SON 42 t� n _ 37 3b 40 810 CORSA 33 3i + as+a 'iao ow,c Rfl. 1?. 15 ioi oAK arm C RD. 19 23 2S 3t HA+NTf RNtE UWAS le Mh CHATM 116 r6 m zz 1W YACATf I 3eo� 3000 Sam 3oos 410 Soo Z 3M ZOE iO o 30 bou 1 aprlo ? 4tw 414 qoi 3 3QSy 1 OAK BROOK ROAD r-1OtpY T 3V s+ f 3 �Ir 405 Sal F+1LL6R3a�1r14 !10 CNRt�r Q 321 313 305 WOOF! G H 4RG M 's%Iq 1j��1 �j�1� �I 3+z3 3121 *Note: The map provided is only an a oximation of the area in question and is intende to be used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the prop Rli im -:innn rnnlirina VAR-Ras Itr Mr. U6DOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REFERRALS 1) THE CLUBHOUSE OAK BROOK- 298 OAKBROOK CENTER- SPECIAL USE- OUTDOOR DINING AREA On April 14, 1998 the Village Board approved Ordinance S-896 to permit an outdoor dining area adjacent to the Clubhouse restaurant located at 298 Oakbrook Center. A Barnes and Noble store was recently completed next to the Clubhouse causing significant changes to the fagade, planters and railings. The proposed amendment will allow the existing outdoor dining area to be updated and improve the visual aesthetics so that the two retail stores flow. Since the outdoor dining area is in high demand when the weather is pleasant, the applicant is also requesting approval to expand the outdoor dining area to the other side of the establishment. The request has been approved by the General Manager of the Oakbrook Center, conditioned upon approval by the Village. The requested action was to refer a request for a special use to permit an additional outdoor dining area adjacent to the Clubhouse Restaurant to the Plan Commission for review at its April 20, 2009 meeting and to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its May 5, 2009 meeting. 2) LABRIOLA CAFE LLC - 3021 BUTTERFIELD ROAD (OAK BROOK PROMENADE) - SPECIAL USE -OUTDOOR DINING AREA Richard Labriola, the tenant operating the Labriola Caf6, located at 3021 Butterfield Road (Oak Brook Promenade), has submitted a petition seeking approval of a special use in order to permit outdoor dining adjacent to the restaurant. The request has been approved by NAI Hiffman Asset Management, as agent for the owner of the Oak Brook Promenade, LLC, conditioned upon approval by the Village. The requested action was to refer a request for a special use to perniit an outdoor dining area adjacent to the Labriola Cafe to the Plan Commission for review at it's April 20, 2009 meeting and to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its May 5, 2009 meeting. 3) LUM- 3000 COOLIDGE-VARIATION-FRONT YARD SETBACK Charles and Catherine Blum are seeking approval of a variation to change the front yard setback of 100 feet on their property to 40 feet. The previous owner of the lot recorded a 100 foot setback on the property at 3000 Coolidge,because he VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 13 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14,2009 • 6. C. 3) resided in the property at 3006 Coolidge and did not want his screened porch view to be blocked, so the Blum's built their home in 1992 adhering to the 100- foot setback. Since that time the property at 3006 Coolidge was sold to a developer and a new house was constructed. The Blum's desire to build an addition and update their home and are requesting relief to bring their property into compliance with the other R-3 properties in the area. The requested action was to refer a request for a variation to the front yard setback to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its May 5, 2009 meeting. > D. AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS OR PROPOSALS OR NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS 1) GOLF CART BATTERIES During the budget process late summer 2008, staff searched for ways to save money in the 2009 budget. At the time we focused on the possibility of foregoing the purchase of a new golf car fleet after the fourth year of ownership. Buying a new fleet after four years has been the standard practice for the golf club for several decades. Our existing fleet hit the four year mark at the end of last season. The major driver for this type of decision is battery health. We decide to do an examination of battery health in September. We tested the specific gravity and a load test on all the batteries. We felt the fleet was in good enough condition to get a fifth year out of the fleet and save the cost of a new purchase. We knew that all of the carts would not make the fifth year. Late in 2008 we installed new batteries (30) in five of the worst carts. We also budgeted for another 25% of the fleet to be retrofitted with new batteries throughout the season ($11,000.00). During the off season we performed all of the normal winter maintenance on the fleet. Unfortunately, the fleet's batteries have degraded even further during the winter months. This past Saturday, 15 carts were unable to make a full 18 holes and were exchanged during use on the golf course. Obviously, this is an unacceptable customer service situation. An acceptable level would be one golf car replaced on the course during a day. Staff is now asking to replace all the batteries in the remaining 63 golf cars (5 of our 68 cars were replaced last year). Each golf car has 6 batteries. We have contacted three suppliers (EZGo, Batteries Plus, and Interstate Battery). The lowest price of $89.95 per battery was received from Interstate Battery. This replacement now will provide for a reliable fleet that meets the service level expected by our customers, and will delay the purchase of a new fleet until after VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 13 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14, 2009 f 6. Motion by Trustee Carson, seconded by Trustee Wolin, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as presented. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 -Trustees Carson, Kennedy, Manofsky, Saiyed, Sanford and Wolin. Nays: 0 -None. Absent: 0 -None. Motion carried. 7. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA—None presented. 8. BOARD &COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. MCDO ALD'S SPRING ROAD RESUBDIVISION NUMBER 3 - FINAL PLAT - THREE- OT SUBDIVISION - 2105 SPRII�Gl ROAD AND 1120 22" STREET. THE PR PERTY IS BOUNDED BYE'"22ND STREET, SPRING ROAD, COMMER E DRIVE AND MCDONAL 'S DRIVE. /P At its meetin on March 16, 2009, ie Plan Commission completed its review and deliberations n an application frtii the McDonald's Corporation, the owner of the 9+ acres boun ed by 22°d Stree�aon the south, Commerce Drive on the north, Spring Road to the we t and McDo ald's Drive to the east seeking approval of a three-lot final plat of sub ivision. e two existing lots will be resubdivided into three lots. The applicant is lso see "ng a variation to the Subdivision Regulations to include a variation to Sect n 1�6-3K to eliminate the requirement for side and rear yard easements. Thi variation request was previously requested and approved in McDonald's Sprin 'koad Resubdivision No. 2. The existing 1JcD nald's restaurant will be located on a separate lot (#1). The remaining area will esubdivided so that the vacant land (for the proposed Gibsons Steakhousq. /and de ntion area that is north of the McDonald's restaurant will become Oe lot(#3) a d the area to the east would become another lot(#2). By a,�ote of 6 to 1, t Plan Commission recommended approval of the proposed Mci onald's Spring Roa Resubdivision No. 3 including a variation to Section 14-6- 3 of the Subdivision egulations, subject to the following conditions: 1) Final gineering approval inc udng all comments raised by Village Engineer Durfey in is memorandum dated March 13, 2009 and 2) The screening/buffering of the storm water management facilityll;shall meet Village requirements for design and safety at the time of permitting. Ordinance S-1228 which was approved allows the outdoor dining area for Gibson's. As part of this ordinance, several conditions were attached which address a shared parking arrangement (permitted in the Zoning Ordinance) and the requirement that the stormwater management facility comply with all Village requirements. Because of the proposed reconfiguration and design of the storm water management facility, Staff will require the installation of a barrier(fence) that is at least 48-inches in height around the perimeter of the facility VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 7 of 13 REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 14, 2009 PGA p F OA k e9 v O O co e G f O ,o \� CF CC U NZV,�� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of April 14, 2009 SUBJECT: Referral - Blum - 3000 Coolidge - Variation- to Reduce the Front Ya Setback FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer a request for a variation to the front yard setback to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its May 5, 2009 meeting. Background/History: Charles and Catherine Blum are seeking approval of a variation to change the front yard setback of 100 feet on their property to 40 feet. The previous owner of the lot recorded a 100 foot setback on the property at 3000 Coolidge, because he resided in the property at 3006 Coolidge and did not want his screened porch view to be blocked, so the Blum's built their home in 1992 adhering to the 100-foot setback. Since that time the property at 3006 Coolidge was sold to a developer and a new house was constructed. The Blum's desire to build an addition and update their home and are requesting relief to bring their property into compliance with the other R-3 properties in the area. Recommendation: Please refer the request for a special use to the above referenced meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. BOT-Referral-Blum-Coolidge-Var.doc �, Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 0 0 13-6C-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Reduction Of Lot Area: Not less than twenty five thousand (25,000) square feet, except that in subdivisions of eighty (80) acres or more in area, the lot area may be reduced to one-half (1/2) acre provided that lands equal to ten percent (10%) of the total area be dedicated to the village, or agency approved by the village board, for park or recreational uses and no portion of which shall be less than four (4) acres. The dedicated land shall be appropriate for park or recreational uses, and shall not include wet drainageways in excess of twenty five percent (25%) of the total dedicated area. B. Lot Width: Not less than one hundred feet (100') within the buildable area. C. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.4 for nonresidential uses. D. Structure Height: 1. Residential Uses: Not more than forty feet (40') except for continuous flat roofs, which shall be not more than thirty feet (30') to the top of any parapet wall. However, where residential building heights exceed thirty feet (30'), the highest space that can be occupied must have an emergency escape and rescue opening at a maximum elevation of thirty two feet (32') above grade. 2. Institutional And Other Nonresidential Uses: Not more than forty five feet (46). E. Ground Floor Area Per Dwelling: 1. One Story: Not less than one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet. 2. Bilevel: Not less than one thousand three hundred (1,300) square feet (floors at grade and above basement). 3. Dwellings Having More Than One Story: Not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet. a)F. Yards: Except as required in subsections B and D under "accessory uses and structures" in section 13-6A-1 of this chapter, yards shall be provided as follows: 1 1 Front: Not less than forty feet (40') in depth, except front yards abutting York Road and 22nd Street shall have a depth of not less than one hundred feet (100'). 2. Side: Not less than twelve feet (12') in depth except: a. A side yard abutting a street shall be not less than forty feet (40') in depth; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/getBookData.php?id=&section id=62107&ke... 4/14/2009 �. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD a OAK BROOK, IL 60523 ii► fi 630-368-5103 v' O9�eROOK�� PETITION APPLICATION for PUBUC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) X❑ VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ VARIATION ($750) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50-each lot frontage) -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW WILL BE FILED WITH THE VILLAGE CLERK. LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 3000 Coolidge Street PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. 06 - 25 - 302 - 038 LOT NO. 2 SUBDIVISION Keehn's Resubdivision LEGALADDRESS* 3000 Coolidge Street ZONING DISTRICT R-3 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 13-6C-3F. 1 ACTION REQUESTED allow front yard building setback to comply with R-3 zoning requirements, consistent with neighborhood PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER X CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT OWNER(S)OFRECORD Blum, Charles & Catherine PHONE 630-574-0855 ADDRESS 3000 Coolidge Street CITY Oak Brook STATE IL Zip 60.523 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) /�L �,j f 3 0 1/4�- PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Contact Name and E-mail Address(s) Blum, Charles - cblum@logofx.com, coolidge30000sbcglobal.net I(we)certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowledge and belie I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s)on the lot frontages of the above subject property as described in V' Code. In addition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Vi e blication costs within 30 days of billing. 3-19-09 0 Signature of Owner _..___....--.---.-----.--._-_-Date _.........__.-.._.__.----.-._---Signature of Applicant _.._.__.__....-...__._....-..._Date...._---.-.__..___......_- DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY or Date Filed 3.2 a 'd9 Fee Paid$ Receipt No. Received By Board of Trustees(Referral) Notice Published A(We'f-Oq Newspaper Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Plan Commission WA- Zoning Board of Appeals 5'- S--0,7 Board of rustees ' Board of Trustees '41-.0 n (Approval of rdinance)SIGNED-VILLAGE CLERK Date , J 3000 Coolidge Street variance - Letter of Explanation In 1992, we purchased the above vacant parcel of land from sellers, Sandy & Jonathan Keehn. At the time, they lived in a modest house (approx. 1200 ft.2) next door at 3006 Coolidge. Their residence had a screened porch at the minimum side yard setback facing our lot to the north. They explained to us that that the 100' front yard setback was specified on our plat because they used the porch frequently and did not want anyone to build very close to this area where it might affect their enjoyment. Additionally, they had mature Norway spruce trees adjacent to the porch and they wanted to preserve and protect their ground-surface root structure. The Keehn's sold their property nine years ago (2000). The developer demolished their house and cleared the lot of much of the landscaping, including the spruce trees that used to stand near the south boundary line of our lot. The developer sold this vacant land to our current neighbor, who built a house with R-3 40' front yard setback with a side entry drive and garage now occupying the space where the Keehn's spruce trees and screened porch once stood. Our primary residence of 3000 Coolidge Street has been our Oak Brook home for 17 years. We have enjoyed living in the last house on a dead end street, with the public golf course on our north and east side. At 2400 square feet, our house is considered small by Oak Brook real estate standards. We are now a family of four and would like to consider feasible construction options to further enjoy the neighborhood and continue residing in Oak Brook. Our backyard features a 70' x 114' woodland ravine area. Last year we contracted with TallGrass Restoration to remove buckthorn, seed and install woodland plugs in order to preserve this environment. When we built our house in 1992, we included a masonry deck surrounding the back of the house. Our master bedroom and bath encompasses the 2nd floor back of the house. Our backyard does not offer any reasonable options for an addition. Currently, all the houses on Coolidge Street except ours are no further than 40' from the street (lot line). We believe that the unusual circumstances of the Keehn's 1992 extraordinary front yard setback are no longer pertinent and that the extraordinary 100' front yard setback stipulated presents a significant hardship to any addition to our residence and our continued enjoyment in this village. We therefore seek a 40' front yard setback consistent with the R-3 zoning requirements of our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration in this matter, Charles & Cathie Blum r� . VARIATION STANDARDS la) The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. RESPONSE: The unusual 100' front yard setback on only this parcel in this subdivision would probably restrict the value of the property if at any time in the future we wished to sell this property. The extraordinary setback impedes the value of the property. 1b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. RESPONSE: When property was purchased in 1992, the plat contained a 100 foot front yard setback specification, not the 40 foot required under R-3 zoning, because original seller used their nearby screened porch frequently and did not want anyone to build close to this area where it might affect their ambiance and mature spruce trees' root structure (see Letter of Explanation). Porch and trees removed when developer bought neighbor's land in 2000. Current neighbor built garage and side entry drive in this area. lc) The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. RESPONSE: The variation, if granted, would more likely improve the character and zoning consistency of the locality, since our residence is oddly the only one on the street with a front yard setback greater than 40 feet. 2a) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. RESPONSE: We have a natural ravine woodland prairie in our backyard, our useable backyard lawn is small, we have a masonry deck attached to the back of our home, our master bedroom and bath encompass the entire back of the 2nd floor of our house- these are significant reasons in addition to the layout of the existing home, why it is not economically feasible to construct any addition to the back of our modest by Oak Brook standards, 2400 square foot home. 2b) The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. : RESPONSE: Actually, this petition for variation is to allow the front yard setback of our property to be treated consistently with properties in the same zoning classification. Ours is the only property in the area with the extraordinary 100' front yard setback restriction. VARIATION STANDARDS (continued) 2c) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. RESPONSE: We do not believe that granting of the variation will be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood whatsoever. 2d) The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. RESPONSE: We do not believe the proposed variation will impair an adequate supply of light whatsoever, with our closest neighbor to our south and our only other neighbor to our west. Additionally, there should not be any increase in the danger of fire or other endangerment with the proposed variation. We believe the proposed variation, being consistent with all the other front yard setbacks on our street, could only increase the property value within the neighborhood. 2e) That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. RESPONSE: The purpose of the variation requested is to provide for greater utility of our residence by feasibly allowing for construction options of an additional bedroom/office, and further enhance our neighborhood experience. Having built our comfortable, modest home in 1992, we now have a larger family and would like to enlarge our space more in line with the average Oak Brook home today. 2f) That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. RESPONSE: The hardship was created by the original seller who imposed the 100' setback to protect his personal interest at that time. In 2000 the original house and circumstances were non-existent. The original seller has no current interest in our property whatsoever. C- r. 1.01'" i, MID 5 Itl WESTCIIESTI R PARK RF;SUDUIVIS1t)I1 RECORDED MARCH 30, 19A4 AS DOCUl EN17 P94-71'165 Ur PARTS OF W17MCi1ESTER I'APK SU11DIV1SION OF 1..IY1S I Ali() ? OF 'flit: i'I,AT OF THE L'AS'T IIAIX OF 111F. r*UUI'1it%`ES1' 1111AR'rim or Sr("rlotQ 25, ToWnSlliJ' 39 mirm, RAIL M 1 1 , EAST OF 'I'1IR Z'um rutwu'AI. IIF1 DIAI1 ACCURU1t1C TO 'Pelf 1•lAT OF SAID WESTCIIESTCI; PARK SURpI.VISIUII RECORML) NOMIRElt 11, 1925 M 1111 :UIIE.HT 101017, IN uu1IACE COUNTY, ILUMOIS. 000 =6 1�-art l;-y t a.�..^�•� r •.�.._ .,.,._ .. o s WQier Maln f nsemen4 Doc.No,19- 1934o ;n ESin I. M C �. (�T 2 J 31, 8 ! IIJ L V i 0.730 Ac-rvs �o ~ " •;p' the vacant lot we -�j purchased in 1992 with 100'front yard setback(bldg. line) -t.S' 37.7Z•� N�c I% • 114'-7 5116" • BLUM RESIDENCE --------------------------------------- 3000 COOLIDGE ST. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT °--- i----------- OAK BROOK, IL 60523 INITIAL SITE STUDY: SITE PLAN 2/21/08 Z Z` W w w woodland ravine area w I Q�Q rn l PREPARED BY: Ltl LU SQUARE ROOT ARCHITECTURE+DESIGN J J I U U J some modification to addition may be required a when final plans are submitted for permit I dependent on the relief approved by the Village to useably:backyard ~' � — — — end of deck — — — 0 24'-5 1/4" 78'-0" 38'-2 1/16" 24'-0" 3000 Eo N Coolidge ' 1769'JD _ 100'BUILDING LI E _ _ _ _ — _ _ — Oq 3006 Coolidge garage addition in consideration' (gray shaded area) eoT � Oak Brook Public Golf Course i , — — — — Tq E L.... ----n '8 IN�i CI E— ;p o rmtnf- ` ± iO R\ \ I LOT AREA=31,845 S.F. i I-----------LOT LINE 9--- , r � — - _ (dead I : COOLIDGE STREET end) -------- _ .-. . ............ ._.. I Oak Brook Public Golf Course-11th green 3000 Coolidge 100 , setback 3.>> i4 i 1 `\ 3006 Coolidge 40f R-3 setback 3 area »��dl�t�d-rdYZtla C f rash yal rd IQO" a�ebeaJc 2213 CHARLES C BLUM 2-173n10 CATHERINE E BLUM 3000 COOLIDGE ST OAK BROOK,IL 60523 / 'J �Q Date Pay to the yiL Li46,e o,k— —=$-20© Order of 0/'/00 � 6"cuIlly F".lura, Dollars mfinancial Oak Brook,IL 60523 .bank- For t/A /fj'�1 Q!�/ � I nLx'✓ , MISCELLANEOUS PAYMENT RECPT#: 26879 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK iL 60523 DATE: 03/25/09 TIME: 14:53 CLERK: pfinaldi DEPT: CUSTOMER#: 0 INFO: VARIATION f.. 4302 ZONING/SUBDIVIS 800.00 h AMOUNT PAID: 800.00 PAID BY: CHARLES BLUM PAYMENT METH: CHECK .,' 2213 REFERENCE: AMT TENDERED: 800.00 AMT APPLIED: 800,00 CHANGE: f Certification Surrounding Property Owners (we) certify that the names and addresses of all the surrounding property owners including mailing labels submitted with this application are located within a minimum distance of 250 feet in all directions from the perimeter of the subject property and that the number of feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways has been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names and addresses are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the County) and as appear from the authentic tax records of this County. The Property owners as listed have been obtained from the Township Assessors office within 30 days of the filing of this application. The surrounding property owners list as submitted herewith and supporting attachments are true to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. (we) give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s) on the lot frontages of the subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the required application fees, applicant/owner agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs, recording fees, and any other associated costs or fees within 30 days of billing. 6-l/�q h LIF '5 L Vly 5 S" Printed Name of Owner Printed Name of Applicant Signature of Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date BILL TO INFOR[HI t 1ON G'#/U L f 3/-y/11 i YO-J--7,v-i9 el:;- Print Name/Company Contact Person Contact Phone 3 ov 014g , wepk !Z- 6'i0J-2- 3 ha - 6 Y 1/-0 G 06 Address To be Billed Alternate Phone NOTE: If the applicant/owner has not complied with these requirements and notification has not been sent to a neighboring property owner,within the 250-foot requirement less than 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing, the hearing on this matter will be postponed to the next regular meeting, or until such time as all neighbors within the 250-foot requirement have been sent proper notification. Variation Packet-2/4/2008 ¢� NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads streets,alleys,and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds (or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule: NAME OF ROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OE PROPERTY ADDRESS ARCEL OWNER PROPERTY OWNER.. NUMBER 3006 Coolidge St. 3006 Coolidge St. Koutsky, Kevin Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-25=302-037 3005 Coolidge St. 3005 Coolidge St. ' Devata, Apparao & NB Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-25-304-038 3020 Coolidge St. 3020 Coolidge St. Rantis, William s Elaine Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-25-302-034 Adriatico, Claude L. 4080 Derr Road 3015 Coolidge St. 06-25-304-039 Springfield, OH 45503 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Kral, Helen 3001 Lincoln Road 3001 Lincoln Road 06-25-302-039 Oak Brook, IL 60523 _ Oak Brook, IL 60523 Kral, Frank 3001 Lincoln Road 3003 Lincoln Road 06-25-302-040 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 5511 Chateau Dr. #1 3007 Lincoln Road Amin, Mohamed Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-25-302-002 Shownkeen, Harish 205 Ambriance Drive 3011 Lincoln Road Burr Ridge, IL 60527 Oak Brook, IL 60523 06-25-302-043 Variation Packet-2/4/2008 Subject Property Verification (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) '" 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 2J 302. 03ff 2. Common Address: 30®o s'L/LZc -7,, B kook 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) 4. Email the Legal Description to gpolanek(cr�oak-brook.org Lot 2 of Keehn's Resubdivision of Lots 4 and 5 in Westchester Park Resubdivision recorded March 30, 1984 as Document R84-23065 of parts of Westchester Park Subdivision of Lots 1 and 2 of the Plat of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the Plat of said Westchester Park Subdivision recorded November 13, 1925 as Document 203037, in DuPage County, Illinois. The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: L/ AJ Date called: —/O — 0 1 verify that the information provided above is accurate. GffA9&ES" 8,(-V ? Printed Name Signature Date: 3-1� ® Relationship✓to Applicant:_ -S`l�� 00 NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE— FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Legal Description Review Corrections Required Yes No Approved By: Date Variation Packet-2/4/2008 S Legal Description PIN # 06-25-302-038 Common Address: 3000 Coolidge Street, Oak Brook Lot 2 of Keehn's Resubdivision of Lots 4 and 5 in Westchester Park Resubdivision recorded March 30, 1984 as Document R84-23065 of parts of Westchester Park Subdivision of Lots 1 and 2 of the Plat of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 39 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the Plat of said Westchester Park Subdivision recorded November 13, 1925 as Document 203037, in Du Page County, Illinois. II J � PEAT PLAT LOT 2 IN KEEHN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN WESTCHESTER PARK RESUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 30, 1984 AS DOCUMEdT R84-23065, OF PARTS OF WESTCHESTER PARK SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE PLAT OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERI- DIAN ACC DING TO N DUPLAT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1925 AS 4 T 10,PUZ _ - 1----1-- — —� dorfh 5Y - -.. •Ce... Sl�eg..r4 - �v ` of 4u I —LEGEND ,I m II+ LO \2` - �� fExln+In9�Conlroar Alk ProPaee41 Contavr i t.il � I /, ° I'• i to.3 Exla+•nq EIevA ion 0.' SI I 104 ?roPDSea EIBJA4ierl Tree q 1 ' Fver5nEen A MonhDlE _ I `( �ti1��ear I N —C— SAni{nrY Scwer —11— Hater Main T/;:Es7., �JI T� 1.0 24 i a"Flo.PVG(SumP ' r rasa. r rt' 1►I' f"CoP0', h/a/er Service Wilk \ 24.33 69.5 or e { l Valve /'N"AF ESrnf Z;ne G8,2 G c Q2,1'7 r I '•, 6y,19 NOTES /00" ' /( �oe 1o. I Add 600 Y}o E1evA cns or I I See a4+AtIkaof 'run (Dr ProFuseJt 5ar11farJjSowcr c A-2 br-f—no.s Svr�ace con-For- 4- =DOT TIF 67.97 �i; �'In I ,Pea;Frca� on-� A3oob o f L v r lta � TyPrca� CjfreeE 67---^ �s l fir, 11 6 ' c �gap OgEDPNRTA2YPagP. -sc.vcR 1 33.00 � C"Crushed5fone/ BASe Course CCq'b) BENCHMARK W/A'2 t ON FIRE HYDRANT 3006 C,OOLIDGE 6T. ELEVATION 666.41 j1111rSrA rW/ SCALE-I Inch 40 Feet 1.ROBERT A.WINIARBKI.A REORBTEREO►ROMSIONAL ENGINEER.HEREBY CERTIFT `pQRRR 2 O 2 16 NG THAT TG THE BEST O/MY KWLEYOE AND BEIJV IN ,THE IRAAOE OR.DRAKE REGISTERED WERE WILL NOT BE CHARGED BT THE PROPOSED CONSTEUCTM TO BUCH A OCONEE.THAT THE SURFACE RETIRE ONOSITED ON THE PROPERTY OR ADJOINING PROFESSION C LAND"HERE WILL BE BR PICH OONCERrHAT10HS Ae MAY CAUSS OAMAOE TO THE EN NEE RRL ` .AOIOININO PROPERTY. .,',R ENGINEERS rEJ SURVEYORS GATED THIS 6F6DAY OP,&r1 1 099 2 -„ �,J 07000,0 -/ 1 8111 South HIIIBIEa Orlve ORDERED BY: 4. 2A(A6,4 Hickory HIIIa,1111nola 00457 9 ORDER NUMBER 2-Z2 �OOO CCOU L 1 roE 5a6-6406 Rev, 514192 Rev.6/8/92 car i LOT 1 IN KEEHN'S......DIVISION OF LOTS 4 AND b IN W�S7CHES OF ARTS SUBDMSIOM RECORDED)MARCH 3U,1886 AS DOCUMENT Rt.4.23BB5 OF PARTS - k t�. OF 'r TER PARK K SUBOrvISION OF LOTS 1 AND 210E THE EAST HALF - - --- - -- --- - - `•� SOUTHWEST OUA ARTER OF SECTION 25,TOWNSHIip 39 NORTH,RANGE ---_-- -- - - - - ---�---- -- --11 Eh9T OP'iHE THIRD-P PRINCIPAL MERIDfAN ACCOROINIG TO THE PLAT OF `� [ SAID vYESTCHESTER PM RK SUBDIVISION RECORDED NOV/EMBER 13,1.25 AS -- - --- - DOCUMENT 303037,IN OU 3 PAGE COLIN IY,ILLINOIS. Z? € Found Iron I On PL t 0.04-E 95523 1..��:r.�-. �, ` �• , / Al 8 ' ' E 88.00'(R) 6 Pubflc Utility Easemont� ae2� �� `b67`— ,� f ,� \\ Povr.•d�o --� 1z'9vffdlny q .9 •C e 'II'\ b Setba[A LIn b bb• 1 0.20'W40.33'S� b e \Q P C / I N 89'55'23'E 194.89'(M1 194.91'(R1 — \ -- Z� 61 public utility E+. me �— _ concrete 0rlvew P 66 o c� �_ b` p 667.5 I �. I 1�9 Setb+ck L •^/T/ r bbbp5 66 •-� X $ 5.se' 6 40.74 J pq e ° 668 \ - f b I 69 0 3566 aai GIF/ 67--Z5.65� y G/Fa 6b8.19 r O I r ti 66� 160.49' w` _ �� `— a.— .,./ �, � w �:cd. �es,X ac. 69 ni bbb - / 6.53 i e y. G.6 i' '6 u y u LOT 1 `� °e bb p.37' 1 G ^3.6,: . ` / Dec. _ \ 'A N v 1 W P 6 5.54 Concrtf Drlvaw a 6 7r - bb e v y. ..-I'- -Ss.'4o•.'d._... pG. - Lj vlbbb"bu o b o 0 to 11 b \ X16` ` E b b b I O \0 ' laver o � 0.v<• c bs' - \ J 01) «6 6bb6 6 b 6� °'m� b Concrete - I Qc h6`a v 66 ' Driveway Bloc /Ny YTa fr 13.sr• S.zs• 66, 0 V BWIding Setbad.Line s.00 2.22 M 6 66 public Utplty Easement f�. i ° oo-cc•aa••w 283.13'M 782.91.1! _. .. . ..... .. . ..... FRED BUCHOLZ DUPAGE COUNTY RECORDER JUN.30,2009 4:16 PM OTHER 06—25—302—038 004 PAGES R2009- 100805 (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document ORDINANCE 2009-ZO-V-S-1265 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3000 COOLIDGE STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Property Address/es 3000 COOLIDGE STREET (If vacant land, state vacant land and list nearest cross streets, Oak Brook, IL 60523.) OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Pin Number/s 06-25-302-038 Name &Address of Applicant: CHARLES AND CATHERINE BLUM 3000 COOLIDGE STREET, OAK BROOK, IL 60523 Name & Address of Responsible CHARLES BLUM Party to Receive Copy of 3000 COOLIDGE STREET Recorded Document and Billing: OAK BROOK, IL 60523 G/L Account# to be Charged: 10-1365 Prepared By: Village of Oak Brook Return To: Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Name &Address of Recipient N/A of Consideration (when applicable): G/L Account# to be Charged: ORDINANCE 2009-ZO-V-S-1265 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3000 COOLIDGE STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK (PIN: 06-25-302-038) WHEREAS, an application has been filed by the property owners, Charles Blum and Catherine Blum (collectively, Petitioner), requesting a variation to Section 13-6C-3.F.1 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the existing front yard setback from 100 feet to 40 feet for the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2009, the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing on the request for variation, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and recommended approval of the variation; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals found that the Petitioner satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of the requested variation and made specific findings, including that the variation will not endanger the public health, safety and welfare, and that there will be no substantial injury to other property in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and deem the variation, as set forth below, to be in the best interests of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows: Section 1: The foregoing preambles are restated and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth herein. Section 2: The Petitioner is hereby granted a variation to Section 13-6C-3.F.1 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the existing 100 foot front yard setback to be reduced to 40 feet to comply with the zoning requirements in the R3 District for the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street. Section 3: The variation and the scope of this ordinance are limited and restricted to the property commonly known as 3000 Coolidge Street, which is legally described as follows: LOT 2 OF KEEHN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IN WESTCHESTER PARK RESUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 30, 1984 AS DOCUMENT R84-23065 OF PARTS OF WESTCHESTER PARK SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE PLAT OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINICIPAL MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID WESTCHESTER PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1925 AS DOCUMENT 203037, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Section 4: If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions of this ordinance. Section 5: All ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Ordinance 2009-ZO-V-S-1265 Variation—3000 Coolidge Street (PIN 06-25-302-038) Page 2 of 2 Section 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. APPROVED THIS 9th day of June, 2009. C /• J•jP .....- i 7' W. /� age President PASSED THIS 9th day of June, 2009. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Carson, Moy, Saiyed, Wolin and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None i F 0::;": ATTEST: ��� � f , /3/ o �ti "� cap; 'A' / % ?3 Charlotte K. Pruss Co ?- .0c„...,.:)...=2,„,,,.,< ,, �, Village Clerk COUNTY,' STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS. COUNTIES OF COOK AND DUPAGE ) I, Charlotte K. Pruss, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that on June 9, 2009 , the corporate authorities of the above municipality passed and approved: ORDINANCE 2009-ZO-SU-S-1265 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3000 COOLIDGE STREET IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK (PIN: 06-25-302-038) I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records, journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 10th day of June , 2009 . 0 F 0 ,,, , / /, 0 . ' w ; ?..\. . Charlotte K. Pruss Aa "� `; ..r` Village Clerk a C,-, , �,°+ ,: ,ti .i Village of Oak Brook t d" k` nY �X" <�1 DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois s•