Loading...
S-1450 - 01/26/2016 - ZONING - Ordinances Exhibits Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 8 of 13 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The subject property is located at 210 22nd Street in Oak Brook, Illinois and the legal description is as follows: LOT 1 OF AMERICAN CAN COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT OF PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 905851, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 22.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 43.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 38.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 158.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 132.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 34.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 35.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO EXCEPT THEREOF THAT PORTION FALLING WITHIN 22ND STREET, IN DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN: 06-24-404-012. Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 9 of 13 EXHIBIT B APPLICATION s� bF 0-44y ppOt1M � BROOK%�`' °o ►1lt II. s APPLICATION for PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ® NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ($1,500)* ® EACH WAIVER or VARIATION ($500)** ❑ MAJOR CHANGE TO AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ($1,500)* ❑ MINOR CHANGE TO AN APPROVED/EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT($750)* ® INITIAL ESCROW DEPOSIT ($500)*** PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS (each lot frontage) ® -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel (2) *Plus all applicable third party costs and recoverable expenses. *"List each waiver or variation on separate sheet with applicable fees calculated. *** From which anticipated third party costs and recoverable expenses are to be drawn. No interest shall be payable on any such escrow account. APPUCAAIT TO COMPLETE LOCATION OF Windsor NEC of 22�d S#reet and ndsor Dr PERMANENT PARCEL N0. 06 - 24 - 404 - 012 SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 LEGAL ADDRESS 210 22^'Street PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER ❑ CONTRACT PURCHASER' ® AGENT'❑ OWNER(S)OF RECORD T u.0- ._ h►i��f f s�- PHONE 400 ft TF I p !Z�S ADDRESS i- zir CITY f� NAME OF APPLICANT'(and Billing Information) Greg Spanos Janko Group LLC PHONE 847-940-0732 ADDRESS 1161 Lake Cook Road Suite A CITY Deerfield STATE IL ZIP 60015 Contact E-mail Address GSPANOSQJANKOGROUP US i(we)certify that all of the above st ements and the s ements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our)knowledge and belief.I(we)give pe to t illag dhstall blic hearing signs on the lot frontages of the above subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the above fees, tag s to r ' rse a illage for all recoverable costs within 30 days of billing ure of Owner Date Signature of icant' Date 'If the applicant/Agent is not the owner of record,a written statement authorizing approval of the proposed planned development application is required from the properly owner in addition to their signature above and supporting documents. DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY -` 3 $3 `Jy.deceived is !� s,( Escrow Paid$ 4n 4 . .Reoe 04 No Y i t�4'A1 tI Date Application Filed fr-' Fee Paii Resident Meehn tie uired/f5st8 ��� «/, Preliminary' 13oard of 7rostees Review /�_Pretilini�Rewew Conference Huth Staff J 4 /►✓fir•/ Notioe. dlished !mot J� Newspaper. Deily Herald AdJ.Property"Owners Notified ' Applioation ISistribtifed to Depts: ' 1------ Planned Development Commission ME- Board of'rnastees '' +� �/ ► Board of7rustees :` �" �tXe �JfJ7fiT/Ill.' (APPrzw2r"Gf Ord inance) - Planned Development Application 7-20141 Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT C PLANS �H 1 ly 5 z owm wn r WIN lu I n@ i!d�ni saw, 1 7 e oil NONNI F, a i �� ]t,� •' �a ne -� ��' '® $ Y � � r E ';7 ROMAN" �� mg y - �'d�`w'��'1 n 3 �fgka��i�,�e,-.c.�{ NMI low No 1'�'e1�■ �®1 "®o 1�� a1� �1® 1� �� �ME WE >t z P .& �1� � „ I`��« M Y®01- �1 r 4 c �rvVS r " y r ws, Nor Ing w • • m�3L9.`�ti?Lv"b9i _. _ ��. �fj����.�0 iw ■� ��� ��111�� ��a{� " s�j�r �l.�YI 1� l MEN ■fps ■■ no ■rr w zt imp; _ ME r�.,r •'�� +���:rL _ ,�>��., +�3;^",� d .'� $' :�R t� ��.f. ;� • is § �4 �h K ��,-, • t 1 a ME on ME on on W BE-., Fr •k.,�„ yT s P Y ' rfi bye" '*" a�wa �.Tr} 'S �� ` ,!MAIN!! y�� § � • • .; •�{�>',. ONE ,,, ,,, AaI F7 .. .:.2(ytMlvtK. -SAY'!; c• DSOR DRIVE �£a/�L CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN NORR Kimley>))Horn 2015/12/04 04KBROOK BUSINESS CENTER YORK PARKINB MN.,TER STRJCTURE HUB H a T CLEMWATER LIONS 4 CLUB W.ZM ST. DSOR DRIVE CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN NORR Kimley»)Horn 2015/11/16 x ^€ rx } w5 s e ; k •t yyss � n-g�s s t x ) ar r, :�s 4i�'�{°'�.r�E ♦.,. ��'��s u"*: ..f� Y``.°. �,Y .���'x� !1 ''sue.. ❑❑ ❑❑ p' o"° Ilm ❑❑ ! ❑❑ m m m m RM. WIX _ M pl m b �.. + ip ® mtl 9 B m m� be e • e >SOR DRIVE GROUND f LOOR PLAN NORR Kimley»)Horn 2015/11/16 m co B R� 6WR M • f0�Yf4 RI � i RI e e m m e 22ND&WINDSOR DRIVE TYPIQ Y NORR Kimley»>Hori Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT D PDC RECOMMENDATION pvE OF Oq,r � 90 o ® December 31, 2015 O y G 0 9CF�0 11 , 2 Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook Village of 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook Oak Brook, IL 60523 1200 Oak Brook Road tk Brook,IL 60523-2255 Subject: Janko Group, LLC 210 22nd Street — Planned Development to Website construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a www.oak-brook.org future restaurant. Administration 630.368.5000 Dear Village President and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.368.5045 Community Background Development On December 10, 2015, the Planned Development Commission held the required 630.368.5101 public hearing and completed its review and deliberations on an application from FAX 630.368.5128 Janko Group, LLC (as contract purchaser) seeking approval of a planned development Engineering in order to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future Department 4,500 square foot restaurant that could include a drive-thru facility. The existing one 630.368.5130 story, 40,000+ square foot office building on the site would be demolished. FAX 630.368.5128 Fire Department The applicant provided a presentation on the proposed project before the President and 630.368.5200 Board of Trustees on September 8, 2015 and the request was well received, pending a FAX 630.368.5251 thorough review and recommendation before the Planned Development Commission. Police Department 630.368.8700 Specifically, this planned development will include the following elements: FAX 630.368.8739 1. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; Public Works 2. Creation of a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru Department 630.368.5270 facility; and FAX 630.368.5295 3. Elimination of the existing southern most access onto Windsor Drive. Oak Brook Vehicular access to the property will be by two separate routes; one on Windsor Drive Public Library (east) and the other on Bliss Drive (north). Internal circulation around both the hotel and restaurant will be provided through a reconfiguration of the surface parking area. 600 Oak Brook Road Oak 6 L I Brook, 0523-2200 630., L 60 2 Waivers and Variations: The Planned Development process allows an applicant to FAX 630.368.7704 request waivers and variations that are needed for the construction of the project. The following summarizes each of the waivers and variations requested herein: Oak Brook Sports Core • Section 13-3-15E: a waiver to permit the proposed canopy for the Hyatt House Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road Hotel to exceed the maximum height of 18 feet by approximately four(4) feet. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 • Section 13-10A-3.A: a waiver to permit an increase in the maximum FAR 630.368.6420 from 0.48 to approximately 0.52 to accommodate the proposed uses on the FAX 630.368.6439 property. Golf Club • Section 13-10A-3.0-1: a waiver to permit a reduction in the required front yard 2606 York Road of 100 feet to approximately 90 feet along Windsor Drive (Hyatt) and Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 approximately 55 feet along 22nd Street(future restaurant). 630.368.6400 FAX 630.368.6419 �q, December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 2 • Section 13-12-3H-2: a waiver to permit more than 10 percent (maximum of six) of the required number of off-street parking spaces in a required yard and to be located less than the required 25 feet from a street line. • Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a hotel and stand-alone restaurant as permitted uses in the proposed planned development. • Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a drive-through for the proposed restaurant. Planned Development Exhibits — The Janko Group project contains a number of exhibits as required by the Village's Planned Development Regulations including: 1. Contextual site plan map 2. Site plan 3. Site plan—sign locations 4. Monument signage 5. Building signage 6. Ground floor plan 7. Typical floor plan 8. Hotel elevations (north and south) 9. Hotel elevations(east and west) 10. Alta site survey 11. Site engineering plans a. Demolition plan b. Site plan c. Grading plan d. Utility plan e. Fire truck circulation plan f. Landscape plan g. Photometric plan 12. Traffic and Trip Generation Report(Kimley-Horn) 13. Comments on Village of Oak Brook (Thomas Engineering) Traffic Study for Windsor/22nd Street intersection(Kimley-Horn). Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for the requested approval of the proposed Janko Planned Development project. PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc �9 a December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 3 Public Comment All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. Tracy Mulqueen presented comments from the Oak Brook Chamber in support of the request. Numerous residents from the York Woods Subdivision presented comments and asked questions of the applicant. Several of the comments expressed concern about the sound that might .come from the outdoor ordering system as well as the possible glare from the headlights of cars using the drive-thru The applicant believed it had addressed these concerns through testimony that the sound level would satisfy the Village ordinance; that the residents expressing those concerns were located at least 400 feet away from the site with six lanes of traffic in between their residences and the site; and the height of the berms and existing vegetation which would shield any glare from automobile headlights. There are existing street lights along 22"d Street. Recommendation The standards for a planned development are detailed and were addressed in writing on pages C-C.6 of the case file. They were also addressed as part of the presentation at the public hearing. By a vote of 6 to 0, the Planned Development Commission found that the applicant had addressed all required standards and recommend approval of the proposed planned development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed berm along 22nd Street by approximately one(1) additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc X16 December 31,2015 .Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 4 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. Very truly yours, NOTE:Chairman Davis has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this letter pending his signature. The signed original will be placed in the official file upon receipt. Champ Davis Chairman Planned Development Commission PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 12 of 13 EXHIBIT E UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT Pursuant to Section 8 of Village of Oak Brook Ordinance No. 2016-ZO-PUD-EX- S-1450 (the "Ordinance'), and to induce the Village of Oak Brook to grant the approvals provided for in such Ordinance, the undersigned acknowledge for themselves, and for their respective corporate successors and assigns in title to the Property, that they: 1• have read and understand all of the terms and provisions of the Ordinance; 2• hereby unconditionally agree to accept, consent to, and abide by all of the terms, conditions, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance, and to all other provisions of the "Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois of 1966," as amended, and all other codes, ordinances, rules, and regulations that are applicable to the use, development, improvement, and operation of the property subject to the Ordinance; 3. acknowledge and agree that the Village is not and shall not be, in any way, liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village's issuance of any permits for the use of the Property, and that the Village's issuance of any permit does not, and shall not, in any way, be deemed to insure the undersigned against damage or injury of any kind and at any time; 4. acknowledge that the public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the adoption of the Ordinance; 5. agree to and do hereby hold harmless and indemnify the Village, the Village's corporate authorities, and all Village elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, from any and all claims that may, at any time, be asserted against any of such parties with respect to the Property and the Village's adoption of the Ordinance or granting the approvals set forth in the Ordinance, except as may arise as a result of the Village's gross negligence or willful misconduct; 6. represent and acknowledge that the persons signing this Unconditional Agreement and Consent are duly authorized to do so on behalf of the respective undersigned; and 7• consent to the recordation of the Ordinance and this Unconditional Agreement and Consent by the Village Clerk with the Office of the Du Page County, Illinois Recorder of Deeds against the property subject to the Ordinance. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 13 of 13 TMBG, LLC -WINDSOR By: Its: Janko Group, LLC By: Gary R. Janko Its: Manager Effective Date of Unconditional Agreement and Consent: , 2016 SENT BY:McBRIDE/BAKER&COLES 5-23-96 : 5:47PM : :# '?/ 3 r . MCBRIDE BAKER & COLES A Lnw Kirtn,'rshlp Int luting F'rq(e,-.Ilim)1 Corfu rrml011'• M: A•i liU � � l-Ont1v m,Mid AmNriC,l Pld4d, tiuitr 1(1!10 7'M 1518.3 )dkljmoIt I t•rrar t', IIIinli 601151-•17 1(1 ldw,ird 11. Haket, Ir. 0A9 54 2'100 1r11S-11)70 86936-00: f:rs 706(-)54 21 1 Direct Dial : (630) 954-7578 August 23 , 1996 VIA FACSIMILE Mr . Robert Nielsen Fire Chief Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Dear Mr. Nielsen: I am writing to you on behalf of the owners of the Windsor Office Plaza at 210 West 22nd Street and the Oak Brook Office Court at 125 Windsor Drive, in the Village of Oak Brook. we wish to appeal from the orders to correct violations of the fire prevention code as follows, both of which pertain to the failure of the fire alarms in the respective buildings to meet life safety code requirements : 1 . Item 11 contained in violation number 96-998 (File No. 369) pertaining to the Oak Brook Office Court, 125 Windsor Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 ; 2 . Item 21 contained in violation number 9C,� o. 319) pertaining to the Windsor Office Plaza,,. 10 west 22nd treet , Oak Brook, Illinois . '�`� As you know, these buildings were constructed in the late 1970s and have been inspected by the Bureau of Fire Prevention at least three times a year in each of the years since they were completed. In all that time, there has been no question about the adequacy of the fire alarms installed in these buildings . The fire alarm in both buildings is triggered by heat detectors spaced per your codes throughout the various suites within the buildings . The exact location of the heat detector that triggers a fire alarm is located on a fire panel so that your personnel can quickly pinpoint the exact location of the trouble . In addition, the fire alarm is directly connected to the Oak Brook fire station by dedicated lines . 500 W(-;( Madison )trr`i•t, 40(h flour Chic;-igo, 11-, 60601 2511 312715-5700 Fix H2993-9350 SENT BY:MrBRIDE/BaKER&COLES : 8-23-96 : 5:48PM :# 3/ 3 Mr. . Robert Nielsen August 23 , 1996 Page 2 Under the circumstances, I would apprcciate an opportunity to visit with you or another member of the fire and/or building department to learn from you exactly which requirements) of the life safety codes are alleged by your inspectors not to be satisfied. As you know, the owners of these buildings have been responsible and contributing members of the Oak Brook community since 1969 . while they deny that violations of the life satety codes exist with respect to the fire alarms, if a violation can in fact be firmly established, they will work closely with you to quickly implement a sensible solution Your v.vet truly, Jo n Huntington JTH: smh cc : Thomas R. Hawk Steven Veitch John L. Huntington NIELSEN.LTR OF OAk 64, �wP Off G � O 4 `2 COUNtr r ` VI LLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60521 -2255 PHONE: 630 990-3000 FAX: 630 990-0876 July 30, 1996 George A. Kennedy and Associates 104 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60603 RE: 210 22nd Street and 125 Windsor Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois Dear Sirs: Attached are copies of the most recent Fire Prevention inspections for the two above captioned locations. With the exception of the fire alarm items, none of these deficiencies are considered as major. It is my understanding that the building owner is working actively to correct the fire alarm problems. For buildings of this age, I am sure there are some Building Code violations, however, we are not aware of any significant violations. Very truly yours, Thomas R. Hawk Director of Code Enforcement TRH/gp Attachments cc: Robert Nielsen, Fire Chief 1 V Building Fire Alarms Windsor Office Plaza & Oak Brook Office Court August 26, 1996 1.) The building panel is installed and serviced for repairs by Rollings Protection Services. Ownership pay for this service. 4 The local fire dept. monitors the each building panel for trouble. QIZ1)3.) Ownership pays the phone company to have the panel monitored via the telephone line. A. Each building suite has 2 heat detectors in the ceiling. B. The wiring from the building control panel has two wires going from the panel to the each heat detector and two wires coming back the building panel, making a loop from the panel the each detector. ie Windor Office Plaza has 76 heat detectors. This wiring is called a 4 conductor wire system. The wiring is lose and is not in conduit. C. The building panel has lights which identifies each building suite. ie Windsor Office Plaza has 38 lights. How the system works example. Building suite 132 is tripped, the building panel light 132 is tripped and the light goes on. The fire dept. monitors the panel but does not know which suite has a problem, they come to the building and go the panel to determine which suite had tripped the panel. Each panel has the buildings floor plan showing the direction and location of each building suite. ---------- C`"' J � �° - �.'.�� -te VVO (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document: ORDINANCE 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT — 210 22" STREET) IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK ILLINOIS Property Address/es 210 22nd Street Oak Brook Illinois 60523 If vacant land, so state and list nearest cross streets) PIN No(s). 06-24-404-012 Name and Address of Applicant: Janko Group LLC 1161 Lake Cook Road Suite A Deerfield IL 60015 Name and Address of Responsible: Attn: Greg Spanos—Same address Party to Receive Copy of Recorded Document and Billing I G/L Account to be charged: 10-1365 Prepared By and Return to: Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 Name&Address of Recipient N/A of Consideration (when applicable): G/L Account to be charged: FRED BUCHOLZ DUPAGE COUNTY RECORDER JUN.16,2016 11:02 AN OTHER : $54.00 06-24-404-01e 028 PAGES R2016-060026 (Above Space For Recorder's Office Only) VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523-2255 RECORDED DOCUMENT TITLE PAGE Title of Document: ORDINANCE 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT — 210 22" STREET) IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS Property Address/es 210 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 If vacant land, so state and list nearest cross streets) PIN No(s). 06-24-404-012 Name and Address of Applicant:_ Janko Group, LLC 1161 Lake Cook Road Suite A Deerfield IL 60015 Name and Address of Responsible:_ Attn: Greq Spanos—Same address Party to Receive Copy of Recorded Document and Billing G/L Account to be charged: 10-1365 Prepared By and Return to: Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 Name &Address of Recipient N/A of Consideration (when applicable): G/L Account to be charged: STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS. COUNTIES OF COOK AND DUPAGE ) I, Charlotte K. Pruss, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that on January 26, 2016 , the corporate authorities of the above municipality passed and approved: ORDINANCE 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT— 210 22nd STREET) IN THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document, of which the annexed copy is a true copy, is entrusted to my care for safekeeping and I am the keeper of the same. DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records, journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the said Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Oak Brook this 12th day of May , 2016. Charlotte K. Pruss Village Clerk N V Village of Oak Brook .3 DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois .j. MOGROUP November 6,2015 Via email: t.gracecapital @gmail.com and in.Lyracecapital mail.coni TMBG,LLC-Windsor 60022 nd Street, Suite 215 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Attention:Thomas Grace and Michael Grace RE: Planned Development—Oak Brook Hyatt House Ownership/Control Area Letter Dear Thomas and Mike: As you are aware, Janko Group LLC ("Janko Group") intends to file with the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois an application for a planned development for the property located at 210 W. 22"d Street, Oak Brook, Illinois (the "Property'). The Property is currently is owned by TMBG, LLC — Windsor ("TMBG"), an entity owned or controlled by you. Pursuant to that certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2015 (the "Agreement'), between Janko Group and TMBG,Janko Group agrees to purchase the Property from TMBG, and TMBG agrees to sell the Property to Janko Group. The Agreement, in part, contemplates that Janko Group will pursue approval of a planned development for the Property and provides that the issuance by the Village of Oak Brook of the final approval of the planned development for the Property is a condition to the obligation of Janko Group to purchase the Property pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. As part of the planned development application process, Janko Group must submit to the Village of Oak Brook evidence that TMBG, as owner of the Property, has authorized Janko Group to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property. Accordingly, please confirm, on behalf of TMBG, that TMBG authorizes Janko Group to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property by executing a copy of this letter and returning the executed copy to the undersigned. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Greg Spanos, CIM Janko Group LLC The undersigned, TMBG, LLC — Windsor, hereby certifies that TMBG, LLC — Windsor is the owner of the Property (defined above) and hereby authorizes Janko Group LLC to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property. TMBG,LJLC— °nd By: Na e° -Z�/'i�G� Title: Date: Janko Group,Inc. 1161 Lake Cook Rd.Ste Al Deerfield, IL 60615 1 p:847.940.8880 1 f:847.940.9801 / WAIVERS and VARIATIONS Zoning Ordinance Section Brief description of each waiver or variation sought Fee Each 13-3-15-E The Ordinance would permit a canopy with a maximum height greater than eighteen feet(18'). $500 13-10A-3-A The Ordinance would allow a Floor Area Ratio consistent with the B4 Hotels-Office District Floor Area $500 Ratio set forth in 13-7D-3-A. 13-10A-3-C-1 The Ordinance would allow a for a front yard setback to be less than one hundred feet(100')in depth. $500 13-12-3-H-2 The Ordinance would permit more than ten percent(10%)of the required off-street parking spaces to $500 be located in the front yard or along the side of the building and less than twenty five feet(25')from a street line. 13-10A-2 Hotels is listed as a Special use within the ORA-1 Zoning District and Restaurant is not specifically $500 listed as an allowable use. We will need a waiver granting the Hotel and Restaurant use within the ORA-1 Zoning District. 13-10A-2 Drive-thrus are only listed as an allowable accessory uses for banks within the ORA-1 zoning district. $500 We will re wire a waiver to allow a drive-thru for the proposed restaurant component of the prowect. TOTAL: $3,000 I (To continue copy or retype form and Attach additional sheets if necessary) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 7-2014 Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT C PLANS e i IAJ 'Q'�� 11� Amp,{;0 111i all IU- Ar eLin wnvE MOOR Aw i HOTEL *a F HYATT HOUSE AT OAK BROOK I 22ND&WINDSOR DRIVE SITE PLAN JX%KO I HOSP I TALI TY NORR Kimley»)Horn 2015/12/04 T.O.CRONN ELBE'-10' CAST SIMF COPIG ,�PAwaEr eRlcKlm.1 aanLND.i BaKK NO.I EL ST-1Y j 1.1E1NL LOpWO. 6 FD.i PREFIHISHED --_ -� AfETAL COPING. BBKK N0.1 �UPLMD.i SM N0.1 �PARAPETELSTb' -- ---- PREFINISHEO c. --- YFTN COPPIO, Y — PMFiHS11E0 1,EfNc pm El4-0' 7� 7 .__I — PREENSTEO ,L LEVEL FOUR ..��l11... �L.L R-11 I I I I I PNF4 yry§ EL 33-1�� I`JI I -� I ---- QI� T I A LemrnREE � - � Eras�r� - �I ALtva TWO 1 I � EL1,.r-p-- - LL;, GROU.. NO AEVEL __ -.1 _r ---) I,• I I —,-y T xKa' . / L IIL IIJII ll II 1 I I I f COST STONE BRICKw.3 MTEGMTEDPTACLCWER M.KNO.1 CAST STONE --_-- _ _ _ TOMTCHWINDOW,(TYP.) BRICK N0.3 To MTEDPTACWWER, ERICKNO.1 NORTH ELEVAs[ON OAWTCHWMWWpW.) AsSTONE BWCKNO.1 PREFW6HE0 ALUA@.UM CASTS OVE GUZWGSnTF1, ATCORRWRS PRFFMEHEDAINLWAkI L`ET,V COPWG, C1A7 VSTE4 PREFMSHED - A To.caowry EL 68'11' p LAST EiONE EWCK N0.1 A PARAPET OISTSigE BRICK N0.1 EL ST-II' i' MEL S STEM K PARAPET ELSSS PMFL SYSTEM HYATT hou se - BMq(,p, BRICK 10.3 BIIK]L110.2 ELEL 52 MEGPATEDPTACLOWEA, t01UTCH IYWDOL'f,li1P1 I � L'� � � I� I I1 �� � • LEVaFrvE PELAZa• PgESwrsA,EOUwwasl I __ rum+GSrsrE1A Ad F PANEL PMEL EYS7ETEId — =TT-L LTHREE !-�1 - �9.37�- I LEVELiWO Cry _ AA a _ Restaurant _ I SPANDREIGIASS J LEN,,_1 PgEFINIEHEOALUA11NUlA ATTOPLREWPICAL GIKIRSHED FAI BLACK No.1 CABTSTOW BRL-K N0.3 BWLKN0.1 CAST STONE ERICKN0.3 L-CAETSTDNE SOUTH ELEVATION " HYATT HOUSE AT OAKBROOK I 22ND&WINDSOR DRIVE JAWOIr;Pn[ 1p - FREFWIBHED AWW L' tETry COMA GlF?1NG SYBTEI.1 PREFN6lIFD T.O.CRDWN 0.fiS•1� o' i R/iMPCf 6Y•1'�•Y uEnl PREA✓E1FD M mincx0.l 0.678 �ELY� �fll�ITi• II III' -" I m � IIf III'' I LE VELFl 0.71-NP i._J___L_! 1 ALEVEI THREE ki 1T�- t �g BRICK NO.1 CAST STONE BRICK NO.2 BRICK N0.1 PREFINISHEDALDNINDAI BRICKNO.2 GLAENGSYSTE EAST ELEVATION TCORR OORB IN FETNDDPIG. P� T 0.LRO4YN BLACK NO PA6MBHED AILAIM�I CAST STONE BRILIt 10.1 BLACK N0.2 GLAZING r 1'ffAL COMB. WIEGPATEO PTAL IgNER, PREFINIGHED T04NTCH WINDOW.(TYP.) 0`'•: ELff-Ili 1' A MOM EL S76 TOMTCTEDPTALLW)TGSNTaw"X LOYP.I PREPUUyIEDUUyw ,(•LEYETFWR D-III ' GLAZPIGSY51E1A ELEL 7I•I� L�J.1J L.11L.� L_L�J 1 ._.I� I ALEYELIHREE Restaurant EL 17-ice P 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 I BwAwl L BWCJ(N0.1 CAST STONE L BRICKW,Z INTEGRATED PTAC LOWER. L BRK:K0.1 L BRICK NO.2 iO MATCH WPIWW,(TYP.) WEST ELEVATION HYATT HOUSE AT OAKBROOK 22ND&WINDSOR DRIVE Iwnviei - - - - - ---- --- - -- YauE NORTH PLANT SCHEDULE DRIVE BLISS D Ulm om 9, JIM. ra ;P. S—E- AST —N—E.--- B&B rmmw ­NS. E `7 IS B&B S'NT.. r -1 1 .--GA uETIC— S­ --S---ET-.— umm B.. ­.S. BMMN PE u. u—S. NT.' E . ................. Sao ME ItRup—S gDM 9TY OTANII-11— cowoN Nn AREA):: : (D - 17 CI_E­­FIXIA'Su­EN­S mm—m—ISANT S— SUPIAN -HTNIN E3 NAN 29 HYDRANGEA CRESCENS.—I— S_ S.'_ 58 —.R..-SI.— ­SNEMPPE 3GAl S-PUN ­TNSN PROPOSED HOTEL JJ 1. . JUNIPERUSCHKENSNIS­SWW­T ­1-111-101 S­ ­TNSN ±20,650 SF T/F 682.70 (D G �S JUNSPERUS CHSNENSIS SEA SEA—ENJUNSPER S1. S.P_ _NT.S. S, PST lu G Pmus m"�cusNcw —cu..—.—,- S.PUN NMMW 0 P. 60 PAN...R—.'N.TM­ 10IRTHNAND­1 GRA35 2GAL SEE PIAN I 57 RASES AuPWUM'GREEN MOUND' SREENMcUND­NEC­ B&B SEE­ wwm 6 2 DENSIMPAPS _P_ _NT_ 1 0 15 (D TN. —S—DIA _NTm C) V8MMMIDcKT­N ILUENSJFFMT SOUTHERN­CSN4NcC0 S.. S.— > RTY W.Muck N.E QNNQN ONT SPACING PROPOSED., AS. — —E CNUNENSIS­IN 11N- 0 to RESTAURANT S- - Ec­P--A— I trot w 14530 SFJ a- 7/1' 682.00 -1 - —­AMENK­P­EPIJRP- < CI 31. —RETURNS z B 9t SC 4_1 1.17LE IS-—­S SHE Say SPOItOBOLUS HETERMFP6 ­E—SED ­ irm U.] 286 N—P—PI. P—­PSE- _ P.0 B m LLJ z scs C:) cSOUND o 22ND STREET < < MINNAL ISSUE: ION PROJECT N0. 16 L1.0 PLANT SCHEDULE FOUNDATION PLANTING DES Oa MMON B iANICJANHAE CO NAME COHT C_ s� -0 OO'. NN 6 gMEUNCHIERXGPNIDFLIXU'NrtUMII BRILLWNCF 'NJNw1BRILLNNCE 3EAVICEBERiry BlB Btrt Mw € sw + svRww RETICIXArA'IVOgr wlx MOgr sex JAPANESE TREE IJUC ese BxrMw J, snw_les om a NxAME cawJDN NAM D—w sPACwc sRE Q CAL tr CIETNMAWEOLN'.—Ex DANDIES' SUNMEgSYEET LLETMK ]ON SEE PLAN NHTW 9 FOUNDATION PLANTING Q HAN 11 NroRAHDEAARBa+E—NS'AwwBELLE NJNABEIJESM00Tn IO'DRNJOSA ]GA SEE—SEE PIAN 3f NTw 5 . JCK__..__._ PnJ % REA VIRGwIG'SPPKH' g LL - tlS AINVERUS NEGS COMPT PINT i] JWPA Cw SFAM B SB M SEE PLW S i7 aT/ cu Q Peev m PWUSNIlm JLEYCUHII- vNIEY ININNWMIIGOP. Bae sEE PUN zrxrw +] ...... tea. snr MWVwGiTW'NOHIHWNO NORTHYNND Ii—HGPASS EEPW1 r + O P N a PAx 2SAL s j ... + INECUMATJT B&B SEE PLAN 2P HT t --'� RAG E ReIES ALPWW GRFFN MOUND GgEENNWNOALP DENSE YEW BeB SEE PUN N M 5 iMD T w S� 4 _ _ .. cN 0 TAZUS z MEOw'oexslFCanas' ' ® ®; + + _ p BM 4 TMINNUMDENTATW BLGEMUFFIM S-EPNARgDWWDDD BAB SEEPIAN ® ® E B Cm 91 BGTANCALNAME -- 5 + ®® AR ClIN—w.ME Get PACING ASC tNl ASTABE CXINENSIS YISX1NSwPINK CXINESE ASTRBE to OC F + ® ® Eu ez EwwADEA PURPUREw ALGA wwITe CGnEFLOwER 1GnL + INDOOR POOLy><{/ E ® HPP a HEMDH FM N]ERMPNA'PNACE PURPIE' —.GERANIUM tGN 1B'OL AREA nRq N S � } EMEgOCPlIJS X'ROSYRENgIIS' DAYMLT 1GAL faa L } OA NFE SB NEPETA X'EAgLY BIRD' EM�L FYBWO GTMwT 1� 16'OC + } SxT ?O1 sPoROBOLUb HETEROLEPIS'TARA' 111111D I'm D Q.5 + _ I 0 1 60 2 ^5 L PROPOSED HOTEL ; oo; Q ± 20,650 SF + + z T/F - 682.70 I� --••.- 1 W N £: 5 R 0 L_ L 1 Q NN 2e 6 E N 5x 5 � Z� J + ++ �W Y°z + + F~ O°3 3 I g I r Q N I = C 3 + I I+ 0—AL ISSUE S6 + + I I' CBB 11 OS 2015 T AO ECT NO. I:' NORTH qeA PROJ a� ++++ 1BB �ow x I ] I SHEET NUMBER E ��pn�v///�liii■■LLA O-R-A-%'{¢IIC�SCALE W—FE�ET' �€ I ,.RGMB9z-0,� � L1.1 v 1zD• TMmK �� ealwe NORTH ���������N�� i �nUOmin NpRamnVa a 120• 1-800897-0123 CIAAPNID PLAN PRN.THREE STAKES r N°KNM°bPHes�aiW� USE9GW ASSEMBLES MMYI.PP,IAe PPoAENLP'VOYR 9 mwWpA�F� FTHE. PEENSAND 0.LVIDHOmP1A51110 ES OVER S CPL 111 W NOT LUILEAOER SRSHtte I'NGIEARWH P�RUUR IMMWNTELY 1KFw5Na MDGI1NE S -V,Dff€�ETI�O&� RAGI� TOPW+IiNG = FXIBDSFRW OMARIE TIEE1ROfE01R1 EVW150ATTAGEDiO FBgNG USENKOR[NOOFWRE OG mKMG AND—MLCMTYFII TREE PROTECTIONNOTES NNENGREEN TREESI ArERSPUbNFIFOMACH { 1.ALLTREESTOBEPROTECTMMPRESERVFDSHALLBEPER DETALGROUPWGOFMORETMNONETREEMYOCOM .ice APP, 1$1 2 TREESTO BEPROTECTFOAIID PRESFINEO GINLL BE S)EMIREDONTHETRUNNWITH WNRE SURJEYTAPE uOE GALVPNUED AT RODiaxE s�®M 3.TO PREVENT ROOT SMOTHERING,SCR STOCKPILES,SUFFUSES,EQUPMFNT W ANY OTHER MTERMLSHALL NOT BE VPRE g PLACED qH STOXEUWRNNTIE DPoP LNEOR WRHIN IS FEET OFATRFE TRIMI(WHCNEVE126 GREATER _ —ESx .Eiwaro tft 0.TREE ROOTS MUM BECUT UNLESS CURING ISUHAVOVASLE TTREE TAPE HDECWUNI4 HESRae W E 5.TRENCHESENAL EEHAHD WGWRMNTIEOMPUMNARFA$W ER.TWOINCHESINdpEIE1ERAWGRFATER C ARE PRESENT,ORTYIEN NCLOSEPROBIMTYTO LOW BRAHCHI NOTREES.MIIENBVER POSSIBLE,ROOTS TWO IMCMOR 2J'U—CEDAR MUI-CH wFn 50uasOwL rtmWiISWnPw V r Y GREATER IN"OR SHALL BENNNEIID OR BORED UXWRANO SWILL BE COVEREDTO PREVNf DENYOMTIIXL (WHEN ROOT CUTRNGPUMVONA&E,A CLENHSHARPCCTSNAULRMATETOAVORISHREOdNGORSMASH .R0 0T �R 3:'P.v.c MPRIEas Ce�oTaun g (TYPICPy OVERVxaE4 OOMNSOM OFPUMPrt CUTS SHWLOB—WKTOALATFRALRWT.MENEVERPo ME.RWTSSXWLDUE BETWEENUTEFALL 53 pXpBW OPEMND,WNEN R00T ENERGY SUPPLES ARE WGN AIACON01TI0NS pRE 1FA5T FAVOMBIE FOR MSFABE KSPECIFIEDSACxFUMw CAUSNGAGENTS.EUMEDROOTSSMLLBECW MWMFBNTRYTOPREVOITDEM'ORpTNN1 ROCTSIMLLBE AHDR Prt san T COVERED WRXIDLORWITU PANDIEPTMOOT. Z T. WATER PRi OF PROTECTED TREES SIMON ROOTS WERECUT SHALL BE PROVIOEDBYTHE CONNECTOR TREATED WOOD POST — A�AUrtssHUO 8.AUGER TUNREUNG MTHERTHANTRENCHNG SHOULD REUSED MR UTILITY PUCEMENT WRHIN DRIPUNE H GaoMMETED NttW - 9.FMCWGMTMLSKMIMIRCUMTREEORSHRUBWIWSEWMDNPUIEEDGEMWRHNIDFF WANY siRAPfusERGUywIaES 7--CONSTRUCTION ACTINIES. —RION—TOP OF WHE 1f FENCING MATERIAL SHALLBE BRMHTWNTMSTNG WLOIL WM MMD A NNIMUM W FWR FEET N HOGHT. 11.FENCNG MTERMLSHALLBE SET AT THE DPP LNE OR ISFEET FRONTREE TRUM,WHCNEVFREGRUTE1t,AND J .aEMOVEWAIED N AN UPRIGHT MSRION WRWGHOUT THE MMTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTNHTES. S 1 TREE TRU_ VINE NOS A m 12 ANYGRADEC MNGESHSWHpSTNERFMaWTOPSMMAWR IONOFFfLMTERIALIWRHNTHEDRI ME TREE SUauPFaoM H HANTEDONAMPNEOaEMaows TO SROMN ON 7 m SHOULDSEAVDIDEOFORE aSTMTREWTOREMUIL RETAUNGWAL MDTRFEWFLLSAREAWEPTABLEONLY FOUgvTHELONGMISOFAREASMERE— CRUMSUNOROOT SAU.s _Fu W M 8 B WNENCONSTRUCTEOPNORTOOMUECHANGE THEMCENTEE—FROM iH EOGESEOF SEO� WILL eE DETECTED NXanPrt d j 1S.REFERTO PLANS FORFDHCE STAgNG LOWTpNS. N:MSETTOVPFRPPTSAU-T—ASOVESUNMUNDHG 9F F M,GaADE s� TREE AND SHRUB PROTECTION TREE PLANTING PERENNIAL PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING 3 ,E S 8 LANDSCAPE NOTES L 1. ALLGENERALLANDSWED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE ORGANIC SOIL PREPARATION AT O A 3.Sw.ye0N1,000sL UN LESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. C 8 2 SEEDUMITLINE'AREAPPROX IMATE CONTRACTOR SHALLSEEDALLAREASWHICHARE l'7 S DISMRBED BY GRADING MATH THE SPECIFIED SEED MIXES. =E 3. ALL SHRUBBEDS ARE TO BE MULCHED WITH MIN.3'DEPTH,WW DOUBLE SHREDDED Oy HARDWOODMUWK NO WEED CONTROL FABRIC IS REQUIRED IN GROUNDCOVER OR D P STALL T ON O S. = 4. LO ATONSO OF TREESWTITIIN PARKWAYS TREES NOT BE LOCATED IN THE FIELD WITH S LOCAWON ERGROU ERGROUY LINES O CL ER THAN N 10'FROM CLSTRUCT AN 5' O E FROM ONTRAC O IS UTILITY LINES AND NO CLOSER TRAP tO FROM UTILITY STRUCTURES. S. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE THAT IS REPAIR D BY WS,ADJACENT a LANDSCAPE,N PUBLIC AND PRNATE PROPERTY THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THEIR SUBCGNPERIODRC OPERATIONS DURING INSTALLATION OR DURING THE SPECIFIED =i WE NUUNT'ENANCE TRACTO RS CALL FOR UTIL DISCRCAMCY tNRIOR TOAJNY FIEW EXCAVATION. fg 6. THEDIATELCTOTHE LANDSCAPE ARYDTCT,PRIOR T CO"N.FIELDTH THAT NS 7 y IMMEDIATELY TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,PRIOR TO CONDNUING MATH THAT PORTION OF IJJ 1 WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF ANY OF THEIR TRENCHES OR EXCAVATIONSTHATSETRLE. Q J X� 8. DO NOT DISTURB THE EXISTING PAVING,LIGHTING,OR LANDSCAPING THAT EKISTS ADJACENT 3 TO THE SRE UNLESS OTHERISE NOTED ON PUW. 9. PLANTQUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCEOF THE OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL Y 4 DEVA+GENCIES.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANT QUANTITIES y Y Z 10.ALLPUMSSHALLBE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF P FINALACCEPTANCE J Z 11.THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATNE MAY REJECT ANY PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE DISEASED, S DEFORMED,OR OTHERWISE NOT EXHIBITING SUPERIOR QUALITY. Sf K O 4 3 L1J in K s i V p O e J O 7 � LLJ =W 3 & c x o $� �Doa Q=mt az _ O H ORIGINAL ISSUE, s OJEC11/05/2015 IAA PRT N0. 33 168AC50W SHEET U.S. �E a8 L2.0 Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Deveo of Development) EXHIBIT D PDC RECOMMENDATION • • o f 04.t December 31, 2015 O h G . Q 9ceCUUNTI '\ Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook Village of 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook Oak Brook,IL 60523 1200 Oak Brook Road ,ak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Subject: Janko Group, LLC — 210 22nd Street — Planned Development to Website constrict a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a www.oatc-brootc.org future restaurant. Administration 630.368.5000 Dear Village President and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.368.5045 Community Background Development On December 10, 2015, the Planned Development Commission held the required 630.368.5101 public hearing and completed its review and deliberations on an application from FAX 630.368.5128 Janko Group, LLC (as contract purchaser) seeking approval of a planned development Engineering in order to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future Department 4,500 square foot restaurant that could include a drive-thru facility. The existing one- 630.368.5130 story,40,000+square foot office building on the site would be demolished. FAX 630.368.5128 Fire Department The applicant provided a presentation on the proposed project before the President and 630.368.5200 Board of Trustees on September 8, 2015 and the request was well received, pending a FAX 630.368.5251 thorough review and recommendation before the Planned Development Commission. Police Department 630.368.8700 Specifically,this planned development will include the following elements: FAX 630.368.8739 1. Construction of afive-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; . Public Works 2. Creation of a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thruu Department 630.368.5270 facility; and FAX 630.368.5295 3. Elimination of the existing southern most access onto Windsor Drive. Oak Brook Vehicular access to the property will be by two separate routes; one on Windsor Drive Public Library (east) and the other on Bliss Drive (north). Internal circulation around both the hotel and restaurant will be provided through a reconfiguration of the surface parking area. 600 Oak Brook Road )ak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Waivers and Variations: The Planned Development process allows an applicant to 630.368.7700 FAX 630.368.7704 request waivers and variations that are needed for the construction of the project. The following summarizes each of the waivers and variations requested herein: Oak Brook Sports Core • Section 13-3-15E: a waiver to permit the proposed canopy for the Hyatt House Bath&Tennis Club Hotel to exceed the maximum height of 18 feet by approximately four(4) feet. 700 Oak Brook Road )ak Brook,IL 60523-4600 • Section 13-10A-3.A: a waiver to permit an increase in the maximum FAR 630.368.6420 from 0.48 to approximately 0.52 to accommodate the proposed uses on the FAX 630.368.6439 property. Golf Club • Section 13-10A-3.0-1: a waiver to permit a reduction in the required front yard 2606 York Road of 100 feet to approximately' 90 feet along Windsor Drive (Hyatt) and )ak Brook,IL 60523-4602 approximately 55 feet along 22nd Street(future restaurant). 630.368.6400 FAX 630.368.6419 December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees. RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22"d Street Planned Development Page 2 • Section 13-12-3H-2: a waiver to permit more than 10 percent (maximum of . six) of the required number of off-street parking spaces line.a required yard and to be located less than the required 25 feet from a street • Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a hotel and stand-alone restaurant as permitted uses in the proposed planned development. Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a drive-through for the proposed restaurant. Planned Development Exhibits — The Janko Group project contains a number of exhibits as required by the Village's Planned Development Regulations including: 1. Contextual site plan map 2. Site plan 3. Site plan—sign locations 4. Monument signage 5. Building signage 6. Ground floor plan 7. Typical floor plan 8. Hotel elevations (north and south) 9. Hotel elevations(east and west) 10. Alta site survey 11. Site engineering plans a. Demolition plan b. Site plan c. Grading plan d. Utility plan e. Fire truck circulation plan f. Landscape plan g. Photometric plan 12. Traffic and Trip Generation Report(Kimley-Horn) 13. Comments on Village of Oak Brook (Thomas Engineering) Traffic Study for Windsor/22nd Street intersection(Kimley-Horn). Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for the requested approval of the proposed Danko Planned Development project. Planned Development CD Final 2016.doc PDCPDCChairletter-Danko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street- December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 3 Public Comment All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. Tracy Mulqueen presented comments from the Oak Brook Chamber in support of the request. Numerous residents from the York Woods Subdivision ments presented c�orncerrl about the asked questions sus sound that of the applicant. Several of the might come from the outdoor ordering system as well as the possible glare from the headlights of cars using the drive-thl-u The applicant believed satisf the Village ordinance; concerns through testimony that the sound level w Y that the residents expressing those concerns were located at least 400 feet away from the site with six lanes of traffic in between their residences and the site; and the height of the berms and existing vegetation which would shield any glare from automobile headlights.There are existing street lights along 22nd Street. Recommendation The standards for a planned development are detailed and were addressed in writing on pages C-C.6 of the case file. They were also addressed as part of the presentation at the public hearing. By a vote of 6 to 0, the Planned Development Commission found that the applicant had addressed all required standards and recommend approval of the proposed planned development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved -plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is . consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed berm along 22nd Street by approximately one (1) additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 4 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. Very truly yours, Chain avis Chairman Planned Development Commission PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 12 of 13 EXHIBIT E UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT Pursuant to Section 8 of Village of Oak Brook Ordinance No. 2016-ZO-PUD-EX- S-1450 (the "Ordinance', and to induce the Village of Oak Brook to grant the approvals provided for in such Ordinance, the undersigned acknowledge for themselves, and for their respective corporate successors and assigns in title to the Property, that they: 1. have read and understand all of the terms and provisions of the Ordinance; 2. hereby unconditionally agree to accept, consent to, and abide by all of the terms, conditions, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance, and to all other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois of 1966;" as amended, and all other codes, ordinances, rules, and . regulations that are applicable to the use, development, improvement, and operation of the property subject to the Ordinance; 3. acknowledge and agree that the Village is not and shall not be, in any way, liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village's issuance of any permits for the use of the Property, and that the Village's issuance of any permit does not, and shall not, in any way, be deemed to insure the undersigned against damage or injury of any kind and at any time; 4. acknowledge that the public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the adoption of the Ordinance; 5. agree to and do hereby hold harmless and indemnify the Village, the Village's corporate authorities, and all Village elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, from any and all claims that may, at any time, be asserted against any of such parties with respect to the Property and the Village's adoption of the Ordinance or granting the approvals set forth in the Ordinance, except as may arise as a result of the Village's gross negligence or willful misconduct; 6. represent and acknowledge that the persons signing this Unconditional Agreement and Consent are duly authorized to do so on behalf of the respective undersigned; and 7. consent to the recordation of the Ordinance and this Unconditional Agreement and Consent by the Village Clerk with the Office of the Du Page County, Illinois Recorder of Deeds against the property subject to the Ordinance. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] Ordinance 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450 An Ordinance Approving A Planned Development (Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant Planned Development) Page 13 of 13 TMBG, LLC -WINDSOR By: Its: c_ Janko Group, LLC By: Gary_R" Its: Manager Effective Date of Unconditional Agreement and Consent: M x r c-t, (o 12016 9) Treasurer, State of Illinois 35th Street/St. Pascal Drive MFT Project-Payout#1 - $267,079.99 10)Treasurer, State of Illinois 35th Street/St. Pascal Drive MFT Project-Payout#2 - $135,408.86 11)Mary Riordan—TIF Note Interest& TIF Principal - $39,020.00 12) 1311, LLC—TIF Note Interest&TIF Principal - $39,015.00 13)St. Paul Fire—TIF Note Interest& TIF Principal - $97,545.00 14)IRMA—2016 Annual Contributions - $469,163.00 B. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 16, 2016 - $718,324.24 C. Community Development Referrals 1) Clearwater—2100 and 2122 York Road—Text Amendment 2) Clearwater Resubdivision—2100 and 2122 York Road—Final Plat D. Ordinances &Resolutions 1) ORDINANCE 2016-BU-AMEND-S-1448, An Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the 2016 Budget(Architectural Design of the Police Department Renovation) 2) ORDINANCE 2016-PP-S-1451, An Ordinance Authorizing the Sale through Electronic Auction or Broker, Donation or Disposal of Certain Items of Personal Property Owned By the Village of Oak Brook 3) ORDINANCE 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1449, An Ordinance Approving a Planned Development(Rush Oak Brook Orthopaedic Center—2011 York Road) 5 4) RDINANCE 2016-ZO-PUD-EX-S-1450,An Ordinance Approving a Planned Development—(Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant—210 22nd Street) E. Issuance of Scavenger/Solid Waste Hauler License (Independent Recycling Services) F. Monthly Financial Reports—December 31, 2015 Motion by Trustee Adler, seconded by Trustee Manzo, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as presented or amended. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 5—Trustees Adler,Baar,Manzo,Tiesenga,Yusuf Nays: 0—None Abstain: 0—None VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES Page 3 of 8 REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 26,2016 f 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Executive Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes of December 8, 2015 Motion by Trustee Baar, seconded by Trustee Manzo, to approve the Minutes of the Special Executive Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes of December 8,2015. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. B. Regular Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes of January 12, 2016 Motion by Trustee Baar, seconded by Trustee Manzo, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of January 12,2016,as revised. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. C. Regular Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2016 Motion by Trustee Baar, seconded by Trustee Manzo, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of January 14,2016,as revised. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 7. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Board member so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as the first item after approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Accounts Payable for Period Ending January 21, 2016 - $2,444,801.00 Significant Items included in Above: 1) Holland&Knight LLP—Legal Services—December, 2015 - $4,380.54 (FYI 5 — YTD - $151,110.50) 2) Seyfarth, Shaw, LLP—Legal Services—December, 2015 - $326.25 (FYI 5—YTD - $24,316.70) 3) Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Bush,DiCianni &Krafthefer,P.C., - Legal Services— December, 2015 - $1,376.19 (FYI 5 —YTD - $64,917.26) 4) Rathje Woodward, LLC - Legal Services—November, 2015 - $3,333.33 5) Rathje Woodward, LLC - Legal Services—December, 2015 - $3,333.33(FY15 — YTD - $39,999.96) TOTAL LEGAL BILLS PAID FOR 2015 - YTD - $284,857.92 6) DuPage Convention &Visitors Bureau—2015 4th Quarter Hotel/Motel Tax Receipt- $26,497.17 7) DuPage Water Commission—December 2015 - $384,629.25 8) Central Blacktop Company—2015 Street Improvement Project—Payout#7 - $352,829.69 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES Page 2 of 8 REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 26,2016 • a Abstain: 0—None Absent: 2—Trustees Manzo,Moy Motion carried. Janko Group, LLC—210 22nd Street—Planned Development to Construct a New 5 Story Hyatt House Hotel and Create a Site for future Restaurant with Drive-Thru Motion by Trustee Baar, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to concur with the recommendation from the Planned Development Commission and approve the proposed Janko Group planned development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed three (3') foot berm along 22°d Street by approximately one(1) additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived; and 3. Authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the January 26,2016 Board of Trustees meeting. Development Services Director Kallien discussed this project and addressed concerns expressed by residents, such as building height, lighting and sound requirements. Questions and comments were made. Development Services Director Kallien stressed that this project has followed all the regulations and required notices. Mr. Greg Spanos of the Janko Group discussed the process regarding potential restaurants and that the restaurant, because of its location, is expected to cater to the daytime employee population. In response to an inquiry, Mr. Spanos stated that the target customer for the hotel would be an upscale business traveler and that half of the guests are expected to be extended stays. Mr. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES Page 6 of 12 REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 12,2016 • 0 Peter Dubin of Norr Architects discussed the design of the building tower. Comments were made regarding the project, specifically the drive-thru. Motion by Trustee Adler, seconded by Trustee Baar, to amend the planned development to extract the drive-thru component of the restaurant. Development Services Director Kallien requested clarification regarding the motion and the required process and Village Attorney Friedman clarified same. Residents Joe Laurencik and Stan Papuga expressed concerns regarding the drive-thru restaurant. Trustee Baar expressed appreciation to the Janko Group. ROLL CALL VOTE ON AMENDMENT MOTION: Ayes: 4—Trustees Adler,Baar,Tiesenga,Yusuf Nays: 0—None Abstain: 0—None Absent: 2—Trustees Manzo,Moy Motion carried. ROLL CALL VOTE ON APPROVAL MOTION AS AMENDED: Ayes: 4—Trustees Adler, Baar, Tiesenga,Yusuf Nays: 0—None Abstain: 0—None Absent: 2—Trustees Manzo,Moy Motion carried. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Ordinances&Resolutions 1) RESOLUTION 2016-PD-RNVTN-PRJT-AG-R-1528, A Resolution Approving and Authorizing a Professional Services Agreement By and Between the Village of Oak Brook and Williams Architects, LTD for Architectural Design Services for the Police Department Renovation Motion by Trustee Baar,seconded by Trustee Adler, to approve this Resolution. Police Chief Kruger discussed the history and process of this project. Mr. Mark Bushhouse of Williams Architects explained the detention facility project. Questions were asked and comments were made. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Trustees Adler,Baar,Yusuf,President Lalmalani Nays: 1—Trustee Tiesenga Abstain: 0—None Absent: 2—Trustees Manzo, Moy Motion carried. 10. ACTIVE BUSINESS VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES Page 7 of 12 REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 12,2016 ITEM 8.13 HYATT HOUSE-JANxo GROUP Hyatt House Hotel and Restaurant- 21022nd Street— PLANNED DEVELOPMENT INDEX PAGE VILLAGE MATERIAL and UPDATES 20-20.b Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien-Village Board Agenda— January 12, 2016 19-19.c Planned Development Commission Recommendation Letter dated December 31, 2015 18-18.v. Planned Development Commission Meeting Minutes dated December 10, 2015 17-17.e Staff Report dated December 4,2015 from Director of Community Development Kallien to the Planned Development Commission 16 Director of Community Development Kallien Questions to Applicant 15-15.a Applicant Response to Director of Community Development Kallien Comments 14 Revised Waivers and Variations—Brief Description 13-13.b Revised Waivers and Variations—Site Development Allowances—Section 13-15-4 12 Police—Police Chief Memorandum dated November 23, 2015 11 Fire—Fire Chief Comments dated November 19, 2015 10 Public Works—Interim Public Works Director Email Review Comments dated November 23, 2015 9 Engineering—Project and Regulatory Engineer Review Comments dated November 23, 2015 8 Certificate of Publication dated November 19, 2015 7-7.a Resident Letter Mailed Certified Mail by Applicant on November 24, 2015 6 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes dated September 8, 2015 5 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Director of Community Development Village Board Agenda— September 8, 2015 4 Section 13-3-15E—General Zoning—The maximum height of the canopy is eighteen feet(18') 3 Section 13-10A-3A—ORA-1 District—Lot Area Requirements-Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.48 Section 13-10A-3C.1 —ORA-1 District—Lot Area Requirements-Yards: Front 2 Section 13-12-3H.2—Off Street Parking Regulations—In Yards 1-1.a Section 13-10A-2—Special Uses—Hotels and Restaurant With Drive-Thru PD Application and Supporting Documents A Application A.1 Statement of Authorization to Seek Planned Development from Owner B-B.2 Brief Narrative Overview Waivers and Variations—Brief Description-SUPERSEDED—NOT INCLUDED—See Page 14 Waivers and Variations—Site Develop.Allowances-SUPERSEDED—NOT INCLUDED—See Page 15 C-C.6 Planned Development Standards—Section 13-15-3 D Project Schedule and Security Plan Statement E Fee and Receipt/Paid F Certification of Surrounding Property Owners G-G.1 Surrounding property owners list H Subject Property Verification—and Legal description of property 1-1.1 Site Security Measures Dated November 6, 2015 J-J.2 Hyatt House Hotel Trip Generation dated November 9, 2015 K-K.2 Review of the Village Traffic Study for Windsor and West 22nd Street L-L.3 Applicant Summary of Meetings with Surrounding Homeowner Associations dated December 2, 2015 Individual Certified Mailing Receipts included in the Official file only Exhibits (Included—Not Attached) M. Architectural Plans: Aerial Contextual Site Plan R Preliminary Engineering Plans Contextual Site Plan Demolition Plan Rendered Site Plan Detailed Site Plan Signage Plan and Sign Package Grading Plan Ground Floor and Typical Floor Plan Utility Plan N Building Elevations Fire Truck Circulation Plan O Land Use Plan Landscape Plan and Details P Stormwater Memorandum Existing/Proposed Photometric Plan and Calculations S Land Title Survey Q Economic Analysis I c O o J � G p 9 v C �COUN'SV,� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of January 12, 2016 SUBJECT: Janko Group, LLC—210 22"d Street—Planned Development to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future restaurant. FROM: Robert L. Kallien,Jr.,AICP,Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendation from the Planned Development Commission and approve the proposed Janko Group planned development subject to the following conditions: i i 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; j B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent j with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed three(Y) foot berm along 22"d Street by approximately one(1)additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived; and 3. Authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the January 26,2016 Board of Trustees meeting. 13OT_Rec-Janko Hyatt House Planned Dovelopment-Jan2016,11oc `�' . Background/History: On December 10, 2015, the Planned Development Commission held the required public hearing and completed its review and deliberations on an application from Janko Group, LLC (as contract purchaser) seeking approval of a planned development in order to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant that could include a drive-thru facility. The existing one-story,40,000+square foot office building on the site would be demolished. The applicant provided a presentation on the proposed project before the President and Board of Trustees on September 8, 2015 and the request was well received, pending a thorough review and recommendation before the Planned Development Commission. Specifically,this planned development will include the following elements: 1. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; 2. Creation of a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru facility; and 3. Elimination of the existing southern most access onto Windsor Drive. Vehicular access to the property will be by two separate routes; one on Windsor Drive (east) and the other on Bliss Drive (north). Internal circulation around both the hotel and restaurant will be provided through a reconfiguration of the surface parking area. j Waivers and Variations: The Planned Development process allows an applicant to request waivers and variations that are needed for the construction of the project. The following summarizes each of the waivers and variations requested herein: • Section 13-3-15E: a waiver to permit the proposed canopy for the Hyatt House Hotel to exceed the maximum height of 18 feet by approximately four(4) feet. • Section 13-IOA-3.A: a waiver to permit an increase in the maximum FAR from 0.48 to approximately 0.52 to accommodate the proposed uses on the property. • Section 13-I0A-3.0-1: a waiver to permit a reduction in the required front yard of 100 feet to approximately 90 feet along Windsor Drive (Hyatt) and approximately 55 feet along 22"a Street (future restaurant). • Section 13-12-3H-2: a waiver to permit more than 10 percent (maximum of six) of the required number of off street parking spaces in a required yard and to be located less than the required 25 feet from a street line. • Section 13-1OA-2: a waiver to permit a hotel and stand-alone restaurant as permitted uses in the proposed planned development. • Section 13-1 OA-2: a waiver to permit a drive-through for the proposed restaurant. Planned Development Exhibits — The Janko Group project contains a number of exhibits as required by the Village's Planned Development Regulations including: 1. Contextual site plan map 2. Site plan 3. Site plan—sign locations 4. Monument signage 5. Building signage 6. Ground floor plan 2 7. Typical floor plan 8. Hotel elevations(north and south) 9. Hotel elevations(east and west) 10. Alta site survey 11. Site engineering plans a. Demolition plan b. Site plan c. Grading plan d. Utility plan e. Fire truck circulation plan f. Landscape plan g. Photometric plan 12. Traffic and Trip Generation Report(Kimley-Horn) 13. Comments on Village of Oak Brook (Thomas Engineering) Traffic Study for Windsor/22' Street intersection (Kimley-Horn). Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for the requested approval of the proposed Janko Planned Development project. Recommendation The standards for a planned development are detailed and were addressed in writing on pages C-C.6 of the case file. They were also addressed as part of the presentation at the public hearing. i By a vote of 6 to 0, the Planned Development Commission found that the applicant had addressed all required standards and recommend approval of the proposed planned development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: G. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; i H. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. if the restaurant and proposed drive-than do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture,the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; 1. Raising the height of the proposed three (3') foot berm along 22"`' Street by approximately one (1) additional foot; J. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; K. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive L. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. 3 Q vE OF Oq,t. • • \p 490 � O 0 A December 31, 2015 9CF�OUNiV •`��` Village President and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook Village of 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook Oak Brook, IL 60523 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Subject: Janko Group, LLC — 210 22nd Street — Planned Development to Website construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a www.oak-brook.org future restaurant. Administration 630.368.5000 Dear Village President and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.368.5045 Community Background Development On December 10, 2015, the Planned Development Commission held the required FAX 630.368.51 public herein and completed its review and deliberations on an application from FAX 630.368.5128 P g p Pp Janko Group, LLC (as contract purchaser) seeking approval of a planned development Engineering in order to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future Department 4,500 square foot restaurant that could include a drive-thru facility. The existing one- 630.368.5130 story, 0,000+s foot office building on the site would be demolished. FAX 630.368.5128 �' square g Fire Department The applicant provided a presentation on the proposed project before the President and 630.368.5200 Board of Trustees on September 8, 2015 and the request was well received, pending a FAX 630.368.5251 thorough review and recommendation before the Planned Development Commission. . Police Department 630.368.8700 Specifically,this planned development will include the following elements: FAX 630.368.8739 1. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; Public Works 2. Creation of a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru Department 630.368.5270 facility; and FAX 630.368.5295 3. Elimination of the existing southern most access onto Windsor Drive. Oak Brook Vehicular access to the property will be by two separate routes; one on Windsor Drive Public Library (east) and the other on Bliss Drive (north). Internal circulation around both the hotel 600 Oak Brook Road and restaurant will be provided through a reconfiguration of the surface parking area. Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.368.7700 Waivers and Variations: The Planned Development process allows an applicant to FAX 630.368.7704 request waivers and variations that are needed for the construction of the project. The following summarizes each of the waivers and variations requested herein: Oak Brook Sports Core • Section 13-3-15E: a waiver to permit the proposed canopy for the Hyatt House Bath&Tennis Club Y pp f f h Hotel to exceed the maximum height o 18 feet b approximately our 4 700 Oak Brook Road g Y f ( ) feet. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 • Section 13-10A-3.A: a waiver to permit an increase in the maximum FAR 630.368.6420 from 0.48 to approximately 0.52 to accommodate the proposed uses on the FAX 630.368.6439 property. Golf Club • Section 13-10A-3.0-1: a waiver to permit a reduction in the required front yard 2606 York Road of 100 feet to approximately 90 feet along Windsor Drive (Hyatt) and Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 approximately 55 feet along 22"d Street(future restaurant). 630.368.6400 FAX 630.368.6419 A? December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 2 • Section 13-12-3H-2: a waiver to permit more than 10 percent (maximum of six) of the required number of off-street parking spaces in a required yard and to be located less than the required 25 feet from a street line. • Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a hotel and stand-alone restaurant as. permitted uses in the proposed planned development. • Section 13-10A-2: a waiver to permit a drive-through for the proposed restaurant. Planned Development Exhibits — The Janko Group project contains a number of exhibits as required by the Village's Planned Development Regulations including: 1. Contextual site plan map 2. Site plan 3. Site plan—sign locations 4. Monument signage 5. Building signage 6. Ground floor plan 7. Typical floor plan 8. Hotel elevations (north and south) 9. Hotel elevations (east and west) 10. Alta site survey 11. Site engineering plans a. Demolition plan b. Site plan C. Grading plan d. Utility plan e. Fire truck circulation plan f. Landscape plan g. Photometric plan 12. Traffic and Trip Generation Report(Kimley-Horn) 13. Comments on Village of Oak Brook (Thomas Engineering) Traffic Study for Windsor/22nd Street intersection(Kimley-Horn). Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for the requested approval of the proposed Janko Planned Development project. PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc /9 a December 31,2015 Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 3 Public Comment All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. Tracy Mulqueen presented comments from the Oak Brook Chamber in support of the request. Numerous residents from the York Woods Subdivision presented comments and asked questions of the applicant. Several of the comments expressed concern about the sound that might come from the outdoor ordering system as well as the possible glare from the headlights of cars using the drive-thru The applicant believed it had addressed these concerns through testimony that the sound level would satisfy the Village ordinance; that the residents expressing those concerns were located at least 400 feet away from the site with six lanes of traffic in between their residences and the site; and the height of the berms and existing vegetation which would shield any glare from automobile headlights. There are existing street lights along 22nd Street. Recommendation The standards for a planned development are detailed and were addressed in writing on pages C-C.6 of the case file. They were also addressed as part of the presentation at the public hearing. By a vote of 6 to 0, the Planned Development Commission found that the applicant had addressed all required standards and recommend approval of the proposed planned development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed berm along 22nd Street by approximately one (1) additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and, the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintaining a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and PDCPDCChairletter-Danko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc L • • December 31,2015 .Village President and Board of Trustees RE: Janko Group,LLC—210 22nd Street Planned Development Page 4 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. Very truly yours, NOTE:Chairman Davis has reviewed and verbally approved the content of this letter pending his signature. The signed original will be placed in the official file upon receipt. Champ Davis Chairman Planned Development Commission PDCPDCChairletter-Janko Hyatt House-210 22nd Street-Planned Development-CD Final 2016.doc • • 5. 485 parking spaces (Section 13-12-5 requires 515 parking spaces). If it appears there is a parking problem, to attempt negotiations with the owner or lessee of the adjacent property to the north to secure additional parking. 6. 18 months to apply for building permit (Section 13-15-7C requires 9 months) 7. 5 foot deep landscaped area along south fayade of parking structure (Section 13-12-14 requires minimum 10 feet depth and average of 15 feet depth) 8. Allow medical office and ambulatory surgery center(Section 13- 10E-1 requires office use) with a new service and emergency access drive from Windsor Drive along the south property line with the condition that it offer no direct access to the building or parking structure; and 2. Comply with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: 6 — Members Bulin, Doyle, Iyer, Sheers, Vice Chair Tropinski and Chairman Davis Absent: 1 —Member Cappetta Nays: 0. Motion Carried. 3. B CASE NO: 2015-12-ZO-PUD — JANKO GROUP LLC, CONTRACT CASE NO:2015-12- PURCHASER ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNER TMBG. LLC - ZO - HYATT HOUSE HOTEL + HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT — 210 22ND STREET — RESTAURANT - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PL ANN ST - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Chairman Davis reviewed the planned development public hearing process and swore in all those that would testify. Director of Community Development Kallien provided a brief summary of the request. Greg Spanos, Managing Director, Janko Group stated that they are the project developer and sponsor. He thanked Village Staff for all their efforts in the process. At the September 8, 2015 presentation before the Village Board, they garnered initial support for the project. They are honored and excited about working with the Village of Oak Brook. It is a very important project to the Janko Group, their partners and associates. They take pride in what they do, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 12 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes the quality and thoughtfulness of what they develop, and the legacy of their projects. They are good neighbors and good corporate citizens within the communities in which they operate. They have a strong track record of creating win/win scenarios with the numerous communities that they have built and developed in, such as Galesburg, Evanston, Naperville and hopefully Oak Brook. They must be astute real estate investors and have to insure they provide themselves, investors, lenders and partners the appropriate risk adjusted return on their investments, which have been substantial. They and the community need the project to be successful in order to create that win/win scenario. Founded in 1988, the Janko Group is a well capitalized and experienced Chicago based development firm with multiple offices in Chicago, Kansas City and California with a track record of success in the acquisition, development, finance, and management of all the major real estate groups, including office, industrial, commercial, residential and hospitality. If they proceed with this project they would love the idea of exploring future projects in Oak Brook. Their platform is unique in that they have in-house expertise in all facets of development, including finance accounting, asset management, legal, leasing, and an affiliated construction and hotel management companies. One of their core strategic focuses is on the development of select service and extended stay hotels. Although they have relationships with all major brands, including Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Starwood, etc., they are pursuing a considerable amount of development with Hyatt Hotels. They like the Hyatt brand for multiple reasons, not the least of which is their sleek modern, thoughtful design that has resulted in a Best in Class upscale physical product. Like the Janko Group Hyatt is a growth oriented company that is eager to grow their Hyatt Place and Hyatt House brands with high quality, well capitalized developers like Janko Group. He reviewed some of their current and recent projects, including the Marriott project along I-88 in Naperville, which was completed gutted and renovated to a full service Marriott and won the Marriott's coveted 2012 opening of the year award. He introduced members of their team, Peter Dubin and Margaret Seed, NORR Architects, which is an internationally renowned architectural firm with considerable hotel and restaurant design experience. Scott Wilson and Drew Walker, Kimley Horn, Civil Engineering firm, which is a national firm. John Brook, Chief Operating officer of Janko Hospitality, their affiliated hotel management company that manages upscale full service hotels throughout the Midwest. Several members of the Janko Group corporate team were present, including Gary Janko, founder and CEO, Pam Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 13 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes Richard Figueroa, Chief Operating Officer, 00 , Justin Dickinson, part of the development team and Paul Golley, construction. Hyatt sought Janko Group out as a qualified developer to identify and source a Hyatt opportunity in Oak Brook. After a multi-year search Janko contracted a 3.86 acre site at the northeast corner of 22nd Street and Windsor Drive. The site is improved with a 40,000 square foot single-story office building that was built in 1978. The site is bordered by 22nd Street, Windsor Drive and Bliss Drive. The building will be demolished. They reviewed pictures of the existing site, including surrounding buildings, views of vegetation bordering the York Woods Subdivision. Since their initial meeting before the Village Board, they took comments from the Trustees, staff, neighbors, and members of the community and did their best to take the comments into their plan to design the best as economically possible. They have added considerable upgrades to the building design, the exterior fagade and material choices. The hotel and retail building have been upgraded to be 100 percent masonry and brick construction. It was a considerable architectural cost upgrade to the project, which was in response to the feedback they had received. They feel the project appropriately captures the market and hospitality and for restaurant users and also has a stunning upscale timeless architecture and design. The mixed use element of the project also aligns directly with the Oak Brook commercial revitalization plan, which calls for both lodging and dining along the 22nd Street corridor. The Hyatt House building will include a 5-story structure with an L-shaped orientation. There are approximately 60 Hyatt Houses across the United States and Puerto Rico. Hyatt is very particular in their design and architectural elements on the interior and exterior of its buildings. They are proposing 144 guest rooms, including many with equipped kitchens, one and two bedroom suites, dens, guest rooms with an open floor plan and a microwave and mini fridge. There will be approximately 1500 square feet of meeting space that will be flexible in design in order to also accommodate smaller groups. It will be predominately used by guests staying at the hotel. Hyatt House features a daily offering of a complimentary breakfast with an omelet bar, fresh fruit, yogurt, as well as other hot breakfast items. Within the lobby great room gathering area there is an H-bar that doubles as a breakfast and eating area earlier in the day and transforms into a social bar in the later afternoon and evening with appetizers and cocktails served. The hotel will feature a first-class fitness room, indoor pool, a guest market, a 24-hour business center and a small outdoor patio/terrace with a fire pit. Hyatt House caters predominately to high income, extended stay business VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 14 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes travelers. Leisure travelers primarily traveling on the weekends will enjoy the oversized suites and the full kitchen amenities. The hotel is also appealing to families with children or sports teams or project teams traveling. These guests are all looking for the comforts of home while they are on the road. They anticipate that the fast casual retail building to be a 4500 square foot, single-story brick structure with a potential drive-thru. The retail restaurant portion of the site represents approximately 22 percent of the total site area(.84 acres). Based on their market research, discussions with retail brokers and their partners, the most likely user would want to capture the 22nd Street traffic and take advantage of the strong daytime employee population along Windsor Drive and York Road. Janko Group and Hyatt want to pursue a restaurant or retail option whose brand is consistent with what Hyatt House delivers, which is an upscale lodging experience. The fast casual restaurant concept will be strategically designed to incorporate the high quality design and architecture of the hotel. On the restaurant concept with the drive-thru they need to remain flexible to have that option. What they have garnered in terms of information from the market place and from retail and restaurant experts is that more and more fast casual dining restaurants are pushing for a drive-thru concept. They want to leave that option open should the market place dictate that that concept is desired. Timing: They anticipate closing during the late first 1St quarter early 2nd quarter of 2016, with a hotel groundbreaking in early summer 2016. The hotel would open July of 2017. Retail leasing of the restaurant would commence early 2016 and with the hopes of identifying a user during 2016 and breaking ground thereafter. Construction of the retail restaurant would be shorter in duration estimated at between 6—8 months. Benefits: There are numerous benefits to the community. There will be a considerable aesthetic upgrade at a highly visible corner of 22nd Street and Windsor Drive. The two all brick buildings complement one another architecturally and give a campus like setting in a mixed use environment. The Village will benefit significantly with the hotel tax generated thru the hotel and sales tax generated from the restaurant, they anticipate approximately $1.1 million in just the first 5 years of operation. They will likely sign a 25-year franchise agreement with Hyatt, so the building will be there for the long haul as well as well as the tax revenue. The hotel and restaurant uses are in close proximity to a large employee base and a substantial local population. The community, its business, its residents and visitors will benefit both from the hotel and restaurant amenities. Clearly there will be numerous construction and VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 15 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes permanent jobs created by the redevelopment. Drew Walker, Kimley Horn, Civil Consultant reviewed the Planned Development. They are seeking a positive recommendation for the 89,000 square foot Hyatt House House hotel, associated parking, a 4500 square foot restaurant with the flexibility to have a drive-thru and associated 45 parking spaces. This will replace the 40,000 square foot single-story office building that has reached the end of its life. Early on they met with stakeholders, Village Board, staff, the York Woods Subdivision to the south, the Lions Club to the west, Advocate Health to the north and the office development to the east. They also met with Homeowners association north of the office park,just to garner feedback. Notices were filed. Waivers: Part of the requirements was to respond to the ways that they meet commercial revitalization plan. A lot of time and resources put that plan together and they realize that it is an important document. They reviewed the plan and looked at ways that they could respond in a positive way. In doing so they believe they have created a mixed use development and have identified a handful of waivers that they will need in order to pursue the mixed use development. The following waivers are being sought Section 13-3-15E—Canopy height Section 13-10A-3.A—FAR Section 13-10A-3.C.1 —Front yard setback and parking setback Section 13-12-3H.2—Use associated with the mixed use development Section 13-10A-2—Drive-thru While they are seeking some waivers, they paid attention to the key elements of the commercial revitalization plan, things that are important to Oak Brook that they comply. Clearly signage, landscaping, architecture are key elements to the community and they comply with all requirements of the ordinance. They landscaping that they are putting together will create great buffering and will exceed the number of plant materials required. The building height is below the threshold allowed by ordinance. The high quality architecture was vital to this development. The parking will be adequately served and the site lighting will use high quality LED fixtures with full cutoff at the property line and to be respectful to the neighbors and will meet all light standards of the Code. They are consistent with the goals Commercial Areas Revitalization Plan in VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 16 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes �d �D� terms of transportation, where safety and connectivity were improved. Beautification in terms of architecture and landscaping and they worked with Public Works on the infrastructure and have reached out to the Flagg Creek Water Reclamation District to make sure that they had an understanding of the flows coming off the property. Consistent with the Land Use Policies. Important concepts were to cluster compatible uses, maximizing properties facing 22nd Street, promoting mixed- use to encourage dining and add hotel and lodging options. Consistent with Commercial Plan with promotion in highly visible areas with upscale projects. They believe the building has been positioned to take advantage of visibility to the intersection. Consistent with Development Guidelines of how to implement a positive plan. They have provided strategic placement screening of the drive-thru has been taken into consideration. In terms of implementation of the plan there is encouragement in the planned development process to put to test some of the outdated setbacks and FAR and create a powerful and successful mixed use development. Such as do you want to create a 100 foot setback off 22"d Street to create a sea of parking in one of the most visible corridors. They have replaced that with high quality architecture and landscaping to create buffers. He reviewed the site plan highlights in regards to circulation/ access and safety and traffic. There is an existing right in/right out access point on the property that has been eliminated due to the number of users coming in and out so it was closed. They improved the entrance for safe fire department access. Loading will be directed to the rear of the property. They have strategically placed the restaurant on the east end of the property with a one-way access along with landscape screening elements and directing headlights to the north of the site away from residents. The wayfinding will direct users to Bliss to exit and connect to Windsor Drive. The front yard parking setback was heavily screened. There are key card access points around the hotel. At 22"d Street there is an existing earthen berm that comes up 3 feet to the property line. They proposed to come back down with their grading will come back down at 2 feet to create a 2 foot differential with an earthen berm to their pavement grade along the south property line. They will plant a continuous row of hedges on top of the two foot berm that will be anywhere from 4-6 feet tall, with a continuous row of hedges. There will be 6-8 feet of total screening to the south which will completely block a headlight from cars in the parking area, while the buildings will remain visible for potential patrons. There are several mature VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 17 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes �d � oak trees on the east property line that will remain in place. They will be planting new evergreen/pine trees they will provide complete blockage and will be approximately 8 feet at planting. There are additional mature trees along the east side that they will be salvaging, so there will be mature trees right at the beginning of the project. They have worked with Engineering and Public Works to provide adequate fire protection through water service and fire truck circulation around the property. They will also provide underground detention and will meet the DuPage County Stormwater Management requirements. They are proposing high quality LED fixtures that will create a safe and secure environment for their patrons, while being respectful of the neighbors. They will be using full cutoff at the property line LED fixtures that will meet the .3 candle foot requirement of a residential district along the southern property line. Peter Dubin, Vice President of the US Division of KNORR. They have a relationship with Hyatt and do a lot of their prototype design for some of their select service hotels, including Hyatt Place and Hyatt House hotels. They have taken the hotel and pushed it away from 22nd Street to meet and bring down the height of the hotel from 22nd Street and the community across 22nd Street. The hotel is organized around a tower and has two guest room wings that have a lower and more residential feel. The drive-thru stack is pointing north so that the headlights at night are pointing away. There is full screening along the south and screening on the east. The issue of noise had come up at the homeowner association meeting. If there is a drive-thru, it will be in compliance with decibel requirements. The drive-thru ordering system is somewhere around 50 decibels, which is the sound of soft rain. When someone is talking in a car, it is similar to a conversation decibels and will not be heard on the other side of 22nd Street. The loading and trash is tucked to the north. The Hyatt House prototype is the most upscale of all the extended stay hotels. Over the last couple of months they have ratcheted up the quality of the building. First in response to the comments from the Village Board about the quality of the architecture in Oak Brook. When the Janko Group does hotels they try to drive as much quality into their hotel properties as they can. What is now being presented is much better than what was initially. The building itself was a combination of materials and is now different kinds of masonry along the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 18 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes two guest wings with metal panels at the corner of the building. They tried to take the scale of the building and break it up to give it more of a residential feel with a corporate aesthetic to anchor the two. The predominant roof height is approximately 58 feet and even the tower is well below 76 feet. It could be much larger. Hyatt would not want a lesser quality for the restaurant than the hotel so the same type of materials is incorporated into the building. The hotel and restaurant signage is all white, with the exception f the H for the Hyatt logo which is blue. They want to drive the campus atmosphere throughout using the red brick throughout. They are also seeking relief to the height of the canopy. The Hyatt porte-cochere is higher and they are seeking relief to construct that. Hyatt says that the hotel is not a place to stay, but a place to live, since it is an extended stay hotel. It is different than other hotels with amenities that you would have in your living room. There is an indoor pool, a gathering room and meeting area. It can open to the lobby area or subdivided into smaller rooms. Everything flows from one area to another like an open plan apartment. He reviewed the different rooms and sizes of the guest rooms. It is a high class business traveler hotel and family traveling magazine has rated it one of the 3 highest family stay hotels in the country. Keith Demchinski, Kimley-Horn and Associates, reviewed the landscape material that meets and exceeds the Village requirements. It complements the high architectural styles of the building. All shrubs along the south consistes of evergreen shrubs, shrubs grasses and all shrubs exceed 4 feet in height. Along Windsor Drive they proposed evergreen trees that will reach heights of 35-45 feet, canopy trees, additional shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses. Along the north property line they are preserving 7 mature trees and proposing additional shrubs, evergreen trees,perennials, and ornamental grasses. Both the north property and west property have a minimum shrub height of 5 feet at mature growth. Along the east property line 9 existing mature trees are being preserved, and they will be screening the trash enclosure with shrubs and ornamental grasses. Internal to the site the landscape plan is a little more contemporary and exceeds what is required by the Village. There are some turf areas to enhance the landscaping color and texture. Chairman Davis noted that the standards were addressed in great detail on pages C-C.6 of the case file. It appears that all of the standards have been addressed. Chairman Davis limited the time to 5 minutes for comments and urged speakers VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 19 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes not to be repetitious as all questions would be answered by the applicant. Alfred Knuth, 25 Croydon Lane, York Woods said that some residents had approached him to speak on their behalf. There were concerns from those that back up to 22"d Street, due to their unique positioning. York Woods is one of the only subdivisions in close proximity to commercial areas. He asked if the funding would benefit from a TIF. Quality of the building and want them to maintain the standards for Oak Brook. Traffic was another issue. What type of clients and are they open to public housing or Section 8. They do not want a fast food such as Taco Bell, Popeye's Chicken,*etc. How will it impact traffic. There are people along 22nd Street that are worried about people coming through their community. They are also concerned about safety. Tracy Mulqueen, President and CEO of the Greater Oak Brook Chamber of Commerce in the Economic Development Partnership, which represent nearly 2,000 local companies and they all encourage the Planned Development Commission to recommend approval of the Janko Group proposal. The proposal presents a well planned hotel and mixed used development. Janko Group is a very well respected development firm with extensive hotel management experience. Janko is working with KNORR which is an international and award winning architecture and design firm. Together, based on Village recommendations have created a unique Hyatt Hotel property specifically for Oak Brook that reflects the upscale culture of this community. Janko Group has also done extensive market research to plan for the best mixed use of new site to ensure significant new revenue generation for the Village going forward. The potential fast casual upscale dining option is a nice amenity for the community, its businesses, its residents and visitors. The mixed use hotel and restaurant retail site are also in line for the goals of the Oak Brook Commercial Revitalization Plan. They plan to bring both lodging and dining options to the area. They asked that the Commission support and approve this new Oak Brook development. They also thanked them for all they do as the Planned Development Commission to grow the community's economy and function and expand the presence of architecturally stunning new properties like this in this very special Hyatt House. Stephen Haszto, 42 Croydon Lane. He said that the fast food casual would be right in his backyard. He read a few comments that his wife wrote since she was ill and could not be at the meeting. He questioned whether appropriate legal notice required by law was given. They received a letter certified mail that said there was an enclosed legal notice, but it was not included. He received a legal description and map of the property. The residents of York VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 20 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes Woods were given one day notice for the Hyatt House project presentation which also coincided with another village meeting that same evening. The entire village should have been invited since it affects all of Oak Brook, not just those along Croydon. His wife contacted neighbors and they had not received notice about the meeting at the Oak Brook Bath and Tennis Club. She attended the meeting at the Oak Brook Bath and Tennis Club and there were discrepancies given when she spoke to a village representative. The investor representatives were asked if they had already had the zoning and everything they needed for the hotel and they answered yes, which was not technically correct. They still need entitlements. When asked if they were seeking TIF's or tax incentives they answered no. They are seeking some assistance. Without identifying what the stand alone casual restaurant will be they are asking to be trusted. This community has no faith or confidence in a group that can't keep it honest for an hour or so. They say it could be a Panera or Gibsons Steakhouse, but what if it is a White Castle, Steak and Shake or Dunkin Donuts? Everything has been couched in terms to pacify the residents. He heard them say several times that they had reached out to the residents, but no one reached out to them. Why should we give complete strangers to the community, faceless investors, that much flexibility and power? They walked every step of the way with the folks that brought back the Drake, which has been good neighbors to York Woods by bringing back what was an eyesore in the community. That is the standard that Oak Brook deserves. It is unprecedented in the Village to have drive-thrus with the exception of McDonald's flagship restaurant. He didn't move into Oak Brook 16 years ago to move across the street from an extended stay hotel and a fast casual restaurant. When he is sitting on his patio outside having a cold beverage is he going to hear the hum of a sewing machine in his backyard or hearing someone ordering a hamburger. No other residents are being asked to view a fast casual restaurant with a drive thru from their homes. There are no drive-thru's visible from home sites in the surrounding suburbs. They are all self-contained within commercial districts. It is true that the district is zoned commercial and they are all just as anxious to have the property which borders their subdivision to be properly developed successfully, but it is also true that the parcel borders a residential zoning district. The residents were given one day notice and the investors have shown no consideration for the community regarding input and planning. The theme of the project seems to be to keep it quiet and move it along quickly. There has never been a reasonable expectation based on the last 50 years of use as a business office park that an extended stay hotel and fast casual restaurant with drive thru would be developed on the site. Just as those of them who purchased their homes 16 years ago adjacent had a reasonable expectation based on the history and vision of Oak Brook that strip clubs, car dealerships, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 21 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes ''t and manufacturing would not be approved for said site. Quite the contrary, the businesses along 22nd Street are compatible with the area. Their quiet, 9-5 and dark in the evening. He appreciated the testimony about the berm and the trees, but there are parking spaces along 22nd Street that will face the back of his house. There will be a drive-thru right in the middle of his backyard. A drive- thru with its lights, microphones, people yelling orders, car headlights, tail lights, people congregating around a fire pit, food smells, garbage cans, glass windows with interior lights, unknown hours of operation, security issues, and signage are not conducive to residents. Please do not recommend that this project proceed and ask them to be the only residents of Oak Brook being asked to put up with a project such as this for this group of investors. Based on their questions there does not seem to be a solid business plan, have not answered their questions truthfully, they have no idea what will be placed in the parking lot or what type of restaurant. They have not shown any projections for need, success, profitability, or sustainability. Not only can Oak Brook do better, Oak Brook deserves better. I Stephanie Kallas, 23 Chatham Lane, York Woods, said she has been a resident for over 20 years and that they had gone through a similar situation not too long ago with the Drake and a development group that blew a lot of stuff at them and told them it would be great and he is now in jail. They had a wonderful man come in and took over the Drake with the full support of the residents and the village. It appears that this group has come in and has said that they have garnered support and they have not. There are a lot of seniors who live in York Woods and don't have computers. All conversations in the York Woods Association for this meeting was via email, with one days notice. She implored the Commission to not pass it without taking the time to extend the invitation to the York Woods residents to have a sincere lengthy meeting to discuss all of the issues that they have. No one is saying that they don't want it. Based on the description and the drive-thru, and the parking has lights heading into peoples backyards. She said that they don't live here and do not understand that they are like the stepchild of Oak Brook. They are the only subdivision by commercial real estate. There has to be some consideration for them as residents and taxpayers. Please take the time, look at alternatives and look at the facts.No one wants a drive-thru restaurant next to their home. Stan Papuga, 29 Croydon Lane and a resident of York Woods for 35 years. He said that Paul Butler's outlook was basically for corporate businesses, office buildings and that was the gist of what was proposed initially which has been carried forward for many years. That area has always been an office park and should remain one. A drive-thru will create traffic, security and noise VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 22 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes • • problems. That hotel with the drive-thru should be in Villa Park on Roosevelt Road. It shouldn't be in Oak Brook where they reside and is an upscale community. This is a downturn in the quality of life for the residents of York Woods and all of Oak Brook, it it's passed. Jeff Krusinski, Krusinski Construction, 2107 Swift Drive, an office building in the business park since 1998 and also a member of the Economic Development Partnership for the Oak Brook Chamber. He reiterated that the Janko Group is a very well respected development company in their industry and operate with the utmost integrity. As a corporate member and corporate citizen they would be very much in favor of the proposal. There have many national clients and partners that fly in very often and this would be a great amenity to have within their business park to have them stay as they have several day meetings. They have about 40 employees and there are not many options for a very nice fast casual restaurant on the east side of Oak Brook. To have that along with the time constraints they have at lunch time to run over there and use that amenity would be a great benefit to their company. Jim Nagle, resident of Oak Brook for 7 years and the owner of the Drake Hotel. They welcome all the development on the east side of town. The more development the better. If they are going through the Planned Development, with the permitting process that he went through, before all the variances are granted, what market studies did they rely on in order to justify another hotel in town. He asked what percent of the taxes they are putting up are going to come at the expense of other hotels. He questioned whether it was zoned for a hotel. Director of Community Development Kallien responded that a hotel is allowed as a special use. Within a stand-alone hotel a restaurant can be located as part of that, since it is ancillary to the hotel. In this particular case there is a stand- alone hotel and they are seeking a stand-alone restaurant, which is what they need the waiver for. Mr. Nagle said that in terms of the hotel he would welcome them and they could even do business together, but in terms of the restaurant and if it was a nice restaurant everyone would welcome it. If it is a Taco Bell or Dunkin Donuts he wasn't sure and that is the concern of a lot of people. If the zoning is permitted for the restaurant carte blanche, it could be a Panera tomorrow and they could change it to a Taco Bell three years from now. He questioned, if the drive-thru lane is stacked how would the cars get out. Is the brick real brick or is it cast that is painted. Are 45 parking spaces enough for a 4500 square foot restaurant. He is not saying he is not for or against it, he would just like VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 23 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes e questions answered since they are not ging through the zoning board and are getting all the waivers. Someone shouted out whether there was going to be a TIF. Director of Community Development Kallien responded that there was only one TIF in town, which was for the Promenade and was not aware of any other requests, especially for this development for a TIF. Mr. Nagle asked if they requested any waivers for permitting fees, or if it had been discussed. Director of Community Development Kallien responded that like many other developments in town,they have requested that and it had been forwarded on to the Village Board. Chairman Davis asked the applicant to respond to the questions. Mr. Spanos responded to audience questions as follows: • Hyatt is the franchisor and they are the franchisee and they sign a long term franchise agreement with Hyatt. It is a very similar relationship that hundreds of thousands of other hotel owners have with other hotel parent brands, such as Hilton, Hyatt, Intercontinental Hotel Group, Starwood and the like. The parent brand Hilton, Hyatt and IHG are less frequently owning the real estate. They are rather managing the property or signing a long term franchise agreement whereby Hyatt receives royalty fees for the use of their brand, reservation systems, and for the franchisee signing up for the very strict restrictions they have in their brand and design. They go through a rigorous process not only through the municipality, but through Hyatt to garner approvals of the franchise committee. A resident interrupted and called out from the audience questioning whether Hyatt managed the brand. • John Brook, Chief Operating officer of Janko Hospitality, which is the management arm for the hotels. Yes, Hyatt does send in inspectors, they monitor the construction process, including the quality of the materials that Janko sends in as part of the approved plans. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 24 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes • Mrs. Spanos, stated that there is no low income or Section 8 housing. • Security — They will have 24/7 video surveillance on the exterior of the building and within all of the common areas of the hotel building and the restaurant. A resident Mr. Papuga questioned from the audience that their concern was security for York Woods and have children in the Butler School system and were not concerned about the cameras around their buildings, but people from the property drifting into their subdivision, which is less than 500 feet away. • Mr. Spanos responded that they will have a captive audience within their hotel. There is a fitness center within the hotel and expect their guests will utilize it. They did not anticipate that the restaurant patrons would be meandering through the neighborhood. Chairman Davis reminded the audience that the public comment portion had been concluded and the applicant is now responding to those questions. • Mr. Walker noted that he had reviewed that they would be meeting the requirements in regards to lighting. A photometric study had been submitted to the Village and the Hyatt marquee was included as part of that. They have taken into consideration the building and parking lot lighting. • Mr. Walker said that they have the certified receipts from the mailings to the residents that met the required timeframe. The letter that had been referred to was that not that there was an additional legal notice in the letter but could refer to the legal notice published in the newspaper by the Village. The letter was sent out to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property as listed by the County Assessor's office. • Mr. Walker noted that the restaurant parking spaces complies with the Village Code. • Mr. Walker said that in the drive-thru there is a bypass lane and a queuing lane. The adjacent parking spaces are specifically placed at an angle so that the patrons can back out into the bypass lane. An inaudible question(unable to record)was spoken from the audience. • Mr. Spanos addressed the question. Based upon market feedback and retail experts, brokers and their partners, is that this market and use will be driven by the large substantial daytime lunch population. They do not envision the fast food restaurants referenced to by the audience. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 25 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes They are trying to find a brand that is instep with the brand of their hotel. When another person shouted out from the audience, Mr. Brook respectfully requested that the comments be controlled. Chairman Davis reminded the audience that the applicant has a list of questions from the audience that they are answering. He also reminded those questioning that they were in attendance at this meeting because of the notice and had been able to provide testimony. Director of Community Development Kallien noted that everyone needs to come to the microphone as this meeting is part of a public record and is only effective if it is recorded on tape. Village Attorney Schuster said that the purpose of the meeting, and not everyone may like the answer, is not to have everyone in the public have every single question asked and answered, and answered in the way that they would like. The purpose of the meeting is for the members of the Commission to flush out all of the issues; to be able to hear the public comment, listen to the applicant, to make sure that they meet the standards that are set forth in the Zoning Code and process that information, deliberate and try to formulate a recommendation. The fact that public comments are given and just because an answer given is not liked or they don't feel has been fully answered, that is not the role of the meeting. From the legal notice perspective, legally there was a letter sent out. From the Village's perspective, if a member of the audience is at the meeting, whether a notice was received or not, or it is felt that that it was adequate or not, if someone is at the meeting, notice was received in one way or the other and those in the audience are in attendance. If it is believed that there was something wrong with the legal notice there are legal rights to challenge the notice. It was the applicant's job to have it done appropriately. From the Village's perspective, from our Code and requirements we have received evidence that legal notice was given. The notice is in the case file packets and has met the apparent requirements for the Commission to proceed at this meeting. He asked the applicant having heard the claim of the notice, did the applicant desire to proceed. The applicant responded they wished to proceed. Mr. Schuster advised that due to the issue being raised,they did so at their own risk. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 26 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes ICY • • Chairman Davis noted that there were several questions regarding the quality of the restaurant and asked if the applicant felt it had been addressed sufficiently even though no restaurant had been selected. —They responded they did. Chairman Davis questioned whether the applicant felt they had addressed the traffic questions. — Tim Shogren with Kimley-Horn said that in conjunction with the Village's traffic study, they prepared a review of the impacts associated with the development compared to the existing office building. He noted that due to the density of the offices in the area there are very heavy inflows of traffic in the morning and heavy outflows in the evening. The hotel and restaurant use operate on a different pattern. They will have people leaving the hotel, but not many arriving. When a lot of the office users are leaving in the evening, there will not be many leaving the hotel. It would actually be good to have a hotel development in place of an office development. Mr. Spanos pointed to the site plan and noted the significant berm that bordered the south and east property lines. He also noted that there were three lanes of traffic on 22nd street, a median and then an additional couple of traffic lanes, then there is what they believe to be NICOR land, all of which is a considerable distance from their development to the south properties, varying from approximately 400 feet. A site plan was shown depicting the various distances from the proposed site, office uses on the north south side of 22nd Street, office buildings on York Road, the Drake Hotel, the tollway, etc. in relation to the residential properties in York Woods. There is considerable existing traffic on 22nd Street and the tollway along with the associated noise and lighting that will stay in place from those uses. It is clearly a commercial district and they believe that the use is in line with the Commercial Areas Revitalization Plan adopted for Oak Brook. They believe they have been sensitive to the neighbors comments. Mr. Papuga asked to cross exam the applicant with additional questions. He asked what the hours of operation would be for the drive-thru restaurant. Mr. Spanos responded that as they had pointed out, they do not know yet. They do not know the user or brand, but that the fast casual restaurants that they believe to be most likely users are a heavy daytime user with hours running from the mid morning to evening and varying hours of closing times perhaps somewhere between 9 to 11 pm. He did not foresee it being a fast food restaurant open 24/7 or open past midnight, but they do not have the user identified. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 27 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes • • Chairman Davis asked if they would be agreeable to hours of operation. Mr. Spanos said that they are already mandating the design, architecture and fagade of the building. The user will have to pay a rent that corresponds with the cost associated with the construction of the building. They are already handicapped in terms of what they will be able to offer a restaurant or retail user, so at this point they would prefer not to further limit any potential user that may entertain leasing in the location. Mr. Papuga asked if the project was predicated on having a drive-thru fast food restaurant. Mr. Spanos responded that based upon their research, market knowledge and correspondence with local brokers and with retail partners they believe the likely user is a fast casual dining option, not what is being perceived as a fast food restaurant option. He was interrupted again by Mr. Papuga. Mr. Spanos said that restaurant real estate and fast casual restaurants, quick serve restaurants, lunch, daytime operating restaurants have evolved over the years. Their architect has done over 800 Panera restaurants all over the country. Ten years ago Panera Bread said that they would not have a drive-thru concept. Today, they do. Like the hotel industry, the restaurant industry and office development and other developments evolve. Retailers evolve arguably quicker than other types of real estate development. He could not project what the restaurant landscape would look like in the future. However, they are trying to align the Hyatt House brand with the restaurant concept that will come into the development. They believe the demand will be driven by the daytime population along Windsor Drive and York Road. Mr. Papuga noted that the 400 foot distance is shown from the building not the properly corner and asked if that was the requirement. Mr. Spanos noted that the 400 foot measurement was from the corner of the retail building and has nothing to do with the property line and was meant as a point of reference not a requirement. They were just looking to provide perspective on what 400 feet looks like, across 6 lanes of traffic, a median, and an easement owned by NICOR that has a considerable berm. Village Attorney Schuster said that there was a right to do cross examination, but should be given on the floor and at the podium. According to the rules there should be a preliminary statement on what would be asked to the applicant at which point they would have an opportunity to answer VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 28 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes Xy- • • uninterrupted. The only other person that can speak is the one doing the cross examination. The one, who is moderating, is the Chair. In order to get to comments in order to make sure there is time for deliberations and all things are flushed out, so the Commission can make its recommendation that it is done in an orderly fashion. It is being recorded and is all part of a record so its important that a microphone is used and done in an orderly fashion and only one person may speak at a time. The Village Board will be reviewing the record when they make the determination. If things are shouted out it would not be in the record. Steve Haszto cross-examined Mr. Spanos. Mr. Haszto asked where he lived. Mr. Spanos responded although he said it was not relevant, Glen Ellyn. Mr. Haszto asked if there was a fast food restaurant. Drive-thru or hotel. Mr. Spanos responded that there was a Pot Belly, although he was not sure of the distance, but has take his kids there on a number of occasions. It's very close and hugely popular within their community. He said that he saw a lot of children and families within the Clearwater development prior to the meeting and there are a number of fast casual dining options that he deemed to be upscale. Mr. Haszto asked when they were looking at homes did they specifically look for a home next to a Pot Belly or for a fast casual drive-thru restaurant. Mr. Spanos responded he did not, but he did realize the distance to the nearest commercial corridor and any high traffic generating road, any highway, any 4 to 6 lane road that would generate traffic like 22nd Street would generate. Mr. Haszto said that he didn't want to move 400 feet from a casual restaurant or hotel. Asked. Chairman Davis noted that he was making argument and not asking questions. His commentary was already heard. Mr. Haszto asked if they would go forward with the project for the hotel if the restaurant was not approved. Mr. Spanos responded that they had articulated to staff, and others in the community, including Mr. Haszto's community association, which was presented to them almost a week prior to this meeting, which date had been picked by the HOA. The short answer at the meeting was given their land costs in the development and the considerable cost to develop the hotel and additional upgrades to the fagade and exterior of the building, II VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 29 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes i from a economic and mixed use standpoint, that the restaurant and retail component is very important for the project. They would not be going through the process if they did not think it was important or needed. The answer would be no. Mr. Haszto asked if they would still build the hotel if the drive-thru were not approved. Mr. Spanos responded that what they are trying to accomplish is to provide a restaurant use that accommodates the marketplace. They think in order to come and lease within this retail building will want and need a drive- thru concept. If they do not they will not provide it. Based on their research they believe the concept would be leasable with a drive-thru and could be leasable without one. From a screening, berming and landscape standpoint and the perspective of the distance from this development, and have headlights facing north they believe they have done everything to accommodate the drive- thru concept. They would go ahead with the project, but could end up with a less successful retail and mixed use project, because they would not be able to lease or possibly build a total development. Problems go beyond whether or not they would build or not,but goes to the economic viability of the project. Mr. Haszto asked about the million dollars in taxes projected for Oak Brook over a 5-year period. Mr. Spanos responded based upon the market and proforma projections the numbers were accurate. They are projections into the future, a recession and other factors cannot be predicted. Mr. Haszto asked about the taxes taken from other hotels. Mr. Spanos responded that they cannot determine the incremental demand, but there are numerous examples in and outside their portfolio, where hotels were built in communities where there was a concern regarding siphoning business from other hotels in the market and it was quite the contrary. A new hotel will create trial and will induce demand from other markets that currently house that guest. A hotel has not been built in Oak Brook since 2003 and the average age of the hotel product in Oak Brook is 40 years old. Hotel product and guests have changed in what they want, require and what they are looking for. They have designed the space to accommodate tomorrow's traveler. They will pull from other surrounding markets, such as Oakbrook Terrace, Downers Grove, Lisle and Naperville, but there will be an increment of new demand generated by this hotel building. Mr. Haszto asked if an economic study had been done. Mr. Brook said that it was done through Peck Consultants. Mr. Haszto asked why it wasn't on the slide and asked for the projections to be VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 30 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes �8• r. shared. Mr. Spanos responded that they were not going to share their business projections with the neighborhood or homeowner association. Mr. Haszto said that they were willing to state that the Village would get a million dollars but not state where it would be siphoned off of other hotels was proprietary. Mr. Spanos responded yes. The future projections are projections. You could not get a million or you could get two million. Chairman Davis asked him to move on. Mr. Haszto said that Janko had reached out to York Woods and met with them. He questioned what efforts were made to reach out to York Woods residents. Mr. Spanos responded that through village staff they obtained contact information for the Association president. They contacted him to set up a meeting for any and all interested homeowner association members. The email and phone calls were sent prior to the December 2, 2015 meeting. The meeting was held at the Oak Brook Bath and Tennis Club for the homeowner association members. Mr. Haszto asked if he had actually seen the emails. Mr. Spanos responded that they went through the homeowner association president to coordinate with the members of his association to invite the homeowners to a presentation on the project. Mr. Haszto asked if had seen the emails. Mr. Spanos responded that he should ask Mike McMann the homeowner association president. He added that he was not privy to his email account. He was not copied on the correspondence to the members. Chairman Davis noted that Mr. Haszto was in attendance at this meeting and had plenty of time to make comments and cross examination. The questions have been asked ad nauseam about the notice and they have been answered. He knew the meeting was held and he is at the meeting today and have heard the testimony. Village Attorney Schuster added that there are strict legal guidelines about the notices that have to be sent. Those notices that are sent are through the newspaper notification as well as certified mail regarding the hearing. There is no obligation in the Village Code or under the Illinois Municipal Code to host outside meetings with homeowner associations and to provide additional notice. Mr. Haszto asked if he read the email. Mr. Spanos responded that he was not copied on the email and added as Mr. Haszto had pointed out that his wife was VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 31 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes OY 'S, in attendance at the homeowner meeting. Chairman Davis opened questions comments to the Commissioners. Member Sheers said that he was not sure what the complainants were really complaining about. They're on the other side of 22nd Street and properties were 400 feet away. Member Doyle asked for an understanding of the berm on the south end of the property along 22nd Street. He asked how high is the berm above the surface of the parking in front of it. Mr. Demchinski responded 2 %2 feet. Member Doyle said that the berm would not shelter lights from an SUV. There have been problems with landscaping, with plants dying and being replaced, especially in the winter. He did not think that a 4 foot berm would guarantee that no lights would be exposed across 22nd Street. Mr. Demchinski added that from the surface of 22nd Street the berm actually extends up 3 feet and back down 2 1/2 feet to the asphalt. They actually provided one continuous row of shrubs that are staggering two rows of shrubs for additional screening. The shrubs will reach a height of 4 to 6 feet on top of a 3-foot berm from 22nd Street. In essence the shrubbery will be between 7 and 9 feet. Member Doyle said that shrubbery is a living thing and sometimes it dies or doesn't do what you think it would do. He thought if the berm were raised slightly that would help. Member Bulin noted that there were a number of mature trees that they were trying to save that did not show up on the landscape plan. The existing vegetation has been tagged and has been maintained fairly well. Mature stock is on the east side of the lot is intended to be kept to help provide screening for the drive-thru. They would like to see as many mature trees as possible saved and care taken to help maintain them during grading. Mr. Demchinski said that they would look at it and try to save as many trees as they can. Chairman Davis asked if the Commission would like to see a condition added to increase the berm, what would be doable along 22nd Street along with a condition regarding maintaining the landscaping. They were areas through the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 32 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes Village that were to be landscaped and have not been properly maintained. Mr. Demchinski responded that they could try to increase the slope of the berm and gain another foot of height in the berm. They would agree to maintain the landscape and replace any landscape that should die. When asked about irrigation he did note that in this area landscaping and sod survives even when not irrigated. In summer months, irrigation may be needed to maintain the green color. They may be hiring a landscape crew to maintain the landscape. Member Iyer questioned the timeframe for determining the restaurant that would occupy the space. Mr. Spanos responded that they will begin to market the restaurant at the beginning of 2016. The feedback that they have gotten from brokers is that the mindset of the retail user is a shorter timeset than hotels. From a development standpoint, the development of the hotel will help to market the restaurant anticipated for the beginning of 2016. Chairman Davis asked if the restaurant would ever be part of the hotel. They responded no. Chairman Davis asked that without disclosing confidential information would they be willing to keep the homeowner association apprised of the developments. Mr. Spanos agreed without disclosing confidential information that would interfere with the negotiations. There were no other comments by the members of the Commission. Chairman Davis noted that the applicant had addressed all required standards in detail on pages C-C.6 of the case file and by their testimony for a recommendation of approval of the proposed planned development. Motion by Member Iyer, seconded by Member Bulin to recommend approval of the proposed planned development for Janko Group, LLC to allow for the a construction of a five-story Hyatt House Hotel and site for a future restaurant with drive-thru as presented, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 33 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes 4• �• • A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, s ize, design and architecture the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; C. Raising the height of the proposed three (3') berm along 22nd Street by approximately one (1)additional foot; D. Maintaining all landscaping along 22nd and the replacement of any landscaping that becomes unhealthy or dies to ensure consistency with approved landscape plans; E. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive F. Without disclosing any confidential information, maintain a dialogue with the Village and the York Woods Homeowner Association with respect to the prospects for the restaurant facility; and 2. Compliance with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: 6 — Members Bulin, Doyle, Iyer, Sheers, Vice Chair Tropinski and Chairman Davis Absent: 1 —Member Cappetta Nays: 0. Motion Carried. 4. OTHER BUSINESS OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. 5. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT Motion by Member Iyer, seconded by Vice Chair Tropinski to adjourn the meeting at 10:44 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried ATTEST: Robert Kallien Jr. Director of Community Development Secretary VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Planned Development Commission Page 34 of 34 December 10, 2015 Minutes �� V. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Planned Development Commission STAFF REPORT DATE: December 4, 2015 CASE FILE NO: 2015-12-ZO-PUP DESCRIPTION: Construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future restaurant facility. PETITIONER: Janko Group, LLC 1161 Lake Cook Road, Suite A Deerfield, IL 60015 PROPERTY OWNER: TMBG, LLC—Windsor 60022 d Street, Suite 215 Oak Brook, IL 60523 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Windsor Drive and 22nd Street ADDRESS: 21022 d Street ACREAGE: Approximately 3.86 acres EXISTING ZONING/USE: ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly District ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly District Office District — Advocate Health Care -office building and surface/structured parking. South: R-3 Single-Family Detach Residence District—York Woods Subdivision —single-family homes. East: ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly District—office building. West: ORA-1 Office-Research-Assembly District — Lions Club International — office building. DISCUSSION: Janko Group, LLC (as contract purchaser) has submitted an application seeking approval of a planned development in order to construct a new five-story Hyatt House Hotel and create a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant that could include a drive-thru facility. The existing one-story, 40,000+ square foot office building on the site would be demolished. The applicant's provided a presentation on the proposed project before the President and Board of Trustees on September 8, 2015 and the request was well received, /7, f j STAFF REPORT—PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANKO GROUP—HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT CASE No.2015-12-ZO-PD pending a thorough review and recommendation before the Planned Development Commission. Specifically,this planned development will include the following elements: 1. Construct a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; 2. Create a site for a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru facility; and 3. Eliminate the existing southern most access onto Windsor Drive. Vehicular access to the property will be by two separate full accesses; one on Windsor Drive (east) and the other on Bliss Drive (north). Internal circulation around both the hotel and restaurant would be provided through a reconfiguration of the surface parking area. Waivers and Variations: A requirement of the Planned Development process is for the applicant to provide a list of waivers and variations that are needed in order to obtain approval and to construct the desired project. The following summarizes each of the waivers and variations being requested. • Section 13-3-15E: waiver to permit the proposed canopy for the Hyatt House Hotel to exceed the maximum height of 18 feet by approximately four (4) feet. • Section 13-10A-3.A: waiver to permit an increase in the maximum FAR from 0.48 to approximately 0.52 to accommodate the proposed uses on the property. • Section 13-10A-3.0-1: waiver to permit a reduction in the required front yard of 100 feet to approximately 90 feet along Windsor Drive (Hyatt) and approximately 55 feet along 22nd Street(future restaurant). • Section 13-12-3H-2: waiver to permit more than 10 percent (maximum of six) in a required yard and to be located less than the required 25 feet from a street line. • Section 13-10A-2: waiver to permit a hotel and stand-alone restaurant as permitted uses in the proposed planned development. • Section 13-10A-2: waiver to permit a drive-thru for the proposed restaurant in the proposed planned development. The Rush project contains a number of exhibits as required by the Village's Planned Development Regulations including: 1. Contextual site plan map 2. Site plan 2 A. STAFF REPORT—PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANKO GROUP—HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT CASE No.2015-12-ZO-PD 3. Site plan—sign locations 4. Monument signage 5. Building signage 6. Ground floor plan 7. Typical floor plan 8. Hotel elevations (north and south) 9. Hotel elevations (east and west) 10. North Elevation Perspective (enlarged)—Medical Office Building 11. South Elevation Perspective(enlarged)—Medical Office Building 12. Alta site survey 13. Site engineering plans a. Demolition plan b. Site plan c. Grading plan d. Utility plan e. Fire truck circulation plan f. Landscape plan g. Photometric plan 14. Traffic and Trip Generation Report(Kimley-Horn) 15. Comments on Village of Oak Brook (Thomas Engineering) Traffic Study for Windsor/22nd Street intersection(Kimley-Horn). Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for the requested approval of the proposed Janko Planned Development project. STAFF COMMENTS: As part of the staff review, the following questions and comments should be considered as part of your review and deliberations on this request. 1. Planned Development Project. The proposed Janko project will result in the construction of a high quality Hyatt House Hotel and create a future site/opportunity for a stand-alone restaurant facility on the property. Due to the size and configuration of the site and proposed uses, a number of waivers are being requested. Instead of processing this case with multiple requests 3 /7 � y STAFF REPORT—PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANKO GROUP—HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT CASE No.2015-12-ZO-PD for variations and text amendments, the planned development submittal can incorporate all of those issues into a single request that can be reviewed and evaluated as a unified development project. 2. Consistency with the Planned Development Regulations. The applicant has addressed each of the application requirements for a planned development in the case file. A summary of those requirements are as follows: a. Contact information—provided. b. Owner authorization—provided. C. Survey w/legal description—provided. d. Statement of compliance—provided. e. Scaled site plan—provided. f. Schematic drawings of improvements—provided. g. Landscape plan—provided. h. Existing covenants/easements—working with engineering. i. Development schedule—provided. j. Professional traffic report—provided. k. Professional EIS (Environmental Impact Study) — Not required per staff review. 1. Economic analysis—provided. m. Copies of EIS—not required. n. Demands on Village services — Village Departments (i.e., Fire, Police, Public Works and Community Development) have reviewed the request and have determined that existing facilities can handle anticipated demands on Village services. o. Utility improvements—provided. p. Drainage/stormwater—provided. q. Photometrics—provided. r. Surrounding Property Notification — the applicant did provide notification to all surrounding property owners and requested comments. S. Building/Property safety—security details are provided. 4 �7 � t STAFF REPORT—PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANKO GROUP—HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT CASE N0.2015-12-ZO-PD 3. Planned Development Standards. The applicant has addressed and responded in detail to the Planned Development Standards as required in Section 13-15-3 of the Regulations. 4. Consistency with Commercial Revitalization Planning Program. The proposed Janko planned development is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village's Commercial Revitalization Plan to "grow and revitalize" the Village's commercial corridor with high quality uses and to generate additional revenues for the Village. The proposed Hyatt House Hotel and future restaurant will be consistent to compliment the other recent redevelopment projects (i.e., HUB Group and Duchossois HQ) in the York Road area and could spur additional redevelopment projects. 5. Waivers and Variations. The applicant is seeking several waivers and variations from the Zoning Ordinance in order to obtain approval and construct the proposed hotel and restaurant facility. 6. Public, Health Safety and Welfare. There is no evidence presented in the application that the project would have a negative effect on the public health safety or welfare to the community, the surrounding property owners, or future patrons using the Rush facility. 7. Village of Oak Brook — Engineering/Public Works. Initial comments have been provided to the applicant. Department will be represented at the PD Commission Meeting. 8. Village of Oak Brook - Fire Dept. Initial comments have been provided to the applicant. Department will be represented at the PD Commission Meeting. 9. Village of Oak Brook — Police Department. Initial comments have been provided to the applicant. Department will be represented at the PD Commission Meeting. 10. Traffic and Access Considerations — There is no evidence provided that the proposed hotel and restaurant will be detrimental to the current roadway configuration on Windsor Drive. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODY: As part of the Planned Development Regulations, the Planned Development Commission shall review the application, the standards and requirements, the report of the community development director, and any oral and written comments and testimony received by the Planned Development Commission before and at the public hearing. The Planned Development Commission shall recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the proposed planned development. Every recommendation of the Commission upon any application filed pursuant to the Planned Development Regulations shall include such findings of fact and 5 /7d ,r STAFF REPORT-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANKO GROUP-HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RESTAURANT CASE No.2015-12-ZO-PD conclusions as the Commission shall deem necessary. The resolutions shall generally refer to the evidence in the record and to the exhibits, plans, or specifications upon which the recommendation is based. The resolution shall generally specify the reason or reasons for the recommendation and shall contain a conclusion or statement separate from the findings setting forth the recommendation of the commission. Every resolution shall expressly set forth any limitations or conditions recommended by the commission. In order to make a recommendation to approve (with or without conditions) or a recommendation to deny a proposed planned development or an amendment to an existing planned development, the affirmative vote of a majority of all members of the commission then holding office shall be required. Please include in your consideration, findings with respect to the standards specified in the Planned Development Regulations for approval of the planned development. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by the Applicant and Staff, if it is the opinion of the Planned Development Commission that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for a Planned Development, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request subject to the following conditions: 1. Development is to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans including all requested waivers from the Village Code for the Janko project including: A. Construction of a five-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel; B. Construction of a future 4,500 square foot restaurant with a drive-thru that is consistent with the architecture and design of the adjacent hotel. If the restaurant and proposed drive-thru do not meet the criteria with respect to location, size, design and architecture, the restaurant project will require an amendment to the approved planned development; and C. Elimination of the southernmost access point on Windsor Drive. 2. Other conditions relevant to the request. 3. Comply with all other Village Ordinance requirements at time of building permit application except as specifically varied or waived. Respectfully Submitted, Robert L. ,AICP Director of Community Development 6 Deficiencies/Questions/Comments 1. Need to seek a waiver to permit both a Hotel and future stand-alone restaurant in the ORA1 District as a permitted use. At the present time a Hotel requires the approval of a special use and restaurants are specifically not mentioned. 2. Need to seek a waiver to permit a drive-thru for the future restaurant. At the present time, drive—thru facilities are only allowed in the ORA1 District as a special use for banks. 3. In their requested waiver to 13-12-3-H-2,they make mention of berming and landscape screening 3-feet in height along 22nd Street. Code requires a minimum of 4-feet. I would think that need to provide that along Windsor also. 5-feet screening would be required along Bliss. 4. Wall signs must conform to the Sign Regulations(no raceways). 5. Monument sign at entrance needs to be landscaped in accordance to code(3-ft. perimeter). Monument sign detail is needed to state the type of letters(i.e., individually affixed, routed letters, etc.). The Village does not permit box signs. 6. 1 would recommend that you weigh in on the issue of the Windsor Drive traffic and how this projects traffic compares to the traffic generated by the existing office use.What are the peak traffic times for your two principal uses? 7. Do you have any comments from your neighbors? If yes bring that to the attention of the Commission at the hearing. 8. For your restaurant building,the sign ordinance limits each building to a maximum of two wall signs(one per frontage). If you will want more,you need to call that out as a separate waiver. 9. If you plan to sell liquor in the hotel and restaurant, I would suggest that you mention that and that issue will be addressed separately as formal request for a liquor license for the property. off. Kimley*Horn November 16, 2015 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523 Attention: Mr. Robert Kallien,AICP Director of Community Relations Re: Hyatt House Planed Development Application 210 22nd Street Oak Brook,IL Dear Mr. Kallien, We are in response of your review comments dated November 13th,2015,for the proposed Hyatt House Planned Development application located at the northeast corner of 22nd Street and Windsor Drive. Below is a summary of the actions taken in response to these comments: Deficencies/Questions/Comments: 1. Need to seek a waiver to permit both a Hotel and future stand-alone restaurant in the ORA1 District as a permitted use. At the present time a Hotel requires the approval of a special use and restaurants are specifically not mentioned. Response: The application and waiver descriptions have been updated to include a waiver for the subject property's principal uses. $500 will be added to the application fee to cover this waiver. 2. Need to seek a waiver to permit a drive-thru for the future restaurant. At the present time, drive-thru facilities are only allowed in the ORA1 District as a special use for banks. Response: The application and waiver descriptions have been updated to include a waiver for the subject property's proposed drive-thru use. $500 will be added to the application fee to cover this waiver. 3. In their requested waiver to 13-12-3-H-2,they make mention of berming and landscape screening 3-feet in height along 22 1d Street. Code requires a minimum of 4-feet. I would think that need to provide that along Windsor also. 5-feet screening would be required along Bliss. Response: The narrative referenced above was indicating the height of the berm. The full height of screening along 22nd Street will exceed 4-ft based on the Landscape Plan's addition of a hedge row along the 3-ft berm. We understand the landscape code requirements with respect to screening and do not propose any variations from those screening requirements. The plans propose a combination of berming and landscaping along Windsor and Bliss to meet the code requirements. 4. Wall signs must conform to Sign Regulations(no raceways). Response:Noted. No raceways are proposed in the sign package. 5. Monument sign at entrance needs to be landscaped in accordance to code(3-ft. perimeter). Monument sign detail is needed to state the type of letters(i.e., individually affixed, routed letters,etc.). The Village does not permit box signs. 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350, Lisle IL 60532 _ Kimley))) Horn Page of Michigan, Inc. Response:Noted. An updated sign package will be provided. The package will remove landscape materials. These materials are indicated on our Landscape Plan and propose to meet the ordinance requirements. Additionally, labelling will be added to the elevations to note materials and letter type. No box signs are proposed. 6. 1 would recommend that you weigh in on the issue of the Windsor Drive traffic and how this projects traffic compares to the traffic generated by existing office use. What are the peak traffic times for your two principal uses? Response:A trip generation memorandum has been provided with the planned development application. In this memo, a comparison of trip generation between the two uses is described in detail. In summary, while total trips slightly increase or remain about the same during different peak hours, the proposed use results in different traffic patterns at those peak hours resulting in either stagnant or decreased peak hour movements at the intersection of 22nd Street and Windsor Drive. 7. Do you have any comments from your neighbors? If yes, bring that to the attention of the Commission at the hearing. Response: Yes, held a meeting on November 11, 2015 and have received comments from the(2)HOA's north of the proposed development. We are participating in a second meeting with the 3'd HOA on December 3'd and will be prepared to discuss the feedback from residents at the Commission hearing. 8. For your restaurant building,the sign ordinance limits each building to a maximum of two wall signs(one per frontage). If you will want more,you need to call that out as a separate waiver. Response:No sign waiver is being sought at this time. At the time a speck user is identified, an evaluation of the sign package will be performed and any necessary waiver requests will be brought to the attention of the Village. 9. If you plan to sell liquor in the hotel and restaurant, I would suggest that you mention that and that issue will be addressed separately as formal request for a liquor license for the property. Response: The proposed uses will plan to sell liquor. This will be noted in our presentation to the Commission and addressed further addressed separately with a formal request for a liquor license. We trust these responses and the description of changes above adequately address your comments. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 630-487-5569. Sincerely, 1��- '00-.1046 Drew Walker, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone:630-487-5569 Email.drew.walker@kimley-horn.com kirnley-horn.corn 111 West Jackson Boulevard,Suite 700,Chicago, IL 60604 WAIVERS and VARIATIONS Zoning Ordinance Section Brief description of each waiver or variation sought Fee Each 13-3-15-E The Ordinance would permit a canopy with a maximum height greater than eighteen feet(18'). $500 13-10A-3-A The Ordinance would allow a Floor Area Ratio consistent with the B4 Hotels-Office District Floor Area $500 Ratio set forth in 13-7D-3-A. 13-10A-3-C-1 The Ordinance would allow a for a front yard setback to be less than one hundred feet(1001 in depth $500 13-12-3-H-2 The Ordinance would permit more than ten percent(10%)of the required off-street parking spaces to $500 be located in the front yard or along the side of the building and less than twenty five feet(25')from a street line. 13-10A-2 Hotels is listed as a Special use within the ORA-1 Zoning District and Restaurant is not specifically $500 listed as an allowable use. We will need a waiver granting the Hotel and Restaurant use within the ORA-1 Zoning District. 13-10A-2 Drive-thrus are only listed as an allowable accessory uses for banks within the ORA-1 zoning district $500 We will re uire a waiver to allow a drive-thru for the proposed restaurant component of the grgiect, TOTAL: $3,000 (To continue copy or retype form and Attach additional sheets if necessary) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 7-2014/ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - SITE DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCES: Section: 13-15-4 WAIVERS and VARIATIONS Proposed site development characteristics that are not consistent with the Zoning Regulations otherwise applicable to the property on which a Planned Development or Planned Development amendment is proposed, may be approved in accordance with this Chapter as part of the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. The applicant shall specifically identify each site development departure and demonstrate how each departure will be compatible with surrounding development and is not inconsistent with the Planned Development standards set forth in Section 13-15-3 of this Chapter. Each departure shall be specifically stated and approved in the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. Any approved departures from the otherwise applicable Zoning Regulations shall not be deemed a nonconformity and shall not require a variation. Identify each waiver below and if applicable refer to the page(s) of the site development plan that the departure can be found. Code S 13-3-15-E ectlon Relief Sought Allow the canopy for the new Hyatt House hotel to exceed the maximum height of eighteen feet(18'). RESPONSE: The canopy designed is consistent with the Hyatt House brand and upscale architecture We are seeking a variance to allow the use of the Porte Cochere as currently designed on the Hyatt House elevations This is consistent with the high-end architecture and standards of the Oak Brook Village redevelopment plan The canopy height has specifically been designed to allow for appropriate emergency vehicular access Common amongst any Hotel use the canopy extends over the drive aisle adjacent to the front entry. It is imperative for public safety that emergency vehicles are able to pass beneath the proposed canopy. Code Section 13-10A-3-A Relief Sought The Ordinance would allow a Floor Area Ratio consistent with the B4 Hotels-Office District Floor Area Ratio set forth in 13-7D-3-A. RESPONSE: The concept proposed by this Planned Development slightly exceeds the 0.48 FAR coming in at 0.52. As demonstrated in the economic analysis, the 5-story 144 room hotel is necessary to serve the surrounding community. The amenities offered within the hotel are critical to the brand of Hyatt House and further drive the FAR of the project In addition to the hotel, the restaurant component brings an added amenity to both patrons of the hotel and the surrounding community. (To continue, Copy or retype form and attach additional sheets if necessary) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 7-2014 43. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - SITE DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCES: Section: 13-15-4 WAIVERS and VARIATIONS Proposed site development characteristics that are not consistent with the Zoning Regulations otherwise applicable to the property on which a Planned Development or Planned Development amendment is proposed, may be approved in accordance with this Chapter as part of the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. The applicant shall specifically identify each site development departure and demonstrate how each departure will be compatible with surrounding development and is not inconsistent with the Planned Development standards set forth in Section 13-15-3 of this Chapter. Each departure shall be specifically stated and approved in the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. Any approved departures from the otherwise applicable Zoning Regulations shall not be deemed a nonconformity and shall not require a variation. Identify each waiver below and if applicable refer to the page(s) of the site development plan that the departure can be found. Code Section 13-10A-3-C-1 Relief Sought The Ordinance would allow a for a front yard setback to be less than one hundred feet(1001 in depth. RESPONSE: The safe and effective circulation of the site is based on the relationship between the Hyatt House and the proposed retail space. The site plan provided demonstrates safe and effective use of the site area by separating drive-thru traffic from Hotel quest traffic. The result is a retail use that is pushed closer to 22nd Street and into the required 100-ft setback. Additionally, based on the 5-Story height of the Hotel it will be impossible to ensure the economic viability of a retail user at the rear of the Hotel as it would be entirely screened from view from the major thoroughfare in the area. For these uses to function symbiotically, the retail space needs to be in front of the Hotel along 22"d Street. Code Section 13-12-3-H-2 Relief Sought The Ordinance would permit more than ten percent (10%) of the required off-street parking spaces to be located in the front yard or along the side of the building and less than twenty five feet(25)from a street line RESPONSE: The 3-ft berminq plus additional landscape screening provided along 22nd Street (our front yard) is designed to meet the intent of the ordinance. A variance to the above referenced code section offsets the need for a variance from the required parking per Ordinance. If we lose additional spaces along the front yard we will no longer be meeting the parking requirements for the project. The additional screening and berminq is a fair compromise to ensure that proper parking is provided to serve the needs of the proiect. (To continue,Copy or retype form and attach additional sheets if necessary) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 7-2014 /3a. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - SITE DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCES: Section: 13-15-4 WAIVERS and VARIATIONS Proposed site development characteristics that are not consistent with the Zoning Regulations otherwise applicable to the property on which a Planned Development or Planned Development amendment is proposed, may be approved in accordance with this Chapter as part of the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. The applicant shall specifically identify each site development departure and demonstrate how each departure will be compatible with surrounding development and is not inconsistent with the Planned Development standards set forth in Section 13-15-3 of this Chapter. Each departure shall be specifically stated and approved in the ordinance approving the Planned Development or Planned Development amendment. Any approved departures from the otherwise applicable Zoning Regulations shall not be deemed a nonconformity and shall not require a variation. Identify each waiver below and if applicable refer to the page(s) of the site development plan that the departure can be found. Code Section 13-10A-2 Relief Sought The Ordinance would allow a Hotel and Restaurant use with the ORA-1 district. RESPONSE: A hotel is a special use within the ORA-1 district. The petitioner is requesting approval of this special use within the district The planned development application outlines clearly how the petitioner proposes to develop the hotel site within the confines of the ordinance and to create an economically viable project that serves the surrounding office community. The restaurant use is not listed as an allowable use within ORA-1. The petitioner is seeking a variance to allow this use to compliment the proposed Hotel development on the property and to use the available site space to its highest and best use. ` Code Section 13-10A-2 Relief Sought The Ordinance would allow a drive-thru accessory use for the Restaurant within the ORA-1 district. RESPONSE: In order to create a complimentary use with a restaurant serving the surrounding office development and hotel, the petitioner is seeking authorization for a drive-thru component to the restaurant. This component is in keeping With today's fast-casual restaurant trends. The petitioner has shown in the PD application documents that high-end architecture matching the Hotel use will be utilized. Additionally, queuing for the drive-thru has strategically been placed on the east side of the building where existing mature trees as well as additional landscaping and berming along 22nd Street and the east property line can be utilized to screen cars from view. (To continue, Copy or retype form and attach additional sheets if necessary) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 7.2014 p LICE �BRO MEMORANDUM IL TO: Robert Kallien, Director of Community Development FROM: James R. Kruger Jr., Chief of Police/.;1 ---}~ DATE: November 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Proposed Hyatt House Hotel I have reviewed the Hyatt House Hotel preliminary plans and have very limited comments. I find the proposed development to be generally acceptable and suggest the following limited comments: • Insure there is adequate video surveillance to include the indoor pool and fitness areas. • If there are any liquor services available to the public, insure it is monitored by video surveillance. • Provide emergency callout stations in stairwells should the area not be able to be reached by cell carriers due to construction materials. • Label and number any outside doors for easy identification in the event of a police tactical event. • Provide law enforcement with the availability to gain remote access to video monitoring in the event of an emergency. Gail Polanek • • From: Barry Liss Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:08 PM To: Gail Polanek Cc: Fire_Prevention Subject: Hyatt House Review Fire has done a careful review of the planned Hyatt House development and have the following comments. C3.0 We have highlighted our concern to ensure that the water distribution system for fire protection eliminates any dead end private or public hydrants. The proposed plan does not necessarily need a complete water supply loop around the property, but can follow our suggested highlighted route. C4.0 In review of the traffic pattern for access and egress of fire department apparatus,we are not in favor of the proposed routes. On paper, it would appear navigating around the property to get access to the front lobby will be extremely difficult and challenging depending on traffic, parking conditions,weather conditions and occupancy loads. Response times are critical,as it also would appear that fire department units would have to circumvent around most of the property to get to the lobby of the hotel and the proposed restaurant. There needs to be discussions for alternative solutions. Thank You Barry Liss Barry Liss Fire Chief Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Rd Phone: 630-368-5204 Fax: 630-368-5205 Email: bliss@)oak-brook.org Web: www.oak-brook.org Follow us: This electronic message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual(s)or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that Is proprietary,confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including protected health information (PHI).If you are not the Intended recipient or the employee or agent,you are hereby notified that any viewing,copying,disclosure or distribution of the Information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction and is strictly prohibited. If you have recelved this communication in error, please notify the sender by return electronic message or telephone,and destroy the original message without making any copies. Unless otherwise stated,any opinions expressed In this electronic message are those of the author and are not endorsed by the Village. Electronic messages sent to and from the Village of Oak Brook may be subject to discovery under the IL Freedom of Information Act. Think Green!Please consider our environment before printing this electronic message. i I 1 III Gail Polanek • • Subject: Hyatt House Oak Brook PD Application -Water and Fire Truck Access comments Attachments: image001 Jpg; image002.png; image003.png -----Original Message----- From: Doug Patchin Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:34 AM To: Gail Polanek Subject: RE: Hyatt House Oak Brook PD Application - Water and Fire Truck Access comments Hi Gail, greetings from Arkansas! I just spoke with Drew about the water connections for the Hyatt House property, they will not have the engineering plans changed before the Dec. 10, Plan Commission meeting. Drew does understand our concerns of having only one connection for their water system loop. I also mentioned that we would want the existing service valve to the property removed and replaced with a piece of water main and solid sleeves, Drew also stated that they would show this and the discussed loop, with the two water main connections on future plans. Have a Happy Thanksgiving! Doug From: Gail Polanek Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 7:21 PM To: Gregory Spanos; Drew.Walker(@kimley-horn.com Cc: Robert Kallien; peter.dubingnorr.com; idickinsonpiankogroup.us; Barry Liss; Doug Patchin Subject: Hyatt House Oak Brook PD Application - Water and Fire Truck Access comments Greg and Drew, I had mentioned that I was waiting on the Fire Chief to weigh in on the looped water system and fire hydrants for the proposed Hyatt site. Chief met with the Interim Public Works Director and Water Production Manager and they agree on the revisions noted on the attached - Sheet C3.0 of the plans. Chief Bliss also reviewed and commented on Sheet C4.0 - Fire Truck access there are issues as well. See attached marked up plan and his review is in the attached email. Chief Barry Liss and Doug Patchin, Public Works Director are also copied on this email. Please review and comment. I am out of the office tomorrow, and will only be in on Monday next week. I will periodically check and respond to emails while I am out. Thanks, Gail Gail Polanek Planning Technician Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Rd. Oak Brook, IL 60523 Phone: 630.368.5106 Fax: 630.368.5107 1 In G�0 F 04 • ���P X90 • O y G r O VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: November 23, 2015 TO: Bob Kallien, Director of Community Development FROM: Jim Bosma, Project Engineer Phil Laures, Regulatory Engineer SUBJECT: Hyatt House and Restaurant—210 22nd Street—Planned Development Review We are in receipt of your November 16, 2015 memo regarding the proposed planned development at 21022 nd Street. We offer the following comments at this time: All plans will be required to comply with the Title 9 storm water ordinance prior to permit issuance, and those related items resolved during the permit review process. Preliminary technical stormwater comments have been forwarded to the design engineer. Hyatt House-ENG NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Chat public hearing before • • the Planned Development Commission of the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois,will be - held on Thursday,December 10,2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center,Village of Oak Brook,1200 Oak Brook Road,oak CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION Brook,Illinois 60523 for the purpose of considering the ap- plication from Janko Group LLC,1161 Lake Cook Road, Suite A, Deerfield, IL 60015, contract purchaser ("Peti- tioner"), on behalf of the property owner TMBG, LLC- Paddock Publications,Inc. Windsor,600 22nd Street,Suite 215,Oak Brook,I L 60523 is seeking a planned development provided for under D&HeWd Chapter 15 of Title 13,the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Oak Brook,Illinois,Ordinance G-6-6 0 as amended. The Petitioner has submitted an application,case number 2015-12-ZO-PUD,seeking approval of a planned develop- ment at 210 22nd Street,Oak Brook, I Ilinois as described below. Pro iect Description: Petitioner has applied to the Village Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of for a Planned Development approval for a 5-story, 144 room Hyatt House Hotel.They are also proposing to acon- the State of Illinois DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher con- struct an approximately 4,500 square foot fast-casual Pro- posed to t with drive-thru the on the site.The petitioner has pro- posed to incorporate the same architectural elements and of the DAILY HERALD. That said DAILY HERALD is a secular materials as part of the planned development to create a high-end complimentary look for thetwo uses.Theexisting newspaper and has been circulated daily in the Village(s)of office building will be demolished. In accordance with the zoning regulations,as part of the Addison,Algonquin,Antioch,Arlington Heights,Aurora,Barrin tgton, Planned development,the Petitioner has requested modifi- cations and departures from the standard zoning provi- sions Barrington Hills,Bartlett,Batavia,Bensenville,Bloomingdale, . All persons desiring to be heard will be afforded an oppor- tunity to do soand may submit their statements orally or in Buffalo Grove,Burlington,Campton Hills,Carol Stream, writing or both.The hearing may be recessed to another date te if notice of time and place thereof is publicly an- Carpentersville,CM,Deer Park,Des Plaines,East Dundee,Elburn, da nounced at the hearing or is given by newspaper publica- tion not less than five(5)days prior to the date of the re- Elain,Elk Grove Village,Elmhurst,Fox Lake,Fox River Grove,Geneva, cessed hearing. The subject property is located at 210 22nd Street in Oak Brook,Illinois and the legal description is as follows: Gilberts,Glen Ellyn,Glendale Heights,Grayslake,Green Oaks, l LOT 1 OF AMERICAN CAN COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT OF PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION Gurnee,Hainesville,Hampshire,Hanover Park,Hawthorn Woods, 24,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,RECORDED AS DOCU- Hoffman Estates,Huntley,Inverness,Island Lake,Itasca, MENT 905851, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DE- SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGINNING AT THE NORTH- Keeneyyllle,Kildeer,Lake Barrington,Lake Villa,Lake in the Hills, WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG Lake Zurich,Libertyville,Lincolnshire,Lindenhurst,Lisle, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID UT1S 51 S EET;THENCE SOUTH 3..9 FEET TO DEGREES ONT ONNTHE WESTELINEDOF SAID Lombard,Long Grove,Medinah,Mt.Prospect,Mundelein,Na Jperville, LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST,ALONGTHE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT North Aurora,North Barrington,Oakbrook,Oakbrook Terrace, 1,38.0 FEET TOTHE POINT OF BEGINNING;ALSO EX- CEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOL- Palatine,Prospect Heights,Rolling Meadows,Roselle, Schaumburg, g BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID Sleepy Hollow, South Barrington, South Elgin, St.Charles, LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 74 MINUTES 24 P g g 1,158.05 FEET; THLEONCE SOUTH 9 D DEGREES 23 MIN- Streamwood,Tower Lakes,Vernon Hills,Villa Park,Volo,Warrenville, 39TDEGREES 422 MINUTESPSECONDS EAST,34.26 Wauconda,Wayne,West Chicago,West Dundee,Wheaton, Wheeling, FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ON DS WEST NORTH 89HE DEGREES 44 MI NU SA 1 LOT 1, Wildwood,Winfield,Wood Dale,Round Lake Park,Pingree Grove 35.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALSO EX- CEPT THEREOF THAT PORTION FALLING WITHIN )of Cook DuPa e,Kane,Lake,McHenry g 22ND STREET,IN DU PAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS.PIN: 06.24-404-012. and State of Illinois,continuously for more than one year prior to the The Petitioner's application,including all supporting docu- ments,will be on file with the Director of Community De- date of the first publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of velopment.Persons wishing to examine the petition docu- ments may arrange to do so with the Community general circulation throughout said Village(s),County les and State. Development Department,ViI loge of Oak Brook,1200 Oak g `1( ) Brook Road,Oak Brook,I L 60523,telephone 630-368-5103. In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabil- ities Act,any individual who is in need of a reasonable ac- commodation in order to participate in or benefit from at- I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in tendance at this public meeting should contact the Village's ADA Coordinator,at 630-368-5022 as soon as pos- "an Act to revise the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 sible before the meeting date. Charlotte r ss Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 7150,Act 5, Section 1 and 5.That a theblPlanned the direction fCommissiontofA he Village of notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy,was published Published In Daily Herald NovCounties,,Illinois.425467) November 19,2015 in said DAILY HERALD. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned,the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS,Inc.,has caused this certificate to be signed by,this authorized agent,at Arlington Heights,Illinois. PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS BY " Authorized Agent Control#4425467 �o JOW01GROUP November 24, 2015 Attention: Property Owner/Taxpayer of Record: Re: Hyatt House Planned Development Submittal 210 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL Dear Property Owner, The Village of Oak Brook Planned Development Commission will be considering the proposed planned development described in the enclosed Legal Notice (the "Village Legal Notice"). HEARING: Thursday, December 10th, 2015, 7:00 PM Samuael E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60528 APPLICANT: Janko Group, LLC 1161 Lake Cook Road, Suite A Deerfield, IL 60015 Relationship of Applicant to Subject Property: Contract purchaser SOURCE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT SUBJECT APPLICATION: Village of Oak Brook Community Development Department, (630) 368-5103, between 8-4, Monday through Friday, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 Janko Group LLC, Gregory Spanos, CCIM, (847) 940-0732, gspanos(aD-iankogroup.us, 1161 Lake Cook Road, Suite A, Deerfield, IL 60015 (contract purchaser) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Drew Walker, PE, (630) 487-5550, drew.wal ker(CD-kim ley- horn.com, 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 315, Lisle, IL 60532 (Civil Engineer representing Janko Group, LLC) Janko Group LLC 1 1161 Lake Cook Rd.Ste A I Deerfield, IL 60615 1 p:847.940.8880 I f:847.940.9801 JIWOIGROUP LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 4 I Please refer to legal description in the Village Legal Notice for Subject Property boundaries. The image above is provided for reference purposes only to assist you in determining the proximity of your property to the subject property (shaded in red). Thanks very much for your attention. Very truly yours, Gregory Spanos Janko Group, LLC Phone: (847) 940-0732 Email: gsPanos(cD-iankogrouP.us Janko Group LLC 1 1161 Lake Cook Rd.Ste A 1 Deerfield, IL 60615 1 p:847.940.8880 1 f:847.940.9801 Of 0,4,.e MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 8,2015 REGULAR MEETING OF .� 90 THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK APPROVED AS WRITTEN ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 O H' G ; C�OOUNJI, 1. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Village Board of Trustees was called to order by President Gopal Lalmalani in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:03 pm. The Pledge of Allegiance was given. 2. ROLL CALL Village Clerk Charlotte Pruss called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: President Gopal Lalmalani, Trustees Donald Adler, John Baar, Michael Manzo, Mark Moy,Edward Tiesenga, and Asif Yusuf ABSENT: None IN ATTENDANCE: Village Manager Rick Ginex; Village Attorney Peter Friedman; Assistant Village Manager/Finance Director Sharon Dangles; Community Development Director Bob Kallien; Information Technology Director Jim Fox; Police Chief Jim Kruger 3. PRESIDENT'S OPENING COMMENTS President Lalmalani asked for a moment of silence for Oak Brook resident and former Plan Commission member, Don Haglund,who passed away on August 21, 2015. Trustee Yusuf remarked about Mr. Haglund. President Lalmalani reported that the Oak Brook Half Marathon was once again a success with approximately 850 people participating. He invited everyone to the annual September 11th Patriot Day Memorial Ceremony this Friday at 11:00am at Village Hall. President Lalmalani congratulated Trustee Yusuf on being re-elected to represent DuPage County District 2 on the Stormwater Committee. President Lalmalani mentioned that Trustee Yusuf also represents the Village of Oak Brook on the Central Tri-State I-294 Tollway Corridor Planning Council. Trustee Yusuf explained the purpose of the Council. A. Janko Development Group Presentation - 210 22nd Street (22nd Street and Windsor Drive) -Preliminary Board Review-Planned Development Community Development Director Kallien explained the purpose for this presentation. Greg Spanos, from the Janko Development Group, provided a presentation regarding the planned development of a Hyatt House & Restaurant and the project's architect explained the hotel project in more detail. Questions and concerns were addressed by Mr. Spanos and Community Development Director Kallien. 4. RESIDENT/VISITOR COMMENTS—None presented. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK MINUTES Page 1 of 9 REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8,2015 vG� Of OqO 0 Gca FCOUNTII,� AGENDA ITEM Board of Trustees Meeting of September 8, 2015 SUBJECT: 210 22°a Street Development Project—Planned Development Process—Preliminary Board Review FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director RECOMMENDED MOTION: Provide comments to the applicant. Background—Planned Development Process: The first step in the planned development process is for the applicant to appear before the Village Board for a preliminary review, with the purpose to acquaint the Board with the applicant's proposal and to provide the applicant with a preliminary review and to address any concerns. Project Overview: Over the past several months, Village Staff has been in discussion with representatives from Janko Group, LLC about the possible construction of a Hotel and an outlot building with a retail/restaurant user on the property located at 210 22nd Street. The property borders 22nd Street —Windsor and Bliss Drives. Very recently, it was disclosed that it would be a 5-story Hyatt House Hotel and they are in the process of identifying a preferred outlot user for the site. Accordingly, representatives of the project team will be present at the September 8, 2015 meeting to make a formal presentation. Recommendation: Provide comments to the applicant. JAI-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-210 22nd Windsor and 22nd Janko Village Board Review-Discussion-Initiate PD Process-September 2015.doc �1 menmg t-oamers,mc. nup:ii www.sieriingcoaiiiers.com/coae000K/pnnmpw.pnp 13-3-15: PERMANENT ENTRYWAY CANOPIES: Permanent entryway canopies to provide weather protection for persons being dropped off or picked up may be erected in required front and corner lot side yards for churches and hotel, restaurant and office use buildings permitted by this title, subject to the following conditions: A. The required yard must be one hundred feet (100') or more in depth; B. The area of the encroachment is limited to a maximum of six hundred (600) square feet; C. The maximum depth of the encroachment into the required yard is thirty feet (30'); D. The minimum clearance for a canopy above a driveway or parking area shall be not less than fourteen and one-half feet (14.5'); and E. The maximum height of the canopy is eighteen feet (18'). (Ord. G-678, 6-26-2001) Iof1 Sterling Codifiers,Inc. nttp:ii www.sterimgcoaliiers.com/coueDooK/prmu►uw.pnp 13-10A-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.48., I B. Structure Height: Not more than five (5) stories or seventy six feet (76'), whichever is less. C. Yards: 1. Front: Not less than one hundred feet (100') in depth, except when adjacent to a residence district boundary line not less than one hundred fifty feet (150') in depth; 2. Side: Not less than thirty feet (30') in depth, except: a) that portion of a side yard when abutting a residence district shall not be less than one hundred fifty feet (150') in depth; b) a side yard abutting a street shall conform in depth to the front yard depth of a contiguous lot abutting on such street; and c) side yards abutting 22nd Street and York Road shall have a depth of not less than one hundred feet (100'); 3. Rear: Not less than forty feet (40') in depth, except that portion of a rear yard abutting a residence district shall be not less than one hundred fifty feet (150') in depth, and except that a rear yard abutting an alley or service drive may be reduced by twenty feet (20') in depth; 4. Conservation/Recreation Districts: Notwithstanding anything contained in this title to the contrary, including, without limitation, section 13-3-13 of this title, any yard which is one hundred feet (100') in depth and which is adjacent in its entirety to a conservation/recreation district boundary shall satisfy the applicable yard requirement; provided, however, that when a developed zoning lot which contains two (2) or more principal buildings is subdivided the yards required along the new lot lines created by the subdivision shall be not less than thirty feet (30') in depth and the depth of all required yards for each lot shall be shown on the subdivision plat; provided, that existing parking stalls and aisles and access and service drives shall be permitted to continue within said yards and within the yards along the boundaries of the original zoning lot required by subsections C1, C2 and C3 of this section, as modified by subsection 13-12-3H of this title; and provided further that upon redevelopment of any part of a lot, other than for resurfacing or for utility replacement, which development requires removal of existing parking stalls or aisles located in whole or in part within areas where such accessory uses are not permitted by said subsections as so modified, no new stalls or aisles shall be constructed in such areas except as permitted by said subsections as so modified, and any landscaping therein required by this title shall be promptly installed and properly 1 of 2 5ter1mg Codltlers,Inc. nUp://W W W.SLerungwU11101S.CVIII/1 UUCUUU&Ipllil LlIVW.Plip ' - D; ✓ mTG� "PAR C Wa RAG ui_ 477olS. intersecting street (measured from the nearest edge of the driveway pavement at its intersection with the street pavement to the nearest right-of-way line, extended, of an adjacent intersecting street): no less than twenty percent (20%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street being entered. F. Use: Accessory off-street parking facilities, as accessory to specific uses listed in this chapter, shall be solely for the parking of automobiles of patrons, occupants or employees. When bus transportation is provided for patrons, occupants or employees of a specific establishment, additional open or enclosed off-street parking spaces for bus parking on the premises shall be provided in accordance with all other regulations set forth in this chapter. G. Computation: When determination of the number of off-street parking spaces required by this chapter results in a requirement of a fractional space, any fraction of one-half(1/2) or less may be disregarded while a fraction in excess of one-half(1/2) shall be counted as one parking space. H. In Yards: Off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts, may be located in required interior side yards and rear yards, no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line, except a parking area containing four (4) or more parking spaces shall be not less than forty feet (40') from an adjoining residence district boundary; provided, however, that: 1. On any lot in a 131 local shopping center district and a B3 general business district, the required off-street parking spaces may be located in a front yard or side yard adjoining a street not less than ten feet (10') from a street line; 2. On any lot in ORA1 or ORA2 office-research-assembly district and an 03 or 04 office district, not more than ten percent (10%) of the required off-street parking spaces, not to exceed six (6) spaces, may be located in a required front yard or along the side of the building adjoining the street and not less than twenty five feet (25') from a street line or fifty feet (50') from the street lines of Cermak and York Road; and 3. On any lot in an ORA3 office-research-assembly district, the location of off-street parking spaces shall be controlled by subsection 13-10C-4E of this title and not the provisions of this subsection H. I. Parking Of Certain Commercial Vehicles And Equipment In Residence Districts Prohibited: No motor vehicle bearing ambulance, funeral home, livery, taxi or tow truck state license 4 of 6 nra JLGlllllg l.VU11 mb,1116. IILLP://W W W.SLOIlllIgUVU111GIS.GV111/GUUUUUUKIPIHILIIVW.Plip 13-10A-2: SPECIAL USES: Clinics, medical and dental, including accessory laboratories. Daycare centers, provided such facility complies with all licensing requirements of the state and maintains a direct alarm hookup to the police department or other emergency dispatch center. Drive-in banking facilities. Health clubs, private, membership only, in multibuilding office complexes under single ownership or control on sites not less than ten (10) acres, when such facility is designed primarily for use by tenants of the office complex. Such structure shall not front on any perimeter road, and access thereto shall be provided only from interior roadways. Heliports (not for freight) shall meet all of the standards as contained in subsection 13-10A-4C of this article. Hotels. Parks and open field recreational activities. Personal service and retail sales uses intended primarily for the use of tenants and having no exterior advertising and accessible only from the lobby or interior of the building, limited to: Barbershops and beauty parlors. Drugstores. Newsstands; newspapers, magazines and other periodicals. Tobacco shops. Public utility, governmental service and transportation uses: Bus turnarounds and passenger shelters. Emergency warning system structures. Fire and police stations. Post office operated by the United States government. I of 2 bierimg uoamers,inc. nup:ii www.SLernngcouitiers.cunvcoue000K/pruiuivw.pnp Sewage and stormwater lift stations. Telephone exchanges, transmission buildings and equipment, and outdoor telephone booths and pedestals. Water filtration plants, wells, pumping stations and reservoirs. Radio and television stations and production studios. Restaurants with accessory cocktail lounges, without facilities for dancing and live entertainment, in multibuilding office complexes under single ownership or control on sites not less than ten (10) acres, when such facility is designed primarily for use by tenants of the office complex. Such structure shall not front on any perimeter road, and access thereto shall be provided only from the interior roadways. Schools, nonresidential, post baccalaureate school; provided, that not more than twenty percent (20%) of the course offerings may be prerequisite to admission to the post baccalaureate programs. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-131, 5-25-1971; Ord. G-210, 2-8-1977; Ord. G-275, 1-20-1981; Ord. G-305, 9-8-1981; Ord. G-424, 1-24-1989; Ord. G-448, 7-10-1990; Ord. G-471, 8-13-1991; Ord. G-483, 3-10-1992; Ord. G-487, 5-12-1992; Ord. G-536, 7-12-1994; Ord. G-553, 3-14-1995; Ord. G-669, 1-23-2001; Ord. G-724, 7-22-2003; Ord. G-785, 6-28-2005) I II i I 2 of 2 VILLAGE C&AK BROOK Community Development Department 0 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD 9�eR0 OK ivy. OAK BROOK, IL 60523 APPLICATION for PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ® NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ($1,500)* ® EACH WAIVER or VARIATION ($500)** ❑ MAJOR CHANGE TO AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ($1,500)* ❑ MINOR CHANGE TO AN APPROVED/EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ($750)* ® INITIAL ESCROW DEPOSIT ($500)*** PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS (each lot frontage) ® -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel (2) * Plus all applicable third party costs and recoverable expenses. ** List each waiver or variation on separate sheet with applicable fees calculated. *** From which anticipated third party costs and recoverable expenses are to be drawn. No interest shall be payable on any such escrow account. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY NEC of 0)C 22M Street and Windsor Dr PERMANENT PARCEL NO. 06 - 24 - 404 - 012 LEGAL ADDRESS_ 210 22nd Street ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER ❑ CONTRACT PURCHASER' ® AGENT' ❑ OWNER(S)OF RECORD 7A48C1 _LLC "i^1P5VZ- PHONE 4,x 2-ra Sr ADDRESS 5,,il 2-m CITY Berk— SJ�4hSr` IL ZIP !Z �� NAME OF APPLICANT'(and Billing Information)_ Grea ano Janko Group LLC PHONE 847-940-0732 ADDRESS 1161 Lake Cook Road, Suite A CITY Deerfield STATE IL ZIP 60015 Contact E-mail Address GSPANOSi7a.JANKOGROUP.US I(we)certify that all of the above st emenythe ments contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our)knowledge and belief.I(we)give pe to t illag hearing signs on the lot frontages of the above subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the above fees, ag s to r e for all recoverable costs within 30 days of billing %Pku'reofOwner' Date Signature of icant' Date 'If the applicant/Agent is not the owner of record,a written statement authorizing approval of the proposed planned development application is required from the property owner in addition to their signature above and supporting documents. DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE—FOR OFFICE USE ONLY _.......------- __...______.__�__.____-_._-------.-__-.-••- _..............._............................................._..._.......................__................._......._.................................._..............._..._........................._....._..._._.................._.........._................._..........._..........................._................_............................ Date Application Filed 11 C-/S Fee Pak'" Escrow Paid$ �p� Receipt No. 35 1 6R1 Received By 49A4 L- �ctlk��i(c- Preliminary Board of Trustees Review"1/S Prefiling Review Conference with Staff Resident Meeting Required/Date Z- s Application Distributed to Depts://-A*/$ Notice Published I/ M"Is Newspaper Daily Herald Adj.Property Owners Notified Planned Development Commission /A-/V-�S Board of Trustees .20,,4,4 Board of Trustees (Approval of Ordinance) Planned Development Application 7-2014 / 1 . JMWOGROUP November 6,2015 Via email: t.gracecapital @gmail.com and m.Liracecapital(a,gmail.com TMBG,LLC-Windsor 60022 d Street, Suite 215 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Attention: Thomas Grace and Michael Grace RE: Planned Development—Oak Brook Hyatt House Ownership/Control Area Letter Dear Thomas and Mike: As you are aware, Janko Group LLC ("Janko Group") intends to file with the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois an application for a planned development for the property located at 210 W. 22nd Street, Oak Brook, Illinois (the "Property"). The Property is currently is owned by TMBG, LLC — Windsor ("TMBG"), an entity owned or controlled by you. Pursuant to that certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2015 (the "Agreement"), between Janko Group and TMBG,Janko Group agrees to purchase the Property from TMBG, and TMBG agrees to sell the Property to Janko Group. The Agreement, in part, contemplates that Janko Group will pursue approval of a planned development for the Property and provides that the issuance by the Village of Oak Brook of the final approval of the planned development for the Property is a condition to the obligation of Janko Group to purchase the Property pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. As part of the planned development application process, Janko Group must submit to the Village of Oak Brook evidence that TMBG, as owner of the Property, has authorized Janko Group to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property. Accordingly, please confirm, on behalf of TMBG, that TMBG authorizes Janko Group to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property by executing a copy of this letter and returning the executed copy to the undersigned. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Greg Spanos, CIM Janko Group LLC The undersigned, TMBG, LLC — Windsor, hereby certifies that TMBG, LLC — Windsor is the owner of the Property (defined above) and hereby authorizes Janko Group LLC to apply for the proposed planned development for the Property. TMBG, C— 'nd By: Na e: /f G� Title: Date: Janko Group,Inc.11161 Lake Cook Rd.Ste A I Deerfield, IL 60615 1 p:847.940.8880 I f:847.940.9801 Kimley>>>Horn November 16, 2015 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Attention: Mrs. Gail Polanek, Planning Technician Re: Hyatt House Planned Development Submittal 210 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL Dear Mrs. Polanek, Janko Group, LLC ("Petitioner') is a vertically integrated owner, manager, and developer of commercial real estate in multiple markets across the US. Janko Group has a targeted focus on select service and extended stay hotel development particularly with the Hyatt brand. Currently, the firm is actively working a hotel development pipeline of more than $200 million and 1,000 rooms. On the above mentioned site in Oak Brook, IL, Janko Group, the Petitioner, is the contract purchaser, developer, and the property manager(through affiliate Janko Hospitality) of a 144 room Hyatt House Hotel. The Petitioner is also proposing the development of an approximately 4,500 SF fast-casual restaurant. The Petitioner proposes to demolish an existing 40,000 SF single-story office space built in the late 1970's. The site is 3.86 acres at the northeast corner of Windsor Drive and 22nd Street in Oak Brook, IL. In keeping with the Village's revitalization plans, Janko will construct a five-story Hyatt House hotel with upscale architectural features including an upgraded all masonry exterior, metal panel accents which are signature Hyatt House elements, along with a thoughtful and sleek interior design. Amenities in the hotel include: meeting space, Hyatt House's signature H-bar, an outdoor patio with fire pit, a business center, fitness center, indoor pool, and multiple social and gathering areas. Due to the sizeable 3.86 acre land parcel, the Petitioner has further explored ways to develop the site to its highest and best use. Thus, the site plan provides area south of the hotel for a new 4,500 SF fast-casual restaurant with a drive-thru. The restaurant/retail use would complement the hotel and be an attractive amenity for nearby office users, residents, hotel guests, and visitors to Oak Brook. In addition, Janko proposes to incorporate the same architectural elements and materials as a part of the planned development(PD) application to create an upscale and complimentary facade for the two uses. The Petitioner has compiled a team of experience professionals to assist with the PD application. The Petitioner and team have carefully considered several key factors in developing the site plan, the architecture, the signage, and the landscape for this project: �I . 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350, Lisle IL 60532 Kimley))) Horn Paget of Michigan, Inc. - Safety: The safety of the Petitioner's guests and patrons as well as the residents of Oak Brook is critical. The Petitioner is proposing to utilize existing access points off of Windsor and Bliss to limit the impacts to public infrastructure; however, the petitioner proposes to close the right-in/right-out access point on Windsor Drive at the southwest corner of the site. The Petitioner believes this is the right thing to do to ensure safety and ease congestion at the intersection of 22nd Street and Windsor Drive. - Residents: The Petitioner has met with three neighboring Homeowner Associations leading up to the petitioner's application (Forest Glen, Woodside Estates, and York Woods). We also listened to concerns from staff related to our impact on the community. In response, the Hyatt House 5-story structure and associated retail exterior facades have been considerably upgraded from the original September 8th presentation to the Village Board: The buildings are now proposed to be 100% masonry exterior. Additionally, the Hyatt House Hotel is set back off of 22nd Street as much as possible to create a buffer for light and noise to adjacent residents. Also, the drive-thru circulation is carefully laid out to create queuing on the east side of the building to promote exit circulation towards Bliss Avenue. The plan provides drive thru queuing on the east side of the building, berming on the east and south property lines and additional screening with existing mature trees on the adjacent property to the east— thus more screening and less visibility for residents to the south and neighbors to the east. The Petitioner has outlined below several documents that demonstrate the project will comply with landscape, engineering, and photometric standards. The Petitioner has submitted a trip generation study showing that the project, and its change in use, has little to no impact on overall trip generation while at the same time improving peak traffic flow at the intersection of 22nd and Windsor. Lastly, the Petitioner's demonstrate high-end, upscale architecture and finishes that are exemplary of the Oak Brook community. In summary, the petitioner is creating an upscale development that looks to serve the surrounding community in a positive way while having limited impact on its neighbors. Application Contents: 1. Signed Application—Original to be provided [Application Requirement#1] a. Includes Subject Property Verification b. List of Residents within 500-ft—Kimley-Horn to issue notice to residents via certified mail 15 days prior to Commission Meeting c. Certification of Surrounding Property Owners d. Waivers and Variations 2. Check in the amount of$4,100+ $1,050 3. Statement from Owner—Original to be provided [Application Requirement#2] 4. Plat of Survey—Original to be provided [Application Requirement#3] 5. Legal Description—Provided in Word [Application Requirement#3] 6. Planned Development Standards [Application Requirements#4, #9, #12, #15] 7. NORR Architecture PD Package [Application Requirements#5, #7] a. Contextual Site Plan b. Rendered Site Plan kirnley-horn.com 111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 700,Chicago, IL 60604 Kimley))) Horn Page of Michigan, Inc. c. Signage Plan and Sign Package d. Ground Floor and Typical Floor Plan e. Elevations 8. Land Use Plan [Application Requirement#5] 9. Preliminary Engineering Plans[Application Requirements#6, #8, #16, #17, #18] a. Title Sheet b. Demolition Plan c. Detailed Site Plan d. Grading Plan e. Utility Plan f. Fire Truck Circulation Plan g. Landscape Plan and Details h. Photometric Plan 10. Stormwater Memorandum &Calculations[Application Requirement#17] 11. Project Schedule[Application Requirement#10] 12. Trip Generation Memo[Application Requirement#11] 13. Economic Analysis [Application Requirement#13] 14. Correspondence with Surrounding HOA—Meetings and comments forthcoming [Application Requirement#19] 15. Security Memorandum [Application Requirement#20] We trust these documents address the requirements of your Planned Development Application. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 630-487-5569. Sincerely, dX4/4-. Drew Walker, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: 630-487-5569 Email. drew.walker(ftimley-horn.corn 111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 700,Chicago, IL 60604 a � VILLAGE OF OAK &OOK O9�eR0 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Section: 13-15-3 A. Planned Developments Are Not Permitted As Of Right: Planned developments shall be approved by the village only in direct response to the accrual of tangible public benefits from the planned development to the village and its residents, along with the neighborhood and area in which the planned development is proposed. These benefits shall include, without limitation, exceptional amenities, landscape features,.architectural or site design, or the conservation of special manmade or natural features of the site, all as more specifically set forth in the standards set forth in subsection B of this section. B. General Design Standards: No application for a planned development shall be approved by the corporate authorities unless the proposed planned development satisfies the standards set forth in this subsection B and subsection C of this section. All of these standards shall not be regarded as inflexible, but shall be used as a framework by the village to test the quality of the amenities, benefits to the community, and design and desirability of the proposal. 1. Commercial Areas Revitalization Master Plan: The planned development shall not be inconsistent with the planning policies, goals, objectives, and provisions of the village's commercial areas revitalization master plan. A planned development must also not be inconsistent with the intent and spirit of the village of Oak Brook comprehensive plan. RESPONSE: The proposed Planned Development will be consistent with the Commercial Areas Revitalization Master Plan or Village of Oak Brook Comprehensive Plan. The Planned Development incorporates similar landscaping and beautification along the 22nd Street corridor while upgrading the architectural features of the site. The Planned Development will increase safety and circulation on Windsor Drive by eliminating a right-in-right-out access point to the site and introduces pedestrian connectivity to the area along 22nd Street. The Hotel and Restaurant will serve a -growing office community in the area consistent with the Commercial Areas Revitalization Master Plan. 2. Public Welfare: The Planned Development shall be designed, located, and proposed to be operated and maintained so that it will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property and will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health, safety and welfare. RESPONSE: The proposed Planned Development as designated located and proposed to be operated and maintained, will not impair light and air to adjacent properties The proposed Planned Development also will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health safety and welfare The proposed improvements will be designed by licensed professionals including architects and engineers; eers• they will be engineered in accordance with applicable building codes and fire safety standards: and they will be subject to multiple governmental reviews by applicable local and State agencies prior to permitting and construction. 3. Impact on Other Property: The Planned Development shall not be unnecessarily injurious to the use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood for the purposes permitted pursuant to the applicable zoning district, shall not prevent the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties for permitted uses, shall not be inconsistent with the community character of the neighborhood, C- shall not alter the ess haracter of the neighborhood, and sh substantially diminish or impair property values within*te6ilghborhood, or be incompatible with oth rroperty in the immediate vicinity. The uses permitted in a Planned Development must be of a type and so located so as to exercise no undue detrimental influence upon surrounding properties. The Planned Development must also address compliance with the Village's noise, lighting, and other performance standards. RESPONSE: The proposed Planned Development will not be unnecessarily injurious, detrimental or inconsistent with the character, use, enjoyment or development of neighboring properties and is an improvement from the existing conditions. The Planned Development will enhance aesthetics in the area in addition to supporting the surrounding businesses. In addition, the applicant's consultant has prepared a photometric study consistent with the Village Ordinance and performance standards. 4. Impact on Public Facilities and Resources: The Planned Development shall be designed so that adequate utilities, road access, drainage, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve the development. The Planned Development shall include such impact donations as may be reasonably determined by the Corporate Authorities. The required impact donations, including, without limitation, obligations under the Village's subdivision regulations, shall be calculated in reasonable proportion to the impact of the Planned Development on public facilities and infrastructure to the extent permitted by law. RESPONSE: Existing Utilities and road access will be sufficient to support the Planned Development Per the enclosed utility plan, there are accessible existing utility connections suitable to serve the project As shown in the Pervious Area Exhibit, the minor increase in impervious area is being reflected in on-site bio- retention and detention areas consistent with the Dupage County Floodplain and Stormwater Ordinance The applicant does not believe that impact donations are required, per applicable Muncipal Code provisions or warranted in connection with the re-development of the property. 5. Archaeological, Historical or Cultural Impact: The Planned Development shall not substantially and adversely affect a known archaeological, historical, or cultural resource located on or off of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The Planned Development has been submitted to IHPA and there is no substantial or adverse impacts to known archaeological, historical, or cultural resources located in the vicinity of the Planned Development. 6. Parking and Traffic: The Planned Development shall have or make adequate provision to provide ingress and egress to the proposed use in a manner that minimizes traffic congestion in the public streets, provides appropriate cross access to adjacent properties and parking areas, and provides adequate access for emergency vehicles. RESPONSE: The Planned Development improves circulation on Windsor Drive by removing an access point located too close to the intersection with 22nd Street Adequate parking is provided per ordinance and there is adequate ingress and egress in a manner that minimizes traffic congestion in the public streets. The applicant's consultant has prepared a trip generation memorandum comparing existing traffic impacts of the 60- /. existing office developmeAhe proposed impacts of the Planned Iftlopment. Please refer to this IMW memorandum for specific details related to proposed trip generation of the Planned Development. 7. Adequate Buffering: The Planned Development shall have adequate landscaping, public open space, and other buffering features to protect uses within the development and surrounding properties. RESPONSE: Per the enclosed Landscaping plan, applicant will be installing landscaping in many Planned Development areas that are not occupied by building structures and drive aisles. Additionally, berms and screening will provided along 22nd Street and the eastern property line. The Planned Development site plan has specifically positioned the hotel further back in the lot compared to the adjacent office buildings to maximize buffering to the neighboring properties to the south. 8. Signage: Signage on the site of the Planned Development shall generally be in conformity with the Village's Sign Regulations(Chapter 11 of the Zoning Regulations), except as may otherwise be specifically provided in the ordinance approving a Planned Development. RESPONSE: No signage relief is being requested. We propose (3) monument signs at each of our respective lot frontages. One monument sign will be near the southwest corner of the property along 22nd Street facing east/west. The sign will be approximately 10-ft in height. Two additional monument signs approximately 8-ft in height will be placed at the two respective entrances off of Bliss and Windsor Drives. Signature Hyatt House sgnage will be positioned on the building south and west face and the front corner of the building. Internally. (4) smaller directional signs will be placed to direct restaurant, registration and delivery traffic safely through the site. All signs will meet the height requirements of the ordinance Additionally, the number of signs and the gross square footage of signs is within the ordinance allowance based on the lot frontage of the property. Lastly, signs will meet the illumination standards of the ordinance A detailed sign package has been included with this submittal for reference. 9. Ownership/Control Area: The site of the Planned Development must be under ownership and/or unified control of the applicant. RESPONSE: Signed Authorization has been granted by the owner. 10. Need: A clear showing of need for the Planned Development must be made by means of an economic feasibility, land utilization and marketing study. RESPONSE: Please see the enclosed Economic Analysis provided b Janko. Y p Y 11. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations and Plat Act: All Planned Developments, whether or not they are by definition subject to the Village's subdivision regulations or the Illinois Plat Act, shall comply with all standards, regulations and procedures of the Village's subdivision regulations and the Plat Act except as is expressly provided otherwise in this Chapter, or as otherwise provided by the Corporate Authorities pursuant to the ordinance approving the Planned Development, or the applicable sections of the Village's subdivision regulations. RESPONSE: The proposed improvements do not require relief from the Village's subdivision regulations or the Illinois Plat Act. The property within the Planned Development will have a single owner. 12. Covenants and Restrictions to be Enforceable by Village: All covenants, deed restrictions, easements, and similar restrictions to be recorded in connection with the Planned Development shall provide that they may not be modified, removed, or released without the express consent of the Corporate Authorities and that they may be enforced by the Village as well as by future landowners within the proposed development. RESPONSE: All existing easements and restrictions are shown on the enclosed ALTA Survey. Proposed reciprocal easements with respect to stormwater, access, and utilities will be provided as necessary to ensure adequate services and maintenance of infrastructure to both uses within the Planned Development boundaries. No covenants or restrictions are proposed. 13. Security and Site Control: The Planned Development shall include the plans necessary to describe, establish, and maintain appropriate property and building security and site control measures for the Planned Development and the property on which the Planned Development is located. These plans shall also include measures to prevent adverse impacts on neighboring properties. RESPONSE: See attached security overview. ail I C. Additional Standards: In addition to the standards required in Subsection B of this Section, the following standards shall be considered in reviewing all proposed and amended Planned Developments, particularly with regard to elements of Planned Development proposals that do not satisfy the otherwise applicable provisions of the underlying zoning and subdivision regulations. e•3 1. Integrated Design: A ed Development shall be laid out and d ed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall d*.. This design shall provide for safe, a ent, convenient and harmonious grouping of structures, uses and facilities, and for appropriate relation of space inside and outside buildings to intended uses and structural features. RESPONSE: Applicant has worked closely with a team of experienced design professionals to ensure that the placement and dimensions of the improvements within the Planned Development will be an integrated and complementary addition to the surrounding area. For example, the exterior finishes and aesthetics will be selected to coordinate their appearance with other buildings in the surrounding area. The retail shell exterior will have the same level of exterior material selection and coordination. 2. Beneficial Common Open Space: Any common open space in the Planned Development shall be integrated into the overall design. These open spaces shall have a direct functional or visual relationship to the main building(s)and shall not be of isolated or leftover character. RESPONSE: N/A The following would not be considered usable common open space: a. Areas reserved for the exclusive use or benefit of an individual tenant or owner. b. Dedicated streets, alleys and other public rights-of-way. C. Vehicular drives, parking, loading and storage areas. d. Irregular or unusable narrow strips of land. 3. Functional and Mechanical Features: Exposed storage areas, trash and garbage retainers, exposed machinery installations, service areas, truck loading areas, utility buildings and structures, and similar accessory areas and structures shall be accounted for in the design of the Planned Development and made as unobtrusive as possible. These features shall be subject to such setbacks, special planting or other screening methods as shall reasonably be required to prevent their being incongruous with the existing or contemplated environment and the surrounding properties. RESPONSE: All exposed trash areas, loading areas and mechanical areas are going to be screened consistent with the proposed architectural features of the proposed buildings These areas have been placed on site to be as unobtrusive as possible. 4. Visual and Acoustical Privacy: The Planned Development elopment shall provide reasonable visual, and acoustical privacy. Fences, insulations, walks, barriers and landscaping shall be used as appropriate for the protection and aesthetic enhancement of property and the privacy of its occupants, screening of objectionable view or uses, and reduction of noises. I RESPONSE: Based on the elevation of the site and the enclosed site and landscaping plans a reasonable visual and acoustically private area will be created for the Planned Development Occupants will have reasonable privacy and screening to objectionable views or noise. C� 5. Energy Efficient n: A Planned Development shall be ed with, consideration given to various methods of design and building location, architecture esign of individual structures, and landscaping design capable of reducing energy consumption within the Planned Development. The applicant will be encouraged, to the extent feasible, to obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ("LEED") certification for the project. A Planned Development applicant may also undertake the following: a. Having at least one member of the applicant's project team be a "LEED Accredited Professional"--a person who has received the LEED Accredited Professional designation from the United States Green Building Council ("USGBC"), the Green Building Certification Institute, or another entity authorized by the USGBC to grant that designation. RESPONSE: Justin Dickinson is LEED AP and is a part of the Janko ownership team Keith Demchinski Tom Runkle. and Justin Muller are LEED AP and a part of the Kimley-Horn development team Lastly, Wally Funk and Margaret Seid are LEED AP and a part of the NORR architecture team i b. Having its application materials include a "LEED Checklist" developed by the U.S. Green Building Council indicating the credits pursued and total points anticipated for a project under the most appropriate LEED rating system, in consultation with the Director of Community Development. RESPONSE: While we are not planning to directly pursue LEED Certification for this project our goal is to exceed IECC mandated Energy Code requirements pertaining to this project We will also actively pursue easily-attainable features of LEED, such as water efficient plumbing features construction waste management, locally-sourced materials, and low VOC finishes C` s. 6. Drives, Parking a rculation: Principal vehicular access s e from dedicated public streets, and access points se designed to encourage smooth traffic fl th controlled turning movements and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, special attention shall be given to location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, adequate provision for service by emergency vehicles, and arrangement of parking areas that are safe and convenient, and insofar as feasible, do not detract from the design of proposed buildings and structures and the neighboring properties. To the extent practical, Planned Developments shall provide connections to and from existing bike and walking paths so as to ensure a continuous route without gaps or disconnections. RESPONSE: Per the enclosed site plan, there are two access points to the Planned Development The site includes wide drives sufficient for emergency vehicles and smooth traffic flow. Sidewalks and crosswalks are shown to provide adequate separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic throughout the Planned Development. There are no existing bike paths to connect to. �I I 7. Surface Water Drainage: Special attention shall be given to proper site surface drainage so that removal of surface waters will not adversely affect neighboring properties or the public storm drainage system. Surface water in all paved areas shall be collected at intervals so that it will not obstruct the flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. RESPONSE: Surface water will drain in compliance with the DuPage County Ordinances The enclosed utility and grading plan shows detention areas on-site to not adversely affect neighboring properties or the public storm drainage system. Surface water in paved areas will be collected at intervals so as not to obstruct the flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Bio-retention areas will be provided to reduce volume of run-off and increase water quality to municipal storm sewer systems. Oak Brook Hyatt House GROUP Master Development Schedule ID ask ask Name Duration Start Finish 2 201 Qtr 3 201 Qtr 4 201 trl 201 Qtr2 201 Qtr 201 Qtr 201 Qtr 201 Qtr 201 tr3 201 Qtr4 201 Qtr'201 Qtr 2,201 Mode a un Jul u e Oct o e an e a a un Jul u e Oct o e Jan e a a lun lul u e Oct o e Jan e a a un cess 181 days Thu 7/23/15 I`n 4/1/16 1 2 Effective Dare 0 days Thu 7/23/15 Thu 7/23/15 7/23 3 Due Diligence Period Summary 181 days Thu 7/23/15 Fri 4/1/16 4 Seller to Deliver Due Diligence Material 6 days Thu 7/23/15 Thu 7/30/15 Seller to D4 diver Due Diligence Material 5 Seller to Deliver ALTA Survey 6 days Tlm 7/23/15 Thu 7/30/15 Seller to Di diver ALTA survey 6 Title Report Process 21 days Thu 7/23/15 Thu 8/20/15 7 Seller to Deliver Title Report 11 days Thu 7/23/15 Thu 8/6/15 Seller to C eliver Title Report 8 Buyer to object to exceptions I0 days Fri 8/7/15 Thu 8/20/15 Buyer tc object to exceptions 9 Inspection&Approval Period(s) 159 days Thu 7/23/15 Tue 3/1/16 10 Initial Inspection&Approval Period 116 days Thu 7/23/15 Thu 12/31/15 Initial Inspection&Approval Period 11 First Extended inspection&Approval Period 22 days Fri 1/1/16 Mon 2/1/16 First Extended Inspection&Approval Period 12 Second Extended Inspection&.Approval Period 21 days Tue 2/2/16 Tue 3/1/16 Second Extended Inspection&Approval Period 13 Outside Closing Date 0 days Fri 4/1/16 Fri 4/1/16 ♦4/1 14 'Planned D,,elopni—t Approval P-ces, 15 Meet with Village Board to Present Plan 0 days ,lion 9/28/15 Mon 9/28/15 16 Complete Planning/DevelopmentApplication 31 days Mon 9/28/15 Mon 11/9/15 mplete Planning/Development Application 17 Submit PD Application 0 days Mon 11/9/15 Mon 11/9/15 1/9 18 Staff Review(revisions to Application) 25 days Tue 11/10/15 Mon 12/14/15 Staff Review(revisions to Application) 19 Present to Planned Development Committee 0 days Thu 12/10/15 Thu 12/10/15 ♦- 2/10 20 Village Board Meeting#1 0days Tue 1/12/16 Tue 1/12/16 1 1/12 21 Village Drafts Ordinance 20 days Wed 1/13/16 Tue 2/9/16 Village Drafts Ordinance 22 Village Board Meeting#2-Planned Development Ordinance Received 0 days Tue 2/9/16 Tue 2/9/16 ♦2/9 23 Franchise Application/Review/Approvil 105 daNs Mon 9/28/15 24 Franchise Agreement 105 days Mon 9/28/15 Fri 2/19/16 25 Submit Franchise Application 50 days Mon 9/28/15 Fri 12/4/15 6 it Franchise Application 26 Franchise Committee_Approval 15 days Mon 1/4/16 Fri 1/22/16 Franchise Committee Approval 27 S75k non-refundable due to Brand 0 days Fri 1/22/16 Fri 1/22/16 1/22 28 Negotiate Franchise Agreement 20 days Mon 1/25/16 Fri 2/19/16 Negotiate Franchise Agreement 29 Execute Franchise Agreement 0 days Fri 2/19/16 Fri 2/19/16 ♦2/19 30 Design&Construction 470 days Alon 9/28/15 I'Fri 7/14/17 31 Design 191 days Mon 9/28/15 Mon 6/20/16 32 Schematic Design 20 days Mon 9/28/15 Fri 10/23/15 Ic iematic Design 33 Design Development 30 days Wed 1/13/16 Tue 2/23/16 Design Development Task Project Summary Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup Deadline i Project:Oakbrook Development S Split ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, External Tasks Inactive Summary � Manual Summary Progress Date:Fri 11/6/15 Milestone ♦ External Milestone 4 Manual Task Start-only C Summary W Inactive Task Duration-only __.._...... Finish-only 3 Fri 11/6/15 Page 1 JANC�� Oak Brook Hyatt House GROUP Master Development Schedule ID Task ask Name Duration Stan Finish 2 201 tr 3 201 Qt r 4 201 Qtr 1 201 qtr 2 201 tr 3 201 Qtr 4 201 1 201 Qtr 2 201 tr 3 201 Qtr 4 201 Qtr 1 201 Qtr 2 201 Mode a un Jul u e Oct o e Jan e a a un Jul u e oct o e Jane a a un Jul u e Oc[ o e Jane a a un 34 Construction Documents 30 days Wed 2/24/16 Tue 4/5/16 i onstruction Documents 35 Demo/Grading Permit 0 days Fri 4/22/16 Fri 4/22/16 ♦-(1/22 36 Final Submittal(IEPA Water/Sewer,tillage Site Permit) 0 days lion 5/16/16 Mon 5/16/16 1 16 37 Village Site Permit 0 days Fri 6/3/16 Fri 6/3/16 6/3 38 IEPA Water/Sewer Permit 0 days lion 6/20/16 Mon 6/20/16 6/20 39 Pre Construction 157 days Mon 10/26/15Tue 5/31/16 40 Draft Contractor RFP 15 days lion 11/23/15 Fri 12/11/15 Dratt Co tra or RFP 41 Select Contractor 5 days Mon 12/14/15 Fri 12/18/15 Select C)ntrz ctor 42 Contractor Confirms SD Cost 10 days lion 10/26/15 Fri 11/6/15 contractor Co nfir s SD Cc st 43 Contractor Confirms DD Cost 10 days Wed 2/24/16 Tue 3/8/16 i5 Coi itractor Cord irms DD Cost 44 Contractor Confirms CD Cost 40 days Wed 4/6/16 Tue 5/31/16 Alontractor Confirms CD Cost 45 Construction 290 days Fri 6/3/16 Fri 7/14/17 46 Break Ground 0 days Fri 6/3/16 Fri 6/3/16 6/3 47 Sitework/Demo 60 days lion 616116 Fri 8/26/16 Sitework/Demo 48 Foundations 40 days lion 8/29/16 Fri 10/21/16 Foundations 49 Structural Steel 60 days Mon 10/24/16 Fri 1/13/17 Structural Steel 50 Masonry 60 days Mon 1/16/17 Fri 4/7/17 Masonry 51 Mechanical,Electrical,Plumbing 60 days lion 1/16/17 Fri 4/7/17 Mechanic ,Electrical,Plumbing 52 Studs&Drywall 40 days lion 1/16/17 Fri 3/10/17 s&Dryw II 53 " Finish Carpentry 20 days lion 4/10/17 Fri 5/5/17 Finish arpentry 54 Finishes(carpet,paint,etc) 20 days Mon 5/8/17 Fri 6/2/17 Fin'hes(carpet,paint,etc.) 55 Certificate of Occupancy 0 days Fri 6/2/17 Fri 6/2/17 61 56 Landscaping 15 days lion 6/5/17 Fri 6/23/17 Lindscaping 57 p Fixtures,Furniture,Equipment Installation 20 days lion 6/5/17 Fri 6/30/17 fixtures,Furniture,Equipment Installation 58 Hyatt End Of Construction date(EOC) 0 days Fri 6/30/17 Fri 6/30/17 6/30 59 Hyatt Training 10 days Mon 7/3/17 Fri 7/14/17 Hyatt Training 60 Grand Opening 0 days Fri 7/14/17 Fri 7/14/17 7/14 Task Project Summary Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup Deadline i Project:Oakbrook Developments Split ............... External Tasks Inactive Summary � Manual Summary rmmmmmn"V Progress Date:Fri 11/6/15 Milestone ♦ External Milestone O Manual Task 11lawwwaiwwROM Start-only C Summary Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only 7 Fri 11/6/15 Page 2 It MISCELLANEOUS PAYMENT RECPT#: 358387 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK IL 60523 DATE: 11/23/15 TIME: 14:33 CLERK: reception DEPT: CUSTOMER#: 0 INFO: ZONING/HYATT HOTEL 4302 ZONING/SUBDIVIS 5150.00 AMOUNT PAID: 5150.00 PAID BY: JANKO GROUP LLC PAYMENT METH: MULTIPLE METH: CH CHECK/REF: 1454 QTY: 1 ADD'L REF: AMT: 4100.00 METH: CH CHECK/REF: 1461 QTY: 1 ADD'L REF: AMT: 1050.00 REFERENCE: AMT TENDERED: 5150.00 AMT APPLIED: 5150.00 CHANGE: .00 00 - d--36f. E. Certification SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS I (we) certify that the names and addresses of all the surrounding property owners including mailing labels submitted with this application are located within a minimum distance of 500 feet in all directions from the perimeter of the subject property . Said names and addresses are as they appear from the authentic tax records of the Township Assessor's Office of this County. The property owners as listed have been obtained from the Township Assessors office within 30 days of the filing of this application. The surrounding property owners list as submitted herewith and supporting attachments are true to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. I (we) give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s) on the lot frontages of the subject property as described in the Village Code. In addition to the required application fees, applicant/owner agrees to reimburse the Village for all costs/fees, publication costs, recording fees, and any other associated costs or fees as contained in Section 13-15-C within 30 days of billing. rinted Name of Owne Printed Name of Applicant gn r;Kbof Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date BILL TO INFORMATION. 6732 Print Na a/Company Contact Person Contact Phone 1141 (. z 66 1030 6z1� r)- 3o? Address To be Billed Alternate Phone NOTE: If the applicant/owner has not complied with these requirements and as a result the notification has not been sent to a neighboring property owner within the 500-foot requirement less than 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing, the hearing on this matter will be postponed to the next regular meeting, or until such time as all neighbors within the 500-foot requirement have been sent proper notification. f . NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of at least 500 feet in all directions. Said names and addresses areas they appear from the authentic tax records of the Township Assessor's Office of DuPage County within 30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each property Owner listed. NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL OWNER PROPERTY OWNER INTERNATIONAL ASSOC II LIONS 300 22nd St, Oak Brook, IL 60523 300 22nd St, Oak Brook, IL 60523 0624403007 YORK RD EW LLC 1 N.Wacker Dr, No.2400, Chicago, IL Yord Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 0624403009 60606 YORK RD EW LLC 1 N.Wacker Dr, No.2400, Chicago, IL Yord Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 0624403010 60606 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 Oak Brook Road,Oak Brook, IL 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak 0624404001 60523 Brook, IL 60523 EVANGELICAL HOSPITALS CO Advocate Health Care,3075 Highland 100 Bliss Dr, Oak Brook, IL 60523 0624404007 Pkwy, Unit 600, Downers Grove, IL 60515 BUTLER COMPANY Dan Development, 1 Trans Am Plaza No. 1000 Oak Brook Rd, Oak Brook, 0624404009 120, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 IL 60523 TMBG LLC WINDSOR 600 22nd St Unit 215, Oak Brook, IL 60523 125 Windsor Dr,Oak Brook, IL 0624404012 60523 EVANGELICAL HEALTH Advocate Health Care,3075 Highland 2025 Windsor Dr, Oak Brook, IL 0624404013 SYSTEM Pkwy, Unit 600, Downers Grove, IL 60515 60523 GR3DB LLC C/O Wester Inc., 122 W.22nd St, Oak W 22nd St, Oak Brook, IL 60523 0624404014 Brook, IL 60523 JUNO PROPERTIES LLC 855 Madison St, Oak Park, IL 60302 120 W. 22nd St,Oak Brook, IL 0624404015 60523 Dan Development LMTD For Investors 22nd-Toll Rd, Oak Brook, IL INVESTORS MANAGEMENT Management, 1 Trans Am Plaza No. 120, 60523 0625200002 Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 NORTHERN ILL GAS CO Nicor Gas, 10 Peachtree Place NE, LOC Oak Brook, IL 60523 062520012 1150,Atlanta, GA 30309 OB I LLC OB I LLC, C/O Herbco LLC, 6000 Garlands 2211-5 York Rd, Oak Brook, IL 062500015 Ln No. 120, Barrington, IL 60010 60523 SCALA, MARY LOU ET AL 66 Windsor Dr,Oak Brook, IL 60523 66 Windsor Dr, Oak Brook, IL 0625200018 60523 LAVRENCIK,JOSEPH&JOY 69 Windsor Dr,Oak Brook, IL 60523 69 Windsor Dr, Oak Brook, IL 0625203001 60523 FAHMY,ABDEL&FARRAH 67 Windsor Dr, Oak Brook, IL 60523 67 Windsor Dr, Oak Brook, IL 0625203002 60523 GROOMS TR, DENISE K 43 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 60523 43 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 0625203003 60523 HASZTO,STEPHEN&K 41 Croydon Ln,Oak Brook, IL 60523 41 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 0625203004 60523 (Attach additional sheets if necessary) V. NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of at least 500 feet in all directions. Said names and addresses are as they appear from the authentic tax records of the Township Assessor's Office of DuPage County within 30 days of the filing of this application. provide a mailing label for each property Owner listed. PROPERTY NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ADDRESS PARCEL OWNER LIN,SHARON 39 Croydon Ln,Oak Brook, IL 60523 39 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 0625203005 60523 BARKATULLAH TR, S&F MIRZA 37 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 60523 37 Croydon Ln, Oak Brook, IL 0625203006 60523 ZAVALA, LEONARDO&MARIA 35 Croydon Ln,Oak Brook, IL 60523 35 Croydon Ln,Oak Brook, IL 0625203007 60523 (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Subject Property Verification (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number(P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 24 404 012 2. Common Address: 210 W. 22nd Street, Oak Brook, IL 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) LOT 1 OF AMERICAN CAN COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT OF PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 905851, EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 22.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 43.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 38.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1• THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 158.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 132.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 34.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 35.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALSO EXCEPT THEREOF THAT PORTION FALLING WITHIN 22ND STREET, IN DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Patty Date called: 11/03/15 1 verify that the information provided above is accurate. Printed Name Agnfur Date: ' 6 - 154P Relationship to Applicant: P NI � 'I JANKOIGROUP MEMO TO: Village of Oak Brook FROM: Greg Spanos,CCIM DATE: November,6th,2015 RE: Security Measures at AM 22nd Street—PD Requirement Janko Group intends to work in conjunction with the Village of Oak Brook, neighboring properties and property owners/manager, local residents, and local law enforcement to ensure a safe and secure environment for guests, visitors, employees, customers, and vendors of both the Hyatt House hotel and adjacent retail property. Hyatt Hotels provides clear direction regarding security to its franchisees/owners within the Hyatt House Owner's Overview Standards. Salient portions of these standards are outlined below: Hyatt House Properties are required to have an approved electronic keycard system with 1" deadbolt, panic release locks and reinforced jambs on all guestroom unit doors. The locks will be automatically re- keyed after each checkout. Additional security features in the guestroom units include a 180 degree minimum door view with cover (on guestroom unit side of door) and swing arm secondary latch. Connecting doors will have a primary knob which secures the door, a thumb latch 1" deadbolt and secondary swing arm latch. Access to the swimming pool (both indoor and outdoor),guest laundry, and Workout Room must be controlled by an electronic keycard lock that is keyed universal and accessible via guestroom unit keys. All exterior entry doors and the porte cochere automatic doors will have electronic lock control as part of the guestroom unit system. A two way intercom system will be provided between The Desk and main entry doors with a "buzz-in" system that is controlled at the front desk Electronic locks keyed to the guestroom unit will control guest access points at all outside doors. A closed circuit television monitoring system will be implemented with extent of coverage limited to The Commons only. The three (3) cameras will be networked so that they can be recorded on a DVD or digitally and can be monitored remotely via the internet. The recording device shall be located in the workroom area. Cameras must be high quality,ceiling mounted of the mini size type and non-obtrusive in design if used. All ground floor stairwell exterior exit doors should be alarmed with a local alarm that sounds upon opening and signage that says the alarm will sound. This should be tied back to The Desk. Additional exterior cameras shall monitor the exterior of the property including but not limited to the parking lot,sidewalks,and all hotel entry/ exit points. Exterior lighting design considerations will include not only aesthetics but also safety and security. The lighting source for parking lots will be selected to maintain the true color of the vehicles. Parking lot lighting will be incorporated into the site plan and provide a lighting level of not less than 2.0 foot-candles at any point in the parking lot area. The building will have accent lighting on the building exterior faces. Sidewalks shall provide a lighting level of not less than 5.0 foot-candles.Driveways shall provide a lighting level of not less than 5.0 foot-candles. All other lot entries shall provide a lighting level of 15- 20 foot- candles. Unless specifically prohibited by code, all site lighting should be mounted on a minimum 25'—0" light pole attached to a concrete light pole base. `.f— • • JANKOIGROUP The entire property (excluding guest rooms) will be video monitored 24 hours a day. Prior to opening, hotel management will meet with local law enforcement to ensure a positive working relationship and to outline any specific needs or requirements for regular or special event security detail. Also, the hotel will establish standardized reporting procedures to inform/notify local police for any abnormal or criminal activity. Similar security measures will be in place for the restaurant building—24 hour video monitoring, satisfactory site lighting requirements,and standardized reporting procedures to inform local police of any abnormal activity. • • Kimley>>>Horn MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Justin Dickinson, Janko Group From: Tim Sjogren, P.E., PTOE Rory Fancler,AICP, PTP Date: November 9, 2015 Subject: Hyatt House Trip Generation, Oak Brook, Illinois Kimley-Horn was retained by Janko Group to review the trip generation characteristics of a proposed redevelopment in the Windsor Office Plaza, located at the northeast corner of West 22nd Street and Windsor Drive in Oak Brook, Illinois. The proposed site plan includes removal of an existing 40,362 square foot office building in order to accommodate a 144-room hotel and a 4,500 square foot fast casual restaurant with a drive-thru window.The purpose of this review is to compare the trip generation characteristics of the existing site and the planned redevelopment. To facilitate this analysis, a comparison was made based on data contained within the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation manual.The trip generation comparison outlined in this memorandum reveals that while the proposed redevelopment is likely to result in higher total trips during the AM peak hour, the total trips estimated for the PM peak hour peak hour is generally consistent with the existing office building. Further, the inbound trips in the morning peak hour are generally consistent with the existing use and the outbound trips in the PM peak hour are less than the existing office building. Based on the volume of inbound and outbound trips, and the direction of peak hour travel for adjacent uses, it is unlikely that the proposed redevelopment would have a meaningful influence on the adjacent roadway network. Further, planned access modifications would enhance traffic flow to and from the site. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Site Conditions The site is currently occupied by a 40,362 square foot office building, which would be removed to accommodate a proposed 144-room hotel (includes approximately 2,000 square feet of accessory meeting space)and a 4,500 square foot fast casual restaurant with a drive-through window. Access to the site would be provided via two full access driveways, including the existing driveway on Bliss Drive and the north driveway on Windsor Drive; the south driveway on Windsor Drive would be removed as part of the project.The north driveway on Windsor Drive would be widened to accommodate a left-and right-turn, thereby enhancing outbound turn movements from the site. kirnley-horn.corn � 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350, Lisle, Illinois 60532 I Kidep Horn Existing Traffic Conditions In order to calculate the trips produced by the existing office building, data was referenced from the ITE manual Trip Generation, 9th Edition. The trip generation for the existing office building is summarized in Table 1. Per ITE, the existing office building likely generates 660 daily trips, 95 trips during the AM peak hour and 125 trips during the PM peak hour. Table 1.ITE Trip Generation for Existing Office Buildings Land Use Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Out • Out • General Office Building 40,362 sq.ft. 660 85 10 95 20 105 125 LUC 710 • . 1 95 20 105 FUTURE CONDITIONS The proposed development consists of a 144-room hotel with approximately 2,000 square feet of accessory meeting space, and a 4,500 square foot fast casual restaurant with a drive-through window. In order to project site-generated traffic for the redevelopment, data from the ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition was applied. As shown in Table 2, Land Use Code 310 was applied to the proposed hotel. Per ITE, trip generation at a hotel may be related to the presence of supporting facilities such as meeting space; therefore, the projected hotel trip generation includes the proposed meeting space. Based on the anticipated fast casual restaurant tenant opportunities, ITE Land Use Code 940 was applied. Table 2.ITE Trip Generation Data by Land Use ITE • Use Unit Daily AM Peak PIVI Peak Hotel(LUC 310) Per room T=8.95(R)-373.16 T=0.53(R) T=0.60(R) 50%in/50%out 59%in/41%out 51%in/49%out Bread/Donut/Bagel Shop T=356.97(X)I Ln(T)=0.50 Ln(X)+4.29 T=18.99(R) with Drive-Through Window Per 1,000 sq.ft. 50%in/50%out 50%in/50%out 49%in/51%out LUC 940 T—Site-generated trips R—Total hotel rooms X—1,000 square feet gross floor area I Data not provided by ITE Trip Generation manual.Estimated daily trip generation rate is based on the sum of the peak hour rates multiplied by the ratio between the daily rate and peak hour rates for a Fast-Food Restaurant with a Drive-Through Window(LUC 934). The fast casual restaurant with a drive-through window is anticipated to create trips classified as"pass- by". Pass-by traffic reflects the travel patterns of users who visit the site enroute to another destination. For example, a motorist who stops at a fast casual restaurant as an intermediate stop in a morning or evening commute would be a pass-by trip. Per data in ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, pass-by reductions for the land use category"Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window"(LUC 945)were applied to the trip generation for the proposed fast casual restaurant(50%for daily trips and for PM peak hour,49%for AM Peak Hour).The number of pass-by trips associated with the fast casual restaurant is subtracted from the trips estimated for the redevelopment project to establish the total project trips. A summary of the projected site-generated trips is provided in Table 3. 00 - 60532 -. • �,r • Kimley)O Horn Page 3 Table 3.Site-Generated Traffic Projections AM Peak . Peak Land Use Size Daily In Out Daily In Out Daily UNADJUSTED TRIPS Hotel(LUC 310) 144 rooms 915 45 30 75 45 40 85 Bread/Donut/Bagel Shop with 4 500 s .ft. 1,645 80 75 155 40 45 85 Drive-Through Window LUC 940 q Subtotal Unadjusted Trips 2,560 125 1 105 230 85 85 170 LESS PASS-BY TRIPS Total Pass-By Trips' -815 -40 1 -35 1 -75 -20 -25 -45 Total Site-Generated Trips 1,745 85 1 70 1 155 1 65 60 125 'Pass-by trips were applied per data in ITE's Trip Generation Handbook,Third Edition. Pass-by trips for fast-food restaurants with drive- through windows(LUC 934)were used to determine the amount of pass-by trips for bread/donut/bagel shop with a drive-through window. As shown in the table above, the proposed redevelopment is anticipated to generate 155 trips during the morning peak hour and 125 trips during the evening peak hour. The trip generation reflects a generally balanced directional distribution during both the morning and evening peak hours. A large number of trips is generated by the fast casual restaurant when a drive-through window is included. CONCLUSION Kimley-Horn conducted trip generation analysis to compare the anticipated traffic created by the proposed redevelopment to the approximate trip generation characteristics of the existing office building. Table 4 summarizes the projected number of trips daily, AM, and PM peak hour trips and shows how the site-generated trips compare with the existing office building. Table 4.Comparison of Existing and Proposed Conditions Development Scenari• Daily In Out • Out • Existing Office Building 660 85 10 j 95 20 105 125 Proposed Redevelopment 1,745 85 70 j 155 65 60 125 Based on the surrounding office uses, it is assumed that traffic operations at the intersection of Windsor Drive/West 22nd Street are largely driven by inbound traffic during the AM peak hour and by outbound traffic during the PM peak hour. Compared to the existing office building, it is anticipated the redevelopment will contribute a similar number of trips to the principle inbound movements in the AM peak hour. During the evening peak hour a 40 percent reduction to outbound trips is anticipated, which may improve intersection performance. In addition to the directional distribution of peak hour trips, removal of the south driveway on Windsor Drive may further improve intersection performance as distance from the intersection is greater at the north driveway on Windsor Drive. E ROM 6 1001 Warrenville Rd Suite#350, Lisle, IL 60532 Kimley>>>Horn MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Justin Dickinson, Janko Group From: Tim Sjogren, P.E., PTOE Rory Fancler,AICP, PTP Date: November 9, 2015 Subject: Review of Village of Oak Brook Traffic Study for Windsor Drive and West 22nd Street Kimley-Horn was retained by Janko Group to complete a general review of the Village of Oak Brook Traffic Study for Windsor Drive and West 22nd Street, prepared by Thomas Engineering Group, LLC.A summary of several questions and/or points of clarification is outlined below for discussion with the Village of Oak Brook. Note that this review was not intended to be a complete evaluation of the data, analysis, and results of every element of the study. Rather, the below are items that deal with the overall methodology and development of the conclusions reached. 1. Clarify the intersection data collection period 3:30 to 5:30 PM. As the study area is primarily developed with office buildings, should the data collection period have included the period from 5:30 to 6:00 PM (i.e., afternoon count period from 4:00 to 6:00 PM)? 2. Is information available for the assumed occupancy rate of 81.4% (page 5)? Does this occupancy rate include the vacant buildings referenced on page 2 (i.e., 25,000 and 40,000 square foot buildings)? 3. The first paragraph under"Vehicle Trip Generation" on page 5 references a 245,000 square foot Duchossois Industries redevelopment project; however, elsewhere in the traffic study 240,000 square feet is referenced. Please clarify the size of the redevelopment project and confirm the correct square footage was used for the trip generation presented on page 6. 4. What methodology was used to develop the"Additional Volumes" presented in the table at the top of page 6? Is the trip generation based on the ITE Trip Generation manual or empirical turning movement counts conducted at the existing driveways? We were unable to independently derive the "Additional Volumes" presented in the table. Clarification on the following may be helpful: a) What was the basis for the development of the additional volumes shown for Scenario B? Was a square footage derived or growth percentage applied to existing turning movements? b) Does Scenario B assume 100%occupancy of the vacant buildings referenced on page 2?Should the analysis take into consideration empirical occupancy rates for the office market in the study area? Is 100%occupancy realistic for the study area? c) Scenario C includes the Duchossois Industries redevelopment and the hotel/restaurant redevelopment. Based on the anticipated trip generation and the potential for each project to proceed independent from the other, we believe the traffic projections, 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350, Lisle, Illinois 60532 Kimley>>>Horn Page 2 capacity analysis and recommended improvements associated with each redevelopment project should be reviewed separately. d) As part of Scenario C, the analysis of the future 240,000 square foot Duchossois Industries redevelopment assumes removal of existing office space for a net addition of 40,000 square feet. Is the trip generation based on the net 40,000 square feet? e) Does the trip generation for Scenario C take into consideration removal of the existing office building to accommodate the proposed hotel and restaurant? f) Clarify the trip generation calculated for Scenario C. For reference, ITE data for the Land Use Codes identified is provided below. Utilizing this ITE data, Scenario C trip generation is provided for discussion. This trip generation is inconsistent with the trips presented in the traffic study. Scenario C ITE Trip Generation Data by Land Use (Land Land Use Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Code) Duchossios Per 1,000 Sq.Ft. Ln(T) 0.80 Ln(X)+1.57 T=10.12(X)a 74.45 (LUC 710) 88%in, 12%out 17%in,83%out Hotel(310) Per Room T=0.53(R) T=0.60(R) 59%in,41%out 51%in,49%out Restaurant(931) Per 1,000 Sq.Ft. o=0.810(X) ' 55%in,45%out 67%in,33%out T—Site-generated trips R—Total hotel rooms X—1,000 square feet gross floor area AM peak hour directional distribution not provided for Quality Restaurant (LUC 931). Assumed AM peak hour directional distribution for High-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant(LUC 932). Scenario C Trip Generation Estimate Land Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (Land Use Code) Fin I Out I Total In I Out Duchossios(710) 40,000 sf 80 12 92 20 99 119 Hotel 310 144 rooms 45 31 76 45 41 86 Restaurant 931 4,000 sf 2 1 j 3 20 10 30 Total 85 150 235 g) In addition to the Duchossois Industries redevelopment and the proposed hotel/restaurant project at the northeast corner of Windsor Drive/West 22nd Street, a 100,000 square foot potential redevelopment is forecast in Scenario D. Would the 100,000 square feet replace an existing building(s)? Does the trip generation take into consideration removal of an existing building(s)? h) Why was Land Use Code 750 (Office Park) used for the 100,000 square feet of office included in Scenario D? i) Clarify the methodology used to calculate trips for the 100,000 square feet of office space included in Scenario D. For reference, ITE data for Land Use Code 750 (Office Park) is presented on the following page. Utilizing this ITE data, Scenario D trip -� • • 1001 Warrenville '• Suite#350, Lisle, I L 60532 • I : 1 k� Kimley>>>Horn Page 3 generation is provided for discussion. This trip generation is inconsistent with the trips presented in the traffic study. Scenario D ITE Trip Generation Data by Land Use Land Use Unit AI Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (Land Use Code) Office(LUC 750) Per 1,000 sq.ft. T=10.37(X)a 124.36 T=10.22(X)0 95.83 89%in, 11/0 out 14%in,86%out Scenario D Trip Generation Estimate Land Use Size AM Peak Hour Peak Hour (Land Use Code) In Out Total In Out Total Office Park(750) 100,000 sq.ft. 230 31 261 30 188 218 Total 230 31 261 1 188 5. "Transit Priority" is referenced as a non-structural recommendation on page 9. To clarify, the recommendation appears to encourage transit ridership through vouchers and marketing; this recommendation does not refer to signal priority for Pace bus on West 22nd Street. 6. One of the recommended non-structural improvements is signal timing optimization at the intersection of Windsor Drive/West 22nd Street. Are signal timing adjustments feasible given the signal proximity to York Road/22nd Street? 7. Should the capacity analysis results include overall intersection delay and LOS? Based on a review of the Village of Oak Brook Traffic Study for Windsor Drive and West 22nd Street, it appears the projected traffic at the study intersection may be overestimated; therefore, clarification on the issues listed above is requested. Please feel free to contact us should there be any questions on the items outlined above. 1001 Warrenville Rd Suite#350, Lisle, IL 60532 K.� JAW01GROUP MEMO TO: Whom it may concern FROM: Oak Brook Hyatt House Development Team DATE: December 3,2015 RE: HOA/resident meeting notes and neighbor comments As part of the Oak Brook Planned Development("PD")process,the Hyatt House and Restaurant/Retail developer,Janko Group,has made presentations to three neighboring Homeowner Associations-Forest Glen,Woodside Estates,and York Woods.Also,Janko Group representatives have met with and spoken to several neighboring building owners and tenants. The purpose of this meetings and neighbor discussions were to review the Planned Development materials associated with the ongoing PD Application for the redevelopment of 210 22nd Street,Oak Brook IL. The following is a summary of the HOA presentations and other discussions: HOA Meetings: November 11 ffi,2015—The HOA meeting was held at Jim Lazarini's(President of Forest Glen HOA) residence at 701 Forest Glen Lane,Oak Brook,Illinois,60523. Jim had members of both the Forest Glen and Woodside HOA's in attendance. Attendees sat around a large table in Jim's kitchen and Jim provided a flat screen monitor/TV to display the presentation. In attendance were the President of Forest Glen(Jim Lazzarini),multiple residents of the Forest Glen neighborhood and the President of Woodside Estates(John Anos). Detailed list of attendees: 1. James Lazzarini 2. Harry Peters 3. Mark Converse 4. John Anos 5. Peter Noranha 6. Kevin Flynn 7. Greg Luczak Members of the Development Team included Greg Spanos(GS)-Janko Group,Justin Dickinson(JD) Janko Group,Peter Dubin(PD)-NORR Architects,and Drew Walker(DW)-Kimley Horn Engineering The following is a summary of the meeting: 1. GS initiated presentation at 7:20p. Members of the Development Team were introduced. 2. GS provided a summary of Janko Group and the team's collective hospitality experience— especially with the Hyatt brand. 3. GS proceeded to describe location of project relative to the immediate and surrounding area. I L. JANKOIGROUP 4. GS described the proposed Hyatt House product,its target customer,and national and local hospitality market trends.The macro hospitality overview was helpful to HOA group as it gave them context on why Janko Group was proposing a Hyatt,an extended stay hotel vs other full service or select service options. 5. GS/PD reviewed the project site plan in detail discussing access,traffic patterns,and locations of improvements within the PD.Much time was spent reviewing the two proposed uses and how Janko Group arrived at current design and exterior fagade quality. 6. GS made it clear that there had been upgrades to the buildings from the initial presentation to the Village Board on September 8t'—the two major points being elimination of a right in/right out along Windsor Drive as well as the exterior"skin"upgrade to 100%masonry building. 7. HOA residents asked questions regarding the potential use/tenant of the retail/restaurant outlot.Their questions focused on finding a use that would maximize the potential sales tax generated—so that the Village of Oak Brook would benefit.Janko Group agreed with that and stated their willingness to continue to find high quality/credit user for outlot 8. Specific comments focused on traffic generated by Duchessous and impact on entrance to Forest Glen and Woodside Estates. It was agreed to by the group that the development of the hotel and associated retail/restaurant outlot would be a net neutral/reduction to current traffic on 22°a/Windsor intersection and York road. This is due to the usage patterns(late evening arrivals)of the hotel and retail/restaurant being opposite of the surrounding office users(8am and 5pm employee traffic). 9. The meeting concluded around 8:30p with both Woodside Estates and Forest Glen HOA members expressing excitement and support for the project.No objections were noted from either HOA. Jim stated that he would be writing a letter of recommendation to the Village of Oak Brook indicating their acceptance of the Planned Development. This letter was subsequently sent to Bob Kallien. December 2,2015—The York Woods HOA meeting was held in a conference room at 7pm at the Oak Brook Bath and Tennis Club at 800 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523. In attendance were Mike McMahon(York Woods HOA President)and approximately 14 other HOA residents.Attendee names were not collected at this meeting. Several attendees arrived shortly after 7pm and/or departed prior to the end of the meeting. Members of the Development Team included Greg Spanos(GS)-Janko Group, Peter Dubin(PD)-NORR Architects,and Drew Walker(DW)-Kimley Horn Engineering. The following is a summary of the meeting: 1. GS initiated the presentation. Members of the Development Team were introduced. 2. GS provided a summary of Janko Group and the team's collective hospitality experience— especially with the Hyatt brand. 3. GS proceeded to describe location of project relative to the immediate and surrounding area. 4. GS explained the PD process and project timing to the HOA members. 5. PD/GS/DW covered additional materials in the presentation including 3D renderings and detailed site plan showing the elimination of the right in/right out along Windsor Drive. 6. HOA members raised questions about the following: a. The feasibility of the hotel and restaurant project—GS explained the hotel research completed thus far and the viability of the site for extended stay hotel development. GS also explained that retail/restaurant brokers and developers have made L-� JANKOIGROUP recommendations of showing a fast-casual restaurant concept based upon the location of the site and user"gaps"in the marketplace b. Residents asked questions about the mix of business typical customer/guest at the hotel—GS/PD explained the target customer is a corporate business traveler during the week and a mixture of leisure and social business on weekends. GS/PD explained the room types and the amenities within the building. c. Residents asked about the amount of meeting and conference space—GS/PD answered that the current programming targeted approximately 1,500sf of flexible meeting space. d. Residents asked about the estimated hotel tax revenues the project would create—GS responded that the proforma suggests over$1 million in the first 5 years of operation. e. Residents questioned the landscaping plans on the south and east sides of the site— PD/DW explained the heavy landscaping buffer along the east side of the site(large existing trees on the east neighbor's site) and more mature landscaping on the east side of our property to"screen"any potential retail/drive thru lane. Also,DW explained the elevation of the site and the 3-4' landscaping berm along 22nd Street providing minimal view of cars parked on site. f. Specifically,one resident asked what hotel rates would be and what rates are at the Drake across the street—GS responded that rates change monthly,weekly,and sometimes daily so it is difficult to project with certainty. But the Hyatt House hotel rates would be consistent with the market but that our hotel would require a premium to existing,older competition that has inferior physical product and or less amenities. Given knowledge of the market,GS suggested mid-week rates would likely be higher than off-peak or weekend days as the market is heavily driven by mid-week corporate demand. g. Residents asked about the size and location of signage.DW/PD walked through the signage plan and locations of directional,monument,and building signage.Also,DW pointed out that the signage plan fits within the Village signage code. h. Residents asked about the hotel and or restaurant being permitted uses—DW commented that the hotel is a permitted use within the current zoning but would require a special use permit. The retail/restaurant is a requested variance from the existing zoning. i. Residents asked how many stories tall the hotel building would be—PD responded the building is 5 stories tall with a signature Hyatt House cap on the prominent corner of the structure. j. Residents asked about existing and future set-backs—DW explained that the current office building maintains a 100' set back from 22nd Street and the hotel building will be approximately 150' set back and the retail building would encroach the 100' set back by approximately 40'. DW also commented that the mixed commercial uses and lodging and dining uses were consistent with the Village of Oak Brook's Revitalization Plan. k. Residents also asked about the Rush Development and associated parking deck— GS/PD/DW declined to comment about the Rush development. JANKOIGROUP 1. The Drake Hotel representative asked what the hotel's projected Revenue per available room("RevPAR")would be—GS answered that he estimated stabilized RevPAR in the$120 range Due to the early departure of some residents during the discussion/presentation,GS/PD/DW were only able to speak to Michael McMahon(President of the HOA)afterward.Michael indicated he is in support of the project and intended to express such support at the December 10`x'PD meeting. Another resident Tim(did not provide last name)contacted GS after the meeting and expressed support for the project and apologized for some of the residents comments/questions interrupting the presentation. Other Relevant Meetings/Conversations: - George Rinaldi III—Owner of 122 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL 60523.On Friday September 11,2015 Greg Spanos and Justin Dickinson met with George Rinaldi III—owner of the office building located immediately east of the proposed Hyatt House project. The meeting took place in Mr.Rinaldi's office at 122 22nd Street. Greg and Justin provided an overview of the project and displayed the site plan,aerials,interior and exterior renderings,and the development timing. Mr.Rinaldi expressed support and excitement to have the hotel and restaurant amenity in close proximity to his place of business.He suggested his tenant(now Milliken)hosts numerous meetings and visitors each year and would like to have a new Hyatt House hotel next door. Mr.Rinaldi was supportive of the project. - Lions Club International—on Wednesday 12/2/15,Greg Spanos spoke to Donald Grant over the phone.Mr.Grant is the head property manager for the Lions Club International at 300 22 Street in Oak Brook,IL—the west neighbor of the proposed Hyatt House development. Greg provided Donald the HOA presentation materials(project overview)and discussed the project over the phone. Mr.Grant expressed support for the project suggesting that Lions Club members and visitors would enjoy the accommodations and amenities of the hotel and associated restaurant facility. - On 12/2/15,Greg Spanos emailed and called Scott Stahr,Principal of Fulcrum Advisors-the current owner/manager of the Drake Office Plaza.at 2215/2211 York Road in Oak Brook. Mr. Stahr was provided the project overview,renderings, and also the traffic memo which is part of the PD submission. Mr. Stahr commented that it looks like a great project. - On 12/1/15,Greg Spanos emailed and called Mr.Kevin Hill—director of real estate for Advocate Health Systems. Advocate is the immediate north neighbor to the subject site— across Bliss Road. Mr.Hill was provided a project overview and information regarding the project. - On 12/3/15,Greg Spanos and Justin Dickinson,both of Janko Group,spoke to Tracey Mulqueen,President and CEO of Oak Brook Economic Development Partnership. Tracey is in support of the project and will provide the board a letter of support. L•3 Kimley>>>Horn MEMORANDUM To: Village of Oak Brook, IL From: Drew Walker, PE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: November 5, 2015 Re: Proposed Hyatt House Development 210 W. 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., serves as the engineering consultant for Janko Group. They are proposing to redevelopment an approximate 3 acre parcel with a one-story office into a 144 Room Hyatt House hotel with accompanying 4,500 SF restaurant. The sitework includes demolition, grading, storm sewer, water, sanitary sewer, and paving installation. Existing Conditions The site is currently 3.86 acres. The site contains a 1-story office building at the center with associated parking surrounding the building. Stormwater run-off drains to a series of inlets within the parking area. These inlets route stormwater to an above ground detention pond at the south side of the property. A discharge pipe runs from the existing detention pond to the northeast corner of the site where it connects to the storm sewer in Bliss Drive. Per the attached Existing Impervious Area Exhibit, it can be seen that the existing impervious area on site is 109,689.13 SF. Proposed Conditions The project proposes to demolish the existing office building, parking, and utility infrastructure in its entirety. The project will consist of a new 144 room hotel and accompanying 4,500 SF restaurant with associated parking and utilities. The site stormater run-off will function in a very similar way to the existing conditions. A series of inlets will pick up surface run-off from the parking area; however, now, we will route this run-off to a new underground storage chamber. The underground storage has been sized to replace the volume previously provided in the above ground detention area. Calculations confirming stage storage of the existing conditions volume as well as the proposed underground volume are attached to this memo. Per the attached Proposed Impervious Area Exhibit, the new layout of the property, the impervious area has increased by approximately 13,000 SF. This exceeds the threshold for DuPage County's Ordinance requirements for Volume Control Measures. Volume control has been calculated for all new impervious area, approximately 125,000 SF. The proposed design provides a bio-retention area at the northeast corner of the property. This area will allow approximately 2-ft of ponding with a soil kill a 1001 Warrenville 60532 ` -: Kimle >>>Horn Page 2 v profile designed to infiltrate stormwater run-off. There will be an inlet in this area connected to the underground storage. The underground storage system will be a concrete modular system on a stone bed. The stone bed will also contribute to the Volume Control requirements. Detailed calculations for the area of volume control are attached to this memo. Ultimately, the underground storage system will drain through an appropriate sized restrictor to the same outfall location in Bliss Road. This can be seen in the Preliminary Engineering Drawings— Grading Plan. At Final Design, an analysis of the storm sewer system will be completed using the Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for AutoCAD 2013. The storm system was designed to convey the 10-year storm. The 100-year storm will be routed overland. This routing has been identified on the Preliminary Grading. Attachments • Existing Impervious Area Exhibit • Proposed Impervious Area Exhibit • Volume Control Calculations • Detention Volume Calculations 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 350, Lisle, IL 60532 IUWI � IY,r� it �Mi IY M 4 I WINDSOR DRIVE MON i El 0 M D 5 � W� � 5 C �n N O N r N mo _0 D OD 1 m C) 1 Z U) `O O m zz _m N� c/) cn m EXISTING IMPERVIOUS EXHIBIT x z Kimley ))) Horn K H YATT HOUSE C 2015 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. m 1001 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 350, LISLE, IL 60532 OAK BROOK, IL PHONE. 630-487-5550 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM .. u _ ��.... WINDSOR DRIVE I O r v ` J D c 5 C O0 N o N D I r W N � m CA 0 Z cn CA m m m 7 �� V) N O _ Kiml z PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA EXHIBIT a ��� Horn N W H YATT HOUSE © 2015 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OAK BROOK, IL 1001 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 350, LISLE, IL 60532 PHONE: 630-487-5550 WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM i i s I WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS Project:Hyatt House Oak Brook, IL Kimley))) Horn Design By:WAW 11/5/2015 DuPage Rainfall Treatment Depth Required Volume Control Existing Impervious area 109,689.13 sf Proposed Impervious area(Roads,roofs,sidewalks,etc.) 124,853.00 sf Net Volume Control Required 13,005.52 cf Provided Volume Control Bioretention Facility Detail Bioretention Facility Area(BioSwale Area) 5,525.00 sf Volume Type Depth Porosity Media Storage Volume (ft) cf cf Surface Storage 2.00 0.85 11,050.00 9,392.50 Soil Media 1.50 0.25 8,287.50 2,071.88 Course Aggregate(Above Invert) 0.67 1 0.36 3,685.18 1,326.66 Course Aggregate(Below Invert) 0.17 0.36 922.68 332.16 Sub-Total 13,123.20 Bioretention Facility Area(Underground Storage) 9,086.00 sf Note:Area of Underground+2'Stone around perimeter Media Volume Type Depth Porosity Volume Storage Volume (ft) cf cf Surface Storage 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 Soil Media 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 Course Aggregate(Above Invert) 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 Course Aggregate(Below Invert) 0.50 0.36 4,543.00 1,635.48 Sub-Total 1,635.48 Total(ac-ft) 14,758.68 Kimley ))) Horn MMO-WATT"OM OM WOM IL DETENTION VOLUME CALCULATIONS Date:October 28th, 2014 Revised: PREPARED FOR: Oak Brook, IL PREPARED BY: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. Elev. (ft) Area (cf) Volume (cf) 681.5 15,009 681.0 12,436 6,861 680.5 9,906 5,585 680 5,208 3,779 679.5 2,192 1,850 679 701 723 Total 18,799 UNDERGROUND DETENTION Elev. (ft) Area (SF)* Volume (AC-ft) 678.5 7425.00 675.83 7425.00 19,825 Total 19,825 Area reduced by 10%to account for vault walls ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AND RETAIL/RESTAURANT OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS Prepared By: JAW01GROUP JUSTIN DICKINSON 847-940-0364 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL—OAK BROOK,IL Executive Summary: Janko Group LLC ("Janko") is under contract to acquire a 3.86 acre site in Oak Brook, IL. The site is currently improved with a 40,000sf single story office building. Janko intends to raze the existing structure to accommodate development of a 144 room Hyatt House Hotel along with a stand-alone 4,000sf-5,000sf restaurant/retail building. The site is located at the NEC of 22nd and Windsor Drive—a four-way fully light intersection (a"hard corner"). The site is easily accessible from Windsor Drive. The hotel will accommodate both extended stay and transient hotel demand. The Hyatt House will feature upscale architecture, comfortable, sleek and modern guest rooms, common areas, swimming pool, meeting space an H-Bar and fitness center. The TBD retail/restaurant will accommodate demand from Oak Brook area residents,visitors, and 22nd Street Traffic Location (macro). Oak Brook, IL is located Oak Brook is located approximately 19 miles (31 km) west of the Chicago Loop (downtown Chicago) and is served by a network of major federal, state, and county roads, including the Tri-State Tollway (Interstate 294), the East-West Tollway (Interstate 88), and the Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate 290). Although Oak Brook is not directly served by any CTA or Metra trains, the commercial corridor along 22nd Street is served by several Pace bus routes,and train stations in neighboring villages offer commuter train access to downtown Chicago. Location(micros The site is located at the NEC of 22nd Street and Windsor Avenue—a fully light four-way intersection. The site is highly visible from 22nd Street and easily accessible from Windsor Drive. The site is 0.30mi east of the two way interchange at I-294 and 22nd Street, 0.25 from Butler Country Club and Oak Brook Golf club, and approximately 1.1mi east of Oak Brook Center Shopping Mall. Supply: Greater Oak Brook experiences a daily influx of both employees and visitors due to the high concentration of office properties as well as the Oakbrook Center mall. The shopping center is the largest open-air center in the contiguous United States with over 160 stores and restaurants. For further definition on existing supply in the market, reference the attached Smith Travel Research (STR) report. Demand: Oak Brook is well-known as a hub of corporate and leisure demand generators. Anchored by Oak Brook Shopping Center, a 2 million square foot outdoor mall and regional shopping destination, Oak Brook is also home to numerous corporate and regional headquarters. Some notables include McDonalds Corporation,Ace Hardware,Blistex,Advocate Healthcare, Inland Real Estate Corporation,Rubbermaid,and Dutchessois Group. Conclusion In summary,the proposed Hyatt House is projected to offer significant appeal to both the corporate and leisure business segments. The hotel will boast an amenity package and a premier brand affiliation. The retail/restaurant outlot will be designed in such a way that it is compatible with the approved architecture of the hotel and support the growing demand for retail/restaurant services in the 22nd&Windsor submarket. 1 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL-OAK BROOK,IL Performance Macro analysis:The performance of the U.S.lodging industry tends to follow cycles that begin or end due to a single major event,or several factors coming together within a very short period of time. Presented in the following charts are trends in occupancy, average room rate and RevPar for the industry nationwide. U.S.LODGING INDUSTRY TRENDS Year Occumncv AM RevPAR 2000 63.2% $ 84.66 $53.49 2001 59.7% $ 83.61 $49.91 2002 59.0% $ 82.53 $48.70 2003 59.3% $ 82.71 $49.03 2004 61.3% $ 86.18 $52.80 2005 63.0% $ 91.03 $57.35 2006 63.1% $ 97.82 $61.75 2007 62.8% $104.32 $65.52 2008 59.8% $107.34 $64.18 2009 54.5% $ 98.17 $53.51 2010 57.6% $ 98.06 $56.46 2011 59.9% $101.85 $61.82 2012 61.3% $106.25 $65.15 2013 62.2% $110.30 $68.58 2014 64.4% $115.32 $74.28 Sources: Smith Travel Research;HREC-Hospitality Real Estate Counselors NATIONAL OCCUPANCY,AVERAGE RATE&REVPAR TRENDS $120 2000-2014 64% $100 62% 60% $80 58% $60 56% 54% $40 52% $20 , 50% 4°°h �°°'o IIIIIIIIIIIIIAOR �RevPAR -Occupancy .Snurre: .Smith Trnvpl Rpsenrrh 2 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL-OAK BROOK,IL U.S.HOTEL OCCUPANCY 2005-2014 64.4% 63.0% 63.1% 62,8% 61.3% 59.8% 57.6% 54.5% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source:Smith Travel Research U.S.AVERAGE DAILY ROOM RATE 2005-2014 $115.32 $110.50 $104.32$107.34 $106.10 $101.82 $97.82 $98.10 $98.06 $91.03 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 r 2013 2014, Source:Smith Travel Research REVPAR PERCENT CHANGE 2005-2016P 8.S% 7.7% 6.1% 5.6% 8.2% 6,8% 5.4% 8.3% 6.4% 5.9% 1_, I , I , ■ 11_, I , ■ , I , I , 1 -2.0% -16.6% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015P 2016P Source:Smith Travel Research In 2008, significant supply growth coupled with national and international monetary turmoil and rapidly deteriorating global and U.S. economic fundamentals resulted in the first significant industrywide decline since 2001. RevPAR declined approximately 2.0 percent for the year which consisted of about a 4.8 percentage point decline in occupancy and a 3.0 percent increase in average rate. The largest single year decline in occupancy,average rate,RevPAR,and demand was posted in 2009.This was the first full year of operation since the onset of the international economic and monetary crises.The scope of the decline exceeded all prior years of the recorded modern history of the U.S. lodging industry. The 3 II ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL-OAK BROOK,IL almost 17 percent single year decline in RevPAR quickly erased several years of real growth.The economic turmoil also came at a time when an approximate 3.0 percent increase in the available supply of guest rooms occurred.This was well above the 20-year average of about two percent per year. The declines of 2009 were followed by a 7.7 percent increase in accommodated demand and 5.3 percent increase in RevPAR in 2010. Occupancy increased 5.3 percentage points while the average rate continued to lag inflation. The 8.2 percent RevPAR gain in 2011 was significantly above the gain seen in 2010,and additional confirmation of the continued recovery of the industry. RevPAR increased 6.8 percent in 2012. Despite a year that was marked by macroeconomic uncertainty,and resulting shaky consumer and business confidence,hotels in the US ended 2011 on a strong note.Lodging performance exceeded expectations in the fourth quarter,in part due to a short-term uptick in economic activity. Hotels across the spectrum of price segments posted occupancy and average daily rate gains in 2011 reflecting the breadth of the recovery. Overall,hotel occupancy in 2011 recovered to 59.9 percent,comparable to its ten-year average of 60.0 percent. Average rate reached a new high at$110.50 for 2013,which exceeds the peak average room rates experienced in 2008. However, that does not take inflation into account.A quarter-by-quarter look at the past two recessions may forecast when ADRs will recover in this cycle.After the 1991 recession,it took six years and three quarters for the industry to get back to its previous peak in ADR.And after the 2001 recession hit,it took six years to restore its ADR to previous levels. Real ADR leads may not recover in this cycle until the third quarter of 2015. Average rate grew faster in 2012 than in 2011;and, supply growth was comparable in both years. RevPAR growth has be en driven by i her room rates while occupancy gr owth has bee n decelerating as it approaches equilibrium and increasing capacity constraints.The industry continued to show positive RevPAR growth in 2013 with an increase of 5.4 percent. RevPAR was the highest ever in 2013 at$68.58 and again established a new high in 2014 with an 8.3 percent increase to$74.28 for the year. Continued ADR growth and stable occupancy are projected to result in a steady progress in RevPAR well into 2015 and 2016. An increase of 6.4 percent in RevPAR is projected for 2015 and 5.9 percent in 2016.Total RevPAR growth in the industry is projected to increase well ahead of inflationary expectations over the next several years. Micro Analysis:The projected occupancy,room rate and resulting RevPAR for the proposed Hyatt House are presented in the following table. JA 01 G ROU P o.n a n.n non. -STABILIZED OPERATIONS%OI .0-I Ve.rI Ve.r2 Ye.r3 V-4 Ye.r5 Ve.,F..dhn: 7;oe-ts J-19 Jane-20 J-21 U-22 Dots OP- 365 365 365 363 505 Nom6or of Rooms 144 144 144 144 134 Oce Room Mghu(Ind.Comps) 39.946 40.997 42.574 33,613 43,625 Ocr.P.nsV Rmc 76.0(r`: 78.09: x1.00": 83.00".: 83.WN R.tc Inc-VoV% 6.529: 5.449: 1.94% 1.90`.4 Avg.R. 11x1.C-P.) $13918) $14M(K) 51560) 4159.00 4162,00 Rooms RnP.r SIOSA4 $115.44 5126-6 5111,97 5134.6 See attached for Smith Travel Research (STR) report outlining competitive hotel performance. (next page) 4 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL—OAK BROOK,IL The projected competitive position of the proposed Hotel is believed to be substantially enhanced or supported by the following considerations: 1. Location: The subject site is well-positioned within a highly desirable,readily accessible,and clearly visible growth area of Oak Brook. The subject location is easily accessible from 22nd Street and proximate to major highways and roadways (22nd Street,I-294, I-88,Route 83). The site is also proximate to an-array of restaurants,entertainment and support facilities,as well as higher education institutions and corporate demand generators. 2. Hyatt Brand: Hyatt Hotels Corporation,headquartered in Chicago,is a leading global hospitality company with a proud heritage of making guests feel more than welcome.Thousands of members of the Hyatt family strive to make a difference in the lives of the guests they encounter every day by providing authentic hospitality.The Company's subsidiaries manage, franchise,own and develop hotels and resorts under the Hyatt,Park Hyatt,Andaz,Grand Hyatt, Hyatt Regency, Hyatt Place, Hyatt House,Hyatt Centric,Hyatt Zilara and Hyatt Ziva brand names and have locations on six continents.As of March 31,2015,the Company's worldwide portfolio consisted of 599 properties in 50 countries. For more information,please visit www.hyatt.com. 3. Hyatt House Product: Hyatt House has been ranked the#1 Upscale Extended-Stay Brand by Business Travel News 2012 Hotel Chain Survey. Currently,Hyatt has 60 Hyatt House hotels operating in the United States and Puerto Rico.The proposed Hotel will be the newest hotel in the market. It will also offer comparable to superior features and amenities to the existing hotel competition. The proposed Hyatt House is intended to offer an excellent lodging option for corporate and leisure travelers due to its location and quality. 4. Hyatt Gold Passport: The proposed Hyatt House is projected to be affiliated with a brand that offers one of the strongest membership rewards programs in the U.S.lodging industry. Frequent traveler programs have grown to become an important and competitive attribute particularly among corporate travelers. These customers will often travel out of their way for a preferred brand and will pay premium rates as well. Hyatt Gold Passport members account for approximately 62%of aggregate Gross Room Revenue and 56%of daily occupancy. 5. Sponsor:Janko Group, founded in 1988,is a well-capitalized,privately-owned real estate investment company. The firm's primary focus is adding value to real estate through strategic acquisition,land development,vertical development, and structured finance. Product types include industrial,office, hospitality, and both single and multi-family residential. Current markets include Chicago,Kansas City,Indianapolis,Madison/Milwaukee, and the San Francisco Bay area.More information can be found at Janko Group's website:www.jankogroup.us Janko's hospitality experience includes the acquisitions of two approximately 90-room Staybridge Suites (an IHG extended-stay product)in Madison,Wisconsin as well as a full-service,240-room Holiday Inn—to be redeveloped—on"The Plaza"in Kansas City,Missouri. Janko purchased a full- service,424-room Holiday Inn Select in Naperville, Illinois and subsequently redeveloped the asset into the recently-opened Marriott Chicago Naperville after a$32,000,000 renovation. The Naperville property received Marriott's 2012 full-service"Opening of the Year"award, Janko Group is under 5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS HYATT HOUSE HOTEL—OAK BROOK,IL construction on a 114 room Hyatt House hotel in Evanston, IL and an 81 room Holiday Inn. Danko Group has an ownership position in the management company Danko Hospitality. Danko Group is in the pre-development phase of over$150 million of hotel development I� 6 anuary 2009 to June 2015 Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 201 urrency: USD-US Dollar Tab Table of Contents 1 Data by Measure 2 Percent Change by Measure 3 Percent Change by Year 4 welve Month Moving Average 5 welve Month Moving Average with Percent Change 6 Day of Week Analysis 7 Raw Data 8 lassic 9 Response Report 10 Help 11 erms and Conditions 12 I LAN f- &.0%A N' IV IVLAV%AI V , Oakbrook Job Number:698685_SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 O .. January February March _ April May June July August September T, October November December t Total Year Jun Y 2009 41.1 51.8 57.0 59.0 64.4 74.0 78.3 74.3 75.9 70.6 62.4 50.1 1 63.3 57 2010 49.8 60.2 69.6 75.4 79.6 87.5 85.3 82.8 84.8 83.6 78.0 57.2 74.5 7( 2011 52.2 63.0 74.6 69.8 82.2 90.0 89.4 89.8 80.9 81.4 79.4 62.3! 75.5 71 2012 57.6 65.7 73.6 79.9 85.0 84.3 87.0 84.5 83.4 84.8 75.2 60.0 j 76.8 7' 2013 54.1 64.0 72.7 85.4 88.5 88.7 86.5 84.7 82.0 83.4 76.3 66.8; 77.8 7E 2014 56.3 67.8 73.8 82.2 86.7 89.5 84.2 77.7 79.6 82.2 72.5 59.5 i 76.2 7E 2015 54.3 63.2 72.2 77.5 82.3 84.4 7, _!A!n 52.1 61.9 70.2 75.0 80.7 85.2 84.9 81.9 81.0 80.8 73.6 58.9, � 73_7-__ _ 7( January February March April May June July August September October November December Total Year Jun Y - -- - 2008 106.99 103.11 102.56 98.51 95.47 97.18- 89.41 89.77 93.82 92.86 92.59 86.90 t 95.10 100. - i 2010 86.75 87.70 88.34 88.59 88.98 95.51 94.40 98.25 99.63 97.10 96.14 88.42 i 1 93.07 89. 2011 97.30 93.07 95.22 95.14 96.03 97.52 95.66 100.38 102.24 101.76 99.79 91.27 j 1 97.23 95. 2012 95.48 95.16 96.58 100.20 105.26 108.78 106.35 108.17 120.84 110.98 100.93 92.62? 1; 104.27 100. 2013 99.67 98.47 95.92 103.74 105.92 112.64 110.40 109.07 111.67 108.80 101.72 97.62 1 05.25 103. 2014 100.30 100.95 100.21 107.98 109.85 116.80 118.33 118.75 129.21 124.08 116.03 110.361? E 114.11 106. 2015 109.00 111.74 113.15 122.99 126.14 132.80 _ 120. Avg - 99.31 96.61 98.90 102.71 104.39 108.89 102 40 103.96 109.47 106.17 101.39 94.92 i 101.41 102: January February _- March_ T_ April - _May_ June Jul r� August__ S-eptember_ . --------- - - - - - - -- Year ._. - 2009 43.95 53.41 58.42 58.13 61.49 71.90 70.05 66.66 71.21 65.57 57.75 43.55; 60.18 57. 2010 43.20 52.80 61.47 66.83 70.83 83.58 80.55 81.38 84.46 B1.1B 74.97 50.621E 69.37 63. 2011 50.78 58.67 71.01 66.37 78.93 87.80 85.53 90.11 82.66 82.80 79.21 56.86¢ j 73.39 68. 2012 54.97 62.53 71.11 80.07 89.42 91.73 92.53 91.37 100.72 94.16 75.94 55.56 j 80.08 75. 2013 53.91 62.98 69.70 88.64 93.76 99.86 95.53 92.43 91.59 90.70 77.63 65.19: 81.90 78. 2014 58.47 68.47 73.99 88.76 95.27 104.55 99.65 92.32 102.86 102.03 84.15 65.64 s 86.92 81. 2015 59.21 70.66 81.69 95.29 103.82 112.14 87, Avg 51.74 61.07 69.46 77.02 84.25 92.74 86.91 85.12 88.64 85.76 74.67 55.93{ g 74.75 72. ____January _ February! March - April - M _ June _July - Aug September _ October_ November December j -Total Year Jun Y 2009 26,660 24,080 26,660 25,800 26,660 25,800 26,660 26,660 25,800 26,660. 25,800 _ 26,660 313,900 155,6 1 2010 26,660 24,080 26,660 25,800 26,660 25,800 26,660 26,660 25,800 26,660 25,800 26,660'i ? 313,900 155,6 2011 26,660 24,080 26,660 25,800 21,514 20,820 21,514 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 21,514' j 273,230 145,5 1 2012 21,514 19,432 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 21,514 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 21,514 i ' 253,310 125,6 2013 21,514 19,432 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 21,514 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 21,514 j I 253,310 125,6 2014 21,514 19,432 21,514 20,820 21,514 20,820 26,846 26,846 25,980 26,846 25,980 26,846 284,958 125,6 2015 26,846 24,248 26,846 25,980 26,846 25,960 156,7 --._ --- - -- --- ._ Avg 24,481 22,112 24,481 23,691 23,746 22,980 24,118 24,118 23,340 24,118 23,340 24,118 282,101 141,4 ,Demand -` _Januar r� Februa -March - April - - Maw- June July Au ust September October -November December3 7.77 rl Year Jun Y 2009 10,951 12,473 15,185 15;226 17,171 19,088 20,888 19,798 19,583- 18,825 16,090 13,362 198,640 90,0 2010 13,276 14,497 18,551 19,461 21,223 22,576 22,748 22,082 21,871 22,291 20,120 1 5262 233,958 109,5 2011 13,914 15,180 19,882 17,999 17,684 18,744 19,236 19,313 16,833 17,506 16,526 13,404 j 206,221 103,4 i 2012 12,386 12,769 15,841 16,638 18,277 17,556 18,719 18,172 17,354 18,253 15,665 12,905 i 194,535 93,4 2013 11,635 12,429 15,633 17,790 19,043 18,458 18,616 18,231 17,077 17,935 15,888 14,368 j 197,103 94,9 2014 12,541 13,181 15,886 17,115 18,658 18,636 22,608 20,872 20,681 22,076 18,842 15,966(1 i 217,062 96,0 2015 .__14,582 15,333._. .---_-_19,381 -- 20,128 - 22,097_ 21,939 _ _ _._....113,4 Avg 12 755 _ 13,695 17 194 17,765 19,165 -19F571 20 469 19,745 18 900 19,481 17,189 -14,211 207 920 100 1 January_ February - March - April May June July mm August - September„- October November December, Total Year Jun Y 2009 1,171,657 1,286,095 1,557,348 1,499,881 1,639,233 1,855,056 1,867,537 1,777,252 1,837,274 1,748,106 1,489,828 1,161,1161 18,890,383 9,009,2 2010 1,151,686 1,271,436 1,638,795 1,724,099 1,888,435 2,156,240 2,147,371 2,169,546 2,179,025 2,164,355 1,934,336 1,349,432 " 21,774,756 9,830,6 2011 1,353,881 1,412,757 1,893,232 1,712,343 1,698,165 1,827,901 1,840,055 1,938,607 1,721,000 1,781,412 1,649,126 1,223,366 20,051,845 9,898,2 2012 1,182,619 1,215,107 1,529,913 1,667,135 1,923,857 1,909,791 1,990,730 1,965,721 2,097,015 2,025,729 1,581,004 1,195,226 20,283,847 9,428,4 2013 1,159,716 1,223,874 1;499,507 1,845,577 2,017,082 2,079,027 2,055,208 1;988,456 1,906,929 1,951,404 1,616,154 1,402,5501 20,745,484 9,824,7 2014 1 257 RR4 1 1430 569 1 591 R79 1 848 077 9 n4A.5Rn 9 176 6RR 9 675 nA7 2 47R sin 9 679 199 9 73A 230 9 1 RR 959 1 7R2 066 I i 24 767 993 in 254 R STR's Trend Report is a publication of STR,Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers.Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report,in whole or part,without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STR,Inc. . %.4 P.0 v . v1 vv1 1r vI I. i I I.v.1. . .v r wMV . %o I 9-0v16aw11 wr7 Oakbrook Job Number:698685_SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 I Occupancy January February March April May June July August SSe tember October November December; ! Total Year _ Jun Y - -._ 2010 21.2 16.2 22.2 27.8 23.6 18.3 8.9 11.5 11.7 18.4 25.0 14.2 i i -1-7.8 21 2011 4.8 4.7 7.2 -7.5 3.3 2.9 4.8 8.4 -4.6 -2.7 1.8 8.8 1 1.3 C 2012 10.3 4.2 -1.3 14.5 3.4 -6.3 -2.7 5.9 3.1 4.3 -5.2 -3.71 1.8 4 2013 -6.1 -2.7 -1.3 6.9 4.2 5.1 -0.6 0.3 -1.6 -1.7 1.4 11.3 1.3 1 2014 7.8 6.1 1.6 -3.8 -2.0 1.0 -2.7 -8.3 -2.9 -1.4 -5.0 -10.9 2.1 1 ! 2015 _ -6.8 _ -6.8 _ -2.2 _ 5.8 -5.1_ -5.7 Avg -5.2 - - 3.6 4.4 5.4 4.5 2.5 1.6 1.2 1.1 -3.4 3.6 _3.91 4.0 4 . Janus_- February- -- March April May June_---July August September - October November December; Total Year --__Jun 2010 i -18.9 -14.9 -13.9 -10.1 -6.8 -1.7 5.6 9.4 6.2 4.6 3.8 1.8' ' -2.1 -1 C 2011 12.2 6.1 7.8 7.4 7.9 2.1 1.3 2.2 2.6 4.8 3.8 3.2; j 4.5 E 1 2012 -1.9 2.2 1.4 5.3 9.6 11.6 11.2 7.8 18.2 9.1 1.1 1.5 7.2 E 2013 4.4 3.5 -0.7 3.5 0.6 3.5 3.8 0.8 -7.6 -2.0 0.8 5.4 '!, 0.9 2 2014 0.6 2.5 4.5 4.1 3.7 3.7 7.2 8.9 15.7 14.0 14.1 13.1 j 6.4 2015 8.7 10.7 12.9 13.9 14.8 13.7 __---_----_--__ _ _._ _. 12 Av$. 0.6 - 1.7 _-_ 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.5 5.8 5.8 7.0 6.1-- - 4.7 5_w ----- 3.8 January -_ February- `- March APni Mai- June -_ �Jui� _^ August September - October November December Total Year Jun Y - -44N ___.,-__.__ _-- -_._--._-_- _ _.._ . _c 2010 -1.7 -1.1 5.2 14.9 15.2 16.2 15.0' 22.1 18.6 23.8 29.8 16.2, ! 15.3 2011 17.6 11.1 15.5 -0.7 11.4 5.0 6.2 10.7 -2.1 2.0 5.6 12.3 1 ( 5.8 7 i � 2012 6.2 6.6 0.7 20.6 13.3 4.5 8.2 1.4 21.8 13.7 -4.1 -2.3 9.1 1 C 2013 -1.9 0.7 -2.0 10.7 4.8 8.9 3.2 1.2 -9.1 -3.7 2.2 17.3 1 ? 2.3 4 2014 8.5 8.7 6.2 0.1 1.6 4.7 4.3 -0.1 12.3 12.5 8.4 0.7 I 6,1 4 2015 1.3 3.2 10.4 7.3 9.0 7.3 __...__- -- _.._.. _ E -__- - - - _ --- - _- _- Av 8.8 9.2 7.8 7.4 7.0 January Februa�y Maw- _ June Ju!y August _- September October November December Total Year - Jun Y 2010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 �0.0- 0.0 _ -0.0 C 2011 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3; !! -13.0 -E 2012 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 -7.3 -1: 2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 C 2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8: 1 12.5 C 2015 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24 Avg 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 -1.6 C Jan u February - - March - April-� Mater - June July Au ust September October November Decembers Total Year Jun Y -2010 21:2 16.2 22.2 27.8 23.6 18.3 6.9 11.5 11.7 _-- 18.4 -- - 25.0 --- 14.2; 17.8 21 2011 4.8 4.7 7.2 -7.5 -16.7 -17.0 -15.4 -12.5 -23.0 -21.5 -17.9 -12.2 ! -11.9 2012 -11.0 -15.9 -20.3 -7.6 3.4 -6.3 -2.7 -5.9 3.1 4.3 -5.2 -3.7 -5.7 £ 2013 -6.1 -2.7 -1.3 6.9 4.2 5.1 -0.6 0.3 -1.6 -1.7 1.4 11.3 j 1.3 1 2014 7.8 6.1 1.6 3.8 -2.0 1.0 21.4 14.5 21.1 23.1 18.6 11.1 10.1 1 's _2.015 _16.3 16.3 22.0 17.6 18.4 17.7 1E Av 5.5 41 52 56 5.1 31 23 16 2.3 45 44 4.2 Janes Febru - March - April - May -� June _ _._. Jul August Member _October November -.,_qe�cemqerj Total Year Jun Y 2010 -1.7 -1.1 5.2 14.9 15.2 16.2 15.0 22.1 1B.6 23.8 29.8 16.2 -_..._- -15.3 2011 17.6 11.1 15.5 -0.7 -10.1 -15.2 -14.3 -10.6 -21.0 -17.7 -14.7 -9.3 I 7.9 C 2012 -12.6 -14.0 -19.2 -2.6 13.3 4.5 8.2 1.4 21.8 13.7 -4.1 -2.3; ? 1.2 -4 2013 -1.9 0.7 -2.0 10.7 4.8 8.9 3.2 1.2 -9.1 -3.7 2.2 17.3 j 2.3 4 2014 8.5 8.7 6.2' 0.1 1.6 4.7 30.2 24.6 40.1 40.4 35.3 25.6 ! 19.4 4 2015 _26.4._-_._---28.8-- 37_8_-- 34 0 36.0 33.9 _.. _. _ _ --- -32 I -. _-.._ _._ _ -. --- - -.---- - -- - _ __._._. _ _- - Avg--- 6.0 5.7 7.3 94 10.1 �� 8.8 B5 -.. _ 7.7- 10.1 _.._ 11.3 _ 9.7 9.5 1_., ._ - 6.0 --f . ww . v vv..• v �w vJv • v . .v�.v..nv . v...� vv�..n . w� . vva. • Oakbrook Job Number:698685_SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 Jan 10 Feb 10 Mar 10 Apr i May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10 Oct Dec ITY: i Occ 21.2 16.2 22.2 2Z8 23.6 18.3 8.9 11.5 11.7 18.4 25.0 14.2; �7.8 �0?'65qll 6 ADR -18.9 -14.9 -13.9 -10.1 -6.8 -1.7 5.6 9.4 6.2 4.6 3.8 1.8 -2.1 -10.31 RevPAR -1.7 -1.1 5.2 14.9 15.2 16.2 15.0 22.1 18.6 23.8 29.8 16.2 15.3 9.1 Supply 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 Demand 21.2 16.2 22.2 27.8 23.6 16.3 8.9 11.5 11.7 18.4 25.0 14:21 ; 17.8 21.6 Revenue -1.7 -1.1 5.2 14.9 15.2 16.2 15.0 22.1 18.6 23.8 29.8 16.21 [L_____15.3 9.1 11 Sep 11 Oct Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar'll Apr 11 May 11 Jun 11 Juill Nov . - P i Occ 4.8 4.7 7.2 -7.5 3.3 2.9 4.8 ,8.4 -4.6 -2.7 1.8 8.8 1.3 0.9 i ADR 12.2 6.1 7.8 7.4 7.9 2.1 1.3 2.2 2.6 4.8 3.8 3.21 4.5 6.7{ RevPAR 17.6 11.1 15.5 -0.7 11.4 5.0 6.2 10.7 -2.1 2.0 5.6 1 2.3 1 1 5.8 7.7 pip Supply 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3:1 -13.0 -6.51, Demand 4.8 4.7 7.2 -7.5 -16.7 -17.0 -15.4 -12.5 -23.0 -21.5 -17.9 -12.2 j -11.9 -5.6 j Revenue 17.6 11.1 15.5 -0.7 -10.1 -15.2 -14.3 -10.6 21.0 -17.7 -14.7 93 1 -7.9 0.7j Oct Jan 12 Feb 12 Mar12 Apr 12 May 12 Jun 12 JuI12 Aug 12 Sep 12 . �' �YM Occ 10.3 4.2 -1.3 14.5 3.4 -6.3 -2.7 -5.9 3.1 4.3 -5.2 -3.7- i 1.8 4.7 ADR -1.9 2.2 1.4 5.3 9.6 11.6 11.2 7.8 18.2 9.1 1.1 1.5? 1 7.2 5.4 RevPAR 8.2 6.6 0.1 20.6 13.3 4.5 8.2 1.4 21.8 13.7 -4.1 -2.3% 1 9.1 10.4 I Supply -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 -19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C { -7.3 -13.7 Demand -11.0 -15.9 -20.3 -7.6 3.4 -6.3 -2.7 -5.9 3.1 4.3 -5.2 -3.7 5.7 -9.6 j __Revenue -12.6 -14.0 -19.2 -2.6 13.3 4.5 8.2 1.4 21.8 13.7 -4.1 2.3 1.2 4.7 Jan 13 Feb 13 Mar13 Apr13 May 13 Jun 13 JuI13- -� -- -._ _ __.-.. ---- -- -- _...__ .._. .._. ._ --------- --- - - ------ --13 Sep 13 Aug Oct Nov •• Occ -6.1 -2.7 -1.3 6.9 4.2 5.1 -0.6 0.3 -1.6 -1.7 1.4 11.3 i j 1.3 1.6 i ADR 4.4 3.5 -0.7 3.5 0.6 3.5 3.8 0.8 -7.6 -2.0 0.6 5.4 i 0.9 2.5 RevPAR -1.9 0.7 -2.0 10.7 4.8 8.9 3.2 1.2 -9.1 -3.7 2.2 17.3' 2.3 4.2 c Supply 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 0.0 0.01 Demand -6.1 -2.7 -1.3 6.9 4.2 5.1 -0.6 0.3 -1.6 -1.7 1.4 11.3 f 1.3 1.6 Revenue -1.9 0.7 M -2.0 - - 10.7 4.8 8.9 3.2 1.2 -9.1 3.7 2.2 17.31 1 2.3 4.2-, Oct-14- , . Occ 7.8 6.1 1.6 -3.8 -2.0 1.0 -2.7 -8.3 -Sep-14 2.9 -1.4 -5.0 10.9: -2.1 1.1 ADR 0.6 2.5 4.5 4.1 3.7 3.7 7.2 8.9 15.7 14.0 14.1 13.1 1 i 8.4 3.3 RevPAR 8.5 8.7 6.2 0.1 1.6 4.7 4.3 -0.1 12.3 12.5 8.4 0.7( 6.1 4.4 Supply 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.6 } 12.5 0.0 Demand 7.8 6.1 1.6 -3.8 -2.0 1.0 21.4 14.5 21.1 23.1 18.6 11.1 10.1 1.1 j Revenue -- -- 8.5 -- - 8.7 - --- - 6.2 -- - 01 - 1.6 ---- -4_7 - 30.2 40.1 40.4 35.3 256 f 194 4.4 Jan 15 Feb 15 Mar15 Apr15 May 15 Jun 15 JU115 Aug 15 Sep 15 • Nov Dec-16, . • Occ -6.8 -6.8 -2.2 -5.8 -5.1 -5.7 5.3 C ADR 8.7 10.7 12.9 13.9 14.8 13.7 12.81 RevPAR 1.3 3.2 10.4 7.3 9.0 7.3 6.8 Supply 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 p 24.6 k Demand 16.3 16.3 22.0 17.6 18.4 17.7 18.2 Revenue 26.4 28.6 37.8 34.0 36.0 33.9 33.3 STR's Trend Report is a publication of STIR,Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers.Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report,in whole or part,without written permission of STIR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available. Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STIR.Source 2015 STIR,Inc. . rnw v . •�v.�v .�.vir �.v� vJ • •�v.rw vJv Oakbrook Job Number:698685 SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 • Janua February - March- A ne'I May June Jul- August September -_____October__-November -�Decemberl 2070 64.o 64.7 65.7 67.1 68.4 69.5 70.1 70.8 71.5 72.6 73.9 74.5 2011 74.7 75.0 75.4 74.9 75.0 75.0 75.1 75.5 75.0 74.7 74.7 75.51 2012 76.4 76.8 76.8 77.7 78.0 77.5 77.3 76.8 77.0 77.3 77.0 76.81 2013 76.5 76.4 76.3 76.7 77.0 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.3 77.1 77.2 77.81 2014 78.2 78.51 78.61 78.3 78.1 78.2 78.1 77.6 77.4 77.4 77.1 76.2 1 2015 75.5 75.0 74.8 74.5 74.4 74.2 _ _ January February March April Ma June July August September -_� October November December 20101 93.90 92.89 91.77 90.99 90.43 90.37 90.88 91.71 92.29 92.72 93.02 93.07 i 2011 93.68 94.01 94.56 95.09 95.72 95.89 96.02 96.18 96.31 96.67 96.97 97.231 2012 97.12 97.30 97.46 97.90 98.75 99.76 100.80 101.53 103.18 104.04 104.15 104.27 2013 104.55 104.78 104.74 105.04 105.10 105.48 105.87 105.95 105.13 104.92 104.98 105.25 2014 105.27 105.40 105.73 106.11 106.48 106.87 107.83 108.83 110.62 112.18 113.28 114.11 2015 114.56 115.17 116.06 117.28 118.721 120.19 RevPAR January Februa - March _ ApN - May _ -June JuIY August - September W October - - November December 2010 60.12 60.07 60.33 61.04 61.84 62.80 63.69 64.94 66.03 67.35 68.77 69.37 2011 70.01 70.46 71.27 71.24 71.81 71.90 72.11 72.59 72.26 72.22 72.48 73.391 2012 74.16 74.72 74.80 76.09 76.98 77.30 77.90 78.01 79.49 80.46 80.19 80.08 2013 79.96 80.02 79.90 80.60 80.97 81.64 81.89 81.98 81.23 80.94 81.08 81.90 2014 82.29 82.71 83.07 83.08 83.21 83.59 84.27 84.42 85.65 86.85 87.29 86.92 2015 66.46 86.35 86.82 87.41 ,Supply. Apnl -- y -_June _._ July ----September - - - October --- November _ Decembers 2010 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 313,900 F 2011 313,900 313,900 313,900 313 900 308,754 303,774 298,628 293,482 288,502 283,356 278,376 273,2301 2012 268,084 263,436 258,290 253 310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 1 2013 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 2014 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253,310 253310 258,642 263,974 269,134 274,466 279,626 284,956 j 2015 290,290 295,106 300,438 305,598 310,930 316090 - _--January__. ._- February �___-__March__..-_ _ April __,-_... MaL _ _.__June-- - July_ ... ._. Aust---- September October ._....__ November Decembers 2010 200,965 202,989 206 355 210,590 214,642 218,130 219,990 222,274 224,562 228,028 232,058 233,958) 2011 234,596 235,279 236610 1 235,148 231,609 227,777 224,265 221,496 216,458 211,673 208,079 206,221 2012 204,693 202,282 198 241 196,880 197,473 196,285 195,768 194,627 195,148 195,895 195,034 194,535 2013 193,784 193,444 M-2361 194,388 195,154 196,056 195,953 196,012 195,735 195,417 195,640 197,103 ' 2014 198,009 198,761 199,014 198,339 197,954 198,132 202,124 204,765 208,369 212,510 215,464 217,062 2015 219,103 221,255 224,750 227,763 231,202 234,505 January February --� - March - April, - Maw- -- June Jules - -August - September - _ October November December 2010 __. 18,870,412 1B 855753 18,937,200 19,161,418 19,410,620 19,711,804 19,991,638 20,383,932 20,725,683 21,141,932 21586,440 21774,756? 2011 21,976,951 22,118,272 22,372,709 22,360,953 22,170,683 21,842,344 21,535,028 21,304,089 20,846,064 20,463,121 20,177,911 20,051,845 2012 19,880,583 19,682,933 19,319,614 19,274,406 19,500,098 19,581,988 19,732,663 19,759,777 20,135,792` 20,380,109 20,311,987 20,283,847', 2013 20,260,944 20,269,711 20,239,305 20,417,747 20,510,972 20,680,208 20,744,686 20,767,421 20,577,335 20,503,010 20,538,160 20,745,484 2014 20,843,632 20,950,327 21,042,692 21,045,192 21,077,690 21 175 351 21,795 240 22,285,294 23,050,557 23,838,383 24 408,488 24 767,993 516 26,710,946 27,448,586 28 185 416 -4015 25,099,605._ _ 25482,389 __..._.26083, .- -----_. ....__._._ -------. _.-...__ --- High va is boxed Low value is boxed and da lue licized STR's Trend Report is a publication of STIR,Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers.Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report,in whole or part,without written permission of STIR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available. Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STIR,Inc. Tab 6 - Twelve Month Moving Average with Percent Change Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 D. D- RevPar Supply Demand This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Ch Jan 10 64.0 93.90 60.12 313,900 200,965 ! 18,870,412 Feb 10 64.7 92.89 60.07 313,900 202,989 18,855,753 Mar 10 65.7 91.77 60.33 313,900 a 206,355 18,937,200 Apr 10 67.1 90.99 61.04 313,900 210,590 19,161,418 May 101 68.4 90.43 I 61.84 313,900 i 214,642 19,410,620 Jun 10i 69.5 90.37 t 62.80 313,900 218,130 19,711,804 90.88 63.69 313,900 219,990 19,991,638 Ju110i 70.1 Au 10 70.8 91.71 64.94 313,900 222,274 I 20,383,932 Sep 101 71.5 92.29 66.03 313,900 224,562 20,725,683 Oct 101 72.6 92.72 67.35 313,900 i 228,028 1 21,141,932 Nov 10 73.9 93.02 1 68.77 313,900 232,058 ( 21,586,440 Dec / • i .• •Ii 0.0 • • Jan 11 74.7 16.7 93.68 -0.2 70.01 16.5 313,900 0.0 234,596 16.7 21,976,951 16.5 Feb 11 75.0 15.9 € 94.01 1.2 70.46 17.3 } 313,900 0.0 235,279 15.9 22,118,272 17.3 Mar 11 75.4 14.7 94.56 3.0 I 71.27 18.1 ! 313,900 0.0 236,610 14.7 22,372,709 18.1 Apr 11 74.9 11.7 I 95.09 4.5 ; 71.24 16.7 313,900 0.0 235,148 11.7 22,360,953 16.7 1, May 11 75.0 9.7 1 95.72 5.9 ; 71.81 16.1 308,754 -1.6 231,609 7.91 22,170,683 14.21 Junl1i 75.0 7.9 l 95.89 6.1 71.90 14.5 303,774 -3.2 227,777 4.4 21,842,344 10.8 1 Jul 11' 75.1 7.2 I 96.02 5.7 72.11 13.2 298,628 -4.9 224,265 1.9 21,535,028 7.7 1 Aug 11 75.5 6.6 96.18 4.91 72.59 11.8 293,482 -6.5 , 221,496 -0.4 21,304,089 4.5 j Sep 11€ 75.0 4.9 1 96.31 4.3 72.26 9.4 1 288,502 -8.1 216,458 -3.6 20,846,064 0.6 i 1 Oct 11 74.7 2.8 i 96.67 4.3E 72.22 7.2 283,356 -9.7 211,673 -7.2 20,463,121 -3.2 9 NovIIj 74.7 1.1 1 96.97 4.2 3 72.48 5.4 ; 278,376 -11.3 208,079 -10.3 20,177,911 -6.5 D- • • 5,8 273,230 i 206,221 -11.91 20,051,845 - s Jan 121 76.4 2.2 1 97.12 3.7 74.16 5.9 268,084 -14.6 204,693 -12.7 f 19,880,583 -9.5 Feb 12,1 76.8 2.4 97.30 3.5 74.72 6.0 263,436 -16.1 x 202,282 -14.0 19,682,933 -11.0 Mar 121 76.8 1.8 97.46 3.1 ? 74.80 4.9 258,290 -17.7 198,241 -16.2 j 19,319,614 -13.6 1 A r 12 77.7 3.8 } 97.90 3.0 76.09 6.8 253,310 -19.3 1 196,880 -16.3 ' 19,274,406 -13.8 P l � G May 121 78.0 3.9 98.75 3.2 1 76.98 7.2 253,310 -18.0 197,473 -14.7 = 19,500,098 -12.0 3 Jun 121 77.5 3.3 99.76 4.0 1 77.30 7.5 253,310 -16.6 , 196,285 -13.8 19,581,988 -10.3 } Jul 12i 77.3 2.9 ` 100.80 5.0 1 77.90 8.0 253,310 -15.2 195,768 -12.7 i 19,732,663 -8.4 1, Aug 12 76.8 1.8 € 101.53 5.6 78.01 7.5 1 253,310 -13.7 i 194,627 -12.1 19,759,777 -7.2 Sep 12 77.0 2.7 103.18 7.1 1 79.49 10.0 253,310 -12.2 - 195,148 -9.8 20,135,792 -3.4 I Oct 12i 77.3 3.5 104.04 7.6 80.46 11.4 253,310 -10.6 195,895 -7.5 20,380,109 -0.4 1 Nov 12` 77.0 3.0 104.15 7.4 1 80.19 10.6 253,310 -9.0 195,034 -6.3 1 20,311,987 0.7 1 Jan 131 76.5 0.2 1 104.55 7.71 79.98 7.9 , 253,310 -5.5 193,784 -57'----70,260,944 1.9 1 Feb 13 76.4 -0.5 1 104.78 7.7 80.02 7.1 253,310 -3.8 193,444 -4.4 20,269,711 3.0 5 79.90 6.8 253,310 -1.9 193,236 -2.5 i 20,239,305 4.8 ar13! 76.3 -0'61 104,74 7. Apr 131 76.7 -1.3 105.04 7.3 80.60 5.9 1 253,310 0.0 194,388 -1.3 20,417,747 5.9 May 131 77.0 -1.2 105.10 6.4 1 80.97 5.2 i 253,310 0.0 195,154 -1.21 20,,510,972 5.2 Jun 131 77.4 -0.1 105.48 5.7 81.64 5.6 253,310 0.0 196,056 -0.1 ; 20,680,208 5.6 Jul 131 77.4 0.1 105.87 5.0 81.89 5.1 253,310 0.0 1 195,953 01 20,744,686 5.1 Aug 13€€ 77.4 0.7 105.95 4.4 _ 81.98 5.1 253,310 0.0 196,012 0.7 20,767,421 5.1 Tab 6 - Twelve Month Moving Average with Percent Change Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 Date Occupancy ADR RevPar Supply Demand Revenue This Year % Chg This Year % Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Ch Oct 13 77.1 -0.2 104.92 0.8 80.94 0.6 253,310 0.0 195,417 -0.2 20,503,010 0.6 Nov131 77.2 0.3 104.98 0.8 81.08 1.1 1 253,310 0.0 195,640 0.3 20,538,160 1.1 197,103 1.3 20,745,484 2.3 Jan 14 78.2 2.21 105.27 0.7 82.29 2.9 253,310 0.0 198'0 09 2.2 20,843,632 2.9 Feb 141 78.5 2.7 105.40 0.6 i 82.71 3.4 253,310 0.0 198,761 2.7 20,950,327 3.4 Mar 14 78.6 3.0 ! 105.73 1.0 83.07 4.0 253,310 0.0 1 199,014 3.0 21,042,692 4.0 ! Apr 14i 78.3 2.0 106.11 1.0 83.08 3.1 253,310 0.0 198,339 2.0 21,045,192 3.1 May 141 78.1 1.4 1 106.48 1.3 83.21 2.8 253,310 0.0 197,954 1.4 21,077,690 2.8 Jun 141 78.2 1.1 106.87 1.3 i 83.59 2.4 253,310 0.0 1 198,132 1.1 21,175,351 2.4 j Jul14` 78.1 1.0 I 107.83 1.9 84.27 2.9 258,642 2.1 202,124 3.1 21,795,240 5.1 ! Aug 14 77.6 0.2 108.83 2.7 84.42 3.0 263,974 4.2 204,765 4.5 22,285,294 7.3 Sep 14i 0.2 110.62 5.2 85.65 5.4 269,134 6.2 { 208,369 6.5 ? 23,050,557 12.0 Oct 141 77.4 0.4 i 112.18 6.9 ' 86.85 7.3 274,466 8.4 212,510 8.7 23,838,383 16.3 Nov 141 77.1 -0.21 113.28 7.9 87.29 7.7 279,626 10.4 215,464 10.1 24,408,488 18.81 Jan 15 75.5 -3.41 114.56 8.8 # 86.46 5.1 290,290 14.6 219,103 10.7 25,099,605 20.4 ? Feb 151 75.0 -4.41 115.17 9.3 1 86.35 4.4 1 295,106 16.5 1 221,255 11.3 25,482,369 21.6 Mar 15` 74.8 -4.81 116.06 9.8 3 86.82 4.51 300,438 18.6 224,750 12.9 1 26,083,516 24.0 Apr 151 74.5 -4.8 117.28 10.5 1 87.41 5.2 305,598 20.6 227,763 14.8 1 26,710,946 26.9 May 151 74.4 -4.8 1 118.72 11.51 88.28 6.1 1 310,930 22.71 231,202 16.8 27,448,586 30.2 Jun 151 74.2 -51 1 120.19 12.5 89.17 6.7 316,090 24.8 1 234,505 18.4 28,185,416 33.1 STR's Trend Report is a publication of STR, Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers. Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report, in whole or part,without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action. Site licenses are available. Ownership, distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR. Source 2015 STR, Inc. Oakbrook Job Number:698685_SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 • Occupancy Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Month Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sati Total Yes Jul-14 57.6 89.9 89.1 88.0 80.4 91.1 92.1 84.2 Jul 12-Jun 13 56.2 80.5 87.4 86.6 76.3 75.7 79.5 77. Aug-14 58.7 78.8 86.4 83.3 70.8 79.0 88.8 77.7 Jul 13-Jun 14 55.8 79.3 88.5 87.3 77.5 77.7 81.5 78. Sep-14 51.8 77.8 88.2 88.2 77.3 81.7 90.5 79.6 Jul 14-Jun 15 49.5 76.6 84.8 85.0 70.0 73.2 80.0 74. Oct-14 56.0 86.7 93.6 90.6 75.1 81.6 91.8 82.2 Total 3 Yr 63.5 78.6 86.7 86.2 74.2 75.4 80.3 76. Nov-114 46.2 78.1 81.9 81.0 73.4 74.5 77.8 72.5 Dec-14 36.0. 56.5 65.5 73.6 60.9 55.5 64.1 59.5 Jan-15 37.7 62.8 73.3 72.7 48.9 42.3 48.3 54.3 Feb-16 38.1 63.9 77.3 77.9 60.1 55.1 70.2 63.2 Mar-15 45.2 74.0 83.6 87.0 69.5 71.3 78.1 72.2 Apr-15 48.5 83.9 93.2 88.5 71.6 75.9 79.4 77.5 May-15 60.2 79.6 92.8 92.4 76.7 85.8 91.2 82.3 Jun-15 55.5 89.0 93.9 97.0 75.7 85.8 90.8 84.4 Total Year 49.5 76.6 84.8 85.0 70.0 73.2 80.0 74.2 •- ThreeYearADR Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Month Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Yes Jul-14 112.60 129.89 129.74 128.86 115.27 102.91 102.83 118.33 Jul 12-Jun 13 100.90 114.17 116.82 116.58 107.41 89.73 88.58 105.4 Aug-14 110.71 129.85 136.18 134.69 122.82 102.44 102.56 118.75 Jul 13-Jun 14 102.46 114.74 118.87 118.65 108.00 91.37 90.18 106.8 Sep-14 124.84 138.51 147.76 146.34 128.64 106.12 103.77 129.21 Jul 14-Jun 15 113.47 131.65 135.80 134.61 119.38 100.41 100.00 120.1 Oct-14 120.28 135.49 140.17 139.80 121.77 103.62 104.91 124.08 Total 3 Yr 105.84 120.85 124.68 124.06 111.93 94.24 93.45 111.4 Nov-14 110.83 130.57 132.21 128.72 115.10 97.70 98.00 116.03 Dec-14 100.03 119.52 124.29 123.63 113.12 88.36 85.66 110.36 Jan-15 103.99 120.30 123.56 122.01 108.24 88.42 85.85 109.00 Feb-15 104.41 122.87 125.47 125.97 111.48 89.56 92.31 111.74 Mar-15 106.24 123.62 126.21 127.20 111.13 93.80 92.10 113.15 Apr-115 111.31 138:49 142.23 136.95 119.91 99.38 99.86 122.99 May-15 119.90 139.75 145.72 144.26 127.64 106.96 107.14 126.14 Jun-15 125.15 142.52 147.12 150.88 132.18 108.93 110.82 132.80 Total Year 113.47 131.65 135.80 134.61 119.38 100.41 100.00 120.19 Three Year RevPAR RevPAR Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Month Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Yes Jul-14 64.86 116.71 115.63 113.39 92.72 93.77 94.74 99.65 Jul 12-Jun 13 56.73 91.94 102.09 100.90 81.96 67.95 70.39 61.6 Aug-14 64.97 102.37 117.72 112.20 86.95 80.98 91.08 92.32 Jul 13-Jun 14 57.15 90.99 105.16 103.55 83.68 71.03 73.45 83.5 Sep-14 64.62 107.72 130.36 129.04 99.48 86.72 93.96 102.86 Jul 14-Jun 16 56.22 100.79 115.20 114.47 83.51 73.53 79.97 89.1 Oct-14 67.33 117.48 131.26 126.67 91.50 84.58 96.27 102.03 Total 3 Yr 56.66 95.03 108.13 106.93 83.08 71.04 75.01 85.1 Nov-14 51.24 101.95 108.31 104.27 84.44 72.83 76.23 84.15 Dec-14 36.01 67.55 81.38 91.00 68.85 49.03 54.88 65.64 Jan-15 39.25 75.55 90.60 88.73 52.88 37.42 41.48 59.21 Feb-16 39.75 78.55 96.96 98.18 67.02 49.37 64.78 70.66 Mar-15 48.02 91.53 105.52 110.68 77.28 66.86 71.94 81.69 Apr-15 54.03 114.52 132.57 121.23 85.80 75.42 79.31 95.29 May-15 72.15 111.20 135.26 133.24 97.95 91.76 97.68 103.82 Jun.15 69.50 126.80 138.09 146.38 100.00 93.48 100.60 112.14 Total Year 56.22 100.79 115.20 114.47 83.51 73.53 79.97 89.17 STR's Trend Report is a publication of STR,Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers.Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report,in whole or part,without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available. Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STR,Inc. Tab 8 - Raw Data Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 Date Occupancy D- RevPar Supply This This This % Rooms STAR Year %Chg Year %Chg Year %Chg_ This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg Census Pros Census Rooms Participants Jan 09 41.1 106.99 43.95 26,660 10,951 1,171,657 6 860 100.0 Feb 09 51.8 103.11 53.41 24,080 12,473 1,286,095 6 860 100.0 i Mar 09 57.0 102.56 58.42 26,660 15,185 1,557,348 6 860 100.0 Apr 09 59.0 E 98.51 58.13 25,800 15,226 i 1,499,881 6 860 100.0 May 09 64.4 95.47 61.49 26,660 17,171 1,639,233 6 860 I 100.0 k Jun 09 74.0 97.18 71.90 €€ 25,800 19,088 1,855,056 6 i 860 1 100.0 Ju109 78.3 89.41 70.05 4 26,660 i 20,888 1,867,537 6 : 860 100.0 E Aug 09, 74.3 89.77 66.66 26,660 I 19,798 i 1,777,252 j 6 860 100.0 Sep 091 75.9 93.82 I 71.21 25,800 I 19,583 1,837,274 11 6 860 100.0 Oct 09i 70.6 92.86 i 65.57 26,660 18,825 1,748,106 ! 6 860 100.0 Nov 091 62.4 92.59 i 57.75 25,800 16,090 1,489,828 6 860 100.0 " Dec 09 50.1 s 86.90 43.55 i 26,660 13,362 , 1,161,116 6 1 860 ( 100.0 Jan 10 49.8 21.2 86.75 -18.9 43.20 -1.7 26,660 0.0 1 13,276 21.2 1 1,151,686 -1.7 6 860 100.0 Feb 10 60.2 16.2 87.70 -14.9 52.80 -1.1 ; 24,080 0.0 14,497 16.2 1,271,436 -1.1 ; 6 ; 860 , 100.0 Mar 10j 69.6 22.2 88.34 -13.91 61.47 5.21 26,660 0.0 18,551 22.2 1 1,638,795 5.2 6 8601 100.0 Apr 10 75.4 27.8 88.59 -10.1 66.83 14.9 25,800 0.0 19,461 27.8 1,724,099 14.9 6 860 100.0 May 10 79.6 23.6 88.98 -6.8 70.83 15.2 26,660 0.0 21,223 23.6 1,888,435 15.2 6 860 100.0 ( Jun 10 87.5 18.3 95.51 -1.7 83.58 16.2 ' 25,800 0.0 22,576 18.3 ! 2,156,240 16.2 61 860 100.0 Julio! 85.3 8.9 94.40 5.6 80.55 15.0 26,660 0.0 22,748 8.9 2,147,371 15.0 1 6 } 860 100.0 Aug 10E 82.8 11.5 98.25 9.4 j 81.38 22.1 1 26,660 0.0 1 22,082 11.5 1 2,169,546 22.1 6 € 860 ( 100.0 Sep 101 84.8 11.7 99.63 6.2 1 84.46 18.6 25,800 0.0 21,871 11.7 2,179,025 18.6 6 ! 860 100.0 Oct 101 83.6 18.4 97.10 4.6 81.18 23.8 26,660 0.0 22,291 18.4 2,164,355 23.8 6 860 E 100.0 Nov 10 78.0 25.0 96.14 3.8 74.97 29.8 25,800 0.0 I€1 20,120 25.0 1,934,336 29.8 6 860 s 100.0 Dec 10i 57.2 14.2 88.42 1.8 i 50.62 16.2 26,660 0.0 15,262 14.2 ; 1,349,432 16.2 6 860 i 100.0 Jan 11- 52.2 4.8 97.30 12.2 ' 50.78 17.6 26,660 0.0 1 13,914 4.8 ! 1,353,881 17.6 61 860 1 100.0 Feb 11 63.0 4.7 93.07 6.1 58.67 11.1 24,080 0.0 ? 15,180 4.7 1,412,757 11.1 i 6 860 i 100.0 Mar 11 74.6 7.2 1 95.22 7.8 ; 71.01 15.5 26,660 0.0 19,882 7.2 1,893,232 15.5 6 860 1 100.0 April 69.8 -7.5 j 95.14 7.4 66.37 -0.7 25,800 0.0 17,999 -7.5 i 1,712,343 -0.7 ` 6 860 1 100.0 May 111 82.2 3.3 96.03 7.91 78.93 11.41 21,514 -19.3 1 17,684 -16.7 1,698,165 -10.1 5 694E 100.0 Jun 11; 90.0 2.9 97.52 2.1 ' 87.80 5.0 1 20,820 -19.3 18,744 -17.0 ! 1,827,901 -15.2 5 694 3 100.0 t Jul 11 E 89.4 4.8 1 95.66 1.3 85.53 6.2 's, 21,514 -19.3 I 19,236 -15.41 1,840,055 -14.3 5 694 1 100.0 Aug 11; 89.8 8.4 100.38 2.2 90.11 10.7 21,514 -19.3 19,313 -12.5 € 1,938,607 -10.6 5 694 100.0 Sep 11 80.9 -4.6 t 102.24 2.6 82.66 -2.1 20,820 -19.3 16,833 -23.0 ? 1,721,000 -21.0 ; 5 ( 694 100.0 Oct 111 81.4 -2.7 101.76 4.8 82.80 2.01 21,514 -19.31 17,506 -21.5 ? 1,781,412 -17.7 s 51 694 1 100.0 Nov 11 79.4 1.8 99.79 3.8 i 79.21 5.6 20,820 -19.3 # 16,526 -17.9 1,649,126 -14.7 i 5 694 100.0 t Dec 111 62.3 8.8 s 91.27 3.2E 56.86 12.3 1 21,514 -19.3 13,404 -12.2 j 1,223,366 -9.3 5 694 l 100.0 E Jan 121 57.6 10.3 ' 95.48 -1.9 54.97 8.21 21,514 -19.3 12,386 -11.0 l 1,182,619 -12.6 5 694 100.0 1 Feb 121 65.7 4.2 95.16 2.2 i 62.53 6.6E 19,432 -19.3 I 12,769 -15.9 1,215,107 -14.0 5 694E 100.0 Mar 12 73.6 -1.3 96.58 1.4 71.11 0.1 21,514 -19.3 1 15,841 -20.3 1 1,529,913 -19.2 5 1 694 100.0 s Apr 12j 79.9 14.5 € 100.20 5.3 ' 80.07 20.6E 20,820 -19.3 16,638 -7.6 1,667,135 -2.6 5 1 694 1 100.0 May 121 85.0 3.4 105.26 9.6 89.42 13.3 ' 21,514 0.0 18,277 3.4E 1,923,857 13.3 5 ; 694 100.0 Jun 121 84.3 -6.3 i 108.78 11.6 91.73 4.5 20,820 0.0 17,556 -6.3 1,909,791 4.5 , 5 694 100.0 Jul 12 87.0 -2.7 106.35 11.2 92.53 8.2 21,514 0.0 18,719 -2.7 1;990,730 8.2 5 694 100.0 Aug 12i 84.5 -5.9 108.17 7.8 91.37 1.4 1 21,514 0.0 I 18,172 -5.9 1,965,721 1.4 1 5 694 ; 100.0 € Sep 121 83.4 3.1 120.84 18.2,i 100.72 21.8 ; 20,820 0.0 17,354 3.1 2,097,015 21.8 5 694 i 100.0 i Oct 12` 84.8 4.3 110.98 9.1 94.16 13.7 21,514 0.0 18,253 4.3 2,025,729 13.7 i 5 694 100.0 Nov 12 75.2 -5.2 111 100.93 1.1- 75.94 -4.1 20,820 0.0E 15,665 -5.2 1,581,004 -4.1 5 694 100.0 Dec 12 60.0 -3.7 92.62 1.5 55.56 -2.3 21,514 0.0E 12,905 -3.7 1,195,226 -2.3 5 694 100.0 Tab 8 - Raw Data Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 Date Occupancy ADIR RevPar Supply Demand Revenue Census&Sample% This This This % Rooms STAR Year %Chg Year %Chg Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg Census Pros Census Rooms Participants E Feb 13. 64.0 -2.7 98.47 3.5 62.98 0.7 19,432 0.0 12,429 -2.7 1,223,874 0.7 5 694 100.0 Mar 13€ 72.7 -1.3 95.92 -0.7 69.70 -2.0 21,514 0.0 15,633 -1.3 1,499,507 -2.0 5 694 100.0 Apr 13 85.4 6.9 103.74 3.5 88.64 10.7 20,820 0.0 17,790 6.9 1,845,577 10.7 5 694 100.0 May 13i 88.5 4.2 105.92 0.6 93.76 4.8 21,514 0.0 19,043 4.2 2,017,082 4.8 5 694 100.0 { Jun 13 88.7 5.1 1 112.64 3.5 99.86 8.9 20,820 0.0 18,458 5.1 2,079,027 8.9 5 694 } 100.0 Jul 13 86.5 -0.6 110.40 3.8 95.53 3.2 21,514 0.0 18,616 -0.6 2,055,208 3.2 5 694 100.0 Aug 13, 84.7 0.3 ! 109.07 0.8 92.43 1.2 . 21,514 0.0 18,231 0.3 , 1,988,456 1.2 5 694 ! 100.0 Sep 131 82.0 -1.6 111.67 -7.6 i 91.59 -9.1 20,820 0.0 17,077 -1.6 1,906,929 -9.1 I 5 694 4 100.0 Oct13 83.4 -1.7 108.80 -2.0 i 90.70 -3.7 21,514 0.0 17,935 -1.7 1,951,404 -3.7 5 694 100.0 I Nov 131 76.3 1.4 i 101.72 0.8 77.63 2.2 20,820 0.0 15,888 1.4 1,616,154 2.2 5 694 100.0 Dec 131 66.8 11.3 ! 97.62 5.4 65.19 17.3 21,514 0.0 i 14,368 11.3 1,402,550 17.3 5 694 100.0 Jan 141 58.3 7.8 i 100.30 0.6 58.47 8.5 21,514 0.0 12,541 7.8 1,257,864 8.5 1 5 694 100.0 Feb 141 67.8 6.1 iI 100.95 2.5 68.47 8.7 19,432 0.0 13,181 6.1 1,330,569 8.7 5 i 694 100.0 Mar 141 73.8 1.6 1 100.21 4.5 73.99 6.2 21,514 0.0 15,886 1.6 1,591,872 6.2 51 694 100.0 Apr 14( 82.2 -3.8 107.98 4.1 88.76 0.1 20,820 0.01 17,115 -3.8 1 1,848,077 0.1 ' 51 694 ; 100.0 May 14! 86.7 -2.0 1 109.85 3.7 95.27 1.6 1 21,514 0.0 1 18,658 -2.0 2,049,580 1.6 5 694 j 100.0 Jun 141 89.5 1.0 ` 116.80 3.7 104.55 4.7 1 20,820 0.0 18,636 1.0 2,176,688 4.7 5 i 694 s 100.0 Jul 141 84.2 -2.7 118.33 7.2 99.65 4.3 i 26,846 24.8 1 22,608 21.4 ' 2,675,097 30.2 6 866 80.1 Aug 141 77.7 -8.3 s 118.75 8.9 ! 92.32 -0.1 i 26,846 24.8 1 20,872 14.5 2,478,510 24.6 1 6 866 l 100.0 Sep 141 79.6 -2.9 i 129.21 15.7 1 102.86 12.3 1 25,980 24.8 20,681 21.1 2,672,192 40.1 �§§ 6 866 1 100.0 Oct 14; 82.2 -1.4 1 124.08 14.0 102.03 12.5 26,846 24.8 3 22,076 23.1 2,739,230 40.4 3 6 i 866 100.0 Nov 141 72.5 -5.0 1 116.03 14.1 1 84.15 8.4 3 25,980 24.8 18,842 18.6 2,186,259 35.3 6 866 1 100.0 Dec 141 59.5 -10.9 [ 110.36 13.1 # 65.64 0.7 26,846 24.8 15,966 11.1 1 1,762,055 25.6 ; 6 866 1 100.0 Jan 151 54.3 -6.8 1 109.00 8.7 } 59.21 1.3 1 26,846 24.8 14,582 16.3 ' 1,589,476 26.4 [ 6 j 866 100.0 Feb 151 63.2 -6.8 111.74 10.7 " 70.66 3.2 24,248 24.8 ; 15,333 16.3 1,713,333 28.8 1 6 866 1 100.0 Mar 151 72.2 -2.2 f 113.15 12.9 81.69 10.4 l 26,846 24.8 19,381 22.0 ' 2,193,019 37.8 1 6 866 100.0 Apr W 77.5 -5.8 1 122.99 13.9 i 95.29 7.3 l 25,980 24.8 20,128 17.6 2,475,507 34.0 6 866 y 100.0 May 15 82.3 -5.1 1 126.14 14.8 103.82 9.0 26 846 24.8 3 22,097 18.4 2,787,220 36.0 6 866 a 100.0 V Jun 15 84.4 -_ .7 ' 132.80 13.7 112.14 7.3 25,980 24.8 21,939 17.7 2,913,518 33.9 i 6 _ 866 L 100.0 __. m 5_ j STR's Trend Report is a publication of STR, Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers. Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report, in whole or part,without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action. Site licenses are available.Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STR, Inc. Tab 9 - Classic Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 Date Occupancy ADR RevPar Supply Demand Revenue Census&Sample% %Rooms STAR This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %Chg This Year %.Chg Census Props Census Rooms Participants Jan 09 41.1 106.99 43.95 ( 26,660 10,951 1,171,657 6 860 100.0 Feb 09 51.8 103.11 53.41 ( 24,080 12,473 1,286,095 6 I 860 ( 100.0 Mar 09 57.0 102.56 ! 58.42 26,660 15,185 1,557,348 6 860 ; 100.0 Apr 091 59.0 98.51 58.13 25,800 15,226 i 1,499,881 6 860 { 100.0 May 091 64.4 95.47 61.49 26,660 17,171 1,639,233 6 1 860 100.0 Jun 091 74.0 97.18 71.90 I 25,800 19,088 1,855,056 i 6 860 100.0 JA 09, 78.3 89.41 70.05 26,660 20,888 1,867,537 1 6 ] 860 1 100.0 Aug 091 74.3 89.77 66.66 26,660 1 19,798 1,777,252 i 6 860 1 100.0 Sep 09j 75.9 i 93.82 71.21 1 25,800 19,583 1,837,274 1 6 860 : 100.0 Oct 09 70.6 f 92.86 65.57 26,660 18,825 1,748,106 ; 6 1 860 100.0 Nov 091 62.4 92.59 57.75 ; 25,800 16,090 1,489,828 j 6 z 860 100.0 Dec 091 50.1 i 86.90 ` 43.55 i 26,660 13,362 1,161,116 ( 6 860 100.0 Jun YTD 2009, 57.9 100.00 Total 009 60.18 313,900 198,640 18,890,383 Jan 10 49.8 21.2 86.75 -18.9 i 43.20 -1.7 26,660 0.0 13,276 21.2 1,151,686 -1.7 6 ; 860 ; 100.0 j Feb 10 60.2 16.2 1 87.70 -14.9 1 52.80 -1.1 ( 24,080 0.0 14,497 16.2 . 1,271,436 -1.1 6 ? 860 t 100.0 Mar 10 69.6 22.2 88.34 -13.9 61.47 5.2 26,660 0.0 . 18,551 22.2 € 1,638,795 5.2 6 1 860 j 100.0 Apr 101 75.4 27.8 88.59 -10.1 66.83 14.9 1 25,800 0.0 19,461 27.8 i 1,724,099 14.9 ( 6 860 100.0 May 10 79.6 23.6 88.98 -6.8 70.83 15.2 '; 26,660 0.0 21,223 23.6 i 1,888,435 15.2 ! 6 3 860 10010 Jun 101 87.5 18.3 95.51 -1.7 ; 83.58 16.2 I 25,800 0.0 ( 22,576 18.3 i 2,156,240 16.2 3 6 860 ! 100.0 Julloi 85.3 8.9 94.40 5.6 1 80.55 15.0 26,660 0.0 1 22,748 8.9 € 2,147,371 15.01 6 1 860 100.0 Aug 10' 82.8 11.5 98.25 9.4 1 81.38 22.1 ? 26,660 0.0 1 22,082 11.5 ( 2,169,546 22.1 6 1 860 s 100.0 Sep 101 84.8 11.7 i 99.63 6.2 € 84.46 18.6 25,800 0.0 1 21,871 11.7 1 2,179,025 18.6 6 i 860 100.0 Oct 101 83.6 18.4 97.10 4.6 81.18 23.8 c 26,660 0.0 22,291 18.4 ? 2,164,355 23.8 1 6 = 860 j 100.0 Nov 101 78.0 25.0 96.14 3.8 74.97 29.8 ' 25,800 0.0 20,120 25.0 1 1,934,336 29.8 1 6 860 ! 100.0 Dec 10' 57.2 14.2 88.42 1.8 50.62 16.2 ( 26,660 0.0 15,262 14.2 1,349,432 16.2 6 860 ; 100.0 Jun YTD r ..• 0.0 109.584 . Total • • 900 - 233,958 17.8 21,774,756 15.3 Jan 11; 52.2 4.8 97.30 12.2 1 50.78 17.6 1 26,660 0.0 13,914 4.8 i 1,353,881 17.6 1 6 860 1 100.0 Feb 11'==, 63.0 4.7 1 93.07 6.1 58.67 11.1 24,080 0.0 I 15,180 4.7 1,412,757 11.1 6 860 100.0 Mar 11 74.6 7.2 95.22 7.8 71.01 15.5 26,660 0.0 ( 19,882 7.2 1,893,232 15.5 6 860 100.0 Apr 111 69.8 -7.5 ! 95.14 7.4 1 66.37 -0.7 ' 25,800 0.0 17,999 -7.5 1 1,712,343 -0.7 i 6 860 100.0 May 111 82.2 3.3 1 96.03 7.9 i 78.93 11.4 -21,514 -19.31 17,684 -16.71 1,698,165 -10.1 i 5 694 ! 100.0 Jun 111 90.0 2.9 97.52 2.1 ` 87.80 5.0 1 20,820 -19.3 18,744 -17.0 ! 1,827,901 -15.2 3 5 694 100.0 Jul 111 89.4 4.8 1 95.66 1.3 1 85.53 6.2 ' 21,514 -19.3 19,236 -15.4 1,840,055 -14.31 5 1 694 1 100.0 Aug 11 89.8 8.4 100.38 2.2 90.11 10.7 21,514 -19.3 19,313 -12.5 ; 1,938,607 -10.6 5 1 694 1 100.0 Sep 111 80.9 -4.6 ± 102.24 2.6 82.66 -2.1 1 20,820 -19.3 16,833 -23.0 1 1,721,000 -21.0 I 5 694 100.0 Oct 111 81.4 -2.7 ` 101.76 4.8 I 82.80 2.0 21,514 -19.3 a 17,506 -21.5 € 1,781,412 -17.7 5 694 100.0 Nov 111 79.4 1.8± 99.79 3.8 1 79.21 5.6 20,820 -19.3 1 16,526 -17.9 1 1,649;126 -14.7 i 5 694 I 100.0 Dec 11 62.3 8.8 91.27 3.2 56.86 12.3 21,514 -19.3 13,404 -12.2 ( 1,223,366 -9.3 5 694 , 100.0 Jun s • • 95.73 6.7 68.01 -0 Total 2011 75.5 1.3 97.23 4,5 73.39 5.8 273,230 i 206,221 Jan 12; 57.6 10.3 1 95.48 1.9 j 54.97 8.21 21;514 -19,3 12,386 -11A 1 1;182,619 -12.6 j 5 1 694 j 100.0 Feb 12j 65.7 4.2 ; 95.16 2.2 1 62.53 6.6 1 19,432 -19.3 ; 12,769 -15.9 1,215,107 -14.01 5 , 694 i 100.0 Mar 121 73.6 -1.3 96.58 1.4 = 71.11 0 1 1 21,514 -19.3 1 15;841 -20.3 1,529,913 -19.2 5 1 694 1 100.0 Apr 12j 79.9 14.5 100.20 5.3 80.07 20.6 20,820 -19.3 1 16,638 -7.6 3 1,667,135 -2.6 5 ° 694 100.0 May 121 85.0 3.4 ( 105.26- 9.6 89.42 13.3 [ 21,514 0.0 18,277 3.4 t 1,923,857 13.3 1 5 694 100.0 Jun 121 84.3 -6.3 ? 108.78 11.6 1 91.73 4.5 i 20,820 0.0 17,556 -6.3 1,909,791 4.5 1 5 ( 694 ! 100.0 Jul 12� 87.0 -2.7 106.35 11.2 I 92.53 8 2 i 21,514 0.0 18;719 -2.7 1,990,730 8.2 1 5 ) 694 ; 100.0 a Aug 12 84.5 -5.9 ; 108.17 7.8 91.37 1 4 1 21,514 0.0 18,172 -5.9 1,965,721 1.4 1 5 694 100.0 Sep 12, 83.4 3.1 1 120.84 18.2 I 100.72 21.8 1 20,820 0.0 17,354 3.1 2,097,015 21.8 i 5 1 694 100.0 Oct 121 84.8 4.3 110.98 9.1 1 94.16 13.7 21,514 0.0 j 18,253 4.3 2,025,729 13.7 5 ; 694 1 100.0 Tab 9 - Classic Oakbrook Job Number: 698685_SADIM Staff: CW Created: July 31, 2015 Date Occupancy ADIR RevPar Supply Demand Revenue Census&Sample% %Rooms STAR This Year %Ch This Year %Chg This Year %Ch This Year %Ch This Year %Chg This Year %Ch Census Props Census Rooms Participants [ Dec 12 60.0 -3.7 92.62 1.5 55.56 -2.3 21,514 0.0 12,905 -3.7 1,195,226 -2.3 1 5 1 694 1 100.0 Jun •2012 74.4 4.7 100.87 06 10.4 Total :0• Jan 131 54.1 -6.1 99.67 4.4 53.91 -1.9 21,514 0.0 11,635 -6.1 1,159,716 -1.9 5 694 100.0 Feb 13 64.0 -2.7 98.47 3.5 ; 62.98 0.7 19,432 0.0 12,429 -2.7 : 1,223,874 0.7 5 I 694 i 100.0 Mar 13I 72.7 -1.3 95.92 -0.7 69.70 -2.0 21,514 0.0 15,633 -1.3 i 1,499,507 -2.0 i 5 ! 694 s 100.0 Apr 131 85.4 6.9 i 103.74 3.5 i 88.64 10.7 1 20,820 0.0 17,790 6.9 1,845,577 10.7 1 5 694 1 100.0 May 13, 88.5 4.2 105.92 0.6 ; 93.76 4.8 21,514 0.0 19,043 4.2 ? 2,017,082 4.8 ? 5 694 1 100.0 Jun 131 88.7 5.1 112.64 3.5 99.86 8.9 j 20,820 0.0 18,458 5.1 2,079,027 8.9 5 ' 694 100.0 Jul 131 86.5 -0.6 110.40 3.8 i 95.53 3.2 i 21,514 0.0 j 18,616 -0.6 1 2,055,208 3.2 5 694 100.0 Aug 131 84.7 0.3 1 109.07 0.8 92.43 1.2 21,514 0.0 1 18,231 0.3 1,988,456 1.2 5 1 694 ; 100.0 Sep 131 82.0 -1.6 '; 111.67 -7.61 91.59 -9.1 20,820 0.0 i 17,077 -1.6 1,906,929 -9.1 5 ; 694 100.0 Oct 131 83.4 -1.7 i 108.80 -2.0 90.70 -3.7 1 21,514 0.0 17,935 -1.7 1,951,404 -3.7 1 5 ; 694 j 100.0 Nov 131 76.3 1.4 101.72 0.8 1 77.63 2.2 20,820 0.0 15,888 1.4 1 1,616,154 2.2 1 5 694 1 100.0 Dec 131 66.8 11.3 1 97.62 5.4 ; 65.19 17.3 I 21,514 0.0 14,368 11.3 ? 1,402,550 17.3 ? 5 694 i 100.0 • • Total 2013� 77.8 13 105.25 0.9 81.90 2.3 253,310 0.0 197,103 1.3 i 20,745,484 23 Jan 141 58.3 7.8 100.30 0.6 58.47 8.5 I 21,514 0.0 12,541 7.8 1 1,257,864 8.51 5 1 694 1 100.0 Feb 141 67.8 6.1 100.95 2.5 1 68.47 8.7 19,432 0.0 13,181 6.1 1,330,569 8.7 5 694 1 100.0 Mar 14 73.8 1.6 ; 100.21 4.5 1 73.99 6.2 21,514 0.0 15,886 1.6 1,591,872 6.2 1 5 694 100.0 Apr% 82.2 -3.8 107.98 4.1 88.76 0.1 1 20,820 0.0 17,115 -3.8 i 1,848,077 0.1 i 5 1 694 1 100.0 May 141 86.7 -2.0 109.85 3.7 95.27 1.6 1 21,514 0.0 1 18,658 -2.0 1 2,049,580 1.6 1 5 694 ^ 100.0 Jun 141 89.5 1.0 116.80 3.7 1 104.55 4.7 20,820 0.0 ' 18,636 1.0 I 2,176,688 4.7 i 5 1 694 100.0 Jul 141 84.2 2.7 ';, 118.33 7.2 ; 99.65 4.3 26,846 24.8 22,608 21.4 ( 2,675,097 30.2 1 6 866 80.1 Aug 141 77.7 -8.3 1. 118.75 8.9 92.32 -0.1 26,846 24.8 20,872 14.5 2,478,510 24.6 6 866 100.0 j Sep 141 79.6 -2.9 1 129.21 15.7 1 102.86 12.3 1 25,980 24.8 i 20,681 21.1 2,672,192 40.1 1 6 866 ? 100.0 Oct 141 82.2 -1.4 i 124.08 14.0 1 102.03 12.5 26,846 24.8 1 22,076 23.1 2,739,230 40.4 6 ; 866 1 100.0 Nov 141 72.5 -5.0 1 116.03 14.1 84.15 8.4 1 25,980 24.8 18,842 18.6 2,186,259 35.3 6 866 100.0 1 Dec 141 59.5 -10.9 j 110.36 13.1 1 65.64 0.7 j 26,846 24.8 15,966 11.1 ; 1,762,055 25.6 1 61 866 ; 100.0 Total Jun YTD 2014i 76.4 1.1 106.80 33 81.64 4.4 125,614 0.01 96,017 11 1 10,254,650 4.4 i. Jan 15€ 54.3 -6.81 109.00 8.7 j 59.21 1.3 11 26,846 24.8 14,582 16.3 i 1,589,476 26.4 1, 6 ! 866 100.0 Feb 151 63.2 -6.8 1 111.74 10.7 1 70.66 3.2 24,248 24.8 15,333 16.3 j 1,713,333 28.8 j 6 866 100.0 Mar 151 72.2 -2.2 1 113.15 12.9 I 81.69 10.4 ! 26,846 24.8 1 19,381 22.0 = 2,193,019 37.8 6 i 866 ; 100.0 Apr 151 77.5 -5.8 ; 122.99 13.9 1 95.29 7.3 25,980 24.8 20,128 17.6 2,475,507 34.0 ; 6 866 100.0 May 151 -5.1 I 126.14 14.8 € 103.82 9.0 ' 26,846 24.8 1 22,097 18.4 1 2,787,220 36.0 1 6 1 866 1 100.0 Jun 15 84.4 -5.71 132.80 13.7 112.14 7.3 i 25,980 24.8 ; 21,939 17.7 1 2,913,518 33.9 ; 6 866 100.0 i i .t STR's Trend Report is a publication of S TR Inc.In a nd is intended solely for use by P aid subscribers.Reproduction o r distribution of the Trend Report, in whole or art without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available.Ownership,distribution and use of the Trend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STIR,Inc. Oakbrook lob Number:698685—SADIM Staff:CW Created:July 31,2015 2013 2014 2015 Chg In STR Code Name of Establishment city&State Zip Code Class Aff Date O en Date Rooms Rms J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S TON D 7JFl M M J J A S O N I 35358 ;Hyatt Place Chicago Lombard Oak Brook Lombard,IL 60148 Upscale Class Nov 2006 Jun 1999 151 • •�• • • • • •j• • • •j•;• • • •!•;• • • • • • •I ' i 38257 iHilton Garden Inn Chicago Oakbrook Terrace Oakbrook Terrace,IL 60181 Upscale Class May 1999 May 1999) 128 • •;• • • •j• •i•(•!• • •!•;• • •!•I•i•j• •!•!• •i• • • •j•' I ' ! i 40662 iStaybridge Suites Chicago Oakbrook Terrace Oakbrook Terrace,IL 60181 Upscale Class Mar 2002 Mar 2002( 112 •$•j• • • •(• • • • • • •(•(• • • •(• • • •I•(• •!•'•j• •I• ! [ 20263 (Courtyard Chicago Oakbrook Terrace Oakbrook Terrace,IL 60181 Upscale Class May 1986 May 1986 147 • •i• • •!•?•i• •!•I• •I•!• • • •I• • •(•i• •(• • • •!•1• •I F i ! 49112 (Residence Inn Chicago Oak Brook Oak Brook,IL 60523 Upscale Class (Mar 2003 Mar 2003 156 •i•I• • •I• • •I•I• • • •j• • • • •j•i• • i•!• • •j• • • • i I 10327 1Le Meridien Chicago Oakbrook Center_ _ Oak Brook,IL _ 60523 U er Upscale Class __� 91-2011— Jun 1966( 172 _.._„Y i�.LL!_1..�L i_ • • • • • •l_!;' -L•L i._i_..�_ __Total Properties: 6'� Monthly data received by-STR (• -Monthly and daily data received by STR LB,lank-No data received by STR (`LY -SCha in Rms Property has experienced a room addition or drop during the time period of the report.___________ ;TR's Trend Report is a publication of STR,Inc.and is intended solely for use by paid subscribers.Reproduction or distribution of the Trend Report,in whole or part,without written permission of STR is prohibited and subject to legal action.Site licenses are available.Ownership,distribution and use of the 'rend Report and its contents are subject to the terms set forth in the contract you have entered into with STR.Source 2015 STR,Inc. %.t a., 1 1 I 3%,1V lethodology While virtually every chain in the United States provides STR with data on almost all of their properties,there are still some hotels that don't submit data. But we've got you covered. Every year we examine guidebook listings and hotel directories for information on hotels that don't provide us with data. We don't stop there. We call each hotel in our database every year to obtain"published"rates for multiple categories. Based on this information we group all hotels-those that report data and those that don't-into groupings based off of price level and geographic proximity. We then estimate the non-respondents based off of nearby hotels with similar price levels. Similarly,we sometimes obtain monthly data from a property,but not daily data. We use a similar process. We take the monthly data that the property has provided,and distribute it to the individual days based on the revenue and demand distribution patterns of similar hotels in the same location. We believe it imperative to perform this analysis in order to provide interested parties with our best estimate of total lodging demand and room revenue on their areas of interest. Armed with this information a more informed decision can be made. glossary ADR(Average Daily Rate) Open Date Room revenue divided by rooms sold,displayed as the average rental rate for a Date the property opened as a lodging establishment. single room. Percent Change Affiliation Date Amount of growth,up,flat,or down from the same period last year(month,ytd,three Date the property affiliated with current chain/flag months,twelve months). Calculated as((TY-LY)/LY)*"100". Census(Properties and Rooms) Revenue(Room Revenue) The number of properties and rooms that exist within the selected property set Total room revenue generated from the sale or rental of rooms. or segment. RevPAR(Revenue Per Available Room) Change in Rooms Room revenue divided by rooms available Indicator of whether or not an individual hotel has added or removed rooms from their inventory. Sample%(Rooms) The%of rooms from which STR receives data. Calculated as(Sample Exchange Rate Rooms/Census Rooms)*100". The factor used to convert revenue from U.S.Dollars to the local currency. The exchange rate data is obtained from Oanda.com. Any aggregated number Standard Historical Trend in the report(YTD, Running 3 month,Running 12 month)uses the exchange Data on selected properties or segments starting in 2005. rate of each relative month when calculating the data. STR Code Extended Historical Trend Smith Travel Research's proprietary numbering system. Each hotel in the lodging Data on selected properties or segments starting in 2000. census has a unique STR code. Demand(Rooms Sold) Supply(Rooms Available) The number of rooms sold(excludes complimentary rooms). The number of rooms times the number of days in the period. Full Historical Trend Twelve Month Moving Average Data on selected properties or segments starting in 1987. The value of any given month is computed by taking the value of that month and the values of the eleven preceding months,adding them together and dividing by twelve. Occupancy Rooms sold divided by rooms available.Occupancy is always displayed as a percentage of rooms occupied. Year to Date fore purchasing this product you agreed to the following terms and conditions. consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,STIR,Inc.("STR"),STIR Global,Ltd.("STRG"),and the snsee identified elsewhere in this Agreement("Licensee")agree as follows: LICENSE I Definitions. "Agreement"means these Standard Terms and Conditions and any additional terms specifically set out in writing in the document(s)(if any)to which these Standard Terms and Conditions are attached or in which they: .orporated by reference,and,if applicable,any additional terms specifically set out in writing in any Schedule attached hereto. "Licensed Materials"means the newsletters,reports,databases or other information resources,and all lodging industry data contained therein,provided to Licensee hereunder. >. Grant of License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,and except as may be expressly permitted elsewhere in this Agreement,STIR hereby grants to Licensee a non-exclusive,non-transferable, iivisible,non-sublicensable license to use,copy,manipulate and extract data from the Licensed Materials for its own INTERNAL business purposes only. I Copies. Except as expressly permitted elsewhere in this Agreement,Licensee may make and maintain no more than two(2)copies of any Licensed Materials. I No Service Bureau Use. Licensee is prohibited from using the Licensed Materials in any way in connection with any service bureau or similar services. "Service bureau"means the processing of input data that is pplied by one or more third parties and the generation of output data(in the form of reports,charts,graphs or other pictorial representations,or the like)that is sold or licensed to any third parties. / ICY IJ41V4L.VII lV 111114 r PI LIG.I. L.-PL QJ-PIGJJIy 'JG 11111\.-111 1111)/"1y1GGIIIGl1\,LIL.GIIJGG IJ rI VIIIVIIGV II VIII 41JL11UVlllly,IG'JU Ulwllllly VI VLIIGI YY IJG IIIPI\II1y 1116 LIGGIIJG4 1YIQlG11QIJ VI -1y PQIL LIIGIGVI�IIIVI II1y-1y cerpts of the data and any manipulations of the data)available in any form whatsoever to any third party,other than Licensee's accountants,attorneys,marketing professionals or other professional advisors who are boun a duty of confidentiality not to disclose such information. i Security. Licensee shall use commercially reasonable efforts to protect against unauthorized access to the Licensed Materials. r >erved to STIR. DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY I Disclaimer of Warranties. The licensed materials are provided to the licensee on an"as is"and"as available"basis. STIR makes no representations or warranties of any kind,express or implied,with respect to the ensed materials,the services provided or the results of use thereof.Without limiting the foregoing,STIR does not warrant that the licensed materials,the services provided or the use thereof are or will be accurate,error-fn uninterrupted.STIR makes no implied warranties,including without limitation,any implied warranty of merchantability,noninfringement or fitness for any particular purpose or arising by usage of trade,course of dealing, urse of performance or otherwise. >. Disclaimers. STIR shall have no liability with respect to its obligations under this agreement or otherwise for consequential,exemplary,special,incidental,or punitive damages even if STIR has been advised of the ssibility of such damages. Furthermore,STIR shall have no liability whatsoever for any claim relating in any way to any decision made or action taken by licensee in reliance upon the licensed materials. I Limitation of Liability. STR's total liability to licensee for any reason and upon any cause of action including without limitation,infringement,breach of contract,negligence,strict liability,misrepresentations,and other ts,shall be limited to all fees paid to STIR by the licensee during the twelve month period preceding the date on which such cause of action first arose. MISCELLANEOUS I Liquidated Damages. In the event of a violation of Section 1.5 of these Standard Terms and Conditions,Licensee shall be required to pay STIR an amount equal to the sum of(i)the highest aggregate price that STR,i cordance with its then-current published prices,could have charged the unauthorized recipients for the Licensed Materials that are the subject of the violation,and(ii)the full price of the lowest level of republishing rights t :ensee would have been required to purchase from STIR in order to have the right to make the unauthorized distribution,regardless of whether Licensee has previously paid for any lower level of republishing rights,and(ii een percent(15%)of the total of the previous two items. This provision shall survive indefinitely the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason. pies of the Licensed Materials and all other information relating thereto in Licensee's possession or control as of the such date. This provision shall survive indefinitely the expiration or termination of this Agreement for an ison. actions regarding or arising out of this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in a court of competent jurisdiction located in Nashville,Tennessee,and the parties expressly consent to personal jurisdiction thereof. The rties also expressly waive any objections to venue. I Assignment. Licensee is prohibited from assigning this Agreement or delegating any of its duties under this Agreement without the prior written consent of STIR. nture relationship. the time of transmission(provided,however,that notice delivered by facsimile transmission shall only be effective if such notice is also delivered by hand or deposited in the United States mail,postage prepaid,registered rtified or express mail or by courier service within two(2)business days after its delivery by facsimile transmission);iii)when delivered by a courier service or by express mail,at the time of receipt;or iv)five(5)business ys after being deposited in the United States mail,postage prepaid,registered or certified mail,addressed(in any such case)to the addresses listed on the first page of this Agreement or to such other address as either rty may notify the other in writing. Waiver. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement will be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision. I Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters described herein,superseding in all respects any and all prior proposals, negotiations,understandings and ier agreements,oral or written,between the parties. ) Amandmant_ Thic Anrepmpnt may hP nmpnrlprl nnly by the written gnrPAmPnt of hnth nnrtipc they may be entitled 11 Injunctive Relief. The parties agree that,in addition to any other rights or remedies which the other or STR may have,any party alleging breach or threatened breach of this Agreement will be entitled to such equitabl d injunctive relief as may be available from any court of competent jurisdiction to restrain the other from breaching or threatening to breach any of the provisions of this Section,without posting bond or other surety. 12 Notice of Unauthorized Access. Licensee shall notify STR immediately upon Licensee's becoming aware of any facts indicating that a third party may have obtained or may be about to obtain unauthorized access tc Licensed Materials,and shall fully cooperate with STR in its efforts to mitigate the damages caused by any such breach or potential breach. 13 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that any provision of these Standard Terms and Conditions directly conflicts with any other provision of the Agreement,the conflicting terms of such other provision shall control. 14 Remedies. In addition to any other rights or remedies that STR may have,in the event of any termination by STR on account of a breach by Licensee,STR may,without refund,immediately terminate and discontinue y right of Licensee to receive additional Licensed Materials from STR.