Loading...
S-1115 - 04/26/2005 - ZONING - Ordinances Supporting Documents• Item 7.K. 111 € IN .� I POW 1111'' 4 � 9 AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of April 12, 2005 SUBJECT: Map Amendment for Oak Brook Promenade FROM: Kenneth T. Kubiesa, Village Attorney BUDGET SOURCE /BUDGET IMPACT: None RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to pass Ordinance 2005- ZO -R -S -1115, An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001 -3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Background /History: This Ordinance amend the Zoning District Map for the Oak Brook Promenade property at 3001- 3003, 3121 Butterfield Road from the present zoning of ORA -1 to B -1. Recommendation: I recommend that Ordinance 2005- ZO -R -S -1115 be passed. Last saved by Default J \ALL DOCS \BOARD MEMOS \OBP Map Amend doc ' Last printed 4/8/2005 8 22 AM i 6 D Motion by Trustee Craig, seconded by Trustee Zannis, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 22, 2005 VOICE VOTE Motion carried E. SPECIAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF MARCH 29, 2005 Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Craig, to approve the Minutes of the Special Board of Trustees Meeting of March 29, 2005 VOICE VOTE. Motion carried. 7 CONSENT AGENDA All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. President Quinlan requested a motion to continue the following Agenda Items to the next Village Board meeting- 7. J An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, 7 K. An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001 -3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, 7. L. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Consolidation Known as NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14 -6 -34 and K of Title 14 ( "Subdivision Regulations ") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements; 7. M An Ordinance Amending Sections 13 -3 -8, 13 -7 -A -1 and 13- 7A -3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses, 7. N An Ordinance Granting Variations from the Provisions of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Lot Area Requirement, Sign Height, Interior Parking Lot landscaping and Off - Street Parking Regulations and 7 0 An Ordinance Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade for Outdoor Dining Areas Adjacent to Up to Three Restaurants Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to continue Agenda Items 7 J An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois; 7 K. An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001 -3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, 7 L A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Consolidation Known as NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14 -6 -3 -J and K of Title 14 ( "Subdivision Regulations ") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements; 7 M. An Ordinance Amending Sections 13 -3 -8, 13 -7 -A -1 and 13- 7A -3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses; 7 N An Ordinance Granting Variations from the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 15 April 12, 2005 •4 7 Provisions of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Lot Area Requirement, Sign Height, Interior Parking Lot Landscaping and Off- Street Parking Regulations and 7 0. An Ordinance Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade for Outdoor Dining Areas Adjacent to Up to Three Restaurants to the next Village Board meeting of April 26, 2005. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays- 0 -None Absent 1 - Trustee Caleel. Motion carried. Trustee Zannis requested Agenda Item 7 A 1) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosslear & Acker, P. C — Legal Services — February, 2005 be removed from the Consent Agenda for further discussion Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as amended ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays • 0 -None Absent: 1 - Trustee Caleel. Motion carried A Accounts Payable for Period Ending April 8, 2005 - $319,367.19 B Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending March 31, 2005 - $538,434 63 C Community Development Referrals D Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts 1) Health Benefits Consultant E. Authorization to Hire, Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees 1) Part -time Document Imaging Clerk F Budget Adjustments G Police Chief Employment Agreement H An Ordinance Authorizing Transfers Among Budget Line Items I U S Conference of Mayors — 2005 Annual Dues 8 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA 7 A 1) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P C — Legal Services — February, 2005 Trustee Zannis indicated that it had been requested that the format of the bills would include initials as to who worked on the specific task. The corrected bills will be sent to the Board in the Friday packet. Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Korin, to approve the bill as presented Ayes 5 - Trustees Aktipis, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays 0 - None Absent 1 - Trustee Caleel Motion carried. 9 BOARD & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS - None presented. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 15 April 12, 2005 AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of Apri126, 2005 SUBJECT: Map Amendment for Oak Brook Promenade FROM: Kenneth T. Kubiesa, Village Attorney BUDGET SOURCE /BUDGET IMPACT: None s IJ Item 7.K. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to pass Ordinance 2005- ZO -R -S -1115, An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001 -3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Background /History: This Ordinance amend the Zoning District Map for the Oak Brook Promenade property at 3001- 3003, 3121 Butterfield Road from the present zoning of ORA -1 to B -1. Recommendation: I recommend that Ordinance 2005- ZO -R -S -1115 be passed. Last saved by mnmbo I \ADMfMrkane\ALL DOGS \BOARD MEMOS \OBP Map Amend doc Last printed 4/19/2005 4 31 PM 7. B. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending April 9, 2005 - $593,694.71 D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts* E Authorization to Hire, Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees F Budget Adjustments G Treasurer's Report — March, 2005 H DuPage County Children's Center Agreement and Contribution I York Road /Harger Road Bicycle /Pedestrian Path — Construction Engineering Amendment No. 1 J An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois K An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001 -3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 L A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Subdivision Known as NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14 -6 -3 -J and K of Title 14 ( "Subdivision Regulations ") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements M An Ordinance Amending Sections 13 -3 -8, 13 -7 -A -1 and 13- 7A -3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses ........ ...................... ... . ............................... N. An Ordinance Granting Variations from the Provisions of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Lot Area Requirement, Sign Height, Interior Parking Lot Landscaping and Off - Street Parking Regulations O An Ordinance Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade for Outdoor Dining Areas Adjacent to Up to Three Restaurants P Revised Settlement Agreement in the Primeco Class Action Litigation N, 8 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. 7 A 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P C. — Legal Services — March, 2005 - $23,703 15 Trustee Korin stated she is agreeable to paying the bill with the exception of the last item, the Elmhurst Builders & Developers litigation, as the Village Board had previously passed a motion that Attorney Kubiesa would not bill the Village for time spent in this litigation considering how it was handled and subsequently what has been done to follow through with the litigation Motion by Trustee Korin, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to approve 7 A. 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P. C. — Legal Services — March, 2005 - $23,703.15 bill with the exception of $5,994.40 for Elmhurst Builders & Developers. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes 6 - Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays 0 - None. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 17 April 26, 2005 1 5. himself, his subdivision and friends throughout the Village expressed his gratitude to Trustees Caleel, Korin and Zannis for their time, energy, thoughts, management skills and efforts. He stated due to their efforts the Village will be better and he personally pleaded to all three of them to run for re- election but each of them were not able to do so due to other endeavors. T h Mario Vescovi also commended Trustees Caleel, Korin and Zannis for their dedication and tenacity in their accomplishments They have inspired the Village residents to become more involved in the Village political system and processes Then Samuel Girgis also thanked the three Trustees for their efforts during their tenure serving on the Board of Trustees. He commended them for a job well done for the long range growth of Oak Brook. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF APRIL 12, 2005 Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of April 12, 2005. CONSENT AGENDA: All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. Trustee Caleel requested that Agenda Item 7. C. Community Development Referrals, 1) Breakenridge Farm Extension — Preliminary Plat of Subdivision and Agenda Item 7. Q Amendment to the 2005 Salary Plan and Salary Administration Policy be removed for further discussion. Trustee Korin requested that Agenda Item 7 A. 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P C — Legal Services — March, 2005 - $23,703 15 be removed for further discussion. Motion by Trustee Caleel, seconded by Trustee Aktipis, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as amended. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes • 6 - Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays 0 -None Absent. 0 - None Motion carried A Accounts Payable for Period Ending April 22, 2005 - $738,021.26 Significant Items included in Above. 1) DuPage Water Commission - $152,276.09 2) Civiltech Engineering —Payout #5 — 31" Street Bike Path VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 17 April 26, 2005 8. A. the center island median that there is nothing that can be done to facilitate something Director Kallien explained that with the McDonald's development it was rather a small green space and the Village agreed that there would be some flowers and low level shrubs He believes there is an opportunity to do that on this site similar to McDonald's but without large trees Trustee Zannis asked if the Board could direct Director Kallien to work with the applicant to develop a plan Director Kallien stated yes that staff would work with the applicant to develop something that is consistent with what McDonald's proposed President Quinlan asked the petitioner if they would put as much landscaping as possible in that location Ms. Riordan agreed to that request President Quinlan recognized Chairman Champ Davis of the Zoning Board of Appeals in attendance of the meeting He also acknowledged Lexi Payovich, Plan Commission Chairman, who was not in attendance of the meeting but to recognize them for the amount of time and effort that they and their teams put into this project He stated this is the biggest undertaking since the building of the Oakbrook Shopping Center Trustee Caleel commented that this is one of the best presentations he has seen in the past eight years Ms Riordan thanked Trustee Caleel for his comments and acknowledged that Manager Boehm, Engineer Durfey and Community Development Director Kallien have been very helpful and spent a great deal of time on this project Trustee Craig stated he is delighted to see this project move forward and the Board agrees on this President Quinlan explained that the Board is now voting on 8 A as follows Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve a final plat of consolidation for the properties at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting VOICE VOTE: Motion carried OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001, 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD — MAP AMENDMENT At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St Paul Properties, Inc, seeking approval of a map amendment (i e , rezoning) from ORA -1 to VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 11 of 44 March 16, 2005 4C 8 A B -1 in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of a map amendment to B -1 to accommodate the Oak Brook Promenade project In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that 1 The five parcels which encompass a total of 19 7 acres is zoned ORA -1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2 The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of office, commercial and restaurant uses 3 Recent development /redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. 4 The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail 5 In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (Le, Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in the previous Office /Warehouse use to a retail use 6 A map amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B -1, to allow the development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development 7 The applicant has requested the following uses (although permitted in the B -1 District) will not be permitted in the project - Servicing of motor vehicles, regular barber shops; photo studios, generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel, traditional hardware stores, Laundromats, shoe repair, sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing, public utility uses, nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings, municipal type uses, cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant, post offices and dry cleaning operations 8 The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15 9 No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested map amendment and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 12 of 44 March 16, 2005 M, 8 A. Trustees meeting VOICE VOTE: Motion carried OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD — SPECIAL USE At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project Even though the actual tenants are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use to establish the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical' outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three sit -down restaurants planned for the project The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24 -ft deep and are oriented towards the five acre water feature located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of this special use The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15 -ft deep Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April 1 sc and October 15"' of each year (weather permitting) and will not offer live music Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to three restaurants proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that 1 The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale restaurants at part of its final tenant mix 2. The applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area that are detailed in the case file 3 The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village 4. The applicant has addressed all the applicable factors required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 13 of 44 March 16, 2005 01 J • ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-R-S-1.115 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP CONCERNING THE OAK BROOK PROMENADE PROPERTY AT 3001-3003, 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD, OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523 (P.I.N. 06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting that the zoning district map be amended as to certain property commonly known as 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois, consisting of approximately nineteen point seven (19.7)acres (the"Subject Property'), of which Parcels 1 through 4 are presently zoned ORA-1 (Office-Research-Assembly District) and of which Parcel 5 is presently zoned R-1 (Single-Family Residence District)to B-1 (Local Shopping Center District); and WHEREAS, public hearings on such application were conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Oak Brook on February 1 and February 15, 2005, pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals have recommended this amendment, with the Zoning Board of Appeals also making the requisite findings that the standards of Section 13-14-8 of the Village Code have been met; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees hereby determine that the map amendment for the Subject Property to the B-1 Local Shopping Center District represents the most appropriate zoning consistent with the highest and best use thereof; and • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the zoning district map is hereby amended so that the Subject Property legally described below, be located within the B-1 Local Shopping Center District: i PARCEL 1 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2, AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE Ordinance 2005-ZO-R-S-1115 Rezoning from ORA-1 to B-1 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road (P.I.N.06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, • 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 2 of 5 DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74-38411. PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269) LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS • RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069), 517.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2- 63.5, 465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. • PARCEL 4 Ordinance 2005-ZO-R-S-1115 Rezoning from ORA-1 to B-1 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road (P.I.N.06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, • 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 3 of 5 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT (SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH . LINE (SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT • 2), 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98-179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET (450.89 FEET RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069, A DISTANCE OF 191.20 • FEET (191.21 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD), ALONG A Ordinance 2005-ZO-R-S-1115 Rezoning from ORA-1 to B-1 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road (P.I.N.06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, • 06-28-103-019) Page 4 of 5 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042, A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1) THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2) THENCE • SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. (Commonly known as 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois) Section 2: That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to amend the official zoning district map of the Village of Oak Brook in accordance with the provisions of Section 1 hereinabove. Section 3. That the following uses, although permitted uses in the B-1 District, will be prohibited uses on the Subject Property: Servicing of motor vehicles, Regular barber shops, Photo studios, Generic drug stores, Grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel • Traditional hardware stores, Laundromats, Ordinance 2005-ZO-R-S-1115 Rezoning from ORA-1 to B-1 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road (P.I.N.06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, • 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 5 of 6 Traditional hardware stores, Laundromats, Shoe repair, Sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing, Public utility uses Nursing homes Telephone equipment buildings, Municipal type uses, Cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant Post offices Dry cleaning operations Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law, subject to approval and recording of a covenant prohibiting the uses listed in Section 3 above, the approval of the annexation of Parcel 5 to the Village of Oak Brook and the approval and establishment of the Promenade Tax Increment Financing District and a Redevelopment Agreement by and between the Village and Petitioner, or waiver of this requirement by Petitioner, on or before December 31,2005. APPROVED THIS 26th day of April , 2005. Kevin uinlan VilleAe President PASSED THIS 26th day of April , 2005. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None t 1 `.'� ` « - � ATTEST: "ra A.'.r f y • ds �` "' C.) Linda K. Gonnella, CMC � 'L y`l r • ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-V-S-1116 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 13(ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO LOT AREA REQUIREMENT,SIGN HEIGHT, INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING AND OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS (3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523) (P.I.N. 06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore adopted an ordinance setting forth the Zoning Regulations for the Village of Oak Brook in Title 13 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code sets forth the authority and standards of the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations; and WHEREAS, NAI Hillman ("Petitioner"), the developer of the project, known as the Oak Brook Promenade, on behalf of St. Paul Properties, Inc., the owners of certain property, commonly known as 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 and legally described as follows: PARCEL 1 • 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2, AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 176 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 00 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74-38411. • Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 • Butterfield Road,Oak Brook,IL, (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 2 of 7 PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269) LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS;ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT.PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069), 517.90 FEET, . MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE • NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2- 63.5, 465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 4 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, • DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 • Butterfield Road,Oak Brook, IL, (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 3 of 7 INNING AT THE BEG SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT (SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE (SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2), 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 • 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98-179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET (450.89 FEET RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069, A DISTANCE OF 191.20 FEET (191.21 FEET RECORD) TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD), ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER- COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE • WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 • Butterfield Road,Oak Brook,IL, (06-286-28-10 103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 4 of 7 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042, A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1) THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, . RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WHEREAS, the Petitioners have submitted Petitions requesting setback and several other variations for the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing at the Butler Government Center, 1200 Oak Brook Road, Oak Brook, Illinois in connection with the aforesaid Petitions, after due and appropriate legal notice was given; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals specifically considered the standards set forth in Section 13-14-6 (D) of the Village Code and found that the petitioner addressed the factors as required by the Zoning Ordinance for approval of variations and that the variations would be designed so that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected and there will be no substantial injury to other property in the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals made specific findings of fact and recommendation for approval of the following variations: 1) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c), Lot Area Requirement, reducing the • required sixty foot(60') setback from the right-of-way to a fifty foot(50') setback; Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Road,Oak Brook, IL, • (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 5 of 7 2) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-11-7(A)4, Sign Height, reducing the requirement that all building signs not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30')to an extension outwards of not more than thirty inches (30") and a height of up to thirty- six feet(36'); 3) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (C), Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles, reducing the twenty-seven foot(27')parking aisles to twenty-four foot(24')drive aisles; 4) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (E)-4, Off Street Parking Regulations—Access, reducing the required four hundred feet (400') of spacing between separate driveway entrances between Entry A and Entry B to two hundred, ninety-two feet (292') and between Entry B and Entry C to three hundred,forty feet(340'); 5) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (H), Off Street Parking Regulations— In Yards, requiring that parking spaces be no less than ten feet(10')from the nearest lot line; 6) A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-4 (C), Design and Maintenance— Interior Parking Lot Landscaping, described below: a. To increase the number of parking bays from three (3)to four(4)to the west of Building "B"without the required divider every three (3)bays; • b. To decrease the requirement of at least one(1)tree be located in the area of every fifteen (15)parking spaces or every forty feet(40'); c. To be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement instead of interior shade trees; WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the above requested variations; and WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees concur with the findings and recommendations made by the Zoning Board of Appeals as amended by their recommendation; and WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of Section 13-14-6 of the Village Code relating to the granting of variations to the Zoning Regulations have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DUPAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the recitals hereto are incorporated as part of this ordinance. Section 2: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-7A-3(C)(1)(c) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow for a fifty foot(50') setback from the right-of-way. Section 3: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-11-7(A) 4 of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow a sign extension of not more than thirty inches (30")and a sign height of up to thirty-six feet(36'). • Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 • Butterfield Road,Oak Brook, IL, (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 6 of 7 I Section 4: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (C) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow for twenty-four foot(24')drive aisles. i Section 5: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (E)-4 of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow for two hundred, ninety-two feet (292') of spacing between Entry A and Entry B and three hundred, forty feet(340') between Entry B,and Entry C. Section 6: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-3 (H) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards. Section 7: A variation from the provisions of Section 13-12-4 (C) of the Zoning Regulations of the Oak Brook Village Code is hereby granted to allow the following: 1. To provide four(4) parking bays to the west of Building "B'; 2. Will not be required to provide one (1)tree for every fifteen (15) parking spaces or every forty feet (40'). However, they will exceed the overall tree requirements for the project and will provide larger than the required four inch to six inch (4"-6")caliper shade trees required by Code. 3. To plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth • , Edison easement. Section 8: The above variations must be in substantial conformance with the Overall Site Summary dated January 10, 2005, as shown as Exhibit 5 of the Booklet, on file with the Village and hereby approved. Section 9: This Ordinance is limited and restricted to the property legally described herein. Section 10: All ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 11: Notwithstanding the approval herein of the above-mentioned plans, exhibits, and Booklet, the Petitioner shall meet all Village ordinance and code requirements as in effect at the time of the issuance of a building permit or permits. Section 12: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law, subject to the approval of the annexation of Parcel 5 to the Village of Oak Brook and approval and establishment of the Promenade Tax Increment Financing District and a Redevelopment Agreement by and between the Village and Petitioner, or waiver of this requirement by Petitioner, on or before December 31, 2005. APPROVED THIS 26th day of April _' 2005. • K in Quinlan, illage Preside t Ordinance 2005-ZO-V-S- Granting Variations from Title 13 re Oak Brook Promenade,3001-3003,3121 • Butterfield Road,Oak Brook, IL, (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 7 of 7 PASSED THIS 26th day of April 2005. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None ATTEST: Q F 04A,dp� CIO t Linda K. Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk A V� . ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIAL USES TO OAK BROOK PROMENADE FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ADJACENT TO UP TO THREE RESTAURANTS (Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523) (06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting special uses, as detailed in the Oak Brook Promenade Booklet in the Petition for Special Use section dated December 14, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "Booklet") submitted by Petitioner in support of its application for up to three (3) outdoor dining special uses adjacent to restaurants at the Oak Brook Promenade to be constructed at the southwest corner of Meyer Road and Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the request for special uses and recommended its approval; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing on the request for special uses pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and recommended approval of the special uses; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission found that the Petitioner satisfactorily addressed the factors required for approval of these special uses and made specific findings including that the special uses for outdoor dining at the Oak Brook Promenade would be operated so that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected and there will be no substantial injury to other • property in the neighborhood.; WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission also found that the request for special uses was consistent with other outdoor dining arrangements for restaurants within the Village of Oak Brook; and WHEREAS, the Village president and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendations of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and deem the special uses as set forth below to be in the best interest of the Village; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DUPAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows: Section 1: The recitals above are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this ordinance. Section 2: The Oak Brook Promenade aforesaid is hereby granted special uses for outdoor dining adjacent to up to three (3)restaurants, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the construction and design of up to three (3) restaurants at Oak Brook Promenade shall be in substantial conformance with the Overall Site Summary dated January 10, 2005, as shown as Exhibit 5 of the Booklet, on file with the Village and hereby approved, as follows: a. The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately twenty-four feet (24') deep and are oriented towards the five (5) acre water feature located at the corner of Butterfield Road and Meyer Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of the special • use; Ordinance 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, • Oak Brook,IL,(06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 2 of 6 b. The smallest of the three (3) outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of Building K and will be approximately fifteen feet(15') deep; c. Access to each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping; d. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for Building K, the addition of a low masonry wall barrier would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick; e. The dining areas will be utilized between April 1St and October 15th of each year (weather-permitting)and will not offer live music; and 2) Construction, design and use of the outdoor seating area and appurtenances shall be in substantial conformance with the detailed site plans as contained in Exhibit 2, plan numbered 2.0, dated January 10, 2005; Site Plan in Exhibit 5, plan numbered 5.0, dated January 10, 2005; and the Petition for Special Use Section of the Booklet, on file with the Village and hereby approved; and 3) Construction of the Oak Brook Promenade restaurants aforesaid shall be in substantial conformance with the site plans and exhibits contained in the Booklet in all respects including, but not limited to screening for trash receptacles, landscaping of the building, parking lot and boulevard entrances, use of building materials and furnishings for the • outdoor dining area. Section 3 These special uses and the scope of this ordinance are limited and restricted to the nineteen point seven (19.7) acre property located at the southwest corner of Meyer Road and Butterfield Road, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois, which property is legally described as follows: PARCEL 1 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2, AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST • COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 176 DEGREES 08 Ordinance 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, • Oak Brook,IL,(06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 3 of 6 MINUTES 00 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74-38411. PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269) LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069), 517.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2- 63.5, 465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION • NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. i Ordinance 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, • Oak Brook,IL,(06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 4 of 6 PARCEL 4 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT (SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID • NORTH LINE (SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2), 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98-179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET (450.89 FEET RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069, A DISTANCE OF 191.20 • FEET (191.21 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 Ordinance 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, • Oak Brook,IL,(06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 5 of 6 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD), ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042, A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1) THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF • 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Section 4: All ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 5: Notwithstanding the approval herein of the above-mentioned plans, exhibits, and Booklet, the Petitioner shall meet all Village ordinance and code requirements as in effect at the time of j the issuance of a building permit or permits. Section 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law, subject to the approval of the annexation of Parcel 5 to the Village of Oak Brook and approval and establishment of the Promenade Tax Increment Financing District and a Redevelopment Agreement by and between the Village and Petitioner, or waiver of this requirement by Petitioner, on or • before December 31, 2005. Ordinance 2005-ZO-SU-S-1117 Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade, 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, • Oak Brook,IL,(06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 6 of 6 APPROVED THIS 26th day of April , 2005. Kevi Quinlan, Vi ge President PASSED THIS 26th day of April '2005. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None • ATTEST: cr. Linda K. Gonnella, CMC Village Clerk • n t ORDINANCE 2005-ZO-TA-G-778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 13-3-8(A), 13-7A-1 j' AND 13-7A-3(B) IN TITLE 13 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO STRUCTURE HEIGHT AND PERMITTED USES WHEREAS, an application has been filed requesting certain amendments to Title 13 of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook with respect to structure height and permitted uses in the B-1, Local Shopping Center District; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has reviewed the request and has unanimously recommended the approval of the zoning text amendments; and WHEREAS, on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted public hearings on the request pursuant to due and appropriate legal notice, and has recommended approval of the zoning text amendments; and WHEREAS, the Village president and Board of Trustees have reviewed the recommendations of the.Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and deem the requested text amendments as set forth below to be in the best interest of the village; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF • THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DUPAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows: Section 1: That Section 13-3-8(A) (Structure Height) of the Village Code be and is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: STRUCTURE HEIGHT: A. No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the Village Engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the Village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the Village except residential districts, shall be thirty feet (30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. Structure height may be measured from a base elevation other than natural ground level only with the express approval of the Village. However, an elevator housing enclosure for the purpose of providing a single elevator access to the penthouse level not to exceed three hundred, twenty-five (325) square feet in area may be erected to heights which do not exceed by more than twenty- two (22)feet the height limits of the district in which it is located. Section 2: That Section 13-7A-1 (Permitted Uses) of the Village Code be and is hereby amended to include"Health Clubs" as a permitted use. Section 3: That Subsection B of Section 13-7A-3 (Lot Area Requirements) of the Village Code be and is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: • B. Structure Height: Not more than fifty feet(50') and not more than two (2) stories. Ordinance 2005-ZO-TA-G-778 Amending Sections 13-3-8, 13-7-A-1 &13-7A-3(6) Page 2 of 2 • Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. APPROVED THIS 26th day of April , 2005. Keenuinlan, Vill President PASSED THIS 26th day of April 2005. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None �F d� c?, ATTEST: ` 9 Linda K. Gonnella, CMC �11, ,,� �*"` Village Clerk �6..epSF(:w•'Y 9�f� *'CY INT • • RESOLUTION 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS NAI HIFFMAN BUTTERFIELD ROAD SUBDIVISION AND GRANTING VARIATIONS FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14-6-3-J AND K OF TITLE 14("SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS") OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK RELATIVE TO MONUMENTATION AND GRANTING OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523) (06-28-103-009, 06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005, 06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Oak Brook, on January 17, 2005, recommended the approval of a one (1) lot subdivision, consolidating the existing five (5) parcels at 3001- 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, known as NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision (hereinafter, "Subdivision")to create a single parcel consisting of 19.7 acres; and WHEREAS, the Village of Oak Brook has heretofore adopted an ordinance setting forth the Subdivision Regulations for the Village of Oak Brook in Title 14 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, Section 14-7-4 of the Village Code sets forth the authority and standards of the granting of variations to the Subdivision Regulations; and • WHEREAS, NAI Hiffman (`Petitioner"), the developer of the project, known as the Oak Brook Promenade, on behalf of St. Paul Properties, the owners of the property at 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, has submitted a petition for variations to sections 14-6-3 (J) and 14-6-3 (K) of the Subdivision Regulations relative to the requirements for monumentation and dedication of public utility easements; and WHEREAS, on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed the petition for subdivision and variations and recommended approval of the plat of subdivision and variations; and WHEREAS, in making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the petitioner had addressed the applicable standards required for variations to the Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission made the following specific findings: 1. The proposed plat consolidates the five (5)existing parcels that are of this project into one (1) parcel. 2. The single 19.7-acre parcel will accommodate an approximate 180,000 square foot mixed- use project consisting of retail, restaurant and office uses. 3. The proposed variations to the Subdivision Regulations requested by the petitioner relates to required monumentation and public utility easements. • Resolution 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 Apprvng FP of SUBDIVISION,Gmtng Vars.—Monumentation,Public Utility (3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Rd.) • (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 2 of 6 4. Because the site is already developed and a portion of the site improvement will be maintained, the variation to the monumentation requirement is being requested. 5. The final plat of subdivision satisfies all other aspects and requirements for the Village's Subdivision Regulations including that neither the proposed variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent properties. 6. The final plat be revised and approved by the Village Engineer. 7. Future dedication of approximately 1.5 acres of property to DuPage County of the Meyers Road right-of-way. WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have considered the recommendations of the Plan Commission and concur with same; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK, DU PAGE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS as follows: Section 1: That the Final Plat of Subdivision prepared by Manhard Consulting Ltd. dated November 2, 2004, last revised February 14, 2005, be and is hereby approved, subject to Section 2 below. • Section 2: That approval of the Final Plat of Subdivision of the NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision as per Section 1 hereof be and is hereby expressly subject to and is not effective until the following conditions are met: 1. Parcel 5, identified as P.I.N. 06-28-103-018 and P.I.N. 06-28-103-019, is annexed to the Village of Oak Brook. 2. The Final Plat be revised and approved by the Village Engineer. 3. Future dedication of approximately 1.5 acres of property to DuPage County of the Meyers Road right-of-way. Section 3: All requirements, conditions and standards of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Oak Brook, except as waived or limited by this Resolution, shall be applicable to the subdivision and development of said NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision - Section 4: A variation to Section 14-6-3-J of the Subdivision Regulations is hereby granted permitting the lot corner designations as depicted on the said Final Plat of Subdivision. Section 5: A variation to Section 14-6-3-K of the Subdivision Regulations is hereby granted permitting the deletion of the six foot (6')and ten foot(10') public utility easements along the side and rear lot lines. Section 6: The variations described above are limited to the property at 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road which is legally described as follows: • Resolution 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 Apprvng FP of SUBDIVISION,Grntng Vars.—Monumentation,Public Utility (3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Rd.) • (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 3 of 6 PARCEL 1 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2, AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 176 DEGREES 08 • MINUTES 00 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74-38411. PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269) LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER • Resolution 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 Apprvng FP of SUBDIVISION,Gmtng Vars.—Monumentation,Public Utility (3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Rd.) • (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 4 of 6 COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069), 517.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2- 63.5, 465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE • THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 4 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT (SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID • NORTH LINE (SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2), 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, + Resolution 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 Apprvng FP of SUBDIVISION,Grntng Vars.—Monumentation,Public Utility (3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Rd.) • (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 5 of 6 ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH., RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98-179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET (450.89 FEET RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST (NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 • MINUTES EAST, RECORD) ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069, A DISTANCE OF 191.20 FEET (191.21 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD), ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042, A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, RECORD) ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE;THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF • SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1) THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF Resolution 2005-SD-FP-CON-V-R-901 Apprvng FP of SUBDIVISION,Gmtng Vars.—Monumentation,Public Utility • (3001-3003,3121 Butterfield Rd.) (06-28-103-009,06-28-103-014, 06-28-103-005,06-28-103-018, 06-28-103-019) Page 6 of 6 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST(SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5) THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Section 7: All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 8: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval • as required by law, subject to the approval of the annexation of Parcel 5 to the Village of Oak Brook and the approval and establishment of the Promenade Tax Increment Financing District and a Redevelopment Agreement by and between the Village and Petitioner, or waiver of this requirement by Petitioner, on or before December 31,2005. APPROVED THIS 26th day of April , 2005. Kevin uinlan Ville de President PASSED THIS 26th day of April ' 2005. Ayes: Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis Nays: None Absent: None ATTEST: :yF ^ • c: „=�7 . Lin K. onnella, CMC Village Clerk �GUNT�/ • 5. himself, his subdivision and friends throughout the Village expressed his gratitude to Trustees Caleel, Korin and Zannis for their time, energy, thoughts, management skills and efforts. He stated due to their efforts the Village will be better and he personally pleaded to all three of them to run for re-election but each of them were not able to do so due to other endeavors. Mario Vescovi also commended Trustees Caleel, Korin and Zannis for their dedication and tenacity in their accomplishments. They have inspired the Village residents to become more involved in the Village political system and processes. Then Samuel Girgis also thanked the three Trustees for their efforts during their tenure serving on the Board of Trustees. He commended them for a job well done for the long range growth of Oak Brook. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: REGULAR BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF APRIL 12 2005 Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of April 12, 2005. 7. CONSENT AGENDA: • All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. Trustee Caleel requested that Agenda Item 7. C. Community Development Referrals, 1) Breakenridge Farm Extension — Preliminary Plat of Subdivision and Agenda Item 7. Q. Amendment to the 2005 Salary Plan and Salary Administration Policy be removed for further discussion. Trustee Korin requested that Agenda Item 7.A. 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar&Acker, P. C.—Legal Services—March, 2005 - $23,703.15 be removed for further discussion. Motion by Trustee Caleel, seconded by Trustee Aktipis, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as amended. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 -Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig,Korin,Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 -None. Absent:0 -None. Motion carried. A. Accounts Payable for Period Ending April 22, 2005 - $738,021.26 Significant Items included in Above: 1) DuPage Water Commission- $152,276.09 2) Civiltech Engineering—Payout#5 —31St Street Bike Path VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 17 April 26, 2005 • 1 • 7. B. Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending April 9, 2005 - $593,694.71 D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposals or Negotiate Contracts: E. Authorization to Hire, Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees F. Budget Adjustments G. Treasurer's Report—March,2005 H. DuPage County Children's Center Agreement and Contribution I. York Road/Harger Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Path—Construction Engineering Amendment No. 1 J. An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois K. An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 L. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Subdivision Known as NAI Hillman Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14-6-3-J and K of Title 14 ("Subdivision Regulations") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements M. An Ordinance Amending Sections 13-3-8, 13-7-A-1 and 13-7A-3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses................................................................................. N. An Ordinance Granting Variations from the Provisions of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Lot Area • Requirement, Sign Height, Interior Parking Lot Landscaping and Off-Street Parking Regulations O. An Ordinance Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade for Outdoor Dining Areas Adjacent to Up to Three Restaurants P. Revised Settlement Agreement in the Primeco Class Action Litigation 8. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: 7. A. 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P.C. — Legal Services — March, 2005 - $23,703.15 Trustee Korin stated she is agreeable to paying the bill with the exception of the last item, the Elmhurst Builders & Developers litigation, as the Village Board had previously passed a motion that Attorney Kubiesa would not bill the Village for time spent in this litigation considering how it was handled and subsequently what has been done to follow through with the litigation. Motion by Trustee Korin, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to approve 7. A. 3) Kubiesa, Spiroff, Gosselar & Acker, P. C. — Legal Services — March, 2005 - $23,703.15 bill with the exception of$5,994.40 for Elmhurst Builders &Developers. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 -Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig,Korin, Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 -None. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 5 of 17 April 26, 2005 • i • 6. D. Motion by Trustee Craig,seconded by Trustee Zannis, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 22, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. E. SPECIAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING OF MARCH 29, 2005 Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Craig, to approve the Minutes of the Special Board of Trustees Meeting of March 29, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 7. CONSENT AGENDA: All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. President Quinlan requested a motion to continue the following Agenda Items to the next Village Board meeting: 7. J. An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois; 7. K. An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523; 7. L. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Consolidation Known as NAI Hiffinan Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting • Variations from the Provisions of Section 14-6-3-J and K of Title 14 ("Subdivision Regulations") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements; 7. M. An Ordinance Amending Sections 13-3-8, 13-7-A-1 and 13-7A-3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses; 7. N. An Ordinance Granting Variations from the Provisions of Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Lot Area Requirement, Sign Height, Interior Parking Lot landscaping and Off-Street Parking Regulations and 7. 0. An Ordinance Granting Special Uses to Oak Brook Promenade for Outdoor Dining Areas Adjacent to Up to Three Restaurants. Motion by Trustee Zannis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to continue Agenda Items 7. J. An Ordinance Annexing Certain Territory to the Village of Oak Brook, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois; 7. K. An Ordinance Amending the Zoning District Map Concerning the Oak Brook Promenade Property at 3001-3003, 3121 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523; 7. L. A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Consolidation Known as NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision and Granting Variations from the Provisions of Section 14-6-3-J and K of Title 14 ("Subdivision Regulations") of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Monumentation and Granting of Public Utility Easements; 7. M. An Ordinance Amending Sections 13-3-8, 13-7-A-1 and 13-7A-3(B) in Title 13 (Zoning Regulations) of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook Relative to Structure Height and Permitted Uses; 7. N. An Ordinance Granting Variations from the VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 4 of 15 April 12, 2005 • • 7. 6. G. screening with which the Village would approve. He stated this seems ambiguous rather than having something here or be willing to take the petitioners word that he would do so. Trustee Caleel explained that generally when the Board approves some of these that there are certain requirements from staff so that he would be in favor of moving it for passage at this time provided that it meets staff requirements. President Quinlan remarked that the Board would have to be willing to accept Director Kallien's judgment which he did not have a problem with this. Trustee Caleel suggested that Director Kallien knows what the Board stated at the last meeting and it is indicated in the Board minutes. President Quinlan commented that one entity must give final approval on this matter. Trustee Caleel suggested that Director Kallien review this with the affected homeowners association prior to his approval that it meets the requirements. Trustee Yusuf indicated that he has full faith in Director Kallien's ability to review those plans to ensure they are of a reasonable nature and consult with and seek the input of the homeowners association in Steeple Chase. President Quinlan noted that under Section 2, 3. of the Ordinance that language be added at the end of that sentence "subject to staff review." With that amendment, President Quinlan asked if there was a motion to approve. Motion by Trustee Atkipis, seconded by Trustee Yusuf, to approve An Ordinance granting a variation to 814 Commerce, LLC to allow ninety-six(96)parking spaces in the front yard setback while maintaining a setback of thirty-five feet (35') along Commerce Drive and to include under Section 2, 3. at the end of the sentence "subject to staff review." ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 -Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig,Korin, Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 -None. Absent: 0 -None.Motion carried. 8. BOARD&COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: A. OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001, 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD— FINAL PLAT MAP AMENDMENT SPECIAL USE TEXT AMENDMENTS VARIATIONS At its meeting on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed an application from NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a final plat of consolidation for approximately 19.7 acres located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road in the Village of Oak Brook. The requested action would consolidate the five existing parcels into one in order to VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 7 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. accommodate the proposed construction of the Oak Brook Promenade project. One of these parcels is presently unincorporated and will require annexation by the Village. As part of this request,the applicant is requesting variations to Section 14-6- 3(J)—required monumentation and Section 14-6-3(K)—required dedication of public utility easements of the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is seeking these approvals in order to redevelop the property and construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft.upscale retail center. Recommendation: By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the final plat of consolidation and requested variations to the subdivision regulations subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The development will be in substantial conformance with the final plat of consolidation prepared by Manhard Consulting, revision date January 6, 2005 found on tab 25 of the case file. 2. With respect to the requested variations relating to monumentation and designation of public utility easements, the Village has in the past (700/800 Commerce and 122 22nd Street) approved similar requests. 3. The final plat consolidation satisfies all other aspects and requirements for the • Village's Subdivision Regulations including that neither the proposed variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent properties. 4. That the applicant address all issues raised by Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated January 12, 2005 on page 12 of the case file including final engineering approval. 5. Annexation approval of the unincorporated parcel as a condition of final approval by the Village. 6. Eventual dedication of approximately 1.5 acres of property to DuPage County as right-of-way for Meyers Road. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for 'a final plat of subdivision as well as the requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve a final plat of consolidation for the properties at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. Before the vote was called,the Village Board addressed the petitioner with questions. Trustee Korin noted that in the tenant handbook it states that tenants are encouraged VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 8 of 44 March 16, 2005 • i • 8. A. to create innovative and dramatic storefronts if not provided by the landlord. She asked how much approval does the landlord or Village has regarding the storefronts. Mary Riordan representing the petitioner, NAI Hiffman, explained that the detailed handbook is incorporated by reference in all of the leases. The landlord, St. Paul and NAI Hiffman, will own all of these buildings. The tenant criteria are incorporated into the leases and all of tenants have to satisfy the criteria. Also they have to come to ownership and get their plan approved before it even comes to the Village for approval. In speaking with Director Kallien, they will develop a form indicating that ownership has reviewed the plan and it does comply with both the approving ordinance referenced in the leases and the design criteria. Trustee Korin reiterated that the Village would approve the storefronts. Ms. Riordan stated that is correct. She stated the petitioner is asking, assuming the Village approves it, that the Village references this in the approved ordinances. By reference they are incorporating those ordinances into the leases. Trustee Korin indicated there is approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of space designated for office space and asked where would those tenants park. Ms. Riordan explained that those tenants would be issued parking pass cards to park underground in the garages. Trustee Korin asked for the number of parking spaces per 1,000 sq. feet. Ms. • Riordan noted that all of the uses are in compliance with the Village Code. Restaurant is 10 to 1, retail is 5 to 1 and office is 3.3 to 1. Their parking calculation assumptions indicate that 128,255 sq. ft. of retail is 5 to 1; 20,450 sq. ft. of office is 3.3 to 1 and the restaurant is 30,000 sq. ft. 10 to 1 per Village Code including handicap parking. Trustee Korin noted that they are asking for a lot of relief. She voiced her concern of the removal of the bays that it would like a sea of cars. Ms. Riordan stated that the Village Code requires a bay every three islands. The only place that is not done which was moved intentionally to provide for the circulation. Village staff had asked that the petitioner be sensitive to the concept of pedestrian circulation. This is the only place that they are in non-compliance as the pedestrian circulation is important. Trustee Korin remarked that she had read the traffic study indicating that the level of service does not change. During certain hours the wait time will increase. She asked if there is any anticipation that the applicant or the Village would ask DuPage County that the length of time of the east and west traffic flowing on Butterfield Road would have a longer green light. Ms. Riordan explained that IDOT has jurisdiction over the Butterfield Road and any changes the Village would have to address to them as it beyond the scope of their project. Don O'Hara,KLOA, Inc.,their traffic engineer addressed the Village Board of their VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 9 of 44 March 16,2005 • • 8. A. traffic study of the proposed project. He stated the problem is that the State of Illinois has total control of the traffic signals on Butterfield Road and they minimize the amount of green time to the minor approach and maximize the amount of green time to the major approach,which is their route. Trustee Korin mentioned that she had previously discussed with Village Manager Boehm and Trustee Zannis a list of potential tenants for this project. She asked if prospective tenants could be presented to the Village Board on a confidential basis. She also asked for a renting rate per sq. footage of the project. She asked if the pond was being enlarged or made smaller. Wendy Schulenberg, Landscape Architect, indicated that the pond size is being increased as part of the actual development around the pond. There are a number of large trees on Meyers Road existing around the pond, shade trees that have been chopped back due to an overhead utility line, will be removed and replaced with ornamental trees under the line. Most trees along Butterfield Road will remain. Along the corner some trees will be removed to allow some views into the site and major signage of the development will also be there. Some ginkos and maples will be relocated. Ash trees on the property will be removed as the emerald ash borer in Michigan is moving into Illinois that destroys these trees. They will be exceeding the requirements of plantings by 10%and they plan to use larger caliber trees throughout • the whole landscape. Trustee Korin explained that a previous petitioner adjusted their entrances to include boulevards rather than a cement median that encompassed ornamental grasses, flowers or trees. Ms. Schulenberg explained that on either side of the entries they plan to plant as much as possible. They are restricted on the location of the driveways based on dimensions that are required for existing locations so that they are not able to get the width to provide a larger median in the road. Trustee Korin reiterated that her concern is the main entrance at the signal. There is a very narrow island and that is all that is allowed based on traffic situation. Don O'Hara, further explained that they have an existing shopping center in Lombard that is signalized and this driveway exists today. They must work with what is opposite the property and the through lanes must be in the proper location. Trustee Korin's final question was if their traffic study included any future building that would happen at the development across the street. Mr. O'Hara stated that an Oakbrook Terrace development was included. Trustee Zannis asked if Community Development Director Kallien concurred with VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 10 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. the center island median that there is nothing that can be done to facilitate something. Director Kallien explained that with the McDonald's development it was rather a small green space and the Village agreed that there would be some flowers and low level shrubs. He believes there is an opportunity to do that on this site similar to McDonald's but without large trees. Trustee Zannis asked if the Board could direct Director Kallien to work with the applicant to develop a plan. Director Kallien stated yes that staff would work with the applicant to develop something that is consistent with what McDonald's proposed. President Quinlan asked the petitioner if they would put as much landscaping as possible in that location. Ms.Riordan agreed to that request. President Quinlan recognized Chairman Champ Davis of the Zoning Board of Appeals in attendance of the meeting. He also acknowledged Lexi Payovich, Plan Commission Chairman, who was not in attendance of the meeting but to recognize them for the amount of time and effort that they and their teams put into this project. He stated this is the biggest undertaking since the building of the Oakbrook Shopping Center. • Trustee Caleel commented that this is one of the best presentations he has seen in the past eight years. Ms. Riordan thanked Trustee Caleel for his comments and acknowledged that Manager Boehm, Engineer Durfey and Community Development Director Kallien have been very helpful and spent a great deal of time on this project. Trustee Craig stated he is delighted to see this project move forward and the Board agrees on this. President Quinlan explained that the Board is now voting on 8. A. as follows: Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve a final plat of consolidation for the properties at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001. 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD—MAP AMENDMENT At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a map amendment(i.e.,rezoning) from ORA-1 to VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 11 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. B-1 in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of a map amendment to B-1 to accommodate the Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that: 1. The five parcels which encompass a total of 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of office, commercial and restaurant uses. 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in the previous Office/Warehouse use to a retail use. 6. A map amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, to allow the development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has requested the following uses (although permitted in the B-1 District)will not be permitted in the project: Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant; post offices and dry cleaning operations. 8. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15. 9. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested map amendment and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22,2005 Board of VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 12 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001, 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD — SPECIAL USE At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project. Even though the actual tenants are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use to establish the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three sit-down restaurants planned for the project. The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five acre water feature located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and • landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April 1st and October 15th of each year(weather permitting) and will not offer live music. Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to three restaurants proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation,the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 2. The applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area that are detailed in the case file. 3. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 4. The applicant has addressed all the applicable factors required f6r a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 13 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. 5. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for building K, the petitioner testified that the additional safety mechanism added would be a low masonry wall barrier that would provide protection as an integrated design that would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick which would be difficult for a car to get through and would more effectively protect patrons. 6. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek an amendment to the special use. 7. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. In making this recommendation, the both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a special use. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested special use for an outdoor dining arrangement and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. • OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD — TEXT AMENDMENTS At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. The specific text amendments include Sections 13-7A-1, 13-7A-3(B), and 13-3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance. A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following (new language is underlined, deleted language is shown with a strike-through). Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in the case file. Text Amendments: Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. Section 13-7A-3(B)—amend text— Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet(30') fifty feet(50')and not more than two (2) stories. Section 13-3-8—amend text— No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 14 of 44 March 16, 2005 • 8. A. reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet(15')thirty feet(30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of several text amendments as requested in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation,the Zoning Board finds that: 1. The amendment to increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability to other existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Route 83 and 16th Street). 2. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by the district to accommodate the proposed tower may be appropriate • in the Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision should be limited (i.e., to redevelopment projects) and it is suggested that the Village Attorney draft appropriate language to be included in the final ordinance. 3. As presented by the applicant,the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and no evidence was presented to show that it negatively impact adjacent property owners. 4. It may be appropriate to consider a review of the other non-residential zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made relative to structure height. 5. The proposed amendment to add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. 6. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a text amendment and as explained in writing under the text amendment tab on pages 3 through 6 in the case file. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 15 of 44 March 16, 2005 • 8. A. OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001. 3003 & 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD — VARIATIONS At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of several variations in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. A detailed description of each variation request is summarized in the following: Variations: 1. Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement — Yards — requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot(50') setback. 2. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is • also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet (36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet(30') allowed by Code. 3. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3) bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four (4) parking bays to the west of building `B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3) bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50%open space. 4. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces and many of the shade trees will be larger than the required 4"-6" caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. 5. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 16 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. 6. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. 7. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations — In Yards — requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards(along Technology Drive). 8. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations —Access — requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet • (292')to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet(340')to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet(108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. Recommendation By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the proposed variations in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for each of the variations as explained in writing under the variation tab in the case file. 2. The proposed variations are deemed reasonable and based on circumstances VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 17 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. unique to the property, including the 5-acre pond, .5-acre floodplain and the 1- acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires on the property. 3. No evidence was presented to show that any of the variations would negatively impact adjacent property owners. Motion by Trustee Aktipis, seconded by Trustee Caleel, to concur with the recommendation from the Zoning Board of Appeals to approve the requested variations and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22,2005 Board of Trustees meeting. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. Ms. Riordan pointed out that there is a piece of property which is not in the Village limits yet, on the property, and the petitioner plans to come before the Village to petition for annexation. They would like to include in the ordinance contingent upon the annexation. The second request is that the petitioner work with the Village Attorney to make the ordinance conditioned upon the approval of tax increment financing. She noted it is on the agenda under Agenda Item 9. K. but that is one of the important ingredients in this project. Trustee Aktipis asked who has jurisdiction of the parcel they wish to incorporate. Ms. Riordan indicated that it is in unincorporated DuPage County owned by St. Paul . Properties. Attorney Spiroff inquired that the annexation is not part of these proceedings thus far. Community Development Director Kallien stated that this is correct. Attorney Spiroff asked upon annexation that the property would be a more restrictive zoning classification and would need to be rezoned. Director Kallien indicated that is correct as all of the requests before the Village Board this evening, the petitioner has incorporated that piece of property into them. The missing link is the annexation of the property into the Village which would be done by a separate ordinance. Attorney Spiroff stated his concern was drafting the map amendment, perhaps the resolution approving the plat for the property that is not yet in the Village of Oak Brook and for which a hearing is required before it can be rezoned to the appropriate zoning classification. These ordinances could not be drafted for the next Board meeting if this property is to be part and parcel of this project. Trusee Aktipis suggested that if the Board decides this evening that incorporating this section into Oak Brook is appropriate, the Attorney could move forward with presenting an ordinance to incorporate which would be voted at the next Board meeting prior to the remaining ordinances. Attorney Spiroff stated that could happen with an annexation ordinance that could be VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 18 of 44 March 16, 2005 • • 8. A. passed but he is concerned with any rezoning. Director Kallien explained that the zoning request included this so technically it is all right as the hearing has been held already. Attorney Spiroff agreed with this, as Trustee Aktipis is correct, that at the next meeting will be the passage of the annexation ordinance and then the remaining ordinances and resolutions. Trustee Aktipis asked if the Board had to confirm the annexation at this point by vote. Attorney Spiroff stated that no the Board could not confirm this as it is not on the agenda. So long as that is the direction of the Board, that ordinance will be prepared and considered along with the other ordinances and resolutions but it should be considered first. President Quinlan asked for a consensus from the Board of Trustees that it is their intention to annex that piece of property within the Village of Oak Brook and be prepared for the next Village Board meeting. The Board of Trustees concurred with this request. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS • 1) Police Chief President Quinlan and the Board of Trustees addressed this item earlier in the meeting. B. ORDINANCES &RESOLUTIONS -None presented. C. AWARD OF CONTRACTS 1) 2005 PAVING PROJECT Nine sealed bids were opened on Tuesday,February 1, 2005. The numeric low bid submitted by Bartlett Bituminous Asphalt, is not acceptable because it was not a responsible bid based on financial information received from Merritt Credit Bureau, Inc. James Benes and Associates (our consulting engineer) recommends that we award the contract to the second low bidder, Central Blacktop, Co., Inc. The bid submitted by Central Blacktop, Co., Inc., in the amount of$948,847.40 is approximately 1.5% higher than the Engineer's estimate of $935,191.30. The Village has worked with Central Blacktop in the past and they have performed adequately. Project work includes bituminous milling and resurfacing, bituminous patching, curb removal and replacement, structure adjustment/replacement, pavement VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 19 of 44 March 16,2005 • Oak Brook Promenade 3001-3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road • COMMERCIAL PROPERTY REDEVELOPMENT INDEX PAGE CONTENTS 30-30.a Final Plat of Consolidation - Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to President Quinlan and Village Board -Agenda dated March 8, 2005 29-29.a Map Amendment - Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to President Quinlan and Village Board —Agenda dated March 8, 2005 28-28.a Special Use - Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to President Quinlan and Village Board —Agenda dated March 8, 2005 27-27.a Text Amendments - Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to President Quinlan and Village Board —Agenda dated March 8, 2005 26-26.b Variations - Memorandum from Director of Community Development Kallien to President Quinlan and Village Board —Agenda dated March 8, 2005 25 Indemnification Letter from St. Paul Properties to the Village of Oak Brook dated March 1, 2005 24-24.e Recommendation Letter from Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman to President and Board of Trustees dated March 1, 2005 23-23.t Zoning Board of Appeals Special Meeting Minutes date February 15, 12005 22-22. Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes date February 1, 12005 • 21-21.a Map Amendment — Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairwoman To Village President, Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals Dated January 27, 2005 20-20.a Special Use — Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairwoman To Village President, Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals Dated January 27, 2005 19-19.a Text Amendment — Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairwoman To Village President, Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals Dated January 27, 2005 19.b-19.c Final Plat of Consolidation - Recommendation Letter from Plan Commission Chairwoman To Village President, Trustees January 24, 2005 18-18.s Plan Commission Meeting Minutes dated January 17, 2005 17-17.c Revised Resident Letter dated January 27, 2005 17.d-17.g Revised Surrounding Property Owner List 16 Framework for Proposed Plan Commission Recommendation 15 Proposed Oak Brook Promenade— Summary by Director of Community Development 14-14.a Map Amendment — Staff Report dated January 14, 2005 from Community Development Kallien to Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals 13-13.a Final Plat of Consolidation — Staff Report dated January 14, 2005 from Community Development Kallien to the Plan Commission 12-12.a Final Plat of Consolidation - Memorandum from Village Engineer DurFey to Director • of Community Development Kallien dated January 12, 2005 re: Final Plat Review 11-11.b Text Amendments — Staff Report dated January 14, 2005 from Community Development Kallien to Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals • 10-10.b Special Use — Staff Report dated January 14, 2005 from Community Development Kallien to Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals 9-9.d Variations — Staff Report dated January 14, 2005 from Community Development Kallien to the Zoning Board of Appeals 8-8.a Engineering Review of Planning and Zoning Applications dated January 7, 2005 7-7.a Fire Prevention Review Comments/copy of approved turning radius dated 1-13-05 6 Certificate of Publication dated January 15, 2005 5-5.c Resident Letter dated January August June 11, 2004 4 Board of Trustees Referral Meeting Minutes dated December 14, 2004 (Not Included) 3 Referral Memo to Board of Trustees from Director of Community Development Village Board Agenda — December 14, 2004 2-2.e Sections of the Zoning Ordinance that the applicant is seeking Text Amendment or Special Use - Sections 13-7A and 13-3-8 1-1.h Sections of the Zoning Ordinance that the applicant is seeking Variations— Corresponds to Variations listed in the Staff Report on page 9. B. Fee/Receipt Book Tabs Executive Summary Application/Petitions - See Tab for each application • Subject Property Verification and Legal Description — located under Map Amendment Surrounding Property Owners List— located under Map Amendment Legal Description — located under Map Amendment Standards -Applicant's Response to Standards Map Amendment — See Map Amendment Tab — pages 3 — 15 Text Amendment — See Text Amendment Tab — pages 3 — 6 Variations — See Variations Tab — pages not labeled Special Use — See Special Use Tab — pages not labeled Exhibits Index— next page i • f • To Locate the Exhibits Below - Go to the Exhibits Tab 1. Concept Elevations 2. Outdoor Dining 3. Photometric Plan 4. Buildable Area Plan 5. Summary Site Plan 6. Monument Signs 7. Signage concept elevations 8. Material sheet 9. Pedestrian Pathways 10. Parking plan 11. Elevations 12. Tenant Criteria Handbook 13. Overall Landscape Plan 14. Existing Tree Survey Plan 15. Existing Tree Survey List 16. Typical Storefront Landscape Plan & Sections 17. Typical Site Entry/Perimeter Landscape Plan and Section 18. Typical Parking Lot Landscape Plan and Section 19. Pond Landscape Plan 20. Pond Landscape Sections 21 . Plant Photos — Perennials, Groundcovers and Grasses 22. Plant Photos —Trees and Shrubs 23. Landscape Details 24. Preliminary Engineering Plan and Scaled Site Plan 25. Plat of Consolidation 26. Economic Analysis 27. Traffic Study i Of 0AIr v 90 O I e d y G COUN"C" AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Fina lat of Consolidation FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr.,AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve a final plat of consolidation and requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations for the properties at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road and authorize the Village Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. Backeround/History: At its meeting on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed an application from NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a final plat of consolidation for approximately 19.7 acres located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road in the Village of Oak Brook. The requested action would consolidate the five existing parcels into one in order to accommodate the proposed construction of the Oak Brook Promenade project. One of these parcels is presently unincorporated and will require'annexation by the Village. As part of this request, the applicant is requesting variations to Section 14-6-3(J) — required monumentation and Section 14-6-3(K) — required dedication of public utility easements of the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is seeking these approvals in order to redevelop the property and construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft. upscale retail center. • i AC}CYVPI��1t1 RxQIIPt1 \\ach\ncPrc\f nrnTlnv\(:P(1T ATTFK\1_FR(IAiT RIIRIRnt_P(`_7RA\R(1T_RPrJlw4hrnn4 Prmm�nwiiP_Fp {�� J© t • Recommendation: By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the final plat of consolidation and requested variations to the subdivision regulations subject to the following findings and conditions: I 1. The development will be in substantial conformance with the final plat of consolidation prepared by Manhard Consulting, revision date January 6, 2005 found on tab 25 of the case file. 2. With respect to the requested variations relating to monumentation and designation of public utility easements, the Village has in the past (700/800 Commerce and 122 22nd Street) approved similar requests. 3. The final plat consolidation satisfies all other aspects and requirements for the Village's Subdivision Regulations including that neither the proposed variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent properties. 4. That the applicant address all issues raised by Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated January 12, 2005 on page 12 of the case file including final engineering approval. 5. Annexation approval of the unincorporated parcel as a condition of final approval by the Village. 6. Eventual dedication of approximately 1.5 acres of property to DuPage County as right-of- way for Meyers Road. • In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a final plat of subdivision as well as the requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations. T O.t--I h{!DW.IIIPn ATTPK\I.RRf1Td RnR\Rnt_P('_7RA\R(1T.RPr_flo4hrnn4 Prmm�nwilP_FP iinr 3`/ �� • GE �F Ogkp v 90 0 , o w ` FCOUNZI,\ AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade—3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road—Map ent FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Direc r BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested map amendment and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. Backeround/History: At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a map amendment (i.e., rezoning) from ORA-1 to B-1 in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of a map amendment to B-1 to accommodate the Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that: 1. The five parcels which encompass a total of 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of office, commercial and restaurant uses. • 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial properties, in particular the Last saved by RKallien \\ash\Users\ComDev\GPOLANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-MA.doc 1. �• • Fountain Square development located directly to the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in the previous Office/Warehouse use to a retail use. 6. A map amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, to allow the development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has requested the following uses (although permitted in the B-1 District) will not be permitted in the project. Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant;post offices and dry cleaning operations. 8. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15. 9. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties. • Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GPOLANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-MA.doc �j 2. • � OF OA of v 90 ` 0 d b o G O AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Spec' Use for Outdoor Dining FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested special use for an outdoor dining arrangement and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22,2005 Board of Trustees meeting. Backeround/History: At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project. Even though the actual tenants are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use to establish the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three sit-down restaurants planned for the project. The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five acre water feature located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include • decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have Last saved by GPOLANEK \\asb\Users\COmDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-SU.doc 1. • • been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April 1 st and October 15th of each year(weather permitting) and will not offer live music. Recommendation The Plan Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 and the Zoning Board of Appeals, by a vote of 4 to 0 have recommended approval of the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to three restaurants proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission and Zoning Board found that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 2. The applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area that are detailed in the case file. 3. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 4. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factor required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. 5. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for building K, the petitioner testified that the additional safety mechanism added would be a low masonry wall barrier that would provide protection as an integrated design that would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick which would be difficult for a car to get through and would • more effectively protect patrons. 6. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek an amendment to the special use. 7. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. In making this recommendation, the both the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a special use. • Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GPOLANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-SU.doc 2. P2p,& • Gk pF 0 A \P 'Q0 0 a x AWL 10 c CF CO AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of March 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Text Amendments FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr., AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to concur with the recommendations from the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals and approve the requested text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and authorize the Village Attorney to draft the necessary ordinance for final consideration at the March 22, 2005 Board of Trustees meeting. BackLyround/History: At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking approval of several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. The specific text amendments include Sections 13-7A-1, 13-7A- 3(B), and 13-3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance. A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following (new language is underlined, deleted language is shown with a strike-through). Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in the case file. ` Text Amendments: Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. • Section 13-7A-3(B) — amend text — Structure Height: Not more than thk4y feet (3 ` fifty feet 50' and not more than two (2) stories. Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-TA.doc 1. ,02 7 • 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. Recommendation By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the proposed variations in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for each of the variations as explained in writing under the variation tab in the case file. 2. The proposed variations are deemed reasonable and based on circumstances unique to the property, including the 5-acre pond, .5-acre floodplain and the 1-acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires on the property. .3. No evidence was presented to show that any of the variations would negatively impact adjacent property owners. • Last saved by GPOLANEK \\ash\Users\ComDev\GPOLANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Rec-OakBrookPromenade-VAR.doc 3. OSTPAULSt.Paul Travelers Companies TRAVELERS St.Paul Properties,Inc. 385 Washington Street,MC51 1 A St.Paul,MN 55102 • 651-310-8276 TEL 651-310-2124 2124 FAx Fax www.stpaultravelers.com March 1, 2005 Richard B. Boehm, Village Manager Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2255 Re: Oak Brook Promenade Meyer& Butterfield Roads Oak Brook, Illinois Dear Rick: Please accept this correspondence as St. Paul Properties'promise to indemnify the Village of Oak Brook for the legal counsel provided by Kenneth T. Kubiesa to the • Village for the limited purpose of creating a tax increment financing district for the above referenced property. Said indemnification shall be for the reasonable costs incurred by the Village, in an amount not to exceed $15,000.00, for Mr. Kubiesa's legal services provided at his usual hourly rate and in his customary manner. Of course if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mary Riordan. Very truly yours, Michael Elnic ME/plj cc: Mary Riordan • iVE DF Oq� \ E - � h .0 2 9c�001UNTV March 1, 2005 Village of Oak Brook Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 1200 Oak Brook Road website Oak Brook, IL 60523 www.oak-brook.org Administration SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — 630.990.3000 Map Amendment—Text Amendments—Variations—Special Use FAX 630.990.0876 Community Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: Development 630.990.3045 At its meetings on February 1.and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals FAX 630.990.3985 reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Engineering Properties, Inc., seeking approval of zoning relief, including a map amendment Department (i.e., rezoning) from ORA-1 to B-1; several text amendments, 8 variations and 630.990.3010 special use for outdoor dining adjacent to three of the restaurants, in order to FAX 630.990.3985 facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. The relief sought is detailed Fire Department below. O630.990.3040 X 630.990.2392 All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. No one spoke in support Police Department of or in opposition to the proposal. 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 Mai) Amendment Public Works The applicant is seeking approval of a map amendment to rezone the property from 630.990.3044 ORA-1 to B-1 (subject to the exclusion of certain normally permitted uses in the B- FAX 630.472.0223 1 District) for the five parcels which make up the site as part of their overall development plan to redevelop the property and construct the Oak Brook Oak Brook Promenade, an 180,000 square foot upscale retail center. Public Library By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan 600 oak Brook Road pp Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Commission recommendation to approve the map amendment to B-1 in order to 630.990.2222 facilitate the construction of the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this FAX 630.990.4509 recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: Oak Brook Snorts Core 1. The five parcels which encompass a total of 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 office, commercial and restaurant uses. 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial Golf Club properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to 2606 York Road the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 2 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in the previous Office/Warehouse use to a retail use. 6. A map amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, to allow the development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has requested the following uses, although permitted in B-1 District, will not be permitted in the project; They are requesting the following uses, although permitted in B-1 District, will not be permitted in the project; Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a • restaurant;post offices and dry cleaning operations. 8. Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant; post offices and dry cleaning operations 9. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and also in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15. 10. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment would negatively impact the adjacent properties. Text Amendments A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following (new language is underlined; deleted language is shown with a strike-through). Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in the case file. 1. Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. 2. Section 13-7A-3(B) — amend text — Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet (-3 fifty . feet 50' and not more than two (2) stories. 3. Section 13-3-8 — amend text — No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and 07 • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 3 television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be�'=n 0-� thirty feet (K above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental u oses onl and shall in no event be occu ied. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve the text amendments as requested in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The amendment to increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability to other existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Route 83 and 16`h Street). 2. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by • the district to accommodate the proposed tower may be appropriate in the Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision should be limited (i.e., to redevelopment projects) and it is suggested that the Village Attorney draft appropriate language to be included in the final ordinance. 3. It may be appropriate to consider a review of the other non-residential zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made relative to structure height. 4. As presented by the applicant, the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and no evidence was presented to show that it would negatively impact adjacent property owners. 5. The proposed amendment to add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a text amendment and as explained in writing under the text amendment tab on pages 3 through 6 in the case file. Special Use The applicant is seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project. Even • though the actual tenants are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use to establish the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three sit-down restaurants planned for the project. • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 4 The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five-acre pond located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all the facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April 15t and October 15th of each year (weather permitting) and will not offer live music. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the findings of the Plan Commission and recommended approval of the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent-to three restaurants proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board finds that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale • restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 2. The applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area that are detailed in the case file. 3. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 4. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. 5. Additional safety mechanism designed for the outdoor dining area proposed for building K and as described by the petitioner to be a low masonry wall barrier that would provide protection as an integrated design that would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick which would be difficult for a car to get through to more effectively protect patrons. 6. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek and amendment to the special use. 7. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. Variations • A detailed description of each variation request is summarized in the following: March 1, 2005 • President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 5 1. Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement —Yards —requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot (50') setback. 2. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet (36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30') allowed by Code. 3. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3) bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four (4) parking bays to the west of building "B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3) bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of • the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. 4. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4"-6" caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. 5. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. 6. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and • hardscape/landscape areas. 7. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations — In Yards — requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). 2((A.. March 1, 2005 • President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 6 If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property, there would be inadequate parking for the Project. 8. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations — Access — requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet (292') to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet (340') to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet (108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. • The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the proposed 'variations in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable standards required for each of the variations as explained in writing under the variation tab in the case file. 2. The proposed variations are deemed reasonable and based on circumstances unique to the property, including the 5-acre pond, .5 acre floodplain and the 1-acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires on the property. 3. No evidence was presented to show that any of the variations would negatively impact adjacent property owners. Very truly yours, 0/1 A A, ka. Champ avi Chairman • Zoning Board of Appeals 02 i NG OF OgIr I e9 � o 1 10 A � \\,,OOUNTI ,���\2 March 1, 2005 Village of Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Oak Brook Q Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Oak Brook, IL 60523 www.oak-brook.org Administration SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — 630.990.3000 Map Amendment—Text Amendments—Variations—Special Use FAX 630.990.0876 Community Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: Development 630.990.3045 At its meetings on February 1 and February 15, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals FAX 630.990.3985 reviewed a petition submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Engineering Properties, Inc., seeking approval of zoning relief, including a map amendment Department (i.e., rezoning) from ORA-1 to B-1; several text amendments, 8 variations and 630.990.3010 special use for outdoor dining adjacent to three of the restaurants, in order to FAX 630.990.3985 facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. The relief sought is detailed Fire Department below. O630.990.3040 X 630.990.2392 All interested parties were notified of the public hearing. No one spoke in support of or in opposition to the proposal. Police Department 630.990 2358 FAX 630:990.7484 Map Amendment Public Works The applicant is seeking approval of a map amendment to rezone the property from Department ORA-1 to B-1 subject to the exclusion of certain normally permitted uses in the B- 630.990.3044 (subject Y P FAX 630.472.0223 1 District) for the five parcels which make up the site as part of their overall development plan to redevelop the property and construct the Oak Brook Oak Brook Promenade, an 180,000 square foot upscale retail center. Public Library By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan 600 Oak Brook Road Commission recommendation to approve the map amendment to B-1 in order to Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 facilitate the construction of the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this FAX 630.990.4509 recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: Oak Brook Sports Core 1. The five parcels which encompass a total of 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. Bath&Tennis Club 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of 700 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 office, commercial and restaurant uses. 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial Golf Club properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to 2606 York Road the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 i�q. March 1, 2005 • President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 2 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in the previous Office/Warehouse use to a retail use. 6. A map amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, to allow the development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has requested the following uses, although permitted in B-1 District, will not be permitted in the project; They are requesting the following uses, although permitted in B-1 District, will not be permitted in the project; Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a • restaurant;post offices and dry cleaning operations. 8. Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant; post offices and dry cleaning operations 9. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and also in writing,which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15. 10. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment would negatively impact the adjacent properties. Text Amendments A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following (new language is underlined; deleted language is shown with a strike-through). Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in the case file. 1. Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. 2. Section 13-7A-3(B) — amend text— Structure Height: Not more than thi fty fee! ;'n" fifty • feet 50' and not more than two (2) stories. 3. Section 13-3-8 — amend text — No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 3 television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet 0-S� thigy feet 30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the Plan Commission recommendation to approve the text amendments as requested in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The amendment to increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability to other existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Route 83 and 16th Street). 2. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by • the district to accommodate the proposed tower may be appropriate in the Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision should be limited (i.e., to redevelopment projects) and it is suggested that the Village Attorney draft appropriate language to be included in the final ordinance. 3. It may be appropriate to consider a review of the other non-residential zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made relative to structure height. 4. As presented by the applicant, the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and no evidence was presented to show that it would negatively impact adjacent property owners. 5. The proposed amendment to add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a text amendment and as explained in writing under the text amendment tab on pages 3 through 6 in the case file. Special Use a The applicant is seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project. Even • though the actual tenants are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use to establish the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three sit-down restaurants planned for the project. 04?V • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 4 The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five-acre pond located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all the facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April lst and October 15th of each year (weather permitting) and will not offer live music. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with the findings of the Plan Commission and recommended approval of the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to three restaurants proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board finds that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale • restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 2. The applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area that are detailed in the case file. 3. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 4. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. 5. Additional safety mechanism designed for the outdoor dining area proposed for building K and as described by the petitioner to be a low masonry wall barrier that would provide protection as an integrated design that would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick which would be difficult for.a car to get through to more effectively protect patrons. 6. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek and amendment to the special use. 7. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. Variations • A detailed description of each variation request is summarized in the following: P? °G.� • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 5 1. Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement—Yards —requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot (50') setback. 2. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet (36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30') allowed by Code. 3. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3) bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four (4) parking bays to the west of building "B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3) bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the • Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. 4. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4"-6" caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. 5. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. 6. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. • 7. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations — In Yards — requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). } • March 1, 2005 President Quinlan and Board of Trustees RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 6 If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property, there would be inadequate parking for the Project. 8. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations — Access — requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet (292') to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet (340') to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet (108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. • The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. By a vote of 4 to 0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the proposed variations in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that: 1. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable standards required for each of the variations as explained in writing under the variation tab in the case file. 2. The proposed variations are deemed reasonable and based on circumstances unique to the property, including the 5-acre pond, .5 acre floodplain and the 1-acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires on the property. 3. No evidence was presented to show that any of the variations would negatively impact adjacent property owners. Very truly yours, A.-. A Champ Davi Chairman • Zoning Board of Appeals i MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 15, 2005 SPECIAL • DRAFTMEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED AS WRITTEN OR AS AMENDED ON , 2005. 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of A pp eals was called to order by Chairman Champ Davis in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairman Champ Davis, Members George Mueller, Manu Shah and Steven Young. ABSENT: Member Richard Ascher and Robert Sanford IN ATTENDANCE: Director of Community Development, Robert Kallien, Jr. and Village Engineer Dale Durfey 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES There were no minutes available for approval. P4. NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS A. OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001, 3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD OAK BROOK PROMENADE-3001, ROAD (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUTTERFIELD ROAD AND 3003 and 3121 BUTTERFIELD MEYERS ROAD) — TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, AMENDMENT, ORDINANCE — MAP AMENDMENT, TEXT AMENDMENTS. TEXT AMENDMENTS VARIATIONS AND SPECIAL USE—TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT PECIAL USE-TO OF A LIFESTYLE CENTER ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LIFESTYLE CENTER Chairman Davis swore in all parties that would testify at the public hearing. Mary Riordan Attorney with the law firm Mary Riordan, Ltd., provided an overview of the project. The project is located at the southwest corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. The site is improved with two three- story office buildings and a one-story brick office building. The property is located on the western edge of the Village boundary, with the exception of the ComEd power station. She introduced the development team who are part of this project that would be speaking at the hearing. Phil Wolf, Manhard Engineering is the Project Engineer; Wendy Schulenberg, Landscape Architect; Henry • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 1 of 21 February 15, 2005 �3. Klover, Klover Architects of Kansas City, Missouri; Nick Smith, Manhard • Engineering; Don O'Hara, Traffic Engineer, KLOA and Joy Pinta, an Associate with Mary Riordan Ltd. She also introduced representatives from NAI Hiffman, Mike Van Sant, Ken Erickson and Ryan Murphy. They are acting as agent for the property owner who is St. Paul Properties, which is located in St. Paul, Minnesota. Ms. Riordan asked that the book containing all of the applications and exhibits be made part of the official record. Along with the 3 office buildings on the site there is an approximate five-acre pond. The pond serves not only the detention, but it is an online pond, which actually provides detention for properties upstream. Along with that, at the back of the buildings there is a 100-foot ComEd easement with high-tension lines so nothing can be built under it. There are also floodplain and floodway issues around the pond and in front of the property, which is part of their hardship. Out of the 18 acres, there are probably about 11 usable acres. In order to redevelop the property and provide adequate parking and the critical mass that they need to have, they need the relief requested because so much of the property is unbuildable in terms of building locations. Right now the occupancy rate of these buildings is only 30%. In the office market including, Oak Brook, Downers Grove, Lombard, and Oakbrook Terrace, the office vacancy rate is about 30%. The buildings are very much • underutilized. In order to build this project the developer is looking to create a critical mass of retail, in the area of 170,000-190,000 square feet. That is necessary to attract tenants since they all want to be where there are other tenants to draw shoppers. The project is proposed to be an approximate 180,000 square foot project with a F.A.R. of.22. The property is currently zoned ORA-1 and they are requesting that a map amendment be approved to rezone the property to B-1. They are estimating approximately 128,255 feet of retail; about 20,000 feet of office and about 30,000 feet of high-end sit down restaurants. The parking is designed to coexist with the particular uses. In order to develop the property it will cost approximately $50 million of private investments. The property is owned by St. Paul Properties in Minnesota and they are looking to develop it along with NAI Hiffman. The project is designed to attract high-end specialty tenants. Thexg,:will.be orm*owner and all the properties will be leased. One owner will be in control of all elements of the project. The Design Criteria Booklet in the file outlines all of the details. These design criteria will be bound into all of the leases. So what will be built is what is being presented at this hearing. ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑A❑❑❑❑❑❑A❑A❑❑f❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑A❑❑ • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 2 of 21 February 15, 2005 o?3.a. Right now the property generates no revenue for the Village because there • is not a local property tax. They are anticipating when the project is fully developed and after the first stabilized year they will generate in excess of one million dollars in sales tax per year. The project will not have any impact on the taxing districts. Economically they believe it will be a positive impact for the village. The property is consistent with surrounding land uses and this is a good use for the property. The B-1 zoning district is an appropriate district for this property. Phil Wolf, Manhard Consulting He said that originally on the site there was an existing culvert that came through the property and was released to a creek and then discharged back into a six-foot diameter culvert going back underneath. The buildings were permitted back in approximately 1974 and as part of the original development there was a lot of filling in done when the pond was actually constructed to provide some compensatory storage for the flood plain that was filled in and some detention volume at that time. In order to work with the new plan at this time they would have liked to have filled in some of those areas of flood plain, but each area that you look at to fill in, because of the depth of the flood plain at that point there is approximately six times the area or the volume has to be created for each area that gets filled. There are substantial constraints with the ComEd easement and the gas lines. What they look to do is to adjust the existing pond that is there to • make up for the small amount of additional pervious that would be added, but in particular to be in compliance with the zoning ordinance of today versus what was in place when the buildings were constructed. They worked hand and hand with Village Engineer Dale Durfey throughout the design. The existing structure that goes out under Meyers Road they are looking to actually lower the water level within the pond providing some additional storage; and for the small amounts they are filling they are replacing per the ordinance at 1 '/2 to 1. They have carved out an area at the base of the pond to the south and have gained substantial additional volume. When the buildings were constructed approximately 4-acre feet of detention was provided in the pond. About 40-acre feet of storage were provided in compensatory fill was placed at that time. The additional developments they are placing on the site at this time doubles the volume of the detention and more than compensates for the additional runoff that will occur from the small amount of additional pervious that has been added. Donald O'Hara, principal with KLOA Inc., 9575 W. Higgins, Rosemont He said that they were retained to do the traffic study, which is on tab 27 of the case file. He highlighted some of the important aspects of the traffic planning for the site. They studied Butterfield Road and Meyers Road. The access today, the right in right out is noted as intersection A, • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 3 of 21 February 15, 2005 47 - Intersection B, is the signalized intersection and the third driveway, listed • as C, is the right in right out onto Butterfield Road. The Village requires 400 feet distance between driveways and the existing driveway does not meet that criteria and neither will the proposed driveway. They have met with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) relative to the access width and access plan and they have given preliminary approval. The idea behind moving the right in right out access plan a little to the west is so that it lines up with the buildings, which allows for a direct connection. They conducted traffic counts at the intersection of Butterfield and Meyers Road and it is at capacity. They also conducted traffic counts at the three driveways to the existing office buildings. They are underutilized today and the volumes were relatively low. They used the ITE trip generation rates for the proposed land uses and assigned them to the various driveways by the directional distribution with the majority of the traffic on Butterfield Road and 28% being on Meyers Road (13% from the north 15% from the south). The analysis went through each driveway and although they would like to see improvements, the State of Illinois has said that they have no plans in the near future to improve Butterfield Road so they are stuck with what they have relative to the intersection at Butterfield and Meyers. The County has recently upgraded the Meyers Road intersection. All of the issues relative to access, from going to and from • Meyers going into the driveways found that externally there really are not any improvements that are necessary relative to this development. The signalized drive will be sufficient when it is striped as a separate left and through right. The right in right outs will function as they are supposed to. The second form of relief they are seeking is to the aisle width of the parking lot from 27 feet down to 24 feet. Existing today on the site it is 24 feet wide and the current Village ordinance requires 27 feet under this type of land use. It is straight forward as relative to what most parking recommendations are as for a 60-foot parking bay; that is an 18-foot depth, 24-foot aisle and 18-foot depth for the vehicles. They will be in total compliance with the parking regulations. Member Young asked about the potential impact of traffic during rush hour going southbound on Meyers Road. He asked what was the potential delay. Mr. O'Hara responded that on Table 3, page 11 of the traffic section of the book. Under existing conditions during the a.m. peak hour, the level of service at Butterfield and Meyers Road is level of service C. The average vehicle delay in seconds is 31.3. Under future conditions, during the a.m. peak hour, the level of service remains level of service C and goes from • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 4 of 21 February 15, 2005 31.3 to 32 seconds. The calculation is based on the Highway Capacity • Manual relative to 1900 vehicles for capacity per hour. The peak hour factor is .9. During the p.m., which is probably the more critical one, under existing conditions it is at level of service E and the vehicle delay is 60.0 and in the future, it remains E, but the site is adding .9 seconds to the average delay. This is very typical of intersections that are at capacity. As you add vehicles the delay is increased significantly, because the headway between vehicles as the queues get longer it takes a longer stretch for the start up so the seconds of delay as your volume increases will increase the delay. The Butterfield Road at site access is at level of service B today, with a 19.8 second delay. With the proposal it will go to 19.7 seconds, which is a little better and that is because of directional distribution and how they are getting into and out of the facility. Member Young questioned the use of the access drive at the rear of the property. Mr. O'Hara responded that it was used by the employees and is a viable alternative because you can come out to another signal at Technology Drive. Chairman Davis questioned if there were concerns at other hours of the day. Mr. O'Hara responded that the belief is that if the highest volume is taken care of for the peak hour, the other hours take care of themselves. The peak hour for this development is actually about 1 p.m. • Member Young asked if there was an increase in traffic accidents as reported by IDOT. Mr. O'Hara responded that he asked about accident data and they were not concerned about it because they had just gone through with the County, relative to the improvements and accidents were supposed to be part of the study conducted for Meyers Road and Butterfield Road and the pond is there. He said that he is not trying to downplay it. He said the opportunity is always there. Henry Klover, Klover Architects He said that he is located out of a suburb in Kansas City and that there were many challenges on this site and out of challenges comes opportunity. The existing pond cuts off a piece of the property, but it also created the opportunity for something they could use and have a lot of character and value. The high-tension lines across the back created a shield that is not attractive or something they wanted. There is also the ComEd station on the other side of the property. The original intent was to try to create a village. The whole idea with a life-style center is to try to create a gathering point; an image for the city of suburbia. The design was to use the buildings to shield the utilities that go across the back of the property. They have taken advantage of the pond and created outdoor seating areas • I VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 5 of 21 February 15, 2005 ..23•.. along the edge of the pond. The intent was to have the restaurants along • that area. One of the considerations of the site was to have nice smooth circulations paths and there is a wide island through the middle that has decorative plantings and the desire was to set up really strong circulation with wide pedestrian areas. There is no direct connection to the pond from the area as it is shielded by the buildings and the railing system. The only way you can get there is to actually walk around the outside. There are two existing underground parking facilities. They had the initial problem because one of them is on caissons. They will use them as valet parking and parking for the office spaces. There will be a connection added between the two underground facilities. They will control exit and access to the garages. The site lighting is a nice shoebox fixture to direct the light downward and designed to have 0-foot candles as they go just to the property edge. The u-shape design of the center will also control the light projecting off of the project as well because it will be screened by the buildings. The power lines on the back side of the property will require lower fixtures as well because they are limited by the utility company as to how high the lights can be. There is also a series of decorative fixtures to create an ambience • of the pedestrian walkway. In a lifestyle center they try to create higher quality finishes on the ground that people can touch and feel. They spent the money to bring in textures and brick materials and add areas for the pedestrians to sit and gather. They created areas where there are seating nodes that are protected by green areas and plantings. There is a large area as wide as 36-feet deep; there are planters and seating walls as well as bollards to try to protect the pedestrians as they come around. They always start a project investigating communities and what images are historic to it. When they met with staff a few of the buildings was pointed out. There was a bit of an old world character to the community there were certain elements that they saw such as the Rocca Jewelers, the eyebrows, detailing and of some of the brick patterns that they wanted to carry into the center. It is important to them to create an image and a character. Most buildings were not built at one time; they were built over a time with a series of architects and sometimes over a period of centuries. They try to create a skyline and a character element. Years ago, everyone wanted a 10-foot ceiling in retail. Nowadays the higher end retailers, under the ICSC rules are called lifestyle tenants, • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 21 February 15, 2005 �3 -c- which are retailers that are directed toward image, such as the Gap, The • Limited, etc., that have a higher end design. One of the things they require is higher height; they want more volume inside the space to put a lot of character into it and they spend a lot of money on it. When they design a center they create height and part of the request was to increase the height from the 30 feet allowed by ordinance, to the more traditional 50 feet and the additional 30 feet for the tower. That is intended to allow them to do various things. They will be able to get the height required for two-story retailers,but also to allow for character elements such as the skyline. Signage is very important. They go to great lengths to try to encourage people to not just stick a standard illuminated sign with straight box letters. They encourage them to have character, elements, designs and marquees to the signs. The intent is to try to get people to do something different. They are also asking for marquee signs that are not just on the building itself, they are actually out on the awnings and architecturally separated that have character and interest. The tenants are each required to install blade signs so there is a 30-inch projection for the blade signs for each tenant so when the people walk by they are perpendicular. Most signs are directed toward distance, while the idea of the blade signs is to deal with it on a pedestrian scale and level. Again they do not want box signs. They want something interesting to provide some character. The monument signs are on tab number 6. It is not a typical monument sign it is not just a • square box; it is being built almost as a structure that is in character with the project itself. There are two signs, one is labeled A, which is a monument sign at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road and is going to be non- illuminated internally but will be pin mounted and would have the sign ground mounted lit and then down below would be the signs for the tenants; and then the actual logo itself would be a halo type sign. The second sign is more of a monument type sign located at the entrance and is more of identification for the entrance to the center, which is labeled as sign B. One of the concerns that staff had was to make the pedestrian connections safe. Exhibit 9 shows that there are straight, horizontal and vertical paths. There is a sidewalk coming off of Building K that connects around the center. There are also valet points on the site, with archway signs to encourage people to go to those areas. The outdoor dining areas will be high quality, and the Design Criteria Booklet requires white tablecloths with high quality railing systems and lighting, and planters to take advantage of the outdoor pond and the amenities that come with that. He reviewed the elevations, including the locations of the restaurants, the • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 7 of 21 February 15, 2005 areas where there will be two-story offices, and the location of the tower, • which is designed to be above the two-story retail. There is a skyline to it using a variety of designs and textures. The elevations facing the pond were reviewed; the rear of the property has the same elevations as the front. By making the buildings taller there is a natural character that comes along with this type of architecture. They are trying to be true to the historic proportions, imagery, types of windows; and the signage by the very nature of making the buildings taller to accommodate the retail tenants, has pushed the signage up as well. Signs want to be above the windows; they do not want to be down below them. To stay with the 30- foot requirement would be a bit arbitrary; it would actually be getting into locations below the structure where you want the windows and for the tenants to do things with. Member Young asked what would be put in place from a filtration standpoint to keep people from throwing cups or other debris into the pond? Mr. Klover responded that from the higher end restaurants there would not be items such as paper plates or such debris that might be flying into the ponds. He said that with this quality of restaurants he did not seeing this as being an issue. Ms. Riordan added that if that would happen they would call the police. Chairman Davis asked if the tenants were lined up yet and what process is • followed in the design of the tenant spaces. Mr. Klover responded that the design intent is there. The tenants are allowed to deal with the entrances and the storefronts. Within the Design Criteria they have the ability to work within the signage and their entrance. The fagade and materials are already selected. Ms. Riordan added that they will require that the tenants go to through the developer to review and approve the proposed signage and permits and approve them prior to the plans being submitted to the Village for permit. Chairman Davis asked what the timeframe was for the project. Ms; Riordan said that they are hoping to start demolition of the office buildings between June and July 2005 and are anticipating a 12-month construction schedule and hoping to open by the fall of 2006. Wendy Schulenberg,principal with Daniel Weinback &Partners They are a landscape architectural firm in Chicago. Landscaping is very important in a lifestyle center and the major goal is that the landscape meets the same quality as the buildings and the overall concept for the site. The first step is to look at the existing vegetation on the site. There is a lot of mature vegetation around the pond. There is a scattering of other vegetation throughout the site and a number of existing shade trees. The • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 8 of 21 February 15, 2005 goal is to maintain as many of the existing trees around the pond as they . can. Along Meyers Road there are overhead power lines and shade trees had been planted that have been topped off over time. They may take those out as well as any other tree that may be in a poor condition. Because of the scope of a development like this there are large areas that will need to be graded and they will be losing a good majority of the vegetation. There are some honey locust, some very nice ginkgo trees, maple and quite a bit of ash trees on the site. There is about 12-13 of those trees that they feel they can relocate. There is a concern that there is going to be an ash borer that is going to attack the ash tree sort of be the next Dutch Elm disease and is going to wipe out all ash trees in the near future, so they are not going to spend the money to relocate ash trees. Most municipalities are not allowing ash trees to be planted anymore and a lot of the really big trees on this site are ash trees. There is dense vegetation at the corner of Meyers and Butterfield and the views into the site are somewhat limited. The new sign will be at the corner and they will probably thin out some of the existing trees so that you can get a better view into the development. They want to create this nice image with the new buildings and the restaurant areas overlooking the pond and they want people to look in and see that. There is a guardrail along Meyers Road that may have been put in when the roadwork was done along Meyers Road. As far as cars coming into the development the guard rail will help as well as the vegetation along Meyers Road as you come towards Butterfield Road as added protection. As far as landscaping is concerned they will have very strong entry points. The places where they have the signs and the major roadway entrances they will add a lot of color to those locations. They also have perimeter planting that will go in along the site. The requirements are for screening along the street as well as on the perimeter of the site. They will be providing the screening hedge as asked for in the ordinance. They are looking to do a thinner area of landscape that is required to be 10-feet; they have 6-feet in most cases. They will be able to provide what is asked for in the ordinance but it would be in a less wide area. Coming into the site entry (where the monument signs are located) there will be a lot of color, perennials, shrub roses, etc. to call attention there. There will be landscaping along the entrance roads and there will be a hedge to line the various parking lots to meet the requirements and then also the site perimeter. Member Young questioned whether the landscaping would block traffic views coming in or out of the development? Ms. Schulenberg responded • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 9 of 21 February 15, 2005 that they would be making a clear view. They will be graded to allow clear • openings so that you can look into the site. The plantings actually start as you get in a little further into the site. Member Young asked with snow removal and placement along the ridges, how difficult would it be or not to see oncoming traffic in or out of the development? Ms. Schulenberg responded that is sort of a maintenance and operations issue. It will be important that there be places that cannot be stockpiled with snow so that views are not blocked for people coming in or going out of the site; or any intersection within the site. The pond is a huge amenity to the site. There is an existing gravel path that circles around the pond right now. They will be changing the shape of g g p the pond due to detention work and it will be extended to the south. Their goal would be to take the existing path; repair it and extend the path so that it would come out at either end. They do not want to extend the path behind the restaurants; they want to try to keep people from being able to climb up into the restaurant even though no one would ever climb up into a restaurant like this, it would never happen. There are existing shrubs, they are going to add to it and clean it up, add new benches and low voltage lighting along the path to provide some lighting. It is not a jogging path. It is more of a path for someone who is out shopping or waiting to get into the restaurant to take a short walk around the pond area. • There are different sections to the pond. There is the section along Meyers Road where there is an existing guardrail. There is a pretty steep slope going down to the pond. The section along Meyers Road where the overhead lines exist they will really clean up the area and replace some of the trees that are in bad shape from being topped off due to the overhead lines with ornamental trees, something that is the right size for being under the lines. The trees along Butterfield Road will remain pretty much as it looks right now. There will be some upgrading along the path. Behind the restaurants there will be decks that come out over the pond area (Exhibit 20). There will be a green screen over the decking material with vines planted which basically develops into a green wall, so the green will be extended up around the bottom of the deck areas. The pond edge will be treated in a different way. It will basically be lawn grass, some areas of perennials and will make it a more natural pond area. Page 23 shows the pond edge and it will make for a much more natural feeling and provide a much more lush appearance than currently exists. Technically it will keep the geese from walking down into the pond, which is one of the reasons they are trying to do it; it is not totally successful, but it helps. It will also help to keep small children from getting into the pond as well. It is actually pretty difficult to walk through the grasses to get into the water. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 10 of 21 February 15, 2005 or)-3 ' • The ordinance requires that there be a divider island every three bays and they have a situation for about 90 feet they will not have that divider. They actually go four bays in one location and part of the reason for that is they did not want to take one of the islands and shift it down because it was so important to the pedestrian connection, so they are seeking a small relief to not have that divider island for that very short distance. They are trying to do very large islands and are trying to plant trees that are larger than required. They will be planting some of the relocated trees in the parking lots. They want the parking lot to have an image of being more mature rather than having a few small trees in all of the islands. The goal would be to get some of that size along the storefronts and salt and pepper them around the site to get that mature image all around the site. The ordinance also has a requirement to provide a tree every 15 parking spaces. In 75% or more of the site they meet that requirement. There are some areas where they have 16 spaces while some are 17. There is an area in the back where it gets up over 20. As an overall number of trees they exceed the number of trees required, but they are not spread around so that they are every 15 spaces. The requirement is to provide 10% green space, however they are providing 11% green space throughout the parking lot. • There are a couple of unique areas they have to deal with; they have the ComEd easement and the parking structures. In the central area where they have the parking structure (Exhibit 18) and you do not want to plant large islands with raised planters because it makes visibility bad in the parking lot. They are taking the image from in front of the storefronts, which is a little more paved and have it come across with raised planters that would be built in place. There will still be trees but they would use ornamental trees instead of shade trees because of the limited soil depth. They would also look at providing ornamental trees in the ComEd easement as opposed to shade trees because of the height restrictions. The storefronts are the most important part of the development. They are going to be introducing all kinds of raised planters that would be spotted all along the storefronts and there will be a lot of seasonal color throughout. There will be bulbs, annuals and freestanding planters with a lot of color and more designing character. They want to have that lush feeling that will work with all of the paving textures and storefront materials. There will be bollards along the storefronts where there are cars with head in parking to protect the pedestrians walking along the front. They want people to be able to get in and out. They do not want to block it off completely, but they want to make sure that they have a safe walkway along the entire storefront. The site will be irrigated and will have • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 11 of 21 February 15, 2005 023 . Jr professional maintenance. There will be hardy material that can tolerate • salt and survive in a shopping environment. Map Amendment Ms. Riordan reviewed the standards for the map amendment. She said that they are seeking a map amendment to change the zoning district from ORA-1 to B-l. 1. Character of the neighborhood • The character of the neighborhood is primarily commercial and business. The property is bounded on the west by the ComEd Substation that is also zoned ORA-1; the Fountain Square to the north is zoned business PUD in the Village of Lombard; immediately to the east across Meyers Road is the Inland office buildings that is also zoned ORA-1. Yorktown Shopping Center is to the west; Oakbrook Center is to the east; • Rezoning this property to a B-1 District is consistent to the surrounding uses and keeping with the character; • The project as proposed will be better and enhance the surrounding neighborhood; and if there is any impact on surrounding land values it will have a positive one. • They are requesting the following uses, although permitted in B-1 District, will not be permitted in the project; • Servicing of motor vehicles; regular barber shops; photo studios; generic drug stores; grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean & Delucca or Fox & Obel; traditional hardware stores; Laundromats; shoe repair; sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing; public utility uses; nursing homes; telephone equipment buildings; municipal type uses; cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant; post offices and dry cleaning operations. 2. The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions. ■ The property values are reduced because of the ORA-1 zoning office use which is only 30% occupied. There is a devaluation of the property due to the existing zoning given the surrounding market. 3. The extent to which the removal of the Existing Limitations Would Depreciate the Value of Other Property in the Area. ■ The removal of the ORA-1 will improve the value of other property in the area. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 12 of 21 February 15, 2005 023 .k 4. The suitability of the Property for Zoned Purposes • ■ They believe the material presented in their petition demonstrates that this property is suitable for a B-1 use. 5. Existing Uses and Zoning of Nearby Properties. ■ It is consistent with surrounding retail property uses. 6. The Length of Time Under the Existing Zoning that the property has remained unimproved considered in the context of land development. i ■ The property has been zoned ORA-1 since 1976 when the office buildings were built. 7. The Relative Gain to the Public as Compared to the Hardship Imposed on the Individual Property Owner. ■ These buildings generate no tax revenue to the Village and are a drain on Village services. This will provide nice shopping and a dining experience and will generate significant revenue for the Village. 8. The Extent to Which the Proposal Promotes the Health, Safety, Morals or General Welfare of the Public. ■ The general welfare will be improved because of the $1 • million dollar per year in sales tax that will be generated. There will not be a demand on services for the schools, parks, libraries, etc. 9. The Relationship of the Proposed Use to the Comprehensive Plan. ■ The comprehensive plan shows the use for the property as office. However, maintaining office space on this site would be detrimental to the community. 10. Community Need for the Use Proposed by the Property Owners. ■ The proposed use meets the Village's standards for a map amendment. (The detailed standards are listed under the map amendment tab of the booklet on pages 1-15 of Narrative in Support of a Map Amendment.) Chairman Davis said that it appears the petitioner has adequately addressed the standards and has substantially satisfied them in connection with the requested map amendment, subject to the exclusion of the permitted uses as set forth in the booklet on page 11 and 12 of the Narrative in Support of a Map Amendment. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 13 of 21 February 15, 2005 _23.x. Motion by Member Young, seconded by Member Mueller to recommend • approval of the applicant's request for a map amendment as requested. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2—Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carved. Text Amendments Three text amendments are being sought: 1. Section 13-7A-1 — To add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District. ■ They are requesting that health clubs be added as a permitted use in the B-1 District. It will allow the petitioner to include an upscale health club to the center. Ms. Riordan said that the standards are the same for the text amendment as they are for a map amendment. The significant issue is the impact on surrounding land values and this would have a positive impact not a negative one. (The detailed standards are listed under the text amendment tab of the booklet on pages 3-6 of the Narrative in Support of Text Amendments.) • Chairman Davis said that it appears the petitioner has adequately addressed the standards and has substantially satisfied them in connection with the proposal to add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District. Motion by Member Mueller, seconded by Member Young to recommend approval of the applicant's request for the text amendment as requested. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2—Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carried. Chairman Davis 2. Section 13-7A-3B —Amend text to change Structure height from 30 feet to 50 feet. Ms. Riordan said that they are requesting this in order to accommodate their project. It was testified that this is more consistent with the trends in retail. The standards are the same for the text amendment as they are for a map amendment. The significant issue is the impact on surrounding land • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 14 of 21 February 15, 2005 values and this would have a positive impact not a negative one. • Under the current zoning they could have a building as tall as 76 feet, so the request is a much lower use than what is permitted now. There will be a benefit to surrounding land uses because this prevents that kind of height. The Village just recently raised the height restrictions in the residential areas, so this is consistent with what is going on within the Village. Director of Community Development Kallien pointed out that all of the ORA-1 properties could go up to 76 feet, however few have utilized it. (The detailed standards are listed under the text amendment tab of the booklet on pages 3-6 of the Narrative in Support of Text Amendments.) Chairman Davis said that it appears the petitioner has adequately addressed the standards and has substantially satisfied them in connection with the proposal to increase the height limitations from 30 feet to 50 feet in the B-1 District. Motion by Member Shah, seconded by Member Young to recommend approval of the applicant's request for the text amendment as requested. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman • Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2—Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carried. Chairman Davis 3. Section 13-3-8 — Amend text to allow design elements from 15 feet to 30 feet. Ms. Riordan said that this text amendment addresses non-occupiable space. The Ordinance currently allows 15 feet and they are requesting that it be amended to 30 feet for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. This change will affect the tower. (The detailed standards are listed under the text amendment tab of the booklet on pages 3-6 of the Narrative in Support of Text Amendments.) Member Young questioned if any aviation lighting would be placed on any of the buildings. Director of Community Development Kallien said that up and down the tollway none of these structures will exceed the height of the high-tension lines and none of them have'the lighting on them. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 15 of 21 February 15, 2005 Director of Community Development Kallien said that he brought up a • concern to the attention of the Plan Commission and Chairwoman Payovich included it in her letter to the Zoning Board on page 19.a, item 3 as follows: "The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by the district for appurtenance may be appropriate for the proposed Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision may be limited to redevelopment projects of a particular size, scale or location. Appropriate language is to be added as determined by the Village Attorney." Right now the limitation is 15 feet for anything above the principal height. In this particular redevelopment project the petitioner has shown that 30 feet requested is okay. However, he does not want someone else to be able to build a 30-foot high elevator shaft, or something else. This language somehow needs to be tied to a development project and perhaps the Village Attorney can come up with some language to limit. Chairman Davis said that it appears the petitioner has substantially addressed the standards and has satisfied them in connection with the proposal to allow design elements from 15 feet to 30 feet, subject to appropriate language to be added as determined by the Village Attorney so that it does not impact the request by this petitioner. Motion by Member Mueller, seconded by Member Young to recommend • approval of the applicant's request for the text amendment as requested. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2 —Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carried. Special Use The Special Use is for outdoor dining adjacent to restaurants. They have designed them with strict criteria to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Chairman Davis said that it appears the petitioner has substantially addressed the standards and has satisfied them in connection with the proposed special use. p P Motion by Member Mueller, seconded by Member Young to recommend approval of the applicant's request for the special use to allow outdoor dining adjacent to a restaurant subject to the following conditions: • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 16 of 21 February 15, 2005 ,2a3. 0 1. The development is to be in substantial conformance with the • approved plans, including the location, size, design and operational guidelines for each outdoor dining area. 2. Additional safety mechanism designed for the outdoor dining area proposed for building K and as described by the petitioner to be a low masonry wall barrier that would provide protection as an integrated design that would be part of the building, including pilaster and brick which would be difficult for a car to get through. 3. Establish a maximum seating capacity for each of the three outdoor dining facilities at the time of permit. 4. Subject to the restrictions imposed in connection with other special uses for outdoor dining that have been granted by the Village. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2—Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carried. Variations • Ms. Riordan said that they are requesting 8 variations. For all of the variations requested, none of the conditions were created by the petitioner. The hardship conditions are the five-acre pond; the .5 acre of floodplain on the property; and the 1-acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires along the southern boundary of the property. This has resulted in a limited amount of space that they are trying to get the project to work. The variations they need are because of that. 1. Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement — Yards — requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty-foot (50') setback,which impacts Building K. 2. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the blade signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 17 of 21 February 15, 2005 also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty- six feet (36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30') allowed by Code. 3. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3) bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four(4) parking bays to the west of building `B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3) bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. 4. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than • the required 4"-6" caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. 5. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance — Interior Parking Lot Landscaping — requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. 6. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 18 of 21 February 15, 2005 C, • Chairman Davis asked the basis for the difference. Director of Community Development Kallien responded that typically retail spaces have a high turnover of traffic coming and going. The larger aisles facilitate the greater number of cars backing in and going into spaces. In an office complex people basically come in and stay for the day, which is why they can get by with the lower number. This project may take on some of the characteristics of an office complex, in that it has been designed for people to come and spend an extended period of time on the site and walk. 7. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations— In Yards— requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property, there would be inadequate parking for the Project. 8. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations—Access— requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the • lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), whichever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet (292') to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet (340') to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet (108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a four hundred foot (400') space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Proj ect. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 19 of 21 February 15, 2005 cP23�r, • Standards 1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. RESPONSE: If they are required to meet the parking they need the reduction of the aisles or it would result in less critical mass. They also would not be able to have the quality of the design or architecture to attract the tenants they are looking for. (In the Narrative in Support of Request for Variations each standard is addressed for each variation requested) 2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. 3. The variation if granted will not alter the essential locality. RESPONSE: The variances are due to the hardshi p conditions. The tension wires, the pond, the flood plain and the limited available buildable area and they will not alter in any significant way the character of the neighborhood. 4. 2.a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owners as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of • the regulations were to be carried out. RESPONSE Because of the hardship condition this would not be feasible without the variances being sought. 5. 2.b. The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. RESPONSE: The project is unique. They do not think there will be other B-1 projects that come in with this kind of development asking for these specific variances. 6. 2.c. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. RESPONSE: The granting of this variation will have no negative affect to other property whatsoever. 7. 2.d. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjoining property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. RESPONSE: They think the project will have a positive impact on surrounding property values and will have no • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 20 of 21 February 15, 2005 �3.s, negative impact at all on the safety, g • g p y, quality of haht or property values. 8. 2.e. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. RESPONSE: The proj ect is not feasible without this relief. 9. 21 That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. RESPONSE: The hardship was created by third parties, none were created by the petitioner. Director of Community Development Kallien commented that the variation request for the 30" blade sign is allowed in the Oakbrook Center. Those are the blade signs allowed under all of the canopies. Ms. Riordan clarified that a portion of the setback along Technology Drive is zero. Chairman Davis said that it appears that the main standards, plus the sub standards for the grant of eight variations have been sufficiently and substantially addressed. Motion by Member Young, seconded by Member Shah to recommend approval of the applicant's request for each of the eight variations as • requested. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 4—Members Mueller, Shah, Young and Chairman Davis Nays: 0—None Absent: 2 —Member Ascher and Sanford. Motion Carried. 5. OTHER BUSINESS: OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. 6. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT Motion by Member Young, seconded by Member Mueller to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. ATTEST: Robert Kallien, Direct of Co unity Development Secretary • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Special Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 21 of 21 February 15, 2005 0440 t • 5. OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001, 3003 AND 3121 BUTTER-FIELD OAK BROOK ROAD (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUTTERFIELD ROAD AND 30o and 3 DE-3001, MEYERS ROAD) — TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, , MAP AMENDMENT, ORDINANCE — MAP AMENDMENT, TEXT AMENDMENTS TEXT AMENDMENTS VARIATIONS AND SPECIAL USE—TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT SPECIIALIOUSE TO OF A LIFESTYLE CENTER ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LIFESTYLE CENTER Chairman Davis said that it was his understanding that an overview was going to be presented and the applicant would be seeking a continuance to another meeting where testimony would then be given. Mary Riordan, Attorney for the petitioner NAI Hiffrnan, which is the development agent for the property owners St. Paul Properties, Inc., introduced Ryan Murphy, Detail Leasing for NAI Hifflnan and Joy Pinta, an Associate with her law firm. Ms. Riordan said that the project is an 18.2 acre project located at the southwest corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. The site is improved with 3 office buildings. The property is owned by St. Paul • Properties. There are two three-story office buildings and a one-story brick office building. Right now the occupancy rate of these buildings is only 30%. In the office market including, Downers Grove, Lombard, Oak Brook and Oakbrook Terrace, the office vacancy rate is about 30%. The market is over built for this area. The existing buildings are competing with Class A buildings, with new lobbies, health clubs, restaurants and other amenities. These are older buildings that cannot compete so as a result they have a very high vacancy rate. The property is somewhat unique in that there is an approximate 5-acre pond on the site. The pond serves not only the detention, but it is an online pond, which actually provides detention for properties upstream. There are also floodplain and floodway issues around the pond an in front of the property, which is part of their hardship. Along with that at the back of the buildings there is a 100-foot ComEd easement with the high-tension wires. They can provide parking under them, but they cannot build under them. There is also almost one acre of floodplain at the front of the property that cannot be filled in. They really have about 12 acres available to do the kind of project they want to do. The project is the Oak Brook Promenade and is being planned as a Lifestyle Center; a high-end boutique type retail with inviting amenities to • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 6 of 12 February 1, 2005 • be attractive to people to come in, sit and spend time. There will be extensive landscaping, beyond what the ordinance requires; streetscapes, with benches, planters and attractive facades. Some of the cornerstones is going to be high-end sit-down restaurants. In the plans, locations A and B will have outdoor seating along the pond. They area trying to use the pond feature as much as possible to enhance the development. Part of the project is going to be to landscaping a good part of the pond. They will be adding low voltage lighting and will redo the path around the pond. They are proposing that the buildings be demolished; that the whole property be redeveloped with 180,000-190,000 feet of office, retail and sit down restaurants. There would be about 20,000 feet of office, which will be specialty office; approximately 128,000 feet of retail and about 30,000 feet of high end sit down restaurants. The parking has designed to coexist with the particular uses. They are looking at the project to be approximately a 50 million dollar investment in order to complete the project. There are going to be high- end tenants, but they will not be competing with the Oakbrook Center. They have talked to the people at the Oakbrook Center and they have a waiting list. This is a different type of tenant than what the mall will be. They need to have a minimal square footage or they cannot attract the kind • of tenants they want to attract. At the same time they have the limitations of the pond, the floodway and the high-tension easement in the back of the building. They have tried to create what they need to do in terms of critical mass and at the same time be mindful of all of the restrictions on the property. Two of the existing buildings presently have an underground garage. One of the ways they have tried to address the parking requirements was to reuse the underground garages. It will be a controlled access. It will continue to be used for employee parking and valet parking. Right now the property generates no revenue for the Village because there is not a local property tax. They are anticipating when the project is fully built and after a couple of stabilized years they will generate in excess of one million dollars in sales tax per year. The project will not have any impact on the taxing districts. Economically they believe it will be a positive impact for the village. The property is located on the far west edge of town across Meyers Road g � Y to the east is the Inland building, which is also zoned ORA-1; immediately • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 7 of 12 February 1, 2005 • to the west is a ComEd substation, also zoned ORA-1. Immediately north of the property is the Village of Lombard and the development to the north is zoned B-3 planned development (according to the Lombard zoning map), which is the Fountain Square restaurants and retail. To the south the property is bounded by the tollway and to the south of that is a residential area. To the west is the Yorktown Shopping Center and down farther to the east is the Oakbrook Center. Given the state of the buildings right now they think the development will be a positive impact on the value and character of surrounding properties. They do not see any negative impacts. Included in the materials is a traffic study by KLOA, which concludes that the current improvements will handle the traffic being generated by the proj ect. Because they wanted this project to be quality and unique they brought in Henry Klover Architects from Kansas City. They have a reputation for doing high quality Lifestyle Centers. They have spent a lot of time on the renderings and the facades. Exhibit 11 are the elevations of the proposed buildings. They looked at various properties within the village and tried to incorporate some of the features that are currently in the Village into this design. They tried to pull together a lot of the common elements of the Village. • Included in the packet is a spiral bound book, which is the design criteria. The center will be owned a single owner. All of the leases will incorporate the book. The book specifies what kind of materials can be used, what kind of lighting, how the freestanding buildings need to be addressed. The architectural plans will need to be submitted to the owner, who will approve them before they every go to the Village. The approval will mean that they are in compliance with the design standards along with all the ordinances they have asked the Village to approve. There is no way that a tenant could come and build something that Is not in conformance with what has been shown. There are certain uses in the B-1 District that they have asked to be excluded. The proposed zoning district is B-1, which they believe is the most appropriate zoning district for the project they are proposing. B-3 had too many uses that they would not want to see on the project. On page 11 of the narrative for the map amendment they have listed the uses to be omitted. They plan on having very strict architectural controls, operational controls and use controls on the project. With a $50 million dollar investment, they want to make sure they maintain the quality of the project. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 8 of 12 February 1, 2005 �.6 • Chairman Davis asked what a "lifestyle center" would be. Ms. Riordan ordan said that it would be center where they do not have the big shops. The largest store would possibly be a specialty furniture store of 12-15,000 square feet. They are smaller stores and a lot of features in the center designed to attract people and keep them there. The whole layout of the center with a pedestrian circulation path made with pavers and the landscaping to get people to come in and keep them in the center. A lot of attention was paid to making it easy for people to walk through and cross over the project. There is a lot of landscaping and discreet signage. Chairman Davis asked how traffic would enter and exit the site. Ms. Riordan reviewed the main entrance to the site, which is at an existing signal that they will not be changing at all. There will be a right in right out on the western border of the property that also exists. There is an existing driveway to the east that will be moved slightly to the west because of the flood plain. She reviewed the access to the south entryway. Technology Drive is behind the buildings on the south and leads to a signalized intersection on Butterfield. As people use it more they will become familiar with that exit. I Ms. Riordan said that they expect the outdoor dining to be similar to the • indoor dining with white linen tablecloths. They will be controlled. Patrons will only enter through the restaurant. There will not be any music and they will be enclosed with fences. There will be the nice amenity to view the pond without any access to it and will be strictly controlled. The outdoor dining will be a nice use of the property during the spring, summer and fall. Because it is a two-story project they are seeking a text amendment for relief to the building height. In the B-1 District 30 feet is the maximum allowed; they are asking for 50 feet. They need that in order to create a 2- story center. They will not be facades; they will actually be used for 2- story retail, office, a possible 2-story restaurant. They have also asked for a text amendment to allow for a tower feature. In any district a design feature is allowed to be 15 feet higher than the structure height, they are asking that it be changed to 25 feet, which could result in a design feature going to 75 feet. To stay in scale with that they are asking for a variance for their signs. Currently the Code allows 30 feet in the B-1 District; they are seeking 36 feet in height which will allow them to stay in scale with the 2-story VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK • Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 9 of 12 February 1, 2005 • building. They are seeking enough flexibility in the signage for their retailers so that the signs can be unique for their property without being too standardized and there is a certain kind of feel they are trying to create. The signs are all spelled out in the design criteria. There will not be any building or box signs. They want to create a downtown streetscape kind of feel. The signage at the entryway will be a monument sign identifying the project and the tenant ID will be at the corner to give people an idea what is there. The development of the project would require the following relief. • A map amendment to change the zoning from ORA-1 to B-1. • Three text amendments. First, to add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District; second, to amend the height of the buildings, and third, to amend the height of the design feature. • A special use for outdoor dining adjacent to restaurants. • Nine variations. A variation to the building setback for building K, the code requires a 60-foot setback and they are seeking 50 feet; a variation to the sign height and projection from 30 feet to 36 feet; a variation to the landscaping to provide unique planting without providing a bay; also one tree for every 40 spaces, but the south end, they may not be every 15 feet. The caliper of trees will exceed what the ordinance requires; they are requesting to have ornamental • trees in certain areas instead of shade trees over the parking garages and by the high tension lines; a variation to the drive aisles, under the existing ORA-1 the width is 24 feet, which they have. Under the B-1 District it is 27 feet and they are requesting to keep it at 24 feet; a variation to the 10-foot parking setback along Technology Drive; the last variance is to the Subdivision Regulations regarding monumentation which is heard by the Plan Commission. She said that they are excited about the project and will provide a complete review at the next meeting. Chairman Davis asked what the timing issue was for the construction of the project. Ms. Riordan responded that they want to be in the ground in June 2005. The plan is to be able to be able to open by Thanksgiving of 2006. Member Sanford asked for clarification of the Executive Summary regarding occupancy rates. Ms. Riordan responded that the surrounding areas have a 30%vacancy rate and they have a 70%vacancy rate. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 10 of 12 February 1, 2005 • Member Sanford questions what problem there would be if the signs remained as required under the present code. Ms. Riordan responded that because of the height of the buildings they would not look right. The signs would be too low to be in scale with 2-story buildings. Member Sanford commented that it would be an aesthetic issue. Ms. Riordan agreed. Member Sanford said that the Plan Commission brought up the safety issue of the pathway around the pond. Ms. Riordan said that there will be heavy landscaping around the edge of the detention pond. It will keep birds and animals out of the pond. They also believe it will be substantial enough to keep small children out as well. That issue will be discussed more in depth at the next meeting. Member Sanford said that on page 26 the projected real estate taxes were listed over a number of years. He asked if that was anticipated real estate taxes increasing or if any special tax relief was included in those numbers. She said that the number was expected to be the total real estate tax once the property is fully assessed as based on by conversations with the York Township Assessor and there is not tax relief included in that at all. Member Young said that he would like to see a study of the traffic study on Meyers Road. The increased traffic flow in that area is probably going • to create major snags. If there is increased traffic flow around the pond and he would like to know about protective measures to keep vehicles from going in the pond. Ms. Riordan said that they have looked at the pond in terms of trees and landscaping trying to make it pretty impossible for a car to go into the pond. They have tried to avoid bollards and between the architect and the landscape architect. Member Young questioned the lighting on the neighboring condo as well as the residential neighborhood behind it. Ms. Riordan said that there is a photometric study in the materials. There will be two different kinds of lighting; practical lighting for the parking lot and decorative lighting. If you look at what they are allowed to do and what the project will do this will be a much less intense project and will be much lower than what they are allowed to build. There will be less intensity on the lighting. What they have proposed will actually be an improvement in terms of the lighting. The photometric has been designed to make sure there is no light spillage at the property line. Director of Community Development commented that if Oak Brook had a Planned Unit Development process in place the applicant would not be • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 11 of 12 February 1, 2005 • seeking variations. He said it would allow them to create a development scheme that would allow them to ask for certain relief but it would be packaged as one request. The burden of proof of unique circumstances is lessened tremendously. Many projects in Oak Brook take on the characteristics of a planned unit development, such as Oakbrook Center, that was done under straight zoning. As a result of the applicant's request a number of other property owners have shown some interest in pursuing development projects also. The areas to the east of this project may see some additional opportunities for mixed use development. Member Mueller asked if there would be a problem in reducing the drive aisles from 27 to 24 feet. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the Village Engineer has reviewed it. He said that is what is there right now and believes that it can work. Once people come to the center, they want them to stay parked and walk to the various buildings because driving within the center defeats the purpose of the layout. Ms. Riordan said that they hope for it to be a pedestrian friendly site. Motion by Member Young, seconded by Member Mueller to continue the public hearing for the Oak Brook Promenade to a Special meeting scheduled for February 22, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. • 6. OTHER BUSINESS: OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. 7. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT Motion by Member Mueller, seconded by Member Shah to adjourn the meeting at 8:34 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. ATTEST: Robert Kallien, Director of Community Development Secretary • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 12 of 12 February 1, 2005 . Motion by Member Young, seconded by Member Mueller to continue the public hearing for the Oak Brook Promenade to a Special meeting scheduled for February 22, 2005. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. 7. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURNMENT Motion by Member Mueller, seconded by Member Shah to adjourn the meeting at 8:34 p.m. VOICE VOTE: Motion carried. ATTEST: Robert Kallien, >i.rector of Co ty Development Secretary • • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Page 12 of 12 February 1, 2005 h January 27, 2005 �4cF 00p"'TI �\ Village President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Village of Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website www.oak-brook.org SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Administration Map Amendment 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals: Community Development At its meetin g on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed a petition 630.990.3045 submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., FAX 630.990.3985 seeking approval of a map amendment (i.e., rezoning) from ORA-1 to B-1 in order to facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. Engineering Department 630.990.3010 The applicant is seeking approval of this map amendment for the five parcels which FAX 630.990.3985 make up the site as part of their overall development plan to redevelop the property Fire Department and construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 square foot upscale retail 0(1630,990.2392 0.990.3040 center. No one spoke in support or in opposition to this request. Police Department 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the map amendment as requested to rezone the property from ORA-1 to B-1. In making this Public Works recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: Department 630.990.3044 1. The five parcels which encompass a total of 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and FAX 630.472.0223 has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of Oak Brook office, commercial and restaurant uses. Public Library 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the 600 Oak Brook Road proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to 630.990 2222 the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. FAX 630.990.4509 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade Oak Brook,Sports Core site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Bath&Tennis Club Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved 700 Oak Brook Road a change in the previous Office/Warehouse use to a retail use. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 6 An amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, and 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. Golf Club 7. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map 2606 York Road Oak Brook.IL 60523-4602 amendment and in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab 630.990.3032 on pages 2 through 15. FAX 630.990.0245 �r January 27, 2005 • President Quinlan RE: Oak Brook Promenade MA—Map Amendment Page 2 8. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a map amendment. Very truly yours, Barbara(Lexi) Payovich Chairwoman Plan Commission • • PGA _F 04K January 27, 2005 q�F°0°"TI '\��\ Village President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Village of Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website www.oak-brook.org SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Administration Special Use for Outdoor Dining 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals: Community At its meeting on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed a petition Development g �' p 630.990.3045 submitted by NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., FAX 630.990.3985 seeking approval of a special use for up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to Engineering the proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment Department project. Since the specific restaurant users are unknown at this time, the applicant 630.990.3010 Is seeking the special use which establishes the location, operational framework FAX 630.990.3985 and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of Fire Department the three planned sit-down restaurants. O630.990.3040 X 630.990.2392 The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five acre water feature located at the corner Police Department 630.990.2358 of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is FAX 630.990.7484 proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K Public Works and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining Department 630.990.3044 areas would be from within the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, FAX 630.472.0223 lighting and landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized Oak Brook between April 1" and October 15t of each year (weather permitting) and will not Public Library offer live music. 600 Oak Brook Road The a pp licant is seeking a pp roval of this special use as part of there overall Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 630.990.2222 development plan to redevelop the property and construct the Oak Brook FAX 630.990.4509 Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft. upscale retail center. Oak Brook Sports Core No one spoke in support or in opposition to this request. Bath&Tennis Club By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the special use 700 Oak Brook Road as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to three restaurants Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 proposed for the Oak Brook Promenade. In making this recommendation, the Plan 630.990.3020 P ro p roo g FAX 630.990.1002 Commission finds that: • Golf Club 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 upscale restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 o?o. January 25, 2005 • President Quinlan RE: Oak Brook Promenade SU—Outdoor Dining Page 2 2. Most of the more upscale restaurants in the Village include a number located at the Oakbrook Center as well as several along 22nd Street have approved special uses for outdoor dining arrangements and successfully operate those facilities for the benefit of their patrons as well as the community. 3. Even though the specifics are not known at this time concerning the actual restaurants that will be locating in the Oak Brook Promenade, the applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area. 4. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 5. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factor required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. 6. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners • that the proposed special use will negatively impact the adjacent properties. 7. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for building K, it may be appropriate to integrate additional landscaping/physical barriers between the dining area and the parking lot to more effectively protect patrons from an errant car. 8. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek and amendment to the special use. 9. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. 10. The approved outdoor dining areas are to be used for outdoor dining purpose only and in no way to be used as a party deck. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a special use. Very truly yours, "L71� Barbara(Lexi) Payovich • Chairwoman Plan Commission • E � A y January 27, 2005 A � 9CF�UUNTI ' Village President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Village of Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website www.oak-brook.org SUBJECT: NAI Hiffman — Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance Text Administration Amendment 630.990.3000 FAX 630.990.0876 Dear President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board of Appeals: Community At its meeting on January 17 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed a petition Development g � � p 630.990.3045 submitted by NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., FAX 630.990.3985 seeking approval of several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to Engineering facilitate development of the Oak Brook Promenade. The specific text amendments Department include Section 13-7A-1, 13-7A-3(B), and Section 13-3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance. 630.990.3010 FAX 630.990.3985 A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following Fire Department (new language is underlined, deleted language is shown with a strike-through). O630.990.3040 Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in X 630.990.2392 the case file. Police Department 630.990.2358 Text Amendments: FAX 630.990.7484 Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. Public Works Department 630.990.3044 Section 13-7A-3(B) — amend text — Structure Height: Not more than thiAy-€eet FAX 630.472.0223 ( "fifty feet (50') and not more than two (2) stories. Oak Brook Section 13-3-8 — amend text— No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, Public Library reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which 600 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, 630.990.2222 flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and FAX 630.990.4509 telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses Oak Brook Sports Core or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen fee! "52' thirty Bath&Tennis Club 700 Oak Brook Road above feet 30' ab the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 No one spoke in support or in opposition to this request. • Golf Club By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the text 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 amendments as requested in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 �g January 27, 2005 President Quinlan, Board of Trustees and Zoning Board RE: Oak Brook Promenade—Text Amendment Page 2 Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: 1. The applicant has proposed three text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to develop the Oak Brook Promenade as presented. 2. The amendment which would increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability with the two existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Route 83 and 16th Street). 3. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by the district for appurtenances may be appropriate for the proposed Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision may be limited to redevelopment projects of a particular size, scale or location. Appropriate language is to be added as determined by the Village Attorney. 4. The Plan Commission concurs with the concept of permitting increased building heights at the proposed location for the Oak Brook Promenade. The Village Board may consider a review of the other non-residential • zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made. 5. As presented by the applicant, the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and will not negatively impact any adjacent property owners. 6. The proposed amendment to add health clubs as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. 7. No comments have been received from any property owner in Oak Brook that objects to the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 8. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factor required for a text amendment and as explained in writing under the text amendment tab on pages 3 through 6 in the case file. Very truly yours, Barbara(Lexi)Payovich Chairwoman Plan Commission • OF Q, 6\ o� t January 24, 2005 9 \� cFCOUN11 �`� Village President Quinlan and Board of Trustees Village of Village of Oak Brook Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook, IL 60523 Oak Brook, 60523-2255 Web site SUBJECT: Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — www.oak-brook.org Final Plat of Consolidation Administration 630.990.3000 Dear President Quinlan and Board of Trustees: FAX 630.990.0876 Community At its meeting on January 17, 2005, the Plan Commission reviewed an application Development from NAI Hiffimn on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., seeking 630.990.3045 approval of a final plat of consolidation encompassing approximately 19.7 acres FAX 630.990.3985 located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road in the Village Engineering of Oak Brook. The requested action would consolidate the five existing parcels Department into one in order to accommodate the proposed construction of the Oak Brook 630.990.3010 Promenade project. One of these parcels is presently unincorporated and will FAX 630.990.3985 require annexation by the Village. As part of this request, the applicant is Fire Department requesting variations to Section 14-6-3(J) — required monumentation and Section O630.990.3040 14-6-3(K) — required dedication of public utility easements of the Subdivision X 630.990.2392 Regulations. Police Department The applicant is seeking these a pp rovals in order to redevelop the property and 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft. upscale retail center. Public Works No one spoke in support or in opposition to this request. Department 630.990.3044 By a vote of 6 to 0, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the final plat FAX 630.472.0223 of consolidation and two requested variations subject to the following findings and conditions: Oak Brook 1. The proposed plat consolidates the five existing parcels that are of this Public Library p P p g p project into one parcel. One of these parcels is contiguous to the site but is 600 Oak Brook Road presently outside the Village limits (i.e., unincorporated). Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 2. The single 19.7-acre parcel will accommodate an approximate 180,000 630.990.2222 square foot mixed-use project consisting of retail, restaurant and office uses. FAX 630.990.4509 3. The proposed variations to the Subdivision Regulations requested by the Oak Brook Sports Core applicant relates to required monumentation and public utility easements. 4. Because the site is already developed and a portion of the site improvement Bath&Tennis Club will be maintained, the variation to the monumentation requirement is being 700 Oak Brook Road requested. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 5. With respect to the requested variations relating to monumentation and FAX 630.990.1002 designation of public utility easements, the Village has in the past (700/800 0 Commerce and 122 22nd Street) approved similar requests. Golf Club 6. The final plat consolidation satisfies all other aspects and requirements for 2606 York Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 the Village's Subdivision Regulations including that neither the proposed 630.990.3032 variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent properties. FAX 630.990.0245 4_1Z January 24, 2005 • President Quinlan RE: Oak Brook Promenade FP and VAR to Subdivision Regulations Page 2 7. That the applicant address all issues raised by Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated January 12, 2005 on page 12 of the case file including final engineering approval. 8. Annexation approval of the unincorporated parcel as a condition of final approval by the Village. 9. Eventual dedication of approximately 1.5 acres of property to DuPage County as right-of-way for Meyers Road. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission found that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed all applicable standards required for a final plat as well as the requested variations to the Subdivision Regulations. Very truly yours, • Barbara(Lexi) Payovich Chairwoman Plan Commission • I • MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 17, 2005 REGULAR DRAFT COMMISSION O VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK UNOFFICIAL UNTIIL APPROVED AS WRITTEN OR AS AMENDED ON 52005. 1. CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairwoman Payovich in the West Wing Training Room of the Butler Government Center at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: ROLL CALL Gail Polanek called the roll with the following persons PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Payovich, Members David Braune, Surendra Goel, Jeffrey Bulin, Marcia Tropinski and Gerald Wolin. ABSENT: Member Paul Adrian IN ATTENDANCE: Robert L. Kallien, Director of Community Development and Dale L. Durfey,Village Engineer. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MINUTES • There were no minutes available to approve. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. 5. NEW BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS r5. OAK BROOK PROMENADE — 3001, 3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD PROMENADE- ROAD (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BUTTERFIELD ROAD AND 3001,3003 AND 3121 MEYERS ROAD) — TITLE 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE — ZONING BUTTERFIELD RD ORDINANCE — MAP AMENDMENT, TEXT AMENDMENTS AND TEXT AMEND., SPECIAL USES. TITLE 14 OF THE VILLAGE CODE — SUBDIVISION AND SPECIAL USES. -FINAL PLAT OF REGULATIONS—FINAL PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION CONSOLIDATION Director of Community Development Kallien reviewed the request. It is an 18.2 acre site with consisting of multiple parcels which is presently improved with 3 office buildings. The goal is to combine the parcels into one lot; rezone the property to B-1; demolish the buildings, subject to text amendments, variations and special use approval to build an 180,000 square foot retail center. It is something that has been talked about for a number of years to help spur redevelopment of the • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 1 of 21 January 17, 2005 • Butterfield/22nd Street corridor. This would be a good start especially since it is on the far end of town. A lot of good things can happen in the middle if it happens that way. They have had many meetings and discussions with the developer and they have already addressed many of the staff's previous issues and concerns. However, there are some things that need to be talked about in order to fine-tune the project,but all in all it is a quality project and good for Oak Brook. Mary Riordan, Attorney for the applicant introduced the developer of the project Dennis Hiffinan, of NAI Hiffinan based in Oakbrook Terrace. Also from NAI Hiffinan were Ryan Murphy and Ken Erickson. They are acting as agent for the property owner who is St. Paul Properties,which is located in St. Paul,Minnesota. She introduced the development team who are part of this project that would be speaking at the hearing. Henry Klover, Klover Architects of Kansas City, Missouri; Phil Wolf and Nick Smith, Manhard Engineering; Wendy Schulenberg, Landscape Architect, Daniel Weinback & Partners and Don O'Hara, Traffic Engineer, KLOA. Ms. Riordan provided an overview of the project. The property has three existing office buildings and is on the southwest corner of Meyer and Butterfield Road. The property has been zoned ORA-1 since 1976 and are 30% occupied, which is a 70% vacancy rate. In the office market the vacancy rate in Oak Brook, Oakbrook • Terrace, Downers Grove and Lombard is 30%, so the occupancy rate for this site is well below the average. Given the market and the state of the properties, which are well maintained but are lacking in the amenities that tenants are looking for, it is very unlikely that these buildings are going to be leased anytime soon. They have property that is vacant and is generating no tax to the Village. The property is located on the far western edge of town. Across Meyers Road to the east is the Inland building,which is also zoned ORA-1; immediately to the west is a ComEd substation, also zoned ORA-1. To the south the property is bounded by the tollway and to the south of that is a residential area. Immediately north of the property is the Village of Lombard and the development to the north is zoned B-3 planned development (according to the Lombard zoning map), which is the Fountain Square development with restaurants and retail. To the west is the Yorktown Shopping Center and down farther to the east is the Oakbrook Center. They are proposing that the buildings be demolished; that the whole property be redeveloped with 180,000-190,000 feet of office, retail and sit down restaurants. Broken down that would be about 20,000 feet of office, 130,000 feet of retail and about 30,000 feet of high end sit down restaurants. The proposed zoning district is B-1, which they believe is the most appropriate zoning district for the project they are proposing. The B-2 district is for the • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 2 of 21 January 17, 2005 Y • regional shopping center. The B-3 District has too many uses that they would not want to see on the project and the Village probably would not like to see them there either. They concluded that B-1 would be the most appropriate zoning for the proposed project and would fit in most with retail trends on Butterfield and 22"d Street. It is consistent with the Fountain Square property to the north. There is also a proposed development to the west and they are somewhat in competition with the developers to the west for tenants and users. The kinds of tenants they are talking about are high-end lifestyle center users. Another development is proposed down the street so these tenants are looking between the two projects to see which one is more desirable. The proposed B-1 district is consistent with surrounding land uses. The proposed development will not have any deleterious impact on the surrounding properties. They think if there is going to be any impact it will be a positive one. It is a high-end project and the density they are looking at is less than that it could be if developed under ORA-1 as far as height and bulk. They have tried to develop something with a lot of public amenities. There is a lot of open space that is friendly to pedestrians and shoppers to come and spend some time and money to eat and shop. They are proud of what they have come up with. They are anticipating when the project is fully built out they will generate approximately one million dollars in sales tax. The project will not have any impact on the taxing districts. They are not creating any new school children. The only services will be those that are now being provided. There will be significant • sales tax to the village. They have several petitions. They are seeking a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-1. They are also seeking several variances, text amendments, special use and a final plat of consolidation. They have 5 separate parcels, one of which is not in the village; it is what they refer to as the tollway parcel and is zoned R-2 in DuPage County. As part of this process they are going to prepare an annexation petition to annex the property into the village. It will also be part of their map amendment, which they understand will be subject to the approval of the annexation. There are a lot of restrictions, constriction and physical problems with this property. Those factors had a lot to do with driving the design and development of the property. The project team presented the proposed project Phil Wolf, Manhard Engineering Since the project began they have been working hand and hand with Village Engineer Dale Durfey to assure they were in compliance with the Village Stormwater Ordinance. The existing buildings were permitted back in 1976. There was an existing culvert that came through the property and was released to a creek and then discharged back into a six-foot diameter culvert going back underneath Meyers Road. As part of the original development some storage had to be provided for detention that was at the time determined to be 4-acre feet and some additional • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 3 of 21 January 17, 2005 AT • detention had to be provided for fill that was going on in the floodplain. Along the front of Butterfield Road where the culvert comes in there are some fairly large depressions that also store stormwater along with the pond itself. In coming up with the proposed plan to redevelop this property they had the constraints of the existing pond. Approximately 3 acres of flood plain are on the site and they had to be in compliance with the new ordinance. They had some areas they were trying to do some fill, but in trying to actually utilize those areas because of the depth of them for even a small area of trying to reclaim out of floodplain, to gain a half of an acre you would need to provide six times that in volume someplace else on the site, which is pretty limited with the pond being utilized and proposed with the new structures and easements running along the southern parts there is not a lot of area to add new volume. They came up with a method whereby the water in the pond gets dropped to provide some additional storage. The bottom of the pond gets elongated out and the net result is that they could be in compliance with the ordinance for the small amount of fill they are placing in flood plain and the new volume that they would need to be in compliance with today's ordinance above and beyond what was required in 1976. They have verified the existing sanitary on the site with the Hinsdale Sanitary District to provide for the increased need for sanitary and the capacity is there. They have worked with Village Engineer Durfey relating to the utilities and some of the revisions to the water system, which would be necessary to ensure that they • would meet the needs and requirements of the Village. Don O'Hara, principal with KLOA Traffic Consultants He said that they were retained by the applicant to do the traffic study, which is on tab 27 of the case file. He highlighted some of the important aspects of the traffic planning for the site. They studied Butterfield Road and Meyers Road. He said that everyone knows that the traffic on Butterfield Road is not good. However, given the existing land use on the subject site they are already generating some traffic. 30% (as stated earlier) of the site is leased, 70% is not. They counted each of the driveways as well as the intersection and reduced the volumes on the roadways to make up for the 30% existing on the site; then they went and generated traffic for the subject site relative to Butterfield Road and Meyers Road. They evaluated the intersection and the development would be adding less than a second of delay on the system. There are really not any improvements that are necessary given the roadway configuration now; it is still not going to be good on Butterfield Road at certain times. However, they are not really putting a large impact on the road system. One of the important aspects is the access to the facility. They have three existing buildings on the site and there are also three existing driveways and the locations of the current driveways do not follow the ordinance as it is today. The plan is that the right in right out of the subject site, which is to the west, will remain as is and the signalized intersection that is aligned with the shopping center across the street will remain as is. There is one minor modification proposed that • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 21 January 17, 2005 • they have reviewed with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) about and which they (IDOT) are not opposed to moving the driveway to the west slightly for safety reasons so that it would be a simple right turn in and would be by the facilities. From the traffic and safety standpoint it made sense, however it does not meet the Village requirement of excess of 400 feet spacing between driveways. An important aspect of this is that Butterfield is IDOT's road and they do not have a problem with the proposal and have given them preliminary approval subject to final engineering. On the site they have an existing road that goes straight through the existing facility that is remaining for the most part. It is 24 feet wide and the current Village ordinance requires 27 feet under this type of land use. It is currently 24 feet and it is their firm belief that 24 feet is more than adequate to have two-way traffic going through the facility. Obviously the majority of the parking is down to the rear so they are going to have traffic that will be moving southerly and northerly in a regular fashion. They are planning to have internal traffic control so that they do not have a speedway. They will be in total compliance with the parking regulations. The next issue is the parking garage that is currently located underneath the site. The parking that is below grade is intended for office parking and valet service that will be controlled. It will not be something regularly opened to the patrons. It is their feeling, given the onsite circulation it is a very good plan and will work under the new urban conditions for this type of land use. • Ms. Riordan clarified that the controlled access to the underground parking would be by keycard or by valet. The plan is to use it for valet and employee parking only and there will always be a control over who accesses it. They do not have the concern they would have had in regards to safety if it were used as an open garage. Henry Klover, Klover Architects He said that he is a lifestyle center architect and has worked on six lifestyle centers across the country. Member Wolin asked for a definition of"lifestyle center." Mr. Klover responded that a lifestyle center is a term that was coined by Poag & McEwen, who developed the Deer Park Town Center. Everyone was going to malls at the time. The original intent was to create an environment that was to acknowledge the lifestyles of the people of today. People go out for entertainment, to restaurants, there is retail and an environment that is a gathering place that you create. Statistically, there was a study done by the ICSC International Council of Shopping Centers and lifestyle centers are designed to bring people in for one activity such as going to dinner and then to stay and browse the shops, stop for ice cream or coffee, etc. It is one of the reasons why the center looks the way it does. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 5 of 21 January 17, 2005 • He reviewed the present layout and structure of the existing site. One of the first thoughts on the proposed layout was to try to use the underground systems. There were other considerations such as the tollway and the overhead power lines and easements. There is also the ComEd substation directly west of the site. One advantage they had was the detention basin. It was an attractive element to deal with so they chose to accentuate it by having outdoor patios and restaurants, which is a natural for that area. They were going to use the buildings to shield the unattractive parts and to focus the center upon itself with a central element in the center. One of the considerations of the site was to have nice smooth circulations paths and there is a wide island through the middle that has decorative plantings and is problematic in itself because it sits on top of the parking deck. The desire was to set up really strong circulation with wide pedestrian areas some are as wide as 36- feet deep; there are planters and seating walls as well as bollards to try to protect the pedestrians as they come around. In a lifestyle center a lot of attention is paid to the materials and the surfaces that people walk on. They created areas where there are seating nodes that are protected by green areas and plantings. There are different textured materials such as stone, colored concrete and a sandblast texture to the materials. They try to create a pattern that actually varies as you go through the center. Part of the idea when you develop is to try to create an image and excitement of your youth. The concept was to try to create something that was old • world and to create skylines as well. At the request of Village Manager Boehm and Director of Community Development Kallien they were asked to look at certain buildings in the Oak Brook community and there were certain elements that they saw such as eyebrows, detailing and of some of the brick patterns that they wanted to carry into the building. There was a bit of an old world charm that they picked up on that they wanted to bring into the center. In the skyline they provided a lot of variety and texture and an important element is to create a signature piece that has some heights. The higher end retailers want higher ceilings than they are used to. The village ordinance under the B-1 District is 30 feet. Typical retail clear ceiling height is 14 feet, which is 16-17 feet to structure. Multiplied by 2, that exceeds the 30 feet allowed by ordinance, which is the reason for one of the text amendments they are seeking, in order to get the height that retailers want and desire. The retailers are going to come in and do a lot more exciting and enticing things. There is a text amendment to allow the tower which is unoccupied space, but the intent is try and create a signature element that will be a lighted tower that will be the place that people acknowledge and see from on and off the property, and hopefully from the tollway. The archways are to signify a gateway and bring people to the rear where there is parking. They have set up valet areas on the site plan for people. They will run lights along and across • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 6 of 21 January 17, 2005 • the pedestrian paths and walkways to create excitement and light. They pay a lot of attention to lighting at night so that the buildings jump at you. They have created areas along the water for 30,000 square feet of restaurant use. The patio areas are designed to be along the waterways. Building K is a smaller area and will be enclosed in a protective barrier and will be designed to be part of the building. By barrier they mean masonry walls and ornamental railing. The intent is to be a high- end environment with linen tables and hopefully some awnings. There is a requirement that they use teak furniture, wrought iron furniture, that it be designed to be compatible with the interior design and style of the restaurant. They have even tried to have the trash enclosures be compatible with the buildings. There are a variety of the types of lights they will be putting on the buildings as well as on the parking lot pedestrian lighting. There are a series of poles that go around the entire ring of the center to create the ambience of the streetscape. The materials used are a combination of brick and stone and different material such as hardy boards, which is a siding that is made out of a cementitious product that will not deteriorate and rot. They are trying to create hard materials that can be touched and felt and not be damaged and other materials that are lighter but provide that interesting character that will be built over a period of time, as well as some prairie stone. He said that Village Manager Boehm and Director of Community Development Kallien suggested a requirement that the tenants must get design approval from the center prior to going to the Village for permit approval. The tenants are each • required to install blade signs and that is to get the scale, some are down low, which is why they have planters so that they cannot be tripped over or they are up at certain heights. The intent is to provide some character, so there is a 30-inch projection for the blade signs for each tenant. They do not want people coming in and just place a box sign on a wall. There are some creative allowances for additional heights and widths if they do some 3-dimensional type signage. They area also asking for marquee signs that are not just on the building itself. Another reason that they asked for the building height to be a little higher was the elevation. You want the signs to fit the proportion to the heights and historical character of the windows, etc. so they are asking for the ability to get the signs up where they belong, which is the second part of the amendment to the signage, in order to get the signs up to the height of the roof line and that has to do primarily with the needs of the tenant. The monument sign is on tab number 6. It is not a typical monument sign. It is a 4-side structure with a natural roof structure. It is halo lit identification for the project and then pin mounted very classy signs for the tenants that would be ground lit, so they will not be traditional illuminated signs. At the entrance is identification just for the center itself, which is labeled as sign B. It is a smaller sign. Both of the signs could be bigger as allowed by ordinance, they are trying to do something that fits in with and identifies the quality and the character of the center. Ms. Riordan asked about the rear treatment of the building, which is not being • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 7 of 21 January 17, 2005 k1l d# • treated as the back of the building but as an additional front and how they will be used with the south parking lot and from the perspective of the residents of the R-2 subdivision south of the tollway. . Mr. Klover reviewed the rear elevations. Decorative walls have been designed to match the center itself and have tried to mirror the pattern and rhythm of the front of the building. There are also a series of tower elements and corners to accentuate and make the corners strong. Wendy Schulenberg, principle with Daniel Weinback &Partners She said they are a landscape architectural firm in Chicago. Landscaping is very important in a lifestyle center. There is a tree survey and tree list contained in the file. The pond is the most significant element on the site and there is a lot of mature vegetation around the pond. Adjacent to the existing buildings is similar vegetation and then there are parking lot plantings. Because of the scope of a development like this there are large areas that will need to be graded and they will be losing a good majority of the vegetation. There are able to save the most significant plantings, which are located around the pond. Along Meyers Road there are overhead power lines and shade trees had been planted that have been topped off over time. They may take those out and put more ornamentals in that would be in a better scale for the overhead lines. Spotted around the site are a number of trees they feel they can relocate. Some are 7 and 8-inch caliper trees. There are some honey locust, some • very nice ginkgo trees,maple and quite a bit of ash trees on the site. There is a concern that there is going to be an ash borer that is going to come and sort of be the next Dutch Elm disease and is going to wipe out all ash trees in the near future. It is not a certainty that it is going to happen, but it is in southern Michigan and could be making its way here. Most municipalities are not allowing ash trees to be planted anymore and a lot of the really big trees on this site are ash trees. They will not do anything with the ones located around the pond they will wait to see what happens. They will spare the expense of relocating those in the parking lot or of movable size because it does not make any sense at this point to move them. As you come up to the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road it is difficult to see into the site and there are some trees at the corner that they would be considering taking out just to allow some views into the site. It will be a nice view of the new development. The west side of the pond will be graded out. They will upgrade the existing pond landscaping. Along the pond edge there is an existing lawn that actually goes down to the water edge. They want to develop a more natural feel along the pond edge as shown on tab 23 of the case file. They will be using more water edge grasses and wildflowers to give it a more natural pond edge from the water line up to the path. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 8 of 21 January 17, 2005 �y. J • There is an existing path around the pond that they will be maintaining and will repair it in a couple of places. They will extend the path so that it extends up at either end of the building development. There are some boulder walls that are spotted around the path. In some areas it will require steps to bring it up to grade and they would use boulder walls along those steps. Along the outdoor dining areas they will have groupings of multi-stemmed trees, such as alders and birch; the birch of which have a very nice bark. They are considering up lighting those trees in between the outdoor dining spaces so that in the evening there will be a nice glow. A green screen will allow vines to grow across. The grasses will help to keep people from walking directly into the pond and it will help to keep the geese away from the pond. Along Butterfield Road they will be cleaning up the existing planting, there are a couple of big willow trees that will remain there. They will be adding new benches along the path and they will be adding seating areas and additional planting for color. The section along Meyers Road where the overhead lines exist they will really clean up the area and replace some of the trees that are in bad shape from being topped off due to the overhead lines. • Along the perimeter of the site there is a 10-foot setback requirement. They are looking for a slightly reduced setback width. They will provide the plantings required and screening for parking. Along Butterfield Road there is a much greater setback however, all of the edges will have very heavy planting and they certainly want a beautiful view with lots of color so that when people drive and also the required screening for the parking lot. There is a hedge that is required in front of all the parking areas. The other important feature at the front would be the signage. There will be kind of a red mass at both sign locations. There will be lots of shrub roses and things that will give very long term color. They will be mixing annuals in at the signage and at the storefronts. The parking lot landscaping has a number of different issues. They have plantings spread all throughout the parking lot. The requirement is to provide 10% green space, they are providing 11% green space throughout the parking lot. There is a requirement to provide a tree every 15 parking spaces. They do have areas where they do exceed that. Some are 16 spaces, some are 17, a few spaces in the back it gets up over 20, but as a requirement 820 divided by 15, they need 54 trees. They are actually providing 54 shade trees, some relocated trees, and using some ornamental trees. In the location of the utility easement they would look at adding ornamental trees in place of the shade trees. With all of the trees, they really exceed the overall requirement and almost double the inches that are required. They are also looking at planting trees that are larger than the minimum 3-inch • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 9 of 21 January 17, 2005 • caliper required; they are providing a minimum of 4-inch caliper trees and in some places they will be larger than that. They want that mature feeling you get when you enter at the corner to continue on as you get into the site. Some of the trees they are going to relocate are 7 and 8-inch caliper. They are looking to spot those around the site in order to get that mature feeling in all portions of the parking lot. Every three parking bays a divider is required, there is one location they are short where they lack that divider. What they feel they gain by putting in the pedestrian connection with the pavers and lighting is much more important than that six-foot divider. The whole storefront is the most important part of the development. Most retailers do not want landscaping in this case they want landscaping in the front and they want nice landscaping. They are going to be introducing all kinds of raised planters that would be spotted all along the storefronts. Not wanting to make it look like a wall they will be using bollards, and will be providing a feeling of safety. The storefront is where they will use seasonal colors. There will be bulbs, annuals and freestanding planters with a lot of color and more designing character. There are pages of plant photos in the files that they show would do well here, are hardy and will give color with a landscape that really compliments the architecture of this development. Ms. Riordan summarized that after the pond, the easement, the high power lines • and the front flood plain, they really have about 11 acres to develop so they have tried to design them to fit and at the same time, if they do not have a certain amount of retail they will not be able to attract tenants. Unless they have so much retail, retailers are not going to be interested. Ideally they would like to have about 200,000 feet, and they have been able to come up with about 190,000 feet, which they still think is working in terms of retailers. That is why it is so important to try and make the site work with what they have. They have talked a lot about the features and design criteria and in the books Exhibit 12 is a spiral bound book that is the tenant design criteria. It lays out every feature of the project. The project is going to be totally owned and controlled by a single owner. Every space will be leased. The design criteria booklet is going to be part of the leases. Tenants will come to them first, they will review the plans to ensure they have complied with the design criteria, so that by the time they come in for permit they will have approved the plans. They believe this project is going to cost in excess of fifty million dollars. Not only do they want to make sure that the Village gets what they are presenting, they want to make sure they protect what is going on there. They cannot represent to one tenant that this is going to be a high scale project and then let something unacceptable happen in another area. In the narrative for the map amendment there are some permitted uses in the B-1 area that they do not want people to have. For example, motor vehicles, barbershops, laundromats, shoe repair, there is a list that they would like to have excluded by ordinance so they do not have that battle with potential tenants. • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 10 of 21 January 17, 2005 • • Member Wolin said that it seems to be an excellent project and he is very familiar with the property. He spent seven years in the 3001 building looking over the pond. The pond was never a safety issue because it was an office building, but with a shopping center there he does have a concern about safety because there will be children there. Ms. Riordan responded said that they really like the pond, but if they had it their way they would get rid of the path especially from a liability view. The Village has asked them to enhance the path and put out lighting. If the village requires it they have tried to do the higher landscaping trying to make it difficult for any one to walk into the pond. Mr. Klover said that there is no direct access from the restaurants. There is no access; there is emergency access only for security. It is all railed and for control of the operators you would be able to walk to the back to see it, but it is completely screened. You cannot get there without going outside to the path. Ms. Schulenberg said in order to get to the path at either end of the building there are some steps that you can walk down. There is a significant change in grade to get down to where the path is. Member Wolin said that from the standpoint of safety, they may consider some • attractive fencing at either end where people have access to the path. He would urge them to consider eliminating the path. Member Braune said that its current population would not use the path, however, with people coming to the site as a destination point they may use the path. Member Bulin noted that while waiting for a table at a restaurant they could walk around the path. He said that he thinks it would be a mistake to lose the path. Chairwoman Payovich noted that if it is a lifestyle center with a health club it would be an amenity. Ms. Riordan said that as Ms. Schulenberg stated they would use landscaping to make it difficult for people or geese to get into the water. Ms. Schulenberg said that it would be particularly difficult for young children to get out into the water. Ms. Riordan said that as the property owner they have a concern also just from basic liability issues. Mr. Klover noted that if you think about the layout of the buildings and the lie VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 11 of 21 January 17, 2005 /?-i • locations of the doors and the access points, if a child would get away they would have to go quite a ways before they can get around and all the way down to the pond. They reviewed the access in and out of the underground parking lot. The underground will be completely controlled. Member Wolin questioned whether the one million dollars in sales tax was the total amount to be collected or the portion to the Village. Ms. Riordan responded that the million dollars was the portion to the Village only. The Village levies a 11/4% tax on all sales. Member Wolin said that it is a very well thought out development and a lot of good work has gone into it. Ms. Riordan responded that they have had a good team, and Director of Community Development Bob Kallien, has been awesome to deal with. Member Goel asked about driving around the shopping center to get from building to building. Mr. O'Hara responded that the hope is that you will walk once you have parked. The'idea in making it so attractive is so that you will want to walk around. The addition of the pedestrian crosswalk is to help provide that interaction between buildings. All the parking is in close proximity to the buildings, which is the nice thing about the plan. Ms. Riordan referred them to Exhibit on tab 9. Mr. • O'Hara explained that each red line indicates a pedestrian walkway that will get you around the site. Chairwoman Payovich asked for any comments from the audience. Patrick Donnelly, resident of Western Springs, said that he shops in the area often.' He thinks it will add a lot to the Oak Brook community and he just came to observe. No other comments were received from the audience, either in support or in opposition to the request. Member Braune said that he agrees with everyone and believes it will be a nice addition to the Oak Brook area. He is particularly attuned to traffic problems and asked for assurance that the traffic will be well controlled. Mr. O'Hara said that he is fairly confident. He said that he believe if you are going to obey the law you will. However, there are people that believe the roads were made for them, not the law. To say that people will not pull into a right turn out to make a left, if they can do it, and they are inclined to do it, they will do it. There is a lot of flexibility in the access system. There is a traffic signal to get into the site and a traffic signal at Technology Drive. If you can reduce the conflict points internally a lot of the traffic problems will be solved, especially on site. The idea is to get the people to • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 12 of 21 January 17, 2005 • parking as soon as possible while minimizing the number of conflicts and he believes they have accomplished that. There is no doubt that Butterfield Road has a lot of traffic on it. There are 40,000+vehicles on it a day, which is a lot of traffic and there is no relief in the very near future. This project will add to that by adding a second to the delay, but 30-40% of that is already on the system today. There has been care taken in the planning for this site. Member Braune said that when Costco was built there was concern about the lighting facing the people across the highway. There appears to be a diagonal sight line to the residences across the street. Ms. Riordan commented that the lighting from the tollway would obviously be much more intense than anything on the site. Mr. Klover said that there are restrictions on how high the poles can be on the back of the site because of the high-powered transmission lines. There will not be wall packs or direct illumination lights. There is a photometric in the booklet that is designed to cut down on light pollution so there is not a spillage of light. When there is a 35-foot pole, obviously there is going to be some as you look up at it, but they are designed so that they shoot light downward and not spill out. The tower is designed to be lit up, but it is not a beacon. It is designed so that you can see it; it would be no different than a church steeple that would be lit by lighting, which he does not think anyone would find offensive. The whole idea is to have a character and an image. They have been very careful not to have wall packs over the doors that shine down. Any lighting they will have will have light fixtures directed down • or glazing the walls to accentuate the walls as opposed to just spilling out over the sidewalks. Lighting is important and some of the centers look the best in the evening. Most of the sales are done in the wintertime went it gets dark early. In an outdoor center it is really important. You have to provide enough lighting so that there is a comfort level. You need a general illumination from the parking lot level and then you count on the accent lights from the building and from the tenants, the sidewalk lighting to get the ambience and character. Director of Community Development Kallien said that there things in the Zoning Ordinance that are relative to controlling lighting. It says that the source of the lighting has to be obscured. The maximum foot-candle at the property line cannot be any more than .5, so they will be held to that standard at the southern property line. There is also an approximate 200-foot right of way at I88, and then there is vacant property that is unincorporated. They do not have the same issues that came up with Costco. Costco's building is far larger than all of these buildings combined. The signs on the south wall of that building are substantially big and very bright. Member Braune noted that no residential property owners were notified, so they must have been far enough away. Director of Community Development Kallien said that the maximum height that could be built under the current zoning is 76 feet, under the ORA-1 District. There • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 13 of 21 January 17, 2005 /Ptzb • is a certain amount of lighting that could have from that type of thing. There are very tall buildings around it, directly to the northeast on the Oakbrook Terrace side. Lombard has plans to the west and there is a hotel there now. There is a substantial amount of light in the area. This site will be rather obscure when you compare it to its surroundings. If they are successful in getting approvals, when they get their building permit they will make sure that they comply with the Village Code. Member Tropinski asked how the deliveries would be handled. Mr. Klover responded that said that the rear of the buildings have delivery areas, that are actually have screened truck walls designed into them. They are tall enough to obscure any trucks. Member Braune asked how the permitted uses they want disallowed, will be enforced. Ms. Riordan said that they will enforce it in their covenants. Director of Community Development Kallien said that under simple zoning concepts if something is listed as a permitted use by right the applicant or owner has the right to that use. However, if the applicant chooses to restrict the types of uses they feel are inappropriate to their development, they can in essence ask the Village if there is a map amendment they can incorporate those limitations into the final ordinance. If it is sold the next owner could ask that some of those things be relieved to modify the ordinance. • Member Braune said that they only comment that he saw from the public was a letter to the editor in the newspaper where they questioned whether we need another set of upscale retail in the area, which is not a rational question based upon what they have seen here, however, it is worth a question on potential tenants. Sometimes if the rent is too high you get empty storefronts and they are hard to fill sometimes. Ms. Riordan responded that right now they have had an incredible response from tenants that are interested in coming in. Right now they are in the process of trying to figure out a way to pick and choose who is going to be allowed in the center. Because of the amount of money that the ownership is spending that is not going to happen unless they have tenants. They are not going to build these buildings on spec and then hope they have tenants come lease them. The lease is going to be completed before they ever do this. This is happening. It is either happening here or it is happening to the west of Oak Brook, they believe that it is better to be happening here. They think that it is a great use for the property and will spur more redevelopment and it keeps the dollars in the Village. Director of Community Development Kallien said that relative to the market, when you look at Oak Brook's commercial space, Oakbrook Center normally has a backlog of who wants to locate there, they can be very selective and can pick and choose and they actually have people that move around. The other centers in town, there were some vacancies, but the storefronts are generally full. The most difficult • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 14 of 21 January 17, 2005 • places are the northeast and northwest corners of Route 83 and 16th Street. Part of the problem there is not that there isn't a market, but they're not laid out maybe the best that they could be. The access and visibility is poor. You see them and then wonder how to get in the site and by the time you figure it out you are already past it. They really are the northerly extension of the shopping center. The Oak Brook market has the capacity to support additional retail. Most of the Village government is funded on sales tax and when we get the opportunity to expand a base, it has to be looked at very seriously. Member Goel said that the plan for the path around the pond seems to be very good and if it is made attractive enough, people will come and maybe jog or walk around there in good weather. Perhaps they could consider revising it to be a jogging trail and would add to the center. Ms. Riordan responded that was something they could look at. In terms of tenants they would have to make sure that is something they would like to have going on to see if it is a feasible use. She said that she did not know if the retailers would like people taking up parking spaces to go jog around the pond. She said that is something they can explore. Member Bulin questioned where the additional 75 valet parking spaces were that were referred to in Exhibit 10. Ms. Riordan responded that their thinking was that the valet company could double or triple-park the cars. However, they do meet the Ordinance without out that. Because there is a single ownership, there would be a • single valet company. Under the map amendment tab on page 10 the calculations determine that they need 1009 spaces. They do have actually 1010 spaces without the valet parking, which meets the requirements of the Ordinance. Member Bulin said that he is very much in favor of the path around the pond and believes it will give an additional amenity to the lifestyle center. He asked if it would connect to the Village's existing bike path system. Ms. Schulenberg responded that part of the problem is the change in grade. With the existing grade that is at the pond and the existing topography that they have with the new development there is such a change in grade that they are not able to do that. Member Bulin said that he did not necessarily mean that particular path, however, it was referenced in their materials that there would be a bike rack and there really is no bike path on Butterfield Road or Meyers Road. Village Engineer Durfey responded that there is no connection along Meyers Road yet, but they foresee sometime in the future there will be. There is a proposal that he has asked the engineers to look at regarding the construction of a sidewalk along the north side of the pond from their easterly driveway to Meyers Road. There is a further proposal, sometime in the future, through working with the State, the Village and Oakbrook Terrace of constructing a sidewalk along the south side of Butterfield and 22°a Street all the way to Route 83. Hopefully some long-term . VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 15 of 21 January 17, 2005 • sidewalks in the commercial areas will be accomplished. Member Bulin asked to what extent could the tenant alter the exterior elevations of the buildings. Ms. Riordan said that there is some allowance for color or glass or entry, but the owner is building the buildings. Member Bulin said that he believes it is a great package. Ms. Riordan summarized the request. She said that they are seeking the following in their petitions: 1. map amendment -to change the zoning district from ORA-1 to B-1. • They believe their requests meet the standards they will not have a deleterious impact on the surrounding properties. They think if there is going to be any impact it will be a positive one. • The proposed B-1 district is consistent with surrounding land uses and will not have any negative impact on the neighborhood. • They believe there is going to be more of a gain to the public for this proj ect. • It will be beneficial to the health, safety and welfare of the public and will not have any negative impacts. 2. Three text amendments are being sought: • ■ Section 13-7A-1 — To add "health clubs" as a permitted use in the B-1 District. ■ Section 13-7A-3B—Amend text to change Structure height from 30 feet to 50 feet. ■ Section 13-3-8 —Amend text to allow design elements from 15 feet to 30 feet. a. They believe that these changes are consistent with the neighborhood with Fountain Square to the north and the current trends in the Village. b. This will be a decrease in the allowable heights, if the property were zoned ORA-1. Director of Community Development Kallien said that he alerted the petitioner of his concerns. The provision they are seeking to 13-3-8 would amend all structures in the Village. In this particular case 30 feet would work, because we know what we are getting. However, to allow this to every property, he and he believes the Village Board would feel uncomfortable in allowing this amendment in its current state because the request is too open. Perhaps the Plan Commission could recommend to the Village Board to limit it in some fashion and direct the Village attorney to work on that as part of an ordinance. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 16 of 21 January 17, 2005 #U06 • 3. Special Use for outdoor dining. ■ They believe the special use is located and designed so that it will not have a negative impact on the public health, safety and welfare. ■ It will not have a negative impact on surrounding property values. ■ The staff report speaks to 3 issues and they agree to the following conditions to be added to the special use: 1. That the standards outlined in the request are enforced. 2. That a safety mechanism is devised for the seating in Building K if it is developed. 3. That a maximum occupancy is established. 4. The safety mechanism devised for Building K will restrict a car from going forward. 4. Plat of Consolidation — To allow them to consolidate the 5 individual parcels they now have into one single parcel. They are also seeking 2 variations to the Subdivision Regulations. • Variation to the monumentation requirements • Variation to the public utility easements • They are also seeking annexation of an unincorporated parcel, prior to plat approval. • Approval of the plat subject dedication of the right of way. • They are also seeking variations that will be heard before the Zoning Board of Appeals in February. Director of Community Development Kallien questioned the purpose of the planters along the walkway. Mr. Klover responded that they are designed for aesthetics as well as safety. Motion by Member Goel, seconded by Member Tropinski to recommend for approval the map amendment as requested to rezone the property from ORA-1 to B-1. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: 1. The 19.7 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for nonresidential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2. The Butterfield Road/22na Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of office, commercial and restaurant uses. 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at lease two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 17 of 21 January 17, 2005 y P • a change in the previous Off/Warehouse use to a retail use. 6. An amendment that changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, and development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment and in writing, which is located under the map amendment tab on pages 2 through 15. 8. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6—Members Adrian, Braune,Bulin, Goel, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Nays: 0—None. Absent: 1 —Member Adrian. Motion Carried Motion by Member Goel, seconded by Member Wolin to recommend for approval the special use as requested to allow up to three outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurant. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale restaurants at part of its final tenant mix. 2. Most of the more upscale restaurants in the Village include a number • located at the Oakbrook Center as well as several along 22"d Street have approved special uses for outdoor dining arrangements and successfully operate those facilities for the benefit of their patrons as well as the community. 3. Even though the specifics are not known at this time concerning the actual restaurants that will be locating in the Oak Brook Promenade, the applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of teach outdoor dining area. 4. The outdoor dining arrangement proposed by the applicant is consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 5. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factor required for a special use as explained in writing under the special use tab in the case file. 6. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed special use will negatively impact the adjacent properties. 7. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for building K, it may be appropriate to integrate additional landscaping/physical barriers between the dining area and the parking lot to more effectively protect patrons from an errant car. 8. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 18 of 21 January 17, 2005 y • seek and amendment to the special use. 9. The maximum seating capacities for each outdoor dining area would be established at time of permit per the building and life safety code as adopted by the Village of Oak Brook. 10. The approved outdoor dining areas are to be used for outdoor dining purpose only and in no way to be used as a party deck. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6—Members Adrian, Braune, Bulin, Goel, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Nays: 0—None. Absent: 1 —Member Adrian. Motion Carried Motion by Member Goel, seconded by Member Braune to recommend for approval the text amendments as requested in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: 1. The applicant has proposed three text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to develop the Oak Brook Promenade as presented. 2. The amendment which would increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability with the two existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Route 83 and 16th Street). 3. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by the district for appurtenances may be appropriate for the proposed Oak Brook Promenade but may be excessive when compared to the other developments in the community. This provision may be limited to redevelopment projects of a particular size, scale or location. Appropriate language is to be added as determined by the Village Attorney. 4. The Plan Commission concurs with the concept of permitting increased building heights at the proposed location for the Oak Brook Promenade. The Village Board may consider a review of the other non-residential zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made. 5. As presented by the applicant, the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and will not negatively impact any adjacent property owners. 6. The proposed amendment to add health clubs as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. 7. No comments have been received from any property owner in Oak Brook that objects to the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 8. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factor required for a text amendment and as explained in writing under the text amendment tab on pages 3 through 6 in the case file. Roll Call Vote: • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 19 of 21 January 17, 2005 • Ayes: 6—Members Adrian, Braune,Bulin, Goel, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Nays: 0—None. Absent: 1 —Member Adrian. Motion Carried Motion by Member Goel, seconded by Member Braune to recommend for approval of a final plat of consolidation and a variation to the Subdivision Regulations. In making this recommendation, the Plan Commission finds that: 1. The proposed plat consolidates the five existing parcels that are of this project into one parcel. One of these parcels is contiguous to the site but is presently outside the Village limits (i.e., unincorporated). 2. The single 19.7-acre parcel will accommodate an approximate 180,000 square foot mixed-use project consisting of retail, restaurant and office uses. 3. The proposed variations to the Subdivision Regulations request by the applicant relates to required monumentation and public utility easements. 4. Because the site is already developed and a portion of the site improvement will be maintained, the variation to the monumentation requirement is being requested. 5. With respect to the requested variation, the Village has in the past (700/800 Commerce) approved a similar request. 6. The final plat consolidation satisfies all other aspects and requirements for the Village's Subdivision Regulations including that neither the proposed • variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent properties. 7. That the applicant addresses all issues raised by Village Engineer Durfey in his memorandum dated January 12, 2005 on page 12 of the case file including final engineering approval. 8. Annexation approval of the unincorporated parcel as a condition of final approval by the Village. 9. Future dedication to DuPage County of the Meyers Road right of way. 10. No comments have been received from any property owner in Oak Brook that objects to the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: 6—Members Adrian, Braune, Bulin, Goel, Tropinski, Wolin and Chairwoman Payovich Nays: 0—None. Absent: 1 —Member Adrian. Motion Carried 6. OTHER BUSINESS OTHERBUSINESS There was no other business to discuss. 7. ADJOURNMENT: ADJOURMENT Motion by Member Braune, seconded by Member Wolin to adjourn the meeting at • VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission Minutes Page 20 of 21 January 17, 2005 /k. s i VI E OF 041( P 9 � 9 O n o January 27,2005 ? s e t a 9CecouNTl Village of Dear Resident/Neighbor: Oak Brook The Oak Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be considering a map 1200 Oak Brook Road amendment,text amendments,variations,and special use at the meetings scheduled at the end Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 of this notice. The Plan Commission heard these matters as well as a request for a final plat Website of consolidation at its meeting on January 17,2005. www.oak-brook.org Administration The application has been filed by: NAI Hiffinan 630.990.3000 One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 FAX 630.990.0876 Oakbrook Terrace,Illinois 60181 For: St.Paul Properties,Inc. Community Development The property in question is located at: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road 630.990.3045 Southwest corner of Meyers and Butterfield Road FAX 630.9930.99 0.3.3 985 Y Engineering Relationship of applicant to property: Property Owner's Developer Department 630.990.3010 Also shown at the end of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you in determining your FAX 630.990.3985 relationship to the property in question. Fire Department The 3 a pp licant is seeking approval of the followin g a map amendment to rezone the 0.990.3040 630.990.2392 properties located at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road from ORA-1 to B-1; several text amendments and variations; a special use for outdoor dining and a plat of consolidation in Police Department order to facilitate the construction of a 180,000+ square foot upscale retail and commercial 630.990.2358 center to be known as the Oak Brook Promenade. The site is presently zoned ORA-1 and FAX 630.990.7484 improved with three office buildings.A detailed description of the requests is as follows: Public Works PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT Department 630.990.3044 The map amendment proposed is to rezone the subject property from ORAL to B1. FAX 630.472.0223 PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS Oak Brook The text is proposed to be amended as follows: (underlined text indicates new text to be Public Library added,strikethrough indicates deleted text) 600 Oak Brook Road Section 13-7A-1—add text to permitted uses—health clubs Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Section 13-7A-3 —amend text—Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet 30' fifty feet 630.990.2222 �) g rtY ( ) fty FAX 630.990.4509 (50')and not more than two(2)stories. Oak Brook Sports Core Section 13-3-8 — amend text — No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural Bath&Tennis Club ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is 700 Oak Brook Road located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and Jak Brook,IL 60523-4600 television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the 630.990.3020 village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, FAX 630.990.1002 i stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or *Golf Club other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet 2606 York Road (15')thirty feet(30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be yak Brook,IL 60523-4602 for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 t PROPOSED VARIATIONS • Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement—Yards—requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty-foot(50')setback. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches(12") or project higher than thirty feet(30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet(36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30')allowed by Code. Section 13-124(C) Design and Maintenance —Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three(3)bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four (4) parking bays to the west of building "B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3)bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50%open space. Section 13-124(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15)interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4"-6"caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. • Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively,although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations—In Yards—requires that off-street parking spaces,open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property,there would be inadequate parking for the Project. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations — Access — requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent(40%)of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the wester Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet(292')to the east • of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet(340')to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet(108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, /� Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-REVISED DATES-Res.ltr.doc /'A • the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. PROPOSED SPECIAL USE Pursuant to Section 13-14-9 and Section 13-7A-2, Petitioner is requesting a special use to allow for outdoor dining adjacent to the sit-down restaurants. All of the outdoor seating areas will be consistent with the upscale nature and interiors of the restaurants. If you desire more detailed information,please contact the Community Development Department at 630- 990-3045 to review the file on this application. Sincerely, Robert L. Kallien,J , ICP Director of Co ity De lopment RLK/gp • • Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-REVISED DATES-Res.ltr.doc �� In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a • reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline, the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, Butler Government Center located on Oak Brook Road(31st Street) and Spring Road,Oak Brook,Illinois. Zoning Board of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,February 1,2005* Special Zoning Board of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,February 15,2005** Board of Trustees Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,March 8,2005*** *The applicant will be providing an overview of the project at this meeting and will be asldng for a continuance. **The applicant will be providing a complete presentation at this Special Meeting. ***Tentative. a2 LOCATION T z8o� OF SuB,EC ?8a6 _ - 6 4 PROPERTY ' M P T I K p $ g q x Ig Y.wco aal 6 la M 17 a A 03 OPQloa 6, 8 6 Ib K�° 9 7 S 2z o 23 V 0 1 c 1 v��� 31zS W Q sz s° rz 24 22 zO 17 z6 V W I .2a `S P4 23 21 34 9x �O a 4 3y a a a c K 36 39 f? I e � 4 2 8 G :� 41 ml a 1a �NH 41 42 9 �YNPIq 43 9 44 0 12 t2 0 zaao 14 6.. 46 46 14 1!1 4/ 4s • *Note: The map provided is only an aoaroximation of the area in question and is intended to be used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the property Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-REVISED DATES-Res.ltr.doc /7.c6 e NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS . Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads,streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement.. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds(or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within'30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule. NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PARCEL PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER P'O' DMG Real Estate Attn: Chief Exec. Technology Drive, 06-28-103-016 Holdings, L.L.C. 799 Roosevelt .Rd Suite 200 Lombard Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 The Commonwealth Ediso P/o Property Tax Department 3125 Butterfield 06-28-103-002 .Company P.O. Box 767 Oakbrook, T11jnnj,.q An';7'. Chicago, Illinois 60690 Fountain Square of Re: 06-28-103-017 Technology Drive, 06-28-103-017 Chicago, Illinois 60602 rity Capital c/o The Shaw Co-D Stine Butterfield Rd. , 06-28-101-005 Lodging, Inc. 2001 York Rd. , No. 550 Lombard Uakbrook, II11nols Glenborough Properties, 400 S. E1 Camino Real 2905 West Butterfield 06-28-104-011 L.P., a California San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 partnership Inland Property Sales, 2901 West Butterfield 2901 West Butterfield 06-28-104-015, Inc. Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 County .of• DuPage, a bod 2901 West Butterfield 2901 West Butterfield 06-28-104-015 corporate & Politic Oakbrook, CP GAL Lombard, L.L.C. 400 S. E1 Camino Real 2907 Butterfield Rd. 06=28-104-013 San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 Northern Illinois Gas Real Estate Meyer Rd, 06-28-104-014 Company P.O. Box 190 Oakbrook no s PLEASE SEE ATTACHED (*Attach additional sheets for each if necessary) 112005 NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS • NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS PIN OWNER Leonard Stutz&Sons,Inc. 10 Wyndham Ct. 10 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-105-001 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Sebastian Mattos 8 Wyndham Ct. 8 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-105-002 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Gregory&Rebecca Ing 6 Wyndham Ct. 6 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-105-003 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 First National Bank Trust 410B 4 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-105-004 620 West Burlington Ave. Oak Brook,IL 60523 LaGrange,IL 60525 Adam Ramsey 6 Swaps Court 6 Swaps Court 06-28-105-007 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 John H. &Judith Gove 4 Swaps Court 4 Swaps Court 06-28-105-008 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Thorman W. Giesche 400 Main Street 12 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-302-001 Glen Ellyn,IL 60137 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Vincent&B.DePhillips 14 Wyndham Ct. 14 Wyndham Ct. 06-28-302-002 • Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 A E Bluhm PO Box 114 2700 S.Meyers Road 06-28-300-003 Downer's Grove, IL 60515 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 2710 Meyers Road 06-28-300-037 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road 2710 Meyers Road 06-28-300-038 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Village of Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook 06-28-300-039 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Western National Bank PO Box 114 2720 Meyers Road 06-28-300-005 Trust 3434 Downer's Grove,IL 60515 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Sylvia J.Veith TR 18W723 Avenue Chateaux N 18W723 Avenue Chateaux East 06-28-300-019 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Raj &Aruna Bodepudi 19WO10 Avenue Chateaux North 19WO10 North Chateaux 06-28-300-012 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 S&S Suitana Shadikhan 18W784 Avenue Chateaux North 18W784 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-013 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 1 • NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS PIN OWNER Earnest Karras 18W772 Avenue Chateaux North 18W772 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-014 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Malgorzata Paterek 18W758 Avenue Chateaux North 18W758 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-015 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Jeanette DeBoer 18W740 Avenue Chateaux North 18W736 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-016 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Joseph&Shirley Carbone 18W736 Avenue Chateaux North 18W736 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-017 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Domenic&Cecilia Parato 18W730 Avenue Chateaux North 18W730 Avenue Chateaux North 06-28-300-018 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Weber Stephen Products,Co. Attn: Leonard S. Gryn 2331 South Fountain Square 06-28-101-007 200 East Daniels Road Lombard,IL 60148 Palatine,IL 60067 Champps' Entertainment Attn:Mark Melnick 2301 South Fountain Square 06-28-101-008 10375 Park Meadow,No. 560 Lombard,IL 60148 Littleton, CO. 80124 • PF Chang's China Bistro c/o V.Ahlstrom 2361 South Fountain Square 06-28-101-006 15210 N. Scottsdale#300 Lombard, IL 60148 Scottsdale,AZ 85254 Victor P.Bodzanowski 1 North Tower Road 1 North Tower Road 06-28-108-008 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 LaSalle National Bank TR B7801008630 3 North Tower Road 06-28-108-009 135 S.LaSalle,No.2500 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Chicago,IL 60603 Joseph Connelly&K Cooney 5 North Tower Road 5 North Tower Road 06-28-108-010 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Jerri L.Mitchell 7 North Tower Road 7 North Tower Road 06-28-108-011 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Aristotle Kornaros 1350 N.Astor Street,No.9A 9 North Tower Road 06-28-108-012 Chicago,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Christopher A.Leone 11 North Tower Road 11 North Tower Road 06-28-108-013 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Charles&Marlene Erdman 15 North Tower Road 15 North Tower Road 06-28-108-014 Oak Brook,IL 60523 Oak Brook,IL 60523 • CP Galyan Lombard,L.L.C. c/o Galyan Trading Co.Inc. 2400 Fountain Square 06-28-100-013 2437 E.Main Street Lombard,IL 60148 Plainfield,IN 46168 2 7v NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS PIN • OWNER WA Fleckles 1033 East St. Charles Road 2370 Fountain Square 06-28-100-019 Lombard,IL 60148 Lombard,IL 60148 Richard Hurd Liberty,L.L.C. 6900 Westown Parkway 2360 Fountain Square 06-28-100-022 W.Des Moines, IA 50266 Lombard, IL 60148 Attn: Richard W.Hurd Chesapeake Companies 2370 Fountain Square Drive 06-28-100-017 Investment Group,L.L.C. Lombard,IL 60148 • • 3 107j GE OF Oq/. P ego A N . ? Date: January 17, 2005 -f �OUNTV Village of To: Plan Commission Oak Brook From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director 1200 Oak Brook Road Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Subject: Framework for Proposed Recommendations — Oak Brook www.oak-brook.org Promenade Administration 630.990.3000 At the request of several Plan Commissioner's, I have prepared draft motions FAX 630.990.0876 (including specific findings) relative to each of the requested actions for the Community above referenced case. Development Final Plat of Consolidation - if it is your wish to recommend approval, it 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 appropriate would be a ro riate to move that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the request from NAI Hiffinan, on behalf of the St. Paul Properties, Inc., the Engineering owners of the property at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road for a final plat Department of consolidation and a variation to the subdivision regulations. In making this 630.990.3010 recommendation FAX 6300.990.3.990.3 985 , the Commission finds that: ire Department 1. The proposed plat consolidates the five existing parcels that are of this W,X 30.990.3040 project into one parcel. One of these parcels is contiguous to the site but 630.990.2392 is presently outside of the Village limits (i.e.,unincorporated). Police Department 2. The single, 18.2 acre parcel will accommodate a 180,000 sq.ft. mixed 630.990.2358 use project consisting of retail,restaurant and office uses. FAX 630.990.7484 3. The proposed variation to the subdivision regulations requested by the Public Works ,applicant relates to required monumentation. Department 630.990.3044 4. Because the site is already developed and a portion of the site FAX 630.472.0223 improvement will be maintained, the variation to the monumentation requirement is being requested. Oak Brook Public Library 5. With respect to the requested variation, the Village has in the past (700/800 Commerce) approved a similar request. 600 Oak Brook Road 6. The final consolidation'plat of lidation satisfies all other aspects and yak Brook,IL 60523-2200 p p 630.990.2222 requirements for the Village's Subdivision Regulations including that FAX 630.990.4509 neither the proposed variation nor final plat conflicts with any adjacent Oak Brook Snorts Core properties. 7. That the applicant address all issues raised by Village Engineer Durfey Bath&Tennis Club including final engineering and annexation of the unincorporated parcel 700 Oak Brook Road as a condition of final approval by the Village. yak Brook,IL 60523-4600 630.990.3020 Map Amendment — if it is your wish to recommend approval, it would be *Golf 30.990.1002 appropriate to move that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the Club request from NAI Hiffinan, on behalf of the St. Paul Properties, Inc., the owners 2606 York Road of the property at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road for a map amendment yak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 Aa January 17,2005 Plan Commission RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 2 from ORA-1 to B-1. In making this recommendation, the Commission finds that: 1. The 18.2 acres is zoned ORA-1 and has been zoned/used for non- residential purposes for nearly 30 years. 2. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor in this area is home to a variety of office, commercial and restaurant uses. 3. Recent development/redevelopment activities in close proximity to the proposed development have resulted in a number of new commercial properties, in particular the Fountain Square development located directly to the north and the Embassy Suites development to the west. 4. The prevalent land use to the north and west of the Oak Brook Promenade site is retail. 5. In Oak Brook, at least two recent redevelopment projects (i.e., Shops of Oak Brook and Costco) have been approved and developed which involved a change in previous Office/warehouse use to a retail use. • 6. An amendment which changes the zoning of the subject property to B-1, and development of the Oak Brook Promenade would in fact be consistent with the surrounding development. 7. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a map amendment (see pages 2-15 of the map amendment section of the case file). 8. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed map amendment will negatively impact the adjacent properties. Special Use— if it is your wish to recommend approval, it would be appropriate to move that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the request from NAI Hiffinan, on behalf of the St. Paul Properties, Inc., the owners of the property at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road for a special use to permit outdoor dining as part of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation,the Commission fords that: 1. The developer is proposing that the Oak Brook Promenade have up to three upscale restaurants as part of its final tenant mix. 2. Most of the more upscale restaurants in the Village including a number • located at the Oakbrook Center as well as several along 22nd Street have approved special uses for outdoor dining arrangements and successfully PC-OakBrookPromenade-Plat-FINDINGS.doc ��`� January 17,2005 • Plan Commission RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 3 operate those facilities for the benefit of their patrons as well the community. 3. Even though the specifics are not known at this time concerning the actual restaurants that will be locating in the Oak Brook Promenade, the applicant has proposed as part of their special use, specific design criteria that will control the location, size, design, lighting and operational aspects of each outdoor dining area. 4. The outdoor dining arrangements proposed by the applicant are consistent with previously approved special uses for other outdoor dining arrangements in the Village. 5. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a special use (see the special use section of the case file). 6. No comments have been received from the neighboring property owners that the proposed special use will negatively impact the adjacent properties. 7. With regard to the outdoor dining area proposed for building K, it may • be appropriate to integrate additional landscaping/physical barriers between the dining area and the parking lot to more effectively protect patrons from an errant car. Text Amendments — if it is your wish to recommend approval, it would be appropriate to move that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the request from NAI Hiffman, on behalf of the St. Paul Properties, Inc., the owners of the property at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road for several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to facilitate construction of the proposed Oak Brook Promenade project. In making this recommendation, the Commission finds that: 1. The applicant has proposed three text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance in order to develop the Oak Brook Promenade as presented. 2. The amendment which would increase the maximum height of structures in the B-1 District would have applicability with the two existing parcels zoned B-1 (the two shopping centers at the northwest and northeast corner of Rte. 83 and 16th) 3. The amendment to permit an additional 30 feet of height above the maximum permitted by the District for appurtenances may be appropriate for the proposed Oak Brook Promenade but may be • excessive when compared to other developments in the community. This provision may need to be limited to redevelopment projects of a particular size, scale or location. PC-OakBrookPromenade-Plat-FINDINGS.doc January 17,2005 • Plan Commission RE: Oak Brook Promenade Page 4 4. If the Plan Commission concurs with the concept of permitting increased building height at the proposed location for the Oak Brook Promenade, the Village sAWtonsider a review of the other non-residential zoning districts to determine what changes if any should be made. 5. As presented by the applicant, the proposed increased structure height for the Oak Brook Promenade is deemed reasonable and will not negatively impact any adjacent property owners. 6. With respect to the proposed amendment to add health clubs as a permitted use in the B-1 District is deemed reasonable for not only the Oak Brook Promenade but any B-1 property in the Village. 7. No comments have been received from any property owner in Oak. Brook that objects to the proposed text amendments to the Zoning' Ordinance. 8. The applicant has addressed all of the applicable factors required for a text amendment (see pages 3-6 of the text amendment section of the case file). • • PC-OakBrookPromenade-Plat-FINDINGS.doc /� G�, OF OAK P d 90 o a .f ® A h O �COU Date: January 14, 2005 Village of To: Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road From: Robert L. Kallien Jr., Community Development Director Oak Brook,IL 60523-2255 Website Subject: Proposed Oak Brook Promenade - Summary www.oak-brook.org Administration NAI Hiffman, on behalf of St. Paul Properties, Inc. has submitted a very significant 630.990.3000 redevelopment proposal for the 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of FAX 630.990.0876 Butterfield and Meyers Road. If approved, the three existing office buildings would Community be demolished and replaced by an approximate 180,000 sq.ft. upscale commercial Development center comprised of a mix of restaurant, retail and office users. Information has been 630.990.3045 provided to the Village from the developer that a retail center with the proposed mix FAX 630.990.3985 of tenants can generate annual sales tax receipts in excess of one million dollars. Engineering Department To bring this project to fruition, the developer is requesting approval by the Village of 630.990.3010 Oak Brook, of a final plat of consolidation, map amendment, a special use for outdoor FAX 630.990.3985 dining, text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and several variations. After many Fire Department meetings and discussions with Staff, the applicant has prepared a very detailed project 630.990.3040 book that discusses each of the requested actions and contains a number of maps, site 630.990.2392 plans, graphics and illustrations to help understand the various details which relate to W Police Department the project. 630.990.2358 FAX 630.990.7484 To help you understand several important aspects of this project, the following Public Works information has been assembled for your review: Department 630.990.3044 1. Existing Zoning/Use—ORA-1, improved with three office buildings. FAX 630.472.0223 2. Proposed Zoning/Use—B-1, improved with an approximate 180,000 sq.ft. "life style center" consisting of restaurants, retail and limited offices. Oak Brook 3. Consistency with B-1 District — all proposed uses (except the health club) are Public Library listed as either a permitted or special use. The health club issue will be 600 Oak Brook Road addressed as a text amendment while the outdoor dining areas will be Oak Brook,IL 60523-2200 addressed with a special use. 630.990.2222 4. Parking—Based on the mix of uses, the project requires 1080+parking spaces. FAX 630.990.4509 The Oak Brook Promenade project provides 1084 parking spaces. Oak Brook Sports Core 5. Traffic — the applicant has retained the services of traffic consultant who can address the impact on the adjacent roadways. Bath&Tennis Club 6. Landscaping — the applicant has retained the services of a landscape architect 700 Oak Brook Road who has prepared a number of illustrations on the extensive landscaping that Oak Brook,IL 60523-4600 this project will offer. 630.990.3020 FAX 630.990.1002 7. Impact of proposed building elevations and design guidelines — the applicant has indicated that the final project will be developed in substantial �GolfClub conformance with the approved plans. However, the proposal (as submitted) 06 York Road does offer the applicant some flexibility to address specific tenant needs. Oak Brook,IL 60523-4602 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 I look forward to your upcoming meetings on this important redevelopment project. Afa"' VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14, 2005 FILE NOS: 2005-001-MA DESCRIPTION: Map amendment from ORA-1 to B-1 to accommodate the future redevelopment of the property. PETITIONERS: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc. One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. ADDRESS: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road ACREAGE: 18.2 acres EXISTING ZONING/USE: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, presently improved with three office buildings ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Fountain Square, Commercial/retail development located in the Village of Lombard. South: R-2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Interstate 88, water reservoir and single family homes. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, multi-story office buildings. West: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, Com-Ed electric substation. DISCUSSION: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., has submitted a petition seeking approval of a map amendment from ORA-1 to B-1 to accommodate the future redevelopment of the property into an upscale retail/restaurant/office project. The 18.2 acre site consists of four parcels—three within the Village and one unincorporated tract. The site is presently improved with three office buildings which will be demolished to accommodate the new project. Under the proposed redevelopment plan for the property, the applicant will also be seeking additional approvals from the Village regarding a plat of consolidation, STAFF REPORT—MAP AMENDMENT OAK BROOK PROMENADE-3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE N0.2005-001-MA annexation of the unincorporated tract, text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, a special use for outdoor dining and several variations. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for this request. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed map amendment (rezoning) to B-1 for the subject properties is consistent with the recent developments along the Butterfield/22°a Street corridor. Directly to the north of this site, the Village of Lombard has approved Fountain Square, which contains a number of upscale restaurants and retail oriented uses. The impact that the rezoning will have on the ComEd substation site, which is the western-most parcel zoned ORA-1, should be minimal because it is already developed with utility facilities. With respect to redevelopment along the Butterfield Road/22"d Street corridor in Oak Brook, two more recent redevelopment projects have been quite successful including the development of the Shops of Oak Brook (former Illinois Tollway facility) and the Costco store (former Kodak facility). RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Plan Commission has the responsibility to make a recommendation on this request for a map amendment. The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to hold the required public hearing on the map amendment and make recommendations on this request. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a map amendment. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address these standards. CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by Staff, if it is the opinion of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for a map amendment, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request. Respectfully Submitted, Robert . KalIien Jr.,rvyDevelopment P Director of Comm 2 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 2005 FILE NOS: 2005-003-FP DESCRIPTION: Final plat of consolidation and a variation to Section 14-6-3(J) of the Subdivision Regulations. PETITIONERS: NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc. One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. ADDRESS: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road ACREAGE: 18.2 acres EXISTING ZONING/USE: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, presently improved with three office buildings ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Fountain Square, Commercial/retail development located in the Village of Lombard. South: R-2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Interstate 88, water reservoir and single family homes. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, multi-story office buildings. West: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, Com-Ed electric substation. DISCUSSION: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., has submitted an application seeking approval of a final plat of consolidation for the four parcels, encompassing 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road in the Village of Oak Brook. The three existing developed parcels (3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield) in the Village and a one acre unincorporated parcel previously owned by the Illinois Toll Authority now make up this site. The requested action would consolidate the four parcels into one in order to accommodate the proposed construction of the Oak Brook Promenade STAFF REPORT—FINAL PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-003-FP project. As part of this request, the applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14-6-3(J)—required monumentation Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for this request. Staff Comments: 1. Village Engineer Durfey has reviewed this submittal and has summarized his comments in his January 12, 2005 memorandum (see included in case file). 2. The proposed variation to the Subdivision Regulations relative to the requirement for monumentation is similar to recent requests for resubdivision of 700/800 Commerce Drive and the property at 120 22nd Street. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Plan Commission has the responsibility to make a recommendation on this request to approve the final plat of consolidation. CONCLUSION: If the Plan Commission is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfied both the requirements for a final plat of consolidation as well as a variation to the Subdivision Regulations, a recommendation would be in order to approve these requests as presented. Also, the Commission is authorized to recommend additional changes and/or modifications as they see fit. Respectfully Submitted, Robert L. Kall' Jr., AICP Director of Community Development 2 6�OF 0.4r P X90 n G C A V� VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: January 12,2005 TO: Robert L. Kallien,Jr.,Director of Community Development FROM: Dale L. Durfey,Jr.,P.E., Village Engineer SUBJECT: NAI Hiffman Butterfield Road Subdivision—Final Plat I have reviewed the final plat submitted on December 15, 2004, and the revised plat submitted on January 10, 2005, and offer the following comments: 1. The application states that the applicant owns five parcels of property totaling 19.7 acres. The • parcels include the old Waste Management Office site, the site currently housing the Earth Tech offices, and other open space parcels. The land is encumbered in the rear by existing ComEd high tension wires and a large Nicor gas main. The applicant wishes to consolidate these parcels into a single lot. Staff is working with the surveyor regarding the potential dedication of that portion of the property that lies within Meyers Road. 2. The plat currently does not depict the required six (6') foot side yard and ten (10') foot rear yard public utility easements. I understand that the applicant may apply for a variation. Unless a variation is granted,the plat must depict the required easements. 3. Parcel 5 is currently outside the Village limits. I understand that the applicant wishes to annex it into Oak Brook. Therefore, an annexation plat needs to be prepared and submitted. The Annexation Plat must be recorded prior to the final plat since the final plat currently does not contain any mention of DuPage County or Lombard. 4. Several minor drafting revisions need to be made to the plat. 5. A note needs to be added to the plat regarding conformance with Section 14-6-3J concerning survey monuments and markers. In the alternative, the applicant may apply for a variation. In discussing this with the surveyor, it seems appropriate to grant a variation (some of the corners lie within asphalt or concrete) as has been done on previous similar commercial subdivision • applications. nai hiffman rk 2.doc /� ' 6. The revised plat depicts "50' building setback line per Ordinance ". I understand • that the applicant has requested a building setback variation from the required 60' to 50'. Assuming the Village grants that variation, staff will confer with the Village Attorney to decide whether the plat should depict the 50' building setback line or the Ordinance required 60' setback line and then rely on the variation for building permits. 7. The subdivision plat also depicts certain existing easements which are noted as"hereby vacated." These easements entail electric and telephone rights in certain areas and water main and sanitary sewer rights in other areas. Regarding the Village's release of its water main rights along the easterly and southerly side of Parcel 3, this appears to be appropriate and I recommend their vacation. The applicant needs to secure approvals from the various other utility agencies. 8. On Sheet 2 of the plat, proposed sanitary sewer easements and water main easements are depicted in accordance with the preliminary site development plans. As the development process proceeds, staff will check the proper location of these easements. I have discussed these issues with the applicant's surveyor. • • nai hiffman rk 2.doc � VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14, 2005 FILE NOS: 2005-004-TA DESCRIPTION: Text Amendments to Section 13-7A-1, 13-7A-3(B), and Section 13-3-8 of the Zoning Ordinance. PETITIONERS: NAI Hifftnan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc. One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 DISCUSSION: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., has submitted petitions seeking approval of several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as part of an overall request in order to construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft. "upscale" retail center on 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road. In order to develop a project with the size, scale and proposed uses, the petitioner is seeking a number of approvals from the Village including a final plat of consolidation, map amendment, special use for outdoor dining, several variations and several text amendments. A detailed description of each of text amendment is summarized in the following (new language is underlined, deleted language is shown with a strike- through). Also, the specific text amendments as requested by the applicant are contained in the case file. Text Amendments: 1. Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs. Staff Comment — This amendment will permit health clubs in the B-1 District as a permitted use. There is no evidence that the amendment will negatively impact the other two retail center properties zoned B-1 in the Village. 2. Section 13-7A-3(B) — amend text — Structure Height: Not more than thit4., feet (3" fifty feet 50'1 and not more than two (2) stories. Staff Comment — The maximum height in the B-1 District is 30 feet. Since the Village recently increased the maximum height of all new residential structures in the Village, this change is STAFF REPORT—TEXT AMENDMENTS OAK BROOK PROMENADE-3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-004-TA consistent with that effort. If approved, this amendment would impact the two other B-1 areas in Oak Brook (northeast and northwest corners of Rte. 83 and 16`h). With respect to the impact on this property, since the existing ORA-1 zoning permits a maximum building height of 76 feet, the effect of this amendment along with the proposed rezoning to B-1 will result in less height than what can now be constructed. 3. Section 13-3-8 — amend text — No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet "`'` thirty feet (30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. Staff Comments — See comments to text amendment #2. In addition, the additional height will provide the applicant with additional flexibility to integrate a variety of roof lines and architectural features into the overall design of the project. The approval of these amendments which increase the maximum height in the B-1 District will result in maximum building height in the Oak Brook Promenade of 80 feet (principal building 50 feet and 30 feet of additional height for ornamental features and mechanicals) which is still less than the 91 feet (principal building 76 feet and 15 feet of additional height for amenities listed in 13-3-of the Zoning Ordinance) that is permitted in the ORA-1 District.. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Plan Commission has the responsibility to make a recommendation on this request for a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to hold the required public hearing on the text amendment and make recommendations on this request. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a text 2 STAFF REPORT—TEXT AMENDMENTS OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-004-TA amendment. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by Staff, if it is the opinion of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for text amendments, a recommendation would be in order to approve these requests. Respectfully Submitted, v Robert L. K(ajWh Jr., AICP Director of Community Development 3 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14, 2005 FILE NOS: 2005-002-SU DESCRIPTION: Special Use—outdoor dining arrangement. PETITIONERS: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc. One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. ADDRESS: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road ACREAGE: 18.2 acres EXISTING ZONING/USE: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, presently improved with three office buildings ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Fountain Square, Commercial/retail development located in the Village of Lombard. South: R-2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Interstate 88, water reservoir and single family homes. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, multi-story office buildings. West: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, Com-Ed electric substation. DISCUSSION: NAI Hiffman on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., has submitted a petition seeking approval of a special use for outdoor dining adjacent to the three proposed restaurants that are part of the Oak Brook Promenade redevelopment project. Since the specific restaurant users are unknown at this time, the applicant is seeking the special use which establishes the location, operational framework and design criteria for a "typical" outdoor dining area that is anticipated for each of the three planned sit-down restaurants. The outdoor dining areas proposed for buildings A and B would be approximately 24-ft. deep and are oriented towards the five acre water feature located at the corner of Butterfield and Meyers Road. The outdoor dining area for building B is proposed to be the largest of all facilities that are part of this special use. The smallest of the three outdoor dining areas is proposed for the east side of building K and will be approximately 15-ft. deep. Access to the each of the outdoor dining areas would be from within • STAFF REPORT-SPECIAL USE-OUTDOOR DINING OAK BROOK PROMENADE-3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-002-SU the restaurant and would include decorative fencing, lighting and landscaping. Similar to other outdoor dining areas that have been approved in the Village, it is expected that these dining areas will be utilized between April 1St and October 15th of each year (weather permitting) and will not offer live music. Under the proposed redevelopment plan for the property, the applicant will also be seeking additional approvals from the Village regarding a plat of consolidation, annexation of the unincorporated tract, text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, a special use for outdoor dining and several variations. Please see the materials provided by the petitioner in the case file for a more detailed description and the rationale for this request. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed special use for outdoor dining at the Oak Brook Promenade development establishes the location, general size and design criteria for up to three outdoor dining areas. The applicant is however requesting some flexibility to address the needs of actual restaurant users. As the project is leased out to specific restaurant users (i.e., tenant), the application and use of the special use for outdoor dining must then be developed in substantial conformance with the approved plans and conditions that are made part of this request. Any future outdoor dining area that is proposed to be constructed that is not in substantial conformance to the approved special use would be required to seek an amendment to the special use. Staff has two comments relative to the special use request. With respect to the outdoor dining area planned for building K, additional safety measures should be incorporated into the design of the area between the actual dining area and the three adjacent parking spaces that face the facility. In addition, all other requests for outdoor dining that have been approved by the Village contain a condition which limits the maximum seating capacity. As such, the applicant should be required to address this issue. RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Plan Commission has the responsibility to make a recommendation on this request for a special use. The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to hold the required public hearing on the map amendment and make recommendations on this request. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a special use. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address each of these standards. 2 /6 1 A STAFF REPORT—SPECIAL USE—OUTDOOR DINING OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-002-SU CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by Staff, if it is the opinion of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for a special use, a recommendation would be in order to approve this request subject to the following conditions: I. Development in substantial conformance with the approved plans including the location, size, design and operational guidelines for each outdoor dining area. 2. Additional safety measures should be considered for the outdoor dining area proposed for building K. 3. Establish a maximum seating capacity for each of the three outdoor dining facilities 4. Other conditions relevant to the special use request. Respectfully Submitted, az;��kaww- Robert L. Kal ' n Jr. AICP Director of Cct2Lm ity Development 3 •6 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Zoning Board of Appeals STAFF REPORT DATE: January 14, 2005 FILE NOS: 2005-005-VAR DESCRIPTION: Variations to Section 13-7A-3(C)(1)(c), Section 13-11-7(A)-4, Section 13- 12-4(C), Section 13-12-3(C), 13-12-3(H), and Section 13-12-3(E)-4 PETITIONERS: NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc. One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Meyers Road and Butterfield Road. I ADDRESS: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road ACREAGE: 18.2 acres EXISTING ZONING/USE: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, presently improved with three office buildings ZONING/USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: North: Fountain Square, Commercial/retail development located in the Village of Lombard. South: R-2, Single-Family Detached Residence District, Interstate 88, water reservoir and single family homes. East: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, multi-story office buildings. West: ORA-1, Office-Research-Assembly District, Com-Ed electric substation. DISCUSSION: NAI Hiffinan on behalf of the owner, St. Paul Properties, Inc., has submitted petitions seeking approval of several variations to the Zoning Ordinance as part of their overall request to construct the Oak Brook Promenade, a 180,000 sq.ft. "upscale" retail center on 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Butterfield Road and Meyers Road. In order to develop a project with the size, scale and proposed uses, the petitioner is seeking a number of approvals from the Village including a final plat of consolidation, map amendment, special use for outdoor dining, several variations and several text amendments. With regard to the variations, a detailed description of each request is summarized in the following: STAFF REPORT—VARIATIONS OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-005-VAR Variations: 1. Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) Lot Area Requirement—Yards— requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot (50') setback. Staff Comments—Size and configuration of site affects ultimate location of buildings. Landscaping between building K and Butterfield Road should help to mitigate the 10 ft. reduction in the required setback. 2. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height— which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet (36') from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30') allowed by Code. Staff Comments— The variation to permit signs that would allow blade and fin signs to project up to 30 inches is consistent with the signage provisions applicable to Oak Brook Center which is zoned B-2. The applicant's request to increase the height of signs from 30- ft. to 36 ft.for this project is consistent with the proposed text amendment which would increase the maximum height of buildings in the B-1 District from 30 to 50 feet. 3. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3)bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four(4)parking bays to the west of building "B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3)bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. Staff Comments— The overall landscaping for the site is significantly more than the minimum required for a typical development in the B-1 District. 2 re OL STAFF REPORT—VARIATIONS OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-005-VAR 4. Section 13-12-4(C)Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping-requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet(40'),provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4"-6" caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. Staff Comments— The overall landscaping for the site exceeds ordinance requirements. Additional interior parking lot landscaping would eliminate a number of spaces which would then impact the applicant's ability to meet Village Code requirements relative to number of parking spaces. 5. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. Staff Comments— The overall landscaping for the site exceeds ordinance requirements. In addition, the existing underground parking area which will be maintained does affect the ability of the applicant to plant certain types of trees. 6. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations— Size and Aisles—requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking)to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. Staff Comments— The applicant is seeking approval of an aisle width that is consistent with the existing aisle widths found on the property. 24 ft. aisles are permitted for all office and hotel uses. . 7. Section 13-12-3(H) Off Street Parking Regulations—In Yards— requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in 3 STAFF REPORT—VARIATIONS OAK BROOK PROMENADE-3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-005-VAR nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks,because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property, there would be inadequate parking for the Project. Staff Comments—In most of these areas where the applicant is seeking a variation to permit less than a 10-ft. setback between the property line and parking spaces, a setback of approximately 6 ft. is provided. Landscaping in these areas should mitigate any impact especially since the reduced setback is being sought along the south side of the project, which backs to I-88 and the west property line which abuts an electric substation. 8. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations—Access— requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety- two feet (292') to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet (340') to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet (108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet(60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for a 400' space between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. Staff Comments— The site is now provided with three accesses onto Butterfield Road. Because the three existing office buildings are located on three lots, the driveways meet the spacing requirements of the Village Code. The plat of consolidation along with the applicant's desire to relocate the eastern access to the west, the requested variation is necessary. 4 A0 ,4b STAFF REPORT—VARIATIONS OAK BROOK PROMENADE—3001,3003 AND 3121 BUTTERFIELD ROAD CASE No.2005-005-VAR RESPONSIBILITIES OF HEARING BODIES: The Zoning Board of Appeals has the responsibility to hold the required public hearing and make a recommendation on these requests for variations to the Zoning Ordinance. Please include in your consideration, your findings with respect to the specific standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance for a variation. The materials submitted by the applicant specifically address these standards for each variation request. CONCLUSION: Based on the information provided by Staff, if it is the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals that the applicant has satisfied the applicable Ordinance requirements and factors for the variations, a recommendation would be in order to approve each of these requests. Respectfully Submitted, Robert L. Kallvu 'y CP Director of Co Develop ment 5 PG@ OF Ogke J � G Q v �0DUN-fY VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Interoffice Memorandum DATE: January 7, 2005 TO: Robert L. Kallien,Jr.,Director of Community Development FROM: Dale L. Durfey, Jr., P.E.,Village Enginee SUBJECT: Planning&Zoning Application NAI Hiffman Butterfield/Meyers Development Phil and I have perused the preliminary plans submitted to date, along with the Planning & Zoning submittal. At this point in the review, it appears that the following items do not meet code and require further explanatory discussion and/or variations: • 1. Building setbacks—I understand the application includes this variation request. 2. Section 13-124C involves several items: A. "In parking areas which are wider than one bay of double parking, interior shade trees shall be planted provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every 15 interior parking spaces." The rear of this site is encumbered by easements which contain high tension overhead electric wires and a large diameter underground gas main, which present certain issues on tree placement. However, it appears that additional tree barriers can be planted which might meet Village code. This needs to be reviewed with the applicant. B. "Landscaped dividers with a minimum width of 6' shall be provided between every 3 parking bays." The current plan submittal requests a variation in two locations. The northerly location can be mitigated and meet Code if the existing landscape divider was relocated one bay to the south. The southerly section is required due to the proposal of four parking spaces next to Building C. Due to its very small nature, this southerly variation seems to be appropriate. C. "Individual permanent planter areas (minimum size of 8'6" by 17') are required for interior trees...." The applicant is requesting a variation to this requirement in those areas on top of the existing underground parking areas just westerly of Building A. I also note that the future parking in the southerly portion of the site will be revised and included within this • development. As such, all of the necessary code requirements need to be met for this rear area. nai hiffman rk.doc • D. Interior shade trees shall be a minimum of 3" caliper. Many areas are utilizing ornamental trees which do not state their caliper and which probably do not meet the 3"requirement. 3. The proposed site plan depicts 24 foot parking bay aisles rather than the code required 27 foot (Section 13-12-3C). 4. Several pavement areas are not dimensioned; their review must therefore wait until a more detailed plan submittal. 5. Section 13-12-3E4 states that spacing between driveways must meet certain distance requirements. The three proposed driveways do not meet the criteria. 6. The scale on many of the landscape plans in the 3-ring binder are not correct. Additionally, the various tree species will be checked for appropriateness with the code when a more detailed plan is submitted. 7. I understand that your department will be reviewing the loading dock requirement for each building. 8. Phil and I met with the applicant's engineer on Tuesday, December 28, 2004. The engineer said that he would be supplying his stormwater management calculations. To date, they have not been received. Without their receipt and review,we cannot say if the proposal is adequate. • 9. Phil and I also met with Mike Meranda and Tom Stanfa concerning water main and fire lane issues. Tom said that he would be preparing a memo regarding Fire Department comments. To date, I have not seen his comments. We also confirmed that the proposed water main around the rear of the buildings is not required. I look forward to discussing this development with you and the applicant next Monday. • nai hiffman rk.doc �� Oak Brook Fire Prevention Bureau Date: Thursday, January 13, 2005 To: Bob Kallien From:Lt. Thomas Stanfa, Director Fire Prevention l RE: Proposed Premium Retail Center(3003 and 3001 Butterfield Road) • 1. Connected buildings with a common wall and no fire separation will require a common fire alarm and evacuation of all spaces. 2. Fire Department connection will be within 100' of a fire hydrant. 3. Fire protection mains will be looped. 4. Fire lane signage will not exceed 35' apart. 5. Minimum inside radius for roads shall be 28.5' 6. One way drive ways will not be less than 18' wide. 7. Underground parking shall have automatic sprinkler protection and emergency power available. 8. Barriers for retention ponds. 9. Verify type of automatic fire alarm system(single facp for each building/or each tenant having their own). 10. No Valet Parking in Fire Lanes, designated car holding areas only. 11. Verify ingress/egress to site for FD during construction phases to completion of site. 12. No fire protection main shall be less than 6". 0 17, WjIiEELBf-..SE 249- ' � I i 1 / / FRONT REEF I AXLE AXLE G Rgpl 3U�f'PER CLEAR FT- PLATFORI"', 95 ' F1D;:.iAL Id0TORa CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION • Paddock Publications, Inc. Dail y Herald Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that it is the publisher of the DAILY HERALD. That said DAILY HERALD is a secular newspaper and has been circulated daily in the Village(s) of Addison, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Glendale Heights, Glen Ellyn, Itasca, Keeneyville, Lisle, Lombard, Medinah, Naperville, Oak Brook, Oakbrook Terrace, Roselle, Villa Park, Warrenville, West Chicago, Wheaton, Winfield, Wood Dale County(ies) of DuPage and State of Illinois, continuously for more than one year prior to the date of the first publication of the notice hereinafter referred to and is of general circulation throughout said Village(s), County(ies) and State. • I further certify that the DAILY HERALD is a newspaper as defined in "an Act to revise the law in relation to notices" as amended in 1992 Illinois Compiled Statutes, Chapter 715, Act 5, Section 1 and 5. That a notice of which the annexed printed slip is a true copy, was published January 15, 2005 in said DAILY HERALD. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the said PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, Inc., has caused this certificate to be signed by, this authorized agent, at Arlington Heights, Illinois. PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. DAILY HERALD NEWSPAPERS BY� , ' _. • uthorized t Control # T3457392 • • rutsu%;nvll%;c ,...,,,,," .. DOCUMENT 950289)LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2(EXCEPT THBWESTERLY 265, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeal.of the Village FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF),IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 of Oak Brook,DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois,win be roll on February 1,2005,at 7:30 p.m.In INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2,OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, • the Samuel E.Dean Board Room of the Butler Government Center,Village of Oak Brook,1200 Oak TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE t i FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING Brook Road.Oak Brook.Illinois 60523 for the purpose of considering the application of NAt Hillman, TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8,1964 AS DOCUMENT R64.24069,IN DUPAGE One Oakbrook Terrace,Sole 600,Oakbrook Terrace,hands 60181 on behaff of the owner,St.Paul COUNTY,ILLINOIS;ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Properties,Inc.,395 Washington St.,Mae Code 511A,Minneapolis,Minnesola 55102 for a map THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO.NIG 2-63,AS SHOWN ON amendment,text amendments,special use and variations as provided for under Title 13 of the Zonng NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. N Ordinance o the Village of Oak Brock,IAkeis,Ordinance G•80 as emended. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The proposal is also being reviewed by the Plan Commission at their meeting of January 17,2005, COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION,AS revs p.m.at the same P t of Coro addition to the proposal listed below,the Plan Commerty to RECORDED OCTOBER 3,1989 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; . revises the proposed Plat of t comer of at its meeting.The Road,3 location a the property to be THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS FAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF Road. consolidated la the Southwest caner o Meyer and Bulterlleld Roetl,3001,3003 etb 3121 Butterfield SAID PARCEL NIG 2-83 BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY The petitioner has submitted a number d requests seeking approval o Me following:a map amend- M-1 INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2,AS RECORDED JULY S.1964 AS DOCUMENT R64.24069), 517.90 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN menu to rezone the properties located at 3001,3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road from ORA-1 to B-1; ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO.E-2-63.5;THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 several text amendments and variations;a special use for outdoor dining and a plat of consolidation SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO.E•2.83.5,94.36 FEET, in order to facAOale the construction of a 191,000 square toot upscale retail and commercial center MORE OR LESS,TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE;THENCE SOUTH 65 to be known as the Oak Brook Promenade. The site Is presently zoned ORA-1 and Improved with DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL three office buildings.A detailed description of the requests is as follows: NO.E-2-63.5,465.95 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO.E-2-63.5;THENCE NORTH 25 DEGREES The map amendment proposed is to rezone the subject property from ORAL to Bt. 46 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 26,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL The text Is proposed to be amended as follows: (underlined text Indicates row text to be added. MERIDIAN,IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS. strlkethrough Indicators dabled text) Section 13.7A-1-add text to pend6ed uses-health clubs PARCELS Section 13.7A3(B)-amend text-Structure Height:Not more than#;'Ky loot(29')tjgy fast(59 1 and 08-28.103.006 not more than two(2)stories, LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO.1,BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET _ AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF,OF LOT 21N BUTLER COMPANY M- Seetlon 13-3.8.am rtid text-No structure shall be eroded,converted,expanded,reconstructed or 1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF structurally&tiered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level,as determined SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, by the village engineer,for ere district In which the structure is located. However,this height Ihnit for ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO.1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, skylights,steeples,flagpoles.chimneys.redo and television aerials,wireless masts,or electric and 1969 AS DOCUMENT R6943878,IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS. lelephone.senvice poles anywhere M the village;and.meclank m al rooms,penthouses or root$true- lures for the housing of elevators,stairways,tanks,veM9ating fans or similar equipment,towers, PARCEL 4 water tanks,or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere In the village except residential districts- 06.28-103-011 shag be MaeeMeel f46')thirty feet(30.1 shwa the height limits of the district in which it is located EOd THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO.NIG 2.63 AS SHOWN ON shag be for ornamental oumnaes orgy and shall in no avert be nonmed. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, PROPOSED VARIATIONS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' Section 13.7A3(C)(1)(c)Lot Area Requirement.Yards.requires that buildings in B-1 district shell BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORD not be erected within a sixty loo(00')setback from the right-of-way. Pelgbnar Is requesting rotten ED OCTOBER 3,1969 AS DOCUMENT R69.43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 troll this requirement to allow lot a 0)setback ck fr m the setback. MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1,A DIS- TANCE OF 82.73 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTH- Section 13.11-7(A)4 Sign Herd-which govems signage for the B-1 zoning district,requires that all ERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-13.5;THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES building signs be properly affixed to the building wags,that the signs shall not extend outwards more 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 285.61 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE than twelve Inches(12-)or project higher than thirty feel(30').Petitioner is requesting relief from this INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUT- requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than eery Indus LER COMPANY M-1,INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2 RECORDED JULY 8,1964 AS DOCUMENT (3(r). Petitioner Is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six last(38')from S64-24000 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE:THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 the curb,rather am the miry fast(30')allowed by Code. MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION,82.73 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE Section 13.124(C)Design and Maintenance-Interior Parking Lo Landscaping-requires that a.land- SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESS- and- divider be provided for every Mras(3)bays o parking.Petitioner is requesting rebel from this MENT PLAT(SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COM- scaped divi for low ovid perking bays three(3)west of building"B." In order to accommodate rom Iha PANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO.NIG 2-63);THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SEC- required number of vpaces,PeMbner will not have are required divider every three(3)bays. ONES EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE(SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH Petitioner will provide landscape sawing the parking area along She Tonway and Meyers Road. LINE,A AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2).265.61 P 39 N FEET,MORE 11 LESS, F THE POINT PR BEGIN- It is Important to note that the P MERIDIAN,ALL IN SECTION C TOWNSHIP 99 NORTH,RANGE 11 FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL Project as designed Ill epproxhnatoly 50%open apace. MERIDIAN,IN DUPAGE COUNTY.ILLINOIS. Section 13.12-MC)Design and Maintenance-Interim Parking Lo Landscaping-requires that lode- — nor shade trees be plemed with a maximum spacing of forty feet(4(r),provided that at least one tree PARCELS is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15)interior parking spaces.Petitioner is requesting M28-103.018 and 08-28403.019 relief from the requirement that at least one tree be kwaled In the area of every 15 parking spaces. THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of we tree for every 15 parking spaces for 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS,DESCRIBED AS Project and marry of the shade!tees planted will be larger than the required 4'-6"caliper to continue -FOLLOWS: the feeling of a more established landscape. BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VIL- Secaon 13.124(C)Def ign and Maintenance-Interior Parking Lot Landscaping.requires that Inte- IAGE,BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 • nor shade trees be planted In the pandrp areas. petitioner is asking for regal from this requirement AND SECTION 29,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1,1998 AS and asking to be allowed to plant omomen101 trees above the underground parking garage and with- DOCUMENT R99-178522,SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF in the Commonwealth Edison easement.Tree planting is restricted in 1Mse areas clue to Wri ted ad[ NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.1 PARCEL NO.NIG24M depth,and are warhead fines respectively,although ornamental trees will be planted wherever pea- ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269;THENCE NORTH slob. 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS FAST(NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, — Section 13-123(C)Off Street Parking Regulations-Size and Aisles-requires that&false for parking RECORD)ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESS- MENT to non•oifids uses are twenty-seven lest(2T). Petitioner la requesting relN from this MENT PLAT NO.1 PARCEL NO.NIG2.63N,A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET(450.89 FEET ASSESS- requirement.Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four loot(24')drive Wles(which RECORD)TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESS- is the Village's requirement for office padit)to minimize the asphalt areas.The 24'aides allow lot MENT PLAT NO.1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N;THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SEC- larger 1 pedestrian and hardscapeAardseape areas. ONDS EAST(NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST,RECORD)ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.1 PARCEL NO.NIG2.63N, Section 13.123(H)Off Street Parking Regulations.M Yards-requires that o6-street parking spaces. AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT r open to the sky,in nonresidential districts be no lase than ten feel(107 from She nearest lot tine. NO.2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.R64-24069,A OIS- Petiaaer Is asking rebel form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and TANCE OF 191.20 FEET(19121 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID . southwestern rear yards(along Technology Drive).If Petitioner were required to most Coda for Mesa LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2;THENCE SOUTH 85 setbacks,because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property,there would be Inadequate DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST(SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST parking for the Project. - RECORD),ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. Section 13-12.3(E)4 Off Street Parking Regulations-Access.-requires that the spacing between ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2,A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF separate driveway entrances on a Ion be no less Man lorry percent(40%)of the length of the lot line SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2,SAID POINT BEING ON adjohang the sheet,or toad hundred feet(400'),which ever Is lase.There are three entryways Into THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT the Project oil Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee PARCEL NO.E-2.83.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO.$46924;THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES parking and rear perking and building entryways:Entry B 1s a lug signalized entry drive approxknatey 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST,RECORD)ALONG two hundred nlaty-two feel(292710 the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT f egress for the Project:and Entry C Is approximately three hundred forty last(340')to the seal of the PARCEL NO.E-2-63.1,AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS k signalized drive.The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet 1108')lees than COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT the required 400'feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.R6428042,A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE (60')less than required by Cafe. Petitioner Is asking relief from this requirement because approxk NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY;THENCE SOUTH 65 matey 40%d the footage on Butterfield Road fronts tie regional detention pond. Therefore,the DEGREES.32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, Property does not allow for a 400'space between Entries A and B nor roes it slow for a 40(Y space RECORD)ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY,A between Entries B and C. The apme entryways,however,are knportant to sufficiently handle Me DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS incoming traffic for the Project DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE;THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECH- PROPOSED SPECIAL USE NOLOGY DRIVE:1)THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST(NORTH - 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 97.36 FEET TO THE Pursuant to Section 13.14.9 and Section 13-7A-2.Petitioner is requesting a special use to Blow for NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE;2)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 outdoor dining adjacent to go Sit-down restaurants.AN of the outdoor seating areas will be Contra- MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, tent with the upscale nature and Interiors of the restaurants. RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET;3)THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SEC- The proposed property may be generally described as the southwest comer Meyers and Butterfield CN1DS EAST ISOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST,RECORD)A DISTANCE Reed,Oak Brook,Slinola 60523,with the legal description ea foitovs: OF 15.00 FEET;4)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET;5)THENCE PARCEL 1 SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST,(SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 08.28403.009 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET;6)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC.ASSESSMENT PLAT NO.2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST,(SOUTH 84 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF,AND EXCEPT RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT.5 IN THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: HOMESTEAD VILLAGE;THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY THAT PART OF LOT 2,AFORESAID,IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING,IN NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS. THEREOF RECORDED JULY S.1964 AS DOCUMENT R64.24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY,IUJ- NOIS,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: All persons desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so and may submit their state- COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2,BEING THE POINT OF INTER- menla orally or In writing or both,The heating may be recessed to another dale If notice of time and SECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A.ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CEN- Place thereof is publicly announced at the hearing or is ghren by newspaperpubtkalkrn not bas San TER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, five(5)days prior to the date of the recessed hearing. A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEY- In accord with the provisions of the American with Dlsablgges Act,any kdfvklual who is In need of a ERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST reasonable accommocation in order to participate In or benefit iron attendance at this peak meet- RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS irg should fey Jeffrey Moline,the Village's ADA Coordinator,at 630-990.5738 as soon as porml- • TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE,A DISTANCE OF ble before the meeting date. 361.1 FEET TO A POINT,SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE FAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY,AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROP- The petitioners application Inducting all supporting documents is on Igo with the Village Clark and ERTY;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALOK-11 A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANO OF 170 QR F V0 Ih Dr9�t9T RI U1!ly. fRlaf3rtl�Rl: R�rltt w relilhlrlp ill ex X. t a peill(gP d°�I 1l �era �_To r�p a� wi g } � d p. y �y ;I1 T1 0 If 1 �"� I,d>IN���k EAENHAI HT WA L E, I P(RgNIHILN pd13M t h�V v I• if b rINMIN: OF 27b FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE Undo Gonnella OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY Village Clerk 29,1974 AS DOCUMENT R74.38411. Published at the direction of the Corporate Authorities and the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village PARCEL 2 of Oak Brook,DuPage and Cook Counties,Illinois. 0&211.109-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS Published In the Daily Herald January 15.2005(345731k /PGE O F 04,t 90 f h \9 �2 January 12,2005 c�00UNT4 ', Village of Dear Resident/Neighbor: Oak Brook 1200 Oak Brook Road The Oak Brook Plan Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board will be yak Brook,IL 60523-2255 considering a map amendment, text amendments, variations, special use and a final plat of Website consolidation at the meetings scheduled at the end of this notice. www.oak-brook.org Administration The application has been filed by: NAI Hiffman 630.990.3000 One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 FAX 630.990.0876 Oakbrook Terrace,Illinois 60181 For: St.Paul Properties, Inc. Community Development The property in question is located at: 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road 630.990.3045 FAX 630.990.3985 Southwest corner of Meyers and Butterfield Road Engineering Relationship of applicant to property: Property Owner's Developer Department 630.990.3010 Also shown at the end of this notice is a map* of the area to assist you in determining your FAX 630.990.3985 relationship to the property in question. OFire Department The applicant is seeking approval of the following: a map amendment to rezone the 30.990.3040 N 630.990.2392 properties located at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road from ORA-1 to B-1; several text amendments and variations; a special use for outdoor dining and a plat of consolidation in Police Department order to facilitate the construction of a 191,000 square foot upscale retail and commercial 630.990.2358 center to be known as the Oak Brook Promenade. The site is presently zoned ORA-1 and FAX 630.990.7484 improved with three office buildings.A detailed description of the requests is as follows: Public Works PROPOSED MAP AMENDMENT Department 630.990.3044 The map amendment proposed is to rezone the subject property from ORA1 to B1. FAX 630.472.0223 PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS Oak Brook The text is proposed to be amended as follows: (underlined text indicates new text to be Public Library added,strikethrough indicates deleted text) 600 Oak Brook Road Section 13-7A-1 —add text to permitted uses—health clubs )ak Brook,IL 60523-2200 Section 13-7A-3(B)—amend text—Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet(30')fifty feet 630.990.2222 FAX 630.990.4509 (50')and not more than two(2)stories. Dak Brook Sports Core Section 13-3-8 — amend text — No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural Bath&Tennis Club ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is 700 Oak Brook Road located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and )ak Brook,IL 60523-4600 television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the 630.990.3020 village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, FAX 630.990.1002 stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or Golf Club other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet 2606 York Road (15')thirty feet(30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be )ak Brook,IL 60523-4602 for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied. 630.990.3032 FAX 630.990.0245 S. • PROPOSED VARIATIONS Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c)Lot Area Requirement—Yards—r e q uire s th at buildings in B-1 district ct s hall not be erected within a sixty foot (60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty-foot(50')setback. Section 13-11-7(A)-4 Sign Height — which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches(12")or project higher than thirty feet(30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fm signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting-that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet(36')from the curb, rather than the thirty feet (30')allowed by Code. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three(3)bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four (4) parking bays to the west of building `B." In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3)bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50%open space. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15)interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree • requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for Project and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4"-6"caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. Section 13-12-4(C) Design and Maintenance—Interior Parking Lot Landscaping—requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. Section 13-12-3(C) Off Street Parking Regulations — Size and Aisles — requires that aisles for parking accessory to non-office uses are twenty-seven feet (27'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village's requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. Section 13-12-3(H)Off Street Parking Regulations—In Yards—requires that off-street parking spaces,open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief form this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards (along Technology Drive). If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships in existence on the Property,there would be inadequate parking for the Project. Section 13-12-3(E)-4 Off Street Parking Regulations — Access —requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent(40%)of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or found hundred feet (400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet(292')to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet(340')to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet(108') less than the required 400' feet required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on Butterfield Road fronts the regional detention pond. Therefore, Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-VAR-Res.ltr.doc SQ the Property does not allow for 400 space between Entries A and B nor does it allow for 400 space P rty P P • between Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. PROPOSED SPECIAL USE Pursuant to Section 13-14-9 and Section 13-7A-2, Petitioner is requesting a special use to allow for outdoor dining adjacent to the sit-down restaurants. All of the outdoor seating areas will be consistent with the upscale nature and interiors of the restaurants. If you desire more detailed information, please contact the Community Development Department at 630- 990-3045 to review the file on this application. Sincerely, Ro ert L.Kallie Jr.,AXVr Director of Co unity velopment RLK/gp • Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-VAR-Res.ltr.doc �„� •b� r • In accord with the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, any individual who is in need of a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in or benefit from attendance at the public meeting should contact Jeffrey Moline, the Village's ADA Coordinator, at 630-990-5738 as soon as possible before the meeting date. All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, Butler Government Center located on Oak Brook Road(31st Street)and Spring Road, Oak Brook,Illinois. Plan Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Monday January 17,2005*** Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,February 1,2005** Board of Trustees Meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7:30 p.m.,Tuesday,February 22,2005** **Tentative ***The location for this meeting may be changed to the West Wing Conference Room of the Butler Government Center L � U� 22 na' r • • t C � u Y 2426 OCA.��ON 1803' 4 A. K 4 1O 8 6 u 2 001 QI^O goo 6FS 8G b 16 IZ 4` 9 7 s Z '0' 23 a �� 31zt U) $� lo» 18 1 1I y• l as 3/2S } 17 26 62 90 ra 24 zz r J W Q zl V f 9 30 P� 2, 8 36,y 3t 29 27 25 23 •3V = aA 1 i \`�\�I°\4 �p\.�� I0 �Y� 4 •� a 95 , e� cK 4 39 �j4 31 7 • 2 3a 5 I 40 39 y 4 2 ! yq / 4g1TipN 1 via 1 8 b c4 47.v 41 4 t i? 1G a l�M g��v1� gg.tev e 10 uwnr 43 0 2 9 44 43 T Y 6D 2R610 .rq�2 14 6.. 46 46 14 11 1 46 45 i Ib u M • 'Note: The map provided is only an approximation of the area in question and is intended to be used only as a visual aid to determine your relationship to the property �w Promenade-Butterfield-Meyers-VAR-Res.ltr.doc V•` • A. Accounts Payable for Period Ending December 10,2004-$426,193.80 Significant Items included in Above: 1) Kubiesa,Spiroff,Gosselar&Acker,P.C.—Legal Services for Month of September-$16,128.50—Continued from November 23,2004 2) James J.Benes and Associates,Inc.—Payout 42—2005 Paving Project-$12,968.56 3) Civiltech Engineering, Inc.—Payout 414—York/Harger Bike Trail Phase III-$17,406.45 4) James D.Fiala Paving Company—Payout 47—2004 Paving Project-$14,129.39 B. Approval of Payroll 1) Pay Period Ending November 20,2004-$570,117.13 2) Pay Period Ending December 4,2004-$607,502.90 CC Community Development Referrals 1) 3404 Adams Road—Variation 02 Oak Brook Promenade—3001,3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road—Map Amendment,Text Amendments, Special Uses,Variations and Plat of Consolidation—Presentation by Petitioner D. Authorization to Seek Bids or Proposal or Negotiate Contracts 1) Microfilm/Electronic Scanning 2) Golf Cart Fleet E. Authorization to Hire,Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees 1) Part-time Reference Librarian F. Budget Adjustments G. Oakland Subdivision—Reduction in Subdivision Security • H. An Ordinance Authorizing the Sale of Certain Items of Personal Property Owned by the Village of Oak Brook—Fire Pumper 911 I. Ratification of Expense—Davey Tree Service—Emergency Tree Limb Removal-$13,935.95 J. Change Order#4—James D.Fiala Paving Company-$5,780.00-2004 Paving Project— Revised Total Contract Amount$944,547.39 K. Fire Department Promotions L. An Ordinance Amending Title 1 (Administration)of the Village Code of the Village of Oak Brook with respect to the Responsibilities,Duties and Authority of the Village Manager Motion by Trustee Caleel, seconded by Trustee Craig, to approve the Consent Agenda and authorize expenditures as presented or amended. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes: 6 -Trustees Aktipis, Caleel, Craig, Korin, Yusuf and Zannis. Nays: 0 -None. Absent: 0 -None Motion carried. 6. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: President Quinlan had previously announced that Agenda Item 5. E., Authorization to Hire, Promote or Reassign Duties of Village Employees, 1) Part-Time Reference Librarian was previously removed from the Consent Agenda as the applicant is no longer available for the position. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 3 of 16 December 14, 2004 • 2. ABSENT: None. • President Quinlan announced that Agenda Item 5. E. 1) Part-time Reference Librarian is stricken from the agenda item as that person is no longer available for that position. 3. RESIDENTNISITOR COMMENT: A. Oath of Office-Edward Nielsen,Board of Fire and Police Commissioners President Quinlan informed the public that Agenda Item 3. A. Swearing in Ceremony of Edward Nielsen to the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners will not occur. Mr. Nielsen was not able to attend the Board meeting but he has accepted the proposed appointment and the official oath ceremony will occur at the next Village Board meeting in January. Dr. Francis Gaik addressed the Board of Trustees of the Village's Ethnic Ordinance G- 748-5-11-2004. She explained that she has written and published articles on the ethics of re-engineering. The State of Illinois at the end of 2003 passed the Ethics Act whereby it is mandatory that all Village, Libraries and public facilities pass their ordinance model. Attorney General Lisa Madigan's model ordinance was distributed to the Board members by Dr. Gaik as well as a guide to the implementation of the model ethics ordinance. She indicated that on May 11, 2004 the Village adopted such an ordinance but she stated it had minimal requirements that only met the State's standards. She recommended with • some of the controversies before the Board at this time, that it would be beneficial for the Board to further review this ordinance and correct it. DuPage County has addressed this issue with their new ordinance. She suggested that the ordinance require subpoena power and an action plan for the appointment of an advisor and commission. President Quinlan requested that the Village Manager and Village Attorney review DuPage County's ordinance and other surrounding communities. B. Prairie State Games- Maureen Moore President Quinlan noted that Ms. Moore was not able to attend the meeting at this time. President Quinlan announced that Trustee Korin has asked for a few moments to make a public comment. She will address her item under New Business. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -None. . CONSENT AGENDA: All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in one motion. VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK Minutes Page 2 of 16 December 14,2004 • • G� OF OAk 90 ` 0 e d D as G v F COUNT4,� AGENDA ITEM Regular Board of Trustees Meeting of December 14, 2004 SUBJECT: Referral — Oak Brook Promenade — 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road — Map Amendment, Text amendments, Special Uses, Variations and Plat of Consolidation FROM: Robert L. Kallien, Jr.,AICP, Community Development Director BUDGET SOURCE/BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to refer the requests from NAI Hiffman on behalf of St. Paul Properties,Inc. for a map amendment, text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, special uses and plat of consolidation to the Plan Commission for review and recommendation at its January 17, 2005 meeting and the requests for the map amendment, text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, special uses, and variations to the Zoning Board of Appeals for Public Hearing at its February 1, 2005 meeting. Background/Historv: NAI Hiffinan, on behalf of St. Paul Properties, Inc, the owners of the 19+ acres located at 3001, 3003 and 3121 Butterfield Road has submitted a number of requests seeking approval of a map amendment (i.e., rezoning to B-1), text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, special uses, variations and a plat of consolidation in order to facilitate the construction of a 191,000 sq.ft. upscale retail and commercial center (herein referred to as the "Oak Brook Promenade"). The site is presently zoned ORA-1 and improved with three office buildings. Recommendation: Please refer the requests for the map amendment, text amendments, special uses and plat of consolidation to the Plan Commission for review and recommendation at its January 17, 2005 meeting and the requests for the map amendment, text amendments, special uses, and variations • to the Zoning Board of Appeals for public hearing at its February 1, 2005 meeting. Last saved by RKalhen \\ash\users\ComDev\GP0LANEK\1-FROM BOB\Bot-PC-ZBA\BOT-Referral-OakBrook Promenade-SU-2004.doc ` 1—t—inr►ii 1 WIAnnAA 2•;'7 AM • 13-7A-1: PERMITTED USES: Accessory uses and structures, including but not limited to off-street loading, off-street parking and business signs. Antique shops. Audio and video equipment, retail sales thereof, including components and related accessories, installation and servicing of such products in motor vehicles and conducted entirely within an enclosed structure with service entry at the rear of the building with no overnight parking. • Bakeries, where not more than thirty percent (30%) of the floor area is devoted to processing. Barbershops and beauty parlors. Book and stationery stores. Camera and photographic supply stores and photographic studios. Candy and ice cream stores. Clinics, medical and dental, including accessory laboratories. Drugstores. Dry-cleaning and laundry retail establishments; provided that processing, if done on the premises, shall utilize nonexplosive and noninflammable materials, and that such processing shall be limited to service of the principal use. Fire stations. Florist shops. Food stores including grocery stores,meat markets and delicatessens. 1 • • '��XT �f��-w��vt-fir Gift shops. Haberdasheries. Hardware stores. Adl #,-4 414 C°�c��S. Hobby, toy and game shops provided amusement arcades are not permitted. Home decorating stores. Home furniture and furnishings stores. Housewares stores. Jewelry stores, including watch, clock and jewelry repair. Laundrettes, including automatic self-service dry-cleaning equipment. • Libraries,branch. Luggage and leather goods stores. Men's and women's accessory and specialty stores. Music stores. Offices: business,professional and public. Optical goods stores. Police stations. Post offices. Restaurants, including cocktail lounges. Shoe stores. Sporting goods stores. Temporary buildings, for construction purposes for a period not to exceed ninety(90) days • 2 �YQ • �pzi �Z GdS following completion of the development. Travel bureaus and transportation ticket offices. Variety, stores. Wearing apparel shops. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-444, 2-13-1990) 13-7A-2: SPECIAL USES: Accessory uses and structures, including but not limited to off-street parking and off-street loading spaces and business signs. Automobile service stations, on lots not less than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. Clubs, lodges, fraternities and community centers on lots not less than twenty thousand(20,000) • square feet. Daycare center,provided such facility complies with all licensing requirements of the State and maintains a direct alarm hookup to the Police Department. Nursing homes, on lots not less than three hundred feet (300') in width and not less than two (2) acres in area. Office supply stores. Outdoor dining areas adjacent to restaurants. Public utility, governmental service and transportation uses: Bus turnarounds and passenger shelters. Electric distribution centers and substations. Gas regulator stations. Sewage and storm water lift stations. Telephone exchanges and transmission buildings and equipment, and outdoor telephone • 3 • WD 44o!5�1 booths and pedestals. Water filtration plants, wells,pumping stations and reservoirs. Restaurants and accessory cocktail lounges,without facilities for dancing and live entertainment, on lots not less than two hundred feet(200') in width and not less than one and one-half(1 1/2) acres in area. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-454, 10-9-1990; Ord. G-513, 6-22-1993; Ord. G-556, 7-11-1995) 13-7A-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.5. �- B. Structure Height: Not more than tRtn�') and not more than two (2) stories. C. Yards: • 1. No structure, other than access drives and paved parking areas, and signs as provided in subsection 13-7A-4A8 of this Article, shall be erected or maintained within the following distances: a. Sixty feet(60') from the right of way of any public street; b. Thirty feet (30') from a District boundary which abuts a public right of way which does not afford a primary means of access to the District; and c. Sixty feet(60') from any other District boundary; except when adjacent to a B-2 District boundary line;provided,however, that the area between a building and the right of way of any street or other district boundary may be occupied by drives, drive-in banking facilities, vehicular parking, sidewalks, landscaping and similar facilities, except paved parking, areas shall not be located closer than ten feet (10')to any lot in a residence district or ten feet(10') to any public street; except that building shall be set back not less than one hundred feet (100') from the rights of way of York Road, 22nd Street and 31 st Street. 2. For the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the yard regulations of this section, the entire area included within a B-1 district, except that portion separated by a dedicated public 4 • street, shall be considered as a single zoning lot; more than one building or structure may, however, be erected thereon; and the only front, side and rear yards that need to be observed are those provided for in subsection Cl of this section. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-513, 6-22-1993) 13-7A-4: ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS: A. Awnings,Marquees And Signs: See chapter 11 of this title. B. Off Street Parking And Loading: Off street parking and loading shall be as provided in chapter 12 of this title. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-85, 5-14-1968; Ord. G-513, 6-22-1993; Ord. G-695, 3-26-2002) • • 5 • "7'E�X7- 4,ve-rvnN A1(---7v7 13-3-8: STRUCTURE HEIGHT: A. No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded,reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in 3o the village except residential districts, shall bzZft=feet-�bove the height limits of the district in which it is located. Structure height may be measured from a base elevation other than natural ground level only with the express approval of the village. However, an elevator housing enclosure for the purpose of providing a single elevator access to the penthouse level not to exceed three hundred twenty five (325) square feet in area may be erected to • heights which do not exceed by more than twenty two feet(22') the height limits of the district in which it is located. -� 5�a /1 b e o-y- 0 rn <M r n4r� Grp e s oh/cJ, hc� 5/1�/� �r9 h d �E'v Q`'1'� •�� �r e r P i-t��s • 1 c q� 13-7A-3: LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS: A. Floor Area Ratio: Not to exceed 0.5. B. Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet(30') and not more than two (2) stories. C. Yards: 1. No structure, other than access drives and paved parking areas, and signs as provided in subsection 13-7A-4A8 of this Article, shall be erected or maintained within the following distances: a. Sixty feet(60') from the right of way of any public street; b. Thirty feet (30') from a District boundary which abuts a public right of way which does not afford a primary means of access to the District; and • c. Sixty feet(60') from any other District boundary; except when adjacent to a B-2 District boundary line; provided, however, that the area between a building and the right of way of any street or other district boundary may be occupied by drives, drive-in banking facilities, vehicular parking, sidewalks, landscaping and similar facilities,except paved parking, areas shall not be located closer than ten feet (10') to any lot in a residence district or ten feet(10')to any public street; except that building shall be set back not less than one hundred feet(100') from the rights of way of York Road, 22nd Street and 31 st Street. 2. For the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the yard regulations of this section,the entire area included within a B-1 district, except that portion separated by a dedicated public street, shall be considered as a single zoning lot; more than one building or structure may, however,be erected thereon; and the only front, side and rear yards that need to be observed are those provided for in subsection Cl of this section. (Ord. G-60, 3-22-1966; Ord. G-513, 6-22-1993) • 1 s 13-11-7: SIGNS IN THE B-1, B-3 AND B-4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS: In the B-1, B-3 and B-4 zoning districts, the following sign provisions are in effect. Except where exempted by this chapter, all of the following commercial signs require permits from the village: A. Awnings,Marquees And Signs: Awnings, marquees and nonflashing illuminated business signs without moving parts and without exposed neon tubing are permitted subject to meeting any other applicable regulations of the village (e.g., electrical code) and the following: 1. All sources of light,whether by direct exposure, surface reflection or transmission, shall be shielded so that the source of light is not visible from any adjacent residentially zoned property- 2. No sign shall be painted,pasted or similarly posted directly on the surface of any building, wall, fence, or structure. • 3. The gross surface area in square feet of all signs on a lot shall be not more than two (2) times the number of lineal feet in the length of the building wall facing a public street. On a corner or through lot a sign may be erected along each street frontage. In a shopping district containing more than ten(10) acres, signs may be erected on each building wall. The maximum size of any sign for a single business is two hundred forty(240) square feet. 4. All signs shall be properly affixed to the building walls and shall not extend outward therefrom more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30') above curb level. 5. In a retail/commercial development containing not less than three (3) acres, one ground sign, facing each street, which identifies the name and address of the shopping center may be. erected in addition to the signs affixed to the building walls. Such signs shall: a)be not closer than ten feet (10') from a lot line; b) have a gross surface area of not more than one hundred sixty(160) square feet which may be in addition to the maximum gross surface area as permitted in subsection A3 of this section; c)not project higher than sixteen feet (16') above grade at the sign; and d)when located within fifty feet (50') of the lot corner of the intersection of two (2) or more streets, it shall have its lowest level not less than eight feet (8') above ground grade, and not closer than three feet(3') from a driveway or parking area. 1 . '' . 96 � 6 � s 13-12-4: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE: A. Surfacing: Except in the RI and R2 single-family residential zoning districts where off street parking areas can be either stone or hard surfaced all off street parking areas shall be improved with an all-weather hard surface pavement installed in accordance with the village of Oak Brook public works construction standards. B.. Screening And Landscaping: The following landscaped and planted areas shall be provided and maintained for all parking areas: 1. Front Yards: Permanent screening at least four feet(4)high shall be installed in front yard areas adjacent to parking areas. This screening may consist of a planted earth berm, densely planted shrubs or trees, or a combination of both. 2. Side And Rear Yards: Permanent peripheral screening at least five feet(5)high shall be • installed in side and rear yards adjacent to parking areas. This screening may consist of a planted earth berm, densely planted shrubs or trees, or a combination of both.In side.and rear yards, the screening shall be so located and constructed as not to interfere or conflict with the use of any utility easements or utility installations existing or planned to be installed in these easement areas. ._� C. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscaped areas shall occupy not less than ten percent (1.0 1/6) of the total lot area excluding: 1. The building footprint or footprint of other structures, 2. All required front yard or street setback areas, and 3. Any required landscape areas along rear lot lines. In parking areas which are wider than one bay of double parking, interior shade trees shall be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet(40'),provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15) interior parking spaces. Landscaped dividers with a minimum width of six feet(6) shall be provided between every three (3)parking bays. Individual permanent planter areas (minimum size of 8 feet 6 inches by 17 feet) are required for interior trees with a minimum caliper of three inches (3"), which shall be of a variety which do not drop a messy fruit (see village of Oak Brook public works construction standards for list of appropriate trees). • H. In Yards: Off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts, may be located in required interior side yards and rear yards,no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line, except a parking area containing four(4) or more parking spaces shall be not less than forty feet(40') from an adjoining residence district boundary; provided,however, that: 1. On any lot in a B 1 local shopping center district and a B3 general business district, the required off-street parking spaces may be located in a front yard or side yard adjoining a street not less than ten feet (10') from a street line; 2. On any lot in OR.A.1 or ORA2 office-research-assembly district and an 03 or 04 office district, not more than ten percent(10%) of the required off-street parking spaces,not to exceed six (6) spaces,may be located in a required front yard or along the side of the building adjoining the street and not less than twenty five feet(25') from a street line or fifty feet(50') from the street lines of Cermak and York Road; and 1 • i 13-12-3: OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS: A. Existing Parking Facilities: Accessory off street parking facilities in existence on the effective date hereof and located on the same lot as the structure or use served shall not hereafter be reduced below the requirements for a similar new structure or use under the provisions of this chapter. B. Location: After the effective date hereof, all off street parking spaces shall be located on the same lot as the building, structure or use of land served; however, off street parking spaces may also be located on a lot other than the lot on which the building, structure or use of land served is located,provided that said spaces are also within five hundred fifty feet(550') walking distance of such building, structure, or use of land. All off street parking spaces required for single-family residences shall be located on the same lot as the residence, provided that no required spaces may be located in any front or side yard. • C. Size And Aisles: Each required off-street parking space shall have a width and length, exclusive of access drives or aisles,ramps, columns, or office and work areas in accordance with standards set forth below.Enclosed parking spaces shall have a vertical clearance of at least seven feet (T). Each required off street parking space shall open directly upon an aisle or driveway of a width and design in accordance with standards set forth below: MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PARKING SPACES,AISLES AND PARKING BAYS FOR PARKING ACCESSORY TO NONOFFICE USES • 1 13-12-3: OFF STREET PARING REGULATIONS: i A. Existing Parking Facilities: Accessory off street parking facilities in existence on the effective date hereof and located on the same lot as the structure or use served shall not hereafter be reduced below the requirements for a similar new structure or use under the provisions of this chapter. B. Location: After the effective date hereof, all off street parking spaces shall be located on the same lot as the building, structure or use of land served; however, off street parking spaces may also be located on a lot other than the lot on which the building, structure or use of land served is located,provided that said spaces are also within five hundred fifty feet(550') walking distance of such building, structure, or use of land. All off street parking spaces required for single-family residences shall be located on the same lot as the residence, provided that no required spaces may be located in any front or side yard. C. Size And Aisles: Each required off-street parking space shall have a width and length, • exclusive of access drives or aisles, ramps, columns, or office and work areas in accordance with standards set forth below. Enclosed parking spaces shall have a vertical clearance of at least seven feet (T). Each required off street parking space shall open directly upon an aisle or driveway of a width and design in accordance with standards set forth below: MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PARKING SPACES, AISLES AND PARKING BAYS FOR PARKING ACCESSORY TO NONOFFICE USES Minimum Space Per Car: Width 9'0" Length 18'0" Parking Space And Aisle Dimensions: Width Of Parking Baysl Width Of Depth Of Space Space Width Of Parallel Perpendicular Width Of Angle Of Space To Aisle, To Aisle, Aisle Head-In To Curb Parking Ft. And In. Ft. And In. Ft. And In. Ft. And In. 1 • property owner may request approval from the director of community development,to initially construct no less than seventy five percent(75%) of the required parking as a condition of occupancy with the remaining required spaces to be set aside and constructed when the parking demands for the site as determined by the village,require the construction of the set aside parking spaces. Prior to occupancy, a written covenant agreeing to construct the set aside parking spaces shall be submitted to the village for review and approval. Once approved, this document shall be filed for recording in the office of the county recorder of deeds and shall run with the parcel of land. E. Access: All off-street parking facilities shall be provided with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street in accordance with regulations set forth below: ACCESS DRIVEWAYS FROM STREETS TO OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING SPACES 1. Width of driveways (measured at the lot line adjoining a street): • a. Residential Uses: Not less than nine feet (9')wide or more than twenty feet(20')wide. b.Nonresidential Uses: (1)Not less than twelve feet(12')wide or more than twenty two feet (22')wide for a one-way driveway. (2)Not less than twenty two feet(22')wide or more than twenty five feet (25')wide for a two-way driveway serving twenty(20) or fewer parking spaces or one loading berth. (3)Not less than: (A) Twenty four feet(24')wide or more than thirty eight feet(38')wide for a two-way driveway(2 lanes out and 1 lane in)*ithout a median; or (B) Twenty four feet(24')wide or more than forty four feet(44')wide for a two-way driveway(2 lanes out and 1 lane in)with a median, serving more than twenty(20)parking spaces or two (2) or more loading berths. 2. Radius connecting street pavement edge and driveway edge: • 3 , r a. In Residential Districts:Not less than two feet(2'). b. In All Other Districts: Not less than fifteen feet(15'). 3. Angle at intersection of a driveway and street: The acute angle formed at the intersection of driveway and street pavement edges shall be not less than sixty degrees (60°). The required turning angle for a vehicle entering or leaving a driveway shall not exceed ninety degrees (90°). 4. Spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot(measured center to center at the lot --� line adjoining a street): no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or four hundred feet(400'), whichever is less. 5. On corner lots, spacing between driveway entrance and right-of-way line of an adjacent intersecting street(measured from the nearest edge of the driveway pavement at its intersection with the street pavement to the nearest right-of-way line, extended, of an adjacent intersecting street): no less than twenty percent(20%) of the length of the lot line • adjoining the street being entered. F. Use: Accessory off-street parking facilities, as accessory to specific uses listed in this chapter, shall be solely for the parking of automobiles of patrons, occupants or employees. When bus transportation is provided for patrons, occupants or employees of a specific establishment, additional open or enclosed off-street parking spaces for bus parking on the - premises shall be provided in accordance with all other regulations set forth in this chapter. G. Computation: When determination of the number of off--street parking spaces required by this chapter results in a requirement of a fractional space, any fraction of one-half('/2) or less may be disregarded while a fraction in excess of one-half('/2) shall be counted as one parking space. H. In Yards: Off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts, maybe located in required interior side yards and rear yards,.no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line, except a parking area containing four(4) or more parking spaces shall be not less than forty feet (40') from an adjoining residence district boundary; provided, however, that: 1. On any lot in a B1 local shopping center district and a B3 general business district, the 4 required off-street parking spaces maybe located in a front yard or side yard adjoining a street not less than ten feet(10') from a street line; 2. On any lot in ORAL or ORA2 office-research-assembly district and an 03 or 04 office district,not more than ten percent (10%) of the required off-street parking spaces,not to exceed six(6) spaces,may be located in a required front yard or along the side of the building adjoining the street and not less than twenty five feet(25') from a street line or fifty feet(50') from the street lines of Cermak and York Road; and • i 5 • • NAI HIFFMAN ®t '°n o"ws,W1 5 13 11984. Hain COmsrs.WI 53130 DATE ONE OAKBROOK TERRACE,SUITE 600 79-549,750 22ND STREET and BUTTERFIELD ROAD OAKBROOK TERRACE,IL 60181 AMOUNT B S 11984 Jan 11,2005 10650. 00 9 PAY TO THE Ten Thousand Six Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars 1 ORDER / OF: VOID AFTER 90 DAYS n VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK r i i AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE IIp0L198411' 1:0750054961: 114II8 7000 2-4 2L11a /m CHECK $ CHECKS $ CASH INVB DATE NAME — NUMBER G.L.ACCOUNT if DESCRIPTION 4 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK INVALID WITHOUT f SIGNATURE +yP ;• DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15 616 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS � u PHONE: (630)990-3045 7 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT 7R YOUR RECORDS ;3 , ��d✓;' �:_ �Il11�1�1=i��r� I Iie jj �� `,.� / e� /I� �t � I��� 1 y�• -e/x �,�,� ��rg8 ='� � �� .e ��'�.�1 1 x�d i* ( 3,1�'F�-• h�ti�f I��u�� ���r -wi ii �����li� �l���i u. I� �•� 1 i:Y �' ,+��1�"�f��: •'e�� til��.' ��i I� �"�fi�\mac.=� ill�r� ��r9 �)r'f,�- � � ci,�.,� �iaf�. �I.a' x " I aw y Yt �S> N I pwPsX�i'" [ fi✓.A S' r. r v....�enn�Ga+laf •Mq �. ,� v,&w.i p�, '� a -- � 1 �' E +>u' ✓J1 rr'dl��, vutt ,r / / pp���� F �y !e °..••�--- sr1fM n' ✓!�.`.� /e � /4`gFfM. .. 6NW.4y � f.4 �� IeRiSI �✓� s 's _...vnwnwaa ,' , ,• I #t� 1 F,i t y'411.. :a•raea. a I �� �' €',..^' . f �., � �,+''p >�/'�"'• =WA rs 1 �Q 3' � Y! � 1_601 � � .,.x,11��e�wswara>3< 1 �;.. > ��s: .. ®��L .S '-`...' •••8;% �i� '/,{ � y,Fl�% .P � !fit � � � ,,11 ') ,y^�!, _.^' �� f`,4.+5.•-ear-: < r ,p�y t'� h�� 1l��11{�{�t�.'4. G•*�' ��1 vt y� UA pb y�,/�'"i�` tir u � H.C. KLOOvER ARCHI ECT � ���N"� OAK BROOK PROMENADE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION FOR MAP AMENDMENT and SUPPORTING NARRATIVE PETITION FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS and SUPPORTING NARRATIVE PETITION FOR VARIANCES and SUPPORTING NARRATIVE PETITION FOR SPECIAL USES and SUPPORTING NARRATIVE PETITION FOR PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION and SUPPORTING NARRATIVE • EXHIBITS i • OAK BROOK PROMENADE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY St. Paul Properties, Inc. ("Owner' or "Petitioner') is the owner of approximate 18.2 acres of real property, generally located at the southwest corner of Meyers and Butterfield Roads (the "Property"), which is more fully described in the various Petitions being submitted with this narrative. The total Property acreage is approximately 18.2 which includes 17.2 acres (the "Office Parcel") and a parcel of approximately 1.0 acres the "Tollwa Parcel"). The Office Parcel, which is in Pp Y ( Y ) the Village and zoned ORA-1, is improved with three office buildings, and the Tollwa Parcel is in unincorporated DuPa a Count and is zoned R-2 pursuant to Y p 9 Y p the County Code. On the Office Parcel, there are two three-story buildings, which were each built in 1978 and a one-story brick building built in 1969. Over the past few years, the occupancy rate of the buildings has dropped below 30%. Since the current vacancy rate in the Oakbrook, Oak Brook Terrace, Lombard • and Downers Grove office market is already at 30%, it is unlikely that the Petitioner will be successful in re-leasing the buildings in the near future. Further, because of a lack of amenities such as impressive lobbies, dining facilities and exercise areas, these buildings have become obsolete. The Tollway Parcel is currently unimproved. Petitioner has developed an extensive plan to redevelop the Property. The plan calls for the demolition of the three existing office buildings and the development of an upscale retail and commercial center ("the Project"). The Project will include upscale and specialty retailers, white-linen table cloth restaurants, and a very limited second floor office area. Petitioner's goal in designing the Center was to provide a lace with an open area for residents and visitors alike to come c� p p p X` to shop and dine, and to enjoy the pedestrian and outdoor amenities. A site plan of the Center is attached as Exhibit 5. The Project will consist of approximately 180,000 square feet and will cost an estimated $50,000,000.00 to develop. The square footage of the Project will be comprised as follows: Retail: 128,255 square feet Office: 20,450 square feet Restaurants: 30,000 square feet An important feature of the Center will be the tenant mix. The restaurants in the Center will be nationally or regionally recognized restaurants. The restaurants will offer lunch and dinner and will provide outdoor seating in spring, summer and fall. The restaurants will vary in type: a seafood place, a steakhouse, an Italian restaurant, etc. Each of the restaurants will require sit down liquor licenses. The retailers will include boutique clothing, jewelry stores, and housewares. The Project will be developed in accordance with the design standards and parameters contained in the supporting narratives and the Exhibits. In order to develop the Project, Petitioner is requesting: a map and text amendments, a is special use permit, certain variations, a plat of consolidation, and the annexation of the Tollway Parcel, all in accordance with the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois, Zoning Regulations (the "Code"). Each of the petitions for the foregoing requests are being submitted as separate petitions with a supporting narrative. The individual petitions have been collected to create this volume. Since many of the Exhibits support the various petitions, the Exhibits are located together and are referred to in the supporting narratives for each specific petition for the actions being requested. OPEYITION APPLICATION for wo; 11 PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) 0 AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ SPECIAL USE ($675) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50- each lot frontage) © -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Southwest corner of Meyer & PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. Please see Exhibit A Batterftetd LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS* Please see Exhibit B ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION Section 13-7, ACTION REQUESTED* Please see Exhibit C WROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT OWNERS)OF RECORD St. Paul Properties, Inc. PHONE (561) 310-2065 ADDRESS 385 Washington Street Mail Code: CITY St. Paul STATE MN ZIP 55102 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) NAI Hiffman PHONE (630) 691-0616 ADDRESS One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 CITY Oakbrook Terrace STATE IL Zip 60181 E-mail Ad ss dhiffman@hiffman.com I (we) ,� that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my 'k wledg and belief. In a dition to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of billi V-1�/lIAOIL4.4— . /� &C ignature of Xpplicant Date Signature of Applicant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY APP-RESIDENTIAL VARIATION 504 NAMES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS • Following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. The number of feet occupied by all public roads,streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Deeds(or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as they appear from the authentic tax records of this County within 30 days of the filing of this application. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. Note: The people on this list will be notified by mail with the information about your request and the meeting schedule. NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PARCEL OWNER PR OPERTY OWNER DMG Real Estate Attn: Chief Exec. Technology Drive, 06-28-103-016 Holdings, L.L.C. 799 Roosevelt Rd Suite 200 Lombard Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 The Commonwealth Ediso c/o Property Tax Department 3125 Butterfield 06-28-103-002 Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Fountain Square of Re: 06-28-103-017 Technology Drive, 06-28-103-017 Chicago, Illinois 60602 rity Capital c/o The Shaw Co-D Stine Butterfield Rd. , 06-28-101-005 Lodging, Inc. 2001 York Rd. , No. 550 Lombard Uakbrook, iiiinois Glenborough Properties, 400 S. E1 Camino Real 2905 West Butterfield 06-28-104-011 L.P. , a California San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 partnership Inland Property Sales, 2901 West Butterfield 2901 West Butterfield 06-28-104-015 Inc. Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 County of DuPage, a bod 2901 West Butterfield 2901 West Butterfield 06-28-104-015 corporate & politic Oak r o � Illinois 60521 -Oakb ank, Illinois 6059': CP GAL Lombard, L.L.C. 400 S. E1 Camino Real 2907 Butterfield Rd. 06-28-104-013 San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 Northern Illinois Gas Real Estate Meyer Rd, 06-28-104-014 Company P.O. Box 190 Oakbrook nois ("Attach additional sheets for each if necessary) 112005 VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60523-2255 Community Development Gail Polanek PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ENCLOSED Village of Oakbrook Terrace 17W215 Bullel1 uld i<U Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-4095 Community Development Gail Polanek PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ENCLOSED Village of Lombard 255 E. Wtlswi Ave. Lombard, IL 60148-3969 Subject Property Verification • (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 103 009 2. Common Address: 3001-3003 Butterfield Road, Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if.longer than the area provided) Please see Exhibit D • The Permanent Index Number,Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Clerk's Office-Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Laura Date called: December 10, 2004 1 verify that the information provided above is accurate. Joy Pinta t Name Signature Date: December 10, 2004 Relationship to Applicant: Attorney 1/2005 Subject Property Verification • (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 103 014 2. Common Address: 3001-3003 Butterfield Road, Oakhronk, T11 inns c 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Please see Exhibit D I • The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 101, 2004 DuPage County Clerk's Office-.Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Laura Date called: December 10, 2004 1 verify that the information provided above is accurate. Joy Pinta v` *e:nted Name Signature December 10, 2004 Relationship to Applicant: Attorney 112005 Subject Property Verification • (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number(P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 103 005 2. Common Address: 3121 Butterfield Road, Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Please see Exhibit D • The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: i DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Karen Date called: vecemBer 1U, DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Clerk's Office—Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Laura Date called: December 10, 2004 I verify that the information provided above is accurate. Joy Pinta 41nted Name Signature te: Relationship o Applicant: December 10, 2004 p Attorney 1/2005 Subject Property Verification • (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number (P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 103 018 2. Common Address: Butterfield, Oakbrook, Illinois 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Please see Exhibit D The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Clerk's Office—Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) Contact Person: Laura Date called: December 10, 2004 1 verify that the information provided above is accurate. Joy Pinta #nted Name Signature t e: December 10, 2004 Relationship to Applicant: Attorney 1/2005 Subject Property Verification • (Complete a separate form for each P.I.N.) 1. Permanent Index Number(P.I.N. from Real Estate Tax Bill): 06 28 103 019 2. Common Address: Butterfield Road, Oakbrook, Illinois 3. Type the Complete Legal Description Below. (Attach a separate page if longer than the area provided) Please see Exhibit D • The Permanent Index Number, Common Address and Legal information provided has been verified as follows: DuPage County Records/Research Room: (630-682-7398) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Recorder's Office: (630-682-7200) Contact Person: Patty/Karen Date called: December 10, 2004 DuPage County Clerk's Office— Revenue Department: (630-510-3376) . Contact Person: Laura Date called: December , I verify that the information provided above is accurate. Joy Pinta �anted Name Signature te: p Relationshi to Applicant' .December 10, 2004 Attorney 1/2005 • EXHIBIT A PERMANENT INDEX NUMBERS 06-28-103-009 06-28-103-014 06-28-103-005 06-28-103-018 06-28-103-019 • • EXHIBIT B LEGAL ADDRESSES 3001-3003 Butterfield Road Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 3121 Butterfield Road Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 I Butterfield Road Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 • • • EXHIBIT C ACTION REQUESTED MAP AMENDMENT The property is currently zoned ORA-1. To develop the Project, Petitioner is requesting the Village rezone the Property to B-1 Local Shopping Center District. Petitioner is requesting the B-1 zoning since it is the most appropriate district for the Project. The provisions of the B-2 district were developed for a regional shopping center, and the permitted uses in a B-3 district include uses that are not appropriate for the Project, e.g. cocktail lounges,printing shops, liquor sales, etc. A B-1 district will allow for the Property to be developed to its highest and best use. • • • EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF,AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2, AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG • SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 176 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 00 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE,A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74- 38411. PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269) LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. • ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF • SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2,AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64- 24069), 517.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET,MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE • INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. • • PARCEL 4 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1,A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64- 24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT (SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO. NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES • 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE (SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2), 265.61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98- 179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST(NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST, RECORD)ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET(450.89 FEET RECORD)TO THE . EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N; THENCE NORTH 04 • DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST(NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST, RECORD)ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N,AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069,A DISTANCE OF 191.20 FEET (191.21 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST(SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD), ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2) A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042,A • DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST, RECORD)ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1)THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD) A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5)THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER . OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS • WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. • • 2003 DU PAGE COUNTY F'AHVl=L NUMbLH 06-28-193-009 JOHN LOTUS NOVAK,County Collector REAL ESTATE TAX BILL $119.835.57 DUE ON JUNE 1, 2004 OFFICE HOURS:9-4.30.MON4RI $116,935.57 DUE ON SEPT 1, 2004 PHONE 630-GB2-7005 1 RATES 2009 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/COD6 6059 2002 TAX 2001 TAX 2002 RATE6 2003 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/OODE 6059 2002 TAX ` .2003 TAX ° COUNTY �* - EDUCATION so .1253 .1146 COUNTT'OF OU PAGE 675D.78 6181.61 1.9084 1.7861 GRADE SCHOOL DIST 58 102940.62 96343.66 .0274 .0231 PENSION FUND 1477.97 1376.09 10681 .0662 PENSION FUND 3673.36 3070.81 .0530 .0457 COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 2966.74 2465.09 116665 1.6246 HIGH SONOOL DIST 99 89892.34 8'1632.23 .0077 .0142 PENSION FUND 415.34 .76$.95 .0599 .0450 PENSION FUND 2907.40 7427,33 .1474 .1333 FOREST PRESERVE DIST 7950.87 7190.30 .2156 .2049 COLLEGE OU PAGE 502 11629.63 13,052.44 .0060 .0086 PENSION FUND 323.64 463.89 .0023 .0048 PENSION FUND 124.15 2".02 .02+18 ,0$70 DU PAGE AIRPORT AUTH 1337.73 1240.63 ss LOCAL s� LEVY NO LEVY DU PAGE MATER COHN .0361 .0346 YORK TONNSHIP 1947.26 1866.35 PAID yy .0357 .00354 YORK TiP ROAD 1925.68 1 09.50 R%m J U i A �Q .0013 .0003 PENSION FUND 70.12 26,97 LEVY NO LEVY VLG OF OAK DRWK .1519 .1476 OAK BROOK PARK DIST 8193.60 7961.66 .0148 .0190 PENSION FUND 798.32 1024.87 r w I�, LEVY NO LEVY HINSDALE SAN DIST '„ v SEP 2 0 ZW4 4."00 4,3357 TOTALS 245430,64 239877,14 NO PAYMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 4:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 19,2004 ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC $85 WASHMOTON V ENT QUESTIONS? CALL YOUR TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR 630-627-3354 ST PAUL MN 55102-1609 WIUMPUEFIS WHICH EOUALIMASSSSSED VALUE 6RIa� 16NTSF BOiAfiQOR 2002 811 N0 2002 F EMDEN71AL 2008 RE61DINTIA,{� DE awn fs W&OF VAWH FAIR CASH VALUE FAIR CASH VALtiCi 0UALRE 1.000000 1.0000 5394080 3EN_roR FREFL7E 3SES&WIft'" F RESIDOMAL ZQW 11"ING TOTAL TAX AM TOTAL 2M Pi EXE WnON VALUE PER$100 VALUATION TAX DUE; ;384080 - 8394080 x 4. 3387/100 = 233, 871.14 2003 DU PAGE COUNTY FAKUht-NUM13EH 06.28.103-014 JOHN LOTUS NOVAK.County Collector $5,749A4 DUE ON JUNE 1. 2004 OFFICE HOURS:a-4:30,MON-FRI REAL ESTATE TAX BILL $5.749.14 DUE ON SEPT 1, 2004 PHONE 830402.7006 2 RATES 2009 PIATE9 TAX DISTRICTS/CODE 6042 2002 TAX 2003 TAX . 2002 RATES 2002 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/CODE 6042 2002 TAX 2M TAX •• CWNTr ew •• EDUCATION •• ,1253 .1116 COUNTY OF OU PAGE • 332.29 303.91 1.9081 1.7861 GRADE SCHOOL GIST 58 3061.07 4736.71 .0274 . .0231 PENSION FUND 72.66 67.36 ,0681 .0662 PENSION FUND 160.60 175.5E .0550 .0437 COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 345.86 121.19 1.6665 1.6246 HIGH SCHOOL DIST 99 1419.55 4908.41 ,0077 .0142 PEYSION'FUND 20,42 3745 .0939 .0430 PENSION FUND 142.94 119.34 .1474 .1333 FOREST PRESERVE DIST 390.90 353.51 .2156 .2049 COLLEGE DU PAGE $02 571.77 543.35 .0060 .0066 PENSION FUND 15.91 22.80 .0023 .0048 PENSION FUND 6.19 12.B: .0218 .0230 DU PAGE AIRPORT AUTH 60.76 60.99 Pa10 m LOCAL +s LEVY NO LEVY DU PAGE MATER COMM 46 p NNp CQ U14 04 .0361 .03 YORK TOWNSHIP 90.73 J 91,75 COLLECTOR .0010 .0022 PENSION FUND 4.77 5.83 .0357 .0354 YORK T14P ROAD 94,67 93.86 .0013 10005 PENSION FUND 3,44 1.32 I LEVY NO LEVY VLO OF OAK BROOK ,1519 .1476 OAK BROOK PARK DIST 402.83 391.43 r A+•�+ ^ is ,0346 .0190 PENSION FUND 39.24 50.38 a DoPI►CI CO. COLLECTOR 4,5500 4.3357 TOTALS 12066.60 11496.2A NO PAYMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 4:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 19,2004 ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC 885 WASHINGTON ST•;, 3SESS ENT QUESTIONS? CALL YOUR TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR 030-627-3364 ST PAUL MN 55102-9308 AWD-wis WNICH EQUAIALEASSE'SSEO VALUE BOAMOF 2032 BLUNG 2002 RE31DEM1AL 2003 RESIDENTIAL REVIEW STATE. VALUE FAIR CASH VALUE FAIR CASH VALIIl: � 000000 1.000000 1.0000 265200 MA"MD SEWOFI FT4El RESIDENTIAL 2000 BILLING TOTAL TAX RATE 3;R�AINf �XfMIPef1011 . E ]1PTION VAWE PM 6100 VALUATION TAX LDue 2652007 X f 4.33571100 = 11.4 98.28 • ----------------------------------------------- ---------------- 2003 DU PAGE COUNTY PARCELNUMBER 00-28-103.006 JOHN LOTUS NOVAK,County.Collmor . REAL ESTATE TAX .BILL S22,902.10 DUE ON JUNE 1, 2004 OFFICE HOURS:8-4:30,MON.FTi1 $22,802.10 DUE ON SEPT 1, 2004 PHONE 630-692-7008 Z RATES 2009 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/CODE 6059 2002 TAX 2003 TAX 2002 RATES 2003 RATES TAX 013TRICTS I CODE .6059 200 TAX Z008 TAX a Y i' +i EDUCATION •• .1253 .1146 COUNTY OF DU PAGE 1317.94 1205.39 1.9084 1.7861 GRADE SCHOOL DIST 58 20073.12 18786.71 .0274 .0254 PENSION FUND 288.20 267.16 .0681 .0662 PENSION FUND 716.29 696.31 .0590 .0687 COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 978.50 480.68 1.6665 1.6246 HIGH SCHOOL.DIST 99 17528.74 1v88.03 .0077 .0142 PENSION FUND $01'99 149.35 .0539 .0450 PENSION FUND 566.93 473.32 .1474 .1333 FOREST PRESERVE DIST 1550.39 1402.08 .2156 ,2049 COLLEGE DU PAGE $02 2267.74 2155.19 .0060 .0086 PENSION FUND 63.10 90.45 .0023 ,0048 PENSION FUND 24.29 .50.99 .0248 .0230 OU PAGE AIRPORT AUTH 260.85 241.92 *� LOCAL ss I LEVY NO LEVY OU PAGE NATER CONM PXID L NOOK .0361 .0346 YORK TOWNSHIP 379.71 963.93 DUPWA Co. JUN 1 2004 .0018 .0022 PENSION FUND 16.93 23.14 COLLECTOR .0357 .0334 YORK THP ROAD 375.50 372.34 .0013 .00" PENSION FUND 13.61 5.25 i LEVY NO LEVY VLC OF OAK BROOK .1519 .1476 OAK 81400K PARK DIST 1597.72 1552.50 F lw .0148 .0190 PENSION FUND 155.67 199.841,110Y1�1 SE LEVY NO LEVY HINSDALE SAN DIST CO 4.5500 4.3357 TOTALS 67858.28 45604.20 NO PAYMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 4:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 19, 2004 ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC 98.5 WASHINGTON ST ENT QUESTIONS? CALL YOUR TOWNSHIP ASSESSOR 630.827-3364 ST PAUL MN 66102.1308 M VENT EQUALIMASSESSED VALUE SqVMOR 2002 S A( S L / ' , iESSAdEN TS E W S rAT VUE FAIR CASH VAL.U4 FAI R CASH VALL B A 000000 1.000000 1.0000 . 1051830 30UAL® ' 'i' RESIDENTIAL 2000 BLUNG TOM TAX RATE TOTAL 2003 &f 1 ' EXETIPTION VALUE PEA 5100 VALUATION TAX DUE 1051830 - - = 1051680 X E 4.33571100 = 45, 004.20 'ACHE COUNTY' � PARCEL NUMBER 00-28-103-018 JOHN LOTUS NOVAK,County Collector RE)_': 'E TAX BILL $217.04 DUE ON JUNE .1. 2004 OFFICE HOURS:a-4:30,MON-FRI $217..04 DUE ON SEPT 1, 2004 PHONE 630.052-70as RATES 2089 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/COD[ 6076 9002 TAX 2=TAX 2002 RATES 2003 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/CODE 6F6 2002 TAX 2003 TAX w COUNTY as -,EDUCATION ss •1253 .1146 COUNTY OF OU PAGE 12.99 11188 1.9084 1.7661 GRADE SCHOOL DIST 58 197.90 45.21 0274 .0254 PENSION FUND 2.84 2.63 .0681 .0662 PENSION FUND 7.06 6.86 0550 .0457. COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 5.70 4.73 1.6665 1.6216 HIGH SCHOOL DIST 99 377.81 168.47 0077 .0142 PENSION FUND .79 1.47 .0539 .0450 PENSION FUND 5.50 4.66 1474 .1333 FOREST PRESERVE.DIST 15.28 13.82 .2356 .2049 COLLEGE OU PAGE 502 22.35 23.24 0060 .0086 PENSION FUND .62 .09 .0023 .0048. PENSION FUND .33 .58 0248 .0230 DU PAGE AIRPORT AUTH 2.57 2.38 ss LOCAL as PA►u LEVY NO LEVY DU PAGE HATER COHH AM L NUM 0361 .0346 VOW TaHlsHIP 3.74 3.58 �'0 ACTOR JUN X 200¢ .0010 .0022 . PENSION FUND .16 .22 0357 .0354 YORK TUP ROAD 3.70 3.67 0013. .0005 PENSION FUND .13 .03 0171 .0168 YORIE TNP SPC POLICE 1.77 1.74 4.4004 4.1859 TOTALS 456.34 434.08 NO PAYMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 4:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 19,2004 ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC 3185 WASHINGTON ST 8MMENT QUESTIONS? CALL YOUR TOWNSHXP ASSESSOR 630-027-3354 ST PAUL MN 66102.1308 MS SS WHICH EQUALMEAESSED VALUE OF EOARD OR 2007 BIw NO 2=R OENTIAL 2008 RESID�IAL ESSMENT3 REVIEW 6TATE VALE FAIR C VAWfi FAIR CASH VALUE 100000 1.000000 1.0000 10370 ; �• Y ',t�r�1K'�5T6 OLLAL® s 8''. l{• R6SIOENTWL 2008 BILLING TOTALTA I RATE TOTAL 2003 S63SMENr S'��"®( 7p ,r E 3mrnoN VALUE P6RSIOOVALUATION TAI(DUE 10870 '- = 10370 X 4. 1185911081 = 434.08 ' v • • ._ r, John Lotus Novak DuPage County Collector . P.O. BOX 787 x Wheaton, (L 60189-M7 12132004 REAL ESTATE TAx PECEIPT FOR PERMANENT PARCeL 06-28-103-016 200-3 TAX 1ST 1N5.TALLHENT 6217404 PAID 06-01-2004 333• 1 000 i JOH14 L•NOYAK DUPAGE CO. COLLECTOR 1003 TAX ZNV INSTALLMENT $217•Q4 PAID 49-30-2404 333 0 000 JOHN L.NOVAK DUPAGE .CO• COLLEC'TOA s i 1 .Y y r ✓ `• i NOTICE 06-28—t03-018 TROES If EITHER INSTALLMENT IS MARKED AS 9EING ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC *UNOPAID* OR *SOLD** YGU MUST CONTACT THE 3Bg WASHINGTON ST OUPAGE COUNTY CLERK .FOR AN ESTtkATE Of ST PAUL NN 55102 REDEMPTION. PHONE FOR INFDZ 630-682-7035 � ' � ?� � � .� '. � ;far x� ,�:. ± ,�� s• �, • N I � 2003 DU PAGE COUNTY F'ASULL NUMBEH 06-28.103.019 JOHN LOTUS NOVAK,County Collector REAL ESTATE TAX BILL $4,011-14 DUE ON JUNE 1, 20o4 OPMOR HOURS:8-4:30.MoN-FRI &„, 54,011,14 DUE ON SEPT 1, 2004 PHONE 63646(2-7005' 2 RATES 2003 RATES TAX DI$TAtCTS/CODE 6076 2002 TAX 2003 TAX 2002 RATES 2003 RATES TAX DISTRICTS/CODE 6076 2000 TAX 200 TAK so COUNTY m st EDUCATION an .1253 .1146 COUNTY OF OU.PAGI 240,13 219.63 1.9084 1.7861 ORADE SCHOOL DIST 58 3697.44 3423.0( .0274 .0254 PENSION FUND 52.51 48:67 .0681 .0662 PENSION FUND 130.51 126.01 .0550 .0447 COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 105,40 87.58 116663 1.6246 HIGH SCHOOL 61ST 99 3193.84 3113.5�� .0077 .0142 PENSION FUND 34.75 27.21 .0539 .0430 PENSION FUND 103.29 86.24 .1474 .1333 FOREST PRESERVE DIST 282.49 255,46 .2156 .20W9 COLLEGE DU PAGE 502 413.19 392.6: .0060 .0086 PENSION FUND 11.49 16.48 .0023 .0048 PENSION FUND 4.53 9.2E .0248 .0239 DJ PAGE AIRPORT AUTH 47.52 44.07 PAID 1 LEVY NO LEVY DU PAGE WATER CUM( � ,1 U id 1 20 4 .0361 .0346 YORK TOWNSHIP 69.18 66.31 .0018 -0022 PENSION FUND 3.34 4.21 .0357 .0354 YORK TFP ROAD 68.61 67.84 10013 .0005 PENSION FUND 2.69 .95 1P A 1 D .0171 .0168 YORK TWP SPC POLICE 32.77 32.19 6Negv rnAAtcTp c n e 20 4 4.4004 4.1859 TOTALS 8439.38 8022.21 NO PAYMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER 4:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 19; 2004 ST PAUL PROPERTIES INC 385 WASIIINQTQN ST MESNEWT QUESTIONS? CALL YOUR TOiNSHXP ASSESWR 630-627-3954 ST PAUL MN 55102.1309 MjrERS WHIC✓'T EQUALIZEACSESGED VALUE R OF BOARD OR 2002 DILUN6 2002 TiEBIDFNITAL 2DW RESIDENTIAL B ENIJ REVBM STATE VALUE FAIR CASH VALUE FAIR CASH VALUE 000000 1.000000 1.0000 191650 20LNLGEO St��0�0y,- SENIQR' RESIDENTIAL 2003 BIWNG TOTAL TAX RATE SSESSMENT .''` N PIIOM sxEM T10N VALUE PERS100VALUATION T7AXD E 7AX DLIB 181850 X 4. 1859/100 BT 022.28 • AFFIVDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND AUTHORITY 1. St. Paul Properties, Inc. ("St. Paul") is the exclusive owner of the approximately 19 acres of property in Oak Brook, Illinois ("Village") as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property"). 2. St. Paul is seeking to develop an approximately 190,000 square foot lifestyle center(the "Center"). 3, St.'Paul has authorized NAI Hiffman ("Agent") to petition the Village on its behalf for the following approvals necessary to develop the Center, • re-zoning the Property to B-1 a text amendment in the B-1 district • certain variances- • special uses a plat of consolidation. 4. Agent is hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents or petitions required by the Village to petition for and implement the,above entitlements. . 5. As of the date of this Affidavit, St. Paul has no partners or affiliates which are members of the developing entity of the Center. If any individuals or entities are added to the developing entity, St. Paul will immediately so notify the Village in wrrting. Michael D. -Inicky, Ass e Manager, not person ly, but as representative of St. Paul Pr , Inc. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) November l 2004 COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Personally appeared, Michael D. Elnicky, Asset Manager, ST. PAUL PROPERTIES and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me. 7C, d !Wtry Public y ' .t....i4_� POTENTIAL SPEAKERS AT PUBLIC MEETINGS OAK BROOK PROMENADE PLAZA • PETITIONER: Dennis Hiffman Ryan Murphy Mike Elnicky ARCHITECT: Henry Mover Klover Architects ENGINEER: Phil Wolf Manhard Engineering TRAFFIC CONSULTANT Don O'hara KLOA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Wendy Schulenberg Daniel Weinbach & Partners • ATTORNEYS Mary Riordan Joy Pinta Other consultants and representatives may be added to this list as needed or requested. • NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF A MAP AMENDMENT St. Paul Properties, Inc. (the "Petitioner") is the owner of approximately 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Meyers and Butterfield Roads (the "Property") which is legally described in Exhibit D attached to the Petition. Petitioner is proposing a mixed use retail and commercial Project (the "Project") consisting of approximately 180,000 square feet. The various elements of the Project are depicted throughout the attached Exhibits. The Property is comprised of two parcels; one is 17.2 acre parcel which is improved with three office buildings and a detention pond (the "Office Parcel'); the other is approximately 1 acre and is unimproved (the "Tollway Parcel). The Tollway Parcel and the Office Parcel are collectively referred to as the "Property." The Office Parcel is in the Village and is currently zoned ORA-1, "Office- Research-Assembly-District." The Tollway Parcel is currently in unincorporated • DuPage County and is zoned R-2 pursuant to County Code. To develop the Project, Petitioner will petition the Village to annex the Tollway Parcel and is currently petitioning the Village to rezone all of the Property to B-1 "Local Shopping Center District." Petitioner is requesting the B-1 zoning because it is the most appropriate zoning district for the Project. The provisions of the B-2 district were developed for a regional shopping center, and the permitted uses in a B-3 district include uses that are not be appropriate for the Project, e.g. cocktail lounges, printing shops, liquor stores, etc. A B-1 district will allow for the Property to be developed to its highest and best use. The Property is subject to certain limitations that cannot be reasonably mitigated or removed by Petitioner. On the Property is an approximately 5 acre detention pond which serves as an on-line detention pond for the properties up stream but cannot be used to provide storage for additional development or redevelopment on the Property. Moreover, according to FEMA maps, the pond is in a flood- • • plain, so no alterations to the pond can be made without first going through an expensive and lengthy approval process. In addition to the pond, the revised FEMA maps now show the 0.5 acres of the Property fronting Butterfield Road as floodplain. This 0.5 acres contains 3.5 acre feet of floodplain. Filling in this floodplain would not be feasible for economic and timing reasons. Finally, there is a Com Ed easement that is one hundred feet (100') wide that runs across the southern boundary of the Property. There are high-tension power lines running across the entire easement, and buildings cannot be located under those wires. This means that while the area can be used for parking, all of the buildings have to be located at least one hundred feet (100') north of the southern property line resulting in the loss of an additional one acre. The resultant impact of the above factors is that of the 18.2 acres of Property, only • about 11.7 acres are available for actual development. At the same time, the Project must have a minimum level of tenant density, or critical mass, in order to attract the high-end commercial users. As a result, the biggest challenge in developing the Property is creating a critical mass or the actual usable remaining acreage, given all of these restrictions. The proposed Project will not have a deleterious impact on the health, safety or welfare of the community. The Project has been designed to exceed the level of quality of the surrounding properties; the traffic and storm water can be managed by the existing improvements, or improvements to be made by Petitioner as a part of the Project. Petitioner's rezoning petition is warranted in that it satisfies the Village's standards for a rezoning. The Project will have a positive financial impact in that it will generate significant sales tax revenue for the Village. Overall, the Oak Brook Promenade will have a positive impact on the quality of the Village. The following is an analysis of the Village's standards for map • amendment and a detailed description of the Project elements. 2 Standard 1: The character of the neighborhood The neighborhood is a business and commercial area. The Property is bounded on the south by the Illinois Tollway, on the east by Meyers Road, on the west by a Com Ed substation, and on the north by Fountain Square Plaza, which is a retail and restaurant development. Fountain Square Plaza includes various sit- down restaurants with valet parking, and some mixed use retail. Moreover, significant retail and commercial uses are located on Butterfield Road to the east of the Property and even more so the west. The proposed Center has been designed to be consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the community as a whole and to look and feel like an open-air market consistent i with the character of Oak Brook. The goal of the Project design team was to create an area with a common architectural character incorporating certain features located through the Village. The design allows for the use of a variety of materials, heights, and signage to allow for the feel of buildings developed independently of one another, as though the buildings were not all designed and • built at the same time. The site plan attached as Exhibit 5 depicts the proposed Site Plan for the Project. At the time of this application, Petitioner cannot actually commit to the exact footprints of various buildings since these will vary as specific tenants are located in the Project. Rather than approving the exact location of the buildings depicted on the Site Plan, Petitioner is requesting that the Village approve the "building envelopes" depicted on Exhibit 4 attached hereto. This will allow Petitioner to adjust buildings footprints anywhere within the envelopes, not to exceed the maximum floor to area ration ("FAR") permitted by Code, the Design Criteria, the parking requirements, all of the Exhibits and all of the other parameters outlined in this petition. Incorporation of Design Criteria Petitioner's architect has developed a Design Criteria, attached hereto as Exhibit 12 to govern the development of the Project. The Petitioner is asking that the Design Criteria, and all the other Exhibits attached hereto, be incorporated by the • Village into its ordinances approving Petitioner's Petitions for the Project. The 3 • Petitioner will also incorporate the Design Criteria into all of its leases, thereby insuring that any development on the Property must comply with the guidelines. Following is an in-depth discussion of the various elements of the Design Criteria, all of which insure the Project will be consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the Village as a whole, and that it be consistent with the materials Petitioner is presenting to the Village for approval. Architecture The Oak Brook Promenade has been designed to create an area with a consistent theme, but with a variety of materials, heights, colors and signage The Design Criteria also regulate the materials and design parameters that are permitted in the Project, including, but not limited to the pattern, size, shape and number of window openings; the glazing or screening of window openings; and surface treatment such as cornices, moldings, reveals and sills. It is the Petitioner's goal to allow enough contrast between the different buildings and various tenants while still maintaining a common architectural character. The design criteria will allow certain tenants to include some detail which is used consistently for identification by that retailer. The elevations of the Project are depicted in Exhibit 11. These elevations demonstrate the type of architectural treatments that will be used in the Project along with the types of materials and colors to be used. All buildings will be built in substantial conformance with the approved Design Criteria and architectural themes. The Design Criteria will be incorporated into each lease, thereby insuring the Village that the Promenade will be the first-class Project being presented by Petitioner. Petitioner anticipates the accompanying material and Exhibits will be incorporated into the Village's ordinances approving the Project Pedestrian Areas and Circulation The pedestrian areas were designed to provide space for patrons to meet, relax and enjoy the amenities of the Project. The pedestrian areas will be between 4 thirteen feet (13') and thirty-six feet (36') and will be clearly delineated by the use of different materials such as pavers, planting materials, trash receptacles and benches. A typical pedestrian area is illustrated in Exhibit 16 attached hereto and a pedestrian circulation plan is attached hereto as Exhibit 9. Landscaping The Landscape Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit 13, depicts the overall. landscape concept. The design has been developed to complement the site layout and the architecture of the new buildings, while helping to create an upscale shopping experience, and taking advantage of the extensive site open space. The existing pond and the mature trees provide a site amenity that helps set the character of the Property. Petitioner's goal in developing the landscape plan was to extend the sense of mature landscaping over the site. This will be accomplished in part by relocating some of the existing trees and installing new trees that are larger than required by the Code. All new plants being proposed for the site will be specifically suited to their location, and they will provide a variety of color and texture throughout the year. A plant palette is provided for each of the landscape elements as specified in Exhibits 16, 17, 18, and 19, and all plant material will meet or exceed Village requirements. Tree Preservation As previously noted, the Property is improved with three office buildings. On the Property, along with the existing office buildings are a variety of mature tree and shrub plantings. There is also a large detention pond that is surrounded by a significant number of mature trees and some shrub masses. The existing trees have been surveyed (refer to Exhibits 14 and 15 for the Site Tree Survey and Tree Survey List respectively) and the landscaping plan indicates the plants and trees that will remain, be moved or removed from the Property. In general, the trees are in good condition and range from 4" to 32" caliper. Existing trees that are unaffected by the proposed site development and grading will be preserved. These trees are located mainly on the north and east sides of the pond. A 5 quantity of existing trees (15) that are of an appropriate size (4"-8" caliper) and quality species (Maple, Ginkgo and honey locust) will be relocated on site. Most of the trees are too large to allow for cost effective relocation. Also, many of the existing trees on site are ash trees. There is a threat that the "Emerald Ash Borer" is making its way to the Chicagoland area (it's currently in southwest Michigan), and many local communities are restricting the planting of new ash. These insects are wiping out all ash trees in the areas that they infest, and there is no known control. While Petitioner will preserve the larger ash around the pond where it is prudent, the landscape plan does not provide for the relocation of any of the ash trees. Site Perimeter Landscape The site perimeter will be planted with trees and shrubs to provide the screening for parking areas as required by Code. The site entries and the intersection of Meyers and Butterfield Roads will be planted with colorful flowering shrubs and perennials as depicted on Exhibit 17 which depicts a Typical Plan, Sections and a Plant Palette. Parking Lot Landscape The landscape for the parking lot landscaping meets and exceeds the Village Code. A minimum of 10% parking lot interior greenspace is required and Petitioner's plan provides over 11%. The Code also requires that one tree is located in the area provided by 15 parking spaces. Based on the parking count (820 surface spaces), 54 trees are required. Petitioner will exceed the overall tree requirement, and many of the shade trees planted will be larger than required 4"-6" caliper) to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. q ( p ) 9 p These trees will be located disproportionately over the parking area as a section of the parking lot is located over the underground parking garage. Much of the south lot is within the Com Ed easement (under the high tension lines) and there is a gas main that restricts planting. Tree planting is restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. Landscape dividers are required every 6 three parking bays, and they have been provided, with the exception of one small area north of building 'D'. The large divider island over the parking garage will be developed as a pedestrian plaza with raised planters, special paving and ornamental trees. Typical landscaped parking lot islands will be planted with low, salt tolerant shrubs, perennials and groundcovers. Significant site intersections and major pedestrian/vehicular circulation routes will be highlighted with perennials to define these routes and provide seasonal color, as depicted on Exhibit 17. Storefront Landscape The storefront streetscape will be one of the most important elements of this type of shopping and dining experience. The special environment that is created by the unique architecture of the buildings, the paving, and the site furniture, is enhanced and softened by the landscape planting. Beds will be planted with trees to provide a shady canopy, a mix of evergreen and flowering shrubs for year round color, and masses of perennials and annual flowers for strong splashes of color. Decorative pots with seasonal flower plantings will accompany the in-ground landscape. Raised planters and bollars will separate pedestrians and cars. All of the landscape elements will be integrated with the site furniture and ornamental lighting as depicted on Exhibit 16 and Exhibit 23. Pond Landscape The existing pond is heavily planted with mature ash, linden, maple, oak, willow, hawthorn, spruce and crabapple trees. There is an existing gravel path and large boulders have been used as retaining walls where needed. There are masses of Junipers and other shrubs spotted along the edge of the path that are in good condition, but much of the other lower and water edge planting is spotty. Wooden benches are currently located occasionally along the pond edge, but they are in poor condition. These benches will be removed and new concrete benches will be added to the seating areas. Petitioner will repair the existing path and boulder walls as needed, and a matching gravel path will be installed 40 where the existing path is removed for the pond re-grading. A low-voltage • pathway lighting system will be installed along the path. The new path will not extend behind the buildings, but outdoor dining areas will be located as overlooks on the west side of the pond. (Outdoor patrons will not have direct access to the pond or path). The existing trees that are not impacted by grading, and that are in good condition, will be preserved. Some trees will be removed at the intersection of Butterfield and Meyers Roads to allow for views into the development and for visibility of the major signage at the corner. A number of the existing trees along Meyers Road have suffered from severe pruning due to overhead lines along that edge of the property. These trees will be replaced with trees of a more appropriate scale. New trees and shrub masses will also be planted along all of the newly graded pond edge. Clump form, water-loving trees, like Birch and Alder, will frame the decks and be up-lighted at night. The area from the path to the normal water line will be planted with a mixture of water edge grasses and perennials. A pond aeration system will be installed as a visual feature and to help with the water quality, as depicted on Exhibit 19, Exhibit 20, and Exhibit 23. Building Signs The Design Criteria allow for several different types of signs within the Project. This is important so as not to create the feel of a typical shopping center which would have same type, size and color of signs. Exhibit 7 depicts a sample of the typical signs that would be permissible under the Design Criteria. The signs and samples of permitted building signs are discussed in depth in the Design Criteria. Petitioner is requesting, in a separate petition, a variance for the building signage to allow for the unique signage as described in the Design Criteria and depicted in Exhibit 12. Monument Signs In addition to building signage, the Project will include two monument signs, located at the main entrance to the Project and the corner of Meyer and Butterfield Roads as depicted on Exhibit 13. The monument sign at the 8 • intersection of Meyers and Butterfield Roads will be stone and brick with tenant identification in metal lettering and will be "halo lit." The entry sign will not include tenant identification. The two monument signs are depicted on Exhibit 6, which shows the color and material of the signs, as well as the dimensions. The monuments signs will provide function in directing patrons to the Center and as a design feature of the overall Project. Both monument signs will be built in conformance with the Code. Lighting Petitioner will light the parking areas of the Project with the type of lighting standard depicted in Exhibit 3 attached hereto. The lighting was designed to provide adequate lighting for safety, without causing any spillage into neighboring properties, and shall comply with the Village of Oak Brook public works construction standards. A photometric plan is also attached as Exhibit 3. Traffic A complete traffic study, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 27, was completed to determine if the existing improvements would be adequate for the traffic the Project will generate. Because the traffic on Butterfield is the same on weekends and weekdays, the study addresses the peak periods on weekdays. The traffic study also indicates that the intersection at Butterfield and Meyers Roads is failing (level of service E); however, without significant State intervention, the improvements needed to improve the level of service at this intersection are too significant to constructed by Petitioner. Therefore, the traffic study concludes that no new improvements are required and that the Project traffic will not create a public safety hazard. There will be no drive-through windows in the Project. Parking The parking for the Project has been designed to meet the Code requirements. The existing office buildings on the Property were constructed with two 9 • underground parking garages. Petitioner has incorporated these underground garages into the Project design, and they will be combined and used for employee and valet parking. As depicted on the Parking Plan attached hereto as Exhibit 10, there are a total of 1009 parking spaces, 819 are surface and 190 are in the underground garages. For the retail, there are 5 spaces for each 1000' of floor area as required by the Code; for offices there are 3.3 for each 1000' of floor area, and for restaurants there are 10 spaces for each 1000' feet of floor area. To meet Code, the Project will provide the 1009 parking spaces as follows: 128, 255 sq. feet of retail at 5:1 = 641 30,000 sq. feet of restaurant at 10:1 = 300 20,450 sq, feet of office at 3.3:1 = 68 Of the 1009 spaces, twenty-one handicapped parking spaces will be provided in accordance with the Code and Illinois law. There will be cross easements for the • entire property to allow for common access and parking, thereby allowing each tenant's patrons to use parking anywhere within the Center. Engineering Exhibit 24 is both the preliminary engineering plan and full size site plan for the Project. The Property is approximately 19.7 acres, with an existing pond of approximately 5 acres and an additional 0.5 acre of floodplain. The Project was engineered to provide adequate storm water detention in accordance with Village Code. No storm water shall flow into adjacent property or onto public roads in a quantity or manner that would be detrimental to the operation of the roadways. There are no sidewalks adjoining the Property, however, there is one sidewalk extending on the west side of the property which is proposed to dead end at building W. No variance is being requested from the Village or the County. Petitioner has applied to the Hinsdale Sanitary District for an allocation analysis • and tap-on approval. Other utilities for the Project will be designed in accordance 10 with Village Code after consultation with Village staff. The Project will meet all Village and life-safety requirements. Included as Exhibit 25 is a plat of consolidation. The Property currently is a combination of five different lots, and Petitioner is desirous of combining them into a single lot. Uses and Design Approval Prior to allowing a tenant into the Project, each prospective tenant will be required to submit its proposed building or space to Petitioner or any subsequent owner. Petitioner will confirm that the tenant's proposed plans conform to all of the Design Criteria and the Exhibits, and will evaluate the available parking to make sure that adequate parking is available for tenant's intended use. Petitioner will send a written approval to the tenant with a copy to the Village's Community Development Director. • Petitioner will also restrict the uses permitted in the Project. Petitioner's uses will be more restrictive than the permitted uses allowed in the B-1 local Shopping Center District by the Code. The following uses are permitted by the Code but will not be permitted in the Project: Servicing of motor vehicles Regular barber shops Photo studios Generic drug stores Grocery stores, except for gourmet stores such as Dean&Delucca or Fox&Obel Traditional hardware stores Laundromats Shoe repair Sporting goods store, other than specialty clothing Public utility uses Nursing homes Telephone equipment buildings Municipal type uses Cocktail lounges not associated with a restaurant Post offices • Dry cleaning operations In addition to the foregoing prohibited uses, "big box" retailers or discount stores will not be allowed to locate in the Project. These uses will be enforced by Petitioner. The foregoing uses will only be allowed upon written approval by the Village Community Development Director. Management All of the tenants in the Project will lease their properties and stores. The Property will remain under a common owner, and that owner will enforce all the provisions agreed to and mandated by the Exhibits, the Design Criteria, and the Village. Schedule Depending on its ability to relocate tenants and finalize leases, Petitioner will commence demolition of the existing office buildings in June 2005. Petitioner • would like to begin new building construction by September 2005, with delivery to tenants in the fall of 2006. The foregoing dates are estimates and are contingent upon the Petitioner's ability to relocate tenants in the office buildings and to obtain all regulatory approvals that are required for the development. These dates may vary due to weather or other circumstances beyond the control of the Petitioner. Standard 2: The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions Currently, the office market in the Oak Brook area is over-built with a vacancy rate greater than 30%. The existing zoning, ORA-1, significantly limits the permitted uses of the Property to office type uses, for which there is currently no demand. The few existing tenants still remaining in the buildings will be relocated to existing buildings with high vacancy rates, thereby improving the 12 • status of other properties. Without the Project, the existing buildings will continue to have chronic vacancies and will diminish in value, which will have an impact on the Village as a whole. Re-zoning the Property to a B-1 "Local Shopping Center District" will allow for the redevelopment of the Property into a vibrant, tax producing property. Standard 3: The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the value of other property in the area. As stated in Standard 2, the rezoning and resulting redevelopment of the Property will help to reverse a trend of depreciation, obsolescence and vacancy in the area. The Village can reasonably expect that the Project will stimulate the development and redevelopment of additional properties along Butterfield Road and 22nd Street. Any impact resulting from this requested map amendment will be positive on surrounding property values. Standard 4: The suitability of the property for the zoned purposes. • The requested B-1 zoning is consistent with surrounding land uses. Two regional commercial/retail developments are located in the Butterfield/22"d Street corridor. Oak Brook Mall is to the east and Yorktown Mall is to the west in Lombard. In addition, there are several other restaurants and commercial and retail developments such as Fountain Square, which is directly to the north on Butterfield Road. B-1 zoning is well-suited for the Property. Standard 5: The existing uses and zoning of nearby property. The Fountain Square shopping center across Butterfield Road to the north is in the Village of Lombard and is zoned B3-PD pursuant to the Lombard Village Code. The Lombard B3-PD allows for the same type of development as the Project, including mixed retail and restaurants. The property to the west is located in the Village, and is improved with the Com Ed substation and zoned ORA-1. The southern boundary of the Property is the 1-88 Tollway. Petitioner is requesting the Village approve its petition for a map amendment to re-zone the • Office Parcel from an ORA-1 and the Tollway Parcel from R-2 in the County to a 13 • B-1 district. The eastern boundary of the Property is Meyers Road, and the property on the east side of Meyers Road is zoned ORA 1. The Project will be consistent with surrounding land uses. Standard 6: The length of time under the existing zoning that the property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of land development. The Property has been zoned ORI-1 since 1976. Standard 7: The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner. Vacant office buildings provide no gain to the public and yet still require the Village's police, fire and regulatory services. The assessed value of the office buildings has declined for the past 3 years. Currently, the Property generates no sales taxes for the Village. If this petition is approved, the Village will gain a desirable economic development which will generate additional revenue for the Village. • Standard 8: The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public. The proposed development will generate in excess of$1,000,000 per year for the Village of Oak Brook as depicted in the economic analysis in Exhibit 26. Since the Project has no residential component, there will be no demand for services on the schools, parks, libraries, etc. The Project will require only those services the Village is currently providing. Moreover, the redevelopment of the Property will act as a catalyst for further redevelopment in the Butterfield/22nd Street corridor. The high quality of the Project will help to set a standard for future development in the Village of Oak Brook. Standard 9: The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan; and the community need for the use proposed by the property owner. The Comprehensive Plan shows the use for the Property as office. However, • given the high vacancy rate for office Projects in 22nd Street/Butterfield Road 14 • corridor, maintaining vacant office space provides no benefit for the community. On the other hand, if this Project is approved as proposed, it will provide needed boutique retail and dining opportunities. The proposed use of the Property meets the Village's standards for a map amendment, and Petitioner is requesting its petition by approved. • I • 15 G � ~ . 00K qErITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) 0 AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ SPECIAL USE ($675) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50 each lot frontage) ❑ -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Southwest corner of Meyer & PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. Please see Exhibit A LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS* Please see Exhibit B ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION Section 13-7A-1, Section ACTION REQUESTED' Please see Exhibit C 13-7A-3(B) , and Section 13-3-8 PERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT x_ OWNER(S) OF RECORD St. Paul Properties, Inc. PHONE (561) 310-2065 ADDRESS 385 Washington Street Mail Code: CITY St. Paul STATE MN ZIP 55102 BENEFICIARY(IES) OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) NAI Hiffman PHONE (630) 691-0616 ADDRESS One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 CITY Oakbrook Terrace STATE IL ZIP 60181 E-mail Ad ess dhiffman@hiffman.com I(we) i that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my( ow and belief. In additio to the above fees, applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of billi 11,41. A�e - nature of Applicant Date ~Signature of Applicant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .. nv- Y 3 3 I c� v � � Pd APP-RESIDENfT1AL VARIATION 504 • EXHIBIT C ACTION REQUESTED TEXT AMENDMENTS Petitioner is requesting three (3) text amendments to the Code as follows: 1. Section 13-7A-1 lists the permitted uses in the B-1 District and does not include "health clubs." Petitioner is requesting that"health clubs"be added to the B-1 District as a permitted use. This will allow Petitioner to market a portion of the second floor space to an upscale health club. 2. Section 13-7A-3(B) "Lot Area Requirements" currently reads: "Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet(30') and more than two (2) stories." Petitioner is requesting that the text be amended to read: "Structure Height: Not more than fifty feet(50') and more than two (2) stories." Increasing the height restriction is necessary for Petitioner to build the Project as depicted in the elevations. The two story buildings will be 50 feet(50') ornamented with decorative features. 3. Section 13-3-8 "Structure Height'' states: "No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in . which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys,radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms,penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet(15') above the height limits of the district in which it is located." Petitioner is requesting that the text be amended to read: ". . . or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be thirty feet(30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied." Increasing the structure height restriction will allow Petitioner to build the Project at the depicted elevations. The two(2) story buildings will be fifty feet(50') high, with decorative features between twenty-five feet(25')to thirty feet(30') in height. • AFFIVDAVIT OF: OWNERSHIP AND AUTHORITY 1• St. Paul Properties, Inc. ("St. Paul") is the exclusive owner of the approximately 19 acres of property in Oak Brook, Illinois ("Village") as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property"). 2• St. Paul is seeking to develop an approximately 190,000 square foot lifestyle center(the "Center"). 37 St.*Paul has authorized NAI Hiffman ("Agent") to petition the Village'on its behalf for the following approvals necessary to develop the Center, • re-zoning the Property to B-1 • a text amendment in the B-1 district • certain variances- 0 special uses • a plat of consolidation. 4. Agent is hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents or petitions-required by the Village to petition for and implement the.above entitlements. 5. As of the date of this Affidavit, St. Paul has no partners or affiliates • which are members of the developing entity of the Center. If any individuals or entities are added to the developing entity, St. Paul will immediately so notify the Village In writing. Michael D, Inicky, Asse Manager, not person ly, but as representative of St. Paul P , Inc. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) November ' 2004 Personally appeared, Michael D. Einicky, Asset Manager, ST. PAUL PROPERTIES and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me. ry Public • NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF TEXT AMENDMENTS St. Paul Properties, Inc. (the "Petitioner") desires to redevelop its approximately 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Meyers the ("Property") which is legally described in Exhibit D attached to this Petition. Petitioner is proposing a retail and commercial project (the "Project") that is depicted in detail in the attached Exhibits. Petitioner is requesting three text amendments, one for building height, one for decorative structure height, and one to add a health club as a permitted use in a B-1 Local Shopping Center District. Petitioner is requesting these text amendments to allow for uses and design features that currently are only allowed in a B-3 District. Petitioner does not seek a B-3 District determination however, because a B-3 District would allow for many permitted uses that are undesirable to both the Village and Petitioner. This is a situation that other property owners and developers will most likely face as • they try to redevelop and develop properties within a B-1 District. These proposed text amendments will allow for the type of design the Village is seeking from future projects without compromising the control afforded it through a B-1 District determination. As depicted in Exhibit 1, the Project will have unique architectural treatment that will be complemented with the landscape shown in Exhibit 13 and the pedestrian areas depicted in Exhibit 16. As shown on Exhibit 11, the buildings have been designed with varying roof lines, both in terms of materials and height, thereby creating an interesting skyline. The design includes a tower which will be a focal point of the Project. Without the requested text amendment governing the height of the buildings and structures, the Project, and other projects within B-1 Districts, will end up looking more like a conventional shopping center. It is important for the success of the Project that tenant mixes be varied and • unique. One of the possible uses is an up-scale health club to complement the • type of shops and restaurants being planned. Accordingly, Petitioner is requesting a text amendment to allow for a high end fitness club as a permitted use in the B-1 Local Shopping Center District. Petitioner is requesting three text amendments to the Code as follows: 1. Section 13-7A-1 lists the permitted uses in the B-1 District and does not include "health clubs." Petitioner is requesting that "health clubs" be added to the B-1 District as a permitted use. This will allow Petitioner to market a portion of the second floor space to an upscale health club; and 2. Section 13-7A-3(B) "Lot Area Requirements" currently reads: "Structure Height: Not more than thirty feet (30') and more than two stories." Petitioner is requesting that the text be amended to read: • "Structure Height: Not more than f&feet (50') and more than two stories." Increasing the height restriction is necessary for Petitioner to build the Project as depicted in the elevations. The two story buildings will be not more than fifty feet (50') and will be ornamented with decorative features; and 3. Section 13-3-8 "Structure Height" states: "No structure shall be erected, converted, expanded, reconstructed, or structurally altered to exceed the height limit measured above the natural ground level, as determined by the village engineer, for the district in which the structure is located. However, this height limit for skylights, steeples, flagpoles, chimneys, radio and television aerials, wireless masts, or electric and telephone service poles anywhere in the village; and mechanical rooms, penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, • ventilating fans or similar equipment, towers, water tanks, or 2 • elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be fifteen feet (16) above the height limits of the district in which it is located." Petitioner is requesting that the text be amended to read: ". . . or elevators or other appurtenances anywhere in the village except residential districts, shall be thirty feet (30') above the height limits of the district in which it is located and shall be for ornamental purposes only and shall in no event be occupied.." As noted above, approving this text amendment to allow for a greater structure height restriction will allow Petitioner to build the Project at the depicted elevations with the design features depicted in the elevations in Exhibit 11. The two story buildings will be fifty feet (50') high, with decorative features between twenty-five feet (25') to thirty feet (30') in height. Pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Plan Commission Rules of Procedure, the • following is an analysis of the text amendments being requested by Petitioner, and the Village's standards for amendments: Standard 1: The character of the neighborhood Because the surrounding uses of the Property are all commercial or office, none of the three text amendments being requested will have any impact on the character of the neighborhood. The health club will be consistent with surrounding uses and the height of the structure and decorative features will be consistent and complementary to the neighborhood. i Standard 2: The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning/text restrictions The current B-1 regulations for height structure (bulk) limits developments within B-1 Districts in the Village to flat, one-story buildings resulting in the development of a typical strip shopping center. The text amendments Petitioner is requesting • will allow development in B-1 Districts to be varied and interesting. The 3 • amendment expanding the permitted uses to include health clubs will add a popular, healthy and appropriate use to the B-1 District. As stated above, the three text amendments being requested will be consistent with and complementary to the character of the neighborhood. Standard 3: The extent to which the removal of the existing limitations would depreciate the value of other property in the area Allowing the Property to be redeveloped into a B-1 District with these text amendments will increase the value of other property in the area. Blighted buildings will be eliminated, and property values will increase. Moreover, development and redevelopment in other B-1 Districts can be more creative thereby increasing property values in other areas within the Village as well. Standard 4: The suitability of the property for the zoned purposes This standard is not applicable for the text amendments being requested. • Standard 5: The existing uses and zoning of nearby property This standard is not applicable for the text amendments being requested. Standard 6: The length of time under the exiting zoning that the property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of land development This standard is not applicable for the text amendments being requested. Standard 7: The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed on the individual property owner. The three amendments being requested will add to the value and uniqueness of this Project and to other projects within a B-1 District. The two amendments for structure height will allow for buildings to be two-story with unique and varied design features. Moreover, the second level will allow for the needs of unique tenants (e.g., furniture store, health club, boutiques, etc.). The text amendment • allowing for the higher design elements will allow for architectural features that 4 • will fit the scale of the buildings. The health club will add an additional amenity available to the community. Without these text amendments, Petitioner would have to apply for a B-3 zoning to develop this Project. The B-3 District will allow for many uses that are undesirable to Petitioner, the Village, and surrounding property owners. These text amendments allow for the unique development of a B-3 District within the more restrictive B-1 District. Standard 8: The extent to which the proposal promotes the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public If Petitioner is allowed to develop the Project as outlined in its various petitions, the Project will generate significant sales taxes for the Village and will provide shopping and dining alternatives within the Village. Also, the demolition and redevelopment of the nearly vacant office buildings will enhance the health, • safety and welfare of the Village. The Village is currently providing services to and collecting no revenue from the Property. Standard 9: The relations of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan This standard is not applicable to the text amendments being requested. Standard 10: The community need for the [text amendments] use proposed by the property owner. The text amendments will allow Petitioner and other property owners and developers to develop first-class projects. The unique features these text amendments allow will be important in creating the tone of future projects appropriate for the Village of Oakbrook. This Project, as designed, will contribute greatly to Village, in both monetary and community terms. However, the Project but can only be developed as planned with these text amendments or by rezoning the Property to a B-3 District. As 5 • noted above, it is preferable for the Village to grant the text amendments as requested. Petitioner requests that these three text amendments be approved. • i • 6 ap m,. PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) © VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) ❑ SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ SPECIAL USE ($675) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50- each lot frontage) ❑ -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPL LOCATION OF Southwest corner of Meyer & Please see Exhibit A SUBJECT PROPERTY PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. - - -flutterfteid LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS* Please see Exhibit B ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 changEONING ORDINANCE SECTION Section 13-7A-3(C) (1) (c) , Section 13-11-7A-4, to B-1 requested Please see Exhibit C Section 13-12-4(C) , Section - - , ACTION REQUESTED Sarrinn 11-12-41l RPrtinn 11-12-3(C) , • Section 13-12-3(H) and Section 13-12-3(E) (4) PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT x OWNER(S) OF RECORD St. Paul Properties, Inc. PHONE (561) 310-2065 ADDRESS 385 Washington Street Mail Code:ClTy St. Paul STATE MN ZIP 55102 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) NAI Hiffman, as agent PHONE (630) 691-0616 ADDRESS One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 CITY Oakbrook Terrace STATE IL ZIP 60181 E-mail Add S dhiffman@hiffman.com I(we)c at all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my(our) knowl d belief. I(we)give permission to the Village to install public hearing sign(s)on the lot frontages of the above subject property as descr' d' Code. Ina to the above fees,applicant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of billing Signatur e_af_/applicant_--______._._._._----Date....__.... _.._...___......_. DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY I j �� � �` APP RESI ENTIAL VARIATION 7/05 v� t EXHIBIT C ACTION REQUESTED In order to develop the Project, Petitioner is requesting eight(8)variances from the Village as follows: Building Set back Section 13-7A-3(C)(1)(c)of the Code requires that buildings in B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty foot(60') setback from the right-of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot(50') setback. Sign Height Section 13-11-7A-4 of the Code,which governs signage for the B-1 zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls, that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet(30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for blade and fin signs that may project outward not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet(36') from the curb,rather than the thirty feet(30') allowed by Code. Landscaping Section 13-12-4(C) of the Code requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three (3)bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for four(4) parking bays to the west of building `B'. In order to accommodate the required number of spaces,Petitioner will not have the required divider every three (3)bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyer's Road. It is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. Section 13-12-4(C) of the Code requires that interior shade trees be planted with a maximum spacing of forty feet(40'),provided that at least one tree is located in the area occupied by every fifteen(15) interior parking spaces. Petitioner is requesting relief from the requirement that at least one tree be located in the area of every 15 parking spaces in order that Petitioner may maintain the necessary parking spaces. Petitioner is exceeding the overall requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for the Project and many shade trees planted will be larger than the required 4'-6' caliper to continue the feeling of a more established landscape. Section 13-12-4(C) of the Code also requires that interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and asking to be allowed to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the Commonwealth Edison easement. Tree planting is • restricted in these areas due to limited soil depth, and the overhead lines respectively, although ornamental trees will be planted wherever possible. Drive Aisles Section 113-12-3(C) of the Code requires that the drive aisles for parking that is an accessory use to retail be twenty-seven feet(27')wide. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas for the Project with twenty-four foot(24') drive aisles (which is the Village requirement for office parking)to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape/landscape areas. Parking Set back Section 12-12-3(H) of the Code requires that off-street parking spaces, open to the sky, in nonresidential districts be no less than ten feet(10') from the nearest lot line. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwester rear yards(along Technology Drive). If Petitioner were required to meet Code for these setbacks, because of the physical hardships existing on the Property,there would be inadequate parking for the Project. Entrance Drives Section 12-12-3(E)-4 of the Code requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or four hundred feed(400'), which ever is less. There are three entryways into the Project off of Butterfield Road: Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet(292')to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet(340')to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet(108')less than required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and C is sixty feet(60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the northern front footage of the Property is adjacent to a regional detention pond. The Property,therefore, does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A and B and Entries B and C. The three entryways, however, are critical for the Project to efficiently handle the incoming traffic. AFt=IVDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND AUTHORITY 1. St. Paul Properties, Inc. ("St. Paur) is the exclusive owner of the . approximately 19 acres of property in Oak Brook, Illinois ("Village") as more fully described In Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property"). 2. St. Paul is seeking to develop an approximately 190,000 square foot lifestyle center(the"Center"). 3. St.'Paul has authorized NAl Hiffrnan ("Agent") to petition the Village on its behalf for the following approvals necessary to develop the Center.: • re-zoning the Property to B-1 • a text amendment in the B-1 district • certain variances- special uses • a plat of consolidation. 4: Agent is hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents or petitions required by the Village to petition for and implement the-above entitlements. • 5. As of the date of this Affidavit, St. Paul has no partners or affiliates which are members of the developing entity of the.Center. If any individuals or entities are added to the developing entity, St. Paul will immediately so notify the Village in writing. Michael D. Inicky, Asse Manager, not person ly, but as representative Of St. Paul P , Inc. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) November 2004 COUNTY OF RAMSEY } Personally appeared, Michael D. Elnicky, Asset Manager, ST. PAUL PROPERTIES and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me. ry Public • ..f -,y,� :� i+v-ttn/r.:SIC • NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR VARIATIONS St. Paul Properties, Inc., ("Petitioner") is seeking to redevelop the approximately 18.2 acres of real property generally located at the southwest corner of Meyers and Butterfield Roads ("Property"). Petitioner is proposing redeveloping the Property with an upscale retail and commercial project consisting of approximately 180,000 square feet (the "Project"). The Project has been designed as an upscale outdoor commercial area, with specialty shops, white linen tablecloth restaurants, and a very limited office component. The design features of the Project are outlined in the attached Exhibits. However, the Property has limitations that were not created by Petitioner and Petitioner cannot overcome (the "Hardship Conditions"). Because of this, • Petitioner can only develop the Project if the relief requested herein is granted. The Hardship Conditions burdening the Property are: 1. There is a five-acre pond on the Property, which functions as a regional detention pond; 2. There is an additional 0.5 acre (3.5 acre feet) of floodplain on the Property that cannot realistically be filled in; and 3. There is a 1-acre ComEd easement with high-tension wires along the southern boundary of the Property and as a result, nothing can be built in this easement. These conditions were not caused by Petitioner, nor can they be remediated by Petitioner. As a result of the Hardship Conditions, of the 18.2 acres, there are actually only 11.7 acres available for building development. With the exception of the sign variance, all of the variances being requested could be • eliminated if Petitioner could use more of the Property for parking spaces. But, to meet the required parking counts without reducing the gross lease able area of the Project, these variances are required. Without a certain level of"critical mass" the Project will not be attractive to the type of retailers and restaurateurs Petitioner is trying to attract. In order to develop the Project, Petitioner is requesting eight variances from the Village as follows: 1. Building Setback Section 13-7A-3(C)(1)(c) of the Code requires that buildings in a B-1 district shall not be erected within a sixty-foot (60') setback from the right of-way. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for a fifty foot (50') setback. The site plan attached at Exhibit 5 shows building 'K' in the Project with the reduced setback. This setback is necessary because of the Hardship Conditions and the need to align certain internal roads to create both safety and continuity within the Project. • 2. Parking Setback Section 13-12-31-1 requires that off-street parking spaces open to the sky in non-residential districts be no less than ten feet (10') from the nearest lot line. The parking on the west side yard of the Project and the parking on the southwest side of the rear yard (along Technology Drive)will not meet the 10' setback requirement. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement to allow for parking on the western side yard and southwestern rear yards. Because of the Hardship Conditions, if Petitioner had to meet Code for these setbacks there would be inadequate parking for the Project. 3. Sign Variance Section 13-11-7A-4 of the Code, which governs signage for the B-1 • zoning district, requires that all building signs be properly affixed to the building walls that the signs shall not extend outwards more than twelve • inches (12") or project higher than thirty feet (30'). Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. As depicted in the Exhibits, and the Design Criteria in particular, Petitioner has designed the Project to be a unique commercial area with buildings that are compatible and yet unique. Petitioner is requesting relief from this provision to allow for blade and fin signs that may project not more than thirty inches (30"). Petitioner is also requesting that signage be allowed to project up to thirty-six feet (36') feet from the curb, rather the thirty feet (30') allowed by Code. This variance is necessary because Petitioner is trying to create the look and feel of two- story buildings as high as 50'. Accordingly, the signs need to be raised to be scale with the height and size of the buildings. Exhibit 7 depicts the types of signs this variance will allow. Without this relief, Petitioner will have to either scale down the scope of the Project, or have signs that do not fit with the Project and that will result in a deleterious impact for the Petitioner and Village. • 4. Landscaping Dividers Section 13-12-4(C) of the Code requires that a landscaped divider be provided for every three bays of parking. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement for the four parking bays to the west of building 'B'. As the Overall Landscape Plan (Exhibit 13) shows, there are three bays of parking perpendicular to building 'B' and north of building 'D'. In order to accommodate the required number of spaces, Petitioner will not have the required divider every three bays. Petitioner will provide landscape screening of the parking area along the Tollway and Meyers Road. This is due to the Hardship Conditions. However, it is important to note that the Project as designed is approximately 50% open space. 5. Location of Parking Lot Trees Section 13-12-4(C) requires that interior shade trees be planted with a . maximum spacing of forty feet (40'), provided that at least one tree be • located every fifteen (15) interior parking spaces. Although Petitioner is providing the required number of trees, because of the Hardship Conditions, Petitioner cannot locate the trees at the end of every fifteen parking spaces. If Petitioner is required to meet this requirement, there will be fewer parking spaces than is required by Code and by the tenants. Petitioner has grouped some of the tree plantings together to accommodate the layout and Hardship Conditions of the Property. Petitioner is exceeding the overall tree requirement of one tree for every 15 parking spaces for the Project. 6. Ornamental Trees in place of Certain Shade Trees Section 13-12-4(C) requires that the interior shade trees be planted in the parking areas. Petitioner is asking for relief from this requirement and is proposing to plant ornamental trees above the underground parking garage and within the ComEd easement. Tree planting is restricted in • these areas due to limited soil depth and the overhead lines respectively. The ornamental trees will not have roots that need to grow as deep as would shade trees and can be used over the underground garage, and are more appropriate for use under the ComEd high-tension wires. 7. Drive Aisle Widths Section 13-12-3(C) requires that the drive aisles for parking that is an accessory use to retail be twenty-seven feet (27')wide. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement. Petitioner has designed the parking areas for the Project with twenty-four foot (24') drive aisles (which is the Village requirement for office parking) to minimize the asphalt areas. The 24' aisles allow for larger pedestrian and hardscape and landscape areas. is 8. Entrance Drives Section 13-12-3(E)(4) requires that the spacing between separate driveway entrances on a lot be no less than forty percent (40%) of the length of the lot line adjoining the street, or four hundred feet(400'), which ever is less. Petitioner is asking relief from this provision. There are three entryways into the Project off Butterfield Road. Entry A on the western Property line allows access to employee parking and rear parking and building entryways; Entry B is a full signalized entry drive approximately two hundred ninety-two feet (292') to the east of Entry A and serves as the main point of ingress and egress for the Project; and Entry C is approximately three hundred forty feet (340')to the east of the signalized drive. The spacing between Entry A and Entry B is one hundred eight feet (108) less than required by Code and the spacing between Entry B and Entry C is sixty feet (60') less than required by Code. Petitioner is asking relief from this requirement because approximately 40% of the footage on • Butterfield Road is fronts the Pond. Therefore, the Property does not allow for a 400' space between Entries A & B and Entries B & C. However, having all three entry drives are important to efficiently handle the incoming traffic for the Project. The three entryways will serve to disburse the incoming traffic rather than having all of the cars entering at only one point. Pursuant to Section 13-14-6 of the Code, the following is analysis of the Village's standards on which variances are to be granted as applied to the specific variances sought in this Petition. Standard 1: The Zoning Board of Appeals shall not recommend a variation of the provision of this Title as authorized in this Section unless it shall have made findings of fact based upon the evidence presented to it on the following specific issues that: • Standard 1(a): The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations governing the district in which it is located. 1. Building Setback Variance: Petitioner is requesting relief from the Code to allow for a fifty-foot (50') setback for building W. Because of the restrictions of the Property (i.e., the pond, floodplain and high-tension wires), the useable acreage of the Property in significantly reduced. The Project will not attract the right mix of tenants without a minimum mass of square footage. The setback variation is required to allow for the required square footage. All other buildings meet this Code requirement. 2. Parking Setback Variance : If required to meet this provision, Petitioner would not have adequate parking for the Project, which would result in less critical mass, making the Project undesirable for national and regional tenants. 3. Sign Variance: Petitioner believes the success of this Project will be due in large part to the uniqueness of design, amenities, and building materials. This uniqueness will not be possible unless there is a solid mix of building colors, materials and signage. Petitioner is requesting this variance so that the signs can be varied and interesting. The types of blade and fin signs this variance will permit are shown in Exhibit 7. 4. Landscape Dividers: As stated above, without the landscape variance Petitioner will have inadequate parking for the Project. Downsizing the square footage of the Project will result in a less desirable tenant mix. 5. Location of Parking Lot Trees: Petitioner would have to reduce the parking spaces to place a tree every fifteen parking spaces, making the Project economically unviable. 6. Ornamental Trees: Petitioner would have to reduce the level of plantings in the parking area, which would have a deleterious impact on the Project, without being able to use ornamental trees over the underground garage and under the high-tension wires. 7, Drive Aisles: If Petitioner is required to provide 27' drive aisles, the available parking would reduce, and as a result, there would be a reduction in the critical mass of retail needed to attract high-end retailers. 8. Entrance Drives: Because of the large detention pond, there is not enough frontage to allow for the required space between the entry drives, and the entry drives are necessary for the efficient ingress and egress of the Project. Standards 1(b & c): The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 1. Building Setback Variance: The proposed building will be located on Butterfield Road, which has a right-of-way of one hundred feet (100') feet. With the fifty foot (50') setback, the building will still be one hundred-fifty feet (150') from the Butterfield Road. Butterfield Road is a commercial street with various types of users. This setback will not have any impact on the character of the area. 2. Parking Setback Variance: The need for this variance is due to the Hardship Conditions. If Petitioner is required to meet this provision, there will be inadequate parking for the Project. 3. Sign Variance: The sign variance will be in keeping with the commercial character of the area. The unique signage will maintain the sense of upscale and discreet development currently in the Village. 4. Landscape Dividers: The landscape variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The landscaping for the Project exceeds the landscaping required Code. The amount of planting, trees and open space far exceeds any properties in the immediate area and will not alter the character of the area. 5. Location of Parking Lot Trees: This variance is required because of the Hardship Conditions. Complying with this provision will result in inadequate • parking. 6. Ornamental Trees: The hardship of the Petitioner is due to the underground garages and the ComEd easement. To the extent using ornamental trees has any impact on the area, it will be positive since the trees are decorative and will add to the ambiance of the Project. 7. Drive Aisles: The Property consists of approximately 18.2 acres of real property, of which, because of its unique limitations noted above, only approximately 11.7 acres is available for building development. The 27' drive aisles allow Petitioner to maintain as much of the landscaping character as possible while at the same time, providing that level of critical mass needed to attract high-end retailers. This variance will not have any impact on the character of the area. 8. Entrance Drives: Petitioner is requesting this variance because of the 5 acres existing pond that fronts on Butterfield Road. The remaining frontage does not allow for the required space between the three entry drives. However, the Project is designed so that there will be no deleterious impact • because of the spacing of the drives. Standard 2: For the purpose of supplementing the above standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals, in making the determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, shall also take into consideration the extent to which the following facts, favorable to the Applicant, have been established by the evidence that: Standard 2(a). The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved would bring a particular hardship upon the owner as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. 1. Building Setback Variance: Because of the Hardship Conditions of the Property, the Project will not be possible without this setback variance because the square footage of the Project will be below an acceptable minimum to retailers. 2. Parking Setback Variance: Because of the Hardship Conditions, there is not enough room on the Property to provide for this setback and keep the Project viable. 3. Sian Variance: Without the signage variance, Petition would be required to use the standard type building signs large enough to be seen from Butterfield Road. As stated above, the signage variance will allow for unique Project signage. 4-6. Landscape Variances (Landscaping Dividers Location of Parking Lot Trees and Ornamental Trees): Without these landscape variances, the Project could not be built. There would be inadequate acreage available to build enough parking space to make the Project viable. 7. Drive Aisles: Without this variance, there will be less retail and parking space available, which will deter from the nature and quality of the Project. • 8. Entrance Drives: This variance is required because of the frontage of the large detention pond, and without the variance, the ingress and egress for the Project will be inadequate. Standard 2(b): The condition upon which the petition for variation is based would not be applicable generally to the other property within the same zoning classification. 1. Building Setback Variance: The Property is located on Butterfield Road, which already has a 100' setback. In addition, most properties do not have the same inherent limitations as does the subject Property. Therefore, it is not likely that other properties will require the same relief. 2. Parking Setback Variance: This variance is required only because of the Hardship Conditions, which are unique to this Property. 3. Sign Variance: The signs, when evaluated in the context of the overall Project design, will be so unique that this variance would not be generally • applicable to other properties in B-1 districts. • 4. Landscape Dividers: The landscape variance is unique to the Property. The Property is approximately 50% open space and is landscape in excess of the requirements of the Code. 5. Location of Parking Lot Trees: This variance is unique to the Property in that it is only required because of the Hardship Conditions. The Project will not be viable without this variance. 6. Ornamental Trees: This variance is unique to the Property in that it is only required because of the Hardship Conditions. 7. Drive Aisles: This variance is unique to the Property. This Property is limited in useable space because of the pond, the high tension wires on the south end, and the floodplain designations. Petitioner has attempted to create as much critical mass and pedestrian amenities as possible given these constraints. The reduced aisle widths free up space for plantings and pedestrian areas. 8. Entrance Drives: This variance is unique to the Property in that is is only • required because of the Hardship Conditions. Standard 2(c): The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 1. Building Setback Variance: Petitioner is requesting relief of 10' from the Code. Even after the relief is granted, there will still be a 50' setback from the right-of-way, and a 100' right-of-way along Butterfield Road providing a 150' setback from Butterfield Road. This variance will have no detrimental impact on the public welfare or surrounding properties. 2. Parking Setback Variance: The parking setback variance being requested will have no impact on the public welfare or surrounding properties. 3. Sian Variance: The sign variance being requested will have no impact on the public welfare or surrounding properties. 4. Landscape Dividers: The landscape variance will have not impact on the • public welfare of surrounding properties. • 5. Location of Parking Lot Trees: This variance will have not impact on the public welfare of surrounding properties. 6. Ornamental Trees: This variance will not impact the public welfare of surrounding properties. 7. Drive Aisles: The landscape variance will have not impact on the public welfare of surrounding properties. 8. Entrance Drives: This variance will not impact on the public welfare of surrounding properties. Standard 2(d): The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the danger of fire, or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. None of the variances will have any deleterious impact on surrounding properties or the health or public safety of the Village. • Standard 2(e): That the purpose of the variation in not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property. Developing the Project as designed, with the requested variances, will enhance the health, safety, and welfare of the Village. 1. Buidling Setback Variance: Without a minimum critical mass of building area, the Petitioner will not be able to attract the upscale tenants for which the Project has been designed for. 2. Parking Setback Variance: Without a minimum number of parking spaces, Petitioner will not be able to meet Code nor be able to attract the upscale tenants the Project has been designed for. 3. Sign Variances: The sign variations are required to allow for the unique design of the Project. Without the sign variances, the Project will be more like a conventional shopping center. 4-6. Landscape Variances (Landscaping Dividers..Location of Parking • Lot Trees, and Ornamental Trees): The three landscape variances allow for • additional landscaped areas and parking spaces which are needed to make the Project viable. 7. Drive Aisles: This variance allows for more pedestrian and landscaped areas making the Project nicer for the Village. 8. Entrance Drives: This variance allows for the efficient and safe ingress and egress to the Project. Standard 2(f): That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest the property. With the exception of the sign variance, all of the variances are required due to the Hardship Conditions: 3. Sign Variance: The signage variances are needed to develop the quality of Project that will be appropriate for the Village of Oak Brook. The Variances being requested are needed because of the hardships caused • by conditions inherent to the Property. These hardships have not been caused by Petitioner, nor can they be remediated by Petitioner. Without the relief requested, Petitioner cannot develop the Project and that would be a loss to the Village of Oakbrook as well as the Petitioner. • OFOgM a ;' h a a x z L P LA E AK �a p a ROOK PETITION APPLICATION for PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE: ❑ APPEAL ($300) ❑ VARIATION ($750) ❑ AMENDMENT ($750) 0 SPECIAL USE ($750) STORMWATER ORDINANCE: ❑ SPECIAL USE ($675) PUBLIC HEARING SIGNS ($50- each lot frontage) ❑ -Enter Number of Street Frontages/Per Parcel APPLICANT TO COMPLETEQ LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Southwest corner of Meyer & PERMANENT PARCEL NO*. Please seg Exhibit A Butterfield Road LOT NO. SUBDIVISION LEGAL ADDRESS* Please see Exhibit B ZONING DISTRICT ORA-1 changeZONING ORDINANCE SECTION Section 13-7A-2 to B-1 requepiease see Exhibit C ACTION REQUESTED PROPERTY INTEREST OF APPLICANT: OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER AGENT X OWNER(S) OF RECORD St. Paul Properties, Inc. PHONE (561) 310-2065 ADDRESS 385 Washington Street Mail Code:ClTy St. Paul STATE MN ZIP 55102 BENEFICIARY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) NAI Hiffman, as agent PHONE (630) 691 70616 ADDRESS One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 CITY Oakbrook Terrace STATE IL ZIP 60181 E-mail ress dhiffman @hiffman.com I (w a ify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any papers or plan submitted herewith are true to the best of my r no ed a and belief. In add' on to the above fees,app icant agrees to reimburse the Village for publication costs within 30 days of bil /�/ ©q ignature of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant Date DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY kMp fix z * xx kr e . c r , 5•kg r a ;x ^.r z r 'E% "'�' .z y s fls xe"a, "`,ys �k J c u i x IN t`ri..zfi2 i�t#a"3a" e t 164­41 "s t y� ateteci � �� r FeeRatd #2e4eipiIJ a{ps Rseiuetl� y x r , ay age t i t s> �.. f` p @ �"� ic06&, t r w §�M �I�tkLTQf1CI8SItJI� + »�9 a �k s y r Cfli r�C1krd'45f�p ,�{� � '4 �' } �kl a'f •4�t i``W�,. 'i Y i YY� gT s �� �' t �`�rr b: TY 'a.4 3 "a a. i. Vi / 1= APP-RESIDENTIAL VARIATION 504 EXHIBIT C ACTION REQUESTED Petitioner is requesting a special use permit pursuant to Section 13-7A-2 of the Code to allow for outdoor dining adjacent to the sit-down restaurants. All of the outdoor seating areas will be consistent with the upscale nature and interiors of the restaurants. • • • NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT St. Paul Properties, Inc. (the "Petitioner") is the owner of approximately 18.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Meyers the ("Property") which is legally described in Exhibit D to the Petitions. Petitioner is proposing a mixed-use retail and commercial Project (the "Project") the components of which are depicted in the attached Exhibits. An important feature of the Project will be the dining experience which will be white linen table cloth sit-down restaurants. Currently, Petitioner is anticipating three of these restaurants in the Project. Building K, the free-standing building on the northwest corner of the Property, may also be leased to a restaurant. The restaurants will be located adjacent to the five acre pond that Petitioner is re-landscaping, installing decorative lighting to, and adding a water feature. The redesigned pond will be an amenity to restaurant owners and diners in the spring, summer and fall in that it will provide an excellent amenity to restaurant patrons. • Petitioner is requesting a special use permit pursuant to Section 13-7A-2 of the Code to allow for outdoor dining adjacent to the sit-down restaurants. All of the outdoor seating areas will be consistent with the upscale nature and interiors of the restaurants. Until these restaurants are actually leased, it will be difficult to specify the actual seating and design features. However, the Design Criteria specifies the many requirement and constraints of outdoor dining, including types of furniture and the d6cor allowed. A typical outdoor seating vignette is attached as Exhibit 2. The plans attached as Exhibits 5 and 24 show the maximum dimensions of the outdoor areas. The requested special use is consistent with the purpose described in Section 13-14-9 of the Code. This special use falls into the second category cited in the Code in that it is entirely private in character. The outdoor seating special use meets the standards set forth in the Code: Standard 1: Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the • public health, safety and welfare will be protected. The outdoor seating areas will be consistent with the upscale nature of the Project. The outdoor seating area will be enclosed by attractive fencing and landscape, and outdoor diners will not have direct access to the pond. Standard 2: Will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood. The outdoor seating will be consistent with the overall Project, which will not have a deleterious impact on any other property. The restaurants taking advantage of the outdoor seating will be upscale in nature. The outdoor seating will be used during both lunch and dinner. There will be no music allowed in the seating areas (only music provided throughout the Project by owner and in accordance with the Code and Design Criteria). Access to the outdoor seating will be strictly controlled, outdoor heaters will be provided, and the outdoor areas will be closed • no later than 2:00 a.m. There are no residential properties adjacent to the Property. Petitioner is requesting approval of this special use for the Project. • SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION vPG�OF 0,4*e90 to ❑ FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION • �2 x❑ FINAL PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION �f w AND/OR PLAT OF VACATION �OUNT� VILLAGE of OAK BROOK ❑ ASSESSMENT PLAT SUBDIVISION 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD ❑ SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT OAK BROOK, IL 60523 AND/OR VARIATION 630-990-3045 NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT. AFTER AN INITIAL REVIEW,IT"WILL BE FILED WITH'THE VILLAGE CLERK: SUBDIVISION TITLE DATE FILED December 14, 2004 GENERAL LOCATION AND LEGAL ADDRESS OF PROPERTY TO BE 89SUMM CONSOLIDATED Southwest corner of Meyer & Butterfield Road; 3001-3003 & 3121 Butterfield Road ARE YOU SEEKING ANY VARIATION (RELIEF)TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS? YES R NO — If YES, list the specific section in the Subdivision Regulations and attach a detailed explanation of the relief you are seeking: Section 14-6-3(J) and Section 14-6-3(K) ; Please see Exhibit D PERMANENT PARCEL NO. Please see Exhibit A NAME OF APPLICANT(and Billing Information) NAI Hiffman PHONE (630) 691-0616 ,•LESS One Oakbrook Terrace, Suite 600 CITY Oakbrook Terrace STATE IL ZIP 60181 RELATIONSHIP of APPLICANT TO PROPERTY authorized Agent/Representative OWNER OF RECORD St. Paul Properties, Inc. PHONE (651) 310-2065 ADDRESS 385 Washington Street Mail Code: CITY St. Paul STATE MN ZIP 55102 BEN RY(IES)OF TRUST PHONE AD CITY STATE ZIP H gnature of Appli Date Signature of Applicant Date OWNE S AFFIDAVIT FOR SUBDIVISIONS OF NOT MO N FIVE 5 LOTS This plat contains the entire contiguous undeveloped d a i h I have any interest. �Al Signature of Owner Date IDENTIFY STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS THE PROPERTY (Use additional paper if needed) Please see Exhibit B SIZING BY`LAND USE '"RESIDENTIAL " COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE' OTHER' 7TOTAL ORY NUMBER of LOTS NUMBER of ACRES 11.7 6.5 1-8.2 NUMBER of SQUARE FEET 509,652 283, 140 792,792 Names of Surrounding Property Owners following are the names and addresses of all surrounding property owners from the property in question for a distance of approximately 250 feet in all directions. Provide a mailing label for each Property Owner listed. The number of feet occupied by all public roads, streets, alleys, and public ways have been excluded in computing the 250-foot requirement. Said names are as recorded i office of the County Recorder of Deeds(or the Registrar of Titles of the County)and as appear from the authentic tax records of unty within 30 days of the filing of this application. (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Please see Exhibit C NOTICE TO APPLICANT REFER TO OAK BROOK CODE: TITLE 14-SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS All Applications must be completed and accompanied with the following: Proper fee(payable to the Village of Oak Brook),Eighteen(18) co ies of the proposed subdivision(pursuant to the Plat Act maximum sheet size permitted is 30"x 36"),4 copies of Plat of W rtwith Legal Description,Common Address and P.I.N. noted. (Include one copy 81/2 x 11"of all plats and plans) Completed Subject y Verification, Surrounding Property Owners form. Letter of Standing if the applicant is NOT the property owner,obtain written authorization from the owner. Note: The Permanent Index No.(P.I.N.), Legal Description and Common Address MUST all coincide All of the documents must be received prior to the 15th of the month for Plan Commission review on the third Monday of the following month.An incomplete submittal will NOT be accepted and may be returned to the applicant. Please check all items applicable: PRELIMINARY PLAT $50.00 per lot or$750.00 minimum** FINAL PLAT(G-289,3124/81) X $750.00—NO IMPROVEMENTS"(Plus Plan Review&Inspection Fees,if required) AMENDMENT or VARIATION x $750.00* ASSESSMENT PLAT(12/11/79) No Charge Public Hearing Signs $50.00 per sign—1 sign required for each Street Frontage/Per Parcel *Fees do not include publication costs ,which are paid for separately **$125 fee for each time extension All meetings are held in the Samuel E. Dean Board Room of the Oak Brook Village Hall, 1200 Oak Brook Road PRIOR 1F0 THE SCHEDULED PLAN GOMNIISSION METING,APRLICANT I.S TO'COW 'C-+ THE,VILLAGE ENGINEER(630-990 3010),AND REQUEST'THE STATUS'OF THE PLAT REVIEW ALLOWING FOR SUFFICIENT TIME TO RESUBMIT PLAT and:.18 COPIES WLTH ALL NECESSARY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS.11-1 .........................................................................................................................................................................._......................_................................................_..............._..........................................................................................................._............................._.......................................................... DONOT WRITE IN THISSP�\CfOR OFFICE USE ONLY 3 EXHIBIT D ACTION REQUESTED Petitioner is requesting the following two (2)variances from the Village regarding its Plat of Consolidation: Utility Easements Section 14-6-3(K) of the Subdivision Regulations require six foot(6') side yard and ten foot(10')rear yard public utility easements. The property is currently subdivided into five lots and Petitioner is requesting the Village approve the Plat of Consolidation combining the property into a single lot. The property is also currently a commercial development serviced by utilities and will be redeveloped as a commercial development serviced by the same utilities. Petitioner is requesting relief from the utility easement requirement as there is little or no need for typical easements along lot lines. Survey Monuments and Markers Section 14-6-30) of the Subdivision Regulations requires the use of monuments and markers. Petitioner is requesting relief from this requirement to allow for special accommodations to be made for the lot corners that lie within asphalt or concrete. As has been done on previous similar commercial subdivision application, it is more appropriate to mark the corners as the surveyor has marked • them,rather than what is required in the code. • • --- --- ---- ---- ---------- --- - ,D708 W.Janesville Rd. 12121 NAI HIFFMAN Sher Fwndal Back Hales Comers,WI 53130 DATE """'°"'°"""' ONE OAKBROOK TERRACE,SUITE 600 79-549n50 22ND STREET and BUTTERFIELD ROAD AMOUNT OAKBROOK TERRACE,IL 60181 $ s 12121 Feb 1,2005 750.00 I PAY TOTHE Seven Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars N ORDER OF: i� AYS p VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK I AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE n'0L2L21115 1:07S00S"61: III L87000211- , 2Lila • �, sr/g G.L.ACCOUNT p DESCRIPTION i CtIECK CASH INV p DATE NAME l NUMBER S CHECKS 3 INVALID WITHOUT VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK SIGNATURE A °12 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B 15620 • • 1200 OAK BROOK ROAD = OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS ° PHONE:(630)990-3045 RETAIN THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS I • • EXHIBIT B LEGAL ADDRESSES 3001-3003 Butterfield Road Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 3121 Butterfield Road Oakbrook,Illinois 60523 Butterfield Road Oakbrook,Illinois 60523 • • • EXHIBIT C NAME OF PROPERTY MAILING ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ADD' PARCEL - OWNER PROPERTY DMG Real Estate Attn: Chief Exec. Technology Drive, 06-28-103-016 Holdings, L.L.C. 799 Roosevelt Rd Suite 200 Lombard Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 The Commonvealth Ediso �'/o Property Tax.Department 3125 Butterfield 06-28-103-002 Company P.O. B Chicago, Illinois 60690- Fountain .Square- of Re: 06-28-103-017 Technology Drive, 06-28-103=017 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Security Capital c/o The- Shaw Co-D Stine Butterfield Rd. , 06-28-101-005 Lodging, Inc. 2001 York Rd., No. 550 Lombard a roo no s Adilk aborough Properties, 400 S. E1 Camino Real . ..2905 'West Butterfield 06-28-104-011 L.P., a California San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 par ners p Inland Property Sales, 2901 West Butterfield .2901 West Butterfield. 06-28-104-015. Inc. Oakbrook, Illinois 60523 Oakbrook, Illinois 6052 County .of-DuPage, a bod7.2901 West Butterfield 2901 West Butterfield 06-28-164-015. corporate .& politic Oa CP GAL Lombard; L.L.C. 400 S. E1 Camino Real 2907 Butterfield Rd. 06=28-104-013 San Mateo, CA 94402 Oakbrook, -Illinois 6052 Northern Illinois, Gas Real Estate Meyer.Rd, 06-28-104-014 Company P.O. Box 190 Oakbrook , o s (*Attach additional sheets for etch ff necessary) • 1/2005 • EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 06-28-103-009 LOT 2 OF BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265 FEET THEREOF AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF,AND EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF LOT 2,AFORESAID, IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069 IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131 WITH THE EXISTING CENTER LINE OF MEYERS ROAD;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 55.4 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MEYERS • ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 31 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE,A DISTANCE OF 361.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY,AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 46940 PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 176 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 00 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE,A DISTANCE OF 347.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF F.A. ROUTE 131; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 27.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,BEING THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1974 AS DOCUMENT R74- 38411. PARCEL 2 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS.GAS COMPANY'S 82.5 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 (PLAT DOCUMENT 950269)LYING SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING LOT 2 (EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 265, FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF), IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF • SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64-24069, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO.NIG 2-63, AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION,AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL NIG 2-63 (BEING ALSO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, AS RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64- 24069), 517.90 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5, 94.36 FEET,MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5,465.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS,TO THE • INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDMSION WITH SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL NO. E-2-63.5;THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3 06-28-103-005 LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1,BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WESTERLY 265 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INCORPORATED ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. • • PARCEL 4 06-28-103-014 THAT PART OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PARCEL NO.NIG 2-63 AS SHOWN ON NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN GLIDDEN SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 1969 AS DOCUMENT R69-43878 AND PROCEEDING SOUTH 28 DEGREES 4.8 MINUTES EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 82.73 FEET, MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PARCEL E-2-63.5; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 265.61 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1, INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 RECORDED JULY 8, 1964 AS DOCUMENT R64- 24069 AND THE AFOREMENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION, 82.73 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED BUTLER COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT(SAID CORNER BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY PROPERTY PARCEL NO.NIG 2-63); THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 27 MINUTES • 37 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE(SAID LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF AFOREMENTIONED LOT 2), 265.61 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,ALL IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5 06-28-103-018 and 06-28-103-019 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH,RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND SECTION 29,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 AS DOCUMENT R98- 179522, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. NIG2-63N ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 950269; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST(NORTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES EAST,RECORD)ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO. • NIG2-63N, A DISTANCE OF 451.02 FEET(450.89 FEET RECORD)TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY • ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO NIG2-63N;THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST(NORTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES EAST, RECORD)ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 PARCEL NO.NIG2-63N,AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-24069,A DISTANCE OF 191.20 FEET(191.21 FEET RECORD)TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST(SOUTH 85 DEGREES 13 MINUTES EAST RECORD),ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 IN BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2,A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 I BUTLER COMPANY M-1 INC. ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 2, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1 ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT NO. 846924; THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 04 DEGREES 47 MINUTES WEST, RECORD)ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY PERMANENT EASEMENT PARCEL NO. E-2-63.1, AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY YORK TOWNSHIP ASSESSMENT PLAT NO. 1 LOT 8-2 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. R64-28042,A • DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST,RECORD)ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOLL HIGHWAY,A DISTANCE OF 349.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TECHNOLOGY DRIVE AS DEDICATED BY THE PLAT OF SAID HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX(6) COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE: 1)THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST (NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 97.36 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TECHNOLOGY DRIVE; 2)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; 3)THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST (SOUTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; 4)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(SOUTH 64 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST,RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 4.75 FEET; 5)THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 6)THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, (SOUTH 64 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, RECORD)A DISTANCE OF 62.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER • OF SAID LOT 5 IN HOMESTEAD VILLAGE; THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST(NORTH 25 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 17 SECONDS • WEST,RECORD)ALONG THE EASTERLY MOST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,A DISTANCE OF 33.80 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING,IN DUPAGE COUNTY,ILLINOIS. • • Exhibits 1. Concept Elevations 2. Outdoor Dining 3. Photometric Plan 4. Buildable Area Plan 5. Summary Site Plan 6. Monument Signs 7. Signage concept elevations 8. Material sheet 9. Pedestrian Pathways 10. Parking plan 11. Elevations 12. Tenant Criteria Handbook 13. Overall Landscape Plan 14. Existing Tree Survey Plan 15. Existing Tree Survey List 16. Typical Storefront Landscape Plan & Sections 17. Typical Site Entry/Perimeter Landscape Plan and Section 18. Typical Parking Lot Landscape Plan and Section 19. Pond Landscape Plan • 20. Pond Landscape Sections 21. Plant Photos— Perennials, Groundcovers and Grasses 22. Plant Photos—Trees and Shrubs 23. Landscape Details 24. Preliminary Engineering Plan and Scaled Site Plan 25. Plat of Consolidation 26. Economic Analysis 27. Traffic Study aT _ R y. lson ong _ move mill MIA Awy. Contextual Images •NF++.ul.. - TES - -(l 1I� EUU of - _ yFp®�, }` W++aaaw ask E E —`Y..k.r tip.:...--• - 'III1t ----_. N - Ler.tmsShosa 1.�•M �NT". � — __&dArde,r.. n amw.••...P Q -..:., ,., it - � .. � � �.�, - Na.-'s�S.E^ry �-.j-- .���_ ca e..., --_- _- _ _ Ire.• ll . Front Elevations —14.caul P i o-perties,, hic• r,� BD1--lioK oco I ovu ARc U_ll U LPL ' HIFFAIAN PIPS lwW f i The Village of Oak Brook,Illinois•Butterfield&Meyers Roads __ ��.��+' 1 ICI � \ � � , • • - � - - • - •- x x � � ���� -���I `—ter �_� � � I� � it � �.,��_ _ r �1 i'_ ''�- ����! • • • • •- • • • • A"cli w" are— will : .,: �i�r`��►'!F 1 �t WIN I►s '' ' • :J) -rlk _.URr + � 1�a "Ai �i:�✓�r���l� � r!�� `r /-` •%��' �.i'�''r�► _, r�'Ij.,� �I `'art• ,P`,-�T� v �`�'.`_' /IIII/ ;,'�+ ' _- Via.` ,,,I fi ��y `py �� - , � �`?�1..-Rif : • • • • • � � �'• - ,nll,I.y 1ta��� ,. s 'I 4 yl.I'+ ' ` � ��►�'�/ ., � I`�- �; _:tr:,�� nq�rl� All iwc � i� � 1! � tn '�10i�;� �. �r •� �Y .� �_ 1 / c air. r iil I � �,: ��,.- ` �I,_'•3� it � . 'fir �r� � � � =} --• �� ... ` T - . OIL P11V log mas owl ♦ � . � : •. . •. . • . Outdoor Dining Area _ � •. F�9 Pa..a&bAw.l3 .� � � � � � � f�4}( i�� � / .c ��� i L- Sir.7. ��'�p�, # '�- _ r H.C. KLOOVER ARCHITECT � �� � � � " � •� ��g� - �. ivy` ti[141Witli +sm Pine+•rc• TUR M RAI , e G F E D -mInalre Schedule Nume'ic S O' ,.'. ..,::-... P—[—L:All P^o ecLS -rojecL: All Projects Sqnbol GtH Lobel Aran ement Lu+nens LLF 7escri lion Label Calc Type Un'!s Avq Max Mln Avq/Min Mox/M'n I Al 5'.N6LF 36000 0.750 raw CIA[ 400 MH XX 5LF Galr.Pts Ill omlrr�nr.e Fr. 1.36 s.l O.O 0.00 0.00 _ D,a'n rir,py Tat'Hc'++:,: 12 3 5 N6LE 36000 0.750 '",o- GAL 400 MH xx 35 4 32 BACK-BACK 36000 0.750 '4c raw-GAL-100-MH-XX-35 5tat'sticol Areo 5urrnor - 10 G2 BACK-BACK 36000 0.750 GAL-400-MH-xX-55 -ro ect: All je.ts Key /��o�/n� 16 O 5'N6LE 14000 0.750 6AT-175-MH-x-5C-X-C Lobel Av Max Min Av In Mox/`91n U V �1J% man (� bock at 1.73 6.7 10. 1 17.30 67.00 morn lot 2.41 6.5 10. 24.10 65.00 Oe oe Oe oa Z'. Traffic Light Butterfield ae oo ae a oe o. oa oe ee oo as oa oo ae o> oe ee ee ae ae Z. ae Z. oe e a Z11 ee ee ee ee ee ae e, o> a> eitye�Oi7Urrieht°Sigh e> a> a, o, oa I>e o, 1>. e, a ae ae ee o., ae o> e> otV dnument Sign e, ae ee ae ee oe ee ae oe ee ae ae e, e, o> o> , a, ee oe ae ae ae oe ee ee oe ae ae Z. ae oa ae ae ae Z. ae oa ae ae ee ae ae e Z. e ae ee 00 0o a os o> o> o• o> o> e> e> e, e, e, o> r. •b r, r. e> a> e, a, ee 1- ae ee ee ee ae ee ee ae ee e, ee ee e, a, o, e, ee ee ee a, t. , a, o, ae oe ee ee ae ee ee ., e, o os oe ,> 7• i• Z. o> a oe oe oo a oe os U 1. }o }, ie L a 1, la a io a o., o• n> CC �QQ a .. a a o. o, a o. a a a. S* etbw '2 1'.] _ 10 I, on be a. o, o> a: o., is }. Ye 1 0, a t. 3> }> >s > s o + s o.+ s os o> //�f//'/§ _�11Q/1/L) /� i 1., le mr b/Vli•6a� oe o iv i> i., s oe oe a o, oe eo oa 00 o0 Z. 0.. a. o> os oe ii 'v i Ddb ie z, i., > •a •. §s b> 3= Ye }> I> I ne o.: n> o> c> n> ce on oe ne ce i 7 1> 1� 7> i> to Is } > Ie oe oe a cn on on ue 00 oe t. a o> os oe to Se Yo S> o��o }e 3> +. Ye Ys •, 3.e 3, 3, }s is t.. os o• ow o> o• o• os oe o > > ,s to s Is e e 7> • ,s is . ,> s U .: t., }o : }s 7> oe o, 00 oe o0 oe o0 s� s 71 i+ 0. o.. o> os o., o., o., >>s, 3>e> 3•>. 3?5. 5e 3+ §•,s 3se s 7iis>< Ral 7Wi, D�w: n N.o.+ i.e o .� N ri:e•< »a+a S,a >o >• » >• > i. is c i> le e a i., :o . :e >• :: >>..o s }S>.•o �> to is o00 0 n 000 0 8 33 os o.. 1 Is I. }. }> }+ 1, is re } } r3 fo 0 0 44 I< So >e as a Yb +o +a.a }.. is s . is s I, I. » >. }, i. >. I, + Se e n }e Y< > s :. Y> 3, I. t 3s :, •'�A 3, 3. Ss Ia ��uBo oe oa o. o, o> o> o+ os ob 1, is to i } 3, 3> 3s 1• i a to a 1: 3> 5, 1. is 3.s }s 3s }. 3: } 3e Yo Ys +o +s §. Y. }e }• ! Ie I.. s Ya 3e •s •e 3> 3s 3 ,.• l.i f. U s f 1. 3e 3s 3. 3 to to > fe rs ie } 3s §o S.+ 3a §o 3• }s ., la re }.s Se 3• }. 7. is 0� T. �s a r> T. .. ra >e >s i, >. �s i, T. S >. 3> 30 5e }, 50 So Ss Ss }, 5 So ao � }+ S. S. § 3. dd�o�q�q 00 0o a. a. o> on ee i> }0 3: }, y, ,s fa o.+ o.+ o., o .>--7r°Y §0 3s 3, § 3s 3. }e 1 • f •o. os ae o., o., o, f. 1, . 1.®3s §s 3. }, }> }> ,, } O� eo�•31P Ba Iw a. b, I» Iv I>e Is S. §. b L }>®�•' 30 }> , 1. o. b> o> 3, }> � S. }, S• Ys §a >, >s >< >e s,pp Y. >, - -- ---- M1. 00 00 00 0.. w w as oe t> Ss }e > Is }. 5• Yo §• }e e e s }s 5e 3• 3. 3.v Ss S.o 1, 7. )s S.s 11 1111111117111 Y } Y> 1"I", phabmstka Rea K z f� •. t I,7L �CZZ 1 �iII� �l1e�iS �I� _ y e s i7 w A, -T nA 4-v° 4 0 MOVE ° °CH 1( ` �° � i HIFF��AN � t _ . . � x} ,. S' ;;... �"� ..,_ � F•l }t i t 'd- .v- _ _ ice.'tt _F. s f fr i i ri •. - t ' :F The III of Oak Brook,Illinois • Butterfi ivie eld& ers Roads - e 1 � � Ke;� Sian '111111111110 Illifilllll4" �.,� �IIIIIIIII ONO men , MIN I Photometrics Plan W: � :.January 10. 2005 _y •9}� _ _ f.�'J'y'4ti,..FR�fiAR � � �. � � � � 3 _ - F fi .53 �. f at�ff ..r0�/i}�'�"- - _ t. x• T -.T• d eaaA _.e.—wl� c+�h3pT �e H..�:�. KLOO VE R��RC H IT.E-CT- rid►/. - .. � J Y�9"?� '§,sa '.z qa _. _ -1 1. r• ,� �..�:: � .,!`�P-• .. .r�; "?sutra. ';.- ;*- .�..,: .>-% s, �� � .q�gn � -'.�y ..�'i.E !�yy�y. ,�"' a ,(s 1�: � " ,�ti 8 .11.'&'.°/<s,'3�. ;1`.:_,: .- � ,;.� ;.�� ! _ si�p '. t�*• X i P t jTrm TTTr � ur-1^r t I� 35 G PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN PARKING LOT PARKING LOT LIGHT POLES POLE BASE LIGHT FIXTURE POLE LIGHT FIXTURE - — Kay sgm m 00 0.. a w w a o to Se S e Is oe oe os S> � 1, I S, Is i> w a oe a. ow a m o.I o> os os oa is }> } • . I> fa ve oe a. v.• ).v `v > Sa i� o os w v v. oe oa os v, o> a� ao va va o.. w o> w os o.+ S is 1> to io .• b a, w a• vs o> 3.+ y 3w iv )a fe I aI ov 0 e ��1 oe o., o., os 0o aI b, w os os a oe ae 1, 1 1 as .o io is as Ss }, So iv a+ a. w w w w w o.a a. aI o, w w w w w w w a. Se S, ie ..> ie os aI 'a S> O b.• oe oa m v.I o.. v> w os os o+ fa is I• 1• s 1> 1 11 s ie }e }w b v., ve 'o., oe b.• o.• le iw Iv o s ve 5, 4o fe • Ie U .o v a os o> }fe � !> 1> oe o, oe oa oa oa o. v> v,a os m oa 1' 3o L 3, > i> §I §, Se §I b > 7, iv v a• oa a.• 1 1> I 1. a le i> > i• a, o+ oe oe v 1, i, ± is 1. > 1> fy I 1. , vs s Y � . is oe oe os as oa ao o. a o> w a 0 Ss S. a 1> I I S. 3 So S. Se �y I o o.• Io > So S. e 1> 1> a S.a �. > I• I,• s i> i• a. a, m I 1� II • t> I, > a• w a, a• oe o., oe as , 1. i. 1. .e 1, s 1. 1• � 50 3s\S> Sw I. ., o, a oa oa o. w o> w w v I, 3 }, to I to i 7• 3e •> s :s }e f 1 1, '. )i !• !s }. }s !o !I }e So is 1. . U U o l0 1. S, fe le 's is 7, }> is is o.• oe a. oa oe is ^}> }y }e }. y. }e •, to L e ��fv ba 3s }e s 1 o aI o.I oa b, a 5> }0 1• 1> i )> §n 9> }e }. § !> y i. 1� 9 }.. !> , }. }w Sw 1, 5+ 3o be ;e :, }s la > v vI a ov oa / oa oa oa a oa w a• a.• I, Se > u 1 S• 1 ... 5. Ss 51 S. � S6 5s Se So Ie s o, o • oa va on aI o, os a. oa I. 3• . o.. oe oa ., :v i> .v } o vv 1• Ss S .o s ..�.s .0 3e b 1• tI i 7 o 1> is • !. .9 5. :, o' oa le }e i i. 5a U 3w }.. •e 1> 11 S, !• 5• }, i i i 3e :w 5., i , i i )> )a , }e }a 3s 1> i o 00 on oa a o w a. o, Is }, s o. a, as to ie S.. S• •. so 5> S, Is i, Ia Io • >w >o So 7. b 5e }. Se > �o a o to a• o I> Ss b §, •. S. S. a a S.s S o I o a� 1 � Se Ss 5e S. 5> S So • > a a m vo va v. a v> w os vs o.• 1> U I> o.• w i 5w }a to 1 1 is i> s le is s I• is v.• v. to v.• a• to v.• 1- ie 5s }> }a „ le }a Ss to i> v.• in o.. o.. a• i> s 30 }, Se }, 3a }, }> S 1 o s L S, 1, y v.I o. 00 on oa a o.I o.� w oe w a. a.> oe oa a is 1 fo I i la �' fo le 1> s ly i> > i a va to a• oa a• L > iw fe }o Ss b Ss y 1. ' le 4e 3s }s L }, is .; a o.I v is t> ty i> 1> in 1, So S, }0 5e So o va oa o. v., o., a, ae o., m o.• o.+ oe vs a os w o� o b, b. ov m oa o0 oa a o� o.I o� w o.• ow os w o.> os vs v.> oe oe oe os w oe os vw vs w w w o. o.I o.I o. aI m w w vs w w w w w os oa w vs vs w 00 oa oa oo I w oa oa as oa a as w aI o.I a oa oa v. aI o, o. o> oa a o, o.I o. a a va o0 va va vo aI w a a m oa o0 m w o, a a a a a w w w vs D> w %a w a> w. w a b, u. Lv o> w b, v.I a aI va BROO _ . ;fit• f" HIFFMAN o , ^ e Village of Oak Brook.Illinois • Butterfield&Meyers Roads T A MINIMUM -. . .. iii WISH VE/////rA/AOod / / GOO, M NMI ►, �� ♦♦i. for HIM INN I"r NMI 110"'dFlo PJJJ 0/1 OF WWI ... MIN , ININ Now I ' =uildable Area y +f`.. p Ct �d './Q r� _sTT7K 3�j'✓ s y G , .- . ..._ - �.. � •, � � - 00 -"-. r F. - H.C. °7� �' 3 - .erg �►� a -� s -... d �. c a5 .•e.«w ."#�- e � _ s7" q�t i Traffic Light p g utterfield - OVERALL SITE SUMMARY City Monument Sign Monument sign BUILDING AREA BUILDING A = 8,000 SF (1 STORY) • �um� �gn 50'Setback ILJI BUILDING B = 35,415 SF (2 STORY) so'setback - - - - - - - — - — — - - - — — — -- -- -- -- -- — _ — _ _ BUILDING C = 20,750 SF (1 STORY) OK 450 SF (2 STORY) �' K a -� BUILDING D = 14, BUILDING E = 25,320 SF (2 STORY) i T Ramp Down / BUILDING F = 14,483 SF (2 STORY)niiiiiiiiii" L Za as BUILDING G = 29,186 SF (2 STORY) A n ,, BUILDING H = 15,700 SF (1 STORY) a BUILDING J = 7,000 SF (1 STORY) BUILDING K = 8,400 SF (1 STORY) J Fr h Pond / BUILDING AREA BY USE H T p T OFFICE AREA = 20,450 SF = 11 f B an RESTAURANT AREA= 30,000 SF = 17% -an RETAILAREA = 128,255 SF = 72% man b as TOTAL AREA = 178,705 SF an / EXISTING VILLAGE ZONING: on ° = ORA-1 (19 ACRES) T p ttYa EXISTING TOLLWAY PARCEL ZONING: _ �' T R-2 (1.5 ACRES) G 0`�, PROPOSED ZONING: F E D B-1 (20.5 ACRES) FRONT SETBACK: 60' (50' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHH BLDG K) --- ----- C�' OCCUPIABLE 50' ------ �a�p /' ��� UNOCCUPIABLE ADDITIONAL 30' �� FLOOR AREA RATIO: — — t adroz 0 178,705 SF / 20.5 ACRES — .2 < .5 — OK PARKING SUMMARY - - - -- - - - -- SURFACE PARKING = 802 SURFACE HANDICAP PARKING = 18 UNDERGROUND PARKING = 187 UNDERGROUND HANDICAP PARKING = 3 TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 1.010 Northern Illinois TO Highway ( dor § aft man M1 -�.. n) _ /, '' i ✓ - St. Paul Properties, Ine, z _ ' }j me Village of Oak Brook.Illinois Butterfield&Meyers Roads I • Nino n ■l�n i N ME Oka �mlm NEWS me minim El IP.��!��,►�����Jl_7� ice_�,:� ,�,��� ''fit\t��I�.\�.�i■t■�.` � - • . a t i � • ' ��� � I .. � gas ww•- 'w s +�r�ti - 1� "� �- w q _:�. • [# H. . KLOOVER /ARCHITECT -��� - � - �:. ��"• J yy , Aryy j ,,�. F Blade Signs: Required one (1) per Storefront, six (6) square • ������� feet max. Letter height shall be six (6) inches max with a maximum of 30" projections. The blade sign shall be located on an elevation and • ` /���/ clear height to bottom of sign shall be indicated. Maintain minimum of 8'-0" clear where possible or mounted above decorative elements or planters to maintain ADA requirements. Decorative brackets and sign design, are to reflect the qualities of the tenant and the shopping center in a greater entirety. Coldwater Creels :., IEx` OAK BROOK CC', C CJ��in,Ai MUH L L(L—' -n--I0IU(r of Oak Biix-k.Ngn(is.N jt rfirkl&Wyen W ,�, General Signage: Tenant sign areas shall be on the building face above the entries and integrated into the building design. ° Maximum height above curb of 36 feet. The maximum height for letters within the sign band shall be as indicated in the Tenant Criteria 14 s6 for each category of Tenant size. Signs shall not extend more than 12" beyond the face of the surface to which the sign is i mounted. i The sign area shall not exceed more than 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of facade ' frontage up to a maximum of 240 s.f. per sign unless approved by the Landlord and local jurisdiction. All signs must be illuminated and shall derive light from a concealed source. No exposed • lamps,globes,tubes,etc.will be permitted. Signage shall be reverse channel, halo light 1 (J illuminated individual letters mounted to the •rJ I building face. r K B m0Om ro -nk-\4IbwofOakBmok.YMx is.Ekrctrrfirkl&Mryea Rcx . 9 .._....f fir..._. _ ROOFING 1 ROOFING 2 ROOFING 3 METAL ROOFING PRAIRIE STONE-1 PRAIRIE STONE-2 I I :# STUCCO-1 1 1 _7' HARDIE BOARD SIDING STUCCO-2 _ - - - Y \ STUCCO-3 ICA r. STUCCO-4 - - _ - °v CULTURED STONE - 1 CULTURED STONE-2 CULTURED STONE-3 CULTURED STONE-4 STUCCO-5 -- STUCCO-6 BRICK-1 BRICK-2 BRICK-3 BRICK-4 BRICK-5 1 wry4 I� KBDf-%OK l - t Inc. t �tU1 I ropey ties, n oho K / Q ARCH] mcT IV I AIAN Afhe Village of Oak Brook,Minos•Butterfield&Meyers RR� v - y TEAK FURNITURE SITE FURNISHINGS LITTER RECEPTACLE AND BENCHES CAFE TABLE BICYCLE RACK $Top oF GAP 7-4• BRICK,STONE,OR - - - _ E.LF.S.,TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDING ` BRICK,STONE,OR MATERIALS ; E.LF.S.,TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDING MATERIALS METAL FRAMED - y 6 V - �\ GATES W/SHEET ; �r - __ .•. t.. \ Fw6RAGE METAL BACK AND I" W,�f� X 1"VERTICAL STEEL - MEMBERS,PAINT CONCRETE FOOTINGS ELEVATION AND FOUNDATIONS BRICK PAVERS AS REQUIRED. SECTION TYPICAL TRASH ENCLOSURE ?A??A t .l BOLLARDS BUILDING LIGHT FIXTURES PEDESTRIAN LIGHT FIXTURE PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE e�0{�Q Q�QG�O�OQ� OAKBI' .%..# I[ � rc>�aerrtzes, Izac. 101 14 W''4tt.l Kk.. k. :. }.�f.kt1' k"+, > � l';,�f�ER0.LL. It \ 11 The Ulllage of Oak Brook.Illinois •Butterfield&Dyers Rikads Traffic Light Butterfield City Monument Sign Monument Sign o - - - - - - - - - - - - - umet ign zip 50'Setback '-- ❑n `1 T Ramp Down ' CtD I c:a �ua 0:0 Q ILLL Ln '_ RA / 1 FFTFFFFFFTFFM O� JPond ' 1 / I T T i �sz i 1 B asp I �tt ra Ana Ped ri n I °gtt e P estr I d� ]12� -C T atttt a U1,11 Dill T p I E ' a �e Q� t 'St. RIUI Properties, In \4.AWAKBKOO 0 I eta . ova �O�.G� � ° N.� j Mn ! rr The Wage of Oak Brook,Illinois • Butterfield&Wyers Roads i I V PARKING CALCULATIONS ' ° ° ; I I - � I -- --- -- — _ I l SURFACE PARKING SPACES = 802 -A � SURFACE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES = 18 d`_ _ _ UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES = 187 K UNDERGROUND HANDICAP SPACES = 3 - M 0 : ; ----- TOTAL PARKING SPACES = 1 ,010 c7D .� - - � — � A AREA = 60 SPACES AREA 2 = 64 SPACES - - AREA 3 = 69 SPACES AREA4 = 70 SPACES _ o AREA 5 = 128 SPACES H - AREA6 = 53 SPACES B ! AREA 7 = 69 SPACES 9 AREA 8 = 83 SPACES AREA 9 = 79 SPACES I AREA 10 = 145 SPACES �t -� I I I q UNDERGROUND PARKING = 190 SPACES 1 I TOTAL PARKING SPACES - 1,010 SPACES a ADDITIONAL VALET = 75 SPACES G ` c - - - TOTAL PARKING INC. VALET = 1,085 SPACES f F ' i ---'--- n Garage Parking Plan u 'f � r / -, / ----------------------- �� \ / /& -------Site Parkin P an --------------------- 1-86-EAST-WEST TOLL WAY / — „ w• > rte_ X. MM � �r R e Village of Oak Brook,Illinois- Butterfield&Wyers Roads _ .si■aeassersossa�o �1 �� y _� �, �e���`���'�33,. s , I�r I�t Irr `r� r■ !Be Ir�r Ir■ ® it 1 �� is Be i soon g.., 1.■_ j.,■11 ■ eL __ �IE'11-1111 G ■ E i _.. �..�....� a . ,��i�,! - _ AB ■` i r`- jam/ pph�i t 1I - �■a "!6e •R■� ��� ` i`. ,■ ■1■1 1■�U i■ ® -aHt■ IfNN � .■!■■■ -_r■C 1l-I■ ■ ? - ee■9!■ I ! ®�IANi■1`S��I�11��d1l�, iu■ flings. -} - Illy Illy ` — 9;4t..a4 Iw, a kf •f' '� i( i3 mod... ;•'W. j r H. KLOO ER A' HIT T ' " T` 1160 Em F f,. ,. ,. .._ .,-..gyx_ � �c ��=,"f _..__ ��- -? n ✓-+ f.1 y R "'��^''9ale€ " :5.. x - -4si ............... _� sal e�rir ■ _ _ - _ n — f� — �. = = '��` _tea°;• _---- _... =t _ _ � �. t='p r ■ � � I V�:�3 �� IFmL.,i3� E.tc fnG eti- a ISO-- - - -- .�� w � - - - =w =m_-may - - - - = _ _ - -�NINON �. ry ._� NOR . ,. .M .� _..<-a-- _ :- ---_-•s----- --. -' or--.. � �;r : .T`s IINIINIII�II IlfUllllllllll!! NIIIIIIIIIIfiG IIIIIINIiIIfG '1NI�1111'� INIII VIII I IIG IIIMIIYihil �II,fIIfGI' Illll,lrl LII,i � u'I'Iall, I ii,� I.Ilil Illlllil� Lldu.l Ilill'ILp a,;_ _e ;,I;�;"", :��,»...r.».�a_�aK� - II ZNN WN Oil elk vp r.. _ ME _ d r µ� .. -e. � � f i r • a .I a = ._�i''—-'fur- R"':...u�Sak.YaGS' 3•r'"ar S- --- _t _ '- ._.—- ■ -- - 4 - kit.-f "- ' .roc °e CON H:C KLOVER�ARGHITECT LAM lam.64+4 _ aC 'r '�-; ,�is •,�. -�. �#'' "^ '���,�{ / ;� 3!!�.; ���! - '���1� l - -- - 'acs = t I .�eS �� •pal, r , .;�/?� a '�'�. CC� .��.. ,,:r,,,. - .•- • •. : • C �- • II.I 1111 1.11 11 1 N► 3 ■ 6 rn 1.11 ii11 111 ��11 111 1111 Inl r 1; I; In�il■1 or L 1`. II tm 11 IN 11 b �- ®� � �.■�� 1 en I.�i I SPIN AB In 1 /q■�i■■�'n�1e� u_au.l■ a � � °,-_-_�, � ,r�l / / 1 I 1 ■m I< i � 1 .1� � ,.;� -1:.,11, ��� �._� i i ,■r■ ■ � - � - '11 1 ii 11 I■ %1 H' _ Iff■■e �e.�, ■1■ :i �-. ;,. -- - r ' e ■ ■: 1■1 q■ q/ �■ .■. 1� 12i 1� �e leln non 1�� ■nn� oa®e� n ■ ■ 6®�9�e I � 11I ii i1 n ai v ■■r lu== r.. � 111 F 1 �� • �. al, cif F"M 111 w cm ME- m mill aw .�✓�` �'` �`�Y ,., �y� � ,'�, � :J � � � � ��' �. ice, C, .;f °� r: a t - - _ P - H.C. KLOO VER ARCH ITECTj �_ - .}{�>�������. � a a - j �®a �Tii �� � < I!!J■ il�!I�` nu n� �i _fit 111111. 1� — — i mi- '$ mill- _ l� ��^ 111 -1♦ ' ���•i,•���yyt� : :. T-_._—.-.— .., _ -_.• _.:__: !!li "' � t� rye m0� - - r nr€ .,:e.-e.,...,.-6 .A A€.: :im.ur■ w _. .... __ .. .v.°.... ..,�•-.';:" , " ' - a _ _ � e'� #: �I�il lr 1� --__ _-—__ _ _ ■��i �� lo1a Ilea el si +i a ■■�•u:_ •■■®ems •u `.a.��� E _ !_iii 1 � - !•■■!! i��e �� � .._ a 'I Ic �: :��'` -' .I. � I . �P II�U —I � � ��1■n - - ..w•a - a■ir�ss y[f pit AN w.- ar - ■ s � . .t _ •sr I' �sisr__ _ � n, Y' .r i r s _ r I rl�4w-L Sam : -K MMra =�S-� :mow: 1 �1� aoi>� .:�I■! ■A, - ® � '�' -im _ _ al lo �{'dp 'rte 3� at�:= r��sc�:aa a -! SIMON um! EEL Wit•�-� �_-�� � ��su��/ �-. � __ =- __=_ — _— $��� •� AEI;T�wr.�rdk5 r " �� � � w ?�L �' � �f� �� ,,,✓'+➢'�<'a. "� _ y H.C. KL•VER ARC ITECT.� � - w� / 1'P���,- ,_�;'l,. .._.. � - a _w, _,. ...�' - `;i%� � vim..- ?� •r-tea ., `.;'� �`�,'�a' f`*m OVA g� •, 1 aEn,. I6■11111► wn 7[1111\. nnum•Irunrl. gillillia.111 I1111�I L. IN1111■,llllll►11■Itlli■111\. _ nlnlllrlxnrt 111rI1NI Ixll. ..a-_ � .�.e-_ Iinwrmnrunlnunnunrnu7OnlruulrOl p-� oe�a-- _a--��a nnlrnlnnnn■■muulrmllruulrmllrnnmull. 9�:_'�_®_:= _®_�=iil�iiiiviiiiliiiiiliiliiiniiiliiiiilii,li■uulnnnnunnxnnnnnnn■nlnmin■nillin Q -----o�O-=---°r A�Yv�"'�-■ � ■ r �u1 l/e!r1t1n11l1■1[11I1l1l1 °Oam m n l lllll�t V1111[IInIr0111n11 > 'InItINlNlrll I\. ��vo���. � s•..�acoo����s.Irlllllrlll/lrlll■rlllll ■IIt111r'.,■IIIIIIIIInrllltl ,o...,xu■nnlllxn[nlnrmmWIN -1 lunOulu '■nrlxnrlunr� -' Ian■ulmn111■. i niiiimwrlr•r■■unuNmur, __ ■u�ira � �nlnunrnlnri, nmlpa.murtu 1 1 unumlalawa.\ 1■lu■�1nwili■INlrt a°!=m'�emia�m�_ 11 IIIQII 111 11 111' ��l -__ ■l _ �r_vl MIS Sig NO; win ® MINIS ■ .��., an ss°om man i- 1.-- ''� ice• y� �r mod: . ' i ��� ���� �I��II. e toe- ��� oe• �1 ZWEL - NEW KNEW k- ' ■'i■ ii-'� R -p° �■ -pr.e �■ tae p� • i■ f�' e.■ice :l-�iM•e�.� �I ■1 _oe i-._i-_� i�oe--=® uunuil nlu ;.nuiaw 1 i�wa iau..i a u me.Iwauclu//muugauulrnp ianmr nulruul.uula uulauulnm unnumnrm mums uNinugougr �n■nnlnxl,■nnuODUnuuuul■lnmmnrnnunnlrlMmntlnuB■nnl■nulnuBlwmm�unul■nul■nlnnull■uumnnNw Inlmnlrnnmunnunnnnuummllronlrnuunullnnunnllnnl[wnnnnmullnumunnummm�unnunrnnlrnlnnn uunuxllNxmnuunumunnvnnnlrnuuunumnlnnlnnnnnBNxnOnmm�nOnmm�nrmm�nlnnulOnnmxnnnnN: IraWrwmm�lrlunrlumnn;iii:711NI■Illq■tlNl■11111■IIIt Ir1111Nlllnrl1111■III/I■IIIInI1lBnllnrlllnll111NI1MI■IUB■11111■111111 ''ll�il�,1 111(\ . 'JI■IIIII■II117■111r111n111I/I■1 ■wnnnn■IlIll Ilia] Illllln■IINI■Illn■1x11■111 ls[Ill 111\11111■Illtlllll/1■IIMIn1111r1n1 1l...... ll,. nlNnnl■nmraulrmmw*.�rnlBS•�wmnumnmumuxn■Null unNnnmxmnnluu■Nnmmmnnllmmnumtamm •,.1■nl IIx1InxBnllBnUllrll1/1r'•'llnllx/I■,.�IIIIIKill ■IIIIInllllr Ill/I Ill lIlls■[sill 1w11■111111r1Inr11111r11111■II Ill r1limill n/11111■I nr1N, �,InnlnnuunNlumcrlt,-'nrlmm�uln.•lminllmua■111 1 11 Ills[ 11 1n11 1 of II I1■wn■mn■w11■m mill■■1 11 ullrnu ..1/1r111�P ■Ill/llll.•■IIIIIl1111I■III/Inllll■Ii11Ulllnrllgllr111rI1111r�1�Q■IIMIII■. M�aiiiil�iiiil�il�n�iii%ISillil�iuil�iiiil�iiiil�iiiil�iun�iilnnnn\wnnnn►'• I■n111r1O11. .I■11111■I� �IIIINIt1'■1x11■111111111n1I11nn11nr1uB■wnrnnl■rtV�-!Illlln■16. nW.�uumx/l■w1I■wmw nxnminnnlN(Ilnnnnl21 1111numu nunln[ulnf d111r1111 1t1/1\111►711111■Illnrl1111■IIN�IIIIIr11IlIr11111rI1NID"11■III:7I1111■In., /I[ww.1Ill m11■Illlll111/1■IUBl1lNllp'11■IIIIIl111Bnpnrin111'tin■Illnll.. 1111■11111■IIIIi►. 11■IIIIi!' _IIIIIr1111i`Illllrlllll■Ills■IIInN1111rIx111I1111r1x,Illllllll 1111111n11i. Illnnnnl`Illn[Illlllllnl[IIIIINIIBIwI" �IN11/1■Illn■1x11■II', X111■IIB■II IIIInr11111r1111116. .811111■1111 illllllnn1111:1111111111111111■Illn■IIIBrlllllmnl[-111/11111■IIW�`11MIr■UI�, •1n11111■111111.',IInr11111nxBNN11[I111�1'' '7111/l■11111■IIN�' M111111111■4 I /i 'A I■un■IINIn1111r1. A1IrI11nP ■1 ■e IIIlnnnnlMl►IUllxullnlnnunllumlxnn■:iinn111111nt1111L lIB1■nr\ .■11/B1IIInllll/lr�.ry1/111111111111111tl/lrnl , rwBllnnll+ �11n11111, �i�L +` g �I■IIInn11/1\11111■I►. .I■IIInn111 .1 11`: 111111■11111■IIIII�'1�1■Illn■111!1■Illn■IINIr'El�wl■11111■EWlrllllp.1111rI1Nlrh. IBNxnrlxllnllnn.•tl11■11111■1/111r111B■' rr /.nrlpn■nIn �t j �dlnn11111 Q ■III1lrlllll■IIIBIIL .illnrlllnlll.a. �� ;; mmmulmnm..'minlmunnummei��.c�■■�Wr•'111n111m1a �I�glnnlNl■Ix1lnlNlrt.,Ul■Illn■1/111■IIII 111a/1\111/1■11 _.I Ilrtllll■IINI. � Illnmumax■mwmx. nmunnnmm�l. �,-„��minlrnulru►nn,anun■lun■n IIF - �nminnn., .mnminrmlmtmrwnn►.Inrwllnnll■11 1( Irnumunr 11 MINIBOOM lunlnnnnn...... l.. t ' �_.._........_.....Ilmnunnnlunl. ���)nnnmm�nlu_ �� 111111.1x11111 ulrnnmxnNU111wB1m nmunnlllOmr yl�mmm�ullmm�a; Ilnumummnr ,anullOnlOmB\ 11■umm�mul, imwmnulal nnlNUmm -'alllllllnwl/ _� := xn■In1111111111x1111. - /1R 11�11�IIIII11111111U11■ql�l■gulrn�ngn�llnnlnnn■Illnrn�■I�� ■ •••-••• •- s— ®�Illnnun/111' - IIIInn1111r11111■Illnrla. ��, Na-a�®— ®i-p,. - - --- �1���1 _ISM --��-row-'�— � "s_:n iI1111■IU/1[. -1�_- Ir111/1r111nnx/1■Ix/11110. - Ffl� �llu - --_ --_ - - --- -� �o=/�-'���i� BHgdd_�o°•' -.r,= -, ! I I I Bnx/mnmwmua. -- om_yaa�� �/fp,p e.a'-am .a 1 ■!-.I � n 197111.IN.111NaaNwllnlnttl . 'o �-_�_�-�_�-' - c - - 00 0•---' q.__i�VV _ 8V/�r_ ��W-r 40•. -- - - /ems.--�eo�-_� - - T- _ �� e�_� Ce.7� Q _ _mad us��. a.��®®.��� j w4 - - - ��+ p goes l = - -9��III II II II ■io - _ _ _ f ■■���■� ® =®Evil °=1���ieee ! °= �t11®t'I ° ,a•• 1, - _ � �: I�� II IIIII� -...• oo� i •�rTs .�r� Isar 1 - - -- w- . ,1 �. - - -..�,1 ®-_° ut_ -• =tai--u:w�t _®-- � �'� — ifFj]q ■ ■® --- ° i r■■I� . ®,�. ■I� ■�■■ per. Io �.i�+w/s/- a� �i� �!sS° � !-- .1� = Im■�a¢� fti n !M � IIIIIII��11 mm♦ sl.+s •'>`` -JMIYF_. <w. /1 • l ff'� illY.�, ;i� •. �. i ���; y ~ ■\111 j*- � -.- 3 � �� t, �ar (11 I; �34•.- � 7b f ^� s ^ y �i�T• amop.-La :.;•!y"„f°c.•. t7.""'I.rQ H. . KLOO VER ARCHITECT _ .-� �. 4:3 °3•=`.`I -�a_ /i,4�', T ; 1 0 ' dill • , r>gHMA'iln * , I I! " 111�I I I I I I I I I 1 1144 II II �IlM I�Il4E d 40A o AN �_/�.�� ,n1iV'�i��i�llVtlit'Y�I���. _I I�LI�LIol,iillCt,C��1'I�ele�el���il.lelaliG41.�1�� + 1, QAM' 44d. 1_ ., rt ,�,,, °�UIPIIIhIIIIIIAIIIIINIIIllll111�► � `g�i,.x �• s,.: K�yY��-S �y\V p � ! � �-•�.at4. � � �: i3 j..—yc�S ..�. ;;. • • • • • section • Introduction section V i • In-Line/Free Standing Restaurant Design • • section • Drawing Submission and Approval section VI I • Procedure • Tenant Sign Criteria • • section section V1 I • Small Shop Storefront and Interior Design (less than 4,999 • S. f.) Site Lighting Criteria • • section IV • Sub Major Tenant Design (5,000 s.f. to 9,999 s.f.) section IX • Major Tenant Design (10,000 s.f. to 25,000 s.f.) • Landscaping Standards • section section X • Office Tenant- Design Store Construction Procedures • • • • • • ���r;r3hr�o�� TABLE OF CONTENTS • • I'i • INTRODUCTION Land I o r d's Design The design of the streetscape has emphasis of Ph i I osop by multiple patterns and wall surfaces, such as shingles, • textured stucco, brick, stone, and asymmetrical This Handbook identified as an Exhibit in your Lease facades. The project will have a distinctive skyline and has been prepared to guide you, as well as your The use of exciting and unique storefronts and merchandising designs create a shopping and be a landmark and the place to shop in Oak Brook. • architect, store designer,and contractor in expediting entertaining environment that attracts customers and the construction of your building or lease premises. results in increased sales. Tenants are encouraged to This information is to be used as guide by your create innovative and dramatic storefronts(if not . Architect, and describes the Landlord's obligations, provided by the Landlord), shop interiors and the Tenant's design responsibilities, and your graphics. Through the dramatic use of lighting and • contractor's requirements. color, as well as careful attention to detailing, • fixturing and graphics, each store can become an , • inviting and effective retail establishment, which will Project Description be compatible with the overall design quality of the Oak Brook Promenade. Oak Brook Promenade is currently planned for • approximately 180,000 square feet. The open air Through the criteria in this Handbook, the Landlord specialty center will consist of approximately 160,000 has set certain quality and design standards that will square feet of specialty retail shops and restaurants help Tenants create stores compatible with the overall with approximately 20,000 square feet of second design concept of The Oak Brook Promenade. story office Tenants. Project Narrative Located at the intersection of Butterfield and Meyer Road with great visibility from the northern Illinois toll The project set in the Suburban Chicago beltway is . Highway,Oak Brook Promenade is a mixed use designed to be reminiscent of Old World and regional Lifestyle Center with high-end Restaurants, retail and historical parts in the Chicago area. • offices on 19 acres. The style is a culmination of eclectic Architecture • styles referred to as Old World but uniquely American and part of Oak Brooks'character. The goal is to • create a shopping environment that is real in character and creates a warmth and familiarity with the main street shopping of the past. section 1 �),ik B, Ok fl,-ot»eli�y(Je I NTRODUCI-10N • �.1 � II 0 U N Yq O to N ff3 a a m c a L a 0 . 0 . 009000000 . 0000000 . 000000000000 • Overa I I Site / Lease PI an •t A I CHI t j j � ''tir•:t� • � r G �.. C % •: * ti„ r `� NOM G2 • ET DZ • Sownd Fbor Lease Plan section 1 ()Ok Pl ,)mel,ac_le INTRODUCTION 1.3 • Oak Brook Promenade Traffic Consultants Co n to c t Sh ee t Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona INC. • Developers 9575 W. Higgins Road Suite 400 • NAI Hiffman Rosemont, IL.60018 One Oakbrook Terrace Phone: 847-518-9990 . 22nd&Butterfield Fax: 847-518-9987 • Suite 600 City of Qak Brook Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 • P Village of Oak Brook Phone: 630-693-0682 Fax-630-932-7258 1200 Oak Brook Road • Oak Brook, IL 60523 Arch i tect Phone: 630.990.3000 H.C. Mover Architect Fax: 630.990.0876 10955 Lowell, Suite 700 info(aa)oak-brook.oro • Overland Park, KS 66210 TelephoneService Phone: 913-649-8181 SBC Fax: 913-649-1275 225 225 W. Randolph St., Floor 27A • IandscapeArchitect Chicago, IL 60606 • Daniel Weinbach&Partners LTD Phone: 800-244-4444 53 West Jackson BLVD • Electrical Service Suite 1850 Chicago,IL.60604 Commonwealth Edison • Phone: 312-427-2888 37th F Corporation Fax: 312-427-7648 37th Floor, 10 South Dearborn Street • P.O. Box 805398 Q i I Engineer Chicago, Illinois 60680-5398 . Manhard Consulting Ltd. Phone: 1-800-483-3220 2050-50 Finley Road www.exeloncori).com • Lombard, IL. 60148 ,as Service • Phone: 630-691-8500 Fax 630-691-8585 18 Gas 44 1844 Ferry Road • Tenant Coo rd4nator Naperville,IL 60563-9600 • NAI Hiffman Phone: 1-888 642-6748 One Oakbrook Terrace Fax: 630 983-6755 • 22nd&Butterfield www.nicor.com Suite 600 • 60181 Geotechni cal Consultants Oakbrook Terrace, IL Testing Service Corporation Phone: 630-693-0682 L Gunderson Drive Fax-630-932-7258 Capol Stream,IL. • Phone: 630-653-3920 Fax: 630-653-2726 section 1 • 01-4k Brook I NTRODUCT ION 1.4 TENANT DESIGN Demising Partition: A common rated wall between two adjacent shops or between a shop and a common area. The centerline of the HANDBOOK demising partition defines each Tenant lease premises. Demising walls shall be constructed of 3 5/8"metal studs only. DEFINITIONS: Gypsum board sheathing and insulation shall be supplied and installed by the Tenant unless otherwise specified in the • Lease Agreement. Blade Sign: Storefront Control Area: • Supplemental signage The area below the bulkhead at the storefront and 4'-0"behind the lease line. The Landlord reserves the right to installed perpendicular require above average materials in this area and to apply all tenant sign criteria guidelines,submittals and approvals to the storefront for within this area. visibility to pedestrians. • All signage is to be provided Facades: • by the Tenant and approved The exterior face of the building which is the architectural front,sometimes distinguished from the other faces by by Landlord. elaboration of architectural or ornamental details. Center or Landlord's • Graphics: Bulkhead: Lettering,symbols and logos used for signage at the storefront and/or throughout the store interior. Element above Tenant's storefront and below the • Landlord's ceiling at small shop buildings. It defines Center Common Area: • the height of a Tenant's storefront. Tenants will not be Shopping Center streetsca sidewalks parking ots,service halls, restrooms if an landscaping,children's la permitted to use a storefront system that does not pp g areas p 9 ( e play • extend up to the Landlord's bulkhead. Tenants shall areas,etc. and all other areas of the Shopping Center not part of a defined lease premises. install all required vapor barrier and gypsum board • sheathing at bulkhead. Neutra I Pier: Architectural element separating two adjacent storefronts,or a storefront and a service corridor. Neutral piers are installed and maintained by the Landlord. The Tenant at its own expense shall repair any damage to the neutral piers Construction COO r d i nat0 r: by the Tenant. The Tenant shall provide flashing and/or caulking as approved by Landlord's Architect(or as directed by . Landlord field representative(s)responsible for Landlord's Tenant Coordinator)when adjoining Tenant's storefront to a neutral pier. oversight of all Tenant construction and compliance. Lease Li ne: • Curtain Wa I 1 : The line shown on the Tenant Lease Diagram (LOD)which defines the confines of the Tenant's demised premises. A non-bearing exterior building wall,between piers or . columns, which is not supported by the beams or Mechanical Zone: girders of a skeleton frame. A"mechanical zone"has been designed to accommodate roof top unit placement. The"mechanical zone"shall be • located per the building shell construction documents. Roof top equipment shall not be placed outside of the • "mechanical zone". In the event that a Tenant requires roof top equipment located outside the"mechanical zone",the Tenant is required to submit calculations prepared by a certified structural engineer for review by the building shell • structural engineer. Additional engineering services and any additional reinforcing shall be at the Tenant's expense. section 1 01,/., ,_),, 1.5 • Pa rabo I i c: Store Name: A type of reflective lens which provides a better Official name of the store as written in the lease documents. control of light, reduces glare and maintains • better light output. i Reveal : • Recessed separator strip between two different materials. Also used to separate Tenant's storefront from Landlord's neutral piers and • bulkheads. a Show Window: • Transparent portion of storefront used for merchandise display; display window. Sign Block: Rectangular areas on building elevations,which • define the allowable sign areas. Sign areas shall be in conformance with local sign ordinances. Simulated: Artificially produced to look or seem like a • natural building material. A Soffit: The exposed undersurface of any overhead component of a building, such as an arch, balcony, beam, cornice, lintel or vault. i Sto ref ront: •.'_ j Front face or other exposed exterior building wall • of the store. _ �? T� section 1 01-ik e', k Pl-o,>ie ilia le I NTRODUCTION 1.6 • • • • • DRAWING SUBMISSION and telephone number. All drawings must be accurately verify the dimensions and conditions of signed and sealed by an architect and engineer the space, shall be at the tenants expense. * AN D APPROVAL registered in the State of Illinois. PROCEDURE It is the responsibility of the Tenant and his In case of any discrepancy between this booklet architect to schedule adequate time for Landlord's The Landlord has established the following and the Tenants Lease Document, the Lease shall preliminary review, Tenant's subsequent revisions procedures to expedite the required approvals of govern. if required, final construction drawings and • the Tenant's drawings for the lease premises. Landlord's final review per the Lease Agreement. • Deviations from these procedures could result in needless delay and redrafting of the Tenants • Contract Documents. • NOTE:The City of Oak Brook requires that • Landlords Tenant Coordinator approve all APPLICABLE CODES: Tenant Drawings prior to submittal to the Codes current at time of printing • city. 2000 International Building Code • All submittals shall be submitted to the Landlord's L 1993 BOCA National Fire Prevention Code • Tenant Coordinator. J J 1994 National Fire Code Volume 1-12 2000 International Residential Code Selection of Tenant's _ 1994 Life Safety Code • J 1998 State of Illinois Plumbing Code with Architect Y Ammendment • J 1999 National Electrical Code with Ammendments The Tenant, at its expense, must select an Illinois 1998 Handicapped/Accessibility Code registered architect(s)and engineer(s)to prepare 1996 Safety Code for Elevations and Escalators • complete plans and specifications for the with Current Updates. improvements to the premises including, but not Village of Oak Brook Design Criteria for Structures • limited to, applicable structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical. Tenants needing After receiving the Tenant Lease Outline Diagram, • assistance in locating an experienced, locally carefully review the design criteria and applicable • licensed architect and engineer(s) should contact codes. Prior to starting construction drawings, the Landlord's Representative. The Tenant must the Tenant's architect(in conjunction with the • forward a copy of this Handbook along with a Tenant) shall proceed with the preliminary design • print of the Tenant Lease Diagram and associated of the Tenant's premises. It shall be the Tenant's details to their architect. It is the Tenant's responsibility to visit the site and verify all existing • architect's responsibility to obtain, review, and conditions prior to commencing with construction comply with this criteria and all applicable codes. documents. Any rework of construction Tenant shall also notify the Landlord's documents, due to the tenants failure to • Representative of the architect's name, address • section 2 • • 2.1 • • SmaI I Retai I Shops Land I ord Bui I d-to-Suit - Land I ord Bui I d-to-Suit Sub-Majors (T. I. not (T.I. included) Sub- Upon execution of the lease the Landlord will i n C I u d e d) Major S provide the following: • 1. Lease Outline Diagram for the proposed Upon execution of the lease the Landlord will Upon execution of the lease the Landlord will • Tenant. provide to the Tenant the following: provide to the Tenant the following: 2. Tenant Design Criteria Booklet. 1. Preliminary building floor plan (with structural 1. Preliminary building floor plan (with structural 3. Site/Leasing Plan grid). grid.) 4. Construction Documents, if available. 2. Site Plan 2. Preliminary Building Elevations. Upon receipt of this information the Tenant has 3. Preliminary Building Elevations. 3. Tenant Design Criteria Booklet. • 30 days in which to produce preliminary 4. Tenant Design Criteria Booklet. documents and subject to Landlord's Tenant Upon receipt of this preliminary information the Upon receipt of this preliminary information the Tenant has 2 weeks for review and return to the • Coordinator for review. The Landlord will review Tenant has 2 weeks for review and return to the Landlord's Architect with tenants approval and/or these documents within 2 weeks and return them Landlord's Architect with Tenant's approval and/or comments. Landlord's Architect shall proceed to the Tenant marked as"Approved","Approved with Building Shell Construction Documents and as Noted"or"Returned for Corrections". The comments. Landlord's Architect shall proceed 9 Tenant will be required to submit final with Construction Documents and shall provide shall provide those documents to the Tenant for Construction Documents within 60 days of receipt those documents to the Tenant for use review. The Tenant has 30 days to review and completing Tenant Improvement(T.I.) Plans. resubmit to the Landlord approved shell • of Landlord comments. Landlord shall again Final T.I. Construction Documents shall be Construction Documents, a Fixture and Reflected review the documents within 2 weeks and mark provided by the Tenant for Landlord review within Ceiling Plan and Design Specifications for the • them as noted above. If final documents are 60 days from receipt of Shell Drawings. Landlord Landlord's use completing T.I. Construction marked Return for Correction Tenant shall Documents. The Landlord's Architect shall address all items and resubmit for final approval will review drawings within 2 weeks and shall be marked"Approved","Approved as Noted"or proceed with the T.I. Construction Documents within 10 working days. • "Returned for Corrections"by the Landlord. If and provide them to the Tenant for final review Failure by the Tenant to comply or show due final T.I.documents are marked"Returned for and approval by the tenant within 60 days. diligence to the above schedule shall be Corrections Tenant shall address all items and Tenant shall review and resubmit with comments considered in nonconformance with lease resubmit for final approval within 10 working within 10 working days.Y Failure by the Tenant to requirements. days. Failure by the Tenant to comply or show comply or show due diligence to the above 0 due diligence to the above schedule shall be schedule shall be considered in nonconformance considered in nonconformance with lease with lease requirements. requirements. section 2 C7.-1{c Br-c) k Pry-)i icle DRAWING SUBMISSION & APPROVAL PROCEDURE 2.2 Tenant shall address all items and resubmit for final approval within 10 working days. • Prel iminary Design Phase (Free Standing Bu i I dings Storefront elevation and section, including and SmaI I Sho Tenants)P T ) any graphics and signage. Indicate all materials and finishes(scale �/a" = V-0').• �` - The purpose of this phase is to acquaint the Landlord with the Tenant's intentions so that the Sketches, perspectives, sections or other • Landlord may comment and/or advise Tenant of details that will clarify the design of the • l// _ €�, I any changes necessary to meet the criteria before storefront and the Design Control Area, or progressing into final Construction Documents. photographs of similar storefront, if related • to Tenant's submission. Please submit three(3)scaled, half size • sets of all drawings to the Landlord's Tenant Material finish and color sample board(s), Coordinator for review of Lease Agreement properly mounted and labeled. compliance. The Landlord's Tenant --- - - Coordinator will then forward the drawings In addition to the above, one set of catalog cuts to the Landlord's Architect for review of and/or photographs and/or samples showing Free Stan d i n g Bu i I d i n g s Design Criteria compliance. One(1)set the store fixtures specialty, lighting fixtures, and • containing review comments will be other special treatments used in the sales area Upon execution of the lease and/or sales contract returned to the Tenant. must be submitted so that all aspects of the . the Landlord will provide to the tenant the public areas of the store can be reviewed by the following: Drawings shall be clearly identified with the Landlord's Tenant Coordinator. shopping center name,Tenant's store name, 1. Site/Grading Plan. Tenant's space number and key plan, and must If Tenant's storefront design follows a specific 2. Site Utility Plan. include the following information as a minimum prototype, photographs of comparable stores 3. Tenant Design Criteria Booklet. (additional information is encouraged). should be submitted to aid the Landlord's Representative in the review process. Upon receipt of the above information the Tenant Preliminary floor plans(scale 1/4"= 1'-0'� • has 30 days in which to produce preliminary indicating interior design concept, The Landlord will review the preliminary design documents for Landlord's approval. The Landlord approximate location of fixtures and and make necessary corrections or suggestions • will review these documents within 2 weeks and equipment, interior partitions, toilet rooms, and return, with his comments and/or approval return them to the Tenant marked as"Approved", exits, seating,etc., identifying all materials or disapproval, one marked-up set of prints to "Approved as Noted"or"Returned for and colors. the Tenant's architect. Corrections". The Tenant will be required to submit final Construction Documents within 90 Reflected ceiling plan indicating all soffits, days of receipt of Landlord preliminary comments. ceiling heights, materials, lighting layouts, Landlord shall review the final documents within 2 locations of HVAC diffusers, and weeks and mark them as noted above. If final approximate location of HVAC units within • documents are marked"Returned for Corrections" the predetermined"mechanical zone". � section 2 f1t ()irrei).jae DRAWING SUBMISSION & APPROVAL PROCEDURE 2.3 S • ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PLUMBING PLANS • Architectural Floor Plan � Construction (Scale: �/a" = 1'-0") These drawings shall incorporate all minimum design and construction requirements as stated Document Phase Demising wall locations and dimensions. herein. If the Tenant's particular occupancy Dimensioned interior partitions. requires that these standards be exceeded to After the preliminary drawings have been Restroom facilities. meet code or the Tenants requirements, the approved in writing by the Landlord's Tenant Location of fixtures and equipment. Tenant shall be responsible for making those • Recessed service door(if applicable). Coordinator and Architect, the Tenant's an. l design adjustments and the cost of architect shall proceed with the final Reflected Ceiling P construction. • construction documents and specifications (Scale: /a„ =V-0”) incorporating design suggestions and comments Ceiling heights including drops and curtain Note: Tenant's are required to use the of the Landlord's Representatives, in walls. Landlord's building shell roofing Contractor for accordance with the criteria contained in this Types of ceiling construction. any and all roof penetrations at the Tenant's Handbook and the Tenant Lease Plan. Decor at ceiling. expense. Additional information may be required as Location of lighting fixtures, sprinkler heads, air deemed necessary by Landlord upon review of diffusers, grilles, access panels and heat Plumbing Plan (Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0") Tenant's drawings. detectors (if applicable). Toilet facilities. Final construction documents shall be Storefront and Interior Elevations Location of other lumbin fixtures. P 9 submitted on or before the date required (Scale: 1/4" = V-0") Location of sewer connection. by the Lease. Final construction Material samples, (if not submitted with Location of plumbing vent connection. documents shall be submitted in three(3) preliminary design). Clean-out and floor drain location. scaled, half or full size sets of prints to the Color storefront elevation and/or submit Domestic water distribution. • Landlord's Tenant Coordinator. All photograph of similar stores as required. Gas piping layout(restaurant tenants, if drawings and specifications must be clearly Finishes and colors. applicable). • identified with the project name, the Tenant's Signing. Water meter. store name, a Key Plan with the Tenant space Sanitary system isometric drawings including • number, and the name and seal of the architect Necessary Sections and Details line sizes.Domestic water isometric indicating pipe sizes. or engineer preparing these drawings indicating Large scale section through storefront to roof 1 • that he or she is registered in the State of = 1'-0" Water heater detail with relief valve and piping Illinois. Final working drawings and Security grille detail, if applicable. to floor drain. specifications shall consist of a minimum of the Details at neutral piers and Landlord's bulkhead Detail of connection to Landlord's vent stack. following: at ceiling 1 1/2" = 1'-011 . Storefront details and wall sections. • Schedules • Door schedules/details. Room finish schedule. section 2 • >:<ir Br ��ok Prc>nten,icle DRAWING SUBMISSION & APPROVAL PROCEDURE 2.4 • • • • • HEATING VENTILATING Exhaust System simultaneous load maintained at three hours or Show windows(if required). more for the store area and all other lighting, A N D A I R Cooking equipment(if applicable). HVAC, and miscellaneous loads per square foot. • CONDITIONING Specifications of exhaust equipment. Electrical Floor Plan (Scale: 1/4"-= 1'-0") Location of equipment. • The HVAC drawings shall incorporate all Methods of installation. Location of all floor and wall outlets. minimum design and construction Ventilation requirements(by Tenant in the Location of Landlord's service. requirements, including complete calculations, event of unusual or excessive requirements). Location of all fans, motors and HVAC • indicating heat gain to and heat loss from the Fresh air intake. equipment. space for all lights,occupancy, exterior Specify minimum CFM requirements. All loads assigned to circuits- itemized load • exposure(if any)and other heat producing breakdown. . elements. All roof top equipment shall be ELECTRICAL Itemized Load Schedule. located within the"mechanical zone"as . Electrical Ceiling Plan (Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0") • identified on the Landlords structural framing Electrical drawings and specifications shall show • plans. all circuits for store lighting (including Lighting fixture layout including night lighting emergency and night lighting), sign lighting, and sign lighting. • Note: Tenant's are required to use the receptacles, toilet exhaust and other fans(if Toilet exhaust and other fans. Landlord's building shell roofing Contractor for different or supplemental to Landlord's central Emergency and exit light locations. any and all roof penetrations at the Tenant's system), and service to heating,ventilating, and All lighting assigned to circuits. • expense. air conditioning system. Indicate sign and lights which are connected to time clock. • Mechanical Plan (Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0") Show single line power riser diagram indicating • Ductwork layout and sizes. main disconnects, size of wire,conduit, panels, Schedules Heights above finished floor. transformers, time clock, etc. Lighting Fixture Schedule. Damper locations. Electrical Panel Schedule. Return air openings through demising walls. Show panel schedule and itemized load breakdown in connected kilowatts for the Type of insulation. Miscellaneous Details Locate diffusers, grilles and registers. premises, including lighting, receptacles, sign Show thermostat location. lighting, water heating, special appliances, toilet Electrical Distribution Riser Diagram. • Return Air Systems: exhaust fans(horsepower), make-up air fan Feed conduit and wire size. Direct. (horsepower), miscellaneous space heating, Arrangement of panels, transformer, time clock, • Indirect. sales door, operator motor(horsepower), fan etc. coil unit(horsepower), return air fans Indicate telephone conduit locations for • Schedules and Details (horsepower)and large motors(starter type). connection to empty telephone conduit. • Conduit and wire size to Individual Units, HVAC Diffuser and Grille Schedule indicating CFM equipment and panels as applicable. • capacities. Equipment schedule. These drawings shall incorporate all minimum Toilet exhaust duct connection detail. design and construction requirements including • complete calculations and show the total � section 2 ��3k B; ,: f'roitienacie DRAWING SUBMISSION & APPROVAL PROCEDURE • 2.5 • FIRE PROTECTION PLANS Final Construction Drawing Approval No deviation from approved Construction drawings will be permitted without prior written These plans must be prepared by a Landlord Upon receipt of complete sets of drawings and approval by Landlord. It must be understood approved sprinkler contractor and submitted to specifications as outlined above, the Landlord's that the Landlord's approval of the Construction • Landlord Tenant Coordinator to verify Consultants will review these drawings for drawings is for general compliance with the compliance in accordance with the compliance with the previously approved criteria established in this Handbook. By requirements of Landlord's insurance preliminary design and the other criteria of this reviewing these drawings, the Landlord and its underwriters and must indicate the following: Handbook, and return to the Tenant one set of agent(s)assume no responsibility for code prints marked with the approval stamp. The compliance, dimensional accuracy,engineering • Fire Marshall's Approval drawings will be marked"Approved","Approved accuracy or sufficiency of these drawings for • as Noted"or"Returned for Corrections". construction purposes. The Landlord reserves Location of existing sprinkler head grid with Drawings stamped"Returned for Corrections" the right to review compliance based on the • main and branch pipe sizes. or"Approved as Noted"requesting resubmittal highest quality construction and craftsmanship. Location of branch piping. of specific sheets shall be revised and i Heights of ceilings and dropped soffits, etc. resubmitted within ten (10)days of the receipt • Location of surface mounted or dropped lighting of the Drawings. and decorative beams. • Location of curtain walls or lighting baffles. Simultaneously, the Landlord's Representative Other construction which will affect sprinkler will forward one (1)set of stamped approved coverage. drawings to the Landlord's Field Representative 2* 5J3 . for field verification during construction. It is b SJ3 • Shop Drawings the Tenant's responsibility to see that the N"TMK The Tenant shall submit to the Tenant approved set of drawings with comments, if any T 3 • Coordinator for approval, three copies of the are distributed to the Tenant's field sign shop drawings. representative. A current set of Landlord • approved plans shall be kept on site at all The Tenant must submit three sets of the times. Prior to the removal of the construction sprinkler shop drawings approved by the Fire barricade,the Tenant's Contractor shall -- Marshall to Landlord Tenant Coordinator. schedule with the Landlord's Tenant _ S� Coordinator a walk-thru (punchlist)of the lease The Landlord reserves the right to request premises. All Punch List items shall be additional detailed shop drawings for review completed prior to the removal of the barricade. ,•., �,e ,4 F . after final construction drawings have been j"g • approved in order to confirm compliance with • the approved plans. 10 section 2 DRAWING SUBMISSION & APPROVAL PROCEDURE 2.6 SMALL RETA I L S HOPS For the intent of the criteria, the term"Entry" Key P Ian shall be described as a grand or imposing i, AND SUB MAJOR entrance and shall encompass the whole Reference Section One of this Design Criteria T E N A N T A N D INTERIOR architectural composition surrounding and for the general overall configuration of the including the doorway. property. Each Tenant should refer to his DESIGN A single portal or a series of multiple portals Tenant lease plan for specific information and may be featured in the storefront design. details relative to its leased space. Phi losophyand Design Entry elements shall be attached to the Concept storefront and provide a weatherproof barrier to the public way. Recessed storefront entry Oak Brook Promenade will be a premier elements are permitted. Tenants are required ashopping center in the Oak Brook area. The to provide innovative floor and ceiling finishes quality of today's retail environment demand at the recessed areas, which are subject to distinctive and high quality storefronts and approval by the Landlord. • presentations to enhance the shopping environment. Special lighting effects such as cove lights or uplights are subject to approval of the 1 • St o ref r o n t Des i g n Landlord's Representative and will be reviewed on an individual basis. • The unique characteristics and quality Tenant mix of Tenants calls for bold,dynamic Des i g n Cr i to r i a storefronts. Critical to the design integrity and • success of the shopping centers image are the This criteria is a basic"set of tools"that the - individual contributions of each Tenants store. Tenant is required to work with and expand • It is essential that proper attention be paid to upon. Criteria are written to encourage proportion, scale, color, and detailing so that freedom of individual expression and to provide the Tenants can enhance the image of the a common point of departure for all Tenants. • shopping center and themselves. Refer to page 3.11 and 3.12 for more information and images. Storefronts should emphasize a"sense of • entry", and display of merchandise. National or St o ref r o n t Ent ry regional Tenants who have a typical or Element recognizable storefront design are expected to • review this design criteria of Oak Brook Promenade and adjust their design to ensure • Storefronts should be designed to incorporate a compatibility and compliance and work closely • feature at the entrance into each leased space. with the Landlord's Architect to achieve the same level of quality as Oak Brook Promanade. section 3 �)iyk SMALL RETAIL SHOPS AND INTERIOR DESIGN 3.1 Storefront Bulkhead The bulkhead above the storefront is a standard _ • Center finish, provided and maintained by the Landlord on the outside of the lease premises. • The Tenant cannot change or modify the bulkhead, nor is the Tenant responsible for its _ maintenance, except for patching and repairing • the bulkhead to new condition of any damage caused by the Tenant during construction. Storefronts may attach to the bulkhead but may • not be structurally dependent on such attachment. All storefronts shall be self- ;!v ^,1-°, - , • supporting and attached to the Landlord - • structure for lateral support only. ! �� Conceptual Storefront/Bu I khead Section (Refer to construction for specific storefront • conditions) —' f section 3 • Oak Brook Pccwner-iacieS-MALL Rd 1 AIL, AIVLU IIV I i.; 3.2 • • • • • • Design Contro I Zone • The Design Control Zone includes all display _ • windows and retail graphics, display fixtures, signs, materials, finishes, colors, and lighting i • from the leaseline to 4'behind the lease line. • If a Tenant chooses to recess the store closure I • behind the designated Design Control Line, the Design Control Area will be enlarged • accordingly. Note reused storefronts require frost footing considerations. j • The Landlord will closely control all elements in TENMTWAM i the Design Control Zone. The soffit at the recessed storefront entrances / • shall be finished in the same material as the � • building shell soffit. The interior soffit height shall be not less than 10'-0"above the Center floor.Acoustical tile is not an acceptable ceiling • for any part of the Design Control Zone. ——DWOG.WZ. —�J / • � � � milov - ; • • • • • Design Contro I Zone • Plan • • section 3 • Oak Brook Proll7e/?aaeSMALL RETAIL SHOPS AND INTERIOR DESIGN • 3.3 • • Open Display Windows ., ; �� ( Doors • Open display windows should be unique and i' Sliding doors shall be electric horizontal doors individual. Open window displays should thus i' „�(�` .: with integrally colored aluminum frames • be integrated into the architectural design and I ? �,�• ° '_ � � r'""� operated by a motion sensor. Doors shall be d,. character of the entire storefront.A variety of r r ' m located so motion sensor will not activate textures in display and window treatment <J �- �^ continuous due to passers by. All door tracks • should be explored, as well as innovative �` f ��,.• are to be recessed and as much as practical lighting and window designs(see Signage �' hidden from view. No depressions are • Criteria). Open display windows shall be ~ permitted in the floor slab for this or any other transparent and open to the store. No back �,�-�* purpose. Pivoting doors may be frameless glass drops behind displays will be allowed without -- outswinging doors on pivots. • written agreement from the Landlord. Outswinging doors are encouraged to be • A minimum of 80% of the storefront width is recessed a minimum of the width of the door. recommended to be used for open display Tenant is responsible for additional measures • windows. The Landlord's Architect will evaluate a required by recessing door. All door pocket exceptions on specific merchandising situations areas created by recessed doors shall be and requirements. �;, I finished with quality floor and soffit materials • For greater transparency, a storefront glazing - matching the shell building and meeting the with a minimum use of mullions or frames is a requirements of this criteria. All locking required. ? ti_ mechanisms shall comply with the ADA. All door systems shall be weather tight as Corner Tenants are encouraged to install required for an open-air mall. If the use of an • display windows and/or store openings on both Sto re C I osu re integrally air lock or vestibule is preferred it elevations. Solid walls will not be permitted • along the Lease Line without approval from the The level of the finished floor within the Tenant shall be designed as part of the storefront Landlord's Architect. The architectural area must correspond within 1/2"of the level of design and shall be located within the lease the public walkway finished floor at the Lease premises. treatment A any proposed solid walls, if any, shall be subject to review and design by the Line and specifically detailed on the plans. Landlord's Architect. Should storefront glazing The store closure may be any one of the • extend to the floor, a minimum 6' durable base following: or frame is required. • Pivoting glass doors. Pivoting wood doors. • Electric Sliding doors. Revolving doors. (Subject to local codes) section 3 Pry>n7F�i7����r�SMALL RETAIL SHOPS AND INTERIOR DESIGN 3.4 • • • • • >�r required where Tenant's stone storefront intermittent lights, black-light, or strobe • ` pN extends to the floors. The base must be of a lights will be permitted. • rr>. durable material capable to withstand standard l� exterior cleaning and snow removal equipment. For illumination in the Design Control Area, Where storefront glazing continues to the Landlord must approve decorative type • finished floor, it must terminate in a minimum lighting (i.e. luminous ceilings, chandeliers, • 6"high base compatible with the store design. pendant fixtures or wall units). Fluorescent I light fixtures, except for hidden cove I Any other durable base material, easy to fixtures, will not be permitted within the • maintain and that matches or is compatible with Design Control Area. All fluorescents • the Tenant's other storefront finishes may be outside of the Design Control Area must be used. Storefront base should reflect the deep cell parabolics. • Tenant Music Systems dimensional quality of the storefront. All signs, logos, and display windows shall • Lighting be illuminated during the hours the center • Tenants are not allowed to install speaker is open and controlled by a time clock, systems as the Landlord will be providing a Tenants are encouraged to use decorative which will be connected to the Tenant's • music system throughout the center. lighting elements as an integral part of their power supply. storefront and interior store design. Lighting All showcase and open display windows • F1 o o r and Base can play an important role in attracting • • The interior floors and base should be covered customers and enhances the design of the must be adequately lighted and ventilated. • with the highest quality materials conforming stores. Direct visual exposure of incandescent 9 q tY � 9 bulbs and/or fluorescent tubes is • to the basic quality criteria outlined later in this All storefront and general store lighting must be prohibited. No lamp shall extend below the manual. Ease of movement, safety, and ceiling line or below the window head at to the following basic guid elines: g • maintenance should be primary considerations reviewed and approved the Landlord, subject show windows within the Design Control in floor covering. d Area. • Tenant shall have a flush transition between the shopping center walkway The Tenant shall provide a high quality of No TV monitors will be permitted in the finish,surface and the Tenants floor nish, illumination above the display area and • entrances. Design Control Area without written • feathering the floor as necessary. The use approval. of vinyl or metal reducer strips will not be • permitted. No storefront lighting shall be installed in the soffit area ceiling beyond the leaseline. 0 Mixtures of lighting types are encouraged • Tenant shall be responsible for the sealing and Up lighting and halo lighting are in the Sales Area. finishing of area within pocket of pivoting doors. encouraged. The storefront base may be stone, precast, No strobe, spinner, or chase type lighting • masonry, metal or tile, and should complement the Tenant's storefront material. A base is not shall be used. No animated flashing or • section 3 • • 3.5 • • • • • • • Plywood paneling. • • Carpet or fabric(except exce t in canvas • awnings). • Painted drywall, including Zolitone or • Polymix type products. • x Metal or plastic laminates. e.. Chain link fencing or rough metal. • Signage F i n i s h es Signage shall be as outlined in Section Seven of • this Design Criteria Booklet. • Materials for the storefront or within the design • control area should suggest quality, craftsmanship, elegance and stability. Innovation and creativity are encouraged. With • that in mind, the use of the following materials • on the storefront is strictly prohibited: • Imitation or simulated materials(including those available in plastic laminates); i.e., imitation brick, simulated wood, synthetic • marble, etc. • Slat wall. • Pegboard in any form. I , • Vinyl or suede wall covering or wallpaper. • Softwood storefronts(i.e. rough sawn cedar). Avoid images that are strongly • rustic or residential. • section 3 • • 3.6 • • • • • • • • MERCHANDISING AND • DISPLAY However, the wide visibility of the store interior • Storefront Phi I o s o p h y also creates some restrictions. The same bookstore mentioned above would need to be Display fixtures should complement the overall • The storefronts create an area visible to the careful not to place messy discount tables, design of the store and present the • customers that extends the store image beyond magazine racks, or plainly stocked shelves in merchandise in an appropriate manner. The the open display window into the shopping areas visible from the courtyard. Tenant is required to use only new, first quality • center creating merchandising opportunities. All merchandise within the open display fixturing throughout his store. Used or The opportunity to display merchandise to windows shall remain subject to Landlord reconditioned display fixtures are not permitted; • shoppers passing b is encouraged. It also high quality bona fide antique furnishings may PPe P 9 Y t approval. be used with prior approval. • affects the front layout of the store. Attractive fixtures and appropriate materials are just as General St o re C r i to r i a The use of pegboard on display fixtures or as a crucial in the front part of the space as in the With recent trends in store design evolving to wall finish is not permitted. open display window itself. Standard light more open and transparent storefronts, it is levels should be maintained to adequately light The use of standard continuous slat wall is also • often not possible to differentiate between the discouraged. merchandise. As the storefront exposes a storefront and the store interior. The way the portion of the store to view, all lighting and • Tenant displays their merchandise, the fixturing display fixtures should be of exceptional quality, • and are subject to Landlord approval. layout, and the fixtures themselves combine with the storefront architecture to create an • Merchandising image to the public. The Landlord requires that the store interior be designed with the same • Opportunity care and attention to detail as the storefront ' • Fixture layout and lighting can be used to itself. Therefore, the following criteria for highlight particular merchandise, to attract interior design have been created to guide the • passing customers, and to enhance the image Tenant. of the store. As one example, a bookstore, Layout, F i xtu r i n g, and • which normally displays best sellers and new Merchandising c h a n d i s i n • releases in its display windows now, has the g ..f opportunity to also display its videotape library, The Tenant is encouraged to use the services of • gift books,or special interest or seasonal titles a professional store planner, visual • as well. merchandiser, and/or fixturing specialist in the _ • design and layout of his store. • A properly designed floor layout will always mean an increase in sales. • • section 3 • • 3.7 • • • • • • • Concealed spline acoustical tiles. Floor Finishes Through the use of coffers, drywall soffits and The Tenant shall provide access to all ductwork, bulkheads, an interesting ceiling design will heaters piping,controls, or valves located • All areas of the Tenants public areas must have within the premises by means of accessible a finished floor. result. A well-designed ceiling can also help to define different lighting values. ceiling the or flush access panels. • The following are approved floor finishes. In general all areas of the Tenant's public areas Wa I I s a n d Wa I I Finishes • shall have a ceiling. Exposed structure(even in • Quarry tile and ceramic tile. storage areas) will be allowed only on an All demising walls(walls between adjacent • Stained and sealed concrete, individual basis and when part of an acceptable Tenants or between a Tenant and a common design. Ceilings above 12'-0"in height may area) must be constructed with 5/8"fire rated • Marbled or other natural stone terrazzo. encounter building obstruction (i.e. sprinkler, drywall, fire taped from floor slab to the • Carpet(outside of design control area), structure, etc.). Tenant shall field verify all underside of deck above and rated as required which must be commercial grade and no existing conditions. Ceilings may not be by local building codes. less than 28 oz. Per square yard face attached to roof deck, sprinkler pipes, electrical Where a demising partition of the Tenant's weight. conduits or ductwork. premises is adjacent to a service corridor or • • Vinyl composition tile and base is not All ceilings in the Design Control Area must be other Landlord-related facility between adjacent permitted in the sales area or anywhere drywall or a continuation of the storefront Tenant spaces, and is not an exterior wall, the • visible to the public. Vinyl composition tile material. Landlord has provided a demising partition from may be used in stock rooms or restrooms. floor slab to underside of structure above. This • All ceiling in the remaining areas of the store partition is of either 6"or 3 5/8", 25 gauge steel • Bullnose tile or carpet reducer strips are must be drywall, metal linear or acoustical stud construction at 24"on center or greater. • not permitted. ceiling tiles, or any combination thereof. Wood flooring is acceptable. However, a Additional materials may also be approved; Structural columns, which occur in a demising • 9 � P wall, must be covered with fire rated drywall as transition at the entry rea of walk off mat however, samples and photographs will need to rY part of the demising wall, if required by local or tile is suggested. Tenant shall provide a be submitted. codes. • vapor barrier if required by the wood Where Tenant elects to use any type of music flooring anufacturer. If acoustical ceiling tiles are used, the following 9 system or sound generating device within the types are acceptable: premises, perimeter wall construction must be Ce i I i n g s such that it does not allow the transmission of • 2'x2'regular edge acoustical panels. sounds to adjacent spaces. Tenant must • The ceiling is an integral part of the store provide any necessary construction such as design and as such requires appropriate 2'x4'acoustical panels scored to sound insulation blankets or sound deadening • emphasis. The ceiling helps define the disguise the 2'x4'module (such as panels to assure adjacent Tenant of the quiet character of the store and when properly Armstrong Second Look). enjoyment of their space. • designed will enhance a store's appearance. The Landlord discourages the use of a ceiling in 2'x2'designer panels(such as • one plane throughout the store. Armstrong Syllables). section 3 • 3.8 • • • • • • • If the Tenant plans to use a demising wall for No Modification t o The mezzanine framing must be completely y the support of shelf standards or heavy attachments, Tenant must reinforce the wall as Landlord's Structural independent of the basic building structural needed at their own expense, such as by frame and demising partitions,and must be • providing additional steel studs, or providing Members o r Bu i I d i n g designed by a licensed structural engineer. • independent supports for the shelf standards. Systems Roofing System Tenant may not install any attachments, such Under no circumstances shall Tenant's as shelving equipment, etc., directly against Contractor cut or modify Landlord's structural Access to the Shopping Center roof is restricted • department store or exterior masonry walls members,expansion joints, wind bracing, to Landlord's personnel and Landlord's • without providing a furring or stud separation columns, beams, and bridging. Any structural designated Contractors only. No Contractor or (while maintaining any existing expansion framing or bracing required for Tenant's Subcontractor will be permitted on the roof joints). The furring or stud separation must be construction and to be attached to Landlord's unless written permission has been obtained • adequate to support the attached shelving structure must be designed by a Structural from the Landlord. The installation of all equipment,etc. All interior partitions must be Engineer and approved by Landlord's Architect flashing and curbing for Tenant related • built with metal stud framing. Fire treated and Engineer. equipment must be by Landlord's roofing wood framing is permitted for incidental Contractor at Tenant's expense. The furnishing blocking only. All interior wall surfaces in the Landlord reserves the right to refuse to permit of the roof curb and the installation of • sales area must be finished in an appropriate the installation of any roof- or wall-mounted equipment on the roof will be by the Tenant's manner. Three coats of paint, wall covering, equipment which exceeds the capability of the Contractor. • paneling, mirror, plastic laminates,finish structural system;or to require screening if the masonry or metal are considered suitable appearance of such equipment would be Filters used in all kitchen exhaust systems shall finishes. detrimental to the appearance of the center. be of non-combustible construction and comply • Exposed pegboard on walls or sales fixtures is with NFPA requirements. All systems shall be not permitted in any area of the store visible to Tenant's Contractor shall not be permitted to provided with access panes and a means of the public. modify,attach or hang from landlord's duct collecting grease drippings from the filters. • work, water lines, sprinkler lines, conduit or Non-Combustible roof deck to accommodate Tenant's Roof-mounted kitchen hood exhaust fans shall • construction including, but not limited to, be of the"mushroom"type and have grease Construction Tenant's ceiling grid, ductwork, pipes, conduit, pans adequate to protect the roof. These pans etc. shall be installed,cleaned and maintained • All Tenant construction, including storefronts regularly by the Tenant. All roof mounted must be non-combustible and subject to the Mezzanines exhaust hoods, equipment, etc. must been • approval of the Building Department and the located to be concealed from public view. Fire Marshal. Treated fire-resistant materials Tenant, upon obtaining prior written approval • will be permitted only where approved by from the Landlord and local attorney, may • jurisdictional authorities. construct a mezzanine or storage platform • subject to the following: section 3 • • 3.9 • • • • • • Tenant Security FIoorSIabs ! System Concrete floor slabs have a smooth troweled • finish and are slab on grade. No depressions or Electronic security systems and shoplifting recesses in slabs will be permitted without prior • detection services shall be designed to be written approval. concealed from public view. Freestanding posts, suspended rails,or walk through portals Any rework, cutting for underground plumbing are discouraged. The Landlord prior to and patching of the existing floor slab shall be installation must approve installation of Tenant at the Tenants expense and must be approved • security systems. by the Landlord. Fi re Protecti o n Grease Interceptors • Sprinkler System • If the Tenant's occupancy requires the use of a The Landlord has provided a fire protection sanitary sewer grease interceptor it shall be • main within Y-0"of the Tenant's Lease provided and installed by the Tenant at it's own premises. All sprinkler heads in the storefront expense. The location of the interceptor is • design control area shall be fully recessed and subject to approval of the Landlord or it's ! semi-recessed in the sales area. Note: Tenant Architect. provides all cross-mains, branch lines,valves, . annunciations and sprinkler heads. Exterior Furniture r i , • Any revisions, extensions or relocations to the All Tenant exterior seating areas shall be per an • Landlord's portion of the sprinkler system shall established Lease Agreement and shall be in be by the Tenant at the Tenant's expense. conformance with local codes and ordinances. • Work to be performed by Landlord approved All exterior furniture shall be reviewed and Sprinkler Contractor at Tenants expense. approved by Landlord's Representatives. • Connections to the Landlord's fire protection • panel (if any) shall be at the Tenant's expense. • Fire Extinguisher �LL • Tenant shall furnish and install fire r == • extinguishers as required by the Fire Marshal. • ! section 3 3.10 ! • • • Storefront Design • 'E r � .. and Colors • y The unique characteristics and quality Tenant • D; '_u mix of Oak Brook Promenade calls for bold, r dynamic storefronts. Critical to the design • o ` �`, integrity and success of the shopping centers • ��'. - Image are the individual contributions of each Tenants store. It is essential that proper . attention be paid to proportion, scale, color, . and detailing so that the Tenants can enhance the image of the shopping center and 'E themselves. • All storefront designs shall be carefully • -- reviewed and approved by the landlord. Please reference storefront examples one, two and • three,; these designs are to establish a s _ precedence for storefront design at the shopping center and tenants are encouraged to • = submit alternatives similar in concept. • ����.. • • • • • section 3 • 3.11 • • • • • • • • Tenants are required to choose from the list of storefront colors provided. Colors are from the Kawneer' s color selection chart. . Custom colors maybe submitted to the Landlord and shall be reviewed on an individual basis. • 1. Ivory Z. Anodized Black • 3. Anodized Champaign Ivory Anodized Light Bronze 4. Anodized Light Bronze • 5. Hartford Green • 6. Antique Bronze • • • • • Anodized Black Hartford Green • • • • • • • Anodized Champaign Antique Bronze • • section 3 • 3.12 • • MAJOR BUILDING Required Exterior No Modification to DESIGN Building Materials Land Iord'sStructuraI • A l l building shall meet the minimum Members or B u i l d i n g • ���,��� S.f. t0 25,00) requirements of the material standards noted Systems General S t o r e C r i to r i a below and per the Design Intent of the Under no circumstances shall Tenant's approved Building Elevations. Contractor cut or modify Landlords structural The Landlord may, as provided in the lease, 0 Minimum 40% Masonry or Stone veneer members,expansion joints, wind bracing, provide standard aluminum storefronts or systems columns, beams, and bridging. Any structural storefronts specified in the preliminary drawings framing or bracing required for Tenant's • for each Tenant premises. Final Exterior Building Design shall be as Construction and to be attached to Landlord's Landlord s Representatives.designed by subject to approval of the structure must be designed by a Structural • St o ref r o n t Des i g n Engineer and approved by Landlord's Architect • Exposed pitch roofs—pitched roofing shall and Engineer. The use of imaginative forms, approved be of a quality concrete roof tile as selected • materials,approved color combinations, and from Landlord's standard material list. Landlord reserves the right to refuse to permit • graphics is encouraged only original and the installation of any roof-or wall-mounted innovative modifications to standard storefront Note: All design modifications and materials designs compatible with the overall design of shall be in strict accordance with the Design equipment which exceeds the capability of the the shopping center will be approved. Criteria and as noted within Landlord's standard structural system; or to require screening if the material list. Any variations from that list are appearance of such equipment would be • Show windows must have concealed lighting subject to Landlord approval. All building detrimental to the appearance of the center. without pulsating, strobe,or otherwise materials are subject to change in accordance Tenant's Contractor shall not be permitted to animated illumination. All interior and exterior with local design ordinances. Approval shall be modify, attach or hang from Landlord's duct • surfaces shall be a high quality finish materials. obtained from the City by the Landlord's work, water lines, sprinkler lines, conduit or roof deck to accommodate Tenant's • Show windows should minimize the use of back Architect. Construction including, but not limited to, walls that tend to close off the store area • visually from the public view. Tenants ceiling grid,ductwork, pipes, conduits, etc. • section 4 MAJOR TENANT DESIGN • 4.1 • • • • • • StorefrontSignage Fire Protection • Signage shall be as indicated in Section Seven Sp r i n k I e r System of the Design Criteria. • Any revisions, extensions or relocations to the F I o o r S I a b Landlord's standard sprinkler system shall be by • the Tenant at the Tenant's expense. Work to Concrete floor slabs have a smooth troweled be performed by Sprinkler Contractor • finish. No depressions or recesses in slabs will acceptable to Landlord. s • be permitted without prior written approval. The Tenant's Contractor shall furnish and install Roof in g Systems • that portion of the concrete slab in all areas - • where the slab has been blocked out in Access to the Shopping Center roof is restricted conformance with Landlord standards. to Landlord's personnel and Landlord's • designated Contractors only. The installation of • Exhaust System all flashing and curbing for Tenant related equipment must be by Landlord's roofing • Tenants who have special exhaust requirements Contractor at Tenant's expense. as a result of odor, moisture or high heat- producing operations shall provide separate Exterior Furniture • special exhaust and make-up air facilities,to be approved by the Coordinating Architect. • Tenants are encouraged to take advantage of Any unacceptable odor, as determined by outdoor dining adjacent to sit down restaurants • Landlord, shall be exhausted by means of and the aesthetic feature of the views to the • centrifugal blowers located within the premises pond. All Tenant exterior-seating areas shall be ducted through the roof to the atmosphere. per an established Lease Agreement and shall and • be in conformance with local codes and shall be No openings for fans, vents louvers, grilles or ordinances. All exterior furniture .-� • other devices will be installed in any demising reviewed and approved by Landlords �I f • partition, exterior wall, or roof without Representative's. Landlord's written approval and Landlord supervision. Outdoor seating areas shall be consistent with _ the upscale nature of the center and the interior EM • designs of the restaurant.All furniture shall be teak, wrought iron of stainless steal consistent • with the restaurant design. Decks and railings • shall be as designed to match the aesthetics of the building and shall include wrought iron G - balusters or other high quality railings. • section 4 • 4.2 • OFFICE TENANT Exhaust System Fire Protection • Sprinkler System General Criteria Tenants who have special exhaust requirements • as a result of odor; moisture or high heat- Any revisions, extensions or relocations to the The office tenants for the Oak Brook producing operations shall provide separate Landlord's standard sprinkler system shall be by special exhaust and make-up air facilities, to be the Tenant at the Tenant's expense. Work to Promenade are an important element to the approved by the Coordinating Architect. � • overall design success of the project.The be performed by Sprinkler Contractor buildings shall be designed to be compatible acceptable to Landlord. with the overall design intent of the Shopping Any unacceptable odor, determined by Landlord, shall be exhausted by means of • Center. centrifugal blowers located within the premises Roof i n g Systems • OFFICE DESIGN and ducted through the roof to the atmosphere. Access to the Shopping Center roof is restricted No openings for fans, vents louvers, grilles or to Landlord's personnel and Landlord's Offices in Oak Brook Promenade are located on other devices will be installed in any demising designated Contractors only. The installation of • the upper level with Buildings B, C, &D with partition exterior wall, or roof without all flashing and curbing for Tenant related independent entrance and signage Landlord's written approval and Landlord equipment must be by Landlord's roofing opportunities. The Entry lobbies, stairs and supervision. Contractor at Tenants expense. • elevator,and restroom facilities are fully furnished. • Storefront Signage • Signage shall be as indicated in Section Seven • of the Design Criteria. i FI oor Slabs Concrete floor slabs have a smooth troweled • finish. No depressions or recesses in slabs will be permitted.Tenant's Contractor shall obtain • Landlords approval prior to coring any upper • level slabs. section 5 <)iiterlricl,-OFFICE TENAN I S 5.1 • • • • • No Modification to Land I o rd's Structu ra I Members or Building • Systems Under no circumstances shall Tenant's • Contractor cut or modify Landlord's structural members,expansion joints, wind bracing, . columns, beams, and bridging. Any structural framing or bracing required for Tenants • Construction and to be attached to Landlord's • structure must be designed by a Structural Engineer and approved by Landlord's Architect • and Engineer. Landlord reserves the right to refuse to permit • the installation of any roof- or wall-mounted • equipment which exceeds the capability of the structural system; or to require screening if the appearance of such equipment would be detrimental to the appearance of the center. • Tenant's Contractor shall not be permitted to • modify, attach or hang from Landlord's duct • work, water lines, sprinkler lines, conduit or roof deck to accommodate Tenant's Construction including, but not limited to, • Tenant's ceiling grid, ductwork, pipes, conduits, • etc. • • • • • • • • Section 5 • 5.2 • IN LINE / FREE STANDING RESTAURANT DESIGN • 0 Main building facades—Minimum of 30% General Store Criteria E.I.F.S. or stucco veneer system as -- - --- • selected from Landlord's standard materials • Since the Individual In-line and Free Standing list and a minimum of 40% masonry or Restaurant represents a major attraction to the stone veneer as selected from Landlord's • shopping center, and is near or directly standard materials list. attached to shops within the center, their — -- building design needs to reflect a dramatic and 0 Entry Facade Element- maintain a individual design image, while maintaining minimum of 60% masonry materials as similar design elements of the shopping center. selected from Landlord's standard materials • This criteria is intended to establish design list. Roofs standards to encourage the Restaurant buildings to become a unique, yet consistent Acceptable exterior material - subject to part of the overall shopping center experience. Landlord design review and approvals: The roof materials and roofline compositions shall be consistent or compatible with the • These criteria are a basic"set of tools"that the 0 Brick Masonry. shopping center design and provide an integral Tenant is required to work with and expand 9 Limestone. part of the individual building design. The upon. Criteria are written to encourage some 0 Selected stone masonry. following are acceptable roof materials: • freedom of individual expression and to provide a E.I.F.S. a common point of departure for all Tenants 0 Concrete roof tiles. 0 Typical bituminous roof with exterior • while adhering to shopping center guidelines. wall screening parapet. Exposed pitch roofs shall be Landlord The building facades should be designed to give approved simulated slate or concrete • an innovative design concept. Tenants are tiles. encouraged to take full advantage • architecturally of the shopping center design All roof slopes and configurations are subject to standards. Landlord approval. No standing seam metal or asphalt shingles will be allowed. • National or regional tenants who have a typical or recognizable building design are expected to Storefront S i g n a g e review the design of Oak Brook Promenade and • this criteria and adjust their design to ensure Signage shall be as indicated in Section Seven compatibility and compliance with these criteria. of this criteria. section 6 • IN-LINE RESTAURANT DESIGN 6.1 • i • • • Trash E n c I osu res spaces. Painting of equipment as a method of criteria. All locking mechanisms shall comply screening is not allowed. with the ADA. All trash enclosures utilities and service areas • shall be appropriately screened to reasonably St O re C I osu re All door systems shall required for an open-air mall. If the use of an weather tight as hide them entirely from public view. All trash r • air lock or vestibule is preferred it shall be enclosures and service areas shall utilize the The level of the finished floor within the Tenant appropriate and approved masonry materials to area must correspond within 1/2"of the level of designed part the storefront design and match shopping center standards. All gates the public walkway finished floor at the Lease shall be located within the lease premises. • shall be metal/steel construction and shall Line and specifically detailed on the plans. match shopping center standard. All trash F l o o r and Base • enclosures shall meet the City codes and The store closure may be any one of the . planning criteria and approvals. following: The interior floors and base should be covered with the highest quality materials, conforming • Screening Pivoting glass doors. to the basic quality criteria outlined later in this • Pivoting wood doors. manual. Ease of movement, safety, and The following items shall be either located out Electric Sliding doors. maintenance should be primary considerations • of direct public view or adequately screened by Revolving doors. in floor covering. a screen wall utilizing the appropriately Tenant shall have a flush transition between the • approved screen wall materials: Doors shopping center walkway surface and the Tenant's floor finish, feathering the floor as • • Gas meters and any associated piping. Sliding doors shall be electric horizontal doors necessary. The use of vinyl or metal reducer • • Electric meters and any associated with integrally colored aluminum frames strips will not be permitted. operated by a motion sensor. Doors shall be • conduits. located so motion sensor will not activate The storefront base may be stone, precast, • • Transformers. continuous due to passers by. All door tracks masonry, metal or tile, and should complement • Trash compactors. are to be recessed and as much as practical the Tenants storefront material. A base is not • Any ground installed equipment. hidden from view. No depressions are required where Tenant's stone storefront permitted in the floor slab for this or any other extends to the floors. The base must be of a • • Trash dumpsters, service areas and purpose. Pivoting doors may be frameless glass durable material capable to withstand standard recycling bins and grease interceptors. outswinging doors on pivots. exterior cleaning and snow removal equipment. Out swinging doors are encouraged to be Where storefront glazing continues to the • All roof mounted equipment shall be adequately recessed a minimum of the width of the door, finished floor, it must terminate in a 6"high and completely screened from any property to not interfere with sidewalk clearance,Tenant base compatible with the store design. • adjacent public right of ways and/or pedestrians is responsible for additional measures required Any other durable base material, easy to • views by means of exterior building walls or by recessing door All door pocket areas created maintain and that matches or is compatible with parapets. All rooftop screening shall be by recessed doors shall be finished with quality the Tenants other storefront finishes may be • integrally designed into the building by use of floor and soffit materials matching the shell used. Storefront base should reflect the roof parapets and walls. Special attention is building and meeting the requirements of this dimensional quality of the storefront. • required for views from Adjacent Office Tenant • • section 6 • Usk E�rovk f�ro�r���,�rc�e IN-LINE RESTAURANT DESIGN • 6.2 • • Non-Combustible Grease Interceptors the shopping center is maintained. The • Construction modifications shall include, but not be limited • If the Tenant's occupancy requires the use of a to, structure, building code classification, • All Tenant construction, including storefronts sanitary sewer grease interceptor it shall be exiting, shared utilities, landscaping, grading, must be non-combustible and subject to the provided and installed by the Tenant at its own approval of the Building Department and the expense. The location of the interceptor is • Fire Marshal. Treated fire-resistant materials subject to approval of the Landlord or its V ;�� , will be permitted only where approved by Architect. ,t • jurisdictional authorities. Exterior PATIO & *- FireProtection Furniture . Sprinkler System • A unique feature of Oak Brook Promenade is fire protection the extensive exterior deck overlooking the The Landlord has provided a ; . • existing water feature. The exterior patios are ty main within 5'-0"of the Tenant's Lease premises. All sprinkler heads in the storefront encouraged to be designed to integrate with design control area shall be fully recessed and the Building design and take full advantage of semi-recessed in the sales area. the open space and elevated view. Decorative railing systems and lighting, with high quality �i •4 • metal or wood outdoors furniture and bars are Any revisions, extensions or relocations to the Landlord's portion of the sprinkler system shall encouraged. . : be by the Tenant at the Tenant's expense. - Work to be performed by Landlord approved All Tenant exterior-seating areas shall be per an • established Lease Agreement and shall be in Sprinkler Contractor at Tenants expense. • conformance with local codes and ordinances. F i re Extinguisher All exterior furniture and Awnings shall be • reviewed and approved by Landlords • Tenant shall furnish and install fire Representatives. • extinguishers as required by the Fire Marshal. Coordination of • Building Plan • Due to site limitations, for"in-line"tenants, some modifications to the tenant's standard footprint will be required in order to coordinate • with the adjacent building. The tenant shall work with the Landlord's Architect to make the • modifications so that the overall design intent of section 6 • _ IN-LINE RESTAURANT DESIGN 6.3 a • Area of Sign ' Area of Allowable Increase Sign Types and Parameters This sign criteria is intended to provide a framework to Average Letter Height • encourage creative and imaginative signage design which both enhance the tenant identification but also the overall customer experience. The allowable signage area is intended • to give flexibility for both letter size and graphics.What is not encouraged is large block letters that are stacked to get as • big as possible within the allowable square footage. The Tenant signage shall be proportional to the scale of the • faSade design. The overall height to width of the signage Area of Allowable Increase area will be reviewed for it's relationship to the building on Area of Sign • which it is installed. To encourage design creativity each signage category shall be allowed a 25% increase of ...... ' .. allowable signage area to be used for design elements as part • the overall sign design. In no case shall the text be in MART O.M.F increased by this percentage. See the examples for � • clarification. Average Letter Height Tenants shall provide design information for all signage on all Area of Allowable Increa�� • preliminary and working drawings submitted to the Landlord. Final approval of Tenant's signage is contingent upon the • Landlord approval of the shop drawings as well as approval • from the Village of Oak Brook, IL. Area of Allowable Increase • • T/Y • T4 • _.._ . . ..... Average Letter Area of Sign Height • • section 7 As 7.1 0 TENANT SM CRITERIA Storefront safety glazing decals: sign width may exceed the maxium height, but by no more than 25%of Building Parameters: Provide a storefront elevation of each sign the allowed height. proposed as well as detailed shop drawing • Small Shop Tenant- elevation indicating dimensions, materials 0 Signs shall not extend more than 12" • Leaseable area 0 -4,999 s.f., 24" and colors. beyond the face of the surface to which • Blade signage: (REQUIRED) the sign is mounted. Sub-Major Tenant • Leaseable area 5,000—9,999 s.f., 30" Provide a storefront elevation and section • The sign area shall not exceed more than 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of each proposed sign indicating mounting of fa4ade frontage up to a maximum of Major Tenant location and height. Provide a detailed shop 240 sa per sign unless approved by • Leaseable area 10,000 s.f. —25,000 s.f., 48" drawing section and elevation indicating the Landlord and local jurisdiction. sign makeup, dimensions, materials and • Office Tenant colors for sign and decorative bracket. All signs must be illuminated and shall • Leaseable area 10,000 s.f. and above, 36" Additional signage/graphics in design derive light from a concealed source. *Refer to the following sections for Specific Sign control zone: No exposed lamps, globes, tubes,etc. will be permitted. Criteria Provide a storefront elevation, plan , and or • SitmSubmW[ReWremegi section indicating any additional proposed 0 Signage shall be reverse channel, halo • signage as well as detailed shop drawings light illuminated individual letters All Signage is to be submitted as a complete indicating sign makeup, dimensions, mounted to the building face. package on appropriate building elevation for materials and colors. All additional signage A colored opaque face is required. One • review and approval. Incomplete submittals shall be reviewed on an individual basis. additional 8"over door transom signage lacking blade sign shall not be approved. allowed per storefront. • Fagade sign or marquee sign: SW 141 adParamelffs • Provide a storefront elevation of each sign The following types and amounts of signs will be proposed as well as detailed shop drawing permitted: elevation and section through sign j fma//JJ�Oppffuldl"ahrmp/PAf • indicating sign makeup, dimensions, materials and colors. Tenant sign areas shall be on the • Over-door transom sign: building face above the entrance and as par of the building deck. Maximum Provide a storefront elevation of each sign height above curb of 36 feet. proposed as well as detailed shop drawing elevation indicating sign dimensions, The maximum height for letters within materials and colors. the sign band shall be 24". 15%of the section 7.2 • • Maximum one sign per storefront with a Tag lines shall be allowed on an individual s.f. per sign unless approved by the maximum of(2) two. basis only and are subject to Landlord Landlord and local jurisdiction. • approval. Any allowable tag lines shall be • No logos will be allowed on Tenant storefronts individual illuminated letters(no box signs) All signs must be illuminated and shall without prior written approval from the and shall not exceed 10"in height. The width derive light from a concealed source. No • landlord. of the tag line shall not exceed the width exposed lamps, globes, tubes, etc. will be established for the primary signage. permitted. • 0 Blade Signs: r� Required Si' Marquee Signage: Allowed one (1) per Signage shall be reverse channel, halo one (1) per storefront in lieu of Facade sign. Maximum light illuminated individual letters • Storefront, sign size shall be 30sf. With a maximum letter mounted to the building face. six(6) height of 18"(inches). Sign shall be A colored opaque face is required. One • square foot individually illuminated letters, pin mounted to additional 8"over door transom signage max. Letter existing projected metal marquees. All allowed per storefront. height shall exposed conduit shall be concealed from • be six(6) inches (Blade Sign Example#1) public view and painted to match marquee Maximum one sign per storefront with a max with a maximum of 30"projections. The structure. Exposed raceways behind letters maximum of(3)three. blade sign shall be located on an elevation are not permitted. . and clear height to bottom of sign shall be Blade Signs: Required one(1) per indicated. Maintain minimum of 8'-0"clear 2 Sub-Mijor Tenant Sign Parameter~ storefront, six(6) square foot max. Letter • where possible or mounted above decorative height shall be six (6) inches max with a elements or planters to maintain ADA Tenant sign areas should be on the maximum of 30"projections.The blade requirements. Decorative brackets and sign building face above the entrance and as sign shall be located on an elevation and • design, reference examples 1 &2, are to par of the building deck. Maximum height clear height to bottom of sign shall be reflect the qualities of the tenant and the above curb of 36 feet. indicated Maintain minimum of 8'-0"clear • shopping center. where possible or mounted above • The maximum height for letters in the decorative elements or planters to • Double stacked body of the sign shall not exceed 36"in maintain ADA requirements. Decorative • lettering shall be - height. 15%of the sign width may brackets and sign design, reference allowed on an exceed the maxium height, but by no examples 1 &2, are to reflect the • individual basis \' more than 25%of the allowed height. qualities of the tenant and the shopping only and are center. subject to Landlord (Blade Sign Example#2) Signs shall not extend more than 12" • approval. Double beyond the face of the surface to which Double stacked lettering shall be allowed stacked letters shall be a maximum 20"high the sign is mounted. on an individual basis only and are • individual letters and shall comfortably fit subject to Landlord approval. Double within the Landlord bulkhead as determined The sign area shall not exceed more than stacked letters shall be a maximum 24" by the Landlord's Representative. 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of high individual letters and shall • fagade frontage up to a maximum of 240 comfortably fit within the Landlord • Section I • Jtt{%Iasi I'rrHawradi'Il LV'I'SN�I I C I'fEII I I 7.3 provided signage area determined by the s.f. per s.f. unless approved by the The maximum height for letters in the Landlord's Representative. Landlord and local jurisdiction. body of the sign shall not exceed 36"in • height. 15%of the sign width may • Tag lines shall be allowed on an 0 Maximum one sign per storefront with a exceed the maxium height, but by no individual basis only and are subject to maximum of(3) three. more than 25%of the allowed height. • Landlord approval. Any allowable tag lines shall be individual illuminated letters 0 Signage shall be illuminated individual The sign area shall not exceed more than • (no box signs)and shall not exceed 12" letters mounted to the face of the 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of in height. The width of the tag line shall building. The use of a colored or frosted facade frontage up to approximately 240 not exceed the width established for the Plexiglas face is required. s.f. per sign unless approved by the • primary Signage. Landlord and local jurisdiction. • Reversed halo lighting is encouraged and • 0 Marquee Signage: Allowed one (1) per shall be reviewed on an individual basis. 0 Signs shall not extend more than 12" storefront in lieu of Facade sign. beyond the face of the surface to which Maximum sign size shall be 30sf. With a 0 Double stacked lettering shall be allowed the sign is mounted. maximum letter height of 18"(inches). on an individual basis only and are Sign shall be individually illuminated subject to Landlord approval. Double 0 All signs must be illuminated and shall • letters, pin mounted to existing projected stacked letters shall be a maximum 36" derive light from a concealed source. No • metal marquees. All exposed conduit high individual letters and shall exposed lamps, globes, tubes, etc. will be shall be concealed from public view and comfortably fit within the Landlord permitted. • painted to match marquee structure. bulkhead as determined by the Landlord's Exposed raceways behind letters are not Representative. Signage shall be reverse channel, halo permitted. light illuminated individual letters • 0 Tag lines shall be allowed on an mounted to the building face. 3. Major Tenant Sign Parameters individual basis only and are subject to A colored opaque face is required. One • Landlord approval. Any allowable tag additional 8"over door transom signage • Tenant sign area shall be on the building lines shall be individual illuminated letters allowed per storefront. faces above the entrances and as part of (no box signs)and shall not exceed 18" • the building design. Maximum height in height. The width of the tag line shall Blade Signs: Required one(1) per above grade of 36 feet. not exceed the width established for the storefront, six(6)square foot max. Letter • primary signage. height shall be six (6)inches max with a • The maximum height for letters in the maximum of 30"projections. The blade body of the sign shall not exceed 48"in 4. MAJOR OFFICE Tenant Sign Parameters sign shall be located on an elevation and • height. 15%of the sign width may clear height to bottom of sign shall be exceed the maxium height, but by no • Tenant sign area shall be on the building indicated Maintain minimum of 8'-0"clear more than 25%of the allowed height. faces above the entrances, if appropriate where possible or mounted above • The sign area shall not exceed more than and as part of the building design. decorative elements or planters to 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of Maximum height above curb of 36 feet. maintain ADA requirements. Decorative • facade frontage up to a maximum of 240 brackets and sign design, reference section r�,G Irrcrri�rnNarir�di 1F:111 I .11L1 tC I'I'EC I1 7.4 • examples 1 &2, are to reflect the 0 Signs shall not extend more than 12" maximum letter height of 18"(inches). qualities of the tenant and the shopping beyond the face of the surface to which Sign shall be individually illuminated . center. the sign is mounted. letters, pin mounted to existing projected The sign area shall not exceed more than metal marquees. All exposed conduit shall • Double stacked lettering shall be allowed be concealed from public view and 2 square feet for each Lineal Foot of on an individual basis only and are painted to match marquee structure. • facade frontage up to a maximum of 240 subject to Landlord approval. Double Exposed raceways behind letters are not La stacked letters shall be a maximum 24" per sign unless approved by the permitted. • high individual letters and shall Landlord and local jurisdiction. comfortably fit within the Landlord Maximum one sign per storefront with a derive light from m illuminated and shall a concealed source. No • bulkhead as determined by the Landlord's All signs must maximum of(3)three. Representative. • exposed lamps, globes, tubes, etc. will be No logos will be allowed on Tenant Maximum of one sign per facade permitted. storefronts without prior written approval. • maximum of(3) three. Signage shall be reverse channel, halo • Marquee Signage: Allowed one (1) per light illuminated individual letters • storefront in lieu of Fagade sign. mounted to the building face. • Maximum sign size shall be 30sf. With a A colored opaque face is required. One additional 8"over door transom signage maximum letter height of 18"(inches). • Sign shall be individually illuminated allowed per storefront. letters, pin mounted to existing projected Blade Signs: Required one(1) per metal marquees. All exposed conduit storefront, six(6) square foot max. Letter • shall be concealed from public view and height shall be six(6) inches max with a painted to match marquee structure. maximum of 30"projections. The blade • Exposed raceways behind letters are not sign shall be located on an elevation and • permitted. clear height to bottom of sign shall be indicated Maintain minimum of 8'-0"clear 5. Mine/FReESTABIYB Restaurants where possible or mounted above decorative elements or planters to • Tenant sign areas should be on the maintain ADA requirements. Decorative . building face above the entrance and as brackets and sign design, reference par of the building deck. Maximum height examples 1&2, are to reflect the • above curb of 36 feet. qualities of the tenant and the shopping • 15%of the sign width may exceed the center. • maxium height, but by no more than Marquee Signage: Allowed one (1) per 25%of the allowed height. storefront in lieu of Fagade sign. Maximum sign size shall be 30sf. With a sedion 7 nrk/rr�a�pr�xarni��-'I};Ill`I'SIGI f L'I'f EIS I I 7.5 • Blade Signs: "''P Sign shall be individually illuminated Manufacturers'labels, underwriters'labels, encouraged one (1) letters, pin mounted to existing projected clips, brackets,or any other form of • per Storefront, metal marquees. All exposed conduit extraneous advertising attachment or lighting seven(7) square shall be concealed from public view and devices shall be fully concealed from public foot max. Letter painted to match marquee structure. view. Labels installed on sign returns are not • height shall Exposed raceways behind letters are not permitted. be six(6) inches (Blade Sign Example#1) permitted. ,i I max. The blade sign shall be located on � / No exposed lamps or neon tubing will be an elevation and clear height to bottom J permitted. of sign shall be indicated. Maintain • minimum of 8'-0"clear where possible or No exposed raceways, crossovers or conduits mounted above decorative elements or will be permitted. • planter to maintain ADA requirements. _ All signage returns shall either match face Decorative brackets and sign design, _ color of sign or blend with adjacent building reference example 1, are to reflect the color. • qualities of the tenant and the shopping center in a greater entirety. GPnerdl Sign hroeten, 0 All cabinets, conductors, transformers and • Double stacked lettering shall be allowed other equipment shall be concealed from • on an individual basis only and are All signs must be made up of individual illuminated public areas;visible fasteners will not be subject to Landlord approval. Double letters; conventional box signs will not be permitted. stacked letters shall be a maximum 24 approved. Box signs with raised letters and All metal letters shall be fabricated using full- high individual letters and shall reverse halo lighting will be considered on an welded construction, with all welds ground comfortably fit within the Landlord individual basis. smooth so as not to be visible. • bulkhead as determined by the Landlord's Lettering on all store signs shall be limited to Acrycap or trimcap retainers used at the Representative. • business or trade name of the premises as it perimeter of sign letter faces shall match in • Tag lines shall be allowed on an appears on the lease. No sign color and finish the face or the sides of the • individual basis only and are subject to manufacturer's name, union labels,or other sign. Landlord approval. Any allowable tag lettering shall be visible. Individual Logo lines shall be individual illuminated letters Threaded rods or anchor bolts shall be used signs, included within allowable sign area, to mount sign letters, which are spaced out (no box signs) and shall not exceed 10" will be reviewed on an individual basis but in • in height. The width of the tag line shall from the building face. Angle clips attached • general logos will not be allowed. to letter sides will not be permitted. All not exceed the width established for the Pe primary signage. No exterior sign or sign panel will be mounting attachments shall be sleeved and permitted to extend above any roof line. painted. • Marquee Signage: Allowed one (1) per Any sign, notice or other graphic or video Except as provided herein, no advertising storefront in lieu of Fa4ade sign. display, particularly self-illuminated signs, placards, banners, pennants, names, Maximum sign size shall be 30sf. With a located within the store and which is easily insignia, trademarks, or other descriptive • maximum letter height of 18"(inches). visible from the shopping center. materials shall be affixed or maintained upon section rti/i I lil'fE1111 7.6 the glass panes and supports of the to any opening of any shopping center 0 Cloth, paper, cardboard and similar stickers storefront windows and doors, attached to tenants. Coordinate location with Landlord's or decals around or on surfaces on the the interior face of glass, or within 4'of the representative. Sign shall comply with all storefront without prior written approval. storefront without prior written approval of city ordinances. • Exposed neon signs. . the Landlord. 0 Minimum height of all signage shall not be • Any Plexiglas sign faces shall not be clear. less than 80%of the maximum allowable Animated, moving, rotating or flashing. • Sign illumination shall be internal and self- letter height without prior written approval. 0 Noise making. • contained. 0 All signage is subject to the approval of the 0 Additional signage of any kind within 4'of All electric signs and installation methods Landlord and the local authorities. storefront windows. • must meet UL standards and contain a UL 0 Tenants are required to provide a concealed 0 Awning signage. label. access panel from within the Tenant's 0 Window signs on storefront or within 4'of • At no time will hand-lettered, non- leaseable area, if applicable, to service and storefront. • professional signs,or newspaper install exterior building signage advertisements be displayed on the Additional Sigllge • storefronts or within the Design Control Signs not permitted Area. • The following es of signs shall not be Signage on service doors to Tenant spaces Decals or other signing indicating products g�'p g throughout the project shall be standard 4"Arial lines or credit card acceptability shall not be permitted: letters, identification only (name and address • permitted on the storefront glazing other number) and shall be installed by the Landlord. than stores operating hours and safety Signs such as die cut vinyl, gold or silver The Tenant shall not apply any signage or other glazing decals. leaf, or paint. wording to service doors. All illuminated signs must be turned on a Boxed pillow or cabinet type. during the Center's normal operating hours. 0 Formed plastic or injection molded plastic The use of time clocks for sign and show signs. All additional signage shall be submitted to window lighting is required. the Coordinating Architect for approval. • Banners or pennants. • Lighting of signs shall be at hours as . Any minor deviations to this criteria will be required b Landlord. Signature signage(window sign or sign plate y indicating name of shop or good sold) in reviewed on an individual basis and subject • 0 All restaurant, Major, and Sub-Major Tenants addition to primary signage. to Landlord approval. • will be allowed one temporary construction panel within overall development sign prior section 7 • 7.7 • • • • • • Shopping Cenk—Monument Signage • A single shopping center monument sign will be provided by the Landlord at • the intersection of Meyer Road and Butterfield to identify the name of the shopping center and Major Tenants as approved by Landlord and the Village • of Oak Brook. A second monument sign will be provided by the Landlord to Identity the main Entrance—No Tenant Identification will be allowed on this • sign. • 74,-0. 9'-8' 20'-0• • Iz - _ � CAST STONE • MATCH B M -�- MATCH BUI LDINGS CAST STONE _ • - CORNICE TO MATCH BUILDINGS PIN MOUNTED • METAL SIGNAGE PIN MOUNTED AND LOGO • METAL SIGNAGE _ HALO-LIGHTED AND LOGO,HALO LIGHTED • CULTURED STONE EIFS FIELD BEHIND TO MATCH BUILDINGS PIN MOUNTED METAL TENANT SIGNAGE AND LOGOS GROUND LIGHTED • • -- CULTURED STONE TO MATCH BUILDINGS • MONUMENT SIGN 'B' • 1/4"=1'-0" • • MONUMENT SIGN "A' • I/4"=I'V • • • • section 7 • u,�6/irai��ir�N�mrWd�'I till�`I'SN�1 f 61TEL'11l • 7.8 • j • • • • • • Site Lighting (G) Each pole shall be installed upon a round • Criteria concrete base with 2'-6"height above grade and 24"diameter. • This section shall apply to all lighting installed • for illumination of parking lots. This section (H) Pedestrian path lighting by Streetworks does not apply to any fixtures mounted in or on decorative Pedestrian Lighting • buildings or common gathering structures. ACN 17MW75C144 on 4"Charleston MDN Pole. Mounting height 16'. Finish black. • All site lighting installed within the development • property shall be designed according to the following standards. • • (A) All fixtures shall be of Metal Halide type and include High Power Factor • Ballasts. High-pressure sodium light fixtures are prohibited. • (B) All parking surfaces, walkways and • drive spaces shall be illuminated such • that 0.5 footcandles(fc)average is Parking Lot Lighting maintained at ground surface. • Average illumination for the same spaces shall be minimum 2.0 fc. Setback and landscaped areas, which • do not contain walkways or parking, • are not bound by these requirements. • (C) Footcandle levels shall be shown out to the lot line or to a .5 footcandle • level. • (E) Site lighting poles for main parking lot • areas shall not exceed 35 feet in height measured from the ground • surface. Calculation of the pole height • shall include the base if a base is used. • (F) Parking lot fixtures shall be McGraw- Edison CSConcourse 111 400 w. Metal • Halide on 32'RTS round tapered steel • pole finish black(4). Pedestrian Path Lighting • section 8 SITE LIGHTING CRITERIA 8.1 • Landscaping Standards This pedestrian-oriented shopping mall will be a unique shopping environment. Landlord will provide a high quality storefront landscaping with planting beds of flowering shrubs, perennials, and • annuals. These colorful blooms will last throughout the growing season and will enhance the uniqueness of the shopping . center and the quality of the customer • experience. ;` • The Landlord's Landscape Architect shall `'��� S approve all plant materials used. A list of ,J approved plant materials shall be provided upon request. ` w • O V • �� • section 9 Oak Bt-ookPror net iaaeLANDSCAPIIVI_, . 9.1 STORE CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES To expedite the construction of the Tenant's • premises, the Landlord has established the Contractors and Subcontractors shall not • following guidelines. discriminate against any person or group of persons on account of race, sex, marital status, It is the Tenant's Contractor's responsibility to • The construction of the Tenant's premises is to age, handicaps, color, creed, religion, national schedule periodic inspections by the appropriate be performed in accordance with the Tenant's origin or ancestry. All Contractors shall have Building Department and other inspectors as approved plans and specifications by a bonded good labor relations, be capable of performing necessary and to comply with their requirements • Contractor selected by the Tenant. Tenants quality workmanship and work in harmony with and all codes and regulations. Inspections needing assistance in locating experienced local Landlord's Contractors and other Contractors on should be scheduled so that there is adequate • general Contractors should contact the Tenant the job, and any other labor entity at or time to make any changes required by the Coordinator for assistance. All general servicing the center. Tenant's Contractor shall inspectors prior to the store opening. Contractors as well as heating and air cooperate with the Landlord's Construction • conditioning, plumbing, gas piping, electrical and Superintendent and any other Contractor by Tenant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy sign Contractors must be licensed by the State coordinating its work in order not to delay other from the Building Department and submit a copy • of Illinois. work in progress, interfere with the operations of of this certificate to the Tenant Coordinator existing stores, or impede or endanger the before opening the premises to the public. The The Tenant or Tenant's architect must also safety of Contractors and the public. original must be posted within the Tenant space. forward a copy of this Handbook to the General • Contractor. Permits and Certificate Prerequisites to Tenant The General Contractor selected by the Tenant of Occupancy Construction must provide for a full time superintendent on site at all times during construction and must The Tenant, or his Contractor must submit the Before Tenant's Contractor will be permitted to • observe the Tenant Contractor Rules and required number of sets of Landlord approved start construction, the Contractor must comply Regulations. final working drawings and specifications and with the following prerequisites: apply for all necessary permits, including a • The Tenant's General Contractor shall coordinate building permit from the The Village of Oak all construction staging with Landlord's Brook Building Department, and pay all Pre-Construction Coordinator prior to construction. associated fees. All permits and one set of Meeting approved drawings must be kept at the • construction site during construction. A pre-construction meeting must be held with . In addition, if applicable, the Tenant may have the Landlord's Field Representative to determine to obtain certain permits or approvals from the suitable access routes to the site and the Health Department or other governing premises, designated parking for Contractors, authorities and pay for any applicable fees. designated loading, unloading and storage areas . if available and approved by Landlord. • All Contractors must be licensed in the State of Illinois and possess a local business licenses. section 10 Oak brook f'romelladeS-1-ORIF CONS I RUCTION F,i�. • 10.1 • B i-week I y Construction Construction U t i I i t i es Tenant and his Contractor shall be responsible Meetings for the cost of any damage to structure, utilities • During construction,Tenant's electrical or vehicles caused by any persons or equipment Tenant's General Contractor shall schedule bi- contractor shall be required to provide ground under Tenant Contracts. weekly meetings with Landlord's Field fault protection for all power equipment used in • Representative to update Construction Schedules the premises. Permits Inspection and and conformance with documents. Acceptance Access to Roof • Tenant's Contractor must provide evidence of all • Access to shopping center roof is restricted to necessary permits prior to start of construction. Landlord's personnel and Landlord's designated It is the Tenant's Contractors responsibility to • Bond and Insurance Contractors. No Contractor or Subcontractor will schedule inspections by the appropriate building be permitted on the roof unless specific department and other inspectors as necessary, • Any Contractor engaged by Tenant having a permission has been obtained from the Field and to comply with their requirements, and all Contract shall furnish a performance bond Representative. The penetration of the roof codes and regulations. A copy of all inspection naming the Tenant, the Landlord's Lender and deck and the installation of all flashing and reports must be submitted to the Field • the Landlord as additional insured, as their curbing for Tenant related equipment must be Representative. From time to time, and upon • interest may appear. Evidence of the bond must by Landlord's roofing Contractor at the Tenant's completion, Landlord's Field Representative will be filed with the Landlord's Field Representative expense. Installation of equipment on the roof inspect Tenant's construction for compliance before construction may begin. Insurance will be by the Tenant's Contractor. with approved drawings and specifications. . requirements should follow the details under Deviations or unsatisfactory workmanship must Insurance Exhibit within the Tenants lease. Rubbish Rem Ova I be immediately corrected, regardless of their • acceptance by public authority or the Tenant. A Tenant or Tenant's Contractor shall be Field Representative for prompt completion by • Progress Schedule responsible for the daily removal of construction Tenant's General Contractor will do a punch list. • The Tenant's Contractor shall promptly submit to debris from the premises and the site. Should • the Landlords Field Representative a progress the Tenant fail to comply with the above the schedule or bar chart showing the work schedule Landlord will proceed, upon 24 hour notice, with . and anticipated completion of the store. the necessary cleanup, demolition and removal, and charge the Tenant accordingly. Curb and • wall damage will be deducted from Tenant Changes in Design or Construction allowance. Materials • Courtyards, public corridors, service corridors, Tenant's Contractor shall not deviate from adjacent Tenant spaces must be kept clear of all approved drawings and specifications without trash, refuse, fixturing and merchandise at all • obtaining prior written permission from the times. Tenant, Landlord's Field Representative, and the . Building Department and/or other governmental Damage . agencies. • section 10 • Oak Brook Promeri,jde �TORE. CONSTRUC-f • 10.2 Land Iord'sPrior Rights • The Landlord retains prior rights to the space �I • above 12'-0"of the Tenant's premises, to i accommodate the shopping center's structural, Temporary Tenant mechanical or electrical requirements, such as Enclosure • piping, ducts, conduit, etc. • Furthermore, Landlord, Landlord's agent(s), or During construction,the Landlord may require the Tenant's premises be separated from the an authorized utility company(subject to Courtyard Hardscape by a temporary tenant Landlord's written permission) shall have the enclosure. -�- • right to run utility lines, pipes, conduits, or duct work where necessary or desirable, through air The enclosure shall be 12'-0"high and space above the Tenant's ceiling, column space constructed of fire treated wood studs with 1/2" . or other parts of the leased premises, and to fire treated plywood, with one coat of flat latex maintain, repair, alter, replace or remove the paint to match Mall standard and shall be • same, all in a manner which does not interfere located no more than three feet in front of the • unnecessarily with the Tenants use thereof. lease line. The entire enclosure must be installed on carpet strips so as not to damage Violations the hardscape. An access door will be permitted • in the temporary tenant enclosure only if there is In the event the Tenant is notified of any no rear service door. Modifications to the • violations of codes, ordinances, or regulations, temporary tenant enclosure during construction or of its obligations hereunder, either by the will be the Tenants Contractors responsibility jurisdictional authorities or by Landlord, Tenant and shall be done immediately. Refer to the • shall correct such violations within seven detail on the right for shopping center standard calendar days, or Landlord will correct at barricade details. Tenant's expense such violations at Landlord's • actual cost plus fifteen percent cost of Clean-Up administration. • Tenant shall provide daily cleanup of its • Repair of Adjacent premises and the surrounding area during Finishes construction, and the removal of all construction • debris from the Tenant space to the trash It is the Tenants responsibility to repair all containers. Upon completion of Tenant's existing Landlord or adjacent Tenant construction,Tenant shall promptly dismantle, I • construction finishes which may have become remove and dispose of the temporary tenant damaged as a result of Tenant's construction to enclosure and any excess materials from the • new condition. premises. Should the Tenant fail to comply with the above, Landlord will proceed, upon 24 hours notice, with the necessary cleanup, demolition and removal, and charge the Tenant. • section 10 Uak b'r ook Pi-omenade STORE CONSTRUCT101'� 10.3 Security Access to the site will be restricted to only those employees working on the project. Contractors wishing access to the site after • normal working hours must obtain approval from the Field Representative. Waivers of Lien • In making progress and final payments to • Contractors, Tenant should obtain valid Waivers of Lien, indicating payment in full for labor, . materials, and subcontractors. Landlord may request to see evidence of such Waivers before permitting Tenant to open the premises for • business. Certificate of Occupancy • Tenant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from The Village of Oak Brook and submit a copy • of this certificate to the Landlord's Field Representative before opening the premises to the public. Further, turn over"as-built" • drawings at the completion of the punch list and for final inspection by the Field Representative. • Tenant shall provide monthly updates to Landlord for lost construction days due to • weather. section 10 Oak Brook Promenade STORE CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES • 10.4 5NR186 -_.— _— B UrTG RFlGL�RQ�Q� ORNAMENTAL TREES AND PEREINIALS NEW LNW 6EEDN5 EXt6TINCa LAIIN TO RV'IAN VIEW REES5 ETIOVED TO OPEN / ALONG PARKING, PROVIDE PERmI COLOR LANDSCAPED VILLAGE AND SITE PERIMETER - LANOSCAPED/ IDENTFIOATICN SIGN t'10"PENT L CtJtll'I B' D _ _ _ oFa+AHENrAL Kss TY ENTRIf� IL --f 1-' — LIGNT6.T7P. PLANTING:I SEE EXHIBIIT17.D I - ------ _ — 1 A e {LI I I I 'LAND6CAPIG M RAISED 8e-7. RETENTION POND: I L� hide.i / PLANTERS OVER PARQNG GARAGE tin SEE EXHIBITS 19&20 r du 0'a Ole TYPICAL PARKING L I LOT PLANTING: PARKMTILOTT l I SEE EXHIBIT.18.0 i `��• % 3-i IPER B 7aSTINS.TREES _ { �N POOR CaclTla PARKING LOT CALCULATIONS TI I Rtt TO BE IEMOVED I - O 13 d�_ _ - / PARKING LOT AREA 331.920 SO.FT.33,200 SO FT. REQUIRED GREENSPACE GREENS ACE PROVIDED I10 ' 39200 SO.FT(11%) w STOREFRONTI � _ / PARKING SPACES 1010 TOTAL(820 SURFACE) -— PLANTING: _ _ -_ C -- , / REQUIRED TREES(1 15 PARKING SPACES) 54 TREES EVERCl7EE SEE EXHIBIT 16.0 O TREES `x i / PROVIDED TREES 51 TREES PROVIDE _ Q SGREENN' \ G � I� FOR REAR OF —— —— ——— - D EIILDNGS c I1 _ E _ j •� r..:• (�,� - f EA6LRENT -` —n `— % PLANT MATERIAL KEY DELI LAA�9EEDNG EXISTING TREE EXISTING LAWN El MID SHADE T 5 AL01G MNMWA.TIRE%INSIDE SAGO'— ms's _ PAPoCING LOT FOR SCREENINS :,`�LIE EAS9'EM _a. ,A / NEW LAWN RELOCATED TREE POND EDGE PLANTING PROPOSED SHADE TREE PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTING ------- ----- ----- ■ G PLANTING SIGN BEDS . ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVERS EXISTING SHRUR BEDS O NEW SCREENING SHRUBS Overall Landscape Plan January 10, 2005 • Scale: 111 — 50' OAS. BROOK F c f ! t. Paul Proper jI1C. I + S - . ADI IFFMAI\T I, _-,_,__ ,�,. ! _ +-.. 1Y r51H}IlCL1y R1=U t.51'AI1.�1:N\•M'1c,N'+XtI U�\t111.=_'--. -- _. -__ •' F `'�, ,., r �;_ - Wyk,`� Ja � ��� �d � j}� i�'I'i r The M16)e of 0,4,B:xk 11n is•Butterfiekl&Meyers Ruacis ' BUTTERFIELD ROAD __ ----------------------------------- ___ ------ v _-------1 —�-- z_ \—\ —_— ------ _ — �� f•�\)\\ z_�' _ // IIII=__-�3� r- __ -�- \ / l l l� � /��/rL/ 1. 1 -�_.tt�-t���-\\ -- / - __ _ '_t_ __ _lt•-- � - �� t�4�V I I l :,r a�+i; t - \1111 \\ a I o� ., ... � \ \ I III / col .�o" �T KEY - -- -- - Y� �'`'� I-�JI e'.a'• � r I Inlll - L \� `BEES TO BE PRESERVED I III I I k I I ^ TREES TO BE REMOVED Q y�( (BASED ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT,POOR CONDITION OR TOO LARGE FOR RELOCATION) 4 / TREES IMPACTED BY NEW WORK TO BE RELOCATED --- -- ---- h00 HONEYLOCUST 5"GAL. - ------ - -- - ---- E E e 901 HONEYLOCUST - l"GAL- . . 902 MAPLE -5"CAL. — " -- M04 HONEYLOCUST - 5"CAL- GAS- e 1 \ 1 c// g��// 905 MAPLE - 4"CAL. S—IGas—� i i//ii%ii, / 990 GINKGO- l"CAL. I1 Ilcas' , /I E L n 994 MAPLE 8"CAL . . — . .,y // ///p/i/i// E 996 GINKGO l"CAL � � r // 991 GINKGO- l"CAL. 998 GINKGO l"GAL. '912 HONEYLOCUST -b"CAL. 913 HONEYLOCUST-b"CAL. 1913x HONEYLOCUST - b"CAL. 1923 HONEYLOCUST - b"GAL. 1-88-EAST-WEST TOLL WAY 0966 GINKGO-9"CAL Existing Tree Survey Plan January 10, 2005 • Scale: I" = 50' �K BR(JOK' 5 St. Paul Properties Inc. _ 1 � 'I ) �� - K; HIFFMAN t . Rill _ -�. '..: wv �) d `S ,p r s; lage of OAK Brt,ok.Ylinois• Butte &Meyers Rcaads _ = �:f° The\4I. TREE CLASSIFICATION SURVEY TREE CLASSIFICATION SURVEY TREE CLASSIFICATION SURVEY TREE CLASSIFICATION SURVEY SUM ARYSHEET SUMMARYSHEET SUMMARYSHEET SUMMARYSHEET P 'eW51b:Oak EYOak Red.M Mm:16214N P .rtlSlb:O.t moot Rad.M Dab:10.2]-0I P 'ead51u:Oak Brook RedeN Dam:10Z/4N P .a/SIta:Oat moot 0..aedo . Dw:lan4M Re led :NA NNnan :pia Re lad :MN HNnan C :wp. Re led :NA Ialfman C :g1Pa R. l.d :NN NM1nan :w Iraell tor:kta ,d C fi Ltd.(Tdq Smm:IL o_. mr:Ma MAN Canadtl ,Ltd.(TDK) Stem:IL Imes ox:wNOrd Co IIii ,Lt6(TDK) Smm:IL I_amt:Ma—,d Coneukb Ltd.(TD.Q 5—IL • Nmrtller COmma�kbm. Sol.r.iko Name mama Farm Ca g N Cannon 73.rrta —me.Name 01m Farm CoMtldn NumBer Common Name SGantlBO Noma gamsmr Form CaMUm NurlMr Denman lbm. td.rMkNam. datmmr Farm 19�906 WWI ash Fraarus ammcare 6 m 916 r American IiNai Tiia amarca. 10 995 Green ash {raarnrs pamsyM vca 13 ,d lab Black space /REP 11 907 I— Acer 13 94) Anaican nrdat Tla am.care 9 906 Arn w Arden I,la ancncare 1] 147 Blacks , /REF! 16 909 Wlile ash Fria B 948 American krdat Tile anarcam 8 lair 98] Gwwn ash ,n Ferrnyk a 11 148 — map. /REP 11 910 Wlite ash Fnnrus art.cam 6 949 Aca aarvdes 12 988 G�al1 Faanus 13 149 W willow IREF1 33 000d 911 I" Groatva macax]ros ] 950 WI1im ash Fnma amaicare 16.1 989 R— aabo Ab'us s 10 150 Great ash Fnaas 15 912 Iota! CJearva lnaca4hws 6 951 Aca antidea 11 Ilr 990 Awnan re Rite 8 151 American kNat IREF! 15 913 lotto Geblva macarrrns 6 952 Geen ash a Frans ] 991 A-na.pre Puns 14 152 Green ash Fnairvs(curs ro 16 91, Ducted leNlwrt Ga ].6.].6.3 953 Wlkte ash Fnmaemaicam 9 992 Aomori pre Puri 9 153 G .h Fnarus panrrsyt✓arvca 13 915 FNrwei Ablis s ,7,6.6,6. 954 Flwveii crap Ma'. 5,6.] 993 Aatn.n're Bras 9 154 American li,ow Td.amencare 16 916 IkII. aWxan a Ga 7.11 955 Green ash Frans 11 994 brio �led.ISia macselns 9 155 AmericanlMat Td.arancare 12 917 Scala oak pAatus cocriraea 15 9% Ausman re Pvasn 7 995 Iona! Cdefava macatlns 15 156 pmencan lyden Tdn amarare 26 910 Hmq loner Grwd/va eiacadros 14 s 957 Astnan P. Pears n 9, 9,7.5 996 i—t Gendsia rnacaalns 13 157 Green ash Fnarus pars m 13 919 Scala oak Chan caaraa 19 9% Geer ash Frans parrs ] 997 kraal 11 15B Marian qte Puasn 13 920 loner 18 959 Flomto W_V. 7,84:4 998 boat Gedasia rnacaalns 15 159 Atanan re Pans rk 15 92, ­y 11 s good 960 Flaven aaB _w 7,4,4 999 Auanan're Rtes 12 1. Great ash Fnaars 15 goon 922 Ina Gbltas macaa]gs 6 %1 FI"wnl Abl. 7,6,6 1000 Antrbn re Peas 8 161 Blacks Pic.maiaa 13 d 923 loner 6 good 962 11— affi Maws 67,4.4,4 123 Marian pre Plus - 9 162 Blads Pic.mffiaa 9 92. laaa Gretirsa macaMOS 16 963 Austrian P. Puus 10 124 Awnan're Pbas 9 163 WM. a Quartos lba 13 925 lams GhHrva niacaMas 16 961 G obdffia 6 125 Aaban pre PNts - 8 161 Write oak parcus Alba 12 926 Fbrwa rmpe AcerP'aawdes 13 965 A...pi. Peas 9,3 126 Austnan pm Ryas,g, 10 9. 165 Arencat I.._ T✓amacaR 12 927 Noma —pl. 8 966 G obilaba 9 127 Marian ore Puasn 11 166 Gres,ash Fresrus 16 Food 928 Euopean alder AN.rs u 7.3 967 Dated 1®vAlmt Gat Plcbb ,0 128 Aw .pre Rns 12 goad 167 Great ash Fnnna parsyf✓aruca 14 gmd 929 E an Ma Alms uunsa 9 968 Dotted lewtlwn Gat mfa 9 129 Amnon're Bras 11 168 Green ash Fnarus 13 ood 930 E an alder A/rus u 6 969 Dated lesahmt Gat 7,3.2 130 Marian pre —,,g, 7.11 169 American!hoot Tire arrekare 12 s goo0 93, I—Y map. Ic pl arddes ] 970 Dotted hanfwn Ga K3 131 Alaman pm Peas - 10 170 American Ir Trrl arldca. 12 gmd 932 IMe local Cdearva aiacaKh°s 6 971 Austrian-re A_ 8 132 Scala oak paces town. 13 111 Red ma a Aca Mrun 12 933 FI—N c Magus s p 7,6,5,4 972 Alma,pm P_n go, 8 133 Scads oak pans coccin. 16 172 Red—pl. Aca Mom 12 934 Flw.ai A4/us 6.4,5,5 973 Ann-'m Pins rk 9 134 Scala oak peas cocuir. 15 173 Nawa r I Aca a ra., 13 935 Great ashen Frmrvs pars✓arc 8 bit 974 Aa,riai pre Pins - 8 135 C ash F.— 16 174 Name rte Acapala ., 13 936 Gear azh Franrars 8 Ian 915 Maoist- Pins - 8 ti6 teat ash Fnlnta 16 175 Flaw- crab Maluss. 6,63 blr 93] Gem asM1 Fnnnrs 9 fair 976 laavl Gledilsia bicanlus 11 1l7 Gem ash Fnaras 8 1)6 Flw.si Maus sp 66,5,4 good we Gwen ash Fnorus 8 917 Aalria,pm Pins - 7AA 138 8brk space Pic.notate 12 177 American h.- U.anaKara 9 good 939 Greco ash Fravrus 7 fair 1IM Astriat're Pins 7.6 139 —s Pic.rrabre 12 178 Norwa ma Aca a, ., 10 rod 910 Leal ash Fraaras 7 fair 979 Amnon' Pi— 9 140 Geer ash. Fm— 16 179 Ia ,y r.p. Acapa/arwdes a gmd 911 Nanan re Pins fq. 10 980 Austrian Pusan 8 141 Geen ash Fnaras 13 180 Naw-a ma Aca a—., 6,7,8,9 912 Atmnan m Puns - 7 981 Meats,-re Puns rd 10 142 Geen. Fraants 11 181 Black spruces A— 14 11 913 Auanan pre Puns - 10 9B2 Amman F.. Pins - 11 143 W willow Sa/u bffi 32 s 182 Black space Pic.maiaa ] 914 Marian-re Puns - 8 983 Aomori- Pins - ] 144 1— ma Aca arertidas 14 183 Blacks Pic.rrviae 15 .5 A Vn..-re Puns - 17 901 Great rill Fnms 11 145 Black spox. 12 184 Blacks Pic.maiara 9 TREE CLASSIFICATION SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET Pr acUSim:Oak Brook R.MVI m Date:1037-61 Re elect :NAI K11man Co :DYP•a Imell tor:W.—C-16,9,Ud.(TDIQ Stam:IL NunMr Common Nam. smotift Name Dlamemr Form C d- 185 Bl kk s e p a 10 186 Black space Prcea manan 10 187 N Ater a rudder 10 GENERAL NOTES 198 Noma m Ater a ruudes 11 189 Austrian pine Pears g. 10 190 Gi G,0o bdoba ) 191 Austrian -re Prnrs og, 11 192 Austrian pre —.9, 12 I. MANY OF THE EXISTING TREES ARE GREEN ASH. THERE IS SOME CONCERN REGARDING 193 A.... P"—n 9 THE POTENTIAL VIABILITY OF THESE TREES DUE TO A FUTURE ASH BORER INFESTATION. 194 Nawa m Ater aanoides B 195 Flaoeri creba a Males s. 7,6,6,4,6,3,2 m gooJ IT IS RECOMMENDED NOT TO RELOCATE ANY OF THE GREEN ASH,AS THE EXPENSE MIGHT 196 Flnwen ­., Haloes. 5,5,5,2 NOT BE JUSTIFIED. 197 Gi Gi o bdla ] 198 G Gi °biAlba 7 2.ALL TREE REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS WILL BE INSPECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE 199 Weep wkllow SAN.bob coca 4fi 200 Scadaoak Q__tin. n ARCHITECT,PRIOR TO ANY WORK 1774 5cana.k Quartos coccirma 16 1775 Aa"a" re Pears 12 3. ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED WILL BE TAGGED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE FIELD, n nm v.K io n —-p r . AND THE TREE PRESERVATION FENCE LOCATION WILL BE STAKED AND APPROVED ALSO. 1779 Am—pm 13 1779 Aetnan re I 11 4. THE TREE PRESERVATION FENCE SHALL BE SNOW FENCING LOCATED AT THE DRIPLiNE OF THE TREE, ,780 Green esM1 Fnnnrs penis ,. 1781 Green ash F.om 13 ADJACENT TREES SHALL BE FENCED OFF AS GROUPS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 1782 Green ash Fnlm 15 1783 Greco ash F­:Pena w 15 goad 5. NO MATERIALS OR VEHICLES SHALL BE STORED INSIDE THE PROTECTIVE FENCING. (b. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WILL BE PRUNED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD. 1. TREES TO BE RELOCATED SHALL BE MOVED BY A COMPANY SPECIALIZING IN TREE RELOCATION WORK(OVER FIVE YEARS EXPERIENCE) Existing -Tree Survey List December 15, 2004 • Scale: N/A M 0AKBt\_%_jOK Paul Properties, Inc. I N� , HJUMAN r i ra + ` + I r The Mirage of Oak Brook Illinois a Butterfield&Meyers Roads � � - � ` - Ord ^`n. • 1 � NG CLIRSIED PLAN T 5ECTION 'A' I AND PERE! ALS PAVERS MARY. n; CROSSWALKS FOR 1 PEDESTRIANS MID vEH CLES cow"L4*d.Wf& j -� DPLANTER WALLS —� dA' .&EPA _SEPARATE CARS AND ------" PEDESTRIANS AND PROVIDE SEATING SPECIALTY .iaSv+- PAVING COMPLEMENTS THE ARCHITECTURE AND " S&MLS STORE ENTRIES I t� 'BOLLARDS THAT MATS GATEWAY ARCHES 'V ORLYENTAL LGHTS INDICATE AND DIRECT h I .I 15EPARATE.PEDESTR CUSTOMERS TO SEA.SONALLTLCUE TRH4 'y'y ` ; AND VEHICLES" ADDITIONAL PARCNG SECTION A: / - - SCALE:N.T.S. 5ECTION'B' I I fiabwa fw°vS �fS�i1�AtAteys I � �yrav+dt�Sc�fTl�, RELOCATED TREES / Ad'BAff h`7,en Q4�,Q WI 1 G (5-1 EAU PRO✓OE LAFd'.CA TREES WRH IIORE MATURE CHARACTER 1 t'JLAL S{Y1 Q-�•.y SPECIAL PAYING DES,ALOW,A I -�yay`Lr j1 CONNECTOR DRIVES PRONDES A v15uAL LINK TO THE 6TOREPROr1TS _ ,JfCgIL m __I I Yp�/Fuvt.c, LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:1"=20' I SECTION B: SCALE: N.T.S. PLANT MATERIAL KEY STOREFRONT PLANT PALETTE (with minimum size at installation) SHADE TREES f3"caliper) TALL SHRUBS What.) GROUNDCOVER 13"pots) Autumn Blaze Maple Blue Muffin Viburnum English Ivy X EXISTING TREE EXISTING LAWN Chanticleer Pear Dwarf Burningbush Periwinkle Emerald Queen Norway Maple Mohican Viburnum Purpleleaf Wintercreeper Gingko Peking Cotoneaster NEW LAWN Homestead Elm PERENNIALS 11 aal.l Miyabe Maple Autumn Joy Sedum a RELOCATED TREE Redmond Linden LOW SHRUBS 1( 8"-24"hgt&sprd.) Black Eyed Susan POND EDGE PLANTING Skyline Honeylocust Andorra.Buffalo&Sea Green Juniper Blue Hill Salvia Tuhptree Annabelle Hydrangea Daylity,sp. Anthony Waterer&Froebers Spnaea Dwarf Fountain Grass PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTING Boxwood sp. Faassen's Catmint PROPOSED SHADE TREE 1:1 Compact Cranberrybush Viburnum Feather Reed Grass ORNAMENTAL TREES 17'hat.) Dense Yew Hosta sp. it ■ SIGN PLANTING BEDS Eastem Redbud Dwarf Korean Lilac Ice Dance Sedge • ORNAMENTAL TREE Japanese Tree Lilac Greenmound Alpine Currant Kobold Liatris Kousa Dogwood Gro•Low Sumac Little Spire Russian Sage PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVERS Magnolia sp Little Princess Splraea Perennial Geraniums EVERGREEN TREE NMI Prainefire Crabapple Rosa sp Purple Coneflower Serviceberry Summersweet Clethra Purple Malden Grass - EXISTING SHRUB BEDS NEW SCREENING SHRUBS Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn Sweetspire Palace Purple Coralbells Typical Storefront Landscape Plan & Sections January 10, 2004 • Scale: 1 " = 20' - u oAK BROO 1 F H A------ w IFFMAN I l ,. . _ j.ulsiilrv:N,•ars,W.u,uM1tvfl. !t _ The\01bge of Oolk Brook&-"s•E WerfieU&NA yers Raac#s' BUTTERFIELD ROAD MEDIAN TO BE PLANTED THE BUTTERFIELD ROAD FRONTAGE 15 I rJ MOWl1B�lT SIGN'D'TO BE LOIDECAPED � 01111 PERENNIALS Ttor�v�vA.U1 ISTH LOO evomwtmml SNOB.ISOSES - - PLANTED WITH A MIX OF EVERGREEN O✓r' + SSGS W('K� R6V-,SGln�j, - '� IQt �. AND DECIDUOUS TREES AND SHRUBS !fn�a{fit�12-m, _ , d AND MASSES 6 LOW fLOWERNS. / N�7>��SYLIiTN�FOR • I I AND PE YEAR Ra+o COLOR R AI ExT MRu�fi�df 14, ah £ 5orQ.n r ��H v.Mt Fk7W6vS� .. r -� �1i.' Y+"J'_"emu•'�'�,� f .y.y-�..� _ w I` �J I SECTION A: SCALE:N.T.S. 1 S7,.tdc Tvcv�(,u#r,( ff*K4?- WithSe1v1 NEW SHADE TREES I ' - - ACCESS To (4-e'CALJ PLTID EDGE GRA56ES PARKWYs _.LEE ROADWAYS M LOW AREA PRONDE GARAGE VISUAL LINK TO POND BELOW -- KREWLAL BEDS LRE MAJOR ROADWAY SYSTEM - �kp tK SECT C\_'- - Gvw Avw ' SHREW N SCREEN 'L �...,y PA111M LOT II RELOCATED TREES USED GARAGE RN'P TpUGNOUT SITE TO ADD MORE MATURE SCALE - I - LANDSCAPE PLAN SECTION B: SCALE:I"=20' SCALE: N.T.S. PLANT MATERIAL KEY SITE PERIMETER PLANT PALETTE (with minimum size at installation) SHADE TREES (3"caliper) TALL SHRUBS 14'hat.) PERENNIALS (1 pal.) Acwlade Elm Arrowwood Viburnum Autumn Joy Sedum x EXISTING TREE EXISTING LAWN Autumn Blaze Maple Border Forsythia Black Eyed Susan Autumn Purple White Ash Bridalwreath Spines, Blue Hill Salvia Hackberry Dwarf Bumingbush Dwarf Fountain Grass NEW LAWN Homestead Elm Redtwig Dogwood Faassen's Catmint Kentucky Coffeetree Mohican Viburnum Feather Reed Grass a RELOCATED TREE Red Oak Peking Cotoneaster Kobold Liatns ® POND EDGE PLANTING Skyline Honeyloeust Pfitzer Juniper Little Spire Russian Sage Swamp White Oak Red Chokeberry Purple Coneflower F-1 Vernal V✓Itchhazel Purple Maiden Grass PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTING EVERGREEN TREES (T hall PROPOSED SHADE TREE Austrian Pine Douglas Fir q SIGN PLANTING BEDS Green Colorado Spruce LOW SHRUBS(18"-24"hat.6 sprd.l ® ORNAMENTAL TREE N Buffalo&Sea Green Juniper ORNAMENTAL TREES What. Anthony Waterer&Froebers Spnaea PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVERS Amur Maple Compact Cranberrybush Viburnum EVERGREEN TREE -= Japanese Tree Lilac Dwarf Korean Lilac Kouse Dogwood Gro-Low Sumac EXISTING SHRUB BEDS NEW SCREENING SHRUBS Prairiefire Crabapple Rosa sp. Serviceberry Summersweet Clethra Typical Site Entry/Perimeter Landscape Plan & Sections January 10, 2004 • Scale: 1" = 20' 10 1 SP� I '� sI K B Rol-K--IN/o l � HIFF_MAN_ ' rp �'kT t a1 m1TL1U ISI A Il'WHViC W01I U --- All I i The Mllage of Oak Brook.Ylirxrs•BuUerfield&lvtyyers Roads ...,__.��..__>�_ _-_ �= LANDSCAPE BEDS OVER T1E PAR"GARAGE HAVE A RAISED CURB _-\ AND DERIING TO PROVIDE A L`O L FOR PLANTING �-♦ —� .I i F tip AAr,C LFrgA1• � I --� -� y PEDtts7wAH �AANIA,t A i1r irG 1 eI'A.e! CROSSWALKS Zvi sAT 41 ,i«l.✓ l w tN lrnl MARI P` Pry s CULL PAVING avrA�Lfrm (T¢y 4, fLtv..VT -- LIGHTS ALONG .� ORNAMENTAL iREEg,PEREM11ALg.AND PEDESTRIAN PATH CiRONDCOVERS ARE LOCATED N THE RAISED PLANTERS ^ - W � J SECTION'B' l —— �, I I SECTION A: : > ' >" SCALE:N.T.S.i S -- L T1E DIVIDER 16L61O(LOCATED OJEI!GARAGE)EEC01E9 A L11Yi 6 PARKING \ PEDESTRIAN PLAZA LNCING THE RETAIL BIALDNGS. GARAGE BELOW SPECIAL PAVNG AND ORNAMENTAL LIGHTS COWINE FROM THE STORIFRONT DEVELOP EW. I 1 a'ltunEt T.4(n cnshin,/ l��Yke1sA"-iw U�r lkQ•itul y/�t-cw _- } 5 A.aLdcs dtr"f TTPICAL PAINKI G LOT ISLANDS BER'ED 12"AND '1 PERENNIALS PLANTED ALONG MAJOR - -- - - -_ .r"�' <. F1y:r. ` �`�'•* -_ PLANTED WITH LOW.SALT TOLERANT PLANTNGS _ PEDESTRIAN PATNg SE COLOR 4ADE TEE AREA TO PROVIDE LIKE 6R0-LLW tSIRTAC AND!lvll0m IIGeE6 - _`________ __.___ ----------------- " -- MORE MATURE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Gar • kr-r,ON',A SECTION B: SCALE:N.T.S. LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:1"=20' PLANT MATERIAL KEY PARKING LOT PLANT PALETTE (with minimum size at installation) SHADE TREES f3"caliper) TALL SHRUBS 14trt.l'h GROUNDCOVER 13"pots Accolade Ekn Arrowwood Viburnum Dwarf Fleeceflower x EXISTING TREE EXISTING LAWN Autumn Blaze Maple Border Forsythia Purpleleaf Wmtercreeeper Bradford Pear Bridalwresth Spiraea Emerald Queen Norway Maple Dwarf Bumingbush PERENNIALS 11 aal.l _ NEW LAWN Hackbeny Redtwig Dogwood Black Eyed Susan e RELOCATED TREE Homestead Elm Mohican Viburnum Daylily sp. POND EDGE PLANTING Kentucky Coffeelrse Peking Coloneaster Dwarf Fountain Grass Retlmond Linden Plitzer Juniper Faassen's Catmint Skyline Honeylocust KoWId Liams Swamp White Oak LOW SHRUBS 118"-24'hat&sprd.l Little Spire Russian Sage tj`I�R7j PROPOSED SHADE TREE PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTING Buffalo&Sea Green Jumper Purple Coneflower ORNAMENTAL TREES IT hat.) Anthony Waterer&Froebers Spriaea ■ SIGN PLANTING BEDS Japanese Tree Lilac Compact Cranberrybush Viburnum ® ORNAMENTAL TREE Kousa Dogwood Dwarf Korean Lilac Magnolia sp. Gro-Low Sumac PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVERS Prairiefire Crabapple Little Princess Spirsea EVERGREEN TREE Serviceberry Rosa sp. EXISTING SHRUB BEDS NEW SCREENING SHRUBS Typical Parking Lot Landscape Plan & Sections January 10, 2005 • Scale: 1" = 20' St. .Paul Pry }ernes In Ol KBf\.%I-i O r - N_ HIFFMAI�T u � < 's � ::_ � ,._� � f;, I ��.._.. ,>.- t?rT1. W[LI H 61 A fk. 'M 1:a.N'.ktl U�llltt.� _ - ._J, -- �=� - _ -_ 1fyeG'• _�F - - i EduK*,tlli"s•B merFle{d S Iv yets of Oar: IEw GRAVEL PATH TO LOW VOLTAGE PATH HATCH EXISTING LIGHTS TO BE ADDED EXISTING TREES TO Will MOWIDIT SIGN'A' eE'RESERVEC'rR BUTTERFIELDROAD FBqBnlALS"-%tfanWas FOR COLOR AT 6M . -- POND PLANT PALETTE (with minimum size at installation) SHADE TREES II calioerl TALL SHRUBS (4'hgtJ • f - - Accolade Ekn Arrowwood Viburnum .7- Autumn Blaze Maple Border Forsythia Hackberry Bridalwreath Spirsee Homestead Elm Dwarf Bumirgbush 7C'. Kentucky Coffeetree Redlwig Dogwood — _ - Red Oak Pfitzer Juniper �- - Swamp White Oak Red Chokeberry - Vernal Witchhazel _ BOULDER STE cow-RI WTH CLUMP TREES 11 '-171 cow-RI SIDE WALLS TO MATCH PATHWAY NEW BENCHES IN •,r / Black Alder LOW SHRUBS 118"-24"hat&sord.l SECTION B SEATING,AREA River Birc1T Sea Green Juniper SEE EXHIBIT 20.0 _ i x Whitespire Birch Annabelle Hydrangea Anthony Waterer&Froebel's Spriaea SHRIB MASSES AT REAR OF BUILDNGS - / EVERGREEN TREES(7'hall Compact Cranberrybush Viburnum Austrian Pine Dwarf Korean Lilac E"11140 94%M WILL Douglas Fir Gro-Low Sumac mm5ERVED WHERE POSSIBLE / Green Colorado Spruce Rosa sp. Summersweet Clethrs ORNAMENTAL TREES(7'haLl Sweetspire Amur Maple ft tt _ Eastern Redbud A t2 tt 1 { RETENTICN POND / - / Kouse Dogwood PERENNIALS 11 gal.and Ip_uaal NULL-10855 `- Prairiefire Crabapple Black Eyed Susan Sewceberry Daylily ap. AThornless Cockspur Hawthorn Feather Reed Grass Hosta sp. EXISTING Ice Dance Sedge 4 / PATH TO SE KObold Liatris REPAIRED Lake Bank Sedge AS NEEDED �i, 4 �• � % Little Spire Russian Sage 'YsREENSCREEN'WITH VANES Praine Cord Grass y a AI BASE OF DECKS POND EDGE GRA66ES WILL BE - -� PLANTED FROM PATHWAY DOW _ Purple Coneflawer TO NWL.(EROSION BLAWET UTiI - • / Purple Maiden Grass CLLtP FO TREES WITH SEEDING AND PLUGS rdt UPLIGHTS ALONG DECKS Swhchgrass Variegated Cord Grass POND AERATOR sa _ I I ttttu i tt j 7 NEW SHS>e nasSES ANO / NEW OPAL PERENNIALS WILL BE ADDED TREES UNDER SECTION G_ 1 ALONG T E PA T14 % WIRE{AD S �A SEE EXHIBITOR PLANTERS ALONG EDGE OF % l -M DECK rOR SEASONAL COLOR ; PLANT MATERIAL KEY , - / x EXISTING TREE El EXISTING LAWN C SECTION A NEI„ 5 � NEW LAWN SEE EXHIBIT 20D �` / N`SEATW a RELOCATED TREE AREAS EVERGREEN TREES TO HEW BENCH POND EDGE PLANTING I' ' SCREEN SERVICE AREA ±\•. / CONCRETE STEPS / ��� / PROPOSED SHADE TREE PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTING fi SIGN PLANTING BEDS ORNAMENTAL TREE ell EVERGREEN TREE PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVERS EXISTING SHRUB BEDS �' NEW SCREENING SHRUBS NEW GRAVEL/ PATS TO, EXISTIG / Pond Landscape Plan January 10, 2005 • Scale: 1" = 40' nI BRoo - - T aul ProPerhes Inc. (f t la �< HIFFMAN E gnMrif:Nl'i.�LW..0 ISr{r/.+1:N1'k tK.W'Ml DWID), t r 4 _ _'..- •� �. \` � • - i Ik'- _' �. • �• T}le�! g OFndk Et>)(�C,tlltflLTIS•BLJ[if'1' M 8.MetS I (�RORA' Wv- / ,4TP- 5 . Matcbv�xi sii� ;a•� 1 � ..� �a,Nt dew Ex c-vu.�s�� New P rt�� aV(4 4 1 g �fuv Pam C-rast,�s ` POND EDGE SECTION A: MEYERS ROAD SCALE: N.T.S. rpwrvL Ex T.�s pro fs G1'nc �'1 whwp,�ki-Ahf� {sand faOvev(,OVIyVI �' • � ,-� I Gohhfisfni,�, 6Gt,dty Des �vv AyAto !s� Ero�ss� W1 706-r, POND EDGE SECTION B: BUTTERFIELD ROAD POND EDGE SECTION C: NEW BUILDINGS SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S. Pond Edge Landscape Sections - Exhibit 20 December 15, 2004 • Scale: As Noted 1 ,� St: Paul Properties, Inc. HIFFMAN r/ it , ![ t i✓< Y.WM!\I tS1A 12.\4.k\ri'f_.,N'.lkll>\III.. ���✓���-' - �� ���'-" - 11 inD =7he Village of Oai Brook.]I lin(�s•Butterfield 4 Meyers Roach 11i � --r r• ✓I I . . ��� ,`�� lei ��{^ - '� IY �Y.\ } � 1. ,` - - ,•� m - it pi• � �•:t / Y�f�S. 1 �C. 'a, ,� I� yr ��"'�ti =j�:i."�r �,y` t' .�' i• ��� '1. � (fin\ 4 —%I - � rr a. »4 }. 1' t •q _� ¢-?> ��W I r 7 � � 1 •► ���i _ t, �; �-f• �,,k.jt Pik! Alp 4 AK .. •. �M I �M,+�• eel a . Ar M FAI IMI' ra C !' �- •- 11� ae j �' •'� � t ffi'�9g5tiah••°.i.9 _ :-i t _!� r r f� ! �- Sy :� p^��q"�slF .%' DANIEL Wb H�C. IL ERAR �' H ITEfCT -- � .�e � r 21 �� a. � .%1y9t; � �. s�aSit `+•�._ _ �'r F f Cdr ,•.,�.y� ( • O i�~lam -•.? � �i�,�/,�ii�.;/"y- ����ss� #�'*��� � Y �2 - t _ 31;f as.�� I _ � x� -l" - n :aur•;. � � � /,' ..." rte• .- ' - ���r,4, c�4g��t;�t F � .� /tai' \ - - - ti I' i r: eta �•� Or y t Or ,qM T.- ,1 / 1 i �- •dalatio 1' - ;��� �d'S•Ii! �srr�rf „�, �r. _ •m � --" �rMA�I► 12� '.`�mi' _ [„ DANLEL W _ i�rib CoC tN - -"+ / _ .4 1 R +�,'�•'a,"ee. A t 1 { S,.;V }:'y3 h', ds 4ar., � 1Y^ e.�Ti.',1.a..'� y 1 H. CKLOVEIR4A -- _ ; �s}i"f q( � � !� � "�'. ray's t� '"f Vin:- - - �r. .,�� � 'ai'• _f d ., z , i; .4, .,'!, .�a,fi :R F. . _ ': iz .v/, .. �:� _;... ._; t ly �y X1.}4+ k tMl "� t•f �. . . — - �" 9k a 5a& y .l.P. .,x j tead =# ,W :z p r v ^ar',Ns �'.• $.,p•y��� ��"�, �.'� ) r'S'4� °' +t,�i' �q,� - ,I -R� _ F ! x�.�` — r • k '� �M`.. ^•rt"� .t .� ..'i � �' y. �qyp li. 'F':X �r� ,� _j 8..:� I �lDba1�. _`�� _ ' r..�. NZ Lv 1 • • . . • . . . . . . . . . • . • . . • .MWWWR "" -#f _ d',..s �c:':a- •!*d• <r. i� n. F":,:, _�•�- � � EMS ,i ��e�tS }� ' ' �� ,.���� - V .• �y� y t vrj _ H 22 , 0 Ulm- fi 1 .lit _p° ✓ ' - v r• .. I f 7 �; Mis- `- .+1'a- • a t ae o� a. -3r �- s,:.: ? -' •xitky�.. r _ � _ E• f �-sy. mtA y�, {, g- *VP ,y e�'7e i � �: � �M _f;,.s � • t�.�`Lj"�},.t�ge to r qq !y . - ". �� F.v }y�• .. H � Y -:'1' fir' �, 1• i �'T. a Q ; � 2 b ``� +4�. _F i�r..� y, , S�VV ��i �j�jyj� ��4• �1 .'t Ii ! y ti 1 ,j•. � ,r. y�f • DITAIVE111. • 114 NIA 0 111 gem • 'Rol 1.2• a A • Y Ar _0. so Tv a''3.`' .. s••� R ,yam � may'�TfiL- f� �k,.Vsr +5�' d y::�;.�'t^'" to _ „�... � :_ �.� -:_s.• � r �. ate: ? f 1 rye � ►�, e: P 1 i A r ��n ��t..• - Cr°S> .�\ . s°�' .`rt'? ��-Rl-`.a -�..* -... � atv ✓�."_ � _ .,��.' _t." - .t i +,..✓:�� ��!' yam •�.:.%i,. �:r�:_ s6f`v-�.N,..2a . IL Eft � HITECT _ >1 �. d- ik 170==4 �• ,s. l .mss_ r .•- • : • • . wit 'c AMP- Ilk '• i .j' - .r _ �rc - - 'c-.°. !� _ :rt Ufa r d� .' f ^' r. J 'i ` IN ID- I. Ali 71 i Yl gap . �`a� _ , .,,`•Y `�-. y. ..t.i.-; '� '. -i��:. .'_•1.3 +��- f' - ��'�_..�.� _��# i- a,� :'1 ii - d'*-� - .�. __ - `.4 '�T •ln'tP - _ :� � 1k '� i _ � a:�{ --;T" e �Y I �s 9, y � - - - � its; .'" ��e •k4 .. iat .:`�,.:.y °�. l�"' � � .. � �;. �}�D � _, �� 7 � 7�, � l -.� F - rte„ ..sM w�...d.r.;.•�-.. �t��rrr - -- " r.. �t � : N'_F�°� , :' i� `fit � T•b ntn;`u tt':. x -.ES •�� n' t' 4" { �{ N �. � _`- ��YIi �I,Yd1 s l '�'-'�',�'-s ;�t� �,�r�••,. -.tee-r � Y f 1� � ice..r.i-' _ Y � . ♦ .. . v aim - +l"' - t'. rte?-`' ,,♦ y•X (�' ',c l��r r{..N�j'.._ `- ";� ,'�'j f3� * _ tip �{•. u't -•r � � 1 < .e4. UZI . T •wt LOU rql 0 Did D §Lam /,��., . t5•` : � ���i��- ' ■yam Rb �F C.ILL= FR Cf IIIH-C f j ►N •� ,, �� d :,��-� —•�,�,- ,,, G ice.. .;• ` `p ft • Exhibit 26 OAKBROOK PROMENADE Economic Analysis REAL ESTATE TAXES SALES TAXES Base RE Taxes $300,000 Base Sales $70,000,000 Tax per Square Foot $4.25 annual inc. 3.00% Annual Increases 3.00%Village 1.25% Project square footage 180,000 Current RE Taxes on Additional Current Sales New Year RE Taxes Project RE Taxes Taxes Sales Taxes 2005 $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 2006 $300,000 $765,000 $232,500 $0 $875,000 2007 $300,000 $787,950 $243,975 $0 $901,250 2008 $300,000 $811,589 $255,794 $0 $928,288 2009 $300,000 $835,936 $535,936 $0 $956,136 2010 $300,000 $861,014 $561,014 $0 $984,820 2011 $300,000 $886,845 $586,845 $0 $1,014,365 2012 $300,000 $913,450 $613,450 $0 $1,044,796 • 2013 $300,000 $940,854 $640,854 $0 $1,076,140 2014 $300,000 $969,079 $669,079 $0 $1,108,424 2015 $300,000 $998,151 $698,151 $0 $1,141,677 2016 $300,000 $1,028,096 $728,096 $0 $1,175,927 2017 $300,000 $1,058,939 $758,939 $0 $1,211,205 2018 $300,000 $1,090,707 $790,707 $0 $1,247,541 1019 $300,000 $1,123,428 $823,428 $0 $1,284,967 No new services will be required The Village is currently providing police&fire protection There will be no additional burden on Schools, libraries or parks is KENIG, LINBGREN, O'HARA, A BoONA, INC. 9575 W. Higgins Road u Suite 400 (847) 518-9990 • Fax (847) 518-9987 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 email: kloackloainc.com • MEMORANDUM TO: St. Paul Properties Project Team FROM: Donald M. O'Hara Principal DATE: December 13,2004 SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis Proposed Retail Development Oak Brook, Illinois This memorandum presents a summary of the results of a traffic study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed mixed-use development (PUD) in Oak Brook, Illinois. The site is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Butterfield Road (Illinois State Route 56) and Meyers Road. Currently there are three office buildings on the subject property that will be razed as part of the redevelopment proposed. The retail site is planned to contain approximately 128,255 square feet of retail shops, three • quality restaurants, with a combined square footage of approximately 30,000 feet and 20,450 square feet of general office space. According to the site plan (last revision date, September 20,2004) by HC Klover Architects, Inc., there will be approximately 900 parking spaces with a potential to expand to 1,039 parking spaces. Access to the site will continue to be two right-turn only driveways and one full signalized driveway that currently serves as access to/from the existing office buildings. This study was conducted to assess the impact the proposed retail facility would have on traffic conditions in the immediate area and identify any roadway and/or access improvements necessary to accommodate site-generated traffic safely and efficiently. The scope of this study included the following components. 1. Data Collection. This phase of the analysis included a reconnaissance of the site and its environs to determine the physical and operational characteristics of the existing road network. Traffic counts were conducted during the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak driving periods (6:30 to 9:30 A.M. and 3:30 to 6:30 P.M.) at Butterfield Road's intersection with Meyers Road and the three driveways to the subject site. A meeting with public officials' was held to go over the study procedure.and any traffic related concerns they may have regarding the site. 2. Directional Distribution. The directional distribution of traffic approaching and departing the site was estimated. The estimate was based on existing travel patterns . determined from the traffic counts. KLOA, Inn. Transportation.and Parking Planning Consultants 3. Traffic Generation Analysis. The peak hour traffic volumes that would be generated by • the proposed retail development were based on trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the 7t Edition of the Trip Generation Manual. 4. Site Traffic Assignment. The peak hour site-generated volumes were assigned to the various site access driveways and adjacent intersection according to the previously determined directional distribution. The resultant peak hour site-generated traffic volumes were combined with the existing (non-site oriented) traffic for analyses purposes. 5. Evaluation and Recommendations. Based on the previous components, the traffic impact for the proposed retail development was determined. Findings and recommendations were developed with respect to what, if any, improvements are necessary to accommodate the proposed retail development. Existing Conditions Transportation conditions in the site area were inventoried to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. Three general conditions were considered: (1) the geographical location of • the site and the land uses in the area; (2) the characteristics of the streets in the site area; and (3)the traffic volumes on these roadways. Site Location The subject site is generally located on the property located within the southwest quadrant of the Butterfield Road(Illinois State Route 56)with Meyers Road intersection. The adjacent land uses are a shopping center to the north, the Interstate Tollway (1-88) to the south, office/commercial to the east and office to the west. The Butterfield Road corridor is developed primarily with commercial (retail/office) developments in Oak Brook, Oak Brook Terrace and Lombard, Illinois. Site Accessibility The accessibility of the proposed commercial development is governed by the characteristics of the streets available to accommodate site-generated traffic movements and the traffic control devices directing traffic operations along their routes. The streets adjacent to the site are described below and illustrated in Figure 1. • 2 13th St y c • 3 e c a 41h S r c to m D m M° inf a N a W a m 15 St m L ell Ln e � r 15th PI D m a; m E 16th St �» 16 h St N �O rX7hPl W 17th St 7 d N a 3 E 1 th St Essex Dr a D m 16th PI �� J0 d atP Z y V� m � m 22nd S V"J 5 a SITE (��O� '(a°r� ti a d m 0 8 w — x � w O a a D s � 31st St t 31st White Oak Ln 3 a f m w xt 3 a m m m a 35th St 36th St PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 0¢290 ST. PAUL PROPERTIES SITE LOCATION AND KLOA INC. RETAIL CENTER AREA R O A D N E T OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS f ICURE NO: 3 Butterfield Road(Illinois State Route 56) is a major east-west arterial that, in the vicinity of the • site, provides three lanes in each direction with a painted median 18 feet in width used to provide separate left turn lanes along Butterfield Road. At its signalized intersection with Meyers Road, in addition to the three through lanes, a separate left and right turn lane is provided on the east and west approach. At its intersection with the signalized driveway to the site, three through lanes and a separate left turn lane are provided. The north approach to this intersection provides a separate left turn, right turn and through lane. The south approach to this intersection provides a separate left turn and a through or right turn lane. The next signalized intersection to the west is at its intersection with Technology Drive where a separate left turn lane is provided in addition to the three through lanes. Both the north and south approach of Technology Drive provide a separate left turn lane and a through or right turn lane. Butterfield Road adjacent to the site is carrying approximately 41,000 vehicles per day. The posted speed limit on Butterfield Road in the vicinity of the site is 45 mph. Meyers Road is a north-south minor arterial that, in the vicinity of the site, provides two lanes in each direction. At its intersection with Butterfield Road, Meyers Road is currently under construction. When complete, Meyers Road will provide a separate left turn lane, a separate right turn lane and two through lanes. Meyers Road north of Butterfield Road is carrying a volume of approximately 22,000 vehicles per day. South of Butterfield Road, Meyers Road is carrying approximately 15,000 vehicles per day. Technology Drive is, at its signalized intersection with Butterfield Road, a north-south local road under the jurisdiction of the Village of Lombard. At its signalized intersection with Butterfield • Road, Technology Drive provides a separate left turn lane and a through or right turn lane on both the south and north approaches. A separate left turn lane is provided on the east and west approaches of Butterfield Road at Technology Drive. Existing Traffic Volume KLOA, Inc. conducted manual traffic counts at the intersection of Butterfield Road with Meyers Road and the three access driveways to the subject site. The counts were conducted on Wednesday, September 15, 2004,from 7:00 A.M. through 9:00 A.M. and again from 4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Summaries of the traffic count data indicate that the weekday peak hours of traffic occur from 7:15 to 8:15 in the morning and again in the evening from 4:45 to 5:45. The existing peak hours of traffic movement during the morning and evening peak hours are illustrated in Figure 2. Development Traffic Characteristics In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions at the proposed site access drives and the adjacent intersections, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed facility, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that the retail development 0 will generate. 4 • LEGEND ® = EXISTING SIGNAL 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR NOT TO SCALE (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR N BV77ERFIELD N N AD ON N ROAD ~1324 (2573) 1293 (24 *1 j- (2463) N eo c 2065 (1653) 45 (6) N M M 7 (4) 50 (159) } �1 '� 252 1944 (3)�)~ 1 1977 (1542)—. (2558) ��� 9� (2(123 j ro 1 (0) �r 278 113 (153) ao N°so `^^- 11681 (11 3)y I • c (148) _ �pN Mtn 4A SITE oyc o >- a W cc • PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 04-279 ST. PAUL PROPERTIES RETAIL CENTER EXISTING A. M. & P. M. PEAK HOUR KLOA INC.OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS TRAFF 1 C VOLUMES FIGURE NO: 2 • Directional Distribution The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the external streets is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the street system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the system without encountering major congestion. The directional distribution of traffic that will be generated by the proposed development was based primarily on existing travel patterns as determined from the traffic counts. The estimated directional distribution is shown in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 3. Table 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Direction of Approach/Departure Percent To and from the north on Meyers Road 15% To and from the south on Meyers Road 13% To and from the east on Butterfield Road 46% To and from the west on Butterfield Road 26% Total 100% • Projected Traffic Generation The estimate of the traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development was based.on the magnitude and character of its land use. As noted previously, the site is proposed to contain approximately 128,255 square feet of retail space, 29,450 square feet of general office space, and three restaurants containing approximately 30,000 square feet for a unified development of 178,705 square feet. The A.M. peak hour, P.M. peak hour and daily (24 hours) traffic volume that would be generated by the subject site was estimated. The estimate was based on surveys of similar land uses by ITE and published in the 7th Edition of their Trip Generation Manual. The estimate of the A.M., P.M. peak hour and daily traffic volume are listed in Table 2. The amount of new (additional) trips generated to/from the subject site are not totally new (additive) trips. Up to 40 percent could already be traveling by this site on a daily basis and would possibly stop at the site as a secondary trip end. This is known as pass by trips. However, to be conservatively high, no reduction for pass-by trips was considered. However, there are three functioning office buildings on the site that generate A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips. Based on the A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic count summary. There were 108 A.M. peak hour trips to/from the site and 110 P.M. peak hour trips to/from the site. Based on the existing directional distribution adjustments in the peak hour volume were made to represent the site without development on the property. After the reduction of existing traffic, the proposed site-generated volume expected during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours was assigned to the site access system and is illustrated in Figure 4. • 6 • LEGEND ® = EXISTING SIGNAL 00% = DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE NOT TO SCALE 0 Ln 8VT7-ERFIELD ROAD 26% SITE 0 M r fY Wa W c PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 04-279 ST. PAUL PROPERTIES RETAIL CENTER DIRECTIONAL D I S T R I B U T I O N KLOA INC. OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS FIGURE NO: 3 LEGEND ® = EXISTING SIGNAL 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR NOT TO SCALE (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR 25 BV�TERFIELD ROAD 1 (9)� 5 �5J) (. 0 65 (280) L (0) 15 ((7 )_' I 40 (210) i 40 (770) ^0 5 (10J -� 10 �-Z N (50 i° 30 (755)i N In 5 (45) n 0 SITE � o W Q W G cr PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 04-279 ST. PAUL PROPERTIES A. M. AND P. M. PEAK HOUR RETAIL CENTER SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC KLOA INC. OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS ASSIGNMENT FIGURE NO: 4 • Table 2 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use ITE Code Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Retail 128,255 s.f. 820 80 55 235 180 2,695 2,695 Restaurant 10,000 s.f 931 N/A N/A 50 25 450 450 Restaurant 10,000 s.f. 931 N/A N/A 50 25 450 450 Restaurant 10,000 s.f 931 N/A N/A 50 25 450 450 Office 20,000 s.f. 110 25 5 5 25 110 110 Total 105 60 385 280 4,155 4,155 Traffic Assignments • The site traffic that would be generated during the peak hours was added to existing traffic and assigned to the area streets according to the directional distribution discussed previously and is shown in Figure 5. These volumes were analyzed to determine both the impact of the proposed facility on area roadways and the requirements for the design of an efficient site access system. Evaluation and Recommendations In order to evaluate the impact of the anticipated A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volume (site + non-site), all of the studied intersections were analyzed to determine what, if any, operational change to the road system was due to the proposed development. To determine the operational characteristics, capacity analyses were conducted at the two signalized intersections of Butterfield Road with Meyers Road and Butterfield Road with the site access drives. Table 3 presents the Level of Service (LOS) and vehicular delay (in seconds) for existing and future conditions. • 9 LEGEND ® = EXISTING SIGNAL 00 = A.M. PEAK HOUR NOT TO SCALE (00) = P.M. PEAK HOUR co a ^ 77FRFifip N ' -e^N (8s ROAD �l 1293 (2463) c4 en c 5 (1738)�► 50 (159 } 65 (280) N M M (5) 115(80�)~ ! 2049 (1771) ��� �945 (2(300) 113 ) i &a 5 h0) -� (153 ax'c 288 (325) 1603 18 Z N X73 (187) co �pN RaN WVM TZ M SITE � o Wa W C cc PROJECT: TITLE: PROJECT NO: 04-279 ST. PAUL PROPERTIES RETAIL CENTER TOTAL A. M. & P. M. PEAK HOUR KLOA INC. OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT FIGURE N0: 5 • Table 3, LEVEL OF SERVICE AND AVERAGE VEHICULAR DELAY Existing Conditions Future Conditions A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Butterfield Road with Meyers Road C 31.3 E 60.0 C 32.0 E 69.9 Butterfield Road with Site Access Drive B 19.8 C+ 21.9 B 19.7 C 32.7 Under existing conditions the intersection of Butterfield Road with Meyers Road is currently operating at capacity (LOS E) with an average vehicle delay of 69.0 seconds during the P.M. peak hour. After the inclusion of traffic generated by the subject site the LOS remains the same (E); however, the average vehicle delay increases to 69.9 seconds. The signalized site access drive during the P.M. peak hour operates at LOS C+ with an average vehicle delay of 21.9 seconds. After redevelopment of the site the LOS will be C with an average vehicle delay of 32.7 seconds. The signalized site access driveway operates at, according to IDOT guidelines, at a desirable level of service. The intersection of Butterfield Road with Meyers Road is currently operating at capacity (LOS E) and will remain the same with an increase of approximately ten seconds of vehicular delay. • Conclusion Based on the analysis of the proposed redevelopment of the subject site, the external roadways require no additional improvement to maintain the existing level of service. The Butterfield Road/22nd Street corridor is currently a heavily congested roadway during the peak driving periods and will remain such until major improvements are constructed from the Tri-State Tollway west to I-355. Retail Center in Oak Brook December 13 2004 dmo 11 Butterfield Road/Meyers Road 10/01/04 • A.M. Peak Hour 09:52:42 Existing Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.59 Vehicle Delay 31.3 Level of Service C ------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 46 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 * ^ 1 + + + 1 + I + I I 1 * ++++1 + + + I + 1 + I ++++1 /I\ I *> I<+ + +> 1<+ 1<+ 1 <**** I I I I v I A ****I A I ++++1 I I I 1++++ v 1**** I++++ v 1 North I <+ I <+ * +>I +>I++++> I++++> I 1 1++++ + I + * + 1 + I++++ I++++ 1 I v + I + * + I + I v I v I ------------------------------------------------------------- I G/C=0.111 I G/C=0.279 I G/C=0.067 I G/C=0.054 I G/C=0.321 I I G= 13.3" 1 G= 33.5" I G= 8.0" 1 G= 6.5" I G= 38. 6" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF=14.5% I OFF=45.7% I OFF--55.8% I OFF=64.5% 1 ------------------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=100.0 sec = 83.3% Y=20.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L I Queue I I Group I Lanes[ Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S IModel 91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 30.9 C I RT 1 12/1 10.310 10.467 1 608 1 740 1 255 10.345 1 20.6 1 C+1 229 ft1 I TH 1 24/2 10.276 10.279 1 368 1 989 1 340 10.344 1 34.7 1 C 1 207 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.111 10.111 1 327 1 423 1 326 10.771 1 34.9 I *C 1 317 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 30.0 C --------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.276 10.380 1 420 1 601 I 141 10.235 1 25.5 1 C+1 147 ft1 I TH 1 24/2 10.279 10.279 1 368 I 989 1 364 10.368 1 35.0 I *C 1 221 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.038 10.111 1 336 1 435 1 173 10.398 1 23.1 1 C+1 168 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 32.2 C I RT 1 12/1 10.314 10.466 1 605 1 738 1 265 10.359 1 20.9 1 C+1 239 fti I TH 1 36/3 10.321 10.321 1 994 1 1634 1 989 10. 605 1 35.0 I *C 1 377 ft) I LT 1 12/1 10.067 10.067 1 120 1 172 1 119 10. 657 1 34.9 I *C 1 123 ftl • W Approach 31.3 C I RT 1 12/1 10.286 10.554 1 782 1 876 1 177 10.202 1 13. 6 1 B+1 133 ft1 I TH 1 36/3 10.392 10.409 1 1740 1 2080 1 1612 10.775 1 32. 6 1 C 1 536 ft1 1 LT 1 12/1 10.155 10.155 1 294 1 369 1 293 10.794 1 34.8 I *C 1 258 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Butterfield Road/Meyers Road 10/01/04 A.M. Peak Hour 09:52:53 Existing-Traffic • SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUME S 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH IT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 242 323 310 252 940 113 134 346 164 168 1531 278 WIDTHS 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 LANES 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 3539 1770 1583 5085 1770 1583 3539 1770 1583 5085 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 46 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes Yes Yes Yes LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 13.34 33.53 8.05 6.52 38.56 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 6 12 5 • Butterfield Road/Meyers Road 10/05/04 A.M. Peak Hour 11:18:44 • Existing-Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 242 323 310 252 940 113 134 346 164 168 1531 278 WIDTHS 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 • LANES 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 3539 1770 1583 5085 1770 1583 3539 1770 1583 5085 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 46 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes No Yes No LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 17. 92 22. 93 20.88 4. 96 33.31 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 • CRITICALS 3 8 6 12 11 Butterfield Road/Meyers Road 10/05/04 P.M. Peak Hour 11:20:09 • Existing Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.79 Vehicle Delay 63.4 Level of Service E+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 44 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- I * A I + + + 1 + I I * ++++1 + + + 1 + I ++++1 / i\ I *> I<+ + +> 1<+ I <****I I I I v I ++++1 I I I I A 1**** v I I North I <+ I <+ * +>I +>I++++> I I 1++++ + l + * + 1 + I++++ I I v + I + * + 1 + I v 1 ------------------------------------------------- I G/C=0.191 I G/C=0.139 I G/C=0.168 I G/C=0.412 I 1 G= 34.4" 1 G= 25.0" 1 G= 30.3" I G= 74.2" 1 I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.3% I OFF--37.5% I OFF--56.5% 1 ------------------------------------------------- C=180 sec G=164.0 sec = 91.1% Y=16.0 sec = 8. 9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0 .0% • -------------------------------------------- ---- - -------------------------- I Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L I Queue I I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S (Model 91 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 72.7 E I RT 1 12/1 10.391 10.330 1 1 1 487 1 204 10.391 1 45.1 1 D 1 346 ftI I TH 1 24/2 10.383 10.139 1 1 1 384 1 391 10.755 1 80.8 1 F 1 426 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.332 10.191 I 1 1 345 1 344 10. 908 1 79.9 I *E 1 599 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 93.2 F I RT 1 12/1 10.369 10.330 1 1 I 487 1 76 10.146 1 41.0 I D+I 129 ftl I TH 1 24/2 10.393 10.139 1 1 1 384 I 527 11.017 1 121.5 I *F 1 593 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.277 10.191 1 1 1 359 1 243 10. 626 1 48.4 I D 1 398 ft1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 59.2 E+ I RT 1 12/1 10.467 10. 626 1 949 1 991 1 537 10.542 I 10.3 1 B+1 508 ft1 1 TH 1 36/3 10.488 10.412 1 1142 1 2208 1 2245 11.017 1 70.0 1 *E 11172 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.380 10.168 ( 1 I 219 1 161 10.540 1 70 .5 1 E l 339 ftl --------------------------------------------------------------------- • W Approach 50.4 ---------------------------------------------- ---------- I RT 1 12/1 10.382 10. 626 1 949 1 991 1 156 10.157 I 7 .2 1 A 1 148 ftl I TH 1 36/3 10.415 10.412 1 1142 1 2208 1 1182 10.535 1 35.4 1 D+1 586 ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.402 10.168 1 1 1 219 1 303 11.017 1 131.3 I *F 1 659 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------- Butterfield Road/Meyers Road 10/05/04 P.M. Peak Hour 11:23:30 Existing.Traffic • SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 D 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 194 371 327 510 2133 153 72 501 231 148 1123 288 WIDTHS 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 12.0 24.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 • LANES 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES . 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 3725 1770 1583 5353 1770 1583 3725 1770 1583 5353 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 44 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes No Yes No LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 34.41 25.04 30.31 74.24 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 12 5 • Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 A.M. Peak Hour 10:00:20 . Existing Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.62 Vehicle Delay 19.8 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 14 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- 1 + + * I + 1 I I + + * 1 + 1 ++++I / I \ I<+ + *> 1<+ 1 <++++I I I v i A ****I A ++++1 I I 1++++ v I++++ v I North I <+ + +>1 I ****> I I I + + + 1 I **** I v I ------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.305 I G/C=0.042 I G/C=0.554 I I G= 36. 6" I G= 5.0" 1 G= 66.4" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF=33.8% I OFF=41.3% I ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=108.0 sec = 90.0% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Ratel AdJ I I HCM I L I Queue I 1 Group I Lanes) Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S (Model 91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 28.2 C ========--------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.245 10.380 1 420 1 601 1 31 10.052 1 23.6 1 C+1 32 ft1 I TH 1 12/1 10.237 10.305 1 287 1 568 1 2 10.004 1 29.0 I C I 2.5 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.255 10.305 1 211 1 421 1 61 10.143 1 30.5 I*C 1 72 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 29.1 C IRT+TH 1 12/1 10.238 10.305 1 248 1 492 1 7 10.014 1 29.1 1 C 1 25 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.237 10.305 1 212 1 423 1 2 10.005 1 29.0 1 C 1 25 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 16.5 B I RT 1 12/1 10.238 10.554 I 782 1 876 1 8 10.009 1 12.0 1 B+1 25 fti I TH 1 36/3 10.362 10.554 1 2704 1 2815 1 1361 10.483 1 16.5 1 B 1 342 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.009 10.042 1 96 1 126 1 47 10.346 1 18.5 I *B 1 29 fti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 21.5 C+ • IRT+TH 1 36/3 10.464 10.554 1 2695 1 2806 1 2122 10.756 1 21.8 I *C+1 533 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.042 1 182 1 220 1 53 10.241 1 11.2 1 B+1 33 ftI i Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 A.M. Peak Hour 10:00:35 Existing-Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 29 2 58 8 1293 45 6 1 2 44 1972 50 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 36.0 12.0 • LANES 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0. 95 0 . 95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 1863 1403 1583 5085 1770 0 1623 1409 0 5069 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes Yes Yes Yes LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 36.58 5.00 66.42 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 6 11 • Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 P.M. Peak Hour 09:58:39 • Existing Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.69 Vehicle Delay 21. 9 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------- Sq 13 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------ ----------- ------------ 1 + + * + A I I + + * 1 + 1 ++++1 /1 \ 1<+ + *> 1<+ I <**** I I I v I A 1 ++++I I I A 1 **** 1++++ v I North I <+ + +>1++++> 1++++> 1 I + + + 1 v I v I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.226 I G/C=0.116 I G/C=0.559 I 1 G= 27.1" I G= 13. 9" I G= 67.0" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF=25. 9% I OFF=40.8% I ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=108.0 sec = 90.0% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% • ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Ratel Add I I HCM I L I Queue I I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S (Model 91 ------------------------------------------------- N Approach 31.3 C ----------------------------- ----------------------- I RT N 1 12/1 10.261 10.375 1--409 1 593 1 88 10.148 1 24. 9 1 C+1 93 ft1 I TH 1 12/1 10.236 10.226 1 1 1 406 I 1 10.002 1 36.0 I D+1 25 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.261 10.226 1 1 1 287 1 76 10.248 1 38.5 I *D+l 99 ftl --------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach IRT+TH 1 12/1 10.248 10.226 1 1 1 343 1 42 10.116 1 37.1 1 D+1 55 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.245 10.226 I 1 1 300 1 27 10.085 I 36.8 1 D+1 35 ftl -------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 28.3 C ----------------------------------- --------------------------- IRT�1-12/1 10.262 10.559 1 791 I 884 1 94 10.106 1 12.5 1 B+1 70 ft1 I TH 1 36/3 10.536 10.559 1 2734 1 2840 1 2593 10.913 1 29.0 I *C 1 644 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.251 10.559 I 112 1 146 1 6 10.039 1 12.1 1 B+1 25 ftl --------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 10-4---8+- - IRT+TH N 1 36/3 10.389 10.707 1 3596 1 3596 1 1586 10.441 I 7 .6 1 A 1 261 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.130 10.116 1 155 1 252 1 167 10.625 1 37. 9 I *D+l 144 ftl --------------------------------------------------------------------- Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 P.M. Peak Hour 09:58:51 Existing,Traffic • SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUME S 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 84 1 72 89 2463 6 38 2 26 3 1504 159 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 36.0 12.0 • LANES 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 1863 1359 1583 5085 276 0 1597 1410 0 5084 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 13 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes Yes Yes Yes LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 27.11 13.87 67.02 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 12 5 Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 A.M. Peak Hour 10:45:33 Total Traffic • SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.61 Vehicle Delay 19.7 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 14 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- I + + * 1 + I I I + + * I + I ++++I / I\ 1<+ + *> 1<+ 1 <++++1 1 1 v I **** 1 ++++I I I 1++++ v 1++++ v I North I <+ + +>1 I ****> I I + + + 1m I v I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.305 I G/C=0.042 I G/C=0.553 I I G= 36.6" I G-- 5.0" 1 G= 66.4" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF--33.8% I OFF=41.3% 1 ------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=108.0 sec = 90.0% Y=12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane (Width/ 1 g/C I Service Rate) Adj I 1 HCM 1 LT Queue- 1 I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S IModel 91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 28.2 C I RT 1 12/1 10.245 10.380 I 420 1 601 1 31 10.052 1 23. 6 1 C+1 32 ftl I TH 1 12/1 10.237 10.305 1 287 1 568 1 2 10.004 1 29.0 1 C 1 25 ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.256 10.305 1 207 1 412 1 61 10.145 1 30.5 1*C 1 72 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 29.5 C IRT+TH 1 12/1 10 .244 10.305 1 243 1 482 1 27 10 .056 1 29.5 1 C 1 32 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.241 10.305 1 212 l 423 1 16 10.037 1 29.4 1 C 1 25 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 16. 6 B ------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.238 10.553 1 782 1 876 1 8 10.009 1 12.0 1 B+1 25 ft I TH 1 36/3 10.362 10.553 1 2704 1 2815 1 1361 10.483 1 16.5 I B 1 342 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.022 10.042 1 96 1 126 1 68 10.500 I 20. 6 I *C+1 43 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 21.2 C+ • IRT+TH 1 36/3 10.459 10.553 1 2700 l 2811 1 2091 10.744 1 21.4 1 C+1 525 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.042 1 182 1 220 1 53 10.241 1 11.2 1 B+1 33 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 A.M. Peak Hour 10:45:39 Total Traffic • SIGNA12000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 29 2 58 8 1293 65 25 1 15 15 1971 50 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 36.0 12.0 • LANES . 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2. 0 2.0 2 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0 .95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4. 0 4.0 4 .0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 1863 1378 1583 5085 1770 0 1594 1409 0 5079 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 14 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes Yes Yes Yes LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 36.58 5.00 66.42 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 6 11 • Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 P.M. Peak Hour 10:47:41 • Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.161 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.80 Vehicle Delay 32.7 Level of Service C ------------------------------------------------- Sq 15 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- I + + + 1 + I I ^ I I + + + 1 + 1 ++++1 ++++1 / 1\ I<+ + +> 1<+ I <++++1 <****1 I I v I ++++I **** I ++++I I I ^ 1**** v 1 v 1++++ v 1 North I <+ * *>I I I++++> 1 I I + * * I I 1++++ I I + * * i I I v I ------------------------------------------------- I G/C=0.264 I G/C=0.098 I G/C=0.064 I G/C=0.441 I I G= 31.6" I G= 11.7" 1 G= 7.7" 1 G= 52. 9" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF=29.7% 1 OFF=42.8% I OFF=52. 6% 1 ------------------------------------------------- C=120 sec G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.35 Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% --------------------------------------- ----------------------- I Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Ratel Add I I HCM I L I Queue I I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S IModel 91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 29.5 C I RT 1 12/1 10.261 10.395 1 N454 1 625 1 88 10.141 1 23.4 1 C+1 90 ft1 I TH 1 12/1 10.236 10.264 1 119 I 483 1 1 10.002 1 32. 6 1 C 1 25 ft1 I IT 1 12/1 10.279 10.264 I 50 1 208 1 76 10.335 1 36. 6 I D+1 94 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 37.8 D+ -- -- ------------------------- ------------------ IRT+TH 1 12/1 10.298 10.264 1 100 I 406 I 218 10.522 I 38. 9 I *D+1 271 ftl I IT 1 12/1 10.264 10.264 1 88 I 358 I 89 10.239 1 35.1 1 D+1 111 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach 33. 9 C --- -- ----------------------------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.262 10.539 1 753 1 853 1 94 10.110 1 13. 6 1 B+1 73 ftl I TH 1 36/3 10.536 10.539 1 2611 1 .2739 1 2593 10. 947 1 34.1 1 *C 1 673 ftl I IT 1 12/1 10.212 10.195 1 272 1 403 1 295 10.725 I 38.7 I *D+1 296 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 30.2 C • IRT+TH 1 36/3 10.401 10.441 1 1957 1 2226 1 M1667 10.749 1 29.4 1 C 1 524 ftl I IT 1 12/1 10.106 10.098 1 159 1 223 1 167 10.711 1 38.4 I *D+1 149 ft1 Butterfield Road/Access Road 10/01/04 P.M. Peak Hour 10:47:55 • Total Traffic SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 2.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - METROAREA NonCBD NETWORK North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No LOS Targets 35 80 5 NETWORK East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No 90 100 5 NETWORK South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No Priorities 0 0 0 0 0 0 NETWORK West 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Def No NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 BIKEVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES None None None None PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 84 1 72 89 2463 280 205 2 85 80 1504 159 WIDTHS 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 36.0 12.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 36.0 12 .0 • LANES 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 GROUPTYPES Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm Norm UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.95 0. 95 0.95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 0. 95 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 STORAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALQUEUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 SATURATIONFLOWS 1583 1863 859 1583 5085 1770 0 1586 1410 0 5047 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 15 ALL PERMISSIVES Yes Yes Yes Yes LEADLAGS None None OVERLAPS Yes Yes Yes Yes OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 120 180 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 31.64 11.72 7.70 52. 94 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 • CRITICALS 8 12 6 5